WEBVTT - Beating The Book: 2019 NFL MegaPod Week 1 Preview

0:00:03.400 --> 0:00:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Check it on man Now Down Now Thursday morning, September

0:00:13.200 --> 0:00:17.280
<v Speaker 1>seams of Beating the Book podcast. It is the Megapod

0:00:17.800 --> 0:00:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Skill Alexander Brand new season season number nine with an

0:00:22.160 --> 0:00:25.040
<v Speaker 1>all new cast. By the way, Uh, for those who

0:00:25.239 --> 0:00:28.920
<v Speaker 1>are looking for Marco and Ace, they have taken their

0:00:28.920 --> 0:00:31.600
<v Speaker 1>talents to South Beach, So in case you missed the

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:34.960
<v Speaker 1>stuff on social media, they're doing their own thing. They

0:00:35.159 --> 0:00:36.920
<v Speaker 1>have their own company and they wanted to do the

0:00:36.960 --> 0:00:39.479
<v Speaker 1>podcast over there and I thought it was better for

0:00:39.520 --> 0:00:41.519
<v Speaker 1>their brand, So that's where you can find them. I

0:00:41.640 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 1>wish them all the best. However, I'm very excited to

0:00:46.000 --> 0:00:48.319
<v Speaker 1>have these two gentlemen on the show this year. You

0:00:48.360 --> 0:00:50.720
<v Speaker 1>may know them if you're a Visa listener. If you

0:00:50.880 --> 0:00:52.800
<v Speaker 1>do not listen to Visa, perhaps you know one of

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:57.360
<v Speaker 1>these guys from the Showtime docuseries Action on my Left.

0:00:57.480 --> 0:00:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Ladies and gentlemen, the Great Todd wishing of hello to

0:01:00.200 --> 0:01:04.119
<v Speaker 1>thank you for doing this. It's my pleasure Gil obviously. Um,

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:06.440
<v Speaker 1>you know this is a nice little thing that came

0:01:06.480 --> 0:01:10.440
<v Speaker 1>out of the Gill and Todd Show onst So the

0:01:10.480 --> 0:01:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Gill and Todd Show not actually a thing and all

0:01:12.800 --> 0:01:15.920
<v Speaker 1>my right. Uh. He is the conciliary to Derek Stevens.

0:01:15.959 --> 0:01:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Over at Circus Sports, they're running a phenomenal football handicapping

0:01:19.800 --> 0:01:23.640
<v Speaker 1>contest which actually has some application to something very timely

0:01:23.640 --> 0:01:26.000
<v Speaker 1>in the news right now, which we'll get into momentarily.

0:01:26.160 --> 0:01:28.520
<v Speaker 1>What is your exact title over at Circle, Mike Well,

0:01:28.560 --> 0:01:32.039
<v Speaker 1>the exact title is Vice President of Operations, Vice President

0:01:32.040 --> 0:01:34.280
<v Speaker 1>of Operations. Over there at Circuits Sports they run the

0:01:34.360 --> 0:01:36.640
<v Speaker 1>d Golden Gate and of course the brand new Circuit

0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Casino which is set to open late twenty with a

0:01:40.319 --> 0:01:43.360
<v Speaker 1>brand new UH Spanking News sports book in Circle A

0:01:43.400 --> 0:01:46.839
<v Speaker 1>Shangri lav Sports Books in December of Mike Palm pump

0:01:46.880 --> 0:01:49.279
<v Speaker 1>that you can join us before we get into anything, guys,

0:01:49.800 --> 0:01:52.800
<v Speaker 1>This Antonio Open Brown news is happening right now as

0:01:52.800 --> 0:01:57.440
<v Speaker 1>we're recording this podcast. Adam Schefter reporting on his Twitter

0:01:57.800 --> 0:02:00.400
<v Speaker 1>that this has gotten ugly all of a sudden between

0:02:00.440 --> 0:02:03.680
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders and Antonio Brown. Antonio Brown clearly not the

0:02:03.680 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 1>brightest bulb. Antonio Brown posted the fine letter he got fined,

0:02:07.680 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 1>posted that fine letter on social media that Raiders GM

0:02:10.639 --> 0:02:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Mike Mayock sent him. It led to an exchange. We're

0:02:13.600 --> 0:02:16.400
<v Speaker 1>not sure how physical it got, but it's now leading

0:02:16.400 --> 0:02:19.000
<v Speaker 1>to further discipline. Adam Schefter says it's not going away

0:02:19.040 --> 0:02:21.520
<v Speaker 1>anytime soon, and he goes on to say now and

0:02:21.560 --> 0:02:23.800
<v Speaker 1>this is the tweet that really gets everybody. This is

0:02:23.800 --> 0:02:26.399
<v Speaker 1>his latest tweet. There are those around the league who

0:02:26.400 --> 0:02:29.880
<v Speaker 1>now believe the Raiders could suspend Antonio Brown with the

0:02:29.919 --> 0:02:32.080
<v Speaker 1>idea of trying to avoid the thirty point one to

0:02:32.240 --> 0:02:34.800
<v Speaker 1>five million dollars of guaranteed money in his contract, which

0:02:34.800 --> 0:02:40.160
<v Speaker 1>obviously would end his time in Oakland before it even begins. Wow,

0:02:40.200 --> 0:02:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Oakland and Denver of course in a virtual pick him

0:02:42.880 --> 0:02:45.600
<v Speaker 1>of a game. Well, actually Denver by two and a half. Now,

0:02:45.720 --> 0:02:47.120
<v Speaker 1>the one thing I want to relate this to the

0:02:47.120 --> 0:02:50.080
<v Speaker 1>circuit contest, Mike go real quick off the bat. Here's

0:02:50.120 --> 0:02:53.239
<v Speaker 1>the difference between other contests like the Westgate that post

0:02:53.320 --> 0:02:57.480
<v Speaker 1>their lines on Wednesday afternoon. You don't post him till Thursday.

0:02:57.840 --> 0:03:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Already a more accurate line per HAPs from you guys

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:03.680
<v Speaker 1>now because of this. Yeah, we we went all the

0:03:03.720 --> 0:03:07.120
<v Speaker 1>way from from Raiders one going to pose Raiders one

0:03:07.880 --> 0:03:10.239
<v Speaker 1>uh to Broncos two and a half for the contest.

0:03:10.280 --> 0:03:13.680
<v Speaker 1>So we we you know, we supposed that the difference

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:17.560
<v Speaker 1>between Wednesday afternoon Thursday morning might come into play several

0:03:17.600 --> 0:03:20.000
<v Speaker 1>times during the year. Well with this bombshell, it already

0:03:20.080 --> 0:03:22.120
<v Speaker 1>is a big factor in week one. It's amazing that

0:03:22.120 --> 0:03:24.280
<v Speaker 1>it's happened at week one. All right, gentlemen, you guys

0:03:24.360 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 1>ready to do this? The new podcast cast gives us

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:28.920
<v Speaker 1>an opportunity to do a new format also on the show,

0:03:29.000 --> 0:03:30.359
<v Speaker 1>So we're gonna do this a little differently. And for

0:03:30.400 --> 0:03:32.240
<v Speaker 1>those wondering, are we're gonna have a rotating guest on

0:03:32.280 --> 0:03:34.960
<v Speaker 1>some weeks, Yes, we absolutely will. We will have that

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 1>as well. Last thing about the Raiders. John Pruten was

0:03:38.320 --> 0:03:41.200
<v Speaker 1>just heard saying, man, we're gonna run the whist bone

0:03:41.240 --> 0:03:44.000
<v Speaker 1>we lost for best receiver knocked on wood if you're

0:03:44.040 --> 0:03:48.800
<v Speaker 1>with me, which got very tiring on Hard Knocks this year.

0:03:48.840 --> 0:03:50.240
<v Speaker 1>By the way, it was the worst season of Hard

0:03:50.280 --> 0:03:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Knocks ever. Can we just establish that was the worst

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:55.800
<v Speaker 1>thing ever? Episode five with a whimper, that's how it

0:03:55.840 --> 0:03:58.120
<v Speaker 1>went out. Let's begin first before we get into your

0:03:58.160 --> 0:04:00.800
<v Speaker 1>best best of the week. Thursday night for ball Green

0:04:00.840 --> 0:04:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Bay at Chicago. This line was about four most of

0:04:03.720 --> 0:04:07.920
<v Speaker 1>the summer in Chicago by three in this ballgame, do

0:04:08.040 --> 0:04:11.560
<v Speaker 1>either of you have any preflop play on this ball game,

0:04:11.560 --> 0:04:15.000
<v Speaker 1>either side or total. Mike, start with you. I do I.

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:18.520
<v Speaker 1>I played the first half under twenty three. I sat

0:04:18.640 --> 0:04:21.000
<v Speaker 1>here thinking about this game for the last few weeks,

0:04:21.000 --> 0:04:22.680
<v Speaker 1>thinking if I was going to take the Bears if

0:04:22.680 --> 0:04:26.360
<v Speaker 1>it came down to three. But I just think I'll

0:04:26.360 --> 0:04:29.039
<v Speaker 1>tell you one for Gil and Todd. I'm not impressed

0:04:29.080 --> 0:04:32.520
<v Speaker 1>with the body of work of Fleur. I mean, I

0:04:32.560 --> 0:04:35.960
<v Speaker 1>still can't get over that game at home against Baltimore

0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:38.520
<v Speaker 1>last year where they went one for ten on third downs.

0:04:39.120 --> 0:04:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Now you couple that with Rogers, who has to put

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:45.560
<v Speaker 1>in a new system for the first time in thirteen years, UM,

0:04:45.800 --> 0:04:50.720
<v Speaker 1>very little reps for the first team offense in the preseason. UM.

0:04:50.960 --> 0:04:53.320
<v Speaker 1>And combine that with the fact that the Bears are

0:04:53.360 --> 0:04:55.719
<v Speaker 1>one of the worst teams in explosive plays of twenty

0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:58.080
<v Speaker 1>yards or more. I think you might see a slow

0:04:58.160 --> 0:05:00.480
<v Speaker 1>start to this game. So I thought, I usually try

0:05:00.520 --> 0:05:02.840
<v Speaker 1>to make a total on every game. I put this

0:05:02.880 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 1>total right around forty two and a half forty three,

0:05:05.120 --> 0:05:07.000
<v Speaker 1>So I think there's some value trying to go under

0:05:07.040 --> 0:05:08.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty three in the first half. I think we might

0:05:08.720 --> 0:05:11.359
<v Speaker 1>get a couple stale series right off the bat. I

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:13.240
<v Speaker 1>like that, By the way, game total forty six and

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:15.160
<v Speaker 1>a half. Just to clarify, but Mike making a play

0:05:15.200 --> 0:05:17.599
<v Speaker 1>on the first half under uh, Todd, anything for you?

0:05:17.600 --> 0:05:19.200
<v Speaker 1>And when I say it's three points, by the way,

0:05:19.200 --> 0:05:24.440
<v Speaker 1>it's three with extra juice. Consensus about minus one minus juice.

0:05:25.120 --> 0:05:28.000
<v Speaker 1>That's pretty much what it is across the board. Anything

0:05:28.040 --> 0:05:32.119
<v Speaker 1>for you, Todd. I strong lean if it's minus three.

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:35.520
<v Speaker 1>They're basically saying that the Bears and the Packers are

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:38.760
<v Speaker 1>even teams, and the home field advantages three and soldier field,

0:05:39.279 --> 0:05:42.640
<v Speaker 1>and I see how the Bears and the Packers are

0:05:42.760 --> 0:05:45.080
<v Speaker 1>equal teams. Just look at last year. Because I know

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:47.720
<v Speaker 1>it's Aaron Rodgers, and I know it's scary to lay

0:05:47.800 --> 0:05:52.240
<v Speaker 1>points against Aaron Rodgers, but um, if anything, I would

0:05:52.320 --> 0:05:56.040
<v Speaker 1>lean to the Bears minus three. Let us begin with Sunday.

0:05:56.040 --> 0:05:58.800
<v Speaker 1>By the way, I have no play whatsoever. Thanks for asking, guys.

0:05:58.839 --> 0:06:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Appreciate it that you care so deeply. I have no

0:06:01.200 --> 0:06:03.080
<v Speaker 1>play on this game. I'm gonna end game. I'm gonna

0:06:03.080 --> 0:06:06.640
<v Speaker 1>watch it, and uh, perhaps bet while it's going on.

0:06:07.040 --> 0:06:09.039
<v Speaker 1>As far as the rest of the weekend is concerned,

0:06:09.080 --> 0:06:11.320
<v Speaker 1>let's do our best bets. We do have the final

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:13.440
<v Speaker 1>two questions that we always have coming up at the

0:06:13.560 --> 0:06:15.279
<v Speaker 1>end of the show, we have our teaser of the

0:06:15.279 --> 0:06:18.320
<v Speaker 1>week coming up as well, But let's just do best bets. Mike,

0:06:18.400 --> 0:06:21.560
<v Speaker 1>we start with you your single best bet of the weekend, Sir.

0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:25.520
<v Speaker 1>I like the Giants catching a touchdown at at Jerry

0:06:25.560 --> 0:06:27.240
<v Speaker 1>World Is. I think this is going to be an

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:32.120
<v Speaker 1>improved version of the Giants um Ezekiel hold out, I

0:06:32.160 --> 0:06:35.160
<v Speaker 1>think may have an effect on the Cowboys, and I'm

0:06:35.160 --> 0:06:37.719
<v Speaker 1>not sure that that that this Cowboys team, although the

0:06:37.760 --> 0:06:41.480
<v Speaker 1>offensive line should be better this year, is that markedly

0:06:41.800 --> 0:06:44.560
<v Speaker 1>much better in a division game. It's really hard to

0:06:44.720 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 1>lay a touchdown in a division game. And I think

0:06:47.000 --> 0:06:50.160
<v Speaker 1>the Giants here are actually a team that's uh that

0:06:50.480 --> 0:06:52.640
<v Speaker 1>could could could stay in this game late and have

0:06:52.720 --> 0:06:54.400
<v Speaker 1>a chance at an upset if you look at the

0:06:54.440 --> 0:06:57.080
<v Speaker 1>history of the series as well, and just take a

0:06:57.080 --> 0:06:59.719
<v Speaker 1>look at the time since it's been Dack versus Eli,

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:02.839
<v Speaker 1>the Giants have traditionally played the Cowboys close, even in

0:07:02.839 --> 0:07:05.479
<v Speaker 1>these opening games, which are usually a Texas stadium. So

0:07:05.760 --> 0:07:08.480
<v Speaker 1>I grabbed up the seven here with the g Yeah,

0:07:08.520 --> 0:07:10.280
<v Speaker 1>and you can find some seven and a half's out

0:07:10.320 --> 0:07:12.400
<v Speaker 1>there as well, Like seven and a hook is pretty

0:07:12.480 --> 0:07:15.400
<v Speaker 1>rampidtly available plus seven and a half minus one, ten's

0:07:15.440 --> 0:07:17.760
<v Speaker 1>out there some minus one fifteen. I'm kind of with

0:07:17.880 --> 0:07:20.440
<v Speaker 1>you there, as as barish as I am on the Giants.

0:07:20.920 --> 0:07:23.240
<v Speaker 1>They might not be that bad. This is one of

0:07:23.280 --> 0:07:25.880
<v Speaker 1>these NFC East games where in past years this would

0:07:25.880 --> 0:07:28.760
<v Speaker 1>be an automatic three on the line. Such a poor

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:31.200
<v Speaker 1>opinion folks have of the Giants that you're catching seven

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:32.840
<v Speaker 1>or seven and a half. Let's put it this way.

0:07:32.880 --> 0:07:36.000
<v Speaker 1>I would not rush to lay the points with the Cowboys. Todd,

0:07:36.040 --> 0:07:38.120
<v Speaker 1>what is your best bet this week? But I would

0:07:38.160 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 1>agree with you. How can you lay seven alf the Cowboys?

0:07:41.680 --> 0:07:44.000
<v Speaker 1>They're not a team anyways that that wins by margins.

0:07:44.120 --> 0:07:47.360
<v Speaker 1>They run too much to win by a big margin.

0:07:47.440 --> 0:07:50.200
<v Speaker 1>But the best bet that I have is the Tennessee

0:07:50.240 --> 0:07:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Titans plus five and a half. I know there's all

0:07:53.400 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 1>the Browns hype. I know the Browns up, you know,

0:07:56.200 --> 0:07:58.760
<v Speaker 1>basically twenty two Hall of Fame or starting on offensive

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:04.800
<v Speaker 1>here and coming of Jesus and Baker may feel at

0:08:04.840 --> 0:08:09.160
<v Speaker 1>the quarterback position, but I just don't buy it until

0:08:09.200 --> 0:08:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I see it. Freddie Kitchens is the Coats. What do

0:08:11.640 --> 0:08:15.320
<v Speaker 1>we know about Freddie Kitchen? Nothing? Zero point zero do

0:08:15.400 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 1>we know about Freddie Kitchen, so I am not buying it.

0:08:18.200 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 1>The Tennessee Titans are well coached. They won some games

0:08:22.200 --> 0:08:24.560
<v Speaker 1>on the road last year, including a game at Dallas.

0:08:24.880 --> 0:08:27.840
<v Speaker 1>I can remember. They usually keep you in the game.

0:08:27.920 --> 0:08:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Their defensive kind of team team they don't you know.

0:08:30.960 --> 0:08:33.080
<v Speaker 1>It's not a light them up, you know, crazy four

0:08:33.080 --> 0:08:34.960
<v Speaker 1>board type of game, so it could easily be a

0:08:35.000 --> 0:08:37.760
<v Speaker 1>tight game. I like the Tennessee Tits, like the Tennessee

0:08:38.320 --> 0:08:41.600
<v Speaker 1>plus five and a half my best bet. And again

0:08:41.679 --> 0:08:44.319
<v Speaker 1>we'll we'll keep track of these for the for the

0:08:44.400 --> 0:08:46.840
<v Speaker 1>duration of the year. That should be fun. I'm sure

0:08:46.840 --> 0:08:48.160
<v Speaker 1>we won't hear the end of that if it goes

0:08:48.200 --> 0:08:51.640
<v Speaker 1>bad or or or if it goes good for Todd,

0:08:52.440 --> 0:08:58.559
<v Speaker 1>that's true, that would be the other scenario. I gets

0:08:58.840 --> 0:09:02.240
<v Speaker 1>to take shots me and say that I won't hear

0:09:02.280 --> 0:09:04.760
<v Speaker 1>the end of it. Meanwhile, he starts winningning he gets

0:09:04.760 --> 0:09:08.199
<v Speaker 1>his whole like clan palm readers or whoever else clan

0:09:08.480 --> 0:09:11.840
<v Speaker 1>that he's got. It'll talk him up. Let me just

0:09:11.880 --> 0:09:14.000
<v Speaker 1>tell everybody right now, Todd is in l A for

0:09:14.040 --> 0:09:17.400
<v Speaker 1>this particular episode. Todd's audio will be better from here

0:09:17.440 --> 0:09:20.480
<v Speaker 1>on out. I just want to point that outside any

0:09:20.559 --> 0:09:22.520
<v Speaker 1>better right now? Yeah, a little better right there? I think,

0:09:23.160 --> 0:09:25.800
<v Speaker 1>all right, my my best bet. I'm actually taking the

0:09:25.880 --> 0:09:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Cincinnati Bengals plus the nine and a half against the

0:09:29.480 --> 0:09:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Seattle Seahawks. I get it, Seattle's got Jadeveon Clowney Seattle,

0:09:34.360 --> 0:09:40.280
<v Speaker 1>known for fine prowess at home in Seattle. But I

0:09:40.320 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 1>don't get nine and a half here at all with

0:09:43.400 --> 0:09:48.240
<v Speaker 1>no real weapons, now that Doug Baldwin has left no

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:50.640
<v Speaker 1>real weapons on the outside, that we can really be

0:09:50.760 --> 0:09:53.440
<v Speaker 1>truly fearful of Tyler Lockett, good ball player, but I

0:09:53.440 --> 0:09:55.840
<v Speaker 1>don't know that without Baldwin to sort of take away

0:09:55.880 --> 0:09:57.760
<v Speaker 1>attention from him, I'm not sure. That's the thing we

0:09:57.760 --> 0:10:00.560
<v Speaker 1>don't know about DK mccalf. We don't know what's happening

0:10:00.600 --> 0:10:03.160
<v Speaker 1>there with his weapons. I don't know that they can

0:10:03.200 --> 0:10:06.600
<v Speaker 1>score enough points to cover nine and a half that easily.

0:10:07.040 --> 0:10:09.800
<v Speaker 1>And I actually think Joe Mixing and crew do some

0:10:09.880 --> 0:10:12.520
<v Speaker 1>things on offense even without a j Green. Give me

0:10:12.600 --> 0:10:15.000
<v Speaker 1>the nine and a half points site unseen on these

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:17.880
<v Speaker 1>two teams. Like I get the Eagles being ten point

0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:20.440
<v Speaker 1>favorites against the Redskins. That's a lot of points. But

0:10:20.480 --> 0:10:23.360
<v Speaker 1>I think the Redskins are are really bad at football.

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:25.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that we know this about the Bengals yet,

0:10:25.679 --> 0:10:27.720
<v Speaker 1>so I'll take the nine and a half as just

0:10:27.760 --> 0:10:30.280
<v Speaker 1>a first salvo of the season. And again these are

0:10:30.280 --> 0:10:32.839
<v Speaker 1>all site unseen obviously, but give me the nine and

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:34.360
<v Speaker 1>a half. I don't know how you guys feel about that.

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:37.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's interesting because I'm sorry Todd. You know

0:10:37.840 --> 0:10:40.839
<v Speaker 1>it's hard enough looking at you, being next to you

0:10:40.920 --> 0:10:42.760
<v Speaker 1>and looking at you and being able to speak now

0:10:42.800 --> 0:10:47.640
<v Speaker 1>when we're in different places is what more. But it's interesting, Gil,

0:10:47.720 --> 0:10:51.360
<v Speaker 1>because the guy was that for me or for Todd today.

0:10:51.760 --> 0:10:53.880
<v Speaker 1>It's also your experience with him as well, and in

0:10:53.920 --> 0:10:57.559
<v Speaker 1>fact you've already started talking. But um, the boys that

0:10:57.640 --> 0:10:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Circuits Sports made this eight and a half on the

0:10:59.720 --> 0:11:02.760
<v Speaker 1>cod test. I thought that was pretty interesting. Obviously they

0:11:02.880 --> 0:11:05.440
<v Speaker 1>shade the game the way you do, Gil, Yeah, so interesting,

0:11:05.720 --> 0:11:08.080
<v Speaker 1>so they shade eight and a half? Interesting? How so

0:11:08.240 --> 0:11:11.440
<v Speaker 1>your lines on in the contest now now in the

0:11:11.480 --> 0:11:13.760
<v Speaker 1>sports book? Is it also eight and a half in

0:11:13.800 --> 0:11:15.800
<v Speaker 1>the sports book right now? The last I looked at

0:11:15.920 --> 0:11:18.200
<v Speaker 1>was nine, But they may be anticipating it goes to

0:11:18.240 --> 0:11:21.160
<v Speaker 1>eight and a half. Obviously, these contest lines are also

0:11:21.200 --> 0:11:23.880
<v Speaker 1>an anticipation of where where the live line is going

0:11:23.960 --> 0:11:26.960
<v Speaker 1>to end up, absolutely, because they're static and so you

0:11:27.040 --> 0:11:29.240
<v Speaker 1>have to have some sort of anticipation on it. By

0:11:29.240 --> 0:11:31.720
<v Speaker 1>the way, I just want to I just wanna say

0:11:31.760 --> 0:11:33.520
<v Speaker 1>that I agree with you on that since it was

0:11:33.520 --> 0:11:35.480
<v Speaker 1>almost my best bet of the week. All right, Well,

0:11:35.480 --> 0:11:37.280
<v Speaker 1>if it's your second or third, well we'll hear about it. Two.

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:39.480
<v Speaker 1>I like it. I like the consensus Mike number two

0:11:39.520 --> 0:11:41.920
<v Speaker 1>for you. Yeah, maybe this is a square play, but

0:11:42.000 --> 0:11:44.600
<v Speaker 1>I I at the Lions. I liked the two and

0:11:44.600 --> 0:11:46.760
<v Speaker 1>a half. I wish I'd got in it earlier, but

0:11:46.800 --> 0:11:48.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to wait for it to get to

0:11:48.120 --> 0:11:51.720
<v Speaker 1>three because it's going to three. Um. I just think

0:11:51.720 --> 0:11:56.400
<v Speaker 1>that this Cardinals team and Cliff Klingsbury way over his head, Um,

0:11:57.120 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 1>this is a great spot for the lines. I think

0:11:59.040 --> 0:12:03.000
<v Speaker 1>going down there Arizona's defense. As much as we want

0:12:03.040 --> 0:12:06.320
<v Speaker 1>to talk about kings Burry in the offense and Kyler Murray,

0:12:06.559 --> 0:12:09.840
<v Speaker 1>take a look at that defense that that defense is putred.

