WEBVTT - Mizuho Securities Adding Staff and Specialties

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Bramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m L

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot Com. Well,

0:00:33.280 --> 0:00:37.960
<v Speaker 1>we now quote bitcoin spot prices here at Bloomberg because

0:00:37.960 --> 0:00:40.080
<v Speaker 1>it has gotten that hot. And here to talk about

0:00:40.360 --> 0:00:43.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of the agony that this presents to the biggest

0:00:43.080 --> 0:00:46.199
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street banks is Shinelli Basak. She's insurance company is

0:00:46.240 --> 0:00:49.400
<v Speaker 1>a boutique investment banks reporter for Bloomberg News. She's also

0:00:49.800 --> 0:00:52.479
<v Speaker 1>getting her m b A at n y U. And

0:00:52.960 --> 0:00:55.120
<v Speaker 1>before we get into the details of what to expect

0:00:55.720 --> 0:00:59.280
<v Speaker 1>right before bitcoin starts trading on the futures exchange this Sunday,

0:00:59.320 --> 0:01:01.760
<v Speaker 1>for the first time time, you said that they're crypto

0:01:01.800 --> 0:01:04.720
<v Speaker 1>clubs and everyone's a crypto trader in your MBA classes.

0:01:04.800 --> 0:01:07.399
<v Speaker 1>And it's shocking how many people talk about it in

0:01:07.400 --> 0:01:09.920
<v Speaker 1>an MBA program. It comes up almost every day. What

0:01:09.959 --> 0:01:12.160
<v Speaker 1>are they talking about? They're talking about how they can

0:01:12.200 --> 0:01:14.240
<v Speaker 1>trade it. All their friends are in the market in

0:01:14.280 --> 0:01:18.640
<v Speaker 1>some fashion, whether they're in technology somehow or whether they're

0:01:18.680 --> 0:01:21.200
<v Speaker 1>at a bank and thinking of leaving actually to kind

0:01:21.200 --> 0:01:23.279
<v Speaker 1>of you know, get into the market in different ways

0:01:23.640 --> 0:01:26.920
<v Speaker 1>to do what well. For example, one of the biggest

0:01:27.040 --> 0:01:29.760
<v Speaker 1>investors we know in this space is Mike Novograds, right,

0:01:29.800 --> 0:01:32.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean Mike Novagrads has people he's hired from Millennium,

0:01:32.440 --> 0:01:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Goldman and Morgan Stanley, right. So you know, while the

0:01:35.480 --> 0:01:37.600
<v Speaker 1>big banks have been very slow to get in, we've

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:40.160
<v Speaker 1>seen talent move to places where they can do more

0:01:40.200 --> 0:01:43.720
<v Speaker 1>active in the market. Curious, how do they expect this

0:01:43.840 --> 0:01:46.119
<v Speaker 1>to be cleared? If a lot of the banks are

0:01:46.120 --> 0:01:49.120
<v Speaker 1>not willing to do that, how do you clear a trade?

0:01:49.440 --> 0:01:52.160
<v Speaker 1>I am very curious to see what volumes look like

0:01:52.240 --> 0:01:55.400
<v Speaker 1>on Sunday and Monday. I've been asking everybody what they're expecting.

0:01:55.600 --> 0:01:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Because Golvin has said they'll be able to do it immediately.

0:01:59.360 --> 0:02:01.440
<v Speaker 1>All the other banks pretty much have said they're not

0:02:01.480 --> 0:02:03.080
<v Speaker 1>going to be ready on day one, or they're not

0:02:03.120 --> 0:02:05.160
<v Speaker 1>going to do it at all. They're still waiting. What's

0:02:05.200 --> 0:02:08.360
<v Speaker 1>the main obstacle is that the margins that people have

0:02:08.440 --> 0:02:11.600
<v Speaker 1>to post. The margins are wicked high. How are they

0:02:11.080 --> 0:02:15.600
<v Speaker 1>they used to be? But after so much volatility the

0:02:15.680 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 1>last couple of weeks, CEBO actually raised the requirements. So

0:02:18.960 --> 0:02:22.280
<v Speaker 1>that means that anybody looking to make a bitcoin trade

0:02:22.320 --> 0:02:25.720
<v Speaker 1>has to post forty four percent of whatever the trade

0:02:25.720 --> 0:02:28.400
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to put on the equivalent of that in

0:02:28.480 --> 0:02:31.959
<v Speaker 1>some kind of hard asset cash correct aside. And and

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:33.960
<v Speaker 1>so what does that mean? If the price goes, you know,

0:02:34.400 --> 0:02:37.040
<v Speaker 1>up rapidly, then the banks have to be worried about it. Right,

0:02:37.120 --> 0:02:41.720
<v Speaker 1>the price yesterday alone surge. So if this is something

0:02:41.760 --> 0:02:45.040
<v Speaker 1>that is going to be tradeable, what is going to

0:02:45.080 --> 0:02:50.480
<v Speaker 1>be the deliverable cash? It's actually cash settled, a cash settled,

0:02:50.520 --> 0:02:52.280
<v Speaker 1>So really everybody, all they just want to do is

0:02:52.280 --> 0:02:55.200
<v Speaker 1>they're just trading this to make dollars. They're using this

0:02:55.280 --> 0:02:57.799
<v Speaker 1>to make money. Well, that's the other question that's coming

0:02:57.840 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 1>up here too, right, I mean, because it's cash, that'll

0:03:00.160 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the shows that the futures market is pretty much a

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:05.639
<v Speaker 1>speculators market, right, and so there's kind of inherent differences

0:03:05.680 --> 0:03:08.000
<v Speaker 1>between how people trade bitcoin now and how they will

0:03:08.040 --> 0:03:11.400
<v Speaker 1>be trading them moving forward. There was a story on

0:03:11.440 --> 0:03:14.079
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg that cited a statistic that I thought was

0:03:14.160 --> 0:03:18.320
<v Speaker 1>rather shocking that when thousand investors, which is a relatively

0:03:18.360 --> 0:03:20.600
<v Speaker 1>small pool in the scheme of the millions of investors

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:23.920
<v Speaker 1>out there, only when thousand investors account for of the

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:30.520
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin holdings, what potential risks does that concentration offer up. Well,

0:03:30.520 --> 0:03:32.880
<v Speaker 1>it's definitely a huge concentration risk, and I think it's

0:03:32.919 --> 0:03:34.880
<v Speaker 1>also another reason people are kind of excited for the

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:37.600
<v Speaker 1>futures market. They're hoping that a lot of big institutional

0:03:37.600 --> 0:03:39.920
<v Speaker 1>investors will start to get into the market because now

0:03:39.960 --> 0:03:43.800
<v Speaker 1>we know the investors are not necessarily institutions. Pensions are

0:03:43.840 --> 0:03:47.560
<v Speaker 1>not investing in bitcoin, they're really worried about custody issues.

