WEBVTT - Trump Has Created An Environment That's Ripe For Political Violence

0:00:03.720 --> 0:00:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Well, good Monday morning, Welcome to another episode of the

0:00:06.920 --> 0:00:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Chuck Podcast. I really want to be uplifting. I'm not

0:00:10.440 --> 0:00:12.959
<v Speaker 1>gonna lie to you, but first of all, even in

0:00:13.000 --> 0:00:19.160
<v Speaker 1>my even in the world of lightness, meaning my sports fandom,

0:00:19.920 --> 0:00:22.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm feeling down in the dumps thanks to the Nats

0:00:22.720 --> 0:00:30.840
<v Speaker 1>getting swept by the Freakin' Marlins, the forkin' Marlins. I'm

0:00:30.880 --> 0:00:33.879
<v Speaker 1>going to get this rant out of the way really fast,

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:37.360
<v Speaker 1>but let me just say, as much as I love

0:00:37.440 --> 0:00:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Davey Martinez, it's time to go. It is time to go.

0:00:40.720 --> 0:00:43.520
<v Speaker 1>We need a house cleaning with the Gnats. It's pretty

0:00:43.520 --> 0:00:46.800
<v Speaker 1>clear this coaching staff and these players are not connecting,

0:00:47.200 --> 0:00:49.320
<v Speaker 1>and he threw the players under the bus over the weekend.

0:00:49.400 --> 0:00:51.559
<v Speaker 2>It's bad. So I say.

0:00:51.320 --> 0:00:56.440
<v Speaker 1>This, this is the lightest thing I'm going to talk about,

0:00:56.560 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 1>because we are obviously living into some a very very

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:02.280
<v Speaker 1>dark period. So if you are listening this on a

0:01:02.320 --> 0:01:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Monday morning, it is painfully obvious. But the world and

0:01:06.880 --> 0:01:10.160
<v Speaker 1>this country are in desperate need of presidential leadership, and

0:01:10.200 --> 0:01:12.320
<v Speaker 1>we're about to find out whether Donald Trump is up

0:01:12.319 --> 0:01:15.919
<v Speaker 1>to the moment. And I'm saying it that way because

0:01:16.920 --> 0:01:19.039
<v Speaker 1>we almost have no choice, because I know many of

0:01:19.040 --> 0:01:21.200
<v Speaker 1>you don't believe he's up to the moment. I know

0:01:21.240 --> 0:01:24.039
<v Speaker 1>many of you believe he's caused all these moments. I'm

0:01:24.080 --> 0:01:27.200
<v Speaker 1>a huge skeptic myself. But here's the reality. We don't

0:01:27.240 --> 0:01:29.520
<v Speaker 1>get to pick a different president just because the moment

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:32.080
<v Speaker 1>feels bigger than the man in office. At least, we

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:34.479
<v Speaker 1>don't get to pick one yet. You only get one

0:01:34.520 --> 0:01:36.399
<v Speaker 1>president at a time. And when you consider the two

0:01:36.440 --> 0:01:41.080
<v Speaker 1>biggest stories dominating the globe right now, growing unrest in

0:01:41.120 --> 0:01:43.960
<v Speaker 1>the United States and a spiraling hot war in the

0:01:44.000 --> 0:01:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Middle East, both require someone who can lower the temperature.

0:01:47.440 --> 0:01:52.120
<v Speaker 1>And right now there's only one person who who can

0:01:52.240 --> 0:01:55.800
<v Speaker 1>do this if he so chooses, and it is Donald

0:01:56.000 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 1>John Trump. Ironically, he may be more inclined to try

0:01:59.680 --> 0:02:04.000
<v Speaker 1>to turn the temperature down overseas before he ever considers

0:02:04.040 --> 0:02:05.720
<v Speaker 1>that doing it here at home. And I'll get to

0:02:05.760 --> 0:02:09.520
<v Speaker 1>that Sunday Night on my new program for Newsphere, the

0:02:09.560 --> 0:02:12.600
<v Speaker 1>app Sunday Nights with Chuck Todd. Please take a look

0:02:12.639 --> 0:02:14.960
<v Speaker 1>get the Free trial right now you can catch up

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:18.040
<v Speaker 1>with the ban and interview in this My latest interview

0:02:18.080 --> 0:02:20.680
<v Speaker 1>is with Treta Parsi. He's written three books on Israel

0:02:20.720 --> 0:02:23.680
<v Speaker 1>and Iran. He's easily one of the most sober clinically

0:02:23.760 --> 0:02:27.360
<v Speaker 1>minded journalists and observers of that region and conflict you

0:02:27.400 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Speaker 1>can find deeply sourced in Jerusalem and Tehran. And he

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:34.720
<v Speaker 1>made one thing clear in our conversation. There's only one

0:02:34.760 --> 0:02:36.800
<v Speaker 1>person who can bring this war to an end right now,

0:02:37.080 --> 0:02:40.640
<v Speaker 1>and it's Donald Trump. Because if the American President can't

0:02:40.680 --> 0:02:44.120
<v Speaker 1>pull the right levers, no one else can in that region.

0:02:44.520 --> 0:02:47.400
<v Speaker 1>No one else can get both either Iran or Israel

0:02:47.440 --> 0:02:50.920
<v Speaker 1>to pull back from the break here. And yet you

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:53.800
<v Speaker 1>do have a situation where Trump's political base is not

0:02:53.880 --> 0:02:58.960
<v Speaker 1>exactly looking for more political, more foreign entanglements. You could

0:02:59.040 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 1>argue that Trump rose to power taking over the Republican

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:04.959
<v Speaker 1>Party by attacking the neo conservative foreign policy of the

0:03:06.000 --> 0:03:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Bush Romney wing, or frankly, the Eisenhower Romney foreign policy

0:03:10.600 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 1>consensus that has dominated Republican politics for a couple of generations.

0:03:15.919 --> 0:03:18.600
<v Speaker 1>He branded Bush era interventionism as a failure, and he

0:03:18.720 --> 0:03:22.320
<v Speaker 1>turned much of the GOP against it. His America first

0:03:22.360 --> 0:03:25.440
<v Speaker 1>instincts are now baked into his coalition, particularly when it

0:03:25.480 --> 0:03:28.760
<v Speaker 1>comes to Ukraine, for instance. And we're going to find

0:03:28.800 --> 0:03:31.800
<v Speaker 1>out about Iran it is a different ballgame, but it

0:03:31.840 --> 0:03:35.720
<v Speaker 1>may be similar feelings about it. Some of Trump's biggest

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:37.960
<v Speaker 1>donors and even some of his business partners in the

0:03:38.000 --> 0:03:44.280
<v Speaker 1>region are actually strongly supportive of Israel's campaign to weaken Iran,

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:48.520
<v Speaker 1>but not the active rank and file base, the ones

0:03:48.560 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 1>that buy into America First and a bit of the isolationism.

0:03:53.040 --> 0:03:55.119
<v Speaker 1>And it's been interesting to watch Trump over the last

0:03:55.160 --> 0:03:57.200
<v Speaker 1>seventy two hours. He claimed that since he is the

0:03:57.200 --> 0:04:00.000
<v Speaker 1>only one, it's interesting here and this whole idea is

0:04:00.200 --> 0:04:02.680
<v Speaker 1>violating his America First policies. Well, he was asked this

0:04:02.960 --> 0:04:05.600
<v Speaker 1>earlier on Sunday and he said he was the only one.

0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:08.320
<v Speaker 1>He says, well, considering that I'm the one that developed

0:04:08.360 --> 0:04:11.040
<v Speaker 1>America First, and he put that in quotes, and considering

0:04:11.040 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 1>that the term wasn't used until I came along, I

0:04:13.240 --> 0:04:16.640
<v Speaker 1>think I'm the one that decides that, meaning what falls

0:04:16.720 --> 0:04:20.560
<v Speaker 1>under the American First umbrella. Now, Donald Trump, obviously no

0:04:20.640 --> 0:04:24.880
<v Speaker 1>student of history isn't fully either isn't aware or chooses

0:04:24.920 --> 0:04:27.080
<v Speaker 1>not to be aware that America First was a big

0:04:27.120 --> 0:04:29.400
<v Speaker 1>movement inside the Republican Party.

0:04:29.200 --> 0:04:30.719
<v Speaker 2>In the nineteen twenties and thirties.

0:04:31.320 --> 0:04:36.160
<v Speaker 1>So he is simply borrowing something that existed before rebranding

0:04:36.240 --> 0:04:39.080
<v Speaker 1>it as his and claiming no one's ever invented a

0:04:39.120 --> 0:04:41.680
<v Speaker 1>political movement like this. So the bottom line is, though,

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:45.120
<v Speaker 1>is that what it does tell you is that he's

0:04:45.160 --> 0:04:47.680
<v Speaker 1>going to try to whatever he ends up doing, he's

0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:50.400
<v Speaker 1>going to try to sell his base that this is

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:53.479
<v Speaker 1>a good thing and that this falls under America First.

0:04:53.960 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 1>So that may explain why you've seen a bit of

0:04:57.120 --> 0:05:01.600
<v Speaker 1>whiplash with Trump, while so him quickly praise what appeared

0:05:01.640 --> 0:05:06.360
<v Speaker 1>to be an early Israeli success. Right, the decapitation strike

0:05:06.400 --> 0:05:09.000
<v Speaker 1>on the military leadership of Iran felt like we were

0:05:09.000 --> 0:05:13.120
<v Speaker 1>seeing a rerun of what happened with Hesbola. But the strike,

0:05:13.200 --> 0:05:19.280
<v Speaker 1>while lethal, wasn't necessarily decapitating. Right, the nuclear program remains intact,

0:05:19.720 --> 0:05:22.520
<v Speaker 1>and now the war threatens to escalate, and there doesn't

0:05:22.520 --> 0:05:25.120
<v Speaker 1>appear to be a clear exit strategy because you now

0:05:25.120 --> 0:05:30.720
<v Speaker 1>have domestic you have domestic influences on both Iran and

0:05:30.800 --> 0:05:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Iran's leaders and Israel's leaders that are going to essentially,

0:05:35.600 --> 0:05:39.200
<v Speaker 1>I think, prevent a quick walk back, not without the

0:05:39.240 --> 0:05:44.240
<v Speaker 1>intervention of the United States. Now here's the hard truth.

0:05:44.320 --> 0:05:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Israel could cannot finish this mission by themselves. They lack

0:05:48.680 --> 0:05:51.560
<v Speaker 1>those bunk or busting capability bombs that are capable of

0:05:51.560 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 1>destroying Iran's underground nuclear sites. They have to get US

0:05:55.920 --> 0:05:59.560
<v Speaker 1>firepower to do that, and without it, this conflict I

0:05:59.640 --> 0:06:03.560
<v Speaker 1>don't know how it ends. And I'll tell you. If

0:06:03.560 --> 0:06:07.560
<v Speaker 1>the US gets in, how do they get out? How

0:06:07.560 --> 0:06:10.520
<v Speaker 1>do we get out? We've been down this road before.

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:13.719
<v Speaker 1>Now there's a growing sense and no one really knows

0:06:13.760 --> 0:06:15.960
<v Speaker 1>what's going on. Did the United States give Israel a

0:06:16.000 --> 0:06:18.080
<v Speaker 1>green light or not? Did we think the threat of

0:06:18.120 --> 0:06:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Israeli action would bring around to the negotiating table? Were

0:06:21.279 --> 0:06:24.480
<v Speaker 1>we leading around on while giving Israel space to strike?

0:06:24.960 --> 0:06:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Are we active players in this or were we passive bystanders.

0:06:29.040 --> 0:06:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Whatever we were may not matter. It's what is perceived

0:06:33.600 --> 0:06:37.520
<v Speaker 1>and believed in the region that may matter more. Here

0:06:38.040 --> 0:06:41.400
<v Speaker 1>there's no doubt that for now, this ambiguity is intentional

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:43.800
<v Speaker 1>by the United States. Our government is trying to have

0:06:43.880 --> 0:06:48.080
<v Speaker 1>it both ways, cheerleading success if Israel prevails, denying involvement

0:06:48.200 --> 0:06:50.840
<v Speaker 1>if things go sideways. In fact, that's sort of a

0:06:50.920 --> 0:06:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Trump staple on most things in life that he's tried

0:06:53.600 --> 0:06:56.320
<v Speaker 1>to deal with, and that's part of the trust deficit

0:06:56.360 --> 0:06:59.159
<v Speaker 1>though we're all experiencing. Middle East is long in a

0:06:59.160 --> 0:07:02.599
<v Speaker 1>place where truth is and perception is weaponized. But now

0:07:02.640 --> 0:07:05.880
<v Speaker 1>that sense of confusion is creeping into our domestic life,

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 1>and I want to get to that as well. And

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:09.479
<v Speaker 1>here's the thing. Donald Trump's at the center of both.

0:07:09.520 --> 0:07:10.960
<v Speaker 1>In the Middle East, he could very well be the

0:07:10.960 --> 0:07:13.400
<v Speaker 1>person to broker peace, strange as that may sound, but

0:07:13.440 --> 0:07:16.679
<v Speaker 1>here at home, it's increasingly clear he's been a driver

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:21.280
<v Speaker 1>of instability, not a buffer against it. Take immigration. His

0:07:21.360 --> 0:07:25.360
<v Speaker 1>latest round of aggressive deportation tactics sparked protests nationwide, particularly

0:07:25.440 --> 0:07:28.080
<v Speaker 1>though in Los Angeles. But behind the scenes now he's

0:07:28.120 --> 0:07:32.080
<v Speaker 1>pulling back, pressured by agricultural and hospitality interest warning of

0:07:32.520 --> 0:07:37.000
<v Speaker 1>dire economic consequences for their industries. Translations, we don't get

0:07:37.040 --> 0:07:40.720
<v Speaker 1>our food supply without migrants, and you don't get your

0:07:40.720 --> 0:07:45.040
<v Speaker 1>bed made at hotels without migrants. Apparently that includes some

0:07:45.080 --> 0:07:48.880
<v Speaker 1>of his own backers, hotel owners, something he's familiar with,

0:07:49.440 --> 0:07:53.720
<v Speaker 1>and farm and the farm corporations, people who rely on

0:07:53.840 --> 0:07:57.800
<v Speaker 1>that undocumented labor to keep their businesses afloat. Here's the

0:07:57.840 --> 0:08:01.160
<v Speaker 1>economic reality. Farmers are reporting shortages and harvest cruz crops

0:08:01.200 --> 0:08:04.080
<v Speaker 1>are at risk of rotting and fields. Meat processors are

0:08:04.080 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 1>already warning of bottlenecks, and as we head into the

0:08:06.320 --> 0:08:10.320
<v Speaker 1>summer travel season, resorts in hotels and tourist towns are

0:08:10.360 --> 0:08:13.560
<v Speaker 1>facing major staffing shortfalls. Guests are already noticing longer waits,

0:08:13.600 --> 0:08:19.480
<v Speaker 1>fewer amenities, and rising costs, all due to essentially a

0:08:19.880 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 1>choice in how Donald Trump's gone about deportation. And that's

0:08:25.440 --> 0:08:28.440
<v Speaker 1>just the political fight. It's also a supply chain crisis

0:08:28.440 --> 0:08:30.440
<v Speaker 1>in the making, and the president knows it. So it's

0:08:30.480 --> 0:08:34.240
<v Speaker 1>quiet backpedaling while avoiding public acknowledgment. Sort of is a

0:08:34.240 --> 0:08:37.400
<v Speaker 1>contradiction between his populis rhetoric and his business first impulses.

0:08:37.880 --> 0:08:40.000
<v Speaker 1>He needs the tough talk to energize his base, but

0:08:40.040 --> 0:08:42.680
<v Speaker 1>he can't afford the economic fallout that comes with actually

0:08:42.880 --> 0:08:47.280
<v Speaker 1>falling through. In this case, the business world is cheering

0:08:47.280 --> 0:08:50.920
<v Speaker 1>for Taco Trump. They want Trump to taco i e.

0:08:51.120 --> 0:08:54.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, the acronym Trump always chickens out. They're desperate

0:08:54.160 --> 0:08:57.880
<v Speaker 1>for him to chicken out on this immigration stuff. Look,

0:08:58.160 --> 0:09:01.920
<v Speaker 1>and considering what we went through last week and what

0:09:02.040 --> 0:09:04.920
<v Speaker 1>happened between Homeland Security and that security detail and the

0:09:05.000 --> 0:09:09.679
<v Speaker 1>US Senator Alex Padilla, none of this what was a

0:09:09.720 --> 0:09:13.480
<v Speaker 1>net positive for him, the immigration and being aggressive with

0:09:13.520 --> 0:09:17.600
<v Speaker 1>these tactics is going to start to turn south on him.

0:09:19.240 --> 0:09:20.360
<v Speaker 2>And then there's Minnesota.

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Two elected Democrats are gonne down and what now appears

0:09:23.240 --> 0:09:27.000
<v Speaker 1>to be a politically motivated attack. The alleged shooter apparently

0:09:27.000 --> 0:09:29.199
<v Speaker 1>had a list of dozens of names of other Democratic

0:09:29.200 --> 0:09:33.320
<v Speaker 1>officials over seventy You would think a story like this

0:09:33.320 --> 0:09:35.680
<v Speaker 1>would stop us all on our tracks, But in a

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:39.120
<v Speaker 1>week like this, I honestly don't know if anything can

0:09:39.240 --> 0:09:42.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of sober us up or make us go wait

0:09:42.160 --> 0:09:45.280
<v Speaker 1>a minute, we've got to change something here. We still

0:09:45.320 --> 0:09:47.400
<v Speaker 1>have the detail, We still are looking for the details.

0:09:47.559 --> 0:09:50.520
<v Speaker 1>As of my conversation here, we still hadn't gotten the guy.

0:09:52.640 --> 0:09:55.200
<v Speaker 1>But there's a familiarity to this, and least of what

0:09:55.240 --> 0:10:00.160
<v Speaker 1>we've known about the suspect, it has the hallmarks.

0:09:59.720 --> 0:10:01.200
<v Speaker 2>Of some thing we've seen before.

0:10:01.280 --> 0:10:04.400
<v Speaker 1>The Tree of Life synagogue shooting, the country music festival

0:10:04.400 --> 0:10:07.319
<v Speaker 1>massacre in Las Vegas in particular, both very heinous acts

0:10:07.760 --> 0:10:12.800
<v Speaker 1>committed by older men, middle aged men radicalized apparently online.

0:10:12.840 --> 0:10:14.600
<v Speaker 2>We don't quite know that about the Vegas guy.

0:10:15.120 --> 0:10:16.960
<v Speaker 1>We do know that on the Tree of Life guy,

0:10:17.800 --> 0:10:20.720
<v Speaker 1>and it's hard to imagine with this won't be the

0:10:20.800 --> 0:10:27.760
<v Speaker 1>case with this Minnesota assassin, with what's happening online, right,

0:10:28.000 --> 0:10:33.200
<v Speaker 1>And look, I know there is this sense of, oh,

0:10:33.440 --> 0:10:36.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, these guys are crazy people. Rhetoric's just rhetoric.

0:10:36.440 --> 0:10:39.800
<v Speaker 1>But we know crazy people get triggered by rhetoric. And

0:10:39.840 --> 0:10:43.520
<v Speaker 1>here's the uncomfortable pattern. The politically motivated violence in this

0:10:43.559 --> 0:10:46.920
<v Speaker 1>country has been more often coming from the right than

0:10:46.960 --> 0:10:47.360
<v Speaker 1>the left.

0:10:47.400 --> 0:10:48.200
<v Speaker 2>Now, the right.

0:10:50.040 --> 0:10:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Ecosystem will respond and attack me. For instance, I was

0:10:52.920 --> 0:10:56.160
<v Speaker 1>saying this by trying to equate violence from protests with

0:10:56.280 --> 0:11:01.600
<v Speaker 1>the same violence from these radicalized assassin But the two

0:11:01.679 --> 0:11:04.440
<v Speaker 1>are not the same. Right one is collective outrage that

0:11:04.600 --> 0:11:09.360
<v Speaker 1>can sometimes spiral into chaos because bad actors infiltrate the

0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:17.280
<v Speaker 1>other's premeditated, premeditated political murder. Ten X, I'm sorry than anything,

0:11:17.320 --> 0:11:19.520
<v Speaker 1>you can equate with what happened, whether you want to

0:11:19.520 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 1>equate during the George Floyd protests or what we've seen

0:11:24.880 --> 0:11:28.480
<v Speaker 1>with these other protests, and the distinction matters a lot.

0:11:30.240 --> 0:11:33.559
<v Speaker 1>So look, and let me accept the premise of the

0:11:33.640 --> 0:11:35.400
<v Speaker 1>right wing for a minute. In fact, let's say you

0:11:35.440 --> 0:11:36.839
<v Speaker 1>are on the right and you believe the left is

0:11:37.640 --> 0:11:40.920
<v Speaker 1>a more violent political movement than you are. Then it

0:11:40.960 --> 0:11:44.360
<v Speaker 1>should be all the more reason to condemn this action

0:11:44.480 --> 0:11:50.520
<v Speaker 1>in Minnesota with even more vigor and more outrage, because

0:11:50.559 --> 0:11:53.640
<v Speaker 1>if you believe this is not becoming of the right wing,

0:11:54.200 --> 0:11:56.800
<v Speaker 1>this is not becoming of the conservative movement in some ways,

0:11:56.800 --> 0:11:58.800
<v Speaker 1>there should be more outrage from the right about this.

0:12:00.120 --> 0:12:04.480
<v Speaker 1>A whole bunch of what about is because one of

0:12:04.520 --> 0:12:08.240
<v Speaker 1>the things that drives me batshit crazy when it comes

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:11.240
<v Speaker 1>to our political debate is the number of people that

0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:14.760
<v Speaker 1>justify their bad actions by pointing to the other side.

0:12:15.559 --> 0:12:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Nobody seems to want to live by the adage of

0:12:17.960 --> 0:12:18.959
<v Speaker 1>two wrongs don't.

0:12:18.760 --> 0:12:19.959
<v Speaker 3>Make a right.

0:12:20.679 --> 0:12:23.360
<v Speaker 1>And look, it's pretty clear Donald Trump is not interested

0:12:23.360 --> 0:12:26.160
<v Speaker 1>in lowering the temperature. Let me quote from you. Let

0:12:26.200 --> 0:12:30.360
<v Speaker 1>me quote you what he said on Sunday when asked

0:12:30.360 --> 0:12:34.000
<v Speaker 1>about the situation of Minnesota. The President said, well, that's

0:12:34.040 --> 0:12:38.000
<v Speaker 1>a terrible thing. Then he's referring to Tim Walls. I

0:12:38.040 --> 0:12:40.640
<v Speaker 1>think he's a terrible governor. I think he's a grossly

0:12:40.640 --> 0:12:43.560
<v Speaker 1>incompetent person. But I may I may call him, I

0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:45.079
<v Speaker 1>may call other people too.

0:12:45.360 --> 0:12:46.480
<v Speaker 2>The question was about whether.

0:12:46.320 --> 0:12:48.840
<v Speaker 1>He was going to call the governor of Minnesota think

0:12:48.880 --> 0:12:50.600
<v Speaker 1>about just let me read this statement again.

