1 00:00:15,370 --> 00:00:31,570 Speaker 1: Pushkin. On the twenty first of August nineteen seventy four, 2 00:00:32,010 --> 00:00:35,450 Speaker 1: Elaine Oswald made a visit to the doctor's office in 3 00:00:35,490 --> 00:00:38,450 Speaker 1: a small town not far from Manchester in the north 4 00:00:38,450 --> 00:00:42,130 Speaker 1: of England. Oswald had a slight pain in her side, 5 00:00:42,410 --> 00:00:44,530 Speaker 1: but she was hoping to go into work later that day. 6 00:00:45,450 --> 00:00:48,970 Speaker 1: Oswald had never met this particular doctor before, and he 7 00:00:49,090 --> 00:00:51,330 Speaker 1: was only a few years older than she was. She 8 00:00:51,410 --> 00:00:54,730 Speaker 1: was only twenty five. He had spectacles and the kind 9 00:00:54,770 --> 00:00:57,530 Speaker 1: of big brown beard that was fashionable at the time. 10 00:00:58,130 --> 00:01:01,970 Speaker 1: The doctor couldn't have been friendlier or more accommodating. He 11 00:01:02,050 --> 00:01:04,290 Speaker 1: sat beside her, not over on the other side of 12 00:01:04,330 --> 00:01:06,850 Speaker 1: a big desk, and he told her she might have 13 00:01:06,970 --> 00:01:11,530 Speaker 1: kidney stones. He prescribed some strong painkillers, then suggested she 14 00:01:11,570 --> 00:01:15,010 Speaker 1: go home and rest. Leave your door unlocked. He said, 15 00:01:15,450 --> 00:01:18,090 Speaker 1: I'll come round after my morning clinic has finished and 16 00:01:18,170 --> 00:01:21,890 Speaker 1: do a blood test. Later that day he stopped by. 17 00:01:22,610 --> 00:01:25,130 Speaker 1: His wife and son were in the car outside. He said, 18 00:01:25,690 --> 00:01:27,970 Speaker 1: just a quick jab with a needle to draw the 19 00:01:27,970 --> 00:01:31,850 Speaker 1: blood and he'd be on his way. The needle slid 20 00:01:32,050 --> 00:01:37,650 Speaker 1: into her arm. The next thing Elaine Oswald remembers was 21 00:01:37,690 --> 00:01:40,490 Speaker 1: waking up on the floor with a doctor and two 22 00:01:40,530 --> 00:01:44,490 Speaker 1: paramedics trying to revive her. She was rushed to hospital, 23 00:01:44,970 --> 00:01:47,850 Speaker 1: where the staff, she recalled, treated her like the scum 24 00:01:47,890 --> 00:01:51,450 Speaker 1: of the earth. They assumed she'd overdosed on those painkillers. 25 00:01:52,210 --> 00:01:55,090 Speaker 1: The young doctor was much kinder. She must have had 26 00:01:55,130 --> 00:01:58,570 Speaker 1: an allergic reaction, he said, Thank goodness he'd been there 27 00:01:58,570 --> 00:02:01,570 Speaker 1: to administer the kiss of life. He promised to write 28 00:02:01,650 --> 00:02:05,210 Speaker 1: up the case for a medical journal. She was grateful, 29 00:02:05,250 --> 00:02:09,770 Speaker 1: of course, who wouldn't be. When she was discharged from hospital, 30 00:02:10,050 --> 00:02:13,130 Speaker 1: the kind doctor even invited her and her husband for dinner. 31 00:02:13,730 --> 00:02:16,410 Speaker 1: It was a pleasant evening. He gave her a medic 32 00:02:16,450 --> 00:02:20,890 Speaker 1: alert bracelet so that no future clinician would accidentally prescribe 33 00:02:20,930 --> 00:02:25,170 Speaker 1: similar drugs. She'd go on to have two children, toughing 34 00:02:25,210 --> 00:02:28,090 Speaker 1: it out through the agonies of labor without pain relief. 