Speaker 1: You are entering the freedom hunch. The only justice Trump
Speaker 1: can receive is through winning. Paint splattered on George Washington.
Speaker 1: Here in New York City is Mount rushmore racist. They're
Speaker 1: coming for superheroes. Are coronavirus cases moving across the border.
Speaker 1: The NBA goes all in on Wroke and reopen the
Speaker 1: schools this fall. Buck Sexton Mission coding the news and
Speaker 1: disseminating information with actionable intelligence mag no mistake. Great, You're
Speaker 1: a great American again. This is the Buck Sexton Show.
Speaker 1: Thomas Cia analysts. I can speak to three hours without
Speaker 1: a phone call. Try doing that sometimes. No. Welcome to
Speaker 1: the Buck Sex to show everybody another day fighting against
Speaker 1: the insanity, the lunacy of the collective and collectivists left.
Speaker 1: Can you feel that panic rising? Oh my gosh, everybody
Speaker 1: start your freak out engines right now. So the media
Speaker 1: wants you to do. They think we'll all be better
Speaker 1: off if you're constantly afraid, constantly scared, And yet all
Speaker 1: you have to do is look at what's really happening
Speaker 1: across the country and everything will seem manageable, not perfect,
Speaker 1: not risk free. But life has never been perfect and
Speaker 1: risk free. How long did it take for us after
Speaker 1: nine to eleven to finally feel like we weren't going
Speaker 1: to get hit with a mass casualty terrorist attack at
Speaker 1: any point in time? Right there was this huge national
Speaker 1: security apparatus that sprung up anew, not just the one
Speaker 1: that we already had, meant to prevent planes from getting
Speaker 1: blown out of the sky, crowded subways from being blown up.
Speaker 1: We lived with that for years and years. But you know,
Speaker 1: we didn't shut down, and we got hit, and things
Speaker 1: were definitely tense for a long time because of the
Speaker 1: threat of the global jihattest targeting our society and trying
Speaker 1: to destroy our civilization. But we won. You know, we
Speaker 1: never had a real victory dance after all this. We
Speaker 1: never took a moment to say, yeah, we won. And
Speaker 1: that doesn't mean that they won't come back. It doesn't
Speaker 1: mean that that's a fight that's over. But this round
Speaker 1: we won, and I'm here to tell you that we're
Speaker 1: also going to win this fight against COVID nineteen. I'm
Speaker 1: here to say that I'm doing everything I can to
Speaker 1: deal with a very clear campaign from the left to
Speaker 1: make fear and anxiety and anger their political campaign. I
Speaker 1: mean that's what this all is. You might be thinking
Speaker 1: to yourself, Hold on a second, where are all of
Speaker 1: the new stories about Joe Biden on this policy and
Speaker 1: Joe Biden on that policy. No, that's not the plan.
Speaker 1: You see, the left, the Democrat Party, is trying to
Speaker 1: make this country as desperate and unlivable, particularly in the cities,
Speaker 1: as possible, to tell us that we're heading toward a
Speaker 1: future that is a disaster, that everything is going against us,
Speaker 1: and to build a savior complex, not around Joe Biden,
Speaker 1: who is an income poop and we're all very aware
Speaker 1: of that, but around not Trump. That's all. It has
Speaker 1: to be a change from Trump, and in a sense,
Speaker 1: the media, the academy, Hollywood, corporate America, the culture by
Speaker 1: and large has all agreed to hold every day average
Speaker 1: Americans hostage. And the only way that we are freed
Speaker 1: from this hostage situation is if we do what's right
Speaker 1: by voting Trump out of office. That's the only way
Speaker 1: that things can ever go back to normal. That's the
Speaker 1: perception they're trying to create. That's ultimately what this is
Speaker 1: really all about. That's why you don't see very much
Speaker 1: talk about this issue or that issue, where are all
Speaker 1: the deep dives into Biden's past, or where are all
Speaker 1: the big pieces on the victories that Biden had in
Speaker 1: the Obama administration. We're basically in July, folks, July, August, September,
Speaker 1: October vote. That's how this is going to go. And
Speaker 1: as long as they can keep people afraid. Right now,
Speaker 1: they view it almost like they're stalling the economy and
Speaker 1: they're stalling our sense of improvement at the starting line,
Speaker 1: if you will, of the race. They're trying to hold
Speaker 1: us back so that no matter what happens in a
Speaker 1: few weeks, they will have done the necessary damage to
Speaker 1: our psyche, to our economy, and to our freedom to
Speaker 1: prevent Trump from getting reelected this fall. That's the plan.
Speaker 1: That's why all this is happening. When you look at
Speaker 1: the data about different states now that are having spikes
Speaker 1: in cases of COVID nineteen, and now there's all this
Speaker 1: focus again on masking. Oh, just wear a mask. Wear
Speaker 1: a mask. Ask someone in the medical profession, what is
Speaker 1: the percentage of protection you get wearing a mask in
Speaker 1: a room with somebody who has COVID nineteen versus not
Speaker 1: wearing a mask? How much of an improvement doesn't make
Speaker 1: you in your defense against the disease. You know, the
Speaker 1: answers you'll get they don't know. They don't know. And
Speaker 1: I would ask you this, if mask wearing was highly effective,
Speaker 1: if it was highly effective in preventing the transmission of
Speaker 1: this disease, then why is it that people who have
Speaker 1: been in situations where they were constantly masked still get
Speaker 1: the disease? You know, we don't have answers to this.
Speaker 1: You know, Cuomo is out there today and he's just
Speaker 1: a he's a nightmare because he has the worst record
Speaker 1: as governor of New York, the worst record of any
Speaker 1: state on COVID nineteen, and he's out there saying, well,
Speaker 1: wear a mask. They all refuse to wear a mask.
Speaker 1: The small people looking at the data wear masks. Really,
Speaker 1: you know that mass compliance. According to the polling and
Speaker 1: the data that we have in the EU, mask compliance
Speaker 1: in some of the states that have had the lowest
Speaker 1: per capita death rate from COVID nineteen Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Finland,
Speaker 1: mask compliance is very low. I mean that people aren't
Speaker 1: wearing masks. I don't have answers as to why, you know,
Speaker 1: they're not getting worse hit by the disease other than
Speaker 1: to say they're not wearing masks and they're okay. Relatively speaking,
Speaker 1: this disease is going to be everywhere. It already is everywhere,
Speaker 1: But how badly does it hit a certain population? Now
Speaker 1: badly does it spread? There are the comorbidities that you
Speaker 1: have to look at. You know, people keep pointing to Japan.
Speaker 1: Do you know what our look Obesity as a health
Speaker 1: issue is directly tied to fatalities from COVID nineteen. This
Speaker 1: is known and the United States has a ten x
Speaker 1: the obe se rate of Japan, for example, which has
Speaker 1: had very very few deaths from COVID nineteen. You know,
Speaker 1: there are all these different factors that go into the
Speaker 1: response and to what we're what we should be doing.
Speaker 1: But instead this gets politicized right away, This gets turned
Speaker 1: into well, you know, it's like we're going back to
Speaker 1: the beginning of this when we didn't know anything. Hospitals
Speaker 1: are not being overwhelmed. There has not been a single
Speaker 1: case that you can point to of a person who
Speaker 1: has died from COVID nineteen because there was no medical
Speaker 1: care in this country. There was no medical care available,
Speaker 1: there was no capacity. I'm not saying people haven't stayed
Speaker 1: home who should have gotten care. That's a different issue.
Speaker 1: Hasn't happened once, But now we're going to go back
Speaker 1: into lockdowns. I just spoke to a guy this morning
Speaker 1: who runs a gym, and he said, you know, in
Speaker 1: New York, we're not even we're not We're going to
Speaker 1: be in phase three for jims, and then we're going
Speaker 1: to be in phase four. Now we're in phase maybe
Speaker 1: never based on what well, what is the purpose of this.
Speaker 1: So you can be in a room that you can
Speaker 1: be in an office now, but you can't be in
Speaker 1: a gym where you can control how many people are
Speaker 1: in at any one time, how many high risk people
Speaker 1: are really going in to throw weights around. I know
Speaker 1: there are some people in their sixties who still like
Speaker 1: the deadlift and bench and all that, But you know,
Speaker 1: can't we try to control for the risk of what's
Speaker 1: actually there instead of just telling everybody, no, you can't.
Speaker 1: You know, more gyms, even private gyms, not just gyms,
Speaker 1: are open the public. Private gyms cannot open. So unless
Speaker 1: it's just yours and you're an individual, if there's any
Speaker 1: access to the outside, this is madness. No one can
Speaker 1: really think that this is a good plan or a
Speaker 1: good idea until you look at the politics of it,
Speaker 1: and then it all starts to come together. It all
Speaker 1: starts to make sense. If mask wearing was really effective,
Speaker 1: then we could just let everybody go back and do
Speaker 1: what they want to do, but wear masks, right, But
Speaker 1: we know that there would still be transmission of this disease.
Speaker 1: In fact, the data, if you want to look at it,
Speaker 1: that handwashing is actually much more important than mask wearing.
Speaker 1: But we don't have a way of virtue signaling. When
Speaker 1: it comes to hand washing. People can't walk around. My
Speaker 1: hands are clean. I washed them, So that hasn't taken
Speaker 1: off in quite the same way. Mask wearing outdoors is dumb.
Speaker 1: Mask wearing indoors TBD. Data still have to look at it,
Speaker 1: and for people that are at really high risk, I
Speaker 1: guess you do what you gotta do. You do what
Speaker 1: you can. But for the general population this is absurd.
Speaker 1: But Governor Cuomo is out there saying wear masks. Mark
Speaker 1: play clip one. The White House has been in denial
Speaker 1: on IRUs from the get go, and the federal response
Speaker 1: has just been wrong. That's not a political statement if
Speaker 1: you look at the facts. That's exactly what it says.
Speaker 1: You have coronavirus increasing in thirty two states across the nation.
Speaker 1: The rate of increase is only getting worse, and a
Speaker 1: number of excuses have been made for this over the
Speaker 1: pa last weeks to further the denialm First, they said, well,
Speaker 1: it's because they're doing more testing and that's why the
Speaker 1: number of infections are going up. Not true, because the
Speaker 1: number of hospitalizations are also going up. The White House
Speaker 1: has been saying reopened fast because that's good for the economy,
Speaker 1: and we have to get the economy going. Yes, we
Speaker 1: have to get the economy going. But reopening fast was
Speaker 1: not good for the economy. What is Cuomo's plan? Does
Speaker 1: anyone in the realm of journalism want to pretend that
Speaker 1: they actually care more about their country than their political
Speaker 1: party for a second and ask them, so, what's the plan?
Speaker 1: We locked down until there are no cases. We're gonna
Speaker 1: be a lockdown forever. These morons who think that they
Speaker 1: have the answer to this never tell us what we're
Speaker 1: actually trying to accomplish. Lockdowns are not going to defeat
Speaker 1: the virus in America. It will destroy the American economy
Speaker 1: and it will ruin lives and the cost of lockdown.
Speaker 1: We've already been through this. The cost to health and
Speaker 1: to lives from doing this is incalculable. But we all
Speaker 1: agree it's a means. Doctor Fauci himself says lockdowns cannot
Speaker 1: continue indefinitely. It is a bad idea. So what do
Speaker 1: we doing. Just keep dragging it out, keep dragging it out,
Speaker 1: keep dragging it out. Cowardice, cowardice and craven politics. That's
Speaker 1: what's driving this decision making from Cuoma. Oh, he's mister
Speaker 1: big guy with his hospitalizations are going up. You know
Speaker 1: what else is going up when they look at this,
Speaker 1: or rather, you know what else? Is a very important
Speaker 1: statistic the speed with which people are leaving the hospital.
Speaker 1: Most of these hospitalizations that are increasing in Arizona and
Speaker 1: in Texas are younger people who are in and out
Speaker 1: of the hospital in two to three days. And part
Speaker 1: of this is because anybody that has the symptoms of
Speaker 1: the disease is going into a hospital to get tested
Speaker 1: and maybe they are told to stay there for observation
Speaker 1: for a day or two. But you're seeing a lot
Speaker 1: of cases and this is what the data actually says.
Speaker 1: We will pretend that they care so much about the science.
Speaker 1: You're seeing a lot of cases where people are in
Speaker 1: for two or three days. It used to be two
Speaker 1: to three weeks, and people weren't even coming off of
Speaker 1: ventilators once they went on, and they were dying after
Speaker 1: weeks of fighting for their lives on ventilators. We're not
Speaker 1: seeing that. There are a number of reasons why. The
Speaker 1: biggest one is that most of these infections are younger,
Speaker 1: healthier people, and people who are young and healthy are
Speaker 1: at an acceptable level of risk from this disease. Even
Speaker 1: if they get it, they're almost certainly going to be okay.
Speaker 1: The same way that we accept a certain level of
Speaker 1: risk from the flu, we accept a certain level of
Speaker 1: risk to the under sixty population from COVID nineteen. This
Speaker 1: disease is worse for people over sixty with comorbidities than
Speaker 1: flu that has been established, But for younger people it's
Speaker 1: not as bad as the flu quite honestly, especially when
Speaker 1: you get down into their ranks of people who are
Speaker 1: under the age of twenty. The fluke can kill a
Speaker 1: ten year old, COVID nineteen is almost no risk to
Speaker 1: people who are really young. And remember, any num you
Speaker 1: can die, believe it or not. You can die from
Speaker 1: strep throat if it progresses enough. I know that it
Speaker 1: doesn't happen very often, but it could. Right There are
Speaker 1: risks from all kinds of health concerns in society. But
Speaker 1: you see the plan here. You know, this is a
Speaker 1: couple of things. It's fighting back against the pandemic panic,
Speaker 1: but it's also understanding why we have to keep returning
Speaker 1: to the same issues, the same arguments, and why there's
Speaker 1: no honesty in this because there are people for whom
Speaker 1: the Trump presidency is a constant, unacceptable assault on their psyche.
Speaker 1: They just can't handle it. Remember things we've been talking
Speaker 1: about for years here on the show. Trump has psychologically
Speaker 1: broken the left. He has really caused a massister area.
Speaker 1: He has caused Democrat to be in the grip of
Speaker 1: a mental illness. They really think it all my gods,
Speaker 1: the gundry is gonna collapse, and we're all gonna go
Speaker 1: to war, and all these terrible things are gonna happen.
Speaker 1: And now there's this opportunity for them to just plunge
Speaker 1: all of that angst and rage and fear and anger,
Speaker 1: all of it into this issue and to blame Trump
Speaker 1: for it. When what we really need is clearheaded thinking
Speaker 1: about what do we know and what should we do?
Speaker 1: Instead of oh my gosh, this state is bad, that
Speaker 1: state is bad. You see this all the time. The
Speaker 1: way that the media is reporting on this. Cuomo has
Speaker 1: look at the record, so to speak. Right. I remember
Speaker 1: when I used to play sports, The ultimate, the ultimate
Speaker 1: thing to say to somebody was talking smack on the
Speaker 1: other team was to say, look at the scoreboard when
Speaker 1: you were crushing them. If you were crushing them, okay,
Speaker 1: look at the record. That's say Florida has versus New York.
Speaker 1: Governor Cuomo put on a clinic. He's a proble Democrat
Speaker 1: who was, of course being talked about as a possible
Speaker 1: VP for buy though that's faded away. He made the
Speaker 1: worst decisions and that's not a theory. That is what
Speaker 1: we see from the results, the worst decisions at the
Speaker 1: worst time of any major political figure in America. And
Speaker 1: now he's gonna blame Trump and say there's a mask mandate.
Speaker 1: I've had an idea for you, Governor Cuobo. Where does
Speaker 1: this mask mandate power come from? Where is the constitutional
Speaker 1: right to tell everybody if they have to wear a mask?
Speaker 1: Who's going to enforce that you're going to start arresting people,
Speaker 1: You're gonna lock them up, take away their freedom because
Speaker 1: you want them to wear a mask for which there
Speaker 1: is no conclusive scientific evidence. Yet there are studies even
Speaker 1: that suggest, including published on the CDC website, that there
Speaker 1: is little to no benefit to mask wearing. There are
Speaker 1: plenty of reasons why. That is your eyes, folks, guess
Speaker 1: what great way to get a disease. Unfortunately, so unless
Speaker 1: you're wearing a mask that is completely fitted so that
Speaker 1: Aslas virus can't get in and you have a total
Speaker 1: seal over your eyes, guess what. But no, they want
Speaker 1: a federal mandate. That's what this is. Now. They want
Speaker 1: everyone walking around in masks because that goes right to
Speaker 1: the psyche of the Democrat Party. You see, the Democrats
Speaker 1: believe America has been sick for four years. They think
Speaker 1: that we have already been in the grip of a pandemic,
Speaker 1: but that pandemic was Trump. This most recent real disease
Speaker 1: outbreak has become an excuse for them to unleash that
Speaker 1: part of their psyche that Trump has so damaged such
Speaker 1: that they think the country is on the brink of collapse.
Speaker 1: This now becomes the excuse to explain why they've been
Speaker 1: acting like such maniacs for the last four years. It's
Speaker 1: all about Trump in their minds. Otherwise they wouldn't be
Speaker 1: able to just pretend the mass protests on the streets
Speaker 1: with no social distancing, They wouldn't be able to just
Speaker 1: wash that away from their memories. No, it's politics that
Speaker 1: is what is driving this. Don't let them get away
Speaker 1: with the hysteria. You're in the Freedom hud This is
Speaker 1: the Buck Sex and Show podcast. Doctor Fauci said this.
Speaker 1: CDC head said this. The main driver was the virus
Speaker 1: came from Europe and it was the greatest miss by
Speaker 1: the federal government of all time. China virus, China virus,
Speaker 1: China virus, China travel band. Forget the China travel ban.
Speaker 1: It was in Europe. It came to Europe from China,
Speaker 1: you moron. And the reason that we don't think of
Speaker 1: the virus in this country as coming from China quite
Speaker 1: the same way is because of the ban on travel
Speaker 1: from China. But you know, if this is about mitigation
Speaker 1: and saving as many lives as possible under the circumstances,
Speaker 1: fewer infected people coming into the country early on in
Speaker 1: the outbreak is clearly a good thing, and there were
Speaker 1: a lot of infected people in Wuhan and the rest
Speaker 1: of China. So what is his point here? This man
Speaker 1: is a hack and an idiot, but the Democrat Party
Speaker 1: is all reading from the same sheet of music here,
Speaker 1: it's bs. Thanks for listening to the bus Esson Show podcasts.
Speaker 1: Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or
Speaker 1: wherever you get your podcasts. That's one of the reasons
Speaker 1: why we have to make sure we engage the community
Speaker 1: as we're doing now, to get community people to help us,
Speaker 1: for people to understand that we are doing everything we
Speaker 1: can to show that it's safe and that it's effective
Speaker 1: and it's for the good of them as individuals and
Speaker 1: in society to take the vaccine. So we have a
Speaker 1: lot of work to do because, as you will know,
Speaker 1: we've spoken about this intensively in the past, there is
Speaker 1: a general anti science, anti authority, anti vaccine feeling among
Speaker 1: some people in this country. Can we worry about what's
Speaker 1: going on right now and not have these projections about
Speaker 1: the anti science, anti vaccine people causing the problems because
Speaker 1: we don't have a vaccine yet, and based on the
Speaker 1: possibility of mutations. We may never really have a perfect vaccine.
Speaker 1: Coronavirus may be with us in a cyclical, seasonal fashion
Speaker 1: for a very very long time. So what exactly are
Speaker 1: we trying to accomplish with all of this? There seems
Speaker 1: to be a lack of comprehension here about what it
Speaker 1: means when younger, healthier people get infected. As long as younger,
Speaker 1: healthier people are getting past the virus and then have
Speaker 1: immunity from the virus, which is what the science tells us,
Speaker 1: the more people who get this, who beat it, and
Speaker 1: who get past it, the better off we are as
Speaker 1: society because we get closer to herd immunity. So, you know,
Speaker 1: if you have in an area, you know, thirty or
Speaker 1: forty percent of all people under forty that have already
Speaker 1: had this impeded. Even though those who are in this
Speaker 1: who are in this society in that area, who are
Speaker 1: at higher risk or still out there and don't have immunity,
Speaker 1: there is a lesser risk of spread to them because
Speaker 1: the immune population is larger. So as long as we
Speaker 1: are taking measures to protect those at higher risk from
Speaker 1: you know, from immediate spread, we should not be panicking
Speaker 1: about people who are at very low risk from this
Speaker 1: disease contracting them. When I say low risk, most people
Speaker 1: who are getting it under forty don't even know they
Speaker 1: have it. They don't have any symptoms. And it's not
Speaker 1: like we're saying, oh my gosh, you know, there's a
Speaker 1: fifty percent mortality rate, so hopefully you know you'll make
Speaker 1: it through. No, there's a the chance if you're if
Speaker 1: you're in the low risk age bracket from this, of
Speaker 1: dying from it, or even being severely hospitalized. For not
Speaker 1: in the hospital for a day or two, but being
Speaker 1: in the hospital for a couple of weeks. The chances
Speaker 1: less than one in a thousand at this point. So
Speaker 1: what exactly are we supposed to do as a society?
Speaker 1: What is the plan here? The health experts who were
Speaker 1: silent for a couple of weeks while it was whose
Speaker 1: streets are streets? We're protesting in justice, but we're all
Speaker 1: wearing masks. Really, we think that all of a sudden,
Speaker 1: Minneapolis has a huge spike in cases of people under
Speaker 1: forty and no one's even raising the possibility over there. Oh,
Speaker 1: maybe it's from the protests. They can't have it both ways.
Speaker 1: It can't be this is an urgent public health crisis,
Speaker 1: do as we say, or else, and then be like, well,
Speaker 1: but I mean, we really got to have these Marxist
Speaker 1: protests against police and against law and order on the street. No, no,
Speaker 1: they gave up the right to do this. I mean,
Speaker 1: I actually want to just shout explotives at people now
Speaker 1: who are saying, come on, guys, we all have to
Speaker 1: do our part. When I've seen them for weeks, people
Speaker 1: with platforms, people on TV, at some of the other
Speaker 1: networks out there, silent, silent as the protesters march around, loot, pillage, riot,
Speaker 1: no social distancing, and not even just at those kind
Speaker 1: of you know, there was a big Pride parade in Chicago,
Speaker 1: and you know, a Pride parade. Great, that's you know,
Speaker 1: I have no problem with what the parade is representing.
Speaker 1: My problem is we're not supposed to have parades, right.
Speaker 1: This is this is the very basic concept that the
Speaker 1: Democrats are just gaslighting us constantly on oh you know
Speaker 1: some parades better than others. Don't know what to tell you, Sorry,
Speaker 1: a mask, my federal mask mandate. Here's here's the truth
Speaker 1: of this. Also, the government can't protect you from this
Speaker 1: and They're just taking more control and more of your freedom.
Speaker 1: We see this, this bargain play out in so many
Speaker 1: different ways across society and have and will for all
Speaker 1: of our lives. The government can't really protect you from this,
Speaker 1: and in trying to do so, not only are you
Speaker 1: not going to be protected, but you are going to
Speaker 1: be losing so many of the core rights that you
Speaker 1: have and we already have been. I'm angry with myself.
Speaker 1: I feel like, you know, how come we haven't been
Speaker 1: doing civil disobedience in a protest movement against this? You know,
Speaker 1: you know, I mean in New York, it's impossible because
Speaker 1: I'm surrounded by commies. But you know, where where is
Speaker 1: the backlash from the right about the hypocrisy and about
Speaker 1: the lies here? Where where is it? Why aren't we
Speaker 1: hearing about that? No? Just you know, wear your mask, peasant,
Speaker 1: stay home, peasant, don't ask too any questions, or else
Speaker 1: doctor Fauci's gonna come for you. You know. Has Fauci
Speaker 1: had any harsh words for the thousands and thousands of protesters? Now?
Speaker 1: Of course not. He He wants to be liked by
Speaker 1: the New York Times. You know, I like, I get it.
Speaker 1: Guy's a guy's not a warrior. He's an academic basically,
Speaker 1: so he's not into he's not into taking the heat.
Speaker 1: But how many times are they able to be wrong
Speaker 1: on this before we say enough is enough? What really
Speaker 1: is the plan? Um? What is the plan when we
Speaker 1: get past let's say, when we get to a level
Speaker 1: of um, we get to a level of virus that
Speaker 1: is really, really low, We're going to reopen again. Guess
Speaker 1: what's gonna happen. You're gonna have more cases. This is
Speaker 1: what I've been saying all along. This is what everybody's
Speaker 1: watching this has been saying. The opened up chorus has
Speaker 1: not been claiming open up, Everything's totally fine, no more. No,
Speaker 1: it's we need to open up and learn to live
Speaker 1: with this thing. That is the argument. So I don't
Speaker 1: want to hear anymore. Oh but there's more cases, yes, correct,
Speaker 1: And there have been cases all throughout this wave up
Speaker 1: wave down, wave up wave down, depends on where you are.
Speaker 1: They have not been able to control it. It is
Speaker 1: out there, It is in community spread as long as
Speaker 1: there are pockets of it in the in the world,
Speaker 1: never mind just the United States. It's gonna come back here.
Speaker 1: We can't trace this. Think about this. There are in
Speaker 1: places like New York, they have barriers to reopening based
Speaker 1: on whether they can trace individual cases. I've been telling
Speaker 1: you that's insane. Of course, it's insane. Oh, and they're
Speaker 1: gonna make sure that the tracers don't ask anybody if
Speaker 1: they were at the protests. Politics not health politics, that's
Speaker 1: what they're doing. It's just, you know, I feel like
Speaker 1: we've already had this debate, and we've already been through
Speaker 1: the discussion about oh my gosh, we're gonna overwhelm hospitals.
Speaker 1: We're not overwhelming hospitals. The hospitals they keep looking at
Speaker 1: hospital admissions, not hospital stay duration. Find me the cases
Speaker 1: where there are major hospital systems where I'm not just
Speaker 1: saying that they you know, yeah, maybe they'd have to
Speaker 1: move someone from one place to another to where they
Speaker 1: But find me a place where you can go into
Speaker 1: a major metropolitan area the United States and you say,
Speaker 1: and you're somebody who has a severe case of COVID
Speaker 1: nineteen and you cannot get the necessary medical attention. We are,
Speaker 1: what five six months into this pandemic now, and that
Speaker 1: has never happened, but we still here, Oh we got
Speaker 1: to flatten the curve flatten. The curve for hospital capacity
Speaker 1: was an excuse to flatten the US economy, to lock
Speaker 1: us in our homes and to tell us what to
Speaker 1: do all the time, and also as an outlet for
Speaker 1: the rage of the anti Trump left for what we're
Speaker 1: three great years under Trump this year so far, you know,
Speaker 1: it's stinks. Okay, twenty twenty has been bad. There's no
Speaker 1: way around that. Bad here for everybody here, bad here
Speaker 1: for the world, and yes, the Trump administration. But if
Speaker 1: we wanted to get better, you know, we have to
Speaker 1: do go on living our lives, all right. They just
Speaker 1: did this huge buy of remdesiviere, which costs over three
Speaker 1: thousand dollars of patient of patient use. They're looking at
Speaker 1: some other treatments for this. Doctors I've talked to have
Speaker 1: said that they're better now. They understand that they really
Speaker 1: don't want to put people on ventilators is an absolute,
Speaker 1: absolute last resort for this. I mean, there's there's been
Speaker 1: improvement in the understanding and treatment of this, and you
Speaker 1: already have a large segment of the American population that
Speaker 1: has beaten this and recovered, and so you know, we
Speaker 1: are making our way through this. There is no template
Speaker 1: for what the Democrats and just the establishment and the
Speaker 1: media are trying to assault to do. Now to what
Speaker 1: shutdown society again? And then the numbers will recede, right
Speaker 1: because if no one's doing it, but there'll still be
Speaker 1: transmissions of this. People will still be getting this. That
Speaker 1: was happening. At one point when New York still had
Speaker 1: a pretty high number of new cases, they found out
Speaker 1: that over sixty percent of people that were coming in
Speaker 1: could only have received the virus in the home. So
Speaker 1: you know, if you're in a household and one person
Speaker 1: has to go out and get groceries, guess what. Everybody's
Speaker 1: at risk from the disease if that person gets it.