0:12:51.559 --> 0:12:52.160
<v Speaker 2>This is again.

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:55.120
<v Speaker 1>In the last forty eight hours, Tim Walls finds out

0:12:55.160 --> 0:12:57.640
<v Speaker 1>two people he worked quite closely with were gunned down

0:12:57.679 --> 0:13:02.240
<v Speaker 1>by an assassin a bunch of friends. He's probably on

0:13:02.280 --> 0:13:04.640
<v Speaker 1>this target list as well. We don't know that for sure.

0:13:04.840 --> 0:13:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Tina Smith, the US Senator, said she's on the list,

0:13:07.640 --> 0:13:10.920
<v Speaker 1>but a slew of Democrats are on the list. Pretty

0:13:10.960 --> 0:13:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Much every elected official in Minnesota is scared assless. Okay,

0:13:16.200 --> 0:13:19.679
<v Speaker 1>and Donald Trump says the following. I think he's a

0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:22.240
<v Speaker 1>terrible governor. I think he's a grossly incompetent person. But

0:13:22.280 --> 0:13:24.000
<v Speaker 1>I may I may call him, I may call other

0:13:24.040 --> 0:13:28.200
<v Speaker 1>people too. In the pre Trump era, moment like this

0:13:28.400 --> 0:13:32.160
<v Speaker 1>might prompt an American president to give a unifying speech,

0:13:32.200 --> 0:13:34.839
<v Speaker 1>maybe even a prime time speech. We got to turn

0:13:35.000 --> 0:13:38.599
<v Speaker 1>the temperature down. But the president isn't going to do this.

0:13:38.679 --> 0:13:42.080
<v Speaker 1>It's not this president because confrontation is his comfort zone.

0:13:42.800 --> 0:13:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Reflection is not in his rhetorical playbook, and he won't

0:13:46.480 --> 0:13:50.880
<v Speaker 1>accept the premise that he has contributed to this atmosphere.

0:13:50.400 --> 0:13:51.240
<v Speaker 2>That we're all living in.

0:13:51.760 --> 0:13:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I could argue and make a strong case that

0:13:55.440 --> 0:14:01.440
<v Speaker 1>he is he is the instigator here, but I'm going

0:14:01.480 --> 0:14:03.840
<v Speaker 1>to accept the premise that there are more than one instigators.

0:14:04.480 --> 0:14:06.559
<v Speaker 1>But here's the thing. He chose to be president of

0:14:06.559 --> 0:14:09.480
<v Speaker 1>the United States of all Americans, and I know he

0:14:09.520 --> 0:14:12.120
<v Speaker 1>only wants to govern for his base, but this is

0:14:12.160 --> 0:14:17.120
<v Speaker 1>a moment where if he doesn't do it, we're on

0:14:17.160 --> 0:14:20.760
<v Speaker 1>the precipice and we all are feeling this way. One

0:14:20.840 --> 0:14:22.960
<v Speaker 1>spark feels like it's going to set us off into

0:14:22.960 --> 0:14:26.920
<v Speaker 1>some explosive, horrendous moment. Now, none of this is playing

0:14:26.960 --> 0:14:29.520
<v Speaker 1>well for him politically. In fact, you actually saw that

0:14:29.600 --> 0:14:32.800
<v Speaker 1>on display at as military theme birthday parade this weekend.

0:14:33.160 --> 0:14:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Whether was grim, crowd was thin, and the mood was flat. Meanwhile,

0:14:38.560 --> 0:14:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the No King's protests drew thousands from coast to coast.

0:14:42.040 --> 0:14:44.240
<v Speaker 1>A lot of those protests were also in the rain,

0:14:44.320 --> 0:14:46.880
<v Speaker 1>and yet they showed up for those might be the

0:14:46.920 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 1>clearest signal yet where the political energy in this country

0:14:50.200 --> 0:14:54.000
<v Speaker 1>is heading. And that's the thing, you know. The irony

0:14:54.040 --> 0:14:57.640
<v Speaker 1>here is that if Donald Trump would accept the tiniest bit,

0:14:59.240 --> 0:15:01.240
<v Speaker 1>except the tiny his bed of the premise that he

0:15:01.840 --> 0:15:07.440
<v Speaker 1>is participating and contributing to this current unstable political environment,

0:15:08.880 --> 0:15:13.480
<v Speaker 1>he could buy himself some political some political lifelines here.

0:15:13.760 --> 0:15:16.320
<v Speaker 1>A little bit he could, it would turn the temperature

0:15:16.360 --> 0:15:19.560
<v Speaker 1>down and would give him an opportunity to try to

0:15:20.280 --> 0:15:24.040
<v Speaker 1>try to actually heal politically. But he's going to go

0:15:24.040 --> 0:15:28.400
<v Speaker 1>down this road, and this isn't going to this isn't

0:15:28.400 --> 0:15:31.040
<v Speaker 1>going to live well. Look, I lived through this cycle myself.

0:15:31.280 --> 0:15:32.880
<v Speaker 1>In twenty eighteen, I had to wake up to the

0:15:32.920 --> 0:15:35.880
<v Speaker 1>news of a man who mailed pipe bombs to CNN,

0:15:35.920 --> 0:15:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and others. Turned out, he had

0:15:38.840 --> 0:15:43.120
<v Speaker 1>my face on his van literally with a group of

0:15:43.120 --> 0:15:45.640
<v Speaker 1>four of the reporters that were considered the quote enemy

0:15:45.720 --> 0:15:48.440
<v Speaker 1>of the people, a phrase that of course he got

0:15:48.480 --> 0:15:53.560
<v Speaker 1>and was inspired by Donald Trump. It was that phrase

0:15:53.600 --> 0:15:55.920
<v Speaker 1>all came from him, and all of this man's rhetoric

0:15:56.000 --> 0:15:58.320
<v Speaker 1>came from him. I'm not saying Donald Trump ordered this

0:15:58.400 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 1>crazy man to attack members of the press, democratic office holders,

0:16:05.520 --> 0:16:09.640
<v Speaker 1>but he is creating an environment and is inspiring weak

0:16:10.160 --> 0:16:14.080
<v Speaker 1>minded individuals who are a bit broken, who take his

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:19.280
<v Speaker 1>words literally and seriously and in some cases act upon them.

0:16:19.640 --> 0:16:24.960
<v Speaker 1>And not once has this man has ever acknowledged the

0:16:25.080 --> 0:16:29.400
<v Speaker 1>role he's done in there. And you know, I had

0:16:29.480 --> 0:16:32.200
<v Speaker 1>to be honest, I still to this day was not

0:16:32.320 --> 0:16:35.120
<v Speaker 1>comforted when I got visited by the FBI inform me, hey,

0:16:35.120 --> 0:16:37.360
<v Speaker 1>by the way, this guy targeted you. This is what's

0:16:37.360 --> 0:16:39.720
<v Speaker 1>happening to all these elected officials in Minnesota. They're getting

0:16:39.720 --> 0:16:41.440
<v Speaker 1>a visit from the FBI to let them know he's

0:16:41.480 --> 0:16:43.360
<v Speaker 1>on their list. You know what all that does is dud.

0:16:43.400 --> 0:16:46.200
<v Speaker 1>It's like, g thanks, Now, what am I supposed to do?

0:16:46.240 --> 0:16:48.200
<v Speaker 1>What we just want to let you know and what

0:16:48.240 --> 0:16:53.520
<v Speaker 1>it is, it's the FBI doing a little cya. But look,

0:16:53.840 --> 0:16:58.440
<v Speaker 1>he has created an environment of violence. Right, he pardoned

0:16:58.440 --> 0:17:01.760
<v Speaker 1>the January sixth rioters, right if he didn't believe, if

0:17:01.760 --> 0:17:05.119
<v Speaker 1>he thought political violence was wrong, He never pardons those folks,

0:17:05.200 --> 0:17:08.320
<v Speaker 1>but he sent a clear message political violence is tolerable

0:17:09.359 --> 0:17:12.159
<v Speaker 1>if the target is your enemy. That's the message he

0:17:12.280 --> 0:17:15.439
<v Speaker 1>sent with those pardons. And you know, you live in

0:17:15.440 --> 0:17:19.359
<v Speaker 1>a world where you reap what you sew. And what's

0:17:19.400 --> 0:17:24.800
<v Speaker 1>not fair is that state representative. She didn't do this,

0:17:25.760 --> 0:17:30.399
<v Speaker 1>She didn't create these conditions. This crazy man was whipped

0:17:30.480 --> 0:17:34.120
<v Speaker 1>up and he's responding to a whipped up political environment.

0:17:35.480 --> 0:17:38.560
<v Speaker 1>And it's a whipped up political environment led by one man.

0:17:39.680 --> 0:17:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Now here's the thing he can tone it down. He

0:17:43.200 --> 0:17:45.720
<v Speaker 1>has the ability to do this if he wants to

0:17:45.720 --> 0:17:48.600
<v Speaker 1>be president of a country that doesn't hate each other

0:17:48.640 --> 0:17:51.040
<v Speaker 1>and isn't on the brink of some sort of hot war.

0:17:52.440 --> 0:17:56.199
<v Speaker 1>But he is creating a terrible situation. And this is,

0:17:56.480 --> 0:17:59.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's morally wrong, and it's how republics fall.

0:18:00.000 --> 0:18:04.159
<v Speaker 1>And here's another thing, considering that the president was a

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:09.800
<v Speaker 1>target himself of an assassination attempt and a second assassin

0:18:09.840 --> 0:18:13.359
<v Speaker 1>that seemed to be stalking him, that he could be

0:18:13.480 --> 0:18:19.040
<v Speaker 1>speaking to this issue with credibility, with a kind of

0:18:19.280 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 1>a different kind of credibility. Unfortunately, as somebody who has

0:18:23.440 --> 0:18:27.840
<v Speaker 1>felt this moment, and it clearly impacted him for a

0:18:27.920 --> 0:18:32.520
<v Speaker 1>period of time, So it almost makes it even more

0:18:32.560 --> 0:18:36.560
<v Speaker 1>head scratching and more frustrating that he doesn't.

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:37.200
<v Speaker 2>Speak to this moment.

0:18:38.440 --> 0:18:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Finally, I want to end on a thought that's been

0:18:40.680 --> 0:18:42.640
<v Speaker 1>haunting me all week. As we've witnessed some of these

0:18:42.720 --> 0:18:48.919
<v Speaker 1>historically horrific moments, we've entered what I call an Orwellian moment,

0:18:49.880 --> 0:18:52.000
<v Speaker 1>and easily I think the last week was the most

0:18:52.080 --> 0:18:55.399
<v Speaker 1>Orwellian week we've lived in the Trump era. Because you

0:18:55.440 --> 0:18:57.800
<v Speaker 1>go online and you don't know which images are real,

0:18:58.480 --> 0:19:00.359
<v Speaker 1>You can't trust what you see what you read or

0:19:00.359 --> 0:19:04.040
<v Speaker 1>even what you think you know. In Los Angeles, manipulated videos,

0:19:04.080 --> 0:19:08.120
<v Speaker 1>AI generated vote photos, They spread confusion, and they did

0:19:08.160 --> 0:19:11.680
<v Speaker 1>so faster than any fact check could catch up. I mean,

0:19:11.720 --> 0:19:13.600
<v Speaker 1>I had to use my own network of people in

0:19:13.760 --> 0:19:17.760
<v Speaker 1>LA that I trust to really understand what was going on.

0:19:17.800 --> 0:19:21.359
<v Speaker 1>You could not trust what you saw online. And that

0:19:21.720 --> 0:19:24.440
<v Speaker 1>is a scary moment. And we know there are professional

0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:27.080
<v Speaker 1>propagandas out there. Some of them are domestic who just

0:19:27.200 --> 0:19:30.480
<v Speaker 1>are trying for clicks. Some are funded by foreign adversaries

0:19:30.520 --> 0:19:33.359
<v Speaker 1>like russ of China, north of Korea, and they flood

0:19:33.440 --> 0:19:36.240
<v Speaker 1>the zone with all of this junk. And the goal

0:19:36.280 --> 0:19:39.760
<v Speaker 1>is in persuasion. It's paralysis. If they can make everything

0:19:39.880 --> 0:19:43.320
<v Speaker 1>feel a bit unknowable, then nothing can be acted upon

0:19:43.440 --> 0:19:47.000
<v Speaker 1>canon And when the public no longer trusts what it sees,

0:19:47.000 --> 0:19:49.720
<v Speaker 1>when truth itself feels up for grabs, that's when democratic

0:19:49.840 --> 0:19:53.200
<v Speaker 1>systems start to wabble. We're watching that unfold right now.

0:19:53.280 --> 0:19:55.080
<v Speaker 1>The chaos in LA this week felt like a test

0:19:55.160 --> 0:19:58.440
<v Speaker 1>run for that uncertainty. And it's not just by the way.

0:19:58.480 --> 0:20:02.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean, listen to the garbage writer that Christy Nome used.

0:20:02.800 --> 0:20:06.200
<v Speaker 1>She was talking about liberating Los Angeles from some socialists.

0:20:06.480 --> 0:20:09.359
<v Speaker 1>What the fork is she talking about? And can you

0:20:09.400 --> 0:20:14.120
<v Speaker 1>imagine if Ali Mayorcis said something about liberating a Texas

0:20:14.160 --> 0:20:18.960
<v Speaker 1>town from its racist tendencies or something like that. This

0:20:19.000 --> 0:20:22.760
<v Speaker 1>is insane rhetoric being used by a cabinet official, and

0:20:22.800 --> 0:20:26.679
<v Speaker 1>not just any cabinet official, a very important one, all right,

0:20:26.720 --> 0:20:30.720
<v Speaker 1>I would you know, no offense to laborhood, but DHS

0:20:30.800 --> 0:20:35.080
<v Speaker 1>is one of the big five after Treasury, State, Pentagon,

0:20:35.200 --> 0:20:38.400
<v Speaker 1>and Attorney General, and I have that kind of sloppy rhetoric,

0:20:39.640 --> 0:20:42.960
<v Speaker 1>ridiculous rhetoric. And it was a sentence that was said

0:20:43.040 --> 0:20:52.920
<v Speaker 1>right before her security detailed tackled Senator Alex Badia. Anyway, Look,

0:20:54.600 --> 0:20:56.480
<v Speaker 1>it's not just a domestic problem. By the way, this

0:20:57.040 --> 0:20:59.840
<v Speaker 1>issue of this Orwellian moment we're living and we've had

0:20:59.840 --> 0:21:02.640
<v Speaker 1>this same cloud of ambiguity over the role over our

0:21:02.720 --> 0:21:05.280
<v Speaker 1>role in the Israel Iran conflicts. I told you before,

0:21:05.400 --> 0:21:07.720
<v Speaker 1>did we help, did we know? Are we responsible? Nobody

0:21:07.760 --> 0:21:11.880
<v Speaker 1>seems to know for sure, and that ambiguity again, may

0:21:12.240 --> 0:21:15.520
<v Speaker 1>it may help short term for us politically, long term,

0:21:15.560 --> 0:21:17.800
<v Speaker 1>no one knows what's going on. This used to be

0:21:17.880 --> 0:21:20.440
<v Speaker 1>the kind of uncertainty you'd only expect in the Middle East,

0:21:20.560 --> 0:21:24.120
<v Speaker 1>or you might expect in Moscow or Beijing, authoritarian places.

0:21:24.680 --> 0:21:27.480
<v Speaker 1>But now it's here. It's in Los Angeles, it's in Washington,

0:21:27.560 --> 0:21:30.080
<v Speaker 1>it's in your Twitter or TikTok feed. And when the

0:21:30.080 --> 0:21:32.400
<v Speaker 1>public's instinct is to say I don't know what to believe,

0:21:33.880 --> 0:21:39.119
<v Speaker 1>that is when you know the democracy itself is extraordinarily vulnerable.

0:21:39.480 --> 0:21:41.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what to believe is a phrase you

0:21:41.320 --> 0:21:45.320
<v Speaker 1>hear all the time in Russia, all the time. So no,

0:21:45.520 --> 0:21:48.680
<v Speaker 1>this wasn't the uplifting, feel good Father's Day PostScript I

0:21:48.720 --> 0:21:49.360
<v Speaker 1>was hoping for.

0:21:50.320 --> 0:21:50.960
<v Speaker 2>But here we are.

0:21:51.280 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 1>The world is unstable, our country is unsettled, and the

0:21:54.600 --> 0:21:56.480
<v Speaker 1>one person who may be able to calm things down

0:21:56.600 --> 0:21:58.920
<v Speaker 1>is also the one person who's helped stoke this fire.

0:21:59.080 --> 0:22:01.040
<v Speaker 1>I think he might try to else the flames abroad.

0:22:01.640 --> 0:22:03.640
<v Speaker 1>I fear he has no interest in doing it here

0:22:03.680 --> 0:22:07.400
<v Speaker 1>at home. So on that uplifting note, I actually have

0:22:08.400 --> 0:22:11.080
<v Speaker 1>a fun and I would hope to think. Actually a

0:22:11.200 --> 0:22:15.119
<v Speaker 1>slightly more uplifting conversation. It's with Mike Pesca. He's the

0:22:15.160 --> 0:22:17.920
<v Speaker 1>man behind the gist. You may be longtime listeners of

0:22:18.000 --> 0:22:21.680
<v Speaker 1>him on Slady to Me He's like an original podcaster.

0:22:21.800 --> 0:22:23.399
<v Speaker 1>He was doing it before anybody thought it was that

0:22:23.520 --> 0:22:27.800
<v Speaker 1>cool to do it. His Gist substack is a lot

0:22:27.800 --> 0:22:31.760
<v Speaker 1>of fun, It's smart, and MY favorite thing about Mike

0:22:32.800 --> 0:22:37.480
<v Speaker 1>is that he is always asking a question. Sort of

0:22:37.480 --> 0:22:40.280
<v Speaker 1>a professional he is. When I think of somebody that

0:22:40.400 --> 0:22:43.280
<v Speaker 1>is a professional skeptic who should practice Joe who does

0:22:43.320 --> 0:22:46.600
<v Speaker 1>practice journalism sort of as a professional skeptic.

0:22:46.440 --> 0:22:47.720
<v Speaker 2>I'd like to think I do that.

0:22:48.240 --> 0:22:50.720
<v Speaker 1>I know Mike does it, and it's what I think

0:22:50.800 --> 0:22:53.400
<v Speaker 1>makes him so readable and so interesting.

0:22:53.920 --> 0:22:56.200
<v Speaker 2>And I think you're going to up this conversation.

0:23:05.080 --> 0:23:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Well joining me now we did a home and away,

0:23:08.560 --> 0:23:11.760
<v Speaker 1>I think is the way to do it. It's Mike Pesca, who,

0:23:11.800 --> 0:23:14.199
<v Speaker 1>of course is best known as host of The Gist.

0:23:15.480 --> 0:23:18.960
<v Speaker 1>I think of you, Mike, as sort of a podcast pioneer.

0:23:19.840 --> 0:23:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Do you feel like you're a pioneer of this, of

0:23:22.840 --> 0:23:24.320
<v Speaker 1>this day and age. I mean, you've been doing this

0:23:24.359 --> 0:23:27.120
<v Speaker 1>for more than a decade. Who else can say that?

0:23:28.600 --> 0:23:29.840
<v Speaker 2>Many can? They'd be lying.

0:23:29.960 --> 0:23:32.439
<v Speaker 3>I do think it's the longest running I guess us

0:23:32.480 --> 0:23:33.920
<v Speaker 3>an analysis.

0:23:33.320 --> 0:23:37.080
<v Speaker 2>You and Bill Simmons right right? If it's Newsy.

0:23:37.240 --> 0:23:40.520
<v Speaker 3>You know, Terry Gross has had a podcast version of

0:23:40.520 --> 0:23:42.200
<v Speaker 3>Fresh Air longer than I have. So if you take

0:23:42.200 --> 0:23:44.720
<v Speaker 3>all the radio shows that went into pod had a

0:23:44.760 --> 0:23:46.680
<v Speaker 3>podcast version in two thousand and seven or eight.

0:23:46.800 --> 0:23:49.679
<v Speaker 2>Sure, but doing it as a daily show news.

0:23:49.400 --> 0:23:53.399
<v Speaker 3>Analysis, I think it's me If not, I'll take on

0:23:53.520 --> 0:23:55.040
<v Speaker 3>all comers in the next.

0:23:54.840 --> 0:23:56.800
<v Speaker 2>Daily show, since there is always a daily show.

0:23:57.320 --> 0:24:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, hey, look, whether you're you're one of the pioneers, right,

0:24:02.359 --> 0:24:04.520
<v Speaker 1>let's let's put it in those terms. I think we'd

0:24:04.520 --> 0:24:10.000
<v Speaker 1>all accept that. I think it's fascinating. I just had

0:24:10.000 --> 0:24:12.320
<v Speaker 1>this conversation with a media reporter who was asking me

0:24:13.200 --> 0:24:16.720
<v Speaker 1>what do I make of podcasts shifting to video and

0:24:16.960 --> 0:24:19.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, and I said, look, I'll be honest. Six

0:24:19.920 --> 0:24:22.960
<v Speaker 1>months ago, I still would have argued against video for

0:24:23.040 --> 0:24:26.680
<v Speaker 1>podcasts because what I what I liked the best about

0:24:26.720 --> 0:24:30.879
<v Speaker 1>a podcast is eavesdropping on a conversation and the idea.

0:24:31.000 --> 0:24:33.199
<v Speaker 1>And I'm a believer that once you introduce a camera,

0:24:34.440 --> 0:24:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to get a less honest take. I'm going

0:24:36.119 --> 0:24:41.199
<v Speaker 1>to get a less honest version of that person. But

0:24:42.000 --> 0:24:44.520
<v Speaker 1>that is where the world is headed, and in fact,

0:24:44.560 --> 0:24:47.479
<v Speaker 1>you will. You will not have a successful podcast if

0:24:47.480 --> 0:24:49.960
<v Speaker 1>you stick to audio only. Now, that's just it just

0:24:50.200 --> 0:24:52.720
<v Speaker 1>is what the business is. But when did this transition

0:24:52.840 --> 0:24:55.600
<v Speaker 1>take place? And where are you on it? I mean,

0:24:55.600 --> 0:24:59.840
<v Speaker 1>obviously you've you've embraced it. Was it a reluctant embrace

0:24:59.920 --> 0:25:01.520
<v Speaker 1>or or an enthusiastic one?

0:25:02.440 --> 0:25:03.959
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? I hate it. I gotta be honest.

0:25:04.240 --> 0:25:08.199
<v Speaker 3>My friend PJ Vote has a great podcast and he

0:25:08.240 --> 0:25:10.320
<v Speaker 3>doesn't want to do video because he says he wants

0:25:10.320 --> 0:25:12.639
<v Speaker 3>to do the best version of what he's doing, and

0:25:12.680 --> 0:25:15.840
<v Speaker 3>the best version of what he does Search Engine, which

0:25:15.880 --> 0:25:19.840
<v Speaker 3>is a nonfiction podcast, would be a documentary, and documentaries

0:25:19.880 --> 0:25:24.320
<v Speaker 3>are their own skill set. So he's either doing the

0:25:24.440 --> 0:25:25.680
<v Speaker 3>very best audio.