0:03:47.680 --> 0:03:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Endowments are not really although people are in talks with

0:03:50.600 --> 0:03:54.120
<v Speaker 1>endowments of certainly they're not investing in this yet, so

0:03:54.360 --> 0:03:56.160
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of limited. But it's also a lot of

0:03:56.200 --> 0:04:00.440
<v Speaker 1>retail investors also, So really it's you know, it'sbody once

0:04:00.480 --> 0:04:02.960
<v Speaker 1>told me the average age of a bitcoin investors twenty two.

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:06.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how true that is, but it's it's

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:11.360
<v Speaker 1>what I'm trying to do at the younger generation. So okay, right, well,

0:04:11.920 --> 0:04:14.839
<v Speaker 1>let's hope not. The thing that occurs to me though,

0:04:15.040 --> 0:04:17.400
<v Speaker 1>is if you have to put up so much margin,

0:04:17.960 --> 0:04:22.120
<v Speaker 1>and if the trade moves against you during whatever time train,

0:04:22.240 --> 0:04:25.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, before it expires, Uh, how are you going

0:04:26.000 --> 0:04:29.520
<v Speaker 1>to manage the big price swing? So you're gonna then

0:04:29.560 --> 0:04:33.280
<v Speaker 1>get a call from your broker whoever is executing the trade,

0:04:33.279 --> 0:04:35.039
<v Speaker 1>saying you better put more money in the account by

0:04:35.200 --> 0:04:37.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, four o'clock, or we're going to close out

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:39.680
<v Speaker 1>your account. Because it can go up and it can

0:04:39.720 --> 0:04:42.760
<v Speaker 1>go down as much as we've seen what is the

0:04:42.880 --> 0:04:46.239
<v Speaker 1>fifteen thousand one day, ten thousand another day, You're gonna

0:04:46.240 --> 0:04:51.520
<v Speaker 1>have to be constantly monitoring your margin. Require That's absolutely true,

0:04:51.680 --> 0:04:54.040
<v Speaker 1>and the people are already thinking about that right now.

0:04:54.520 --> 0:04:57.039
<v Speaker 1>And um, you know, I wonder too. It means you

0:04:57.080 --> 0:04:59.640
<v Speaker 1>also have less leverage on the investment, right So I'm

0:04:59.640 --> 0:05:02.920
<v Speaker 1>wondering if it makes it somehow less attractive. So let's

0:05:02.920 --> 0:05:05.960
<v Speaker 1>talk about the deliberations that are going on inside the

0:05:05.960 --> 0:05:09.159
<v Speaker 1>biggest Wall Street banks right now. Goldman Sachs, as Pin

0:05:09.279 --> 0:05:13.320
<v Speaker 1>was saying, has decided to start clearing bitcoin futures from

0:05:13.400 --> 0:05:17.400
<v Speaker 1>day one. What's the debate internally here? The debate internally

0:05:17.560 --> 0:05:19.359
<v Speaker 1>comes from a couple of ways. We talked about the

0:05:19.400 --> 0:05:23.440
<v Speaker 1>volatility for a while that's definitely a huge concern reputational risk.

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:26.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we've seen every bank CEO come out in

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:29.839
<v Speaker 1>some fashion saying something the most promised in An example

0:05:29.880 --> 0:05:31.600
<v Speaker 1>of this is Jamie Diamond who has called it a

0:05:31.600 --> 0:05:35.200
<v Speaker 1>bubble and a fraud. UM. However, JP Morgan, that doesn't

0:05:35.200 --> 0:05:37.560
<v Speaker 1>mean their clients are not asking about it, and they

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:39.240
<v Speaker 1>have to and they they are one of the people

0:05:39.279 --> 0:05:42.000
<v Speaker 1>that have been weighing offering the futures contracts to their clients.

0:05:42.240 --> 0:05:45.000
<v Speaker 1>So there's this inherent disconnect between what they have to

0:05:45.200 --> 0:05:48.200
<v Speaker 1>address to clients and how maybe the banks feel about it.

0:05:48.400 --> 0:05:52.039
<v Speaker 1>There's also no your customer, customer and undering leandering concerns

0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:55.080
<v Speaker 1>with with these contracts as well. Is it useful to

0:05:55.080 --> 0:05:58.960
<v Speaker 1>to think of bitcoin as a commodity or is a currency?

0:05:59.160 --> 0:06:03.159
<v Speaker 1>That's the big debate, right what what? What is it? Um?

0:06:03.200 --> 0:06:06.839
<v Speaker 1>You know there there are arguments for it to be both. UM.

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:09.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that generally, walking into the futures market, people

0:06:09.640 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 1>are behaving as if it's a currency. I gotta say,

0:06:13.160 --> 0:06:15.120
<v Speaker 1>one thing that I'm struck by is that the actual

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:18.359
<v Speaker 1>price that you can get on bitcoin is completely different

0:06:18.440 --> 0:06:22.000
<v Speaker 1>from coin based to other other exchanges. So you have

0:06:22.080 --> 0:06:25.160
<v Speaker 1>to wonder what the real value is and how are

0:06:25.200 --> 0:06:28.680
<v Speaker 1>people not going to just simply get scammed? Right, We're

0:06:28.720 --> 0:06:32.920
<v Speaker 1>definitely wondering kind of what the differentiation is among different

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:35.919
<v Speaker 1>exchanges and also not only just bitcoin, but now you

0:06:35.960 --> 0:06:37.520
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of other options to invest in the

0:06:37.560 --> 0:06:41.400
<v Speaker 1>cryptocurrency space and how those prices are connected to each other.

0:06:41.800 --> 0:06:43.920
<v Speaker 1>One of the biggest mysteries in this world, for example,

0:06:44.000 --> 0:06:46.039
<v Speaker 1>is tether. We had a fantastic story and if you

0:06:46.040 --> 0:06:48.320
<v Speaker 1>haven't read it yet, I really suggest you guys look

0:06:48.360 --> 0:06:50.479
<v Speaker 1>at it. By might not licening you know what is

0:06:50.560 --> 0:06:54.520
<v Speaker 1>underpinning the value of tether. Well, we'll go and we'll

0:06:54.760 --> 0:06:56.719
<v Speaker 1>explore that at another time. I want to thank you

0:06:56.800 --> 0:07:00.159
<v Speaker 1>very much for being with us, just as shoes gold shoes. Uh.

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:05.080
<v Speaker 1>The Commodity Futures Trading Commission says that bitcoin is a

0:07:05.160 --> 0:07:10.280
<v Speaker 1>commodity anyway, Thanks very much, Snali boss, much appreciated, and uh,

0:07:10.560 --> 0:07:12.840
<v Speaker 1>we'll be looking forward to more reports on what happens

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:14.760
<v Speaker 1>to bitcoin. I have a feeling Sunday is going to

0:07:14.800 --> 0:07:35.880
<v Speaker 1>be an important day. Blame Japanese banks for the flat

0:07:36.000 --> 0:07:39.200
<v Speaker 1>treasury curve. That's according to City Group strategists. Here with

0:07:39.280 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 1>us is the CEO of the U S arm of

0:07:41.600 --> 0:07:45.000
<v Speaker 1>a Japanese bank, to comment on those Japanese flows and

0:07:45.040 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 1>what they're doing to US markets. Jerry Rosieri, president and

0:07:47.880 --> 0:07:50.920
<v Speaker 1>chief executive officer of Missoojo Securities, joins us here in

0:07:50.920 --> 0:07:53.560
<v Speaker 1>our eleven three studios. Jerry, thank you so much for

0:07:53.640 --> 0:07:56.360
<v Speaker 1>joining us. SO is this the case? Is it Japanese

0:07:56.400 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 1>banks that are flooding into longer term US treasure ease

0:08:00.360 --> 0:08:04.720
<v Speaker 1>that's keeping the yield curve flat? Well, that has been

0:08:04.720 --> 0:08:08.480
<v Speaker 1>the case over many years. UH. You know, foreign foreign

0:08:08.480 --> 0:08:13.120
<v Speaker 1>holdings by the Japanese have increased substantially over the last

0:08:13.200 --> 0:08:19.720
<v Speaker 1>five to seven years. Up over that time period. UM,

0:08:19.760 --> 0:08:23.880
<v Speaker 1>I think the bigger movement into US treasuries and and

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:28.440
<v Speaker 1>similar risk risk free assets was in two thousand sixteen

0:08:29.160 --> 0:08:32.880
<v Speaker 1>two thousand seventeen. It's been less of a fixed income story. UH.

0:08:32.920 --> 0:08:38.000
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, we've seen evidence that the banks and UH,

0:08:38.080 --> 0:08:41.040
<v Speaker 1>particularly the regional banks in Japan will be pulling back

0:08:41.040 --> 0:08:46.000
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, much of that dictated by the regulator.

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 1>To be really clear, they've pulled back a little bit

0:08:50.040 --> 0:08:54.440
<v Speaker 1>on their investments in US treasuries, I would say, not

0:08:54.440 --> 0:08:58.280
<v Speaker 1>not pulling back in terms of UH selling assets, but

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:01.880
<v Speaker 1>the pace of buying, I would say, has has lessened.

0:09:02.679 --> 0:09:06.040
<v Speaker 1>So this is not exactly the dynamic that well, I think,

0:09:06.080 --> 0:09:09.000
<v Speaker 1>I think. You know, whenever you see moves, particularly in

0:09:09.000 --> 0:09:12.840
<v Speaker 1>the U S treasury market, you'll curve flattening, you'll curve steeping. Uh.

0:09:13.280 --> 0:09:17.320
<v Speaker 1>It's it's always common to to blame uh, non US

0:09:17.360 --> 0:09:23.240
<v Speaker 1>investors oftentimes Asia. Uh, you know, and uh and uh.

0:09:23.400 --> 0:09:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Certainly the Japanese are large holders at last China of

0:09:27.200 --> 0:09:29.679
<v Speaker 1>US treasuries. I just want to ask a little bit

0:09:29.679 --> 0:09:32.240
<v Speaker 1>and maybe get an update. I know in twenty fifteen,

0:09:32.400 --> 0:09:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Missouho paid what about three billion dollars for the loan

0:09:35.640 --> 0:09:38.559
<v Speaker 1>book of Royal Bank of Scotland. Right about that was

0:09:38.600 --> 0:09:40.520
<v Speaker 1>a thirty six and a half billion dollar loan book

0:09:40.520 --> 0:09:43.439
<v Speaker 1>for North America. Can you give us an update on

0:09:43.480 --> 0:09:46.720
<v Speaker 1>that and whether if you were to be able to

0:09:46.760 --> 0:09:50.360
<v Speaker 1>buy that today, what would that be worth? Well, they

0:09:50.400 --> 0:09:55.320
<v Speaker 1>were basically a loan commitments, So the reason we pursued

0:09:55.400 --> 0:10:02.000
<v Speaker 1>that transaction was to elevate our client penetration here in

0:10:02.040 --> 0:10:07.560
<v Speaker 1>the America's So the book itself was interesting, but more importantly,

0:10:07.640 --> 0:10:11.040
<v Speaker 1>we are looking to establish long term lending relationships in

0:10:11.080 --> 0:10:13.880
<v Speaker 1>the US and that's what we've actually done. We've uh,

0:10:14.160 --> 0:10:17.200
<v Speaker 1>we've more than uh I think for top tier lending

0:10:17.240 --> 0:10:21.480
<v Speaker 1>relationships of increased ten times over the last two and

0:10:21.480 --> 0:10:24.280
<v Speaker 1>a half years. And you're hiring human beings, right, Yeah.

0:10:24.320 --> 0:10:26.600
<v Speaker 1>So with the the the asset purchase in and of

0:10:26.640 --> 0:10:30.079
<v Speaker 1>itself was interesting, but we actually wouldn't have pursued that

0:10:30.440 --> 0:10:33.080
<v Speaker 1>unless we were able to bring a number of people

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:35.199
<v Speaker 1>over from the institution. So we took on about a

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:39.880
<v Speaker 1>hundred and twenty people from RBS along with those assets.

0:10:40.440 --> 0:10:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Just with respect to MISSOO Securities, how much has it

0:10:44.080 --> 0:10:46.960
<v Speaker 1>expanded and how much do you plan to continue expanding

0:10:47.000 --> 0:10:49.080
<v Speaker 1>from a head count perspective? Sure? So so in the

0:10:49.200 --> 0:10:52.680
<v Speaker 1>US I joined the company two thousand, ten UM and

0:10:52.760 --> 0:10:56.160
<v Speaker 1>we securities, we were maybe a little over three hundred people.

0:10:56.840 --> 0:11:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Uh now we're hentering heading towards eight hundred UM. It's

0:11:01.000 --> 0:11:05.880
<v Speaker 1>been a h I say, a measured expansion. We've tried

0:11:05.960 --> 0:11:09.200
<v Speaker 1>to uh move at a pace that sort of suits

0:11:09.200 --> 0:11:13.440
<v Speaker 1>our organizations tolerants. Uh. And but having said that, uh,

0:11:13.720 --> 0:11:16.959
<v Speaker 1>it's been very targeted. So it's been capital markets, so

0:11:17.120 --> 0:11:19.840
<v Speaker 1>debt capital markets, it's been equity capital markets. We've expended

0:11:19.880 --> 0:11:21.840
<v Speaker 1>our high yield business over the last couple of years,

0:11:22.440 --> 0:11:24.959
<v Speaker 1>also on the sales and trading front as well, growing

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:27.680
<v Speaker 1>out our equity platform as well as diversifying our fixed

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:32.240
<v Speaker 1>income platform. Any thoughts are maybe comparisons between now and

0:11:32.280 --> 0:11:35.640
<v Speaker 1>the and the time of Lehman Brothers. Whether the banks

0:11:35.679 --> 0:11:38.360
<v Speaker 1>and the brokerage firms have they changed at least the

0:11:38.360 --> 0:11:41.439
<v Speaker 1>way that they perceived their balance sheets? I mean, does

0:11:41.440 --> 0:11:44.760
<v Speaker 1>that inform the day to day operations of of the organization?

0:11:44.960 --> 0:11:47.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean things are you know, I'm former Leman Brothers.

0:11:47.360 --> 0:11:49.240
<v Speaker 1>I was there for twenty three years, so I know

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:52.440
<v Speaker 1>that situation well. But uh yeah, the environment is a

0:11:52.440 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 1>lot different. I mean there's less leverage, uh you know,

0:11:55.520 --> 0:12:01.120
<v Speaker 1>the regulatory environments different. Um but you know, I would

0:12:01.120 --> 0:12:03.640
<v Speaker 1>say that uh you know, the the industries have been

0:12:03.640 --> 0:12:07.920
<v Speaker 1>expanding since two thousand and eight. Uh so employments up

0:12:08.080 --> 0:12:11.880
<v Speaker 1>in business actually is pretty decent. Where is the biggest

0:12:11.960 --> 0:12:15.960
<v Speaker 1>opportunity for MISSOO host securities in US markets? Is it

0:12:16.320 --> 0:12:19.880
<v Speaker 1>highel bond trading? Is it underwriting investment grade bonds? So

0:12:19.920 --> 0:12:22.680
<v Speaker 1>we're we're already top ten in corporate investment grade debt

0:12:22.840 --> 0:12:25.280
<v Speaker 1>in the U S which is trading in terms of

0:12:25.320 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 1>origination UH. In terms of trading activities, we've been aggressively

0:12:30.400 --> 0:12:36.120
<v Speaker 1>expanding our equity platform UH and cash businesses. We're working

0:12:36.200 --> 0:12:39.640
<v Speaker 1>on both derivatives and ffects for fixed income UH and

0:12:39.800 --> 0:12:44.959
<v Speaker 1>equities UM. In the fixed income side, we've been expanding

0:12:45.000 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 1>our security securitized products area as well as in our

0:12:48.120 --> 0:12:50.880
<v Speaker 1>high yield trading area. And just real quick, are you

0:12:50.960 --> 0:12:54.679
<v Speaker 1>using balance sheet? Yes? We do? And is that increasing?

0:12:55.320 --> 0:13:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Our balance sheet has been relatively stable. UM, it's but

0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:03.000
<v Speaker 1>it's not a constraint on our business. I would say,

0:13:03.480 --> 0:13:05.440
<v Speaker 1>thanks very much for coming in and spending time with us.

0:13:05.520 --> 0:13:09.559
<v Speaker 1>Much appreciate it. Very interesting UH. Jerry Rozsieri is the

0:13:09.640 --> 0:13:34.240
<v Speaker 1>president and the chief executive of Missouho Security. Total addressable market?

0:13:34.600 --> 0:13:37.160
<v Speaker 1>What is it? And why does it matter? Well, we

0:13:37.200 --> 0:13:39.400
<v Speaker 1>have Bill Smede to help us answer this question. He

0:13:39.480 --> 0:13:42.600
<v Speaker 1>is the chief executive officer and chief investment officer for

0:13:42.720 --> 0:13:46.480
<v Speaker 1>smed Capital Management. They're based in Seattle, helping to manage

0:13:46.480 --> 0:13:49.800
<v Speaker 1>more than two point two billion dollars and you can

0:13:49.920 --> 0:13:54.400
<v Speaker 1>follow Bill on Twitter at Smede Cap, s m E

0:13:54.480 --> 0:13:59.359
<v Speaker 1>A d cap alright, smead cap. What is total addressable

0:13:59.440 --> 0:14:04.360
<v Speaker 1>market t A M. Well, it means how many possible

0:14:04.480 --> 0:14:09.440
<v Speaker 1>customers or how many possible widgets that you can sell

0:14:10.320 --> 0:14:14.319
<v Speaker 1>based on the population available and those that have access

0:14:14.360 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 1>to what you're doing. And it's become quite a popular

0:14:18.040 --> 0:14:21.760
<v Speaker 1>thing where you know, we're we're ten years into maybe

0:14:21.800 --> 0:14:24.800
<v Speaker 1>the best stretch that growth has ever had against value.

0:14:25.240 --> 0:14:29.680
<v Speaker 1>So when when when valuations aren't very enjoyable to talk about,

0:14:30.320 --> 0:14:32.880
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty easy for growth people to kind of slip

0:14:32.920 --> 0:14:38.119
<v Speaker 1>into talking about possibilities and potential and uh, total addressable

0:14:38.120 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 1>market is a way to to think about potential. Well,

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:43.560
<v Speaker 1>I could guess, I could say potentially at one point

0:14:43.600 --> 0:14:45.360
<v Speaker 1>I was going to play for the NBA, but I

0:14:45.440 --> 0:14:48.480
<v Speaker 1>knew that wasn't gonna happen, So potential goes out the window.

0:14:48.800 --> 0:14:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Does this make any sense? Well, you know it doesn't

0:14:54.360 --> 0:14:57.920
<v Speaker 1>certain circumstances. I think you know. Warren Buffett says, what

0:14:57.920 --> 0:14:59.840
<v Speaker 1>the wise man does at the beginning of the fool

0:14:59.840 --> 0:15:01.880
<v Speaker 1>to us at the end. So so let me give

0:15:01.880 --> 0:15:05.680
<v Speaker 1>you an example. When he bought Coca Cola, he actually

0:15:05.720 --> 0:15:08.280
<v Speaker 1>paid a much higher price earnings ratio than he normally

0:15:08.360 --> 0:15:11.440
<v Speaker 1>used to pay. He paid eighteen times earnings. But he

0:15:11.480 --> 0:15:15.000
<v Speaker 1>could see that Coke was in the early stages of

0:15:15.120 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 1>beginning to sell soda pop all over the world rather

0:15:19.320 --> 0:15:22.240
<v Speaker 1>than just the you know, the most sophisticated parts of

0:15:22.240 --> 0:15:25.000
<v Speaker 1>the world. And so you know, by the time he

0:15:25.080 --> 0:15:28.200
<v Speaker 1>got done, we were on a one week mission trip

0:15:28.240 --> 0:15:30.760
<v Speaker 1>with our family and they were drinking phantom on a

0:15:30.800 --> 0:15:34.480
<v Speaker 1>relatively deserted island off the coast to Honduras. And that

0:15:34.520 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 1>was about ten years ago, right, So they went from

0:15:37.240 --> 0:15:41.480
<v Speaker 1>from mainly mainly dominating the highly populated parts of the

0:15:41.520 --> 0:15:44.200
<v Speaker 1>western world and they went all the way around the world.

0:15:44.200 --> 0:15:47.840
<v Speaker 1>So that market got addressed by Coca Cola. So it's

0:15:47.880 --> 0:15:49.720
<v Speaker 1>a good time to think about it at the beginning,

0:15:50.720 --> 0:15:53.160
<v Speaker 1>but but it's it's not good at all when you

0:15:53.240 --> 0:15:55.520
<v Speaker 1>get in the late stages of a lot of financial

0:15:55.560 --> 0:15:58.360
<v Speaker 1>euphoria like we are now to think about that because

0:15:58.400 --> 0:16:02.960
<v Speaker 1>it usually breeds trouble. Bill, What could be in your

0:16:03.000 --> 0:16:05.280
<v Speaker 1>mind the next Coca Cola, if not on that scale,

0:16:05.360 --> 0:16:08.160
<v Speaker 1>but has the potential to really take off. I think

0:16:08.160 --> 0:16:13.360
<v Speaker 1>you did home in on some pharmaceutical companies. Correct. Well, yeah,

0:16:13.760 --> 0:16:17.440
<v Speaker 1>the there's an enormous population, both in the States and

0:16:17.480 --> 0:16:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Europe of of baby boomers and osteo processes is a

0:16:22.280 --> 0:16:25.720
<v Speaker 1>is a malady that that has a tendency to hit

0:16:25.800 --> 0:16:29.280
<v Speaker 1>as you get older, and it's especially prevalent in women.

0:16:29.760 --> 0:16:34.120
<v Speaker 1>And so you know, m Gen makes the most successful

0:16:34.600 --> 0:16:38.720
<v Speaker 1>uh drug for treating osteo process Prola, and then as

0:16:38.760 --> 0:16:41.840
<v Speaker 1>a bit of good fortune, they found out in testing

0:16:41.840 --> 0:16:45.360
<v Speaker 1>thirty people that it also caused tumors that were close

0:16:45.440 --> 0:16:48.040
<v Speaker 1>to the bone to stop growing, and they sell that

0:16:48.160 --> 0:16:51.640
<v Speaker 1>as Xchieva. And so you know, even though that's a

0:16:51.640 --> 0:16:54.880
<v Speaker 1>blockbuster already prolia Is, it's just got a lot of

0:16:54.920 --> 0:16:58.320
<v Speaker 1>population in its way, and and that's something that the

0:16:58.360 --> 0:17:01.960
<v Speaker 1>company has to look forward to. Another case, in Mgen's case,

0:17:02.000 --> 0:17:06.159
<v Speaker 1>they're introducing Rapata, and the health insurance industry has been

0:17:06.200 --> 0:17:08.840
<v Speaker 1>slow to take it on given all the tweets and

0:17:08.960 --> 0:17:14.280
<v Speaker 1>grief associated with pharmaceutical prices. So uh it's been a

0:17:14.359 --> 0:17:18.159
<v Speaker 1>slow to be adopted. But if you combine that with staatens,

0:17:18.640 --> 0:17:22.800
<v Speaker 1>people with terrible high bad cholesterol dropped down to about

0:17:22.840 --> 0:17:25.800
<v Speaker 1>seventy bad cholesterol. In effect, we could have a nation

0:17:25.840 --> 0:17:29.600
<v Speaker 1>of marathon runners running around people that were formerly had

0:17:29.640 --> 0:17:33.160
<v Speaker 1>the blood of of someone with severe heart disease potential

0:17:33.440 --> 0:17:36.159
<v Speaker 1>and and and very likely at some point time to

0:17:36.160 --> 0:17:38.440
<v Speaker 1>get hit by heart attack or stroke to a bunch

0:17:38.440 --> 0:17:41.480
<v Speaker 1>of marathon runners around running around because of the way

0:17:41.480 --> 0:17:44.600
<v Speaker 1>that this attacks bad cholesterol in the bloodstream. Well, Bill,

0:17:44.680 --> 0:17:48.560
<v Speaker 1>eventually those marathon runners might have to head home. Can

0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:53.440
<v Speaker 1>you talk about the home building market and specifically Lenar Well, Yeah,

0:17:53.520 --> 0:17:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Leonard now owns more build uble lots than anybody because

0:17:57.880 --> 0:18:01.960
<v Speaker 1>they're they're merging with call Atlantic and UH as you

0:18:02.040 --> 0:18:04.320
<v Speaker 1>go forward, the three things that are gonna be tough

0:18:04.400 --> 0:18:06.920
<v Speaker 1>to deal with to build all the homes we're gonna need,

0:18:06.920 --> 0:18:11.280
<v Speaker 1>and the total addressable market is that some large percentage

0:18:11.359 --> 0:18:13.760
<v Speaker 1>I think Zillo is on the cutting edge of of

0:18:13.840 --> 0:18:17.000
<v Speaker 1>measuring this, some very large percentage of the millennials that

0:18:17.040 --> 0:18:20.399
<v Speaker 1>our ages twenty two tote are going to end up

0:18:20.400 --> 0:18:22.399
<v Speaker 1>buying a home, and many of those homes need to

0:18:22.440 --> 0:18:25.280
<v Speaker 1>be built because the people at the other end aren't

0:18:25.320 --> 0:18:27.600
<v Speaker 1>moving out of their homes as fast as people are

0:18:27.640 --> 0:18:31.080
<v Speaker 1>moving in. So so UH, having a lot of buildable

0:18:31.119 --> 0:18:33.959
<v Speaker 1>lots is one of the ingredients that would help you

0:18:34.080 --> 0:18:37.800
<v Speaker 1>meet that addressable market. And then of course the labor

0:18:37.920 --> 0:18:40.680
<v Speaker 1>is going to be a big challenge. Right. We think

0:18:40.720 --> 0:18:44.120
<v Speaker 1>that you might see a very generous green card set

0:18:44.200 --> 0:18:50.639
<v Speaker 1>up for people in carpentry, plumbing, electricians, etcetera. Uh, bricklayers, roofers,

0:18:50.880 --> 0:18:54.440
<v Speaker 1>you name it, and and uh and then the materials

0:18:54.480 --> 0:18:57.159
<v Speaker 1>and we could see some inflation in the materials as well.

0:18:57.280 --> 0:19:00.120
<v Speaker 1>But uh, that's right, those are in front of us

0:19:00.160 --> 0:19:04.560
<v Speaker 1>because even today, the home building that's being done today

0:19:04.680 --> 0:19:07.440
<v Speaker 1>is way better than five years ago. But it wouldn't

0:19:07.440 --> 0:19:10.399
<v Speaker 1>It would have been a bad number in nineteen sixty,

0:19:10.840 --> 0:19:14.920
<v Speaker 1>seventy eighty five or ninety five. Rights, it's we're as

0:19:14.920 --> 0:19:19.159
<v Speaker 1>still at recession low levels of home building compared to

0:19:19.240 --> 0:19:22.120
<v Speaker 1>past decades. Okay, but Bill, when does the stock get

0:19:22.200 --> 0:19:25.120
<v Speaker 1>too expensive? I mean you're looking at Lenar right now.

0:19:25.160 --> 0:19:29.119
<v Speaker 1>The stock is up within so far this year and

0:19:29.240 --> 0:19:35.679
<v Speaker 1>it sports a pe of over sixteen for a home builder, right, So, so, uh,

0:19:36.160 --> 0:19:40.119
<v Speaker 1>what you've got here is a historically cyclical business in

0:19:40.200 --> 0:19:44.560
<v Speaker 1>a secular surge, and we think we're we've finished the

0:19:44.640 --> 0:19:47.040
<v Speaker 1>third inning is where we think we are now what

0:19:47.160 --> 0:19:50.960
<v Speaker 1>that means PIM and for low turnover portfolio managers like

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:53.640
<v Speaker 1>the US, this is one of the challenge of being

0:19:53.640 --> 0:19:57.640
<v Speaker 1>our investors is we want to sit through whatever correction

0:19:57.760 --> 0:20:00.080
<v Speaker 1>comes next to get to where this is going to

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:03.639
<v Speaker 1>be in five or six years. So you're right. This industry,

0:20:03.840 --> 0:20:07.600
<v Speaker 1>the earnings are growing twenty percent a year on about

0:20:07.640 --> 0:20:12.760
<v Speaker 1>ten revenue growth. Right, So there's people out here in

0:20:12.800 --> 0:20:16.479
<v Speaker 1>Seattle excited about the company whose revenue is growing and

0:20:16.480 --> 0:20:19.040
<v Speaker 1>whose profits don't go at all. And this is an

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:22.000
<v Speaker 1>industry whose revenue is growing ten percent and the profits

0:20:22.000 --> 0:20:25.080
<v Speaker 1>are growing twenty So you're absolutely right. They've had a

0:20:25.080 --> 0:20:27.680
<v Speaker 1>good run. They could have a correction at any time. Fact,

0:20:27.720 --> 0:20:29.560
<v Speaker 1>this market could have a correction at any time. But

0:20:30.000 --> 0:20:32.440
<v Speaker 1>for the long duration investor that wants to catch this

0:20:32.520 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 1>next five to ten years aging of the Moneial group,

0:20:36.000 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a nice addressable market to consider. Build. Another way

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:43.320
<v Speaker 1>to hedge against the downturn is holding more cash? Are

0:20:43.440 --> 0:20:47.400
<v Speaker 1>you doing that? No? We we We kind of made

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:50.760
<v Speaker 1>a decision ten year our fund are our fund will

0:20:50.760 --> 0:20:53.879
<v Speaker 1>be ten years old, our strategy ten years old right

0:20:53.880 --> 0:20:56.840
<v Speaker 1>after the first of the year, and and we just

0:20:56.920 --> 0:20:59.880
<v Speaker 1>made a choice. At the beginning. We assume that most

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:02.840
<v Speaker 1>of the people that would invest with us, we would

0:21:02.840 --> 0:21:05.840
<v Speaker 1>be a part of their total portfolio. Someone else is

0:21:05.880 --> 0:21:09.840
<v Speaker 1>likely doing the asset allocation, and so we don't really

0:21:09.920 --> 0:21:13.280
<v Speaker 1>feel like we have any special competency to time the market.

0:21:13.800 --> 0:21:17.480
<v Speaker 1>In fact, you know what we got started at the

0:21:17.480 --> 0:21:19.959
<v Speaker 1>beginning of Oh wait, the next fourteen months was the

0:21:20.000 --> 0:21:23.640
<v Speaker 1>worst market decline in eighty years, So I don't think

0:21:23.640 --> 0:21:26.439
<v Speaker 1>people should be coming to us for market timing. Bill Smide,

0:21:26.480 --> 0:21:28.720
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us. Bill Smeede, Chief

0:21:28.720 --> 0:21:32.520
<v Speaker 1>executive Officer and chief investment Officer. It's Smeed a capital

0:21:32.560 --> 0:21:56.879
<v Speaker 1>management overseeing two point two billion dollars in Seattle. What

0:21:56.920 --> 0:21:59.359
<v Speaker 1>would you like to do for a job? Perhaps a

0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:01.840
<v Speaker 1>game to hester you don't need any experience for that,

0:22:02.000 --> 0:22:04.960
<v Speaker 1>or a heavy equipment operator. We hope you have experience

0:22:05.040 --> 0:22:07.639
<v Speaker 1>for that. Here to help us understand the job market

0:22:07.720 --> 0:22:11.159
<v Speaker 1>right now is the chief executive of Zip Recruiter. Ian

0:22:11.320 --> 0:22:13.399
<v Speaker 1>Siegel is also the founder. Great to have you with us,

0:22:13.400 --> 0:22:16.359
<v Speaker 1>ce In, Thanks for spending time. You know, I was

0:22:16.400 --> 0:22:19.560
<v Speaker 1>looking at your side, looking at a trending job titles,

0:22:19.840 --> 0:22:23.960
<v Speaker 1>trending job types, and I'm seeing that one of them

0:22:24.160 --> 0:22:31.120
<v Speaker 1>is a boat captain. Where does this information come from? Well,

0:22:31.720 --> 0:22:37.160
<v Speaker 1>we a Zipp Recruiter, are probably the single largest starting

0:22:37.240 --> 0:22:41.440
<v Speaker 1>point for small and mid sized businesses that do job

0:22:41.480 --> 0:22:46.200
<v Speaker 1>posting in America, and so we end up getting all

0:22:46.240 --> 0:22:50.440
<v Speaker 1>the interesting jobs on our site. So if you, for example,

0:22:51.160 --> 0:22:54.080
<v Speaker 1>run a small ship business, or let's say you are

0:22:54.600 --> 0:22:59.160
<v Speaker 1>in a hurricane struck area and hurricanes have knocked out

0:22:59.200 --> 0:23:02.360
<v Speaker 1>your business that will last few months, then it seems

0:23:02.440 --> 0:23:05.000
<v Speaker 1>likely that you're going to go on a hiring binge

0:23:05.119 --> 0:23:09.399
<v Speaker 1>right now to restock the captains for your ships. So

0:23:09.560 --> 0:23:12.080
<v Speaker 1>I is it fair to say that zip recruiter is

0:23:12.200 --> 0:23:18.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of a byproduct or caters to the gig economy. Well, certainly,

0:23:18.800 --> 0:23:21.040
<v Speaker 1>the gig economy makes up a lot of the jobs

0:23:21.080 --> 0:23:22.960
<v Speaker 1>that you will find on our site, and that's because

0:23:23.000 --> 0:23:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the gig economy increasingly represents a large percentage of opportunities

0:23:28.040 --> 0:23:31.240
<v Speaker 1>for people to work in America. So, whether it's Uber

0:23:31.560 --> 0:23:34.639
<v Speaker 1>or list or delivery Hero or a multitude of on

0:23:34.720 --> 0:23:39.120
<v Speaker 1>demand services, the gig economy has become a material option

0:23:39.359 --> 0:23:41.840
<v Speaker 1>for a lot of job diggers, not just for full

0:23:41.840 --> 0:23:46.480
<v Speaker 1>time work, but also as a second job to bolster

0:23:46.640 --> 0:23:50.359
<v Speaker 1>their income. So in one thing that a lot of

0:23:50.400 --> 0:23:53.639
<v Speaker 1>economists sort of decry is that there isn't a tremendous

0:23:53.640 --> 0:23:57.320
<v Speaker 1>amount of visibility into the gig economy. And I'm wondering,

0:23:57.440 --> 0:23:59.920
<v Speaker 1>from your perspective, you probably have one of the best

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:03.239
<v Speaker 1>views into it. Frankly, and I'm wondering what kinds of

0:24:03.320 --> 0:24:06.800
<v Speaker 1>wage increases are you are you seeing and and has

0:24:06.880 --> 0:24:11.119
<v Speaker 1>that been a positive trend that you've been noticing? Well,

0:24:11.160 --> 0:24:14.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you if you look at the health

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:17.520
<v Speaker 1>of the global job market and want to see global,

0:24:17.520 --> 0:24:19.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean in the United States. Uh, you know, you're

0:24:19.920 --> 0:24:23.360
<v Speaker 1>at four point one percent unemployment, which is a seventeen

0:24:23.440 --> 0:24:26.359
<v Speaker 1>year low. You've had ninety two months of the economy

0:24:26.400 --> 0:24:29.240
<v Speaker 1>adding jobs in a row, and so you're really looking

0:24:29.280 --> 0:24:32.120
<v Speaker 1>at what some would call peak employment. And when you're

0:24:32.119 --> 0:24:35.080
<v Speaker 1>in that kind of environment, what happens is there is

0:24:35.119 --> 0:24:38.040
<v Speaker 1>a dearth of talent searching for work, and so employers

0:24:38.080 --> 0:24:40.760
<v Speaker 1>are forced to do things like raise wages to induce

0:24:40.800 --> 0:24:43.600
<v Speaker 1>people to leave jobs they currently have and come to

0:24:43.720 --> 0:24:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the those employers opportunities. So the gig economy um isn't

0:24:48.840 --> 0:24:52.560
<v Speaker 1>really benefiting from that wage increase. The gig economy is

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:55.199
<v Speaker 1>more like a foundation upon which if you want to

0:24:55.200 --> 0:24:57.800
<v Speaker 1>work today, there is an opportunity out there for you

0:24:57.880 --> 0:25:00.160
<v Speaker 1>to go get. But if you are looking for are

0:25:00.560 --> 0:25:04.000
<v Speaker 1>more full time work and a more traditional role. Right

0:25:04.000 --> 0:25:06.680
<v Speaker 1>now is a great time, probably one of the greatest

0:25:06.720 --> 0:25:09.920
<v Speaker 1>times in our lifetime to be a job seeker. So

0:25:09.960 --> 0:25:12.000
<v Speaker 1>are you saying that there's sort of a divergence here

0:25:12.160 --> 0:25:16.760
<v Speaker 1>with sort of the standard jobs being much more sort

0:25:16.760 --> 0:25:20.240
<v Speaker 1>of competitive and higher paying and paying even higher wages,

0:25:20.440 --> 0:25:22.680
<v Speaker 1>whereas in the gig economy you're not seeing those pay

0:25:22.760 --> 0:25:28.280
<v Speaker 1>raises exactly. And and part of why you're seeing people

0:25:29.200 --> 0:25:32.320
<v Speaker 1>uh be more patient in their job search is because

0:25:33.640 --> 0:25:36.320
<v Speaker 1>the employees who are working in a gig economy are

0:25:36.400 --> 0:25:38.600
<v Speaker 1>using it as a secondary source of income or is

0:25:38.640 --> 0:25:41.720
<v Speaker 1>a bridging income between opportunities as they look for work

0:25:41.800 --> 0:25:44.600
<v Speaker 1>that they would consider more meaningful. Well, Ian, when I

0:25:44.680 --> 0:25:46.639
<v Speaker 1>asked you about being a boat captain, I thought you

0:25:46.680 --> 0:25:48.879
<v Speaker 1>were going to say that you've got an algorithm or

0:25:48.920 --> 0:25:52.879
<v Speaker 1>a way to aggregate all of the information that comes

0:25:52.920 --> 0:25:58.600
<v Speaker 1>to your site and to your specific company. I'm wondering, then,

0:25:59.560 --> 0:26:03.680
<v Speaker 1>how do you automate the process of matching the right

0:26:03.760 --> 0:26:07.040
<v Speaker 1>person with the right job or is that left up

0:26:07.080 --> 0:26:12.160
<v Speaker 1>to the company that's looking for the worker. Oh no, no, no, no,

0:26:12.400 --> 0:26:16.200
<v Speaker 1>we are not just at the bleeding edge. We're sorry.

0:26:16.200 --> 0:26:18.280
<v Speaker 1>We're not the cutting edge of technology. We're at the

0:26:18.320 --> 0:26:22.280
<v Speaker 1>bleeding edge right now. There is technology that has evolved

0:26:22.359 --> 0:26:25.600
<v Speaker 1>over the last two years, often referred to as machine

0:26:25.680 --> 0:26:29.159
<v Speaker 1>learning or sometimes called deep learning. It's an approach to

0:26:29.160 --> 0:26:33.199
<v Speaker 1>building algorithms that do things that humans will never be

0:26:33.280 --> 0:26:37.640
<v Speaker 1>able to match. You give us an example behind absolutely

0:26:38.160 --> 0:26:42.680
<v Speaker 1>so uh when you use one of these algorithms instead

0:26:42.720 --> 0:26:46.080
<v Speaker 1>of doing a traditional match the way you would rationally

0:26:46.080 --> 0:26:48.840
<v Speaker 1>do it, which is I, for example, have been a

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:52.680
<v Speaker 1>product manager in my career. Old school algorithms would say

0:26:52.680 --> 0:26:54.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to find all the jobs that have product

0:26:54.480 --> 0:26:57.200
<v Speaker 1>manager in the job title, and I will just show

0:26:57.200 --> 0:27:01.480
<v Speaker 1>you those jobs. Today, the technolog is so good, it says,

0:27:01.560 --> 0:27:03.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to look at everyone who's ever searched for

0:27:03.720 --> 0:27:06.359
<v Speaker 1>product manager in there in the history of this company,

0:27:06.359 --> 0:27:08.640
<v Speaker 1>and then see all the other job titles that they've

0:27:08.680 --> 0:27:11.160
<v Speaker 1>ever looked for, and as a result of that, they're

0:27:11.160 --> 0:27:14.520
<v Speaker 1>able to cluster opportunities that might be interesting to you

0:27:14.920 --> 0:27:17.600
<v Speaker 1>that a traditional search engine would not be able to surface.

0:27:17.880 --> 0:27:20.399
<v Speaker 1>And that's really the tip of the iceberg, because with

0:27:20.440 --> 0:27:23.400
<v Speaker 1>these algorithms we can start to use signal data from

0:27:23.400 --> 0:27:26.280
<v Speaker 1>the job seekers themselves, so we know, for example, if

0:27:26.320 --> 0:27:28.959
<v Speaker 1>ten job seekers go look at a specific job and

0:27:29.000 --> 0:27:32.240
<v Speaker 1>none of them apply, there is something unappealing about that job,

0:27:32.280 --> 0:27:34.520
<v Speaker 1>and the algorithm is smart enough to stop showing it.

0:27:36.040 --> 0:27:41.159
<v Speaker 1>Ian How does zip recruiter make money? So zip Recruiter

0:27:41.280 --> 0:27:44.520
<v Speaker 1>was built with a very simple premise is that a

0:27:44.560 --> 0:27:46.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of small businesses don't have the time to figure

0:27:46.960 --> 0:27:49.399
<v Speaker 1>out which job board they should be posting too. So

0:27:49.760 --> 0:27:52.440
<v Speaker 1>zip recruiter enables you, if you are a hiring manager,

0:27:52.920 --> 0:27:55.720
<v Speaker 1>supposed to over a hundred job sites with a single click,

0:27:56.200 --> 0:27:58.280
<v Speaker 1>and then all the candidates from all those different sites

0:27:58.400 --> 0:28:02.800
<v Speaker 1>come into one easy to review list. And in as

0:28:02.800 --> 0:28:08.520
<v Speaker 1>far as wages go, can you track individual wage offers

0:28:08.680 --> 0:28:13.440
<v Speaker 1>or salary requirements on the site? Yeah, so we get

0:28:13.520 --> 0:28:17.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, high hundreds of thousands of jobs directly posted

0:28:17.680 --> 0:28:21.400
<v Speaker 1>through zip recruiter every month, and one of the pieces

0:28:21.400 --> 0:28:24.360
<v Speaker 1>of information we capture about every one of those opportunities

0:28:24.440 --> 0:28:27.480
<v Speaker 1>is what salary is being offered. We use a BLS

0:28:27.480 --> 0:28:31.080
<v Speaker 1>based definition of low skilled, mid skilled, and high skilled

0:28:31.400 --> 0:28:34.359
<v Speaker 1>so we can watch trends that occur in the hiring market.

0:28:34.480 --> 0:28:38.600
<v Speaker 1>And just to make it simple, across all levels, all

0:28:38.720 --> 0:28:42.120
<v Speaker 1>skill levels, in the past year, there has been wage increase,

0:28:42.840 --> 0:28:45.720
<v Speaker 1>So it is, as I said, a great time to

0:28:45.760 --> 0:28:48.440
<v Speaker 1>be a job seeker. So I just not to harp

0:28:48.440 --> 0:28:50.560
<v Speaker 1>on this, but who pays you. Which is it? Is

0:28:50.600 --> 0:28:53.640
<v Speaker 1>it the job seeker or is it the potential employer?

0:28:55.560 --> 0:28:58.200
<v Speaker 1>It's the employers who pay us in order to do

0:28:58.240 --> 0:29:01.160
<v Speaker 1>that job distribution and collect Canada, it's we never charged

0:29:01.240 --> 0:29:04.840
<v Speaker 1>job seekers for anything. Okay, what what is next for

0:29:05.440 --> 0:29:08.200
<v Speaker 1>ZIP recruiter? Is there a way to tell whether it's

0:29:08.240 --> 0:29:11.800
<v Speaker 1>been a successful match and then you use that same

0:29:11.840 --> 0:29:16.040
<v Speaker 1>algorithm or an unsuccessful match brings some kind of remedy

0:29:16.240 --> 0:29:20.880
<v Speaker 1>or correction. I mean it's been Honestly, it's the most

0:29:20.920 --> 0:29:24.760
<v Speaker 1>exciting time it's ever been to be working in the

0:29:24.880 --> 0:29:29.240
<v Speaker 1>job category. The technology that has evolved, uh is so

0:29:29.280 --> 0:29:33.840
<v Speaker 1>advanced it's starting to feel like magic. So historically, from

0:29:33.840 --> 0:29:35.840
<v Speaker 1>the time you posted a job to the time you

0:29:35.880 --> 0:29:38.080
<v Speaker 1>sell that job, it would take you between forty five

0:29:38.120 --> 0:29:42.400
<v Speaker 1>and sixty days. And now literally almost instantly after you

0:29:42.480 --> 0:29:45.160
<v Speaker 1>post a job, we're able to go cherry pick the

0:29:45.320 --> 0:29:48.120
<v Speaker 1>very best candidates that are in market and notified and

0:29:48.280 --> 0:29:51.720
<v Speaker 1>instantly of just that job going live, which is inducing

0:29:52.160 --> 0:29:56.560
<v Speaker 1>unbelievable high quality candidates literally within an hour of a

0:29:56.680 --> 0:30:00.800
<v Speaker 1>job being posted. The entire recruiting process moving towards an

0:30:00.840 --> 0:30:03.680
<v Speaker 1>almost real time experience, and it's going to be a

0:30:03.720 --> 0:30:06.400
<v Speaker 1>real disruption to the way people hire. Ian Segel, thank

0:30:06.400 --> 0:30:08.400
<v Speaker 1>you so much for joining us. Ian Siegel, co founder

0:30:08.400 --> 0:30:16.200
<v Speaker 1>and chief executive officer of Zip Recruiter. Thanks for listening

0:30:16.240 --> 0:30:19.120
<v Speaker 1>to the Bloomberg P and L podcast. You can subscribe

0:30:19.120 --> 0:30:22.720
<v Speaker 1>and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whatever

0:30:22.760 --> 0:30:26.280
<v Speaker 1>podcast platform you prefer. I'm pim Fox. I'm on Twitter

0:30:26.560 --> 0:30:30.320
<v Speaker 1>at pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at Lisa abramowits one

0:30:30.520 --> 0:30:33.200
<v Speaker 1>before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide on

0:30:33.280 --> 0:30:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio.