WEBVTT - The Outlook On Real Estate 

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.640 --> 0:00:18.479
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.640
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com Slash podcast. Commercial real Estate for

0:00:23.000 --> 0:00:24.880
<v Speaker 1>just you know, walking down the streets of New York City,

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:28.840
<v Speaker 1>we need a lot of empty spots right across the

0:00:28.840 --> 0:00:30.960
<v Speaker 1>street from where we are in next door, yep, and

0:00:31.080 --> 0:00:34.800
<v Speaker 1>next door lots of commercial real estate empty. Um. But

0:00:35.280 --> 0:00:38.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, on the residential side, it is extraordinarily hot

0:00:38.479 --> 0:00:40.800
<v Speaker 1>and I can attest to that. Let's talk all things

0:00:40.880 --> 0:00:43.479
<v Speaker 1>real estate. We do that with Hassan Naji, President and

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:47.440
<v Speaker 1>chief executive officer of Marcus and Millichap, and real estate

0:00:48.000 --> 0:00:52.480
<v Speaker 1>firm based in Calabasas, California. I've been to Calabasas, California.

0:00:52.560 --> 0:00:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Pretty cool place, all right, Hassan, thanks so much for

0:00:55.120 --> 0:00:57.440
<v Speaker 1>joining us here. I know you guys reported some earnings

0:00:57.480 --> 0:01:00.200
<v Speaker 1>this morning. Give us the lowdown of what you're were

0:01:00.440 --> 0:01:03.640
<v Speaker 1>re reporting today. Good afternoon, Thanks for having me on

0:01:03.640 --> 0:01:08.400
<v Speaker 1>the program. We were very proud to report the largest

0:01:08.440 --> 0:01:11.000
<v Speaker 1>revenue and the income quarter in our fifty year history.

0:01:11.680 --> 0:01:14.640
<v Speaker 1>The second quarter was a reflection of a lot of

0:01:14.680 --> 0:01:18.440
<v Speaker 1>delayed and canceled transactions that we're still able to resurrect

0:01:18.480 --> 0:01:23.160
<v Speaker 1>from last year, as well as incredible new demand from

0:01:23.280 --> 0:01:27.480
<v Speaker 1>buyers that see commercial real estate as a great investment

0:01:27.560 --> 0:01:31.120
<v Speaker 1>because the economy is recovering. We added almost a million

0:01:31.200 --> 0:01:36.000
<v Speaker 1>jobs in July and we're back to UH sixteen and

0:01:36.080 --> 0:01:38.200
<v Speaker 1>a half million jobs of the twenty two million that

0:01:38.240 --> 0:01:40.920
<v Speaker 1>we've lost, So the recovery is bringing a lot of

0:01:40.920 --> 0:01:45.319
<v Speaker 1>confidence into the fact that eventually those empty spaces you

0:01:45.319 --> 0:01:49.440
<v Speaker 1>were talking about right there in Manhattan will get re occupied.

0:01:50.080 --> 0:01:53.760
<v Speaker 1>And interest rates are so low, with so much liquidity

0:01:53.760 --> 0:01:57.600
<v Speaker 1>in the marketplace, that the investment community is seeing real

0:01:57.680 --> 0:02:00.240
<v Speaker 1>estate as a great play right now, given we're stocks

0:02:00.280 --> 0:02:02.400
<v Speaker 1>are at, given when bronze are at and the fact

0:02:02.440 --> 0:02:04.320
<v Speaker 1>that commercial real estate has proven to be a very

0:02:04.360 --> 0:02:08.760
<v Speaker 1>good inflation hedge going into an economic expansion, So all

0:02:08.800 --> 0:02:12.040
<v Speaker 1>those things are happening. We as a company have had

0:02:12.080 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 1>a number of key execution strategies. We've acquired nine firms

0:02:16.440 --> 0:02:18.959
<v Speaker 1>in the last three years. We have done a number

0:02:18.960 --> 0:02:22.320
<v Speaker 1>of technology upgrades which were just in time for the pandemic,

0:02:22.760 --> 0:02:26.400
<v Speaker 1>where we had no downturn in our operations or any

0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:30.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of a disruption. Thankfully, technology investments have really paid

0:02:31.000 --> 0:02:35.160
<v Speaker 1>off and that productivity that we brought to our salesforces

0:02:35.720 --> 0:02:38.360
<v Speaker 1>is really showing up in the numbers. Breaking out the

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:42.079
<v Speaker 1>types of commercial real estate that are the most popular ones,

0:02:42.360 --> 0:02:44.680
<v Speaker 1>where do you see that? I mean, it's hard to

0:02:44.680 --> 0:02:48.120
<v Speaker 1>believe it's offices, But is it restaurants? Is it gym's

0:02:48.160 --> 0:02:53.440
<v Speaker 1>What kind of commercial real estate is seeing the most success. Well,

0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:56.919
<v Speaker 1>the beauty of commercial real estate is that there's something

0:02:57.120 --> 0:03:00.760
<v Speaker 1>for everyone on the menu. For risk of our investors,

0:03:00.760 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 1>a G baby movements that are very yield and cash

0:03:03.919 --> 0:03:08.960
<v Speaker 1>flow sensitive, apartments and single tenant at least those are

0:03:09.080 --> 0:03:13.840
<v Speaker 1>your drug stores, your fast food restaurants, auto parts types

0:03:13.840 --> 0:03:16.280
<v Speaker 1>of outlets where you have one tenant on a long

0:03:16.360 --> 0:03:19.919
<v Speaker 1>term lease. The cash flow is very predictable there, they've

0:03:19.960 --> 0:03:24.200
<v Speaker 1>been incredibly popular. Apartments have been very popular for many,

0:03:24.240 --> 0:03:28.840
<v Speaker 1>many decades because they're stable regardless of the economic cycle

0:03:29.000 --> 0:03:32.680
<v Speaker 1>for the most part, and uh, there's so much demand

0:03:32.760 --> 0:03:36.800
<v Speaker 1>for affordable housing that apartment demand has been very very strong.

0:03:37.400 --> 0:03:40.200
<v Speaker 1>On the other end of this spectrum. You have hotels

0:03:40.840 --> 0:03:43.840
<v Speaker 1>and office buildings to it to a very large extent,

0:03:44.040 --> 0:03:48.080
<v Speaker 1>and shopping centers that were hit incredibly hard by the pandemic,

0:03:48.120 --> 0:03:52.400
<v Speaker 1>of course, and for those more higher risk, higher return

0:03:52.480 --> 0:03:56.560
<v Speaker 1>types of investors, those asset classes are providing a phenomenal

0:03:57.280 --> 0:04:01.120
<v Speaker 1>uh if you will acquire and fix it or acquire

0:04:01.200 --> 0:04:04.480
<v Speaker 1>and ride the recovery play And we're seeing both ends

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:08.080
<v Speaker 1>of those safety and then more high risk, high return

0:04:08.600 --> 0:04:11.760
<v Speaker 1>ends at the spectrum play out in the marketplace. You know,

0:04:12.360 --> 0:04:14.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe just have my New York City bias here, but

0:04:14.600 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 1>I am less cautious, much less cautious on the rebound

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:20.599
<v Speaker 1>of commercial real estate. You know, we're just seeing hassam.