0:25:25.480 --> 0:25:27.960
<v Speaker 2>Podcast or a third rate documentary.

0:25:28.280 --> 0:25:31.240
<v Speaker 3>I feel like I'm doing the best podcast that I

0:25:31.240 --> 0:25:35.159
<v Speaker 3>could possibly do, or a TV talk show with a

0:25:35.160 --> 0:25:37.440
<v Speaker 3>weird green curtain behind me. The curtain is going to

0:25:37.520 --> 0:25:39.880
<v Speaker 3>get better, you know, at some point, I swear to God.

0:25:39.920 --> 0:25:43.240
<v Speaker 3>So I also think, was this what it seems like?

0:25:43.280 --> 0:25:45.640
<v Speaker 3>It's what the audience demanded. If you look at audio

0:25:46.119 --> 0:25:49.600
<v Speaker 3>audience metrics right, videos are doing really well. And if

0:25:49.640 --> 0:25:53.800
<v Speaker 3>you look at people under thirty two, they don't think

0:25:53.800 --> 0:25:56.240
<v Speaker 3>of podcasting as an audio medium. They think of it

0:25:56.240 --> 0:25:59.119
<v Speaker 3>as a video medium. But so often it is the

0:25:59.200 --> 0:26:02.400
<v Speaker 3>algorithm or it is the some corporate boss that made

0:26:02.440 --> 0:26:05.480
<v Speaker 3>a decision. And what really is going on is that

0:26:05.880 --> 0:26:09.879
<v Speaker 3>Spotify has to creed that this is the way to

0:26:09.960 --> 0:26:12.280
<v Speaker 3>go because they're thinking of.

0:26:12.280 --> 0:26:15.040
<v Speaker 2>You put this on differentiate on Spotify, not YouTube.

0:26:15.119 --> 0:26:19.399
<v Speaker 3>That's interesting, yes, yeah, this is YouTube is benefiting from it,

0:26:19.440 --> 0:26:23.600
<v Speaker 3>but mostly it's Spotify saying video. There's one other aspect

0:26:23.600 --> 0:26:27.480
<v Speaker 3>I'll get into, but Spotify has said to themselves if

0:26:27.560 --> 0:26:30.680
<v Speaker 3>we become a video player, that's much better for business

0:26:30.960 --> 0:26:34.719
<v Speaker 3>because as an audio player, we're not differentiated from the

0:26:34.760 --> 0:26:37.600
<v Speaker 3>Apple podcast or some of the other audio podcasts out there,

0:26:37.880 --> 0:26:40.520
<v Speaker 3>but we've got video from the jump. So some of

0:26:40.520 --> 0:26:44.000
<v Speaker 3>the most popular ones, like Joe Rogan, they've always been video.

0:26:44.480 --> 0:26:47.440
<v Speaker 3>So then they started to tell everyone you got to

0:26:47.480 --> 0:26:49.960
<v Speaker 3>go video. I think they probably punish.

0:26:49.720 --> 0:26:52.400
<v Speaker 2>People who didn't go video. The other thing that's going on.

0:26:52.359 --> 0:26:56.480
<v Speaker 3>Is podcast has a terrible problem with discovery, right. The

0:26:56.520 --> 0:26:59.800
<v Speaker 3>funnel is if you get attention, maybe you got attention

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:03.880
<v Speaker 3>you left NBC, people said where's Chuck, and early on

0:27:04.000 --> 0:27:06.560
<v Speaker 3>people started to find you, and to this day people

0:27:06.560 --> 0:27:10.240
<v Speaker 3>are probably saying, oh, Chuck's there. On podcasting, the funnel

0:27:10.440 --> 0:27:13.760
<v Speaker 3>in almost only works in the beginning and then a

0:27:13.840 --> 0:27:16.440
<v Speaker 3>year and two years in, how do you get attention?

0:27:16.840 --> 0:27:19.720
<v Speaker 3>It's terrible. There's no way in podcasting to kind of

0:27:19.760 --> 0:27:22.439
<v Speaker 3>tell people that you're out there. But video is the

0:27:22.440 --> 0:27:25.080
<v Speaker 3>one way to do it. So you have clips. I

0:27:25.119 --> 0:27:27.840
<v Speaker 3>only do video. I do a video of every interview

0:27:27.880 --> 0:27:29.679
<v Speaker 3>I do. I think we'll put this up on video

0:27:29.920 --> 0:27:33.240
<v Speaker 3>and some people will watch it. The only reason I'm

0:27:33.280 --> 0:27:37.520
<v Speaker 3>doing that is to generate clips from Instagram, so that

0:27:37.760 --> 0:27:41.160
<v Speaker 3>maybe someone will see this Instagram clip and say, oh,

0:27:41.280 --> 0:27:44.399
<v Speaker 3>Mike Pasca, Chuck Todd. That exists as what I consider

0:27:44.440 --> 0:27:47.360
<v Speaker 3>to be the primary product, which is audio. It's crazy

0:27:47.400 --> 0:27:48.720
<v Speaker 3>and it's algorithm driven.

0:27:49.200 --> 0:27:51.960
<v Speaker 1>It's so true and what you just described, and I

0:27:52.000 --> 0:27:54.440
<v Speaker 1>appreciate you describing it that way because it's it's.

0:27:56.359 --> 0:27:59.720
<v Speaker 2>It is, it is.

0:28:00.000 --> 0:28:03.399
<v Speaker 1>It's weird something in human nature. For whatever reason, we

0:28:03.440 --> 0:28:07.040
<v Speaker 1>won't clip on an audio clip. You send a great

0:28:07.040 --> 0:28:10.560
<v Speaker 1>exchange between you and I audio only, and it doesn't

0:28:10.560 --> 0:28:13.120
<v Speaker 1>get whether it's on a social media app or via

0:28:13.200 --> 0:28:15.520
<v Speaker 1>text or whatever. I'm this way, like, send me a

0:28:15.520 --> 0:28:18.399
<v Speaker 1>piece of video, I quickly watch it. Send me a

0:28:18.480 --> 0:28:20.480
<v Speaker 1>piece of audio. I'm like, well, let me put my

0:28:20.480 --> 0:28:24.359
<v Speaker 1>headphones in or whatever whatever it is. And so it

0:28:24.400 --> 0:28:28.400
<v Speaker 1>feels as if almost ninety percent of the reasons most

0:28:28.440 --> 0:28:30.480
<v Speaker 1>podcasts went video as well, it's the only way to

0:28:30.480 --> 0:28:31.840
<v Speaker 1>market the podcast.

0:28:33.000 --> 0:28:36.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I think it has fundamentally to do with attention.

0:28:36.520 --> 0:28:40.880
<v Speaker 3>So when something has a visual component, including words, it's

0:28:41.000 --> 0:28:43.040
<v Speaker 3>vying for your attension.

0:28:43.120 --> 0:28:46.120
<v Speaker 2>It's announcing itself. It's saying, pay attention to me.

0:28:46.600 --> 0:28:49.239
<v Speaker 3>Probably because of the kind of animals we were on

0:28:49.280 --> 0:28:52.520
<v Speaker 3>the savannah as prey. By the way, anthropology is finding

0:28:52.560 --> 0:28:55.280
<v Speaker 3>out more and more that we're inherently prey, and most

0:28:55.320 --> 0:28:59.160
<v Speaker 3>of our motivation is we're worried about the armed anyway. Yeah, yeah,

0:28:59.480 --> 0:29:02.280
<v Speaker 3>we're where animals were worried about this, and the visual

0:29:02.440 --> 0:29:05.400
<v Speaker 3>is how we stay alive. The audio is a little

0:29:05.440 --> 0:29:08.600
<v Speaker 3>bit deeper. It probably activates other aspects of our brain,

0:29:08.760 --> 0:29:13.040
<v Speaker 3>but it's not as urgent visual, as urgent audio less urgent.

0:29:13.080 --> 0:29:16.000
<v Speaker 3>This used to be great, the lack of urgency in audio,

0:29:16.080 --> 0:29:17.920
<v Speaker 3>and I work for NPR for ten years. We would

0:29:18.000 --> 0:29:21.800
<v Speaker 3>use phrases like you know, it's a companion and it's uh,

0:29:21.880 --> 0:29:24.760
<v Speaker 3>and we'd have driveway moments. But it was sort of

0:29:24.800 --> 0:29:28.160
<v Speaker 3>the warm bath of attention as opposed to a tiger

0:29:28.240 --> 0:29:28.880
<v Speaker 3>is going to eat us?

0:29:28.880 --> 0:29:29.400
<v Speaker 2>Of attention.

0:29:30.560 --> 0:29:34.560
<v Speaker 3>So I do, Yeah, I do think that there's fundamental

0:29:34.600 --> 0:29:36.640
<v Speaker 3>difference between each medium.

0:29:37.040 --> 0:29:38.200
<v Speaker 2>And I think that.

0:29:38.520 --> 0:29:41.520
<v Speaker 3>It's have people really said, you know what, I like

0:29:41.760 --> 0:29:42.880
<v Speaker 3>audio video podcasts.

0:29:42.920 --> 0:29:44.480
<v Speaker 2>I just like them. They just appealed to me. I

0:29:44.480 --> 0:29:45.720
<v Speaker 2>don't know how many people have said that.

0:29:45.800 --> 0:29:47.680
<v Speaker 3>Maybe young people have said that, but I think it

0:29:47.880 --> 0:29:50.720
<v Speaker 3>just you can't get away from it. And in this

0:29:50.800 --> 0:29:54.400
<v Speaker 3>attention economy is also the urgency economy.

0:29:54.880 --> 0:29:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, here's something else though. That why I think many

0:29:59.600 --> 0:30:04.040
<v Speaker 1>people wouldn't have predicted that podcasts would continue to grow,

0:30:04.160 --> 0:30:06.080
<v Speaker 1>And in some ways this is right. We're in a

0:30:06.080 --> 0:30:09.160
<v Speaker 1>second growth period because of the video component. I guess

0:30:09.320 --> 0:30:11.479
<v Speaker 1>it was probably the best way to put it. But

0:30:13.080 --> 0:30:14.880
<v Speaker 1>and maybe this is going to change as more people

0:30:14.960 --> 0:30:18.120
<v Speaker 1>do live. But I think about you doing a daily podcast.

0:30:19.160 --> 0:30:23.520
<v Speaker 1>How how did you get over the moment that you

0:30:24.240 --> 0:30:27.800
<v Speaker 1>finished your recording and then some breaking news happened in

0:30:27.840 --> 0:30:31.520
<v Speaker 1>you'r lie? Oh man, this is going to feel, you know,

0:30:32.120 --> 0:30:34.000
<v Speaker 1>because you have to get over that. Because I could

0:30:34.000 --> 0:30:36.280
<v Speaker 1>make a case that you can always find a story.

0:30:36.800 --> 0:30:37.840
<v Speaker 2>I wish we would have done this.

0:30:38.280 --> 0:30:40.840
<v Speaker 1>You can always find a reason to be How did

0:30:40.840 --> 0:30:43.400
<v Speaker 1>you get over that? And does it surprise you that

0:30:43.480 --> 0:30:48.400
<v Speaker 1>the public has it punished the podcast industry collectively for

0:30:48.480 --> 0:30:50.840
<v Speaker 1>its ability not to be in real time because it's

0:30:50.880 --> 0:30:53.080
<v Speaker 1>really not in real time. It's we are I always

0:30:53.080 --> 0:30:56.720
<v Speaker 1>say a good podcast is on the news, not necessarily,

0:30:58.120 --> 0:31:01.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's news adjacent. Sometimes can feel on the news,

0:31:01.240 --> 0:31:04.600
<v Speaker 1>but it's not necessarily in a breaking news moment.

0:31:05.600 --> 0:31:07.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's a problem, and I don't know if it's gone.

0:31:08.040 --> 0:31:12.200
<v Speaker 3>You're framing the question. Look how much podcasting has thrived

0:31:12.840 --> 0:31:13.960
<v Speaker 3>even though this is the case.

0:31:14.040 --> 0:31:15.479
<v Speaker 2>I think it's thrived despite that.

0:31:15.600 --> 0:31:17.240
<v Speaker 3>I think if there was a way to be on

0:31:17.320 --> 0:31:20.240
<v Speaker 3>the news, it would be even better. And it's especially

0:31:20.280 --> 0:31:23.640
<v Speaker 3>true when news happens on a Sunday and I listen

0:31:23.720 --> 0:31:25.960
<v Speaker 3>to a lot of sports podcasts, and if the game

0:31:26.080 --> 0:31:28.680
<v Speaker 3>was on a Saturday and the production schedule is not

0:31:28.800 --> 0:31:31.440
<v Speaker 3>to come back to a Monday, I have to wait

0:31:31.640 --> 0:31:34.880
<v Speaker 3>two days to get my podcast discussion of the game.

0:31:34.920 --> 0:31:37.080
<v Speaker 2>I do not like that. So I think that it

0:31:37.160 --> 0:31:38.480
<v Speaker 2>is a problem. How'd I get over it?

0:31:38.840 --> 0:31:40.800
<v Speaker 3>Just when it became a parent that I was killing

0:31:40.840 --> 0:31:44.000
<v Speaker 3>my staff The first three times I said we got

0:31:44.000 --> 0:31:46.640
<v Speaker 3>to go live and it didn't really matter. But here's

0:31:46.640 --> 0:31:49.840
<v Speaker 3>what's happening we're now in an age. We are in

0:31:49.880 --> 0:31:53.920
<v Speaker 3>an age of media abundance. Abundance, but it's really commentary.

0:31:54.200 --> 0:31:57.480
<v Speaker 3>There's so much more commentary than news, and even so

0:31:57.600 --> 0:31:59.840
<v Speaker 3>much of the news is commentary, as you know.

0:32:00.360 --> 0:32:03.280
<v Speaker 2>And I don't know how much the consumer really.

0:32:03.000 --> 0:32:06.280
<v Speaker 3>Realizes that, but I think we've gotten to a ratio

0:32:06.400 --> 0:32:09.600
<v Speaker 3>that's I don't know if it's dangerous, but it's certainly

0:32:09.640 --> 0:32:13.200
<v Speaker 3>not optimal and place my due. Yeah, yeah, are more

0:32:13.240 --> 0:32:16.200
<v Speaker 3>commentary than is I think optimal?

0:32:16.680 --> 0:32:18.640
<v Speaker 1>No, it is, and it's you know, I get so

0:32:18.720 --> 0:32:21.200
<v Speaker 1>frustrated when people are even trying to pay me a

0:32:21.200 --> 0:32:23.720
<v Speaker 1>compliment that they'll say, oh, I can tell you're really

0:32:23.720 --> 0:32:26.160
<v Speaker 1>speaking your mind, and I'm like, yeah, but that doesn't

0:32:26.160 --> 0:32:28.200
<v Speaker 1>mean I'm a partisan, you know, I'm just sort of

0:32:28.800 --> 0:32:32.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm no longer what I always say is I'm no

0:32:32.080 --> 0:32:35.680
<v Speaker 1>longer rounding the edges as much. Right for network television,

0:32:35.760 --> 0:32:38.840
<v Speaker 1>i'd have to round the edges. Sometimes it's because my

0:32:38.880 --> 0:32:41.440
<v Speaker 1>first name was meet, or sometimes because I didn't want to.

0:32:41.520 --> 0:32:44.320
<v Speaker 1>I knew whatever I said was going to reflect all

0:32:44.400 --> 0:32:47.800
<v Speaker 1>on the entire network. Fair unfair that it would, and

0:32:47.840 --> 0:32:50.239
<v Speaker 1>I was mindful of that. I always got irritated when

0:32:50.280 --> 0:32:54.880
<v Speaker 1>certain colleagues who hosted certain cable news morning shows didn't

0:32:55.040 --> 0:32:57.239
<v Speaker 1>seem to care about their colleagues and the perception that

0:32:57.280 --> 0:32:59.400
<v Speaker 1>they were creating for the rest of us that have

0:32:59.480 --> 0:33:04.680
<v Speaker 1>to do this. And so now I'm no longer rounding

0:33:04.680 --> 0:33:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the edges, right, I'm like, yeah, Joe Scarborough is the singular.

0:33:09.360 --> 0:33:12.120
<v Speaker 1>If you're looking for somebody who did the most damage

0:33:12.160 --> 0:33:15.640
<v Speaker 1>to the press and the Joe Biden story, it's Joe Scarborough.

0:33:16.000 --> 0:33:19.240
<v Speaker 3>Now, it just is maybe that was as long game

0:33:19.280 --> 0:33:22.120
<v Speaker 3>as a Republican I don't know, but it's like, I

0:33:22.360 --> 0:33:23.800
<v Speaker 3>don't know how else to put it right.

0:33:23.880 --> 0:33:26.680
<v Speaker 1>He was Now what I always found unfair is that

0:33:26.800 --> 0:33:28.640
<v Speaker 1>was just his opinion and it should have just been

0:33:28.680 --> 0:33:31.240
<v Speaker 1>seen as like, I don't mind that he did that,

0:33:31.200 --> 0:33:34.760
<v Speaker 1>that was an opinionated show. What I minded was the

0:33:34.800 --> 0:33:38.040
<v Speaker 1>perception that somehow this was a media driven narrative. And

0:33:38.080 --> 0:33:41.440
<v Speaker 1>it's like, no, he's a partisan. But all of that

0:33:41.480 --> 0:33:43.920
<v Speaker 1>has gotten so lost. I mean, me trying to explain

0:33:43.960 --> 0:33:46.000
<v Speaker 1>that that, hey, morning.

0:33:45.880 --> 0:33:48.720
<v Speaker 2>Joe is not this it's not a news it's more of.

0:33:48.680 --> 0:33:53.520
<v Speaker 1>A commentary thing. And you know, it's at this point,

0:33:53.680 --> 0:33:55.560
<v Speaker 1>what does the viewer see? You know, as I've always

0:33:55.560 --> 0:33:57.960
<v Speaker 1>said that Peacock is on every channel, so the viewer

0:33:58.040 --> 0:34:01.040
<v Speaker 1>just sees it all as one thing. Don't differentiate it

0:34:01.120 --> 0:34:04.640
<v Speaker 1>that much. It's true, right, newspaper headlines, whether the headlines

0:34:04.680 --> 0:34:07.880
<v Speaker 1>over an op ed or a news story, the headline's

0:34:07.920 --> 0:34:10.120
<v Speaker 1>the headline, and it's a Washington Post headline, right.

0:34:10.040 --> 0:34:13.600
<v Speaker 2>Regardless of which section of the paper. So it is.

0:34:14.600 --> 0:34:16.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, I don't know whether it's even worth fighting

0:34:16.920 --> 0:34:20.880
<v Speaker 1>those particulars anymore in the news consumption space.

0:34:22.239 --> 0:34:25.759
<v Speaker 3>The last one hundred people who pointed out to me, well,

0:34:25.760 --> 0:34:27.880
<v Speaker 3>that's an opinion piece, not from the news section.

0:34:27.960 --> 0:34:31.440
<v Speaker 2>We're all journalists. No citizen has ever said that to me.

0:34:31.560 --> 0:34:32.640
<v Speaker 2>But was that a news piece?

0:34:33.120 --> 0:34:34.840
<v Speaker 3>Just the other day on the show, I did a

0:34:35.040 --> 0:34:37.640
<v Speaker 3>big story on a Guardian piece trying to say that

0:34:37.800 --> 0:34:40.719
<v Speaker 3>the defund movement worked well in Houston and Seattle, and

0:34:40.719 --> 0:34:42.719
<v Speaker 3>it clearly didn't if you look at the murder rate.

0:34:43.320 --> 0:34:45.719
<v Speaker 2>And I was like, wait a minute, is this a newspiece?

0:34:45.760 --> 0:34:47.919
<v Speaker 3>And I scanned it and I actually put it through

0:34:48.040 --> 0:34:51.480
<v Speaker 3>chat GPT. Is this a newspiece or is this an

0:34:51.520 --> 0:34:54.239
<v Speaker 3>opinion piece? And it was in the news section, and

0:34:54.239 --> 0:34:56.160
<v Speaker 3>then we figured out it probably shouldn't have been but

0:34:56.920 --> 0:35:00.399
<v Speaker 3>you're so right that no one gets the distinction. And

0:35:00.760 --> 0:35:03.279
<v Speaker 3>there's one of the reasons they don't get to the

0:35:03.440 --> 0:35:08.520
<v Speaker 3>distinction isn't just on the consumer. Certain outlets will sometimes

0:35:08.560 --> 0:35:12.239
<v Speaker 3>cordon off news and opinion, but there are almost no

0:35:12.480 --> 0:35:17.120
<v Speaker 3>outlets anymore that you would be shocked that that opinion

0:35:17.200 --> 0:35:20.480
<v Speaker 3>is being run in that outlet. There's almost no outlets

0:35:20.480 --> 0:35:24.120
<v Speaker 3>where you'd even be a little bit surprised. I think

0:35:24.160 --> 0:35:28.879
<v Speaker 3>The Atlantic will consistently if we stripped the title and

0:35:28.920 --> 0:35:32.399
<v Speaker 3>I said, where did this run, you might consistently say

0:35:32.520 --> 0:35:34.680
<v Speaker 3>that could either be in the Wall Street Journal or

0:35:34.680 --> 0:35:36.920
<v Speaker 3>the New York Times. So that's a little bit unique.

0:35:37.120 --> 0:35:41.600
<v Speaker 3>But especially before Jeff Bezos had this turn with the

0:35:41.719 --> 0:35:42.840
<v Speaker 3>Washington Post, where.

0:35:42.840 --> 0:35:44.640
<v Speaker 1>I know I used to think the Post was the

0:35:45.440 --> 0:35:47.919
<v Speaker 1>best of all worlds for a while, I really did, yes,

0:35:47.960 --> 0:35:49.760
<v Speaker 1>I felt like for a period the time, the Post

0:35:49.880 --> 0:35:51.360
<v Speaker 1>was its best version of itself.

0:35:51.520 --> 0:35:54.120
<v Speaker 3>And then Jeff right, because I think they were reflecting Washington,

0:35:54.120 --> 0:35:57.440
<v Speaker 3>and Washington was a town with functional Democrats and Republicans,

0:35:57.440 --> 0:35:59.279
<v Speaker 3>and they would sometimes talk to each other.

0:35:59.440 --> 0:36:02.080
<v Speaker 2>But when that ought to change, the Post got to change.

0:36:02.080 --> 0:36:04.799
<v Speaker 3>And now there are there are many many stories that

0:36:04.840 --> 0:36:10.000
<v Speaker 3>were in the post opinion section that were you wouldn't say,

0:36:10.040 --> 0:36:13.680
<v Speaker 3>oh that could run in another newspaper's opinion section who

0:36:13.719 --> 0:36:17.439
<v Speaker 3>had a reading of Donald Trump that wasn't caustic. So yeah,

0:36:17.480 --> 0:36:20.640
<v Speaker 3>I think it's I think it's very one of the

0:36:20.760 --> 0:36:24.040
<v Speaker 3>very bad trends of journalism. Also, could I just say,

0:36:24.400 --> 0:36:26.440
<v Speaker 3>when you say, I've heard you say that before, my

0:36:26.480 --> 0:36:29.960
<v Speaker 3>first name is meet as in the press, how many people?

