WEBVTT - How do particles carry forces?

0:00:08.360 --> 0:00:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Hey, Jorge, I'm wondering how you feel about the Midi Chlorians,

0:00:12.360 --> 0:00:15.840
<v Speaker 1>those little critters that give Jedi the ability to interact

0:00:15.840 --> 0:00:16.480
<v Speaker 1>with the Force.

0:00:17.480 --> 0:00:21.400
<v Speaker 2>You mean in Star Wars. I mostly try to ignore them.

0:00:21.920 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 2>They're a bit of an awkward retroactive continuity or redcon

0:00:25.640 --> 0:00:26.960
<v Speaker 2>of the original series.

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Mm so you prefer the original approach where it's like

0:00:29.880 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 1>more democratic. Anybody can learn the force like yoga.

0:00:33.240 --> 0:00:34.640
<v Speaker 2>You mean, like Yoda or yoga.

0:00:36.240 --> 0:00:37.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean like Yoda doing.

0:00:37.680 --> 0:00:40.760
<v Speaker 2>Yoga, and like downward facing Jedi.

0:00:40.760 --> 0:00:42.960
<v Speaker 1>That conjured of a pretty awkward mental image.

0:00:43.120 --> 0:00:45.199
<v Speaker 2>How flexible is Yoda? We may never know.

0:00:45.400 --> 0:00:47.159
<v Speaker 1>Well, I'm a fan of the Midichlorians. I feel like

0:00:47.159 --> 0:00:48.280
<v Speaker 1>they're more scientific.

0:00:48.479 --> 0:00:50.279
<v Speaker 2>Oh are you a fan of jar Jar Binks too?

0:00:50.400 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 2>Because I think most people who are in that camp

0:00:53.400 --> 0:00:55.360
<v Speaker 2>are also in the jar Jar Binks camp. But you're

0:00:55.400 --> 0:00:57.480
<v Speaker 2>not tall made up right? It's not real science.

0:00:57.800 --> 0:01:00.800
<v Speaker 1>I know it's not real science, but it's science. You know.

0:01:00.840 --> 0:01:04.120
<v Speaker 1>It's a better microscopic explanation than just like hand waving

0:01:04.240 --> 0:01:04.919
<v Speaker 1>yoga magic.

0:01:05.520 --> 0:01:08.839
<v Speaker 2>I think the magic in Star Wars is literally handwaving,

0:01:09.120 --> 0:01:10.959
<v Speaker 2>like waving your hands in front of your face, going,

0:01:11.160 --> 0:01:12.720
<v Speaker 2>does this not the signs you're looking for.

0:01:13.040 --> 0:01:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I need the old physics mind trick instead.

0:01:15.280 --> 0:01:18.560
<v Speaker 2>That's right, redcon our real universe, not my childhood fantasy.

0:01:18.920 --> 0:01:19.720
<v Speaker 1>That's my job.

0:01:35.120 --> 0:01:37.920
<v Speaker 2>Hi'm Jorhem, a cartoonist and the author of Oliver's Great

0:01:37.920 --> 0:01:38.680
<v Speaker 2>Big Universe.

0:01:38.920 --> 0:01:39.080
<v Speaker 3>Hi.

0:01:39.120 --> 0:01:41.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm Daniel. I'm a particle physicist, and that means my

0:01:41.880 --> 0:01:45.039
<v Speaker 1>job is to explain away all the apparent magic in

0:01:45.080 --> 0:01:45.679
<v Speaker 1>the universe.

0:01:46.160 --> 0:01:48.120
<v Speaker 2>You have to understand it first, though, don't you. Isn't

0:01:48.120 --> 0:01:51.120
<v Speaker 2>that step one? Or are you just making stuff up?

0:01:51.160 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 2>Are you? George Lucas seing it?

0:01:52.440 --> 0:01:55.680
<v Speaker 1>I think explaining it away is understanding it. Describing how

0:01:55.720 --> 0:01:57.760
<v Speaker 1>something works in terms of its like tiny little bits

0:01:57.760 --> 0:02:00.640
<v Speaker 1>and how they bump and dance together. That's basically explanation.

0:02:00.920 --> 0:02:02.640
<v Speaker 2>Or maybe I think you're maybe saying your job is

0:02:02.680 --> 0:02:04.720
<v Speaker 2>to look for explanations.

0:02:04.160 --> 0:02:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and sometimes we actually find them.

0:02:06.120 --> 0:02:07.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and then explain it to other pe books like

0:02:07.880 --> 0:02:10.239
<v Speaker 2>we do in this podcast. So welcome to Daniel and

0:02:10.320 --> 0:02:13.840
<v Speaker 2>Jorge Explain the Universe, a production of iHeartRadio.

0:02:13.240 --> 0:02:15.679
<v Speaker 1>In which we try to take everything in the universe

0:02:15.720 --> 0:02:19.440
<v Speaker 1>that seems unexplainable, that seems magical, and figure out how

0:02:19.480 --> 0:02:22.480
<v Speaker 1>it comes to be. Drill down into its tiny little

0:02:22.480 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 1>bits and particles and explain how they bump and dance

0:02:25.240 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 1>and push on each other to weave themselves together into

0:02:28.120 --> 0:02:31.440
<v Speaker 1>our reality, to explain why yoga feels so good or

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:32.120
<v Speaker 1>so bad.

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:34.840
<v Speaker 2>That's right, because it is a marvelous universe out there,

0:02:34.880 --> 0:02:38.440
<v Speaker 2>with giant gaxies moving across at cosmos and stars exploding

0:02:38.520 --> 0:02:40.720
<v Speaker 2>and black holes sucking stuff in, and we're interested in

0:02:40.800 --> 0:02:42.920
<v Speaker 2>knowing what are some of the forces that bind it

0:02:42.960 --> 0:02:45.639
<v Speaker 2>all together, that flow through us and make it all

0:02:45.639 --> 0:02:46.120
<v Speaker 2>make sense.

0:02:46.280 --> 0:02:49.799
<v Speaker 1>And is it even possible to explain all of that craziness,

0:02:49.800 --> 0:02:52.480
<v Speaker 1>all the amazing things we experience in the universe, from

0:02:52.560 --> 0:02:55.840
<v Speaker 1>leaves swirling in the fall to black holes collapsing in

0:02:55.960 --> 0:02:58.959
<v Speaker 1>terms of tiny particles. Is it really possible to break

0:02:58.960 --> 0:03:00.880
<v Speaker 1>it all down and say it's just a bunch of

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 1>electrons passing particles back and forth.

0:03:03.480 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 2>I feel like you're minimizing electrons. You said, only a

0:03:06.040 --> 0:03:09.359
<v Speaker 2>bunch of electrons. But electrons are pretty pretty special, aren't they.

0:03:09.400 --> 0:03:12.040
<v Speaker 2>Each one is a tiny snowflake in the universe.

0:03:12.120 --> 0:03:15.160
<v Speaker 1>They're all actually identical right in a way snowflakes aren't

0:03:15.160 --> 0:03:17.600
<v Speaker 1>even But I think the job of particle physics is

0:03:17.800 --> 0:03:21.440
<v Speaker 1>literally to minimize the universe, to say, everything that's big

0:03:21.480 --> 0:03:23.840
<v Speaker 1>can be explained in terms of everything that's small.

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:24.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:03:24.320 --> 0:03:26.520
<v Speaker 2>I guess that's a job of physics to break things down.

0:03:26.880 --> 0:03:29.919
<v Speaker 2>And I guess throughout the history of humans and signs,

0:03:30.160 --> 0:03:32.160
<v Speaker 2>that's what you have been doing, right, first breaking things

0:03:32.200 --> 0:03:35.280
<v Speaker 2>down into types of elements, and then atoms and then

0:03:35.320 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 2>atomic particles.

0:03:36.400 --> 0:03:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. We hope that breaking things down will give us explanations,

0:03:39.640 --> 0:03:42.440
<v Speaker 1>will reveal the true nature of the universe, and that

0:03:42.480 --> 0:03:45.200
<v Speaker 1>we could go the opposite direction also from the little

0:03:45.240 --> 0:03:47.800
<v Speaker 1>bits tooing and frowing, that we can weave those little

0:03:47.800 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 1>bits back together. All their tooing and frowing can be

0:03:50.600 --> 0:03:53.440
<v Speaker 1>sewn together to explain everything that happens, the way like

0:03:53.520 --> 0:03:56.560
<v Speaker 1>water droplets eventually could explain a hurricane, and the way

0:03:56.640 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 1>quantum particles somehow make up your classical body. We hope

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:02.920
<v Speaker 1>that by drilling down we can expose the most fundamental

0:04:03.000 --> 0:04:05.000
<v Speaker 1>layer of the universe and then build back up to

0:04:05.080 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 1>explain everything.

0:04:06.120 --> 0:04:08.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and so, little by little, scientists have come up

0:04:08.280 --> 0:04:10.320
<v Speaker 2>with a picture of the universe that can be broken

0:04:10.360 --> 0:04:14.200
<v Speaker 2>down into subatomic particles called electrons and quarks, and also

0:04:14.360 --> 0:04:17.240
<v Speaker 2>force particles. So the question is does it all make sense?

0:04:17.440 --> 0:04:18.200
<v Speaker 2>Does it all stick?

0:04:18.760 --> 0:04:21.040
<v Speaker 1>We have a mathematical description of how this all works,

0:04:21.080 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 1>which is incredibly precise. We can predict the outcomes of

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:27.560
<v Speaker 1>experiments to ten or fifteen decimal places and mostly get

0:04:27.600 --> 0:04:30.240
<v Speaker 1>it right. But is it possible to get an intuitive

0:04:30.360 --> 0:04:33.600
<v Speaker 1>understanding to tell ourselves, like a little story about what's

0:04:33.640 --> 0:04:36.520
<v Speaker 1>happening down there in the quantum realm in a way

0:04:36.520 --> 0:04:39.480
<v Speaker 1>that gives us some insights, some understanding. Is it really

0:04:39.480 --> 0:04:42.560
<v Speaker 1>true that particles are zipping around tossing force particles back

0:04:42.600 --> 0:04:44.760
<v Speaker 1>and forth together or is something deeper happening?

0:04:45.080 --> 0:04:47.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so we're here to force out the truth. So

0:04:47.200 --> 0:04:54.080
<v Speaker 2>today on the podcast, we'll be asking the question how

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:59.520
<v Speaker 2>do particles carry force? This is generic force, not the force, right.

0:04:59.360 --> 0:05:02.880
<v Speaker 1>This is science force, not science fiction force or magical force.

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:04.880
<v Speaker 2>Who Science Force? I want to be part of that team.

0:05:05.000 --> 0:05:07.760
<v Speaker 2>Do you wear uniforms? Do you have like a secret base?

0:05:08.520 --> 0:05:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, they're snappier than the Space Force.

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:13.320
<v Speaker 2>Also, yeah, well I'll join either one. To be honest,

0:05:13.520 --> 0:05:16.440
<v Speaker 2>anything that has a base and involves space or science

0:05:17.480 --> 0:05:18.239
<v Speaker 2>and laser guns.

0:05:18.240 --> 0:05:20.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think we settle this already. The Science

0:05:20.240 --> 0:05:21.839
<v Speaker 1>Force is going to elect you to be part of

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:24.080
<v Speaker 1>the space Force and send you up to meet the aliens?

0:05:24.160 --> 0:05:24.320
<v Speaker 4>Wait?

0:05:24.360 --> 0:05:26.320
<v Speaker 2>Wait, when do we settle this? I didn't sign any

0:05:26.600 --> 0:05:27.719
<v Speaker 2>agreements here.

0:05:27.920 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Oh sorry, we had a meeting of the Science Force.

0:05:29.640 --> 0:05:30.599
<v Speaker 1>I guess you weren't there.

0:05:30.800 --> 0:05:32.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I guess it depends on how much you're

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:34.839
<v Speaker 2>paying me. How much are you paying me to do this? Daniel?

0:05:35.000 --> 0:05:37.360
<v Speaker 2>And or am I surviving relatives?

0:05:37.480 --> 0:05:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? You get paid on your return? Is that all right?

0:05:39.720 --> 0:05:42.040
<v Speaker 2>What do you mean I pay or I get paid?

0:05:42.080 --> 0:05:43.520
<v Speaker 1>You get paid if you survive.

0:05:43.800 --> 0:05:46.760
<v Speaker 2>That sounds like a terrible deal. Do you get paid

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:49.839
<v Speaker 2>only if you discover something in physics Daniel? Or do

0:05:49.880 --> 0:05:50.839
<v Speaker 2>you get paid either way?

0:05:50.920 --> 0:05:53.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm getting paid and I never discovered anything?

0:05:54.480 --> 0:05:58.240
<v Speaker 2>Then the answerds yes, so far, so far right. There's

0:05:58.240 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 2>always an optimism.

0:05:59.440 --> 0:06:00.839
<v Speaker 1>That's right and over yet.

0:06:00.960 --> 0:06:04.400
<v Speaker 2>That's right, your careering over yet? But maybe have a

0:06:04.440 --> 0:06:07.560
<v Speaker 2>podcast long enough and who knows what you'll say, day

0:06:07.560 --> 0:06:10.560
<v Speaker 2>tuned folks. But anyways, it's an interesting question because we

0:06:10.920 --> 0:06:13.360
<v Speaker 2>tend to think of matter and the things around us

0:06:13.440 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 2>is being made out of particles. That kind of makes sense.

0:06:15.600 --> 0:06:18.520
<v Speaker 2>But the idea that maybe the forces between those particles

0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:20.719
<v Speaker 2>the things that make you stand here on Earth or

0:06:20.839 --> 0:06:23.680
<v Speaker 2>that makes all your atoms stick together, or your hair

0:06:23.760 --> 0:06:27.520
<v Speaker 2>stent when they're theirs static electricity, those things could be

0:06:27.560 --> 0:06:30.960
<v Speaker 2>due to particles also is kind of confusing, right.

0:06:30.839 --> 0:06:33.080
<v Speaker 1>It is confusing, and yet it's something you hear a

0:06:33.120 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 1>lot in popular science without a sort of deeper explanation

0:06:36.240 --> 0:06:38.919
<v Speaker 1>for what the limits are of that description. You know,

0:06:38.960 --> 0:06:41.040
<v Speaker 1>everything in the end is an analogy, and those analogies

0:06:41.080 --> 0:06:43.400
<v Speaker 1>always break down at some point. So which parts of

0:06:43.400 --> 0:06:45.640
<v Speaker 1>that story are true and which parts of that story

0:06:45.680 --> 0:06:46.640
<v Speaker 1>are just a cartoon?

0:06:46.880 --> 0:06:49.000
<v Speaker 2>That's right. You don't want to force a force analogy

0:06:49.600 --> 0:06:51.720
<v Speaker 2>that's too deep, all right? Well, as usual, we were

0:06:51.760 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 2>wondering how many people out there I thought about the

0:06:53.920 --> 0:06:57.039
<v Speaker 2>idea of particles caring force and how they might do that.

0:06:57.240 --> 0:07:00.600
<v Speaker 1>So thanks to everybody who volunteers for this audience participation

0:07:00.720 --> 0:07:03.960
<v Speaker 1>segment of the podcast. We'd love if you participated. Since

0:07:04.040 --> 0:07:06.360
<v Speaker 1>you are part of the audience. Don't be shy write

0:07:06.360 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 1>to me two questions at Daniel and Jorge dot com

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:11.640
<v Speaker 1>and in the future you'll hear your voice on the podcast.

0:07:11.760 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 2>So think about it for a second. How do you

0:07:13.800 --> 0:07:17.000
<v Speaker 2>think particles carry forth? Here's what I be glad to say.

0:07:17.120 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 4>I think technically, they carry force by exchanging particles. I know,

0:07:20.840 --> 0:07:24.120
<v Speaker 4>all the matter particles are called fermions, and they exchange

0:07:24.160 --> 0:07:28.480
<v Speaker 4>force by passing around their boson counterparts. For example, the

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:31.440
<v Speaker 4>strong force I think passes around gluons, and so the

0:07:31.480 --> 0:07:35.160
<v Speaker 4>mental model that I have is fermians passing their bosons around,

0:07:35.240 --> 0:07:37.480
<v Speaker 4>sort of like playing catch. But I'm sure that's not

0:07:37.520 --> 0:07:39.960
<v Speaker 4>even close to an accurate representation, but it's kind of

0:07:40.000 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 4>what I've.

0:07:40.560 --> 0:07:43.320
<v Speaker 2>Thought of boson's carry force, because there's a way paint

0:07:43.720 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 2>qui fermions, just in the way light light steams up.

0:07:50.640 --> 0:07:56.040
<v Speaker 5>I think particles carry forces by interacting with fields, or

0:07:56.080 --> 0:07:59.040
<v Speaker 5>they might also carry a force by being like a

0:07:59.080 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 5>part of them, like shaking in that dimension. Sort of.

0:08:03.080 --> 0:08:06.400
<v Speaker 6>Particles carry force in their pockets, and when they want

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:08.920
<v Speaker 6>to transmit a force, they reach into their pocket and

0:08:08.920 --> 0:08:11.280
<v Speaker 6>they pull out a boson and they lob it at

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:13.040
<v Speaker 6>another particle to push it out of the way.

0:08:13.360 --> 0:08:17.760
<v Speaker 7>I assume particles carry force through velocity, mass, and spin,

0:08:18.360 --> 0:08:22.400
<v Speaker 7>and they transfer force as they translate one of those

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:25.239
<v Speaker 7>upon interaction with something else.

0:08:25.600 --> 0:08:28.600
<v Speaker 6>I thought that the forces were transmitted when the force

0:08:28.680 --> 0:08:31.800
<v Speaker 6>particles were transferred from one particle to another, but Having

0:08:31.880 --> 0:08:35.200
<v Speaker 6>just listened to your podcast on energy, I imagine the

0:08:35.240 --> 0:08:37.760
<v Speaker 6>answer is probably just momentum.

0:08:37.840 --> 0:08:40.199
<v Speaker 2>All right, a lot of pretty science the answers. Are

0:08:40.200 --> 0:08:42.560
<v Speaker 2>you also recruiting them for the science force? Is there

0:08:42.559 --> 0:08:44.199
<v Speaker 2>a pledge to be in the science force?

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:46.439
<v Speaker 1>Did you like the answer where the're pulling bosons out

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:47.040
<v Speaker 1>of their pockets?

0:08:47.920 --> 0:08:48.120
<v Speaker 7>Yeah?

0:08:48.160 --> 0:08:49.959
<v Speaker 2>What's it required? What kind of gadgets do you get?

0:08:50.280 --> 0:08:53.160
<v Speaker 1>You get a pocket full of bosons and you set free,

0:08:53.600 --> 0:08:55.360
<v Speaker 1>go go forth in science.

0:08:55.600 --> 0:08:58.439
<v Speaker 2>Nice. Nice, that sounds like a ninety song pocket full

0:08:58.480 --> 0:09:01.480
<v Speaker 2>of bosons. But anyways, interesting answers from our listeners here.

0:09:01.600 --> 0:09:06.959
<v Speaker 2>None of them mentioned Yoda doing yoga or Medei Chlorians disappointed. Yeah,

0:09:07.120 --> 0:09:10.440
<v Speaker 2>step it up, listeners. We have some interesting answers having

0:09:10.480 --> 0:09:14.160
<v Speaker 2>to do with velocity and mass and colored matter and

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:16.600
<v Speaker 2>maybe extra dimensions. So I'll have to explore here. So

0:09:16.679 --> 0:09:19.400
<v Speaker 2>let's break it down, Daniel, what is the technical definition

0:09:19.640 --> 0:09:21.360
<v Speaker 2>of a force? Let's start with that.

0:09:21.440 --> 0:09:23.840
<v Speaker 1>So all of these explanations in the end are trying

0:09:23.840 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 1>to describe things we have experience with. That's what physics does, right,

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:29.640
<v Speaker 1>give labels to things and then try to explain them.

0:09:29.920 --> 0:09:32.440
<v Speaker 1>And so a force is something we're familiar with. Right,

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:35.040
<v Speaker 1>somebody pushes you, or you press down the accelerator in

0:09:35.080 --> 0:09:38.520
<v Speaker 1>your car. These are things that involve forces. Mathematically and

0:09:38.520 --> 0:09:41.320
<v Speaker 1>in physics, we think about a force as anything that

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:44.520
<v Speaker 1>changes the momentum of an object. So a ball flying

0:09:44.520 --> 0:09:46.840
<v Speaker 1>through space at the same velocity, there's no force on

0:09:46.920 --> 0:09:49.400
<v Speaker 1>it. It just continues. If you want to change its velocity,

0:09:49.440 --> 0:09:52.120
<v Speaker 1>its direction, or its overall momentum in any way, you

0:09:52.200 --> 0:09:53.680
<v Speaker 1>have to apply a force.

0:09:54.160 --> 0:09:56.920
<v Speaker 2>Right. It also goes back to basically f equals ma

0:09:56.960 --> 0:09:58.880
<v Speaker 2>a right, like, if you have a mass, something with

0:09:59.000 --> 0:10:01.800
<v Speaker 2>mass and it's change it's velocity, then there must be

0:10:02.000 --> 0:10:04.120
<v Speaker 2>a force involved. And that's kind of maybe what you're

0:10:04.120 --> 0:10:05.160
<v Speaker 2>saying is the definition of it.

0:10:05.280 --> 0:10:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you can actually even rewrite eth eqals ma as

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the change in momentum, and that really helps you understand

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:14.679
<v Speaker 1>the connection between forces and momentum because remember that in

0:10:14.720 --> 0:10:17.600
<v Speaker 1>our universe, momentum is conserved, So if something has a

0:10:17.600 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 1>certain momentum, it's just going to keep that momentum unless

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:22.840
<v Speaker 1>you add in momentum from somewhere else. That's what a

0:10:22.880 --> 0:10:25.400
<v Speaker 1>force is. You have a particle flying through space, you

0:10:25.440 --> 0:10:27.960
<v Speaker 1>want to change its direction, change its momentum, you have

0:10:28.040 --> 0:10:30.280
<v Speaker 1>to bring in some external momentum, you have to have

0:10:30.280 --> 0:10:32.800
<v Speaker 1>another particle come by and give it a push or pull.

0:10:32.960 --> 0:10:35.800
<v Speaker 1>That's what the force is. It's the change of momentum

0:10:35.880 --> 0:10:36.600
<v Speaker 1>of an object.

0:10:36.960 --> 0:10:39.959
<v Speaker 2>But the objects ever really change mass, And if they

0:10:40.080 --> 0:10:42.120
<v Speaker 2>never do, then what's the point of saying momentum? Why

0:10:42.160 --> 0:10:43.200
<v Speaker 2>did you say ethicals?

0:10:43.600 --> 0:10:46.240
<v Speaker 1>When things are moving slowly, you can think of momentum

0:10:46.240 --> 0:10:49.000
<v Speaker 1>as just mass times velocity. But as things approach the

0:10:49.000 --> 0:10:51.680
<v Speaker 1>speed of light, when they get relativistic, there's another term

0:10:51.760 --> 0:10:55.240
<v Speaker 1>that creeps in there that changes the relationship between momentum

0:10:55.240 --> 0:10:58.160
<v Speaker 1>and velocity. They're no longer just linear. We whole episode

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:00.960
<v Speaker 1>on the concept of like relativistic mass and whether that

0:11:01.040 --> 0:11:03.480
<v Speaker 1>makes any sense, and you remember, we decided that the

0:11:03.520 --> 0:11:07.640
<v Speaker 1>real concept is relativistic momentum. That momentum has a simple

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:10.240
<v Speaker 1>relationship with velocity when you're moving slowly, but when you

0:11:10.320 --> 0:11:13.199
<v Speaker 1>move fast, it's much more complicated, And it's momentum that's

0:11:13.240 --> 0:11:15.720
<v Speaker 1>really the more fundamental concept. That's the thing that the

0:11:15.840 --> 0:11:19.360
<v Speaker 1>universe cares about, that's the thing the universe conserves. So

0:11:19.400 --> 0:11:22.599
<v Speaker 1>it's really sort of the more pure idea is momentum.

0:11:22.679 --> 0:11:25.120
<v Speaker 2>So when you say force is a change in momentum.

0:11:25.200 --> 0:11:28.800
<v Speaker 2>Are you also talking about its relativistic momentum?

0:11:28.920 --> 0:11:29.120
<v Speaker 7>Yeah?

0:11:29.120 --> 0:11:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely. Relativistic momentum is the more general concept. You only

0:11:32.360 --> 0:11:34.200
<v Speaker 1>really need it near the speed of light. Mostly you

0:11:34.200 --> 0:11:36.480
<v Speaker 1>can use the old classical momentum, which is just mass

0:11:36.480 --> 0:11:39.679
<v Speaker 1>times velocity, and it gets things mostly right. But it

0:11:39.760 --> 0:11:43.040
<v Speaker 1>is the relativistic momentum that the universe conserves. And that's

0:11:43.040 --> 0:11:45.120
<v Speaker 1>one way we know that relativity is right is that

0:11:45.160 --> 0:11:48.360
<v Speaker 1>it's this relativistic momentum that the universe keeps track of.

0:11:49.160 --> 0:11:51.079
<v Speaker 2>I see all right, So then to change your momentum,

0:11:51.120 --> 0:11:53.640
<v Speaker 2>you can increase it or decrease it. So forces can

0:11:53.640 --> 0:11:54.719
<v Speaker 2>push and pull.

0:11:54.640 --> 0:11:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Right, yeah, exactly. The intuitive description of a force is

0:11:57.160 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 1>a push or a pull. And what happens there is

0:11:59.040 --> 0:12:01.400
<v Speaker 1>you're changing your momentum. When you hit the brakes on

0:12:01.440 --> 0:12:04.160
<v Speaker 1>your car, you're changing your velocity. When you hit the accelerator,

0:12:04.200 --> 0:12:06.959
<v Speaker 1>you're changing your velocity. A change in your velocity is

0:12:07.000 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 1>an acceleration. It's a change in momentum, and there's always

0:12:10.000 --> 0:12:12.320
<v Speaker 1>a force involved there. Like the fastest way to slow

0:12:12.360 --> 0:12:14.360
<v Speaker 1>down is like hit a brick wall. There the wall

0:12:14.440 --> 0:12:17.320
<v Speaker 1>is applying a force on you and your car changing

0:12:17.360 --> 0:12:18.760
<v Speaker 1>your momentum.

0:12:18.800 --> 0:12:21.080
<v Speaker 2>And it's kind of a weird feature of the universe

0:12:21.120 --> 0:12:23.560
<v Speaker 2>that it has this conservation of momentum, right, or that

0:12:23.600 --> 0:12:25.280
<v Speaker 2>you need a force to change momentum. It could have

0:12:25.280 --> 0:12:27.080
<v Speaker 2>been that the universe was different, right. It could have

0:12:27.080 --> 0:12:30.440
<v Speaker 2>been that the universe maybe preferred mass time's acceleration to

0:12:30.600 --> 0:12:31.240
<v Speaker 2>be conserved.

0:12:32.200 --> 0:12:32.400
<v Speaker 7>Right.

0:12:32.520 --> 0:12:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Maybe yes, and no, it's not true that we have

0:12:35.080 --> 0:12:38.720
<v Speaker 1>no idea why the universe conserves momentum. It comes from

0:12:38.720 --> 0:12:41.840
<v Speaker 1>a deeper symmetry. We know because of Nuther's law, which

0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:44.400
<v Speaker 1>tells us that every time the universe can serves something,

0:12:44.440 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 1>it's because of a symmetry of the universe. In this case,

0:12:47.280 --> 0:12:50.280
<v Speaker 1>the symmetry of the universe is a symmetry of space itself.

0:12:50.280 --> 0:12:52.760
<v Speaker 1>The laws of physics are the same at every point

0:12:52.800 --> 0:12:56.040
<v Speaker 1>in space, the momentum is conserved. That step there seems

0:12:56.080 --> 0:12:57.920
<v Speaker 1>like a big leap, but that's exactly the leap from

0:12:57.960 --> 0:13:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Nuther's law. I mean Nuther, this mathematics from about one

0:13:00.679 --> 0:13:03.400
<v Speaker 1>hundred years ago made this deep realization that there's a

0:13:03.400 --> 0:13:07.160
<v Speaker 1>connection between symmetry and conservation laws. So this law conservation

0:13:07.240 --> 0:13:10.640
<v Speaker 1>momentum comes from the fact that space is the same everywhere,

0:13:10.679 --> 0:13:12.440
<v Speaker 1>and so you're right, it doesn't have to be true

0:13:12.440 --> 0:13:14.679
<v Speaker 1>that space is the same everywhere in our universe. It

0:13:14.760 --> 0:13:17.720
<v Speaker 1>seems to be, and that's why we have conservation and momentum.

0:13:17.720 --> 0:13:20.040
<v Speaker 1>But there could be other universes where the laws of

0:13:20.080 --> 0:13:23.120
<v Speaker 1>physics change as you move through space and their momentum

0:13:23.160 --> 0:13:24.200
<v Speaker 1>would not be conserved.

0:13:24.559 --> 0:13:26.400
<v Speaker 2>I feel like you. You spend a minute agreeing with me.

0:13:26.640 --> 0:13:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Awesome, can we agree?

0:13:30.120 --> 0:13:31.880
<v Speaker 2>Well, this is the universe we live in, and it

0:13:31.880 --> 0:13:35.240
<v Speaker 2>seems to conserve momentum. And there's several ways that you

0:13:35.280 --> 0:13:38.040
<v Speaker 2>can do that, right, Several forces that will allow you

0:13:38.080 --> 0:13:41.480
<v Speaker 2>to change particle's momentum, maybe depending on what kind of

0:13:41.520 --> 0:13:43.480
<v Speaker 2>particle it is and what its properties are.

0:13:43.559 --> 0:13:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and so we can take the same concept of

0:13:45.480 --> 0:13:48.480
<v Speaker 1>a force that applies to your car and applied also

0:13:48.480 --> 0:13:50.960
<v Speaker 1>to particles. Particles have momentum, and if you want to

0:13:51.000 --> 0:13:53.000
<v Speaker 1>change your momentum, you have to apply a force. And

0:13:53.000 --> 0:13:55.440
<v Speaker 1>you're right, there's several ways to do that. We've observed

0:13:55.559 --> 0:13:58.320
<v Speaker 1>several ways, and again this is just descriptive. We've noticed

0:13:58.360 --> 0:14:01.240
<v Speaker 1>several things happened to particles, and we've categorized them as

0:14:01.320 --> 0:14:03.240
<v Speaker 1>much as we can. We've tried to like weave them

0:14:03.280 --> 0:14:06.320
<v Speaker 1>together into one concept, but haven't totally succeeded. We call

0:14:06.360 --> 0:14:10.120
<v Speaker 1>these things the fundamental forces. So there's like electricity and magnetism.

0:14:10.440 --> 0:14:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Charged particles will push or pull on each other. That's

0:14:13.760 --> 0:14:17.400
<v Speaker 1>definitely a force. Electrons will change each other's momentum. They'll

0:14:17.480 --> 0:14:20.640
<v Speaker 1>change their direction entirely, right, that's a change in momentum.

0:14:20.680 --> 0:14:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Even if your velocity is the same but your direction

0:14:23.480 --> 0:14:26.520
<v Speaker 1>is different, it's still a change in momentum.

0:14:25.840 --> 0:14:28.920
<v Speaker 2>M So that's maybe the most familiar force to people,

0:14:28.960 --> 0:14:32.400
<v Speaker 2>like your magnetism. That's basically what keeps our atoms together, right,

0:14:32.480 --> 0:14:35.960
<v Speaker 2>and our molecules stuck together with the different atoms in it. Right.

0:14:36.000 --> 0:14:38.320
<v Speaker 2>Without the electromagnetic force, it would be a big deal.

0:14:38.360 --> 0:14:41.400
<v Speaker 2>We would all fall apart, exactly. We all need electromagnetism.

0:14:41.520 --> 0:14:44.160
<v Speaker 2>So you truly acknowledge the electromagnetic force in like every

0:14:44.160 --> 0:14:46.520
<v Speaker 2>book or paper you write, because you totally rely on it.

0:14:46.600 --> 0:14:49.920
<v Speaker 2>That's right, every acceptance speech you give, every thank you

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:51.400
<v Speaker 2>card you write.

0:14:51.080 --> 0:14:53.240
<v Speaker 1>There you go, yeah, you sent a holiday card to

0:14:53.280 --> 0:14:54.880
<v Speaker 1>the electromagnetic force this year.

0:14:55.720 --> 0:14:58.280
<v Speaker 2>Have put it on the holidays, and thanks again to

0:14:58.360 --> 0:14:59.400
<v Speaker 2>the electromagnetic force.

0:14:59.560 --> 0:15:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for all the photons but it's not the only

0:15:01.840 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 1>force that's out there. There's another force called the weak force,

0:15:05.080 --> 0:15:08.280
<v Speaker 1>which US physicists actually have managed to stitch together into

0:15:08.400 --> 0:15:11.640
<v Speaker 1>one force we call the electro week. But traditionally people

0:15:11.640 --> 0:15:14.600
<v Speaker 1>talk about the weak force as responsible for like radioactive

0:15:14.600 --> 0:15:18.240
<v Speaker 1>decay and interactions of neutrinos and stuff like that. So

0:15:18.280 --> 0:15:19.600
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of a shyer force.

0:15:20.400 --> 0:15:22.680
<v Speaker 2>What does it mean that it's related to radioactive decay?

0:15:22.720 --> 0:15:26.360
<v Speaker 2>Like when something decays radioactively, the weak force is there

0:15:26.400 --> 0:15:28.840
<v Speaker 2>to split things apart or to hold things together. What

0:15:28.920 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 2>is it doing there?

0:15:29.640 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Lots of radioactive decay can be explained by one kind

0:15:32.240 --> 0:15:35.160
<v Speaker 1>of quark changing into another kind of quark, and it

0:15:35.160 --> 0:15:37.560
<v Speaker 1>does so using the weak force. So the weak force

0:15:37.600 --> 0:15:39.840
<v Speaker 1>can change, for example, like an upcork into a down

0:15:39.920 --> 0:15:42.240
<v Speaker 1>cork if you emit a w boson, and the w

0:15:42.360 --> 0:15:44.760
<v Speaker 1>boson is intimately connected to the weak force, as we'll

0:15:44.800 --> 0:15:47.640
<v Speaker 1>talk about more later. Without the weak force, that can't happen.

0:15:47.720 --> 0:15:49.200
<v Speaker 1>And so that's what we mean when we say the

0:15:49.200 --> 0:15:52.560
<v Speaker 1>weak force is responsible for radioactive decay. It like opens

0:15:52.640 --> 0:15:53.880
<v Speaker 1>up a channel for this to happen.

0:15:54.000 --> 0:15:55.640
<v Speaker 2>But is it pushing or pulling on anything?

0:15:55.880 --> 0:15:58.360
<v Speaker 1>That's a tricky question the weak force can push and

0:15:58.440 --> 0:16:01.200
<v Speaker 1>it can pull. The whole podcast episode inspired by a

0:16:01.280 --> 0:16:04.320
<v Speaker 1>question from an organic chemistry professor, but whether the weak

0:16:04.360 --> 0:16:06.800
<v Speaker 1>force can push and can pull? The answer is that

0:16:06.840 --> 0:16:08.960
<v Speaker 1>it can do both, but it's more complicated than the

0:16:09.000 --> 0:16:10.080
<v Speaker 1>electromagnetic force.

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:12.600
<v Speaker 2>Well or right, what are some of the other forces

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:13.160
<v Speaker 2>in nature?

0:16:13.240 --> 0:16:15.440
<v Speaker 1>So the last thing that's really a force is the

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:17.560
<v Speaker 1>strong force. This is the thing that quarks feel, but

0:16:17.640 --> 0:16:20.400
<v Speaker 1>like electrons don't. Two electrons can pass near each other

0:16:20.480 --> 0:16:22.040
<v Speaker 1>and not push or pull on each other with the

0:16:22.080 --> 0:16:25.880
<v Speaker 1>strong force. But quarks or gluons, these things do feel

0:16:25.920 --> 0:16:28.680
<v Speaker 1>the strong force. They have another kind of charge, the

0:16:28.720 --> 0:16:31.440
<v Speaker 1>way an electron has an electric charge, which allows it

0:16:31.480 --> 0:16:35.360
<v Speaker 1>to feel electric fields and electromagnetic force, but neutrinos don't.

0:16:35.640 --> 0:16:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Quarks and gluons have a color charge, a strong force

0:16:39.160 --> 0:16:41.800
<v Speaker 1>charge lets them interact using the strong force in a

0:16:41.840 --> 0:16:45.000
<v Speaker 1>way that electrons just don't. And so that's the last force.

0:16:45.040 --> 0:16:47.240
<v Speaker 1>And this is the one that holds quarks together into

0:16:47.280 --> 0:16:50.600
<v Speaker 1>protons and neutrons, and the residual little forces bind those

0:16:50.640 --> 0:16:53.760
<v Speaker 1>protons and neutrons together into nuclei. So we also rely

0:16:53.960 --> 0:16:56.080
<v Speaker 1>on the strong force to build our world.

0:16:57.200 --> 0:16:58.800
<v Speaker 2>So they're all pretty necessary.

0:16:58.840 --> 0:17:01.400
<v Speaker 1>It seems they all have role to play exactly the

0:17:01.440 --> 0:17:03.160
<v Speaker 1>top billing to the extras in the back.

0:17:03.320 --> 0:17:05.720
<v Speaker 2>What about gravity? Is in gravity also a force.

0:17:05.560 --> 0:17:07.639
<v Speaker 1>So we sometimes think of gravity as a force, and

0:17:07.640 --> 0:17:10.639
<v Speaker 1>we talk about the force of gravity, and Newton describes

0:17:10.680 --> 0:17:13.199
<v Speaker 1>his force law or gravity. But now we know that

0:17:13.240 --> 0:17:15.560
<v Speaker 1>gravity isn't actually a force. Things move in a way

0:17:15.560 --> 0:17:17.639
<v Speaker 1>that makes it look like there's a force there, but

0:17:17.680 --> 0:17:21.119
<v Speaker 1>that's actually just because they are free falling in curved space.

0:17:21.280 --> 0:17:24.280
<v Speaker 1>There's no actual change in momentum there. And you can

0:17:24.280 --> 0:17:27.080
<v Speaker 1>tell the difference between gravity and these other forces because

0:17:27.080 --> 0:17:30.760
<v Speaker 1>gravity doesn't cause a change in momentum. You can't measure

0:17:30.840 --> 0:17:32.520
<v Speaker 1>acceleration due to gravity.

0:17:32.680 --> 0:17:34.439
<v Speaker 2>Wait, what do you mean If I hold a bowling

0:17:34.440 --> 0:17:36.800
<v Speaker 2>ball above you and I let it go, isn't it

0:17:36.800 --> 0:17:38.800
<v Speaker 2>going to gain some dangerous momentum for you there?

0:17:38.840 --> 0:17:40.960
<v Speaker 1>So if you're falling with the bowling ball and you

0:17:41.040 --> 0:17:43.760
<v Speaker 1>have like an accelerometer, you're not going to measure any

0:17:43.800 --> 0:17:46.919
<v Speaker 1>acceleration there. The bowling ball is in freefall, there are

0:17:46.920 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 1>no forces on it.

0:17:47.840 --> 0:17:50.000
<v Speaker 2>Right, But here it is going to measure a pretty

0:17:50.000 --> 0:17:51.280
<v Speaker 2>big acceleration, isn't it.

0:17:51.359 --> 0:17:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Because in that scenario I'm actually doing the accelerating.

0:17:54.440 --> 0:17:57.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm accelerating towards the bowling ball. The bowling ball is

0:17:57.400 --> 0:17:59.520
<v Speaker 1>in freefall. The surface of the Earth or my chair

0:17:59.600 --> 0:18:03.320
<v Speaker 1>or whatever is accelerating me against the natural curvature of

0:18:03.359 --> 0:18:06.280
<v Speaker 1>space time towards the bowling ball. So that's actually my

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:08.919
<v Speaker 1>acceleration due to the structure of the Earth or my

0:18:09.040 --> 0:18:11.919
<v Speaker 1>rocket ship or whatever that I'm measuring. There's no acceleration

0:18:12.000 --> 0:18:13.000
<v Speaker 1>there due to gravity.

0:18:13.080 --> 0:18:14.800
<v Speaker 2>Wait, so if I drop a bowling ball on you,

0:18:15.119 --> 0:18:17.600
<v Speaker 2>it's not my fault, it's you're saying it's your fault.

0:18:18.440 --> 0:18:19.879
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I basically rear ended you.

0:18:20.760 --> 0:18:24.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, basically would that work in a court of law? Daniel,

0:18:24.440 --> 0:18:26.680
<v Speaker 2>can I bring you in as an expert physicist?

0:18:26.800 --> 0:18:29.440
<v Speaker 1>I definitely recommend you hire a particle physicist instead of

0:18:29.440 --> 0:18:31.800
<v Speaker 1>a lawyer next time you're in court. See how that

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:35.760
<v Speaker 1>works out, well, your honor, I want to upend thousands

0:18:35.800 --> 0:18:37.360
<v Speaker 1>of years of legal tradition.

0:18:37.720 --> 0:18:39.880
<v Speaker 2>That's right. Let me bring out some charts here.

0:18:40.000 --> 0:18:41.920
<v Speaker 1>And the truth is that Einstein did say something really

0:18:42.000 --> 0:18:44.440
<v Speaker 1>interesting about this. The equivalence principle that a lot of

0:18:44.480 --> 0:18:46.640
<v Speaker 1>people have heard about says that any experiment you do

0:18:46.760 --> 0:18:49.399
<v Speaker 1>is the same whether or not. You're in curved space

0:18:49.400 --> 0:18:53.280
<v Speaker 1>that you basically can't ever measure locally the curvature of space.

0:18:54.160 --> 0:18:56.240
<v Speaker 2>Wait, so I feel like I'm a little bit confused, Beau.

0:18:56.280 --> 0:18:59.320
<v Speaker 2>If I drop a bowling ball on you, and you're

0:18:59.320 --> 0:19:02.400
<v Speaker 2>saying the only bob doesn't accelerate to the gravity, You're

0:19:02.400 --> 0:19:06.040
<v Speaker 2>saying you're accelerating. Your head is accelerating due to the

0:19:06.280 --> 0:19:08.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, the forces that the ground is pushing up

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 2>on you with exactly.

0:19:09.840 --> 0:19:11.680
<v Speaker 1>So it looks to me like the bowling ball is

0:19:11.720 --> 0:19:14.440
<v Speaker 1>accelerating towards me, but I'm actually accelerating towards it.

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:14.880
<v Speaker 2>I see.

0:19:14.920 --> 0:19:17.879
<v Speaker 1>An acceleration is not just relative, right, unlike velocity, and

0:19:17.960 --> 0:19:20.160
<v Speaker 1>velocity is equivalent to say, I'm moving in this speed

0:19:20.200 --> 0:19:22.159
<v Speaker 1>relative to you, and you're moving in this speed relative

0:19:22.200 --> 0:19:24.600
<v Speaker 1>to me, But acceleration is not relative. We can both

0:19:24.640 --> 0:19:27.760
<v Speaker 1>hold accelerometers and we can tell who's being accelerated.

0:19:28.200 --> 0:19:30.640
<v Speaker 2>Right. Does that mean that if I'm just sitting here

0:19:30.720 --> 0:19:32.800
<v Speaker 2>doing nothing, my momentum is changing.

0:19:32.960 --> 0:19:33.120
<v Speaker 7>Yeah?

0:19:33.119 --> 0:19:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, Right now you are being accelerated.

0:19:35.160 --> 0:19:37.680
<v Speaker 2>So you're saying my momentum is changing, Yeah, absolutely, even

0:19:37.680 --> 0:19:38.640
<v Speaker 2>though I'm just sitting here.

0:19:38.720 --> 0:19:41.159
<v Speaker 1>Momentum is defined relative to your axis. So you can

0:19:41.200 --> 0:19:43.399
<v Speaker 1>always define an access in which you're at rest and

0:19:43.440 --> 0:19:45.760
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't change, and so your momentum is not changing,

0:19:45.920 --> 0:19:48.760
<v Speaker 1>but that frame of reference is accelerating. So from an

0:19:48.800 --> 0:19:51.840
<v Speaker 1>inertial reference frame, you are definitely accelerating, but you are

0:19:51.880 --> 0:19:55.080
<v Speaker 1>not in an inertial reference frame. You're an accelerating reference

0:19:55.080 --> 0:19:56.560
<v Speaker 1>frame on the surface of the Earth.

0:19:56.800 --> 0:19:59.840
<v Speaker 2>So my reference frame is like off into space or what.

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:02.640
<v Speaker 1>If you define your reference frame to be you, then

0:20:02.680 --> 0:20:05.680
<v Speaker 1>you have no momentum and you never will right by definition, hmm.

0:20:06.040 --> 0:20:08.400
<v Speaker 1>If you pick some reference frame of a distant observer

0:20:08.640 --> 0:20:11.280
<v Speaker 1>looking at the Earth, then yes, you are definitely accelerating.

0:20:11.320 --> 0:20:14.520
<v Speaker 1>You're accelerating against the curvature of space time from the Earth,

0:20:14.560 --> 0:20:17.000
<v Speaker 1>and you're accelerating against the curvature of space time from

0:20:17.080 --> 0:20:17.440
<v Speaker 1>the Sun.

0:20:18.480 --> 0:20:20.359
<v Speaker 2>I see this requires us to kind of think in

0:20:20.520 --> 0:20:21.879
<v Speaker 2>space time, not just space.

0:20:22.119 --> 0:20:23.919
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that you need space time, but you

0:20:23.960 --> 0:20:26.399
<v Speaker 1>do have to think about inertial reference frames, ones that

0:20:26.440 --> 0:20:29.120
<v Speaker 1>are not accelerating and accelerating reference frames.

0:20:29.240 --> 0:20:30.919
<v Speaker 2>So then how do you explain the fact that I

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:31.880
<v Speaker 2>don't feel like I'm moving?

0:20:32.200 --> 0:20:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Why don't you feel like you're moving? If you stand

0:20:33.840 --> 0:20:36.080
<v Speaker 1>on a scale, you measure something that tells you that

0:20:36.080 --> 0:20:38.199
<v Speaker 1>there's a force being applied. You're just used to it.

0:20:38.359 --> 0:20:39.359
<v Speaker 2>I don't feel like I'm moving.

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Motion is relative, right, You can just define a reference

0:20:42.080 --> 0:20:44.719
<v Speaker 1>frame at yourself and then you're not moving, But acceleration

0:20:44.880 --> 0:20:46.399
<v Speaker 1>is not, and that's why you can measure it.

0:20:46.640 --> 0:20:49.040
<v Speaker 2>M I think maybe what you say is you said

0:20:49.119 --> 0:20:52.000
<v Speaker 2>relativity is complex, and if you sort of think about

0:20:52.240 --> 0:20:56.280
<v Speaker 2>the curvature space or of space time, then technically even

0:20:56.280 --> 0:20:58.200
<v Speaker 2>if you're just sitting there, you're changing momentum.

0:20:58.240 --> 0:21:00.640
<v Speaker 1>If you want to dig deep into these questions relativity,

0:21:00.680 --> 0:21:03.840
<v Speaker 1>we had an episode recently about inertial versus gravitational mass

0:21:03.840 --> 0:21:05.919
<v Speaker 1>that laid it all out in detail. I think the

0:21:05.920 --> 0:21:08.280
<v Speaker 1>big picture here is that gravity is not a force.

0:21:08.320 --> 0:21:11.000
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't apply in acceleration the way the other fundamental

0:21:11.040 --> 0:21:15.400
<v Speaker 1>forces do, at least not in our current understanding of gravity, right.

0:21:15.320 --> 0:21:18.280
<v Speaker 2>Right, Because some people think maybe gravity is a force, right,

0:21:18.320 --> 0:21:21.159
<v Speaker 2>and there might be gravit cons perhaps.

0:21:20.920 --> 0:21:23.200
<v Speaker 1>There might be in future theories of quantum gravity might

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:25.320
<v Speaker 1>change our entire picture of how gravity works.

0:21:26.000 --> 0:21:28.400
<v Speaker 2>All right, Well, let's dig into the larger question we're

0:21:28.400 --> 0:21:31.200
<v Speaker 2>trying to answer here, which is how particles can carry

0:21:31.240 --> 0:21:34.720
<v Speaker 2>forces for the things that we do call forces for now,

0:21:35.040 --> 0:21:37.199
<v Speaker 2>I guess, And so let's dig into that. How to

0:21:37.240 --> 0:21:40.080
<v Speaker 2>force particles work? And is that really the picture of

0:21:40.160 --> 0:21:43.080
<v Speaker 2>how the universe actually is? So let's dig into that.

0:21:43.119 --> 0:21:53.600
<v Speaker 2>But first let's take a quick break. All right, we're

0:21:53.600 --> 0:21:56.800
<v Speaker 2>talking about Yoda doing yoga. Now do you think Yoda

0:21:56.840 --> 0:21:59.960
<v Speaker 2>does hot yoga or some other kind of yoga?

0:22:00.280 --> 0:22:02.240
<v Speaker 1>I think Yoda's pretty hot already. I don't think he

0:22:02.280 --> 0:22:03.159
<v Speaker 1>has to do any yoga.

0:22:03.280 --> 0:22:06.320
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, yeah, you're into the ears and the wrinkles.

0:22:06.359 --> 0:22:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Well, you know, there's also baby Yoda, right for those

0:22:08.359 --> 0:22:09.960
<v Speaker 1>of you who are interested in the smoother skin.

0:22:10.280 --> 0:22:15.280
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, yeah, he does like cute yoga, adorable adorbs yoga. Well,

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:18.000
<v Speaker 2>it's hard to keep track of yoga and yoga at

0:22:18.000 --> 0:22:21.439
<v Speaker 2>the same time. Now, can Yoda drink yogurt doing yoga?

0:22:21.840 --> 0:22:22.359
<v Speaker 1>You got me?

0:22:22.680 --> 0:22:26.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yo got me? All right, Well, we're talking about

0:22:26.240 --> 0:22:28.919
<v Speaker 2>how particles can carry force? Do they carry force? What

0:22:28.960 --> 0:22:31.000
<v Speaker 2>does it mean for a particle to carry force? Because

0:22:31.000 --> 0:22:33.480
<v Speaker 2>I feel like we're used to forces being just some

0:22:33.520 --> 0:22:35.800
<v Speaker 2>sort of invisible thing in the universe. It makes us

0:22:35.800 --> 0:22:37.919
<v Speaker 2>want to go towards something, we're away from something, But

0:22:37.960 --> 0:22:40.359
<v Speaker 2>I feel like you're saying. Physicists have this view where

0:22:40.520 --> 0:22:43.199
<v Speaker 2>a force, when something's pulling or pushing you, it's actually

0:22:43.200 --> 0:22:45.119
<v Speaker 2>some sort of exchange of particles.

0:22:45.320 --> 0:22:48.639
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, this microscopic picture is compelling because it helps connect

0:22:48.640 --> 0:22:52.439
<v Speaker 1>with our macroscopic understanding, our like intuitive experience of what

0:22:52.480 --> 0:22:55.520
<v Speaker 1>a force is, and that's basically touching. You know, when

0:22:55.520 --> 0:22:57.600
<v Speaker 1>the brick wall slows your car down, it does so

0:22:57.840 --> 0:23:00.320
<v Speaker 1>because you hit the brick wall. Or when you lap

0:23:00.359 --> 0:23:02.480
<v Speaker 1>that baseball into a home run, you do so because

0:23:02.480 --> 0:23:04.800
<v Speaker 1>the baseball hit the bat. Right, And we have this

0:23:04.920 --> 0:23:07.480
<v Speaker 1>sense that in order to change something's momentum, you got

0:23:07.480 --> 0:23:09.840
<v Speaker 1>to touch it, that it comes from contact, from like

0:23:10.040 --> 0:23:13.119
<v Speaker 1>literally pushing on something or pulling on something to apply

0:23:13.200 --> 0:23:13.720
<v Speaker 1>that force.

0:23:13.920 --> 0:23:16.359
<v Speaker 2>Well, not necessarily like a magnet, Like I think people

0:23:16.400 --> 0:23:19.240
<v Speaker 2>are familiar with a magnet kind of pushing pulling things

0:23:19.280 --> 0:23:20.479
<v Speaker 2>without actually touching it.

0:23:20.600 --> 0:23:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's a great example. I think that's probably why

0:23:22.720 --> 0:23:25.560
<v Speaker 1>magnets feel so spooky and weird to a lot of people,

0:23:25.640 --> 0:23:28.760
<v Speaker 1>because it is action at a distance. Right, it's things

0:23:28.800 --> 0:23:31.280
<v Speaker 1>pushing and pulling out each other without touching.

0:23:31.720 --> 0:23:33.879
<v Speaker 2>Or Oh well, I don't want to get into this again,

0:23:34.000 --> 0:23:37.040
<v Speaker 2>but you know, reused to gravity making things move towards

0:23:37.080 --> 0:23:38.959
<v Speaker 2>each other without any kind of contact.

0:23:39.119 --> 0:23:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Also, yeah, there, what's happening is you're interacting with curved.

0:23:42.160 --> 0:23:44.719
<v Speaker 2>Space, all right, So then what do you mean by

0:23:44.760 --> 0:23:45.960
<v Speaker 2>this macroscopic view?

0:23:46.200 --> 0:23:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Just basically that things feel like they're local. You know,

0:23:48.600 --> 0:23:50.320
<v Speaker 1>if you want to push on something, you got to

0:23:50.320 --> 0:23:53.160
<v Speaker 1>touch it. And often when we're telling stories about what's

0:23:53.200 --> 0:23:56.120
<v Speaker 1>happening on the microscopic scale, when we're trying to tell

0:23:56.119 --> 0:23:58.600
<v Speaker 1>ourselves a story about the particles, we rely on our

0:23:58.640 --> 0:24:01.639
<v Speaker 1>intuition from the macroscop it from like the big scale stuff.

0:24:01.720 --> 0:24:04.520
<v Speaker 1>So then the question is, when particles are pushing on

0:24:04.560 --> 0:24:07.120
<v Speaker 1>each other, are they coming into contact in some way?

0:24:07.280 --> 0:24:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Is this interaction like a local thing? And that's where

0:24:09.520 --> 0:24:13.080
<v Speaker 1>the story of two particles exchanging some particle helps us

0:24:13.119 --> 0:24:15.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of fill in that gap. It tells us a

0:24:15.119 --> 0:24:18.280
<v Speaker 1>local story. Now, like one particle is flying along and

0:24:18.320 --> 0:24:21.639
<v Speaker 1>it throws a particle, pulling it out of its boson pocket.

0:24:21.680 --> 0:24:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Add another particle which catches it. In that story, everything

0:24:24.640 --> 0:24:25.600
<v Speaker 1>is always local.

0:24:25.920 --> 0:24:30.040
<v Speaker 2>M Yeah, I'm all about eating local and theorizing locally.

0:24:31.440 --> 0:24:33.879
<v Speaker 2>But maybe let's paint a picture, more concrete picture for

0:24:33.920 --> 0:24:36.400
<v Speaker 2>folks Let's say you have two electrons a meter part

0:24:36.640 --> 0:24:39.879
<v Speaker 2>and according to what we know, they feel that electromagnetic

0:24:39.920 --> 0:24:42.160
<v Speaker 2>force and they have the same charge. So they're repelling

0:24:42.200 --> 0:24:44.440
<v Speaker 2>each other, meaning if you just leave it for a while,

0:24:44.480 --> 0:24:46.600
<v Speaker 2>they're going to move away from each other. Yep, okay,

0:24:46.680 --> 0:24:49.120
<v Speaker 2>So then how is that force being transmitted if they're

0:24:49.160 --> 0:24:49.920
<v Speaker 2>not touching each other.

0:24:50.119 --> 0:24:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So there's a lot of different ways to think

0:24:51.840 --> 0:24:54.040
<v Speaker 1>about it. One story, which I'm not a big fan of,

0:24:54.400 --> 0:24:56.600
<v Speaker 1>but is a sort of common story you hear, is

0:24:56.640 --> 0:24:59.440
<v Speaker 1>that they do it by exchanging a particle. That one

0:24:59.480 --> 0:25:04.399
<v Speaker 1>electron transmits momentum to the other electron basically by shooting

0:25:04.480 --> 0:25:07.879
<v Speaker 1>a photon at it. Because electrons can emit photons and

0:25:07.880 --> 0:25:11.160
<v Speaker 1>they can also absorb photons, it's like an interaction that's

0:25:11.200 --> 0:25:14.080
<v Speaker 1>allowed in the universe. So the story is like, electron

0:25:14.119 --> 0:25:16.600
<v Speaker 1>one shoots off a photon and in doing so, it

0:25:16.680 --> 0:25:19.840
<v Speaker 1>recoils against that photon. Right, maybe it was going straight,

0:25:19.920 --> 0:25:22.560
<v Speaker 1>now it's going left, shoots that photon off to the right.

0:25:22.680 --> 0:25:25.520
<v Speaker 1>The other electron, which was going straight, absorbs that photon

0:25:25.560 --> 0:25:28.159
<v Speaker 1>which was going right, and now it's going right. And

0:25:28.200 --> 0:25:30.480
<v Speaker 1>so it's sort of like two cars driving in parallel,

0:25:30.520 --> 0:25:32.520
<v Speaker 1>and one of them throws a ball at the other one,

0:25:32.520 --> 0:25:35.240
<v Speaker 1>and some momentum gets carried along with that ball.

0:25:36.119 --> 0:25:38.280
<v Speaker 2>Or like if I toss a bowling ball at you,

0:25:38.280 --> 0:25:39.879
<v Speaker 2>you know, when I toss it at you, I'm going

0:25:39.960 --> 0:25:41.600
<v Speaker 2>to move back a little bit because it takes some

0:25:41.720 --> 0:25:43.679
<v Speaker 2>effort to toss it your way, and then when you

0:25:43.720 --> 0:25:46.320
<v Speaker 2>catch it, you're going to recoil back also a little bit,

0:25:46.440 --> 0:25:48.679
<v Speaker 2>because the ball had some sort of momentum to it

0:25:48.720 --> 0:25:49.680
<v Speaker 2>and it pushes you back.

0:25:50.000 --> 0:25:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly the same way you feel a literal recoil

0:25:52.960 --> 0:25:55.280
<v Speaker 1>when you shoot a gun, and then the target also

0:25:55.400 --> 0:25:56.880
<v Speaker 1>feels that momentum transfer.

0:25:56.960 --> 0:25:59.439
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, I feel like this view is something that you

0:25:59.440 --> 0:26:01.719
<v Speaker 2>would get it if you were already a little bit

0:26:01.760 --> 0:26:03.760
<v Speaker 2>familiar with science, right, like if you're take in a

0:26:03.920 --> 0:26:06.400
<v Speaker 2>maybe a college little physics course. I don't know, maybe

0:26:06.400 --> 0:26:08.280
<v Speaker 2>they teach it also in high school. But maybe for

0:26:08.320 --> 0:26:10.840
<v Speaker 2>the everyday person, this might be a new story that

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:12.800
<v Speaker 2>they had never heard before, right, Like, maybe to then

0:26:12.840 --> 0:26:15.919
<v Speaker 2>average person, they're just thinking, well, those two electrons, one

0:26:15.960 --> 0:26:17.920
<v Speaker 2>of them is exerting a force on the others through

0:26:18.040 --> 0:26:19.280
<v Speaker 2>the magic of magnetism.

0:26:19.359 --> 0:26:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and then the question is, how do you actually

0:26:21.040 --> 0:26:22.320
<v Speaker 1>explain that. How do you come up with like a

0:26:22.359 --> 0:26:25.360
<v Speaker 1>coherent theory that says what's really happening? And one way

0:26:25.359 --> 0:26:27.920
<v Speaker 1>to do that is to say, oh, these forces are

0:26:27.960 --> 0:26:31.400
<v Speaker 1>actually being carried by particles, right, because particles are things

0:26:31.400 --> 0:26:33.399
<v Speaker 1>we know in the universe can carry momentum, and so

0:26:33.400 --> 0:26:35.760
<v Speaker 1>if you want to push on something or pull on something,

0:26:35.880 --> 0:26:38.639
<v Speaker 1>you've got to use particles to carry that momentum. So

0:26:38.720 --> 0:26:40.760
<v Speaker 1>this is just like a way to try to explain

0:26:41.119 --> 0:26:45.080
<v Speaker 1>these forces that we see. Maybe what's happening microscopically is

0:26:45.080 --> 0:26:47.480
<v Speaker 1>that particles are being exchanged the same way you might

0:26:47.520 --> 0:26:49.879
<v Speaker 1>wonder like, well, what's everything made out of around me?

0:26:50.000 --> 0:26:52.480
<v Speaker 1>And you drill in on the tiny details and you discover, oh,

0:26:52.520 --> 0:26:54.680
<v Speaker 1>the surface of my table is not smooth. It's actually

0:26:54.720 --> 0:26:57.000
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of particles. I just don't see them because

0:26:57.000 --> 0:27:00.480
<v Speaker 1>they're so tiny. So maybe the forces between two and

0:27:00.480 --> 0:27:03.879
<v Speaker 1>the forces between two electrically charged objects are actually particles

0:27:03.920 --> 0:27:07.320
<v Speaker 1>being transmitted between them. That's sort of how the story goes.

0:27:07.240 --> 0:27:09.280
<v Speaker 2>Right, Like if people see me and you moving away

0:27:09.320 --> 0:27:11.600
<v Speaker 2>from each other, they might think, oh, there's some sort

0:27:11.600 --> 0:27:14.800
<v Speaker 2>of invisible magical force, but no, really, actually it's because

0:27:14.960 --> 0:27:16.439
<v Speaker 2>Orhea tossed a bowling ball to Daniel.

0:27:16.520 --> 0:27:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly, do you have invisible bowling balls? By the way,

0:27:18.760 --> 0:27:19.560
<v Speaker 1>that sounds pretty cool.

0:27:19.680 --> 0:27:21.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, no, it doesn't have to be invisible. It could

0:27:21.560 --> 0:27:25.679
<v Speaker 2>just be a black bowlling ball at night. But I

0:27:25.680 --> 0:27:27.359
<v Speaker 2>think what you're trying to get at is like, this

0:27:27.480 --> 0:27:30.159
<v Speaker 2>is a view that's maybe popular out there if you

0:27:30.200 --> 0:27:32.320
<v Speaker 2>consume a lot of science and physics, but maybe this

0:27:32.440 --> 0:27:34.600
<v Speaker 2>view doesn't quite work. So does it work or not?

0:27:34.720 --> 0:27:36.679
<v Speaker 1>It definitely doesn't work for me, and I get the

0:27:36.720 --> 0:27:38.680
<v Speaker 1>sense that it doesn't work for a lot of people

0:27:38.720 --> 0:27:40.600
<v Speaker 1>out there because they get a lot of questions about it.

0:27:40.720 --> 0:27:43.240
<v Speaker 1>People absorb this idea and then they do what we're

0:27:43.240 --> 0:27:45.680
<v Speaker 1>always telling them to do on this podcast, which is well,

0:27:45.720 --> 0:27:48.120
<v Speaker 1>think about whether that makes sense. Does it explain other

0:27:48.200 --> 0:27:50.800
<v Speaker 1>things you see? Can you understand it in other circumstances,

0:27:50.840 --> 0:27:53.320
<v Speaker 1>does it click together with the other parts of your understanding.

0:27:53.400 --> 0:27:55.560
<v Speaker 1>And there's a bunch of pretty typical questions that this

0:27:55.680 --> 0:27:59.639
<v Speaker 1>picture raises and can't really answer. For example, For example,

0:27:59.720 --> 0:28:02.400
<v Speaker 1>we can tell a nice story about electrons repelling each

0:28:02.400 --> 0:28:04.879
<v Speaker 1>other by tossing photons back and forth, but how do

0:28:04.960 --> 0:28:08.000
<v Speaker 1>things attract each other if an electron and a positron.

0:28:08.200 --> 0:28:11.199
<v Speaker 1>Electromagnetism says they should be pulled together. How does an

0:28:11.240 --> 0:28:14.160
<v Speaker 1>electron or a positron throw a ball at the other

0:28:14.200 --> 0:28:16.760
<v Speaker 1>one and pull it towards itself. It have to be

0:28:16.840 --> 0:28:19.480
<v Speaker 1>like a ball with negative momentum somehow.

0:28:19.880 --> 0:28:21.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I was about to say that.

0:28:21.600 --> 0:28:24.679
<v Speaker 1>Why not, because if it's negative momentum, it's going the

0:28:24.720 --> 0:28:25.960
<v Speaker 1>other direction, right?

0:28:26.240 --> 0:28:27.879
<v Speaker 2>Is that a requirement? Can I just come up with

0:28:27.880 --> 0:28:30.320
<v Speaker 2>a magical bowling ball it has negative momentum.

0:28:30.359 --> 0:28:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Having negative momentum really makes no sense. It's sort of

0:28:32.960 --> 0:28:35.840
<v Speaker 1>like having a negative mass or negative length, right. It

0:28:35.880 --> 0:28:38.320
<v Speaker 1>really just means momentum in the other direction. So if

0:28:38.320 --> 0:28:39.920
<v Speaker 1>you're going to throw a ball to the right with

0:28:40.040 --> 0:28:42.040
<v Speaker 1>negative momentum, you're really throwing a ball to the.

0:28:42.080 --> 0:28:45.480
<v Speaker 2>Left right, which would push me towards the you right,

0:28:45.560 --> 0:28:47.000
<v Speaker 2>And so it would make sense.

0:28:47.040 --> 0:28:49.640
<v Speaker 1>But that's not an exchange of particles. Right. Maybe the

0:28:49.680 --> 0:28:52.320
<v Speaker 1>electron throws off a ball in one direction, the positron

0:28:52.360 --> 0:28:53.959
<v Speaker 1>throws off the ball in the other direction. They move

0:28:54.000 --> 0:28:56.719
<v Speaker 1>towards each other. But now you also have these photons, right,

0:28:56.720 --> 0:28:59.760
<v Speaker 1>and we don't see those photons when electrons and positrons

0:28:59.760 --> 0:29:02.160
<v Speaker 1>are try and then there's no exchange there, the electron

0:29:02.200 --> 0:29:05.120
<v Speaker 1>and positron not actually exchanging particles there.

0:29:05.200 --> 0:29:07.920
<v Speaker 2>Well, I feel like you know, I'm new to this,

0:29:08.360 --> 0:29:11.440
<v Speaker 2>so to me, it could all be magical. Daniel, lets

0:29:11.440 --> 0:29:13.760
<v Speaker 2>you make stuff up. I'm relying on YouTube. Tell me, like, no,

0:29:13.840 --> 0:29:15.760
<v Speaker 2>that's a fundamental law of the universe that you're breaking.

0:29:15.800 --> 0:29:17.360
<v Speaker 2>So like, let's you have a magical bowling ball with

0:29:17.440 --> 0:29:19.680
<v Speaker 2>native momentum and you're you're standing in front of me,

0:29:19.920 --> 0:29:21.640
<v Speaker 2>so to toss it to you, I actually have to

0:29:21.640 --> 0:29:24.200
<v Speaker 2>push it back behind me, and then the ball would

0:29:24.240 --> 0:29:26.120
<v Speaker 2>go towards you, and then when you catch it, it has

0:29:26.160 --> 0:29:29.000
<v Speaker 2>negative momentum, which would actually pull you towards me. When

0:29:29.000 --> 0:29:29.720
<v Speaker 2>am I breaking there?

0:29:29.800 --> 0:29:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Okay, well then I'll just tell you that that's not allowed.

0:29:32.600 --> 0:29:35.320
<v Speaker 1>You can't have particles with negative momentum. It just doesn't

0:29:35.360 --> 0:29:36.000
<v Speaker 1>make any sense.

0:29:36.080 --> 0:29:38.360
<v Speaker 2>Hmmm, it says to you. But let's move on.

0:29:40.360 --> 0:29:41.840
<v Speaker 1>You just have to me to tell you when you're

0:29:41.840 --> 0:29:44.360
<v Speaker 1>breaking the rules, you breaking the rules. But there's also

0:29:44.520 --> 0:29:46.520
<v Speaker 1>other parts of the story that don't really make sense,

0:29:46.560 --> 0:29:48.520
<v Speaker 1>like how does the electron know the positron is there?

0:29:48.600 --> 0:29:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Has it no to admit a photon in one direction

0:29:51.520 --> 0:29:52.800
<v Speaker 1>to attract the positron.

0:29:53.120 --> 0:29:55.640
<v Speaker 2>M Yeah, That's one thing I've always wondered about this

0:29:55.800 --> 0:29:58.200
<v Speaker 2>picture is like, does that mean that electrons are just

0:29:58.240 --> 0:30:00.800
<v Speaker 2>throwing a photons in all their all the time, and

0:30:00.840 --> 0:30:02.920
<v Speaker 2>then it just happens to interact with another elect what

0:30:02.960 --> 0:30:04.920
<v Speaker 2>happens to catch it? Then they're going to repel each other?

0:30:05.000 --> 0:30:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly is that what you mean?

0:30:06.480 --> 0:30:07.440
<v Speaker 2>Like that doesn't make sense.

0:30:07.600 --> 0:30:10.040
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't make sense. And then you would see those photons, right,

0:30:10.160 --> 0:30:12.280
<v Speaker 1>And if you stick your head between two particles that

0:30:12.320 --> 0:30:14.920
<v Speaker 1>are supposedly exchanging photons, why can't you see them? When

0:30:15.000 --> 0:30:17.400
<v Speaker 1>magnets are floating above each other? Why can't you see

0:30:17.480 --> 0:30:20.200
<v Speaker 1>flashes of light there? So there's all sorts of questions

0:30:20.200 --> 0:30:22.920
<v Speaker 1>that are raised by this particle exchange model that don't

0:30:22.960 --> 0:30:23.960
<v Speaker 1>really have good answers.

0:30:24.640 --> 0:30:26.960
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so this view doesn't seem to make sense. Where

0:30:27.000 --> 0:30:28.560
<v Speaker 2>did it come from? Who came up with this? And

0:30:28.600 --> 0:30:30.200
<v Speaker 2>then didn't they think of these things when they came

0:30:30.240 --> 0:30:30.600
<v Speaker 2>up with it.

0:30:31.160 --> 0:30:33.240
<v Speaker 1>They didn't have a cartoonist keeping them in check. That's

0:30:33.280 --> 0:30:33.840
<v Speaker 1>really the problem.

0:30:33.920 --> 0:30:37.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's really the problem. They're missing their cartoonists in

0:30:37.320 --> 0:30:38.120
<v Speaker 2>their science force.

0:30:38.400 --> 0:30:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly. Every physicists should have adult supervision in the

0:30:41.320 --> 0:30:44.000
<v Speaker 1>form of a cartoonist. That's what we're learning today.

0:30:44.640 --> 0:30:49.240
<v Speaker 2>But then who supervises the cartoonist and we're off the rails?

0:30:49.360 --> 0:30:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Yoda, I think, yoda. But yeah, where does this come from?

0:30:52.400 --> 0:30:54.880
<v Speaker 1>It comes from You won't be surprised to learn the

0:30:55.000 --> 0:30:59.400
<v Speaker 1>unfortunate naming of another idea. So what's really happening here

0:30:59.520 --> 0:31:02.840
<v Speaker 1>is not the There are literal photons being exchanged between

0:31:02.840 --> 0:31:06.200
<v Speaker 1>electrons or electrons and positrons. But there's something else happening.

0:31:06.200 --> 0:31:09.640
<v Speaker 1>There's an interaction that we describe using the phrase virtual

0:31:09.760 --> 0:31:13.400
<v Speaker 1>particles and virtual particles because it has the word particle

0:31:13.480 --> 0:31:15.640
<v Speaker 1>in it sounds like maybe it's a kind of particle,

0:31:15.800 --> 0:31:18.480
<v Speaker 1>but really they're not particles at all.

0:31:18.520 --> 0:31:20.760
<v Speaker 2>Which you're saying, like the first person who came up

0:31:20.800 --> 0:31:23.600
<v Speaker 2>with this idea really meant virtual particles. But then at

0:31:23.640 --> 0:31:25.880
<v Speaker 2>some point people stop using the word virtual.

0:31:26.000 --> 0:31:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly when it transitions over into popular science, people

0:31:28.680 --> 0:31:30.600
<v Speaker 1>are like, you know, it's kind of like they're throwing

0:31:30.800 --> 0:31:33.320
<v Speaker 1>photons back and forth. They're virtual particles, but you can

0:31:33.320 --> 0:31:35.400
<v Speaker 1>think of them as particles, And that's exactly where it

0:31:35.400 --> 0:31:37.560
<v Speaker 1>breaks down. If you think of them as particles, they're

0:31:37.600 --> 0:31:39.920
<v Speaker 1>not really because they don't do all these other things

0:31:39.960 --> 0:31:41.320
<v Speaker 1>you would expect particles to do.

0:31:41.680 --> 0:31:44.640
<v Speaker 2>All right, well, let's dig into what is actually going

0:31:44.680 --> 0:31:47.680
<v Speaker 2>on virtually and for reals in this universe and see

0:31:47.680 --> 0:31:50.160
<v Speaker 2>if we can make sense of this picture of what

0:31:50.200 --> 0:31:52.680
<v Speaker 2>a force is. So tostig into that. But first let's

0:31:52.760 --> 0:32:06.120
<v Speaker 2>take another quick break. All right, we're asking the question

0:32:06.120 --> 0:32:09.000
<v Speaker 2>how do particles carry force? And there's a view that

0:32:09.040 --> 0:32:12.440
<v Speaker 2>maybe they exchange force particles. But Daniel, you're saying that

0:32:12.600 --> 0:32:16.440
<v Speaker 2>actually they're not really exchanging particles. They're exchanging virtual particles,

0:32:16.480 --> 0:32:18.320
<v Speaker 2>which is kind of like bitcoin.

0:32:19.240 --> 0:32:23.280
<v Speaker 1>It's nothing. Well, I mean if you say bitcoin is

0:32:23.320 --> 0:32:26.760
<v Speaker 1>nothing like money, then yes, virtual particles are like bitcoin.

0:32:27.000 --> 0:32:29.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there you go. They're not real. They're just like

0:32:29.720 --> 0:32:30.440
<v Speaker 2>a concept.

0:32:30.560 --> 0:32:32.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you're going to bring all the crypto bros

0:32:32.200 --> 0:32:33.240
<v Speaker 1>down on us, dude.

0:32:33.040 --> 0:32:36.280
<v Speaker 2>Bring it on. Yeah, maybe they like to fund us

0:32:36.280 --> 0:32:37.760
<v Speaker 2>in bitcoin or dorsche coin.

0:32:37.920 --> 0:32:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, we can only pay virtual bills with virtual dollars,

0:32:40.200 --> 0:32:41.920
<v Speaker 1>so I'm not sure how helpful that is.

0:32:42.600 --> 0:32:46.040
<v Speaker 2>I feel like I have a virtual job anyways. But anyway,

0:32:46.120 --> 0:32:47.920
<v Speaker 2>so explain it to us. What's the difference between a

0:32:47.920 --> 0:32:50.320
<v Speaker 2>particle and a virtual particle, and how to virtual particles

0:32:50.760 --> 0:32:51.520
<v Speaker 2>create forces.

0:32:51.640 --> 0:32:54.400
<v Speaker 1>So what is a particle anyway? A particle is actually

0:32:54.440 --> 0:32:57.720
<v Speaker 1>a ripple in a field, like what is a real photon.

0:32:57.880 --> 0:33:00.840
<v Speaker 1>A photon is a ripple in the electronnetic field. The

0:33:00.880 --> 0:33:03.640
<v Speaker 1>whole field fills the universe, and a photon is a

0:33:03.760 --> 0:33:07.080
<v Speaker 1>very regular disturbance in that field. It's a very particular,

0:33:07.320 --> 0:33:10.760
<v Speaker 1>very special kind of disturbance that's sort of self sustaining.

0:33:10.920 --> 0:33:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Like you point your flashlight up at Alpha Centauri. Those

0:33:13.640 --> 0:33:16.960
<v Speaker 1>photons can go across light years and make it to

0:33:17.040 --> 0:33:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Alpha Centauri. They don't get tired, they don't run out

0:33:19.360 --> 0:33:22.400
<v Speaker 1>of steam. All that energy is compact in this perfect way.

0:33:22.440 --> 0:33:25.440
<v Speaker 1>It's slashing through the electromagnetic fields in this very special

0:33:25.480 --> 0:33:28.440
<v Speaker 1>particular way that lets it propagate through the universe. That's

0:33:28.440 --> 0:33:31.520
<v Speaker 1>what a particle is, So like a very special kind

0:33:31.560 --> 0:33:34.160
<v Speaker 1>of disturbance in the field that satisfies a bunch of

0:33:34.200 --> 0:33:36.000
<v Speaker 1>equations for how those field works.

0:33:36.160 --> 0:33:38.760
<v Speaker 2>Okay, it's a particle, not like a real object. It's

0:33:38.760 --> 0:33:42.840
<v Speaker 2>a little ripple, special ripple in the giant cosmic universe

0:33:42.880 --> 0:33:44.280
<v Speaker 2>spanding field.

0:33:44.800 --> 0:33:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly. Now, a virtual particle is also a disturbance

0:33:49.040 --> 0:33:51.560
<v Speaker 1>in that field, but doesn't have any of those same properties.

0:33:51.640 --> 0:33:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Virtual particles are like basically everything else that field can do.

0:33:55.680 --> 0:33:57.880
<v Speaker 1>If that field is disturbed by the presence of some

0:33:58.040 --> 0:34:00.800
<v Speaker 1>other particle, then the field will slasher and oscillate a

0:34:00.840 --> 0:34:03.400
<v Speaker 1>little bit, and then that'll die out, and that we

0:34:03.440 --> 0:34:06.280
<v Speaker 1>can describe as virtual particles if you like, or you

0:34:06.280 --> 0:34:08.920
<v Speaker 1>can just think about it as oscillations in the field.

0:34:09.040 --> 0:34:11.760
<v Speaker 1>But virtual particles are basically a way of thinking about

0:34:11.800 --> 0:34:15.759
<v Speaker 1>what else fields can do other than having particles in them.

0:34:15.800 --> 0:34:18.360
<v Speaker 2>Now is the difference that that one is sustainable or

0:34:18.400 --> 0:34:21.200
<v Speaker 2>sustained and the other one kind of fades away like

0:34:21.239 --> 0:34:24.759
<v Speaker 2>an electron. It's special in the electron field because it's

0:34:24.800 --> 0:34:25.880
<v Speaker 2>there and it doesn't go away.

0:34:26.120 --> 0:34:29.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly. All these fields have equations to describe how

0:34:29.400 --> 0:34:32.400
<v Speaker 1>they wiggle. The fields are always wiggling. They have kinetic energy,

0:34:32.440 --> 0:34:34.839
<v Speaker 1>which means they're moving. They have potential energy, which means

0:34:34.880 --> 0:34:37.200
<v Speaker 1>they have energy of their configuration. It's sort of like

0:34:37.280 --> 0:34:40.720
<v Speaker 1>a kid on a swing. Right, they're swinging back and forth.

0:34:40.760 --> 0:34:42.200
<v Speaker 1>And for a kid on a swing, you give them

0:34:42.280 --> 0:34:44.680
<v Speaker 1>just the right push, they can swing really nicely. Right,

0:34:44.680 --> 0:34:46.440
<v Speaker 1>if you push them at the right frequency, they can

0:34:46.480 --> 0:34:48.920
<v Speaker 1>swing in a really nice regular way. But there's also

0:34:48.960 --> 0:34:51.720
<v Speaker 1>other crazy things that that swing can do that aren't

0:34:51.719 --> 0:34:54.040
<v Speaker 1>so nice and self sustaining. Like you give that kid

0:34:54.120 --> 0:34:56.360
<v Speaker 1>random pushes at random times, it's going to get a

0:34:56.440 --> 0:34:59.040
<v Speaker 1>very chaotic sort of oscillation. So if you wiggle a

0:34:59.080 --> 0:35:01.160
<v Speaker 1>field in just the the right way, you can set

0:35:01.239 --> 0:35:04.600
<v Speaker 1>up these self sustaining perturbations that will move through space.

0:35:04.760 --> 0:35:06.640
<v Speaker 1>If you don't do it in just the right way,

0:35:06.760 --> 0:35:09.160
<v Speaker 1>then they sort of peeter out and the energy dissipates

0:35:09.200 --> 0:35:11.400
<v Speaker 1>instead of like moving in a little compact blob.

0:35:11.640 --> 0:35:15.520
<v Speaker 2>And so virtual particle is any wiggle of the field

0:35:15.640 --> 0:35:18.480
<v Speaker 2>that is not self sustaining, which is not special like

0:35:18.800 --> 0:35:20.800
<v Speaker 2>the wiggle that is an electron exactly.

0:35:20.840 --> 0:35:22.960
<v Speaker 1>So an electron is a special wiggle, and you can

0:35:22.960 --> 0:35:25.320
<v Speaker 1>see it, you can interact with it, same with a photon.

0:35:25.400 --> 0:35:27.480
<v Speaker 1>A virtual particle is any other sort of disturbance in

0:35:27.520 --> 0:35:29.600
<v Speaker 1>the field that fades away really quickly. And there's sort

0:35:29.640 --> 0:35:32.359
<v Speaker 1>of an argument in particle physics about what's the best

0:35:32.360 --> 0:35:34.640
<v Speaker 1>way to describe them. Some people think, look, let's just

0:35:34.680 --> 0:35:37.480
<v Speaker 1>talk about the fields. Everything is a field. Particles are

0:35:37.520 --> 0:35:39.759
<v Speaker 1>actually wiggles in fields when they interact with each other.

0:35:39.760 --> 0:35:43.480
<v Speaker 1>That's just fields interacting other people like this virtual particle story.

0:35:43.520 --> 0:35:45.839
<v Speaker 1>They say, no, particles are the basic thing, and let's

0:35:45.840 --> 0:35:48.440
<v Speaker 1>talk about how they interact in terms of virtual particles.

0:35:48.480 --> 0:35:51.080
<v Speaker 1>So in some sense, virtual particles are just the story

0:35:51.160 --> 0:35:54.080
<v Speaker 1>we tell ourselves to describe some things that fields can do.

0:35:54.239 --> 0:35:57.320
<v Speaker 1>But fields are really the more fundamental element of the universe,

0:35:57.560 --> 0:35:59.080
<v Speaker 1>according to lots of physicists.

0:36:00.080 --> 0:36:01.680
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so then it has to if it feels. But

0:36:01.719 --> 0:36:04.040
<v Speaker 2>then I guess what do you call these particles virtual?

0:36:04.120 --> 0:36:06.600
<v Speaker 2>They seem as real as the other kinds of particles,

0:36:06.600 --> 0:36:07.240
<v Speaker 2>like the electron.

0:36:07.360 --> 0:36:09.359
<v Speaker 1>We call them virtual for a few reasons. Number one

0:36:09.400 --> 0:36:11.480
<v Speaker 1>is they don't obey the rules that particles obey. These

0:36:11.480 --> 0:36:14.080
<v Speaker 1>real particles. They have like the same mass, right, so

0:36:14.280 --> 0:36:16.960
<v Speaker 1>a real electron always has the same mass, and real

0:36:17.000 --> 0:36:20.160
<v Speaker 1>photons always have zero mass. These other wiggles in the field,

0:36:20.200 --> 0:36:22.120
<v Speaker 1>you can try to describe them in terms of a

0:36:22.160 --> 0:36:24.919
<v Speaker 1>particle like story, but it breaks down because they don't

0:36:24.920 --> 0:36:27.040
<v Speaker 1>follow the same rules. And so like, what is the

0:36:27.080 --> 0:36:29.279
<v Speaker 1>mass of this virtual photon? Well, if you try to

0:36:29.320 --> 0:36:31.720
<v Speaker 1>calculate a mass, you end up with weird numbers. Sometimes

0:36:31.760 --> 0:36:34.640
<v Speaker 1>they have really huge mass, sometimes it's even negative. It's

0:36:34.640 --> 0:36:36.840
<v Speaker 1>because it doesn't really apply. You're trying to describe a

0:36:36.840 --> 0:36:38.680
<v Speaker 1>bowling ball as a car, and you're asking, like, you know,

0:36:38.719 --> 0:36:40.720
<v Speaker 1>what's it like to drive? Well, it's not really anything

0:36:40.800 --> 0:36:41.959
<v Speaker 1>like to drive a bowling ball.

0:36:42.200 --> 0:36:45.200
<v Speaker 2>Oh, how do you know. I'm just trying to ask

0:36:45.200 --> 0:36:46.720
<v Speaker 2>the tough questions here today, Daniel.

0:36:46.960 --> 0:36:48.799
<v Speaker 1>No, these are great questions. I love that you can't

0:36:48.960 --> 0:36:50.959
<v Speaker 1>be flat footed with questions like what is it really

0:36:51.080 --> 0:36:52.160
<v Speaker 1>like to drive a bowling ball?

0:36:53.480 --> 0:36:56.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean, for making blanket statements here about the nature

0:36:56.880 --> 0:36:58.560
<v Speaker 2>of bowling balls, we need to back it up with

0:36:58.640 --> 0:36:59.320
<v Speaker 2>real science.

0:37:00.080 --> 0:37:02.279
<v Speaker 1>The point is that we have these weird disturbances in

0:37:02.320 --> 0:37:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the field that we can describe mathematically, but they don't

0:37:05.040 --> 0:37:07.840
<v Speaker 1>have the same behavior as normal particles, and so we

0:37:07.920 --> 0:37:09.560
<v Speaker 1>can't interpret them in the same way.

0:37:10.440 --> 0:37:13.000
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so they're weird wiggles in the field. They're not

0:37:13.120 --> 0:37:16.799
<v Speaker 2>as as special as the particles. You call them virtual particles. Now,

0:37:16.800 --> 0:37:19.080
<v Speaker 2>how do they actually the transmit a force?

0:37:19.360 --> 0:37:22.000
<v Speaker 1>All these fields contain energy, right, An electron is a

0:37:22.040 --> 0:37:24.520
<v Speaker 1>little pulse in the field, still vibration of the fields.

0:37:24.560 --> 0:37:27.560
<v Speaker 1>It's an excited state of the field. It has energy.

0:37:27.719 --> 0:37:30.239
<v Speaker 1>So in this field picture, how do two electrons push

0:37:30.280 --> 0:37:33.160
<v Speaker 1>on each other? They do so through the electromagnetic field.

0:37:33.600 --> 0:37:36.439
<v Speaker 2>So we're talking about multiple fields now, right. So there's

0:37:36.480 --> 0:37:39.799
<v Speaker 2>an electron field and then there's a photon field, which

0:37:39.840 --> 0:37:42.839
<v Speaker 2>is the electromagnetic force field. Yes, and you're saying, like,

0:37:42.920 --> 0:37:45.240
<v Speaker 2>the two electrons are in the same field, the electron field.

0:37:45.320 --> 0:37:47.719
<v Speaker 2>They're sharing the same field, but to talk to each

0:37:47.719 --> 0:37:49.800
<v Speaker 2>other they have to go through another field.

0:37:49.960 --> 0:37:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's exactly right. The field doesn't interact with itself. Right.

0:37:53.640 --> 0:37:56.320
<v Speaker 1>You have these two fields that feel space, the electromagnetic

0:37:56.360 --> 0:38:00.000
<v Speaker 1>field and the electron field. These are two separate fields, right.

0:38:00.120 --> 0:38:02.000
<v Speaker 1>For one of them, the excited state of that field

0:38:02.040 --> 0:38:05.400
<v Speaker 1>is an electron. For the other one, for the electromagnetic field,

0:38:05.480 --> 0:38:07.239
<v Speaker 1>the excited state of it is a photon.

0:38:07.719 --> 0:38:10.360
<v Speaker 2>Right now, why can't they interact within the same field,

0:38:10.600 --> 0:38:12.399
<v Speaker 2>Like if I have the ocean like a way will

0:38:12.400 --> 0:38:13.439
<v Speaker 2>interact with another wave.

0:38:13.719 --> 0:38:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Some fields will do that, like the strong force. Gluons

0:38:16.640 --> 0:38:20.520
<v Speaker 1>can interact directly with themselves, but photons can't interact with photons,

0:38:20.520 --> 0:38:22.920
<v Speaker 1>and electrons can't interact with other electrons.

0:38:22.960 --> 0:38:25.120
<v Speaker 2>It's just a weird happenstance of the universe that the

0:38:25.120 --> 0:38:26.439
<v Speaker 2>electron field can't do that.

0:38:26.440 --> 0:38:29.440
<v Speaker 1>That's right. Some fields are allowed to interact directly with themselves.

0:38:29.480 --> 0:38:31.440
<v Speaker 1>But the electron field doesn't do that, and you might

0:38:31.480 --> 0:38:33.600
<v Speaker 1>ask why, and it's just description, this is what we

0:38:33.719 --> 0:38:34.919
<v Speaker 1>see in the field.

0:38:34.600 --> 0:38:37.719
<v Speaker 2>Do Okay, So they talked through the photon field, and

0:38:38.120 --> 0:38:40.320
<v Speaker 2>so what's going on. Where are the virtual particles in

0:38:40.360 --> 0:38:42.240
<v Speaker 2>the photon field or the electron field.

0:38:42.280 --> 0:38:45.160
<v Speaker 1>They're in the photon field, So these are virtual photons,

0:38:45.160 --> 0:38:48.120
<v Speaker 1>and again they're not real particles. They're like weird disturbances

0:38:48.160 --> 0:38:51.080
<v Speaker 1>in the field. So electron number one causes a disturbance

0:38:51.120 --> 0:38:53.239
<v Speaker 1>in the photon field, and it does that all the time,

0:38:53.360 --> 0:38:56.719
<v Speaker 1>like electron can't exist without disturbing the photon field. It's

0:38:56.719 --> 0:38:59.600
<v Speaker 1>doing it all the time. It's constantly interacting with the

0:38:59.600 --> 0:39:02.560
<v Speaker 1>photon field, and the photon field is constantly interacting with

0:39:02.640 --> 0:39:05.600
<v Speaker 1>electron fields, like a photon flying through space is constantly

0:39:05.640 --> 0:39:07.960
<v Speaker 1>interacting with the electron field. It's not like it just

0:39:08.000 --> 0:39:11.640
<v Speaker 1>sometimes does. And so the electron is causing these disturbances

0:39:11.680 --> 0:39:14.880
<v Speaker 1>in the photon field. And if those disturbances interact with

0:39:14.920 --> 0:39:18.800
<v Speaker 1>another electron, then that's effectively momentum transfer from one electron

0:39:18.960 --> 0:39:21.440
<v Speaker 1>to another through the photon field, which you could also

0:39:21.480 --> 0:39:24.680
<v Speaker 1>say is the exchange of a virtual photon, but it's

0:39:24.680 --> 0:39:26.799
<v Speaker 1>not really a particle. It's not a particle you could

0:39:26.840 --> 0:39:28.560
<v Speaker 1>like see with your eyes or if you put a

0:39:28.600 --> 0:39:31.319
<v Speaker 1>detector in there, because it's not a real photon. It's

0:39:31.360 --> 0:39:33.080
<v Speaker 1>just a ripple in the photon field that we call

0:39:33.160 --> 0:39:36.600
<v Speaker 1>a virtual particle to connect with this story about electrons

0:39:36.600 --> 0:39:38.080
<v Speaker 1>passing particles back and forth.

0:39:38.680 --> 0:39:40.640
<v Speaker 2>But I feel like this all sounds great, but I

0:39:40.640 --> 0:39:42.040
<v Speaker 2>feel like you're just going to run into the same

0:39:42.120 --> 0:39:44.960
<v Speaker 2>question as you did with the real particles picture right,

0:39:45.000 --> 0:39:46.600
<v Speaker 2>because you might say this is not a bowling balls,

0:39:46.600 --> 0:39:49.120
<v Speaker 2>there's a virtual bowling ball, or it's a tennis ball,

0:39:49.239 --> 0:39:51.680
<v Speaker 2>but you're still you're still run into the same questions

0:39:51.719 --> 0:39:54.120
<v Speaker 2>like if I toss a virtual a tennis ball to you,

0:39:54.239 --> 0:39:55.719
<v Speaker 2>how did I know where you were? And how did

0:39:55.760 --> 0:39:57.279
<v Speaker 2>you know to catch it? And why am I not

0:39:57.320 --> 0:39:59.759
<v Speaker 2>shooting tennis balls in all directions? And what if you're

0:40:00.400 --> 0:40:02.359
<v Speaker 2>and I'm an electron, how do we repel each other?

0:40:02.400 --> 0:40:05.640
<v Speaker 2>How do we throw a negatively momentum a tennis ball?

0:40:05.760 --> 0:40:08.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, okay, great questions, and we can actually answer all

0:40:08.280 --> 0:40:11.600
<v Speaker 1>of them now, right, So an electron is constantly creating

0:40:11.640 --> 0:40:13.399
<v Speaker 1>these ripples in the field. It doesn't have to know

0:40:13.520 --> 0:40:15.879
<v Speaker 1>that the positron or the other electron is there. It's

0:40:16.000 --> 0:40:19.200
<v Speaker 1>constantly creating these ripples in the electromagnetic field. That's just

0:40:19.200 --> 0:40:21.840
<v Speaker 1>what it does. The two fields are constantly interacting, so

0:40:21.880 --> 0:40:23.960
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to know the other particle is there.

0:40:24.040 --> 0:40:27.480
<v Speaker 2>So it's constantly in all directions shooting virtual photons. Yes,

0:40:27.480 --> 0:40:29.200
<v Speaker 2>but where does this energy come from? And wouldn't you

0:40:29.239 --> 0:40:31.120
<v Speaker 2>be able to see them? It's the same question you

0:40:31.120 --> 0:40:32.520
<v Speaker 2>have with the photons, right, mm hmm.

0:40:32.680 --> 0:40:35.360
<v Speaker 1>The energy dissipates, right, So virtual photons are not like

0:40:35.440 --> 0:40:37.560
<v Speaker 1>real particles that you could interact with. It's not like

0:40:37.640 --> 0:40:40.280
<v Speaker 1>it's shooting a light bulb at Alpha centauri and eventually

0:40:40.280 --> 0:40:42.480
<v Speaker 1>it will be seen. These fade away really quickly, and

0:40:42.520 --> 0:40:43.759
<v Speaker 1>if you try to think about them in terms of

0:40:43.800 --> 0:40:46.200
<v Speaker 1>a particle, it's really just part of the story. There's

0:40:46.200 --> 0:40:48.799
<v Speaker 1>lots of complicated ripples going on. You can describe them

0:40:48.800 --> 0:40:51.520
<v Speaker 1>in terms of one virtual photon or two virtual photons

0:40:51.600 --> 0:40:54.560
<v Speaker 1>or seventeen virtual photons. That's really just an attempt to

0:40:54.560 --> 0:40:56.759
<v Speaker 1>describe what's happening to the field. But to get back

0:40:56.760 --> 0:40:59.920
<v Speaker 1>to the question, basically, the two fields are constantly interacting,

0:41:00.040 --> 0:41:02.359
<v Speaker 1>So if a positron comes by then the fact that

0:41:02.400 --> 0:41:05.840
<v Speaker 1>there's an electron there. The electron is affecting the electromagnetic

0:41:05.840 --> 0:41:08.919
<v Speaker 1>field that the positron is also constantly interacting with. So yeah,

0:41:08.960 --> 0:41:12.279
<v Speaker 1>basically you're constantly shooting these virtual particles. Answered the other

0:41:12.400 --> 0:41:14.800
<v Speaker 1>question of like, well, then how do you attract virtual particles?

0:41:14.840 --> 0:41:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Don't have to obey that law I told you about

0:41:16.560 --> 0:41:22.080
<v Speaker 1>earlier about what because they're not really particles. There you go, yes, exactly.

0:41:22.239 --> 0:41:27.600
<v Speaker 3>He's told me that it was not possible, Daniel, for particles,

0:41:27.719 --> 0:41:30.400
<v Speaker 3>or for bowling balls, or for tennis balls. Particles have

0:41:30.480 --> 0:41:33.360
<v Speaker 3>to obey that law. Virtual particles are not particles. It

0:41:33.400 --> 0:41:35.239
<v Speaker 3>feels like a cop out because we're saying, oh, you

0:41:35.280 --> 0:41:37.280
<v Speaker 3>put virtual on it. You don't have to obey the rules.

0:41:37.320 --> 0:41:39.480
<v Speaker 3>Like if I'm driving my virtual car, can I ignore

0:41:39.480 --> 0:41:42.160
<v Speaker 3>the speed limits. It's not really a particle. It's just

0:41:42.200 --> 0:41:44.680
<v Speaker 3>a ripple in the field. And these fields can have

0:41:44.760 --> 0:41:46.080
<v Speaker 3>all sorts of weird.

0:41:45.880 --> 0:41:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Ripples in them that don't obey the rules of normal particles,

0:41:49.200 --> 0:41:52.800
<v Speaker 1>like negative mass or crazy high mass photons. That feels

0:41:52.800 --> 0:41:53.560
<v Speaker 1>like a contradiction.

0:41:53.640 --> 0:41:56.680
<v Speaker 2>So it is like I'm shooting a negative momentum tennis

0:41:56.680 --> 0:41:58.840
<v Speaker 2>ball at you, right, that's what you're saying.

0:41:58.760 --> 0:42:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Sort of, except that these are not particles, right, They're ripples.

0:42:02.080 --> 0:42:03.720
<v Speaker 1>They're ripples exactly.

0:42:03.440 --> 0:42:04.319
<v Speaker 2>Just like a particle is.

0:42:05.360 --> 0:42:07.759
<v Speaker 1>A particle is a special kind of ripple that like

0:42:07.840 --> 0:42:11.160
<v Speaker 1>satisfies the wave equation of the field. Virtual particles do

0:42:11.200 --> 0:42:13.080
<v Speaker 1>not satisfy that, and so you can't even ask the

0:42:13.200 --> 0:42:15.239
<v Speaker 1>question like, what is the mass of this thing? There

0:42:15.280 --> 0:42:17.640
<v Speaker 1>are energy and they are flowing through the field, but

0:42:17.680 --> 0:42:18.759
<v Speaker 1>they're not particles.

0:42:19.239 --> 0:42:21.040
<v Speaker 2>Hmmm. I feel like you're trying to get me on

0:42:21.080 --> 0:42:22.000
<v Speaker 2>a technicality here.

0:42:22.680 --> 0:42:24.359
<v Speaker 1>Physics is technicalities, man.

0:42:25.400 --> 0:42:27.680
<v Speaker 2>But I guess the main question is, so you're saying

0:42:27.719 --> 0:42:31.000
<v Speaker 2>that if we've put the word virtual in front of it,

0:42:31.120 --> 0:42:33.840
<v Speaker 2>then this whole picture of exchanging particles work. You just

0:42:33.880 --> 0:42:36.080
<v Speaker 2>have to call them virtual so that they can break

0:42:36.120 --> 0:42:37.680
<v Speaker 2>the rules of regular particles.

0:42:37.800 --> 0:42:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but they're not even really particles, right. I feel

0:42:40.040 --> 0:42:42.319
<v Speaker 1>like it's really misleading to just say, oh, it's a

0:42:42.400 --> 0:42:44.359
<v Speaker 1>kind of particle. It's not a kind of particle. It's

0:42:44.400 --> 0:42:47.200
<v Speaker 1>a totally different thing. Virtual particles are kinds of particles

0:42:47.239 --> 0:42:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the way bowling balls are types of cars.

0:42:49.160 --> 0:42:51.359
<v Speaker 2>Well, I see, Really the name should be a non

0:42:51.440 --> 0:42:52.400
<v Speaker 2>particle ripple.

0:42:52.680 --> 0:42:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Yes, exactly, come up with a better name than virtual

0:42:55.200 --> 0:42:57.680
<v Speaker 1>particle because that has misled millions of people.

0:42:57.840 --> 0:43:01.240
<v Speaker 2>Now, is that the best name for it, non particle ripple.

0:43:02.560 --> 0:43:04.560
<v Speaker 1>I feel like that's confusing because you're still using the

0:43:04.560 --> 0:43:05.240
<v Speaker 1>word particle.

0:43:05.360 --> 0:43:08.200
<v Speaker 2>No, but it's a non particle ripple. It's a ripple

0:43:08.280 --> 0:43:10.440
<v Speaker 2>that doesn't mean all the requirements of a particle.

0:43:10.560 --> 0:43:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Should I describe my bowling ball as a non car

0:43:12.880 --> 0:43:13.680
<v Speaker 1>bowling ball.

0:43:13.719 --> 0:43:16.200
<v Speaker 2>It causes confusion. Yeah, for sure.

0:43:16.080 --> 0:43:17.839
<v Speaker 1>It has nothing to do with cars. I should also

0:43:17.880 --> 0:43:20.479
<v Speaker 1>describe it as a non banana ball and a non

0:43:20.560 --> 0:43:21.320
<v Speaker 1>chocolate ball.

0:43:21.400 --> 0:43:23.400
<v Speaker 2>Well, no, I mean the difference is that of this

0:43:23.560 --> 0:43:26.400
<v Speaker 2>virtual particle in this particle have something common, which is

0:43:26.400 --> 0:43:28.080
<v Speaker 2>that they're both ripples in the field.

0:43:28.320 --> 0:43:30.879
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's true. Bowling balls and cars both can roll

0:43:30.920 --> 0:43:33.719
<v Speaker 1>down the road, right, very different things. I feel like

0:43:33.800 --> 0:43:35.439
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to get me in a technicality here.

0:43:36.200 --> 0:43:39.759
<v Speaker 2>No, just trying to understand you're confusing nomenclature here. But

0:43:39.800 --> 0:43:42.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, just so we can reach an understanding maybe

0:43:42.560 --> 0:43:45.200
<v Speaker 2>with our listeners, would you say that a better way

0:43:45.239 --> 0:43:48.840
<v Speaker 2>to call these things is as non particle ripples in

0:43:48.840 --> 0:43:50.560
<v Speaker 2>the field, because I feel like that's what you just

0:43:50.600 --> 0:43:51.359
<v Speaker 2>explained it as.

0:43:51.400 --> 0:43:54.799
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's definitely better than virtual particles because they're not particles.

0:43:54.800 --> 0:43:57.200
<v Speaker 1>And there are ripples in the field, yes, there you go.

0:43:57.239 --> 0:44:00.160
<v Speaker 2>But some ripples are particles, but those are special m

0:44:00.600 --> 0:44:02.680
<v Speaker 2>and so these are not those kinds exactly.

0:44:02.840 --> 0:44:05.840
<v Speaker 1>And we often describe these in terms of virtual particles

0:44:05.880 --> 0:44:07.920
<v Speaker 1>because we like to think about particles particles are the

0:44:07.920 --> 0:44:10.600
<v Speaker 1>things we observe. We never see the field directly, right,

0:44:10.600 --> 0:44:12.920
<v Speaker 1>You never observe a field. You only see the effect

0:44:12.960 --> 0:44:14.719
<v Speaker 1>of the field on a particle. So a lot of

0:44:14.719 --> 0:44:17.000
<v Speaker 1>people like to think of the particles as the sort

0:44:17.000 --> 0:44:20.200
<v Speaker 1>of basic stuff that we're using to describe the universe,

0:44:20.320 --> 0:44:22.640
<v Speaker 1>and in order to describe how they interactly, think about

0:44:22.680 --> 0:44:24.239
<v Speaker 1>that in terms of particles. And we draw these cute

0:44:24.239 --> 0:44:27.080
<v Speaker 1>little finement diagrams that include like little wiggles in the

0:44:27.080 --> 0:44:29.520
<v Speaker 1>paper that we say are virtual particles. So it's a

0:44:29.520 --> 0:44:31.680
<v Speaker 1>compelling story, but we should always remember these are not

0:44:31.800 --> 0:44:34.440
<v Speaker 1>really particles. They're really just different kinds of ripples in

0:44:34.480 --> 0:44:34.920
<v Speaker 1>a field.

0:44:35.160 --> 0:44:38.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, and I mean to be a pain, but it's

0:44:38.560 --> 0:44:40.600
<v Speaker 2>a little bit like says you kind of right, like

0:44:40.760 --> 0:44:43.560
<v Speaker 2>you're saying that the boundary of the definition of a

0:44:43.600 --> 0:44:46.640
<v Speaker 2>particle is that it meets all these rules. Now, is

0:44:46.680 --> 0:44:49.399
<v Speaker 2>that something that's totally accepted by every physicist or would

0:44:49.440 --> 0:44:51.440
<v Speaker 2>some physicists say, well, I would say any ripple is

0:44:51.480 --> 0:44:51.960
<v Speaker 2>a particle.

0:44:52.040 --> 0:44:54.960
<v Speaker 1>No, I think that's totally acceptable. And also, you can

0:44:55.000 --> 0:44:58.600
<v Speaker 1>see real particles. You can't ever see virtual particles. They're

0:44:58.640 --> 0:45:01.840
<v Speaker 1>just a part of the description. This feels very complicated ripples,

0:45:01.880 --> 0:45:04.240
<v Speaker 1>and you can describe part of it using a virtual particle,

0:45:04.280 --> 0:45:06.280
<v Speaker 1>but to describe it fully you need like an infinite

0:45:06.400 --> 0:45:08.960
<v Speaker 1>number of virtual particles. So the virtual particles are just

0:45:09.000 --> 0:45:11.680
<v Speaker 1>like a component of the story. They're not a real

0:45:11.760 --> 0:45:14.799
<v Speaker 1>thing in any sense. You can't see or interact with

0:45:14.840 --> 0:45:15.760
<v Speaker 1>a virtual particle.

0:45:15.760 --> 0:45:17.680
<v Speaker 2>Would you sort of see them? When two electrons repel

0:45:17.719 --> 0:45:19.680
<v Speaker 2>each other, aren't you sort of seeing them?

0:45:19.719 --> 0:45:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Not directly? I mean, if you had like a photon counter,

0:45:22.040 --> 0:45:24.480
<v Speaker 1>you wouldn't register any photons there. You're right, you can

0:45:24.480 --> 0:45:27.600
<v Speaker 1>see the effect on two electrons. Absolutely well.

0:45:27.640 --> 0:45:30.080
<v Speaker 2>You can't see in the photon either without interacting with it.

0:45:30.080 --> 0:45:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Right, Yeah, but here you're one more step removed. Right here,

0:45:32.480 --> 0:45:35.000
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing its effect on the electron. You're not even

0:45:35.000 --> 0:45:37.319
<v Speaker 1>interacting with a photon because you can't because it's not

0:45:37.360 --> 0:45:39.000
<v Speaker 1>a real photon a virtual photon.

0:45:39.760 --> 0:45:43.080
<v Speaker 2>Now, okay, so then you're saying that forces happen in

0:45:43.120 --> 0:45:46.719
<v Speaker 2>the universe between two particles with a capital P because

0:45:46.719 --> 0:45:51.440
<v Speaker 2>they interchange virtual particles or non particle ripples in the

0:45:51.560 --> 0:45:54.200
<v Speaker 2>quantum field. Yes, does that mean that everything's explained now?

0:45:54.440 --> 0:45:54.920
<v Speaker 2>That works?

0:45:55.239 --> 0:45:58.000
<v Speaker 1>That works. That is a very effective description of how

0:45:58.080 --> 0:46:01.239
<v Speaker 1>particles interact and allows us to ditt what particles will

0:46:01.280 --> 0:46:04.720
<v Speaker 1>do with extraordinary accuracy, which makes us feel like maybe

0:46:04.719 --> 0:46:05.439
<v Speaker 1>we got it right.

0:46:05.719 --> 0:46:07.680
<v Speaker 2>And in this picture, like an electron is just sitting

0:46:07.719 --> 0:46:10.799
<v Speaker 2>there in space and it's shooting an infinite number of

0:46:10.920 --> 0:46:12.839
<v Speaker 2>ripples in all directions all the time.

0:46:12.920 --> 0:46:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, the two fields are interacting with each other. The

0:46:15.120 --> 0:46:18.359
<v Speaker 1>electromagnetic field and the electron field are interacting with each other.

0:46:18.360 --> 0:46:20.520
<v Speaker 1>The energy is kind of going back and forth, right,

0:46:20.520 --> 0:46:23.400
<v Speaker 1>it's a constant interaction. You can describe that as like

0:46:23.440 --> 0:46:26.640
<v Speaker 1>the electron creeds virtual photons which it then absorbs, or

0:46:26.680 --> 0:46:30.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe those virtual photons interact with a passing positron or electron,

0:46:30.280 --> 0:46:32.000
<v Speaker 1>or you can just think about it as fields sort

0:46:32.000 --> 0:46:33.560
<v Speaker 1>of pulsing back and forth together.

0:46:33.800 --> 0:46:37.479
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I see, there's no like energy being generated. It's

0:46:37.520 --> 0:46:39.960
<v Speaker 2>like the electron puts some energy into the photon field,

0:46:40.080 --> 0:46:42.920
<v Speaker 2>and maybe that energy doesn't like dissipate, it goes back

0:46:42.960 --> 0:46:45.640
<v Speaker 2>to the electron. But unless maybe there's another electron nearby,

0:46:45.760 --> 0:46:47.880
<v Speaker 2>or a positron, in which case some of that energy

0:46:47.960 --> 0:46:51.320
<v Speaker 2>goes to the other particles exactly. All right, that was

0:46:51.400 --> 0:46:54.280
<v Speaker 2>not a forced conversation at all. You got very real,

0:46:54.560 --> 0:46:55.160
<v Speaker 2>not virtual.

0:46:56.640 --> 0:46:59.520
<v Speaker 1>And somewhere out there in some universe, Yoda is driving

0:46:59.520 --> 0:47:01.560
<v Speaker 1>his bowling all down the road and this all makes

0:47:01.600 --> 0:47:03.080
<v Speaker 1>sense to him. That's right on his way to his

0:47:03.160 --> 0:47:03.720
<v Speaker 1>yoga class.

0:47:04.480 --> 0:47:08.800
<v Speaker 2>Hot yoga class. Yes, Now, do you think both Jedis

0:47:08.880 --> 0:47:12.880
<v Speaker 2>and Sith practice yoga or is this something only the

0:47:12.960 --> 0:47:13.680
<v Speaker 2>Jedi would do?

0:47:14.160 --> 0:47:16.120
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if there's dark yoga there you.

0:47:16.080 --> 0:47:20.759
<v Speaker 2>Go, Yeah, evil yoga. All yoga is evil. Maybe what's

0:47:20.800 --> 0:47:24.200
<v Speaker 2>the other one? Pilates? Maybe pilates is what the Sith practice.

0:47:24.280 --> 0:47:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, forever he will dominate their strenchiness.

0:47:26.719 --> 0:47:29.160
<v Speaker 2>That's right? All right? Well, I think this has been

0:47:29.200 --> 0:47:32.840
<v Speaker 2>an interesting exploration of how physicists view the universe and

0:47:32.840 --> 0:47:35.400
<v Speaker 2>how particles interact. But again, this is just kind of

0:47:35.440 --> 0:47:38.560
<v Speaker 2>your view of it, right, who knows what's really happening underneath?

0:47:38.719 --> 0:47:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, philosophically, this is just a story we tell that

0:47:41.480 --> 0:47:44.400
<v Speaker 1>explains experiments. Is any of it true? Do the elements

0:47:44.400 --> 0:47:47.240
<v Speaker 1>of our ideas actually correspond to real physical things happening

0:47:47.239 --> 0:47:50.200
<v Speaker 1>out there in the universe. That's for philosophers to decide.

0:47:50.280 --> 0:47:52.600
<v Speaker 2>All right, well, we hope you enjoyed that. Thanks for

0:47:52.719 --> 0:47:54.399
<v Speaker 2>joining us. See you next time.

0:47:57.920 --> 0:48:00.800
<v Speaker 1>For more science and curiosity, come fine us on social

0:48:00.840 --> 0:48:05.760
<v Speaker 1>media where we answer questions and post videos. We're on Twitter, Discord, Insta,

0:48:05.840 --> 0:48:09.280
<v Speaker 1>and now TikTok. Thanks for listening, and remember that Daniel

0:48:09.320 --> 0:48:12.800
<v Speaker 1>and Jorge Explain the Universe is a production of iHeartRadio.

0:48:13.040 --> 0:48:18.200
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:48:18.320 --> 0:48:20.680
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.