0:04:20.680 --> 0:04:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Some companies like Wells Fargo and black Rock announced some

0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:27.800
<v Speaker 1>delays in bringing people back to the office. I think

0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:29.560
<v Speaker 1>this is going to be folks just kind of feeling

0:04:29.560 --> 0:04:32.839
<v Speaker 1>it out a little bit. I think you're right. In

0:04:32.880 --> 0:04:36.680
<v Speaker 1>the urban markets, where we have so much dependency on

0:04:36.760 --> 0:04:41.440
<v Speaker 1>public transportation, the new rounds of outbreaks have been a

0:04:41.480 --> 0:04:46.360
<v Speaker 1>major concern. Even without frankly, the resurgence of new cases

0:04:46.520 --> 0:04:50.039
<v Speaker 1>COVID cases, we knew that the urban markets would take

0:04:50.040 --> 0:04:52.840
<v Speaker 1>time to recover. People are going to be cautious and

0:04:52.880 --> 0:04:54.800
<v Speaker 1>there is going to be a kind of a dampening

0:04:54.800 --> 0:04:59.320
<v Speaker 1>effect on office space usage and office space demand in

0:04:59.360 --> 0:05:02.719
<v Speaker 1>the near term, probably the next twelve to eighteen months.

0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:04.880
<v Speaker 1>But on the other end of the scale, if you

0:05:04.920 --> 0:05:07.599
<v Speaker 1>look at the fact that new business formations in the

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:11.320
<v Speaker 1>United States are at a record high, we're seeing this

0:05:11.560 --> 0:05:14.839
<v Speaker 1>job growth resurgence and changes in the economy where people

0:05:14.880 --> 0:05:18.679
<v Speaker 1>have discovered you can have a hybrid work model. People

0:05:18.720 --> 0:05:21.159
<v Speaker 1>can work from home some of the time at least

0:05:21.720 --> 0:05:25.479
<v Speaker 1>and and commute much less and be more productive. On

0:05:25.600 --> 0:05:29.760
<v Speaker 1>top of all that, you're seeing new generation of companies.

0:05:29.839 --> 0:05:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Forming companies will eventually start to expand and there will

0:05:32.880 --> 0:05:37.360
<v Speaker 1>be a backfill for demand, uh that is dampened by

0:05:37.440 --> 0:05:41.080
<v Speaker 1>this new hybrid model and cautiousness. It's not a straight

0:05:41.160 --> 0:05:43.359
<v Speaker 1>up recovery where it's a hockey stick for for the

0:05:43.400 --> 0:05:47.520
<v Speaker 1>office market. We don't expect that, but we do believe

0:05:47.560 --> 0:05:50.680
<v Speaker 1>that there will be a recovery. In Urban America has

0:05:50.760 --> 0:05:55.520
<v Speaker 1>so many different benefits that were really thriving pre pandemic,

0:05:56.200 --> 0:05:58.120
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's a matter of time before those

0:05:58.160 --> 0:06:00.839
<v Speaker 1>come back, and I would a gin that that's part

0:06:00.839 --> 0:06:02.839
<v Speaker 1>of the reason why some of the markets that were

0:06:02.839 --> 0:06:05.600
<v Speaker 1>hardest hit by the pandemic are also poised for the

0:06:05.600 --> 0:06:10.680
<v Speaker 1>biggest recovery. We're talking New York, San Francisco, Austin. Correct. Absolutely.

0:06:10.720 --> 0:06:14.800
<v Speaker 1>If you look at the twelve months job creation, New

0:06:14.880 --> 0:06:18.000
<v Speaker 1>York is number one over the last twelve months at

0:06:18.000 --> 0:06:22.120
<v Speaker 1>eight point three percent employment growth with over three thousand

0:06:22.640 --> 0:06:26.120
<v Speaker 1>jobs created. It's the number one metro on this list

0:06:26.120 --> 0:06:28.440
<v Speaker 1>that I'm looking at produced by a research department, followed

0:06:28.440 --> 0:06:33.240
<v Speaker 1>by Boston, Chicago, Dallas, Los Angeles, Philadelphia, DC, Atlanta, Detroit,

0:06:34.279 --> 0:06:38.240
<v Speaker 1>and Northern New Jersey. From a percentage perspective, those metors,

0:06:38.240 --> 0:06:40.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of those metros were hit very, very hard,

0:06:40.520 --> 0:06:43.120
<v Speaker 1>and they're making a big comeback. To your point, all right,

0:06:43.120 --> 0:06:46.800
<v Speaker 1>talk to us about interest rates here. We're obviously historically

0:06:46.800 --> 0:06:49.080
<v Speaker 1>low interest rates, although do have the rates popping up

0:06:49.080 --> 0:06:51.159
<v Speaker 1>today of the tenure up to about one point nine

0:06:51.880 --> 0:06:55.239
<v Speaker 1>On that strong jobs gain, people are betting that rates

0:06:55.279 --> 0:06:58.479
<v Speaker 1>are in fact going to rise again from historically low levels.

0:06:58.480 --> 0:07:01.440
<v Speaker 1>How sensitive is kind of the commercial side of the

0:07:01.440 --> 0:07:05.760
<v Speaker 1>real estate business to interest rates. It's very sensitive because

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:08.440
<v Speaker 1>the cost of debt plays a big part in the

0:07:08.480 --> 0:07:11.480
<v Speaker 1>way you value commercial real estate. Most commercial real estate

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:16.080
<v Speaker 1>of vast majority of the transactions do rely on financing

0:07:16.240 --> 0:07:20.680
<v Speaker 1>from banks and credit unions and other forms of of lenders,

0:07:20.680 --> 0:07:24.680
<v Speaker 1>life insurance companies, UH, the commercial mortgage backed securities the

0:07:24.760 --> 0:07:28.680
<v Speaker 1>MBS marketplace, and therefore interest rates play a big part.

0:07:28.760 --> 0:07:33.320
<v Speaker 1>On average, we see loan to value ratios of somewhere

0:07:33.360 --> 0:07:38.200
<v Speaker 1>between depending on the property type. So where interest rates go,

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:43.880
<v Speaker 1>valuations UH follow, and we are expecting interest rates to rise.

0:07:43.920 --> 0:07:46.240
<v Speaker 1>They have to. We can't stay at these record low

0:07:46.320 --> 0:07:49.680
<v Speaker 1>levels forever. But the beauty of the balance in the

0:07:49.720 --> 0:07:52.800
<v Speaker 1>marketplace for commercial real estate is that if inflation is

0:07:52.800 --> 0:07:56.680
<v Speaker 1>coming back, if interest rates are rising and those are

0:07:56.680 --> 0:08:00.440
<v Speaker 1>being accompanied by job growth, by new occupancies, by some

0:08:00.520 --> 0:08:03.360
<v Speaker 1>new demand of stilling those empty spaces you are commenting

0:08:03.360 --> 0:08:07.360
<v Speaker 1>on in Manhattan and other places, then the rents should

0:08:07.400 --> 0:08:09.640
<v Speaker 1>be going up and the income levels of the properties

0:08:09.640 --> 0:08:12.160
<v Speaker 1>should be going up along with inflation and along with

0:08:12.520 --> 0:08:14.960
<v Speaker 1>interest rates. That's why commercial rules it is viewed as

0:08:14.960 --> 0:08:19.600
<v Speaker 1>an inflation hedge, especially property types like hotels which are

0:08:19.640 --> 0:08:22.320
<v Speaker 1>marked to market on a daily basis depending on demand

0:08:22.720 --> 0:08:25.760
<v Speaker 1>for their room rates, and apartments which typically have a

0:08:25.760 --> 0:08:30.440
<v Speaker 1>twelve month lease. And UH, we're we don't get concerned

0:08:30.440 --> 0:08:32.920
<v Speaker 1>about interest rates rising as long as it's rising for

0:08:32.960 --> 0:08:37.800
<v Speaker 1>the right reasons, economic growth and and new demand being created.

0:08:38.000 --> 0:08:41.360
<v Speaker 1>If we get variations and interest rates because of some

0:08:41.440 --> 0:08:43.880
<v Speaker 1>shock or because of some credit freeze, that's a whole

0:08:43.920 --> 0:08:46.080
<v Speaker 1>different story. All right, Son, thank you so much for

0:08:46.160 --> 0:08:49.480
<v Speaker 1>joining us. We really appreciate your perspective and experience. As Nagi,

0:08:49.840 --> 0:08:53.679
<v Speaker 1>CEO of real estate firm Marcus and Millichap m m

0:08:53.679 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 1>I is the stock symbol ticker to put into your Bloomberg.

0:08:57.000 --> 0:09:00.360
<v Speaker 1>They reported some earnings. Uh, so we appreciate getting his

0:09:00.400 --> 0:09:07.000
<v Speaker 1>thoughts on the real estate market. Good news on the economy.

0:09:07.040 --> 0:09:10.200
<v Speaker 1>To end the week here, all right, let's get some

0:09:10.880 --> 0:09:13.760
<v Speaker 1>insight into some of that economic data. We welcome Sarah House.

0:09:13.800 --> 0:09:17.240
<v Speaker 1>She's director and senior economist at Wells Fargoes Corporate and

0:09:17.360 --> 0:09:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Investment Banks. Sarah, thanks so much for joining us here.

0:09:19.720 --> 0:09:23.280
<v Speaker 1>I love to get your take on the job's number

0:09:23.320 --> 0:09:28.680
<v Speaker 1>and kind of where we are in this economic reopening. Yeah.

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:31.200
<v Speaker 1>I think all around, it was a pretty strong report

0:09:31.280 --> 0:09:33.240
<v Speaker 1>that was hard to find fault with, so, of course

0:09:33.280 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 1>we saw perils come in better than expected. We saw

0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:39.000
<v Speaker 1>a nice upward revision to the prior two months the

0:09:39.080 --> 0:09:42.280
<v Speaker 1>unemployment rate self for all the right reasons, as we

0:09:42.320 --> 0:09:45.080
<v Speaker 1>did see a drop in the number of people reported

0:09:45.160 --> 0:09:49.240
<v Speaker 1>unemployed even as the labor force rose, and of course

0:09:49.280 --> 0:09:52.559
<v Speaker 1>you saw another decent gain in earnings. UM. I think

0:09:52.600 --> 0:09:54.679
<v Speaker 1>if you want to nitpick with with the report, you

0:09:54.720 --> 0:09:57.680
<v Speaker 1>could probably look at the participation rate and maybe wonder

0:09:57.960 --> 0:10:00.520
<v Speaker 1>why it's it's not rising further. But I think it

0:10:00.600 --> 0:10:03.240
<v Speaker 1>comes down to the fact that there's still a lot

0:10:03.320 --> 0:10:06.400
<v Speaker 1>of constraints on the labor supply right now, and I

0:10:06.400 --> 0:10:08.559
<v Speaker 1>think given where we are with the delta variant, we're

0:10:08.760 --> 0:10:11.760
<v Speaker 1>probably going to see those constraints get prolonged a little

0:10:11.760 --> 0:10:14.240
<v Speaker 1>bit here in the upcoming months. Sarah, will we look

0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:17.319
<v Speaker 1>at that increased cost of labor, like, why are the

0:10:17.400 --> 0:10:20.800
<v Speaker 1>sharp jumping wages over the past few months, Um, What

0:10:20.880 --> 0:10:26.199
<v Speaker 1>do you think maybe contributing to that? It just speaks

0:10:26.240 --> 0:10:28.960
<v Speaker 1>to how reluctant I think a lot of workers are

0:10:29.040 --> 0:10:32.560
<v Speaker 1>to come back, either because they are concerned about the

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:37.120
<v Speaker 1>coronavirus or they have childcare issues, and so I think

0:10:37.160 --> 0:10:39.880
<v Speaker 1>what we're seeing is that employers have have really had

0:10:39.960 --> 0:10:42.280
<v Speaker 1>to pony up to get workers back in the door,

0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:46.000
<v Speaker 1>especially in those lower paced sectors where maybe those extra

0:10:46.080 --> 0:10:50.360
<v Speaker 1>unemployment benefits are replacing a higher rate of income UM.

0:10:50.360 --> 0:10:53.160
<v Speaker 1>But also those are the same sectors where you are

0:10:53.400 --> 0:10:55.840
<v Speaker 1>doing a lot of in person contact and so there

0:10:55.840 --> 0:10:59.040
<v Speaker 1>are greater health risks and so employees have have to

0:10:59.080 --> 0:11:01.880
<v Speaker 1>be compensated it for that, and we've seen a pretty

0:11:01.880 --> 0:11:04.600
<v Speaker 1>sharp jump in wages as a result. So, for example,

0:11:04.679 --> 0:11:07.360
<v Speaker 1>just in the leisure and hospitality sector, wages are of

0:11:07.440 --> 0:11:10.040
<v Speaker 1>about eight percent since the start of the year. Were

0:11:10.040 --> 0:11:14.800
<v Speaker 1>there any other standout sectors that you saw, well, Transportation

0:11:14.920 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 1>warehousing has been another, So this is an area that's

0:11:18.000 --> 0:11:21.720
<v Speaker 1>obviously been in high demand given the strength in good

0:11:21.800 --> 0:11:24.959
<v Speaker 1>spending that we've seen over the course of the pandemic.

0:11:25.000 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 1>And this is also another sector that you tended to

0:11:27.800 --> 0:11:30.720
<v Speaker 1>have a lower pay rate to begin with, and so

0:11:30.800 --> 0:11:32.679
<v Speaker 1>that that means that you're going to have to see

0:11:33.040 --> 0:11:35.840
<v Speaker 1>UM stronger wages there, I think, to entice some workers

0:11:35.880 --> 0:11:38.920
<v Speaker 1>back into the jobs market again given those health concerns

0:11:38.960 --> 0:11:43.319
<v Speaker 1>and the offset provided by some of those unemployment benefits. Sarah, Okay,

0:11:43.360 --> 0:11:45.680
<v Speaker 1>So now the discussion I think pivots a little bit

0:11:45.720 --> 0:11:49.560
<v Speaker 1>to the FED. What does the FED takeaway from this

0:11:49.840 --> 0:11:52.120
<v Speaker 1>job's report and maybe some of the other echo data

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:55.520
<v Speaker 1>we see out there. Yeah, I think overall this is

0:11:55.720 --> 0:11:58.960
<v Speaker 1>a pretty strong report and what the Fed wants to

0:11:59.000 --> 0:12:02.440
<v Speaker 1>see is as far as progress growth goes on the

0:12:02.520 --> 0:12:05.120
<v Speaker 1>labor market. And then the big question though, is this

0:12:05.360 --> 0:12:08.720
<v Speaker 1>enough to maybe move some of the more devish members

0:12:08.720 --> 0:12:12.560
<v Speaker 1>of the Fed off their their taper timing. Um. I

0:12:12.600 --> 0:12:14.640
<v Speaker 1>think you know, this certainly kicks the box if you're

0:12:14.720 --> 0:12:18.320
<v Speaker 1>in the government Waller camp. But I think when you

0:12:18.480 --> 0:12:20.640
<v Speaker 1>look at the clouds on the horizon with with the

0:12:20.679 --> 0:12:25.000
<v Speaker 1>delta variant and how that might slow the timing of

0:12:25.000 --> 0:12:27.520
<v Speaker 1>when we get clarity on on just how much the

0:12:27.600 --> 0:12:31.120
<v Speaker 1>labor supply comes back, I think that might keep some

0:12:31.240 --> 0:12:34.760
<v Speaker 1>folks wanting to see um that fall data, which would

0:12:35.080 --> 0:12:39.960
<v Speaker 1>probably put the taper announcement more towards December, and it

0:12:40.080 --> 0:12:46.920
<v Speaker 1>may or may not raise the case for raising rates. Right, So,

0:12:46.960 --> 0:12:49.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think the case for for raising rates

0:12:49.480 --> 0:12:52.560
<v Speaker 1>is still pretty far off. But what we've seen, um,

0:12:52.600 --> 0:12:55.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, particularly from Governor Wallers comments, but even from

0:12:56.320 --> 0:12:59.440
<v Speaker 1>vice vice share claratives comments as well, is that they

0:12:59.440 --> 0:13:02.880
<v Speaker 1>are thinking about the flexibility later on down the road.

0:13:02.960 --> 0:13:06.480
<v Speaker 1>So if we continue to see upside surprises in inflation,

0:13:06.679 --> 0:13:09.880
<v Speaker 1>if we continue to see some pretty strong jobs numbers

0:13:09.920 --> 0:13:14.120
<v Speaker 1>and rapid improvement in the labor market. They want that optionality.

0:13:14.559 --> 0:13:16.920
<v Speaker 1>But I think we we still see some some of

0:13:16.920 --> 0:13:19.240
<v Speaker 1>your term risks on the horizon that we think they'll

0:13:19.320 --> 0:13:22.520
<v Speaker 1>will probably stay patient a little longer yet. And Sarah,

0:13:22.480 --> 0:13:24.240
<v Speaker 1>I just want to fall up on that inflation point

0:13:24.280 --> 0:13:26.120
<v Speaker 1>you were making here. I mean, on those rare days

0:13:26.120 --> 0:13:29.080
<v Speaker 1>when I was paying attention in economics class, I was

0:13:29.120 --> 0:13:31.960
<v Speaker 1>taught you can't really have real inflation unless you're gonna

0:13:31.960 --> 0:13:34.920
<v Speaker 1>have wage inflation. And I'm not sure this report kind

0:13:34.920 --> 0:13:37.720
<v Speaker 1>of suggests that that's on the table here. How do

0:13:37.720 --> 0:13:42.680
<v Speaker 1>you think about inflation and going forward? Well, I think

0:13:42.679 --> 0:13:45.480
<v Speaker 1>we have some continued upward pressure that we're seeing. So

0:13:45.559 --> 0:13:47.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's a couple of of the categories that

0:13:47.720 --> 0:13:50.120
<v Speaker 1>have made a lot of headlines, like used autos that

0:13:50.240 --> 0:13:53.240
<v Speaker 1>are probably do do for some payback here pretty soon.

0:13:53.280 --> 0:13:54.839
<v Speaker 1>But we still have a lot of pressure in the

0:13:54.960 --> 0:13:57.920
<v Speaker 1>system if we look at what's happening across supply chains

0:13:57.920 --> 0:14:00.360
<v Speaker 1>and what that's doing to the goods picture. But I

0:14:00.400 --> 0:14:02.800
<v Speaker 1>think what's really important is we look further down the road.

0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Is this um pressure that we are seeing from from

0:14:06.000 --> 0:14:08.480
<v Speaker 1>the labor side now part of this might be a

0:14:08.520 --> 0:14:11.640
<v Speaker 1>little bit overstated of what the post COVID trend is,

0:14:11.679 --> 0:14:15.800
<v Speaker 1>given that there is this timing mismatch between how soon

0:14:16.440 --> 0:14:19.880
<v Speaker 1>employers want workers back and and how soon that labor

0:14:20.000 --> 0:14:22.560
<v Speaker 1>is willing to return. And so we have seen some

0:14:23.000 --> 0:14:27.400
<v Speaker 1>pretty remarkable increases, at least some within different industries over

0:14:27.640 --> 0:14:30.320
<v Speaker 1>over the past few months. But I think this is

0:14:30.520 --> 0:14:35.120
<v Speaker 1>a source of probably more durable inflation pressures over over

0:14:35.160 --> 0:14:37.400
<v Speaker 1>the coming months. That's going to keep the overall pace

0:14:37.400 --> 0:14:40.760
<v Speaker 1>of inflation elevated and and slow to return back towards

0:14:41.000 --> 0:14:44.040
<v Speaker 1>the FEDS two percent target. And how much does this

0:14:44.200 --> 0:14:49.480
<v Speaker 1>delta variant threaten this progress and any near term progress.

0:14:50.720 --> 0:14:53.480
<v Speaker 1>I think it threatens to slow the progress. I don't

0:14:53.480 --> 0:14:57.440
<v Speaker 1>think this is going to derail the expansion by any means.

0:14:57.520 --> 0:15:01.560
<v Speaker 1>So we have tools to deal with the virus, so

0:15:01.760 --> 0:15:04.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, as compared to the prior waves, we have

0:15:04.880 --> 0:15:09.200
<v Speaker 1>access to really good vaccines. And then we have learned

0:15:09.240 --> 0:15:11.920
<v Speaker 1>over the course of the past sixteen months or so,

0:15:12.240 --> 0:15:15.440
<v Speaker 1>how did you business and how to still um have

0:15:16.400 --> 0:15:20.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, economic activity within UM within this environment, so

0:15:21.040 --> 0:15:25.040
<v Speaker 1>businesses have adjusted, UM we have we we know how

0:15:25.120 --> 0:15:28.240
<v Speaker 1>to have better health hygiene and so I think that's

0:15:28.240 --> 0:15:31.120
<v Speaker 1>going to limit the dent to activity, but it is

0:15:31.160 --> 0:15:33.080
<v Speaker 1>going to to weigh on the margin. And so I

0:15:33.120 --> 0:15:36.600
<v Speaker 1>think UM again, probably somewhat slower um than we would

0:15:36.600 --> 0:15:39.600
<v Speaker 1>have expected maybe a month or six weeks ago. All Right, Sarah,

0:15:39.640 --> 0:15:41.560
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us. We really appreciate

0:15:41.680 --> 0:15:45.000
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts and insight. Sarah House, director and senior economist

0:15:45.360 --> 0:15:51.160
<v Speaker 1>for Wells Fargo's corporate and investment bank. Right now, let's

0:15:51.160 --> 0:15:53.840
<v Speaker 1>go talk about getting some of these Wall Street folks

0:15:53.920 --> 0:15:57.680
<v Speaker 1>back into the office. We need an ire here back

0:15:57.800 --> 0:16:01.480
<v Speaker 1>in the office of the Interactive Rovers studio. But we've seen,

0:16:02.080 --> 0:16:04.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, some news come out of the last couple

0:16:04.000 --> 0:16:06.360
<v Speaker 1>of days from the legs of Wells Fargo and in

0:16:06.440 --> 0:16:10.160
<v Speaker 1>black Rock that perhaps perhaps they are going to delay

0:16:10.240 --> 0:16:13.080
<v Speaker 1>this from September to October. Amazon came back and said

0:16:13.360 --> 0:16:15.200
<v Speaker 1>all the way to January. But let's talk about the

0:16:15.200 --> 0:16:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street folks. And to do that we welcome Hannah Levitt.

0:16:17.640 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 1>She's a financi reporter for Bloomberg News. Joinings on the

0:16:20.000 --> 0:16:22.800
<v Speaker 1>phone from New York. So, Hannah, it seems like we're

0:16:22.800 --> 0:16:25.360
<v Speaker 1>seeing some of these big investment banks backtrack a little

0:16:25.400 --> 0:16:29.480
<v Speaker 1>bit on their scheduling. Yeah, so it's it's really a

0:16:29.480 --> 0:16:32.160
<v Speaker 1>confusing time, right because there's those rising cases, there's to

0:16:32.240 --> 0:16:36.240
<v Speaker 1>dom CDC guidance and so well, different banks were already

0:16:36.280 --> 0:16:39.080
<v Speaker 1>taking you know, for each bank there's their own approach,

0:16:39.200 --> 0:16:42.760
<v Speaker 1>and that gulf has kind of gotten wider recently. And

0:16:42.880 --> 0:16:45.680
<v Speaker 1>what you're seeing is you have two firms, really JP

0:16:45.840 --> 0:16:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Morgan and Goldman Sacks, that are really leading the charge

0:16:48.360 --> 0:16:50.360
<v Speaker 1>on return to office. You know, they called workers back

0:16:50.760 --> 0:16:53.640
<v Speaker 1>at least on a part time basis earlier this summer.

0:16:54.000 --> 0:16:55.960
<v Speaker 1>And then you have some other firms that are taking

0:16:55.960 --> 0:16:58.880
<v Speaker 1>it slower. And so that's like Wells Fargo for example.

0:16:58.920 --> 0:17:01.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, they were pointing to early September is when

0:17:01.440 --> 0:17:04.440
<v Speaker 1>they were going to start that process of getting people

0:17:04.480 --> 0:17:07.000
<v Speaker 1>back into the office, and they said yesterday that it

0:17:07.040 --> 0:17:11.080
<v Speaker 1>would be um October instead, so and we saw Black

0:17:11.119 --> 0:17:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Crock do the same thing. So it's yeah, there definitely

0:17:14.080 --> 0:17:17.040
<v Speaker 1>is uh, you know, different approaches going on here, Kenna.

0:17:17.080 --> 0:17:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Do you know what I wonder if this has more

0:17:19.560 --> 0:17:23.040
<v Speaker 1>to do with the data for the delta variant or

0:17:23.119 --> 0:17:24.840
<v Speaker 1>it has to do with the fact that a lot

0:17:24.840 --> 0:17:27.760
<v Speaker 1>of people are resigning if their companies ask them to

0:17:27.840 --> 0:17:31.440
<v Speaker 1>go into work. Yeah, you know, that's a really interesting question.

0:17:31.440 --> 0:17:35.280
<v Speaker 1>And I also think that, um, something worth exploring here

0:17:35.680 --> 0:17:38.359
<v Speaker 1>is just you know, for the firms that have already

0:17:38.600 --> 0:17:42.720
<v Speaker 1>started doing this, I don't know how you unring that bell, um,

0:17:42.960 --> 0:17:44.960
<v Speaker 1>so that you know you're dealing with kind of apples

0:17:44.960 --> 0:17:48.040
<v Speaker 1>and orangers when you're talking about, um, you know, sending

0:17:48.040 --> 0:17:50.840
<v Speaker 1>people back home versus when you start bringing people back.

0:17:51.840 --> 0:17:55.080
<v Speaker 1>So follow up on Nita's line there, I mean, are

0:17:55.119 --> 0:17:58.159
<v Speaker 1>we is there examples where we've had like major I

0:17:58.160 --> 0:18:02.280
<v Speaker 1>don't know groups or trade eating deaths, or say or

0:18:02.400 --> 0:18:06.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe a regional office in Florida or Texas saying we

0:18:06.320 --> 0:18:10.840
<v Speaker 1>don't really need to come back. Um, you know, I mean,

0:18:10.840 --> 0:18:12.960
<v Speaker 1>I think when you think about some of these big banks,

0:18:13.000 --> 0:18:15.439
<v Speaker 1>you think about all all the locations that they have

0:18:15.520 --> 0:18:17.960
<v Speaker 1>and them really being you know, a cross section of

0:18:18.000 --> 0:18:20.560
<v Speaker 1>the country in that way, and especially when you are

0:18:21.040 --> 0:18:23.480
<v Speaker 1>when you start looking at like their branch operations as well,

0:18:23.560 --> 0:18:25.480
<v Speaker 1>which is kind of a different question because those people

0:18:25.480 --> 0:18:28.800
<v Speaker 1>have been going in uh this whole time. But yeah,

0:18:28.800 --> 0:18:32.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that that people's reactions, my senses at the

0:18:32.040 --> 0:18:35.879
<v Speaker 1>banks kind of um, you get the diversity of reactions

0:18:35.920 --> 0:18:39.480
<v Speaker 1>that you know, you're you're seeing and reading about, so

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:42.320
<v Speaker 1>you know what I see. Also, we know that Goldman,

0:18:42.359 --> 0:18:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Sachs and JP Morgan there they are not forcing workers

0:18:46.800 --> 0:18:49.680
<v Speaker 1>to get the shot. Um, but we found out last

0:18:49.760 --> 0:18:53.760
<v Speaker 1>week I believe that it would be legal for employees

0:18:53.800 --> 0:18:56.560
<v Speaker 1>to require shots. And so I wonder how much of

0:18:56.560 --> 0:19:01.320
<v Speaker 1>that also played into the decision. Uh. Yeah, and we've

0:19:01.320 --> 0:19:04.640
<v Speaker 1>we have seen them stop short. You know, a couple uh,

0:19:04.880 --> 0:19:06.960
<v Speaker 1>a couple of banks have warned that this might be

0:19:07.000 --> 0:19:09.680
<v Speaker 1>on the table, but no one uh of the big

0:19:09.720 --> 0:19:11.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, of the giant lenders like JP Morgan and

0:19:11.920 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Goldman have not mandated that. We've seen Morgan Stanley say

0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:19.199
<v Speaker 1>only vaccinated employees can return to our New York offices.

0:19:19.280 --> 0:19:21.879
<v Speaker 1>But then you know, we we wrote about yesterday to

0:19:22.000 --> 0:19:25.520
<v Speaker 1>vaccine employees then got uh COVID at their office. So

0:19:25.600 --> 0:19:30.040
<v Speaker 1>this really just shows again like the the different approaches

0:19:30.040 --> 0:19:33.720
<v Speaker 1>that are being taken, and also the reality that, um,

0:19:33.760 --> 0:19:36.639
<v Speaker 1>this pandemic is still very much going on. Yeah, and Hannah,

0:19:36.640 --> 0:19:38.680
<v Speaker 1>we had I remember we made a pretty big deal

0:19:38.680 --> 0:19:41.080
<v Speaker 1>when JP Morgan brought their people back. I know Snali

0:19:41.359 --> 0:19:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Bassik from Bloomberg News is actually reporting on site there

0:19:44.160 --> 0:19:46.280
<v Speaker 1>in New York City, at their headquarters. Have we had

0:19:46.280 --> 0:19:48.960
<v Speaker 1>any feedback from the JP Morgan folks about how things

0:19:49.040 --> 0:19:52.800
<v Speaker 1>might be going. I mean, I think so they were

0:19:53.040 --> 0:19:58.240
<v Speaker 1>people at JP Morgan, we're going back into the office, um.

0:19:58.400 --> 0:20:00.359
<v Speaker 1>For they've been doing that for a while, so that

0:20:00.480 --> 0:20:04.119
<v Speaker 1>there was, um, you know, at the time, which I

0:20:04.160 --> 0:20:06.440
<v Speaker 1>believe they put out a memo in mayor June saying

0:20:06.520 --> 0:20:09.920
<v Speaker 1>by July people should be in you know, at least

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:13.080
<v Speaker 1>part time, UM. But a lot of people were already

0:20:13.480 --> 0:20:16.720
<v Speaker 1>going in UM. And so I think that that stayed

0:20:16.720 --> 0:20:21.960
<v Speaker 1>pretty consistent. And lastly, do you think that um just

0:20:22.200 --> 0:20:25.760
<v Speaker 1>going forward, this might be a thing that companies may do.

0:20:26.000 --> 0:20:30.359
<v Speaker 1>They may require workers to get the shot or or else.

0:20:32.280 --> 0:20:34.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a great question. And uh, I mean

0:20:34.920 --> 0:20:37.520
<v Speaker 1>we've seen we've seen firms and other industries do it.

0:20:37.600 --> 0:20:40.480
<v Speaker 1>So I guess the question really is, are are these

0:20:40.520 --> 0:20:42.960
<v Speaker 1>banking giants going to take the plunge and do that?

0:20:43.040 --> 0:20:45.720
<v Speaker 1>And I guess that remains to be seen. All right. Hannah,

0:20:45.720 --> 0:20:47.399
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us. We appreciate it.

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:49.919
<v Speaker 1>Hannah Levitt, financial reporter for Bloomberg News, joining us on

0:20:49.960 --> 0:20:55.439
<v Speaker 1>the phone from New York. Now let's get over to

0:20:55.720 --> 0:20:58.760
<v Speaker 1>Ethan devit. She is the c i O at Monetta.

0:20:58.800 --> 0:21:02.200
<v Speaker 1>They've got twenty seven points four billion dollars in assets

0:21:02.280 --> 0:21:05.639
<v Speaker 1>under management. And first off, well, first off, good morning,

0:21:05.800 --> 0:21:09.320
<v Speaker 1>thanks for joining us. Let me ask what you your

0:21:09.320 --> 0:21:13.359
<v Speaker 1>reaction is to this job's number. Well, obviously, I would

0:21:13.400 --> 0:21:16.600
<v Speaker 1>consider this quite a lagging indicator here in that this

0:21:16.680 --> 0:21:19.280
<v Speaker 1>was the job sport which came out in advance of

0:21:19.320 --> 0:21:22.240
<v Speaker 1>the delta variants, leading to increase mass mandates across the

0:21:22.280 --> 0:21:25.800
<v Speaker 1>country and just ongoing uncertainty to saw today the Auto

0:21:25.840 --> 0:21:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Show and New York was counceled, and this is that

0:21:28.800 --> 0:21:31.439
<v Speaker 1>we're in a climate up great uncertainty, and if we

0:21:31.520 --> 0:21:34.560
<v Speaker 1>have renewed mass mandates, will this mean certain indoor vince

0:21:34.600 --> 0:21:37.520
<v Speaker 1>venues will close? And what's going to happen to to

0:21:37.520 --> 0:21:40.200
<v Speaker 1>to the employment in that case? So I'd say it's

0:21:40.200 --> 0:21:42.480
<v Speaker 1>really it's it's interesting, and it is certainly consoling to

0:21:42.560 --> 0:21:45.520
<v Speaker 1>markets that markets have reacted accordingly. But I see this

0:21:45.600 --> 0:21:49.400
<v Speaker 1>is actually more looking to pass, not really an indicator

0:21:49.440 --> 0:21:50.960
<v Speaker 1>of what the rest of the summer and the fall

0:21:50.960 --> 0:21:53.440
<v Speaker 1>will hold. All Right, it's a very good point, and

0:21:53.560 --> 0:21:57.480
<v Speaker 1>the uptick in the delta variant has been disturbing, to

0:21:57.520 --> 0:22:00.320
<v Speaker 1>say the least, we've seen it effect the real omy,

0:22:00.400 --> 0:22:05.159
<v Speaker 1>with a number of Wall Street firms and mega cap

0:22:05.240 --> 0:22:11.040
<v Speaker 1>tech firms pushing back their return to work. Um, how

0:22:12.280 --> 0:22:14.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, how how difficult is it to work with

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:18.080
<v Speaker 1>this kind of uncertainty. It's extremely difficult. And I've said

0:22:18.080 --> 0:22:20.880
<v Speaker 1>before that markets really are sort of fishing for answers

0:22:20.960 --> 0:22:23.680
<v Speaker 1>right now. They're sort of playing around in areas such

0:22:23.720 --> 0:22:25.840
<v Speaker 1>as the is it going to be good for the

0:22:26.000 --> 0:22:28.399
<v Speaker 1>stay at home stocks? Is the tech stox of pelotons,

0:22:28.520 --> 0:22:31.879
<v Speaker 1>zooms the slacks? Are are we going to see return

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:34.080
<v Speaker 1>to some of the value names that were overlooked? And

0:22:34.080 --> 0:22:35.960
<v Speaker 1>then we saw a cyclically come back at the beginning

0:22:36.000 --> 0:22:37.719
<v Speaker 1>of the year, but they then fall off again as

0:22:37.760 --> 0:22:39.760
<v Speaker 1>some of the uncertainty came into the summer. So I

0:22:39.760 --> 0:22:42.320
<v Speaker 1>think it's really a question of fishing. There is still

0:22:42.359 --> 0:22:45.119
<v Speaker 1>strong support. I've spoken before about the wall of money

0:22:45.240 --> 0:22:48.000
<v Speaker 1>that I believe it's still poised to enter markets upon

0:22:48.080 --> 0:22:51.520
<v Speaker 1>a correction. Every correction is is very short lived, as

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:54.200
<v Speaker 1>we've seen even in this past week and last week.

