1 00:00:01,480 --> 00:00:04,560 Speaker 1: Hi, guys, Welcome to another episode of Legally Brunette. I 2 00:00:04,559 --> 00:00:08,480 Speaker 1: will be your host today Emily Simpson with Shane. First 3 00:00:08,480 --> 00:00:10,520 Speaker 1: of all, if you guys haven't listened to our last episode, 4 00:00:10,600 --> 00:00:13,880 Speaker 1: it was on Jody Hildebrandt, which if you remember, she 5 00:00:13,920 --> 00:00:16,040 Speaker 1: had to do with the Ruby Frankie child abuse case, 6 00:00:16,440 --> 00:00:19,119 Speaker 1: and a lot of you DMed me. I know, I 7 00:00:19,120 --> 00:00:21,200 Speaker 1: thought it was interesting. Do you remember when we were 8 00:00:21,200 --> 00:00:25,840 Speaker 1: talking and Ruby Frankie's YouTube channel was called eight Passengers 9 00:00:25,880 --> 00:00:27,360 Speaker 1: and then you made a comment, why is it called 10 00:00:27,400 --> 00:00:32,000 Speaker 1: eight passengers because someone has to be driving, right, So 11 00:00:32,120 --> 00:00:35,200 Speaker 1: I had several people DM me that said they felt 12 00:00:35,240 --> 00:00:37,880 Speaker 1: as if it was the eight passengers and God was driving. 13 00:00:39,320 --> 00:00:43,760 Speaker 1: So anyway, I don't know, I just thought I maybe, 14 00:00:43,760 --> 00:00:45,280 Speaker 1: but I just thought I would relay that to you 15 00:00:45,360 --> 00:00:47,440 Speaker 1: because a lot of people heard that, and then that 16 00:00:47,600 --> 00:00:50,160 Speaker 1: was kind of the comment overall. 17 00:00:49,800 --> 00:00:52,320 Speaker 2: So that speculation, we don't know that that was the thinking. 18 00:00:53,200 --> 00:00:55,000 Speaker 1: Well, I don't know, I don't know. I think that's 19 00:00:55,000 --> 00:00:57,520 Speaker 1: how people interpreted it, is that they were the eight 20 00:00:57,560 --> 00:01:00,360 Speaker 1: passengers and they were a very religious family and so 21 00:01:00,520 --> 00:01:04,440 Speaker 1: God was like guiding that right exactly. 22 00:01:04,120 --> 00:01:07,760 Speaker 2: And she's dumb okay, as proven by her behavior. 23 00:01:07,920 --> 00:01:10,200 Speaker 1: All right, let's move on. We wanted to do an 24 00:01:10,280 --> 00:01:12,640 Speaker 1: update on Nick Reiner. Also, not only did you guys 25 00:01:12,840 --> 00:01:15,280 Speaker 1: dmail out about the last case we did the Jody 26 00:01:15,440 --> 00:01:20,399 Speaker 1: Hildebrandt and Ruby Frankie situation. But as you all know, 27 00:01:20,760 --> 00:01:24,319 Speaker 1: my obsession with Alan Jackson runs deep. So when you 28 00:01:24,400 --> 00:01:26,759 Speaker 1: all saw the news that he withdrew from the Nick 29 00:01:26,800 --> 00:01:31,640 Speaker 1: Reiner case, I got I got tons of dms where 30 00:01:31,680 --> 00:01:33,679 Speaker 1: people were like, did you see this? What's going on? 31 00:01:33,760 --> 00:01:35,200 Speaker 2: Are you going to talk about it? Did you see this? 32 00:01:35,280 --> 00:01:38,880 Speaker 1: So anyway, so let's talk about it. Nick Reiner's arraignment 33 00:01:39,160 --> 00:01:43,280 Speaker 1: has been postponed once again after Alan Jackson quit moments 34 00:01:43,319 --> 00:01:47,040 Speaker 1: before the scheduled hearing. So this happened last Wednesday. Jackson 35 00:01:47,040 --> 00:01:49,720 Speaker 1: informed the court that he was stepping away from the 36 00:01:49,800 --> 00:01:52,240 Speaker 1: case and would no longer represent Reiner, who was charged 37 00:01:52,280 --> 00:01:56,920 Speaker 1: with murdering his parents. Jackson told the judge, we would 38 00:01:57,000 --> 00:01:59,720 Speaker 1: ask to withdraw as counsel of record. We have no 39 00:02:00,120 --> 00:02:02,760 Speaker 1: choice but to withdraw and ask to be relieved. 40 00:02:03,000 --> 00:02:06,280 Speaker 2: He didn't announce why, he just announced that he's removing himself. 41 00:02:06,440 --> 00:02:08,280 Speaker 1: Well, he had some things to say, but there is 42 00:02:08,360 --> 00:02:11,800 Speaker 1: no clear cut reason. A lot of people speculate, but 43 00:02:12,120 --> 00:02:14,640 Speaker 1: you know, to me, it's interesting that Reiner will now 44 00:02:14,680 --> 00:02:18,680 Speaker 1: be represented by Los Angeles County Deputy Public Defender Kimberly Green, 45 00:02:19,320 --> 00:02:22,680 Speaker 1: and the judge approved the substitution, and now the arraignment 46 00:02:22,720 --> 00:02:27,920 Speaker 1: is rescheduled for February twenty third. I think my personal 47 00:02:28,040 --> 00:02:30,280 Speaker 1: opinion is I think it had to do with money, 48 00:02:30,320 --> 00:02:32,040 Speaker 1: because that was my question all along. 49 00:02:32,160 --> 00:02:34,200 Speaker 2: What else would I have to do with? Well, some 50 00:02:34,280 --> 00:02:37,280 Speaker 2: people not disgusted by crimes, He's been around it. 51 00:02:37,440 --> 00:02:40,359 Speaker 1: No, but we'll talk about some speculation that some other 52 00:02:40,400 --> 00:02:41,280 Speaker 1: attorneys and. 53 00:02:41,520 --> 00:02:42,639 Speaker 2: Money mighty talks. 54 00:02:43,560 --> 00:02:47,120 Speaker 1: I My initial reaction when Alan Jackson first took the 55 00:02:47,200 --> 00:02:51,519 Speaker 1: case was who is paying this bill? Because I would assume, 56 00:02:51,520 --> 00:02:54,240 Speaker 1: and I'm probably correct, that his retainer would be seven 57 00:02:54,280 --> 00:02:59,440 Speaker 1: figures for a murder trial and with the complexities of 58 00:03:00,000 --> 00:03:05,000 Speaker 1: probably an insanity defense and expert witnesses and all of 59 00:03:05,080 --> 00:03:08,119 Speaker 1: the due diligence and that goes. 60 00:03:07,919 --> 00:03:10,560 Speaker 2: Into that does a lot of due diligence involved. When 61 00:03:10,600 --> 00:03:15,080 Speaker 2: your clients slit the victim's throats and they have a history, 62 00:03:15,280 --> 00:03:17,280 Speaker 2: it's pretty tough to defend, so it's going to take 63 00:03:17,280 --> 00:03:17,880 Speaker 2: a lot of work. 64 00:03:18,000 --> 00:03:19,600 Speaker 1: No, but I'm saying if you're going to have an 65 00:03:19,639 --> 00:03:22,160 Speaker 1: insanity defense. You're going to have to have a lot 66 00:03:22,160 --> 00:03:26,040 Speaker 1: of testing, and you know, all the experts suits insane. 67 00:03:27,200 --> 00:03:29,880 Speaker 2: That's the part I never really get. They're all insane. 68 00:03:30,360 --> 00:03:32,360 Speaker 1: During the brief appearance, when asked by the judge if 69 00:03:32,360 --> 00:03:35,440 Speaker 1: he understood the changing council, Reiner replied, oh, yeah, I 70 00:03:35,480 --> 00:03:39,080 Speaker 1: agree with that. Before being escorted back to the correctional facility. 71 00:03:39,640 --> 00:03:43,520 Speaker 1: Outside the courthouse, Jackson addressed reporters and he said, this morning, 72 00:03:43,600 --> 00:03:46,720 Speaker 1: I had to withdraw as Nick Reiner's counsel, adding that 73 00:03:46,880 --> 00:03:51,920 Speaker 1: quote circumstances beyond our control, but more importantly, circumstances beyond 74 00:03:52,040 --> 00:03:56,800 Speaker 1: Nick's control made it impossible for us to continue our representation. 75 00:03:57,680 --> 00:04:01,480 Speaker 1: I'm legally and ethically prohibited from all the reasons why. 76 00:04:01,920 --> 00:04:04,720 Speaker 1: I know that's a question on everyone's mind. I'm assuming 77 00:04:04,720 --> 00:04:08,520 Speaker 1: I'm legally and ethically prohibited. Is just it's attorney client privilege. 78 00:04:08,560 --> 00:04:10,560 Speaker 1: Whatever has to do with who's financing it or what's 79 00:04:10,600 --> 00:04:12,080 Speaker 1: going on behind the scenes. 80 00:04:12,320 --> 00:04:14,440 Speaker 2: Client if he wants to break that privilege. 81 00:04:14,560 --> 00:04:16,840 Speaker 1: He emphasized that his departure should not be viewed as 82 00:04:16,839 --> 00:04:19,320 Speaker 1: a lack of support for his former clients. So he 83 00:04:19,440 --> 00:04:22,480 Speaker 1: says quote be clear, be very very clear. My team 84 00:04:22,520 --> 00:04:25,240 Speaker 1: and I remain deeply, deeply committed to Nick Reiner and 85 00:04:25,360 --> 00:04:28,720 Speaker 1: to his best interest, asserting that the legal process will 86 00:04:28,839 --> 00:04:32,760 Speaker 1: ultimately quote reveal the true facts of the circumstances surrounding 87 00:04:32,760 --> 00:04:36,760 Speaker 1: the case. Then he went further declaring, we've learned, and 88 00:04:36,839 --> 00:04:39,960 Speaker 1: you can take this to the bank. Is that pursuant 89 00:04:39,960 --> 00:04:42,120 Speaker 1: to the law in this state, Nick Reiner is not 90 00:04:42,160 --> 00:04:43,320 Speaker 1: guilty of murder. 91 00:04:43,600 --> 00:04:46,640 Speaker 2: Print that pursuant to the law exactly. 92 00:04:46,839 --> 00:04:51,440 Speaker 1: So pursuant to the law means he's I would assume my. 93 00:04:51,600 --> 00:04:56,000 Speaker 2: Illegal legal standard that it does not murder as. 94 00:04:55,880 --> 00:05:00,760 Speaker 1: In premeditated capital murder, because they're going to most. 95 00:05:00,560 --> 00:05:04,920 Speaker 2: Likely you know what he can't insanity defense Reiner's check. 96 00:05:05,520 --> 00:05:06,839 Speaker 2: That's what he couldn't take to the bank. 97 00:05:07,000 --> 00:05:09,800 Speaker 1: No, he can't take it Withdrew. Yeah. 98 00:05:09,920 --> 00:05:11,880 Speaker 2: I'm not saying there's anything wrong with that. I'm just 99 00:05:11,920 --> 00:05:12,520 Speaker 2: saying that's the. 100 00:05:12,440 --> 00:05:14,320 Speaker 1: Reason no, Because that was my question from the very 101 00:05:14,480 --> 00:05:17,360 Speaker 1: very beginning, was why would Alan Jackson represent Nick We 102 00:05:17,400 --> 00:05:19,560 Speaker 1: know Nick Reiner doesn't have any money personally, or he 103 00:05:19,560 --> 00:05:25,600 Speaker 1: wouldn't be living in his parents guesthouse, you know, And 104 00:05:25,880 --> 00:05:27,840 Speaker 1: I mean I don't think he was employed, and I 105 00:05:28,200 --> 00:05:31,080 Speaker 1: think they were. His parents were wealthy and well to 106 00:05:31,120 --> 00:05:33,680 Speaker 1: do and Hollywood elite, and I think they were continuing 107 00:05:33,680 --> 00:05:35,160 Speaker 1: to pay it as happened the. 108 00:05:35,240 --> 00:05:37,919 Speaker 2: Wealth to be able to hire Jackson. 109 00:05:37,920 --> 00:05:41,320 Speaker 1: That's what you're saying, right So to me, the only 110 00:05:41,400 --> 00:05:45,640 Speaker 1: way that there could be someone to cover Jackson's enormous 111 00:05:46,000 --> 00:05:49,640 Speaker 1: legal bill for a murder trial is if the estate 112 00:05:50,640 --> 00:05:53,760 Speaker 1: went to the other siblings and the siblings were willing 113 00:05:53,920 --> 00:05:55,640 Speaker 1: to pay. 114 00:05:54,360 --> 00:05:59,000 Speaker 2: At the settled a little bit, the emotions were set aside. 115 00:05:59,600 --> 00:06:04,800 Speaker 2: The fan family attorney, state law attorney, whatever, all got 116 00:06:04,839 --> 00:06:08,160 Speaker 2: together and started to really realize what they would be doing, 117 00:06:08,240 --> 00:06:12,599 Speaker 2: and that would probably be depleting all their worth for 118 00:06:12,880 --> 00:06:17,200 Speaker 2: a sibling that was probably troubled and killed the parents. 119 00:06:17,279 --> 00:06:20,160 Speaker 2: And it's not about trying to find him a better 120 00:06:20,200 --> 00:06:23,480 Speaker 2: opportunity and that's worth every penny. It's we're going to 121 00:06:23,520 --> 00:06:26,960 Speaker 2: get this guy like off from a criminal charge and 122 00:06:27,160 --> 00:06:30,800 Speaker 2: deplete all our funds when he killed our parents and 123 00:06:30,839 --> 00:06:32,200 Speaker 2: he clearly needs help. 124 00:06:32,880 --> 00:06:35,360 Speaker 1: It's also very telling that a public defender stepped in, 125 00:06:36,320 --> 00:06:38,800 Speaker 1: because if it was not an issue of money, then 126 00:06:38,800 --> 00:06:42,960 Speaker 1: you would probably have another big time elite attorney step 127 00:06:42,960 --> 00:06:46,160 Speaker 1: in in Alan Jackson's place, but it was not Kimberly Green, 128 00:06:46,279 --> 00:06:47,440 Speaker 1: not a public defender. 129 00:06:47,480 --> 00:06:50,400 Speaker 2: I think I heard her speak, make a public speech 130 00:06:50,480 --> 00:06:55,719 Speaker 2: or whatever, like for the press, and she was very quiet, 131 00:06:55,960 --> 00:06:59,560 Speaker 2: and she just not one to have public meetings and stuff. 132 00:07:00,080 --> 00:07:02,240 Speaker 1: Alan Jackson, she's not media trained. 133 00:07:03,720 --> 00:07:05,080 Speaker 2: Yeah he likes the microphone. 134 00:07:05,120 --> 00:07:06,000 Speaker 1: Oh, yes he does. 135 00:07:06,279 --> 00:07:08,480 Speaker 2: I don't know if she did so. 136 00:07:08,720 --> 00:07:11,960 Speaker 1: Some legal experts have wide in and said that maybe 137 00:07:11,960 --> 00:07:14,960 Speaker 1: Alan Jackson had no chance or had no choice but 138 00:07:15,040 --> 00:07:18,400 Speaker 1: to quit offering some insight. A California, New York based 139 00:07:18,520 --> 00:07:21,160 Speaker 1: entertainment attorney, her name is Lisa Bonner, told Page six 140 00:07:21,200 --> 00:07:26,120 Speaker 1: that Jackson's carefully chosen language strongly points to a professional conflict. 141 00:07:26,240 --> 00:07:29,200 Speaker 1: Referencing his remarks to the court, She said that such 142 00:07:29,240 --> 00:07:32,040 Speaker 1: phrases like we have no choice and circumstances beyond our 143 00:07:32,040 --> 00:07:35,000 Speaker 1: control are commonly used when an attorney is legally required 144 00:07:35,040 --> 00:07:38,800 Speaker 1: to step aside, such as an ethical or legal conflict. 145 00:07:38,840 --> 00:07:40,200 Speaker 1: I don't know if I believe that. I don't really 146 00:07:40,200 --> 00:07:42,040 Speaker 1: feel like it's a conflict of interest. I still go 147 00:07:42,160 --> 00:07:43,560 Speaker 1: back to the whole money thing. 148 00:07:43,960 --> 00:07:48,040 Speaker 2: But what if it was something like like Alan Jackson's, like, 149 00:07:48,480 --> 00:07:52,600 Speaker 2: oh wait, you did kill your parents? Oh, like I 150 00:07:52,720 --> 00:07:55,800 Speaker 2: misunderstood it. Oh, I can't defend you like he got 151 00:07:55,840 --> 00:07:58,480 Speaker 2: a bachel later because I heard it as a criminal defenser, 152 00:07:58,520 --> 00:08:00,520 Speaker 2: and you never want to ask your clients they did it. 153 00:08:00,600 --> 00:08:02,680 Speaker 1: Oh, so you never you never ask. So you're saying, 154 00:08:02,760 --> 00:08:05,000 Speaker 1: maybe he just assumed that, you know, there's some third 155 00:08:05,040 --> 00:08:05,680 Speaker 1: party out there. 156 00:08:05,760 --> 00:08:07,920 Speaker 2: I mean, I was kind of lightly joking, but you know, 157 00:08:08,080 --> 00:08:10,120 Speaker 2: but that's the thing. You know, if you ask your 158 00:08:10,160 --> 00:08:12,400 Speaker 2: client if they did it, now, you can never say 159 00:08:12,400 --> 00:08:15,280 Speaker 2: that your client is not guilty or you know, innocent 160 00:08:15,520 --> 00:08:17,960 Speaker 2: or anything like that. Once you heard it, you can't 161 00:08:18,040 --> 00:08:21,000 Speaker 2: unhear it and you can't lie. So I talked to 162 00:08:21,040 --> 00:08:23,120 Speaker 2: some criminal defense attorneys and they don't want to ask 163 00:08:23,160 --> 00:08:23,960 Speaker 2: their client. 164 00:08:23,800 --> 00:08:25,239 Speaker 1: Because they don't want to have the knowledge. 165 00:08:25,360 --> 00:08:28,600 Speaker 2: Yeah, they'll only ask, maybe for what information they want, 166 00:08:28,800 --> 00:08:31,200 Speaker 2: but they're not going to say like, did you do it? 167 00:08:31,280 --> 00:08:32,440 Speaker 2: How long have you been planning this? 168 00:08:32,600 --> 00:08:32,880 Speaker 1: Yes? 169 00:08:33,960 --> 00:08:35,880 Speaker 2: What were your thoughts? Did it feel good when you did? 170 00:08:36,400 --> 00:08:41,760 Speaker 1: That's those questions. So another theory is well, and this 171 00:08:41,760 --> 00:08:44,120 Speaker 1: one makes a little bit of sense to me because 172 00:08:44,160 --> 00:08:47,760 Speaker 1: he's a high profile defense attorney, that he might have 173 00:08:47,800 --> 00:08:51,560 Speaker 1: a professional fallout from the Hollywood elite. The way I 174 00:08:51,640 --> 00:08:54,760 Speaker 1: understand it is there's only a handful of attorneys that 175 00:08:54,800 --> 00:08:57,840 Speaker 1: the elite in Hollywood would go to, and Alan is 176 00:08:57,880 --> 00:09:03,800 Speaker 1: on that very short listed. So because Rob Reiner and 177 00:09:03,840 --> 00:09:07,240 Speaker 1: his wife Michelle were very beloved within Hollywood, and this 178 00:09:07,400 --> 00:09:13,400 Speaker 1: is such a heinous crime to be defending, he'd defending, yeah, 179 00:09:13,720 --> 00:09:16,240 Speaker 1: and so it could take him off of that high 180 00:09:16,240 --> 00:09:17,160 Speaker 1: profile list. 181 00:09:17,640 --> 00:09:20,439 Speaker 2: So if Rob Reiner killed his son, it would have 182 00:09:20,440 --> 00:09:22,600 Speaker 2: been okay to represent him. 183 00:09:22,720 --> 00:09:25,120 Speaker 1: Well, I don't know about that either. I'm just saying 184 00:09:25,240 --> 00:09:26,080 Speaker 1: I think that's a stretch. 185 00:09:26,080 --> 00:09:27,559 Speaker 2: I think it's simply a money thing. And I think 186 00:09:27,600 --> 00:09:30,480 Speaker 2: Alan Jackson has every right to not represent someone that's 187 00:09:30,480 --> 00:09:32,840 Speaker 2: not going to pay his fee. That's just the way 188 00:09:32,840 --> 00:09:33,240 Speaker 2: it works. 189 00:09:33,480 --> 00:09:37,520 Speaker 1: Yeah, I guess basically it could be that through representing 190 00:09:37,600 --> 00:09:41,280 Speaker 1: Nick Reiner there could be some reputational consequences, the backlashes. 191 00:09:41,320 --> 00:09:44,080 Speaker 1: He becomes a pariah in Hollywood because Michelle and Rob 192 00:09:44,080 --> 00:09:46,560 Speaker 1: were beloved. You know. 193 00:09:47,000 --> 00:09:48,600 Speaker 2: The question I have, which I don't think we'll ever 194 00:09:48,640 --> 00:09:50,439 Speaker 2: get an answer to, is how did he get one? 195 00:09:50,520 --> 00:09:54,480 Speaker 2: If it's a finance thing and there's no they cut 196 00:09:54,480 --> 00:09:57,040 Speaker 2: off funds or whatever, there's no money or whatever it is, 197 00:09:57,520 --> 00:10:00,680 Speaker 2: then what made him initially think he could take the case, Like, 198 00:10:00,720 --> 00:10:03,280 Speaker 2: did he jump on it before he looked into it. 199 00:10:03,640 --> 00:10:05,840 Speaker 2: Did the family initially say hey, yeah, we got it, 200 00:10:05,840 --> 00:10:07,680 Speaker 2: we got it, we want to we want our brother 201 00:10:07,800 --> 00:10:09,480 Speaker 2: taken care of. And then they she I don't know, 202 00:10:09,559 --> 00:10:10,360 Speaker 2: we'll never know, but. 203 00:10:10,720 --> 00:10:13,520 Speaker 1: Yeah, we'll never know. But I that that interests me too. 204 00:10:13,679 --> 00:10:17,080 Speaker 1: Was it Nick Reiner that that reached out to Alan? Well, 205 00:10:17,120 --> 00:10:20,559 Speaker 1: Alan Jackson is legally barred from reaching out to him. 206 00:10:20,559 --> 00:10:23,920 Speaker 1: But I don't know how they came into contact. I 207 00:10:23,960 --> 00:10:27,560 Speaker 1: don't know if the family reached out to Alan. I 208 00:10:27,559 --> 00:10:27,880 Speaker 1: don't know. 209 00:10:28,080 --> 00:10:32,520 Speaker 2: I don't know. I don't know. I bet you, I 210 00:10:32,520 --> 00:10:35,760 Speaker 2: bet you. Some of the key parts were they came 211 00:10:35,800 --> 00:10:39,000 Speaker 2: to like things settled down, they talked to attorneys, they 212 00:10:39,080 --> 00:10:41,480 Speaker 2: learned how much their parents are worth, how much they're 213 00:10:41,520 --> 00:10:43,480 Speaker 2: going to get, how it's going to be dispersed, all 214 00:10:43,520 --> 00:10:48,079 Speaker 2: that stuff, all the logistics, and then maybe they had 215 00:10:48,120 --> 00:10:51,959 Speaker 2: a realization of you know, we're gonna lose all the money. 216 00:10:52,080 --> 00:10:53,520 Speaker 2: And it's not always a money thing, but it's like 217 00:10:53,520 --> 00:10:56,080 Speaker 2: we're gonna throw good money after like something that's not 218 00:10:56,240 --> 00:10:59,320 Speaker 2: really gonna be productive, and he's just gonna, you know, 219 00:11:00,080 --> 00:11:02,160 Speaker 2: and maybe he needs to be in prison. Yeah. 220 00:11:02,280 --> 00:11:12,960 Speaker 1: Yeah. So today on the podcast, we are going to 221 00:11:12,960 --> 00:11:16,200 Speaker 1: have a special guest come on who Shane introduced me to. 222 00:11:16,320 --> 00:11:20,640 Speaker 1: This is your special guest. And before she comes on, 223 00:11:21,400 --> 00:11:25,440 Speaker 1: I wanted to talk about the Parkland shooting because she 224 00:11:25,600 --> 00:11:28,439 Speaker 1: was the judge in that case. So she goes by 225 00:11:28,520 --> 00:11:30,880 Speaker 1: Judge Liz and before she comes on, let's just talk 226 00:11:30,880 --> 00:11:34,880 Speaker 1: about the Parkland shooting. So on February fourteenth of twenty eighteen, 227 00:11:35,040 --> 00:11:38,880 Speaker 1: at Marjorie Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, it 228 00:11:38,960 --> 00:11:41,480 Speaker 1: became the site of a devastating shooting when nineteen year 229 00:11:41,520 --> 00:11:44,600 Speaker 1: old Nicholas Cruz, a former student who had been expelled 230 00:11:44,640 --> 00:11:49,440 Speaker 1: for disciplinary issues, entered the campus and opened fire. Cruz 231 00:11:49,559 --> 00:11:51,760 Speaker 1: entered the school at two twenty one pm, beginning in 232 00:11:51,800 --> 00:11:55,800 Speaker 1: the freshman building, which housed approximately nine hundred students along 233 00:11:55,840 --> 00:11:58,840 Speaker 1: with faculty and staff. He drew his rifle and his 234 00:11:58,920 --> 00:12:02,400 Speaker 1: stairwell before moving on to a first floor hallway, where 235 00:12:02,400 --> 00:12:06,680 Speaker 1: he fired the first shots. Within about two minutes, eleven 236 00:12:06,720 --> 00:12:10,640 Speaker 1: people were killed and thirteen were wounded. Crews then moved 237 00:12:10,760 --> 00:12:14,240 Speaker 1: upstairs and discharged his weapon again, though he did not 238 00:12:14,320 --> 00:12:16,600 Speaker 1: hit anyone on the second floor. He continued to the 239 00:12:16,640 --> 00:12:20,439 Speaker 1: third floor, where he killed six more people and injured four, 240 00:12:20,840 --> 00:12:24,680 Speaker 1: spending less than a minute there. At two twenty eight pm, 241 00:12:24,760 --> 00:12:27,920 Speaker 1: Cruz left his rifle in a stairwell and exited the building. 242 00:12:28,080 --> 00:12:30,520 Speaker 1: He then went to a wal mart at two fifty pm, 243 00:12:31,080 --> 00:12:34,280 Speaker 1: stopped at his subway for a drink, and later visited 244 00:12:34,320 --> 00:12:37,920 Speaker 1: a McDonald's. He was located by Broward County police and 245 00:12:38,000 --> 00:12:41,480 Speaker 1: arrested on a nearby street approximately eighty minutes after the 246 00:12:41,520 --> 00:12:46,360 Speaker 1: shooting began. The Parkland shooting left seventeen people dead and 247 00:12:46,440 --> 00:12:49,719 Speaker 1: seventeen others injured, and the wake of the tragedy, survivors 248 00:12:49,800 --> 00:12:54,720 Speaker 1: organized the student led advocacy group Never Again MSD, focused 249 00:12:54,720 --> 00:12:59,400 Speaker 1: on addressing gun violence and promoting policy change. Florida responded 250 00:12:59,400 --> 00:13:02,880 Speaker 1: by passing new gun control laws, including raising the minimum 251 00:13:02,880 --> 00:13:07,720 Speaker 1: age for gun purchases and imposing mandatory waiting periods. The 252 00:13:07,760 --> 00:13:12,920 Speaker 1: shooting also sparked ongoing national conversations about mental health, school safety, 253 00:13:13,000 --> 00:13:17,000 Speaker 1: and gun regulations, as survivors and communities continued to grapple 254 00:13:17,040 --> 00:13:20,760 Speaker 1: with the emotional and psychological impact of the event. Let 255 00:13:20,800 --> 00:13:23,559 Speaker 1: me ask you a question. The high school I graduated 256 00:13:23,600 --> 00:13:28,640 Speaker 1: from in Ohio actually had a school shooting oh yeah, yeah, 257 00:13:28,720 --> 00:13:33,440 Speaker 1: when maybe ten years ago or so, after that happened, 258 00:13:35,120 --> 00:13:38,600 Speaker 1: they they armed teachers with guns. 259 00:13:39,679 --> 00:13:41,960 Speaker 2: Then the community they allowed teachers. 260 00:13:42,000 --> 00:13:43,679 Speaker 1: I don't know exactly what the terms are, but they 261 00:13:43,679 --> 00:13:44,640 Speaker 1: allowed teachers. 262 00:13:45,000 --> 00:13:47,760 Speaker 2: They didn't just hand out guns, no, but the teachers lounge. 263 00:13:47,960 --> 00:13:50,000 Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean, I don't know the process that took place, 264 00:13:50,200 --> 00:13:56,280 Speaker 1: but they initially after that happened, teachers were then permitted 265 00:13:56,360 --> 00:14:00,440 Speaker 1: to carry guns on campus. Then the community where I 266 00:14:00,520 --> 00:14:03,640 Speaker 1: used to live was outraged and there were tons of 267 00:14:03,679 --> 00:14:06,440 Speaker 1: meetings with school boards and everything, and I believe that 268 00:14:06,600 --> 00:14:09,840 Speaker 1: was eventually repealed and they're not allowed to do that anymore. 269 00:14:10,720 --> 00:14:12,520 Speaker 1: What is your take on that. I don't know if 270 00:14:12,559 --> 00:14:14,160 Speaker 1: that's I mean. 271 00:14:15,200 --> 00:14:18,199 Speaker 2: As if I thought about this, I don't know. I mean, 272 00:14:18,280 --> 00:14:21,320 Speaker 2: I would think, at the very least, if professors are 273 00:14:21,320 --> 00:14:24,600 Speaker 2: going to carry, they certainly need to have training. You 274 00:14:24,640 --> 00:14:28,960 Speaker 2: don't just hand out guns. And I guess if my 275 00:14:29,640 --> 00:14:33,600 Speaker 2: children's teacher had a gun in class, i'd understand the 276 00:14:34,280 --> 00:14:38,440 Speaker 2: intention behind it, but I probably wouldn't like it. I 277 00:14:38,480 --> 00:14:41,440 Speaker 2: would think, I don't know, better to have the place 278 00:14:41,840 --> 00:14:48,560 Speaker 2: secured with offense as much as possible, and security on campus, 279 00:14:48,960 --> 00:14:51,680 Speaker 2: and then you have a you because what if what 280 00:14:51,720 --> 00:14:53,920 Speaker 2: if students find out, Oh, this teacher doesn't have a gun, 281 00:14:54,040 --> 00:14:56,240 Speaker 2: but this one does, but that one doesn't. But if 282 00:14:56,240 --> 00:14:59,640 Speaker 2: you have armed security, like a lot of private schools do. 283 00:15:00,400 --> 00:15:03,640 Speaker 2: I've been to some of those high schools that are like, 284 00:15:03,800 --> 00:15:07,880 Speaker 2: you know, run by the Jewish church or community and stuff, 285 00:15:07,880 --> 00:15:11,560 Speaker 2: and those are highly like protected, and it's awesome, you know, 286 00:15:11,600 --> 00:15:14,320 Speaker 2: and the kids feel this is a place that's kind 287 00:15:14,320 --> 00:15:16,720 Speaker 2: of sacred, right, it's a learning ground, right, it's safe. 288 00:15:16,840 --> 00:15:17,200 Speaker 1: Yeah. 289 00:15:17,400 --> 00:15:19,120 Speaker 2: So yeah, I always that is more effective. 290 00:15:19,200 --> 00:15:22,600 Speaker 1: I always felt as if a situation like that, if 291 00:15:22,640 --> 00:15:28,720 Speaker 1: you're arming teachers, you're adding more issues eventually down the line. 292 00:15:29,240 --> 00:15:31,560 Speaker 1: You know. The solution, I mean, there is no solution 293 00:15:31,640 --> 00:15:34,280 Speaker 1: that like there is other than it all comes down 294 00:15:34,280 --> 00:15:39,320 Speaker 1: to a mental health issue. I mean someone's not mentally healthy. Yea, 295 00:15:39,360 --> 00:15:39,960 Speaker 1: who does that? 296 00:15:40,440 --> 00:15:44,080 Speaker 2: Yeah, but that's I think we're talking about the defense mechanisms, Yeah, 297 00:15:44,120 --> 00:15:46,120 Speaker 2: the treating mechanisms. 298 00:15:46,200 --> 00:15:48,880 Speaker 1: So the trial of Nicholas Cruz focus almost entirely on 299 00:15:49,000 --> 00:15:51,960 Speaker 1: sentencing rather than guilt, as he pleaded guilty in October 300 00:15:52,000 --> 00:15:54,520 Speaker 1: of twenty twenty one to seventeen counts of first degree 301 00:15:54,600 --> 00:15:58,400 Speaker 1: murder and seventeen counts of attempted murder. The penalty phase trial, 302 00:15:58,440 --> 00:16:01,680 Speaker 1: held in twenty twenty two, was tasked with determining whether 303 00:16:01,760 --> 00:16:04,800 Speaker 1: Cruz should receive the death penalty or life in prison 304 00:16:04,840 --> 00:16:08,960 Speaker 1: without parole. Prosecutors presented graphic evidence of the killings and 305 00:16:09,000 --> 00:16:12,400 Speaker 1: testimony from victim's families to argue for death, while the 306 00:16:12,440 --> 00:16:18,000 Speaker 1: defense emphasized mitigating factors, including Cruise's severe mental health issues, 307 00:16:18,400 --> 00:16:23,720 Speaker 1: fetal alcohol spectrum disorder, childhood abuse, and neglect. In October 308 00:16:23,760 --> 00:16:27,280 Speaker 1: of twenty twenty two, the jury failed to unanimously agree 309 00:16:27,280 --> 00:16:30,400 Speaker 1: on the death penalty, resulting in an automatic sentence of 310 00:16:30,440 --> 00:16:33,640 Speaker 1: life in prison without the possibility of parole. The outcome 311 00:16:33,720 --> 00:16:38,480 Speaker 1: drew intense national attention and anger from victim's families, some 312 00:16:38,560 --> 00:16:42,280 Speaker 1: of whom criticized the jury and the defense strategy. 313 00:16:42,320 --> 00:16:44,240 Speaker 2: Because he didn't get the death penalty. 314 00:16:43,920 --> 00:16:45,680 Speaker 1: Because he did not get the death penalty because they 315 00:16:45,680 --> 00:16:48,000 Speaker 1: could not unanimously agree on it, and. 316 00:16:47,880 --> 00:16:50,840 Speaker 2: That's a Florida thing, then hunt they have to unanimously agree. So. 317 00:16:50,960 --> 00:16:54,160 Speaker 1: Judge Elizabeth Shearer served as a presiding judge over the 318 00:16:54,200 --> 00:16:57,680 Speaker 1: Parkland shooters criminal case in Boward County, including both the 319 00:16:57,720 --> 00:17:01,160 Speaker 1: pre trial proceedings and the twenty twenty two penalty phase 320 00:17:01,240 --> 00:17:05,640 Speaker 1: trial that determined Nicholas Cruz's sentence. She managed an unusually 321 00:17:05,760 --> 00:17:11,639 Speaker 1: emotional and high profile proceeding, repeatedly enforcing courtroom decorum, amid 322 00:17:11,680 --> 00:17:16,159 Speaker 1: graphic testimony and intense reactions from victim's families. After the 323 00:17:16,240 --> 00:17:19,280 Speaker 1: jury failed to unanimously agree on the death penalty, Judd 324 00:17:19,320 --> 00:17:22,720 Speaker 1: Shearer was legally required to impose the mandatory sentence of 325 00:17:22,760 --> 00:17:26,439 Speaker 1: life in prison without the possibility of parole, which she 326 00:17:26,480 --> 00:17:30,119 Speaker 1: did at Cruz's formal sentencing in November of twenty twenty. 327 00:17:29,880 --> 00:17:32,800 Speaker 2: Seven, so her hands were tied, she could not sentence 328 00:17:32,840 --> 00:17:33,639 Speaker 2: him to death right. 329 00:17:35,359 --> 00:17:38,760 Speaker 1: During a presentation to Miami law students in twenty twenty four, 330 00:17:39,040 --> 00:17:43,679 Speaker 1: Judge Liz sharply criticized Cruse's public defenders, claiming they acted 331 00:17:43,800 --> 00:17:49,000 Speaker 1: unprofessionally in overstep boundaries. She said Cruise's defense team lost 332 00:17:49,080 --> 00:17:52,240 Speaker 1: their minds during the twenty twenty two trial and recalled 333 00:17:52,280 --> 00:17:55,800 Speaker 1: being friendly with lead defense attorney Melissa McNeil and her 334 00:17:55,840 --> 00:17:58,359 Speaker 1: team before the case, but said that during four years 335 00:17:58,359 --> 00:18:01,439 Speaker 1: of pre trial motions, three months jury selection, and the 336 00:18:01,480 --> 00:18:06,680 Speaker 1: three month trial, they all lost their perspective. According to 337 00:18:06,760 --> 00:18:10,360 Speaker 1: Judge Liz, the de offense, engaged in disruptive behavior, talking, 338 00:18:10,400 --> 00:18:13,040 Speaker 1: passing notes, using a printer, and even brushing their hair 339 00:18:13,160 --> 00:18:16,960 Speaker 1: while prosecution witnesses testified. Sounds like a high school classroom, 340 00:18:17,359 --> 00:18:19,960 Speaker 1: like this is how I picture Annabelle in school, Like 341 00:18:20,080 --> 00:18:22,280 Speaker 1: passing notes, brushing hair. 342 00:18:22,119 --> 00:18:24,800 Speaker 2: Which is unacceptable, exactly seventh grade class. 343 00:18:25,160 --> 00:18:27,680 Speaker 1: She added that one attorney during a recess raised her 344 00:18:27,680 --> 00:18:30,840 Speaker 1: middle finger at a camera broadcasting the trial, feeling it 345 00:18:31,000 --> 00:18:34,360 Speaker 1: threatened attorney client privilege. This consumed them to a point 346 00:18:34,359 --> 00:18:36,439 Speaker 1: where they started doing things in acting ways that I 347 00:18:36,440 --> 00:18:38,720 Speaker 1: had never seen before from any defense attorney that I 348 00:18:38,720 --> 00:18:41,960 Speaker 1: have ever dealt with, she said. Judge Liz resigned from 349 00:18:41,960 --> 00:18:45,200 Speaker 1: the bench in June of twenty twenty three, eight months 350 00:18:45,200 --> 00:18:48,119 Speaker 1: after sentencing Cruise to life without parole, but maintains that 351 00:18:48,200 --> 00:18:51,919 Speaker 1: this case had nothing to do with her resignation. She 352 00:18:52,000 --> 00:18:54,040 Speaker 1: had no choice in the sentencing since at the time, 353 00:18:54,080 --> 00:18:57,159 Speaker 1: Florida law required a unanimous vote from the jury to 354 00:18:57,200 --> 00:19:01,000 Speaker 1: impose the death penalty, and Cruises panels nine to three 355 00:19:01,040 --> 00:19:04,320 Speaker 1: in favor. Florida soon after change the law to allow 356 00:19:04,320 --> 00:19:07,320 Speaker 1: a death sentence if eight or more jurors recommended it. Oh, 357 00:19:07,320 --> 00:19:08,680 Speaker 1: that's interesting. I did not know that. 358 00:19:08,600 --> 00:19:10,960 Speaker 2: Did you know that? No, But that's why I asked earlier. 359 00:19:11,000 --> 00:19:12,760 Speaker 2: If it was it had to be unanimous by the 360 00:19:12,840 --> 00:19:14,000 Speaker 2: juror if that was a state law. 361 00:19:14,119 --> 00:19:14,639 Speaker 1: That's interesting. 362 00:19:14,880 --> 00:19:19,200 Speaker 2: Now it's a majority, yeah, well eight of eight or more. Yeah, 363 00:19:19,720 --> 00:19:20,400 Speaker 2: two thirds. 364 00:19:20,920 --> 00:19:24,200 Speaker 1: The prosecutors and victims families received hugs from Judge Liz 365 00:19:24,280 --> 00:19:27,159 Speaker 1: after the sentencing, which was a decision later criticized by 366 00:19:27,160 --> 00:19:31,760 Speaker 1: the Judicial Qualifications Commission for showing quote her emotions to 367 00:19:31,880 --> 00:19:35,359 Speaker 1: overcome her judgment. Judge Liz said she offered hugs to 368 00:19:35,400 --> 00:19:38,520 Speaker 1: the defense team as well, but was rebuffed. She defended 369 00:19:38,520 --> 00:19:39,720 Speaker 1: her actions, saying. 370 00:19:39,520 --> 00:19:41,360 Speaker 2: Quote, I regrets for everybody. 371 00:19:41,440 --> 00:19:44,320 Speaker 1: Yeah, I regret that it the hugging was found to 372 00:19:44,320 --> 00:19:48,879 Speaker 1: be inappropriate, but maintained she oversaw the case properly. You 373 00:19:48,920 --> 00:19:49,840 Speaker 1: know that's that's. 374 00:19:49,720 --> 00:19:50,960 Speaker 2: Well, the case was over right. 375 00:19:51,160 --> 00:19:58,160 Speaker 1: That's interesting as I think as females, we are innately nurturers. 376 00:19:59,000 --> 00:20:02,040 Speaker 1: And if you sit in a courtroom for that long 377 00:20:02,200 --> 00:20:04,600 Speaker 1: and you hear all of this horrific things and the 378 00:20:04,640 --> 00:20:08,040 Speaker 1: families are sitting there, and then once it's over, it's 379 00:20:08,200 --> 00:20:08,960 Speaker 1: very difficult. 380 00:20:08,960 --> 00:20:10,320 Speaker 2: And how long was the trial? 381 00:20:10,440 --> 00:20:11,480 Speaker 1: I think it said three months. 382 00:20:11,600 --> 00:20:13,119 Speaker 2: See, that's a lot. 383 00:20:13,440 --> 00:20:19,280 Speaker 1: It's very difficult to be completely robotic and stone based from. 384 00:20:18,960 --> 00:20:23,400 Speaker 2: So you're saying a male judge would have been like, what, like, well, 385 00:20:23,400 --> 00:20:26,720 Speaker 2: he probably over and out. Yeah it's lunchtime. 386 00:20:26,880 --> 00:20:29,639 Speaker 1: Yeah, but you know, women are natural nurturers. So I 387 00:20:29,680 --> 00:20:34,119 Speaker 1: think her probably her just innate reaction was to and 388 00:20:34,160 --> 00:20:36,359 Speaker 1: she said she tried it. She tried to equally hug everyone, 389 00:20:36,480 --> 00:20:39,479 Speaker 1: according to her, so it was an equal distribution of hugs. 390 00:20:39,720 --> 00:20:42,919 Speaker 1: But she was rebuffed by the defense. So Judge U. 391 00:20:43,080 --> 00:20:44,919 Speaker 1: Liz highlighted during her left the. 392 00:20:44,920 --> 00:20:49,199 Speaker 2: Defense was probably smart by declining because they're like, maybe 393 00:20:49,240 --> 00:20:51,439 Speaker 2: they don't want to like, Okay, we know your intentions 394 00:20:51,440 --> 00:20:54,280 Speaker 2: are well, but this is bad optics, and my clients 395 00:20:54,320 --> 00:20:58,240 Speaker 2: can file for like, you know, some you know trial, Yeah, 396 00:20:58,280 --> 00:21:00,959 Speaker 2: sometime of miss trial. You know, he's got a life sentence. 397 00:21:01,280 --> 00:21:03,359 Speaker 1: Not one person on that commission has ever tried a 398 00:21:03,359 --> 00:21:05,159 Speaker 1: case like this, much less a case where you have 399 00:21:05,240 --> 00:21:07,600 Speaker 1: seventeen families who have spent a big part of a 400 00:21:07,640 --> 00:21:09,840 Speaker 1: four and a half years with you. She explained that 401 00:21:09,880 --> 00:21:11,720 Speaker 1: she had been a judge for nearly six years when 402 00:21:11,720 --> 00:21:14,000 Speaker 1: assigned to the case, and that no other Broward County 403 00:21:14,040 --> 00:21:16,680 Speaker 1: criminal judge at the time had handled a death penalty 404 00:21:16,720 --> 00:21:21,560 Speaker 1: trial Judge Liz described the challenge of maintaining composure amid 405 00:21:21,600 --> 00:21:25,840 Speaker 1: emotional testimonies, stating, quote, the men judges don't cry. The 406 00:21:25,840 --> 00:21:28,520 Speaker 1: female judge was not going to cry. She also commented 407 00:21:28,520 --> 00:21:31,840 Speaker 1: on Cruz's character, stating that he is a sociopath who 408 00:21:31,880 --> 00:21:34,199 Speaker 1: knows not one single bit of remorse for his actions 409 00:21:34,320 --> 00:21:37,119 Speaker 1: or the pain he calls the families and the Parkland community. 410 00:21:37,440 --> 00:21:40,639 Speaker 2: So, you know, I never that's something I never said, like, Okay, 411 00:21:41,000 --> 00:21:44,640 Speaker 2: if he felt bad, he should have a lesser sentence, 412 00:21:45,119 --> 00:21:48,040 Speaker 2: because if you feel bad, like you commit a murder. 413 00:21:48,680 --> 00:21:50,520 Speaker 2: I know this was more than just a murder, but 414 00:21:50,800 --> 00:21:52,960 Speaker 2: you commit a murder, and then it's like if you 415 00:21:52,960 --> 00:21:55,199 Speaker 2: feel bad, it's less of a sentence. It's like, well no, 416 00:21:55,359 --> 00:21:58,160 Speaker 2: because the person's still dead, like the crime was still committed. 417 00:21:58,640 --> 00:22:02,080 Speaker 2: To me, I don't get that. Maybe in jail or 418 00:22:02,080 --> 00:22:06,600 Speaker 2: in prison, if that starts to show and they're educating 419 00:22:06,640 --> 00:22:09,240 Speaker 2: themselves and they're going to be a better person, in 420 00:22:09,359 --> 00:22:11,760 Speaker 2: productive member of society, and you'd be better off for 421 00:22:11,960 --> 00:22:13,959 Speaker 2: you know, putting them out in society where they can 422 00:22:14,000 --> 00:22:16,200 Speaker 2: be productive and they're not just taking tax dollars, but 423 00:22:16,240 --> 00:22:19,480 Speaker 2: they're contributing then maybe, but at the sentencing hearing, I 424 00:22:19,520 --> 00:22:22,320 Speaker 2: never really understood that. I know that's the way it works, yeah, 425 00:22:22,320 --> 00:22:23,120 Speaker 2: but I don't get that. 426 00:22:23,160 --> 00:22:26,320 Speaker 1: So you're saying you would, You're okay during parole hearings 427 00:22:26,359 --> 00:22:29,760 Speaker 1: that they use the like an indication of remorse as 428 00:22:29,760 --> 00:22:33,560 Speaker 1: something to take into consideration during a parole hearing, because 429 00:22:33,560 --> 00:22:36,320 Speaker 1: you're saying after the fact, after the sentencing, if they've 430 00:22:36,320 --> 00:22:40,639 Speaker 1: shown remorse and they've tried to better themselves, yeah. 431 00:22:40,160 --> 00:22:42,440 Speaker 2: Then and then it also but you're saying. 432 00:22:42,200 --> 00:22:44,840 Speaker 1: It shouldn't be criteria during this initial sentence and. 433 00:22:44,880 --> 00:22:47,199 Speaker 2: Also with the victim's statements, which I know is a 434 00:22:47,240 --> 00:22:50,440 Speaker 2: therapeutic thing also, and I would if that happened to 435 00:22:50,480 --> 00:22:53,560 Speaker 2: me and I was, you know, family to someone that 436 00:22:53,600 --> 00:22:54,920 Speaker 2: was a victim, and I had to give a victis 437 00:22:54,960 --> 00:22:56,399 Speaker 2: to name, you better believe I would. So I'm not 438 00:22:56,400 --> 00:23:00,480 Speaker 2: opposed to that. But it's like, because there's more heartache, 439 00:23:00,520 --> 00:23:03,239 Speaker 2: they should have more jail time. Does that mean if 440 00:23:03,240 --> 00:23:05,919 Speaker 2: there was less heartache and this person that was killed 441 00:23:06,200 --> 00:23:09,240 Speaker 2: had no family or no victim statements because they were 442 00:23:09,760 --> 00:23:12,679 Speaker 2: not really engaged with anyone in their family and their 443 00:23:12,680 --> 00:23:14,800 Speaker 2: family didn't come, then that would person would get a 444 00:23:14,880 --> 00:23:18,000 Speaker 2: lesser sentence. It's still a life that was taken. So 445 00:23:18,119 --> 00:23:20,880 Speaker 2: I kind of don't really know how that comes into 446 00:23:20,920 --> 00:23:23,840 Speaker 2: play with sentencing, but I know it does, and I 447 00:23:23,880 --> 00:23:25,960 Speaker 2: know it's you know, there's probably more to it than 448 00:23:25,960 --> 00:23:26,680 Speaker 2: what I'm just saying. 449 00:23:26,920 --> 00:23:28,920 Speaker 1: Well, because at the end of the day, both sides 450 00:23:28,960 --> 00:23:32,159 Speaker 1: want to get to your pull your heart strings of 451 00:23:32,200 --> 00:23:32,719 Speaker 1: the jury. 452 00:23:32,880 --> 00:23:35,560 Speaker 2: Oh in some way, okay, yeah, yeah, if the jury 453 00:23:35,600 --> 00:23:37,240 Speaker 2: is involved in sensing. But all the time it is 454 00:23:37,720 --> 00:23:41,120 Speaker 2: to judge. But you know, everyone's sorry when they get caught, right, 455 00:23:41,200 --> 00:23:43,920 Speaker 2: So that makes it hard to believe. I remember, I, uh, 456 00:23:44,720 --> 00:23:46,520 Speaker 2: I caught shoplifters, right, that was one. 457 00:23:46,440 --> 00:23:49,800 Speaker 1: Of my jobs. Yes, I love Shane stories. We could 458 00:23:49,840 --> 00:23:50,840 Speaker 1: do a whole podcast. 459 00:23:50,920 --> 00:23:53,760 Speaker 2: I was a store investcart and every time it was 460 00:23:53,800 --> 00:23:57,080 Speaker 2: their first time, yes, and they were sorry and they 461 00:23:57,119 --> 00:24:00,159 Speaker 2: would never do it again. Right, But that's that's not 462 00:24:00,200 --> 00:24:03,480 Speaker 2: true because I'd seen him before, right, I'd like, now, 463 00:24:03,480 --> 00:24:05,200 Speaker 2: I've seen you many times coming here, and stud just 464 00:24:05,200 --> 00:24:07,400 Speaker 2: couldn't catch you. Now I did. It's not your first time, 465 00:24:07,440 --> 00:24:09,200 Speaker 2: and they're always sorry when they get caught. 466 00:24:10,240 --> 00:24:13,440 Speaker 1: You know, Shane is an interesting man, and I don't 467 00:24:13,480 --> 00:24:16,320 Speaker 1: know if the majority of you out there understand how 468 00:24:16,359 --> 00:24:17,199 Speaker 1: interesting he is. 469 00:24:17,359 --> 00:24:17,520 Speaker 3: You know. 470 00:24:17,640 --> 00:24:19,480 Speaker 1: Also, by the way, I had a lot of people 471 00:24:19,560 --> 00:24:25,360 Speaker 1: send me dms and they wanted more information about your 472 00:24:26,520 --> 00:24:29,439 Speaker 1: your your mission because you didn't give away a lot 473 00:24:29,440 --> 00:24:33,680 Speaker 1: of information when we talked about Jody Hildebrandon Ruby, Frankie. 474 00:24:33,720 --> 00:24:35,479 Speaker 1: You know, you did get you touched a little bit 475 00:24:35,480 --> 00:24:37,040 Speaker 1: on the fact that you did go on a mission 476 00:24:37,040 --> 00:24:39,359 Speaker 1: with the LDS Church, that you went to Portugal, that 477 00:24:39,400 --> 00:24:41,840 Speaker 1: you went to Cape Verd but you didn't give away 478 00:24:41,840 --> 00:24:43,600 Speaker 1: a lot more. And I had a lot of people 479 00:24:43,680 --> 00:24:45,840 Speaker 1: reach out and ask if we could do an in 480 00:24:45,960 --> 00:24:52,840 Speaker 1: depth podcast just on you and your mission, and someday, 481 00:24:52,960 --> 00:24:55,520 Speaker 1: maybe someday we take a deep dive into Shane Simson. 482 00:24:55,960 --> 00:24:58,399 Speaker 1: Shane also some of my other favorite stories, some of 483 00:24:58,440 --> 00:25:00,720 Speaker 1: his other career choices that people I don't know about. 484 00:25:01,119 --> 00:25:03,879 Speaker 1: When you did he did past control at once, that's 485 00:25:03,920 --> 00:25:05,720 Speaker 1: time I saved up for my mission. He did past 486 00:25:05,760 --> 00:25:08,520 Speaker 1: control before he went on his mission, And those are 487 00:25:08,560 --> 00:25:12,359 Speaker 1: some of my favorite Shane Simpson stories. So anyway, maybe 488 00:25:12,359 --> 00:25:23,080 Speaker 1: we'll take a deeper dive into Shane Simpson. So Judge 489 00:25:23,080 --> 00:25:26,399 Speaker 1: Liz graduated from University of Miami School of Law before 490 00:25:26,440 --> 00:25:29,680 Speaker 1: working for the State Attorney's Office for the seventeenth Judicial 491 00:25:29,760 --> 00:25:34,680 Speaker 1: Circuit Broward County, Florida. Shearer was first chair in over 492 00:25:34,840 --> 00:25:39,200 Speaker 1: seventy five jury trials handling charges of murder, attempted murder, 493 00:25:39,400 --> 00:25:43,320 Speaker 1: armed home invasion, robbery, and arson. She worked as a 494 00:25:43,359 --> 00:25:46,119 Speaker 1: prosecutor for eleven years before she was appointed to the 495 00:25:46,160 --> 00:25:49,879 Speaker 1: Florida Circuit Court bench by Florida Governor Rick Scott. She 496 00:25:49,920 --> 00:25:53,920 Speaker 1: spent two years presiding over family court cases before being 497 00:25:53,920 --> 00:25:57,120 Speaker 1: assigned by the chief judge to the Circuit Felony Division. 498 00:25:57,680 --> 00:26:00,800 Speaker 1: Judge Liz became widely known for presiding over the Parkland 499 00:26:00,800 --> 00:26:04,000 Speaker 1: shooting case, which we just discussed, which was the biggest 500 00:26:04,000 --> 00:26:07,800 Speaker 1: mass shooting case to go to trial in American history. 501 00:26:08,359 --> 00:26:11,840 Speaker 1: It's bigger than Columbine. How many were killed in Columbine, 502 00:26:11,840 --> 00:26:12,959 Speaker 1: I don't know. I'd have to look that up. 503 00:26:13,000 --> 00:26:16,399 Speaker 2: I don't know, but Columbine was as far as I remember, 504 00:26:17,080 --> 00:26:19,840 Speaker 2: like prior to that, there didn't seem to be such 505 00:26:19,960 --> 00:26:25,560 Speaker 2: a school shooting. I don't Also, security camera something so dramatic, 506 00:26:25,600 --> 00:26:27,639 Speaker 2: the way they dressed up, the way it was the 507 00:26:27,680 --> 00:26:30,919 Speaker 2: students that went in, and you know, how did the 508 00:26:31,000 --> 00:26:34,439 Speaker 2: parents not know? And you know, with media being more accessible, 509 00:26:34,480 --> 00:26:38,199 Speaker 2: it spread faster. So I don't know. To me, that 510 00:26:38,280 --> 00:26:41,800 Speaker 2: always felt like that kind of sparked school shootings, but 511 00:26:41,840 --> 00:26:44,919 Speaker 2: at least that that's also just from my generation and 512 00:26:44,920 --> 00:26:45,520 Speaker 2: what I've seen. 513 00:26:45,640 --> 00:26:47,760 Speaker 1: Well, No, I believe that there's a lot of truth 514 00:26:47,800 --> 00:26:49,600 Speaker 1: to that. I don't There might have been some school 515 00:26:49,600 --> 00:26:51,840 Speaker 1: shootings prior to that, but I don't know if they had. 516 00:26:52,320 --> 00:26:54,680 Speaker 1: I don't know if they were widely known or talked about. 517 00:26:54,680 --> 00:26:56,480 Speaker 1: Columbine was definitely. 518 00:26:56,320 --> 00:26:58,000 Speaker 2: And it almost like came on the news in real 519 00:26:58,080 --> 00:27:01,240 Speaker 2: time almost you know, everyone was outside the school trying 520 00:27:01,240 --> 00:27:04,320 Speaker 2: to figure out what's going on, and bombs and lots. 521 00:27:04,359 --> 00:27:07,760 Speaker 2: It wasn't one handgun, right, they had lots of weapons. 522 00:27:08,119 --> 00:27:09,240 Speaker 2: You know, they were gonna you know, it was like 523 00:27:09,240 --> 00:27:10,320 Speaker 2: an army kind of what was. 524 00:27:10,320 --> 00:27:12,360 Speaker 1: Well thought out and well planned. I think they planned 525 00:27:12,359 --> 00:27:13,600 Speaker 1: for over a year. 526 00:27:13,440 --> 00:27:15,520 Speaker 2: I believe probably. Yeah. 527 00:27:15,600 --> 00:27:18,399 Speaker 1: So, Sheer's career plan was to retire from the bench 528 00:27:18,480 --> 00:27:21,040 Speaker 1: after ten years in order to go into private practice 529 00:27:21,040 --> 00:27:23,520 Speaker 1: at her family's law firm, but at the request of 530 00:27:23,640 --> 00:27:26,359 Speaker 1: Chief Judge Jack Tudor, she agreed to stay until the 531 00:27:26,359 --> 00:27:30,200 Speaker 1: completion of the Parkland case. Shortly after the trial concluded, 532 00:27:30,280 --> 00:27:33,520 Speaker 1: she followed through with her career plan, retired from the 533 00:27:33,560 --> 00:27:37,120 Speaker 1: bench and now works as a partner at Conrad and Shearer, 534 00:27:37,280 --> 00:27:41,200 Speaker 1: specializing in civil litigation. Judge Sheer also works as a 535 00:27:41,280 --> 00:27:45,520 Speaker 1: legal analyst, making frequent TV appearances on Fox News, CBS 536 00:27:45,640 --> 00:27:50,640 Speaker 1: News Nation, Long, Crime Court TV, and now Legally Brunette. 537 00:27:51,080 --> 00:27:54,040 Speaker 1: She recently started her own YouTube channel. You can find 538 00:27:54,080 --> 00:27:56,880 Speaker 1: her at the Judge Liz, which is how she came 539 00:27:56,960 --> 00:27:59,240 Speaker 1: on our radar because Shane watched. 540 00:27:58,880 --> 00:28:02,200 Speaker 2: Her YouTube ita of her in the courtroom before, Yeah, 541 00:28:02,240 --> 00:28:03,480 Speaker 2: before her YouTube but then you. 542 00:28:03,440 --> 00:28:05,159 Speaker 1: Also watched some of her YouTube. 543 00:28:04,920 --> 00:28:07,119 Speaker 2: Channel, right, and then somehow it popped up and so 544 00:28:07,160 --> 00:28:08,280 Speaker 2: I got one of it. 545 00:28:08,359 --> 00:28:11,879 Speaker 1: Yeah, right, where's she? On her YouTube channel, she shares 546 00:28:11,920 --> 00:28:16,959 Speaker 1: her insight on a variety of legal issues and cases. So, Hi, 547 00:28:17,119 --> 00:28:19,399 Speaker 1: Judge list, thanks for coming on Legally Brunette today. I 548 00:28:19,440 --> 00:28:21,960 Speaker 1: appreciate it. It's nice to chat with you. Thanks, thank 549 00:28:22,000 --> 00:28:24,760 Speaker 1: you for having me. Of course, we've actually wanted to 550 00:28:24,800 --> 00:28:28,119 Speaker 1: have you on for a while. Shane, my husband Shane 551 00:28:28,320 --> 00:28:31,520 Speaker 1: uh was watching your YouTube videos and that's how we 552 00:28:31,840 --> 00:28:34,080 Speaker 1: were like, oh, we should have her on the podcast. 553 00:28:34,160 --> 00:28:36,200 Speaker 1: So we enjoyed watching. 554 00:28:35,840 --> 00:28:37,320 Speaker 3: You and I'm so great. 555 00:28:37,400 --> 00:28:40,160 Speaker 1: Yeah, anyway, and you do have a YouTube channel. It's 556 00:28:40,160 --> 00:28:42,600 Speaker 1: called at the Judge Liz correct if anybody wants to 557 00:28:42,640 --> 00:28:46,080 Speaker 1: find you, correct, I know on your YouTube, do you 558 00:28:46,160 --> 00:28:48,440 Speaker 1: just kind of take whatever's currently going on and kind 559 00:28:48,480 --> 00:28:50,640 Speaker 1: of talk about it from a judge perspective or just 560 00:28:50,680 --> 00:28:52,760 Speaker 1: a legal perspective. Is that kind of what you like 561 00:28:52,800 --> 00:28:53,040 Speaker 1: to do? 562 00:28:53,240 --> 00:28:57,960 Speaker 3: Yes, I try to get I try very hard. And 563 00:28:58,000 --> 00:29:01,640 Speaker 3: you all know because you do this, it's hard to 564 00:29:01,680 --> 00:29:05,080 Speaker 3: think of topics that not everybody's doing all the time, right, 565 00:29:05,280 --> 00:29:07,760 Speaker 3: So I try to take a case it's popular, that's 566 00:29:07,760 --> 00:29:10,080 Speaker 3: in the news that people are very interested in, and 567 00:29:10,560 --> 00:29:14,040 Speaker 3: I try, you know, my best to think of an 568 00:29:14,080 --> 00:29:17,200 Speaker 3: aspect that no one else is covering. Right of course, 569 00:29:17,320 --> 00:29:19,800 Speaker 3: like I said, you all know how hard that can be, 570 00:29:19,960 --> 00:29:21,720 Speaker 3: especially if you don't have if you're not big enough 571 00:29:21,800 --> 00:29:24,920 Speaker 3: to have you know, producers and writers and things like that. 572 00:29:25,440 --> 00:29:28,040 Speaker 3: But I try very hard to think of something that's 573 00:29:28,160 --> 00:29:31,720 Speaker 3: interesting that has not been talked about at nauseum. 574 00:29:32,120 --> 00:29:34,120 Speaker 1: Right, Well, I would think because I feel like a 575 00:29:34,120 --> 00:29:36,680 Speaker 1: lot of content creators, I mean, they don't have legal backgrounds. 576 00:29:36,680 --> 00:29:39,600 Speaker 1: So it's like everybody's talking about, you know, the Blake 577 00:29:39,680 --> 00:29:42,840 Speaker 1: Lively case, and everybody talks about Diddy and everybody talks 578 00:29:42,840 --> 00:29:45,880 Speaker 1: about the big things that are out there. But I mean, 579 00:29:46,120 --> 00:29:48,760 Speaker 1: you're You're not only an attorney, you're a judge, and 580 00:29:48,880 --> 00:29:53,040 Speaker 1: so you can have like that very deep perspective that 581 00:29:53,120 --> 00:29:56,880 Speaker 1: other content creators can't. So yes, you know, I think 582 00:29:56,960 --> 00:29:59,640 Speaker 1: that's always interesting that you can take a deeper dive 583 00:29:59,680 --> 00:30:03,280 Speaker 1: into that. So anyway, before you came on, we were 584 00:30:03,280 --> 00:30:06,040 Speaker 1: talking about the Parkland shooting, and you know, I just 585 00:30:06,080 --> 00:30:08,880 Speaker 1: had a I had. First of all, I didn't realize 586 00:30:08,880 --> 00:30:10,800 Speaker 1: it was twenty twenty two. For some reason, I felt 587 00:30:10,800 --> 00:30:13,320 Speaker 1: like it was farther back in time, but it actually 588 00:30:13,440 --> 00:30:14,520 Speaker 1: was pretty recent. 589 00:30:14,960 --> 00:30:17,720 Speaker 3: The sentencing was actually in twenty twenty. 590 00:30:17,480 --> 00:30:20,880 Speaker 1: Three, was it? The sentencing was in twenty twenty three. Now, 591 00:30:21,560 --> 00:30:24,000 Speaker 1: I know that you were tired right after that. Was 592 00:30:24,080 --> 00:30:26,400 Speaker 1: that that was a choice that you had made previously 593 00:30:26,440 --> 00:30:28,080 Speaker 1: though not because of the case? Correct? 594 00:30:28,640 --> 00:30:33,560 Speaker 3: So yeah, so I had, I had. I was appointed 595 00:30:33,560 --> 00:30:35,040 Speaker 3: to the bench at a young age. I was I 596 00:30:35,040 --> 00:30:37,440 Speaker 3: thirty five or thirty six, so I knew that wasn't 597 00:30:37,440 --> 00:30:43,280 Speaker 3: going to be my resting place, so to speak, so 598 00:30:43,440 --> 00:30:47,080 Speaker 3: I wanted to get the experience. I was very flattered 599 00:30:47,080 --> 00:30:50,920 Speaker 3: for the appointment, and I loved doing what I did, 600 00:30:52,880 --> 00:30:55,640 Speaker 3: but I knew there was a shelf life. I have 601 00:30:55,680 --> 00:30:58,040 Speaker 3: a family that has a very successful law form in 602 00:30:58,040 --> 00:31:00,880 Speaker 3: Fort Lauderdale. It's always been my dad's dream to have 603 00:31:01,040 --> 00:31:03,840 Speaker 3: me come help him run his firm with my brothers, 604 00:31:04,320 --> 00:31:06,520 Speaker 3: and so I had put him off for twenty years, 605 00:31:06,600 --> 00:31:09,240 Speaker 3: ten years as a prosecutor, in ten years as a judge. 606 00:31:09,640 --> 00:31:13,640 Speaker 3: So I told him at the end of at the 607 00:31:13,760 --> 00:31:15,720 Speaker 3: end of the Parkland case, I gave the chief judge 608 00:31:15,760 --> 00:31:18,120 Speaker 3: my word that I would stay through that case so 609 00:31:18,160 --> 00:31:21,000 Speaker 3: that the case would have continuity. But at the end 610 00:31:21,640 --> 00:31:25,720 Speaker 3: I was going to resign and perhaps take part in 611 00:31:25,760 --> 00:31:29,040 Speaker 3: my family business or do some other creative type things. 612 00:31:29,440 --> 00:31:33,800 Speaker 3: So that decision was made before. I can tell you 613 00:31:34,000 --> 00:31:40,840 Speaker 3: that the Parkland trial solidified my decision. In other words, 614 00:31:40,880 --> 00:31:43,480 Speaker 3: if I was on the cusp of should I do 615 00:31:43,520 --> 00:31:46,160 Speaker 3: it now or should I wait a few years, I 616 00:31:46,240 --> 00:31:50,400 Speaker 3: felt as though, you know what, I need to see 617 00:31:50,720 --> 00:31:53,280 Speaker 3: things and hear things that are not the worst of 618 00:31:53,320 --> 00:31:56,880 Speaker 3: the worst, because as a criminal judge, especially presiding over 619 00:31:56,920 --> 00:31:59,840 Speaker 3: a case like that, you hear things that are just 620 00:32:00,560 --> 00:32:04,960 Speaker 3: absolutely tragic, and you hear the worst parts of society 621 00:32:05,200 --> 00:32:07,360 Speaker 3: as opposed to the best. And you know, I like 622 00:32:07,440 --> 00:32:11,120 Speaker 3: to tell people. I've learned in my profession that most 623 00:32:11,120 --> 00:32:14,320 Speaker 3: people are good, most people are kind, most people would 624 00:32:14,680 --> 00:32:17,080 Speaker 3: lend a hand if they if they had the opportunity. 625 00:32:17,560 --> 00:32:21,400 Speaker 3: There are very few and far between are the criminals, 626 00:32:21,440 --> 00:32:26,720 Speaker 3: hardened criminals like the Parkland shooter. So I just felt like, 627 00:32:26,760 --> 00:32:30,720 Speaker 3: you know what, I need a new, fresh perspective right now. 628 00:32:30,760 --> 00:32:34,000 Speaker 3: I'm in civil I do civil litigation now, and it's 629 00:32:34,040 --> 00:32:36,560 Speaker 3: boring and I'm not sure it's the fresh perspective that 630 00:32:36,600 --> 00:32:40,400 Speaker 3: I was anticipating or needing. But at least I'm not 631 00:32:40,560 --> 00:32:45,560 Speaker 3: dealing with, you know, the death of children, or shootings 632 00:32:45,680 --> 00:32:49,320 Speaker 3: or just people, the worst people and the worst behavior, 633 00:32:49,320 --> 00:32:50,160 Speaker 3: if that makes sense. 634 00:32:50,400 --> 00:32:52,400 Speaker 1: You were offered where they came to you and they 635 00:32:52,400 --> 00:32:55,280 Speaker 1: wanted you to preside over that case, and you know seventeen, 636 00:32:55,360 --> 00:32:57,760 Speaker 1: you know, people were affected by that. How do you 637 00:32:57,800 --> 00:33:00,840 Speaker 1: prepare for something like that. I mean, that's a huge trial. 638 00:33:00,960 --> 00:33:03,320 Speaker 1: I mean you're dealing with seventeen families that were affected. 639 00:33:03,960 --> 00:33:05,720 Speaker 3: So it came out during the trial that I was 640 00:33:05,800 --> 00:33:08,720 Speaker 3: randomly assigned. I'm not afraid to say now because it's 641 00:33:08,720 --> 00:33:12,000 Speaker 3: been long enough. It was random, But the chief judge 642 00:33:12,000 --> 00:33:14,440 Speaker 3: had told me that if you don't get assigned this case. 643 00:33:15,040 --> 00:33:17,560 Speaker 3: I'm going to assign it to you because I had 644 00:33:17,600 --> 00:33:24,640 Speaker 3: the most experience and I knew how to handle myself 645 00:33:24,640 --> 00:33:27,960 Speaker 3: in front of the cameras. A lot of judges really 646 00:33:27,960 --> 00:33:32,840 Speaker 3: wanted the attention, the media attention. I had judges that 647 00:33:32,880 --> 00:33:37,280 Speaker 3: were close to retirement that were like calling me, begging me, 648 00:33:37,320 --> 00:33:39,320 Speaker 3: can I cover the arrangement? Can I cover this? Because 649 00:33:39,320 --> 00:33:41,840 Speaker 3: they wanted to be on TV? And the chief judge 650 00:33:41,920 --> 00:33:43,880 Speaker 3: knew that I wouldn't do that, that I would take 651 00:33:43,920 --> 00:33:47,480 Speaker 3: it seriously, that I wouldn't show both. So I knew 652 00:33:47,520 --> 00:33:52,000 Speaker 3: it was coming my way. I you know, you can't 653 00:33:52,040 --> 00:33:55,320 Speaker 3: prepare for it. At first, I said, you know what, 654 00:33:55,400 --> 00:33:57,640 Speaker 3: this is like any other case. He's not getting any 655 00:33:57,680 --> 00:34:01,080 Speaker 3: special treatment. I'm going to run this this case like 656 00:34:01,120 --> 00:34:03,320 Speaker 3: I do any other case. There's going to be deadlines. 657 00:34:03,680 --> 00:34:05,240 Speaker 3: You know, I'm gonna hold their feet to the fire 658 00:34:05,280 --> 00:34:08,120 Speaker 3: on both sides as far as discovery goes. He's gonna 659 00:34:08,120 --> 00:34:10,399 Speaker 3: come in with all the rest of the inmates. He's 660 00:34:10,440 --> 00:34:12,600 Speaker 3: gonna sit in the box like the rest of the inmates. 661 00:34:13,280 --> 00:34:15,880 Speaker 3: And then, very very quickly it was brought to my 662 00:34:15,920 --> 00:34:19,279 Speaker 3: attention judges is not a regular case. We can't bring 663 00:34:19,360 --> 00:34:21,960 Speaker 3: him in with the other inmates because it's dangerous to him. 664 00:34:22,000 --> 00:34:24,200 Speaker 3: Somebody's going to try to kill him. We have to 665 00:34:24,239 --> 00:34:26,640 Speaker 3: have him in a separate hearing where nobody else is 666 00:34:26,640 --> 00:34:29,960 Speaker 3: in the courtroom. We have to be able to accommodate 667 00:34:30,000 --> 00:34:34,520 Speaker 3: all the different lawyers on both sides. So you know, 668 00:34:34,600 --> 00:34:36,120 Speaker 3: my point of view is I'm going to handle this 669 00:34:36,200 --> 00:34:37,040 Speaker 3: like any other case. 670 00:34:38,600 --> 00:34:42,919 Speaker 4: Then I realized because of the specific circumstances with all 671 00:34:43,000 --> 00:34:45,400 Speaker 4: of the victims' family members that wanted to be present 672 00:34:45,480 --> 00:34:50,040 Speaker 4: for all of the hearings, and the network's live streamed 673 00:34:50,080 --> 00:34:53,480 Speaker 4: every single minute of every single hearing for five years, 674 00:34:53,960 --> 00:34:56,359 Speaker 4: and the fact that there was such a security risk 675 00:34:56,440 --> 00:34:58,320 Speaker 4: on the part of the shooter, which a lot of 676 00:34:58,360 --> 00:34:59,640 Speaker 4: people would think, well, who cares. 677 00:35:00,080 --> 00:35:03,120 Speaker 3: Well, the sheriff's office in any state or county, they 678 00:35:03,160 --> 00:35:06,200 Speaker 3: do care because if an inmate is killed or badly 679 00:35:06,400 --> 00:35:09,480 Speaker 3: hurt on their watch, it leaves them open to liability, 680 00:35:09,520 --> 00:35:11,719 Speaker 3: and they certainly did not want that to happen. So 681 00:35:12,480 --> 00:35:16,000 Speaker 3: there were all kinds of precautions that were taken. So 682 00:35:16,080 --> 00:35:18,480 Speaker 3: I just I went in with a mindset, this is 683 00:35:18,560 --> 00:35:21,719 Speaker 3: just like any other case, and I tried to keep 684 00:35:21,800 --> 00:35:26,399 Speaker 3: that that mindset. You know, this is like any other case. 685 00:35:26,480 --> 00:35:28,640 Speaker 3: I'm going to call balls and strikes. I'm going to 686 00:35:28,680 --> 00:35:31,000 Speaker 3: deal with what's what's put in front of me, and 687 00:35:31,440 --> 00:35:33,319 Speaker 3: then you know, we'll go from there. 688 00:35:33,560 --> 00:35:38,640 Speaker 1: Yeah, were you surprised by the jury's decision that he 689 00:35:38,760 --> 00:35:40,759 Speaker 1: did not get the death penalty? So you were was 690 00:35:40,800 --> 00:35:41,759 Speaker 1: that shocking for you? 691 00:35:43,640 --> 00:35:46,839 Speaker 3: So okay, yes and no. So my court reporter, who's 692 00:35:46,880 --> 00:35:50,000 Speaker 3: been a court reporter for like thirty years, she's the best. 693 00:35:50,080 --> 00:35:52,120 Speaker 3: She's worked with all of the judges who has tried 694 00:35:52,120 --> 00:35:57,600 Speaker 3: death penalty cases. So she has been the court reporter 695 00:35:57,680 --> 00:35:59,600 Speaker 3: for let's say, like I don't know, twenty five to 696 00:35:59,680 --> 00:36:03,880 Speaker 3: fifty death penalty cases and so many trials, and I 697 00:36:03,920 --> 00:36:05,800 Speaker 3: was lucky enough to have her. So she, you know, 698 00:36:05,840 --> 00:36:08,200 Speaker 3: the core reporter sits in front of the bench, right, 699 00:36:08,600 --> 00:36:12,280 Speaker 3: and they have a direct view to the jury. 700 00:36:12,520 --> 00:36:12,680 Speaker 1: Right. 701 00:36:12,920 --> 00:36:15,040 Speaker 3: I'm on the bench. I'm up here, so I'm sort 702 00:36:15,080 --> 00:36:16,799 Speaker 3: of looking down on them. So if they see me 703 00:36:16,840 --> 00:36:18,800 Speaker 3: looking at them, they sort of look up and smile. 704 00:36:20,080 --> 00:36:22,239 Speaker 3: The court reporter is a couple of feet from the 705 00:36:22,280 --> 00:36:25,879 Speaker 3: jury and sits just you know, five feet from them, 706 00:36:25,960 --> 00:36:28,200 Speaker 3: so she's watching them. So she had told me throughout 707 00:36:28,200 --> 00:36:31,040 Speaker 3: the trial judge, there's gonna be a problem with journal 708 00:36:31,120 --> 00:36:33,680 Speaker 3: number so and so. And I said, what do you mean, 709 00:36:33,920 --> 00:36:36,200 Speaker 3: and she said, I can tell by the way she 710 00:36:36,280 --> 00:36:39,880 Speaker 3: looks at the shooter. She said, he kind of just 711 00:36:39,960 --> 00:36:43,120 Speaker 3: makes a face like like she's so sorry for him. 712 00:36:43,840 --> 00:36:46,680 Speaker 3: And I said, Trisha, I don't want to hear it, 713 00:36:47,160 --> 00:36:48,960 Speaker 3: because there's nothing anybody can do. 714 00:36:49,120 --> 00:36:52,520 Speaker 1: If she's you know, sympathetic, it is what it is. 715 00:36:52,520 --> 00:36:55,640 Speaker 3: And you know so. But she kept telling me that, 716 00:36:55,719 --> 00:37:00,360 Speaker 3: and as much as I wanted to believe that she 717 00:37:00,520 --> 00:37:03,279 Speaker 3: was mistaken, because even if a jury is sympathetic, they 718 00:37:03,280 --> 00:37:07,359 Speaker 3: shouldn't be staring at the defendant and making like, you know, 719 00:37:07,440 --> 00:37:11,800 Speaker 3: like mom eyes and kind of like you know, sad 720 00:37:11,920 --> 00:37:16,200 Speaker 3: faces and that type of thing. They should be professional, 721 00:37:16,200 --> 00:37:21,520 Speaker 3: which mosturs are. So when the jury was out deliberating, 722 00:37:21,520 --> 00:37:24,840 Speaker 3: which was only for I think it was like five hours, 723 00:37:25,560 --> 00:37:28,440 Speaker 3: and considering the amount of evidence in the number of victims, 724 00:37:29,400 --> 00:37:32,560 Speaker 3: it was a very short amount of time. But during 725 00:37:32,640 --> 00:37:38,879 Speaker 3: that time, my chambers were like right down the hallway 726 00:37:38,880 --> 00:37:41,759 Speaker 3: from the jury, and the we had armed deputies and 727 00:37:41,760 --> 00:37:43,680 Speaker 3: so they would come into my chambers, like, Judge, the 728 00:37:43,719 --> 00:37:46,800 Speaker 3: jurors are screaming, they're pounding they're pounding on the doors. 729 00:37:46,800 --> 00:37:49,399 Speaker 3: They want to get out. They say they can't. They 730 00:37:49,440 --> 00:37:52,240 Speaker 3: have to get away from her. They need a break. 731 00:37:52,320 --> 00:37:54,040 Speaker 3: What do you want us to do? And anytime you 732 00:37:54,120 --> 00:37:55,960 Speaker 3: hear that kind of thing as a judge, it's like, 733 00:37:56,040 --> 00:37:59,879 Speaker 3: oh boy, this is not good. And then I found 734 00:37:59,880 --> 00:38:04,600 Speaker 3: out later on from my bailiffs that this particular juror 735 00:38:05,160 --> 00:38:07,719 Speaker 3: would not engage with any of the other jurors. Like 736 00:38:07,840 --> 00:38:10,200 Speaker 3: they go to a hotel at night and they're all 737 00:38:10,239 --> 00:38:12,239 Speaker 3: sitting at the table eating dinner. She goes to her 738 00:38:12,239 --> 00:38:16,640 Speaker 3: own table. She has her arms crossed, she's giving all 739 00:38:16,640 --> 00:38:19,160 Speaker 3: of these signs like she doesn't even want to participate 740 00:38:19,320 --> 00:38:25,640 Speaker 3: in with the rest of the of the members. So 741 00:38:28,520 --> 00:38:31,880 Speaker 3: when I got to the verdict and it was so quick, 742 00:38:34,120 --> 00:38:36,920 Speaker 3: you know, it's hard. It's hard to guess what a 743 00:38:37,000 --> 00:38:39,040 Speaker 3: jury's going to do. Especially this was my first death 744 00:38:39,080 --> 00:38:42,799 Speaker 3: penalty case. I had tried capital cases, but not death penalty. 745 00:38:42,960 --> 00:38:47,000 Speaker 3: So I mean, the evidence, as you all know, that 746 00:38:47,160 --> 00:38:52,120 Speaker 3: the the aggravating factors have to outweigh the mitigating factors, 747 00:38:52,800 --> 00:38:56,239 Speaker 3: and in my opinion, my legal opinion, the aggravating factors 748 00:38:56,719 --> 00:39:01,280 Speaker 3: grossly outweighed the mitigating In fact, there was the mitigating 749 00:39:01,320 --> 00:39:05,760 Speaker 3: evidence was so just. I mean, one of the mitigating 750 00:39:05,760 --> 00:39:08,640 Speaker 3: factors was Nicholas Cruz is a human being. I mean really, 751 00:39:09,239 --> 00:39:12,200 Speaker 3: because basically you have to include anything that the defense wants. 752 00:39:12,239 --> 00:39:13,840 Speaker 3: So that was a mitigating factor. 753 00:39:14,680 --> 00:39:17,800 Speaker 1: Can we just clarify for just the listeners, and mitigating 754 00:39:17,880 --> 00:39:22,720 Speaker 1: factors means the evidence that the defense presents that would say, okay, 755 00:39:22,760 --> 00:39:25,239 Speaker 1: he was wasn't there some evidence of abuse and things 756 00:39:25,320 --> 00:39:25,680 Speaker 1: like that. 757 00:39:26,040 --> 00:39:30,359 Speaker 3: Sure, So the state will come forward and they will 758 00:39:30,400 --> 00:39:34,320 Speaker 3: present aggravating factors, and they're statutory and the very similar 759 00:39:34,360 --> 00:39:38,040 Speaker 3: state by state. Because I've looked at them. One of 760 00:39:38,040 --> 00:39:41,560 Speaker 3: them is heinous, atrocious, and cruel. In other words, And 761 00:39:41,600 --> 00:39:44,640 Speaker 3: I hate to give this example, Emily, but if I 762 00:39:44,680 --> 00:39:46,360 Speaker 3: came into your office right now and shot you in 763 00:39:46,360 --> 00:39:50,360 Speaker 3: the face, that would not be considered heinous, atrocis and cruel. 764 00:39:50,400 --> 00:39:53,719 Speaker 3: If I tied you up and tortured you for an 765 00:39:53,800 --> 00:39:57,319 Speaker 3: hour and a half and then played Russian Roulette at 766 00:39:57,360 --> 00:39:59,960 Speaker 3: the back of your head until one boat finally came out, 767 00:40:00,080 --> 00:40:02,960 Speaker 3: that would probably be considered heineous choices and cruel. So, 768 00:40:03,160 --> 00:40:05,960 Speaker 3: as I've explained to my daughter, who's always very curious 769 00:40:06,000 --> 00:40:10,160 Speaker 3: about this, not every murder qualifies for the death penalty. 770 00:40:10,200 --> 00:40:13,239 Speaker 3: It has to be the worst of the worst. So 771 00:40:13,640 --> 00:40:17,200 Speaker 3: some of the aggravating factors were, this shooter came in 772 00:40:17,239 --> 00:40:21,160 Speaker 3: with a high powered assault rifle. Those the ammunition and 773 00:40:21,160 --> 00:40:24,960 Speaker 3: that type of rifle. They're about this big and I 774 00:40:24,960 --> 00:40:27,080 Speaker 3: would say about two and a half inches, and they 775 00:40:27,120 --> 00:40:31,600 Speaker 3: are made to tumble. So imagine a tumble weed going 776 00:40:31,640 --> 00:40:34,719 Speaker 3: through your body, so it just shreds whatever's in front 777 00:40:34,719 --> 00:40:37,040 Speaker 3: of it. So if I shot you with a regular gun, 778 00:40:37,080 --> 00:40:39,960 Speaker 3: it would go maybe through and through, maybe the bullet 779 00:40:39,960 --> 00:40:43,640 Speaker 3: would enter your flight, but this type would basically tumble 780 00:40:43,719 --> 00:40:46,360 Speaker 3: weed all the way through your body until it came out. 781 00:40:47,560 --> 00:40:51,080 Speaker 3: The fact that he planned this, the fact that it 782 00:40:51,200 --> 00:40:55,480 Speaker 3: was so high premeditated, a higher level of premeditation. The 783 00:40:55,520 --> 00:40:58,720 Speaker 3: fact that he went up and down the hallways shot 784 00:40:58,920 --> 00:41:01,319 Speaker 3: some people, and and then when he went back and 785 00:41:01,320 --> 00:41:04,120 Speaker 3: made the second pass through, he realized that certain people 786 00:41:04,120 --> 00:41:08,279 Speaker 3: weren't dead yet, and then he shot him again. Like 787 00:41:08,400 --> 00:41:10,759 Speaker 3: the terror, the fact that it was done on a 788 00:41:10,840 --> 00:41:13,880 Speaker 3: school grounds. All of these things were aggravating factors. The 789 00:41:13,920 --> 00:41:17,759 Speaker 3: fact that he killed so many people each victim can 790 00:41:17,800 --> 00:41:22,760 Speaker 3: be an aggravating factor in the other victim's case. Okay, 791 00:41:22,800 --> 00:41:25,840 Speaker 3: so the state presented all of the aggravating factors. The 792 00:41:25,960 --> 00:41:29,920 Speaker 3: mitigating factors are by the defense and their factors, like, look, 793 00:41:30,640 --> 00:41:34,719 Speaker 3: this person is not like you and I. He or 794 00:41:34,880 --> 00:41:39,280 Speaker 3: she has special circumstances that you should take into account 795 00:41:39,320 --> 00:41:44,560 Speaker 3: so you can understand the person and know more about 796 00:41:44,600 --> 00:41:47,320 Speaker 3: them why they committed the crime. And then you should 797 00:41:47,320 --> 00:41:51,160 Speaker 3: weigh that according to the aggravating factors and say which 798 00:41:51,200 --> 00:41:55,840 Speaker 3: one outweighs the other. Many people are under the mistaken 799 00:41:55,880 --> 00:41:59,120 Speaker 3: belief that Nicholas Cruz came from an abusive home. It was, 800 00:41:59,160 --> 00:42:02,120 Speaker 3: in fact the oppice it he was. He and his 801 00:42:02,200 --> 00:42:07,760 Speaker 3: younger brother were both adopted at birth by a lovely 802 00:42:07,840 --> 00:42:11,000 Speaker 3: couple who wanted nothing more but to have kids, but 803 00:42:11,040 --> 00:42:14,319 Speaker 3: they hadn't been able to, so they adopted them. They 804 00:42:15,239 --> 00:42:19,319 Speaker 3: gave them every kind of thing physical and emotional that 805 00:42:19,320 --> 00:42:22,600 Speaker 3: they could think of. His father died when he was 806 00:42:22,760 --> 00:42:26,120 Speaker 3: rather young, but his mother was always there, you know, 807 00:42:26,520 --> 00:42:29,160 Speaker 3: And as he became more and more troubled, she had 808 00:42:29,239 --> 00:42:32,920 Speaker 3: him in therapy, she had him in you know, special programs. 809 00:42:33,440 --> 00:42:37,799 Speaker 3: She she got him tested, she she she worked with 810 00:42:37,880 --> 00:42:42,920 Speaker 3: the schools for absolutely not. That's the mistake and belief. 811 00:42:43,000 --> 00:42:49,160 Speaker 3: This woman was a saint. She tried everything. At the end, 812 00:42:49,480 --> 00:42:52,080 Speaker 3: it got so bad, even with all of these services 813 00:42:52,120 --> 00:42:55,040 Speaker 3: in place, that she would walk around the house and 814 00:42:55,160 --> 00:42:58,480 Speaker 3: she was terrified. She was terrified of him and his 815 00:42:58,560 --> 00:43:02,759 Speaker 3: younger brother because they just they got they got a 816 00:43:02,840 --> 00:43:05,640 Speaker 3: kick out of terrorizing this this lady. But no, she tried. 817 00:43:05,800 --> 00:43:08,200 Speaker 3: She tried very hard. They lived in a nice area 818 00:43:08,280 --> 00:43:15,040 Speaker 3: of Parkland, so that wasn't that's that's sort of a 819 00:43:15,080 --> 00:43:17,800 Speaker 3: mistake and belief. What the defense did try to present 820 00:43:17,920 --> 00:43:21,879 Speaker 3: is that he he suffered from fetal alcohol syndrome. The 821 00:43:21,920 --> 00:43:24,440 Speaker 3: problem with that was that there was no evidence of it. 822 00:43:24,480 --> 00:43:27,160 Speaker 3: His marconium I think, I believe that's what you call 823 00:43:27,320 --> 00:43:31,879 Speaker 3: the like the umbilical cord stuff. I'm not very good 824 00:43:31,880 --> 00:43:36,839 Speaker 3: at science, but it tested negative. He didn't have any 825 00:43:36,840 --> 00:43:38,960 Speaker 3: of the signs. There's all these factors that you have 826 00:43:39,040 --> 00:43:42,720 Speaker 3: to have all of these symptoms. He didn't. He didn't 827 00:43:42,719 --> 00:43:45,279 Speaker 3: even have let's say there's I can't remember off the 828 00:43:45,320 --> 00:43:46,799 Speaker 3: top of my head, but let's say in order to 829 00:43:46,800 --> 00:43:50,920 Speaker 3: be diagnosed with this illness, you have to have like 830 00:43:51,080 --> 00:43:53,719 Speaker 3: five factors. He didn't even have two. 831 00:43:54,320 --> 00:43:59,000 Speaker 2: So you're saying, you're saying absent all these possible mitigating factors, 832 00:43:59,040 --> 00:43:59,960 Speaker 2: he still didn't get the. 833 00:44:00,719 --> 00:44:02,560 Speaker 3: Correct he was a psychopath. 834 00:44:10,680 --> 00:44:12,440 Speaker 1: Do you think it was the one juror that you 835 00:44:12,480 --> 00:44:14,879 Speaker 1: were talking about earlier. Do you think that she because 836 00:44:14,920 --> 00:44:17,040 Speaker 1: I know it was nine to three, So do you 837 00:44:17,120 --> 00:44:21,080 Speaker 1: think maybe she managed to convince to other people or 838 00:44:21,120 --> 00:44:23,520 Speaker 1: something and she was kind of the cancer in this 839 00:44:23,680 --> 00:44:24,320 Speaker 1: jury pool. 840 00:44:24,440 --> 00:44:26,880 Speaker 3: I don't think it was nine to three. I think 841 00:44:27,440 --> 00:44:31,360 Speaker 3: because this particular juror wrote me a note after the 842 00:44:31,480 --> 00:44:35,799 Speaker 3: verdict in its public record, and she said, Judge, all 843 00:44:35,840 --> 00:44:38,319 Speaker 3: the jurors are accusing me, saying that I hadn't made 844 00:44:38,400 --> 00:44:40,839 Speaker 3: my mind up from the beginning, and I wouldn't deliberate, 845 00:44:41,520 --> 00:44:44,200 Speaker 3: and I just want you to know that that I 846 00:44:44,640 --> 00:44:48,759 Speaker 3: deny that fully, and etcetera, and et cetera. There were 847 00:44:48,880 --> 00:44:52,759 Speaker 3: two jurors, from my understanding, that had not made up 848 00:44:52,800 --> 00:44:55,920 Speaker 3: their mind, and so people put the one hold out. 849 00:44:56,280 --> 00:44:57,880 Speaker 3: I wouldn't even call her a holdout. I would I 850 00:44:57,920 --> 00:45:01,279 Speaker 3: would say she she she got I'm that jury to hijacket. 851 00:45:01,719 --> 00:45:06,680 Speaker 3: I believe because all of her answers in a definitely case, 852 00:45:06,719 --> 00:45:11,480 Speaker 3: the lawyers are Aret vadier Or. Jury selection went on 853 00:45:11,719 --> 00:45:14,760 Speaker 3: for I think it was two months of jury selection, 854 00:45:15,600 --> 00:45:20,400 Speaker 3: so each juror was questioned, I mean at nauseum, to 855 00:45:20,400 --> 00:45:22,279 Speaker 3: the point where you're like, oh, how many times can 856 00:45:22,320 --> 00:45:25,440 Speaker 3: you ask the same question? So you would have to 857 00:45:25,480 --> 00:45:28,319 Speaker 3: be really, really good to be able to answer all 858 00:45:28,360 --> 00:45:33,000 Speaker 3: of the questions to gives. You'd have to try very 859 00:45:33,040 --> 00:45:36,480 Speaker 3: hard if you were not fair. Okay, if you said 860 00:45:36,600 --> 00:45:40,320 Speaker 3: I'm anti death penalty or I'm absolutely pro death penalty 861 00:45:40,320 --> 00:45:41,920 Speaker 3: and I think this guy should get the death penalty 862 00:45:41,920 --> 00:45:43,359 Speaker 3: and I can keep an open mind. If you had 863 00:45:43,400 --> 00:45:48,880 Speaker 3: either extreme view, you would have to try very very 864 00:45:48,920 --> 00:45:53,000 Speaker 3: hard to answer the questions from the lawyers on both 865 00:45:53,040 --> 00:45:55,680 Speaker 3: sides to be able to make it through to the end. 866 00:45:55,719 --> 00:45:59,440 Speaker 3: If that makes sense, because both sides get hours and 867 00:45:59,480 --> 00:46:03,279 Speaker 3: hours to question each your individually and ask them in 868 00:46:03,560 --> 00:46:07,920 Speaker 3: many different ways, and the jurors are told, listen, if 869 00:46:08,120 --> 00:46:11,400 Speaker 3: you have a belief that you're against the death penalty, 870 00:46:11,400 --> 00:46:16,520 Speaker 3: that's fine, that's okay, but not in this case, because 871 00:46:16,560 --> 00:46:19,439 Speaker 3: you have to at least you don't have to say yes, 872 00:46:19,440 --> 00:46:21,239 Speaker 3: I'll give them the death penalty. You just have to 873 00:46:21,280 --> 00:46:24,600 Speaker 3: say I will keep an open mind. I understand that 874 00:46:24,960 --> 00:46:28,000 Speaker 3: my duty, my legal duty, and I just have to 875 00:46:28,040 --> 00:46:31,280 Speaker 3: be willing to be fair and impartial. And consider the factors. 876 00:46:31,760 --> 00:46:34,520 Speaker 3: That's it. You don't have to say yes, I will 877 00:46:34,520 --> 00:46:36,600 Speaker 3: give the death penalty or no I won't. You just 878 00:46:36,640 --> 00:46:40,600 Speaker 3: have to say I will participate in the legal process, 879 00:46:41,080 --> 00:46:44,400 Speaker 3: have the discussion, and if you have a belief that's firm, 880 00:46:44,520 --> 00:46:48,120 Speaker 3: like I don't believe in the death penalty, that's okay, 881 00:46:48,160 --> 00:46:50,799 Speaker 3: but you need to be a different case. 882 00:46:51,640 --> 00:46:54,640 Speaker 2: That makes sense because if if you were a jury 883 00:46:55,360 --> 00:46:59,560 Speaker 2: member for a case that was over a crime that 884 00:46:59,600 --> 00:47:03,440 Speaker 2: the the juror member didn't believe was criminal, right, like 885 00:47:03,880 --> 00:47:06,319 Speaker 2: marijuana or something, and they felt that that should be 886 00:47:06,440 --> 00:47:08,440 Speaker 2: legal and it's not, then obviously they're not going to 887 00:47:08,560 --> 00:47:12,759 Speaker 2: consider issuing any punishment or finding anyone guilty of a 888 00:47:12,760 --> 00:47:15,040 Speaker 2: crime they don't believe it's a crime to begin with. 889 00:47:15,120 --> 00:47:16,840 Speaker 2: So it's the same with death penalty. It's not a 890 00:47:16,880 --> 00:47:20,360 Speaker 2: matter of there's nothing wrong with being opposed to the 891 00:47:20,400 --> 00:47:22,920 Speaker 2: death penalty. The problem is if you're opposed to the 892 00:47:22,920 --> 00:47:25,399 Speaker 2: death penalty, then you won't even consider it. And that's 893 00:47:25,400 --> 00:47:27,799 Speaker 2: what needs to be considered, whether it's right or wrong 894 00:47:27,840 --> 00:47:28,440 Speaker 2: in this case. 895 00:47:28,520 --> 00:47:32,360 Speaker 3: And we tell them, listen, there's absolutely nothing wrong with 896 00:47:32,480 --> 00:47:35,239 Speaker 3: being opposed to the death penalty under any circumstances. There's 897 00:47:35,280 --> 00:47:36,879 Speaker 3: a lot of people that believe that. There's a lot 898 00:47:36,920 --> 00:47:40,120 Speaker 3: of states that are like that. But in Florida, we 899 00:47:40,280 --> 00:47:42,319 Speaker 3: have the death penalty. So you have to be able 900 00:47:42,360 --> 00:47:44,560 Speaker 3: to say you'll consider it. You have to be fair. 901 00:47:46,440 --> 00:47:49,680 Speaker 3: I'll give you a great example. So the head of 902 00:47:49,719 --> 00:47:52,799 Speaker 3: the sexual battery unit at the State Attorney's office here 903 00:47:52,800 --> 00:47:59,719 Speaker 3: in Broward County never went in Roward County. The hierarchy 904 00:47:59,840 --> 00:48:03,120 Speaker 3: is homicide is the sort of considered the highest trial unit. 905 00:48:03,160 --> 00:48:06,640 Speaker 3: It's the most elite trial unit. So as a trial lawyer, 906 00:48:07,160 --> 00:48:09,720 Speaker 3: if you want to devote your life to public service, 907 00:48:10,120 --> 00:48:12,600 Speaker 3: be a prosecutor, your goal would be to get to 908 00:48:12,640 --> 00:48:16,600 Speaker 3: get to homicide. So I once asked him, why aren't 909 00:48:16,600 --> 00:48:19,080 Speaker 3: you even homicide? Why have you been in the sexual 910 00:48:19,080 --> 00:48:21,000 Speaker 3: battery unit for so long? And he said, because I 911 00:48:21,000 --> 00:48:24,160 Speaker 3: don't believe in the death penalty. And that's a perfect example. 912 00:48:24,400 --> 00:48:28,680 Speaker 3: He's a prosecutor. He has no trouble prosecuting cases. He 913 00:48:28,719 --> 00:48:31,160 Speaker 3: believes in the law. But he knows that if I 914 00:48:31,200 --> 00:48:33,680 Speaker 3: don't believe in the death penalty, I can't go to homicide. 915 00:48:34,239 --> 00:48:36,280 Speaker 3: I can't make a decision whether or not the state's 916 00:48:36,320 --> 00:48:38,000 Speaker 3: going to seek the death penalty because I don't believe 917 00:48:38,000 --> 00:48:38,200 Speaker 3: in it. 918 00:48:39,440 --> 00:48:41,600 Speaker 2: Person take over correct. 919 00:48:42,160 --> 00:48:44,719 Speaker 3: But I think someone who can recognize that even as 920 00:48:44,760 --> 00:48:47,120 Speaker 3: a prosecutor, I give that person a lot of credit 921 00:48:47,200 --> 00:48:52,880 Speaker 3: because you know, not everybody has the same beliefs as judges. 922 00:48:53,120 --> 00:48:53,640 Speaker 3: It's hard. 923 00:48:53,800 --> 00:48:57,000 Speaker 1: Also, I'll tell you, was the jury decision difficult for you? 924 00:48:58,080 --> 00:49:02,000 Speaker 3: I was frustrated because we spent so much time and 925 00:49:02,680 --> 00:49:06,319 Speaker 3: I did not feel that. I believe what happened is 926 00:49:06,719 --> 00:49:10,120 Speaker 3: there were a lot of younger jerors, and I believe 927 00:49:10,600 --> 00:49:15,360 Speaker 3: that this woman was so adamant that she wouldn't discuss 928 00:49:15,400 --> 00:49:19,120 Speaker 3: it that they just threw up their hands and gave up. 929 00:49:19,719 --> 00:49:26,640 Speaker 3: And in my opinion, there were thirty five victims if 930 00:49:26,680 --> 00:49:29,279 Speaker 3: you divide, I did the math one time. They gave 931 00:49:29,360 --> 00:49:32,120 Speaker 3: less than like ten minutes of consideration to each victim. 932 00:49:32,560 --> 00:49:35,880 Speaker 3: And by the way, there were victims who got it 933 00:49:36,040 --> 00:49:40,879 Speaker 3: much worse than other victims, so the aggravating factors would 934 00:49:40,920 --> 00:49:43,960 Speaker 3: be worse. For example, I always call him little sweet 935 00:49:44,120 --> 00:49:49,080 Speaker 3: Peter Wang. He was count seventeen of the indictment. He 936 00:49:49,280 --> 00:49:53,080 Speaker 3: was holding the door on the third floor for the 937 00:49:53,160 --> 00:49:56,400 Speaker 3: mass of students to get out. Will this shooter is 938 00:49:56,480 --> 00:50:00,880 Speaker 3: heading towards them. Shooting into the crowd. He was shot 939 00:50:01,000 --> 00:50:06,279 Speaker 3: something like seventeen times. His skull was completely I mean 940 00:50:07,280 --> 00:50:14,680 Speaker 3: it was held together by skin. To me, someone like 941 00:50:14,760 --> 00:50:18,040 Speaker 3: that's much more aggravating than someone who was perhaps shot once. 942 00:50:19,680 --> 00:50:22,840 Speaker 3: So the fact that they did not even take the 943 00:50:22,880 --> 00:50:28,000 Speaker 3: time to go through each victim. And also I mentioned 944 00:50:28,320 --> 00:50:30,880 Speaker 3: there were two or three victims that were shot once 945 00:50:31,440 --> 00:50:34,800 Speaker 3: and would have lived, and they were trying to crawl 946 00:50:34,880 --> 00:50:38,720 Speaker 3: to safety, into the bathroom or trying to get away. 947 00:50:39,200 --> 00:50:41,640 Speaker 3: And what he did was he made two passes. On 948 00:50:41,719 --> 00:50:47,280 Speaker 3: each floor. There was a coach and at least two 949 00:50:47,560 --> 00:50:52,680 Speaker 3: children who were crawling to safety, and he didn't get them. 950 00:50:52,719 --> 00:50:57,640 Speaker 3: The first pass. There was a video of a coach 951 00:50:59,440 --> 00:51:02,760 Speaker 3: who had been shot numerous times, and he was trying 952 00:51:02,760 --> 00:51:08,080 Speaker 3: to get up. And I'll never forget it. And he's 953 00:51:08,160 --> 00:51:09,920 Speaker 3: trying to get up, and he's trying to get up 954 00:51:10,040 --> 00:51:13,080 Speaker 3: and and and I'm imagining this guy is just he's got, 955 00:51:13,239 --> 00:51:17,600 Speaker 3: he's got he's got two kids and a grand baby 956 00:51:17,640 --> 00:51:21,400 Speaker 3: on the way, and a wife who just absolutely adores him, 957 00:51:21,400 --> 00:51:26,800 Speaker 3: and I and I could just you can tell he's 958 00:51:26,960 --> 00:51:29,320 Speaker 3: trying to get up. He he's hey, I'm going to 959 00:51:29,360 --> 00:51:30,759 Speaker 3: get out of here. For my family, you know, and 960 00:51:30,800 --> 00:51:33,360 Speaker 3: he's get and he actually got up and he managed 961 00:51:33,360 --> 00:51:36,640 Speaker 3: to walk a few feet when when the shooter made 962 00:51:36,640 --> 00:51:41,439 Speaker 3: the second pass, and even after he shot him again 963 00:51:41,680 --> 00:51:44,680 Speaker 3: light on him two or three times, he still struggled 964 00:51:45,840 --> 00:51:48,520 Speaker 3: and he's still moving. And you can just see this 965 00:51:48,560 --> 00:51:57,520 Speaker 3: guy was a veteran, a marine, wonderful family man, wonderful coach, 966 00:51:57,719 --> 00:52:01,239 Speaker 3: you know, barged right in trying to save his kids, 967 00:52:01,280 --> 00:52:05,359 Speaker 3: and he didn't make it. Now, certainly there's a lot 968 00:52:05,920 --> 00:52:10,560 Speaker 3: more aggravating factors to that murder than there would be 969 00:52:11,280 --> 00:52:15,120 Speaker 3: to another person who was shot once. So yes, I 970 00:52:15,200 --> 00:52:19,120 Speaker 3: was frustrated. I don't believe that. I think that the 971 00:52:19,400 --> 00:52:22,319 Speaker 3: attitude of the one juror made it so that the 972 00:52:22,360 --> 00:52:24,680 Speaker 3: other jurors were just because they knew if they don't 973 00:52:24,719 --> 00:52:27,160 Speaker 3: all agree, if it's not unanimous, by the way that 974 00:52:27,239 --> 00:52:29,759 Speaker 3: law was changed, like I don't know. Thirty days after the. 975 00:52:29,760 --> 00:52:31,520 Speaker 1: Verdict, I know we read that I was going to 976 00:52:31,520 --> 00:52:32,200 Speaker 1: ask you about that. 977 00:52:32,719 --> 00:52:37,399 Speaker 3: That was because of my case. Basically the law. The 978 00:52:37,440 --> 00:52:42,000 Speaker 3: Florida Supreme Court had written an opinion maybe two years 979 00:52:42,040 --> 00:52:46,160 Speaker 3: before the Parkland shooting case went to trials, saying that 980 00:52:46,680 --> 00:52:52,520 Speaker 3: the Constitution does not require the verdict to be unanimous 981 00:52:52,320 --> 00:52:57,359 Speaker 3: as far as life versus death. But the and by 982 00:52:57,360 --> 00:53:00,000 Speaker 3: the way, when I read that opinion as a judge, 983 00:53:00,360 --> 00:53:05,960 Speaker 3: I thought to myself, that's scary, Like I almost panicked 984 00:53:06,000 --> 00:53:07,680 Speaker 3: because I thought that means it's going to be up 985 00:53:07,719 --> 00:53:14,800 Speaker 3: to me. And I'm Catholic. Catholics are anti death penalty. 986 00:53:14,800 --> 00:53:17,840 Speaker 3: I can tell you personally, I am not anti death penalty. 987 00:53:18,440 --> 00:53:21,640 Speaker 3: But on the other hand, being the person that essentially 988 00:53:21,640 --> 00:53:27,799 Speaker 3: pulls the trigger, that's a huge responsibility. So the the 989 00:53:27,800 --> 00:53:33,520 Speaker 3: the Florida legislature never codified that opinion. They just never 990 00:53:33,600 --> 00:53:37,080 Speaker 3: got to it. I couldn't help but think, you know, 991 00:53:37,280 --> 00:53:42,440 Speaker 3: maybe I rushed things. Maybe I didn't give you know, 992 00:53:42,560 --> 00:53:44,960 Speaker 3: as a judge, you have to move things. You have to, 993 00:53:45,120 --> 00:53:50,600 Speaker 3: you know, in that case went on forever, and I 994 00:53:50,640 --> 00:53:53,440 Speaker 3: still I needed to be efficient and I needed to 995 00:53:53,440 --> 00:53:56,719 Speaker 3: be fair, and sometimes that means putting your foot down 996 00:53:56,760 --> 00:53:58,640 Speaker 3: and saying no, we're not going to take another day 997 00:53:58,680 --> 00:54:00,719 Speaker 3: to do this. We're gonna you know, and give deadlines 998 00:54:00,719 --> 00:54:04,560 Speaker 3: and moving things. So I couldn't help, but think, in hindsight, 999 00:54:04,600 --> 00:54:07,120 Speaker 3: did I did I push too hard to get you know, 1000 00:54:07,160 --> 00:54:09,400 Speaker 3: maybe I should have given him longer In jury selection. 1001 00:54:10,160 --> 00:54:11,800 Speaker 3: You know, maybe I should have done this, maybe I 1002 00:54:11,840 --> 00:54:16,200 Speaker 3: should have done that. If if I didn't know all 1003 00:54:16,239 --> 00:54:19,040 Speaker 3: of the reasons about if I didn't know that that 1004 00:54:19,120 --> 00:54:24,080 Speaker 3: particular juror had refused to participate in the jury deliberation process, 1005 00:54:24,120 --> 00:54:26,880 Speaker 3: I wouldn't feel bad because a jury's verdict, it's a 1006 00:54:26,960 --> 00:54:29,040 Speaker 3: jury's verdict. It's a jury of your peers, and that's 1007 00:54:29,080 --> 00:54:31,319 Speaker 3: their decision. If that's their decision, even if I don't 1008 00:54:31,360 --> 00:54:32,680 Speaker 3: agree with it, I have to accept it. 1009 00:54:32,760 --> 00:54:33,280 Speaker 1: Right. 1010 00:54:33,960 --> 00:54:38,280 Speaker 3: My frustration was with all of the banging on the door, 1011 00:54:38,320 --> 00:54:40,399 Speaker 3: get me out of here, get me away from her her, 1012 00:54:40,760 --> 00:54:43,920 Speaker 3: you know, with the with the arms crossed, not engaging 1013 00:54:43,960 --> 00:54:51,279 Speaker 3: with the jury, not considering anything. That was frustrating. I 1014 00:54:51,320 --> 00:54:53,440 Speaker 3: mean when when the jurors came out with the verdict, 1015 00:54:53,560 --> 00:54:55,960 Speaker 3: there were two or three jurors that put their heads 1016 00:54:56,000 --> 00:54:58,680 Speaker 3: down and were crying hysterically. They wouldn't even look at me. 1017 00:54:59,200 --> 00:55:01,880 Speaker 1: Yeah, because they so disappointed in the verdict. 1018 00:55:02,960 --> 00:55:05,680 Speaker 3: I don't know if they knew that I would be disappointed, 1019 00:55:05,719 --> 00:55:09,239 Speaker 3: But I think that I think good jurors if they 1020 00:55:09,320 --> 00:55:11,719 Speaker 3: see as a good judge who follows the law and 1021 00:55:11,800 --> 00:55:14,520 Speaker 3: tries very hard to be fair and impartial. I think 1022 00:55:14,560 --> 00:55:17,399 Speaker 3: they don't want to disappoint you. And I think they 1023 00:55:17,520 --> 00:55:21,080 Speaker 3: knew that they had failed and that there was no 1024 00:55:22,360 --> 00:55:26,319 Speaker 3: substance deliberation, and they just finally all gave up. I 1025 00:55:26,320 --> 00:55:28,000 Speaker 3: mean there were a couple of them that fell down 1026 00:55:28,040 --> 00:55:32,040 Speaker 3: in the parking lot crying hysterically, that had like ms had. 1027 00:55:31,880 --> 00:55:33,960 Speaker 1: To be called wow really. 1028 00:55:34,120 --> 00:55:38,799 Speaker 3: Yeah, because they were just besides themselves. And like I say, 1029 00:55:38,800 --> 00:55:45,160 Speaker 3: there was a lot of younger people twenties and thirties, 1030 00:55:46,920 --> 00:55:53,359 Speaker 3: and I think that if and I don't know this, 1031 00:55:53,520 --> 00:55:56,600 Speaker 3: but I think that maybe if they if the jury 1032 00:55:56,640 --> 00:56:02,600 Speaker 3: had been older, maybe they would have the strength to 1033 00:56:02,640 --> 00:56:05,360 Speaker 3: sort of fight and say, no, you have to deliberate. 1034 00:56:05,880 --> 00:56:08,440 Speaker 3: That's your job. You took an oath to deliberate, and 1035 00:56:08,440 --> 00:56:10,640 Speaker 3: we're gonna, you know, we're gonna tell the judge if 1036 00:56:10,640 --> 00:56:13,840 Speaker 3: you don't, if you don't participate in this instructions, and 1037 00:56:13,880 --> 00:56:15,920 Speaker 3: the instructions are given to them about how they should, 1038 00:56:16,160 --> 00:56:18,120 Speaker 3: you know, elect a four person and they should go 1039 00:56:18,160 --> 00:56:21,040 Speaker 3: around the room and what they should do. What I 1040 00:56:21,120 --> 00:56:22,840 Speaker 3: believe they should have done is pass a note and 1041 00:56:22,880 --> 00:56:25,080 Speaker 3: say this juror is not following her oath and she's 1042 00:56:25,120 --> 00:56:27,719 Speaker 3: refusing to deliberate. What would I have done with that, 1043 00:56:27,920 --> 00:56:32,560 Speaker 3: and would I have been reversed? I don't know, but 1044 00:56:32,760 --> 00:56:38,160 Speaker 3: at least it would have given me the opportunity to. 1045 00:56:36,920 --> 00:56:38,440 Speaker 2: To address address in fashion. 1046 00:56:39,040 --> 00:56:41,960 Speaker 3: Yeah, to address it and to perhaps excuse her and 1047 00:56:42,000 --> 00:56:47,360 Speaker 3: replace her with one of the alternates, which we had. Again, 1048 00:56:47,480 --> 00:56:51,160 Speaker 3: that's never been done, but in the in the context 1049 00:56:51,239 --> 00:56:54,799 Speaker 3: of a jury saying this juror won't deliberate, But to me, 1050 00:56:55,440 --> 00:56:57,719 Speaker 3: that means she's not being fair and impartial if she's 1051 00:56:57,800 --> 00:57:00,040 Speaker 3: refusing to have any discussions. 1052 00:56:59,400 --> 00:56:59,680 Speaker 1: You know. 1053 00:57:02,320 --> 00:57:04,840 Speaker 3: So, yes, that was sort of a long answer. 1054 00:57:04,920 --> 00:57:06,239 Speaker 1: I'm sorry. 1055 00:57:06,440 --> 00:57:10,520 Speaker 3: I was disappointed because I can't help but feel like 1056 00:57:10,719 --> 00:57:15,160 Speaker 3: I may have played a part and what went wrong, 1057 00:57:15,400 --> 00:57:18,720 Speaker 3: And also because the world was watching. And I have 1058 00:57:18,760 --> 00:57:21,480 Speaker 3: to tell you that ninety nine percent of juris they 1059 00:57:21,600 --> 00:57:25,760 Speaker 3: try really hard to get it right, and they listen intently, 1060 00:57:25,880 --> 00:57:29,479 Speaker 3: and they listen to the instructions, and I think, even 1061 00:57:29,520 --> 00:57:32,800 Speaker 3: if maybe I don't agree with their decision, that they 1062 00:57:32,920 --> 00:57:36,120 Speaker 3: give it. They're all And I feel that this was 1063 00:57:36,160 --> 00:57:42,560 Speaker 3: such a bad example for the nation and in other countries. 1064 00:57:42,600 --> 00:57:44,960 Speaker 3: I mean, this case was watched in every country in 1065 00:57:44,960 --> 00:57:49,600 Speaker 3: the world, and I just felt like, this is not 1066 00:57:50,200 --> 00:57:55,240 Speaker 3: how justice is supposed to work, and for that I 1067 00:57:55,640 --> 00:57:59,560 Speaker 3: had to blame myself because ultimately the responsibility of making 1068 00:57:59,560 --> 00:58:06,520 Speaker 3: sure the tireless fairs up to the judge. 1069 00:58:09,640 --> 00:58:11,280 Speaker 1: Now, Nick Reiner has been in the news a lot. 1070 00:58:11,320 --> 00:58:14,880 Speaker 1: Have you been following that I have to a certain extent. Yeah, yeah, 1071 00:58:14,880 --> 00:58:17,200 Speaker 1: And we just talked about before you came on, how 1072 00:58:17,240 --> 00:58:19,560 Speaker 1: Alan Jackson was representing him and then he you know, 1073 00:58:19,640 --> 00:58:25,160 Speaker 1: at the arraignment he withdrew. We me basically, I'm of 1074 00:58:25,200 --> 00:58:27,480 Speaker 1: the opinion that he withdrew because of finances. Do you 1075 00:58:27,480 --> 00:58:28,800 Speaker 1: have an opinion on the reason. 1076 00:58:29,240 --> 00:58:31,960 Speaker 3: You know, It's funny. Before the podcast, I was preparing 1077 00:58:32,160 --> 00:58:35,040 Speaker 3: and reading everything and trying to figure things out, and 1078 00:58:35,440 --> 00:58:38,480 Speaker 3: the first thing I thought was money, because he's not 1079 00:58:38,520 --> 00:58:40,840 Speaker 3: gonna have access to his parents' money. He's in jail. 1080 00:58:40,960 --> 00:58:42,960 Speaker 3: And when I read that he's been in and out 1081 00:58:42,960 --> 00:58:45,680 Speaker 3: of rehab so many times, I'm assuming he doesn't have 1082 00:58:45,720 --> 00:58:51,240 Speaker 3: some trust fun sitting in the bank. So yes, I 1083 00:58:51,280 --> 00:58:54,960 Speaker 3: assume money. But the way that the defense attorney, mister 1084 00:58:55,040 --> 00:58:57,680 Speaker 3: Jackson responded saying it would be aune ethical for me 1085 00:58:57,720 --> 00:59:01,760 Speaker 3: to say that, I was a little confused about because 1086 00:59:04,000 --> 00:59:06,560 Speaker 3: attorneys come forward all the time at least in Florida 1087 00:59:06,640 --> 00:59:08,320 Speaker 3: and say Judge that he can't he doesn't have the 1088 00:59:08,320 --> 00:59:10,320 Speaker 3: money to pay me. I can't stand. 1089 00:59:10,400 --> 00:59:12,400 Speaker 2: But that's all. But that's also in a courtroom setting, 1090 00:59:12,480 --> 00:59:15,480 Speaker 2: right when they're trying to present and they're making emotion 1091 00:59:15,560 --> 00:59:16,600 Speaker 2: to withdraw or something. 1092 00:59:16,600 --> 00:59:18,200 Speaker 3: Sure, but it would be public. 1093 00:59:19,520 --> 00:59:21,320 Speaker 2: Well, maybe he just doesn't want to look like he's 1094 00:59:21,360 --> 00:59:22,280 Speaker 2: a greedy attorney. 1095 00:59:23,480 --> 00:59:25,440 Speaker 3: Well, I'm thinking that a lot of people would want 1096 00:59:25,440 --> 00:59:28,040 Speaker 3: to take this case for free anyway for the publicity. 1097 00:59:27,560 --> 00:59:29,240 Speaker 2: Right, I thought I thought so too, but that I 1098 00:59:29,280 --> 00:59:31,000 Speaker 2: read that he doesn't do probona, but I would have 1099 00:59:31,000 --> 00:59:32,560 Speaker 2: thought he did it. In fact, I think I told 1100 00:59:32,600 --> 00:59:34,440 Speaker 2: Emily that, I'm like, he's probably doing it for free, 1101 00:59:35,120 --> 00:59:36,600 Speaker 2: and then he gets a lot of free I think, 1102 00:59:36,640 --> 00:59:38,880 Speaker 2: gets a lot of potential criminal cases. And then he 1103 00:59:39,000 --> 00:59:41,040 Speaker 2: might throw him down to his other attorneys in his 1104 00:59:41,120 --> 00:59:42,880 Speaker 2: firm and he's doing the head this big one. 1105 00:59:42,880 --> 00:59:43,080 Speaker 3: You know. 1106 00:59:44,080 --> 00:59:48,160 Speaker 2: Well, Emily is just in love with Alan Jackson, and 1107 00:59:48,200 --> 00:59:50,320 Speaker 2: she wants to find every reason to say that he's 1108 00:59:50,360 --> 00:59:52,720 Speaker 2: a gentleman and his hands are tied. 1109 00:59:52,920 --> 00:59:56,080 Speaker 1: Well, I'm a big fan of I became a big 1110 00:59:56,120 --> 00:59:58,640 Speaker 1: fan of Alan Jackson watching him do the Karen Reid trial. 1111 00:59:58,760 --> 01:00:00,919 Speaker 1: So yeah, well here's the thing. 1112 01:00:02,040 --> 01:00:04,720 Speaker 3: You know, like you you all are lawyers practicing lawyers, 1113 01:00:04,720 --> 01:00:08,120 Speaker 3: so you know that for example, my law firm, we've 1114 01:00:08,120 --> 01:00:13,160 Speaker 3: stopped taking not completely, but we have tapered down the 1115 01:00:13,920 --> 01:00:17,200 Speaker 3: amount of contingency cases that we take because you have 1116 01:00:17,240 --> 01:00:20,480 Speaker 3: to bankroll the litigation and then it can be years 1117 01:00:20,520 --> 01:00:22,760 Speaker 3: and then the case is on appeal and you may 1118 01:00:22,800 --> 01:00:25,240 Speaker 3: not get paid for ten to fifteen years, and while 1119 01:00:25,280 --> 01:00:27,720 Speaker 3: who's paying at all, you know, who's paying keep the 1120 01:00:27,760 --> 01:00:30,760 Speaker 3: lights on. So I wouldn't think an attorney is a 1121 01:00:30,800 --> 01:00:33,600 Speaker 3: bad person just because they won't take a case for free. 1122 01:00:33,760 --> 01:00:35,440 Speaker 2: No, No, I said that earlier. I said, he has 1123 01:00:35,440 --> 01:00:37,560 Speaker 2: every right to charge what heah he's worth, and he's 1124 01:00:37,560 --> 01:00:39,960 Speaker 2: given him his time, and if they can't afford it, 1125 01:00:39,960 --> 01:00:41,120 Speaker 2: then he's going to put us, you. 1126 01:00:41,040 --> 01:00:43,520 Speaker 3: Know, and he may not. He might not have the funds. 1127 01:00:43,560 --> 01:00:46,080 Speaker 3: He may not have the money to be able to 1128 01:00:46,120 --> 01:00:49,760 Speaker 3: bankroll that that case. He may not. You know, I 1129 01:00:49,760 --> 01:00:53,400 Speaker 3: don't know that much about him, but that's going to 1130 01:00:53,440 --> 01:00:56,680 Speaker 3: be an expensive case to try, I would imagine. 1131 01:00:56,280 --> 01:00:58,439 Speaker 2: To put it lightly, Yeah, you know all. 1132 01:00:58,360 --> 01:01:03,400 Speaker 3: The experts that they're probably going to hide, psychologists, psychiatrists, 1133 01:01:04,360 --> 01:01:06,200 Speaker 3: I mean, I don't know what the defense will be, but. 1134 01:01:09,760 --> 01:01:13,040 Speaker 1: We've discussed we're some type of insanity defense, right. 1135 01:01:16,360 --> 01:01:19,360 Speaker 3: I mean, I wasn't able to find like a probable 1136 01:01:19,400 --> 01:01:21,760 Speaker 3: cause affidavit or anything like that. I was able to 1137 01:01:21,800 --> 01:01:24,920 Speaker 3: find just the injuries to the victims and then the 1138 01:01:24,920 --> 01:01:26,800 Speaker 3: fact that he was arrested. I don't know if there's 1139 01:01:26,840 --> 01:01:28,440 Speaker 3: more to it that I don't know, but. 1140 01:01:30,040 --> 01:01:32,600 Speaker 1: Well, I've read some things about I mean, just like 1141 01:01:32,640 --> 01:01:35,440 Speaker 1: his past, his past behavior, some of the way he 1142 01:01:35,480 --> 01:01:37,920 Speaker 1: was acting the night before at a party that he 1143 01:01:38,040 --> 01:01:41,160 Speaker 1: was on meds, but the meds had been switched, and 1144 01:01:41,240 --> 01:01:42,960 Speaker 1: so I don't know. I was just taking all that 1145 01:01:43,000 --> 01:01:45,200 Speaker 1: into account, thinking that, you know, when we're talking about 1146 01:01:45,200 --> 01:01:48,760 Speaker 1: mitigating factors, that that's probably something that's going to come 1147 01:01:48,800 --> 01:01:51,480 Speaker 1: into play eventually. And the fact that a public defender 1148 01:01:51,520 --> 01:01:53,240 Speaker 1: took the case made me think it also had to 1149 01:01:53,240 --> 01:01:55,080 Speaker 1: do with money, because I felt like if there was 1150 01:01:55,160 --> 01:01:57,520 Speaker 1: money to defend him, they would have brought some other 1151 01:01:57,560 --> 01:01:59,520 Speaker 1: big name defense attorney. And but it's not. It's a 1152 01:01:59,520 --> 01:02:00,320 Speaker 1: public defen or. 1153 01:02:01,720 --> 01:02:05,600 Speaker 3: It may be that what happens a lot of times, 1154 01:02:06,120 --> 01:02:08,240 Speaker 3: and I feel bad for the public defenders for this, 1155 01:02:08,920 --> 01:02:12,480 Speaker 3: but they'll say, let the public. You know, a private 1156 01:02:12,520 --> 01:02:15,240 Speaker 3: attorney will say, let the public defender work up the case, 1157 01:02:15,400 --> 01:02:17,320 Speaker 3: Let the public defender take the depots and do all 1158 01:02:17,360 --> 01:02:19,800 Speaker 3: the leg work, and then all come in substitutent at 1159 01:02:19,840 --> 01:02:23,080 Speaker 3: the end. Now, of course they don't say this, but 1160 01:02:23,200 --> 01:02:25,920 Speaker 3: when it happens, it's very frustrating to the public defenders 1161 01:02:25,960 --> 01:02:29,840 Speaker 3: and unfair because they bear the brunt, so that that 1162 01:02:30,000 --> 01:02:34,080 Speaker 3: could be an angle. I wouldn't be surprised if mister 1163 01:02:34,200 --> 01:02:37,480 Speaker 3: Jackson or another prominent attorney were to substitutent once the 1164 01:02:37,520 --> 01:02:38,439 Speaker 3: heavy lifting is done. 1165 01:02:38,680 --> 01:02:40,240 Speaker 1: Oh yeah, you know, I didn't think of that, But 1166 01:02:40,280 --> 01:02:42,200 Speaker 1: that's that's that's an interesting take. 1167 01:02:42,080 --> 01:02:45,760 Speaker 3: You know what I mean. Yeah, because then they pay 1168 01:02:45,840 --> 01:02:47,840 Speaker 3: for the depots, they pay for the they pay for 1169 01:02:47,880 --> 01:02:50,200 Speaker 3: everything in two months before trial. You know, you have 1170 01:02:50,240 --> 01:02:51,800 Speaker 3: a right to pick your own lawyer, and as long 1171 01:02:51,840 --> 01:02:54,480 Speaker 3: as the lawyer can be ready within a reasonable time period, 1172 01:02:54,840 --> 01:02:56,600 Speaker 3: the judge has no other choice but to let the 1173 01:02:56,640 --> 01:02:59,800 Speaker 3: person substitute in. I would not be surprised if that 1174 01:02:59,840 --> 01:03:00,520 Speaker 3: were to happen. 1175 01:03:00,960 --> 01:03:04,400 Speaker 1: Right, that's interesting. We'll have to keep following that case 1176 01:03:04,440 --> 01:03:08,000 Speaker 1: and see what happens. Just one one more question. Now, 1177 01:03:08,280 --> 01:03:09,520 Speaker 1: I'm sure you followed Diddy. 1178 01:03:10,120 --> 01:03:10,439 Speaker 3: I did. 1179 01:03:11,360 --> 01:03:13,880 Speaker 1: Were you surprised by the verdict. 1180 01:03:14,000 --> 01:03:16,640 Speaker 3: You know, because it's in federal court and you don't 1181 01:03:16,640 --> 01:03:19,480 Speaker 3: get to watch it, hear it, see it every day. 1182 01:03:20,120 --> 01:03:22,600 Speaker 3: I mean the bits from what I could, you know, 1183 01:03:22,600 --> 01:03:24,760 Speaker 3: you had to rely on reporters to tell you what 1184 01:03:24,840 --> 01:03:30,480 Speaker 3: their sense of what was going on. I mean, my 1185 01:03:30,520 --> 01:03:32,800 Speaker 3: opinion is they just didn't think that they believed it 1186 01:03:32,840 --> 01:03:34,800 Speaker 3: was consensual, so it didn't rise to the to the 1187 01:03:34,880 --> 01:03:36,320 Speaker 3: level of trafficking. 1188 01:03:36,880 --> 01:03:41,160 Speaker 1: Right. Well, we had discussed a few times on this podcast, 1189 01:03:41,200 --> 01:03:43,320 Speaker 1: and I think we always said was I felt like 1190 01:03:43,360 --> 01:03:46,080 Speaker 1: they were going to have trouble with the Rico part 1191 01:03:46,280 --> 01:03:49,320 Speaker 1: of it. Yeah, it didn't that seemed I mean, obviously 1192 01:03:49,360 --> 01:03:51,240 Speaker 1: he was a horrible person. We all watched the video 1193 01:03:51,320 --> 01:03:54,600 Speaker 1: of him, you know, attacking Cassie in the hallway. He 1194 01:03:54,720 --> 01:03:57,280 Speaker 1: was violent. We knew that. But I felt as if 1195 01:03:57,320 --> 01:04:00,720 Speaker 1: those higher charges, the reco charge, those were going to 1196 01:04:00,760 --> 01:04:01,360 Speaker 1: be difficult. 1197 01:04:01,840 --> 01:04:06,480 Speaker 3: Yes see, if the prosecution was smart, and I've I 1198 01:04:06,560 --> 01:04:10,040 Speaker 3: said this on another podcast that I was on, if 1199 01:04:10,080 --> 01:04:12,520 Speaker 3: they would have prosecuted him for the dragging her in 1200 01:04:12,560 --> 01:04:14,800 Speaker 3: that hotel, at least in Florida, and I don't know 1201 01:04:14,840 --> 01:04:17,920 Speaker 3: about California. But that could have been a kidnapping. That 1202 01:04:17,960 --> 01:04:20,800 Speaker 3: could have been a false imprisonment, holding somebody against their will, 1203 01:04:20,840 --> 01:04:23,640 Speaker 3: that could have been an aggravated battery, that could have 1204 01:04:23,800 --> 01:04:26,880 Speaker 3: been a number of felonies that would where he would 1205 01:04:26,880 --> 01:04:29,960 Speaker 3: face fifteen plus years in prison. And it's all on 1206 01:04:30,080 --> 01:04:32,800 Speaker 3: video and he can't explain it. There's no way to 1207 01:04:32,800 --> 01:04:36,200 Speaker 3: explain away what he did. Why they didn't prosecute him 1208 01:04:36,240 --> 01:04:38,880 Speaker 3: for that and asked for the maximum punishment. I don't know, 1209 01:04:39,200 --> 01:04:41,760 Speaker 3: because certainly that was a much that would have been 1210 01:04:41,760 --> 01:04:45,640 Speaker 3: a one day trial. You show the video he hit 1211 01:04:45,680 --> 01:04:48,720 Speaker 3: her with I believe multiple he was throwing multiple objects 1212 01:04:48,760 --> 01:04:51,560 Speaker 3: at her in Florida. That's an aggravated battery with a weapon, 1213 01:04:51,640 --> 01:04:56,080 Speaker 3: deadly weapon. And again, kidnapping because when you're holding somebody 1214 01:04:56,120 --> 01:04:59,200 Speaker 3: against their will and false imprisonment. 1215 01:05:00,280 --> 01:05:02,480 Speaker 1: Like back to the room or something, right right, he 1216 01:05:02,520 --> 01:05:04,840 Speaker 1: doesn't let her get on the elevator right right. 1217 01:05:05,000 --> 01:05:09,919 Speaker 3: And that's like for anybody that doesn't understand, a kidnapping 1218 01:05:10,160 --> 01:05:12,360 Speaker 3: does not necessarily have to be that you put somebody 1219 01:05:12,360 --> 01:05:14,600 Speaker 3: in your car and you take them away for like 1220 01:05:14,640 --> 01:05:18,040 Speaker 3: two days. A kidnapping can be fifteen seconds, you know, 1221 01:05:18,200 --> 01:05:21,200 Speaker 3: trying exactly, trying to get her before she gets on 1222 01:05:21,200 --> 01:05:25,280 Speaker 3: the elevator and keeping her from escaping. To me, they 1223 01:05:25,280 --> 01:05:27,320 Speaker 3: should have gone for that. That would have been a 1224 01:05:27,360 --> 01:05:31,560 Speaker 3: slam dunk. But this other case, you know, I think 1225 01:05:31,640 --> 01:05:35,040 Speaker 3: the jury didn't buy it and so they came back 1226 01:05:35,080 --> 01:05:38,840 Speaker 3: with a lesser charge. I wasn't I wasn't totally surprised. 1227 01:05:38,880 --> 01:05:43,320 Speaker 3: I you know, I think they deliberated for quite some time. 1228 01:05:43,440 --> 01:05:45,440 Speaker 3: They were listening, and they did their job. And if 1229 01:05:45,480 --> 01:05:47,560 Speaker 3: that's what they if that's what a jury does, then 1230 01:05:48,280 --> 01:05:51,920 Speaker 3: then you know, to me, I'm fully in favor of 1231 01:05:52,000 --> 01:05:55,000 Speaker 3: our of our system of justice. I think juries get 1232 01:05:55,040 --> 01:05:57,840 Speaker 3: it right most of the time. So you know, without 1233 01:05:57,880 --> 01:06:01,760 Speaker 3: having been there, I don't know, but it does not surprise. 1234 01:06:01,800 --> 01:06:03,080 Speaker 3: The verdict did not surprise me. 1235 01:06:03,480 --> 01:06:04,920 Speaker 1: Can I ask you one more thing? And I don't 1236 01:06:04,960 --> 01:06:07,280 Speaker 1: know if you're comfortable talking about it, but I do 1237 01:06:07,400 --> 01:06:09,440 Speaker 1: know when when when the jury came out in the 1238 01:06:09,440 --> 01:06:12,520 Speaker 1: Parkland case and they gave the verdict and everything, and 1239 01:06:12,560 --> 01:06:16,000 Speaker 1: then you hugged the families and then I think you 1240 01:06:16,080 --> 01:06:18,840 Speaker 1: got some backlash because of that, I guess because you 1241 01:06:18,840 --> 01:06:22,920 Speaker 1: weren't showing what impartiality or whatever is that that's what 1242 01:06:22,960 --> 01:06:26,320 Speaker 1: the accusation was but I was before you came on. 1243 01:06:26,360 --> 01:06:30,240 Speaker 1: I was discussing that with Shane, and I said, I said, 1244 01:06:30,320 --> 01:06:34,640 Speaker 1: women are innately nurturers, and like how you were talking 1245 01:06:34,680 --> 01:06:37,080 Speaker 1: about before with like a man on the bench, and 1246 01:06:37,120 --> 01:06:40,160 Speaker 1: I could picture if it was a male judge, the 1247 01:06:40,280 --> 01:06:42,440 Speaker 1: verdict would have come out, he would have whatever and 1248 01:06:42,480 --> 01:06:46,320 Speaker 1: then walked away. But as women were mothers, were nurtures, 1249 01:06:46,400 --> 01:06:50,040 Speaker 1: were like were innately that way. So I feel as 1250 01:06:50,040 --> 01:06:53,320 Speaker 1: if what you just giving the families a hug is 1251 01:06:53,560 --> 01:06:57,960 Speaker 1: just a natural progression of what women do well. 1252 01:06:58,960 --> 01:07:02,280 Speaker 3: So let me just say this. It started off I 1253 01:07:02,320 --> 01:07:05,480 Speaker 3: was going to shake hands with the lawyers and whoever 1254 01:07:05,520 --> 01:07:07,760 Speaker 3: wanted to shake my hand, which men, male judges do 1255 01:07:07,840 --> 01:07:10,560 Speaker 3: all the time, and the way the bench was set up, 1256 01:07:10,720 --> 01:07:12,760 Speaker 3: I had to reach so far over that I was 1257 01:07:12,800 --> 01:07:14,919 Speaker 3: afraid my thiek were going to come out from under 1258 01:07:14,920 --> 01:07:17,080 Speaker 3: me and I was going to sort of fall forward. 1259 01:07:17,640 --> 01:07:20,440 Speaker 3: So I said, let me come off the bench and 1260 01:07:20,480 --> 01:07:22,880 Speaker 3: come around. Now at this point, I know it's a 1261 01:07:22,920 --> 01:07:26,040 Speaker 3: life sentence, so I know there's no appeal. The defendant's 1262 01:07:26,040 --> 01:07:29,800 Speaker 3: already been taken by the corrections officers, so I'm not 1263 01:07:29,880 --> 01:07:35,000 Speaker 3: worried about being unfair because I was planning to shake 1264 01:07:35,040 --> 01:07:39,040 Speaker 3: hands with anybody, including defense, prosecution, anyone. 1265 01:07:38,720 --> 01:07:40,360 Speaker 1: Right, So I go. 1266 01:07:40,360 --> 01:07:44,840 Speaker 3: Up to the first prosecutor and I thought, you know what, 1267 01:07:45,240 --> 01:07:49,400 Speaker 3: we've all been together hearing this horrible story for five years. 1268 01:07:49,840 --> 01:07:54,960 Speaker 3: I'm going to give them a hug. It's kind of uncomfortable. Women, 1269 01:07:55,040 --> 01:07:56,640 Speaker 3: we don't really shake hands, right. 1270 01:07:57,280 --> 01:07:58,600 Speaker 1: I'm more of a hugger. 1271 01:07:58,760 --> 01:08:03,120 Speaker 3: Yeah, I'm a but under those circumstances, I just thought, 1272 01:08:03,160 --> 01:08:05,920 Speaker 3: you know what, a hug is more appropriate. So I 1273 01:08:05,960 --> 01:08:09,280 Speaker 3: started hugging the lawyers and then I walked over to 1274 01:08:09,320 --> 01:08:12,800 Speaker 3: the defense and I said, thank you all very much, 1275 01:08:13,000 --> 01:08:15,680 Speaker 3: before you leave, I would love to give you, know, 1276 01:08:15,920 --> 01:08:17,840 Speaker 3: give you all. I've come down off the bench. If 1277 01:08:17,840 --> 01:08:19,720 Speaker 3: anyone wants a hug. I'm not a big hugger, but 1278 01:08:19,760 --> 01:08:22,320 Speaker 3: now it's your chance. And they all just sort of 1279 01:08:22,360 --> 01:08:25,840 Speaker 3: looked at me like they were not interested. I said, okay, 1280 01:08:25,880 --> 01:08:31,960 Speaker 3: going once, going twice. And then after that the prosecution said, Judge, 1281 01:08:32,439 --> 01:08:36,360 Speaker 3: the family members would like to meet you and thank you. 1282 01:08:37,479 --> 01:08:40,759 Speaker 3: Do you mind And I said no, of course not, because, 1283 01:08:41,320 --> 01:08:43,760 Speaker 3: like I said, if it had been a situation where 1284 01:08:43,800 --> 01:08:46,519 Speaker 3: I had stayed behind the bench, anybody can come up 1285 01:08:46,560 --> 01:08:49,160 Speaker 3: to me. The if the defendant had family members there 1286 01:08:49,160 --> 01:08:50,360 Speaker 3: and they want to come up to me. It'd have 1287 01:08:50,360 --> 01:08:53,519 Speaker 3: been fine because I was off the bench again, and 1288 01:08:53,560 --> 01:08:56,920 Speaker 3: because the family members had seen me hugging the lawyers. 1289 01:08:57,120 --> 01:09:00,280 Speaker 3: I hug the press, you know, yeah, to see me 1290 01:09:00,360 --> 01:09:03,080 Speaker 3: hugging lawyers. So I the families come up and they 1291 01:09:03,120 --> 01:09:07,640 Speaker 3: start hugging me. And I thought to myself, you know, 1292 01:09:07,760 --> 01:09:11,720 Speaker 3: as a human being, if I can do this, if 1293 01:09:11,720 --> 01:09:18,280 Speaker 3: this gives these people some sort of reprieve from their grief, 1294 01:09:18,439 --> 01:09:21,880 Speaker 3: if I can offer them some kind of human kindness 1295 01:09:22,000 --> 01:09:25,240 Speaker 3: in this just simple, simple gesture, I'm going to do it. 1296 01:09:25,280 --> 01:09:25,439 Speaker 2: Now. 1297 01:09:25,479 --> 01:09:28,200 Speaker 3: I knew the cameras were rolling, I knew I was 1298 01:09:28,240 --> 01:09:32,200 Speaker 3: being filmed. I made the decision. I didn't care. I 1299 01:09:32,280 --> 01:09:37,120 Speaker 3: knew this is this is uh, this could be considered unfair. 1300 01:09:37,640 --> 01:09:39,800 Speaker 3: But I felt because I hugged the press, you know, 1301 01:09:39,840 --> 01:09:41,920 Speaker 3: I was hugging everybody that it was like, you know, 1302 01:09:42,080 --> 01:09:44,479 Speaker 3: it wasn't expartey because I wasn't just hugging one side. 1303 01:09:44,479 --> 01:09:48,360 Speaker 3: I was, you know, hugging everybody, right, But I knew 1304 01:09:48,680 --> 01:09:50,880 Speaker 3: this could come back to get me. And my staff 1305 01:09:50,880 --> 01:09:53,240 Speaker 3: attorney was there, and afterwards I said to him, Michael, 1306 01:09:53,960 --> 01:09:56,679 Speaker 3: he said, Judge, I think you're fine, And I said, 1307 01:09:56,680 --> 01:09:58,280 Speaker 3: you know what, even if I'm not, I don't care 1308 01:09:58,479 --> 01:10:03,040 Speaker 3: because offer these people just that small gesture. I think 1309 01:10:03,080 --> 01:10:06,960 Speaker 3: it made such a difference to them to know that. Look, 1310 01:10:07,320 --> 01:10:13,440 Speaker 3: I tried my best, and I listened, and I understand 1311 01:10:13,800 --> 01:10:19,160 Speaker 3: and so yes, I was brought before the Judicial Qualifications 1312 01:10:19,160 --> 01:10:24,680 Speaker 3: Commission for that and they told me that it, you know, 1313 01:10:24,960 --> 01:10:32,400 Speaker 3: was not fair and the appearance of impartiality, and we 1314 01:10:32,880 --> 01:10:36,080 Speaker 3: had to we agreed to disagree. I can tell you 1315 01:10:36,240 --> 01:10:40,519 Speaker 3: I that none nobody on that committee has ever tried 1316 01:10:40,600 --> 01:10:43,880 Speaker 3: a case like this. Most of them are appellate judges. 1317 01:10:43,880 --> 01:10:46,680 Speaker 3: They've never even tried a case in their life. But 1318 01:10:48,080 --> 01:10:50,479 Speaker 3: the I don't regret my decision. 1319 01:10:50,920 --> 01:10:52,519 Speaker 1: That's why I was going to ask you, given the 1320 01:10:52,600 --> 01:10:54,720 Speaker 1: chance to do it again, would you do it the same? 1321 01:10:54,880 --> 01:10:58,120 Speaker 3: Yes, well absolutely, and I could have. I could have 1322 01:10:58,160 --> 01:11:01,160 Speaker 3: taken that charge to try. I basically pled no contest, 1323 01:11:01,280 --> 01:11:05,360 Speaker 3: meaning I'm not going to dispute this allegation. And the 1324 01:11:05,600 --> 01:11:08,800 Speaker 3: punishment was, oh, we're going to reprimand you. And by 1325 01:11:08,880 --> 01:11:11,639 Speaker 3: way of this order, this is the reprimand, which has 1326 01:11:11,720 --> 01:11:14,599 Speaker 3: by the way, never been done before ever in the 1327 01:11:14,640 --> 01:11:16,880 Speaker 3: history of Florida. A reprimand as you go before the 1328 01:11:16,880 --> 01:11:21,160 Speaker 3: Florida Supreme Court and on national television they shame on 1329 01:11:21,280 --> 01:11:24,719 Speaker 3: you and really let you have it on national TV. 1330 01:11:24,880 --> 01:11:27,719 Speaker 3: The Florida Supreme Court did not do that. They issued 1331 01:11:27,760 --> 01:11:30,760 Speaker 3: a one sentence order that says this will be the 1332 01:11:30,800 --> 01:11:35,040 Speaker 3: reprimand which to me says that they either didn't agree 1333 01:11:35,040 --> 01:11:39,360 Speaker 3: with it or felt it was over overdone. I could 1334 01:11:39,360 --> 01:11:42,800 Speaker 3: have gone to trial, which my family wanted me to do, 1335 01:11:42,920 --> 01:11:48,360 Speaker 3: to dispute it, but I said no, because my witnesses 1336 01:11:49,160 --> 01:11:51,479 Speaker 3: are going to be that these family members. I can 1337 01:11:51,600 --> 01:11:54,080 Speaker 3: have these people go through this again. There's no way 1338 01:11:54,080 --> 01:11:56,519 Speaker 3: I can't if I have to take a slap on 1339 01:11:56,560 --> 01:12:01,760 Speaker 3: the wrists or whatever it was. Plus I kind of 1340 01:12:02,640 --> 01:12:05,439 Speaker 3: I mean, this is gonna sound maybe not that nice, 1341 01:12:05,439 --> 01:12:06,960 Speaker 3: but it's okay because I haven't been a judge for 1342 01:12:07,000 --> 01:12:10,360 Speaker 3: two years so that they don't have jurisdiction over me anymore. 1343 01:12:10,400 --> 01:12:12,800 Speaker 3: But I was thinking, you know what, fine, bring me 1344 01:12:12,840 --> 01:12:15,800 Speaker 3: up before the Phoidacy Supreme Court, because guess what's gonna happen. 1345 01:12:16,600 --> 01:12:19,720 Speaker 3: A whole bunch of my colleagues, fellow judges, and all 1346 01:12:19,760 --> 01:12:21,439 Speaker 3: of those family members. We're going to go and sit 1347 01:12:21,479 --> 01:12:27,320 Speaker 3: in that courtroom right behind me so I don't regret it. 1348 01:12:27,439 --> 01:12:32,760 Speaker 3: I feel close to a lot of those families, even 1349 01:12:32,760 --> 01:12:36,519 Speaker 3: though we never spoke for all those years, just from 1350 01:12:36,600 --> 01:12:41,160 Speaker 3: listening to their stories and having me opportunity to interact 1351 01:12:41,200 --> 01:12:41,559 Speaker 3: with them. 1352 01:12:42,120 --> 01:12:44,000 Speaker 1: Well, sometimes at the end of the day, it's about 1353 01:12:44,000 --> 01:12:46,960 Speaker 1: being human and not as what the black and white 1354 01:12:47,280 --> 01:12:50,680 Speaker 1: legal rules of the courtroom are. And I think you 1355 01:12:50,840 --> 01:12:52,840 Speaker 1: just showed humanity. 1356 01:12:53,720 --> 01:12:58,320 Speaker 3: I mean, thank you for saying that. I think that 1357 01:12:58,439 --> 01:13:05,080 Speaker 3: the people who criticize me, I just I know for 1358 01:13:05,120 --> 01:13:07,559 Speaker 3: a fact no one has ever been in that situation before. 1359 01:13:08,120 --> 01:13:10,160 Speaker 2: Well, none of the people would criticize you have never 1360 01:13:10,200 --> 01:13:12,840 Speaker 2: been in your place either to be able to say 1361 01:13:12,880 --> 01:13:13,960 Speaker 2: what is right and wrong. 1362 01:13:15,600 --> 01:13:18,840 Speaker 3: And I have to tell you that trial, everybody was 1363 01:13:18,880 --> 01:13:22,320 Speaker 3: crying in the courtroom. The defense attorneys were hysterical, the 1364 01:13:22,439 --> 01:13:26,720 Speaker 3: state shed tears, the court deputies shed tears, the security 1365 01:13:26,760 --> 01:13:29,040 Speaker 3: shed tears, the family were crying. Guess who never cried? Me? 1366 01:13:29,600 --> 01:13:32,360 Speaker 3: I never cried. And I had male judges coming up 1367 01:13:32,400 --> 01:13:34,280 Speaker 3: to me every day saying, Liz, how did you do that? 1368 01:13:34,360 --> 01:13:37,120 Speaker 3: How did you not cry? Because I put on my 1369 01:13:37,120 --> 01:13:39,840 Speaker 3: big girl pants and I said, if a male judge 1370 01:13:39,840 --> 01:13:42,160 Speaker 3: doesn't cry, this female judge is not going to cry. 1371 01:13:42,200 --> 01:13:45,599 Speaker 3: But I had a lot of stuff that I buried 1372 01:13:45,640 --> 01:13:49,520 Speaker 3: deep to make sure that that trial was fair and impartial. 1373 01:13:50,160 --> 01:13:54,679 Speaker 3: And you know, if I had broken down in tears, 1374 01:13:54,760 --> 01:13:56,160 Speaker 3: I don't think I would have gotten trouble because they 1375 01:13:56,160 --> 01:13:58,240 Speaker 3: would have said, well, you can't help that, you know 1376 01:13:58,240 --> 01:13:58,719 Speaker 3: what I mean. 1377 01:13:59,040 --> 01:14:02,280 Speaker 1: Yeah, But to me, that's more if that would have happened, 1378 01:14:02,320 --> 01:14:06,679 Speaker 1: that's more showing some kind of emotion when you hugging 1379 01:14:06,840 --> 01:14:09,320 Speaker 1: after the sentencing and the verdict, after the. 1380 01:14:10,880 --> 01:14:14,160 Speaker 3: After the defendant was excused, when there's I know there's 1381 01:14:14,200 --> 01:14:15,880 Speaker 3: not going to be any appeal. If he had been 1382 01:14:15,880 --> 01:14:17,640 Speaker 3: given the death penalty, I would not have done that 1383 01:14:17,680 --> 01:14:19,600 Speaker 3: because I know there would have been an appeal, but 1384 01:14:19,720 --> 01:14:23,559 Speaker 3: I knew there's no there's no appeal. This is all over. 1385 01:14:23,960 --> 01:14:27,360 Speaker 3: You know, I buried that, that my emotions this whole time, 1386 01:14:27,640 --> 01:14:30,600 Speaker 3: and I'm going to be a human being and you know, 1387 01:14:30,640 --> 01:14:31,599 Speaker 3: I'll deal with it later. 1388 01:14:31,720 --> 01:14:35,559 Speaker 1: So yeah, well, you know what, thank you for sharing 1389 01:14:35,920 --> 01:14:39,639 Speaker 1: all of that. We really appreciate you coming on today 1390 01:14:39,880 --> 01:14:42,519 Speaker 1: and being so vulnerable and talking about that case and 1391 01:14:42,560 --> 01:14:47,280 Speaker 1: your experience. And you can find your YouTube channel. It's 1392 01:14:47,320 --> 01:14:49,760 Speaker 1: at the judge list. So I would suggest if if 1393 01:14:49,800 --> 01:14:52,120 Speaker 1: you guys have the time to watch her. We've watched 1394 01:14:52,160 --> 01:14:54,160 Speaker 1: several of your videos and I really enjoy them. I 1395 01:14:54,280 --> 01:14:56,840 Speaker 1: like your perspective and I think, thanks you done so. 1396 01:14:57,320 --> 01:14:59,080 Speaker 1: But anyway, thank you so much for joining us today 1397 01:14:59,080 --> 01:15:01,120 Speaker 1: on Legally Brunette. Really appreciate it. 1398 01:15:01,120 --> 01:15:04,720 Speaker 3: It was so great to meet you both. I'm so flattered. 1399 01:15:05,360 --> 01:15:09,080 Speaker 3: And your show the was it? Was it a wife 1400 01:15:09,120 --> 01:15:10,040 Speaker 3: swap last week? 1401 01:15:10,240 --> 01:15:12,519 Speaker 1: Oh yeah, I've been on white Swap. Yeah. Yeah. 1402 01:15:12,720 --> 01:15:14,840 Speaker 3: So my assistance text, you got to turn this on. 1403 01:15:14,880 --> 01:15:17,759 Speaker 3: You got to turn this on. She's a really nice lady. 1404 01:15:17,800 --> 01:15:21,519 Speaker 3: You're going to love her. And so I turn it 1405 01:15:21,560 --> 01:15:24,000 Speaker 3: on for a few minutes. So I was telling a 1406 01:15:24,000 --> 01:15:26,000 Speaker 3: lot of my friends at my barn like I'm gonna 1407 01:15:26,000 --> 01:15:31,840 Speaker 3: be on this podcast and she's on Housewives of Orange 1408 01:15:31,920 --> 01:15:33,840 Speaker 3: County and they were like, oh my god, that's so cool. 1409 01:15:33,920 --> 01:15:37,840 Speaker 1: So yes, well, thank you, thank you so nice to 1410 01:15:37,880 --> 01:15:40,680 Speaker 1: meet both of you. Thanks Liz, We appreciate it all right, 1411 01:15:40,760 --> 01:15:44,400 Speaker 1: take care you too, Bye bye Bay. Thanks guys for listening. 1412 01:15:44,520 --> 01:15:47,479 Speaker 1: We appreciate it. Again. You can find us anywhere you 1413 01:15:47,520 --> 01:15:50,200 Speaker 1: listen to podcasts. You can just search for Legally Brunette. 1414 01:15:50,200 --> 01:15:53,200 Speaker 1: Make sure you tell your friends and family and Also, 1415 01:15:53,320 --> 01:15:55,640 Speaker 1: I always appreciate the feedback. You guys dm me on 1416 01:15:55,680 --> 01:15:58,200 Speaker 1: Instagram and let me know what cases you're interested in 1417 01:15:58,439 --> 01:16:00,720 Speaker 1: and thank you and we will see you soon. 1418 01:16:00,840 --> 01:16:07,000 Speaker 2: Thank you. Follow h