WEBVTT - Tech News: Flying Taxis and Metaverses in South Korea

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tex Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:12.119 --> 0:00:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host

0:00:15.000 --> 0:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>job in Strickland. I'm an executive producer with iHeart Radio

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 1>and a love all things tech, and let me cover

0:00:20.640 --> 0:00:22.799
<v Speaker 1>a couple of things before we get to the news today.

0:00:22.920 --> 0:00:25.400
<v Speaker 1>One of those is that I might sound a little different.

0:00:25.480 --> 0:00:29.440
<v Speaker 1>That's because super producer Tari sent me a brand new

0:00:29.520 --> 0:00:33.519
<v Speaker 1>microphone that is a serious upgrade from the one I

0:00:33.600 --> 0:00:35.960
<v Speaker 1>had been using, So if it sounds a little different,

0:00:36.479 --> 0:00:40.400
<v Speaker 1>that's why. Uh. Second, I will be on vacation next week,

0:00:40.800 --> 0:00:45.320
<v Speaker 1>but I will be running some reruns about General Electric

0:00:45.640 --> 0:00:48.400
<v Speaker 1>during the time I'm gone. Since we now know that

0:00:48.560 --> 0:00:51.000
<v Speaker 1>g E is going to split up into three companies

0:00:51.040 --> 0:00:53.600
<v Speaker 1>in the near future, I thought it would be a

0:00:53.640 --> 0:00:56.200
<v Speaker 1>good thing to go back over the history of that company.

0:00:56.240 --> 0:00:59.319
<v Speaker 1>So those will be publishing next week as well as

0:00:59.320 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 1>well as a Smart Talks with IBM episode which should

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:05.800
<v Speaker 1>come out Thursday, and then I'll be back for part

0:01:05.800 --> 0:01:08.399
<v Speaker 1>of the following week and then we go into US Thanksgiving.

0:01:08.720 --> 0:01:12.319
<v Speaker 1>But that's all of the way. Now let's cover the

0:01:12.360 --> 0:01:18.039
<v Speaker 1>tech news for Thursday, November eleven one. So I'm going

0:01:18.080 --> 0:01:21.160
<v Speaker 1>to start off this News episode with a correction and

0:01:21.280 --> 0:01:24.640
<v Speaker 1>an explanation about the story that I mentioned earlier this week.

0:01:25.000 --> 0:01:27.679
<v Speaker 1>So on Tuesday, I talked about how Elon Musk had

0:01:27.720 --> 0:01:30.720
<v Speaker 1>set up a Twitter poll about whether or not he

0:01:30.760 --> 0:01:33.160
<v Speaker 1>should sell off ten percent of the stock he was

0:01:33.200 --> 0:01:36.640
<v Speaker 1>holding in Tesla, and he framed it as a response

0:01:36.680 --> 0:01:41.759
<v Speaker 1>to US lawmakers who said that, you know, stocks are

0:01:41.880 --> 0:01:44.600
<v Speaker 1>unrealized gains that wouldn't be taxed, and that this was

0:01:44.640 --> 0:01:48.559
<v Speaker 1>a way that the ultra rich billionaires like Elon Musk

0:01:49.200 --> 0:01:51.720
<v Speaker 1>use in order so that they don't have to pay

0:01:51.800 --> 0:01:55.440
<v Speaker 1>taxes on that. So essentially he was saying the US says,

0:01:55.440 --> 0:01:57.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to avoid paying taxes, should I sell ten

0:01:58.000 --> 0:02:02.240
<v Speaker 1>percent of my stock? Because then you see, by selling

0:02:02.280 --> 0:02:03.920
<v Speaker 1>the stock, he would have to pay taxes on the

0:02:03.920 --> 0:02:06.880
<v Speaker 1>money he earned from that sale. Now, in the story,

0:02:06.960 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 1>I believe I mentioned that it would be worth around

0:02:09.720 --> 0:02:15.400
<v Speaker 1>twenty one billion dollars. Business Insider reports that Musk exercise

0:02:15.560 --> 0:02:18.760
<v Speaker 1>two point one five million stock options for six dollars

0:02:19.320 --> 0:02:22.640
<v Speaker 1>cents a share each. That means he actually purchased the

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:26.120
<v Speaker 1>stock at that price that set him back thirteen point

0:02:26.200 --> 0:02:29.000
<v Speaker 1>four billion bucks. Then he sold off around four and

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:31.919
<v Speaker 1>a half million shares for a total of around five

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:36.040
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars, And you might say, hey, five billion dollars

0:02:36.639 --> 0:02:40.520
<v Speaker 1>is significantly less than twenty one billion. But then Musk

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:43.200
<v Speaker 1>sold off less than his ten percent of holdings he

0:02:43.240 --> 0:02:46.240
<v Speaker 1>had mentioned in Twitter. In fact, it was less than

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:51.919
<v Speaker 1>three percent that he sold off, So that is where

0:02:51.960 --> 0:02:54.359
<v Speaker 1>part of that discrepancy comes in. But the big thing

0:02:54.400 --> 0:02:57.280
<v Speaker 1>that Business Insider reported was that Musk had been planning

0:02:57.360 --> 0:03:00.520
<v Speaker 1>to sell off that stock for months and that the

0:03:00.560 --> 0:03:03.840
<v Speaker 1>poll was really more of a stunt than anything else.

0:03:04.160 --> 0:03:06.520
<v Speaker 1>And honestly, if I had used a little bit of

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:10.280
<v Speaker 1>critical thinking, if I had taken my own advice, I

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:13.399
<v Speaker 1>might have come to a similar conclusion. But I fell

0:03:13.480 --> 0:03:16.080
<v Speaker 1>short on that, which just goes to show that critical

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:20.400
<v Speaker 1>thinking is an active skill that you have to work at. Anyway.

0:03:20.480 --> 0:03:24.640
<v Speaker 1>According to Business Insider, regulatory filings showed that Musk always

0:03:24.720 --> 0:03:28.240
<v Speaker 1>planned on this course of action because those stock options

0:03:28.240 --> 0:03:31.640
<v Speaker 1>that he exercised were set to expire next year and

0:03:31.639 --> 0:03:34.680
<v Speaker 1>he had to act before they actually did expire. On

0:03:34.760 --> 0:03:37.880
<v Speaker 1>top of that, he's going to face a pretty big

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:40.960
<v Speaker 1>tax bill coming up, like a ten billion dollar one,

0:03:41.360 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 1>so liquidation was kind of a necessity. So might did

0:03:44.920 --> 0:03:47.760
<v Speaker 1>he post the Twitter poll. If all this was already

0:03:47.800 --> 0:03:51.800
<v Speaker 1>planned well, Speculation says that Musk might have done this

0:03:51.840 --> 0:03:54.760
<v Speaker 1>in order to soften the news that the CEO of

0:03:54.760 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 1>a company was selling off a large block of stocks

0:03:57.800 --> 0:04:00.800
<v Speaker 1>in that company, because that's a message that could have

0:04:00.880 --> 0:04:04.920
<v Speaker 1>a dramatic impact on the company's stock price. So instead

0:04:04.960 --> 0:04:08.560
<v Speaker 1>of the media saying Musk suddenly dumps millions of shares

0:04:08.560 --> 0:04:12.720
<v Speaker 1>of Tesla, the media says, Musk asks Twitter if he

0:04:12.760 --> 0:04:17.600
<v Speaker 1>should sell stock. So the price of Tesla stock still

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:22.200
<v Speaker 1>took a hit, but by shifting accountability to Twitter rather

0:04:22.240 --> 0:04:26.359
<v Speaker 1>than to himself, Musk can avoid the appearance that the

0:04:26.480 --> 0:04:30.760
<v Speaker 1>CEO of a company has lost confidence in their own company,

0:04:30.800 --> 0:04:34.840
<v Speaker 1>because that really that doesn't reflect reality anyway. So yeah,

0:04:35.000 --> 0:04:37.960
<v Speaker 1>I was one of those stooges who pushed that narrative forward.

0:04:38.920 --> 0:04:41.359
<v Speaker 1>Dang it critical thinking, why are you got to be

0:04:41.440 --> 0:04:46.120
<v Speaker 1>so hard? I also mentioned on Tuesday that hackers accessed

0:04:46.279 --> 0:04:50.919
<v Speaker 1>user information on the broker company robin Hood's internal systems,

0:04:51.560 --> 0:04:55.640
<v Speaker 1>robin Hood allowing people to create accounts and then you know,

0:04:55.760 --> 0:04:59.719
<v Speaker 1>get involved in in stock market trades and stuff. Initially,

0:04:59.760 --> 0:05:03.200
<v Speaker 1>it's sounded as though the information that hackers accessed was

0:05:03.279 --> 0:05:07.280
<v Speaker 1>limited to stuff like email addresses for the vast majority

0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 1>of those affected, UH, the names and physical addresses, and

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:16.039
<v Speaker 1>some similar information for a smaller number. So the vast

0:05:16.600 --> 0:05:19.839
<v Speaker 1>the vast majority of users who were affected, it was

0:05:19.960 --> 0:05:25.160
<v Speaker 1>supposedly just their email address. Now Motherboard has released screenshots

0:05:25.160 --> 0:05:28.560
<v Speaker 1>showing the internal tools that the hackers used to get

0:05:28.560 --> 0:05:31.680
<v Speaker 1>a closer look of at least a few accounts, maybe

0:05:31.720 --> 0:05:34.560
<v Speaker 1>as few as ten UH, and they had access to

0:05:34.600 --> 0:05:39.080
<v Speaker 1>stuff like bank transfer histories, which devices were authorized to

0:05:39.160 --> 0:05:44.200
<v Speaker 1>access the account customers, support conversations with certain users, and

0:05:44.279 --> 0:05:46.800
<v Speaker 1>that kind of thing. There's no word on whether the

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:49.840
<v Speaker 1>hackers actually used the tools to make changes to the accounts.

0:05:49.920 --> 0:05:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Robin Hood says that did not happen, but it does

0:05:53.240 --> 0:05:55.240
<v Speaker 1>look like they would have at least been able to

0:05:55.640 --> 0:05:58.679
<v Speaker 1>if they had wanted to. Also, no word on whether

0:05:58.720 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Speaker 1>the hackers purposefully targeted the small number of accounts that

0:06:02.440 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 1>received a more extensive probing or whether that was just

0:06:05.839 --> 0:06:10.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, random. In YouTube News, the platform is saying

0:06:10.320 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 1>goodbye to a feature that's been around for years, and

0:06:13.279 --> 0:06:18.039
<v Speaker 1>that is of the public dislike tally. The dislike button

0:06:18.120 --> 0:06:21.760
<v Speaker 1>is sticking around, but the tally is going away. Anyone

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:25.080
<v Speaker 1>familiar with YouTube knows that the like and dislike options

0:06:25.120 --> 0:06:27.599
<v Speaker 1>below a video or there. I mean, you often have

0:06:27.720 --> 0:06:30.680
<v Speaker 1>creators saying, if you enjoyed this video, hit that little

0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:35.320
<v Speaker 1>like button. Like that's pretty common, and the assumption goes

0:06:35.360 --> 0:06:39.320
<v Speaker 1>that the likes factor into YouTube's recommendation algorithm and thus

0:06:39.360 --> 0:06:42.680
<v Speaker 1>makes it more likely that the video will one get

0:06:42.680 --> 0:06:46.160
<v Speaker 1>greater exposure to other users, and two that if you

0:06:46.200 --> 0:06:49.000
<v Speaker 1>like a video, YouTube is going to probably serve you

0:06:49.080 --> 0:06:53.320
<v Speaker 1>up stuff that's similar. Now, I say assumption because YouTube

0:06:53.320 --> 0:06:56.600
<v Speaker 1>is pretty darn quiet about how it's recommendation engine actually works,

0:06:57.000 --> 0:07:00.200
<v Speaker 1>and it's frequently tweaking the system. And for a just

0:07:00.600 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 1>you could actually see the tally of likes and dislikes

0:07:04.680 --> 0:07:07.840
<v Speaker 1>below the video. But now YouTube is going to hide

0:07:08.080 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 1>the number of dislikes that a video actually receives. The

0:07:11.480 --> 0:07:13.920
<v Speaker 1>dislike button is still going to be there, but you

0:07:13.960 --> 0:07:17.000
<v Speaker 1>won't see how many times folks have clicked on this. Uh,

0:07:17.040 --> 0:07:19.160
<v Speaker 1>this YouTube says is meant to prevent a kind of

0:07:19.200 --> 0:07:23.080
<v Speaker 1>snowball effect that sometimes happens where folks will dislike a

0:07:23.200 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 1>video and the number will go up, and then more

0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:28.240
<v Speaker 1>people will pile on and it becomes kind of an

0:07:28.240 --> 0:07:31.200
<v Speaker 1>avalanche of dislikes, and some folks join in on that

0:07:31.240 --> 0:07:33.560
<v Speaker 1>activity even if they've never watched the video in the

0:07:33.600 --> 0:07:36.720
<v Speaker 1>first place. I made this argument on Twitter that for

0:07:36.760 --> 0:07:40.520
<v Speaker 1>a very long time, the Justin Bieber music video for

0:07:40.640 --> 0:07:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Baby was the most disliked video on YouTube, and I

0:07:45.040 --> 0:07:48.880
<v Speaker 1>am certain that a large number of people who hit

0:07:49.040 --> 0:07:52.240
<v Speaker 1>dislike on that video had never bothered to watch it.

0:07:52.280 --> 0:07:54.080
<v Speaker 1>They just kind of thought it was funny to pile

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:56.640
<v Speaker 1>on and dislike the video. I'm not saying the video

0:07:56.680 --> 0:07:58.920
<v Speaker 1>is good, by the way, I'm just saying that I

0:07:59.120 --> 0:08:03.480
<v Speaker 1>am convinced that it earned way more dislikes than people

0:08:03.520 --> 0:08:08.320
<v Speaker 1>actually watched in that in that sense, So the ideas

0:08:08.360 --> 0:08:12.240
<v Speaker 1>this will help prevent those kind of instance and you know,

0:08:12.320 --> 0:08:16.840
<v Speaker 1>hopefully reduce the amount of abuse people have heaped onto

0:08:16.880 --> 0:08:21.520
<v Speaker 1>creators using the dislike button. Now, the video creators will

0:08:21.520 --> 0:08:24.520
<v Speaker 1>still be able to see dislike counts through their analytics,

0:08:24.960 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 1>and the dislikes should help YouTube continue to tune recommendations

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:31.920
<v Speaker 1>more to the individual users so that you're not flooded

0:08:31.960 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 1>with more videos that you don't like. And I actually

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 1>do like that because I I recently, you know, this

0:08:37.240 --> 0:08:40.000
<v Speaker 1>is a personal story, I watched some videos about camping.

0:08:40.600 --> 0:08:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Not that I think I'm gonna go camping anytime soon,

0:08:43.000 --> 0:08:45.160
<v Speaker 1>but for some reason I got on this camping kick,

0:08:45.720 --> 0:08:50.800
<v Speaker 1>and now YouTube occasionally suggests hunting videos to me. And

0:08:50.840 --> 0:08:54.080
<v Speaker 1>I've got nothing against hunting, at least as long as

0:08:54.120 --> 0:08:57.120
<v Speaker 1>it's not trophy hunting. I think trophy hunting is cruel

0:08:57.200 --> 0:09:02.760
<v Speaker 1>and horrifying and awful and unnecessary. But whether it's you know,

0:09:02.920 --> 0:09:06.200
<v Speaker 1>subsistence hunting or not, I don't want to watch videos

0:09:06.200 --> 0:09:09.960
<v Speaker 1>about it. That's not my bag. So knowing the dislike

0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:13.280
<v Speaker 1>feature is really more so that viewers can shape their

0:09:13.320 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 1>recommendations and less about mob mentality is cool. Whether or

0:09:17.520 --> 0:09:20.360
<v Speaker 1>not it works remains to be seen. I'm sure there

0:09:20.360 --> 0:09:24.280
<v Speaker 1>will still be campaigns against certain videos or creators that

0:09:24.320 --> 0:09:27.679
<v Speaker 1>will commence tons of folks to dislike specific videos, even

0:09:27.760 --> 0:09:30.560
<v Speaker 1>if they've never watched the video. But maybe it won't

0:09:30.600 --> 0:09:32.520
<v Speaker 1>be as bad as it was before because you won't

0:09:32.559 --> 0:09:35.080
<v Speaker 1>see how effective the attack is. There will be no

0:09:35.200 --> 0:09:39.959
<v Speaker 1>number associated with dislikes. Also, let's take a moment to

0:09:40.200 --> 0:09:44.160
<v Speaker 1>mourn the passing of an amazing internet meme joke, and

0:09:44.240 --> 0:09:47.680
<v Speaker 1>that is of the neutral Response video, which is a

0:09:47.720 --> 0:09:51.120
<v Speaker 1>clip from the show Futurama and in the clip, there's

0:09:51.160 --> 0:09:54.440
<v Speaker 1>an alien from this planet that's just filled with people

0:09:54.480 --> 0:09:58.360
<v Speaker 1>who have neutral tendencies, and the alien says, I have

0:09:58.440 --> 0:10:01.760
<v Speaker 1>no strong feelings one way or the other. And the

0:10:01.840 --> 0:10:05.240
<v Speaker 1>joke was that the number of likes and dislikes for

0:10:05.360 --> 0:10:08.920
<v Speaker 1>that video have balanced out, like whenever anyone would like

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:10.959
<v Speaker 1>the video, someone else would come along and dislike it

0:10:11.000 --> 0:10:13.960
<v Speaker 1>in order to keep them even so, the current tally

0:10:14.400 --> 0:10:18.720
<v Speaker 1>is at five fifty four thousand each more or less. Well,

0:10:18.800 --> 0:10:24.440
<v Speaker 1>once dislikes disappear, that collective joke will be over. So

0:10:24.640 --> 0:10:28.280
<v Speaker 1>that's a little sad. It seems like the concept of

0:10:28.280 --> 0:10:30.680
<v Speaker 1>the metaverse is gonna be a theme for a while.

0:10:31.080 --> 0:10:32.959
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a little bit odd because the concept

0:10:32.960 --> 0:10:36.680
<v Speaker 1>itself isn't really that new, and arguably you could even

0:10:36.720 --> 0:10:39.839
<v Speaker 1>call stuff like Second Life a type of metaverse, and

0:10:40.080 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 1>that's been around for ages. Anyway. The reason I even

0:10:42.960 --> 0:10:46.360
<v Speaker 1>mentioned it is that the Soul Metropolitan Government, as in

0:10:46.559 --> 0:10:49.959
<v Speaker 1>Soul Korea, has announced it will create its own metaverse

0:10:50.000 --> 0:10:53.760
<v Speaker 1>with Blackjack and no way, I'm still thinking about Futurama quotes.

0:10:53.840 --> 0:10:56.280
<v Speaker 1>No uh, I mean it's going to create a metaverse

0:10:56.360 --> 0:11:00.280
<v Speaker 1>meant to allow quote citizens to conveniently meet with Avatar

0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:04.200
<v Speaker 1>officials to deal with civil complaints and consultations end quote.

0:11:04.520 --> 0:11:07.880
<v Speaker 1>So essentially, this would replace the need to physically travel

0:11:07.920 --> 0:11:11.480
<v Speaker 1>to a municipal office for an in person appointment, which

0:11:11.520 --> 0:11:13.320
<v Speaker 1>is not a bad thing considering it, you know, there's

0:11:13.360 --> 0:11:16.720
<v Speaker 1>a pandemic going at all. It's interesting that they're going

0:11:16.840 --> 0:11:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the avatar route. To me, I'm not sure how that

0:11:20.679 --> 0:11:25.360
<v Speaker 1>is more beneficial oversay a video conference called directly with

0:11:25.400 --> 0:11:27.599
<v Speaker 1>whomever it is you need to meet, Like, how is

0:11:27.640 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 1>it better than that? But the city government is willing

0:11:31.080 --> 0:11:34.400
<v Speaker 1>to invest around three billion dollars into the project, which

0:11:34.440 --> 0:11:36.760
<v Speaker 1>is part of a larger city plan that aims to

0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:41.160
<v Speaker 1>transform Soul by twenty and I guess one benefit is

0:11:41.400 --> 0:11:44.839
<v Speaker 1>the metaverse proposal would also include the ability to virtually

0:11:44.960 --> 0:11:49.520
<v Speaker 1>attend mass events like imagine a giant concert that kind

0:11:49.559 --> 0:11:52.080
<v Speaker 1>of thing. You could virtually be there and you would

0:11:52.080 --> 0:11:56.600
<v Speaker 1>be surrounded by other virtual people watching a virtual concert,

0:11:57.040 --> 0:11:58.920
<v Speaker 1>so you could still be part of a group experience

0:11:58.920 --> 0:12:01.840
<v Speaker 1>without actually having to leave house. Now, again, it's hard

0:12:01.840 --> 0:12:05.160
<v Speaker 1>for me to see this as being better than just say,

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:09.040
<v Speaker 1>watching a live stream video of the concert. Uh. I

0:12:09.080 --> 0:12:12.360
<v Speaker 1>know that virtual reality can be really immersive. I've experienced

0:12:12.360 --> 0:12:15.480
<v Speaker 1>that myself. I get that, and probably there is some

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:18.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of psychological boost compared to just watching a live

0:12:18.320 --> 0:12:21.240
<v Speaker 1>stream video on a classic screen. But I think part

0:12:21.240 --> 0:12:23.320
<v Speaker 1>of me would still be thinking to myself, it's weird

0:12:23.360 --> 0:12:25.160
<v Speaker 1>that I have to put on all this VR gear

0:12:25.280 --> 0:12:29.240
<v Speaker 1>just to witness this. You know. Then again, I've also

0:12:29.480 --> 0:12:32.720
<v Speaker 1>always been a little anxious in crowds. That has actually

0:12:32.760 --> 0:12:37.080
<v Speaker 1>gotten way worse since the pandemic. So maybe it's just

0:12:37.200 --> 0:12:40.240
<v Speaker 1>that this particular thing is not for me anyway. There's

0:12:40.280 --> 0:12:42.679
<v Speaker 1>some aspects to VR metaverse stuff that I can totally

0:12:42.679 --> 0:12:46.720
<v Speaker 1>get behind, like the idea of improved accessibility for folks

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:50.720
<v Speaker 1>who otherwise would have trouble attending physical events. I think

0:12:50.800 --> 0:12:54.000
<v Speaker 1>that's great to give people who otherwise couldn't have that

0:12:54.120 --> 0:12:57.839
<v Speaker 1>chance to do it. That is fantastic. However, you also

0:12:58.000 --> 0:13:02.400
<v Speaker 1>have to acknowledge this has improved accessibility assuming you're able

0:13:02.440 --> 0:13:04.920
<v Speaker 1>to afford the hardware you need in order to run

0:13:05.000 --> 0:13:10.200
<v Speaker 1>VR properly. To me, that's still an accessibility barrier. We

0:13:10.280 --> 0:13:12.200
<v Speaker 1>have a few more stories to cover, but before we

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:21.640
<v Speaker 1>get to that, let's take a quick break. Before the break,

0:13:21.679 --> 0:13:24.640
<v Speaker 1>I talked a little bit about accessibility. Sticking with that

0:13:25.120 --> 0:13:28.200
<v Speaker 1>that theme, of the United States government has sued the

0:13:28.320 --> 0:13:32.080
<v Speaker 1>ride hailing company Uber, saying that the company has failed

0:13:32.120 --> 0:13:37.000
<v Speaker 1>to ensure equitable fairs for passengers with disabilities. So Uber

0:13:37.080 --> 0:13:42.280
<v Speaker 1>has this weight time fee, and it's the idea is

0:13:42.320 --> 0:13:45.520
<v Speaker 1>that the weight time fee charges a passenger if they

0:13:46.760 --> 0:13:49.680
<v Speaker 1>force a driver to wait a couple of minutes once

0:13:49.720 --> 0:13:52.960
<v Speaker 1>they arrive at a destination UH to pick someone up. So,

0:13:53.280 --> 0:13:55.600
<v Speaker 1>in other words, if I call an Uber and the

0:13:55.679 --> 0:13:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Uber pulls up outside my house, but I'm still inside

0:13:58.720 --> 0:14:01.840
<v Speaker 1>puttering around, trying to get stuff done, putting on shoes,

0:14:02.040 --> 0:14:04.760
<v Speaker 1>whatever it may be, and I'm making the driver weight,

0:14:05.200 --> 0:14:07.880
<v Speaker 1>then Uber charges me for the fact that I have

0:14:08.400 --> 0:14:13.040
<v Speaker 1>inconvenience the driver, I have taken time away from the driver.

0:14:13.200 --> 0:14:16.079
<v Speaker 1>That's time that they could potentially be earning on another fair.

0:14:16.440 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 1>That's the idea behind the policy. Unfortunately, this policy would

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:25.440
<v Speaker 1>also adversely affect people with disabilities who need more time

0:14:25.480 --> 0:14:28.360
<v Speaker 1>to get into a vehicle. If they are actually taking

0:14:28.400 --> 0:14:32.560
<v Speaker 1>more time to get into the vehicle and the driver

0:14:32.720 --> 0:14:35.200
<v Speaker 1>is sitting there for a few minutes, this policy would

0:14:35.280 --> 0:14:40.120
<v Speaker 1>pop into effect and the passengers would be essentially monetarily

0:14:40.200 --> 0:14:42.400
<v Speaker 1>penalized for the fact that they can't get into a

0:14:42.440 --> 0:14:46.600
<v Speaker 1>car very fast, and that's just discrimination as defined by

0:14:46.640 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 1>the Americans with Disabilities Act. So that's why the United

0:14:49.760 --> 0:14:53.080
<v Speaker 1>States government has sued Uber. Uber, by the way, has

0:14:53.400 --> 0:14:57.400
<v Speaker 1>introduced a feature in its app that will waive weight

0:14:57.480 --> 0:15:02.880
<v Speaker 1>time fees for passengers who are certified as being disabled.

0:15:02.920 --> 0:15:07.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure what that certification process actually is. I

0:15:07.080 --> 0:15:10.080
<v Speaker 1>don't know how they determine that, but the Department of

0:15:10.120 --> 0:15:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Justice is seeking damages from Uber to compensate passengers who

0:15:14.840 --> 0:15:17.960
<v Speaker 1>had been affected by this policy, as well as just

0:15:18.040 --> 0:15:22.520
<v Speaker 1>mandating that that policy cannot apply to people with disabilities

0:15:22.560 --> 0:15:26.880
<v Speaker 1>because otherwise it does discriminate and the Americans with disabilities

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:32.400
<v Speaker 1>that makes that illegal. So interesting story. Sony has recently

0:15:32.440 --> 0:15:35.720
<v Speaker 1>revealed that, due to ongoing supply chain issues, the company

0:15:35.760 --> 0:15:39.720
<v Speaker 1>expects to produce fewer PlayStation five consoles than they had

0:15:39.760 --> 0:15:43.320
<v Speaker 1>originally planned, by the tune of one million units. Now.

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Their fiscal year ends in March or at the beginning

0:15:46.800 --> 0:15:48.960
<v Speaker 1>of March, I believe, and so I think the original

0:15:49.000 --> 0:15:51.560
<v Speaker 1>plan was to produce sixteen million units. It's going to

0:15:51.640 --> 0:15:54.280
<v Speaker 1>be closer to fifteen million, and the sales goal was

0:15:54.320 --> 0:15:57.800
<v Speaker 1>for fourteen point eight million, which means there's not a

0:15:57.800 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 1>whole lot of margin there. They have to pray much

0:16:00.080 --> 0:16:03.240
<v Speaker 1>sell every single unit they make in order to meet

0:16:03.280 --> 0:16:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the numbers that they had projected. The PS five launched

0:16:06.680 --> 0:16:09.640
<v Speaker 1>almost exactly a year ago. The original launch date was

0:16:09.800 --> 0:16:14.520
<v Speaker 1>November twelve, and it has been consistently challenging to find

0:16:14.520 --> 0:16:17.480
<v Speaker 1>in stores. You know, actually had the chance to snag

0:16:17.560 --> 0:16:20.160
<v Speaker 1>one a couple of weeks ago, but a dilly dallied

0:16:20.480 --> 0:16:24.240
<v Speaker 1>and then that chance went bye bye. And you know,

0:16:24.480 --> 0:16:26.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure a lot of you gamers out there have

0:16:26.280 --> 0:16:29.960
<v Speaker 1>had similar experiences. And unfortunately, this means there will be

0:16:30.040 --> 0:16:33.840
<v Speaker 1>fewer consoles produced than planned. That means it's still going

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:36.120
<v Speaker 1>to be difficult to find them in stores, which is

0:16:36.120 --> 0:16:39.320
<v Speaker 1>a real blow, particularly since we're into the holiday gift

0:16:39.440 --> 0:16:42.800
<v Speaker 1>buying season. Uh that, by the way, is sure to

0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:45.520
<v Speaker 1>be impacted by various supply chain issues. A lot of

0:16:45.520 --> 0:16:48.240
<v Speaker 1>people have found that just the stuff that they were

0:16:48.480 --> 0:16:50.800
<v Speaker 1>planning on buying is taking way longer to get to

0:16:50.840 --> 0:16:54.960
<v Speaker 1>them than they had originally thought. That's gonna keep going, right,

0:16:55.040 --> 0:16:57.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the supply chain crunch is a real one,

0:16:57.760 --> 0:17:02.640
<v Speaker 1>and it has created bottle throughout the entire system where

0:17:03.200 --> 0:17:07.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, suddenly a facility gets flooded with products and

0:17:07.720 --> 0:17:09.640
<v Speaker 1>then it has to figure out how does it deal

0:17:09.680 --> 0:17:12.040
<v Speaker 1>with that to pass it further down the chain. This

0:17:12.160 --> 0:17:14.800
<v Speaker 1>is a domino effect, a cascading effect that we see

0:17:14.800 --> 0:17:19.359
<v Speaker 1>throughout the supply chain. So as a tech person, typically

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:22.360
<v Speaker 1>I would be expected to suggest certain like Black Friday

0:17:22.480 --> 0:17:25.359
<v Speaker 1>or Cyber Monday deals that focus on stuff like TVs

0:17:25.480 --> 0:17:29.040
<v Speaker 1>and electronics and sound systems, that kind of thing. This year,

0:17:29.200 --> 0:17:34.000
<v Speaker 1>I humbly suggest that if you plan on buying holiday presents,

0:17:34.119 --> 0:17:39.480
<v Speaker 1>patronize like local shop owners and artists and tradespeople instead,

0:17:40.080 --> 0:17:43.000
<v Speaker 1>it will be a bigger benefit to your immediate community.

0:17:43.520 --> 0:17:46.040
<v Speaker 1>And if enough of us actually do that, it will

0:17:46.080 --> 0:17:48.679
<v Speaker 1>relieve some of the insane pressure that's on the supply

0:17:48.840 --> 0:17:53.000
<v Speaker 1>side of the supply chain economy right now, and things

0:17:53.119 --> 0:17:56.760
<v Speaker 1>can get to a better equilibrium. But only if enough

0:17:56.800 --> 0:17:59.920
<v Speaker 1>of us actually kind of at least remove that part

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 1>to the pressure on the system, Like the demand side

0:18:03.680 --> 0:18:08.080
<v Speaker 1>is still super high, and that's just kind of exacerbating

0:18:08.080 --> 0:18:12.520
<v Speaker 1>an already tough situation. Okay, let's go back to South Korea.

0:18:12.680 --> 0:18:16.000
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned them earlier in the episode. Well, the country

0:18:16.040 --> 0:18:19.760
<v Speaker 1>recently unveiled a traffic control system designed to handle urban

0:18:19.960 --> 0:18:24.000
<v Speaker 1>air mobility vehicles or u a m s, which is

0:18:24.240 --> 0:18:27.840
<v Speaker 1>a fancy way of saying flying machines what take passengers

0:18:27.880 --> 0:18:31.600
<v Speaker 1>from one place to another place, or a flying taxi

0:18:31.640 --> 0:18:34.760
<v Speaker 1>in other words. And these typically take the form factor

0:18:34.880 --> 0:18:38.960
<v Speaker 1>of a really large multi rotor drone type thing, because

0:18:38.960 --> 0:18:42.679
<v Speaker 1>it's not drones, more like a multi rotor helicopter in

0:18:42.680 --> 0:18:45.040
<v Speaker 1>a way. So think of like like the drones you

0:18:45.040 --> 0:18:49.080
<v Speaker 1>would see that are remote controlled, but much much bigger

0:18:49.240 --> 0:18:53.160
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes with more rotors. The traffic control system would

0:18:53.200 --> 0:18:55.919
<v Speaker 1>be a necessary component if flying taxis are to be,

0:18:56.200 --> 0:18:58.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, a real thing, Like if they're to become

0:18:59.480 --> 0:19:04.360
<v Speaker 1>an integral component in transportation, then you've got you've got

0:19:04.359 --> 0:19:06.040
<v Speaker 1>to have some sort of system to be able to

0:19:06.080 --> 0:19:09.520
<v Speaker 1>handle that. So the country is actually testing this to

0:19:09.600 --> 0:19:12.119
<v Speaker 1>kind of work out the design flaws and to tweak

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:14.800
<v Speaker 1>things in order to set a foundation for a future

0:19:14.840 --> 0:19:18.919
<v Speaker 1>with flying vehicles that are actually an actively carrying people

0:19:19.000 --> 0:19:22.080
<v Speaker 1>to and fro. The test involved a vehicle made by

0:19:22.119 --> 0:19:25.800
<v Speaker 1>a company called Volocopter, and according to the Korean Times,

0:19:26.280 --> 0:19:30.240
<v Speaker 1>that particular vehicle is one that can either be piloted

0:19:30.280 --> 0:19:35.040
<v Speaker 1>by a human or it can operate in an autonomous mode. Currently,

0:19:35.320 --> 0:19:38.960
<v Speaker 1>South Korea requires a pilot to be present should any

0:19:39.040 --> 0:19:42.520
<v Speaker 1>passengers be inside the vehicle, so you cannot, you know,

0:19:42.640 --> 0:19:46.520
<v Speaker 1>use this like an autonomous taxi under South Korean law currently.

0:19:46.600 --> 0:19:49.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a wise decision. The government says it's

0:19:49.640 --> 0:19:52.400
<v Speaker 1>necessary both as a safety measure and also to help

0:19:52.440 --> 0:19:56.159
<v Speaker 1>secure passenger confidence in the system. Makes sense to me.

0:19:56.680 --> 0:20:00.119
<v Speaker 1>The Korean Times also reports that the expected cost or

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:03.760
<v Speaker 1>a customer to take a ride from the Incheon International

0:20:03.800 --> 0:20:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Airport to Central Soul to be around nine dollars American

0:20:08.760 --> 0:20:13.320
<v Speaker 1>the equivalent of ninety dollars when the pilot program No

0:20:13.440 --> 0:20:17.359
<v Speaker 1>Pun Intended launches No Pun Intended, which is supposed to

0:20:17.359 --> 0:20:21.280
<v Speaker 1>be in However, they say that that price should drop

0:20:21.400 --> 0:20:27.720
<v Speaker 1>dramatically once the technology and the business matures, so within

0:20:27.760 --> 0:20:31.560
<v Speaker 1>a decade they expect the cost to drop low enough

0:20:31.600 --> 0:20:33.720
<v Speaker 1>so that it would be the equivalent of less than

0:20:33.760 --> 0:20:37.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty dollars per trep. That to me is phenomenal. I

0:20:37.240 --> 0:20:40.080
<v Speaker 1>think it's really optimistic, but I would love to see

0:20:40.080 --> 0:20:42.960
<v Speaker 1>it happen, assuming, of course, that the system has proven

0:20:43.000 --> 0:20:46.920
<v Speaker 1>to be safe and reliable. Finally, I've written and talked

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:50.080
<v Speaker 1>about brain computer interfaces quite a few times. I always

0:20:50.119 --> 0:20:54.520
<v Speaker 1>find them fascinating. Creating technology that can detect and interpret

0:20:54.560 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 1>brain waves and then produce some sort of meaningful output

0:20:58.359 --> 0:21:01.920
<v Speaker 1>is really cool, particularly for people who have limited or

0:21:02.000 --> 0:21:05.640
<v Speaker 1>no motor functions and who otherwise would find it challenging

0:21:05.760 --> 0:21:09.840
<v Speaker 1>or even impossible to communicate well. Science Alert reported earlier

0:21:09.880 --> 0:21:12.960
<v Speaker 1>this week on a research program called brain Gate that

0:21:13.040 --> 0:21:16.840
<v Speaker 1>has developed an interface that allows a paralyzed subject, a

0:21:16.920 --> 0:21:20.520
<v Speaker 1>man who volunteered to be part of this, to generate

0:21:20.640 --> 0:21:25.399
<v Speaker 1>text on a screen just by imagining his own handwriting,

0:21:25.720 --> 0:21:29.680
<v Speaker 1>so he can think about writing a word by hand,

0:21:29.880 --> 0:21:33.760
<v Speaker 1>even though he lost all uh control of his limbs

0:21:33.840 --> 0:21:37.760
<v Speaker 1>years ago, and that thought will then be interpreted by

0:21:37.760 --> 0:21:40.439
<v Speaker 1>the system, and then the text will appear on a

0:21:40.520 --> 0:21:44.880
<v Speaker 1>screen reflecting the letters he was imagining himself writing. Now,

0:21:44.880 --> 0:21:48.040
<v Speaker 1>I've heard of other systems that use training sessions so

0:21:48.080 --> 0:21:50.639
<v Speaker 1>that someone can learn how to control a cursor with

0:21:50.720 --> 0:21:53.040
<v Speaker 1>their mind, and they can move the cursor around to

0:21:53.240 --> 0:21:56.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of type things out on an on screen keyboard,

0:21:56.160 --> 0:21:58.439
<v Speaker 1>very similar to how you would use an on screen

0:21:58.520 --> 0:22:01.120
<v Speaker 1>touch keyboard. But this is the first time I've heard

0:22:01.160 --> 0:22:05.119
<v Speaker 1>about something that can interpret the thoughts about writing a

0:22:05.160 --> 0:22:09.960
<v Speaker 1>word and use that to display that same word on screen. Now,

0:22:10.000 --> 0:22:12.880
<v Speaker 1>it's still a slow process. The subject in the research

0:22:12.920 --> 0:22:17.160
<v Speaker 1>project could right around nine characters per minute, that's about

0:22:17.200 --> 0:22:20.119
<v Speaker 1>eighteen words per minute, but they could do it with

0:22:20.200 --> 0:22:25.840
<v Speaker 1>like accuracy before auto correct was brought in. And it

0:22:26.000 --> 0:22:29.959
<v Speaker 1>still requires surgery to implant electrodes into the brain, so

0:22:30.000 --> 0:22:33.119
<v Speaker 1>this is not like some hat you put on and

0:22:33.160 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 1>you can use it. It is an invasive process, but

0:22:36.640 --> 0:22:39.560
<v Speaker 1>for people who would otherwise find themselves unable to communicate,

0:22:40.080 --> 0:22:43.840
<v Speaker 1>this technology is incredibly powerful. It's also fascinating to me

0:22:43.880 --> 0:22:47.119
<v Speaker 1>that the brain can retain abilities related to fine motor

0:22:47.160 --> 0:22:52.040
<v Speaker 1>movements even years after someone has lost that actual physical capability.

0:22:52.119 --> 0:22:54.679
<v Speaker 1>So not only are we learning more about how to

0:22:54.760 --> 0:22:59.359
<v Speaker 1>develop these systems, we're learning more about the resilience of

0:22:59.040 --> 0:23:03.080
<v Speaker 1>the brain and how the brain operates. So those learnings

0:23:03.119 --> 0:23:07.760
<v Speaker 1>will inform future implementations which will continue to improve. And

0:23:07.880 --> 0:23:11.720
<v Speaker 1>my hope is that in the future will have systems

0:23:11.760 --> 0:23:15.239
<v Speaker 1>that give people a lot more independence and autonomy and

0:23:15.280 --> 0:23:20.480
<v Speaker 1>communication abilities and to dramatically improve their quality of life,

0:23:21.280 --> 0:23:24.920
<v Speaker 1>even in the case where they have lost or maybe

0:23:25.040 --> 0:23:28.960
<v Speaker 1>never even had abilities to to move around. I think

0:23:28.960 --> 0:23:33.240
<v Speaker 1>that that is really phenomenal. All right, that wraps up

0:23:33.280 --> 0:23:37.640
<v Speaker 1>the news episode for Thursday, November eleven, twenty one. If

0:23:37.640 --> 0:23:39.760
<v Speaker 1>you have suggestions for topics I should cover in future

0:23:39.800 --> 0:23:42.440
<v Speaker 1>episodes of tech Stuff, please reach out. The best way

0:23:42.480 --> 0:23:44.520
<v Speaker 1>to do that is on Twitter. The handle for the

0:23:44.520 --> 0:23:48.040
<v Speaker 1>show is tech Stuff hs W. I'm out next week.

0:23:48.280 --> 0:23:51.640
<v Speaker 1>You'll get your g E episodes in place of me,

0:23:52.400 --> 0:23:54.840
<v Speaker 1>and there will also be a Smart Talks with IBM

0:23:54.840 --> 0:23:58.640
<v Speaker 1>episode on Thursday. But I will be back the following Monday,

0:23:58.840 --> 0:24:01.560
<v Speaker 1>so catch you on the flip side. And if you

0:24:01.680 --> 0:24:04.160
<v Speaker 1>are walking around Disney World, look for a bald guy

0:24:04.920 --> 0:24:08.400
<v Speaker 1>who's probably staring on his phone because of Genie Plus.

0:24:08.400 --> 0:24:11.320
<v Speaker 1>But that's a that's a topic for another podcast. All right,

0:24:11.720 --> 0:24:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Bye bye, I'll talk to you again really soon. Text

0:24:20.920 --> 0:24:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Stuff is an I Heart Radio production. For more podcasts

0:24:24.400 --> 0:24:27.160
<v Speaker 1>from I Heart Radio, visit the i Heart Radio app,

0:24:27.320 --> 0:24:30.439
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.