WEBVTT - FTX's Potential Robinhood Deal and SCOTUS

0:00:02.279 --> 0:00:05.640
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where innovation, money and power collive

0:00:06.400 --> 0:00:10.920
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:11.000 --> 0:00:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Emily Chang. I'm Emily Chang in San Francisco and this

0:00:26.720 --> 0:00:29.200
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Technology. Coming up in the next hour to

0:00:29.560 --> 0:00:31.720
<v Speaker 1>trading players could be looking at tie the knot. With

0:00:31.760 --> 0:00:35.440
<v Speaker 1>the markets in free fall, ft X is exploring an

0:00:35.479 --> 0:00:39.440
<v Speaker 1>acquisition of robin Hood. According to Bloomberg sources, robin Hood

0:00:39.600 --> 0:00:43.760
<v Speaker 1>is down some seventy five since it went public last year.

0:00:43.760 --> 0:00:46.760
<v Speaker 1>We'll tell you where the talk stand and we'll also

0:00:46.800 --> 0:00:49.760
<v Speaker 1>bring your exclusive interview with coin Flex CEO Mark Lamb

0:00:49.760 --> 0:00:53.600
<v Speaker 1>about why they froze all withdrawals and what they're doing

0:00:53.680 --> 0:00:57.160
<v Speaker 1>to fix it. Plus, tech companies may be willing to

0:00:57.200 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 1>cover travel fees for employees looking to get an aboord,

0:01:00.240 --> 0:01:02.800
<v Speaker 1>But what about protecting your data? We'll talk to a

0:01:02.840 --> 0:01:06.119
<v Speaker 1>civil rights attorney about the power tech company's have over

0:01:06.319 --> 0:01:10.199
<v Speaker 1>your digital rights. In a post row era and Para

0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Nos's Sunny Baldwani his fate in the hands of a

0:01:13.360 --> 0:01:16.679
<v Speaker 1>jury at the same courthouse where his ex girlfriend, Elizabeth

0:01:16.680 --> 0:01:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Bones was found guilty of defrauding Investors will get the

0:01:20.000 --> 0:01:23.800
<v Speaker 1>latest on where the trial stands. More on that bloomberg

0:01:23.800 --> 0:01:26.400
<v Speaker 1>scoop news of f t X and Sam Bankman Freed's

0:01:26.440 --> 0:01:30.640
<v Speaker 1>interest in acquiring robin Hood. We learned just last month

0:01:30.840 --> 0:01:33.800
<v Speaker 1>that Bankman Freed owns a seven point six percent stake

0:01:34.440 --> 0:01:37.480
<v Speaker 1>in robin Hood through another holding company. As this news

0:01:37.520 --> 0:01:42.600
<v Speaker 1>was breaking, he tweeted backstopping customer assets should always be primary,

0:01:42.959 --> 0:01:46.440
<v Speaker 1>everything else is secondary. For more, I'm joined by Bloombergs.

0:01:46.440 --> 0:01:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Annie Massa, who covers robin Hood has been working this

0:01:49.120 --> 0:01:51.400
<v Speaker 1>story for us. What's the latest, Annie? What do we know?

0:01:51.440 --> 0:01:54.360
<v Speaker 1>What's the status of this? So the service is that

0:01:54.440 --> 0:01:59.080
<v Speaker 1>f t X has talked internally about potentially reaching out

0:01:59.120 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 1>seeing if they could buy I robin Hood, and we've

0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:05.600
<v Speaker 1>seen robin Hood has been pretty distressed in the months

0:02:05.600 --> 0:02:09.560
<v Speaker 1>since its I p O last year, and it's led

0:02:09.600 --> 0:02:12.399
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people to wonder if robin Hood might

0:02:12.720 --> 0:02:16.000
<v Speaker 1>pursue a deal. Now, they haven't advanced as far as

0:02:16.680 --> 0:02:19.440
<v Speaker 1>uh as having formal M and A talks, but this

0:02:19.480 --> 0:02:22.800
<v Speaker 1>is something FTX is exploring, especially after that stake that

0:02:23.240 --> 0:02:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Sam Bankmn Freed took. As you mentioned, so fd X

0:02:27.840 --> 0:02:30.720
<v Speaker 1>saying in a statement, we're excited about robin Hood's business

0:02:30.800 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 1>prospects and potential ways we could partner with them. That

0:02:34.120 --> 0:02:38.080
<v Speaker 1>being said, no active M and A conversations with robin Hood.

0:02:38.080 --> 0:02:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Do we know how robin Hood and its co founders

0:02:40.480 --> 0:02:44.480
<v Speaker 1>feel about this? They're the company declines to come in

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:47.080
<v Speaker 1>for our story. It's true that this is in the

0:02:47.120 --> 0:02:51.440
<v Speaker 1>earlier stages right now, but and it's complicated by the

0:02:51.480 --> 0:02:54.240
<v Speaker 1>fact that robin Hood's co founders lad tin Of and

0:02:54.280 --> 0:02:59.519
<v Speaker 1>Beij Jubat have super majority voting uh they control over

0:02:59.639 --> 0:03:03.440
<v Speaker 1>fifty percent of voting power at robin Hood, so that

0:03:03.480 --> 0:03:07.359
<v Speaker 1>would complicate any deal. However, you're still in a position

0:03:07.440 --> 0:03:10.320
<v Speaker 1>where there there have been a lot of questions about

0:03:10.600 --> 0:03:12.960
<v Speaker 1>what robin Hood might do, whether it might come under

0:03:13.080 --> 0:03:15.680
<v Speaker 1>enough pressure to look at a deal, and if FTX

0:03:15.720 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 1>were to come forward with something, um they might have

0:03:18.520 --> 0:03:20.840
<v Speaker 1>to take a look. Why would it feel like this

0:03:20.919 --> 0:03:24.080
<v Speaker 1>makes sense? Obviously, we know robin hood stock has plummeted,

0:03:24.160 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 1>They've had to do some layoffs. There are still an

0:03:27.600 --> 0:03:30.760
<v Speaker 1>incredibly popular trading app. When you ask, you know, a

0:03:30.800 --> 0:03:35.400
<v Speaker 1>typical retail investor, UM that said, you know that they've

0:03:35.440 --> 0:03:38.160
<v Speaker 1>been working trying to push harder into the crypto market.

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:40.640
<v Speaker 1>That's f T x is bread and butter. You know,

0:03:40.680 --> 0:03:43.440
<v Speaker 1>talk to us about you know, the reasoning behind a

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:45.760
<v Speaker 1>tie up other than the fact that sam Bank been

0:03:45.800 --> 0:03:49.920
<v Speaker 1>freed is interested. That's right. So first year have sam

0:03:49.920 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Bank been freed with his stake that he already has

0:03:52.560 --> 0:03:54.760
<v Speaker 1>your holding company in robin Hood. But there are other

0:03:54.840 --> 0:03:59.200
<v Speaker 1>overlaps between the companies too. Robin Hood really benefited from

0:03:59.200 --> 0:04:01.760
<v Speaker 1>the huge boom and retail trading that we saw during

0:04:01.760 --> 0:04:05.560
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic. You can trade equities options crypto all on

0:04:05.680 --> 0:04:08.640
<v Speaker 1>robin Hood and f t X is a crypto exchange,

0:04:08.640 --> 0:04:11.800
<v Speaker 1>but it's also shown interest in getting into the equities

0:04:11.840 --> 0:04:14.280
<v Speaker 1>world as well. So there is a fair amount of

0:04:14.360 --> 0:04:17.960
<v Speaker 1>overlap between the very retail heavy world of crypto f

0:04:18.040 --> 0:04:21.920
<v Speaker 1>t X really embodies and the crypto stock trading options

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:26.760
<v Speaker 1>trading for younger investors, newer investors that robin Hood represents.

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:28.919
<v Speaker 1>So you can see a tie up of the two

0:04:29.040 --> 0:04:32.800
<v Speaker 1>making sense, all right, bloom Brigs. Animasa will continue to

0:04:32.839 --> 0:04:44.279
<v Speaker 1>stay tuned to your reporting. Thank you. Some of the

0:04:44.279 --> 0:04:46.920
<v Speaker 1>biggest companies in the world, many of them in tech,

0:04:46.960 --> 0:04:49.800
<v Speaker 1>have quickly put into action plans to help employees who

0:04:49.839 --> 0:04:53.240
<v Speaker 1>may need access to abortion care following the Supreme Courts

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:58.760
<v Speaker 1>ruling overturning Rowe versus Wade. Companies like Apple, Uber, Lift, Meta, Amazon,

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:01.719
<v Speaker 1>and dozens more have an ou still cover travel expenses

0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:05.440
<v Speaker 1>for employees and states where the medical procedure is or

0:05:05.520 --> 0:05:08.760
<v Speaker 1>will be banned for more. Now, I'm joined by Bloomberg

0:05:08.839 --> 0:05:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Sarah Fryer. So Sarah explained to us what's happening in

0:05:11.800 --> 0:05:16.080
<v Speaker 1>the fine print here and what these companies are saying. Well,

0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:17.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the companies are saying that they will

0:05:17.920 --> 0:05:22.040
<v Speaker 1>include abortion among the health care procedures, that they will

0:05:22.320 --> 0:05:26.520
<v Speaker 1>will reimburse travel for UM. So often that is, you know,

0:05:26.600 --> 0:05:31.160
<v Speaker 1>if it's if it's something that you that you need, UM,

0:05:31.279 --> 0:05:33.200
<v Speaker 1>they will find a way to fly you to a

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:36.720
<v Speaker 1>state where that's possible. The problem is, UM, they're not

0:05:36.760 --> 0:05:39.600
<v Speaker 1>saying anything about another big question that we have here

0:05:39.600 --> 0:05:44.080
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg, which is not just about employees, but about

0:05:44.080 --> 0:05:46.800
<v Speaker 1>their investments in these states, but about the data that

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:49.320
<v Speaker 1>they collect UM. There's a lot of concern right now

0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:53.880
<v Speaker 1>that that companies will collect data just through their uses,

0:05:53.920 --> 0:05:58.320
<v Speaker 1>through their searches, through their messaging, through UM, their interactions

0:05:58.320 --> 0:06:03.440
<v Speaker 1>online about whether they're playing abortions, and that prosecutors in

0:06:03.480 --> 0:06:06.480
<v Speaker 1>these states where abortion is illegal might try to subpoena

0:06:06.600 --> 0:06:09.159
<v Speaker 1>the companies to get it. And so far, we haven't

0:06:09.240 --> 0:06:11.800
<v Speaker 1>seen a lot of companies stand up and say they

0:06:11.800 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 1>won't provide that data or that they'll protect user privacy.

0:06:16.080 --> 0:06:21.040
<v Speaker 1>And it's a tricky situation for them because UM historically

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:25.320
<v Speaker 1>their rule has been whenever there is UM something illegal

0:06:25.600 --> 0:06:29.000
<v Speaker 1>or something requested by law enforcement, they could apply UM.

0:06:29.040 --> 0:06:30.960
<v Speaker 1>But in this case, where they have a subject that

0:06:31.040 --> 0:06:33.919
<v Speaker 1>a lot of employees feel very passionately about, most of

0:06:33.920 --> 0:06:36.560
<v Speaker 1>the us UM is on the side that, you know,

0:06:36.560 --> 0:06:39.000
<v Speaker 1>people should be able to have this health care procedure.

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:42.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how they're going to react when when

0:06:42.480 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 1>prosecutors started asking for that data, and Sarah, I know

0:06:45.480 --> 0:06:47.840
<v Speaker 1>that you and your team are trying to get some

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:50.039
<v Speaker 1>answers from these companies about how they're going to handle

0:06:50.080 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 1>these bigger questions. What are we hearing so far? Well,

0:06:55.240 --> 0:06:57.600
<v Speaker 1>I think I think that what we might see is

0:06:57.880 --> 0:07:00.120
<v Speaker 1>some companies standing up and saying, no, we're not going

0:07:00.240 --> 0:07:03.680
<v Speaker 1>to do that. UM this data, this user data, will

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:06.880
<v Speaker 1>fight in court over not providing it to the government

0:07:07.200 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 1>and potentially endangering someone, whereas other companies will say, listen,

0:07:10.960 --> 0:07:14.000
<v Speaker 1>this is the law, and we operate by the law

0:07:14.000 --> 0:07:17.800
<v Speaker 1>of the land wherever we wherever we are, UM, you know,

0:07:17.840 --> 0:07:21.400
<v Speaker 1>putting our product, we have to do that, and so

0:07:21.480 --> 0:07:24.920
<v Speaker 1>they'll just they'll just comply, and UM it could set

0:07:25.000 --> 0:07:27.160
<v Speaker 1>up a lot of problems for a lot of people

0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:30.040
<v Speaker 1>who use these services. UM. It's it's very different than

0:07:30.080 --> 0:07:35.080
<v Speaker 1>fifty years ago, UM pre row. Whereas now we have

0:07:35.240 --> 0:07:40.040
<v Speaker 1>this entire economy around knowing exactly what people intend to

0:07:40.080 --> 0:07:43.320
<v Speaker 1>do based on their online behavior. And I think that

0:07:43.440 --> 0:07:45.600
<v Speaker 1>the next few years we're going to see a lot

0:07:45.720 --> 0:07:51.680
<v Speaker 1>of pain and question around what responsibility companies have to

0:07:51.720 --> 0:07:55.400
<v Speaker 1>their users versus what responsibility ability they have to the

0:07:55.480 --> 0:07:58.440
<v Speaker 1>law in the area where they operate. All right, huge

0:07:58.680 --> 0:08:03.040
<v Speaker 1>big questions that have yet to be answered. Bloomberg's Sarah Fiar,

0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:05.800
<v Speaker 1>editor for our Tech Team, Thank you, Sarah. Now, while

0:08:05.800 --> 0:08:08.920
<v Speaker 1>tech companies might be offering their employees navigating a new

0:08:09.000 --> 0:08:13.280
<v Speaker 1>important abortion landscape help, there are concerns, and Sarah said

0:08:13.280 --> 0:08:16.160
<v Speaker 1>about the information these companies have on their users and

0:08:16.200 --> 0:08:18.280
<v Speaker 1>how it could be used against them if they try

0:08:18.320 --> 0:08:22.840
<v Speaker 1>to access an abortion. Digital rights experts warned that search trees,

0:08:23.000 --> 0:08:26.600
<v Speaker 1>location data app usage could all be fair game for

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 1>more on this. I'm joined by Cynthia Conti Cook. She's

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 1>a civil rights attorney and currently at Tech fellow at

0:08:31.640 --> 0:08:36.280
<v Speaker 1>the Ford Foundations Gender, Racial and Ethnic Justice Team. So, Cynthia,

0:08:36.480 --> 0:08:39.880
<v Speaker 1>we're in some very uncharted territory here. Walk us through

0:08:40.480 --> 0:08:44.640
<v Speaker 1>this post row era and the heightened risk of surveillance.

0:08:46.360 --> 0:08:49.559
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. Yes, we are not going back in time.

0:08:49.760 --> 0:08:54.400
<v Speaker 1>We are going fast forward into uncertainty. And what we

0:08:54.480 --> 0:08:59.560
<v Speaker 1>have already seen happen with digital evidence used against people

0:08:59.679 --> 0:09:02.720
<v Speaker 1>who were pregnant and we're charged with conduct related to

0:09:02.760 --> 0:09:07.560
<v Speaker 1>the termination of their pregnancies, is that that information was

0:09:07.840 --> 0:09:12.960
<v Speaker 1>text messages, it was email receipts, it was search histories

0:09:13.000 --> 0:09:16.520
<v Speaker 1>and websites visited. That's the information that already has been

0:09:16.640 --> 0:09:20.160
<v Speaker 1>used in cases we've already examined coming in front of

0:09:20.200 --> 0:09:24.560
<v Speaker 1>courts across the country. How do you expect companies to

0:09:24.679 --> 0:09:28.360
<v Speaker 1>handle this information? I mean, I wonder is there going

0:09:28.400 --> 0:09:31.120
<v Speaker 1>to be some sort of shadow economy or even a

0:09:31.160 --> 0:09:38.360
<v Speaker 1>shadow society created as a result. Absolutely, people will be

0:09:38.440 --> 0:09:42.559
<v Speaker 1>pushed into shadow economies and pushed into places where they

0:09:42.640 --> 0:09:47.400
<v Speaker 1>are experiencing a lot more vulnerability as a result of

0:09:47.440 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 1>this decision. So the tech companies have here to to

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:55.920
<v Speaker 1>to do something about it, to take a stand one

0:09:55.960 --> 0:10:01.200
<v Speaker 1>way or another. Tech companies could engage in a few

0:10:01.240 --> 0:10:05.280
<v Speaker 1>different ways. They could, for example, collect less data in

0:10:05.320 --> 0:10:08.760
<v Speaker 1>addition to I've heard a few tech companies speak to

0:10:09.120 --> 0:10:12.120
<v Speaker 1>location data recently, but location data so far has not

0:10:12.160 --> 0:10:15.319
<v Speaker 1>been used in criminal court against pregnant people. However, their

0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:20.440
<v Speaker 1>search histories have, their website tract have. The other things

0:10:20.440 --> 0:10:23.920
<v Speaker 1>that tech companies can do is become very prepared to

0:10:24.080 --> 0:10:26.720
<v Speaker 1>go into court and actually pushed back against the requests

0:10:26.720 --> 0:10:29.800
<v Speaker 1>that they get from law enforcement to share information about

0:10:30.240 --> 0:10:33.400
<v Speaker 1>what what websites people are looking at and what information

0:10:33.440 --> 0:10:36.440
<v Speaker 1>they're searching for. So you're talking about the biggest and

0:10:36.440 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 1>most powerful companies in the world. So, for example, Senators

0:10:39.000 --> 0:10:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Around Widen and Elizabeth Warren wrote a letter to the

0:10:41.679 --> 0:10:46.120
<v Speaker 1>fc FTC asking them to investigate Apple and Google's role

0:10:46.400 --> 0:10:50.080
<v Speaker 1>in all of this. What responsibility do you think these

0:10:50.120 --> 0:10:55.480
<v Speaker 1>companies have. The companies provide a very important service that

0:10:55.600 --> 0:10:58.960
<v Speaker 1>allows people to access information about their healthcare. This is

0:10:59.040 --> 0:11:01.400
<v Speaker 1>very simply a public health issue much more than it

0:11:01.480 --> 0:11:06.480
<v Speaker 1>is a technology issue, and the technology companies need to

0:11:06.640 --> 0:11:10.360
<v Speaker 1>understand that the information they collect and store and the

0:11:10.480 --> 0:11:13.640
<v Speaker 1>law enforcement agencies that they provide it to will in

0:11:13.679 --> 0:11:16.559
<v Speaker 1>turn use it to criminalize the people that they are

0:11:16.559 --> 0:11:19.160
<v Speaker 1>relying on to be their users and to be the

0:11:19.240 --> 0:11:24.040
<v Speaker 1>people who will purchase information and of commit to their advertisers.

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:28.000
<v Speaker 1>It's part of the ecosystem. And if they are disregarding

0:11:28.200 --> 0:11:31.720
<v Speaker 1>the rights and welfare of the people that they are

0:11:31.840 --> 0:11:35.199
<v Speaker 1>serving through the technologies that they provide, those people are

0:11:35.200 --> 0:11:39.400
<v Speaker 1>going to be less and less able to participate. Now,

0:11:39.440 --> 0:11:42.360
<v Speaker 1>there are these big companies, you know, that's one thing,

0:11:42.400 --> 0:11:45.200
<v Speaker 1>but there's also a host of startups offering you know,

0:11:45.240 --> 0:11:48.719
<v Speaker 1>women and family health care UM and I wonder what

0:11:48.760 --> 0:11:52.120
<v Speaker 1>you think the role is of those companies, less powerful,

0:11:52.520 --> 0:11:56.320
<v Speaker 1>obviously less well resourced, you know, being put in a

0:11:56.520 --> 0:12:00.160
<v Speaker 1>in a very difficult position where you know, in any

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:03.480
<v Speaker 1>afford to states this is all just totally fine, and

0:12:03.520 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 1>in the rest of the country it's not. First, smaller startups,

0:12:09.440 --> 0:12:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I would say that they first should be they should

0:12:14.080 --> 0:12:18.240
<v Speaker 1>find out from the places that are already existing and

0:12:18.280 --> 0:12:21.120
<v Speaker 1>have been serving the abortion access movement what the needs

0:12:21.120 --> 0:12:25.240
<v Speaker 1>are for the UH questions that they're asking and for

0:12:25.320 --> 0:12:29.800
<v Speaker 1>the types of services that they are considering making available. First,

0:12:30.040 --> 0:12:33.560
<v Speaker 1>the people that are going to be using the service

0:12:33.640 --> 0:12:36.720
<v Speaker 1>should be involved in designing it. Now, what do you

0:12:36.720 --> 0:12:40.480
<v Speaker 1>think about the role of these quote unquote crisis pregnancy firms.

0:12:40.520 --> 0:12:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg has reported that these firms, which are encouraging women

0:12:44.880 --> 0:12:48.840
<v Speaker 1>to not get abortion, are also scooping up data on

0:12:48.920 --> 0:12:54.040
<v Speaker 1>women who are seeking abortion. Yes, that's right, they are.

0:12:55.320 --> 0:13:00.920
<v Speaker 1>The crisis pregnancy centers have been very delus really not

0:13:01.080 --> 0:13:04.680
<v Speaker 1>just through in person interviews collecting information about people, but

0:13:04.960 --> 0:13:08.480
<v Speaker 1>simply through existing as a website collecting information about people

0:13:08.520 --> 0:13:12.440
<v Speaker 1>that visit their websites in the same way. So, what's

0:13:12.440 --> 0:13:15.840
<v Speaker 1>your advice to women right now about protecting their digital

0:13:15.960 --> 0:13:19.840
<v Speaker 1>autonomy in this kind of messy middle where we are,

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:22.480
<v Speaker 1>where a lot of this has yet to be decided

0:13:22.520 --> 0:13:26.880
<v Speaker 1>and this law was just overturned. In the same way

0:13:26.880 --> 0:13:31.160
<v Speaker 1>that we should not all be individually responsible for protecting

0:13:31.160 --> 0:13:35.079
<v Speaker 1>ourselves against COVID, we should all not be individually responsible

0:13:35.120 --> 0:13:39.760
<v Speaker 1>for securing all of our digital devices and having all

0:13:39.760 --> 0:13:43.199
<v Speaker 1>the knowledge of what types of information is collected about us.

0:13:43.640 --> 0:13:46.040
<v Speaker 1>But there are a few things that people can do.

0:13:46.360 --> 0:13:50.439
<v Speaker 1>Secure your devices, Do not share your devices voluntarily with

0:13:50.760 --> 0:13:55.840
<v Speaker 1>police officers, social workers, anyone at a hospital. Secure your communications.

0:13:56.240 --> 0:13:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Make sure that you're using encrypted communication, even very casual,

0:14:00.440 --> 0:14:03.120
<v Speaker 1>and that you have all of your contacts already imported

0:14:03.320 --> 0:14:07.480
<v Speaker 1>and secure your browsing, so use as your default browser

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:10.280
<v Speaker 1>the types of browsers that are not going to track

0:14:10.360 --> 0:14:14.480
<v Speaker 1>you as you visit website to website. All right, Cynthia

0:14:14.480 --> 0:14:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Conte Cook, fascinating new landscape to explore. Ford Foundation, fellow

0:14:19.800 --> 0:14:23.320
<v Speaker 1>civil rights attorney, thank you well. A new poll suggests

0:14:23.360 --> 0:14:26.600
<v Speaker 1>that a majority of Americans disapprove of the U. S.

0:14:26.600 --> 0:14:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court's decision to overturn the constitutional right to an abortion.

0:14:31.000 --> 0:14:34.880
<v Speaker 1>According to the CBS News survey, fifty opposed this ruling,

0:14:34.920 --> 0:14:40.040
<v Speaker 1>including six of women, while seventy percent of Republicans support

0:14:40.200 --> 0:14:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Supreme courts action of Democrats disapprove. Coming up with the

0:14:47.280 --> 0:14:50.680
<v Speaker 1>boyfriend of Farina's founder Elizabeth Holmes, will he face the

0:14:50.760 --> 0:14:54.160
<v Speaker 1>same fate? A joury is deliberating the future of Sunny

0:14:54.240 --> 0:14:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Baldwani right now, We're gonna have the latest on the case. Next,

0:14:58.120 --> 0:15:09.360
<v Speaker 1>this is Bloomberg. A jury is now deliberating in the

0:15:09.400 --> 0:15:12.760
<v Speaker 1>trial of Sonny ball Waming, the former second in command

0:15:12.920 --> 0:15:16.560
<v Speaker 1>at Sara No Nos and ex boyfriend to founder Elizabeth Holmes.

0:15:16.800 --> 0:15:19.120
<v Speaker 1>While Wanni's lawyers have done their best to try to

0:15:19.200 --> 0:15:23.000
<v Speaker 1>separate him from Holmes, who was found guilty of DEFRAUDI

0:15:23.040 --> 0:15:25.160
<v Speaker 1>investors back in January for more on the trial. I'm

0:15:25.240 --> 0:15:28.160
<v Speaker 1>joined by Bloomberg Stral Rosenblatt, who covered the Holmes trial

0:15:28.320 --> 0:15:30.400
<v Speaker 1>for US. And you were in the courtroom every day

0:15:30.440 --> 0:15:32.480
<v Speaker 1>for the trial of Elizabeth Holmes. You've been in there

0:15:32.520 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 1>for much of the trial of Sonny Ball Wanni. Have

0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:41.560
<v Speaker 1>lawyers been successful separating the two? You know, we're gonna

0:15:41.560 --> 0:15:44.600
<v Speaker 1>find out. I'm not sure. It's just gonna be interesting

0:15:44.640 --> 0:15:49.920
<v Speaker 1>to see what what jurors think. Uh. Elizabeth Holmes has

0:15:50.080 --> 0:15:53.320
<v Speaker 1>loomed large over this trial. I was in closing arguments

0:15:53.400 --> 0:15:57.560
<v Speaker 1>last week and on one day alone in in his

0:15:57.680 --> 0:16:03.920
<v Speaker 1>lawyers closing arguments, she was mentioned nineties six times. So

0:16:03.920 --> 0:16:07.280
<v Speaker 1>so they're they're trying what what Sonny's lawyers are trying

0:16:07.320 --> 0:16:10.600
<v Speaker 1>to do. I say that he too was defrauded by

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Elizabeth Holmes, that that she tricked him to. That's what

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:17.800
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to pull off. Um, I think that's going

0:16:17.840 --> 0:16:22.920
<v Speaker 1>to be unsuccessful. The jury was instructed to separate the two,

0:16:23.560 --> 0:16:28.360
<v Speaker 1>and so you wonder if it's actually gonna work. Yeah,

0:16:28.840 --> 0:16:31.000
<v Speaker 1>that's to me the kind of the real conundrum of

0:16:31.040 --> 0:16:34.560
<v Speaker 1>this trial and confusing for jurors because they got an instruction.

0:16:34.680 --> 0:16:36.960
<v Speaker 1>I sent you the instructions up. I don't enough you're

0:16:37.120 --> 0:16:41.640
<v Speaker 1>able to show that, but asked yours to to not

0:16:41.760 --> 0:16:46.440
<v Speaker 1>consider any fact or aspect of Elizabeth Holmes's trial. And

0:16:46.520 --> 0:16:50.080
<v Speaker 1>that's you know, read very legally and very technically. You're

0:16:50.120 --> 0:16:54.160
<v Speaker 1>not supposed to consider the trial. That's okay, that's the instruction.

0:16:54.680 --> 0:16:59.600
<v Speaker 1>But she has permeated this entire affair and the trial.

0:16:59.640 --> 0:17:02.240
<v Speaker 1>And I said, she's been mentioned so many times that

0:17:02.320 --> 0:17:06.000
<v Speaker 1>it's impossible for them to to to I think, separate

0:17:06.040 --> 0:17:07.720
<v Speaker 1>the two of them out, and that's part of the

0:17:07.720 --> 0:17:10.600
<v Speaker 1>reason he's in so much trouble. What is your perception

0:17:10.880 --> 0:17:15.840
<v Speaker 1>after spending so much time in the courtroom, you know,

0:17:16.200 --> 0:17:18.520
<v Speaker 1>is it clear that one had more of a role

0:17:18.720 --> 0:17:23.159
<v Speaker 1>than another, or were they working in tandem? You know,

0:17:24.320 --> 0:17:27.320
<v Speaker 1>some of these lawyers have said that he joined much later.

0:17:27.480 --> 0:17:30.840
<v Speaker 1>She founded the company and he joined years later. Um,

0:17:31.119 --> 0:17:33.640
<v Speaker 1>that's another way that his lawyers have tried to say

0:17:33.880 --> 0:17:36.480
<v Speaker 1>this was her company and he kind of just got

0:17:36.560 --> 0:17:40.560
<v Speaker 1>duped or got pulled in. But the we've seen the

0:17:40.680 --> 0:17:45.280
<v Speaker 1>same texts and the same emails that were shown at

0:17:45.480 --> 0:17:49.639
<v Speaker 1>Elizabeth Holmes trial, showing how tight they were that even

0:17:50.200 --> 0:17:52.359
<v Speaker 1>he was the president of the company, she was CEO.

0:17:52.800 --> 0:17:56.159
<v Speaker 1>But even in that kind, in those titles, they just

0:17:56.280 --> 0:17:59.919
<v Speaker 1>held a very special place at the company, special roles.

0:18:00.280 --> 0:18:03.399
<v Speaker 1>They held onto information that only they could see or

0:18:03.440 --> 0:18:07.560
<v Speaker 1>they decided who could see what. So they were in tandem.

0:18:07.760 --> 0:18:11.480
<v Speaker 1>And that's that's that's what geors are going to see,

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:13.040
<v Speaker 1>and that's what they're going to contemplate it. And does

0:18:13.040 --> 0:18:16.480
<v Speaker 1>he face the same potential sentence he does. I mean,

0:18:16.520 --> 0:18:18.679
<v Speaker 1>part of the reasons she hasn't been sentenced yet is

0:18:18.720 --> 0:18:22.080
<v Speaker 1>because the judge wants to figure out his role in

0:18:22.160 --> 0:18:26.200
<v Speaker 1>relationship to hers. They look to be so closely aligned

0:18:26.640 --> 0:18:29.640
<v Speaker 1>that I think they're both facing between eight and ten

0:18:29.720 --> 0:18:33.800
<v Speaker 1>years of prison. Interesting now, Elizabeth Holmes, the deliberations took

0:18:33.920 --> 0:18:37.000
<v Speaker 1>much longer than any of us expected. Do you think

0:18:37.040 --> 0:18:39.919
<v Speaker 1>that's going to happen here? Yeah, this trial is just

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:43.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of it's just very different. It's been much quieter.

0:18:43.480 --> 0:18:46.119
<v Speaker 1>So you don't have the media showing up at two

0:18:46.200 --> 0:18:48.840
<v Speaker 1>am dressed like Elizabeth Holmes. You don't have that. You

0:18:48.920 --> 0:18:52.040
<v Speaker 1>don't have that the the courtrooms are actually very quiet

0:18:52.040 --> 0:18:54.960
<v Speaker 1>and almost empty. His family is sitting right behind him,

0:18:55.359 --> 0:18:59.760
<v Speaker 1>just packed together, even though there's space in the courtroom. Um,

0:18:59.800 --> 0:19:02.879
<v Speaker 1>I you know what they're seeing is it's really a

0:19:02.960 --> 0:19:05.760
<v Speaker 1>very different trial. I mean there's the same facts, but

0:19:06.160 --> 0:19:08.320
<v Speaker 1>there's not this kind of energy, not this kind of

0:19:08.400 --> 0:19:11.639
<v Speaker 1>pressure that I know. Jurors in the Homeless trial I

0:19:11.640 --> 0:19:14.439
<v Speaker 1>was speaking to them afterwards felt to to make a

0:19:14.440 --> 0:19:17.880
<v Speaker 1>decision and make the right decision. I think here they

0:19:17.880 --> 0:19:20.720
<v Speaker 1>could decide it kind of easier and without the pressure.

0:19:21.000 --> 0:19:26.240
<v Speaker 1>So interesting, not as long I'm expecting. Well, keep following.

0:19:26.520 --> 0:19:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Have you back when there is one? Thank you. This

0:19:36.680 --> 0:19:39.720
<v Speaker 1>is a moment that feels that it has been twelve

0:19:39.880 --> 0:19:41.959
<v Speaker 1>years in the making, and if you look at today's

0:19:41.960 --> 0:19:46.399
<v Speaker 1>technology companies, the very very large majority of will survive it.

0:19:46.720 --> 0:19:50.280
<v Speaker 1>The question is do they have a strategy to thrive afterwards.

0:19:50.280 --> 0:19:52.240
<v Speaker 1>The best time to start a company is where do

0:19:52.240 --> 0:19:54.480
<v Speaker 1>you notice such it? It's clear right now the market

0:19:54.800 --> 0:19:57.080
<v Speaker 1>is going to reward real companies to build real things

0:19:57.080 --> 0:19:59.240
<v Speaker 1>and make real earnings. Now we are going into a

0:19:59.320 --> 0:20:02.719
<v Speaker 1>world where we're going to have to be more discerning.

0:20:02.880 --> 0:20:06.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that the place of opportunity today that We're

0:20:06.840 --> 0:20:11.359
<v Speaker 1>quite focused on continue to be uh is on cyber security.

0:20:11.600 --> 0:20:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I would say, you know, pick sectors that are essential businesses,

0:20:15.480 --> 0:20:20.679
<v Speaker 1>essential markets, government perhaps draw also think the future work

0:20:21.359 --> 0:20:24.239
<v Speaker 1>continues to be a place of great opportunity. A lot

0:20:24.280 --> 0:20:27.120
<v Speaker 1>of companies will will be absorbed in. Other companies will

0:20:27.240 --> 0:20:32.280
<v Speaker 1>just disappear um. But at the end, typically a situation

0:20:32.320 --> 0:20:34.800
<v Speaker 1>like this creates a lot of new growth. So there

0:20:34.840 --> 0:20:38.639
<v Speaker 1>are bright spots, but no question we're in for choppy times.

0:20:40.200 --> 0:20:42.159
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to bloom More Technology and Emily Chin in

0:20:42.160 --> 0:20:45.360
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco. Snapshots there of the reactions we've gotten from

0:20:45.400 --> 0:20:48.560
<v Speaker 1>investors and CEOs right here on our show about their

0:20:48.600 --> 0:20:51.480
<v Speaker 1>outlook on the market downturn, what the next big thing

0:20:51.760 --> 0:20:54.800
<v Speaker 1>could be. This has data from CB Insights shows that

0:20:54.960 --> 0:20:58.920
<v Speaker 1>private capital back startups raised far fewer rounds of funding

0:20:58.960 --> 0:21:01.560
<v Speaker 1>in the last three months they did late last year

0:21:01.600 --> 0:21:03.840
<v Speaker 1>early this year. I want to stick with this now

0:21:03.880 --> 0:21:06.399
<v Speaker 1>and bringing Phil Haslett for more on it. He's a

0:21:06.400 --> 0:21:09.760
<v Speaker 1>founder in chief strategy officeer for equities and so first

0:21:09.800 --> 0:21:11.960
<v Speaker 1>of all, Phil, we hadge back on the show in March.

0:21:12.000 --> 0:21:13.959
<v Speaker 1>Where do you think we are right now in the

0:21:14.000 --> 0:21:18.440
<v Speaker 1>cycle of this particular downturn, Yeah, I think we've continued

0:21:18.480 --> 0:21:20.960
<v Speaker 1>the trend since we last spoken March, which is that

0:21:21.200 --> 0:21:23.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, private valuations tend to lag a little bit

0:21:23.880 --> 0:21:26.359
<v Speaker 1>behind public ones, and we're just kind of starting to

0:21:26.400 --> 0:21:29.120
<v Speaker 1>see that reality set in through Q two as observed

0:21:29.119 --> 0:21:32.160
<v Speaker 1>through some of the CD Insights data. Something that we've

0:21:32.160 --> 0:21:35.000
<v Speaker 1>seen on our side is that maybe if companies were

0:21:35.000 --> 0:21:37.560
<v Speaker 1>trading on the equities and platform in the secondaries, that

0:21:37.600 --> 0:21:41.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe discount and Q one to the most recent funding ground.

0:21:41.240 --> 0:21:43.440
<v Speaker 1>We're seeing that to continue to go downwards towards maybe

0:21:43.440 --> 0:21:46.000
<v Speaker 1>the forty to six percent drop, which again is kind

0:21:46.000 --> 0:21:48.080
<v Speaker 1>of reflective what we're seeing in the public markets. So

0:21:48.280 --> 0:21:50.560
<v Speaker 1>I think we uh may be reaching the bottom here,

0:21:50.560 --> 0:21:52.560
<v Speaker 1>but we've we've certainly kind of continued the slide over

0:21:52.600 --> 0:21:55.760
<v Speaker 1>the past few months. Some venture capitalists are recommending not

0:21:55.920 --> 0:21:58.080
<v Speaker 1>just one to two years of runway, but three to

0:21:58.160 --> 0:22:00.440
<v Speaker 1>four years of runway. I mean, can start ups really

0:22:00.480 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 1>handled that when their businesses are already getting a hit? Yeah,

0:22:04.119 --> 0:22:06.200
<v Speaker 1>it's an easy thing for a bunch of venture capitalists

0:22:06.200 --> 0:22:08.840
<v Speaker 1>to say. I think it's no company was really prepared

0:22:09.200 --> 0:22:11.880
<v Speaker 1>to have three to four years of cash um as

0:22:11.920 --> 0:22:13.720
<v Speaker 1>a startup, the same way that no company back in

0:22:13.760 --> 0:22:17.200
<v Speaker 1>cobD was really prepared for an environment with zero revenue

0:22:17.240 --> 0:22:19.720
<v Speaker 1>for a period of time. So I think that's a

0:22:19.720 --> 0:22:22.119
<v Speaker 1>bit unrealistic. I think what you will see is kind

0:22:22.119 --> 0:22:25.360
<v Speaker 1>of a definite shift in atitude and how companies are

0:22:25.400 --> 0:22:28.000
<v Speaker 1>sending money. In particular, UM, one of the things they

0:22:28.000 --> 0:22:31.080
<v Speaker 1>can control, has already kind of observed by UM some

0:22:31.160 --> 0:22:34.920
<v Speaker 1>pretty significant headcount reductions. You know, we we've seen that that.

0:22:35.080 --> 0:22:37.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, compensation really is the majority of stend for

0:22:37.600 --> 0:22:39.640
<v Speaker 1>most of these technology companies, so will expect to see

0:22:39.680 --> 0:22:42.400
<v Speaker 1>that continue. So let's talk to us. Uh So, talk

0:22:42.440 --> 0:22:44.280
<v Speaker 1>to us about these folks who are getting laid off.

0:22:44.320 --> 0:22:47.160
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people don't understand that employees who work

0:22:47.160 --> 0:22:49.720
<v Speaker 1>at startups. You know, half of the upside is the

0:22:49.720 --> 0:22:52.560
<v Speaker 1>equity in those startups, But you have to buy that

0:22:52.600 --> 0:22:56.520
<v Speaker 1>equity in order to benefit from that upside, often before

0:22:56.720 --> 0:22:58.760
<v Speaker 1>you know if the startup is going to be a

0:22:58.760 --> 0:23:01.920
<v Speaker 1>success or not. So when you get laid off from

0:23:01.920 --> 0:23:05.080
<v Speaker 1>a company, you have a very short window oftentimes in

0:23:05.160 --> 0:23:08.520
<v Speaker 1>order to buy that equity. Can you explain to us

0:23:08.560 --> 0:23:12.399
<v Speaker 1>what these laid off employees are going through right now? Yeah? Absolutely,

0:23:12.400 --> 0:23:14.560
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, it's a tough time. You know, it

0:23:14.640 --> 0:23:16.919
<v Speaker 1>starts off by getting laid off, which is obviously a

0:23:16.920 --> 0:23:20.520
<v Speaker 1>big hit to someone's or financial future. UM. It's compounded

0:23:20.560 --> 0:23:22.720
<v Speaker 1>by the fact that most of these employees, as you mentioned,

0:23:23.160 --> 0:23:25.840
<v Speaker 1>are issued you know, stock options, which basically give them

0:23:25.880 --> 0:23:28.880
<v Speaker 1>the rights to purchase shares of the company they work for. UM.

0:23:28.920 --> 0:23:31.399
<v Speaker 1>And that's usually a really big hook uh and and

0:23:31.480 --> 0:23:34.960
<v Speaker 1>incentive for for these employees to have joined the companies. Unfortunately,

0:23:35.040 --> 0:23:36.800
<v Speaker 1>most of the rules around this say that you have

0:23:36.960 --> 0:23:41.480
<v Speaker 1>ninety days to basically buy those shares after you've left

0:23:41.480 --> 0:23:43.639
<v Speaker 1>the company or even if you're terminated. So you can

0:23:43.680 --> 0:23:47.119
<v Speaker 1>kind of imagine this really unfortunate scenario where hundreds or

0:23:47.200 --> 0:23:49.560
<v Speaker 1>thousands of employees are getting laid off and are then

0:23:49.600 --> 0:23:51.879
<v Speaker 1>given a really short window to decide if they should

0:23:52.560 --> 0:23:54.960
<v Speaker 1>pay money out of pocket and incur a tax bill

0:23:55.040 --> 0:23:57.520
<v Speaker 1>to own their stock or not. Right, it's it's really

0:23:57.600 --> 0:23:59.320
<v Speaker 1>uncertain to know if your company is going to be

0:23:59.359 --> 0:24:02.120
<v Speaker 1>successful this point, whereas maybe nine or twelve months ago

0:24:02.119 --> 0:24:04.320
<v Speaker 1>it felt like a complete no brainer. UM. And so

0:24:04.359 --> 0:24:06.720
<v Speaker 1>we're starting to see some more and more active conversations

0:24:06.720 --> 0:24:10.320
<v Speaker 1>between companies and between secondary platforms like equities and and

0:24:10.359 --> 0:24:12.520
<v Speaker 1>also between companies and their employees to see if they

0:24:12.520 --> 0:24:15.080
<v Speaker 1>can kind of help UM solve this problem, which is

0:24:15.080 --> 0:24:18.640
<v Speaker 1>obviously a pretty meaningful one. Then you have a company

0:24:18.680 --> 0:24:22.640
<v Speaker 1>like Bolt, the high flying e commerce startup that actually

0:24:22.680 --> 0:24:27.080
<v Speaker 1>gave employees an option to buy their shares early. I

0:24:27.119 --> 0:24:30.840
<v Speaker 1>wonder if those employees are now in a horrible or

0:24:30.960 --> 0:24:34.520
<v Speaker 1>very precarious financial situation because they took that bet and

0:24:34.600 --> 0:24:38.000
<v Speaker 1>now it's not panning out at least not now, as

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:41.280
<v Speaker 1>they absolutely are. And and actually, when that proposal came

0:24:41.320 --> 0:24:44.440
<v Speaker 1>out from from UH both financial whatever, it was maybe

0:24:44.520 --> 0:24:48.320
<v Speaker 1>four or five months ago, a lot of the venture capitalists,

0:24:48.320 --> 0:24:50.600
<v Speaker 1>particularly ones that had gone through the dot com crash

0:24:50.600 --> 0:24:53.320
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand, waved as many red flags as they

0:24:53.359 --> 0:24:55.600
<v Speaker 1>possibly could to say, you know, this can end very

0:24:55.640 --> 0:24:58.240
<v Speaker 1>poorly when markets kind of turned on their head UM.

0:24:58.280 --> 0:25:00.359
<v Speaker 1>And so while it is one idea it to kind

0:25:00.359 --> 0:25:02.760
<v Speaker 1>of help employees with donating their stock, we can kind

0:25:02.760 --> 0:25:04.600
<v Speaker 1>of think of many other solutions that I think are

0:25:04.640 --> 0:25:07.560
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more palatable for for companies to enact

0:25:07.600 --> 0:25:09.520
<v Speaker 1>for their employees. I would say kind of the two

0:25:09.720 --> 0:25:12.880
<v Speaker 1>easiest ones to do UM are that, you know, companies

0:25:12.920 --> 0:25:16.560
<v Speaker 1>can proactively kind of convert the equity compensation to give

0:25:16.600 --> 0:25:19.439
<v Speaker 1>to employees at departure to actually extend that amount of

0:25:19.440 --> 0:25:21.800
<v Speaker 1>time where they have to exercise to own their shares.

0:25:22.040 --> 0:25:24.680
<v Speaker 1>That's something we saw from pinterest, and we saw from

0:25:24.720 --> 0:25:27.840
<v Speaker 1>coin based many years ago, um while they were private,

0:25:27.840 --> 0:25:30.000
<v Speaker 1>and I think it was very well received. And something

0:25:30.040 --> 0:25:33.199
<v Speaker 1>that we work on with companies is that we can

0:25:33.240 --> 0:25:35.920
<v Speaker 1>help companies elect to allow employees, you know, to sell

0:25:35.960 --> 0:25:38.600
<v Speaker 1>some of their shares you know, through secondary transactions and

0:25:38.680 --> 0:25:42.120
<v Speaker 1>private transactions to help you cover the cost of any

0:25:42.200 --> 0:25:45.760
<v Speaker 1>exercise or any tax and uh implications as well. The

0:25:45.840 --> 0:25:47.359
<v Speaker 1>last one I think that we'll see that that we

0:25:47.440 --> 0:25:49.960
<v Speaker 1>talked about a bit before, was that companies can actually

0:25:49.960 --> 0:25:52.440
<v Speaker 1>redo kind of their fair market valuation, which is what's

0:25:52.520 --> 0:25:55.960
<v Speaker 1>used to determine tax implications and also the price of

0:25:56.040 --> 0:25:58.240
<v Speaker 1>which you get your stock options. And we saw companies

0:25:58.280 --> 0:26:00.160
<v Speaker 1>like instat cart do that and I expect and hope

0:26:00.160 --> 0:26:02.520
<v Speaker 1>to seem any more do that as well. So what's

0:26:02.520 --> 0:26:05.880
<v Speaker 1>your advice to employees right now, say they've just gotten

0:26:05.920 --> 0:26:08.280
<v Speaker 1>laid off, they don't know what to do, should they

0:26:08.280 --> 0:26:12.120
<v Speaker 1>buy the stock or not? How do they evaluate this decision? Yeah,

0:26:12.240 --> 0:26:15.119
<v Speaker 1>it's a tough one. Uh. My first advice would be

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:17.159
<v Speaker 1>to kind of ask the company, what, you know, what

0:26:17.320 --> 0:26:19.480
<v Speaker 1>choices they do have with their equity? Is it really

0:26:19.520 --> 0:26:21.679
<v Speaker 1>just ninety days? Um? The second thing I would ask

0:26:21.760 --> 0:26:24.440
<v Speaker 1>is if the company is aware of investors that maybe

0:26:24.440 --> 0:26:26.400
<v Speaker 1>are already on the company's cap table that are looking

0:26:26.440 --> 0:26:28.439
<v Speaker 1>to grow their position that can help with liquidity. I

0:26:28.480 --> 0:26:31.000
<v Speaker 1>think that's absolutely the first one. And then the last one,

0:26:31.040 --> 0:26:32.920
<v Speaker 1>which is obviously a little self serving, is to kind

0:26:32.920 --> 0:26:35.600
<v Speaker 1>of explore what options you have within the secondary markets

0:26:35.640 --> 0:26:38.439
<v Speaker 1>to get liquidity for your shares um As you know,

0:26:38.640 --> 0:26:40.760
<v Speaker 1>while the markets have taken a turn, we have seen

0:26:40.800 --> 0:26:43.199
<v Speaker 1>a lot of investor interests, particularly at these lower prices

0:26:43.240 --> 0:26:45.720
<v Speaker 1>for companies that they wanted to invest in for years

0:26:45.720 --> 0:26:47.919
<v Speaker 1>that they finally feel like are more fairly valued. So

0:26:48.400 --> 0:26:50.760
<v Speaker 1>I encourage employees to kind of start having those conversations

0:26:50.760 --> 0:26:54.600
<v Speaker 1>as soon as possible. Interesting, all right, Phil has Let, founder,

0:26:54.680 --> 0:26:58.480
<v Speaker 1>chief strategy officer at Equities and lots to consider. Appreciate

0:26:58.520 --> 0:27:00.520
<v Speaker 1>you taking the time to walk through all that. With

0:27:00.600 --> 0:27:04.840
<v Speaker 1>us coming up the crypto futures exchange that just halted

0:27:05.040 --> 0:27:08.560
<v Speaker 1>all withdrawals, we'll speak to coin Flex CEO Mark Lamb

0:27:08.680 --> 0:27:13.359
<v Speaker 1>exclusively about what happened and how fast they can fix it.

0:27:13.680 --> 0:27:30.119
<v Speaker 1>That's next. This is Bloomberg and it's time now for

0:27:30.240 --> 0:27:32.160
<v Speaker 1>our crypto report, and I want to take a look

0:27:32.200 --> 0:27:36.119
<v Speaker 1>at the crypto liquidity as a wave of liquidations gives

0:27:36.240 --> 0:27:40.480
<v Speaker 1>rise to even more fear. Selsie has started freezing withdrawals

0:27:40.520 --> 0:27:42.800
<v Speaker 1>earlier this month, and then a vague tweet by a

0:27:42.880 --> 0:27:46.080
<v Speaker 1>founder of the crypto hedge fund Three Arrows Capital, which

0:27:46.160 --> 0:27:49.960
<v Speaker 1>is facing its own liquidity troubles, created even more anxiety.

0:27:50.080 --> 0:27:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Then came babbled finance pausing withdrawals. Now coin flix Flex,

0:27:54.600 --> 0:27:57.720
<v Speaker 1>the crypto physical futures exchanges in the spotlight. Our crypto

0:27:57.720 --> 0:28:01.760
<v Speaker 1>contributortionally Bossa here to give us the lay of the land, Shinali. Yeah,

0:28:01.800 --> 0:28:04.800
<v Speaker 1>something interesting here, Emily is then, in addition to the

0:28:04.960 --> 0:28:06.960
<v Speaker 1>situations that you had talked about, when it comes to

0:28:06.960 --> 0:28:10.480
<v Speaker 1>coin flex, the counterparty was not Three Arrows Capital or

0:28:10.600 --> 0:28:13.320
<v Speaker 1>another lending firm. We're going to get some more details

0:28:13.320 --> 0:28:15.320
<v Speaker 1>about that in just a second. But just as equally

0:28:15.359 --> 0:28:18.440
<v Speaker 1>interesting here is how the industry is being shored up

0:28:18.440 --> 0:28:21.560
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of this crypto winter and liquidity crunch.

0:28:21.920 --> 0:28:23.800
<v Speaker 1>We're going to talk about just how that's going to

0:28:23.840 --> 0:28:26.960
<v Speaker 1>happen now with Mark Lamb, the CEO of coin Flex.

0:28:27.280 --> 0:28:31.399
<v Speaker 1>Coin Flex is looking to bring back their operations in

0:28:31.480 --> 0:28:36.800
<v Speaker 1>more normal form of resuming with withdrawals by Thursday June.

0:28:36.920 --> 0:28:39.000
<v Speaker 1>And one of the ways that you said to me

0:28:39.120 --> 0:28:42.040
<v Speaker 1>today that you're planning on doing that is by issuing

0:28:42.280 --> 0:28:45.880
<v Speaker 1>a new token that is almost fifty million, it's forty

0:28:45.880 --> 0:28:50.719
<v Speaker 1>seven million dollars worth with a twenty percent yield. That

0:28:50.880 --> 0:28:54.040
<v Speaker 1>is a large return to investors who would get into

0:28:54.040 --> 0:28:57.920
<v Speaker 1>this token. But Mark, tell me, what does this token

0:28:57.960 --> 0:29:02.040
<v Speaker 1>actually represent? Who isn't making whole? How is it making

0:29:02.080 --> 0:29:05.920
<v Speaker 1>them whole? And what happens if you can't raise that money? Yeah?

0:29:05.920 --> 0:29:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Sure so um at coin flex fundamentally we believe in markets,

0:29:11.000 --> 0:29:15.440
<v Speaker 1>transparency and token ization. So we've done that with one

0:29:15.480 --> 0:29:18.440
<v Speaker 1>of our other products, flex USD. It's uh, it's it's

0:29:18.520 --> 0:29:22.040
<v Speaker 1>on markets, it's it's it's funding a market, our repo market,

0:29:22.320 --> 0:29:24.480
<v Speaker 1>and it's a token. And we're doing that again here

0:29:24.920 --> 0:29:28.680
<v Speaker 1>with the Recovery Value us D SO r v U

0:29:28.800 --> 0:29:31.880
<v Speaker 1>s D. It's a way for us to use token

0:29:31.920 --> 0:29:35.120
<v Speaker 1>ization to solve this problem where we have this asset

0:29:35.280 --> 0:29:39.000
<v Speaker 1>which is UM. It's an ultra highnet worth individual UM.

0:29:39.320 --> 0:29:42.920
<v Speaker 1>They they owe us these funds UM. We do believe

0:29:42.960 --> 0:29:44.960
<v Speaker 1>that they're going to get us these funds at some

0:29:45.000 --> 0:29:48.920
<v Speaker 1>point in the future, and we wanted to make it

0:29:49.000 --> 0:29:52.600
<v Speaker 1>such that the assets UM all match up and everything

0:29:52.680 --> 0:29:55.160
<v Speaker 1>matches up in a way where it's a market based

0:29:55.520 --> 0:29:58.880
<v Speaker 1>and we pass on this risk to investors that are

0:29:59.400 --> 0:30:02.120
<v Speaker 1>understand what the risk is and and are eager for

0:30:02.280 --> 0:30:06.320
<v Speaker 1>this risk, and basically UM solve the problem right now,

0:30:06.360 --> 0:30:09.480
<v Speaker 1>we can't have withdrawals UM. There are lots of different

0:30:09.520 --> 0:30:13.600
<v Speaker 1>ways of solving these problems in in crypto finance, and

0:30:13.680 --> 0:30:16.600
<v Speaker 1>crypto generally is on the cutting edge of finance. And

0:30:17.120 --> 0:30:20.440
<v Speaker 1>one of the ways that UM hasn't been as successful

0:30:20.480 --> 0:30:22.800
<v Speaker 1>in the past is when companies put their head in

0:30:22.840 --> 0:30:26.360
<v Speaker 1>the sand or refuse to communicate or go high behind

0:30:26.400 --> 0:30:30.320
<v Speaker 1>the excuse of lawyers. UM rather than treating lawyers as

0:30:30.480 --> 0:30:35.040
<v Speaker 1>as advisors and consigliarias in creating solutions that resolve the

0:30:35.040 --> 0:30:38.280
<v Speaker 1>problem extremely quickly and and also in a way where

0:30:38.560 --> 0:30:41.960
<v Speaker 1>more people get to participate in the solution. Mark, assuming

0:30:42.040 --> 0:30:45.120
<v Speaker 1>that this does work, that you're able to raise this

0:30:45.240 --> 0:30:49.240
<v Speaker 1>token and withdrawals do begin again on June, are you

0:30:49.360 --> 0:30:51.760
<v Speaker 1>afraid that you will face a run on the bank

0:30:51.880 --> 0:30:54.680
<v Speaker 1>in that kind of a scenario. We're not worried about

0:30:54.720 --> 0:31:01.320
<v Speaker 1>that scenario because upon this fundraise being concluded, um, everyone

0:31:01.360 --> 0:31:04.760
<v Speaker 1>can withdraw and and so we want everything to be

0:31:04.880 --> 0:31:08.000
<v Speaker 1>always mashed at all times. And you know, in situations

0:31:08.000 --> 0:31:10.600
<v Speaker 1>where that isn't, we have to intervene. We have to

0:31:10.600 --> 0:31:14.080
<v Speaker 1>do these things. We are going forward, We're going to

0:31:14.120 --> 0:31:17.240
<v Speaker 1>take even further steps on making every aspect of the

0:31:17.280 --> 0:31:22.000
<v Speaker 1>exchange transparent, including the futures positions, the notional value not

0:31:22.120 --> 0:31:25.120
<v Speaker 1>the specific coin, but the notional value of every account's

0:31:25.160 --> 0:31:29.840
<v Speaker 1>positions public via an external auditing firm, and also the

0:31:29.880 --> 0:31:34.440
<v Speaker 1>margin backing those positions. And we think that ultimately that's

0:31:34.480 --> 0:31:37.360
<v Speaker 1>in line with our you know, our ethos from day one,

0:31:37.480 --> 0:31:41.440
<v Speaker 1>we've we've wanted everything to be market based, transparent and tokenized.

0:31:42.560 --> 0:31:45.560
<v Speaker 1>What's our longer term plan mark to make sure that

0:31:45.760 --> 0:31:48.400
<v Speaker 1>if we experience this kind of volatility in the market again,

0:31:48.400 --> 0:31:52.320
<v Speaker 1>and certainly the crypto market will experience this volatility again,

0:31:52.360 --> 0:31:56.000
<v Speaker 1>it is a volatile market, that this won't happen, that

0:31:56.080 --> 0:32:00.360
<v Speaker 1>it all doesn't come down to or depend on one individual. Yeah,

0:32:00.440 --> 0:32:03.440
<v Speaker 1>So part of the issue here was and this is

0:32:03.480 --> 0:32:06.760
<v Speaker 1>common practice in crypto and and really it originates from

0:32:06.760 --> 0:32:11.840
<v Speaker 1>traditional finance, but we had a customer on a personal

0:32:11.880 --> 0:32:16.200
<v Speaker 1>recourse based non liquidation account. UM. We will be eliminating

0:32:16.600 --> 0:32:20.080
<v Speaker 1>that type of account. We will also be making these

0:32:20.120 --> 0:32:23.040
<v Speaker 1>positions public and you won't just have to take our

0:32:23.080 --> 0:32:25.600
<v Speaker 1>word for it. We have an auditing firm that we're

0:32:25.600 --> 0:32:29.640
<v Speaker 1>going to be working with two have them published this data,

0:32:29.760 --> 0:32:32.280
<v Speaker 1>and this is much needed data in futures. There isn't

0:32:32.280 --> 0:32:36.520
<v Speaker 1>a single crypto futures exchange in the world, uh, including

0:32:36.520 --> 0:32:39.360
<v Speaker 1>here in the US UM that that makes this data

0:32:39.400 --> 0:32:44.680
<v Speaker 1>public around position sizes and the margin ratios, margin balances

0:32:44.800 --> 0:32:47.600
<v Speaker 1>and collateral backing those positions. And it is one of

0:32:47.600 --> 0:32:51.440
<v Speaker 1>those things where there's a balance between transparency and privacy.

0:32:51.560 --> 0:32:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Right now and Defy they've set the standard in terms

0:32:54.040 --> 0:32:58.000
<v Speaker 1>of transparency, and we need to do at least as

0:32:58.000 --> 0:33:01.280
<v Speaker 1>good as, if not much better than Defy with respect

0:33:01.320 --> 0:33:05.880
<v Speaker 1>to transparency so that depositors and users can feel comfortable trading. UM.

0:33:05.920 --> 0:33:09.040
<v Speaker 1>It has a damage to privacy, but we think that

0:33:09.320 --> 0:33:12.240
<v Speaker 1>traders are going to find that worthwhile for the you know,

0:33:12.280 --> 0:33:15.520
<v Speaker 1>the additional comfort that they get from knowing the risk

0:33:15.600 --> 0:33:18.959
<v Speaker 1>and the leverage implicit in the system. So what's your

0:33:18.960 --> 0:33:21.680
<v Speaker 1>message to customers right now. What's the level of confidence,

0:33:21.760 --> 0:33:24.880
<v Speaker 1>your level of confidence that in the three days between

0:33:24.880 --> 0:33:29.000
<v Speaker 1>now and June you're going to make that date. Yeah,

0:33:29.360 --> 0:33:33.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm highly confident. We have we have spoken to people

0:33:33.440 --> 0:33:37.360
<v Speaker 1>NonStop on on phone calls and in person meetings UH

0:33:37.560 --> 0:33:43.040
<v Speaker 1>since this issue arose, and UM, we have more than

0:33:43.080 --> 0:33:48.000
<v Speaker 1>half of the UH the amount needed in soft commitments

0:33:48.560 --> 0:33:52.280
<v Speaker 1>to UH to get this done. And so I'm I'm

0:33:52.360 --> 0:33:56.720
<v Speaker 1>highly confident that there's strong appetite from within the crypto

0:33:56.760 --> 0:34:00.320
<v Speaker 1>space and also in the broader institutional space in this

0:34:00.400 --> 0:34:04.360
<v Speaker 1>type of token. UM, it's not we're turning a problem

0:34:04.360 --> 0:34:09.919
<v Speaker 1>into an opportunity, and we're also UM, you know, we're

0:34:09.920 --> 0:34:13.600
<v Speaker 1>also turning that into an opportunity that gets resolution very

0:34:13.680 --> 0:34:17.879
<v Speaker 1>very quickly. You know. This this is something where at

0:34:17.880 --> 0:34:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the end of this offering, UM, you know, the problem

0:34:21.120 --> 0:34:23.880
<v Speaker 1>is solved within a matter of days. This is something

0:34:23.920 --> 0:34:27.400
<v Speaker 1>that's been done before in Crypto's history. UM, and and

0:34:27.480 --> 0:34:30.480
<v Speaker 1>it's been extremely successful when it's been done before in crypto.

0:34:30.719 --> 0:34:33.399
<v Speaker 1>What kind of treasure do you feel to reveal more

0:34:33.440 --> 0:34:36.440
<v Speaker 1>details about who this investor is who couldn't meet the

0:34:36.440 --> 0:34:40.600
<v Speaker 1>margin calls initially, especially when this new token is tied

0:34:40.680 --> 0:34:43.600
<v Speaker 1>to their fortunes. The people who will be investing in

0:34:43.640 --> 0:34:46.000
<v Speaker 1>this new token are doing it to make this other

0:34:46.040 --> 0:34:49.640
<v Speaker 1>investor that they don't know. Hal, Yeah, that's a that's

0:34:49.640 --> 0:34:52.520
<v Speaker 1>a great question. And look, I think the market is

0:34:52.600 --> 0:34:57.279
<v Speaker 1>always going to demand more and more transparency. So we're

0:34:57.400 --> 0:35:00.880
<v Speaker 1>going to be revealing as much information and as we

0:35:01.000 --> 0:35:04.320
<v Speaker 1>can as we're able to reveal that information. At this point,

0:35:04.719 --> 0:35:06.960
<v Speaker 1>this is you know, this is what we can give,

0:35:07.160 --> 0:35:11.880
<v Speaker 1>and we wanted to very very quickly, uh, be fully

0:35:11.880 --> 0:35:15.239
<v Speaker 1>transparent about what happened, how we're resolving it, and our

0:35:15.280 --> 0:35:20.080
<v Speaker 1>plan going forward to uh, you know, protect customers, uh

0:35:20.120 --> 0:35:22.799
<v Speaker 1>and and be fully transparent to customers about all the

0:35:22.880 --> 0:35:26.600
<v Speaker 1>leverage in the system and how it's collateralized. But I think, uh,

0:35:26.840 --> 0:35:29.080
<v Speaker 1>I think the market will demand that information. I think

0:35:29.080 --> 0:35:32.400
<v Speaker 1>the market will try to pursue that information, and uh,

0:35:32.520 --> 0:35:36.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's the beautiful and powerful thing about markets,

0:35:36.200 --> 0:35:40.319
<v Speaker 1>and that's the important thing about transparency, and uh, I

0:35:40.360 --> 0:35:43.200
<v Speaker 1>think that's what's going to happen going forward. This one customer,

0:35:43.239 --> 0:35:45.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how do you know whether he or she

0:35:46.120 --> 0:35:48.880
<v Speaker 1>can pay you back? How much confidence do you have

0:35:48.960 --> 0:35:51.759
<v Speaker 1>that you will get that money back? And what confidence

0:35:51.760 --> 0:35:54.440
<v Speaker 1>can you have customers that you would remain solvent and

0:35:54.480 --> 0:35:58.080
<v Speaker 1>be able to continue operations in normal form if they

0:35:58.120 --> 0:36:01.759
<v Speaker 1>can't pay you back. Yes, So we have alternative mechanisms

0:36:02.000 --> 0:36:05.880
<v Speaker 1>if if we're not able to conclude this raise, we

0:36:05.920 --> 0:36:08.799
<v Speaker 1>have alternative mechanisms we're looking at and we have on

0:36:08.840 --> 0:36:14.240
<v Speaker 1>the table. Um. Really the focus is on this mechanism

0:36:14.280 --> 0:36:18.080
<v Speaker 1>because it actually opens up a new type of asset

0:36:18.239 --> 0:36:21.920
<v Speaker 1>for customers to invest in. And UM, you know, I

0:36:21.960 --> 0:36:24.320
<v Speaker 1>think there's a lot of people very familiar with the situation.

0:36:24.400 --> 0:36:26.160
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a lot of people who you know,

0:36:26.640 --> 0:36:31.640
<v Speaker 1>want access to this type of yield. So it's again,

0:36:31.880 --> 0:36:34.120
<v Speaker 1>we want to turn this into an opportunity for people.

0:36:34.480 --> 0:36:37.239
<v Speaker 1>We want to be totally transparent about what happened, and

0:36:37.280 --> 0:36:41.480
<v Speaker 1>we also want to make it clear um going forward, Ah,

0:36:42.680 --> 0:36:45.200
<v Speaker 1>every bit of data about the inner workings of our

0:36:45.239 --> 0:36:47.719
<v Speaker 1>exchange is going to be public. You know. We we

0:36:47.760 --> 0:36:51.000
<v Speaker 1>already um are extremely public about all the data in

0:36:51.000 --> 0:36:53.480
<v Speaker 1>our exchange, but this is an area for us to

0:36:54.000 --> 0:36:57.600
<v Speaker 1>go even further and even more cutting edge on the transparency.

0:36:57.640 --> 0:37:01.799
<v Speaker 1>Know all right, Mark Lambs of coin Plex coin Flex,

0:37:01.840 --> 0:37:04.719
<v Speaker 1>thank you Mark for coming and sharing your side. What's

0:37:04.760 --> 0:37:08.440
<v Speaker 1>happening with us along with our very own shot. Appreciate it.

0:37:16.760 --> 0:37:20.439
<v Speaker 1>Short sellers reportedly have been ramping up their bets against Tether,

0:37:20.600 --> 0:37:23.560
<v Speaker 1>the world's largest stable coin, according to The Wall Street Journal.

0:37:23.600 --> 0:37:27.000
<v Speaker 1>More traditional hedge funds have executed trades to short Tether

0:37:27.160 --> 0:37:30.960
<v Speaker 1>through Genesis Global Trading, one of the largest crypto brokerage

0:37:31.280 --> 0:37:35.200
<v Speaker 1>brokerages for professional investors. Some hedge funds are shorting Tether

0:37:35.440 --> 0:37:40.640
<v Speaker 1>as a bet about the broader economy and Taiwan's Global

0:37:40.680 --> 0:37:44.719
<v Speaker 1>Wafers plans to build a semiconductor silicon wafer plant in

0:37:44.920 --> 0:37:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Texas that will be the biggest of its kind on

0:37:47.920 --> 0:37:50.719
<v Speaker 1>American soil. The company says the factory will close a

0:37:50.719 --> 0:37:53.640
<v Speaker 1>critical gap in the supply chain. The plant is being

0:37:53.640 --> 0:37:57.120
<v Speaker 1>built in Sherman, Texas, could support as many as fifteen

0:37:57.160 --> 0:38:01.280
<v Speaker 1>hundred jobs. And that doesn't for the citition of Bloomberg Technology.

0:38:01.280 --> 0:38:03.120
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna be back tomorrow. We've got some great guests

0:38:03.120 --> 0:38:06.120
<v Speaker 1>lined up. Arms CEO Renee Has will be here along

0:38:06.160 --> 0:38:10.279
<v Speaker 1>with Cloud Flares, Matthew Prince and this will be fun.

0:38:10.400 --> 0:38:13.960
<v Speaker 1>American sprinter and the most decorated US track and field

0:38:14.000 --> 0:38:18.399
<v Speaker 1>athlete in Olympic history, Alison Felix, she's got a tech

0:38:18.400 --> 0:38:21.480
<v Speaker 1>angle for you. We'll talk to her about that tomorrow.

0:38:22.120 --> 0:38:25.759
<v Speaker 1>And natally changing in San Francisco. This is Bloomberg