0:36:30.040 --> 0:36:32.480
<v Speaker 3>And did you guys have a super cut in the

0:36:32.520 --> 0:36:35.120
<v Speaker 3>studio where people called you Todd by the stake?

0:36:35.239 --> 0:36:38.560
<v Speaker 2>Oh? Yeah, that happened once every four shows. It did.

0:36:38.960 --> 0:36:41.240
<v Speaker 1>What's funny about it for me is is that actually

0:36:41.320 --> 0:36:43.680
<v Speaker 1>I grew I grew up with that because my grandfather

0:36:44.280 --> 0:36:47.760
<v Speaker 1>his first name was Merle and his middle name was Lynn.

0:36:48.200 --> 0:36:51.240
<v Speaker 2>So what do you think he preferred to be called Todd?

0:36:51.520 --> 0:36:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so he actually all of his friends called him Todd.

0:36:55.760 --> 0:37:00.640
<v Speaker 1>My father had it literally, his his asociates would call

0:37:00.680 --> 0:37:03.800
<v Speaker 1>him Tom. My mother when she got into real estate,

0:37:04.960 --> 0:37:07.440
<v Speaker 1>all of she would be just referred to as Todd.

0:37:08.600 --> 0:37:09.000
<v Speaker 2>It was.

0:37:09.120 --> 0:37:12.360
<v Speaker 1>It's such a normal thing in my family that I

0:37:12.360 --> 0:37:14.719
<v Speaker 1>would It's funny you bring it up. It always seemed

0:37:14.760 --> 0:37:16.880
<v Speaker 1>to bother other people more than it ever bothered me.

0:37:17.160 --> 0:37:17.920
<v Speaker 2>It didn't.

0:37:18.040 --> 0:37:20.880
<v Speaker 1>I never I used to let I get up. The

0:37:20.880 --> 0:37:22.839
<v Speaker 1>only time I'd get annoyed is when I would get

0:37:23.680 --> 0:37:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Chuck Dodd or Chris Todd or you know, there was

0:37:28.840 --> 0:37:31.840
<v Speaker 1>a time i'd get the Chuck rob you know that,

0:37:32.280 --> 0:37:34.879
<v Speaker 1>or or but that would annoy me a little bit.

0:37:35.280 --> 0:37:37.880
<v Speaker 1>But it never bothered me. But you're so, it's so

0:37:38.000 --> 0:37:41.960
<v Speaker 1>funny how often the Todd thing happened. But that is

0:37:42.000 --> 0:37:44.040
<v Speaker 1>something I grew up with and all the time. You know,

0:37:44.400 --> 0:37:46.000
<v Speaker 1>when you grew up with two first names. I mean

0:37:46.040 --> 0:37:47.840
<v Speaker 1>I used to joke NBC we were the home of

0:37:47.840 --> 0:37:52.840
<v Speaker 1>two first names, Brian Williams, Andrea Mitchell, Chris Matthews, David Gregory,

0:37:53.080 --> 0:37:53.720
<v Speaker 1>Chuck Todd.

0:37:53.840 --> 0:37:56.279
<v Speaker 2>It was sort of astonishing how many of them?

0:37:56.280 --> 0:37:59.359
<v Speaker 3>You're like, joy, you know, yeah, it was like how

0:37:59.800 --> 0:38:02.360
<v Speaker 3>high that's Jen Sackey. There are no sacking the.

0:38:04.120 --> 0:38:06.920
<v Speaker 2>Right, no Madows out there anymore, you know whatever. I

0:38:06.960 --> 0:38:08.680
<v Speaker 2>once did a story on the Senate.

0:38:08.719 --> 0:38:11.319
<v Speaker 3>First of all, there's a good statistic how many Americans

0:38:11.360 --> 0:38:14.840
<v Speaker 3>have two first names? And you know senators, uh have

0:38:15.480 --> 0:38:17.680
<v Speaker 3>double the rate of two first names.

0:38:17.680 --> 0:38:20.399
<v Speaker 1>Interesting, So I went into the long business. I could

0:38:20.440 --> 0:38:23.719
<v Speaker 1>have I had a shot at this if I wanted to.

0:38:24.320 --> 0:38:25.800
<v Speaker 3>And then you could be a senator and get on

0:38:25.840 --> 0:38:28.160
<v Speaker 3>a Sunday show and call someone about their last name.

0:38:28.239 --> 0:38:28.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:38:28.760 --> 0:38:30.560
<v Speaker 1>So let me let me to go back to the

0:38:30.600 --> 0:38:36.840
<v Speaker 1>timing issue of your podcast. What what's a story that

0:38:36.960 --> 0:38:39.680
<v Speaker 1>I would think belongs to your podcast that you don't

0:38:39.800 --> 0:38:43.200
<v Speaker 1>do because of timing or because of topic. What what's

0:38:43.200 --> 0:38:46.160
<v Speaker 1>something that doesn't make the cut that might surprise people?

0:38:47.320 --> 0:38:50.520
<v Speaker 3>Well, how I describe it to people is ideally it's

0:38:50.520 --> 0:38:54.680
<v Speaker 3>an op ed of the air. And okay, that's me

0:38:54.880 --> 0:38:56.480
<v Speaker 3>using these antiquated terms.

0:38:56.600 --> 0:38:59.080
<v Speaker 2>We were just done talking about it. Talking about it

0:38:59.160 --> 0:39:00.560
<v Speaker 2>right understands what an is.

0:39:00.680 --> 0:39:04.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but it is a good gi just discussion is

0:39:05.440 --> 0:39:08.600
<v Speaker 3>subtly a debate. It's always a debate. And I'm not

0:39:08.640 --> 0:39:11.719
<v Speaker 3>taking the other side of the debate. I'm not a partisan,

0:39:12.200 --> 0:39:15.960
<v Speaker 3>but I want them to explain, not just there are

0:39:16.000 --> 0:39:19.960
<v Speaker 3>great interviews that the question to be asked and answered

0:39:20.000 --> 0:39:22.480
<v Speaker 3>is and then what happened or what happened next? That's

0:39:22.520 --> 0:39:24.560
<v Speaker 3>a great interview. It's not a great gist interview. A

0:39:24.560 --> 0:39:26.399
<v Speaker 3>great gist interview is why.

0:39:28.880 --> 0:39:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, those are Larry King and Charlie Rose I always

0:39:31.680 --> 0:39:34.560
<v Speaker 1>thought were underrated interviewers. Because they were so good at

0:39:35.280 --> 0:39:37.359
<v Speaker 1>at just sometimes saying and then what.

0:39:39.000 --> 0:39:41.360
<v Speaker 2>You know? And why is why is still the best question?

0:39:41.840 --> 0:39:44.440
<v Speaker 3>But if it's we don't do a lot of history

0:39:44.800 --> 0:39:47.080
<v Speaker 3>unless there's an angle to it, bringing it up to

0:39:47.120 --> 0:39:49.360
<v Speaker 3>the present, or let's re examine why.

0:39:49.200 --> 0:39:49.880
<v Speaker 2>People thought that.

0:39:51.320 --> 0:39:54.040
<v Speaker 3>But I would love to if I had a show

0:39:54.080 --> 0:39:56.400
<v Speaker 3>that wasn't to just I do a ton of history,

0:39:56.440 --> 0:40:01.120
<v Speaker 3>and when we do history podcasts or history interviews, people

0:40:01.200 --> 0:40:05.360
<v Speaker 3>love them. But I do think it's because I'm engaging

0:40:05.480 --> 0:40:06.520
<v Speaker 3>a little bit of a debate.

0:40:07.680 --> 0:40:10.399
<v Speaker 2>What's a if you had more bandwidth, what's a what

0:40:10.440 --> 0:40:11.120
<v Speaker 2>would you be doing?

0:40:12.400 --> 0:40:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Uh?

0:40:12.760 --> 0:40:13.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's a great question.

0:40:13.960 --> 0:40:16.040
<v Speaker 3>I have two shows besides this one, but they're sort

0:40:16.080 --> 0:40:18.360
<v Speaker 3>of shows within a show. And what is called funny

0:40:18.360 --> 0:40:21.239
<v Speaker 3>you should mention it's where I interview comedians sort of

0:40:21.280 --> 0:40:26.200
<v Speaker 3>about their theses. You know, comedians being the new philosophers,

0:40:26.360 --> 0:40:29.200
<v Speaker 3>and we deferred lots of our punchlines insights.

0:40:29.560 --> 0:40:31.040
<v Speaker 2>It's been that way for decades.

0:40:31.200 --> 0:40:34.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, I've always dot comedians were comedians.

0:40:34.520 --> 0:40:36.479
<v Speaker 1>Stand up comedians were always the most well read people

0:40:36.480 --> 0:40:37.480
<v Speaker 1>you'd ever meet.

0:40:38.160 --> 0:40:39.880
<v Speaker 3>They read more than all Yeah, a lot of times

0:40:40.040 --> 0:40:42.799
<v Speaker 3>and a lot of times not formally educated, and they

0:40:42.880 --> 0:40:45.720
<v Speaker 3>felt bad about that, and then they became auto di dacks.

0:40:45.760 --> 0:40:47.600
<v Speaker 2>They're great love I love them. I love the way

0:40:47.600 --> 0:40:48.000
<v Speaker 2>they think.

0:40:48.280 --> 0:40:52.520
<v Speaker 3>But I think since you know, definitely pre George Carlin

0:40:52.600 --> 0:40:55.239
<v Speaker 3>and Richard Pryor, no one was looking to comedians for

0:40:55.320 --> 0:40:58.879
<v Speaker 3>inside And then there were the niche Yeah, and then

0:40:58.880 --> 0:41:01.200
<v Speaker 3>there was Mort Saul who read a newspaper on stage.

0:41:01.200 --> 0:41:03.320
<v Speaker 3>I don't know how funny it was. And then Lenny

0:41:03.320 --> 0:41:06.160
<v Speaker 3>Bruce and this all changed. But I do think there

0:41:06.239 --> 0:41:08.440
<v Speaker 3>was a story in the either Late Night Now that

0:41:08.520 --> 0:41:11.480
<v Speaker 3>must have been the odds where it just quoted Chris

0:41:11.560 --> 0:41:14.720
<v Speaker 3>Rock as an expert on the black experience, and maybe

0:41:14.719 --> 0:41:17.400
<v Speaker 3>said comedian Chris Rock, but he was there for his insight.

0:41:17.640 --> 0:41:20.359
<v Speaker 3>And that's when I said, Okay, they're pundits now, you know,

0:41:20.719 --> 0:41:22.080
<v Speaker 3>they're pundits with punchlines.

0:41:22.160 --> 0:41:24.319
<v Speaker 1>So that's one of the shows that another thing, have

0:41:24.360 --> 0:41:26.080
<v Speaker 1>you ever done it? Have you ever done stand up comedian?

0:41:26.920 --> 0:41:29.600
<v Speaker 3>You know when I was in college, I did, and

0:41:30.160 --> 0:41:32.719
<v Speaker 3>so the read my and my kids do it, and

0:41:32.760 --> 0:41:34.759
<v Speaker 3>the reason that I'm not good at it could be

0:41:34.800 --> 0:41:37.479
<v Speaker 3>many things, right, but the big one is a stand

0:41:37.560 --> 0:41:39.759
<v Speaker 3>up comedian will do when you see his act it's like,

0:41:39.760 --> 0:41:41.879
<v Speaker 3>oh my god, what fresh insights. But of course they'd

0:41:41.920 --> 0:41:45.320
<v Speaker 3>have done this hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of times.

0:41:45.560 --> 0:41:48.000
<v Speaker 3>So I'd rather do a show every day and have

0:41:48.080 --> 0:41:49.839
<v Speaker 3>a couple of hits and say to myself, you know,

0:41:50.120 --> 0:41:52.480
<v Speaker 3>if I had more time to work that over, it

0:41:52.520 --> 0:41:55.600
<v Speaker 3>could be a fantastic it could be an a plus.

0:41:55.640 --> 0:41:58.960
<v Speaker 3>But I'd rather have a string of, let's hope, a minuses.

0:41:59.000 --> 0:42:01.279
<v Speaker 3>This is also one I'm my problems with. When I

0:42:01.280 --> 0:42:04.320
<v Speaker 3>worked for NPR, I was on I did mostly sports,

0:42:04.360 --> 0:42:07.520
<v Speaker 3>and I would crank out a lot of stories because

0:42:07.560 --> 0:42:09.760
<v Speaker 3>when you cover the World Series, you do two stories

0:42:09.800 --> 0:42:11.719
<v Speaker 3>every day, and then you cover the Super Bowl, and

0:42:11.760 --> 0:42:12.240
<v Speaker 3>that's great.

0:42:12.280 --> 0:42:13.400
<v Speaker 2>I love the pace of that.

0:42:13.719 --> 0:42:16.680
<v Speaker 3>But there was a certain kind of NPR reporter as

0:42:16.719 --> 0:42:20.200
<v Speaker 3>epitomodz by this American Life for cereal, where man, did

0:42:20.200 --> 0:42:24.200
<v Speaker 3>they love going over their tape and with a lapidary

0:42:24.280 --> 0:42:27.200
<v Speaker 3>fineness bringing out that one cut of sound. Some of

0:42:27.239 --> 0:42:29.239
<v Speaker 3>my best friends are great at this. I had no

0:42:29.320 --> 0:42:31.600
<v Speaker 3>patience for that. So, yeah, this was the problem with

0:42:31.640 --> 0:42:33.200
<v Speaker 3>stand up. It's you really have to.

0:42:33.520 --> 0:42:35.719
<v Speaker 2>Work it over and over and over again. You don't

0:42:35.719 --> 0:42:36.600
<v Speaker 2>want to be a refiner.

0:42:36.640 --> 0:42:38.239
<v Speaker 1>You're like sort of an entrepre you want to you

0:42:38.239 --> 0:42:40.560
<v Speaker 1>want to be, you want to break the mold quickly

0:42:40.680 --> 0:42:41.200
<v Speaker 1>type of thing.

0:42:41.280 --> 0:42:41.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah.

0:42:41.880 --> 0:42:45.200
<v Speaker 3>Adam Carolla has this great analogy where he says, we're

0:42:45.239 --> 0:42:47.760
<v Speaker 3>either a factory or a warehouse, right, and the factory

0:42:47.800 --> 0:42:51.080
<v Speaker 3>is putting out content and the warehouse is storing it

0:42:51.120 --> 0:42:55.360
<v Speaker 3>and maybe crafting it. So he sees himself more of

0:42:55.400 --> 0:42:58.360
<v Speaker 3>a factory. A stand up comedian is more of a warehouse.

0:42:58.360 --> 0:43:01.719
<v Speaker 3>I'd say maybe a curator if they're really good. All right,

0:43:01.760 --> 0:43:03.239
<v Speaker 3>so you do that Moselle on the other show, the

0:43:03.239 --> 0:43:05.359
<v Speaker 3>show within a show. Yeah, it's called Not Even Mad,

0:43:05.440 --> 0:43:07.600
<v Speaker 3>and this is there's an interesting backstory there.

0:43:07.640 --> 0:43:09.600
<v Speaker 2>So I would always listen.

0:43:09.640 --> 0:43:12.160
<v Speaker 3>I do always listen to all these podcasts, and the

0:43:12.239 --> 0:43:16.200
<v Speaker 3>standard form if it's not two people being interviewed, three

0:43:16.600 --> 0:43:19.239
<v Speaker 3>guys talking, not always guys, that's changed a little bit,

0:43:19.320 --> 0:43:21.719
<v Speaker 3>but let's call it three guys talking and agreeing with

0:43:21.760 --> 0:43:24.400
<v Speaker 3>each other, right, it's three guys from the Bulwark or

0:43:24.440 --> 0:43:27.000
<v Speaker 3>three guys from the Dispatch, or three guys from Commentary,

0:43:27.200 --> 0:43:30.480
<v Speaker 3>and three guys from Pod Save America. And I can't

0:43:30.560 --> 0:43:32.560
<v Speaker 3>I listened to all these shows, and I can't tell

0:43:32.600 --> 0:43:34.680
<v Speaker 3>you how many times I've listened to it.

0:43:34.640 --> 0:43:37.480
<v Speaker 1>As you listen to it in speed sped up one

0:43:37.480 --> 0:43:39.919
<v Speaker 1>and a half speed Yeah, I'm two and a half

0:43:40.520 --> 0:43:41.440
<v Speaker 1>and a half Wow.

0:43:41.560 --> 0:43:42.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah wow.

0:43:42.480 --> 0:43:45.279
<v Speaker 3>And the app my app of choice, also cuts out silences.

0:43:45.560 --> 0:43:48.920
<v Speaker 3>We could listen, by the way, much faster than we do.

0:43:50.080 --> 0:43:53.800
<v Speaker 3>So yes, so maybe you've had this this thought. Also,

0:43:54.000 --> 0:43:57.120
<v Speaker 3>I listened to the three people at the commentary podcast

0:43:57.360 --> 0:43:59.960
<v Speaker 3>talking about whatever they're talking about, and John pod Hortz

0:44:00.160 --> 0:44:01.719
<v Speaker 3>makes a good point, and then I'll listen to the

0:44:01.760 --> 0:44:04.239
<v Speaker 3>three guys at Pod Save America talk about what they

0:44:04.280 --> 0:44:06.040
<v Speaker 3>are talking about, and luckily it's another job.

0:44:06.080 --> 0:44:08.239
<v Speaker 2>You know, John love It or John Favreau makes a

0:44:08.239 --> 0:44:08.680
<v Speaker 2>good point.

0:44:08.760 --> 0:44:11.080
<v Speaker 3>But Favreau and love It are always agreeing with each other,

0:44:11.120 --> 0:44:13.440
<v Speaker 3>and pod Horrits and his guys are always agreeing.

0:44:13.560 --> 0:44:16.120
<v Speaker 2>What what if we took a love It and put

0:44:16.160 --> 0:44:17.280
<v Speaker 2>him next to a pod Horrit.

0:44:17.360 --> 0:44:19.720
<v Speaker 3>So this was my idea, right, this is my idea

0:44:19.760 --> 0:44:21.759
<v Speaker 3>to have a liberal and a conservative talk And the

0:44:21.760 --> 0:44:25.959
<v Speaker 3>first iteration of it didn't really work because of well

0:44:26.000 --> 0:44:27.880
<v Speaker 3>it was called not even mad, but there was a

0:44:27.920 --> 0:44:31.880
<v Speaker 3>little bit of madness. And so now instead of I

0:44:31.920 --> 0:44:34.400
<v Speaker 3>do think that for these shows to have a lot

0:44:34.440 --> 0:44:37.840
<v Speaker 3>of traction, you get to know the host and the panelists,

0:44:37.880 --> 0:44:40.520
<v Speaker 3>and that would be ideal. But I'm just changing panelists

0:44:40.600 --> 0:44:42.720
<v Speaker 3>every week, and it's, uh boy.

0:44:43.000 --> 0:44:45.920
<v Speaker 1>It's a tough I'm I'm rooting for you on that,

0:44:46.120 --> 0:44:48.160
<v Speaker 1>but the algorithms really fights you on that.

0:44:49.000 --> 0:44:49.960
<v Speaker 2>It really is hard.

0:44:50.000 --> 0:44:52.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, I'm watching this myself, right, I'm trying

0:44:52.640 --> 0:44:54.719
<v Speaker 1>to build a specific I do not want to pick

0:44:54.760 --> 0:44:57.440
<v Speaker 1>a side, right. Megan Kelly made a decision and she

0:44:57.520 --> 0:45:00.560
<v Speaker 1>built a big audience quickly. That's one way to do it.

0:45:01.120 --> 0:45:03.920
<v Speaker 1>I kind of want to, you know, I sort of

0:45:03.960 --> 0:45:05.640
<v Speaker 1>believe in the I want to get it. I'm going

0:45:05.719 --> 0:45:08.000
<v Speaker 1>to do it my way and hopefully it'll be a

0:45:08.040 --> 0:45:10.040
<v Speaker 1>more durable audience. It's actually what worked for me on

0:45:10.080 --> 0:45:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Twitter versus the way others did.

0:45:12.080 --> 0:45:15.719
<v Speaker 2>It, and and so i've i'm I'm mindful of that.

0:45:16.400 --> 0:45:22.880
<v Speaker 1>But there are just the distribution models don't reward left this,

0:45:23.000 --> 0:45:23.319
<v Speaker 1>left right.

0:45:23.400 --> 0:45:26.200
<v Speaker 2>It's hard to find an audience. It says they they.

0:45:26.200 --> 0:45:29.239
<v Speaker 1>Want that, and it's I don't know. I don't know

0:45:29.280 --> 0:45:35.320
<v Speaker 1>whether that's the algorithms speaking or whether that's reality.

0:45:36.280 --> 0:45:37.720
<v Speaker 2>I do think it's mostly reality.

0:45:37.760 --> 0:45:40.680
<v Speaker 3>I think the algorithms figured out what works because the

0:45:40.920 --> 0:45:45.200
<v Speaker 3>audience told them. And I think that there's a niche

0:45:45.239 --> 0:45:47.120
<v Speaker 3>for it, but it is a niche, and I hope

0:45:47.200 --> 0:45:49.279
<v Speaker 3>you come to dominate the niche. And I've got my

0:45:49.360 --> 0:45:50.720
<v Speaker 3>little toe hold in the direction.

0:45:51.000 --> 0:45:53.080
<v Speaker 2>It's all niches. You're right, really, you're right. It's a

0:45:53.120 --> 0:45:54.520
<v Speaker 2>series of them. I do think.

0:45:54.680 --> 0:45:56.840
<v Speaker 3>I think it's mostly like when you listen to a

0:45:56.920 --> 0:45:59.000
<v Speaker 3>radio station. Remember kids, there was a thing called radio.

0:45:59.120 --> 0:46:01.800
<v Speaker 3>There's no radio station that plays a little country, a

0:46:01.840 --> 0:46:03.680
<v Speaker 3>little hip hop, and a little classic rock.

0:46:03.840 --> 0:46:04.880
<v Speaker 2>You have to have a format.

0:46:05.120 --> 0:46:08.840
<v Speaker 3>And the format of podcasts is this is a conservative podcast,

0:46:09.000 --> 0:46:11.680
<v Speaker 3>this is a liberal podcast. The exception are the ones

0:46:11.680 --> 0:46:15.040
<v Speaker 3>that are neither liberal or conservative but are actually more

0:46:15.160 --> 0:46:16.240
<v Speaker 3>radical than either.

0:46:16.840 --> 0:46:18.640
<v Speaker 2>Maybe not consistently left.

0:46:18.440 --> 0:46:21.799
<v Speaker 3>And right, but I think you know, uh Sargar and

0:46:22.080 --> 0:46:25.960
<v Speaker 3>Breaking Points, Crystal Ball, that's in that category. Maybe I

0:46:26.000 --> 0:46:30.120
<v Speaker 3>guess you could dub them, you know, far left, but

0:46:30.480 --> 0:46:32.879
<v Speaker 3>so far left that there's a lot of right to them.