Speaker 1: And that's where a lot of the transmission was happening.
Speaker 1: So unless you're really going to have a lockdown where
Speaker 1: no one can leave their house period, full stop, nobody,
Speaker 1: nobody for two weeks, guess what, it's still going to
Speaker 1: be out there. And I know we're all getting tired
Speaker 1: of it. It's the same argument, it's the same nonsense.
Speaker 1: But we have not made the psychological shift in America
Speaker 1: that we do the best we can, We use the
Speaker 1: health resources that we have in our system, and we
Speaker 1: are reopening. That's it. We have not reopened. That is
Speaker 1: a lie. We are in a lesser state of lockdown.
Speaker 1: We are not open. We have not returned to normalcy.
Speaker 1: I just think we need a completely a different philosophical
Speaker 1: approach to this. But we're not going to get there
Speaker 1: as long as the Democrat Party and the media are
Speaker 1: incentivized for Americans to be terrified and miserable all the time.
Speaker 1: We're not going to get there while that's happening. And
Speaker 1: this is what we have to fight back against. You're
Speaker 1: in the freedom hunt. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast.
Speaker 1: We must have no stigma, none about wearing mask when
Speaker 1: we leave our homes and come near other people. Wearing
Speaker 1: simple face coverings is not about protecting ourselves. It is
Speaker 1: about protecting everyone we encounter. In fact, the more we
Speaker 1: hate the pain and suffering that accompanied the strict stay
Speaker 1: home guidelines a few months ago, there happier. We should
Speaker 1: be to take responsible small steps every day to ensure
Speaker 1: our country can stay on offense for How long Center McConnell,
Speaker 1: how long do we do this? Well? Why not wear
Speaker 1: goggles too? Goggles would be helpful. There's a reason why
Speaker 1: when someone's in a true you know, full medical protective suit.
Speaker 1: Their eyes are covered as well. So why not we
Speaker 1: all wear goggles all the time, goggles and masks, And
Speaker 1: until this virus is officially cured, I guess we have
Speaker 1: to keep doing that forever. Oh Buck, there'll be a vaccine. Really,
Speaker 1: how much damage you're willing to incur to your society
Speaker 1: before the vaccine comes out? How much are we all
Speaker 1: supposed to suffer? The morons in charge have no idea
Speaker 1: what they are doing. And this is bipartisan. Now, there
Speaker 1: are a lot of Republicans you just heard from which
Speaker 1: mc Mitch McConnell. There's no stigma of wearing a mask.
Speaker 1: We want to wear a mask. Wearing a mask, I
Speaker 1: don't care. That's great. Look if I'm sitting in a
Speaker 1: room indoors with people who are at higher risk, or
Speaker 1: if it's going to make them more comfortable and they
Speaker 1: want me to wear a mask, fine, I'll wear a mask.
Speaker 1: Not an anti mask zealot, but a national mask mandate.
Speaker 1: So if you live in you know, Bozeman, Montana, and
Speaker 1: there's like no cases of coronavirus anywhere, but if the
Speaker 1: copsy you walk into the you know, the general store,
Speaker 1: without a mask on, They're gonna find you, they're gonna rescue.
Speaker 1: People think that that's same, that's crazy, it's crazy. But
Speaker 1: this is what is being held up as somehow intelligent,
Speaker 1: This is what is being talked about as what the
Speaker 1: experts want us to do. And then there's of course
Speaker 1: just more of the nonsense that you'll hear from from Democrats.
Speaker 1: Here's the Lieutenant Governor of California, Kuni Lacis, play clip seven. Well,
Speaker 1: it is extremely important, and honestly, it's very happy to
Speaker 1: see Mikey pens Is finally putting a mask on and signaling.
Speaker 1: And you know, I think that's probably going to be
Speaker 1: helpful in places like Texas and yes, probably in the
Speaker 1: Central Valley, in parts of our state where you do
Speaker 1: have more people who are listening to the signaling out
Speaker 1: of Washington, which has been something like, you know, a
Speaker 1: mask is politicized. If you're in a red state, you rejected.
Speaker 1: If you're in a blue state, you wear it. This
Speaker 1: is ridiculous. It's like sunscreen. You wear it to protect yourself,
Speaker 1: and in this case, of course, you really wear it
Speaker 1: to protect others and to stop the spread. You've got
Speaker 1: major European countries that have reopened schools, reopened businesses. Germany, France, Denmark, Sweden,
Speaker 1: where we're effectively very little mask wearing of any less
Speaker 1: than half the population regularly wears a mask when they're
Speaker 1: out in public. Okay, are they just trumpers? Is that
Speaker 1: what we're to be told? They're trumpers? If it were
Speaker 1: only that easy, Oh yeah, wear a mask, it'll stop
Speaker 1: the spread. Clearly, that's not what happened in this country. Okay,
Speaker 1: I was out for weeks in New York City. You
Speaker 1: could not find a person anywhere without a mask. Still
Speaker 1: lots of spread, Still lots of spread. How everyone's locked
Speaker 1: in their homes. If you weren't in your home, you're
Speaker 1: wearing a mask. But now we're told, oh, but there
Speaker 1: were thousands and thousands of cases all over the place everyday,
Speaker 1: new cases. Does does anyone ever stop to think this
Speaker 1: stuff through? The CDC has a study that says influenza
Speaker 1: mask wearing, for example, does almost nothing, a real peer
Speaker 1: reviewed study. So yeah, maybe one person like doesn't sneeze
Speaker 1: in your face, they sneeze in the mask and that
Speaker 1: stops it. But other than that, just breathing into the air,
Speaker 1: it's in the air. That's what the study suggests. The
Speaker 1: World Health Organization, our own health authorities told us six
Speaker 1: months ago, don't wear masks now, with no new signs
Speaker 1: to back it up. Whatever they are saying, wear a
Speaker 1: mask by federal mandate. Again, if you want to wear
Speaker 1: a mask, God bless, go for it. Do it all
Speaker 1: the time, Do it in the shower, do it in bed,
Speaker 1: don't ever do anything without a mask on. Go for it.
Speaker 1: But you're gonna tell me that I have to on
Speaker 1: pain of what and based on what evidence? What if
Speaker 1: I just had a COVID test, Yes oray, still have
Speaker 1: to wear a mask today. So if you do this
Speaker 1: all the time, oh, because it makes other people feel
Speaker 1: more comfortable. I mean, there are people who live in
Speaker 1: my building in New York, and I'm being serious, who
Speaker 1: wear full on it looks like hazmat suits and that's
Speaker 1: how they go outside every day. I will say this,
Speaker 1: They look a little bit crazy. But but from a
Speaker 1: science perspective, at least they're taking it. At least they're
Speaker 1: doing real stuff. Yeah, that will probably protect you. Wearing
Speaker 1: the little piece of fabric across your mouth, you know,
Speaker 1: you're pulling it down over your nose all your videos,
Speaker 1: touch something, touch your face. Guess what? Now you got coronavirus.
Speaker 1: Oh but if you wear the fabric, it's going to
Speaker 1: slow the I look, you know when when the studies
Speaker 1: come out the show that I'm wrong. I want to
Speaker 1: see them. But if really we could stop the pandemic
Speaker 1: just by wearing masks, don't you think we could just
Speaker 1: stop that? We would have already stopped this. But don't. No,
Speaker 1: no one should think for themselves. Listen to the idiots
Speaker 1: who change their minds every few weeks. Thanks for listening
Speaker 1: to the bus seton show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on
Speaker 1: Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Speaker 1: Oh Democrats, you never fail to disappoint. So dumb Trump
Speaker 1: has disrespected native communities time and again. This is from
Speaker 1: an official the Democrats Twitter account. He's attempted to limit
Speaker 1: their voting rights and blocked critical pandemic relief. Now he's
Speaker 1: holding a rally glorifying white supremacy at Mount Rushmore, a
Speaker 1: region wants sacred to tribal communities. Now they have since
Speaker 1: deleted that. Now we're going to start to have dictates
Speaker 1: about what we can and can't do. According to the
Speaker 1: most absurd, a historical and moronic versions of wokeness. This
Speaker 1: is what This is the country we're living in now,
Speaker 1: folks and corporations. Oh my gosh, everyone is so craven.
Speaker 1: You know, we have about less than one percent of
Speaker 1: this country actually fights in all of our wars. Is
Speaker 1: trying to keep America free by signing up to if
Speaker 1: if necessary, give their life for their country. And what
Speaker 1: you see is that pretty much the rest of the
Speaker 1: country is overrun by people who are like, oh, I
Speaker 1: don't want to. I don't want to get any heat
Speaker 1: for my position. I want what if my stock options
Speaker 1: don't vest that. That's who's actually determining national policy. Now.
Speaker 1: I've got a second home, a third home to pay off.
Speaker 1: I need to be able to take a helicopter to work.
Speaker 1: Come on, I don't want to and I'm on the
Speaker 1: board of this company. I don't want any problems. Sure,
Speaker 1: I'll listen to these morons. I'll do whatever the woke
Speaker 1: left says. It's it's very discouraging. It's very discouraging. You
Speaker 1: would think that just a basic sense of patriotism. I'm look,
Speaker 1: I'm not talking about you. If you run a small
Speaker 1: business and you think that you're gonna get shutdown. I don't.
Speaker 1: I don't want anyone going hungry because they're making a
Speaker 1: point that may honestly get just overwhelmed, may get lost
Speaker 1: in the noise about wokeness. Pick your battles, as I've
Speaker 1: always said, But for people who have a tremendous amount
Speaker 1: of influence and wealth, really what this is about his
Speaker 1: status and what's easiest for them, And they don't really
Speaker 1: want to take the heat. They don't want to be
Speaker 1: leading a movement to say I don't care if you
Speaker 1: guys try to boycott me. People are still going to
Speaker 1: buy this product, They're still going to watch this show,
Speaker 1: And we stand behind the right to disagree, because we
Speaker 1: don't want to live in a country where you can't disagree.
Speaker 1: How about just one corporate leader, how about one billionaire
Speaker 1: or multimillionaire who's never gonna have to worry about paying
Speaker 1: the bills or putting food on the table, sending up
Speaker 1: and saying I'm sick of this crap. Now. I know
Speaker 1: some of you're gonna say buck elon musk. There there
Speaker 1: are some people who are kind of saying this stuff,
Speaker 1: kind of saying this stuff, but nonetheless here we are.
Speaker 1: We are at a point where jokes that were made.
Speaker 1: There were jokes made about how what are they going
Speaker 1: to do come for Mount Rushmore next, And turns out
Speaker 1: they will. What are they gonna do? Tear down statues
Speaker 1: or desecrate statues of George Washington? Yep, just happened here
Speaker 1: in New York City. Washington Square Park named for the
Speaker 1: man himself, a place I've spent countless days and in
Speaker 1: afternoons evenings, one of my favorite places actually in New
Speaker 1: York City. It's just always an interesting, always an interesting
Speaker 1: scene down there. That's that's putting it mildly. They threw
Speaker 1: red paint on a statue of Washington. Now I assume
Speaker 1: they might be able to clean it in some way.
Speaker 1: You know, they haven't. They didn't take a chisel two
Speaker 1: it and ruin it. But the point is this is
Speaker 1: a desecration, it's vandalism. Someone's gonna have to someone's gonna
Speaker 1: have to clean that up. You're stealing money from the
Speaker 1: public here by making this now a job that someone
Speaker 1: has to have to clean up the desecration of the statue.
Speaker 1: And yeah, now they're coming for George Washington. Notice that
Speaker 1: they never they never put up who do they want
Speaker 1: to celebrate? I think because most of their answers people
Speaker 1: would laugh at I mean, we're gonna have statues at
Speaker 1: Jimmy Carter everywhere? Is that the plan? Who are we
Speaker 1: allowed to celebrate? That's that's the question the left never
Speaker 1: never answers, because it's just so much easier to destroy.
Speaker 1: It's so much more fun to be in a position
Speaker 1: on perpetual offense because you're perpetually aggrieved, because you're always
Speaker 1: angry about something. All you do is complain. You don't build,
Speaker 1: you don't make things better. You just complain. Take no responsibility.
Speaker 1: This is really now the organizing principle between much of
Speaker 1: the for much of the Democrat left, it's not about
Speaker 1: making things better. It's not about making our society a
Speaker 1: happier health your place where people are free and people
Speaker 1: can pursue their destiny. It's people are mad and they
Speaker 1: want someone to blame. People are angry. You know, I'm
Speaker 1: just gonna say it. When you see these you see
Speaker 1: these mugshots of the Antifa folks that they're picking up,
Speaker 1: and now some of the people that they're going after
Speaker 1: with the statues, they don't look like a lot of winners.
Speaker 1: I'm just they don't look like winners. Can we just
Speaker 1: be a little honest about this for a second? I
Speaker 1: think these are people that need a lot of need
Speaker 1: a lot of therapy, and did not have particularly strong
Speaker 1: father figures. These Antifa movements they got people a lot
Speaker 1: of problems. You just see this. I mean, how else
Speaker 1: could you could you imagine being so disrespectful to not
Speaker 1: just cops, but just to a person you don't even know.
Speaker 1: As we see in all these videos running up, yelling
Speaker 1: in their faces, saying horrible things. Their families should be ashamed.
