WEBVTT - Citizens Bank CEO Says Fed Should 'Step it Up'

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Karl Masser and I'm

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanovik. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world to business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all purtnising the power of Business

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>analyst in more than one twenty countries. You can download

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:23.479
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Weekend iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com. You

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:25.439
<v Speaker 1>can also listen to our radio show at two pm

0:00:25.480 --> 0:00:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio, or watch us on YouTube

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:32.280
<v Speaker 1>search Bloomberg clovel News. We've been watching bank stocks in

0:00:32.320 --> 0:00:33.879
<v Speaker 1>a big way this week due to the move up

0:00:33.880 --> 0:00:36.000
<v Speaker 1>in rates, or the volatility and rates, if you will,

0:00:36.040 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 1>all the Fed talk about monetary policy as a whole.

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:41.239
<v Speaker 1>Bank stocks st roughly about two percent year to day,

0:00:41.240 --> 0:00:43.159
<v Speaker 1>compared with a nearly six percent drop in the S

0:00:43.159 --> 0:00:45.720
<v Speaker 1>and P five hundred. Citizens Financial Group they're temp up

0:00:45.760 --> 0:00:48.280
<v Speaker 1>around three percent so far this year. Joining us now

0:00:48.360 --> 0:00:51.159
<v Speaker 1>is the chairman and CEO of Citizens Financial Group of

0:00:51.200 --> 0:00:53.559
<v Speaker 1>Bruce van Son. He's with us in the Bloomberg Interactive

0:00:53.560 --> 0:00:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Broker studio. Bruce how are you good, good, good? Um, Bruce,

0:00:58.440 --> 0:01:00.680
<v Speaker 1>I just wanted are you really with every thing going on?

0:01:01.000 --> 0:01:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Tell me how great? How crazy? Is it? Right? Well,

0:01:03.320 --> 0:01:06.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a really interesting time to be in banking. Uh

0:01:06.200 --> 0:01:08.319
<v Speaker 1>So there's a lot of things happening in the macro

0:01:08.600 --> 0:01:12.839
<v Speaker 1>economic environment. But then just the level of competition, the

0:01:12.880 --> 0:01:17.120
<v Speaker 1>technology changes of everything moving digital. It's just lots of challenges,

0:01:17.160 --> 0:01:20.760
<v Speaker 1>which makes things fun to me. Okay, So when we

0:01:21.040 --> 0:01:24.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, we have been trying to figure out what

0:01:24.560 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 1>happens next. And you know, just when we thought the

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:28.679
<v Speaker 1>end of last year, we thought we had a good

0:01:28.680 --> 0:01:32.160
<v Speaker 1>handle on things. Of course, then you have the Ukraine war, um,

0:01:32.280 --> 0:01:34.080
<v Speaker 1>and we know the costs and we talked about the

0:01:34.160 --> 0:01:36.920
<v Speaker 1>humanitarian costs, which you know there is no excuse for,

0:01:37.080 --> 0:01:38.920
<v Speaker 1>but we're trying to figure out kind of where it

0:01:38.920 --> 0:01:40.680
<v Speaker 1>all goes. Do you feel like you have good visibility

0:01:40.800 --> 0:01:44.960
<v Speaker 1>because you play into individuals, small businesses, institutional What are

0:01:44.959 --> 0:01:46.760
<v Speaker 1>you seeing from them when you I'd say that the

0:01:46.800 --> 0:01:50.440
<v Speaker 1>economy is still on a very solid footing. Uh. You know,

0:01:50.560 --> 0:01:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the major worry at the moment is inflation. That inflation

0:01:55.800 --> 0:01:59.919
<v Speaker 1>is very harmful. Uh. It affects businesses, it affects individuals,

0:02:00.320 --> 0:02:06.040
<v Speaker 1>particularly those at the lower end of the economic means. UH,

0:02:06.080 --> 0:02:10.119
<v Speaker 1>and so getting inflation back under control is a very

0:02:10.320 --> 0:02:13.920
<v Speaker 1>urgent task, and I think the FED now is on it. UH.

0:02:14.000 --> 0:02:16.600
<v Speaker 1>They've made the first hike, and I think they've talked

0:02:16.600 --> 0:02:19.520
<v Speaker 1>about being aggressive to this is. Job one is to

0:02:19.600 --> 0:02:24.320
<v Speaker 1>bring this down. So UM, I think they'll hopefully engineer

0:02:24.360 --> 0:02:27.600
<v Speaker 1>a soft landing. That's that's you know what what would

0:02:27.600 --> 0:02:31.960
<v Speaker 1>be the desired outcome. But I think the economy has

0:02:32.080 --> 0:02:33.919
<v Speaker 1>enough power that if they go about it the right

0:02:33.919 --> 0:02:36.799
<v Speaker 1>way and they're measured and UH, they start to bring

0:02:36.800 --> 0:02:39.880
<v Speaker 1>inflation down, this could be a very good year for

0:02:40.120 --> 0:02:43.880
<v Speaker 1>the US economy for stocks ultimately could kind of bounce back.

0:02:43.919 --> 0:02:46.880
<v Speaker 1>If you get some kind of stalemate or resolution in

0:02:46.919 --> 0:02:49.600
<v Speaker 1>the Ukraine, UH, and the Fed does its job, it

0:02:49.639 --> 0:02:52.440
<v Speaker 1>can still be quite a positive year. What what does

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:55.280
<v Speaker 1>it mean to you in terms of of, you know,

0:02:55.280 --> 0:02:57.480
<v Speaker 1>how the Fed actually can pull this off. Does that

0:02:57.520 --> 0:02:59.919
<v Speaker 1>mean a fifty basis point? Yeah, I think they probably

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:02.680
<v Speaker 1>should should step it up a little bit for the

0:03:02.760 --> 0:03:05.000
<v Speaker 1>next meeting or two, and then kind of they can

0:03:05.040 --> 0:03:07.400
<v Speaker 1>sit back and digest. If they start to see the

0:03:07.480 --> 0:03:10.760
<v Speaker 1>numbers coming back down, then they could kind of go

0:03:10.960 --> 0:03:13.960
<v Speaker 1>drop back to twenty five and just again take the

0:03:14.040 --> 0:03:18.520
<v Speaker 1>data in and uh and even uh pause after a

0:03:18.560 --> 0:03:21.640
<v Speaker 1>certain time. But you know, right now the market is

0:03:21.680 --> 0:03:25.600
<v Speaker 1>projecting that the short rates go up to maybe two

0:03:25.639 --> 0:03:28.600
<v Speaker 1>and a half by the end of the year. Historically speaking,

0:03:28.720 --> 0:03:32.919
<v Speaker 1>that's still relatively low from an absolute standpoint, So I

0:03:32.960 --> 0:03:36.200
<v Speaker 1>don't think it chokes off economic activity. It doesn't choke

0:03:36.240 --> 0:03:38.880
<v Speaker 1>off all the private equity money going to work trying

0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:41.280
<v Speaker 1>to get deals done. The pipelines for deals are still

0:03:42.080 --> 0:03:45.520
<v Speaker 1>very strong, and people see that. The FEDS telegraphed what's happening.

0:03:45.680 --> 0:03:48.520
<v Speaker 1>But what's the biggest part of your business deposits loans?

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Individual loans business, Well, the kind of overall mix of

0:03:53.240 --> 0:03:56.400
<v Speaker 1>our loan book is about fifty four percent consumer and

0:03:56.480 --> 0:03:59.920
<v Speaker 1>forty six percent commercials, so we're pretty well balanced between

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:03.920
<v Speaker 1>serving individuals. I'd put small businesses in with individuals, and

0:04:03.960 --> 0:04:08.560
<v Speaker 1>then the commercial side. We we cover companies, middle market

0:04:08.560 --> 0:04:11.600
<v Speaker 1>companies from twenty five million up to mid corporate companies

0:04:11.640 --> 0:04:15.400
<v Speaker 1>with three billion in revenues, So that's that's been our focus.

0:04:15.560 --> 0:04:18.760
<v Speaker 1>What's demand among those two sides of the business in

0:04:18.880 --> 0:04:22.080
<v Speaker 1>terms of just business overall loan demand or and I'm

0:04:22.120 --> 0:04:25.520
<v Speaker 1>also curious about deposits, especially among individuals. Are they higher

0:04:25.560 --> 0:04:29.120
<v Speaker 1>than normal or yeah, deposits are still elevated given all

0:04:29.160 --> 0:04:31.800
<v Speaker 1>the liquidity that the FED pumped into the system and

0:04:31.800 --> 0:04:37.040
<v Speaker 1>that the government pushed out into into the economy. So um,

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:39.800
<v Speaker 1>I think. You know, most banks are sitting with relatively

0:04:39.960 --> 0:04:43.599
<v Speaker 1>low loan to deposit ratios and we're been waiting for

0:04:43.680 --> 0:04:47.080
<v Speaker 1>loan demand to pick up. We are seeing that our

0:04:47.160 --> 0:04:49.919
<v Speaker 1>rates to be able to charge to make more money

0:04:49.920 --> 0:04:52.520
<v Speaker 1>with the higher rates. So it looked going into the

0:04:52.600 --> 0:04:54.839
<v Speaker 1>year that all that was lined up very well because

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:57.160
<v Speaker 1>the loan growth and fourth quarter was quite high, both

0:04:57.160 --> 0:04:59.800
<v Speaker 1>on the consumer side and on the commercial side. Companies

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:02.480
<v Speaker 1>starting to draw down on their lines again so they

0:05:02.480 --> 0:05:07.200
<v Speaker 1>could make investments in inventories and plant and equipment to

0:05:07.320 --> 0:05:10.080
<v Speaker 1>meet the higher demand that they saw coming. So those

0:05:10.080 --> 0:05:13.120
<v Speaker 1>were all good signs. We haven't really seen an interruption

0:05:13.160 --> 0:05:15.920
<v Speaker 1>in that yet, so the first quarter it's still held

0:05:15.960 --> 0:05:19.839
<v Speaker 1>in pretty good. But again back to the macro, the

0:05:19.960 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 1>fear is if the Fed uh moves more aggressively or

0:05:23.240 --> 0:05:25.360
<v Speaker 1>if people start to pull back and say, well, I

0:05:25.360 --> 0:05:28.040
<v Speaker 1>don't know what's going to happen, that could cool that off.

0:05:28.080 --> 0:05:30.280
<v Speaker 1>A little bit, but at this point I'm going to

0:05:30.400 --> 0:05:33.800
<v Speaker 1>stay optimistic and say that won't happen. Bruce. I want

0:05:33.839 --> 0:05:35.160
<v Speaker 1>to go back to something that you said a little

0:05:35.160 --> 0:05:38.080
<v Speaker 1>earlier at the start of our discussion, talking about inflation

0:05:38.080 --> 0:05:40.919
<v Speaker 1>and hurting the consumer at the lower end of the

0:05:41.120 --> 0:05:44.600
<v Speaker 1>income spectrum. What do you hear from small businesses, from

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:47.919
<v Speaker 1>medium sized businesses, middle market businesses about inflation and the

0:05:47.920 --> 0:05:51.240
<v Speaker 1>effect that it's having on their costs. It depends on

0:05:51.400 --> 0:05:55.320
<v Speaker 1>the nature of the business. Um. I think many companies

0:05:55.360 --> 0:05:58.520
<v Speaker 1>have been able to pass through the inflation, so they're

0:05:58.560 --> 0:06:02.560
<v Speaker 1>maintaining their margins. Uh. And you know, I'd say the

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:06.280
<v Speaker 1>bigger the company, maybe the bigger capacity to do that.

0:06:06.680 --> 0:06:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Maybe not always as easy for smaller businesses, but even

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:13.480
<v Speaker 1>small businesses like restaurants. What what's the Have you been

0:06:13.520 --> 0:06:16.040
<v Speaker 1>out and had a stake lately? Yeah, exactly. I mean

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:21.279
<v Speaker 1>there's the higher costs for for labor and for the supplies,

0:06:21.400 --> 0:06:25.280
<v Speaker 1>the meat and other ingredients has gone up, so so

0:06:25.560 --> 0:06:29.000
<v Speaker 1>many people are able to pass that through at this point,

0:06:29.040 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 1>What about for you and in your firm are you

0:06:32.480 --> 0:06:35.560
<v Speaker 1>are you seeing higher costs? So we've had to take

0:06:35.640 --> 0:06:39.320
<v Speaker 1>people more. One of the nice things as an offset

0:06:39.480 --> 0:06:41.960
<v Speaker 1>is those higher rates mean we're going to start repricing

0:06:42.000 --> 0:06:46.159
<v Speaker 1>our loans faster than we repriced deposits, and so that

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:50.000
<v Speaker 1>additional income allows us to cover some of that higher

0:06:50.160 --> 0:06:53.240
<v Speaker 1>cost of our people. At this point. The other thing

0:06:53.279 --> 0:06:56.719
<v Speaker 1>that we constantly are seeking to do is to look

0:06:56.760 --> 0:06:59.160
<v Speaker 1>for ways to run the bank more efficiently, and so

0:06:59.200 --> 0:07:03.240
<v Speaker 1>we're trying to substitute capital. Can you use artificial intelligence

0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:07.560
<v Speaker 1>or can you use bots to automate some tasks that

0:07:07.680 --> 0:07:13.200
<v Speaker 1>used to require people that we're probably less uh enriching

0:07:13.280 --> 0:07:15.920
<v Speaker 1>from a from a kind of growth standpoint, the jobs

0:07:15.920 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 1>that menial things that that get in the way of

0:07:18.120 --> 0:07:21.640
<v Speaker 1>people enjoying their careers. Can we can we kind of

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:23.800
<v Speaker 1>take those off the table and allow people to do

0:07:23.880 --> 0:07:26.040
<v Speaker 1>some of the more higher value add stuff. We're talking

0:07:26.040 --> 0:07:28.720
<v Speaker 1>with Bruce beans On, chairman and CEO of Citizens Financial Group.

0:07:28.880 --> 0:07:32.200
<v Speaker 1>What what is the importance of still having branches like

0:07:32.280 --> 0:07:34.160
<v Speaker 1>k I'm amazed. I'll even walk in like the city

0:07:34.160 --> 0:07:36.280
<v Speaker 1>branch in the corner and it's like it's probab We

0:07:36.360 --> 0:07:39.440
<v Speaker 1>just we just uh you know, made a big play

0:07:39.440 --> 0:07:43.320
<v Speaker 1>to get into New York metro by buying HSBC's East

0:07:43.320 --> 0:07:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Coast branches and then buying Investors Bank, which is we

0:07:47.960 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 1>just got approval on this week from the FED, so

0:07:50.360 --> 0:07:53.000
<v Speaker 1>that'll close shortly, but that'll give us a combined two

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:57.160
<v Speaker 1>branches in the New York metro area, top ten deposit

0:07:57.200 --> 0:08:00.720
<v Speaker 1>market share, a million new customers. People say, I'm saying

0:08:00.720 --> 0:08:02.480
<v Speaker 1>you're all in on branches. All right, We're still in

0:08:02.520 --> 0:08:04.160
<v Speaker 1>on branches. So you say, well, Bruce, you know you

0:08:04.200 --> 0:08:06.800
<v Speaker 1>also launched a digital bank, so you have citizens access,

0:08:06.920 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 1>is doing business in fifty states. Why do you need branches? Uh? Interestingly,

0:08:11.560 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 1>are most satisfied customers value all our distribution channels. So

0:08:15.960 --> 0:08:19.600
<v Speaker 1>if you have a branch network where you can offer advice,

0:08:20.360 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 1>you have a digital channel where you can people use

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:25.320
<v Speaker 1>their phone and bank on their phone and make check

0:08:25.400 --> 0:08:28.920
<v Speaker 1>deposits and check balances. So it's convenience. You're offering convenience.

0:08:29.240 --> 0:08:31.280
<v Speaker 1>And then on the weekend that branches aren't open and

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:33.680
<v Speaker 1>you have a question, you can call the contact center.

0:08:34.040 --> 0:08:36.880
<v Speaker 1>If you have all those channels working at a high level,

0:08:36.960 --> 0:08:40.800
<v Speaker 1>seamlessly together, that's when you have a really satisfied customer.

0:08:40.920 --> 0:08:43.280
<v Speaker 1>So it's help me channel like retail. Yes exactly, that's

0:08:43.280 --> 0:08:46.199
<v Speaker 1>what's happening. Yeah. I just interviewed earlier today Jason Wilk,

0:08:46.360 --> 0:08:49.839
<v Speaker 1>the CEO of Dave, it's three billion dollar market cap

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:53.080
<v Speaker 1>fintech startup. But the idea is to displace banks the

0:08:53.080 --> 0:08:55.800
<v Speaker 1>same way that Chime is looking to do that. How

0:08:55.840 --> 0:08:57.920
<v Speaker 1>do you make sure that these you know, digital first

0:08:58.000 --> 0:09:02.359
<v Speaker 1>fin techs don't take customers from you? Well, I think, um,

0:09:02.440 --> 0:09:06.959
<v Speaker 1>there's lots of examples you mentioned those. There's uh the

0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:11.080
<v Speaker 1>payments companies are trying to take revenue streams away from banks.

0:09:11.080 --> 0:09:15.600
<v Speaker 1>I think what banks have is a full products set

0:09:15.760 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 1>and an ability to be an individual's trusted advisor on

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:24.280
<v Speaker 1>their life's journey. So that's where we're trying to position

0:09:24.320 --> 0:09:28.880
<v Speaker 1>ourselves that you should open your bank account at Citizens

0:09:29.080 --> 0:09:31.360
<v Speaker 1>and uh, look at all the great things we can

0:09:31.400 --> 0:09:33.280
<v Speaker 1>do for you. We can give you wealth advice, we

0:09:33.280 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 1>can figure out how to refinance your student loans. We

0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:39.360
<v Speaker 1>can help you buy your first house. We can give

0:09:39.400 --> 0:09:41.200
<v Speaker 1>you a home equity line of credit when that's an

0:09:41.200 --> 0:09:45.080
<v Speaker 1>advantageous way to borrow. So uh so banks that can

0:09:45.200 --> 0:09:48.400
<v Speaker 1>give you that advice to make you more successful on

0:09:48.440 --> 0:09:52.040
<v Speaker 1>your financial journey. I think that's hard for some of

0:09:52.040 --> 0:09:55.480
<v Speaker 1>these uh startups to compete against. And and they can

0:09:55.520 --> 0:09:58.679
<v Speaker 1>go in and uh, they can offer since they're they're

0:09:58.760 --> 0:10:02.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of a lot of times the profit motive is relaxed,

0:10:02.040 --> 0:10:07.120
<v Speaker 1>so they can uh offer services at below cost to

0:10:07.200 --> 0:10:11.080
<v Speaker 1>try to gain customers. But ultimately can they really deepen

0:10:11.160 --> 0:10:15.360
<v Speaker 1>that customer relation and turn those into profitable relationships is

0:10:15.360 --> 0:10:18.480
<v Speaker 1>still an open question. So the market is valuing them

0:10:18.559 --> 0:10:21.200
<v Speaker 1>on their growth rates, and so they're all pushing really

0:10:21.240 --> 0:10:25.319
<v Speaker 1>hard to just acquire customers. Many of these companies aren't profitable,

0:10:25.360 --> 0:10:29.520
<v Speaker 1>and the question is what what's the ultimate outcome for them?

0:10:29.679 --> 0:10:31.440
<v Speaker 1>But ultimate outcomes you want to make sure you're bringing

0:10:31.480 --> 0:10:33.640
<v Speaker 1>in younger customers right that you hold on grab them

0:10:33.679 --> 0:10:37.320
<v Speaker 1>young and do and and we are. So one of

0:10:37.320 --> 0:10:41.160
<v Speaker 1>the things we're focused on mass affluent young professionals. One

0:10:41.160 --> 0:10:44.920
<v Speaker 1>of our lead hook products there is student loan financing

0:10:44.960 --> 0:10:49.080
<v Speaker 1>for those people listening. If you're carrying some high costs

0:10:49.480 --> 0:10:55.839
<v Speaker 1>student debt many are. Unfortunately, there's opportunities to consolidate that

0:10:55.920 --> 0:10:58.480
<v Speaker 1>into a single loan at a lower interest rate and

0:10:58.480 --> 0:11:01.559
<v Speaker 1>we put money back in your pocket. Uh and so

0:11:01.559 --> 0:11:03.959
<v Speaker 1>so that's allowed us to gain a lot of market

0:11:04.000 --> 0:11:07.640
<v Speaker 1>share and get younger in our customer base. Quick question

0:11:07.720 --> 0:11:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Home buying is it happening slowing down just quickly? Home

0:11:11.240 --> 0:11:15.280
<v Speaker 1>buying is still uh in good shape. There's people who

0:11:15.520 --> 0:11:17.839
<v Speaker 1>are kind of figuring out the next phase of their

0:11:17.880 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 1>life and they're moving around a bit, and so I

0:11:20.840 --> 0:11:22.960
<v Speaker 1>think the purchase market's going to stay strong this year.

0:11:23.480 --> 0:11:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much, great interview, and thanks so much

0:11:26.040 --> 0:11:27.839
<v Speaker 1>for giving us a bunch of time. Bruce Fanson, He's

0:11:27.880 --> 0:11:30.560
<v Speaker 1>chairman and chief executive officer of Citizens Financial Group. Here

0:11:30.760 --> 0:11:35.000
<v Speaker 1>in our Interactive Broker Studio, you're listening to Bloomberg Business

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovic

0:11:39.320 --> 0:11:42.520
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio. So a story online of Bloomberg Business

0:11:42.559 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Week on the Bloomberg terminals, but Hong Kong and how

0:11:44.679 --> 0:11:46.880
<v Speaker 1>it went from COVID zero to one of the world's

0:11:46.920 --> 0:11:49.920
<v Speaker 1>deadliest outbreaks. To him, how did this happen? Well? Joel

0:11:49.920 --> 0:11:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Webber is editor at Bloomberg Business Week. Keep with us

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:55.120
<v Speaker 1>in the Bloomberg Interactor Broker Studio. Ian Marlow is Asia

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Government senior reporter for Bloomberg News. He joins us on

0:11:57.600 --> 0:12:00.120
<v Speaker 1>the phone from Canada. The story by Ian Marlow and

0:12:00.280 --> 0:12:02.720
<v Speaker 1>surely Jao you can read in story on the Bloomberg

0:12:02.760 --> 0:12:05.120
<v Speaker 1>terminal and at Bloomberg dot com slash business Week, Joel,

0:12:05.400 --> 0:12:07.560
<v Speaker 1>when we think about Hong Kong and during the course

0:12:07.559 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 1>of the pandemic, oftentimes we think about how good of

0:12:10.000 --> 0:12:13.360
<v Speaker 1>a job it has done in controlling the spread of

0:12:13.400 --> 0:12:16.239
<v Speaker 1>the outbreak. It was all well and good until omicron

0:12:17.000 --> 0:12:20.720
<v Speaker 1>COVID zero worked really really well for a long time

0:12:21.000 --> 0:12:23.280
<v Speaker 1>in Hong Kong, and then all of a sudden it didn't.

0:12:23.440 --> 0:12:27.440
<v Speaker 1>And what's really surprising about Ian's reporting in this story

0:12:27.600 --> 0:12:31.760
<v Speaker 1>is it shows you know, just how contagious something like

0:12:31.800 --> 0:12:35.000
<v Speaker 1>omicron can be. They had some mechanisms in place, and

0:12:35.040 --> 0:12:39.160
<v Speaker 1>they basically were overwhelmed by them because the virus um

0:12:39.400 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 1>spread so quickly and became incredibly lethal. Because there was

0:12:43.559 --> 0:12:47.160
<v Speaker 1>also some lackadaisical qualities that I think we're bred and

0:12:47.160 --> 0:12:50.559
<v Speaker 1>while a lot of people never got vaccinated, there's distrust

0:12:50.600 --> 0:12:55.559
<v Speaker 1>between citizens and state. Um that or you probably unique

0:12:55.600 --> 0:12:59.120
<v Speaker 1>to Hong Kong. Um. And you know Ian from the

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:02.080
<v Speaker 1>outside looking and um, you know you you live in

0:13:02.160 --> 0:13:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Hong Kong, You're you're stuck in Toronto, can't get back yet, um.

0:13:06.320 --> 0:13:09.359
<v Speaker 1>And yet this, you know, it has been a devastating

0:13:09.480 --> 0:13:12.679
<v Speaker 1>impact on especially the elderly community in Hong Kong. What

0:13:13.040 --> 0:13:15.640
<v Speaker 1>have you? What did you learned outside looking in during

0:13:15.640 --> 0:13:20.480
<v Speaker 1>the course of reporting the story. Yeah, I think the

0:13:20.520 --> 0:13:23.840
<v Speaker 1>one thing that that really struck me was just how

0:13:24.000 --> 0:13:28.600
<v Speaker 1>little the government had done to prepare for what, to

0:13:28.679 --> 0:13:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the rest of us seemed like the inevitable, the fact

0:13:31.640 --> 0:13:34.880
<v Speaker 1>that the virus was going to come in. It looked

0:13:34.920 --> 0:13:39.040
<v Speaker 1>like they were basically overconfident that there was a case

0:13:39.120 --> 0:13:41.800
<v Speaker 1>of hubris. And we had seen this kind of play

0:13:41.840 --> 0:13:45.920
<v Speaker 1>out across a couple of different so COVID zero or

0:13:45.960 --> 0:13:50.560
<v Speaker 1>elimination uh places like in Taiwan, and in New Zealand,

0:13:50.880 --> 0:13:52.679
<v Speaker 1>uh and and in the mainland right now, which is

0:13:52.720 --> 0:13:56.280
<v Speaker 1>also facing a big outbreak. Uh. But I think everyone

0:13:56.400 --> 0:13:59.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of assumed that at least the government might have

0:13:59.520 --> 0:14:05.000
<v Speaker 1>been doing something ramping up isolation facilities for example, or

0:14:05.679 --> 0:14:10.520
<v Speaker 1>uh you know, having some kind of contingency plan in place, uh,

0:14:10.559 --> 0:14:14.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, for once cases started rising beyond the capacity

0:14:14.360 --> 0:14:18.280
<v Speaker 1>of these really owners travel restrictions and contact tracing regimes

0:14:18.320 --> 0:14:20.560
<v Speaker 1>that had kept the virus out for so long, because

0:14:20.600 --> 0:14:23.880
<v Speaker 1>of course they had these contingency plans in place in

0:14:23.920 --> 0:14:27.560
<v Speaker 1>general for pandemics, because of their experience with stars about

0:14:27.560 --> 0:14:30.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty years ago. So it was pretty shocking I think

0:14:30.880 --> 0:14:33.200
<v Speaker 1>for for the city to go from a place that

0:14:33.280 --> 0:14:36.800
<v Speaker 1>was totally calm, had spent two years basically dodging the

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:39.720
<v Speaker 1>worst of the pandemic uh to then end up in

0:14:39.720 --> 0:14:46.280
<v Speaker 1>a style outbreak UHO when there's vaccines that are you know,

0:14:46.320 --> 0:14:48.480
<v Speaker 1>fully available for everyone. So I think that was that

0:14:48.560 --> 0:14:50.520
<v Speaker 1>was shocking, I think for people in Hong Kong, and

0:14:50.560 --> 0:14:52.560
<v Speaker 1>can you explain what's like there for people who haven't

0:14:52.560 --> 0:14:54.480
<v Speaker 1>been to Hong Kong, For people haven't spent time. They're

0:14:54.640 --> 0:14:57.080
<v Speaker 1>very densely populated. A lot of people live in really

0:14:57.120 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 1>really small homes. And I mean when I say small,

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:01.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean the way you write about them, as you

0:15:01.680 --> 0:15:07.480
<v Speaker 1>describe them as coffins. Yeah, exactly. I mean in Hong

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Kong the government refers to them UH as subdivided housing units,

0:15:11.520 --> 0:15:14.280
<v Speaker 1>but really we're talking about a bed with some stuff

0:15:14.320 --> 0:15:17.359
<v Speaker 1>strung up around it. There's a lot of uh inequality

0:15:17.360 --> 0:15:20.040
<v Speaker 1>in Hong Kong. It's obviously the one of the most

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:22.760
<v Speaker 1>expensive housing markets in the world. A lot of people

0:15:23.160 --> 0:15:25.800
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of the poorest neighborhoods are crammed into

0:15:25.840 --> 0:15:31.040
<v Speaker 1>places that just will not work with a mainland China

0:15:31.120 --> 0:15:33.880
<v Speaker 1>style lockdown, and so that was one of the reasons

0:15:33.920 --> 0:15:37.320
<v Speaker 1>why the government from the beginning was kind of reluctant

0:15:37.400 --> 0:15:41.120
<v Speaker 1>to really impose the kind of harsh measures that everyone

0:15:41.200 --> 0:15:44.720
<v Speaker 1>is familiar with from Wuhan and and other Chinese cities.

0:15:44.760 --> 0:15:48.080
<v Speaker 1>But but once on the cron got in, Uh, this

0:15:48.160 --> 0:15:50.640
<v Speaker 1>isn't a place really where you can even really isolate

0:15:50.680 --> 0:15:53.160
<v Speaker 1>at home. I mean, uh, you know, the high rises

0:15:53.200 --> 0:15:55.480
<v Speaker 1>of New York and other American cities are one thing,

0:15:55.560 --> 0:15:58.160
<v Speaker 1>but I mean Hong Kong, everyone is sort of packed

0:15:58.160 --> 0:16:00.360
<v Speaker 1>into ten percent of the land maps one of the

0:16:00.440 --> 0:16:03.280
<v Speaker 1>densest cities on Earth, and so there was a lot

0:16:03.320 --> 0:16:06.200
<v Speaker 1>of what they called, you know, in epidemologicals, are in

0:16:06.560 --> 0:16:10.640
<v Speaker 1>vertical transmission. People were infecting their neighbors up and down. Uh.

0:16:10.720 --> 0:16:14.440
<v Speaker 1>There were you know, a bathroom and kitchen exhaust fans

0:16:14.560 --> 0:16:16.960
<v Speaker 1>that were kicking the virus all around these really densely

0:16:17.000 --> 0:16:20.760
<v Speaker 1>populated high rises. And once on the cron got in, Uh,

0:16:20.960 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 1>it really raced like wildfire through the city and there

0:16:23.840 --> 0:16:28.200
<v Speaker 1>was a race kind of whackable locking down all these

0:16:28.520 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 1>high rise towers. At one point early on in the

0:16:31.720 --> 0:16:35.480
<v Speaker 1>in the pandemic, my building was locked down entirely because

0:16:35.680 --> 0:16:38.800
<v Speaker 1>there was a single COVID case UH in one of

0:16:38.880 --> 0:16:41.800
<v Speaker 1>the two towers UH and the cops pulled up outside

0:16:41.880 --> 0:16:45.360
<v Speaker 1>lost everyone in until everyone had been tested and everyone

0:16:45.440 --> 0:16:47.960
<v Speaker 1>tested negative. So this is a city that really took

0:16:48.000 --> 0:16:51.200
<v Speaker 1>everything very seriously. But once the cases started, you know,

0:16:51.320 --> 0:16:54.920
<v Speaker 1>going from a handful to you know, tens of thousands

0:16:54.960 --> 0:16:56.360
<v Speaker 1>a day. At one point it was well over fifty

0:16:56.400 --> 0:16:58.400
<v Speaker 1>thousand a day in a city that had spent most

0:16:58.440 --> 0:17:01.360
<v Speaker 1>of the last year at zero hate to day. There

0:17:01.400 --> 0:17:04.479
<v Speaker 1>are measures just could not keep up with what was happening,

0:17:04.880 --> 0:17:08.320
<v Speaker 1>and healthcare system just utterly and totally collapsed. And how

0:17:08.400 --> 0:17:10.480
<v Speaker 1>much of a problem too, is I mean, obviously sounds

0:17:10.480 --> 0:17:12.760
<v Speaker 1>like a policy failure. We talked about you right about

0:17:12.760 --> 0:17:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the government enforcement of the new National Security Law and

0:17:15.520 --> 0:17:18.600
<v Speaker 1>how that has effectively banned political opposition. And I think

0:17:18.640 --> 0:17:21.440
<v Speaker 1>about you know, lack of access to maybe you know,

0:17:21.560 --> 0:17:25.439
<v Speaker 1>more global media to really understand this global pandemic. How

0:17:25.520 --> 0:17:30.000
<v Speaker 1>much of that is also to blame. Yeah, I think

0:17:30.080 --> 0:17:34.840
<v Speaker 1>there's a large element of this preventable outbreak that was political.

0:17:35.480 --> 0:17:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Hong Kong has adopted a mainland style COVID zero approach

0:17:42.160 --> 0:17:45.840
<v Speaker 1>to total elimination of the virus, So there was no

0:17:46.040 --> 0:17:50.239
<v Speaker 1>tolerance for any cases whatsoever, even when vaccines were uh

0:17:50.359 --> 0:17:53.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, being administered throughout the city. So this was

0:17:53.600 --> 0:17:57.280
<v Speaker 1>a problem from the very beginning that had uh you know,

0:17:57.359 --> 0:18:00.600
<v Speaker 1>political routs. The last two years of the pandemic had

0:18:00.720 --> 0:18:05.640
<v Speaker 1>basically been two years of Beijing taking unprecedented political control

0:18:05.920 --> 0:18:09.840
<v Speaker 1>over over Hong Kong in the in the wake of

0:18:09.920 --> 0:18:13.760
<v Speaker 1>those democracy protests that everyone saw in twenty nineteen, which

0:18:13.840 --> 0:18:17.560
<v Speaker 1>only really dissipated once social distancing measures came down because

0:18:17.600 --> 0:18:21.239
<v Speaker 1>of the pandemic. So even at the city was uh

0:18:21.520 --> 0:18:24.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, preparing for this, uh you know, preparing for

0:18:24.760 --> 0:18:27.399
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic and putting in all these measures, Beijing was

0:18:27.440 --> 0:18:30.560
<v Speaker 1>taking more control, and what was generally considered a very

0:18:31.000 --> 0:18:36.399
<v Speaker 1>efficient technocratic, uh you know, free market government just became

0:18:36.520 --> 0:18:39.760
<v Speaker 1>more and more under this way of China. All Right,

0:18:39.920 --> 0:18:42.159
<v Speaker 1>we gotta run. Hey, listen, great stuff, Ian, Thank you

0:18:42.240 --> 0:18:45.080
<v Speaker 1>so much. Ian Marlowe of course at Bloomberg News until Webber,

0:18:45.240 --> 0:18:48.760
<v Speaker 1>editor of Bloomberg Business Week. This is Bloomberg Business Week

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:52.840
<v Speaker 1>with Carol Measure and Bloomberg Quick Takes. Tim Stinovic on

0:18:53.080 --> 0:18:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. We did have a bunch of headlines coming

0:18:56.080 --> 0:18:57.879
<v Speaker 1>out of Europe. I feel like, Tim, I I can

0:18:57.920 --> 0:19:00.440
<v Speaker 1>barely keep up, you know, I can't even there. And

0:19:00.680 --> 0:19:02.480
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't just have to do with the war, but

0:19:02.600 --> 0:19:05.000
<v Speaker 1>it also has to do with the rising COVID cases

0:19:05.040 --> 0:19:07.560
<v Speaker 1>in some parts of the world. Uh. And of course

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:10.320
<v Speaker 1>much of the West focused on there as President Biden

0:19:10.400 --> 0:19:13.679
<v Speaker 1>continues to make his way across the across the continent. Right.

0:19:13.720 --> 0:19:15.080
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I've talked about just like one of

0:19:15.119 --> 0:19:16.960
<v Speaker 1>the headlines out of Europe that have really caught us

0:19:17.080 --> 0:19:19.520
<v Speaker 1>is about the possible use by Russia of weapons of

0:19:19.600 --> 0:19:22.080
<v Speaker 1>mass destruction and nuclear weapons. So we kind of have

0:19:22.400 --> 0:19:24.200
<v Speaker 1>I feel like a perfect guest to tackle it all.

0:19:24.600 --> 0:19:27.280
<v Speaker 1>And so let's bring in Crystal Watson, Senior scholar at

0:19:27.320 --> 0:19:29.760
<v Speaker 1>the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security at the Bloomberg

0:19:29.800 --> 0:19:32.320
<v Speaker 1>School of Public Health, the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of

0:19:32.320 --> 0:19:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Public Health that is supported by Michael or Bloomberg, the

0:19:35.160 --> 0:19:38.680
<v Speaker 1>founder of Bloomberg LP and Bloomberg Philanthropies. Dr Watson, really

0:19:38.760 --> 0:19:40.040
<v Speaker 1>good to have you with us. I do want to

0:19:40.080 --> 0:19:42.160
<v Speaker 1>get to COVID in just a few minutes, but uh,

0:19:43.000 --> 0:19:45.639
<v Speaker 1>a little earlier in our program. Um, Carol and I

0:19:45.760 --> 0:19:50.040
<v Speaker 1>were talking about Yen Stoltenberg of NATO and what he

0:19:50.200 --> 0:19:53.359
<v Speaker 1>said with regard to chemical and biological weapons. And this

0:19:53.520 --> 0:19:56.720
<v Speaker 1>is part of your specialty at the Johns Hopkins Center

0:19:56.760 --> 0:19:59.399
<v Speaker 1>for Health Security at the Bloomberg School of Public Health. UM,

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:03.200
<v Speaker 1>explain what's at risk here if Russia were to use

0:20:03.359 --> 0:20:10.040
<v Speaker 1>chemical weapons. Yeah, thanks for having me on. I think, um,

0:20:10.200 --> 0:20:14.359
<v Speaker 1>we have seen the devastation that chemical weapons can cause,

0:20:14.520 --> 0:20:18.159
<v Speaker 1>and and most of the world has committed to not

0:20:18.400 --> 0:20:22.600
<v Speaker 1>using chemical weapons to via international treaty. UM. So I

0:20:23.080 --> 0:20:25.000
<v Speaker 1>think that it will put a lot of things up

0:20:25.000 --> 0:20:27.679
<v Speaker 1>in the air if Russia did choose to use chemical

0:20:27.760 --> 0:20:34.040
<v Speaker 1>weapons UM against the Ukrainian people, because they're they're definitely

0:20:34.760 --> 0:20:39.080
<v Speaker 1>their norms against this, their heart prohibitions against the use

0:20:39.119 --> 0:20:42.960
<v Speaker 1>of chemical weapons. UM. But we also have the complicated

0:20:43.040 --> 0:20:46.080
<v Speaker 1>history of with what history, with what's happened in Syria

0:20:46.800 --> 0:20:50.360
<v Speaker 1>and the lack of our in terms of a red

0:20:50.400 --> 0:20:55.000
<v Speaker 1>line for Syria. I think that the response will be complicated. Well,

0:20:55.080 --> 0:20:57.560
<v Speaker 1>can you can you define biological and chemical weapons for

0:20:57.760 --> 0:21:01.280
<v Speaker 1>our audience and help us just understand what they are

0:21:01.359 --> 0:21:06.439
<v Speaker 1>and what they do. Yeah, So, biological and chemical weapons

0:21:06.480 --> 0:21:11.679
<v Speaker 1>are two separate categories. Of unconventional weapons UM that are

0:21:11.760 --> 0:21:15.880
<v Speaker 1>both banned by international treaty and have signatories from most

0:21:15.920 --> 0:21:20.240
<v Speaker 1>countries around the world. UM Biological Both of these weapons

0:21:20.359 --> 0:21:24.520
<v Speaker 1>would be UM the use of a biological agents or

0:21:24.680 --> 0:21:28.520
<v Speaker 1>chemical agents in a way that is intended to harm

0:21:28.760 --> 0:21:33.240
<v Speaker 1>individuals or use on a larger scale potentially as well.

0:21:33.960 --> 0:21:38.399
<v Speaker 1>And so UM any any chemical or biological agent that

0:21:38.600 --> 0:21:42.080
<v Speaker 1>is used in that way can be considered UM banned

0:21:42.280 --> 0:21:47.240
<v Speaker 1>under the Biological Weapons Convention or the Chemical Weapons Convention.

0:21:48.080 --> 0:21:50.560
<v Speaker 1>So what do like, where are we in terms of

0:21:50.680 --> 0:21:56.400
<v Speaker 1>like I understand, you know, weapons to counteract missile attacks

0:21:56.480 --> 0:21:59.600
<v Speaker 1>and so and so forth. You know what realistically, like

0:22:00.080 --> 0:22:02.320
<v Speaker 1>do you guys talk about it? John's Hopkins when it

0:22:02.400 --> 0:22:05.560
<v Speaker 1>comes to what we might not need to do if

0:22:05.600 --> 0:22:07.840
<v Speaker 1>there is some kind of attack, or what can we

0:22:08.000 --> 0:22:10.920
<v Speaker 1>do ahead of time to kind of protect ourselves. What

0:22:11.040 --> 0:22:13.040
<v Speaker 1>are what are the smart conversations we need to be

0:22:13.119 --> 0:22:18.119
<v Speaker 1>having the realistic ones. I think, UM, we need to

0:22:18.200 --> 0:22:21.680
<v Speaker 1>talk about what would actually be the goals of of

0:22:22.000 --> 0:22:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Russia using these weapons against the Ukrainian people. UM. I

0:22:26.600 --> 0:22:30.160
<v Speaker 1>think with there's a higher likelihood of use of chemical

0:22:30.600 --> 0:22:35.920
<v Speaker 1>weapons because of the history of use, the recent history

0:22:35.960 --> 0:22:39.280
<v Speaker 1>of use by Russia and our support of youth in

0:22:39.440 --> 0:22:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Syria against the Syrian people. So looking at what what

0:22:44.280 --> 0:22:49.600
<v Speaker 1>that would actually um do for prutent efforts, I think

0:22:49.840 --> 0:22:52.880
<v Speaker 1>is will help us give an understanding of the likelihood

0:22:52.960 --> 0:22:56.399
<v Speaker 1>of their use. I do think it's less likely that

0:22:56.520 --> 0:23:01.000
<v Speaker 1>biological weapons can be will be used because they're they

0:23:01.160 --> 0:23:06.159
<v Speaker 1>provide less of a strategic advantage UM than chemical weapons might.

0:23:07.359 --> 0:23:10.760
<v Speaker 1>I hope that neither of them are really on the table,

0:23:10.920 --> 0:23:14.000
<v Speaker 1>But we have seen a history of violations by by

0:23:14.080 --> 0:23:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Russia of both of these treaties, and so I think

0:23:16.640 --> 0:23:20.320
<v Speaker 1>we need to plan for um the case that they

0:23:20.400 --> 0:23:23.360
<v Speaker 1>might be used. So we've only got about a minute

0:23:23.359 --> 0:23:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and a half left here. I mean, all of this

0:23:24.960 --> 0:23:27.800
<v Speaker 1>is so heavy, Uh, just when we think, you know,

0:23:27.920 --> 0:23:30.399
<v Speaker 1>two years were coming out of the pandemic and and

0:23:30.720 --> 0:23:34.040
<v Speaker 1>and you know, we're not in Ukraine and or we're

0:23:34.080 --> 0:23:36.320
<v Speaker 1>not a refugee, or we haven't lost family members, so

0:23:36.440 --> 0:23:40.520
<v Speaker 1>we know how difficult UM this this has been when

0:23:40.600 --> 0:23:43.680
<v Speaker 1>it comes to the pandemic. What's front and center for you?

0:23:43.840 --> 0:23:45.600
<v Speaker 1>What are you thinking about in terms of these sub

0:23:45.680 --> 0:23:49.960
<v Speaker 1>variants macron some sub variant. Are you anticipating another spike?

0:23:50.040 --> 0:23:52.440
<v Speaker 1>We just did a story from Business Week about what's

0:23:52.440 --> 0:23:54.240
<v Speaker 1>going on in Hong Kong. Right now, we're watching what's

0:23:54.240 --> 0:23:57.119
<v Speaker 1>going on overseas. UM. Are you anticipating we're going to

0:23:57.200 --> 0:24:01.640
<v Speaker 1>see some kind of spike here and just got about seconds? Sure? Yeah,

0:24:01.720 --> 0:24:04.560
<v Speaker 1>we are seeing in Europe and it may be contributing

0:24:04.600 --> 0:24:07.040
<v Speaker 1>to some of the spikes in in such as an

0:24:07.080 --> 0:24:10.320
<v Speaker 1>in Hong Kong and in South Korea. UM. This is

0:24:10.359 --> 0:24:13.320
<v Speaker 1>the B A to sub variant of omicron, and so

0:24:14.040 --> 0:24:16.639
<v Speaker 1>we are starting to see some upticking cases in New

0:24:16.720 --> 0:24:20.440
<v Speaker 1>York for example, UM and Texas in the US and

0:24:20.520 --> 0:24:23.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe a few other places and some indication in wastewater

0:24:24.040 --> 0:24:27.480
<v Speaker 1>surveillance that we may be seeing UM more virus circulating

0:24:27.520 --> 0:24:29.960
<v Speaker 1>and wastewater. So I think we have to prepare that

0:24:30.040 --> 0:24:32.680
<v Speaker 1>we may see an additional omicron surge with the B

0:24:32.880 --> 0:24:35.200
<v Speaker 1>I two subpariant. What is that just in the last

0:24:35.240 --> 0:24:37.000
<v Speaker 1>thirty seconds we have with you, Dr Watson, What does

0:24:37.040 --> 0:24:38.760
<v Speaker 1>that surge look like? Should we be prepared for something

0:24:38.800 --> 0:24:42.280
<v Speaker 1>that we saw in December in January? I think it

0:24:42.440 --> 0:24:45.840
<v Speaker 1>will in terms of severity, will probably look similar to

0:24:46.000 --> 0:24:50.120
<v Speaker 1>the prior omicron surge. UM. Hopefully it won't be as high,

0:24:50.359 --> 0:24:52.840
<v Speaker 1>but we still have a large proportion of the populations

0:24:52.840 --> 0:24:56.720
<v Speaker 1>who haven't been infected by omicron so I we have

0:24:56.840 --> 0:24:59.359
<v Speaker 1>seen in Europe, for example, that it has been a

0:24:59.640 --> 0:25:02.879
<v Speaker 1>large She's blowed well. We are so grateful that we

0:25:02.920 --> 0:25:04.879
<v Speaker 1>got some time with you. Dr Crystal Watson. She is

0:25:04.920 --> 0:25:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Senior Scholar at the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security

0:25:07.520 --> 0:25:10.240
<v Speaker 1>at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. On

0:25:10.320 --> 0:25:13.480
<v Speaker 1>the phone from Baltimore, of course, supported by Michael R. Bloomberg,

0:25:13.520 --> 0:25:17.480
<v Speaker 1>founder of Bloomberg Philanthropies and Bloomberg LP Carol Master, Tim Stanovic.

0:25:18.040 --> 0:25:25.200
<v Speaker 1>We are Bloomberg Radio. I'm road Michael, Yeah, but you

0:25:25.280 --> 0:25:31.520
<v Speaker 1>let me drive? No, no, no, all right, please Gravels.

0:25:32.520 --> 0:25:37.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to drive. It's a good question. Drive

0:25:40.240 --> 0:25:47.440
<v Speaker 1>this ride to the close on Bloomberg Radio. All right, everybody,

0:25:47.520 --> 0:25:49.639
<v Speaker 1>just about ten minutes left in the trading session on

0:25:49.720 --> 0:25:52.160
<v Speaker 1>this Thursday, on this Friday's even we're seeing an uptick.

0:25:52.200 --> 0:25:54.919
<v Speaker 1>We've been seeing some buying into the clothes, as Charlie mentioned,

0:25:55.119 --> 0:25:57.360
<v Speaker 1>pretty much at our best levels of the session. And Tim,

0:25:57.760 --> 0:26:00.440
<v Speaker 1>once again, we're seeing some tech aut performance here. Help

0:26:00.520 --> 0:26:02.720
<v Speaker 1>us make sense of it. Hillary Kramer, President and Chief

0:26:02.800 --> 0:26:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Investment Officer at a n G Capital Research. Hillary Kramer

0:26:06.240 --> 0:26:08.359
<v Speaker 1>is also the author of Game Changer Investing, How to

0:26:08.440 --> 0:26:11.359
<v Speaker 1>Profit from Tomorrow's billion dollar trend. She joins us once

0:26:11.400 --> 0:26:13.280
<v Speaker 1>again on the phone from New York City, So help

0:26:13.359 --> 0:26:15.480
<v Speaker 1>us make sense of it, Hillary, It's it's we're just

0:26:16.240 --> 0:26:17.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you if you go back to where

0:26:17.840 --> 0:26:19.760
<v Speaker 1>we were a little over a week ago, it's a

0:26:19.840 --> 0:26:23.720
<v Speaker 1>completely different mood in the market. Yes, we're really riding.

0:26:24.200 --> 0:26:27.119
<v Speaker 1>We're really riding ourselves up into that end of the quarter.

0:26:27.720 --> 0:26:31.720
<v Speaker 1>It's it's window dressing for the most part. And all

0:26:31.760 --> 0:26:34.680
<v Speaker 1>them easy money's pretty much Jim been made here already.

0:26:34.840 --> 0:26:37.720
<v Speaker 1>What do you mean, it's just window dressing end of

0:26:37.800 --> 0:26:41.199
<v Speaker 1>the quarter. All of the fund managers, you know, they

0:26:41.240 --> 0:26:44.680
<v Speaker 1>were miserable early on, and this is an opportunity just

0:26:45.480 --> 0:26:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the group think with just all buy. And of course

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:51.480
<v Speaker 1>you have to combine it with some reality, which is

0:26:51.560 --> 0:26:57.040
<v Speaker 1>for example, like Intel and then video today. Yeah, performance, right, Well,

0:26:57.040 --> 0:26:58.520
<v Speaker 1>it's funny that you say that, right, so that when

0:26:58.560 --> 0:27:00.280
<v Speaker 1>we open up or check out our quarter list, aiments

0:27:00.280 --> 0:27:02.200
<v Speaker 1>were like, oh yeah, they were good, they were smart,

0:27:02.240 --> 0:27:04.080
<v Speaker 1>they were in some of the top performers. Right, that's

0:27:04.119 --> 0:27:08.399
<v Speaker 1>some of the window dressing. That's going on well longer

0:27:08.600 --> 0:27:10.960
<v Speaker 1>term now, you know, Hillary, we are at this point,

0:27:11.080 --> 0:27:15.280
<v Speaker 1>this this UM point where we're trying to figure out

0:27:15.880 --> 0:27:18.800
<v Speaker 1>are we topping out on yields? Are we bottoming out

0:27:18.880 --> 0:27:21.880
<v Speaker 1>on equity selling? Is it too early to make that call?

0:27:21.960 --> 0:27:26.040
<v Speaker 1>In your view, it is too early because we have

0:27:26.520 --> 0:27:30.800
<v Speaker 1>the federal reserve next month, and we have earnings, and

0:27:31.000 --> 0:27:34.679
<v Speaker 1>those two are the big factors. And Carol, I'm always

0:27:34.800 --> 0:27:38.880
<v Speaker 1>saying Mark is going to go up. You know, we're debarish, bullish,

0:27:39.480 --> 0:27:43.280
<v Speaker 1>But in this particular case, we really have to see

0:27:43.359 --> 0:27:47.280
<v Speaker 1>what happens with earnings up to combined earnings for hundred

0:27:47.359 --> 0:27:51.359
<v Speaker 1>looks to be about two thirty dollars, and we'll see

0:27:51.440 --> 0:27:53.800
<v Speaker 1>if we're really going to make it and uh and

0:27:53.920 --> 0:27:56.600
<v Speaker 1>what those CEOs have to say about the supply side.

0:27:56.920 --> 0:27:59.240
<v Speaker 1>But we but we still have revenue growth right like

0:27:59.359 --> 0:28:02.560
<v Speaker 1>it's I mean, the economy is still growing um and

0:28:02.680 --> 0:28:05.760
<v Speaker 1>we still have revenue growth. We just had on UM

0:28:05.880 --> 0:28:08.240
<v Speaker 1>the CEO of Citizens Financial Group. You know, they are

0:28:08.240 --> 0:28:10.960
<v Speaker 1>publicly held bank, twenty billion market camp. They just made

0:28:11.080 --> 0:28:13.879
<v Speaker 1>some acquisitions and branches here in New York City, and

0:28:14.160 --> 0:28:17.439
<v Speaker 1>he had optimism about the outlook even the housing market

0:28:18.000 --> 0:28:20.399
<v Speaker 1>um and thinking that in the face of what he

0:28:20.480 --> 0:28:24.320
<v Speaker 1>expects and things should be a more aggressive fed. Well,

0:28:24.480 --> 0:28:28.080
<v Speaker 1>we have revenue growth because we have such high inflation

0:28:28.560 --> 0:28:31.399
<v Speaker 1>and there's so much money slashing around, and people have

0:28:31.720 --> 0:28:35.440
<v Speaker 1>made a lot of money, and a group of people

0:28:35.520 --> 0:28:40.400
<v Speaker 1>that didn't make money previously, the renovators, the contractors, the plumbers,

0:28:40.480 --> 0:28:44.480
<v Speaker 1>the electricians, so they've made so much money they're spending.

0:28:45.160 --> 0:28:48.280
<v Speaker 1>That's a lot of why revenue growth is in the picture.

0:28:48.360 --> 0:28:51.760
<v Speaker 1>And the banks are very happy because they've really taken

0:28:51.840 --> 0:28:55.480
<v Speaker 1>better care of their balance sheet. Uh, going into anything

0:28:55.560 --> 0:28:58.240
<v Speaker 1>that could be scary looking if you're looking over a cliff.

0:28:59.080 --> 0:29:01.160
<v Speaker 1>So why do we need to keep an eye on

0:29:01.200 --> 0:29:03.880
<v Speaker 1>in terms of earnings as the next catalyst? You said that,

0:29:04.320 --> 0:29:06.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's really what we need to be focused on.

0:29:06.280 --> 0:29:08.920
<v Speaker 1>But what are the red flags or or what are

0:29:09.000 --> 0:29:11.440
<v Speaker 1>you really going to try to watch to help you

0:29:11.560 --> 0:29:15.560
<v Speaker 1>understand how these companies are are taking this inflationary environment.

0:29:16.320 --> 0:29:19.560
<v Speaker 1>It's the industrials and it's and it's the banks and

0:29:19.640 --> 0:29:22.560
<v Speaker 1>what they are going to tell us. Yes, those those

0:29:22.600 --> 0:29:24.440
<v Speaker 1>are the two that I'm going to really have my

0:29:24.560 --> 0:29:27.120
<v Speaker 1>eye on. And as we know, the banks come first. Yeah,

0:29:27.200 --> 0:29:30.440
<v Speaker 1>JP Morgan right April thirteen, six in the morning. It's

0:29:30.520 --> 0:29:32.480
<v Speaker 1>just around the corner. Having said that, in terms of

0:29:32.480 --> 0:29:35.960
<v Speaker 1>the banks, you like Goldman Sacks. I love Goldman Sachs

0:29:36.040 --> 0:29:41.320
<v Speaker 1>and I have for a while Carol Goldman Sachs. It

0:29:41.560 --> 0:29:45.640
<v Speaker 1>is a bargain at two point four percent of it

0:29:45.760 --> 0:29:49.560
<v Speaker 1>in yield right, it's certainly way off of it's fifty

0:29:49.600 --> 0:29:53.680
<v Speaker 1>two week high and can really benefit in a market

0:29:53.760 --> 0:29:56.920
<v Speaker 1>that has volatility because in many ways they're able to

0:29:57.040 --> 0:29:58.720
<v Speaker 1>use their balance sheet and they're able to use it

0:29:58.760 --> 0:30:01.800
<v Speaker 1>in a smart way that a commercial bank of JP

0:30:01.960 --> 0:30:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Morgan just can't do. Golden Stacks is very stealth. It's

0:30:06.080 --> 0:30:08.480
<v Speaker 1>about a hundred dollars almost or just about ten bucks

0:30:08.480 --> 0:30:12.040
<v Speaker 1>shy hundred dollars ninety dollars off of its fifty two

0:30:12.040 --> 0:30:14.520
<v Speaker 1>week HI, so it has come way down. Another particularly

0:30:14.640 --> 0:30:17.480
<v Speaker 1>that you have is Newell Brands UH. It's the parent

0:30:17.560 --> 0:30:22.120
<v Speaker 1>company of Rubber Made, as well as Coleman camping Um

0:30:22.600 --> 0:30:26.800
<v Speaker 1>supply chain concerns. That's why the stock got hit so

0:30:27.040 --> 0:30:30.920
<v Speaker 1>badly and why Newell n w L is trading at

0:30:31.000 --> 0:30:35.920
<v Speaker 1>twelve times this year's earnings YO dollar stock. But they

0:30:36.080 --> 0:30:40.400
<v Speaker 1>actually had a strong fourth quarter and the CEO has

0:30:40.400 --> 0:30:43.320
<v Speaker 1>said he's not worried about the supply chain issues, and

0:30:43.520 --> 0:30:47.120
<v Speaker 1>so much of their money comes from Schwebs Canada, Dry

0:30:47.840 --> 0:30:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Sun Kiss. They made Clomado. There's a tomato. Yeah, I

0:30:52.840 --> 0:30:55.000
<v Speaker 1>don't know. It's a clam juice and tomato juice. That

0:30:55.040 --> 0:30:58.720
<v Speaker 1>sounds disgusting. It was, you know, my dad had actually

0:30:58.800 --> 0:31:01.960
<v Speaker 1>worked on the advertising paid for that. That's how I

0:31:02.040 --> 0:31:06.680
<v Speaker 1>know about it. Yeah, is it good? I don't really know.

0:31:06.840 --> 0:31:08.720
<v Speaker 1>What does dad say? I was like, you know, pretty young.

0:31:08.840 --> 0:31:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Then another name that you like is PayPal. Talk to

0:31:11.520 --> 0:31:15.040
<v Speaker 1>us about that one. Well, PayPal, certainly it may not

0:31:15.200 --> 0:31:21.280
<v Speaker 1>be there this year. Yeah, PayPal just got slammed. So

0:31:21.480 --> 0:31:24.160
<v Speaker 1>it was a bargain at eight four dollars in it,

0:31:24.240 --> 0:31:27.440
<v Speaker 1>but at one fifteen we're still talking a bargain because

0:31:27.920 --> 0:31:32.920
<v Speaker 1>PayPal has just become the standard. Plus they have Venmo,

0:31:33.120 --> 0:31:36.520
<v Speaker 1>they have Zoom, they have something called Chargehound. They're really

0:31:36.560 --> 0:31:39.440
<v Speaker 1>and they're finding niches in the market. So what's the

0:31:39.520 --> 0:31:44.040
<v Speaker 1>problem the fires low expectations there? The concern was that

0:31:44.400 --> 0:31:47.360
<v Speaker 1>pap that well, much of the concern is that JP

0:31:47.560 --> 0:31:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Morgan Chase getting into the business by having Zell for example,

0:31:52.280 --> 0:31:55.160
<v Speaker 1>you know what the Apple going to do. But it

0:31:55.320 --> 0:32:02.720
<v Speaker 1>still seems that the Venmo PayPal brands are strong. Interesting.

0:32:02.800 --> 0:32:04.240
<v Speaker 1>I was just looking at the stock price, right, so

0:32:04.280 --> 0:32:09.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm still thinking about Clamato. I am certainly not PayPal shares,

0:32:09.480 --> 0:32:11.760
<v Speaker 1>by the way, up about a buck today. If you

0:32:11.840 --> 0:32:13.760
<v Speaker 1>had to put some new money to work just today,

0:32:13.760 --> 0:32:15.240
<v Speaker 1>where would you do it or where are you putting

0:32:15.240 --> 0:32:17.400
<v Speaker 1>it together? Is it these names you just talked about?

0:32:18.280 --> 0:32:20.600
<v Speaker 1>It would be it would be new old for sure

0:32:20.680 --> 0:32:22.400
<v Speaker 1>to get that to it in yield, and because it's

0:32:22.400 --> 0:32:25.760
<v Speaker 1>a cheap stock, and then people are still like the

0:32:25.880 --> 0:32:29.800
<v Speaker 1>rubber Maid and it's been around forever, and ingredient is

0:32:29.840 --> 0:32:34.520
<v Speaker 1>incredibly undervalued. That's your starches and your sugars and uh.

0:32:35.160 --> 0:32:38.480
<v Speaker 1>And for me, that's one that at seven dollars. Uh,

0:32:39.280 --> 0:32:41.480
<v Speaker 1>it's training at twelve times this year's earnings and a

0:32:41.560 --> 0:32:44.000
<v Speaker 1>three percent of it in yield. That's what I'm looking for.

0:32:44.080 --> 0:32:47.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking for safety. And then I'm taking some flyers

0:32:47.880 --> 0:32:52.000
<v Speaker 1>out there, not not going into Tesla. I know electric vehicles,

0:32:52.080 --> 0:32:54.640
<v Speaker 1>electric is where to be, so I'm looking at some

0:32:54.760 --> 0:32:58.640
<v Speaker 1>of these small guys like them. The easy lightning emotors

0:32:59.280 --> 0:33:01.800
<v Speaker 1>are the electric Wait, all right, we gotta run, Hey, listen.

0:33:01.840 --> 0:33:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Great to talk names with you, as always are thanks

0:33:05.040 --> 0:33:07.760
<v Speaker 1>to Hillary Cram where she's president chief investment Officer at

0:33:07.760 --> 0:33:11.760
<v Speaker 1>A and G Capital Research. Thanks for listening to Bloomberg

0:33:11.800 --> 0:33:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Business Week. Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg

0:33:15.520 --> 0:33:17.360
<v Speaker 1>dot com, and you can also listen to our radio

0:33:17.400 --> 0:33:19.960
<v Speaker 1>show at two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio or watch

0:33:20.080 --> 0:33:22.360
<v Speaker 1>us on YouTube search Bloomberg Global News