0:46:33.120 --> 0:46:36.120
<v Speaker 2>But they're also have a consistent, yeah, consistent format.

0:46:37.160 --> 0:46:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, look, I I look, I think I don't want

0:46:40.120 --> 0:46:42.320
<v Speaker 1>to do too much more on sort of the business

0:46:42.400 --> 0:46:44.839
<v Speaker 1>of what we're doing, but it does feel like you

0:46:44.840 --> 0:46:46.839
<v Speaker 1>you have such a knowledge of this and you've been

0:46:47.840 --> 0:46:51.080
<v Speaker 1>are you you know, are you one of those folks?

0:46:51.120 --> 0:46:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Do you think is there more change in the next

0:46:53.560 --> 0:46:56.239
<v Speaker 1>five years or less of it? You know, we're all

0:46:56.280 --> 0:47:01.360
<v Speaker 1>preparing for radical transformation, and usually sometimes if everybody's betting

0:47:01.360 --> 0:47:03.480
<v Speaker 1>on that, it sometimes doesn't become self fulfilling.

0:47:04.960 --> 0:47:07.960
<v Speaker 3>Right in terms of media, in terms of politics, in

0:47:08.040 --> 0:47:10.560
<v Speaker 3>terms of what media or media. In terms of media,

0:47:11.200 --> 0:47:13.200
<v Speaker 3>I would expect I would expect there to be a

0:47:13.239 --> 0:47:14.120
<v Speaker 3>lot of change.

0:47:14.160 --> 0:47:16.760
<v Speaker 2>I would expect AI to change things greatly.

0:47:16.880 --> 0:47:20.520
<v Speaker 3>I would we gotten to this place where there used

0:47:20.520 --> 0:47:23.520
<v Speaker 3>to be a lot of inefficiencies and now there's a

0:47:23.560 --> 0:47:27.080
<v Speaker 3>war on inefficiency and it's working. But you know, inefficiency

0:47:27.160 --> 0:47:30.280
<v Speaker 3>in many systems is a really good thing. Like if

0:47:30.640 --> 0:47:34.399
<v Speaker 3>the in the animal kingdom, inefficiency is a mutt and

0:47:34.400 --> 0:47:36.439
<v Speaker 3>by the way, the healthiest dogs.

0:47:36.440 --> 0:47:36.879
<v Speaker 2>That's right.

0:47:37.040 --> 0:47:39.919
<v Speaker 1>And what it's funny you say that you know why

0:47:39.960 --> 0:47:45.200
<v Speaker 1>our voting system is so secure because it's inefficient, because

0:47:45.360 --> 0:47:49.040
<v Speaker 1>it's methodical, because there's these paper ballots that have to

0:47:49.080 --> 0:47:52.759
<v Speaker 1>follow this, and if we it is actually something that's

0:47:52.800 --> 0:47:56.560
<v Speaker 1>completely inefficient. But if you made it efficient, you'd actually

0:47:58.640 --> 0:48:00.960
<v Speaker 1>send a message of life. Lack of confidence in the

0:48:00.960 --> 0:48:02.719
<v Speaker 1>system we wouldn't trust it. I'm going to give you

0:48:02.680 --> 0:48:05.160
<v Speaker 1>an advision one makes it more trustworthy.

0:48:05.719 --> 0:48:08.160
<v Speaker 3>I'll tell you one right in your wheelhouse. So in

0:48:08.200 --> 0:48:10.360
<v Speaker 3>the as you I'm probably telling you something you know.

0:48:10.520 --> 0:48:15.080
<v Speaker 3>But one hundred eighty years ago, the political science movement

0:48:15.239 --> 0:48:20.319
<v Speaker 3>du jore, started by and led by A. Shatschneider, was

0:48:20.880 --> 0:48:25.520
<v Speaker 3>we have these political parties and they're inefficient. It really

0:48:25.560 --> 0:48:29.760
<v Speaker 3>got the political scientists upset. The parties need to sort

0:48:30.080 --> 0:48:33.640
<v Speaker 3>according to ideology. It doesn't make sense to have all

0:48:33.640 --> 0:48:37.120
<v Speaker 3>these conservatives in the Democratic Party. Then that happened, not

0:48:37.200 --> 0:48:39.359
<v Speaker 3>because the political scientists said it, but this is what

0:48:39.360 --> 0:48:43.080
<v Speaker 3>the political scientists wanted, and it was a total.

0:48:42.680 --> 0:48:46.319
<v Speaker 1>Be careful disasters for Oh yes, I talked about this

0:48:46.360 --> 0:48:50.200
<v Speaker 1>all the sorting, oh one hundred percent. The lack of

0:48:50.280 --> 0:48:54.600
<v Speaker 1>ideological diversity inside the two parties. I mean, you and

0:48:54.640 --> 0:48:58.799
<v Speaker 1>I grew up with liberal Republicans working with conservative Democrats,

0:48:59.160 --> 0:49:02.960
<v Speaker 1>with the populist Democrats in the Midwest work and it.

0:49:03.000 --> 0:49:06.560
<v Speaker 3>Was public living from when FDR had to work it

0:49:06.560 --> 0:49:09.880
<v Speaker 3>out with Theodore Bilbo and the very Democrats.

0:49:09.960 --> 0:49:10.600
<v Speaker 2>But I and I.

0:49:10.560 --> 0:49:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Grew up with a with a basically a conservative Democrat

0:49:14.520 --> 0:49:17.799
<v Speaker 1>who left the Party and would say, well, Sam Nune

0:49:17.840 --> 0:49:18.120
<v Speaker 1>would be.

0:49:18.120 --> 0:49:19.080
<v Speaker 2>A Republican in New York.

0:49:19.080 --> 0:49:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Would be always he would always say that, like, you know,

0:49:21.200 --> 0:49:22.799
<v Speaker 1>that's why I like because I'd always said I thought

0:49:22.800 --> 0:49:24.160
<v Speaker 1>that I thought you were Republican. He said, well, Sam,

0:49:24.200 --> 0:49:25.800
<v Speaker 1>none would be a Republican if he were in Iowa.

0:49:25.960 --> 0:49:28.200
<v Speaker 1>To be a Republican, you know, he's just a Democrat

0:49:28.200 --> 0:49:30.040
<v Speaker 1>in the South because you have to be in order

0:49:30.080 --> 0:49:32.560
<v Speaker 1>to vote right because at the time there was no.

0:49:32.800 --> 0:49:36.000
<v Speaker 2>There weren't many registered Republicans. So it is.

0:49:36.239 --> 0:49:40.640
<v Speaker 1>But you're right, I think that lack of ideological you know,

0:49:40.680 --> 0:49:46.399
<v Speaker 1>the conservative Democrats and liberal Republicans are extinct, and that's

0:49:46.400 --> 0:49:46.959
<v Speaker 1>what we miss.

0:49:47.160 --> 0:49:50.520
<v Speaker 3>Yes, And I was just I was just in Seattle,

0:49:50.560 --> 0:49:52.319
<v Speaker 3>and I was spending some time with a very top

0:49:52.320 --> 0:49:56.920
<v Speaker 3>political consultant. And he's because he makes a living, he's

0:49:56.920 --> 0:49:59.600
<v Speaker 3>a Democrat. I don't have to say he's a Democrat Seattle.

0:50:00.000 --> 0:50:02.560
<v Speaker 3>But he bemoans the fact that the Republican Party is

0:50:02.640 --> 0:50:05.480
<v Speaker 3>pretty much non existent and all they could do is

0:50:05.920 --> 0:50:10.279
<v Speaker 3>run some protest candidates who are way out there ideologically

0:50:10.360 --> 0:50:12.320
<v Speaker 3>and never have a chance for winning. This is another

0:50:13.400 --> 0:50:15.920
<v Speaker 3>pretty bad aspect of monopolies.

0:50:17.040 --> 0:50:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Monopolies are bad for economies. Doopolies are not great to economies,

0:50:21.560 --> 0:50:25.680
<v Speaker 1>but monopolies are worse. And what's what's a what's a what?

0:50:25.760 --> 0:50:25.960
<v Speaker 2>You know?

0:50:26.000 --> 0:50:29.480
<v Speaker 1>The political economy that has become a monopoly in rural

0:50:29.560 --> 0:50:32.440
<v Speaker 1>America for red and a monopoly in urban America for

0:50:32.480 --> 0:50:36.080
<v Speaker 1>blue has been bad for the voters. It's just been bad,

0:50:36.360 --> 0:50:38.680
<v Speaker 1>been bad for diversity of thought. It's been bad for

0:50:39.040 --> 0:50:43.440
<v Speaker 1>new ideas, you know, and it's a that's a problem.

0:50:44.200 --> 0:50:47.320
<v Speaker 3>And your other business, or your main business, which is media,

0:50:47.719 --> 0:50:51.920
<v Speaker 3>has been waylaid by efficiency. Because a newspaper used to

0:50:52.120 --> 0:50:55.200
<v Speaker 3>have all these advertisements. And the point is, you knew

0:50:55.239 --> 0:50:58.600
<v Speaker 3>you were throwing away ninety percent of your advertising dollar,

0:50:58.640 --> 0:51:02.799
<v Speaker 3>and everyone who took out a want to add, nine

0:51:02.920 --> 0:51:05.759
<v Speaker 3>point nine percent of the people weren't in the market.

0:51:05.480 --> 0:51:06.160
<v Speaker 2>For a boat.

0:51:06.360 --> 0:51:08.799
<v Speaker 3>So is this inefficient way of hitting a lot of

0:51:08.840 --> 0:51:12.560
<v Speaker 3>people than when the Internet and especially the Google out

0:51:12.640 --> 0:51:17.200
<v Speaker 3>algorithm got really efficient, great for advertising, pointless for newspapers,

0:51:17.480 --> 0:51:20.400
<v Speaker 3>they were left with maybe cars and supermarkets and not

0:51:20.440 --> 0:51:22.640
<v Speaker 3>even that because you're only on the move to buy

0:51:22.640 --> 0:51:26.440
<v Speaker 3>a car once every seven years. Yeah, So efficiency, So

0:51:26.680 --> 0:51:28.719
<v Speaker 3>to go back to your answer, we're going to get

0:51:28.760 --> 0:51:32.759
<v Speaker 3>more efficient there's no way that the media ecosystem is

0:51:32.800 --> 0:51:35.359
<v Speaker 3>not going to get more efficient. And from what I see,

0:51:35.400 --> 0:51:40.400
<v Speaker 3>efficiency more often has costs than benefits, except for the

0:51:40.560 --> 0:51:43.920
<v Speaker 3>very specific person who is served by the efficiency.

0:51:44.920 --> 0:51:47.080
<v Speaker 2>All Right, I got to ask about.

0:51:46.840 --> 0:51:49.960
<v Speaker 1>The comic books because if you look carefully, you look

0:51:50.000 --> 0:51:50.799
<v Speaker 1>carefully behind me.

0:51:52.520 --> 0:51:53.680
<v Speaker 2>The Roy Campanella is.

0:51:53.640 --> 0:51:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Actually a portrait of one of his baseball cards. Yeah,

0:51:58.600 --> 0:52:01.400
<v Speaker 1>from tops in the early early fifties. I'm a baseball

0:52:01.400 --> 0:52:03.560
<v Speaker 1>card guy. Are you a comic guy?

0:52:04.600 --> 0:52:06.880
<v Speaker 3>I'm probably more of a baseball card guy, But you

0:52:06.920 --> 0:52:09.000
<v Speaker 3>know what I am. I may I just moved my

0:52:09.120 --> 0:52:12.279
<v Speaker 3>parents out of the house that not only they lived

0:52:12.280 --> 0:52:14.440
<v Speaker 3>in for fifty years, that I was literally born in

0:52:14.480 --> 0:52:17.120
<v Speaker 3>the driveway of. And so now I have all these

0:52:17.480 --> 0:52:20.720
<v Speaker 3>baseball cards and comic books that I gotta sell because

0:52:20.719 --> 0:52:22.560
<v Speaker 3>I have no room. So when you have no room

0:52:22.600 --> 0:52:24.799
<v Speaker 3>for something, you put a Howard the Duck comic on

0:52:24.880 --> 0:52:25.280
<v Speaker 3>the wall.

0:52:25.360 --> 0:52:29.080
<v Speaker 2>I do like nice Howard the Duck. Nice nice Well.

0:52:29.680 --> 0:52:31.200
<v Speaker 2>I worked at a baseball card store.

0:52:31.239 --> 0:52:33.480
<v Speaker 3>That was my first job, and it was the era

0:52:33.640 --> 0:52:36.960
<v Speaker 3>of Matt I guess I learned about bitcoin then because

0:52:37.080 --> 0:52:40.839
<v Speaker 3>Kevin Seisser rookies were selling for like seventy dollars if

0:52:40.880 --> 0:52:42.160
<v Speaker 3>you remember that funny use.

0:52:42.400 --> 0:52:45.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm so glad you referred to it as bitcoin, because

0:52:45.440 --> 0:52:48.719
<v Speaker 1>that's been my analogy is tell me how it's not

0:52:49.280 --> 0:52:51.200
<v Speaker 1>like I have these mic I have a stack of

0:52:51.239 --> 0:52:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Mike Trout Rookie cards. Can I Can I buy something

0:52:56.080 --> 0:52:58.560
<v Speaker 1>with them directly? No, I've got to trade it in

0:52:58.600 --> 0:53:01.000
<v Speaker 1>for cash, and then I can. And what's the difference

0:53:01.000 --> 0:53:04.600
<v Speaker 1>between my mic trop baseball card and bitcoin? And when

0:53:04.600 --> 0:53:08.640
<v Speaker 1>you throw that out there at a crypto person and

0:53:08.719 --> 0:53:10.399
<v Speaker 1>it's like, you know, it's probably the same thing.

0:53:11.000 --> 0:53:13.759
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and then if you get into blockchain, I don't know,

0:53:13.840 --> 0:53:16.520
<v Speaker 3>Ray Fossey blocking the plate chain, I don't know what

0:53:16.640 --> 0:53:21.080
<v Speaker 3>our analogy could be, but yeah, I remember I was

0:53:21.120 --> 0:53:23.360
<v Speaker 3>listening on NPR and then the beginning of the Ukraine

0:53:23.400 --> 0:53:26.400
<v Speaker 3>War there was a story about how it's fun to

0:53:26.640 --> 0:53:29.839
<v Speaker 3>via bitcoin and isn't it great that bitcoin can get

0:53:29.840 --> 0:53:33.600
<v Speaker 3>this money to the Ukrainian fighters, and like that seems

0:53:33.800 --> 0:53:36.920
<v Speaker 3>much less efficient than a bank account. Like I understand,

0:53:37.040 --> 0:53:40.160
<v Speaker 3>you have this interesting thing in the news called the Ukraine,

0:53:40.280 --> 0:53:41.799
<v Speaker 3>the War on Ukraine, and then you have this thing

0:53:41.880 --> 0:53:44.640
<v Speaker 3>called bitcoin. I think there are more layers in between.

0:53:44.680 --> 0:53:46.480
<v Speaker 3>Then are just bank account that works.

0:53:46.960 --> 0:53:49.359
<v Speaker 1>Look, I do I accept the premise it's a little

0:53:49.360 --> 0:53:51.600
<v Speaker 1>bit easier to hide money. And when you're funding a

0:53:51.680 --> 0:53:55.040
<v Speaker 1>war and an insurgency, you need to hide stuff.

0:53:55.080 --> 0:53:58.000
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I get that the block Maybe that's the.

0:53:59.520 --> 0:54:02.799
<v Speaker 1>What's hell full in a moment, But most of the time,

0:54:02.840 --> 0:54:06.680
<v Speaker 1>if you're something that is able to hide transactions or money,

0:54:07.080 --> 0:54:09.240
<v Speaker 1>that's usually not a net positive for society.

0:54:09.320 --> 0:54:11.840
<v Speaker 2>That's usually a net Yeah, that is true.

0:54:12.120 --> 0:54:14.600
<v Speaker 3>I mean my suspicion is mostly and by the way,

0:54:14.680 --> 0:54:16.920
<v Speaker 3>I've lost out on a lot of money because of

0:54:16.920 --> 0:54:21.520
<v Speaker 3>my suspicion. But there are two things that these cryptocurrencies

0:54:21.560 --> 0:54:24.359
<v Speaker 3>are supposed to do, and there are exact odds with

0:54:24.440 --> 0:54:24.879
<v Speaker 3>each other.

0:54:25.120 --> 0:54:27.440
<v Speaker 2>Right, this is almost like Donald Trump.

0:54:27.480 --> 0:54:29.960
<v Speaker 3>The great thing about tariffs is that they will both

0:54:30.080 --> 0:54:33.680
<v Speaker 3>give us money in the treasury and suppressed trade. No,

0:54:33.719 --> 0:54:36.040
<v Speaker 3>they can't do both. But the one thing they're supposed

0:54:36.040 --> 0:54:38.080
<v Speaker 3>to do is be a great store of value. I

0:54:38.160 --> 0:54:41.600
<v Speaker 3>get the intellectual case for that. But the other thing

0:54:41.680 --> 0:54:44.399
<v Speaker 3>why everyone loves them is they're going up to the moon. Now,

0:54:44.440 --> 0:54:46.759
<v Speaker 3>nothing that doubles or triples in value is a great

0:54:46.800 --> 0:54:49.080
<v Speaker 3>store of value if it's always if it's also being

0:54:49.160 --> 0:54:51.839
<v Speaker 3>traded as the priceiest commodity ever made.

0:54:51.960 --> 0:54:55.640
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, no, I mean like I remember as a kid.

0:54:55.440 --> 0:54:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Growing up when I think the Hunt Brothers tried to

0:54:57.360 --> 0:55:00.680
<v Speaker 1>corner the silver market thinking it was an underutil commodity,

0:55:00.719 --> 0:55:03.680
<v Speaker 1>and it's this just feels like it's going to end badly.

0:55:04.280 --> 0:55:06.799
<v Speaker 1>And the question is how many Americans are going to

0:55:06.800 --> 0:55:10.000
<v Speaker 1>get stuck holding the crypto bag when this happens, because

0:55:10.000 --> 0:55:12.319
<v Speaker 1>we know the super wealthy are going to are not

0:55:12.320 --> 0:55:13.879
<v Speaker 1>going to be the ones hold in the bag. It's

0:55:13.920 --> 0:55:18.200
<v Speaker 1>going to be the everyday people. Yeah, just crazy housing.

0:55:18.400 --> 0:55:19.360
<v Speaker 2>So there's an example.

0:55:19.640 --> 0:55:22.879
<v Speaker 3>Would you would you say that in that way when

0:55:22.920 --> 0:55:23.879
<v Speaker 3>your first name was meet?

0:55:26.120 --> 0:55:26.840
<v Speaker 2>That's interesting?

0:55:27.160 --> 0:55:32.040
<v Speaker 1>So I feel like no, because you know I would

0:55:32.040 --> 0:55:34.560
<v Speaker 1>be you know, then I would be blamed for you know,

0:55:34.640 --> 0:55:37.920
<v Speaker 1>some other entities inability to book so and so or

0:55:38.080 --> 0:55:42.480
<v Speaker 1>I came across, and so you worry about that. And

0:55:42.520 --> 0:55:46.880
<v Speaker 1>it's like I will just say I you know, I

0:55:46.920 --> 0:55:49.200
<v Speaker 1>would sometimes speak out on some things and then someone

0:55:49.239 --> 0:55:50.920
<v Speaker 1>would say, hey, we're trying to book so and so,

0:55:51.600 --> 0:55:54.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, try not to do that again type of mindset.

0:55:54.600 --> 0:55:56.160
<v Speaker 1>And it's like, look, I'm a team player and I

0:55:56.239 --> 0:55:59.080
<v Speaker 1>get it. You know, look you know this this balance

0:55:59.160 --> 0:56:04.280
<v Speaker 1>between you know, I'm always careful. I don't respect access

0:56:04.320 --> 0:56:09.080
<v Speaker 1>only journalists, but I respect the need for access, right,

0:56:09.120 --> 0:56:11.080
<v Speaker 1>there's a there's a fine line between that, and I

0:56:11.080 --> 0:56:14.520
<v Speaker 1>think you can a good journalist draws a distinction. But

0:56:14.520 --> 0:56:18.520
<v Speaker 1>but sort of I kind of view it similarly on

0:56:18.560 --> 0:56:22.280
<v Speaker 1>that So I understand it from that, But I certainly

0:56:22.400 --> 0:56:25.799
<v Speaker 1>feel better about not asking permission, right, And I know

0:56:26.040 --> 0:56:29.040
<v Speaker 1>so for instance, like I've I've been very I've been

0:56:29.200 --> 0:56:31.640
<v Speaker 1>very straightforward, but I've been tough on Biden's for the

0:56:31.640 --> 0:56:34.719
<v Speaker 1>Bidens for a couple of years, and you know, they

0:56:34.719 --> 0:56:37.040
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't return any of my calls. Well, I understood that,

0:56:37.239 --> 0:56:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Like I made a you know, like and that's okay.

0:56:40.320 --> 0:56:42.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't They don't have credibility with me, so why

0:56:42.560 --> 0:56:45.280
<v Speaker 1>would I want to interview them anyway. So I'm okay

0:56:45.320 --> 0:56:47.760
<v Speaker 1>with that, And I think that that's sort of that's

0:56:48.080 --> 0:56:50.960
<v Speaker 1>that if you're going to burn something, you better feel

0:56:51.000 --> 0:56:51.920
<v Speaker 1>comfortable burning it.

0:56:52.440 --> 0:56:54.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, As an example, I don't know if they're the

0:56:54.880 --> 0:56:59.279
<v Speaker 3>best example of someone who will punish a journalist for

0:56:59.320 --> 0:57:01.200
<v Speaker 3>not doing this story they want because they were in

0:57:01.200 --> 0:57:04.200
<v Speaker 3>the mode of we only want to talk to one

0:57:04.360 --> 0:57:05.080
<v Speaker 3>or two people.

0:57:05.200 --> 0:57:08.640
<v Speaker 2>They were very much in the mode of our way.

0:57:08.719 --> 0:57:11.200
<v Speaker 3>Our theory of the case is to do almost no interviews,

0:57:11.600 --> 0:57:14.200
<v Speaker 3>and when we do, maybe do it on morning Joe.

0:57:14.440 --> 0:57:18.720
<v Speaker 3>I think your listeners to the Chuck podcast get this.

0:57:19.120 --> 0:57:22.360
<v Speaker 3>But what maybe people don't when they criticize you for

0:57:22.480 --> 0:57:25.840
<v Speaker 3>being or when they question your partisanship and are you

0:57:25.920 --> 0:57:29.920
<v Speaker 3>able to be partisan? You and I have opinions and

0:57:30.040 --> 0:57:32.680
<v Speaker 3>strong opinions, but you know what wake us up in

0:57:32.680 --> 0:57:34.200
<v Speaker 3>the middle of night. I think that's true for you.

0:57:34.240 --> 0:57:36.720
<v Speaker 3>I know it's true for me. The thing I won't

0:57:36.760 --> 0:57:38.919
<v Speaker 3>be shouting is you got to vote for this guy.

0:57:39.400 --> 0:57:42.240
<v Speaker 3>That's not where my strong opinions lie. It's more like

0:57:42.360 --> 0:57:45.680
<v Speaker 3>looking at a system and we're being crazy when it

0:57:45.720 --> 0:57:49.760
<v Speaker 3>comes to whatever it is MMT or funding.

0:57:50.360 --> 0:57:53.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, look I look my rant. Look the current podcast

0:57:53.840 --> 0:57:54.760
<v Speaker 2>that I have up. One of them.

0:57:55.040 --> 0:57:58.320
<v Speaker 1>My rant this morning was, you know, was how poorly

0:57:59.120 --> 0:58:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Trump and Musk executed Doge. But the idea was a

0:58:02.680 --> 0:58:04.720
<v Speaker 1>really good one and there was a better way to

0:58:04.800 --> 0:58:08.400
<v Speaker 1>do this, and sort of like it actually was empowering

0:58:08.480 --> 0:58:12.480
<v Speaker 1>because I realized this is what you do I think

0:58:12.520 --> 0:58:15.840
<v Speaker 1>extraordinarily well and what I hope to do better, which

0:58:15.920 --> 0:58:20.880
<v Speaker 1>is explain why. Look, you know this is the criticism

0:58:21.120 --> 0:58:26.360
<v Speaker 1>is in execution. The criticism isn't in ideology. And so

0:58:26.640 --> 0:58:31.080
<v Speaker 1>my biggest criticisms of Trump are execution. This is just

0:58:31.160 --> 0:58:37.160
<v Speaker 1>a terribly incompetent administration in just doing the basics doesn't

0:58:37.160 --> 0:58:39.640
<v Speaker 1>mean his ideas. I'd like to see more manufacturing back

0:58:39.680 --> 0:58:42.520
<v Speaker 1>in America. There is a systematic way I had to

0:58:42.560 --> 0:58:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Orange cass On. The way he would have implemented this

0:58:45.920 --> 0:58:50.040
<v Speaker 1>tariff regimen might have had a better shot at triggering

0:58:50.080 --> 0:58:52.840
<v Speaker 1>better trade deals and not shaking up the markets. But

0:58:52.880 --> 0:58:54.880
<v Speaker 1>that's not the way Donald Trump did it. He did

0:58:54.960 --> 0:58:58.480
<v Speaker 1>it in an incompetent way. Making government more efficient and

0:58:58.560 --> 0:59:01.760
<v Speaker 1>more modern. We need to update the infrastructure of government

0:59:01.840 --> 0:59:04.440
<v Speaker 1>the same way. You can't have the same bridge that

0:59:04.480 --> 0:59:08.920
<v Speaker 1>you're going over from the nineteen fifties with today's traffic patterns.

0:59:09.160 --> 0:59:13.120
<v Speaker 1>It's the same thing with various government agencies. But dose

0:59:13.280 --> 0:59:15.840
<v Speaker 1>was a poorly executed version of this, and in fact,

0:59:16.680 --> 0:59:19.800
<v Speaker 1>the dirty little secret is those will cost the American

0:59:19.840 --> 0:59:22.760
<v Speaker 1>taxpayer more money than it saved because of all the lawsuits,

0:59:23.000 --> 0:59:26.920
<v Speaker 1>all the restoration of benefits, all the restoration of contracts

0:59:26.920 --> 0:59:30.479
<v Speaker 1>that got unconstitutionally.

0:59:29.480 --> 0:59:31.840
<v Speaker 3>Nick paying people for ninety days not to work and

0:59:31.840 --> 0:59:32.640
<v Speaker 3>then filling them in.

0:59:33.160 --> 0:59:36.000
<v Speaker 1>So we've just cost us. And yet the irony is,

0:59:36.600 --> 0:59:38.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, had bipartisan buy in. There was a whole

0:59:38.840 --> 0:59:42.000
<v Speaker 1>bunch of Democrats. I mean, this is what really frustrates

0:59:42.040 --> 0:59:45.800
<v Speaker 1>me about the mindset of Trump and Maga, which is

0:59:46.040 --> 0:59:48.680
<v Speaker 1>they won now will never work with the other side,

0:59:48.800 --> 0:59:52.680
<v Speaker 1>when every other president of my lifetime said, hey, you know,

0:59:52.720 --> 0:59:55.320
<v Speaker 1>the best way for me to be to get something

0:59:55.360 --> 0:59:58.880
<v Speaker 1>done is to And it's sort of two motivations. One,

0:59:58.960 --> 1:00:00.920
<v Speaker 1>I can divide the other already by getting some of

1:00:00.960 --> 1:00:03.720
<v Speaker 1>them to work with me, and it guess what, it

1:00:03.800 --> 1:00:06.160
<v Speaker 1>helps me in the macro it's better for the country.

1:00:06.200 --> 1:00:07.439
<v Speaker 2>Oh and I divide my.

1:00:07.360 --> 1:00:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Opponent like it's it's it's a you're still you know,

1:00:10.720 --> 1:00:14.400
<v Speaker 1>but it's an effective way to still be partisan, but

1:00:14.560 --> 1:00:16.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe doing it through the prism of the best interests

1:00:16.800 --> 1:00:21.240
<v Speaker 1>of the country versus Trump, who's refusing to work with Democrats.

1:00:20.840 --> 1:00:21.920
<v Speaker 2>Just fired you know.

1:00:22.280 --> 1:00:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Suppose you know and you're like, dude, there's a whole

1:00:24.960 --> 1:00:26.920
<v Speaker 1>bunch of Democrats that want to prove that they do

1:00:27.000 --> 1:00:29.600
<v Speaker 1>want to work with you. Take advantage of it, and

1:00:29.640 --> 1:00:33.160
<v Speaker 1>your inability is on you you're in and guess what

1:00:33.480 --> 1:00:36.040
<v Speaker 1>you're now going to just drive people away. This is

1:00:36.080 --> 1:00:38.440
<v Speaker 1>why his approval rating is already under forty five is

1:00:38.720 --> 1:00:41.280
<v Speaker 1>he refuses to be president for all the people.

1:00:41.480 --> 1:00:42.000
<v Speaker 2>He just does.

1:00:42.320 --> 1:00:46.520
<v Speaker 3>His great skill is at diagnosing the problem, and then

1:00:46.520 --> 1:00:49.400
<v Speaker 3>he has no interest, in fact a negative interest in

1:00:49.440 --> 1:00:50.600
<v Speaker 3>actually solving the problem.

1:00:50.600 --> 1:00:53.280
<v Speaker 2>And I think that, oh, you'd rather have the problems

1:00:53.320 --> 1:00:54.840
<v Speaker 2>to use as a cudgel.

1:00:55.120 --> 1:00:58.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, But one of the things that makes him so

1:00:58.320 --> 1:01:01.080
<v Speaker 3>good at diagnosing the problem is what he's been doing

1:01:01.120 --> 1:01:04.080
<v Speaker 3>for fifty years as a salesman. You know, every innovation

1:01:04.280 --> 1:01:06.480
<v Speaker 3>is what problem does' solve. So he'll put his finger

1:01:06.520 --> 1:01:08.760
<v Speaker 3>on the problem, he'll put it in a more vivid

1:01:08.800 --> 1:01:12.160
<v Speaker 3>way than anyone else in politics, and have absolutely no

1:01:12.240 --> 1:01:15.200
<v Speaker 3>interest in solving it. But I do think the knowledge

1:01:15.320 --> 1:01:19.040
<v Speaker 3>of how hard these problems to solve holds a lot

1:01:19.080 --> 1:01:22.120
<v Speaker 3>of Democrats and some Republicans back. It would be great

1:01:22.200 --> 1:01:25.480
<v Speaker 3>to just point your finger to the problem of infrastructure

1:01:25.640 --> 1:01:29.240
<v Speaker 3>and say, infrastructure, it's the other guy's fault.

1:01:29.280 --> 1:01:31.680
<v Speaker 2>But no infrastructures a giant lift.

1:01:31.760 --> 1:01:34.640
<v Speaker 3>Once you know that, maybe you don't speak as starkly

1:01:34.680 --> 1:01:37.280
<v Speaker 3>about it as Donald Trump does. So I do think

1:01:37.440 --> 1:01:39.880
<v Speaker 3>the more you know about the problem, sometimes the more

1:01:39.880 --> 1:01:42.640
<v Speaker 3>it gets in the way of actually solving it. You know,

1:01:43.760 --> 1:01:46.000
<v Speaker 3>I did this pretty much the same segment, but I

1:01:46.040 --> 1:01:47.880
<v Speaker 3>did it in a different way through an interview.

1:01:48.560 --> 1:01:50.880
<v Speaker 2>As we're recording. I had a niche chopra On.

1:01:51.280 --> 1:01:54.880
<v Speaker 3>He was the first ever Chief Technology Officer of the

1:01:55.000 --> 1:01:59.120
<v Speaker 3>United States and he ran essentially ran the office that

1:01:59.160 --> 1:02:02.680
<v Speaker 3>became DOGE, and we just talked about So tell me

1:02:02.800 --> 1:02:04.640
<v Speaker 3>he didn't do it in the style that you did.

1:02:04.880 --> 1:02:08.160
<v Speaker 3>I understand Elon had a hat and a chainsaw and

1:02:08.200 --> 1:02:10.880
<v Speaker 3>you wore a suit. But what were the things that

1:02:10.960 --> 1:02:12.000
<v Speaker 3>he did that you liked?

1:02:12.040 --> 1:02:13.240
<v Speaker 2>And we had a.

1:02:13.240 --> 1:02:16.480
<v Speaker 3>Very good conversation, was very constructive. He talked about a

1:02:16.520 --> 1:02:19.439
<v Speaker 3>lot of the things that he admired that Doje actually did.

1:02:19.640 --> 1:02:23.160
<v Speaker 3>He made a couple of points, one explicitly and won

1:02:23.240 --> 1:02:26.040
<v Speaker 3>by inference. The point he made explicitly is, you know,

1:02:26.360 --> 1:02:29.560
<v Speaker 3>he could have come up with more savings if he

1:02:29.760 --> 1:02:32.920
<v Speaker 3>was or that office was as prioritized by the Clint

1:02:32.960 --> 1:02:37.760
<v Speaker 3>by the Obama administration as Doge was. Right, So presidential

1:02:38.560 --> 1:02:42.120
<v Speaker 3>bandwidth in mental time that counts for a lot.

1:02:42.320 --> 1:02:43.640
<v Speaker 2>And so Obama was doing.

1:02:43.560 --> 1:02:46.200
<v Speaker 3>Other things and he wanted this as a backstop. He'd

1:02:46.240 --> 1:02:49.600
<v Speaker 3>never be able to achieve the actual cuts, not even

1:02:49.640 --> 1:02:53.160
<v Speaker 3>the minuses that Elon did. But also, as I was

1:02:53.200 --> 1:02:55.760
<v Speaker 3>talking to him, I just said to myself, yes, you.

1:02:55.720 --> 1:02:57.840
<v Speaker 2>Know what you are. You're reasonable.

1:02:58.400 --> 1:03:02.200
<v Speaker 3>You look at the net benefits, right, you definitely don't

1:03:02.200 --> 1:03:05.880
<v Speaker 3>have a chainsaw and a hat, and that alone is.

1:03:05.840 --> 1:03:06.840
<v Speaker 2>Not holding you back.

1:03:07.280 --> 1:03:09.360
<v Speaker 3>But the way that any shoppeur would have done it,

1:03:09.400 --> 1:03:12.880
<v Speaker 3>he could have gotten billions more in savings and we

1:03:13.080 --> 1:03:16.000
<v Speaker 3>would have known a billionth of what he did. There

1:03:16.080 --> 1:03:20.360
<v Speaker 3>was no pr aspect. It's almost negative pr Yeah.

1:03:19.840 --> 1:03:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Well that's I mean that goes back to I mean,

1:03:21.920 --> 1:03:24.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's amazing to me how many.

1:03:24.160 --> 1:03:27.360
<v Speaker 2>People don't learn the lesson from Trump. I mean, have you.

1:03:27.480 --> 1:03:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Noticed like what to me, like the brilliance of Trump

1:03:30.720 --> 1:03:34.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty fifteen was he was He'd go anywhere, he would

1:03:34.400 --> 1:03:37.760
<v Speaker 1>interview with anybody, he didn't care, and he sat down

1:03:37.800 --> 1:03:42.880
<v Speaker 1>with everybody. I've not seen a democrat implement that same strategy,

1:03:43.280 --> 1:03:43.760
<v Speaker 1>not once.

1:03:44.200 --> 1:03:46.280
<v Speaker 2>You're like that guy comes close, right?

1:03:46.600 --> 1:03:50.680
<v Speaker 1>He and by the way, who got traction out of nowhere?

1:03:51.360 --> 1:03:53.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah boodag right?

1:03:53.200 --> 1:03:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Why because he was showing up and everywhere, right, he

1:03:55.840 --> 1:03:58.520
<v Speaker 1>was willing to show up everywhere, So it is weird

1:03:58.520 --> 1:03:59.600
<v Speaker 1>to me how long it's taken.

1:03:59.640 --> 1:04:00.760
<v Speaker 2>Pare you know there's such.

1:04:00.680 --> 1:04:03.680
<v Speaker 1>This this anger, this you know, it's it's funny.

1:04:03.680 --> 1:04:04.080
<v Speaker 2>It's like.

1:04:05.760 --> 1:04:08.479
<v Speaker 1>There's people on the left who view Trump the same

1:04:08.520 --> 1:04:11.720
<v Speaker 1>way as society views Hitler. And I know that the

1:04:11.720 --> 1:04:13.560
<v Speaker 1>minute I bring up the H word, like people start

1:04:13.600 --> 1:04:16.400
<v Speaker 1>tuning out. But the point is is that you know,

1:04:16.440 --> 1:04:20.480
<v Speaker 1>there is no praising any idea Hitler ever had because

1:04:20.520 --> 1:04:23.880
<v Speaker 1>it was all in service to something grotesque, right right?

1:04:26.560 --> 1:04:29.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, the Democrats, I think sometimes too often look

1:04:29.320 --> 1:04:31.640
<v Speaker 1>at Trump and saying, if he's for it, we have

1:04:31.680 --> 1:04:35.360
<v Speaker 1>to be against it because his ends, everything he does

1:04:35.400 --> 1:04:37.919
<v Speaker 1>is and you're just sitting there going, you know, there's

1:04:37.960 --> 1:04:42.640
<v Speaker 1>ways to learn from him without emulating him, and I don't,

1:04:42.800 --> 1:04:46.720
<v Speaker 1>you know it is And I don't know why I don't.

1:04:46.760 --> 1:04:48.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know whether we blame internet culture for this

1:04:48.880 --> 1:04:51.600
<v Speaker 1>right where where too many of politicians today are so

1:04:51.680 --> 1:04:54.080
<v Speaker 1>responsive to the moment that they actually can't take a

1:04:54.080 --> 1:04:56.160
<v Speaker 1>step back and see the big picture.

1:04:56.240 --> 1:04:57.200
<v Speaker 2>I don't. I don't know.

1:04:57.280 --> 1:04:59.080
<v Speaker 1>I wish I had a better answer as to why

1:05:00.000 --> 1:05:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Democrats have had such a hard time learning.

1:05:02.840 --> 1:05:05.400
<v Speaker 2>What has made Trump work there's some.

1:05:05.440 --> 1:05:09.720
<v Speaker 3>Parts of this that work, and they are I think Democrats,

1:05:10.320 --> 1:05:14.400
<v Speaker 3>especially when they were a sentant, their skill set, what

1:05:15.320 --> 1:05:18.320
<v Speaker 3>success in the party selected for was the ability to

1:05:18.400 --> 1:05:21.040
<v Speaker 3>relentlessly stay on message and not make a mistake. And

1:05:21.080 --> 1:05:23.439
<v Speaker 3>it's the and this was what Obama was great at.

1:05:23.520 --> 1:05:25.720
<v Speaker 3>And you could see that this was what Kamala Harris,

1:05:25.760 --> 1:05:28.200
<v Speaker 3>this was her theory, even if she didn't articulate, it

1:05:28.240 --> 1:05:29.240
<v Speaker 3>is how she operated.

1:05:29.400 --> 1:05:30.760
<v Speaker 2>Trump's the opposite.

1:05:30.880 --> 1:05:34.120
<v Speaker 3>Mistakes don't matter, mistakes probably help them, and there.

1:05:34.000 --> 1:05:34.920
<v Speaker 2>Is no message.

1:05:34.960 --> 1:05:38.440
<v Speaker 3>But I do think because of all fractured media society,

1:05:38.480 --> 1:05:41.960
<v Speaker 3>and because of podcasting and long form podcasting and the

1:05:42.000 --> 1:05:44.280
<v Speaker 3>fact that an audio interview could go an hour and

1:05:44.320 --> 1:05:47.320
<v Speaker 3>a half, I think that old Obama way of don't

1:05:47.360 --> 1:05:50.440
<v Speaker 3>make a mistake and get your three messages message points

1:05:50.480 --> 1:05:53.000
<v Speaker 3>of the day out, I think that's done. And I

1:05:53.040 --> 1:05:56.240
<v Speaker 3>don't know that the Democrats have realized that. The other

1:05:56.320 --> 1:05:58.760
<v Speaker 3>thing is the things that Trump does.

1:05:58.800 --> 1:06:01.800
<v Speaker 2>Well. We were just talking about dose and you know democrats.

1:06:02.240 --> 1:06:05.760
<v Speaker 2>You said Democrats would love to cut Would they? I

1:06:05.800 --> 1:06:08.200
<v Speaker 2>think probably in their heart of hearts, a.

1:06:08.160 --> 1:06:11.120
<v Speaker 3>Few would, maybe many would, But in terms of the

1:06:11.120 --> 1:06:13.440
<v Speaker 3>salience of the issue, it's not one two, or if

1:06:13.480 --> 1:06:14.240
<v Speaker 3>you're right, and.

1:06:14.200 --> 1:06:18.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean I hears it about a democratic ten years ago. Yeah,

1:06:18.000 --> 1:06:20.320
<v Speaker 1>and maybe that one doesn't exist, because you know, not

1:06:20.400 --> 1:06:22.680
<v Speaker 1>every answer is government, but I do think a growing

1:06:22.760 --> 1:06:26.000
<v Speaker 1>number of democratic office holders believe that it is well.

1:06:26.000 --> 1:06:29.040
<v Speaker 3>One thing that I support Trump on is the elimination

1:06:29.080 --> 1:06:31.160
<v Speaker 3>of pennies. And I've been talking about this on my

1:06:31.240 --> 1:06:34.440
<v Speaker 3>show for five ten years, and every time a presidential

1:06:34.440 --> 1:06:37.160
<v Speaker 3>candidate or a senator anyone else would come through, I

1:06:37.200 --> 1:06:39.240
<v Speaker 3>would ask them, why do we still make the penny?

1:06:39.440 --> 1:06:41.600
<v Speaker 3>What do you think about the elimination of pennies? And

1:06:41.640 --> 1:06:44.440
<v Speaker 3>I asked many senators about this. I asked Michael Bennett,

1:06:44.560 --> 1:06:49.280
<v Speaker 3>I asked sp Bootage, and every single one of them

1:06:49.880 --> 1:06:53.960
<v Speaker 3>was interested in the idea, but they were all hesitant

1:06:54.320 --> 1:06:58.120
<v Speaker 3>to just sign on to the obvious. They all claim

1:06:58.160 --> 1:06:59.960
<v Speaker 3>they hadn't thought of it before, and I believe them.

1:07:00.160 --> 1:07:06.520
<v Speaker 3>They're all unbelievably cautious in embracing the riskiness of eliminating

1:07:06.560 --> 1:07:09.320
<v Speaker 3>the penny. And you know, Donald Trump, sure he gets

1:07:09.360 --> 1:07:13.480
<v Speaker 3>himself in trouble with much more consequential items like yeah,

1:07:13.520 --> 1:07:16.080
<v Speaker 3>maybe we should arrest doctors if they give it abortion,

1:07:16.360 --> 1:07:18.400
<v Speaker 3>But he definitely would have said, oh yeah, pennies to no,

1:07:18.640 --> 1:07:19.680
<v Speaker 3>and that's the right answer.

1:07:19.920 --> 1:07:22.480
<v Speaker 1>By the way, look, do you think Kamala Harris would

1:07:22.480 --> 1:07:23.800
<v Speaker 1>be negotiating with Iran right now?

1:07:25.200 --> 1:07:25.320
<v Speaker 2>No?

1:07:26.520 --> 1:07:28.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, so I sit there and it's like, now,

1:07:29.360 --> 1:07:32.040
<v Speaker 1>am I troubled that the what's motivating Trump to do

1:07:32.080 --> 1:07:35.400
<v Speaker 1>this is his business deals in the with the golf guys. Yeah,

1:07:35.440 --> 1:07:37.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm troubled by the motivation of it. But at the

1:07:37.960 --> 1:07:41.520
<v Speaker 1>same time, sometimes you need some pragmatism. Has to be

1:07:41.600 --> 1:07:43.240
<v Speaker 1>the coin of the realm in the Middle East, or

1:07:43.240 --> 1:07:46.200
<v Speaker 1>you're not going to have any stability in the Middle East.

1:07:45.480 --> 1:07:49.400
<v Speaker 1>And I say stability, not peace. They actually think there's

1:07:49.400 --> 1:07:54.640
<v Speaker 1>a difference. And you know, so, you know, these are

1:07:54.680 --> 1:07:57.600
<v Speaker 1>the things that the left needs to realize why the

1:07:57.640 --> 1:08:01.600
<v Speaker 1>public is more tolerantive Trump than they are because on

1:08:01.600 --> 1:08:04.840
<v Speaker 1>some of these things, Trump's behaving no different than what

1:08:05.240 --> 1:08:07.120
<v Speaker 1>I think they think anybody.

1:08:06.640 --> 1:08:08.920
<v Speaker 2>In that position should be behaving, which is, hey.

1:08:08.880 --> 1:08:11.320
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes you got to make deals with people you don't like,

1:08:12.640 --> 1:08:16.439
<v Speaker 1>and that there's no you know, that's that's real politique.

1:08:17.160 --> 1:08:18.320
<v Speaker 2>So it is.

1:08:19.680 --> 1:08:22.040
<v Speaker 1>It is interesting to me, how and I think what's

1:08:22.080 --> 1:08:24.559
<v Speaker 1>going to be interesting is that if Democrats do win

1:08:24.600 --> 1:08:28.040
<v Speaker 1>the presidency in twenty eight. My assumption it's because somebody

1:08:28.280 --> 1:08:29.400
<v Speaker 1>has learned those lessons.

1:08:30.640 --> 1:08:32.639
<v Speaker 2>If they have a nominee that hasn't learned those lessons,

1:08:32.680 --> 1:08:35.200
<v Speaker 2>are not going to win in twenty oh. Well, have

1:08:35.240 --> 1:08:36.280
<v Speaker 2>to be, have to be.

1:08:36.880 --> 1:08:40.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And I think everyone's running is positioning themselves as

1:08:40.400 --> 1:08:43.360
<v Speaker 3>the guy who's learned the lessons, and I think they

1:08:43.360 --> 1:08:45.640
<v Speaker 3>all have a different version of right. Gavin Newsom is,

1:08:45.640 --> 1:08:49.880
<v Speaker 3>I talked to Michael Savage and contradicted, you know, twelve years.

1:08:49.600 --> 1:08:51.040
<v Speaker 2>Of my record.

1:08:51.320 --> 1:08:53.439
<v Speaker 3>And I think Tim wallas is, I'm that regular guy

1:08:53.439 --> 1:08:56.840
<v Speaker 3>who code talks, comes off as a little clok.

1:08:57.080 --> 1:08:59.439
<v Speaker 1>I think if you're caught trying too hard, you're just

1:08:59.479 --> 1:09:01.519
<v Speaker 1>that trying to let me close out with this. Since

1:09:01.520 --> 1:09:05.800
<v Speaker 1>you're a recovering sports reporter, and I spent a brief

1:09:05.800 --> 1:09:09.120
<v Speaker 1>period I helped found a sports business publication back in

1:09:09.120 --> 1:09:11.720
<v Speaker 1>the early nineties, so I guess I can claim some

1:09:11.880 --> 1:09:15.919
<v Speaker 1>stint on the sports reporting world. I do view sports

1:09:16.120 --> 1:09:18.320
<v Speaker 1>as sort of the last bastion of our culture that

1:09:18.320 --> 1:09:23.120
<v Speaker 1>can bring us together, Like I have this thesis that

1:09:21.320 --> 1:09:28.320
<v Speaker 1>I can make youth sports and high school sports. The

1:09:28.360 --> 1:09:32.200
<v Speaker 1>revenue stream that classified advertising was to support local news

1:09:32.479 --> 1:09:34.599
<v Speaker 1>that in the long term that that could be. I

1:09:34.640 --> 1:09:38.479
<v Speaker 1>think when you look at you know, a live event,

1:09:40.280 --> 1:09:43.120
<v Speaker 1>a sporting event can bring red and blue together better.

1:09:43.160 --> 1:09:45.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the NFL's the king of all of it.

1:09:46.720 --> 1:09:51.880
<v Speaker 1>And yet coverage of sports is becoming more partisan and more.

1:09:51.880 --> 1:09:54.880
<v Speaker 1>You're starting to see there's conservative sports guys and there's

1:09:54.920 --> 1:09:58.840
<v Speaker 1>liberal sports guys. Where's this headed. Is sports going to

1:09:58.880 --> 1:10:04.479
<v Speaker 1>become as polarizing as politics because of the nature of

1:10:04.920 --> 1:10:08.880
<v Speaker 1>how independent media works, or will it continue to be

1:10:09.000 --> 1:10:11.080
<v Speaker 1>the last piece of glue we have in society.

1:10:12.600 --> 1:10:15.439
<v Speaker 3>I think sports themselves are going to continue to be

1:10:15.520 --> 1:10:18.360
<v Speaker 3>the glue. The talking about sports is definitely going to

1:10:18.400 --> 1:10:22.400
<v Speaker 3>fracture along the lines that you're talking about, but the

1:10:22.439 --> 1:10:23.360
<v Speaker 3>sports themselves.

1:10:23.439 --> 1:10:24.719
<v Speaker 2>Take Caitlyn Clark.

1:10:25.280 --> 1:10:29.600
<v Speaker 3>She can be the epitome of everything that a progressive

1:10:29.640 --> 1:10:32.320
<v Speaker 3>believes in, and she could also be the epitome of

1:10:32.479 --> 1:10:34.599
<v Speaker 3>everything that a conservative.

1:10:34.000 --> 1:10:35.320
<v Speaker 2>Says is good about the country.

1:10:35.400 --> 1:10:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Right, one of the best, actually, my favorite Rorschach test

1:10:38.280 --> 1:10:41.559
<v Speaker 1>in America these days, Right, Like, Yeah, I can learn

1:10:41.600 --> 1:10:43.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot about somebody by how they feel about Kaitlyn Clark.

1:10:44.360 --> 1:10:46.519
<v Speaker 2>Right, look at what she's done as a woman. Look

1:10:46.560 --> 1:10:48.479
<v Speaker 2>at what she's done for women's sports.

1:10:48.520 --> 1:10:51.720
<v Speaker 3>Look at how she's unapologetic, or look at how a

1:10:51.840 --> 1:10:53.320
<v Speaker 3>dad and daughter work together.

1:10:53.439 --> 1:10:56.200
<v Speaker 2>Look at all the hard work, look at all the teamwork.

1:10:56.520 --> 1:10:58.680
<v Speaker 3>So Caitlyn's going to be Caitlyn and is when she

1:10:58.760 --> 1:11:01.000
<v Speaker 3>goes back from her quad and is going to be

1:11:01.400 --> 1:11:04.160
<v Speaker 3>converting these twenty five footers, She'll be the thing, and

1:11:04.200 --> 1:11:07.360
<v Speaker 3>then everything around it can talk about her however they want.

1:11:07.680 --> 1:11:11.439
<v Speaker 1>Right, But it is sort of I am hopeful that

1:11:11.479 --> 1:11:12.439
<v Speaker 1>we can stay glue.

1:11:12.920 --> 1:11:15.720
<v Speaker 2>But you know, I we'll say, you know, I.

1:11:16.040 --> 1:11:18.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, I am a little concerned that a few

1:11:18.240 --> 1:11:22.479
<v Speaker 1>sports are the participants are all lean one way, Like

1:11:22.560 --> 1:11:24.760
<v Speaker 1>it's tough to be a liberal.

1:11:24.439 --> 1:11:27.679
<v Speaker 2>Golfer and it's tough to be a conservative NBA player.

1:11:28.400 --> 1:11:32.679
<v Speaker 3>Right, Well, I know examples both, and I think it's

1:11:32.840 --> 1:11:33.719
<v Speaker 3>much less tough.

1:11:33.800 --> 1:11:35.800
<v Speaker 2>I could speak. I know that golfers.

1:11:35.800 --> 1:11:38.000
<v Speaker 3>I think I think twelve years ago I read a

1:11:38.000 --> 1:11:40.559
<v Speaker 3>story that there were no registered Democrats on the on

1:11:40.640 --> 1:11:44.960
<v Speaker 3>the tour. But I know that especially among conservative or

1:11:45.000 --> 1:11:49.040
<v Speaker 3>people who are not orthodoxly or progressive among the NBA,

1:11:49.680 --> 1:11:51.920
<v Speaker 3>much easier than it was during the days of the

1:11:51.960 --> 1:11:53.200
<v Speaker 3>bubble and the lockdown.

1:11:53.680 --> 1:11:56.320
<v Speaker 2>Oh that's interesting, easier I find it interesting.

1:11:56.360 --> 1:11:59.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, Bruce Pearl is fascinating to me because you

1:11:59.760 --> 1:12:04.479
<v Speaker 1>don't don't see a lot of college basketball coaches being

1:12:04.520 --> 1:12:07.080
<v Speaker 1>so political, I think, for fear it would harm recruiting.

1:12:07.760 --> 1:12:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Right now, he's political on one story and on one issue,

1:12:11.439 --> 1:12:13.960
<v Speaker 1>though I notice he's every once in a while he'll

1:12:14.080 --> 1:12:16.400
<v Speaker 1>he'll just do regular politics, but for the most party

1:12:16.479 --> 1:12:20.920
<v Speaker 1>sticks to just Israel. And obviously it hadn't had any impact, right,

1:12:20.960 --> 1:12:26.439
<v Speaker 1>Auburn's had too and terrific and in fact, he's turned

1:12:26.439 --> 1:12:28.439
<v Speaker 1>them more into a basketball school than they've ever been,

1:12:28.479 --> 1:12:29.920
<v Speaker 1>even in the Charles Barkley days.

1:12:31.479 --> 1:12:31.759
<v Speaker 2>Right.

1:12:31.920 --> 1:12:36.400
<v Speaker 1>But but it is that that stuff fascinates me, and

1:12:36.479 --> 1:12:40.160
<v Speaker 1>I am very curious because you also see it, you know,

1:12:40.280 --> 1:12:47.080
<v Speaker 1>certain in college football, certain coaches, if they're believers on

1:12:47.160 --> 1:12:52.639
<v Speaker 1>a religious front, almost then do better with other believers, right,

1:12:52.640 --> 1:12:55.360
<v Speaker 1>And it's almost how they recruit is through that prism.

1:12:56.040 --> 1:12:58.200
<v Speaker 1>And it is still interesting to me that how much

1:12:58.240 --> 1:13:00.439
<v Speaker 1>college football does work that way and that and people

1:13:00.479 --> 1:13:02.240
<v Speaker 1>are are not quite aware of that.

1:13:03.479 --> 1:13:03.679
<v Speaker 2>Right.

1:13:03.880 --> 1:13:05.800
<v Speaker 3>Bobby Batnan was a great example of that. There are

1:13:05.800 --> 1:13:08.599
<v Speaker 3>many others, but I do think Bruce Pearl, I think

1:13:08.640 --> 1:13:11.280
<v Speaker 3>the team responds to it. You know, there's a lot

1:13:11.280 --> 1:13:13.880
<v Speaker 3>of inspiration there, and he brought these this hostage family

1:13:13.920 --> 1:13:17.920
<v Speaker 3>to the final four and they were eventually freed. I

1:13:17.960 --> 1:13:22.000
<v Speaker 3>also think that uh, Steve Kerr, Okay, I know they're professional,

1:13:22.320 --> 1:13:24.080
<v Speaker 3>but Kerr and Popovich.

1:13:23.720 --> 1:13:25.880
<v Speaker 2>Were are very vocal.

1:13:26.400 --> 1:13:30.200
<v Speaker 3>Popovitch was on the progressive side, and I think what

1:13:30.280 --> 1:13:31.160
<v Speaker 3>people respond to.

1:13:31.240 --> 1:13:35.519
<v Speaker 1>You think ku Indianapolis versus San Francisco, be with a

1:13:35.680 --> 1:13:36.240
<v Speaker 1>coach and anything.

1:13:36.280 --> 1:13:39.799
<v Speaker 3>I think so because I think people respond to his conviction,

1:13:39.840 --> 1:13:42.400
<v Speaker 3>the strength of his conviction. I don't think most of

1:13:42.439 --> 1:13:45.439
<v Speaker 3>these twenty something year olds really have strong They might

1:13:45.479 --> 1:13:47.000
<v Speaker 3>have inclinations, but they have.

1:13:46.920 --> 1:13:49.240
<v Speaker 2>Deep political opinions to begin with.

1:13:49.439 --> 1:13:55.120
<v Speaker 3>And when they see Kerr as interpersonally, they respect him

1:13:55.360 --> 1:13:58.559
<v Speaker 3>and therefore they respect the stances that he takes. He also,

1:13:58.800 --> 1:14:01.160
<v Speaker 3>you know, it's very important that all of these cases,

1:14:01.400 --> 1:14:06.760
<v Speaker 3>no one is taking really outlandish, outray dangerous everyone. You

1:14:06.800 --> 1:14:09.800
<v Speaker 3>could always criticize everyone in someone's eyes as doing that,

1:14:10.080 --> 1:14:13.120
<v Speaker 3>but I think they are sticking mostly to, you know,

1:14:13.200 --> 1:14:15.920
<v Speaker 3>the factual basis of their arguments and doing it with

1:14:16.040 --> 1:14:17.880
<v Speaker 3>conviction and responsibility overall.

1:14:18.680 --> 1:14:20.080
<v Speaker 2>And I think you just said the same.

1:14:20.160 --> 1:14:21.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, in some ways, Bruce Pearl and Steve Kerr

1:14:22.000 --> 1:14:24.320
<v Speaker 1>both have that they speak with such a conviction on

1:14:24.360 --> 1:14:28.639
<v Speaker 1>the singular topic right Tricklarly Current on gun reform, pearl

1:14:28.680 --> 1:14:32.400
<v Speaker 1>on On on the Israeli hostages that that if you,

1:14:32.400 --> 1:14:34.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, if it's deeply held, I think in some

1:14:34.320 --> 1:14:36.280
<v Speaker 1>ways even people that don't agree with you will.

1:14:36.160 --> 1:14:39.519
<v Speaker 2>Respect it right to that. Yeah, let me get you

1:14:39.520 --> 1:14:39.840
<v Speaker 2>out of here.

1:14:39.840 --> 1:14:43.080
<v Speaker 1>On this, which is an expression Tony Korneizer uses, and

1:14:43.120 --> 1:14:48.040
<v Speaker 1>I love it, and it's and it's simply this, what's there?

1:14:48.120 --> 1:14:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Or four things you read every day that people that

1:14:51.760 --> 1:14:54.200
<v Speaker 1>that most people would be shocked to know that you

1:14:54.240 --> 1:14:56.599
<v Speaker 1>read every day in order to like, what's what's your

1:14:57.040 --> 1:14:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Not to give away any secrets, but you're clearly a

1:14:59.200 --> 1:15:02.040
<v Speaker 1>pretty well read in person. You're you have a diversity

1:15:02.080 --> 1:15:04.519
<v Speaker 1>of interests. You know, I thought I had a diversity

1:15:04.520 --> 1:15:09.439
<v Speaker 1>of interests your Times a thousand and and in fact,

1:15:09.439 --> 1:15:13.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm very jealous of your newsletter at times because I'm like, yeah,

1:15:14.680 --> 1:15:17.200
<v Speaker 1>you literally have I think have created a newsletter of

1:15:17.200 --> 1:15:19.240
<v Speaker 1>just your interests, and you're just like, if you have

1:15:19.240 --> 1:15:20.679
<v Speaker 1>my interest, then you'll enjoy my newsletter.

1:15:21.000 --> 1:15:21.360
<v Speaker 2>Period.

1:15:21.400 --> 1:15:23.800
<v Speaker 3>This is this is the newsletter the just List, which

1:15:23.840 --> 1:15:26.280
<v Speaker 3>I probably should have played it really is just my stuff, right,

1:15:26.360 --> 1:15:29.160
<v Speaker 3>it's the pescal list rights.

1:15:29.240 --> 1:15:30.800
<v Speaker 1>What's a couple of things you read in on every

1:15:30.880 --> 1:15:33.960
<v Speaker 1>day that is just that just nourishes you to a point.

1:15:34.000 --> 1:15:35.960
<v Speaker 2>Whe're like, everybody should be reading this, and I know

1:15:36.000 --> 1:15:36.720
<v Speaker 2>they don't.

1:15:37.680 --> 1:15:39.280
<v Speaker 3>Right, So I will say the New York Times, which

1:15:39.280 --> 1:15:40.920
<v Speaker 3>doesn't surprise won't surprise everyone.

1:15:40.920 --> 1:15:42.840
<v Speaker 2>The Financial Times is fantastic.

1:15:43.160 --> 1:15:46.040
<v Speaker 3>I think the Financial press overall is I don't know

1:15:46.040 --> 1:15:49.400
<v Speaker 3>if the last bastion, but they're much more truthful and

1:15:49.600 --> 1:15:50.719
<v Speaker 3>honest and the least.

1:15:51.040 --> 1:15:52.080
<v Speaker 2>It's the least partisan.

1:15:52.280 --> 1:15:54.960
<v Speaker 1>It certainly has an ideology you could devolve it, but

1:15:55.000 --> 1:15:55.360
<v Speaker 1>it's less.

1:15:55.360 --> 1:15:57.200
<v Speaker 3>I don't think they're trying to convince you of anything

1:15:57.240 --> 1:15:59.720
<v Speaker 3>other than this is really the story, and so Bloomberg

1:15:59.760 --> 1:16:02.240
<v Speaker 3>and the economists or things that I'm happy to spend

1:16:02.640 --> 1:16:06.400
<v Speaker 3>subscription money on. And then I also read, uh the

1:16:07.479 --> 1:16:12.960
<v Speaker 3>Nick Reports from Japan just to get some interesting, kind

1:16:13.000 --> 1:16:16.439
<v Speaker 3>of funny news. I read another newsletter put together by

1:16:16.520 --> 1:16:19.640
<v Speaker 3>Walt Hickey called Numblock. He's been doing it for so

1:16:19.760 --> 1:16:22.599
<v Speaker 3>many years. I love that newsletter. I have vowed never

1:16:22.640 --> 1:16:26.000
<v Speaker 3>to steal an item, but I steal his sources or

1:16:26.240 --> 1:16:28.439
<v Speaker 3>I see where he's getting and then.

1:16:28.360 --> 1:16:31.280
<v Speaker 2>You're like, I'm gonna start reading that sour. Yes, exactly.

1:16:31.400 --> 1:16:32.280
<v Speaker 2>That's how I got Nike.

1:16:33.439 --> 1:16:37.080
<v Speaker 3>And then I read I read Eric Zorn, who does

1:16:37.120 --> 1:16:38.920
<v Speaker 3>a thing called the Piki un Sentinel. He used to

1:16:38.920 --> 1:16:41.840
<v Speaker 3>be the best columnist of the Chicago Tribune, and the

1:16:41.880 --> 1:16:47.280
<v Speaker 3>Tribune has been facimated. Zorn is awesome, and especially my

1:16:47.360 --> 1:16:48.320
<v Speaker 3>sister lives in Chicago.

1:16:48.320 --> 1:16:49.919
<v Speaker 2>I'm fascinated by Chicago.

1:16:50.160 --> 1:16:52.240
<v Speaker 1>I have a few stories like the last he was

1:16:52.320 --> 1:16:54.720
<v Speaker 1>like the replacement for Roiko, wasn't he? And he was

1:16:54.720 --> 1:16:57.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of like the last of his kind. I think

1:16:57.120 --> 1:16:59.320
<v Speaker 1>there's like a direct line there. Yes, I think he's

1:16:59.320 --> 1:17:00.439
<v Speaker 1>in that linea jill though.

1:17:00.479 --> 1:17:02.919
<v Speaker 3>You know, I think everyone probably who is a columnist

1:17:03.120 --> 1:17:06.160
<v Speaker 3>editor the Tribune, like John Cass and all these guys

1:17:06.200 --> 1:17:08.280
<v Speaker 3>were kind of anti Roykos would say I'm the I'm

1:17:08.280 --> 1:17:10.759
<v Speaker 3>the last roy Co And Bob Green there was another

1:17:10.800 --> 1:17:11.799
<v Speaker 3>controversial figure.

1:17:12.120 --> 1:17:14.439
<v Speaker 2>What a paper? What a paper that is now a

1:17:14.560 --> 1:17:15.439
<v Speaker 2>husk of itself.

1:17:15.479 --> 1:17:18.679
<v Speaker 3>And there's a building in Chicago called the Tribune Building,

1:17:18.680 --> 1:17:19.960
<v Speaker 3>and I bet people don't even.

1:17:19.840 --> 1:17:21.720
<v Speaker 2>Know there's a newspaper associated with it.

1:17:22.040 --> 1:17:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, some of the papers that didn't survive, I just

1:17:26.200 --> 1:17:27.960
<v Speaker 1>that one, you know.

1:17:27.880 --> 1:17:30.280
<v Speaker 2>But there's it's there, but sure.

1:17:30.400 --> 1:17:32.600
<v Speaker 1>But like the Boston Globes the same way, like it

1:17:32.680 --> 1:17:36.519
<v Speaker 1>was Wow, it was like a more of a sports section.

1:17:36.960 --> 1:17:41.960
<v Speaker 3>The Globe Sports section, Oh my god, everyone in section,

1:17:42.280 --> 1:17:45.680
<v Speaker 3>the Post, the Post dial section, there was a that

1:17:45.800 --> 1:17:47.280
<v Speaker 3>was a great tangium of greatness.

1:17:47.400 --> 1:17:48.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and now.

1:17:48.160 --> 1:17:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Boy, the Post both are just you know, they're they're

1:17:50.920 --> 1:17:51.880
<v Speaker 1>they're not what they used to be.

1:17:52.600 --> 1:17:54.280
<v Speaker 2>Uh, Mike, this was a pleasure.

1:17:54.760 --> 1:17:55.040
<v Speaker 3>Uh.

1:17:55.200 --> 1:17:57.080
<v Speaker 2>You're, like I said, you're a pioneer in the space

1:17:57.120 --> 1:18:02.000
<v Speaker 2>and you you you you you have an originality that.

1:18:03.520 --> 1:18:07.080
<v Speaker 1>You know you can't it's hard to emulate, and I

1:18:07.120 --> 1:18:09.600
<v Speaker 1>think that for me it feels like the key to

1:18:09.640 --> 1:18:10.200
<v Speaker 1>your success.

1:18:11.840 --> 1:18:17.759
<v Speaker 2>Well, thanks, thanks Todd. All Right, Pasca Italian for a fish.

1:18:17.800 --> 1:18:20.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean, is it that simple? You grew up as

1:18:20.040 --> 1:18:21.800
<v Speaker 2>a fish.

1:18:21.880 --> 1:18:24.920
<v Speaker 3>The name of the production company is Peach Fish Productions

1:18:25.040 --> 1:18:30.240
<v Speaker 3>because Italian Pasca is peach, but pache is fish, so

1:18:30.320 --> 1:18:31.000
<v Speaker 3>it's peach fish.

1:18:31.280 --> 1:18:32.680
<v Speaker 2>Oh that's funny. I like that.

1:18:33.240 --> 1:18:36.960
<v Speaker 1>I love a good sort of naming origin that that

1:18:37.120 --> 1:18:39.439
<v Speaker 1>does stuff like that with words and language.

1:18:39.520 --> 1:18:43.120
<v Speaker 2>That's awesome. Mike, appreciate the time. Oh, thank you so much.

1:18:52.520 --> 1:18:55.479
<v Speaker 1>All Right, see that dark open that I brought to

1:18:55.520 --> 1:18:59.679
<v Speaker 1>you a tad lighter right with the conversation with Mike anyway,

1:19:00.360 --> 1:19:03.720
<v Speaker 1>So with that, let's do a few questions. The last

1:19:03.800 --> 1:19:07.920
<v Speaker 1>chuck here ash chuck. This one comes from Angela from

1:19:07.960 --> 1:19:10.519
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans. I check love the podcast and enjoyed the

1:19:10.560 --> 1:19:11.879
<v Speaker 1>new Sphere interview Sunday.

1:19:12.320 --> 1:19:13.280
<v Speaker 2>I like that format.

1:19:13.320 --> 1:19:15.559
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to follow up on John from Fairfield question

1:19:15.560 --> 1:19:18.040
<v Speaker 1>about Trump and Musk. Trump's tweets seem to admit he

1:19:18.080 --> 1:19:21.919
<v Speaker 1>gave Elon Musk a government contractor sweeping access to government systems,

1:19:22.200 --> 1:19:25.000
<v Speaker 1>raising serious conflict of interest concerns within the level of influence.

1:19:25.040 --> 1:19:27.519
<v Speaker 1>If true, suggests corruption or at least poor judgment for

1:19:27.600 --> 1:19:30.880
<v Speaker 1>both Trump and his advisors. Also, how are tweets viewed legally?

1:19:30.960 --> 1:19:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Can they be used as evidence or trigger congressional inquiries?

1:19:33.880 --> 1:19:36.360
<v Speaker 2>Thank you? Well, look, they are considered.

1:19:36.920 --> 1:19:39.400
<v Speaker 1>I do think that the tweets are you know, they're

1:19:39.400 --> 1:19:43.639
<v Speaker 1>not somehow protected as some sort of like half speech

1:19:43.760 --> 1:19:46.320
<v Speaker 1>or something like that. Right, what he says on a

1:19:46.400 --> 1:19:50.200
<v Speaker 1>social media what he says in social media is no

1:19:50.200 --> 1:19:53.479
<v Speaker 1>different than what he says in public. And he's the

1:19:53.520 --> 1:19:55.800
<v Speaker 1>president whenever he does it right, and it can be

1:19:55.800 --> 1:20:00.360
<v Speaker 1>a presidential So no, I don't there's no there's there's

1:20:00.400 --> 1:20:05.439
<v Speaker 1>no less. I guess there's no less. You know, a

1:20:05.479 --> 1:20:08.640
<v Speaker 1>tweet hasn't viewed any less any differently than what he

1:20:08.680 --> 1:20:13.320
<v Speaker 1>would say in a TV interview.

1:20:13.040 --> 1:20:14.439
<v Speaker 2>Or a print interview.

1:20:16.040 --> 1:20:19.360
<v Speaker 1>But you're right, I mean, this goes back to about

1:20:19.360 --> 1:20:23.160
<v Speaker 1>what you said, you know, sort of he he basically

1:20:23.240 --> 1:20:27.519
<v Speaker 1>confesses to what he's doing up front, right, And it

1:20:27.560 --> 1:20:31.639
<v Speaker 1>goes back to my to that quote from Speaker Mike Johnson,

1:20:31.640 --> 1:20:33.320
<v Speaker 1>who I think I've quoted now there will probably be

1:20:33.320 --> 1:20:37.120
<v Speaker 1>the fourth time in two weeks where he said the

1:20:37.120 --> 1:20:40.479
<v Speaker 1>biggest difference between Trump's corruption and Biden's corruption is that

1:20:40.520 --> 1:20:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Biden tried to keep his corruption on the down low

1:20:43.520 --> 1:20:45.799
<v Speaker 1>with what Hunter Biden was doing and what Frank Biden

1:20:45.920 --> 1:20:48.200
<v Speaker 1>was doing. Donald Trump does it out in the open

1:20:48.200 --> 1:20:52.280
<v Speaker 1>and transparently so because he tells you in plain sight

1:20:52.360 --> 1:20:55.519
<v Speaker 1>that he's handed the keys to the government over to

1:20:55.520 --> 1:20:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk, and he's allowed Elon Musk to have his way,

1:20:58.520 --> 1:21:00.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, when it comes to certain things that impact

1:21:00.439 --> 1:21:03.559
<v Speaker 1>his businesses, get Star Link into the White House, whatever right,

1:21:03.720 --> 1:21:07.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, allows him to get more government contracts. That

1:21:07.240 --> 1:21:09.360
<v Speaker 1>that's well, it's out in the open so it's not

1:21:09.439 --> 1:21:13.960
<v Speaker 1>unethical anyway. My skepticism is there. Now here's the problem

1:21:14.360 --> 1:21:18.280
<v Speaker 1>the entity we have two. There are three different places

1:21:18.280 --> 1:21:22.840
<v Speaker 1>that could investigate what is clearly obvious conflict of interest

1:21:22.920 --> 1:21:25.200
<v Speaker 1>and it may be corrupt, right, it may be a crime.

1:21:25.240 --> 1:21:26.880
<v Speaker 1>We don't know that it's a crime. We would need

1:21:26.920 --> 1:21:29.479
<v Speaker 1>more evidence to prove it. But there are three entities

1:21:30.040 --> 1:21:33.680
<v Speaker 1>that could essentially do this investigating to see if a

1:21:33.720 --> 1:21:36.839
<v Speaker 1>crime was committed. Entity one would be an inspector general

1:21:36.920 --> 1:21:39.519
<v Speaker 1>at any of the agencies. But of course Donald Trump

1:21:39.560 --> 1:21:43.120
<v Speaker 1>fired all the inspector generals. Now summers are kind of

1:21:43.200 --> 1:21:45.320
<v Speaker 1>be back in place, and when he fires one, there's

1:21:45.320 --> 1:21:47.880
<v Speaker 1>a temporary but by doing the across the board firing,

1:21:47.920 --> 1:21:50.120
<v Speaker 1>he was sending a warning shot, don't come after me.

1:21:50.600 --> 1:21:54.200
<v Speaker 1>The second group is your is your congressional committees? Well,

1:21:54.200 --> 1:21:57.360
<v Speaker 1>guess what Congress is controlled by his party and they

1:21:57.360 --> 1:22:00.799
<v Speaker 1>seem to I mean the House Oversight Committee is literally

1:22:00.800 --> 1:22:04.800
<v Speaker 1>holding investigations about whether Joe Biden had control of his

1:22:04.880 --> 1:22:05.600
<v Speaker 1>autopen or not.

1:22:06.520 --> 1:22:07.120
<v Speaker 2>They are not.

1:22:07.240 --> 1:22:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Investigating what's hitting them in plain sight, which is he

1:22:11.160 --> 1:22:15.960
<v Speaker 1>handed government contracts, gave them away like candidate Elon Musk,

1:22:16.439 --> 1:22:20.120
<v Speaker 1>and he gave Elon Musk unfettered access, probably illegal, unfettered

1:22:20.160 --> 1:22:23.639
<v Speaker 1>access to the federal government to different databases like Social

1:22:23.680 --> 1:22:27.559
<v Speaker 1>Security in the IRS. But we don't know if he

1:22:27.640 --> 1:22:31.360
<v Speaker 1>did it corruptly or not. It certainly looks like it is,

1:22:32.560 --> 1:22:36.439
<v Speaker 1>but there's no investigators. And of course the third entity

1:22:36.479 --> 1:22:40.040
<v Speaker 1>that could do this is the Justice Department. I'm going

1:22:40.120 --> 1:22:41.960
<v Speaker 1>to pause here to let you laugh when I said

1:22:42.120 --> 1:22:45.799
<v Speaker 1>the Justice Department. So you get my point here. Everything

1:22:45.840 --> 1:22:50.880
<v Speaker 1>you say is valid. The problem is the entities that

1:22:51.080 --> 1:22:53.400
<v Speaker 1>are in charge of sort of the rule of law

1:22:53.840 --> 1:22:57.800
<v Speaker 1>in these scenarios. Your inspectors generals, your Justice Department, and

1:22:57.840 --> 1:23:02.640
<v Speaker 1>your congressional committees have all been compromised. I wish I

1:23:02.640 --> 1:23:05.200
<v Speaker 1>had a better answer for you, Angel, I appreciate the question.

1:23:05.800 --> 1:23:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Let me go this second question, alternate history question. Where

1:23:10.080 --> 1:23:13.880
<v Speaker 1>would we be now if Trump didn't withdraw from the

1:23:14.000 --> 1:23:15.439
<v Speaker 1>Iran nuclear deal?

1:23:16.160 --> 1:23:16.760
<v Speaker 2>Jim E.

1:23:18.960 --> 1:23:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's an interesting question. Well, I can tell you

1:23:23.439 --> 1:23:27.120
<v Speaker 1>what Israel feared of Trump doing a new deal. Here's

1:23:27.160 --> 1:23:30.519
<v Speaker 1>what Israel feared in a new deal. And by the way,

1:23:31.160 --> 1:23:33.639
<v Speaker 1>if you're really interested in the sort of the nitty

1:23:33.640 --> 1:23:37.000
<v Speaker 1>gritty of this, I do hope you tune into the

1:23:37.040 --> 1:23:39.679
<v Speaker 1>interview I did with Treta Parsi on Newsphere. This guy,

1:23:40.040 --> 1:23:43.000
<v Speaker 1>he just he really laid it out well, and we

1:23:43.320 --> 1:23:45.840
<v Speaker 1>go back to that, you know, back to that original

1:23:45.840 --> 1:23:48.760
<v Speaker 1>deal and sort of he really just explains the political

1:23:49.080 --> 1:23:53.200
<v Speaker 1>motivations that each government has domestically. Anyway, It's a terrific

1:23:53.200 --> 1:23:57.240
<v Speaker 1>conversation and I think we'll fill in some blanks here, But.

1:23:57.880 --> 1:23:59.000
<v Speaker 2>Look what Israel.

1:23:59.280 --> 1:24:03.160
<v Speaker 1>One of the reasons there's real acted is they had

1:24:03.160 --> 1:24:05.120
<v Speaker 1>a fear that Trump would cut a deal with Iran,

1:24:05.600 --> 1:24:08.439
<v Speaker 1>and that the deal would give Aron some money that

1:24:08.520 --> 1:24:15.040
<v Speaker 1>could in turn allow them to replenish Hesbalo, perhaps replenish

1:24:15.040 --> 1:24:20.080
<v Speaker 1>the Hoodies, and maybe even help Hamas, although I'm less

1:24:20.640 --> 1:24:24.200
<v Speaker 1>not one hundred percent sure they would be as inclined

1:24:24.200 --> 1:24:27.800
<v Speaker 1>to help rebuild Hamas as they actually the Iranians, I

1:24:27.840 --> 1:24:33.400
<v Speaker 1>think blame Hamas for creating this situation. They suddenly find

1:24:33.439 --> 1:24:36.559
<v Speaker 1>them in right. Hamas did not have Iran's green light

1:24:36.640 --> 1:24:40.439
<v Speaker 1>for the October seventh attack, and yet that October seventh

1:24:40.439 --> 1:24:44.200
<v Speaker 1>attack could look looks like it's turning into the beginning

1:24:44.200 --> 1:24:47.160
<v Speaker 1>of the end for a Ran or at least certainly

1:24:47.800 --> 1:24:51.400
<v Speaker 1>for many of Iran's proxies. But if we still had

1:24:51.439 --> 1:24:56.280
<v Speaker 1>this Iran deal, well they would have you know, in theory,

1:24:57.160 --> 1:25:00.559
<v Speaker 1>they would have more money to at to use, they

1:25:00.600 --> 1:25:04.120
<v Speaker 1>would be more The question would be would they be

1:25:04.200 --> 1:25:07.200
<v Speaker 1>as aggressive if we were if we had if we

1:25:07.200 --> 1:25:09.760
<v Speaker 1>were on top of them all the time. You know,

1:25:09.880 --> 1:25:13.559
<v Speaker 1>it was interesting what Treta thought. You know, they're in

1:25:13.600 --> 1:25:17.240
<v Speaker 1>the first Iran deal. The Golf States were also against

1:25:17.800 --> 1:25:20.479
<v Speaker 1>the United States cutting a deal with Iran, and as

1:25:20.520 --> 1:25:22.200
<v Speaker 1>he put it, he said their fear was that the

1:25:22.280 --> 1:25:25.519
<v Speaker 1>United States would end up just doing business with Iran

1:25:25.640 --> 1:25:29.040
<v Speaker 1>over time and essentially not allowing the Golf States to

1:25:29.080 --> 1:25:31.080
<v Speaker 1>have the advantage that they've had for quite some time,

1:25:31.120 --> 1:25:35.760
<v Speaker 1>at least financially in the region now. And so that's

1:25:35.800 --> 1:25:38.040
<v Speaker 1>why they were They shared the same position as Israel.

1:25:38.080 --> 1:25:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Now they're less you know, they're not as supportive of

1:25:42.040 --> 1:25:44.760
<v Speaker 1>what Israel did, and at the same time, they're not

1:25:44.840 --> 1:25:51.799
<v Speaker 1>any more pro Iran. They just at this point, don't

1:25:52.680 --> 1:25:55.080
<v Speaker 1>they just want stability in the region, because it's the

1:25:55.120 --> 1:25:58.439
<v Speaker 1>instability that costs the money, and it's the instability. Look

1:25:58.439 --> 1:26:00.600
<v Speaker 1>what it's going to do to I don't think this

1:26:00.720 --> 1:26:03.280
<v Speaker 1>is going to be good for anybody in that region.

1:26:03.360 --> 1:26:10.400
<v Speaker 1>So I still don't know how how to answer your question.

1:26:10.439 --> 1:26:14.080
<v Speaker 1>There's so many what ifs here, would be be still

1:26:14.240 --> 1:26:14.960
<v Speaker 1>still be in power?

1:26:15.479 --> 1:26:15.639
<v Speaker 2>Right?

1:26:15.680 --> 1:26:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Would he be considered? How would that have happened? Would

1:26:18.360 --> 1:26:22.719
<v Speaker 1>this if? If Iran? If this deal is staying, does

1:26:22.720 --> 1:26:25.559
<v Speaker 1>Iran pull back on its proxies or get more aggressive

1:26:25.560 --> 1:26:34.280
<v Speaker 1>with its proxies? I I am, I don't know. I'm

1:26:34.400 --> 1:26:37.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm not going to sit here and claim that

1:26:38.080 --> 1:26:41.960
<v Speaker 1>things would be better. It's very possible we could have

1:26:41.960 --> 1:26:45.479
<v Speaker 1>been in the same place because maybe Iran gets cocky

1:26:45.520 --> 1:26:49.160
<v Speaker 1>and violates the agreement, and if they do, then we're

1:26:49.240 --> 1:26:52.679
<v Speaker 1>drawn into this. So I don't know if there's any

1:26:53.000 --> 1:26:59.040
<v Speaker 1>if there's any upside to have to have now at

1:26:59.040 --> 1:27:01.759
<v Speaker 1>this point, I don't know if there had been upside,

1:27:01.840 --> 1:27:04.240
<v Speaker 1>especially if it appears that you were about to get

1:27:04.240 --> 1:27:08.040
<v Speaker 1>them back into a deal that might have been slightly

1:27:08.360 --> 1:27:13.719
<v Speaker 1>tougher than the deal that was cut with Obama. But Jim,

1:27:13.720 --> 1:27:16.960
<v Speaker 1>it's a great question. I don't that's let me put

1:27:16.960 --> 1:27:18.880
<v Speaker 1>it this way. I'm going to go ask some of

1:27:18.920 --> 1:27:23.200
<v Speaker 1>my smarter Middle East experts that very same question, and

1:27:23.200 --> 1:27:24.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to see if I can get you a

1:27:24.240 --> 1:27:28.840
<v Speaker 1>better answer down the road, all Right, let's see here,

1:27:28.960 --> 1:27:33.360
<v Speaker 1>Joe may do one more here, Joe R. He's just

1:27:33.400 --> 1:27:38.320
<v Speaker 1>got a note. Not necessarily a question, but it's an

1:27:38.360 --> 1:27:40.479
<v Speaker 1>interesting one. So I thought I charged from Joe. Ours

1:27:40.520 --> 1:27:43.479
<v Speaker 1>from Vero Beach, home of Dodgertown. When I was a kid,

1:27:43.960 --> 1:27:45.639
<v Speaker 1>I went to Vera. We got to Vera Beach every

1:27:45.680 --> 1:27:48.080
<v Speaker 1>spring break to go check out the Dodgers. My dad

1:27:48.120 --> 1:27:50.519
<v Speaker 1>was a Dodger fan. That was the team of my

1:27:50.560 --> 1:27:52.880
<v Speaker 1>youth as well. So love me some Vera Beach and

1:27:52.880 --> 1:27:54.559
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to see Vera Beach get a new team

1:27:54.600 --> 1:27:57.960
<v Speaker 1>for spring training. How another club hasn't said, hey, we

1:27:58.000 --> 1:28:01.120
<v Speaker 1>want a piece of Dodger Town is beyond me. But Joe,

1:28:01.160 --> 1:28:03.840
<v Speaker 1>here's your observation. Watched your Newsphere interview with Steve Bannon.

1:28:03.880 --> 1:28:05.719
<v Speaker 1>It was like a fresh breeze coming off the ocean.

1:28:05.760 --> 1:28:06.040
<v Speaker 2>Wow.

1:28:06.120 --> 1:28:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, see, this is why I'm going to share this

1:28:08.040 --> 1:28:09.639
<v Speaker 1>with you, right. I mean, been to meet the press

1:28:09.640 --> 1:28:11.240
<v Speaker 1>and face the nation fan for decades. In the last

1:28:11.240 --> 1:28:13.120
<v Speaker 1>few years, I've been fast forwarding through the interviews with

1:28:13.160 --> 1:28:15.840
<v Speaker 1>politicians who appeared merely to repeat the party line and

1:28:15.880 --> 1:28:19.120
<v Speaker 1>ignore hard questions. Your podcasts and Newsphere interviews provide more

1:28:19.120 --> 1:28:21.439
<v Speaker 1>information on the state of politics in the world than

1:28:21.479 --> 1:28:23.759
<v Speaker 1>those shows. So congrats on moving to your new formats

1:28:23.760 --> 1:28:26.360
<v Speaker 1>and providing real sight on today's weighty issues.

1:28:26.439 --> 1:28:27.839
<v Speaker 2>Co Gators, Oh man.

1:28:28.080 --> 1:28:30.400
<v Speaker 1>That pains me to have to repeat You'd said all

1:28:30.400 --> 1:28:34.240
<v Speaker 1>these nice things and then you had to say, go Gators. Anyway, Joe,

1:28:34.320 --> 1:28:36.800
<v Speaker 1>let me defend those Sunday shows here. Though I think

1:28:36.840 --> 1:28:40.640
<v Speaker 1>both Margaret and Kristen are trying their very best. I

1:28:40.640 --> 1:28:45.519
<v Speaker 1>think the formats are what prevents them, I think from

1:28:45.560 --> 1:28:46.680
<v Speaker 1>doing the interviews.

1:28:46.280 --> 1:28:48.640
<v Speaker 2>That they would like to be doing. So don't trust me.

1:28:48.680 --> 1:28:49.639
<v Speaker 2>I've been in that seat.

1:28:49.800 --> 1:28:52.960
<v Speaker 1>I understand the different pressures that come with it. So

1:28:53.000 --> 1:28:55.960
<v Speaker 1>I want to be as much as much as I

1:28:55.960 --> 1:28:59.679
<v Speaker 1>appreciate the question and appreciate the sentiment, I'm not interested

1:28:59.680 --> 1:29:02.439
<v Speaker 1>in and dunking on them. I just think that we're

1:29:02.479 --> 1:29:04.880
<v Speaker 1>in a different place now, in this current media ecosystem,

1:29:05.320 --> 1:29:05.719
<v Speaker 1>and I.

1:29:05.640 --> 1:29:06.679
<v Speaker 2>Do think that.

1:29:08.439 --> 1:29:11.560
<v Speaker 1>There is a that there's a better way to surface information.

1:29:11.760 --> 1:29:17.400
<v Speaker 1>I know it's not as sometimes, it's not as shiny,

1:29:17.520 --> 1:29:19.479
<v Speaker 1>it's not as much of a shiny metal object right

1:29:19.520 --> 1:29:23.639
<v Speaker 1>to grab your attention. But I fear traditional media in general.

1:29:24.120 --> 1:29:27.639
<v Speaker 1>You know, when you start to lose audience. You start

1:29:27.680 --> 1:29:30.519
<v Speaker 1>to like try to grab viewers by the lapels, don't leave,

1:29:30.600 --> 1:29:32.840
<v Speaker 1>don't leave, right, and you start to sort of chase

1:29:32.880 --> 1:29:35.200
<v Speaker 1>certain shiny metal things, thinking that it's going to help

1:29:37.040 --> 1:29:40.680
<v Speaker 1>when sometimes zagging just when everybody's zigging is sometimes the

1:29:41.120 --> 1:29:47.519
<v Speaker 1>better move. But look, you know it's a this is

1:29:47.560 --> 1:29:50.840
<v Speaker 1>the advantage of the formats that I'm in. But at

1:29:50.840 --> 1:29:53.320
<v Speaker 1>the same time, sometimes you don't there aren't You can't

1:29:53.320 --> 1:29:56.160
<v Speaker 1>get these people to sit down for twenty at thirty minutes, right,

1:29:56.240 --> 1:29:59.920
<v Speaker 1>So the people I am getting are end up sounding

1:30:00.080 --> 1:30:02.439
<v Speaker 1>forthcoming because they're willing to come on for twenty thirty

1:30:02.520 --> 1:30:05.439
<v Speaker 1>forty five minutes, and you get a better understanding of

1:30:05.439 --> 1:30:08.640
<v Speaker 1>how someone thinks, even if they're not being straight with

1:30:08.720 --> 1:30:10.479
<v Speaker 1>the answers that they're giving, and you kind of catch

1:30:10.479 --> 1:30:13.679
<v Speaker 1>them with it. Right, that five to ten minute interview,

1:30:13.720 --> 1:30:16.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if it serves anybody anything, And I

1:30:16.640 --> 1:30:21.120
<v Speaker 1>think that unfortunately, everybody knows how to do the five

1:30:21.160 --> 1:30:24.280
<v Speaker 1>minute interview, right. You know how to avoid making news.

1:30:24.320 --> 1:30:26.280
<v Speaker 1>If you have to avoid making news, you know how

1:30:26.320 --> 1:30:29.080
<v Speaker 1>to hijacket if you'd like to make a one particular

1:30:29.080 --> 1:30:31.439
<v Speaker 1>piece of information and then make it so that it's

1:30:31.520 --> 1:30:32.320
<v Speaker 1>nothing else.

1:30:32.560 --> 1:30:34.120
<v Speaker 2>I think that's what has made it.

1:30:34.120 --> 1:30:36.160
<v Speaker 1>It's just, you know, look, we just got to the

1:30:36.320 --> 1:30:38.600
<v Speaker 1>end of the usefulness of that kind of format, is

1:30:38.600 --> 1:30:38.960
<v Speaker 1>the way I.

1:30:38.920 --> 1:30:42.080
<v Speaker 2>Would put it. But anyway, I appreciate the sentiment.

1:30:44.520 --> 1:30:46.800
<v Speaker 1>I hope my media writer friends out there don't try

1:30:46.800 --> 1:30:49.360
<v Speaker 1>to overwrite what I just said there, don't aggregate what

1:30:49.439 --> 1:30:50.000
<v Speaker 1>I just said.

1:30:50.240 --> 1:30:55.320
<v Speaker 2>Just let it be all right with that. It's Monday.

1:30:56.320 --> 1:30:58.200
<v Speaker 1>I know there's a lot of maybe there might be

1:30:58.240 --> 1:31:00.160
<v Speaker 1>another podcast or two you want to catch up with,

1:31:00.360 --> 1:31:03.559
<v Speaker 1>so I won't add to the U add to your

1:31:03.600 --> 1:31:05.920
<v Speaker 1>listening time today, but I promise you a couple more

1:31:05.960 --> 1:31:08.600
<v Speaker 1>fun drops later this week and with that until we

1:31:08.680 --> 1:31:09.200
<v Speaker 1>upload again.

1:31:09.760 --> 1:31:12.439
<v Speaker 2>M M