Speaker 1: They've forgotten that every day, in every city in the country,
Speaker 1: and every really every county in the country, the cops
Speaker 1: will get a call from someone, and in some cases
Speaker 1: they'll get thousands and thousands of these calls. Right, But
Speaker 1: the cops get calls from people who are terrified, who
Speaker 1: have no one else to go to, and they go
Speaker 1: to our law enforcement officers, and ninety nine point nine
Speaker 1: times out of a hundred, the cops are professional. The
Speaker 1: cops do their jobs. The cops make things better. If
Speaker 1: we're going to tear down society because of what point
Speaker 1: one percent of interactions or cops or whatever do We're
Speaker 1: going to be in a perpetual state of anarchy, despair
Speaker 1: and destruction. All right, this is completely lacking in context.
Speaker 1: It also skips past so many of the much more
Speaker 1: prominent problems that we have that we really could work
Speaker 1: to address. But those are off limits. To talk about
Speaker 1: family structure, off limits, can't talk about it, not allowed.
Speaker 1: Attitudes about school, about police and respecting police, not allowed
Speaker 1: to talk about that. Off limits. Okay, well, we can
Speaker 1: keep having more of what we have right now, angry
Speaker 1: people demanding things that won't fix the things that they
Speaker 1: claim made them angry in the first place. And what
Speaker 1: we see from Antifa in particular, the group that the
Speaker 1: left pretends doesn't exist, but we all know it very
Speaker 1: clearly does exist. What we see from Antifa is that
Speaker 1: they have become useful to the Democrat Party for getting attention,
Speaker 1: for scaring people. They are a wing of the DNC,
Speaker 1: and that's why the media won't touch them. Otherwise, what
Speaker 1: could be more obvious than as a society condemning these morons. No,
Speaker 1: there are people that that praise them as heroes. There
Speaker 1: are people that are saying that what they're doing is
Speaker 1: you know, good, I mean quote himself and other people
Speaker 1: have compared them on CNN of the founding Father. Sorry,
Speaker 1: I have to specify which Cuomo the Kuomo brothers have
Speaker 1: really become among the worst offenders of virtue signaling bs
Speaker 1: crap in this period of riots and pandemic. I mean,
Speaker 1: they're they're just awful, awful, no no honesty, no integrity,
Speaker 1: and they're both more famous and more more influential than
Speaker 1: they've ever been, which then brings me to you, how
Speaker 1: crazy are the libs really? Right now? I just had
Speaker 1: to share this with you. This was amazing. You have
Speaker 1: Paul Krugman who shared out. And Paul Krugman is a
Speaker 1: celebrated figure on the left. He's someone he's he's an
Speaker 1: intellectual that the left holds up as a person. His
Speaker 1: political analysis is childish, does not very smart, not very wise,
Speaker 1: but he's good at at complicated economic models. What exact
Speaker 1: athlete is Paul Krugman bring the world? Teaches economics at
Speaker 1: Princeton University, another place that's been churning out deeply unimpressive,
Speaker 1: but think they're very impressive people for many decades now,
Speaker 1: Paul Krugman says, and then, by the way, that's true
Speaker 1: of all lead schools. I'm much just picking on Princeton,
Speaker 1: you know, pretty much. When I meet someone who says
Speaker 1: they went to an IVY League school, now I just
Speaker 1: I said, okay, well, it's fifty fifty that you're smart.
Speaker 1: It's fifty fifty, which maybe is a little higher than
Speaker 1: the general. And I mean, like, you know, impressive, academically impressive,
Speaker 1: but it's fifty fifty. Did you get into school because
Speaker 1: mommy and daddy went there? Did you get into school
Speaker 1: because you're recruited athlete? Did you get into the school
Speaker 1: because you're a preferred underrepresented category? None of those have
Speaker 1: to do with academic excellence, none of them. So there
Speaker 1: and and by the way, when you cover those three
Speaker 1: categories at a lot of schools, it's like more than
Speaker 1: half the class. It's like sixty seventy percent of the class.
Speaker 1: But I digress. Paul Krugman in response to this piece,
Speaker 1: Surge begins reaching old are more more vulnerable Floridians. From Bloomberg,
Speaker 1: Paul Krogman writes, reality is coming for white supremacists driving
Speaker 1: golf carts? What what? What did this this little sick
Speaker 1: maniacs say? We've got a lot of seniors, Democrats and Republicans.
Speaker 1: Not that that matters to any normal, sane person. A
Speaker 1: lot of seniors in Florida, who yeah, are at risk.
Speaker 1: We are in a pandemic. I mean, this is really
Speaker 1: bad for older people. It is scary. I get that,
Speaker 1: But we also need to have policies in place that
Speaker 1: recognize who is really at risk, and who this is
Speaker 1: frightening for, and who is being used as a as
Speaker 1: a political tool. Paul Krugman says reality is coming for
Speaker 1: white supremacists driving golf carts. He thinks that's funny. He
Speaker 1: thinks that people's moms and dads who might get this
Speaker 1: might get COVID nineteen and die, or people's grandma grandpa
Speaker 1: get COVID nineteen and die. They're they're white supremacists. Now,
Speaker 1: these are just people who live in Florida. The articles
Speaker 1: about about seniors living in Florida. I mean, Paul Krugman
Speaker 1: is a disgusting moron. These leftist libs are a disgrace.
Speaker 1: I don't just disagree with them. I don't think they're
Speaker 1: wrong on some stuff. These are bad people. These are immoral, vicious, insecure,
Speaker 1: sanctimonious people. But you know that describes a big chunk
Speaker 1: of the Democrat Party these days. Unfortunately, that mentality and
Speaker 1: that approach to politics really describes a big piece of
Speaker 1: the Democrat Party, certainly the vanguard, the intellectual elite. They're
Speaker 1: not impressing anybody with their wisdom and their knowledge. They're
Speaker 1: shouting people down and doing ad hominem attacks of the
Speaker 1: most base and ridiculous kind. And then they celebrate things
Speaker 1: like this because yeah, hashtag own Trump, hashtag orange man bad.
Speaker 1: Paul Krugman says reality is coming for white supremacists driving
Speaker 1: golf carts in Florida because one person on one video
Speaker 1: tried to mock protesters by very foolishly yelling white power.
Speaker 1: He was trying to say it sarcastically, but it was
Speaker 1: a dumb thing to say. That's one person. There are
Speaker 1: hundreds of thousands of seniors in Florida of all ethnicities
Speaker 1: and political persuasions who are at risk from COVID nineteen
Speaker 1: and Paul Krugman's making jokes about it. Do you think
Speaker 1: he's gonna get fired from his job in The New
Speaker 1: York Times for that? No? No, my friends, where is
Speaker 1: our national courage not just to speak the truth on
Speaker 1: these issues, but to take the fight to the enemy.
Speaker 1: I keep saying, when an't we going to be wartime conservatives?
Speaker 1: When are we going to take action? And I'm also
Speaker 1: going to keep saying this, where is President Trump on
Speaker 1: this stuff? Where's the fire in the belly? I haven't
Speaker 1: seen it yet. You're in the freedom hunt. This is
Speaker 1: the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Just another thing on the
Speaker 1: coronavirus debate. I know I'm hinting hard today and I
Speaker 1: want to get into some other topics. We have discussed
Speaker 1: a little bit about wokeness, but you know there's this
Speaker 1: is the political race right now. So you can think
Speaker 1: about it this way. Whenever I'm talking to you about
Speaker 1: COVID nineteen or about the woke mobs in the streets
Speaker 1: and the statue toppling and all this stuff, that is
Speaker 1: the Democrats Elect Biden effort. Because Joe Biden is a
Speaker 1: joke and has nothing to offer American society himself. He's
Speaker 1: an empty vessel for the Democrat left to exploit once
Speaker 1: he fools enough people who aren't paying attention to what's
Speaker 1: really happening in this country in devoting for him this fall.
Speaker 1: So think of it that way. It's almost it's a
Speaker 1: two fird. I mean, talk about COVID or to talk
Speaker 1: about the wokeness. That's the Biden twenty twenty election campaign.
Speaker 1: That's what the Democrats and the left are running right now.
Speaker 1: But on the reopening schools point, you know, the American
Speaker 1: Association of Pediatrics, it's something like that. I might be
Speaker 1: getting the name of the group somewhat, it's but basically
Speaker 1: the big association about pediatricians in America has put out
Speaker 1: a statement. But I got very little media place saying
Speaker 1: we got to reopen schools this fall. Okay, everyone needs
Speaker 1: to be back in school. We're not going to reopen schools.
Speaker 1: This distance learning thing. Kids need interaction with other kids,
Speaker 1: they need socialization, they need interaction with teachers for a
Speaker 1: lot of kids being in school. And I would just
Speaker 1: note this, you know, the people said, oh, and this
Speaker 1: is a terrible situation, but there are a lot of
Speaker 1: morons out there in the media who can't figure this
Speaker 1: stuff out, so I've got to talk about it. They say, well,
Speaker 1: child abuse are actually has going down by the numbers.
Speaker 1: People who say that really are you know, I just
Speaker 1: don't think that they have an IQ above that of
Speaker 1: a handbag or a toaster. The reason that a lot
Speaker 1: of child abuse is found is from teachers who are
Speaker 1: mandated to report if they see signs of child abuse
Speaker 1: when the kid comes into school. That's not happening anymore.
Speaker 1: You think that child abuse while people have been locked
Speaker 1: at home. Without that, without that additional layer of possible
Speaker 1: protection and assistance, you think it's got and worse. Of course,
Speaker 1: it's gotten much worse. For a lot of kids. Their
Speaker 1: food security that they're get fed every day is tied
Speaker 1: to being able to go to school. Where we're not
Speaker 1: going to open schools. You got over half of teachers
Speaker 1: in the K through twelve system nationwide are under the
Speaker 1: age of forty, which means that they're not going to
Speaker 1: be in the classroom, even though they're at less risk
Speaker 1: from this disease than they are from seasonal flu. It's
Speaker 1: true for people in the younger age categories. Right then
Speaker 1: at least other flus have been in recent years, just
Speaker 1: making about H one N one to be shut down.
Speaker 1: All the schools for H one and one no, A
Speaker 1: lot of people died from that, and younger people certainly
Speaker 1: died from it. Why aren't we opening schools. It's hard
Speaker 1: to see this as anything other than just a fight
Speaker 1: against normalcy and a fight against things getting better from
Speaker 1: people who don't want them to get better. They just
Speaker 1: find a way to blame all this on pre as
Speaker 1: in Trump and their entire identity. Their sense of worth
Speaker 1: is tied up in their spoon fed Democrat politics, and
Speaker 1: if that means kids don't get to stay in school
Speaker 1: this fall or go to school this fall, as long
Speaker 1: as Trump loses, nothing else matters, nothing else matters that
Speaker 1: they just simply don't care. It doesn't make any difference
Speaker 1: to them. But the kids are going to suffer. The
Speaker 1: science is in on this. Children are at completely tolerable
Speaker 1: risk from COVID nineteen. It is almost zero. Kids need
Speaker 1: to be back in school. Why aren't we opening up
Speaker 1: all the schools. Oh, because the teachers are afraid. Well,
Speaker 1: teachers that are legitimately afraid can do distance learning, but
Speaker 1: a lot of other teachers should be able to go
Speaker 1: in and should be told you're really going to be okay.
Speaker 1: If you're thirty five years old and you teach sixth
Speaker 1: grade social studies, you're gonna be okay, because you know,
Speaker 1: kids are very unlikely to transmit the disease to adults
Speaker 1: don't know why this is, but they know that's the case.
Speaker 1: No one pays attention to science on this. It's all
Speaker 1: been so politicized. This is the presidential election playing out.
Speaker 1: What happens with COVID is the presidential election. What happens
Speaker 1: with these statute toppling lunatics will determine who their next
Speaker 1: president United States is. It's not about who has a
Speaker 1: better vision for the future. It's not about, you know,
Speaker 1: the record that these that Trump has now versus the
Speaker 1: record that Biden has. We will determine who will be
Speaker 1: the next president United States based upon how these issues
Speaker 1: play out right now, unless you know, I don't know
Speaker 1: we go to war with Iran in the next thirty days,
Speaker 1: but I think that's unlikely because Mustache Bolton is no
Speaker 1: longer the National Security Advisor, so we're in better shape
Speaker 1: on that front. Oh we got another another all in
Speaker 1: on wokeness situation here. Oh boy, we got a couple
Speaker 1: of them, actually, the NBA and also some new a
Speaker 1: new think piece in Time magazine on superheroes. The superhero
Speaker 1: are going to get the woke treatment. I will have
Speaker 1: to dig into this with you. I'm this NBA decision.
Speaker 1: Professional sports are really they're just going to destroy themselves
Speaker 1: unless they stop doing this nonsense. But they're not going
Speaker 1: to stop. They're not going to stop. They're going to
Speaker 1: become as politicized as the faculty lounge at Oberlin College.
Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to the Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember
Speaker 1: to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever
Speaker 1: you get your podcasts. NBA may allow players to wear
Speaker 1: social justice messages on their jerseys. This was the piece
Speaker 1: in the Washington Post. Yester, let me give you some
Speaker 1: of the details, and then we will we will dive
Speaker 1: into this one together. The NBA season, compressed out of
Speaker 1: necessity because of the novel coronavirus pandemic, is going to
Speaker 1: look a lot different, possibly right down to the jury's
Speaker 1: the players where when it resumes next month outside Orlando.
Speaker 1: The players union and the league are in talks about
Speaker 1: allowing a player to use the shirt on his back
Speaker 1: to send a message that he cares deeply about, whether
Speaker 1: it's social justice or a charity. ESPN reported it would
Speaker 1: be a logical extension of last week's agreement in which
Speaker 1: the NBA and the National Basketball Players Association agreed to
Speaker 1: continue to discuss how they could best use their platform
Speaker 1: to fight systemic racism. We're just trying to continue to
Speaker 1: shed light on different social justice issues that guys around
Speaker 1: our league continue to talk about day in and day out.
Speaker 1: Chris Paul, president of the NBPA and a guard for
Speaker 1: the Oklahoma City Thunder, said, people are saying that social
Speaker 1: justice will be off everybody's mind in Orlando with these jerseys.
Speaker 1: It doesn't go away, yeah, but I think your audience
Speaker 1: may go away, or at least a portion of it.
Speaker 1: I know I will definitely not Why if I see
Speaker 1: a bunch of professional athletes getting paid millions of dollars,
Speaker 1: treated like heroes by society, elevated to the status of superstars,
Speaker 1: and then turn around and tell the country how racist
Speaker 1: it is with you know, I don't know what they're
Speaker 1: gonna possibly have on the backs of their jerseys, but
Speaker 1: you know, I can't breathe or you know, cops or
Speaker 1: racist or just black lives matter or whatever it may be.
Speaker 1: People want sports to get away from all of that.
Speaker 1: People watch sports for the narrative, the excellence, the drama,
Speaker 1: the excitement. They're not watching sports to get a political lesson. Okay,
Speaker 1: that's just the truth. And you know, look, this is
Speaker 1: where I think the market will have to speak because
Speaker 1: and whenever I talk about corporate America, Benny, they need
Speaker 1: to wokeness. This is another perfect example of that. Oh,
Speaker 1: does anyone think this is really going to be good
Speaker 1: for league viewing? Does anyone think this is going to
Speaker 1: be in a league that's struggling right now because it's
Speaker 1: been off the air, so they clearly need money, right
Speaker 1: They clearly need to get this up and running again.
Speaker 1: Does anyone think that this will improve viewership? I think
Speaker 1: the answer is quite clearly no. For individual players, it
Speaker 1: may enhance their brand. We've seen this with Colin Kaepernick,
Speaker 1: who was, based on everything I've been told by people
Speaker 1: that actually pay very close attention to football, essentially at
Speaker 1: the end of his productive, most productive years in the
Speaker 1: NFL and managed to turn himself into a civil rights icon.
Speaker 1: So there's that. So there will be players that do this.
Speaker 1: It's going to be some of the usual players that
Speaker 1: have had very loud voices in the past. I mean
Speaker 1: Lebron James is someone who will not bend the knee
Speaker 1: to you know, or rather rather will bend the knee
Speaker 1: to China you know, that's a place where you know,
Speaker 1: you don't want that. That swhoa whoa hold on, let's
Speaker 1: not stand up for freedom when it comes to China,
Speaker 1: but is perfectly happy to lecture America and Americans about
Speaker 1: the circumstances of systemic racism in this country. I mean,
Speaker 1: this is a guy who has been treated like a
Speaker 1: superhero since he was what fourteen or fifteen years old.
Speaker 1: He's worth hundreds of millions of dollars. He has incredible influence.
Speaker 1: Everywhere he goes, people just want to see him, talk
Speaker 1: to him, you know, get a high five, think he's amazing.
Speaker 1: And he really doesn't have anything kind to say about America,
Speaker 1: does he. No, it's always more about systemic racism. And
Speaker 1: what are we told about systemic racism that it's really
Speaker 1: the problem. It has to do with the cops. That's
Speaker 1: where the systemic racism really is. Okay, how do they
Speaker 1: suggest that we deal with that fewer cops on the streets.
Speaker 1: We know how that ends. It's already happening now. It
Speaker 1: means more more minorities will be killed in high crime neighborhoods.
Speaker 1: So they're doing it. You know, the rich millionaires of
Speaker 1: the NBA really doing a great job helping out people
Speaker 1: left behind in rough neighborhoods. But you won't hear much
Speaker 1: talk about that, will you. Nope, you will not, And
Speaker 1: just never mind. In all neighborhoods, crime spreads. When there's
Speaker 1: a crime wave, it's not just limited to any one
Speaker 1: part of a city. It'll get worse everywhere. It's it's
Speaker 1: a question of how much worse it gets and where
Speaker 1: you see the biggest spike. So here we're being told, yes,
Speaker 1: the Washington Post is reporting that black lives matter or
Speaker 1: I can breathe. Messages will be sent when the season
Speaker 1: resumes to Lie thirtieth, an extension of the activism NBA
Speaker 1: players of long show when it comes to social injustice
Speaker 1: and police brutality. Lebron James, Dwayne Wade and the Miami
Speaker 1: Heat posed in hoodies after Trayvon Martin was killed in
Speaker 1: Florida twenty twelve. Okay, well we know what actually happened
Speaker 1: with Trayvon Martin. He attacked somebody and was smashing his
Speaker 1: head into the sidewalk. Now, the guy he attacked is
Speaker 1: a weirdo who thought he was some kind of like,
Speaker 1: you know, neighborhood super coop or something wasn't a cop
Speaker 1: at all. But you know, if you're smashing someone's head
Speaker 1: against the sidewalk and they have a gun, they're probably
Speaker 1: going to use it. How George Zimmerman, who according to
Speaker 1: left wing media rules, was a white Hispanic, which was
Speaker 1: fascinating because under other circumstances he would just be described
Speaker 1: as Hispanic. But George Zimmerman, who is as Hispanic as
Speaker 1: Colin Kaepernick, is African American by background. Right, these are
Speaker 1: just facts. George Zimmerman was classified as a white Hispanic
Speaker 1: and somehow became a stand in for cops. And when
Speaker 1: the facts came out about this, and they did an
Speaker 1: investigation and they showed the abrasions on Zimmerman's head. A
Speaker 1: guy into a fight with another guy, and one guy
Speaker 1: was bashing his head against the sidewalk or in the concrete,
Speaker 1: and the guy who was getting his head bashed in
Speaker 1: pulled the gun shot him. Well, what does that tell
Speaker 1: us about systemic racism? Exactly? I don't know. To this day,
Speaker 1: I still wonder where's the what's the systemic racism? A
Speaker 1: black guy and Hispanic guy get into a fight and
Speaker 1: the Hispanic guy has a gun pulls it and shoots
Speaker 1: him while he's getting his headpounded in I'm I'm missing
Speaker 1: the This is a racism incident. But remember the media
Speaker 1: constructed one constructed a racist narrative out of this. There
Speaker 1: was a reporter I believe she worked for NBC who
Speaker 1: doctored the audio that they aired so that it sounded
Speaker 1: like Zimmerman said something racist when he hadn't said anything.
Speaker 1: But they just edited the audio. And this isn't a theory,
Speaker 1: This isn't something that Just do a Google search you'll see.
Speaker 1: Why would why would the liberal media lie about the incident?
Speaker 1: Why why create facts that aren't there? Why fabricate them?
Speaker 1: Because they liked this narrative. They the narrative of Oh
Speaker 1: and the photos of young Treyvon that we were all
Speaker 1: constantly showed he was like eleven years old or something,
Speaker 1: when in reality, the Trayvon Martin that George Zimmerman was
Speaker 1: fighting was eighteen years old, a legal adult in every
Speaker 1: state in the United States, and was like six feet
Speaker 1: tall and waited about one hundred and seventy pounds. But
Speaker 1: let's all only see a photo of him when he's twelve.
Speaker 1: That was the media's How could I even see that
Speaker 1: as anything other than dishonest. Same thing with Mike Brown,
Speaker 1: hands up, don't shoot, hands up, don't shoot is a lie.
Speaker 1: But remember Trayvon was killed for his hoodie, a lie.
Speaker 1: Mike Brown was killed with hands up, don't shoot a lie.
Speaker 1: I don't think these things are lies. This is what
Speaker 1: the investigations of these including by Eric Holder, the African
Speaker 1: American Attorney General under President Obama, the first African American president,
Speaker 1: found about the incident in Saint Louis, according to numerous eyewitnesses.
Speaker 1: But is there ever a counting for this. Do they
Speaker 1: ever take a step back and say, you know what,
Speaker 1: We're sorry that we spread all these lines about this
Speaker 1: and we're trying to put a poison into American society
Speaker 1: rooted in exaggerated claims of racism and systemic racism and
Speaker 1: systemic bias and all this stuff. Now they never do.
Speaker 1: It doesn't matter. This serves the democrat purpose. You see
Speaker 1: when people talk about this as a Marxist movement at
Speaker 1: its core, it's a very easy way to understand this
Speaker 1: marx is and there's people who have spent their whole
Speaker 1: lives just studying marks and the writings of Marx. And really,
Speaker 1: Karl Marx and Angles along with them, are responsible for
Speaker 1: what has been the most destructive, violent, nihilistic, and evil
Speaker 1: ideology of the last hundreds sixty years or so. So
Speaker 1: let's remember that they have caused hundreds of millions, billions
Speaker 1: of people over time to live in misery, despair, and
Speaker 1: often have their lives ended by people who thought they
Speaker 1: were doing good stuff for the collective or for the
Speaker 1: people by putting a pistol at the back of somebody's
Speaker 1: head in a dark cellar somewhere and never letting them
Speaker 1: see their family again. And that's the last thing they
Speaker 1: ever hear, is that cocking of the pistol. And Marx
Speaker 1: used a very powerful tool. We always hear about about
Speaker 1: how he believed in the rising up and the dictatorship
Speaker 1: of the proletariat, and that the workers of the world
Speaker 1: would unite and all these things, But Marx really just
Speaker 1: use class warfare, really took the separation of different individuals
Speaker 1: by economic socioeconomic status, and then took that very basic
Speaker 1: human feeling of envy and turned to society inward against
Speaker 1: each other right and used the politics of envy are
Speaker 1: very powerful. Oh, I should have you know that guy
Speaker 1: has a big, fancy house down the street. I should
Speaker 1: have that too, but instead of thinking what did that
Speaker 1: person do to get that, or how can we have
Speaker 1: more of that throughout all society? Because wealth creation is
Speaker 1: actually not zero sum. This is one of the great
Speaker 1: lies the left will tell you. You listening to this
Speaker 1: right now, live a life of greater affluence based on food,
Speaker 1: the size of your home, the conveniences you have, the
Speaker 1: medical care you of access to. You live a life
Speaker 1: of greater affluence than the richest people in the world
Speaker 1: one hundred and fifty years ago. And then you can't
Speaker 1: even contest this right, well, how can you explain that?
Speaker 1: How can people today be Oh? Because wealth is not
Speaker 1: zero sum, wealth as we know it, material wealth, the
Speaker 1: comforts of the modern world around us. It's not zero sum,
Speaker 1: but we're led to believe it is zero sum by Marxists.
Speaker 1: So what they do is they use this class separation
Speaker 1: as a form of constant agitation and promise to eliminate
Speaker 1: these divisions, when, as we know, human nature is some
Speaker 1: people work harder than other, some people are luckier than other,
Speaker 1: some people have more gifts than other people. That's never
Speaker 1: going to change. You can have an equal playing field.
Speaker 1: You can have uniformly enforced rules, you can have contracts,
Speaker 1: you can have private property, but you can't eliminate inequality.
Speaker 1: But if you believe it inequality is effectively a religious calling, right,
Speaker 1: that the elimination of it is the highest achievement that
Speaker 1: humankind could ever reach. You always have a cause for agitation.
Speaker 1: And so that's why it's so useful. What when people
Speaker 1: are talking about how this is a Marxist group, they
Speaker 1: mean it in economic terms, but they also they mean
Speaker 1: it in the sense that race is now being used
Speaker 1: by a political movement by the left as this source
Speaker 1: of constant agitation and division among us. The same way
Speaker 1: that you can tell people in a society that, even
Speaker 1: if it were ethnically homogeneous, well that guy down the
Speaker 1: street has something better than you, or he's happier than you,
Speaker 1: and that gets And if you do this with enough people,
Speaker 1: you can get them angry, play on the envy, play
Speaker 1: on their on their outrage and fear. You can do
Speaker 1: that in a very diverse society, which America is by
Speaker 1: constantly saying this group is oppressing you, you are oppressed,
Speaker 1: that group is oppressing you. That will never entirely go away,
Speaker 1: and so that's why it's so useless to the rabble
Speaker 1: rousers of the left. And that's where this Marxism comes in.
Speaker 1: It's just now the focus is more on race instead
Speaker 1: of class as the point of Marxist division between all
Speaker 1: of us. That's what they're doing though. That's what's happening
Speaker 1: right now, and it will never entirely go away, right
Speaker 1: It's just a question of who exploits it, Who takes
Speaker 1: that out of context, Who ignores that Americans love each other,
Speaker 1: want to hang out with each other and see each
Speaker 1: other as human beings, and don't see each other based
Speaker 1: on their race. Just just ignore all of that and
Speaker 1: make it about race, because you can always find friction
Speaker 1: and agitation which helps people to get power. There are
Speaker 1: people that use this for their own purposes, and that's
Speaker 1: what's actually happening right now. This is where the Democrats
Speaker 1: are using it. The Democrats are leveraging is to defeat Trump.
Speaker 1: You're in the Freedom Hunts. This is the Buck Sexton
Speaker 1: Show podcast. The tens of thousands of Americans protesting the
Speaker 1: appalling killings of black men and women are calling upon us,
Speaker 1: on all of us, not just to say the words
Speaker 1: black lives matter, but to take a tangible step toward
Speaker 1: making it true by breaking apart the systems that have
Speaker 1: stolen countless black lives and denied Black Americans opportunity and
Speaker 1: equal treatment. Being race conscious is not enough, it never was.
Speaker 1: We must be anti racists. Straight out of the Corporate
Speaker 1: Diversity Seminar playbook here from Elizabeth Warren. It's not enough
Speaker 1: to not be racist. You have to be an anti racist.
Speaker 1: How do you become an anti racist? According to Democrat
Speaker 1: at party in according to the left, do what they say,
Speaker 1: sign on for the whole agenda. And so if you're
Speaker 1: not willing to do that and therefore be an anti racist,
Speaker 1: you know what, you know what they're telling you, you
Speaker 1: might be a little racist. Yeah, you might be a
Speaker 1: little racist. This is the form of psychological coercion that
Speaker 1: they use, and unfortunately is so effective, whether it's in
Speaker 1: the corporate boardroom or even people now you know, sitting
Speaker 1: around but not that you consider un really have a
Speaker 1: drink anywhere these days without the fear of being shut
Speaker 1: down for COVID. Everyone's constantly panicked about it. But I
Speaker 1: want to ask Elizabeth Warren, how we make this go away? Okay,
Speaker 1: we have this systemic racism. Nowhere in the law. Nowhere
Speaker 1: in the law can you point to anything that is
Speaker 1: discriminatory against Black Americans as law exists today. And the
Speaker 1: only racial discrimination that does exist that is legitimized and
Speaker 1: that is clear in the law is in favor of
Speaker 1: black and other minorities in this country in the form
Speaker 1: of affirmed of action. So can we deal in reality?
Speaker 1: Are we going to deal in it? No? No, that
Speaker 1: we're going to deal in something that's not reality. Congresswoman
Speaker 1: Ianna Pressley here saying that that Black Americans have never
Speaker 1: ever had equal treatment under the law. Play clip six. Frank,
Speaker 1: you remember Jordan earlier was talking about equal protection under
Speaker 1: the law and his experience of violations of the First
Speaker 1: Amendment in the wake of a pandemic. And you know
Speaker 1: the ironic things. The reason why there is unrest in
Speaker 1: our streets is because Black Americans have never had equal
Speaker 1: protection under the law. That's why they're in the streets
Speaker 1: in the midst of a pandemic and are being met
Speaker 1: with more of a police state, which is the very
Speaker 1: reason why there is an uprising. And the protesters that
Speaker 1: are the front lines today would have been the Diane
Speaker 1: Megans and the John Willises and the Doctor Chase of
Speaker 1: the early days of the civil rights movement. What a
Speaker 1: what a misrepresentation that is on two levels. One that
Speaker 1: here you have a sitting member of Congress who says
Speaker 1: that there's never been equal treatment for Black Americans under
Speaker 1: the law. Okay, if that's true, where is the unequal
Speaker 1: treatment in the law? Talk to me about Show it
Speaker 1: to me, and don't tell me that there's a disparate
Speaker 1: rate of incarceration, because then the next question it will be,
Speaker 1: is there a disparate rate of committing crimes? That's the
Speaker 1: next That's the obvious next question that anybody would ask.
Speaker 1: I've talked about this in the male female context too.
Speaker 1: Men commit many more violent crimes than women. The law
Speaker 1: is not discriminatory against men when it comes to don't
Speaker 1: assault people. Then there's also her claim about the protesters today. Really,
Speaker 1: I don't think that the civil rights heroes of the
Speaker 1: past thought that tearing down statues of abolitionists even was
Speaker 1: a good idea. Thanks for listening to the Busson shows.
Speaker 1: Remember just subscribe on Apple podcast, the iHeart Radio app,
Speaker 1: or wherever you get your podcasts. Oh, they've already come
Speaker 1: for Washington. The woke left has come for Mount Rushmore.
Speaker 1: They are finding so many of the heroes of America's past,
Speaker 1: Teddy Roosevelt unacceptable, not woke enough. But it was really
Speaker 1: only a matter of time, given the way that this
Speaker 1: was also affecting the culture, that they would come for
Speaker 1: even fictional characters, or they'd come for entertainment that was
Speaker 1: not woke enough. You've had this series of people in
Speaker 1: the last couple of weeks who work in the on
Speaker 1: the entertainment side, who voice cartoon characters of the other gender,
Speaker 1: which I would think that wouldn't that be I mean,
Speaker 1: can't the character identify whatever? Who knows? But that's not okay.
Speaker 1: Cat can't voice a cartoon character of another race, that's
Speaker 1: not okay. No more Cops the show on TV. No
Speaker 1: more Live PD on TV. That's also unacceptable. So where
Speaker 1: else where else is the woke mob going to turn
Speaker 1: its attention and its urge for cancelation? Well guess what,
Speaker 1: now they're coming after your beloved superheroes. Time Magazine has
Speaker 1: a piece how and how we need to here we go.
Speaker 1: We're re examining how we portray cops on screen. Now
Speaker 1: it's time to talk about superheroes. That's right, fictional characters
Speaker 1: with powers that no human being actually possesses in it,
Speaker 1: operating an entirely fictionalized universe. Those characters now have to
Speaker 1: be seen through the lens of current wokeness. And we
Speaker 1: need to have a rethink about all of this now,
Speaker 1: largely because cops that there, they call it cops with capes,
Speaker 1: the cops with capes phenomenon that superheroes are people who
Speaker 1: step in as super coops when the police themselves fail. Now,
Speaker 1: for anybody who is not deeply psychologically damaged by the
Speaker 1: left propaganda, this would be a pretty easy thing to understand. Yeah,
Speaker 1: In in Gotham, for example, with Batman, the reason you
Speaker 1: need Batman is because the cops aren't able to deal
Speaker 1: with the overwhelming number of bad guys all throughout the city,
Speaker 1: remember the fictional city, And so Batman comes along and
Speaker 1: then people are inspired and the cops do better. And
Speaker 1: then but why is that a good story or why
Speaker 1: is that a good guys story? Well, if you remember
Speaker 1: your Batman lore, you know that he lost his mother
Speaker 1: and father to a what is essentially a robbery, and
Speaker 1: they a robbery. I'm trying to think armed robbery, thank you,
Speaker 1: that's a term. I'm trying to think of an armed
Speaker 1: robbery and shoots his mom and dad in front of
Speaker 1: him because someone's trying to take their take their money,
Speaker 1: and take their jewelry. And what is the point of
Speaker 1: Batman being successful in Gotham so that that doesn't happen
Speaker 1: to other people? Because that's a really terrible thing. You know,
Speaker 1: people getting you know, stopped and frisked. You can say
Speaker 1: that this is a bad thing. People being murdered outside
Speaker 1: their own home. That's a terrible thing. So if we're
Speaker 1: going to look at police actions and going to look
Speaker 1: at what creates a better, safer society, let's at least
Speaker 1: understand that not all, not all of these different components
Speaker 1: should be weighed equally. Right, someone's right to not be
Speaker 1: offended by police presence in their neighborhood is less important
Speaker 1: than the rights of everyone else around them not to
Speaker 1: be raped, murdered, bludgeoned, etc. And so the the cops,
Speaker 1: with CAP's phenomenon of superheroes, appeals to people because we
Speaker 1: all want justice and we want safety, and we want
Speaker 1: the good guys to win. But here Time Magazine is
Speaker 1: saying that they think we should rethink this. They obviously
Speaker 1: go after the Punisher, who, you know, I thought it
Speaker 1: was a pretty good Netflix series. I actually think the
Speaker 1: Daredevil series where the Punisher makes an appearance is a
Speaker 1: bit better. You know, I like superhero stories. And they
Speaker 1: do point out in this analysis that there are some
Speaker 1: very prominent, successful as a franchise, black superheroes that have
Speaker 1: been celebrated in comic books for a very long time.
Speaker 1: That that movie A Black Panther was a huge global hit.
Speaker 1: I'm somebody who's been a long time a fan of
Speaker 1: the Blade series, the Blade franchise which Wesley Snipe starting back,
Speaker 1: and I think it was nineteen ninety eight or so,
Speaker 1: and that was a big hit. That was really the
Speaker 1: first excellent new era superhero movie when people often forget
Speaker 1: about this, that was a Marvel comic book hero. You know,
Speaker 1: you had these old Look, I'm just gonna say it,
Speaker 1: the old Superman movies are kind of nice. But there,
Speaker 1: you know, he's wearing like blue pajamas and it's a
Speaker 1: little dated. Now you know that the effects aren't very good.
Speaker 1: I oh yeah, yell at me, because you love that.
Speaker 1: You got a nostalgia for the old superhero movies with Superman,
Speaker 1: they're not that good. Go back and watch the old
Speaker 1: Batman movies and that guy's basically dancing around in like
Speaker 1: a wetsuit. You know, it didn't spend a lot of
Speaker 1: time in the gym. Whatever his name is, I'm just
Speaker 1: gonna say it. And he's like the superhero with the
Speaker 1: play pow bam wow. You know, all that stuff going
Speaker 1: on the screen. But it's fun in its day. I
Speaker 1: used to watch it too, But superhero stuff has gotten
Speaker 1: a lot better in recent recent years. Although I do
Speaker 1: think the X Men franchise kind of spun off the
Speaker 1: planet and stopped making sense. But that's a whole other thing.
Speaker 1: So now even superheroes, though, are a problem. And it's
Speaker 1: not that I don't think we can have this kind
Speaker 1: of cultural debate and discussion. It's the why they're problematic.
Speaker 1: It's the connection between superhero as super cops in the
Speaker 1: public mind that has bothersome to the woke left now
Speaker 1: and then. And then they obviously also get into the
Speaker 1: who you know, who are the bad guys? But I'm
Speaker 1: gonna just say this, in superhero movies, the bad guys
Speaker 1: are overwhelmingly uh you know, like white corporatist guys with
Speaker 1: weird European accents. I mean, it's really not you know,
Speaker 1: the bad guys. And I'm just gonna say, you know,
Speaker 1: you watch these movies that they're not singling out any
Speaker 1: any ethnicity to be the bad guys in superhero movies.
Speaker 1: If they are, they're singling out like West Germans or something.
Speaker 1: I mean, this is who the bad guys are. Superhero
Speaker 1: Alex Luthor and uh, you know, think think of um
Speaker 1: in all the Batman's you know, the Joker, you know
Speaker 1: in all the Batman series. These are not people who
Speaker 1: are in any way and underrepresented minority that's being picked
Speaker 1: on or being singled out by superhero movies. But uh,
Speaker 1: everything she everything has to go through the woke scanner.
Speaker 1: And that's really what this is about. Everything has to
Speaker 1: be viewed through this prism. Now no one is allowed
Speaker 1: to escape it. People will be excused, right if you're
Speaker 1: on team left wing, if you're on team Democrat and
Speaker 1: you're important, you just need to you need to bend
Speaker 1: the knee and you'll be forgiven. But if you're a conservative,
Speaker 1: you're finished. I mean, I do find it fascinating now
Speaker 1: that we're seeing beyond any doubt that Howard Stern, Jimmy Kimmel,
Speaker 1: you know, their black face incidents in the nineties will
Speaker 1: result in zero repercussions and nothing. And just remember Megan
Speaker 1: Kelly was fired from NBC for saying that when she
Speaker 1: was younger, people dressed up in black face, darkened their faces,
Speaker 1: is what she said, if they were doing a like
Speaker 1: fictional character as a Halloween costume, and that wasn't considered
Speaker 1: a big deal. Whereas I mean the the things that
Speaker 1: Howard Stern and Jimmy Kimmel did. Look, I'm not I'm
Speaker 1: not somebody that advocates for going back in time and
Speaker 1: finding things out of context and looking at things through
Speaker 1: our current view of society in the country and ruining
Speaker 1: people based on that. I think that's a very dangerous
Speaker 1: approach to society in general. But I also think that, okay,
Speaker 1: then then no one should be put through that. It
Speaker 1: can't be Sometimes that's true, sometimes it's not, but that's
Speaker 1: you know, as the saying goes, if Democrats didn't have
Speaker 1: double standards, they wouldn't have any standards, which I think
Speaker 1: is more true now than it has ever been. Speaking
Speaker 1: of those of those double standards, Devin Newness, and I
Speaker 1: am one of the few people that says his name properly.
Speaker 1: Devin Newness is out there and he's making a point
Speaker 1: about the Democrats that I think we should all remember,
Speaker 1: and that is, if we're going to look at institutions
Speaker 1: that have a history a legacy of racism, how is
Speaker 1: it the Democrat Party is gapes this play clip whatever
Speaker 1: the newde and nine. I find it rather ironic that
Speaker 1: the Democrats are now destroying their own history. If you
Speaker 1: look at just just yesterday, Woodrow Wilson, the father of
Speaker 1: the progressive movement and the father of the really kind
Speaker 1: of the modern day Democratic Party in this socialist movement,
Speaker 1: you know, his name is now being a race from history.
Speaker 1: Why because he was a racist. You have the trying
Speaker 1: to tear down and take out portraits in the US capital.
Speaker 1: The Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi, took out the portraits.
Speaker 1: What she's not saying is I think three of those
Speaker 1: portraits were actually Democratic speakers. So I understand why the
Speaker 1: Democrats want to a race history, because they have a
Speaker 1: very racist history. They were the ones who opposed getting
Speaker 1: rid of slavery, They opposed the civil rights movement, so
Speaker 1: they want to label the Republicans saying they're racist, because
Speaker 1: in fact they're relying on these these identity politics to
Speaker 1: win election. Everything in Devin Nuna said there is true.
Speaker 1: The Democrat Party was the pro slavery party. The Democrat
Speaker 1: Party was the party of Jim Crowe. The Democrat Party
Speaker 1: was the segregationist party in this country. So all the
Speaker 1: worst periods of actual true systemic racism, and that whether
Speaker 1: you're talking about slavery all the way up to Jim
Speaker 1: Crow and then the segregation, all of the true racism
Speaker 1: in this country, systemic racism in this country is directly
Speaker 1: tied to the Democratic Party in its history. And yet
Speaker 1: it is the Republican Party that is now cast by
Speaker 1: the Democrats as constantly being racist. And there's there's no
Speaker 1: accounting of this in the history that is told. Kids
Speaker 1: go to school and somehow it escapes them. This is
Speaker 1: why I insist on saying that these protesters, these lunatics
Speaker 1: running understroying things, we don't just call them protesters or
Speaker 1: the left. They're Democrats. These are people that are going
Speaker 1: to go out and vote for Joe Biden and they
Speaker 1: they're on board for that platform. They're on board for
Speaker 1: what the Democratic Party believes in. I assure you if
Speaker 1: there were mobs of Republicans walking around with maga hats
Speaker 1: destroying things, first of all, Democrats would be calling for
Speaker 1: dropping napalm on them from you know, f sixteens. They
Speaker 1: would not They would all this stuff but oh, police
Speaker 1: violence and I would all be no problem at all
Speaker 1: for them. But they would also be very clear to
Speaker 1: make sure that anybody paying attention would know that this
Speaker 1: was part of the Republican Party. But of course it's not.
Speaker 1: It's all part of the Democrat Party. And just another
Speaker 1: note on the cancelation stuff we have seen now in
Speaker 1: a way that is, you cannot avoid coming to conclusion
Speaker 1: that the standards, even as they evolve on who's acceptable
Speaker 1: in history, the standards will be constantly changing. And where
Speaker 1: whereas right now it is about who has a past,
Speaker 1: whether it's about the founding fathers and connections to slavery
Speaker 1: all the way up to in the twentieth century, you know,
Speaker 1: presidents who said things or did things that are considered
Speaker 1: racially insensitive or racially or racist or racially wrong. In
Speaker 1: our current era, does anyone really think that they're not
Speaker 1: going to apply the full spectrum of wokeness to our history.
Speaker 1: Just give it time. They will decide that anyone who
Speaker 1: was for the traditional family marriage between a man and
Speaker 1: a woman, anyone who was insufficiently favorable to trans rights,
Speaker 1: they will They will also be a subject of racing.
Speaker 1: They will also be removed from the historical record and denounced.
Speaker 1: So we know right now that sounds like a joke.
Speaker 1: But remember they just threw red paint on George Washington
Speaker 1: and Washington Square Park, and years ago we're saying, yeah,
Speaker 1: they're gonna come up for the founding fathers. Oh no,
Speaker 1: we won't. Yeah, they did. Give it time. Once they've
Speaker 1: torn down enough statues of former presidents or people from
Speaker 1: America's past that they find to be colonialists or oppressors
Speaker 1: or whatever, then they'll come after people who are not
Speaker 1: woken up on gender issues. And then they'll come after
Speaker 1: people who are not enough on trans rights. Guaranteed, it's
Speaker 1: just a question of when. And all this really does
Speaker 1: for them is give them one a sense of self
Speaker 1: righteousness that is of course priceless to lives, but also
Speaker 1: a sense of constant control. They can change the rules
Speaker 1: and attack anyone they want. And what is your defense
Speaker 1: against this in a society that constantly caves to it.
Speaker 1: You're in the freedom Hunt. This is the Buck Sexton
Speaker 1: Show podcast, and this isn't getting nearly enough attention. I
Speaker 1: think as we're talking about what the country should do,
Speaker 1: people with coronavirus are crossing the US Mexico border for
Speaker 1: medical care. This is This is from CNN. Chris Van
Speaker 1: Gorder says he's seeing a telling trend in the hospitals
Speaker 1: he runs. Coronavirus patients are showing up in emergency rooms
Speaker 1: after calling nine one one from the US Mexico border.
Speaker 1: They'll literally come to the border and call an ambulance.
Speaker 1: This is the President's CEO of Script's Health in southern California.
Speaker 1: The rise and ambulance traffic from the border, which several
Speaker 1: officials describe the CNN, is a symptom of the pandemic
Speaker 1: spread in the region. There's just not a wall for
Speaker 1: viruses at the border. According to someone at the what
Speaker 1: is the center firm? Yeah, whatever, The wall is an
Speaker 1: illusion because the two sides are really woming together. No, actually,
Speaker 1: what this Isn't it so funny? Son immediately says, look,
Speaker 1: we have coronavirus cases coming over our border. This tells
Speaker 1: us that we shouldn't have a border. That's the exact
Speaker 1: wrong thing that this tells our CNN. But that's'll notice
Speaker 1: the trick they report on this and very quickly turn
Speaker 1: it into a narrative that's more to their liking. The
Speaker 1: real narrative should be, we're not taking COVID cases into
Speaker 1: this country from outside of this country. That's been true
Speaker 1: of cruise ships, that's been true of airlines. It should
Speaker 1: also be true of our southern border. You know, we're
Speaker 1: always being told about the possibility of hospitals being overwhelmed
Speaker 1: hospital capacity. This has got to be a we take
Speaker 1: care of the people in this country first situation. All right,
Speaker 1: We're always hearing about what a great healthcare system they
Speaker 1: have in other countries, and oh, you know, socialism is
Speaker 1: fantastic in these countries. Yet somehow everone kind of knows
Speaker 1: if your life is really on the line, you want
Speaker 1: to be in America. You want to be in America.
Speaker 1: Not not a surprise to any of us who try
Speaker 1: to live in in the real world. But yeah, you
Speaker 1: have people coming across the border who have COVID and
Speaker 1: are calling for ambulances. Remember, no socomial transmission of this.
Speaker 1: No socomial transmission is when people in the hospital give
Speaker 1: this to other people. That's still one of the main
Speaker 1: ways that this is passed among people. Intra familial and
Speaker 1: no socomial are very much at the front, at the
Speaker 1: front end of how people get infected with COVID nineteen.
Speaker 1: So putting more and more people in the hospitals, particularly
Speaker 1: if they have really bad cases, which I'm assuming they
Speaker 1: do if they come to the border, this is now
Speaker 1: straining the public health system that we're already told is
Speaker 1: strained that it is supposed to be for Americans. It's
Speaker 1: not supposed to be foreign or show up here because
Speaker 1: they want American healthcare treatment. Now a lot of people say, oh,
Speaker 1: that's nuts, not nice. Really, we're being told that we're
Speaker 1: going to have hospitals overwhelmed any second. Do any of
Speaker 1: the libs that would say, oh, we should just take
Speaker 1: anyone who shows up here from outside of America and
Speaker 1: take them in and give them give them treatment. Will
Speaker 1: they feel that way if it was their mom or
Speaker 1: dad who was waiting in the er to see if
Speaker 1: there's a hospital and I see, you bet for them
Speaker 1: while they have COVID nineteen. Very easy to virtue signal
Speaker 1: on this one, isn't it. But here you have a
Speaker 1: lot of people that are showing up. Now some of
Speaker 1: them are US citizens who are coming across the border,
Speaker 1: but it also goes to show that border controls and
Speaker 1: so other US citizens who are across the border in
Speaker 1: Mexico are coming back and saying they have COVID. But
Speaker 1: it also goes to show you why border controls are
Speaker 1: so very, very important. So we'll have to see as
Speaker 1: these numbers continue to play out. So that's where that's
Speaker 1: where the situation is right now. My friends, I've some
Speaker 1: of you been pointing this out and saying this, I'm
Speaker 1: very curious to see what the number of illegal crossings are.
Speaker 1: I have not seen that quite yet. So we'll see
Speaker 1: what ends up happening here. We'll see what ends up happening.
Speaker 1: But for now, having a secure border is clearly important,
Speaker 1: especially given that there are cases that are now coming
Speaker 1: across the border into the United States and people are
Speaker 1: bringing in the virus. So, you know, I don't know
Speaker 1: if we're supposed to believe that all illegal immigration has
Speaker 1: stopped in the country now, but I'll tell you this,
Speaker 1: if I were living in northern Mexico and I had
Speaker 1: COVID nineteen and I thought I could get across the
Speaker 1: US border and remember ers half to treat people they
Speaker 1: cannot be turned away. I might make a run for
Speaker 1: it too. I might decide that I was gonna try
Speaker 1: to get into a US hospital as well. Is there
Speaker 1: any data on this? Do we have any numbers? Nope?
Speaker 1: But I will continue to follow this. Thanks for listening
Speaker 1: to the bus swast. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcast,
Speaker 1: the iHeart Radio app, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Speaker 1: Roll call time everyone, don't forget to check in on
Speaker 1: buck sexton dot com and also our YouTube channel. We
Speaker 1: got a new video up there that does not exist elsewhere,
Speaker 1: the Buckbrief YouTube dot com slash buck Sexton. Please watch it,
Speaker 1: share it. Let's get that thing going all right, Thomas
Speaker 1: First up here, Thomas writes, Oh wait, before you get
Speaker 1: to this, producer, Mark, do you have a favorite superhero? Oh?
Speaker 1: That is tough, but I think I'll say Captain America.
Speaker 1: Very solid, very safe choice. I can't can't hate on
Speaker 1: that one. I do love Thorals, but Captain has to
Speaker 1: be my number one. I do think that I used
Speaker 1: to be more of a Marvel guy. But I've become
Speaker 1: more of a DC comics guys. I've got a little
Speaker 1: bit older. See, the movies are just so other than
Speaker 1: like The Dark Knight, the Batman movies. Those are amazing
Speaker 1: and probably the best superhero movies ever. But just the
Speaker 1: Superman movie, the other than wonder Woman. In the last
Speaker 1: five years, there has not been a good DC movie.
Speaker 1: I can't disagree with you. This sup the Superwoman a
Speaker 1: wonder Woman rather wonder Woman movie, right, isn't that the
Speaker 1: Wonder Woman hits the Israeli actress? Yeah? Yeah, Gal Dad
Speaker 1: was a good movie. I enjoyed that. That was very good.
Speaker 1: I tried to watch the Batman Superman thing. I actually
Speaker 1: kept getting drawn in because I was like, this is
Speaker 1: so weird and so boring. I don't understand how this
Speaker 1: is a movie that got made. I almost walked out
Speaker 1: of the theater. It was so bad. It's so bad
Speaker 1: that you sit there. Was it a Zack Snyder one?
Speaker 1: I think so, And there was a whole controversy that
Speaker 1: they wouldn't let him release his cut. And now I
Speaker 1: think it's out on HBO Max. So people are excited
Speaker 1: about but I'm not watching it. It was so bad
Speaker 1: the first time. Yeah, it was. It was so bad
Speaker 1: that it was a curiosity to see how much to
Speaker 1: watch it, to see how much worse it could actually get.
Speaker 1: That was kind of that was kind of how I
Speaker 1: felt about it. So well, the best superhero movie of
Speaker 1: all time? Oh, the Dark Knight, The Dark Knight, Yeah, easily. Um,
Speaker 1: all right, all right, I actually am a Batman Begins guy. Really,
Speaker 1: I actually like bat I mean that's part of the trilogy.
Speaker 1: I guess you'd call the trilogy. Yeah, well, that's the
Speaker 1: best superhero trilogy of all time. I think the Batman
Speaker 1: Agains is really good. I do. I always thought Wolverine
Speaker 1: was probably my favorite superhero character. The Wolverine movies have
Speaker 1: been a little hit and miss for me. I really
Speaker 1: from that. Like X Men World, Deadpool is fantastic. Oh
Speaker 1: for the children, but it's fantastic. I would agree. The
Speaker 1: first Deadpool movie was excellent. I really like that one
Speaker 1: a lot too. See. I like superhero movies, but I
Speaker 1: don't like all of them. I don't like all of them.
Speaker 1: All right, Um, now that we've heard from producing on
Speaker 1: that one. Oh, also, do you think that the NHL
Speaker 1: is gonna get pulled into wokeness at all, because it
Speaker 1: seems like the NHL not so woke. See, that's actually
Speaker 1: been a criticism of a lot of people on the
Speaker 1: NHL and the players is the players have no personality
Speaker 1: and won't speak out on anything, which actually changed a
Speaker 1: little bit with the George Floyd thing. A lot of
Speaker 1: the players did come out and put out a statement.
Speaker 1: You know how terrible the George Floyd thing was. But
Speaker 1: that was like the first time maybe ever that hockey
Speaker 1: players has stood out. So you're not gonna be seeing
Speaker 1: stuff like the NBA is doing. In hockey. Hockey, it's
Speaker 1: just play the game. You played for your team, you
Speaker 1: play to win. That's it. That's hockey. Players are very
Speaker 1: simple creatures. I might have to start watching hockey. And
Speaker 1: I'm serious. You know I've been telling you to do
Speaker 1: it for a long time now. Well it's hasn't. In fairness,
Speaker 1: the last six months has not been my fault. That's
Speaker 1: a good point. Yeah, But but I will. And I said,
Speaker 1: I'll take you to a game because games are allowed.
Speaker 1: I didn't think. I didn't realize we were working against
Speaker 1: the clock, producer Mark. I thought i'd have some time
Speaker 1: to get you to this hockey game. But turns out,
Speaker 1: you know, as soon as I, as soon as I
Speaker 1: make the offer to take you and end producer brand
Speaker 1: into a hockey game, they shut down all gatherings of
Speaker 1: like over ten people in the world. Well, the good
Speaker 1: thing is we could probably get season tickets to the
Speaker 1: Florida Panthers for less than one game at the garden.
Speaker 1: H Well, there's that too, all right, Facebook dot com,
Speaker 1: slash buck sexon if you want to get in on
Speaker 1: this action or teambucket. iHeartMedia dot com and don't forget.
Speaker 1: Producer Mark's favorite late night activity is to go through
Speaker 1: your voicemails eight four four nine hundred two eight two
Speaker 1: five eight four four nine hundred buck. Please do right in.
Speaker 1: Let us know what you're thinking, Thomas. I'm sorry, I
Speaker 1: say right in. Call in, callin. Leave us a voicemail
Speaker 1: under sixty seconds, please under thirty even better, but please
Speaker 1: do call in eight four four nine hundred buck. That
Speaker 1: is our voicemail. We will play more on Thursday because
Speaker 1: we will be off Friday for the holiday, so Thursday
Speaker 1: will be voicemail day. Producer Mark. I was hoping you
Speaker 1: were going to forget. Yeah, I know you were, but
Speaker 1: You've got homework, now get excited about it, all right, Thomas,
Speaker 1: Your segment today about the chant black lives matter is
Speaker 1: an affirmation of the view held by those who chanted
Speaker 1: buck huh. It may have been originally said by a
Speaker 1: relative of a black citizen who died during an altercation
Speaker 1: with a policeman, and then became a social justice theme
Speaker 1: in current use during these protests, it has become a
Speaker 1: rallying cry for racists and has been adopted by many
Speaker 1: activist groups because it instantly gets media attention. The intimidation
Speaker 1: factor is openly used out of force silence by those
Speaker 1: of us who believe all lives matter. This tactic should
Speaker 1: be used by the pro choice activists chanting newborn babies matter.
Speaker 1: Then they can confront the planned parenthood crusaders the same way.
Speaker 1: When questioning a member of the abortion crowd, asked them
Speaker 1: if newborn babies matter, well, no, they would say they
Speaker 1: would say no. Or unborn babies they would say no.
Speaker 1: When they feel the respond they can be accused of
Speaker 1: being part of Planned parenthood who slaughters babies. The social
Speaker 1: justice snowflakes will freak out shieldside, okay, Thomas, Covering a
Speaker 1: lot of ground there. Thank you for writing in Tommy book.
Speaker 1: Do you think Biden will debate Trump? My money says
Speaker 1: Biden's handlers will find a way to get him out
Speaker 1: of it. Tommy, I think that they're going to try.
Speaker 1: I think that they're going to try to get out
Speaker 1: of it. I do not think that they want Biden
Speaker 1: to debate Trump. They want this to be the machine,
Speaker 1: the DNC apparatus, the Democrat left. You know, all the
Speaker 1: Marxist loons and all the overpaid idiotic TV anchors who
Speaker 1: are you know doing the Democrats bidding against Trump? And
Speaker 1: Biden is just the vessel for that effort. Biden is
Speaker 1: not in any way the leader of it, and he's
Speaker 1: not supposed to be anything other than what he is,
Speaker 1: which is a placeholder. So I think that they will
Speaker 1: try to not have Biden. I think they will try
Speaker 1: to not have Biden as a debater against Trump, but
Speaker 1: if there's too much of an outcry about it, they
Speaker 1: might have Biden as a debater against Trump. So we'll see.
Speaker 1: Paul rights, Hey Buck, Paul from Canada, fairly new listener
Speaker 1: since COVID started Love Your Show. My daughter was looking
Speaker 1: over my shoulder at a video of protest from La,
Speaker 1: and she asked why they were outside and not social distancing,
Speaker 1: but she isn't allowed to see your friends. I tried
Speaker 1: to explain what they were protesting, and her only response was,
Speaker 1: but they won't still get sick. Apparently my nine year
Speaker 1: old daughter understands the double standard, but many adults can't
Speaker 1: see it. Oh, Paul, and yeah, your daughter is certainly
Speaker 1: astute to pick up on this, But I would say
Speaker 1: that adults can see it, they just don't care. They
Speaker 1: view this as you know that the standard that they
Speaker 1: have set was always subject to the whims of the
Speaker 1: Democrat Party and the whims of the mob. So it's
Speaker 1: not that they're unaware of the fact that they're being
Speaker 1: frauds and hypocrites on this. It's that they don't care.
Speaker 1: And that's where the gas lighting comes in. Yeah, it's
Speaker 1: all right, well, I guess you know, no big deal whatever.
Speaker 1: That's the way that and they enjoy it too. I
Speaker 1: think they like to rub your face in it. Yeah,
Speaker 1: you've been stuck at home. You can't see family, you
Speaker 1: can't see friends, you can't go to your job. But
Speaker 1: we're gonna make allowances for the people that want to
Speaker 1: get out there and scream about how racist and evil
Speaker 1: America is. Isn't it interesting? And there's so little time
Speaker 1: spent on this that America. Hatred from Americans effectively entirely
Speaker 1: resides within the Democrat Party. If you hate America and
Speaker 1: you're an American, you're a Democrat. Because if you're a
Speaker 1: Republican and you hate America, all your Republican friends are like,
Speaker 1: what's wrong with you? This place is great. So if
Speaker 1: you're gonna hate this country, you better do it, or
Speaker 1: you're gonna do it in the Democrat Party because that's
Speaker 1: where you have a home, and that's where you have
Speaker 1: a lot of support for that unhinged disdain for the
Speaker 1: greatest country and the freest country in the history of
Speaker 1: the world. Also the most powerful and the wealthiest. But
Speaker 1: you know, Democrats don't care about that. I mean they do.
Speaker 1: They like to be rich, they like their friends to
Speaker 1: be rich. But then they get to tell all the
Speaker 1: rest of us, no, we have not done enough to
Speaker 1: fight against oppression. And Paul from Canada man a great
Speaker 1: to have some listeners up up north. It's exciting. Team
Speaker 1: Buck International. Cynthia I reactivated reluctantly in my Facebook to
Speaker 1: follow your show, your podcast keeps me thinking and laughing
Speaker 1: as I row and work out in the morning. You
Speaker 1: do the best Fauci imitation ever, keeping the youthful saying
Speaker 1: voice for conservatives. Cynthia, thank you. I appreciate it. I
Speaker 1: just want to say, if you're going to be on
Speaker 1: the rowing machine, also for the experts out there, known
Speaker 1: as the ERG machine, make sure that you engage your
Speaker 1: latissimus dorsey. See I'm a medical guy, so I'm an expert.
Speaker 1: Make sure you have the latissimus dorcy muscles and you
Speaker 1: feel a pull a pinch between your scapula muscles of
Speaker 1: the back area when you're pulling, and you don't do
Speaker 1: what people do in a bozos on the ERG machine
Speaker 1: when they pull with their arms, not with the back.
Speaker 1: And first thing is you got to file those quads. Also,
Speaker 1: for the experts out data, quad recet muscles, which to
Speaker 1: data will tell you a very large group of leg muscles. Now,
Speaker 1: I just gave you Fauci explaining how to rgs. Quads
Speaker 1: back lasting to fire are the arms, and the arms
Speaker 1: are a minor muscle in the process. It's really all
Speaker 1: quads and lats. That's that's how you do the rowing machine.
Speaker 1: Make sure you know I has somebody who is, by
Speaker 1: no means a workout expert in these days, is really
Speaker 1: just like a stay Puff marshmallow man, but does know
Speaker 1: a fair bit about rowing from doing it in college.
Speaker 1: I've never seen so many people use a piece of
Speaker 1: exercise equipment wrongly as the rowing machine. And I mean
Speaker 1: people who are in really good shape too. They they
Speaker 1: I mean, they look like they're having a back spasm
Speaker 1: when they're doing it. They have no idea what they're doing.
Speaker 1: Watch a video of it, have someone watch you as
Speaker 1: you do it, because once you learn, then it's a
Speaker 1: great exercise. But it's actually pretty easy to hurt yourself
Speaker 1: on that machine if you don't know what you're doing,
Speaker 1: because you're pulling your body at weird angles. So I'm
Speaker 1: just saying you're saying, but Cynthy, I'm sure you know
Speaker 1: it very well. So thank you for writing in, and
Speaker 1: I hope doctor Fauci was able to explain the mitigation
Speaker 1: to you. You're in the Freedom Hunt. This is the
Speaker 1: Buck Sexton Show podcast. All right. Next up here in
Speaker 1: roll call John Here Rights. I live in College Station, Texas,
Speaker 1: twenty three years old and tested positive for COVID nineteen
Speaker 1: on Monday. I have mild symptoms. The most annoying of
Speaker 1: them is that I lost my sense of taste. I
Speaker 1: took a risk assessment for going out and about enjoying
Speaker 1: my life and doing what I can to be productive.
Speaker 1: Thanks for making a show full of content to keep
Speaker 1: me informed and occupied as I now have to go
Speaker 1: back into quarantine. Keep fighting the good fight. Well, John,
Speaker 1: I'm glad to hear you doing. O came in and
Speaker 1: you're doing the right thing. Stay stay home while you
Speaker 1: got this. The good news for you is it sounds
Speaker 1: like you're already You're immune system is doing really well
Speaker 1: against it. You're a young guy. You're at very very
Speaker 1: low risk for this disease in any and I just
Speaker 1: mean even for a serious symptoms. I've never mind for
Speaker 1: anything more than that, and you just want to make
Speaker 1: sure you don't spread it to anybody who's at high risk.
Speaker 1: But after this is done, you'll be immune at least
Speaker 1: for a period of time, and then you won't have
Speaker 1: to worry about it again. So that's nice, isn't it.
Speaker 1: That's a good thing. So yeah, man, but stay safe,
Speaker 1: be smart out there, take care of yourself. College Station
Speaker 1: I actually was just kind of curious. I looked at
Speaker 1: some real estate and college station because I was wondering
Speaker 1: because one of you told me to move down there
Speaker 1: with someone Team Buck, and it's a lovely place and
Speaker 1: you get a really nice house for not a whole
Speaker 1: lot of money, unlike in New York, where they constantly
Speaker 1: take all the money in your bank account to put
Speaker 1: you in like a kennel. Basically that's you know, here's
Speaker 1: your kennel. That'll be four thousand dollars a month. You go,
Speaker 1: ah stinks andrew a Buck. Ninety nine point nine percent
Speaker 1: of the country agrees that black lives matter. Only a
Speaker 1: truly horrible racists would believe otherwise. The fact that the NBA,
Speaker 1: English Premier League and everyone else is shoving us down
Speaker 1: our throats is only going to lead to more division.
Speaker 1: On top of all that, if all cable news took
Speaker 1: a one year hiatus, I can almost guarantee you that
Speaker 1: race relations in this country would heal very quickly. The
Speaker 1: media makes money and ratings on us hating each other racist.
Speaker 1: Don't hate each other. But when CNN is constantly calling
Speaker 1: white people racist and how we are oppressing people, of course,
Speaker 1: minority groups are going to get angry. Just my two cents,
Speaker 1: Andrew Yam and cable news is a source of division
Speaker 1: and often brainwashing in this country, and I think that.
Speaker 1: You know, look, I obviously I admit this. I like Fox.
Speaker 1: I don't like all the shows on Fox. I don't
Speaker 1: like all the hosts on Fox. But I like Fox
Speaker 1: overall as a channel. I think it does a fair
Speaker 1: job of showing a center right point of view in
Speaker 1: the news that it chose. I don't pretend that it's
Speaker 1: all objective. I don't think that the opinion hosts aren't
Speaker 1: sharing opinions. CNN is delusional. They've got people that are
Speaker 1: everybody as opinionated as Fox in their primetime lineup, but
Speaker 1: they say they're journalists. This is a lie. This is
Speaker 1: my problem with it. This is not all equal, this
Speaker 1: is not all ah know, everyone's doing it now. There's
Speaker 1: a fundamental dishonesty that exists in CNN and ABC and
Speaker 1: New York Times, Washington Post, all these places that does
Speaker 1: not exist at Fox, where they say, yeah, we've got
Speaker 1: these opinion hosts and yeah, most of the news is
Speaker 1: coming from a center right perspective. But that's not the
Speaker 1: same thing as other places where there's only a left
Speaker 1: wing perspective, there is no other perspective. So then there's Brian. Right.
Speaker 1: I just want to send along my compliments on your
Speaker 1: very important and impactful radio show. You've stolen me away
Speaker 1: from a competing host that is not as talented as
Speaker 1: you are. Oh well, thank you, Brian. I appreciate that.
Speaker 1: Is he really mean and quite a bit older and
Speaker 1: has a very high nasally voice. I wonder, especially during
Speaker 1: this ridiculous and frustrating lockdown, I find you to be
Speaker 1: a fellow traveler on a journey we don't want to
Speaker 1: be on, but have no choice. Keep up the great work.
Speaker 1: I am really enjoying the show. You've a talent for
Speaker 1: articulating what many of us are thinking, but don't have
Speaker 1: the powerful medium you do. I'm sure it's an awesome responsibility,
Speaker 1: but you were certainly living up to it well, Brian.
Speaker 1: Thank you so much. And look, hey, I think that
Speaker 1: anybody on the time that I'm on, because when the
Speaker 1: podcast goes up, or when my radio show goes up,
Speaker 1: Russia Limball show is already done. So you already had
Speaker 1: your chain, You've already had rush time. Okay, I think
Speaker 1: you know other than once that's done. I think you
Speaker 1: should be listening to this show before any other show.
Speaker 1: I'm just gonna say it. I obviously believe that this
Speaker 1: show you can listen to Rush. That's fine, because our
Speaker 1: podcast goes up at three. Rush is the greatest of
Speaker 1: all time. Once Rush, Once Russia show is no longer
Speaker 1: on the ear though. I mean, I think you gotta
Speaker 1: listen to this show, folks. I'm just gonna say it.
Speaker 1: And I know I know the other folks out there.
Speaker 1: Some of them I like, some of them are horrible
Speaker 1: human beings. Depends, but yeah, I think you should be
Speaker 1: listening to this one. I'm not I'm not not shy
Speaker 1: about that either. Brian, Oh no, he already said nice things.
Speaker 1: Robert buck dear Buck. Oh well, thank you, Robert, not
Speaker 1: just a buck a dear buck. Appreciate that a few things.
Speaker 1: The WAPO fact check story reminds me of a few
Speaker 1: years ago when Trump was fact checked about a statement
Speaker 1: that something to effect of forty percent of female illegal
Speaker 1: immigrants were raped on the journey, the objection being the
Speaker 1: number was really forty five percent. I don't really recall
Speaker 1: that fact check, Robert, but I'll take your word for it.
Speaker 1: Number two, I think you should consider running for mayor
Speaker 1: of New York when de Blasio's term is up. It
Speaker 1: would be nice to have an articulate conservative get some
Speaker 1: airtime and expose the stupidity of leftist policies. You probably
Speaker 1: wouldn't win, but William F. Buckley did it. I think
Speaker 1: it'd be worth doing, and you'd get some more national exposure. Yeah, Robert,
Speaker 1: thank you for that. And then number three, Amherst is
Speaker 1: a very good school. I didn't even apply the applying
Speaker 1: because I knew I wouldn't get in. Don't disparage your education.
Speaker 1: Oh that's very nice, if you, Robert. That's a pretty
Speaker 1: good place. Enjoy your podcast. Keep up the good work, Robert.
Speaker 1: Of some excellent insights coming to us here from you,
Speaker 1: So thank you for that. No, look, there were some
Speaker 1: I I made some great friends at Amherst, and there
Speaker 1: were there were plenty of brilliant There were really some
Speaker 1: brilliant kids in my class, some very very senior people
Speaker 1: I know in the DJ now when the Trump administration
Speaker 1: went to Amherst in their top minds say there's there's
Speaker 1: a very few. But you know, we also had a
Speaker 1: fair amount of you know, Hey, I played football and
Speaker 1: I cracked things on my head and I was like,
Speaker 1: how did these guys get in but football, So we
Speaker 1: know how that goes. That's gonna be a today team.
Speaker 1: Thank you so much for being here. Appreciate it as always,
Speaker 1: Until next time, Shields High