35 00:02:31,050 --> 00:02:35,450 Speaker 1: Elaine Oswald eventually moved to America, became a professor of English, 36 00:02:36,090 --> 00:02:39,330 Speaker 1: and for the next twenty five years assumed that the 37 00:02:39,450 --> 00:02:44,090 Speaker 1: kind doctor, a man called Harold Shipman, had saved her life. 38 00:02:45,250 --> 00:02:50,010 Speaker 1: She couldn't have been more wrong. I'm Tim Harford, and 39 00:02:50,170 --> 00:03:31,730 Speaker 1: you're listening to cautionary tales. It took twenty five years 40 00:03:31,770 --> 00:03:34,730 Speaker 1: for the world to realize that Harold Chipman was not 41 00:03:34,970 --> 00:03:38,290 Speaker 1: the kindly doctor who believed in his patients while others 42 00:03:38,330 --> 00:03:41,810 Speaker 1: treated them badly. Not the bold life saver who'd leap 43 00:03:41,890 --> 00:03:45,090 Speaker 1: to administer the kiss of life, Not the caring man 44 00:03:45,170 --> 00:03:47,890 Speaker 1: who'd go the extra mile to visit his patience at 45 00:03:47,930 --> 00:03:52,530 Speaker 1: home rather than drag them into the clinic. No, Harold 46 00:03:52,530 --> 00:03:57,810 Speaker 1: Shipman was a murderer, and not just any murderer. In 47 00:03:57,970 --> 00:04:03,250 Speaker 1: sheer numerical terms, he was the worst serial killer in history. 48 00:04:04,770 --> 00:04:09,410 Speaker 1: There are plenty of notorious killers, the charming Ted Bundy, 49 00:04:10,050 --> 00:04:14,090 Speaker 1: John Wayne Gaycy, the Killer Clown, the son of Sam 50 00:04:14,330 --> 00:04:19,570 Speaker 1: David Berkowitz. But while Bundy, Gaycey, and Berkowitz between them 51 00:04:19,730 --> 00:04:24,650 Speaker 1: killed more than seventy people, Shipman alone killed more than 52 00:04:24,690 --> 00:04:29,490 Speaker 1: two hundred. Often his victims would be people living by themselves, 53 00:04:30,050 --> 00:04:34,330 Speaker 1: elderly but in perfectly fine health. Shipman would come round, 54 00:04:34,810 --> 00:04:38,090 Speaker 1: inject them with an overdose of morphine, just as he 55 00:04:38,130 --> 00:04:41,770 Speaker 1: had injected young Elaine Oswald, and then sign a death 56 00:04:41,770 --> 00:04:47,170 Speaker 1: certificate saying that they had died of old age. When 57 00:04:47,210 --> 00:04:50,770 Speaker 1: I began researching this cautionary tale, I knew that Shipman 58 00:04:50,970 --> 00:04:55,330 Speaker 1: was a terrible man. I didn't understand quite how terrible 59 00:04:56,170 --> 00:04:59,050 Speaker 1: I vaguely had in mind a doctor who started down 60 00:04:59,090 --> 00:05:01,810 Speaker 1: this path by easing the deaths of patients who were 61 00:05:01,850 --> 00:05:05,450 Speaker 1: in pain and terminally ill, and then got carried away. 62 00:05:06,450 --> 00:05:10,610 Speaker 1: But the truth is so much more horrible than Shipman 63 00:05:10,650 --> 00:05:15,490 Speaker 1: would kill healthy people, then to explain their deaths, he'd 64 00:05:15,490 --> 00:05:19,170 Speaker 1: say they'd been drug addicts. He'd retrospectively tamper with their 65 00:05:19,210 --> 00:05:24,930 Speaker 1: medical records and leave the bereaved families bewildered. More than once, 66 00:05:25,210 --> 00:05:28,810 Speaker 1: he killed someone in his clinic, then would claim they'd 67 00:05:28,890 --> 00:05:32,570 