0:22:54.400 --> 0:22:56.359
<v Speaker 1>It really is that a day long and then markets

0:22:56.400 --> 0:22:59.160
<v Speaker 1>will will will crowd back in again, Investors will cred

0:22:59.240 --> 0:23:01.760
<v Speaker 1>back in again, and for that reason, it's really everything

0:23:01.840 --> 0:23:04.000
<v Speaker 1>is happening in real time. It's very dynamic. We're very

0:23:04.000 --> 0:23:07.600
<v Speaker 1>short cycled right now, so tremendous uncertainty, but still the

0:23:07.640 --> 0:23:09.840
<v Speaker 1>momentum is still upwards. I want to talk about the

0:23:09.880 --> 0:23:14.880
<v Speaker 1>persistence of two things then, from your perspective, inflation and

0:23:15.320 --> 0:23:18.880
<v Speaker 1>E s G investing. I know they're very different issues,

0:23:19.160 --> 0:23:21.560
<v Speaker 1>but um I had the same question in each one.

0:23:21.640 --> 0:23:25.320
<v Speaker 1>So is inflation transitory? Let's start with that one. I

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:27.400
<v Speaker 1>don't believe that it is. I think we are here

0:23:27.400 --> 0:23:31.520
<v Speaker 1>with significantly higher rates of inflation that we've been comfortable

0:23:31.560 --> 0:23:33.600
<v Speaker 1>with over the past a number of years, where we've

0:23:33.640 --> 0:23:36.440
<v Speaker 1>really been hovering around about two percent. There have been

0:23:36.440 --> 0:23:40.240
<v Speaker 1>deflationary forces causing that, just generally that the gig economy

0:23:40.560 --> 0:23:43.919
<v Speaker 1>and components come down, and then of course supply shortages

0:23:44.000 --> 0:23:46.600
<v Speaker 1>and and other disruptions of COVID led to the somewhat

0:23:46.680 --> 0:23:49.840
<v Speaker 1>artificial supplied constraints which have led to some of the

0:23:49.920 --> 0:23:53.320
<v Speaker 1>increases we're seeing now. But I don't believe it's transitory.

0:23:53.359 --> 0:23:56.119
<v Speaker 1>I think we're looking at stay higher levels for at

0:23:56.200 --> 0:23:59.639
<v Speaker 1>least the next eighteen months. And because the companies have

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:01.960
<v Speaker 1>been able to weather this form so far, there has

0:24:01.960 --> 0:24:04.960
<v Speaker 1>been a built up of inventory. They have been relatively

0:24:05.000 --> 0:24:08.600
<v Speaker 1>able to push prices through to consumers. They have pricing power.

0:24:08.920 --> 0:24:11.440
<v Speaker 1>I think they were going to see margins contracting as

0:24:11.440 --> 0:24:14.920
<v Speaker 1>a result of persistent inflation. That's going to cause jitters,

0:24:15.040 --> 0:24:17.040
<v Speaker 1>and I think consumers themselves are going to kind of

0:24:17.160 --> 0:24:19.280
<v Speaker 1>let the A bulliants die down a little bit from

0:24:19.320 --> 0:24:22.800
<v Speaker 1>stimulus checks and from the pent up be cash pile

0:24:22.880 --> 0:24:25.919
<v Speaker 1>that they've built over COVID that will dissipate, and then

0:24:25.960 --> 0:24:28.800
<v Speaker 1>we're going to see I think inflation really starting to buy. Yeah.

0:24:28.840 --> 0:24:31.239
<v Speaker 1>I mean we're starting to hear that from more and

0:24:31.320 --> 0:24:36.760
<v Speaker 1>more economists and more business leaders. Honeywell internationals UM CEO

0:24:36.920 --> 0:24:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Darius and Damsi yesterday told us that he sees downward

0:24:41.080 --> 0:24:45.400
<v Speaker 1>pressure on supply and upward pressure on demand and he's

0:24:45.440 --> 0:24:48.680
<v Speaker 1>not seeing either one of those things kind of um

0:24:48.840 --> 0:24:51.159
<v Speaker 1>turned look like they're gonna turn around in the near future.

0:24:51.200 --> 0:24:52.760
<v Speaker 1>How do you think the FED is going to start

0:24:53.280 --> 0:24:55.199
<v Speaker 1>to react to this, because now we even you know,

0:24:55.400 --> 0:25:01.560
<v Speaker 1>some members of the Pharaoh Reserve Um Open Monetary Committee

0:25:01.560 --> 0:25:04.440
<v Speaker 1>are are starting to say the same thing. I don't

0:25:04.440 --> 0:25:06.680
<v Speaker 1>see them reacting. I think they will find any way

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:10.240
<v Speaker 1>in order to to classify inflation that it is not

0:25:10.440 --> 0:25:14.200
<v Speaker 1>a real time concern. They're prepared to tolerate at somewhat

0:25:14.280 --> 0:25:16.880
<v Speaker 1>higher levels of inflation. We've already seen that. I think

0:25:16.880 --> 0:25:19.960
<v Speaker 1>what is dominating the Fed's response is their unwillingness to

0:25:20.080 --> 0:25:22.919
<v Speaker 1>rock the boat of the so called I think it's

0:25:22.920 --> 0:25:25.960
<v Speaker 1>still a fragile economic recovery. I think the delta various

0:25:25.960 --> 0:25:28.280
<v Speaker 1>a reminder that we're not back to to to normal

0:25:28.359 --> 0:25:31.399
<v Speaker 1>yet much as money would like, and therefore markets are

0:25:31.400 --> 0:25:34.000
<v Speaker 1>still quite fragile. And I see the FED is being

0:25:34.000 --> 0:25:36.200
<v Speaker 1>more driven by the desire not to rock that boat

0:25:36.560 --> 0:25:38.720
<v Speaker 1>than than a need to react to inflation, which they

0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:41.720
<v Speaker 1>don't think so far, is is actually too much of

0:25:41.720 --> 0:25:45.040
<v Speaker 1>a concern. Uh So can you take advantage of that

0:25:45.119 --> 0:25:47.960
<v Speaker 1>as an as an investor? Or? Is it too difficult?

0:25:47.960 --> 0:25:50.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, don't fight the Fed? Is hard, don't don't

0:25:50.800 --> 0:25:52.520
<v Speaker 1>fight the Fed. Um, if we're going to look at

0:25:52.520 --> 0:25:54.560
<v Speaker 1>lower for longer rates, what's going to mean that traditional

0:25:54.600 --> 0:25:57.040
<v Speaker 1>fixed income is not going to be a great still

0:25:57.040 --> 0:25:58.199
<v Speaker 1>not going to be a great place to be, and

0:25:58.240 --> 0:26:00.320
<v Speaker 1>we're not in a rising rate environment. But I still

0:26:00.320 --> 0:26:03.160
<v Speaker 1>don't think there's a particularly good upside and core fixed

0:26:03.160 --> 0:26:06.600
<v Speaker 1>income today, I think, whether the FED likes to recognize

0:26:06.600 --> 0:26:09.000
<v Speaker 1>it or not, inflation is here, and how do we

0:26:09.640 --> 0:26:12.600
<v Speaker 1>respond to inflation and how do we allow portfolios to

0:26:12.640 --> 0:26:16.160
<v Speaker 1>be UM to be resilient against inflation. Well, Equity traditional

0:26:16.200 --> 0:26:19.240
<v Speaker 1>equity holding are traditionally a good head against inflation in

0:26:19.240 --> 0:26:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the medium to long term, not for inflation shocks. But

0:26:22.640 --> 0:26:25.240
<v Speaker 1>given that most investors have a solid equity underpinning of

0:26:25.240 --> 0:26:27.879
<v Speaker 1>their portfolios, I believe those portfolios will be resilient in

0:26:27.880 --> 0:26:32.160
<v Speaker 1>the medium terms as far as inflation shocks. Typically, commodities

0:26:32.240 --> 0:26:34.919
<v Speaker 1>might respond well to inflation shocks, but there tend to

0:26:34.920 --> 0:26:37.639
<v Speaker 1>be too volatile for most investors to hold. So what

0:26:37.960 --> 0:26:42.800
<v Speaker 1>like commodities will real acts, infrastructure investing, real estate investing.

0:26:43.040 --> 0:26:45.919
<v Speaker 1>They tend to have more typical triggers are linked to

0:26:45.960 --> 0:26:49.560
<v Speaker 1>inflation and to provide more inflation resilience going forward. So

0:26:49.640 --> 0:26:51.919
<v Speaker 1>I always encourage investors to have a portion of their

0:26:51.920 --> 0:26:56.600
<v Speaker 1>portfolio that is designed to participate in inflationary conditions, and

0:26:56.760 --> 0:27:01.200
<v Speaker 1>not just medium to long term conditions, but also inflationary shocks.

0:27:01.240 --> 0:27:03.959
<v Speaker 1>And that's where real assets come in great great insight.

0:27:04.280 --> 0:27:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Let's get to e s G now, and UM want

0:27:07.440 --> 0:27:11.280
<v Speaker 1>to get your take on this, because it's a conundrum, right,

0:27:11.320 --> 0:27:15.600
<v Speaker 1>you want to do good, but you also want to

0:27:15.840 --> 0:27:19.760
<v Speaker 1>make returns? Can you do both? Absolutely? We believe in

0:27:19.800 --> 0:27:23.320
<v Speaker 1>sustainable investing, and I would question whether any business model

0:27:23.359 --> 0:27:25.680
<v Speaker 1>that is not sustainable would actually be a long term

0:27:25.680 --> 0:27:28.080
<v Speaker 1>business model you would want to be investing in. Any way,

0:27:28.119 --> 0:27:30.919
<v Speaker 1>I think the notion that E s G investing evolves

0:27:30.920 --> 0:27:34.320
<v Speaker 1>the return sacrifice in a somewhat antilicated one. I think

0:27:34.359 --> 0:27:36.879
<v Speaker 1>now investors are more sophisticated and more aware of the

0:27:36.960 --> 0:27:40.159
<v Speaker 1>nuance sit in that E s G. I've described it

0:27:40.200 --> 0:27:42.560
<v Speaker 1>as a hygiene factor going forward, that E s G

0:27:42.760 --> 0:27:45.399
<v Speaker 1>risks are just like any sort of risk factors that

0:27:45.400 --> 0:27:48.119
<v Speaker 1>will have to be assessed in any assessment of a

0:27:48.200 --> 0:27:51.920
<v Speaker 1>portfolio or an investment fund investment. So I would say

0:27:51.960 --> 0:27:53.520
<v Speaker 1>that you know, E f G factors are now just

0:27:53.640 --> 0:27:56.440
<v Speaker 1>part of the investing due diligence, so that we're aware

0:27:56.480 --> 0:27:58.520
<v Speaker 1>of that and when it's the decision is made as

0:27:58.560 --> 0:28:00.600
<v Speaker 1>to whether a risk reward is a active that will

0:28:00.640 --> 0:28:03.480
<v Speaker 1>take into account to ES chief factors. As far as

0:28:03.520 --> 0:28:07.199
<v Speaker 1>certain other areas, like say renewable energy or water conservation,

0:28:07.600 --> 0:28:11.639
<v Speaker 1>they may have quite distinct kind of missions or purposes

0:28:11.680 --> 0:28:13.960
<v Speaker 1>attached to those investments. So maybe an investor who is

0:28:14.000 --> 0:28:17.119
<v Speaker 1>passionate about ocean conservation and wants to invest in a

0:28:17.160 --> 0:28:19.879
<v Speaker 1>water technology fund that would still have to have a

0:28:19.920 --> 0:28:22.600
<v Speaker 1>meaningful rate of return, I would suggest before it makes

0:28:23.000 --> 0:28:27.040
<v Speaker 1>a viable investment opportunity. I don't believe in return sacrifice,

0:28:27.240 --> 0:28:29.520
<v Speaker 1>but I do believe in looking at it holistically in

0:28:29.640 --> 0:28:32.280
<v Speaker 1>terms of what you want to achieve from your investment.

0:28:33.040 --> 0:28:35.159
<v Speaker 1>All right, even, thanks very very much for joining us.

0:28:35.160 --> 0:28:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Evan Devitt there, chief investment officer at Moneta, and we're

0:28:40.160 --> 0:28:42.240
<v Speaker 1>talking obviously about a little bit about E s G,

0:28:42.360 --> 0:28:45.800
<v Speaker 1>but a lot about UM, the jobs number, the FED reaction,

0:28:45.880 --> 0:28:49.760
<v Speaker 1>and how you as an investor can cassion on discrepancies

0:28:49.840 --> 0:28:52.800
<v Speaker 1>that we see in this in this market. Thanks for

0:28:52.840 --> 0:28:56.360
<v Speaker 1>listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe and

0:28:56.400 --> 0:29:00.480
<v Speaker 1>listen to interviews of Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform

0:29:00.520 --> 0:29:03.840
<v Speaker 1>you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter at Matt

0:29:03.840 --> 0:29:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Miller three. On Fall Sweeney, I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney.

0:29:08.240 --> 0:29:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Before the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide at

0:29:10.920 --> 0:29:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio