WEBVTT - Surveillance: Modi's Cash Move Is Radical, Rogoff Says

0:00:00.320 --> 0:00:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Who you put your trust in matters. Investors have put

0:00:04.200 --> 0:00:07.640
<v Speaker 1>their trust in independent registered investment advisors to the tune

0:00:07.640 --> 0:00:12.240
<v Speaker 1>of four trillion dollars. Why learn more and find your

0:00:12.240 --> 0:00:29.040
<v Speaker 1>independent advisor dot com. Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast.

0:00:29.440 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tom Keene with David Gura. Daily we bring you

0:00:33.200 --> 0:00:38.200
<v Speaker 1>insight from the best in economics, finance, investment, and international relations.

0:00:38.640 --> 0:00:43.239
<v Speaker 1>Find Bloomberg Surveillance on iTunes, SoundCloud, Bloomberg dot com, and

0:00:43.280 --> 0:00:50.680
<v Speaker 1>of course, on the Bloomberg Princie The Quad in London.

0:00:50.720 --> 0:00:52.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tom Keene in New York and listening now. We

0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:56.040
<v Speaker 1>know are so much of Asia, and particularly the people

0:00:56.120 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 1>of India. Kenneth Rogoff of Harvard University wrote A Little

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Look a year or so ago about cash, about corruption,

0:01:04.800 --> 0:01:09.000
<v Speaker 1>about the underworld, about suitcases of cash going to no good.

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:11.399
<v Speaker 1>It is my book of the year. It is without question,

0:01:11.760 --> 0:01:15.800
<v Speaker 1>the most controversial book of economics in decades. Professor Rogoff

0:01:15.880 --> 0:01:18.840
<v Speaker 1>joins us now on India. Let's first start with what

0:01:18.959 --> 0:01:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Mr Modi is trying to do. What was his change

0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:25.960
<v Speaker 1>in policy for India. Well, on the same day that

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 1>we were electing President Trump, the Prime Minister went on

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:31.639
<v Speaker 1>the air and said the two largest notes in India,

0:01:31.720 --> 0:01:35.520
<v Speaker 1>the five thousand rupea note four hours from now will

0:01:35.560 --> 0:01:39.399
<v Speaker 1>be no longer youthful boom and you have fifty days

0:01:39.400 --> 0:01:42.840
<v Speaker 1>to turn it in for other cash. That is radically

0:01:42.880 --> 0:01:45.640
<v Speaker 1>different than the policy I propose, which is doing it

0:01:45.720 --> 0:01:50.160
<v Speaker 1>over say five to seven years, trying to avoid collateral damage.

0:01:50.680 --> 0:01:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Within the collateral damage. What would be your advice to

0:01:53.480 --> 0:01:57.480
<v Speaker 1>the Prime Minister now to move forward after this announcement,

0:01:57.520 --> 0:02:00.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean away from the debate about cash. What's ken

0:02:00.640 --> 0:02:04.600
<v Speaker 1>rogos to do list for India this morning? Well, that's

0:02:04.600 --> 0:02:07.600
<v Speaker 1>a tough question. I mean, the Prime Minister cites a

0:02:07.680 --> 0:02:09.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of the reasons, all the reasons that I've given

0:02:09.720 --> 0:02:14.800
<v Speaker 1>the book of why cash is pernicious, uh, you know, corruption, crime,

0:02:15.200 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 1>tax of Asian terrorism. But on the other hand, I

0:02:18.600 --> 0:02:20.919
<v Speaker 1>mentioned as tactics are very different. And by the way,

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:24.360
<v Speaker 1>my book states again and again very carefully, if you're

0:02:24.360 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 1>a developing economy, don't try this at home. You need

0:02:27.760 --> 0:02:30.600
<v Speaker 1>financial inclusion. He's done a lot of things. I think

0:02:30.639 --> 0:02:33.520
<v Speaker 1>India's reached a point where implementation is very important. There

0:02:33.560 --> 0:02:38.239
<v Speaker 1>could be long run beneficial effects, but it really involves,

0:02:38.280 --> 0:02:40.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, doing things to assure people that in the

0:02:40.760 --> 0:02:44.120
<v Speaker 1>long run, we're fighting crime, we're fighting corruption, which is

0:02:44.160 --> 0:02:47.320
<v Speaker 1>a huge problem in India. In many ways I have learned,

0:02:47.360 --> 0:02:50.280
<v Speaker 1>and this goes back to one of your great mentors, Jagnaguadi,

0:02:50.360 --> 0:02:53.000
<v Speaker 1>that India is, in each and every case, always about

0:02:53.040 --> 0:02:56.840
<v Speaker 1>domestic politics. What would the RBI, their central bank do,

0:02:57.360 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 1>and could rob and rog and their former leader at

0:02:59.720 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the Bank of the Boot School Chicago, could ragu have

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:08.519
<v Speaker 1>stopped this tough po is bad pos well. I suspect

0:03:08.560 --> 0:03:11.639
<v Speaker 1>they were overridden. Initially, when I heard about this, it

0:03:11.760 --> 0:03:14.560
<v Speaker 1>seemed that the rb I was behind it, a joint

0:03:14.919 --> 0:03:17.240
<v Speaker 1>you know push. But I think as time went on,

0:03:17.400 --> 0:03:20.600
<v Speaker 1>we didn't see Governor Patel. The governor replaced where John

0:03:20.680 --> 0:03:23.399
<v Speaker 1>speak for a couple of weeks, which kind of made

0:03:23.400 --> 0:03:26.000
<v Speaker 1>it clear that they weren't um It doesn't mean that

0:03:26.040 --> 0:03:28.720
<v Speaker 1>they don't agree with the broad idea, but they might

0:03:28.760 --> 0:03:31.000
<v Speaker 1>not have agreed with the tactics. They might have wanted

0:03:31.040 --> 0:03:34.600
<v Speaker 1>to do it slowly and gradually, as others, say myself

0:03:34.639 --> 0:03:37.200
<v Speaker 1>would suggest. And by the way, India doesn't have a

0:03:37.280 --> 0:03:41.480
<v Speaker 1>large note. Their largest notes fifteen dollars. To introduced a

0:03:41.520 --> 0:03:44.560
<v Speaker 1>bigger one in this to replace the old ones, which

0:03:44.560 --> 0:03:47.120
<v Speaker 1>again is a hundred eighty degrees opposite to what I

0:03:47.160 --> 0:03:51.680
<v Speaker 1>would advise for advanced economies. If we focus on the

0:03:51.720 --> 0:03:54.440
<v Speaker 1>news right that we have had overlast to two weeks,

0:03:54.440 --> 0:03:57.040
<v Speaker 1>we had a record load from repee extreme volatility will

0:03:57.080 --> 0:04:01.320
<v Speaker 1>dis continue well. I think the thinking is eventually they

0:04:01.320 --> 0:04:04.440
<v Speaker 1>will come out of this. They hadn't printed enough currency.

0:04:05.080 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 1>We just don't know all the considerations why this was

0:04:07.800 --> 0:04:10.840
<v Speaker 1>so sudden. Evidently word leaked that they were going to

0:04:10.960 --> 0:04:14.320
<v Speaker 1>do it. I suspect that will all settle down. And

0:04:14.400 --> 0:04:17.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's surprising how many Indian economists people think

0:04:17.960 --> 0:04:21.800
<v Speaker 1>in the long run making this statement against corruption, which

0:04:21.839 --> 0:04:25.000
<v Speaker 1>of course as India's number one problem, will have you know,

0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:28.360
<v Speaker 1>good effects, but they have to get there. There have

0:04:28.440 --> 0:04:32.599
<v Speaker 1>been really a lot of problems, really poor planning implementation,

0:04:33.320 --> 0:04:35.080
<v Speaker 1>uh in the short run. But I think that will

0:04:35.160 --> 0:04:38.839
<v Speaker 1>probably sort out. But it isn't done yet. And I

0:04:38.880 --> 0:04:41.440
<v Speaker 1>know the RBI, for example, put some limits on withdrawals

0:04:41.440 --> 0:04:44.479
<v Speaker 1>from no frill bank accounts. I mean, is it always

0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:48.040
<v Speaker 1>a bad idea it can to limit withdrawals. Yeah, I

0:04:48.040 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 1>mean they were very awkward position that they hadn't printed

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:53.760
<v Speaker 1>enough currency. It's actually not that easy to print currency.

0:04:53.920 --> 0:04:56.400
<v Speaker 1>It could take a year. I kind of wonder why

0:04:56.440 --> 0:04:59.360
<v Speaker 1>they didn't do maneuver like the Greeks had considered a

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:03.360
<v Speaker 1>stamp the old currency to create the new currency temporarily.

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:06.120
<v Speaker 1>I just don't know what the planning was. They haven't

0:05:06.120 --> 0:05:09.479
<v Speaker 1>really described it. It's clear what the goals were, which

0:05:09.560 --> 0:05:13.760
<v Speaker 1>I think are laudable, but the implementation and execution, they

0:05:13.839 --> 0:05:16.800
<v Speaker 1>haven't really explained why they did it this way. There

0:05:16.800 --> 0:05:19.720
<v Speaker 1>are people who recommended sudden currency moves. There was an

0:05:19.720 --> 0:05:22.839
<v Speaker 1>economist in the mid seventies, James Henry, who said, let's

0:05:22.880 --> 0:05:25.800
<v Speaker 1>do a sneak attack on the criminals and the drug dealers.

0:05:26.400 --> 0:05:29.400
<v Speaker 1>I think the collateral damage is just too great. In

0:05:29.440 --> 0:05:31.200
<v Speaker 1>the case of the U S, it looks too much

0:05:31.240 --> 0:05:34.640
<v Speaker 1>like a default. Again, what is the you know, the

0:05:34.680 --> 0:05:38.680
<v Speaker 1>lessons learned. We've seen you know, panics or volatility of

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:40.839
<v Speaker 1>whatever you want to call it in other countries, and

0:05:40.920 --> 0:05:43.240
<v Speaker 1>as long as there's one or two lessons that you

0:05:43.320 --> 0:05:46.359
<v Speaker 1>don't repeat, then the country will be Okay. What's it

0:05:46.400 --> 0:05:49.760
<v Speaker 1>in this case, Well, it's about implementation and planning and

0:05:49.800 --> 0:05:54.520
<v Speaker 1>again and developing economies. The issue of financial inclusion is huge. Uh,

0:05:54.600 --> 0:05:57.680
<v Speaker 1>you know in the US, it's very easy to cover that.

0:05:57.800 --> 0:06:00.640
<v Speaker 1>My book explains how to do that. And Indie a

0:06:00.720 --> 0:06:03.279
<v Speaker 1>Prime Minister Modi has taken a lot of steps. He's

0:06:03.320 --> 0:06:06.640
<v Speaker 1>taken biometric data for almost a billion Indians and you

0:06:06.680 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 1>can get a bank account if you have that, but

0:06:09.160 --> 0:06:12.640
<v Speaker 1>they're way away from doing that. This was a very

0:06:12.760 --> 0:06:15.080
<v Speaker 1>radical step to take. One of the strengths of your book,

0:06:15.080 --> 0:06:18.000
<v Speaker 1>The Curse of Cash is you put out front your

0:06:18.000 --> 0:06:22.120
<v Speaker 1>critics amersing on page seven, Lord Summers, you're calling at

0:06:22.120 --> 0:06:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Harvard on page one two, the Greatest sing of Germany,

0:06:25.920 --> 0:06:28.680
<v Speaker 1>the Great Summers of Cambridge. They pushed back against Ken

0:06:28.760 --> 0:06:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Rogoff describe their caution about the curse of cash in

0:06:33.480 --> 0:06:37.039
<v Speaker 1>your formula. Well, actually, Larry Summers has come around to

0:06:37.080 --> 0:06:39.800
<v Speaker 1>be a big champion of getting rid of hundred and

0:06:39.839 --> 0:06:44.320
<v Speaker 1>fifty dollar bills and that's been fantastic Admares saying, you know,

0:06:44.520 --> 0:06:48.160
<v Speaker 1>sites of Dusty Jevsky and says, you know, money is

0:06:48.279 --> 0:06:51.840
<v Speaker 1>coined freedom. Uh, but I think there's a big difference

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:54.320
<v Speaker 1>between you know, getting rid of big notes and getting

0:06:54.360 --> 0:06:57.160
<v Speaker 1>rid of all cash. I am for less cash, not

0:06:57.360 --> 0:07:01.839
<v Speaker 1>no cash. Is money a repress seditive of freedom. In Mr.

0:07:01.920 --> 0:07:06.599
<v Speaker 1>Modi's India. Well, it's how a lot of the economy functions.

0:07:06.640 --> 0:07:10.240
<v Speaker 1>It's transactions I think he would like, and many steps

0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:13.320
<v Speaker 1>that officials are so corrupt. I had a colleague who

0:07:13.440 --> 0:07:16.880
<v Speaker 1>told me about her father sold an apartment just recently

0:07:17.240 --> 0:07:20.160
<v Speaker 1>in a rural India. He gets back the deed that

0:07:20.320 --> 0:07:22.960
<v Speaker 1>list half the price that he paid because the official

0:07:23.040 --> 0:07:26.520
<v Speaker 1>was paid off. This is routine business India. Modi wants

0:07:26.560 --> 0:07:29.920
<v Speaker 1>to stamp it out. Francine, the Curse of cash and India.

0:07:29.960 --> 0:07:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Of course, I'll put this out on social again today.

0:07:32.200 --> 0:07:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Ken Rogoff joins US now cabinet Professor of Public Policy,

0:07:35.320 --> 0:07:38.160
<v Speaker 1>professor of economics at Harvard, the author of Tom's Book

0:07:38.200 --> 0:07:40.480
<v Speaker 1>of the Year, much Ballyhood book of the Year by Time,

0:07:40.520 --> 0:07:42.680
<v Speaker 1>the Cursive Cash. We will talk about that in a

0:07:42.760 --> 0:07:44.800
<v Speaker 1>little bit, but some news at first, Ken Rogoff, good

0:07:44.800 --> 0:07:46.040
<v Speaker 1>to have you with us, Thanks for being thank you

0:07:46.080 --> 0:07:48.120
<v Speaker 1>good to be here. I'm very curious and I've been

0:07:48.120 --> 0:07:50.720
<v Speaker 1>asking a lot of people about this, the definition of

0:07:50.960 --> 0:07:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Trump economics, what Trump and omics is, and and here

0:07:53.920 --> 0:07:55.480
<v Speaker 1>a few weeks after the election, are you went it

0:07:55.520 --> 0:07:58.600
<v Speaker 1>closer to to coming up with to having a definition

0:07:58.600 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 1>of what it is? No, I'm not. I mean, also,

0:08:02.360 --> 0:08:05.640
<v Speaker 1>bear in mind everybody's watching these appointments and saying, who

0:08:05.680 --> 0:08:08.360
<v Speaker 1>is he going to point he isn't locked in. This

0:08:08.440 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 1>is a guy who made his living by firing people.

0:08:11.520 --> 0:08:14.080
<v Speaker 1>And it wasn't so long ago, back in the Jimmy

0:08:14.120 --> 0:08:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Carter days, even you know Lynton Johnson, where they routinely

0:08:17.720 --> 0:08:21.080
<v Speaker 1>fired people all the time. So what I'm expecting is

0:08:21.120 --> 0:08:24.800
<v Speaker 1>not just have a parade of candidates. I'm expecting a

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:27.920
<v Speaker 1>parade of appointees. He'll have a meeting, He'll have the

0:08:27.920 --> 0:08:31.960
<v Speaker 1>three guys you know shamefully lined there. He'll go you're fired,

0:08:32.080 --> 0:08:35.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, or however he says that line. So I

0:08:35.600 --> 0:08:38.560
<v Speaker 1>think he will recalibrate if he's not happy how things

0:08:38.600 --> 0:08:42.680
<v Speaker 1>are going. I expect just as he recalibrates his comments,

0:08:42.720 --> 0:08:45.760
<v Speaker 1>he'll recalibrate as appointees to looking for some some drama

0:08:45.800 --> 0:08:48.320
<v Speaker 1>there in the appointments, at least not immediately down the line.

0:08:49.040 --> 0:08:52.680
<v Speaker 1>What power does does a president? Does a Treasury secretary, say,

0:08:52.679 --> 0:08:54.960
<v Speaker 1>have to to influence the trajectory of the the U.

0:08:55.040 --> 0:08:59.360
<v Speaker 1>S economy right now? The Treasury secretary's power comes a

0:08:59.480 --> 0:09:02.640
<v Speaker 1>lot from their ear having the ear of the president,

0:09:02.800 --> 0:09:05.120
<v Speaker 1>and to the extent they do. Of course, they have

0:09:05.160 --> 0:09:08.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of influence over legislation, especially with the Republican

0:09:08.960 --> 0:09:11.320
<v Speaker 1>controlled Congress. And I've got to say, there's a lot

0:09:11.360 --> 0:09:14.840
<v Speaker 1>of talk about, well, Trump wants this, Congress wants this.

0:09:14.960 --> 0:09:17.760
<v Speaker 1>He won't get his policies through. Yes, he will when

0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:20.600
<v Speaker 1>he decides what they are. I think in the short

0:09:20.679 --> 0:09:23.679
<v Speaker 1>run there will be a honeymoon with the Republican Congress.

0:09:23.840 --> 0:09:26.439
<v Speaker 1>A lot of them opposed Trump or didn't support him.

0:09:26.640 --> 0:09:28.840
<v Speaker 1>They'll support him here. They'll give him what he wants

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:31.880
<v Speaker 1>and you know, see how it goes. So I do

0:09:32.000 --> 0:09:35.640
<v Speaker 1>think we'll see a pretty dramatic stimulus plan. I don't

0:09:35.679 --> 0:09:38.160
<v Speaker 1>know if it'll be completely coherent, but I think we'll

0:09:38.160 --> 0:09:41.720
<v Speaker 1>see something very dramatic. All this stuff about the Republicans

0:09:41.760 --> 0:09:45.160
<v Speaker 1>won't go along with deficits, that's just nonsense. They wouldn't

0:09:45.200 --> 0:09:48.120
<v Speaker 1>go along with deficits when they're spending it on what

0:09:48.200 --> 0:09:52.120
<v Speaker 1>President Obama wanted. But if you talk, if President Obama

0:09:52.160 --> 0:09:54.920
<v Speaker 1>had proposed tax cuts to get deficits, he would have

0:09:54.960 --> 0:09:58.360
<v Speaker 1>got it passed in an afternoon. Also, So I'm but

0:09:58.559 --> 0:10:01.960
<v Speaker 1>exactly what shaped this will take. I think, you know

0:10:02.320 --> 0:10:05.720
<v Speaker 1>is constantly Morphing, There's no doubt about it. We're beginning

0:10:05.760 --> 0:10:08.520
<v Speaker 1>to hear something of a debate here about the timing

0:10:08.559 --> 0:10:11.240
<v Speaker 1>of those tax cuts or or an infrastructure spending plan,

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:13.839
<v Speaker 1>whether or not now is the time to do those things.

0:10:13.880 --> 0:10:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Do you expect that to be a robust debate in Washington?

0:10:16.640 --> 0:10:19.960
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned the support he'll likely have from the Republican Congress. Well,

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:22.280
<v Speaker 1>I think I really think he can do whatever he

0:10:22.360 --> 0:10:25.079
<v Speaker 1>wants to do. We really haven't seen someone come in

0:10:25.160 --> 0:10:29.319
<v Speaker 1>with this, you know, kind of support for a long time.

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:31.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm not you know, in terms of having Congress in

0:10:31.600 --> 0:10:35.200
<v Speaker 1>the Senate. Uh, it's been a while, and I suspect

0:10:35.200 --> 0:10:37.000
<v Speaker 1>he'll do what he wants to do. Yes, they'll be debate,

0:10:37.040 --> 0:10:40.240
<v Speaker 1>they'll be bad articles, they'll be complaints, They'll people say

0:10:40.280 --> 0:10:42.400
<v Speaker 1>that I voted for even though he didn't mean too.

0:10:43.160 --> 0:10:46.320
<v Speaker 1>I think the infrastructure has bipartisan support. If he can't

0:10:46.360 --> 0:10:48.760
<v Speaker 1>get the Republicans to support it, he'll get the Democrats

0:10:48.800 --> 0:10:52.120
<v Speaker 1>to support it. Uh. That's something everyone agrees on. We'll

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:54.640
<v Speaker 1>finally get it done. The tax cuts are a whole

0:10:54.760 --> 0:10:56.840
<v Speaker 1>another matter, and I don't even know what they're gonna be.

0:10:57.440 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's the most effective form of stimulus,

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:03.320
<v Speaker 1>but it's been you know, red meat for the Republican Party.

0:11:03.559 --> 0:11:05.480
<v Speaker 1>He's going to give it to them, maybe to get

0:11:05.520 --> 0:11:07.800
<v Speaker 1>support in other areas. Ken roll Off with us of

0:11:07.880 --> 0:11:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Harvard University will speak of India and the curse of

0:11:10.800 --> 0:11:13.840
<v Speaker 1>cash his book and my book of the year, I

0:11:13.920 --> 0:11:16.880
<v Speaker 1>might point out, we'll do that here in a bit. Ken,

0:11:17.000 --> 0:11:19.640
<v Speaker 1>You're in the class, you're you know, manque's got a headache,

0:11:19.640 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 1>you've gotta teach at ten are in the basic undergraduate

0:11:22.840 --> 0:11:27.240
<v Speaker 1>class teaching at Harvard, and somebody says to you, Vice

0:11:27.320 --> 0:11:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Chairman Fisher, he's of a college down the road. M

0:11:29.800 --> 0:11:34.000
<v Speaker 1>I T. Vice Chairman Fisher says, we're almost fully employed.

0:11:34.400 --> 0:11:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump got elected because we're not fully employed. Is

0:11:38.679 --> 0:11:42.480
<v Speaker 1>it to America's? And do we do our macro economics

0:11:42.520 --> 0:11:47.520
<v Speaker 1>just chair yelling, do our macroeconomics as one America one

0:11:47.679 --> 0:11:51.560
<v Speaker 1>mathematical distribution? Or do we need to always consider that

0:11:51.600 --> 0:11:54.839
<v Speaker 1>there's two America's in every discussion. Well, first of all,

0:11:54.880 --> 0:11:57.960
<v Speaker 1>you're not gonna get me sharply agreeing with Stan Fisher,

0:11:57.960 --> 0:12:00.080
<v Speaker 1>who's you know, a great a great man, and I

0:12:00.120 --> 0:12:03.080
<v Speaker 1>think you know, really understands the data. But it's sort

0:12:03.080 --> 0:12:05.920
<v Speaker 1>of a definition of what it doesn't mean to be employed.

0:12:05.960 --> 0:12:08.480
<v Speaker 1>And I think the quality of jobs, the quality of

0:12:08.520 --> 0:12:11.280
<v Speaker 1>life for many people hasn't improved at the rate that

0:12:11.320 --> 0:12:14.080
<v Speaker 1>they thought, and I think Trump got elected on the

0:12:14.120 --> 0:12:16.559
<v Speaker 1>back of that. That's the core of the populism with

0:12:16.640 --> 0:12:19.920
<v Speaker 1>the middle class. But the policies to fix that are

0:12:20.120 --> 0:12:25.199
<v Speaker 1>really much more about improving education. They're conceivably infrastructure, things

0:12:25.280 --> 0:12:28.520
<v Speaker 1>you can do with the tax system. One area where

0:12:28.800 --> 0:12:32.400
<v Speaker 1>I think maybe there's cause for some optimism is that

0:12:32.480 --> 0:12:35.960
<v Speaker 1>business investment has just been awful all across the world.

0:12:36.520 --> 0:12:39.720
<v Speaker 1>And if there is a coherent policy, almost any coherent

0:12:39.800 --> 0:12:42.920
<v Speaker 1>policy going forward, I think we could see a big

0:12:42.960 --> 0:12:45.760
<v Speaker 1>pick up in business investment. That's the key. If you

0:12:45.800 --> 0:12:47.960
<v Speaker 1>don't see that it's not going to be great for

0:12:48.040 --> 0:12:52.240
<v Speaker 1>long from your reading of history. Can we migrate policy

0:12:52.360 --> 0:12:56.600
<v Speaker 1>to create incentives for domestic investment? Can we do tax

0:12:56.720 --> 0:13:00.240
<v Speaker 1>credits to make Jeff Emil invest in David gur Is

0:13:00.840 --> 0:13:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Ithaca versus Malaysia. I love Ithaca. I grew up in

0:13:05.640 --> 0:13:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Rochester like you, Tom, but I think they're much more important.

0:13:10.840 --> 0:13:13.959
<v Speaker 1>Much more important in Trump's policies are the how he

0:13:14.040 --> 0:13:18.560
<v Speaker 1>handles regulation because there's, you know, a lot of needed regulation,

0:13:18.720 --> 0:13:20.680
<v Speaker 1>but at the same time, there there's a lot of

0:13:20.720 --> 0:13:23.720
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to interpret. I certainly know some of the

0:13:23.760 --> 0:13:28.080
<v Speaker 1>regulation that's come on universities has been dramatic changes, difficult

0:13:28.120 --> 0:13:30.800
<v Speaker 1>to interpret. If it's been in other industries like that,

0:13:30.920 --> 0:13:34.320
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to function and where there's confidence, where there's

0:13:34.360 --> 0:13:38.520
<v Speaker 1>optimisms coming from that. More than anything, I get the

0:13:38.520 --> 0:13:41.319
<v Speaker 1>sense that, you know, when when Congress takes up a

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:42.839
<v Speaker 1>tax plan, it's a tax plan that's on the shelf.

0:13:42.880 --> 0:13:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Republicans have been talking about tax cuts and reforming the

0:13:45.120 --> 0:13:48.240
<v Speaker 1>tax code for for a long time. With regulation, I

0:13:48.280 --> 0:13:50.679
<v Speaker 1>lived in Washington for a long time. I heard Republicans

0:13:50.720 --> 0:13:53.280
<v Speaker 1>mostly decrying Dodd Frank for years and years and years.

0:13:53.280 --> 0:13:56.600
<v Speaker 1>But it was all about removing that law, not replacing it.

0:13:57.280 --> 0:13:59.160
<v Speaker 1>How nuanced do you think the conversation is going to

0:13:59.160 --> 0:14:01.599
<v Speaker 1>be about about what regulation looks like here under the

0:14:01.640 --> 0:14:05.560
<v Speaker 1>new prison We're seeing anything but nuanced conversation and the

0:14:05.600 --> 0:14:08.880
<v Speaker 1>debate in America today. But I mean, Dodd Frank has

0:14:08.920 --> 0:14:12.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of problems. I think Dodd Frank uh does

0:14:12.160 --> 0:14:15.520
<v Speaker 1>need to be fixed. Uh they've known that. President Obama

0:14:15.559 --> 0:14:18.040
<v Speaker 1>knew that, but they couldn't get anything through Congress. Usually

0:14:18.040 --> 0:14:20.640
<v Speaker 1>when you pass a law, there's a whole sequence of

0:14:20.680 --> 0:14:23.560
<v Speaker 1>fixes that you do, little technical fixes. They couldn't do

0:14:23.600 --> 0:14:26.240
<v Speaker 1>it because there was so much difficulty. So at a

0:14:26.320 --> 0:14:29.280
<v Speaker 1>minimum they're going to do that. I think we need

0:14:29.320 --> 0:14:32.479
<v Speaker 1>to make the path for small and medium sized businesses

0:14:32.520 --> 0:14:35.920
<v Speaker 1>to get loans much better than it's been. They are

0:14:35.960 --> 0:14:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the core of productivity in this economy. I think the

0:14:39.720 --> 0:14:44.280
<v Speaker 1>that's where we've slowed down, particularly the businesses that eventually

0:14:44.320 --> 0:14:49.040
<v Speaker 1>get big. Obviously, and you know, improving innovation, improving investment

0:14:49.160 --> 0:14:52.840
<v Speaker 1>and Dodd Frank you know, stopped us from having the

0:14:52.840 --> 0:14:57.320
<v Speaker 1>financial crisis of two thousand and forty, but didn't necessarily

0:14:57.480 --> 0:15:00.800
<v Speaker 1>generate the recovery we needed just to going overseas here

0:15:00.840 --> 0:15:02.240
<v Speaker 1>for a bid. Looking at Europe, we had the President

0:15:02.240 --> 0:15:04.760
<v Speaker 1>of the Eurogroup this morning saying that the UK would

0:15:04.760 --> 0:15:07.160
<v Speaker 1>likely get access to internal markets in the European univer

0:15:07.160 --> 0:15:09.640
<v Speaker 1>We saw sterling strength and on that news, what do

0:15:09.680 --> 0:15:11.120
<v Speaker 1>you make of how this has played out, how indeed

0:15:11.160 --> 0:15:14.560
<v Speaker 1>this is playing out, this Brexit process, and and what

0:15:14.600 --> 0:15:17.520
<v Speaker 1>it what it what it portends here for the UK economy.

0:15:18.120 --> 0:15:22.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm very leary about the longer term they want it.

0:15:22.200 --> 0:15:25.320
<v Speaker 1>There's no precedent for this of having this tightly net

0:15:25.360 --> 0:15:28.480
<v Speaker 1>trade deal and pulling out short of a war, civil war,

0:15:28.560 --> 0:15:31.760
<v Speaker 1>revolution or something. It's not that easy to do. And

0:15:31.840 --> 0:15:34.680
<v Speaker 1>by the way, negotiating the new treaties is not that

0:15:34.720 --> 0:15:37.920
<v Speaker 1>easy to do. Usually a trade agreement takes five years

0:15:37.960 --> 0:15:41.600
<v Speaker 1>to negotiate, five years to implement, and that's fast track.

0:15:42.160 --> 0:15:44.560
<v Speaker 1>And here they're trying. They haven't only two years to

0:15:44.600 --> 0:15:48.520
<v Speaker 1>negotiate it, then you know, three years for implementation. There's

0:15:48.560 --> 0:15:51.040
<v Speaker 1>going to be a long period of accodus from the

0:15:51.120 --> 0:15:55.080
<v Speaker 1>UK economy of people, firms. Uh, they face a very

0:15:55.160 --> 0:15:58.920
<v Speaker 1>difficult road ahead. I think the Braxitters seem to have

0:15:59.080 --> 0:16:02.600
<v Speaker 1>no idea what they're doing. I had been assuming they

0:16:02.640 --> 0:16:05.280
<v Speaker 1>would back down. I've been assuming there was going to

0:16:05.360 --> 0:16:08.680
<v Speaker 1>be a soft Braxit, but at least term, you know,

0:16:08.760 --> 0:16:11.560
<v Speaker 1>won't brook that it could all change. I really would

0:16:11.560 --> 0:16:14.440
<v Speaker 1>hold the possibility that they'll just you know, pull out

0:16:14.480 --> 0:16:16.920
<v Speaker 1>at the last minute, though the French chemed to be

0:16:16.920 --> 0:16:19.960
<v Speaker 1>pushing them out the door. Ken Rogoff with us because

0:16:20.000 --> 0:16:22.280
<v Speaker 1>we got we could go with the Professor Rogoff here

0:16:22.320 --> 0:16:24.440
<v Speaker 1>for five or six hours, maybe get to the Italian

0:16:24.840 --> 0:16:28.800
<v Speaker 1>referendum by ten am Wall Street time this morning. We

0:16:28.840 --> 0:16:31.160
<v Speaker 1>will not do that. Coming up, what many of you

0:16:31.240 --> 0:16:34.800
<v Speaker 1>been waiting for, particularly our listeners in Asia in India.

0:16:35.200 --> 0:16:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Ken Rogoff on the history making effort by Mr Mody

0:16:38.840 --> 0:16:43.000
<v Speaker 1>to limit cash in Indian society. Coming up, Ken Rogoff

0:16:43.480 --> 0:16:46.520
<v Speaker 1>on the curse of cash, the curse of cash. What

0:16:46.600 --> 0:16:48.840
<v Speaker 1>did Mr Modi get wrong in India? He tried to

0:16:48.880 --> 0:16:52.240
<v Speaker 1>apply Rogolf one oh one, and you made clear you

0:16:52.320 --> 0:16:54.880
<v Speaker 1>can't do that in an emerging market. What did he

0:16:54.920 --> 0:16:57.600
<v Speaker 1>get wrong? Well, I mean the first thing, I don't

0:16:57.600 --> 0:16:59.160
<v Speaker 1>know if he got it wrong because I don't know

0:16:59.200 --> 0:17:02.040
<v Speaker 1>all that it tail. But I view the right way

0:17:02.080 --> 0:17:05.600
<v Speaker 1>to do phasing out large bills is very slowly to

0:17:05.720 --> 0:17:09.480
<v Speaker 1>void collateral damage. It's not technically easy to do there.

0:17:09.480 --> 0:17:11.359
<v Speaker 1>You know a lot of people that you heard in

0:17:11.400 --> 0:17:13.920
<v Speaker 1>addition to the tax of aiders and criminals. He did

0:17:13.920 --> 0:17:17.600
<v Speaker 1>it overnight. Uh. He really wanted to lash out. He's

0:17:17.720 --> 0:17:21.239
<v Speaker 1>very angry about corruption. And of course India didn't have

0:17:21.280 --> 0:17:24.120
<v Speaker 1>any big bills. Their biggest bill was about fifteen dollars,

0:17:24.800 --> 0:17:27.440
<v Speaker 1>which is you know, basically where I'm hoping to end

0:17:27.600 --> 0:17:30.560
<v Speaker 1>up with countries like the United States, and the euros

0:17:30.840 --> 0:17:32.879
<v Speaker 1>twenty or thirty years and now, by the way, no

0:17:33.280 --> 0:17:36.600
<v Speaker 1>time soon. And he was taking away these bills that

0:17:36.960 --> 0:17:41.280
<v Speaker 1>the particularly five rupe notes seven dollars and fifty cents

0:17:41.280 --> 0:17:44.640
<v Speaker 1>that ordinary Indians use. One more question is what can

0:17:44.680 --> 0:17:47.560
<v Speaker 1>we learn from Sweden? In your book you drop in

0:17:47.600 --> 0:17:51.199
<v Speaker 1>these nations that are affecting your plan. What can the

0:17:51.280 --> 0:17:55.160
<v Speaker 1>United States learn from Sweden? Again, my book is really

0:17:55.200 --> 0:17:57.800
<v Speaker 1>about the issues with cash and what surrounds it. And

0:17:57.840 --> 0:17:59.720
<v Speaker 1>there's more than one way to skin a cat. I

0:17:59.760 --> 0:18:02.560
<v Speaker 1>try to propose something very simple. Sweden does it on

0:18:02.800 --> 0:18:06.240
<v Speaker 1>many dimensions. You can't easily find an a t M

0:18:06.320 --> 0:18:09.119
<v Speaker 1>machine in Sweden. Their places in all of the Nordic

0:18:09.160 --> 0:18:11.840
<v Speaker 1>countries where you might have to go a hundred kilometers

0:18:11.880 --> 0:18:14.840
<v Speaker 1>to find ATM machines. Well, they were very worried about crime.

0:18:14.920 --> 0:18:17.040
<v Speaker 1>They stripped cash out of a lot of the banks

0:18:17.080 --> 0:18:19.320
<v Speaker 1>that had a lot of violent crime. There's a lot

0:18:19.320 --> 0:18:22.600
<v Speaker 1>of support in society. They also have very very good

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:26.960
<v Speaker 1>mobile person to person apt way more sophisticated than ours.

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:29.040
<v Speaker 1>We need to rip up the script and David Gurry,

0:18:29.080 --> 0:18:31.720
<v Speaker 1>you're going to help her with this. You gave that

0:18:31.840 --> 0:18:35.320
<v Speaker 1>you had the ceremonial first move at the Chess Championships,

0:18:35.720 --> 0:18:38.600
<v Speaker 1>and then Mr Teal Peter Teal did the same thing.

0:18:38.640 --> 0:18:42.440
<v Speaker 1>I believe yesterday we have a newly minted chess champion veteran.

0:18:43.359 --> 0:18:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Is he as good as you were? Is he different?

0:18:46.440 --> 0:18:48.679
<v Speaker 1>Is it like tennis where we don't even know what

0:18:48.720 --> 0:18:52.720
<v Speaker 1>the game was? First of all, Carlson is was the

0:18:52.800 --> 0:18:56.320
<v Speaker 1>champion and defended it. He's just turned twenty six years old.

0:18:56.680 --> 0:18:58.639
<v Speaker 1>As good as I was, he's so much better than

0:18:58.640 --> 0:19:00.880
<v Speaker 1>I was. I mean, I couldn't like a handle to him.

0:19:01.280 --> 0:19:04.960
<v Speaker 1>He's an incredible player. His Russian opponent put up a

0:19:05.000 --> 0:19:08.600
<v Speaker 1>big fight. Putin followed very closely. They weren't couldn't do

0:19:08.640 --> 0:19:11.280
<v Speaker 1>the Olympics, of course, so they were very excited about

0:19:11.359 --> 0:19:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the chess match. This opponent played great. But I have

0:19:14.119 --> 0:19:16.560
<v Speaker 1>to say when I made the first move, uh, you know,

0:19:16.640 --> 0:19:19.800
<v Speaker 1>I shook both their hands. Carlson was smiling and relaxed.

0:19:19.960 --> 0:19:22.159
<v Speaker 1>Karyakin looked like he was about to be fed to

0:19:22.240 --> 0:19:26.480
<v Speaker 1>the wolves. Here Professor of Public Policy, Economic international grandmaster

0:19:26.960 --> 0:19:30.040
<v Speaker 1>as well. David ger and I played chess. Was embarrassing.

0:19:30.040 --> 0:19:33.199
<v Speaker 1>He beat me in seven moves, David. When you watch it,

0:19:33.240 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 1>when you watch matches likely when somebody who is skilled

0:19:35.600 --> 0:19:37.359
<v Speaker 1>at chess, who's played chess for a long time watches,

0:19:37.960 --> 0:19:40.159
<v Speaker 1>is it for pure enjoyment or is is he or

0:19:40.280 --> 0:19:43.479
<v Speaker 1>she learning new new opens, learning new moves? How does

0:19:43.520 --> 0:19:46.840
<v Speaker 1>one watch a match like this? I mean watching Carlson

0:19:47.080 --> 0:19:52.000
<v Speaker 1>is just such a pleasure. Um. He manages to press

0:19:52.080 --> 0:19:56.440
<v Speaker 1>in these creative ways. He wins positions where Bobby Fisher,

0:19:56.480 --> 0:19:58.880
<v Speaker 1>who arguably might have been the greatest player of all

0:19:58.960 --> 0:20:02.159
<v Speaker 1>time until be cast prov in Carlson. I mean, Bobby

0:20:02.160 --> 0:20:04.959
<v Speaker 1>Fisher would have given me a draw. Where's Carlson's just

0:20:05.080 --> 0:20:08.440
<v Speaker 1>starting to go to work? Uh? And it's just beautiful.

0:20:08.520 --> 0:20:12.080
<v Speaker 1>And his opponent, by the way, was incredibly creative. He

0:20:12.760 --> 0:20:15.719
<v Speaker 1>defended positions where he looked like he was dead, and

0:20:15.760 --> 0:20:17.880
<v Speaker 1>he did these risky, creative things. It was a really

0:20:17.960 --> 0:20:20.760
<v Speaker 1>fantastic match. What's your sense of the health of the

0:20:20.760 --> 0:20:23.399
<v Speaker 1>game these days? Down at the Full Market building in

0:20:23.440 --> 0:20:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Lower Manhattan they had a V I P lounge. This

0:20:25.440 --> 0:20:28.959
<v Speaker 1>was streamed worldwide. How do you gage the interest in chess? Right?

0:20:29.040 --> 0:20:31.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the interest in this match was just phenomenal.

0:20:31.160 --> 0:20:34.280
<v Speaker 1>You have to remember chess as an online game even

0:20:34.320 --> 0:20:37.000
<v Speaker 1>more than say football, as a TV sports so they

0:20:37.040 --> 0:20:40.639
<v Speaker 1>had you know, certainly millions of people just watching every

0:20:40.680 --> 0:20:44.639
<v Speaker 1>move online paid subscribers, and then it was shown live

0:20:44.680 --> 0:20:47.840
<v Speaker 1>on television in many countries of particularly Russia. You read

0:20:47.880 --> 0:20:50.719
<v Speaker 1>square was just filled with people like it was New

0:20:50.800 --> 0:20:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Year's Eve watching the games. It's still very very popular.

0:20:54.280 --> 0:20:59.680
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting despite computers coming in, chess as as popular

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:03.000
<v Speaker 1>as ever and just very quickly. This lasted many weeks.

0:21:03.040 --> 0:21:06.120
<v Speaker 1>How do these how are these matches structured? Well, I mean,

0:21:06.240 --> 0:21:10.119
<v Speaker 1>I just say the physical components very very important. Carlson

0:21:10.240 --> 0:21:13.080
<v Speaker 1>always has trained physically, and this was really the first

0:21:13.119 --> 0:21:15.320
<v Speaker 1>time he came up against opponent who was in the

0:21:15.400 --> 0:21:18.639
<v Speaker 1>kind of shape he was think of taking. If a

0:21:18.720 --> 0:21:22.639
<v Speaker 1>six hour exam every day for several weeks in a row,

0:21:22.680 --> 0:21:25.280
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna grind anybody down. Plus you gotta study for

0:21:25.400 --> 0:21:28.840
<v Speaker 1>the exam, let's not forget. So there's a huge physical component.

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Carlson tip typically tears people up in the fifth and

0:21:31.800 --> 0:21:34.760
<v Speaker 1>sixth hour, and this guy, karayak In was just right

0:21:34.840 --> 0:21:38.760
<v Speaker 1>with him. We're going to leave it there. Thank you.

0:21:39.880 --> 0:21:42.399
<v Speaker 1>The book my book of the year. Read it. It

0:21:42.560 --> 0:21:48.200
<v Speaker 1>is controversial. The Curse of Cash Daniel Jurgen next. This

0:21:48.280 --> 0:22:03.320
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomer. This is Bloomberg Surveillance on Bloomberg Radio. David

0:22:03.320 --> 0:22:06.119
<v Speaker 1>Gurreau with Tom Keane. The news broke yesterday while we

0:22:06.119 --> 0:22:08.200
<v Speaker 1>were on air. OPEC members had come to a deal

0:22:08.560 --> 0:22:11.560
<v Speaker 1>at their meeting in Vienna, a production target of thirty

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:14.440
<v Speaker 1>two points seven million barrels a day, by all accounts,

0:22:14.440 --> 0:22:17.159
<v Speaker 1>a pretty broad deal. I want to bring in perhaps

0:22:17.160 --> 0:22:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the pre eminent expert on OPEC on the global energy market.

0:22:20.560 --> 0:22:22.679
<v Speaker 1>That's Dan Jurgen, vice chairman of i h S, Founder

0:22:22.720 --> 0:22:25.720
<v Speaker 1>of i h S Cambridge Energy Research Associates, author of

0:22:25.760 --> 0:22:28.160
<v Speaker 1>course of the quest and the prize. Dan, You're gonna

0:22:28.160 --> 0:22:29.600
<v Speaker 1>great to have you with us this morning. Thank you,

0:22:29.680 --> 0:22:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Good morning. I mentioned that the relative broadness of that deal.

0:22:33.200 --> 0:22:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Did it surprise you A that we got a deal?

0:22:35.200 --> 0:22:37.440
<v Speaker 1>And be that it seems so broad? Well, going into

0:22:37.480 --> 0:22:40.439
<v Speaker 1>the deal, I had about a seventy probability that they

0:22:40.440 --> 0:22:43.000
<v Speaker 1>would do a deal. It was certainly as though a

0:22:43.080 --> 0:22:46.159
<v Speaker 1>cliffhanger at the end, and where you had basically on

0:22:46.200 --> 0:22:49.439
<v Speaker 1>the one hand, the specter of the onslaught of UH

0:22:49.680 --> 0:22:54.760
<v Speaker 1>new waves of Saudi oil versus h Iranian UH negotiating talents.

0:22:55.400 --> 0:22:58.720
<v Speaker 1>But at the end I think self interest prevailed among

0:22:58.760 --> 0:23:01.280
<v Speaker 1>all these countries and there were enough wiggle room in

0:23:01.320 --> 0:23:03.879
<v Speaker 1>the deal that everybody could claim a victory. We were

0:23:03.880 --> 0:23:06.560
<v Speaker 1>talking about OPEC, of course, we were also talking about Russia,

0:23:06.640 --> 0:23:10.280
<v Speaker 1>not a member of the cartel. Explain why Russia was

0:23:10.320 --> 0:23:13.240
<v Speaker 1>playing such an outsized role here in these deliberations. Since

0:23:13.280 --> 0:23:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the late nineties nineties, OPEC has tried to win it

0:23:18.080 --> 0:23:21.679
<v Speaker 1>back then, to to bring Russia into a sort of

0:23:21.680 --> 0:23:24.440
<v Speaker 1>solving the market problem at that point when there was

0:23:24.440 --> 0:23:26.800
<v Speaker 1>a collapse in oil prices and Russia said they'd go along,

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:30.280
<v Speaker 1>but they didn't. But this time Russia was much more

0:23:30.320 --> 0:23:35.080
<v Speaker 1>actively involved. UH. The Energy Minister Alexander Novak has been

0:23:35.080 --> 0:23:37.840
<v Speaker 1>out front on this really since early in UH in

0:23:37.920 --> 0:23:41.720
<v Speaker 1>twenty six and even President Putin at one point gathered

0:23:41.760 --> 0:23:44.639
<v Speaker 1>all of the CEOs of the Russian oil industry in

0:23:44.640 --> 0:23:46.359
<v Speaker 1>a room and said, this is earlier in the year,

0:23:46.400 --> 0:23:48.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm in favor of a freeze. Are you all in

0:23:48.920 --> 0:23:51.800
<v Speaker 1>favor of a freeze? And remarkably everybody was in favor

0:23:51.920 --> 0:23:54.960
<v Speaker 1>of a freeze. So I think that the Russians, looking

0:23:55.080 --> 0:23:57.520
<v Speaker 1>if you look at their budget, you look at their

0:23:57.520 --> 0:24:00.239
<v Speaker 1>sovereign wealth funds, and where they were there, We're going

0:24:00.280 --> 0:24:03.160
<v Speaker 1>to move into a situation of a lot more financial pressure.

0:24:03.480 --> 0:24:05.400
<v Speaker 1>So I think they were eager to get a deal.

0:24:05.760 --> 0:24:07.480
<v Speaker 1>The big thing was to get them to agree to

0:24:07.520 --> 0:24:10.480
<v Speaker 1>a cut and not just a freeze. Daniel, you're gonna

0:24:10.760 --> 0:24:14.680
<v Speaker 1>improving the prize. And you go back to in the

0:24:14.720 --> 0:24:18.800
<v Speaker 1>sobering moment for the cartel. Are they at that point now?

0:24:19.160 --> 0:24:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Is there a a psychological mindset of the cartel in

0:24:23.280 --> 0:24:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Saudi Arabia that is equivalent or similar to the agony

0:24:27.960 --> 0:24:30.840
<v Speaker 1>of well, I think that's you know, that's probably the

0:24:30.880 --> 0:24:35.280
<v Speaker 1>best analogy to uh where the market has been for

0:24:35.320 --> 0:24:38.480
<v Speaker 1>the last two years. And I think then too, there

0:24:38.520 --> 0:24:41.680
<v Speaker 1>was a resistance to do anything, and finally, when everybody

0:24:41.760 --> 0:24:44.800
<v Speaker 1>was looking at how far down prices would stay or

0:24:45.000 --> 0:24:48.600
<v Speaker 1>might go, they finally were able to come together. And

0:24:48.640 --> 0:24:51.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that was the same situation here because remember

0:24:51.880 --> 0:24:55.520
<v Speaker 1>uh Tom two years ago, uh Opek resigned at quit

0:24:55.560 --> 0:24:57.600
<v Speaker 1>it said we're out of the business of market management,

0:24:57.920 --> 0:24:59.960
<v Speaker 1>and now they're back. And I think it's that they

0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:02.320
<v Speaker 1>looked over the side of the abyss and so that's

0:25:02.359 --> 0:25:05.200
<v Speaker 1>pretty down deep there, and if we get down there,

0:25:05.440 --> 0:25:07.040
<v Speaker 1>we don't quite know how we get out of it.

0:25:07.200 --> 0:25:10.280
<v Speaker 1>All of this is at the margin. What is the

0:25:10.320 --> 0:25:14.159
<v Speaker 1>marginal dynamic you and uh your shop will look for

0:25:14.320 --> 0:25:18.359
<v Speaker 1>in the coming weeks and months from the supposed cartel. Well,

0:25:18.400 --> 0:25:21.720
<v Speaker 1>I think it will be, of course, a degree of compliance.

0:25:21.800 --> 0:25:27.160
<v Speaker 1>And uh the so called secondary sources that monitor uh output,

0:25:27.200 --> 0:25:30.160
<v Speaker 1>and I think we're one of them. Uh, everybody will

0:25:30.200 --> 0:25:33.359
<v Speaker 1>look at those numbers. Uh, the countries will look at

0:25:33.359 --> 0:25:36.720
<v Speaker 1>the numbers, and the other communities. That's really important. The

0:25:36.720 --> 0:25:40.160
<v Speaker 1>traders will look at it, and also the hedge funds

0:25:40.200 --> 0:25:42.720
<v Speaker 1>will look at it and and vote in effect in

0:25:42.720 --> 0:25:44.720
<v Speaker 1>the market whether they think the deal will be there.

0:25:45.200 --> 0:25:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Often when these things start off, they're shaky. There's a

0:25:47.440 --> 0:25:50.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of skepticism. It's only a six month deal. What

0:25:50.359 --> 0:25:52.760
<v Speaker 1>they're really trying to do is by time, get through

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:56.000
<v Speaker 1>the winter when inventories would normally build, try and prevent

0:25:56.040 --> 0:25:58.680
<v Speaker 1>that from happening, and get to a more balanced market

0:25:58.680 --> 0:26:01.040
<v Speaker 1>in the spring. That's with this. This is more like

0:26:01.080 --> 0:26:04.720
<v Speaker 1>a sprint than a marathon. How is a producer in

0:26:04.800 --> 0:26:08.000
<v Speaker 1>saying Oklahoma watching the goings on in Vienna? What's his

0:26:08.080 --> 0:26:11.400
<v Speaker 1>sense of his sense? Or two things? One is a

0:26:11.480 --> 0:26:14.720
<v Speaker 1>giant sigh of relief and the other is a rush

0:26:14.720 --> 0:26:17.680
<v Speaker 1>of adrenaline. And I think we saw that the same

0:26:17.720 --> 0:26:21.640
<v Speaker 1>thing in the in the stock markets yesterday. Uh. One

0:26:21.720 --> 0:26:24.000
<v Speaker 1>guy actually said to me said, you know, we're holding

0:26:24.000 --> 0:26:28.360
<v Speaker 1>our breath until until November, and they had to hold

0:26:28.359 --> 0:26:31.280
<v Speaker 1>it for several days there until they got to an agreement.

0:26:31.600 --> 0:26:34.680
<v Speaker 1>But I think this says that people will feel more

0:26:34.720 --> 0:26:37.920
<v Speaker 1>confident they'll be investing. We'll see rick counts go up,

0:26:37.920 --> 0:26:41.240
<v Speaker 1>and we think, you know, if the agreement roughly holds,

0:26:41.240 --> 0:26:42.960
<v Speaker 1>and it's only going to roughly hold, it's not going

0:26:43.040 --> 0:26:46.080
<v Speaker 1>to be a perfect agreement. Uh, then we'll see US

0:26:46.160 --> 0:26:50.920
<v Speaker 1>production turning around and uh in increased by the by

0:26:50.960 --> 0:26:53.159
<v Speaker 1>this time next year. We would be rude if we

0:26:53.200 --> 0:26:56.439
<v Speaker 1>did not speak about the history making new administration we have.

0:26:56.960 --> 0:26:59.240
<v Speaker 1>First of all, have you been called by the transition team?

0:26:59.240 --> 0:27:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Would professor you're dr you're gon be part of a

0:27:02.480 --> 0:27:05.639
<v Speaker 1>Trump administration? I don't think so. Uh. I mean, I

0:27:06.040 --> 0:27:08.680
<v Speaker 1>think they're still organizing themselves in terms of what they

0:27:08.720 --> 0:27:11.200
<v Speaker 1>want to do. Do we do we have a national

0:27:11.280 --> 0:27:14.399
<v Speaker 1>energy policy? Then? Well, I think, um, I think we

0:27:14.520 --> 0:27:17.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of summarize it at S market is uh more

0:27:18.040 --> 0:27:21.920
<v Speaker 1>rigs less rags is what we're going to see I mean,

0:27:22.200 --> 0:27:24.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, there'll be more activity. I think, you know,

0:27:24.800 --> 0:27:26.679
<v Speaker 1>I think in the first instance, people think there will

0:27:26.720 --> 0:27:29.360
<v Speaker 1>be this vast rolling back of regulations. I don't think

0:27:29.400 --> 0:27:31.639
<v Speaker 1>that's the case, first of all, and a lot of

0:27:32.080 --> 0:27:34.760
<v Speaker 1>much of oil production is governed by state regulations, not

0:27:34.840 --> 0:27:37.480
<v Speaker 1>federal regulations. But I think what it does mean is

0:27:37.520 --> 0:27:41.880
<v Speaker 1>that we're not going to see another wave of additional regulations.

0:27:41.920 --> 0:27:44.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the kind of the the starting, the

0:27:44.560 --> 0:27:47.520
<v Speaker 1>going in point. Let's leave it there, Daniel, You're gonna

0:27:47.520 --> 0:27:50.240
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. A short visit here. Really after

0:27:50.400 --> 0:27:55.439
<v Speaker 1>history in uh Vienna, the Quest is his latest effort,

0:27:55.520 --> 0:27:59.040
<v Speaker 1>and it's really remarkably good. I was surprised, David. I

0:27:59.040 --> 0:28:01.760
<v Speaker 1>did not expect the drama out of the end. No,

0:28:02.160 --> 0:28:04.239
<v Speaker 1>and I was taken by the drama leading up to

0:28:04.280 --> 0:28:06.760
<v Speaker 1>it as well, and how quickly the meeting itself seemed

0:28:06.800 --> 0:28:08.720
<v Speaker 1>seemed to go. But you know, we've been through this,

0:28:08.760 --> 0:28:10.640
<v Speaker 1>as we mentioned time and time again over these last

0:28:10.640 --> 0:28:12.400
<v Speaker 1>few meetings, there is talk of a deal and then

0:28:13.040 --> 0:28:14.960
<v Speaker 1>no deal. So I think it will be waiting to

0:28:15.040 --> 0:28:18.040
<v Speaker 1>see here how cohesive OPI looks going forward, how disciplined

0:28:18.080 --> 0:28:19.760
<v Speaker 1>the Bartel is going to be going forward is a

0:28:19.800 --> 0:28:24.919
<v Speaker 1>tries to win force this deal. Who you put your

0:28:24.960 --> 0:28:29.280
<v Speaker 1>trust in matters. Investors have put their trust in independent

0:28:29.320 --> 0:28:32.960
<v Speaker 1>registered investment advisors to the tune of four trillion dollars.

0:28:33.640 --> 0:28:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Why they see their role is to serve, not sell.

0:28:38.320 --> 0:28:40.680
<v Speaker 1>That's why Charles Schwab is committed to the success of

0:28:40.720 --> 0:28:45.920
<v Speaker 1>over seven thousand independent financial advisors who passionately dedicate themselves

0:28:46.240 --> 0:28:50.080
<v Speaker 1>to helping people achieve their financial goals. Learn more and

0:28:50.280 --> 0:29:00.520
<v Speaker 1>find your independent advisor dot com. David, and to bringing

0:29:00.560 --> 0:29:02.840
<v Speaker 1>our next guest. We've had Kenneth rog up to and

0:29:02.920 --> 0:29:05.200
<v Speaker 1>and you're going to know another wonderful guest. But we

0:29:05.240 --> 0:29:07.719
<v Speaker 1>need to frame this, David. We need to do this right.

0:29:08.400 --> 0:29:12.120
<v Speaker 1>A little bit of foggy bottom game show. When only

0:29:12.160 --> 0:29:15.000
<v Speaker 1>three or four candidates depending on the season, are left,

0:29:15.240 --> 0:29:19.120
<v Speaker 1>they are interviewed. Rather than being assigned to task. Executives

0:29:19.160 --> 0:29:23.400
<v Speaker 1>from various companies interview the finalists and report their assessments

0:29:23.440 --> 0:29:26.880
<v Speaker 1>to the host. Based on the interviews, a boardroom meeting

0:29:26.960 --> 0:29:31.360
<v Speaker 1>and firing takes place, leaving two candidates. I don't know

0:29:31.400 --> 0:29:35.040
<v Speaker 1>if that's the apprentice has described in Wikipedia, or if

0:29:35.080 --> 0:29:38.080
<v Speaker 1>that's our selection of the next Secretary State and many

0:29:38.080 --> 0:29:41.040
<v Speaker 1>of us saw CNN correspondent Jim Acossa's photograph from John

0:29:41.040 --> 0:29:43.840
<v Speaker 1>George the other night of Donald Trump sitting with one

0:29:43.920 --> 0:29:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Mitt Romney, former governor of Massachusetts, former presidential candidate, as

0:29:47.600 --> 0:29:49.720
<v Speaker 1>well Nicholas Burns here, a professor of the practice of

0:29:49.760 --> 0:29:52.360
<v Speaker 1>diplomacy the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University joined

0:29:52.440 --> 0:29:55.560
<v Speaker 1>us here in New York. Is Mitt Romney the forerunner here?

0:29:55.600 --> 0:29:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Who else is in the running here? Who else are

0:29:57.440 --> 0:30:00.160
<v Speaker 1>the finalist? Well, he's certainly. Mit Romney's certainly one of

0:30:00.200 --> 0:30:03.560
<v Speaker 1>the finalists. Um, You've also have David Portray as very

0:30:03.680 --> 0:30:07.000
<v Speaker 1>very smart, experience general, and you have Senator Bob Corker,

0:30:07.000 --> 0:30:09.600
<v Speaker 1>the chairman of the Form Relations Committee. All these three

0:30:09.640 --> 0:30:13.720
<v Speaker 1>people have in depth international experience, especially General Portrays. All

0:30:13.760 --> 0:30:17.200
<v Speaker 1>of them are mature people of even temperament. All of

0:30:17.280 --> 0:30:21.720
<v Speaker 1>them have credibility both here and also overseas. And so

0:30:21.760 --> 0:30:25.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that, Um, it's okay, that's that's the ambassador.

0:30:25.840 --> 0:30:31.360
<v Speaker 1>We only let ambassadors have their phone on. That's exactly

0:30:31.400 --> 0:30:33.680
<v Speaker 1>what it is. But if you think about it, Donald

0:30:33.680 --> 0:30:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Trump is going to be the very first president in

0:30:35.520 --> 0:30:39.200
<v Speaker 1>the history of the United States are with no prior

0:30:39.320 --> 0:30:43.040
<v Speaker 1>public experience, political experience, military experience. He's gonna need a

0:30:43.080 --> 0:30:45.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of help. He's a smart guy. He's obviously succeeded

0:30:45.280 --> 0:30:48.080
<v Speaker 1>in New York and real estate, but international politics is

0:30:48.120 --> 0:30:50.840
<v Speaker 1>a very different game. And so I think any one

0:30:50.840 --> 0:30:54.400
<v Speaker 1>of these three would center him, give him the credibility

0:30:54.440 --> 0:30:56.760
<v Speaker 1>he needs, and I think make up for some of

0:30:56.800 --> 0:31:00.360
<v Speaker 1>the one dimensional nature of the current national security of Romans.

0:31:00.480 --> 0:31:02.959
<v Speaker 1>General Flynn's a very smart cons a military officer who

0:31:02.960 --> 0:31:05.880
<v Speaker 1>has been a counter terrorist person. You need someone who

0:31:05.920 --> 0:31:08.600
<v Speaker 1>can thank broadly and act broadly globally. Is that message

0:31:08.600 --> 0:31:11.400
<v Speaker 1>getting telegraphed to him? We saw his pick forree Treasury secretary,

0:31:11.880 --> 0:31:15.320
<v Speaker 1>uh Steve semnuchen A, a loyalist, somebody who ran his

0:31:15.360 --> 0:31:18.720
<v Speaker 1>campaign finance operation. Are you worried here that that message

0:31:18.720 --> 0:31:20.000
<v Speaker 1>that he needs to pick somebody with a lot of

0:31:20.000 --> 0:31:22.400
<v Speaker 1>experience in statecraft is not going to get the job.

0:31:22.640 --> 0:31:24.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure any of us know, because all that

0:31:24.560 --> 0:31:26.640
<v Speaker 1>matters is what's in the kind of Donald Trump. But

0:31:26.760 --> 0:31:29.520
<v Speaker 1>this this team of rivals thing, it wasn't just Barack

0:31:29.560 --> 0:31:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Obama and Hillary Clinton. It was Lincoln of course. With

0:31:32.240 --> 0:31:35.560
<v Speaker 1>the appointing Seward as Secretary of State. I think it

0:31:35.640 --> 0:31:38.360
<v Speaker 1>makes sense for this government. I come from a world

0:31:38.720 --> 0:31:42.440
<v Speaker 1>international politics and diplomacy were experience actually counts for a lot.

0:31:42.680 --> 0:31:44.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, Trump's going to have to go up against

0:31:44.560 --> 0:31:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Demir Putin j and ping. These are consequential, very tough piece.

0:31:49.160 --> 0:31:52.160
<v Speaker 1>I want to tie two strands together here, Ambassador. The

0:31:52.200 --> 0:31:54.719
<v Speaker 1>first one is Joseph Nye, who was just with us,

0:31:54.720 --> 0:31:57.440
<v Speaker 1>the giant of international relations. Yes, my good friend of

0:31:57.480 --> 0:32:03.320
<v Speaker 1>college an adamant Adam about a strong America, America exceptionalism,

0:32:03.320 --> 0:32:07.240
<v Speaker 1>the negativity of America is unfounded. And then I want

0:32:07.280 --> 0:32:10.600
<v Speaker 1>to tie you in the massive miscalculation of all to

0:32:10.760 --> 0:32:15.040
<v Speaker 1>how weak Russia was when it collapsed. Our intelligence there

0:32:15.080 --> 0:32:19.000
<v Speaker 1>really wasn't I believe that good. Is Mr Trump and

0:32:19.080 --> 0:32:25.240
<v Speaker 1>his supporters misjudging the state of America within the international community.

0:32:25.480 --> 0:32:28.120
<v Speaker 1>I think so. And what bothered me during the campaign

0:32:28.880 --> 0:32:31.760
<v Speaker 1>was Donald Trump talking down American power, but also Bernie

0:32:31.760 --> 0:32:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Sanders on the left talking down American power. I see

0:32:34.760 --> 0:32:37.760
<v Speaker 1>a country, the United States. We are the strongest economy

0:32:37.760 --> 0:32:40.400
<v Speaker 1>in the world. We're growing, maybe not a China's six

0:32:40.520 --> 0:32:43.560
<v Speaker 1>or seven present, but we're growing. We have the knowledge economy,

0:32:43.680 --> 0:32:45.800
<v Speaker 1>skill set, and I think dynamics to do well in

0:32:45.800 --> 0:32:49.480
<v Speaker 1>the century. Strongest military, politically, the most influential Joe and

0:32:49.560 --> 0:32:52.720
<v Speaker 1>I will tell you culturally, the greatest soft power, the

0:32:52.760 --> 0:32:56.320
<v Speaker 1>greatest cultural attraction. We're at the top of our game.

0:32:56.440 --> 0:32:59.680
<v Speaker 1>We're not weak, we're not failing, but we do need leadership.

0:32:59.680 --> 0:33:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Is there an historical precedent for us being quote unquote

0:33:03.120 --> 0:33:06.280
<v Speaker 1>at the top of our game? And what we observed

0:33:06.280 --> 0:33:09.240
<v Speaker 1>in this election, which is not so much the walls,

0:33:09.280 --> 0:33:11.920
<v Speaker 1>but boy, those oceans are comfortable to keep us away.

0:33:12.240 --> 0:33:14.080
<v Speaker 1>I think the Internet. I think there is, and you

0:33:14.080 --> 0:33:16.800
<v Speaker 1>and I are thinking alike. It's Woodrow Wilson. It's the

0:33:16.880 --> 0:33:20.000
<v Speaker 1>our victory in the First World War, our buoyant economy

0:33:20.360 --> 0:33:23.560
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen and twenty, and then we tossed it all

0:33:23.600 --> 0:33:27.800
<v Speaker 1>away by going towards protectionism eventually and also thinking that

0:33:27.840 --> 0:33:29.400
<v Speaker 1>we could withdraw from the rest of the world. We

0:33:29.560 --> 0:33:33.400
<v Speaker 1>can't in a globalized Is there a mirrored hall where

0:33:33.400 --> 0:33:36.000
<v Speaker 1>everyone can get together? Are we so away from the

0:33:36.000 --> 0:33:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Westphalian system of the of the Palace of Versailles that

0:33:39.560 --> 0:33:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Mr Trump is not going to have that tool? You know?

0:33:42.120 --> 0:33:44.760
<v Speaker 1>I think hopefully he gets a team around him, and

0:33:44.760 --> 0:33:47.600
<v Speaker 1>whether it's Jim General, Jim Madison Defense, or Mitt Romney

0:33:47.720 --> 0:33:51.200
<v Speaker 1>or Bob Corker in state who who carefully kind of

0:33:51.320 --> 0:33:54.920
<v Speaker 1>nudge him towards internationalism. That doesn't mean giving away the story.

0:33:55.040 --> 0:33:58.440
<v Speaker 1>It means that American economic power and future depends on

0:33:58.680 --> 0:34:01.520
<v Speaker 1>trade deals. If we walk away from the Trans Pacific

0:34:01.520 --> 0:34:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Partnership that's Global GDP, the Chinese will move in with

0:34:05.840 --> 0:34:10.600
<v Speaker 1>their own highly protectionist for China trade regime will be

0:34:10.640 --> 0:34:13.120
<v Speaker 1>at a disadvantage for a generation. We have an opportunity

0:34:13.160 --> 0:34:15.520
<v Speaker 1>for a free trade agreement with the European Union. It

0:34:15.600 --> 0:34:18.280
<v Speaker 1>also bothered me that the left, Bernie Sanders and Donald

0:34:18.280 --> 0:34:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Trump talked down trade. I think we're a free trade

0:34:20.560 --> 0:34:23.000
<v Speaker 1>society and we ought to stick with that. We had

0:34:23.000 --> 0:34:24.800
<v Speaker 1>the pleasure of speaking on on election night, thank you

0:34:24.840 --> 0:34:27.320
<v Speaker 1>again for for coming in as those votes were being tabulate,

0:34:27.360 --> 0:34:30.200
<v Speaker 1>and George Mitchell was on the show as well, and

0:34:30.280 --> 0:34:33.799
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking, is there an opportunity here diplomatically for

0:34:33.840 --> 0:34:36.880
<v Speaker 1>there to be someone like a special Envoid of Russia

0:34:36.920 --> 0:34:39.440
<v Speaker 1>to bridge this relationship. Is there a need here to

0:34:39.520 --> 0:34:43.319
<v Speaker 1>focus more doggedly on improving that relationship with somebody in

0:34:43.320 --> 0:34:45.719
<v Speaker 1>a capacity like Senator Mitchell had in the past. Well,

0:34:45.719 --> 0:34:48.040
<v Speaker 1>there's so many people you could choose for that, former

0:34:48.080 --> 0:34:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Secretary James Baker, Condoleeza Rice, Robert Gates. But here's the deal.

0:34:52.960 --> 0:34:54.920
<v Speaker 1>We don't want to just have a good relationship with Russia.

0:34:54.960 --> 0:34:56.920
<v Speaker 1>We want to have the right relationship with Russia. And

0:34:57.000 --> 0:34:58.880
<v Speaker 1>right now, the deal he wants to make with Donald

0:34:58.880 --> 0:35:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Trump he us the sanctions lifted. These are the energy

0:35:01.920 --> 0:35:05.080
<v Speaker 1>and financial sanctions that have been very difficult for the

0:35:05.160 --> 0:35:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Russian economy. And we shouldn't give that up. Because when

0:35:08.560 --> 0:35:10.880
<v Speaker 1>we give up the sanctions, these are European Union, Canadian,

0:35:10.920 --> 0:35:15.440
<v Speaker 1>American sanctions. Then Putin his stealing crimea, his division of

0:35:15.480 --> 0:35:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine is rewarded, and that's the bad signal to send.

0:35:18.719 --> 0:35:21.120
<v Speaker 1>So if there's Trump should not be looking for a deal.

0:35:21.280 --> 0:35:25.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that Putin responds to strength and conviction. He's

0:35:25.040 --> 0:35:27.920
<v Speaker 1>that kind of a guy. He takes advantage of weakness.

0:35:28.040 --> 0:35:30.040
<v Speaker 1>And so the right strategy for Trump in his new

0:35:30.080 --> 0:35:33.880
<v Speaker 1>secretary state is tough minded, align yourself with Anglo Merkel,

0:35:34.440 --> 0:35:36.560
<v Speaker 1>keep the sanctions on. The e will vote on this

0:35:36.800 --> 0:35:39.280
<v Speaker 1>in the next ten days, and then wait for Putin

0:35:39.360 --> 0:35:42.600
<v Speaker 1>to crack. So sometimes diplomacy is just not making deals,

0:35:42.600 --> 0:35:45.359
<v Speaker 1>it's being strong and protecting your interests. Let's go back

0:35:45.400 --> 0:35:48.160
<v Speaker 1>to Let's go back to Roosevelt. How does Nick Burns

0:35:48.440 --> 0:35:52.480
<v Speaker 1>show the flag over the next four years this commune?

0:35:52.600 --> 0:35:54.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, first of all, I think we're gonna have

0:35:54.160 --> 0:35:56.719
<v Speaker 1>all generals in the cabinet the way we're going. But

0:35:56.800 --> 0:35:59.399
<v Speaker 1>are there are there too many generals being involved? How

0:35:59.440 --> 0:36:02.080
<v Speaker 1>do we know? The flag is a nation to the

0:36:02.080 --> 0:36:04.440
<v Speaker 1>rest of the world. So you know, obviously, if you

0:36:04.480 --> 0:36:06.920
<v Speaker 1>can get someone like Jim Maddis to be Defense Secretary,

0:36:06.960 --> 0:36:08.440
<v Speaker 1>that's a good thing for the United States. But you

0:36:08.480 --> 0:36:11.320
<v Speaker 1>don't want to have a cabinet that is primarily in

0:36:11.600 --> 0:36:14.560
<v Speaker 1>national security, military and nature of nature, because you do

0:36:14.640 --> 0:36:17.319
<v Speaker 1>have civilian control. Is traditionally the United States over the

0:36:17.360 --> 0:36:20.560
<v Speaker 1>military and people from civilian life, whether it's a diplomat

0:36:20.560 --> 0:36:23.680
<v Speaker 1>like Condoleeza or Rice or a politician like Mitt Romney sec.

0:36:25.320 --> 0:36:27.960
<v Speaker 1>This is too important. Should Condo Lisa Roy step forward

0:36:27.960 --> 0:36:30.560
<v Speaker 1>to provide leadership? I want to get you in trouble here,

0:36:30.600 --> 0:36:32.560
<v Speaker 1>and don't get she's a very close friend of mine,

0:36:32.600 --> 0:36:34.080
<v Speaker 1>so don't get me in trouble. I think she's very

0:36:34.080 --> 0:36:40.399
<v Speaker 1>happy where she is asked forward to provide leadership to America. Well,

0:36:40.440 --> 0:36:42.200
<v Speaker 1>she is stepping forward in a lot of different ways

0:36:42.239 --> 0:36:44.000
<v Speaker 1>to provide that leadership. But you know, the President of

0:36:44.040 --> 0:36:45.600
<v Speaker 1>the United States is the one who has to call,

0:36:45.680 --> 0:36:47.799
<v Speaker 1>and he's not going to call. He's already made it clear.

0:36:47.800 --> 0:36:51.759
<v Speaker 1>There are four, as they say reality TV jargon finalists.

0:36:52.400 --> 0:36:54.200
<v Speaker 1>I think this campaign this by the way, this selection

0:36:54.239 --> 0:36:57.200
<v Speaker 1>process been too public. It's demeaning to the people who

0:36:57.239 --> 0:36:59.919
<v Speaker 1>won't make it. We've never had this before in either

0:37:00.000 --> 0:37:02.759
<v Speaker 1>Republican or Democratic administrations. Not the right thing. Thank you

0:37:02.800 --> 0:37:05.279
<v Speaker 1>for visiting Nick Burns with a splasher investor de Greece

0:37:05.400 --> 0:37:11.160
<v Speaker 1>one other services to America's international relations worldwide. This is Bloomberg.

0:37:22.080 --> 0:37:24.320
<v Speaker 1>This is a great honor for David Gura and myself.

0:37:24.719 --> 0:37:28.960
<v Speaker 1>We spoke with Kenneth Rogoff earlier on his economics and

0:37:29.040 --> 0:37:31.560
<v Speaker 1>had what a privilege to speak to ken Rogoff about

0:37:31.640 --> 0:37:36.400
<v Speaker 1>chess and his thoughts on the recent tournament. He is

0:37:36.480 --> 0:37:41.120
<v Speaker 1>the US chess champion. Fabiana Karna who joins us. All

0:37:41.200 --> 0:37:46.880
<v Speaker 1>right now, Fabiana, good morning, Well, it's wonderful to have

0:37:46.960 --> 0:37:50.040
<v Speaker 1>you on. I want to go to David Gura's Park Slope, Brooklyn.

0:37:50.719 --> 0:37:54.000
<v Speaker 1>You moved from Miami to Park Slope, Brooklyn years ago

0:37:54.600 --> 0:37:57.600
<v Speaker 1>and you had the privilege of a giant of chess.

0:37:58.160 --> 0:38:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Is your first coach at age five? Ever six, Bruce Pandelfini.

0:38:02.640 --> 0:38:05.960
<v Speaker 1>All of us have read Bruce Pandelfinie What it was?

0:38:06.120 --> 0:38:08.839
<v Speaker 1>What was it like as a child to work with

0:38:08.880 --> 0:38:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Bruce Pandelfini? Well, just growing up in the chest in

0:38:14.200 --> 0:38:16.520
<v Speaker 1>New York and working with Bruce was was great because

0:38:16.520 --> 0:38:19.120
<v Speaker 1>there's so much history behind it. He's worked with a

0:38:19.120 --> 0:38:23.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of fantastic players. He commented on the UH on

0:38:23.640 --> 0:38:28.120
<v Speaker 1>the match between Bobby Fisher and Borspasky when when he

0:38:28.160 --> 0:38:31.120
<v Speaker 1>was just you know, coming onto the scene. Um. And

0:38:31.200 --> 0:38:34.279
<v Speaker 1>he has a very patient style, which is great for

0:38:34.400 --> 0:38:36.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, a young up and coming chess player. He

0:38:36.800 --> 0:38:39.759
<v Speaker 1>kind of nurtures talent, which which helped me a lot.

0:38:39.880 --> 0:38:43.520
<v Speaker 1>And he's never harsh. I guess you've you've probably seen

0:38:43.560 --> 0:38:47.359
<v Speaker 1>the the movie Searching for Bobby Fisher were um, where

0:38:47.360 --> 0:38:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Bruce is portrayed by Ben Kingsley, And he's very different

0:38:51.640 --> 0:38:54.080
<v Speaker 1>from how he was portrayed in that movie, although they

0:38:54.120 --> 0:38:57.239
<v Speaker 1>did do a great job as well. Yeah, my daughter

0:38:57.280 --> 0:38:59.640
<v Speaker 1>goes to school at the school where you had your

0:38:59.640 --> 0:39:01.719
<v Speaker 1>first asked lessons, and I marvel at how young. The

0:39:02.000 --> 0:39:04.120
<v Speaker 1>kids are there playing chess when I go to to

0:39:04.200 --> 0:39:06.640
<v Speaker 1>pick her up. There's a sense here that there there

0:39:06.719 --> 0:39:09.040
<v Speaker 1>is a gift for chess. There are chess prodigies, but

0:39:09.080 --> 0:39:11.720
<v Speaker 1>this is hard work, and there there's a lot of practice,

0:39:11.760 --> 0:39:13.919
<v Speaker 1>a lot of work that goes into becoming a great

0:39:13.960 --> 0:39:16.680
<v Speaker 1>chess player. Ken Rogoff told us that this morning, talk

0:39:16.719 --> 0:39:18.960
<v Speaker 1>a bit about how you made that jump from somebody

0:39:19.080 --> 0:39:21.439
<v Speaker 1>who was interested in the game indeed good at the game,

0:39:21.840 --> 0:39:24.640
<v Speaker 1>to one of the greatest in the world. I think

0:39:24.640 --> 0:39:26.960
<v Speaker 1>in the United States you have an enormous amount of

0:39:27.040 --> 0:39:29.600
<v Speaker 1>very talented young players starting chest at you know, age

0:39:29.680 --> 0:39:32.160
<v Speaker 1>five six. Um. I started when I was five years old,

0:39:32.200 --> 0:39:34.960
<v Speaker 1>and there was a large group of kids who were

0:39:35.000 --> 0:39:39.120
<v Speaker 1>as talented as me, or more talented, and most of

0:39:39.160 --> 0:39:43.680
<v Speaker 1>them became grandmasters, top players. But um, but I didn't

0:39:43.680 --> 0:39:47.839
<v Speaker 1>stick with it, you know, moved into academics and and

0:39:48.360 --> 0:39:52.640
<v Speaker 1>chose other paths. Well. I basically probably chess professionally from

0:39:52.640 --> 0:39:57.120
<v Speaker 1>the like the age of fourteen, and UM, chess has

0:39:57.320 --> 0:40:00.080
<v Speaker 1>always been like the main focus for me. So I

0:40:00.120 --> 0:40:04.080
<v Speaker 1>think if you take a young player with some talent

0:40:04.160 --> 0:40:07.160
<v Speaker 1>and put them in a strict chess environment of playing

0:40:07.160 --> 0:40:09.200
<v Speaker 1>and studying chess constantly, then there's a good chance that

0:40:09.239 --> 0:40:13.120
<v Speaker 1>they will you reach the top of chess. The chess playing.

0:40:13.160 --> 0:40:15.680
<v Speaker 1>The chess following world has been focused on Lower Manhattan

0:40:15.719 --> 0:40:18.400
<v Speaker 1>here over these last few weeks, Magnus Carlson winning the

0:40:18.400 --> 0:40:21.480
<v Speaker 1>World Chess A Championship, there was a v I P room.

0:40:21.520 --> 0:40:23.960
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of people watching these games, these matches, indeed,

0:40:24.000 --> 0:40:27.359
<v Speaker 1>from from from around around the world. You've played him before,

0:40:27.400 --> 0:40:29.359
<v Speaker 1>tell us a bit about his style, what he's like

0:40:29.400 --> 0:40:33.600
<v Speaker 1>as a player. Well, Magnus is a player who when

0:40:33.640 --> 0:40:37.200
<v Speaker 1>he gets a better position, even a position where the

0:40:37.200 --> 0:40:42.240
<v Speaker 1>advantage is maybe not visible to most people or extremely minuscule,

0:40:42.320 --> 0:40:45.320
<v Speaker 1>he he tries to nurture that advantage and turn it slowly,

0:40:45.360 --> 0:40:48.880
<v Speaker 1>turn it into something more, something which is more tangible

0:40:48.920 --> 0:40:52.200
<v Speaker 1>and um enough for a win. And he does that

0:40:52.280 --> 0:40:54.920
<v Speaker 1>over the course of many hours. Um he might play,

0:40:55.080 --> 0:40:59.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, a seven hour game trying to turn um

0:40:59.200 --> 0:41:02.080
<v Speaker 1>what looks like nothing thing into into something and eventually

0:41:02.080 --> 0:41:05.000
<v Speaker 1>win the game. Like that, so it is very dangerous

0:41:05.040 --> 0:41:07.920
<v Speaker 1>too to get a bad position against him, well against

0:41:07.920 --> 0:41:11.200
<v Speaker 1>other players in the world. Um, even though obviously you

0:41:11.200 --> 0:41:12.640
<v Speaker 1>don't want to get a bad position, you might have

0:41:12.680 --> 0:41:16.440
<v Speaker 1>more hopes of of trying to salvage the game. Uh

0:41:16.480 --> 0:41:20.640
<v Speaker 1>So against Mangnus, it's possible, it's possible to win. And

0:41:20.680 --> 0:41:22.680
<v Speaker 1>he I mean even he lost a game in this

0:41:22.960 --> 0:41:27.040
<v Speaker 1>last World Championship match. Um so I have I have

0:41:27.120 --> 0:41:29.920
<v Speaker 1>beaten him several times. But it really requires that you

0:41:30.000 --> 0:41:33.239
<v Speaker 1>go for the throat, that you don't be afraid of him,

0:41:33.360 --> 0:41:35.640
<v Speaker 1>um and that you you know, you don't try to

0:41:35.760 --> 0:41:38.480
<v Speaker 1>let's they go into a defensive mode when he might

0:41:38.840 --> 0:41:41.319
<v Speaker 1>slowly strangle you and you you try to get from

0:41:41.480 --> 0:41:44.959
<v Speaker 1>from move on. We are honored, Fabiana, thank you so much.

0:41:44.960 --> 0:41:47.520
<v Speaker 1>He is the chess champion of the United States. And

0:41:47.520 --> 0:41:49.799
<v Speaker 1>of course I urge you to look at all the

0:41:49.840 --> 0:41:51.840
<v Speaker 1>different coverage of what we saw. What a great privilege

0:41:51.880 --> 0:41:55.480
<v Speaker 1>of Keneral and Fabian a car on on Blueberk surveillance

0:41:55.480 --> 0:41:58.200
<v Speaker 1>in the same day. Just that's what. That's what the

0:41:58.280 --> 0:42:01.759
<v Speaker 1>youngest is, David. When we play chess at home, she goes,

0:42:03.200 --> 0:42:09.000
<v Speaker 1>she is she's tough, she's she's known to move all

0:42:09.040 --> 0:42:10.759
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden, you you know, you look away at

0:42:10.800 --> 0:42:13.520
<v Speaker 1>the red Sox or whatever on TV and one of

0:42:13.520 --> 0:42:19.480
<v Speaker 1>your bishops is gone ahead. She's taking no she's taking

0:42:19.560 --> 0:42:23.400
<v Speaker 1>pieces off the board. Struck by what Fratianna said there

0:42:23.400 --> 0:42:25.399
<v Speaker 1>and Ken Rogoff as well, just about how long these

0:42:25.400 --> 0:42:28.040
<v Speaker 1>matches can be, six or seven hours in the physical

0:42:28.520 --> 0:42:31.839
<v Speaker 1>rigor the strength required to play a match. That pretty's great.

0:42:31.920 --> 0:42:33.439
<v Speaker 1>This is what this is why we do the show.

0:42:33.480 --> 0:42:37.680
<v Speaker 1>The surprises folks of dealing with this and dealing with

0:42:38.040 --> 0:42:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Bob Moon as well. You know chess champion of surveillance

0:42:42.840 --> 0:42:44.880
<v Speaker 1>as well. He does that when he's not doing the

0:42:44.920 --> 0:42:48.400
<v Speaker 1>STEM report, he's he's playing chess out with Michael Barr.

0:42:55.520 --> 0:42:59.759
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Subscribe and

0:43:00.000 --> 0:43:05.000
<v Speaker 1>listen to interviews on iTunes, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast platform

0:43:05.160 --> 0:43:08.680
<v Speaker 1>you prefer. I'm out on Twitter at Tom Keene. David

0:43:08.719 --> 0:43:12.399
<v Speaker 1>Gura is at David Gura. Before the podcast, you can

0:43:12.520 --> 0:43:28.960
<v Speaker 1>always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio. Who you put

0:43:29.000 --> 0:43:32.719
<v Speaker 1>your trust in? Matters? Investors have put their trust in

0:43:32.880 --> 0:43:37.160
<v Speaker 1>independent registered investment advisors to the tune of four trillion dollars.

0:43:37.560 --> 0:43:44.239
<v Speaker 1>Why learn more and find your independent advisor dot com