Speaker 1: died of heart failure. He may have killed a severely 68 00:05:32,610 --> 00:05:36,970 Speaker 1: disabled four year old girl. When one middle aged man, 69 00:05:37,290 --> 00:05:43,170 Speaker 1: Jim King, was misdiagnosed with cancer, Shipman intercepted the letter 70 00:05:43,210 --> 00:05:45,370 Speaker 1: from the hospital with a good news that he was 71 00:05:45,450 --> 00:05:50,530 Speaker 1: cancer free after all. Shipman supplied Jim with morphine, got 72 00:05:50,610 --> 00:05:54,010 Speaker 1: him hooked, and watched as Jim lost his job and 73 00:05:54,210 --> 00:05:59,210 Speaker 1: pawned his possessions. Meanwhile, Shipman skimmed off some of that 74 00:05:59,290 --> 00:06:03,330 Speaker 1: morphine and used it to murder Jim King's own father. 75 00:06:04,770 --> 00:06:08,890 Speaker 1: Why did he do it? Plenty of people have speculated, 76 00:06:09,610 --> 00:06:14,450 Speaker 1: but nobody knows. One doctor, an expert witness at Shipman's 77 00:06:14,530 --> 00:06:18,410 Speaker 1: trial mused that while some doctors would relax from the 78 00:06:18,450 --> 00:06:21,450 Speaker 1: stresses of the profession by playing a round of golf, 79 00:06:22,250 --> 00:06:28,290 Speaker 1: Shipman seemed to relax by murdering his patience. Shipman, who 80 00:06:28,490 --> 00:06:32,610 Speaker 1: killed himself in prison, never offered an admission of guilt, 81 00:06:33,170 --> 00:06:37,530 Speaker 1: let alone an explanation. But this cautionary tale isn't going 82 00:06:37,570 --> 00:06:42,530 Speaker 1: to pick apart Harold Shipman's psychology. No, this tale, like 83 00:06:42,650 --> 00:06:47,170 Speaker 1: all our tales, is about the lessons we can learn here. 84 00:06:47,570 --> 00:06:50,090 Speaker 1: The lesson is that Harold Shipman could have been caught 85 00:06:50,370 --> 00:06:53,850 Speaker 1: much earlier. Maybe not as early as nineteen seventy four 86 00:06:53,930 --> 00:06:57,770 Speaker 1: when he injected the young Elaine Oswald with morphine, perhaps 87 00:06:57,810 --> 00:07:01,130 Speaker 1: intending to kill her, and perhaps with some other wickedness 88 00:07:01,170 --> 00:07:04,170 Speaker 1: in mind, but he could have been caught early enough 89 00:07:04,290 --> 00:07:11,050 Speaker 1: to have saved more than a hundred lives. In the 90 00:07:11,090 --> 00:07:15,010 Speaker 1: early hours of July the twenty ninth, nineteen seventy six, 91 00:07:15,570 --> 00:07:19,690 Speaker 1: in the Bronx, New York, Jody Valenti and her friend 92 00:07:19,810 --> 00:07:24,490 Speaker 1: Donna Lauria sat in their oldsmobile chatting. They were just 93 00:07:24,650 --> 00:07:29,490 Speaker 1: outside Donna's home, Donna's parents were inside. Both of them 94 00:07:29,530 --> 00:07:33,210 Speaker 1: were in medical training, Jody to be a nurse, Donna 95 00:07:33,490 --> 00:07:36,330 Speaker 1: to be a medic, but Donna would never get the 96 00:07:36,450 --> 00:07:40,890 Speaker 1: chance to finish her studies. Jody Valenti was a young 97 00:07:40,930 --> 00:07:45,210 Speaker 1: woman like Elaine Oswald, but her brush with death at 98 00:07:45,210 --> 00:07:48,650 Speaker 1: the hands of a serial killer was a complete contrast 99 00:07:48,730 --> 00:07:52,770 Speaker 1: with Elane's. As Jody and Donna were talking, a man 100 00:07:52,850 --> 00:07:56,650 