0:12:10.240 --> 0:12:12.400
<v Speaker 1>I think the Lions will have their best rushing attack

0:12:12.440 --> 0:12:14.120
<v Speaker 1>that they've had in years, and I look for the

0:12:14.160 --> 0:12:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Lions to be able to control the ball here and

0:12:16.640 --> 0:12:19.040
<v Speaker 1>when this game pretty comfortably on the road. So my

0:12:19.080 --> 0:12:21.280
<v Speaker 1>second best bet is the Detroit Lions laying two and

0:12:21.360 --> 0:12:23.480
<v Speaker 1>a half. Let me ask you, when you saw Jalen Hurts,

0:12:23.520 --> 0:12:25.720
<v Speaker 1>and I know it was against Houston. Houston is awful

0:12:25.760 --> 0:12:28.280
<v Speaker 1>on defense, But when you saw Jalen Hurts put up

0:12:28.679 --> 0:12:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Techmobile numbers in Oklahoma's opener against Houston, was there a

0:12:33.240 --> 0:12:37.200
<v Speaker 1>little part of you that thought about Kyler Murray and

0:12:37.280 --> 0:12:39.440
<v Speaker 1>that sort of said to yourself, I know, Kyler's fun

0:12:39.480 --> 0:12:40.960
<v Speaker 1>and he had a great year, and he was and

0:12:40.960 --> 0:12:45.200
<v Speaker 1>he was absolutely tremendous, But did it minimize him at

0:12:45.240 --> 0:12:48.559
<v Speaker 1>all for you? That you can now firmly establish from

0:12:48.559 --> 0:12:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Baker Mayfield to Kyler Murray to perhaps even Jalen Hurts,

0:12:52.360 --> 0:12:54.880
<v Speaker 1>who we've never seen do this at Alabama right, that

0:12:55.040 --> 0:12:58.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe the Cardinals did not make the right pick with

0:12:58.520 --> 0:13:01.360
<v Speaker 1>the first pick of the draft. It actually you you

0:13:01.440 --> 0:13:03.360
<v Speaker 1>bring up a point that I thought about because I

0:13:03.400 --> 0:13:06.440
<v Speaker 1>had a strong feeling going into that Sunday night game

0:13:07.280 --> 0:13:09.640
<v Speaker 1>that that Hurts was not going to be able to

0:13:09.679 --> 0:13:12.720
<v Speaker 1>adapt to this system just because of the way Saban

0:13:12.800 --> 0:13:17.240
<v Speaker 1>plays is compared to to Oklahoma and not in a

0:13:17.320 --> 0:13:21.520
<v Speaker 1>hurry up and straight ahead running and dropped back, and boy,

0:13:21.559 --> 0:13:23.880
<v Speaker 1>he just picked up like like where Murray left off.

0:13:24.400 --> 0:13:27.400
<v Speaker 1>And so it does sort of diminish what Murray did

0:13:27.480 --> 0:13:30.199
<v Speaker 1>if anybody can step into it, especially somebody that spent

0:13:30.400 --> 0:13:35.679
<v Speaker 1>two years being successful in a totally polar opposite system. Yeah,

0:13:35.800 --> 0:13:38.960
<v Speaker 1>it definitely, at the very least, I think it was

0:13:39.160 --> 0:13:41.200
<v Speaker 1>valid that the thought comes up, and we'll see if

0:13:41.200 --> 0:13:43.800
<v Speaker 1>it happens. You're taken Detroit laying the two and a half.

0:13:43.840 --> 0:13:45.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's square. By the way, where did

0:13:45.120 --> 0:13:46.800
<v Speaker 1>you hear my next pig? Now this is this is

0:13:47.320 --> 0:13:50.240
<v Speaker 1>super square coming up, ladies and gentlemen once again. Todd

0:13:50.240 --> 0:13:55.400
<v Speaker 1>wishnev the star, the bona fide star of Showtime's docuseries Action. Todd,

0:13:55.440 --> 0:13:57.720
<v Speaker 1>by the way, for those who don't know, you were

0:13:57.760 --> 0:14:02.840
<v Speaker 1>the lovable character on Showtimes docuseries Action, you were made

0:14:03.120 --> 0:14:06.079
<v Speaker 1>to look like the everyman that you were just this

0:14:06.120 --> 0:14:08.200
<v Speaker 1>guy in a casino who hangs out every day. By

0:14:08.200 --> 0:14:10.360
<v Speaker 1>the way, that parts true, but that you really didn't

0:14:10.440 --> 0:14:12.720
<v Speaker 1>know what you were doing so much, but fair to

0:14:12.760 --> 0:14:15.320
<v Speaker 1>say that in real life, and I think you display

0:14:15.400 --> 0:14:17.280
<v Speaker 1>this on visa and all the time, that you are

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:21.000
<v Speaker 1>not only smarter than you were portrayed as but you're

0:14:21.040 --> 0:14:23.040
<v Speaker 1>the smartest guy in the room at all times. Well,

0:14:23.400 --> 0:14:27.000
<v Speaker 1>if I'm not in the room with Mike Palm, he

0:14:27.120 --> 0:14:29.720
<v Speaker 1>may not be the smartest, but he's always the most cerebral.

0:14:32.160 --> 0:14:35.240
<v Speaker 1>That's very we We were doing a lot of inside

0:14:35.320 --> 0:14:37.400
<v Speaker 1>jokes folks for people who listened to the visas and

0:14:37.760 --> 0:14:41.240
<v Speaker 1>uh Gil and Todd show. When I'm on Gil's show, Um,

0:14:41.280 --> 0:14:44.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, we have a whole football coach who's very

0:14:44.400 --> 0:14:46.920
<v Speaker 1>physical out there, and you know he's not very cerebral,

0:14:46.960 --> 0:14:50.520
<v Speaker 1>but he's very physical. So anyways, knock on wood if

0:14:50.520 --> 0:14:53.680
<v Speaker 1>you're with me, man, uh, let me just say I can't.

0:14:53.880 --> 0:14:55.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I'm gonna be able to stop saying

0:14:55.400 --> 0:14:58.120
<v Speaker 1>that all year. Um. Yeah, we won't get tired of

0:14:58.160 --> 0:15:02.200
<v Speaker 1>that or anything. The different for Mr for miniature Kyler

0:15:02.280 --> 0:15:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Murray is that on the team that he's gonna be on,

0:15:05.840 --> 0:15:08.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't believe they play with an offensive line. And

0:15:08.280 --> 0:15:10.800
<v Speaker 1>on the team that he was on last year, Oklahoma,

0:15:10.920 --> 0:15:13.920
<v Speaker 1>they have a huge offensive line. That could be a

0:15:13.960 --> 0:15:16.000
<v Speaker 1>slight difference. I think that both of you guys are

0:15:16.200 --> 0:15:19.920
<v Speaker 1>are making the point on um, Oklahoma is almost plug

0:15:19.960 --> 0:15:22.520
<v Speaker 1>and play when you got those big hawses up in front.

0:15:22.920 --> 0:15:25.360
<v Speaker 1>I think me or Mike could even throw two yards.

0:15:25.400 --> 0:15:28.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's like ridiculous. Um. But anyways, back you

0:15:28.760 --> 0:15:31.280
<v Speaker 1>were asking me about the second best bet. Yes, okay,

0:15:31.320 --> 0:15:37.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go because you already used since you can,

0:15:37.440 --> 0:15:39.680
<v Speaker 1>you can totally use ones that other people have used.

0:15:39.680 --> 0:15:42.960
<v Speaker 1>I want your authentic three best bets. I'm I'm on.

0:15:43.040 --> 0:15:45.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm on the fence on these. I'm gonna do something

0:15:45.720 --> 0:15:49.800
<v Speaker 1>crazy here and I'm gonna go with ten fits magic

0:15:50.240 --> 0:15:54.920
<v Speaker 1>and you're gonna say you and seen are you crazy?

0:15:55.320 --> 0:15:58.160
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, I guess I'm crazy. But let's let's remember

0:15:58.240 --> 0:16:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Fitzpatrick's usual old pattern. He goes to a new team,

0:16:02.840 --> 0:16:05.960
<v Speaker 1>he plays really well, and then inevitably the three and

0:16:06.040 --> 0:16:09.320
<v Speaker 1>four interception games start. So what if he has the

0:16:09.320 --> 0:16:12.880
<v Speaker 1>same pattern in Miami and Miami's not horrible, I guess

0:16:12.880 --> 0:16:15.840
<v Speaker 1>on defense, and maybe they can stay in the game.

0:16:16.200 --> 0:16:19.760
<v Speaker 1>They've had a whole offseason to watch the Lamar Jackson

0:16:19.840 --> 0:16:23.000
<v Speaker 1>ship on tape, so they could probably you know, get get,

0:16:23.160 --> 0:16:24.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, school them up or coach them up on

0:16:24.960 --> 0:16:27.400
<v Speaker 1>that whole deal. Baltimore is not exactly a team that

0:16:27.440 --> 0:16:30.280
<v Speaker 1>wins by a million anyway. Ways, and in the NFL,

0:16:30.400 --> 0:16:33.280
<v Speaker 1>six points is a lot of points. So I'm gonna go.

0:16:33.440 --> 0:16:35.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna be crazy here. As long as Josh Rosen

0:16:35.800 --> 0:16:37.840
<v Speaker 1>is not in the game, I'm gonna go with Miami

0:16:37.880 --> 0:16:41.560
<v Speaker 1>plus two six. You hate Josh Rosen, You hate him

0:16:42.280 --> 0:16:46.440
<v Speaker 1>like he's thrown too many bad interceptions. Good fellow tribesman

0:16:46.680 --> 0:16:49.400
<v Speaker 1>on the leaflet, Josh Rosen, you hate him? Plus six

0:16:49.400 --> 0:16:51.360
<v Speaker 1>and a half? Home dog? You do? You will not

0:16:51.440 --> 0:16:54.360
<v Speaker 1>go broke betting home dogs. I I do not hate

0:16:54.360 --> 0:16:56.040
<v Speaker 1>that pick. By the way, I do not hate that

0:16:56.120 --> 0:16:58.440
<v Speaker 1>catching six and a half at home for the Dolphins,

0:16:58.480 --> 0:17:01.520
<v Speaker 1>whose season win total is four and a half. How

0:17:01.520 --> 0:17:04.560
<v Speaker 1>many times have we seen fits Magic play well for

0:17:04.640 --> 0:17:08.320
<v Speaker 1>a game or two or even three well. Famously with

0:17:08.359 --> 0:17:11.480
<v Speaker 1>the Bucks, he had a ridiculous September right he was tremendous,

0:17:11.640 --> 0:17:14.080
<v Speaker 1>filling for four yards every week, seemingly. So we'll see

0:17:14.080 --> 0:17:16.080
<v Speaker 1>if that's the case of Miami, who just there were

0:17:16.160 --> 0:17:18.479
<v Speaker 1>four and oh with the Buffalo Bills one year. Remember

0:17:18.520 --> 0:17:20.480
<v Speaker 1>that I do not, but I thank you for reminding

0:17:20.520 --> 0:17:22.040
<v Speaker 1>me that is correct. He was four an o with

0:17:22.080 --> 0:17:25.240
<v Speaker 1>the Bills. They just traded their starting left tackle, Laramie Tunzell,

0:17:25.280 --> 0:17:27.960
<v Speaker 1>their number one wide out, and Kenny Stills, so this

0:17:28.000 --> 0:17:30.399
<v Speaker 1>should be interesting, let's put it that way. My my

0:17:30.520 --> 0:17:33.560
<v Speaker 1>second pick is, uh, if we're using the word square,

0:17:33.640 --> 0:17:36.120
<v Speaker 1>this is about as square as it gets. And this

0:17:36.200 --> 0:17:39.840
<v Speaker 1>is this is like malpractice because this line is only increased.

0:17:39.880 --> 0:17:43.240
<v Speaker 1>So we're doing this Thursday morning before the game. Philadelphia

0:17:43.320 --> 0:17:46.399
<v Speaker 1>is giving ten now to the Washington Redskins. I'm giving it.

0:17:46.640 --> 0:17:49.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm a I'm a lifelong Washington Redskins fan. They are

0:17:49.600 --> 0:17:52.000
<v Speaker 1>not going to be good at football this year. They

0:17:52.040 --> 0:17:55.359
<v Speaker 1>have a credible defense. The goal for the Redskins defense

0:17:55.440 --> 0:17:58.200
<v Speaker 1>is to hold the opponent to seventeen points and hope

0:17:58.200 --> 0:18:01.399
<v Speaker 1>that they're offkins their offense overcome it. I think the

0:18:01.440 --> 0:18:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Eagles are going to the super Bowl. I think Carson

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:06.679
<v Speaker 1>Wentz is going to have a major bounce back season.

0:18:07.000 --> 0:18:09.159
<v Speaker 1>I just think they're a better football team up and

0:18:09.280 --> 0:18:12.640
<v Speaker 1>down than the Redskins. I will give the ten points.

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:15.560
<v Speaker 1>I think the Eagles blow out the Redskins in Philly

0:18:15.560 --> 0:18:18.000
<v Speaker 1>on Sunday. How about them apples right there? I might

0:18:18.040 --> 0:18:20.600
<v Speaker 1>mention that game as well. When we get to the teasers,

0:18:20.640 --> 0:18:23.520
<v Speaker 1>gill oh, I like that all right? Um, I want

0:18:23.560 --> 0:18:26.080
<v Speaker 1>to ask you a question, Gil, in reference to Todd's

0:18:26.520 --> 0:18:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Dolphins play do Youth. Do you think that the Dolphins

0:18:31.119 --> 0:18:35.080
<v Speaker 1>are intentionally tanking? Yes, by if people have trouble with

0:18:35.160 --> 0:18:37.840
<v Speaker 1>the word tanking, so let me define what I mean

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:41.600
<v Speaker 1>by that. I think they're absolutely tanking based on what

0:18:41.680 --> 0:18:43.679
<v Speaker 1>my definition is of the word tanking, which is not

0:18:43.720 --> 0:18:46.239
<v Speaker 1>a bad word, by the way. So I think they

0:18:46.280 --> 0:18:49.640
<v Speaker 1>are intentionally doing a Houston Astro Chicago Cubs thing right

0:18:49.880 --> 0:18:52.959
<v Speaker 1>where they're stripping it down. They are going to go

0:18:53.080 --> 0:18:56.080
<v Speaker 1>with youth and low cost and then they're gonna try

0:18:56.119 --> 0:18:58.679
<v Speaker 1>to build it up. So if that's the definition of

0:18:58.720 --> 0:19:02.159
<v Speaker 1>modern day tanking and respect, then I believe they absolutely are.

0:19:02.200 --> 0:19:05.960
<v Speaker 1>You I don't understand if they're going to do that,

0:19:06.200 --> 0:19:09.120
<v Speaker 1>why they don't play Rosen. I agree, you're trying. If

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:11.879
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to build a team for three years from now,

0:19:12.040 --> 0:19:14.639
<v Speaker 1>then once you want to get this kid the work

0:19:14.760 --> 0:19:16.919
<v Speaker 1>over that stretch, I would think. So that's where it

0:19:16.920 --> 0:19:19.600
<v Speaker 1>doesn't make sense to me agree with that, by the way,

0:19:19.680 --> 0:19:21.240
<v Speaker 1>and you know who else, I don't understand why they're

0:19:21.240 --> 0:19:23.960
<v Speaker 1>not playing the rookie quarterback. Why are the Giants bothering

0:19:24.000 --> 0:19:26.960
<v Speaker 1>playing Eli Manning at all, what's that? Like? What is

0:19:27.000 --> 0:19:29.200
<v Speaker 1>what's the point of that? And I think Daniel Jones

0:19:29.280 --> 0:19:32.520
<v Speaker 1>for all the uh the crap that he got for

0:19:32.600 --> 0:19:35.199
<v Speaker 1>the Giants drafting him so early, none of that. And

0:19:35.240 --> 0:19:36.800
<v Speaker 1>I tried to point this out on a numbers game

0:19:36.840 --> 0:19:39.760
<v Speaker 1>at Visa seven and nine Pacific tend to down Eastern

0:19:39.840 --> 0:19:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Money through Friday, serious sex and Channel two four uh

0:19:42.960 --> 0:19:46.760
<v Speaker 1>that that. I think the criticism of Daniel Jones is

0:19:47.000 --> 0:19:48.880
<v Speaker 1>ill found it because none of us know how good

0:19:48.880 --> 0:19:50.560
<v Speaker 1>these guys are gonna be. And by the way, my

0:19:50.600 --> 0:19:53.880
<v Speaker 1>buddy e most successful sports better. I know he loved

0:19:53.960 --> 0:19:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Jones senior year. In fact, he said, besides Kyler Murray,

0:19:56.359 --> 0:19:58.200
<v Speaker 1>that's the best quarterback in the league or in college.

0:19:58.200 --> 0:20:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Excuse me. We can criticize the Giant for when they

0:20:01.000 --> 0:20:03.760
<v Speaker 1>drafted him, because the draft is a game after all.

0:20:04.000 --> 0:20:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Maybe they didn't play the game correctly, but it wasn't

0:20:06.440 --> 0:20:08.520
<v Speaker 1>a referendum on Daniel Jones. I don't understand why the

0:20:08.520 --> 0:20:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Giants don't play Hi from the beginning. I agree with

0:20:10.600 --> 0:20:13.119
<v Speaker 1>you there, and I go back to when the Cowboys

0:20:13.160 --> 0:20:14.879
<v Speaker 1>drafted Akman. I mean they put him in there and

0:20:14.960 --> 0:20:17.240
<v Speaker 1>let him take his lumps on and one in fifteen year.

0:20:17.920 --> 0:20:19.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, were they going to try to protect him

0:20:19.960 --> 0:20:22.639
<v Speaker 1>and stay with Steve Tulure or the guys like that,

0:20:22.720 --> 0:20:24.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, I mean you have to you have to

0:20:24.960 --> 0:20:26.840
<v Speaker 1>let him get in there and play and learn the game,

0:20:27.000 --> 0:20:29.360
<v Speaker 1>learned the NFL game and the speed that it's at

0:20:29.400 --> 0:20:33.720
<v Speaker 1>in the complexity of the Are you talking about Steve Burlin? Yeah,

0:20:34.200 --> 0:20:36.359
<v Speaker 1>Steve Walsh was also on that roster then, wasn't he.

0:20:36.440 --> 0:20:39.280
<v Speaker 1>There were many Steves that were backup quarterman. He was

0:20:39.320 --> 0:20:43.000
<v Speaker 1>talking about Steve Burlin anyways, trying to get the Notre

0:20:43.080 --> 0:20:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Dame guys in Do you know who the Cowboys beat

0:20:45.160 --> 0:20:49.200
<v Speaker 1>that year? Yes? The Washington Redskins on a Sunday night.

0:20:49.880 --> 0:20:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Doug Williams by the way, talking about the young quarterback.

0:20:54.000 --> 0:20:56.600
<v Speaker 1>If I could bet at circa a future who will

0:20:56.640 --> 0:20:58.439
<v Speaker 1>have the better career and we can come up with

0:20:58.480 --> 0:21:02.120
<v Speaker 1>some metric on careers, but I will take Daniel Jones

0:21:02.680 --> 0:21:06.600
<v Speaker 1>minus one thirty five over Josh Rosen all day long.

0:21:08.680 --> 0:21:11.560
<v Speaker 1>You're you're such an anti semit side. What is going

0:21:11.600 --> 0:21:14.239
<v Speaker 1>on with you with Courter? Ever since Mike WERKOVICI did

0:21:14.280 --> 0:21:15.840
<v Speaker 1>it to me in the Holme Kipper Master and that

0:21:16.640 --> 0:21:18.840
<v Speaker 1>you didn't you didn't even know he was Jewish? Then

0:21:19.680 --> 0:21:23.160
<v Speaker 1>that's right. That shows that just shows you how how

0:21:23.320 --> 0:21:26.280
<v Speaker 1>how powerful it is. Well, we'll have to tell the

0:21:26.480 --> 0:21:29.359
<v Speaker 1>youme Kipper massacre story on a subsequent podcast. You can

0:21:29.400 --> 0:21:31.760
<v Speaker 1>also get it on on my pin tweet at my Twitter.

0:21:32.080 --> 0:21:34.720
<v Speaker 1>On my first appearance on GIL, I told funny gambling

0:21:34.760 --> 0:21:37.840
<v Speaker 1>stories Kipper massacre from people Single Love? Is it Mike's

0:21:37.840 --> 0:21:40.399
<v Speaker 1>turn again? Last best bet? Mike, Wow, I gotta have

0:21:40.480 --> 0:21:42.879
<v Speaker 1>three best bets. That's how unbelievable. I'm a little more

0:21:42.960 --> 0:21:44.680
<v Speaker 1>just you don't have to if you don't. If if

0:21:44.680 --> 0:21:46.000
<v Speaker 1>two is where you want to end it, we can

0:21:46.040 --> 0:21:49.440
<v Speaker 1>do too. We're just you know, I don't know where

0:21:49.480 --> 0:21:52.320
<v Speaker 1>this line is going to end up, but it seems

0:21:52.440 --> 0:21:56.720
<v Speaker 1>seemingly keep keep going down, keeps going down. Um. I

0:21:57.160 --> 0:22:00.560
<v Speaker 1>know Michael Lombardi talked about the humidity and and I

0:22:00.600 --> 0:22:04.280
<v Speaker 1>know there's concerns about the surrounding circumstances with the hurricane.

0:22:04.320 --> 0:22:07.040
<v Speaker 1>But boy, I think I think the Chiefs are just

0:22:07.119 --> 0:22:09.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot better side here and are gonna still put

0:22:09.280 --> 0:22:11.920
<v Speaker 1>up put up points when they go down to Jacksonville.

0:22:11.960 --> 0:22:15.880
<v Speaker 1>So this number creeps down closer to three. I think

0:22:15.920 --> 0:22:19.120
<v Speaker 1>this game is worth a play if it gets to three. Um.

0:22:19.200 --> 0:22:21.240
<v Speaker 1>With the Chiefs on the road there, I see some

0:22:21.359 --> 0:22:25.399
<v Speaker 1>threes out there in uh some offshore bookmaker five times

0:22:25.440 --> 0:22:28.240
<v Speaker 1>three with extra juice. Um. So it is available to

0:22:28.320 --> 0:22:31.240
<v Speaker 1>some on Kansas City, but it is down there. Did

0:22:31.280 --> 0:22:34.040
<v Speaker 1>you know this? This Jaguarar team was so injured and

0:22:34.080 --> 0:22:36.639
<v Speaker 1>banged up and didn't really get to play, get to

0:22:36.680 --> 0:22:38.919
<v Speaker 1>play together. And Maron said, I'm not playing anybody in

0:22:38.920 --> 0:22:43.200
<v Speaker 1>the preseason because everybody's hurt, so they've had no reps together. Um,

0:22:43.320 --> 0:22:45.560
<v Speaker 1>And I just think the Chiefs are the spot here.

0:22:45.560 --> 0:22:47.080
<v Speaker 1>I know I didn't. I didn't really like to lay

0:22:47.080 --> 0:22:48.880
<v Speaker 1>five five and a half, but as this number has

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:51.920
<v Speaker 1>come down, I'll lay three when I can get it. Yeah,

0:22:52.000 --> 0:22:53.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I don't hate it. I really don't. Todd

0:22:54.080 --> 0:22:56.560
<v Speaker 1>number three. Am I allowed to do a total or

0:22:56.560 --> 0:22:58.480
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have to be Yeah, no, you can do a total.

0:22:58.600 --> 0:23:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Do whatever you want, man. I think that the New

0:23:01.680 --> 0:23:08.520
<v Speaker 1>England Patriots versus the Pittsburgh Stiller's is a great under. Um.

0:23:08.600 --> 0:23:13.000
<v Speaker 1>If you remember they played under fifty. The New England

0:23:13.000 --> 0:23:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Patriots really turned into a different kind of team late

0:23:15.720 --> 0:23:18.080
<v Speaker 1>in the season last year, kind of became ground and

0:23:18.119 --> 0:23:21.600
<v Speaker 1>pound and play good defense. I think people are sleeping

0:23:21.600 --> 0:23:24.320
<v Speaker 1>on the fact that the Patriots defense is a lot

0:23:24.400 --> 0:23:26.800
<v Speaker 1>better from the end of last season. Now I could

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:29.639
<v Speaker 1>be totally wrong on this, and the Patriots could do

0:23:29.680 --> 0:23:31.800
<v Speaker 1>their usual first four games where they go to and

0:23:31.840 --> 0:23:35.040
<v Speaker 1>two and lose by thirty to some ridiculous club from Detroit.

0:23:35.359 --> 0:23:37.960
<v Speaker 1>That could happen, as it's happened in many Super Bowl

0:23:38.040 --> 0:23:40.800
<v Speaker 1>years for the Patriots. But with that being said, I

0:23:40.920 --> 0:23:43.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of like the under here. I think the Steelers

0:23:43.480 --> 0:23:46.119
<v Speaker 1>are gonna run the ball. I think the Patriots defense

0:23:46.160 --> 0:23:47.840
<v Speaker 1>is a lot better. I think the Steelers defense is

0:23:47.880 --> 0:23:50.159
<v Speaker 1>going to be better with Bush from uh with Bush

0:23:50.160 --> 0:23:53.879
<v Speaker 1>from Michigan, I think under fifty is probably not a

0:23:53.920 --> 0:23:57.440
<v Speaker 1>bad play. You know. I used to work with twin

0:23:57.520 --> 0:24:00.440
<v Speaker 1>brothers at a startup in San Francisco, and every once

0:24:00.480 --> 0:24:03.200
<v Speaker 1>in a while they would come into work and purposely

0:24:03.320 --> 0:24:06.480
<v Speaker 1>mispronounced words and act like they had pronounced it that

0:24:06.520 --> 0:24:09.480
<v Speaker 1>way the whole time. Patriots was one of those words

0:24:09.560 --> 0:24:11.960
<v Speaker 1>that they once came in and mispronounced. One day, I

0:24:12.000 --> 0:24:13.960
<v Speaker 1>was like, why are you guys naming Patriots? They're like,

0:24:14.040 --> 0:24:17.119
<v Speaker 1>what are you meaning? Reggae was another one that leaps

0:24:17.119 --> 0:24:21.000
<v Speaker 1>to mind the music genre reggae. Reggae, I will do it.

0:24:21.080 --> 0:24:23.240
<v Speaker 1>I will have a correlated play to yours as my

0:24:23.359 --> 0:24:26.119
<v Speaker 1>number three. By the way, Mr Wishnep, I am taking

0:24:26.119 --> 0:24:28.760
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers plus the points. You like the under I'll

0:24:28.760 --> 0:24:31.080
<v Speaker 1>take the Steelers plus the points in that six points

0:24:31.080 --> 0:24:32.879
<v Speaker 1>is a lot. And I, by the way, I have

0:24:32.960 --> 0:24:35.080
<v Speaker 1>bet Big Ben to win the m v P this

0:24:35.160 --> 0:24:38.400
<v Speaker 1>year at one. I think with the absence of the

0:24:38.920 --> 0:24:42.399
<v Speaker 1>now fully exposed headcase that is Antonio Brown, with the

0:24:42.440 --> 0:24:45.480
<v Speaker 1>absence of Levon Bell, I think Ben is on a mission.

0:24:46.119 --> 0:24:48.800
<v Speaker 1>I still think he has great weapons and James Connor

0:24:49.240 --> 0:24:51.800
<v Speaker 1>and Juju, and I think James Washington is gonna be

0:24:51.840 --> 0:24:54.400
<v Speaker 1>a great weapon this year. Uh, in his first real

0:24:54.520 --> 0:24:58.119
<v Speaker 1>season playing meaningful minutes with the Steelers. Give me the

0:24:58.160 --> 0:25:01.439
<v Speaker 1>six points all day long. I will take six Sunday night.

0:25:01.520 --> 0:25:04.520
<v Speaker 1>I think this game is close and that six is

0:25:04.560 --> 0:25:07.840
<v Speaker 1>a gift. So Steelers plus six that would be uh

0:25:08.000 --> 0:25:10.640
<v Speaker 1>my third best bet. So someone out there will keep

0:25:10.680 --> 0:25:12.520
<v Speaker 1>track of this. We will keep track of it as well.

0:25:12.760 --> 0:25:14.760
<v Speaker 1>People in the Twitter verse will absolutely do so, and

0:25:14.760 --> 0:25:18.160
<v Speaker 1>we'll will monitor these sport For today's Beating the Book Podcast,

0:25:18.240 --> 0:25:20.920
<v Speaker 1>comes as always from our friends at Bookmaker dot EU.

0:25:21.040 --> 0:25:23.119
<v Speaker 1>Bookmaker dot E as an industry leader for close to

0:25:23.160 --> 0:25:25.560
<v Speaker 1>thirty years, you should know that by now pro players

0:25:25.560 --> 0:25:28.720
<v Speaker 1>consider them a must because their first to post odds,

0:25:28.760 --> 0:25:31.520
<v Speaker 1>they take the highest limits and most importantly, pride themselves

0:25:31.520 --> 0:25:34.159
<v Speaker 1>on never having kicked out a winning player. That is

0:25:34.320 --> 0:25:36.800
<v Speaker 1>huge in this day and age. Bookmakers a high volume

0:25:36.840 --> 0:25:39.800
<v Speaker 1>sports book best suited for not only the sophisticated player

0:25:39.800 --> 0:25:42.679
<v Speaker 1>who understand sports betting, but also the large recreational players

0:25:42.680 --> 0:25:45.600
<v Speaker 1>as well. And their motto is where the lines originate,

0:25:45.640 --> 0:25:48.440
<v Speaker 1>because chances are the sports book at which you've been

0:25:48.440 --> 0:25:52.199
<v Speaker 1>betting all along follows their lines. And right now, if

0:25:52.200 --> 0:25:55.600
<v Speaker 1>you visit Bookmaker dot eu slash gill that's Bookmaker dot

0:25:55.600 --> 0:25:58.280
<v Speaker 1>E slash g I l L, you can claim an

0:25:58.320 --> 0:26:03.280
<v Speaker 1>exclusive well bonus of up to three hundred dollars. Once again,

0:26:03.280 --> 0:26:06.560
<v Speaker 1>that's Bookmaker dot eu slash gill g I l L.

0:26:06.840 --> 0:26:08.960
<v Speaker 1>To join and claim you're welcome bonus of up to

0:26:09.040 --> 0:26:12.200
<v Speaker 1>three hundred dollars right now. Don't miss out before we

0:26:12.240 --> 0:26:14.480
<v Speaker 1>get to our favorite teasers of the week in the

0:26:14.520 --> 0:26:18.280
<v Speaker 1>final two questions. Mike Circus Sports Million update for those

0:26:18.320 --> 0:26:22.359
<v Speaker 1>who still have to sign up. So we we we

0:26:22.480 --> 0:26:26.200
<v Speaker 1>crossed over the magical threshold of fifteen hundred to eliminate

0:26:26.240 --> 0:26:29.399
<v Speaker 1>the overlay, and now everything gets plowed back into the

0:26:29.480 --> 0:26:33.480
<v Speaker 1>quarterly winners. For those not familiar, there's really five contest

0:26:33.600 --> 0:26:37.720
<v Speaker 1>for mini contest within a contest, the best record each month,

0:26:37.800 --> 0:26:40.600
<v Speaker 1>which is the four weeks in September, four weeks in October,

0:26:41.040 --> 0:26:44.879
<v Speaker 1>four weeks, November in the five weeks, and December was

0:26:44.920 --> 0:26:49.000
<v Speaker 1>guaranteed fifty thousand. Well, now all these additional entries beyond

0:26:49.040 --> 0:26:52.040
<v Speaker 1>fifteen hundred go back into there. As of ten am

0:26:52.040 --> 0:26:54.200
<v Speaker 1>this morning, we were at one thousand, five hundred and

0:26:54.320 --> 0:26:57.919
<v Speaker 1>fifty four. I think we'll cross sixteen hundred today and

0:26:57.960 --> 0:27:00.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm very sure that we're gonna get to seventeen hundred.

0:27:00.880 --> 0:27:03.320
<v Speaker 1>I've sort of said that as a magical number because

0:27:03.800 --> 0:27:06.600
<v Speaker 1>if you get two hundred above the minimum, that adds

0:27:06.600 --> 0:27:09.479
<v Speaker 1>an extra two hundred thousand to the quarters and split.

0:27:10.080 --> 0:27:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Now the quarters suddenly become a hundred thousand minimum instead

0:27:13.400 --> 0:27:17.080
<v Speaker 1>of fifty thousand. So I'm pretty confident. I think tomorrow

0:27:17.119 --> 0:27:19.080
<v Speaker 1>will be a big day. So you come down to

0:27:19.119 --> 0:27:21.400
<v Speaker 1>the Deer or the Golden Gate here downtown on Freemont

0:27:21.400 --> 0:27:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Street to the Circus Sports Book. It's a quick process minutes,

0:27:25.240 --> 0:27:27.640
<v Speaker 1>gets a registered for the contest, signed up for the app,

0:27:27.640 --> 0:27:29.520
<v Speaker 1>and you can load it up for live wagering as well.

0:27:29.600 --> 0:27:32.040
<v Speaker 1>We can make our picks weekly via the app, which

0:27:32.080 --> 0:27:34.600
<v Speaker 1>is just such a huge thing. Now. Paully Howard, as

0:27:34.680 --> 0:27:36.400
<v Speaker 1>soon as the lines came out at ten am, he's

0:27:36.400 --> 0:27:38.040
<v Speaker 1>sitting here at Long Bar. He just put his five

0:27:38.080 --> 0:27:40.960
<v Speaker 1>picks in. Boom boom, boom, boom boom. He's in nice

0:27:41.040 --> 0:27:43.359
<v Speaker 1>Polly Howard part of the Bitch and Paul follow the

0:27:43.359 --> 0:27:46.359
<v Speaker 1>Money Show at Visa as well. Todd, you were saying something, Yeah,

0:27:46.000 --> 0:27:48.080
<v Speaker 1>the reason I did that the Circle this year was

0:27:48.119 --> 0:27:50.560
<v Speaker 1>because of the quarterly contest. I think it's the most

0:27:51.119 --> 0:27:53.639
<v Speaker 1>I think it's the best innovation in the contest is

0:27:53.680 --> 0:27:56.840
<v Speaker 1>the quarterly. And if you get a hundred thousand for

0:27:56.920 --> 0:28:00.280
<v Speaker 1>each quarterly, I mean that's fantastic. Now I'm like, I'm

0:28:00.280 --> 0:28:03.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna assume if two guys go seventeen and three, they

0:28:03.560 --> 0:28:05.480
<v Speaker 1>each get fifty out of the hundred. Is that I

0:28:06.160 --> 0:28:09.359
<v Speaker 1>just break up, you know, split evenly. I guess, yeah,

0:28:09.359 --> 0:28:11.719
<v Speaker 1>what if eight guys go eighteen and two, then we're

0:28:11.720 --> 0:28:14.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna split a hundred thousand and eight ways, twelve five

0:28:14.080 --> 0:28:17.280
<v Speaker 1>each exactly for the million itself for the top price

0:28:17.359 --> 0:28:20.320
<v Speaker 1>for the contest, though there's like forty eight tiebreakers. We

0:28:20.359 --> 0:28:22.280
<v Speaker 1>want one person to win the contest and win the

0:28:22.320 --> 0:28:26.600
<v Speaker 1>whole million. What's the forty what's tiebreaker? By the way,

0:28:27.040 --> 0:28:32.240
<v Speaker 1>how close you came to your actual jacket side. That's

0:28:32.240 --> 0:28:36.160
<v Speaker 1>a great one. Wow. I hope somebody wins on that.

0:28:36.160 --> 0:28:38.360
<v Speaker 1>It's hard. It's hard for a guy like Todd who's

0:28:38.400 --> 0:28:42.360
<v Speaker 1>losing so rapidly. Yeah, I'm gonna lose that one. Todd

0:28:42.360 --> 0:28:45.360
<v Speaker 1>wishnev losing losing ridiculous amounts of pounds and is he

0:28:45.400 --> 0:28:47.880
<v Speaker 1>will tell you more importantly, his blood sugar level dipping

0:28:48.640 --> 0:28:50.840
<v Speaker 1>you are you are now south of three hundred pounds not?

0:28:51.040 --> 0:28:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Is that right? I'm about two nine three h point

0:28:54.920 --> 0:28:57.400
<v Speaker 1>of reference, I was three thirty three in the action

0:28:57.440 --> 0:29:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Showtime series when you saw my large belly hanging over

0:29:00.560 --> 0:29:04.200
<v Speaker 1>my shorts. One other quick point to mention is you

0:29:04.280 --> 0:29:07.880
<v Speaker 1>called me anti Semitic when you said, uh, I talking

0:29:07.880 --> 0:29:10.560
<v Speaker 1>about quarterbacks. But it's obviously not true, certainly when you

0:29:10.600 --> 0:29:13.240
<v Speaker 1>talk about receivers, because you talked about my favorite jew,

0:29:13.560 --> 0:29:17.120
<v Speaker 1>double jew jew Smith Schuster as a wide receiver. I

0:29:18.120 --> 0:29:21.200
<v Speaker 1>love them. So I may be anti Semitic towards quarterbacks,

0:29:21.200 --> 0:29:23.400
<v Speaker 1>but I love Jewish wide receiver. Yes, for those who

0:29:23.400 --> 0:29:26.280
<v Speaker 1>don't know, Todd By the Way was once an Orthodox Jew.

0:29:26.880 --> 0:29:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Uh so we are. I want people to understand that

0:29:29.080 --> 0:29:31.800
<v Speaker 1>we're not making making serious one of this and now

0:29:31.840 --> 0:29:34.840
<v Speaker 1>you are a renounce to jew that's what you call yourself. Correct. Yes,

0:29:34.880 --> 0:29:36.560
<v Speaker 1>we don't have enough time to go into that right now.

0:29:36.800 --> 0:29:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Different show, whole, different show. We supposed, Gail, we tried

0:29:40.000 --> 0:29:43.520
<v Speaker 1>to suppose what record would it take, yes to win

0:29:43.600 --> 0:29:45.960
<v Speaker 1>the first like to win September. Come up with a

0:29:46.080 --> 0:29:50.520
<v Speaker 1>number I said, I said, eighteen one and one would

0:29:50.520 --> 0:29:55.840
<v Speaker 1>win it. Man eight if eighteen and one, If eighteen

0:29:55.840 --> 0:29:58.520
<v Speaker 1>and two wins that I was right, eighteen eighteen one

0:29:58.520 --> 0:30:00.320
<v Speaker 1>and one would have won it. But I think it's

0:30:00.320 --> 0:30:02.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna be right around eighteen or seventeen is probably going

0:30:02.720 --> 0:30:05.320
<v Speaker 1>to be the magic numbers to get there. And starting

0:30:05.360 --> 0:30:08.480
<v Speaker 1>like the uh the after two weeks at each month,

0:30:08.920 --> 0:30:11.840
<v Speaker 1>we'll we'll start talking about who who's within range. You know,

0:30:11.880 --> 0:30:14.600
<v Speaker 1>who's in the top top thirty that month or top

0:30:14.680 --> 0:30:16.760
<v Speaker 1>fifty that's within a game or two, and it gets

0:30:16.800 --> 0:30:19.680
<v Speaker 1>pretty interesting. You know, there's actually like four races to

0:30:19.840 --> 0:30:22.920
<v Speaker 1>to the winner circle in this contest, and that's that's

0:30:23.000 --> 0:30:25.440
<v Speaker 1>also interesting because you're gonna have to play a game

0:30:25.520 --> 0:30:28.080
<v Speaker 1>theory on the quarterlies while you're is still in the

0:30:28.120 --> 0:30:31.400
<v Speaker 1>main contest. So it brings a lot of interesting strategy

0:30:31.480 --> 0:30:35.040
<v Speaker 1>to what was actually talking about game strategy today. It

0:30:35.240 --> 0:30:38.360
<v Speaker 1>was on the Gil Alexander's show, also called The Numbers

0:30:38.400 --> 0:30:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Game on Visa and Channels four, sometimes also called The

0:30:41.480 --> 0:30:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Gill and Codd Show. But that show he was talking

0:30:44.880 --> 0:30:47.520
<v Speaker 1>about the game theory at the end of the contest,

0:30:47.760 --> 0:30:50.160
<v Speaker 1>where people who are behind by a game or two

0:30:50.160 --> 0:30:52.080
<v Speaker 1>have to try to figure out who the people in

0:30:52.080 --> 0:30:53.960
<v Speaker 1>front of them are gonna take, so they take the

0:30:54.000 --> 0:30:56.200
<v Speaker 1>other side and they have a chance to pick up

0:30:56.200 --> 0:30:57.960
<v Speaker 1>a game, because if they both end up on the

0:30:57.960 --> 0:31:00.280
<v Speaker 1>same side, they can't end up picking up any games.

0:31:00.440 --> 0:31:03.800
<v Speaker 1>And if you're this this contest with the quarterly, let's

0:31:03.800 --> 0:31:07.600
<v Speaker 1>say you're let's say you're fifteen and one going into

0:31:07.640 --> 0:31:10.840
<v Speaker 1>a quarterly, you might have to do some game theory

0:31:11.280 --> 0:31:13.680
<v Speaker 1>even though it's only week four or week eight or

0:31:13.680 --> 0:31:16.120
<v Speaker 1>week twelve, for for example. It's a great point I

0:31:16.160 --> 0:31:18.400
<v Speaker 1>had not. I had actually not thought of that. That's

0:31:18.840 --> 0:31:21.080
<v Speaker 1>a little thing. Yeah, it's a little bit like if

0:31:21.080 --> 0:31:23.360
<v Speaker 1>you have a full game bet and you have a

0:31:23.400 --> 0:31:25.720
<v Speaker 1>halftime as well, and you're trying to use in game

0:31:25.800 --> 0:31:29.600
<v Speaker 1>strategy on your halftime and your and your full game

0:31:29.680 --> 0:31:31.800
<v Speaker 1>or first five in full game in baseball. I've had

0:31:31.800 --> 0:31:33.840
<v Speaker 1>to do this, and it's interesting where you don't want

0:31:33.880 --> 0:31:36.200
<v Speaker 1>to put yourself in a pickle. Mike Palm was talking

0:31:36.240 --> 0:31:38.240
<v Speaker 1>about what it would take to win the quarterlies. Now,

0:31:38.240 --> 0:31:41.480
<v Speaker 1>obviously on a short sample size, you're gonna need seventeen

0:31:41.520 --> 0:31:44.280
<v Speaker 1>eighteen wins to win the quarter but to win the

0:31:44.280 --> 0:31:46.800
<v Speaker 1>whole thing, I think you're gonna need somewhere in the

0:31:46.840 --> 0:31:50.720
<v Speaker 1>neighborhood of seventy. And I'm saying that based on what's

0:31:50.720 --> 0:31:52.920
<v Speaker 1>happened in the past in the Super Bowl, as they've

0:31:52.920 --> 0:31:55.440
<v Speaker 1>had more and more contestants, you've needed a higher and

0:31:55.520 --> 0:31:57.600
<v Speaker 1>higher percentage. But since you guys are going to be

0:31:57.640 --> 0:32:02.120
<v Speaker 1>in about seventeen hundred this year, I'm thinking seventies might

0:32:02.160 --> 0:32:04.240
<v Speaker 1>win the whole thing. Mike, what do you think about that?

0:32:04.960 --> 0:32:07.280
<v Speaker 1>I put that that's somebody asked me, and I said,

0:32:07.320 --> 0:32:09.040
<v Speaker 1>I think if you can get to seventy one percent,

0:32:09.120 --> 0:32:11.160
<v Speaker 1>you've got a real good shot to win it, or

0:32:11.160 --> 0:32:13.440
<v Speaker 1>at least be in the top five. I think seventy

0:32:13.520 --> 0:32:16.320
<v Speaker 1>percent is the threshold right now. I always like to say,

0:32:16.320 --> 0:32:18.320
<v Speaker 1>if you're not even at sixty percent, you shouldn't even

0:32:18.360 --> 0:32:20.640
<v Speaker 1>be discussing where you are in the standings. You know,

0:32:20.680 --> 0:32:24.360
<v Speaker 1>there's a year every few years where it's just a

0:32:24.400 --> 0:32:27.680
<v Speaker 1>tough year and somebody wins at sixty So the uh

0:32:27.800 --> 0:32:30.520
<v Speaker 1>the Starbucks Barrista won the Super Contest a few years ago,

0:32:30.880 --> 0:32:36.959
<v Speaker 1>dipping back to old school level percentage wins of sixty. Uh,

0:32:37.000 --> 0:32:38.360
<v Speaker 1>there was a lot. I mean it was it was

0:32:38.360 --> 0:32:40.600
<v Speaker 1>only a few years ago. It wasn't like it wasn't

0:32:40.600 --> 0:32:42.240
<v Speaker 1>an old school year. There was a lot of entries.

0:32:42.280 --> 0:32:45.440
<v Speaker 1>There was well over a thousand Damon Graham, by the way,

0:32:45.480 --> 0:32:49.000
<v Speaker 1>who's been on this podcast. So I think I think

0:32:49.040 --> 0:32:51.760
<v Speaker 1>seventy percent is probably the threshold. What's the all time record?

0:32:51.760 --> 0:32:54.160
<v Speaker 1>The all time record is what James Salinas or C. H.

0:32:54.280 --> 0:32:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Bawlers for the old Super Contest one they had the record,

0:32:57.680 --> 0:33:00.680
<v Speaker 1>So we'll see. I think seventy percent is absolutely what

0:33:00.720 --> 0:33:02.960
<v Speaker 1>you have to look for. Um, But I hadn't thought

0:33:03.000 --> 0:33:06.360
<v Speaker 1>of that quarterly thing where you almost have to make

0:33:06.440 --> 0:33:08.920
<v Speaker 1>the What you're saying, Todd is you have to make

0:33:08.920 --> 0:33:12.200
<v Speaker 1>the calculus. If you're in it going into the final

0:33:12.240 --> 0:33:15.160
<v Speaker 1>week of the quarter contest, you almost have to make

0:33:15.160 --> 0:33:18.320
<v Speaker 1>the decision do I go for the hundred thousand here

0:33:18.640 --> 0:33:21.640
<v Speaker 1>at the risk of fucking up the big one? And

0:33:21.680 --> 0:33:23.720
<v Speaker 1>what made me think of this is that because you

0:33:23.840 --> 0:33:26.160
<v Speaker 1>talked about this on your show today when you had

0:33:26.160 --> 0:33:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Crack on, I believe you were talking about the contest

0:33:28.880 --> 0:33:31.000
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the contest where you have to

0:33:31.000 --> 0:33:33.720
<v Speaker 1>have this game theory just so that people understand exactly

0:33:33.760 --> 0:33:37.200
<v Speaker 1>what we're talking about. If you if you need in

0:33:37.320 --> 0:33:39.760
<v Speaker 1>first and second place and you're behind me by two

0:33:39.800 --> 0:33:42.960
<v Speaker 1>games and I picked and you end up on the

0:33:43.000 --> 0:33:45.680
<v Speaker 1>same teams as me, forget it lost because there's no

0:33:45.720 --> 0:33:48.040
<v Speaker 1>way you can make up ground. Whereas if you pick

0:33:48.120 --> 0:33:52.080
<v Speaker 1>five the opposite teams of you could theoretically five and

0:33:52.840 --> 0:33:55.120
<v Speaker 1>two and thirty and you can win because you pick

0:33:55.200 --> 0:33:57.880
<v Speaker 1>up three games. So that kind of thing is gonna

0:33:58.160 --> 0:34:01.160
<v Speaker 1>in play even in a quarter the situation, and then

0:34:01.200 --> 0:34:02.960
<v Speaker 1>you brought up make the great point. You have to

0:34:02.960 --> 0:34:05.240
<v Speaker 1>decide do I go for the hundred k or do

0:34:05.320 --> 0:34:08.480
<v Speaker 1>I worry more about my season long deal. Yeah. You

0:34:08.520 --> 0:34:11.399
<v Speaker 1>know what's interesting too. What's interesting to Gil and Todd

0:34:11.520 --> 0:34:14.560
<v Speaker 1>is that in our contest, obviously we're only paying ten

0:34:14.640 --> 0:34:16.839
<v Speaker 1>because we didn't know people are critical of that. Well

0:34:16.840 --> 0:34:18.360
<v Speaker 1>they only k ten, But we didn't know if we

0:34:18.360 --> 0:34:20.080
<v Speaker 1>were going to have three hundred entries. It was our

0:34:20.120 --> 0:34:23.239
<v Speaker 1>first year. But think of this, second place for the

0:34:23.320 --> 0:34:26.120
<v Speaker 1>overall contest is a hundred thousand. You know, it goes

0:34:26.160 --> 0:34:28.839
<v Speaker 1>from a million to a hundred down to whatever sixty five.

0:34:29.200 --> 0:34:31.840
<v Speaker 1>But so each quarter, if we get to seventeen hundred,

0:34:31.920 --> 0:34:33.680
<v Speaker 1>is actually going to be the same as second place.

0:34:33.719 --> 0:34:37.160
<v Speaker 1>So so that that that quarterly theory is pretty strong.

0:34:37.200 --> 0:34:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Now I am so worried that I know my jacket

0:34:41.320 --> 0:34:44.400
<v Speaker 1>size right now. You have no idea. It's got to

0:34:44.440 --> 0:34:47.480
<v Speaker 1>get that down. Also, Todd, Todd, did you notice the

0:34:47.480 --> 0:34:50.560
<v Speaker 1>way that Gil suddenly hinted back to something you mentioned

0:34:50.560 --> 0:34:57.600
<v Speaker 1>earlier by intentionally mispronouncing Barista. I didn't, did I is

0:34:57.640 --> 0:35:02.560
<v Speaker 1>it not pronounced barista A barista lista? Yes? Oh, I'm sorry,

0:35:02.520 --> 0:35:07.640
<v Speaker 1>I think I mean you did pronounce Steve Ploor Steve Burline,

0:35:07.880 --> 0:35:13.800
<v Speaker 1>or that's true, you did misper pronounced Steve Burline. That's correct,

0:35:13.840 --> 0:35:17.640
<v Speaker 1>that barista may be an alternate pronunciation. I might be

0:35:17.800 --> 0:35:20.600
<v Speaker 1>critical here, Yeah, I think I think I might be. Okay,

0:35:20.600 --> 0:35:23.640
<v Speaker 1>all right, gentlemen, let's wrap this up here. Teaser of

0:35:23.680 --> 0:35:26.120
<v Speaker 1>the week, Mike, you got DIBs? What do you got?

0:35:26.239 --> 0:35:28.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go to two of your best bets. I'll

0:35:28.640 --> 0:35:31.400
<v Speaker 1>tease the Eagles down, and I'm gonna tease the uh.

0:35:31.760 --> 0:35:34.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna tease the Steelers up. Yeah, we don't quite

0:35:34.320 --> 0:35:36.600
<v Speaker 1>get the Eagles through the three at this point. When

0:35:36.640 --> 0:35:39.120
<v Speaker 1>we do get them through the seven, but I'm if

0:35:39.160 --> 0:35:41.959
<v Speaker 1>I may jump my turn here, Todd, that's actually mine

0:35:42.000 --> 0:35:45.880
<v Speaker 1>as well. Pittsburgh up to twelve, through the seven and

0:35:45.920 --> 0:35:49.239
<v Speaker 1>the ten and the Eagles down. I love that one, Todd.

0:35:49.280 --> 0:35:53.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry. I like the San Diego Chargers, even though

0:35:53.840 --> 0:35:58.040
<v Speaker 1>they are no longer in San Diego, handicapped at the coach.

0:35:58.080 --> 0:36:02.840
<v Speaker 1>I like the San Diego Chars to cheese down to

0:36:02.960 --> 0:36:05.680
<v Speaker 1>I believe around one or a half, right, because we're

0:36:05.719 --> 0:36:11.080
<v Speaker 1>doing six point teasers, right, okay? Chargers? And then the Saints,

0:36:11.480 --> 0:36:16.960
<v Speaker 1>the New Orleans Saints last scene suing the National Football

0:36:17.040 --> 0:36:20.479
<v Speaker 1>League for a penalty in New Orleans court. I will

0:36:20.600 --> 0:36:24.360
<v Speaker 1>take them down to plus a half against the maybe

0:36:24.760 --> 0:36:28.440
<v Speaker 1>most annoying coach in the history of the National Football League, Bilbrian.

0:36:28.640 --> 0:36:30.279
<v Speaker 1>All right, and you are, it should be pointed out,

0:36:30.320 --> 0:36:33.120
<v Speaker 1>you are doing the teasers proper, the old Stanford Wong

0:36:33.200 --> 0:36:36.800
<v Speaker 1>teasers again, the most profitable teasers in the National Football League.

0:36:37.320 --> 0:36:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Taking a home favorite down through the seven and three,

0:36:40.000 --> 0:36:41.680
<v Speaker 1>which is Todd just did with both the charges in

0:36:41.719 --> 0:36:46.200
<v Speaker 1>the Saints, or taking small favorites either on the home

0:36:46.440 --> 0:36:49.279
<v Speaker 1>or roadside, and teasing them up to go through the

0:36:49.280 --> 0:36:51.759
<v Speaker 1>three and seven the other way. Those are the most

0:36:51.800 --> 0:36:57.439
<v Speaker 1>profitable teaser legs. Teasing a team that is a seven points, say,

0:36:57.600 --> 0:37:02.840
<v Speaker 1>road favorite down is not a positive evy situation. Not

0:37:02.920 --> 0:37:04.880
<v Speaker 1>that we had any of those just now, but just

0:37:04.920 --> 0:37:07.280
<v Speaker 1>to let people know moving forward with the teaser segment.

0:37:07.400 --> 0:37:09.319
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, if you don't believe me, Todd

0:37:09.360 --> 0:37:10.799
<v Speaker 1>and I, you too. You and I talked about this

0:37:10.840 --> 0:37:13.480
<v Speaker 1>on the show the other day. The South Point Hotel

0:37:13.520 --> 0:37:16.759
<v Speaker 1>Casino had twenty one different permutations of teasers. They did

0:37:16.800 --> 0:37:19.319
<v Speaker 1>a little inventory on this before last football season. They

0:37:19.320 --> 0:37:22.319
<v Speaker 1>had twenty one different permutations six point teaser, six and

0:37:22.320 --> 0:37:25.080
<v Speaker 1>a half, seven point anywhere between two to eight teams.

0:37:25.480 --> 0:37:28.640
<v Speaker 1>They found that they were getting beat on fifteen of them,

0:37:28.719 --> 0:37:31.680
<v Speaker 1>and so what did they do? They raised the juice

0:37:31.920 --> 0:37:34.759
<v Speaker 1>on all of those because what they wanted to do

0:37:34.840 --> 0:37:38.440
<v Speaker 1>was make your break even strike that much higher. Your

0:37:38.480 --> 0:37:42.320
<v Speaker 1>break even percentage went up incrementally, and so that tipped

0:37:42.360 --> 0:37:45.080
<v Speaker 1>the scales back in their favor. So again, you don't

0:37:45.080 --> 0:37:47.560
<v Speaker 1>have to believe what we're saying. The books are basically

0:37:47.600 --> 0:37:51.719
<v Speaker 1>admitting that to you by making those kinds of price adjustments.

0:37:52.200 --> 0:37:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Final two questions, gentlemen, is how we close out each

0:37:54.440 --> 0:37:56.640
<v Speaker 1>and every podcast. This is the one sort of carry

0:37:56.680 --> 0:37:59.160
<v Speaker 1>over from all of it. Which is the big favorite

0:37:59.200 --> 0:38:01.720
<v Speaker 1>on the board? Define mine by I sort of fudget.

0:38:01.800 --> 0:38:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Usually it's a touchdown or more, but sometimes I dip

0:38:03.600 --> 0:38:05.440
<v Speaker 1>it down to six boy favorites or more, which are

0:38:05.440 --> 0:38:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the big favorite on the board that you believe is

0:38:07.040 --> 0:38:09.480
<v Speaker 1>the most likely to lose. Out right, here are your

0:38:09.560 --> 0:38:12.120
<v Speaker 1>choices from week one. The Eagles, as we've talked about,

0:38:12.160 --> 0:38:15.640
<v Speaker 1>ten point favorites over the Redskins, I'll throw in the

0:38:15.640 --> 0:38:19.680
<v Speaker 1>the should I throw in Cleveland Shore Cleveland six point

0:38:19.719 --> 0:38:21.840
<v Speaker 1>favorites or five and a half point favorites Hosting the

0:38:21.840 --> 0:38:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee Titans Baltimore six and a half point favorites on

0:38:25.000 --> 0:38:27.680
<v Speaker 1>the road at Miami, Seattle ten point favorites at home

0:38:27.680 --> 0:38:30.839
<v Speaker 1>against Cincinnati Chargers six and a half point favorites at

0:38:30.840 --> 0:38:34.600
<v Speaker 1>home against the Colts, and then Dallas seven point favorites

0:38:34.640 --> 0:38:36.640
<v Speaker 1>at home against the Giants. And we mentioned New Orleans

0:38:36.680 --> 0:38:39.080
<v Speaker 1>seven point favorites at home the first of two Monday

0:38:39.160 --> 0:38:42.560
<v Speaker 1>night games hosting the Texans. Mike, which is the one

0:38:42.719 --> 0:38:46.040
<v Speaker 1>most likely to lose outright, Well, it's the same as

0:38:46.120 --> 0:38:49.360
<v Speaker 1>my My first best bet is, uh, the Cowboys. I

0:38:49.360 --> 0:38:51.160
<v Speaker 1>think the Giants are a live dog here and have

0:38:51.200 --> 0:38:55.000
<v Speaker 1>a shot to win this game. Todd, same question, I

0:38:55.120 --> 0:38:56.880
<v Speaker 1>have the same answer to. It's the same as my

0:38:56.920 --> 0:38:59.600
<v Speaker 1>best bet the Titans plus the five and a half

0:39:00.040 --> 0:39:06.160
<v Speaker 1>against Freddie Kitchens and Jesus and quarterback. I'm gonna take

0:39:06.200 --> 0:39:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the Dallas Cowboys. Believe it or not, I'm gonna take

0:39:09.560 --> 0:39:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the Dallas Cowboys. Like division game, you never quite know

0:39:14.280 --> 0:39:16.839
<v Speaker 1>what could happen there. Dallas just getting Zeke back of

0:39:16.840 --> 0:39:20.319
<v Speaker 1>course this week. That is one of five afternoon games.

0:39:20.320 --> 0:39:22.439
<v Speaker 1>That's the one thing the NFL got right in Week one,

0:39:22.560 --> 0:39:25.520
<v Speaker 1>because I don't think CBS has the US open package

0:39:25.520 --> 0:39:28.440
<v Speaker 1>anymore tennis, which obviously has the men's final this Sunday,

0:39:28.600 --> 0:39:31.359
<v Speaker 1>so five afternoon games. I would say Dallas the most

0:39:31.400 --> 0:39:32.759
<v Speaker 1>likely to lose out right. We none of us are

0:39:32.800 --> 0:39:34.880
<v Speaker 1>predicting by the way that these teams will lose out right,

0:39:34.880 --> 0:39:36.960
<v Speaker 1>But if we had to choose one, uh, those are

0:39:36.960 --> 0:39:38.680
<v Speaker 1>the teams were going with. And then the final question

0:39:38.880 --> 0:39:41.840
<v Speaker 1>full slate of games. Sixteen games in the NFL Week one,

0:39:42.239 --> 0:39:44.200
<v Speaker 1>which is the game on the side that if you

0:39:44.239 --> 0:39:46.440
<v Speaker 1>had to pick one, Mike, if you were forced to

0:39:46.440 --> 0:39:48.680
<v Speaker 1>bet fifteen of them on the side, but you've got

0:39:48.680 --> 0:39:51.120
<v Speaker 1>one free pass, one game that you want no part

0:39:51.120 --> 0:39:54.680
<v Speaker 1>of whatsoever, which game would it be? I don't. I

0:39:54.719 --> 0:39:57.200
<v Speaker 1>didn't want to play this Jets Bills game. I think

0:39:57.239 --> 0:39:59.560
<v Speaker 1>these teams are awful close and the line is probably

0:39:59.640 --> 0:40:01.720
<v Speaker 1>right at three. A lot of people are really bullish

0:40:01.800 --> 0:40:04.080
<v Speaker 1>on the Jets. I'd like to I'd like to see

0:40:04.120 --> 0:40:07.520
<v Speaker 1>these two teams play because I think that the thought

0:40:07.600 --> 0:40:10.000
<v Speaker 1>is they're very similar and how successful they're going to

0:40:10.080 --> 0:40:12.600
<v Speaker 1>be this year, so you get three points being at

0:40:12.600 --> 0:40:14.319
<v Speaker 1>the Jets. I think the line is right on. I

0:40:14.320 --> 0:40:16.879
<v Speaker 1>would not bet that game. Yeah, I don't. I would

0:40:16.920 --> 0:40:18.520
<v Speaker 1>stay away from that too. I don't know if it's

0:40:18.520 --> 0:40:20.400
<v Speaker 1>my first choice, though, Todd, what's your What's the one

0:40:20.400 --> 0:40:22.480
<v Speaker 1>you want no part of? The one I want no

0:40:22.600 --> 0:40:25.960
<v Speaker 1>part of is the Rams Carolina. What Cam Newton is

0:40:25.960 --> 0:40:30.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna show up? A healthy camp or a totally unhealthy

0:40:30.080 --> 0:40:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Cam Newton who throws the ball five feet over guy's heads,

0:40:33.360 --> 0:40:37.160
<v Speaker 1>does stupid thing, all kinds of nonsense, and you want

0:40:37.160 --> 0:40:39.120
<v Speaker 1>to kill yourself if you back them. So I have

0:40:39.239 --> 0:40:42.040
<v Speaker 1>no idea what Carolina team I'm getting this week, so

0:40:42.160 --> 0:40:44.520
<v Speaker 1>I want no part of it. For me, it's a

0:40:44.560 --> 0:40:47.279
<v Speaker 1>toss up between Mike's Buffalo Jets pick because I really

0:40:47.280 --> 0:40:50.240
<v Speaker 1>don't want any part of that and Denver Oakland actually

0:40:50.280 --> 0:40:52.080
<v Speaker 1>the second of the two Monday night games. I don't

0:40:52.160 --> 0:40:53.480
<v Speaker 1>really have a feel for that. And if you look

0:40:53.480 --> 0:40:56.279
<v Speaker 1>at Oakland schedule, man, they better win this game because

0:40:56.360 --> 0:40:58.719
<v Speaker 1>they don't win this good Lord, I don't know when

0:40:58.719 --> 0:41:01.680
<v Speaker 1>they're winning. Their schedule is brutal. But I would actually

0:41:01.680 --> 0:41:04.160
<v Speaker 1>say gunnahead Buffalo Jets. That's the one that I would

0:41:04.160 --> 0:41:05.800
<v Speaker 1>want the least part of. That would be my answer

0:41:05.840 --> 0:41:08.840
<v Speaker 1>as well, Gil, can we get our since the season

0:41:08.920 --> 0:41:10.839
<v Speaker 1>is starting to Nike in the three of us make

0:41:10.880 --> 0:41:14.400
<v Speaker 1>our conference champion in Super Bowl predictions. Now, I just

0:41:14.440 --> 0:41:17.239
<v Speaker 1>think that would be it. All right, let's do that.

0:41:17.840 --> 0:41:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's hear from Todd Wish. Wow, I'm put on the spot.

0:41:21.239 --> 0:41:23.120
<v Speaker 1>I didn't even know I needed to come up with one,

0:41:23.160 --> 0:41:25.839
<v Speaker 1>but I guess I'm gonna do something boring. And I'm

0:41:25.840 --> 0:41:29.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna go with Uncle Billy to win the a f C.

0:41:29.520 --> 0:41:32.759
<v Speaker 1>He seems to win it every year. How can not

0:41:33.000 --> 0:41:37.360
<v Speaker 1>take Uncle Billy Belichick to win the a f C

0:41:37.760 --> 0:41:41.080
<v Speaker 1>in the National Football Conference? I think I would have

0:41:41.160 --> 0:41:44.120
<v Speaker 1>to go. And this is just totally on the spot.

0:41:44.480 --> 0:41:48.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go with your New Orleans things. Wow, Mike,

0:41:48.080 --> 0:41:51.560
<v Speaker 1>you want me to go next? Patriots Eagles? In fact,

0:41:51.600 --> 0:41:55.440
<v Speaker 1>I bet it at to one. There's some markets that

0:41:55.480 --> 0:41:58.240
<v Speaker 1>have exacted, some books that have the market for exact

0:41:58.239 --> 0:42:00.799
<v Speaker 1>as which Christie Andrews, by the way, innovated many years ago.

0:42:01.200 --> 0:42:02.840
<v Speaker 1>And I and let me just say this in advance.

0:42:03.120 --> 0:42:06.160
<v Speaker 1>They're two hundred and fifty six different combinations of teams

0:42:06.160 --> 0:42:07.719
<v Speaker 1>that get to the Super Bowl. Obviously, you can throw

0:42:07.719 --> 0:42:10.040
<v Speaker 1>out some crappy teams, so it's not quite that difficult,

0:42:10.160 --> 0:42:13.160
<v Speaker 1>not quite that much of a crapshoot. You'll get almost

0:42:13.239 --> 0:42:15.919
<v Speaker 1>as good odds on this right before the postseason, so

0:42:16.080 --> 0:42:19.360
<v Speaker 1>they're only thirty six combinations at that point. So this

0:42:19.520 --> 0:42:21.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty five, the one that I have on the Eagles

0:42:21.280 --> 0:42:24.440
<v Speaker 1>and the Patriots, you probably won't be worse than fifteen

0:42:24.440 --> 0:42:26.560
<v Speaker 1>to one then, So not the greatest bet in the

0:42:26.600 --> 0:42:28.279
<v Speaker 1>world to make now, but I made it nonetheless. But

0:42:28.320 --> 0:42:31.400
<v Speaker 1>those are my two picks I went in terms of confidence.

0:42:31.440 --> 0:42:33.319
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell the one that I have more confidence, and

0:42:33.320 --> 0:42:35.920
<v Speaker 1>I really love the Eagles in the NFC. I think

0:42:35.920 --> 0:42:40.160
<v Speaker 1>it's a regression year um for the Rams and not

0:42:40.239 --> 0:42:42.960
<v Speaker 1>knowing Girley's health, and then uh, a tough choice for

0:42:43.000 --> 0:42:45.319
<v Speaker 1>me between Chiefs and Steelers in the FC, but I

0:42:45.320 --> 0:42:47.600
<v Speaker 1>went with the Chiefs. So Chiefs and Eagles in the

0:42:47.640 --> 0:42:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl, Chiefs and Eagles. Should we do one wacky

0:42:50.680 --> 0:42:53.000
<v Speaker 1>division pick that does off the radar? Can we do that?

0:42:53.560 --> 0:42:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's do that before we close. Because I have the

0:42:55.280 --> 0:43:00.160
<v Speaker 1>Niners at plus three Niners plus three to in the

0:43:00.320 --> 0:43:02.640
<v Speaker 1>NFC West. I think a lot of people are sleeping

0:43:02.680 --> 0:43:05.200
<v Speaker 1>on them. I think they've got a great young team

0:43:05.239 --> 0:43:07.200
<v Speaker 1>that flies around. I think Jimmy g is gonna get

0:43:07.200 --> 0:43:10.560
<v Speaker 1>it back together. And I think the Rams, while good

0:43:10.600 --> 0:43:12.640
<v Speaker 1>will not be nearly as good as they were last

0:43:12.680 --> 0:43:15.319
<v Speaker 1>year for any number of reasons, including the fact that

0:43:15.320 --> 0:43:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Bill Belichick gave him a blueprint in the Super Bowl,

0:43:17.960 --> 0:43:20.080
<v Speaker 1>the fact that we don't really know what Todd Gurley's doing.

0:43:20.400 --> 0:43:23.359
<v Speaker 1>They had a great record in one score games last year.

0:43:23.400 --> 0:43:25.560
<v Speaker 1>There's a whole bunch of reasons. But Niners plus three

0:43:26.160 --> 0:43:28.239
<v Speaker 1>to win the West? Anything from you, Mike, Yeah, but

0:43:28.320 --> 0:43:29.879
<v Speaker 1>that's what I was going to give out. I bet

0:43:29.920 --> 0:43:32.279
<v Speaker 1>I bet the Niners. I didn't bet them to win

0:43:32.320 --> 0:43:35.040
<v Speaker 1>the West, but that would be my prediction of of

0:43:35.040 --> 0:43:37.280
<v Speaker 1>of a team under the radar. I bet him overwin

0:43:37.400 --> 0:43:39.879
<v Speaker 1>total and to make the playoffs. And then the other

0:43:39.920 --> 0:43:43.400
<v Speaker 1>one is I think that the Falcons are very live

0:43:43.719 --> 0:43:46.440
<v Speaker 1>in the in the NFC South. I think their schedule

0:43:46.520 --> 0:43:48.839
<v Speaker 1>is very favorable for them and that they don't have

0:43:48.880 --> 0:43:51.040
<v Speaker 1>to play in any cold weather. So I'd look at

0:43:51.200 --> 0:43:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Niners and Falcons. Is upset division winners? Niners and Falcons?

0:43:55.800 --> 0:43:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Uh time my, uh, you know, pull it out of

0:43:58.960 --> 0:44:03.319
<v Speaker 1>your ass, so to speak. It would be the Jacksonville Jaguars.

0:44:03.400 --> 0:44:07.560
<v Speaker 1>The Jacksonville Jaguars are in that typical NFL pattern of

0:44:08.120 --> 0:44:11.200
<v Speaker 1>big step up one year, and we know They almost

0:44:11.239 --> 0:44:13.080
<v Speaker 1>beat the Patriots to go to Super Bowl two years

0:44:13.239 --> 0:44:16.240
<v Speaker 1>ago after whooping the Steelers in Pittsburgh in the playoffs.

0:44:16.239 --> 0:44:18.239
<v Speaker 1>So they were almost a super Bowl team two years ago.

0:44:18.520 --> 0:44:21.799
<v Speaker 1>Then the ship hit the proverbial fan last year. And

0:44:21.880 --> 0:44:24.200
<v Speaker 1>now if they can get it together with with Mr

0:44:24.280 --> 0:44:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Nick Foles at the quarterback position, maybe they could have

0:44:27.200 --> 0:44:30.880
<v Speaker 1>another big step forward. Because that defense was tremendous two

0:44:30.960 --> 0:44:33.120
<v Speaker 1>years ago. And you know, if they could get that

0:44:33.160 --> 0:44:35.840
<v Speaker 1>back together and get some stability instead of boarders at

0:44:35.880 --> 0:44:39.000
<v Speaker 1>the quarterback position, why can't they win that division? Andrew

0:44:39.120 --> 0:44:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Luck's not there and you've got Bill O'Brien, so why

0:44:42.239 --> 0:44:47.200
<v Speaker 1>can't they win? I mean, I was gonna say take

0:44:47.239 --> 0:44:49.520
<v Speaker 1>of reasons, but you know, I don't wanna. I don't

0:44:49.520 --> 0:44:52.560
<v Speaker 1>wanna say yeah. I'm just saying you're saying you want

0:44:52.560 --> 0:44:54.759
<v Speaker 1>to pick that's like off the radar. Yeah, no, I

0:44:54.840 --> 0:44:56.799
<v Speaker 1>like it. I like it. Well, Well, well, Mark mall

0:44:56.840 --> 0:44:58.719
<v Speaker 1>Dann will see how ridiculous we are by the end

0:44:58.719 --> 0:45:02.880
<v Speaker 1>of the season. I appreciate at Mike Palm conciliarated Derrick Stevens,

0:45:02.880 --> 0:45:05.560
<v Speaker 1>the vice president of operations at Circuit Sports. Thank you,

0:45:05.600 --> 0:45:08.440
<v Speaker 1>sir for being on and uh Todd Wish and of

0:45:08.840 --> 0:45:13.080
<v Speaker 1>multi media star Uh. You may know him from Showtime's

0:45:13.440 --> 0:45:16.919
<v Speaker 1>docuseries Action as the lovable guy at the south Point

0:45:16.960 --> 0:45:19.040
<v Speaker 1>sports Book. Thank you both, I appreciate it very much.

0:45:19.320 --> 0:45:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Kill Alexander, thank you so much for listening. Good luck

0:45:21.440 --> 0:45:24.200
<v Speaker 1>with all your bets. Week one in the NFL.