Speaker 1: walked up, pulled out a pistol, and shot them both. 101 00:07:58,010 --> 00:08:02,690 Speaker 1: Donna Laurier died instantly. Jody Valenti took a bullet in 102 00:08:02,770 --> 00:08:08,090 Speaker 1: her leg and she survived. She was, of course traumatized, 103 00:08:08,410 --> 00:08:12,090 Speaker 1: and she obviously understood quite how close she had come 104 00:08:12,130 --> 00:08:16,370 Speaker 1: to death. Unlike Elaine Oswald, she didn't spend the next 105 00:08:16,530 --> 00:08:20,250 Speaker 1: twenty five years believing that her attacker was a hero 106 00:08:20,450 --> 00:08:24,570 Speaker 1: who had saved her life. The NYPD had a clearly 107 00:08:24,610 --> 00:08:29,330 Speaker 1: defined problem. Someone calling himself the Son of Sam was 108 00:08:29,370 --> 00:08:33,770 Speaker 1: wandering around New York City shooting young people, leaving some dead, 109 00:08:34,050 --> 00:08:37,810 Speaker 1: some disabled, and the whole community in a panic. He 110 00:08:37,890 --> 00:08:42,050 Speaker 1: had to be found, and eventually, in August the following year, 111 00:08:42,570 --> 00:08:50,410 Speaker 1: he was found. In the case of Harold Chipman, the 112 00:08:50,490 --> 00:08:55,450 Speaker 1: Greater Manchester Police faced a radically different problem. The problem, 113 00:08:55,530 --> 00:08:59,170 Speaker 1: in fact, was to realize that there was a problem, 114 00:08:59,970 --> 00:09:03,090 Speaker 1: because The police had no idea that people were being murdered. 115 00:09:03,890 --> 00:09:07,290 Speaker 1: People were dying, yes, but according to their doctor, they 116 00:09:07,290 --> 00:09:11,250 Speaker 1: were dying of natural causes. The deaths were a surprise 117 00:09:11,370 --> 00:09:14,490 Speaker 1: to friends and family. Most of the time, the victims 118 00:09:14,570 --> 00:09:18,450 Speaker 1: weren't seriously ill, just old and alone. In the morning, 119 00:09:18,530 --> 00:09:21,770 Speaker 1: there would be pottering around, catching the bus or dropping 120 00:09:21,810 --> 00:09:24,890 Speaker 1: in on a neighbor, in good shape and fine spirits. 121 00:09:25,770 --> 00:09:30,450 Speaker 1: And in the afternoon, dear kind doctor Shipman would come 122 00:09:30,490 --> 00:09:34,770 Speaker 1: by on a routine visit, and according to doctor Shipman, 123 00:09:35,650 --> 00:09:39,690 Speaker 1: well he'd find them dead, dead of old age. He 124 00:09:39,730 --> 00:09:43,210 Speaker 1: would often write on the death certificate, even though doctors 125 00:09:43,210 --> 00:09:47,410 Speaker 1: would normally be more specific. And while their friends and 126 00:09:47,490 --> 00:09:52,410 Speaker 1: relatives were shocked, they weren't shocked enough to call the police. 127 00:09:53,410 --> 00:09:56,330 Speaker 1: As far as the police were concerned, then there was 128 00:09:56,730 --> 00:10:05,170 Speaker 1: nothing to investigate. Sarah Marsland died on the seventh of 129 00:10:05,250 --> 00:10:09,210 Speaker 1: August nineteen seventy eight at her home in Hyde, a 130 00:10:09,250 --> 00:10:13,210 Speaker 1: small town near Manchester. Harold Shipman was a doctor. He 131 00:10:13,250 --> 00:10:18,010 Speaker 1: had moved to hide in nineteen seventy seven. By coincidence, 132 00:10:18,090 --> 00:10:20,330 Speaker 1: that was about the time my own family moved to 133 00:10:20,370 --> 00:10:24,090 Speaker 1: the area. I was four years old. I'm so glad 134 00:10:24,130 --> 00:10:27,450 Speaker 1: I never came any closer to his orbit. We can't 135 00:10:27,490 --> 00:10:30,530 Speaker 1: be absolutely sure that Sarah was one of Shipman's victims, 136 00:10:30,570 --> 00:10:34,130 Speaker 1: because nobody even suspected that a crime had been committed 137 00:10:34,410 --> 00:10:37,690 Speaker 1: until more than two decades after she had died. But 138 00:10:37,890 --> 00:10:42,810 Speaker 1: the circumstantial evidence is this. Although Sarah Marsland seems to 139 00:10:42,810 --> 00:10:46,570 Speaker 1: have had no particular health complaint, Harold Shipman came to 140 00:10:46,610 --> 00:10:51,890 Speaker 1: see her uninvited and unannounced. While he was there she died. 141 00:10:52,530 --> 00:10:55,770 Speaker 1: It wasn't unusual for Shipman to visit patients for no 142 00:10:55,890 --> 00:10:58,770 Speaker 1: particular reason. He did it all the time, and they 143 00:10:58,810 --> 00:11:02,690 Speaker 1: loved him for it. A good old fashioned, hard working doctor, 144 00:11:02,730 --> 00:11:06,130 Speaker 1: they said, someone with all the time in the world 145 00:11:06,170 --> 00:11:10,770 Speaker 1: for his patience. But even so, it is a striking 146 00:11:10,810 --> 00:11:14,090 Speaker 1: coincidence that some one would drop dead just when a 147 00:11:14,170 --> 00:11:16,730 Speaker 1: doctor happened to be popping in for a friendly visit. 148 00:11:18,090 --> 00:11:21,010 Speaker 1: One physician later testified that this was the sort of 149 00:11:21,050 --> 00:11:24,490 Speaker 1: coincidence there might be at once in a lifetime experience 150 00:11:24,530 --> 00:11:28,690 Speaker 1: for a family doctor, but for Harold Shipman, it seemed 151 00:11:28,690 --> 00:11:34,170 Speaker 1: to happen every few weeks. Nevertheless, nobody raised the alarm 152 00:11:34,250 --> 00:11:37,770 Speaker 1: about Sarah Marsland at the time, and why would they 153 00:11:37,850 --> 00:11:40,890 Speaker 1: raise the alarm. She was in her eighties and her 154 00:11:40,930 --> 00:11:44,650 Speaker 1: own doctor had declared that she had died of coronary thrombosis. 155 00:11:45,290 --> 00:11:50,650 Speaker 1: The situation didn't seem out of the ordinary. A few 156 00:11:50,770 --> 00:11:55,930 Speaker 1: years before Sarah Marsland's death, two psychologists, Daniel Carneman and 157 00:11:56,090 --> 00:12:01,050 Speaker 1: Amos Verski, began investigating patterns in the way we make judgments. 158 00:12:01,850 --> 00:12:05,570 Speaker 1: One pattern that they discovered helps to explain why nobody 159 00:12:05,650 --> 00:12:10,330 Speaker 1: suspected doctor Shipman for a very long time. That pattern 160 00:12:10,410 --> 00:12:15,050 Speaker 1: is known as the representativeness heuristic, a habit of mind 161 00:12:15,290 --> 00:12:20,090 Speaker 1: that leads us to sort a situation into strange or unremarkable, 162 00:12:20,410 --> 00:12:24,330 Speaker 1: depending not on the true likelihood, but whether it matches 163 00:12:24,370 --> 00:12:29,690 Speaker 1: our existing mental groupings. For an example of the representativeness heuristic, 164 00:12:30,050 --> 00:12:33,490 Speaker 1: consider the following description of a person. He's called Jeff. 165 00:12:34,050 --> 00:12:37,370 Speaker 1: Jeff is forty and very good looking. He works out, 166 00:12:37,690 --> 00:12:41,730 Speaker 1: practices yoga, and is a vegetarian. When he was a teenager, 167 00:12:41,970 --> 00:12:44,370 Speaker 1: Jeff was a movie buff, and he also took the 168 00:12:44,490 --> 00:12:48,050 Speaker 1: lead role in the school play. He's always been extroverted. 169 00:12:48,410 --> 00:12:52,050 Speaker 1: He's already gone through two divorces, and his current girlfriend 170 00:12:52,130 --> 00:12:55,890 Speaker 1: is fifteen years younger than him. Which of the following 171 00:12:55,930 --> 00:12:59,610 Speaker 1: do you think is more probable A. Jeff is now 172 00:12:59,610 --> 00:13:06,690 Speaker 1: a Hollywood movie star or B Jeff is now an accountant. Intuitively, 173 00:13:06,930 --> 00:13:10,650 Speaker 1: Jeff sounds like a movie star, but that's not right. 174 00:13:11,650 --> 00:13:14,970 Speaker 1: There are just a few dozen genuine movie stars in Hollywood, 175 00:13:15,330 --> 00:13:18,130 Speaker 1: while there are well over a million accountants in the 176 00:13:18,210 --> 00:13:22,410 Speaker 1: United States. Many thousands of them will, like Jeff, be 177 00:13:22,490 --> 00:13:26,770 Speaker 1: good looking, twice divorced vegetarians with a background in amateur dramatics. 178 00:13:27,490 --> 00:13:31,290 Speaker 1: The representativeness heuristic is a quick and easy way for 179 00:13:31,370 --> 00:13:34,530 Speaker 1: our subconscious mind to make decisions. We use it all 180 00:13:34,530 --> 00:13:38,570 Speaker 1: the time without knowing, and it often works, but it 181 00:13:38,650 --> 00:13:43,930 Speaker 1: can lead us astray. It led the community of Hide 182 00:13:43,930 --> 00:13:48,250 Speaker 1: astray too. In a subtly different way. Harold Chipman didn't 183 00:13:48,290 --> 00:13:51,450 Speaker 1: repeat his early mistake of drugging a twenty five year 184 00:13:51,490 --> 00:13:55,130 Speaker 1: old Elane Oswald. He began to target much older people, 185 00:13:55,530 --> 00:13:59,370 Speaker 1: people like the widow Sarah Marsland. Although Sarah was in 186 00:13:59,410 --> 00:14:03,330 Speaker 1: decent health, she fits the mental template of someone who 187 00:14:03,370 --> 00:14:06,810 Speaker 1: would die from natural causes. My point is not that 188 00:14:06,890 --> 00:14:10,490 Speaker 1: when an elderly person dies we should assume it was murder, 189 00:14:10,890 --> 00:14:14,090 Speaker 1: not even when the elderly person dies, just as her 190 00:14:14,170 --> 00:14:18,810 Speaker 1: doctor happens to call past unannounced. No. My point is 191 00:14:18,970 --> 00:14:23,130 Speaker 1: that when something fits neatly into our mental story, we 192 00:14:23,210 --> 00:14:26,490 Speaker 1: don't ask questions. We don't start to weigh up the 193 00:14:26,530 --> 00:14:31,810 Speaker 1: probabilities of murder versus natural causes. If we did, we'd 194 00:14:31,850 --> 00:14:35,130 Speaker 1: simply ask for an autopsy, wouldn't we But we don't, 195 00:14:36,050 --> 00:14:40,010 Speaker 1: and we don't because what we see fits naturally into 196 00:14:40,050 --> 00:14:44,170 Speaker 1: the story we expect. So the fundamental problem was not 197 00:14:44,330 --> 00:14:47,930 Speaker 1: only did people not realize that Shipman was a murderer, 198 00:14:48,370 --> 00:14:51,770 Speaker 1: they didn't even realize that there were any murders taking place. 199 00:14:52,570 --> 00:14:58,810 Speaker 1: The representativeness heuristic reassured them, nothing strange is happening. Move on, 200 00:14:59,450 --> 00:15:04,810 Speaker 1: there's nothing to see. Cautionary tales will be right back. 201 00:15:11,690 --> 00:15:16,890 Speaker 1: Shipmen murdered people with lethal doses of morphine, which left 202 00:15:16,970 --> 00:15:20,970 Speaker 1: no obvious trace unless there was an autopsy. But why 203 00:15:20,970 --> 00:15:24,650 Speaker 1: would there be one? The representativeness heuristic tells us nothing 204 00:15:24,690 --> 00:15:28,530 Speaker 1: stranger has happened. Shipman would sign the death certificate himself 205 00:15:28,650 --> 00:15:32,410 Speaker 1: to certify death from old age or heart failure. No 206 00:15:32,490 --> 00:15:36,410 Speaker 1: need to call the ambulance, he'd say, too late, no 207 00:15:36,570 --> 00:15:38,690 Speaker 1: need to call the police. He could deal with the 208 00:15:38,770 --> 00:15:45,050 Speaker 1: necessary paperwork himself again and again, Harold Shipman murdered people 209 00:15:45,330 --> 00:15:49,050 Speaker 1: in their own homes, and again and again. The friends 210 00:15:49,090 --> 00:15:52,130 Speaker 1: and the family of the victims did not realize that 211 00:15:52,210 --> 00:15:56,610 Speaker 1: a crime had been committed. Indeed, many people were grateful 212 00:15:56,650 --> 00:16:00,370 Speaker 1: to Shipmen, glad that in their final hours the patients 213 00:16:00,410 --> 00:16:03,130 Speaker 1: had had the close attention of the doctor they adored. 214 00:16:05,810 --> 00:16:09,690 Speaker 1: Not everyone felt that way. In nineteen ninety four, for example, 215 00:16:10,090 --> 00:16:13,770 Speaker 1: Alice Kitchen died suddenly at the age of seventy A 216 00:16:13,810 --> 00:16:16,530 Speaker 1: few hours after seeing her son and appearing to be 217 00:16:16,610 --> 00:16:19,890 Speaker 1: in good health. Doctor Shipman told her family that he 218 00:16:19,930 --> 00:16:22,330 Speaker 1: had called in to visit her, that she had clearly 219 00:16:22,330 --> 00:16:24,890 Speaker 1: suffered a stroke, but that she had refused to go 220 00:16:24,970 --> 00:16:28,170 Speaker 1: to hospital as he had suggested. It was a cruel 221 00:16:28,330 --> 00:16:33,650 Speaker 1: lie and an arrogant one. Alice Kitchen's family decided against 222 00:16:33,770 --> 00:16:37,530 Speaker 1: making a formal complaint, but they were angry. They thought 223 00:16:37,610 --> 00:16:42,690 Speaker 1: Shipman was guilty of negligence. In their book about Shipman's crimes, 224 00:16:43,170 --> 00:16:47,930 Speaker 1: Prescription for Murder, the journalists Brian Whittle and Jean Richie 225 00:16:48,330 --> 00:16:51,050 Speaker 1: muse on the nature of the murders and the people 226 00:16:51,090 --> 00:16:54,410 Speaker 1: who died. Their ages meant that the death would not 227 00:16:54,450 --> 00:16:58,810 Speaker 1: make any statistician raise an eyebrow seventy seventy four, sixty 228 00:16:58,850 --> 00:17:02,210 Speaker 1: nine eighty three, all within the range that death comes. 229 00:17:02,930 --> 00:17:06,890 Speaker 1: The deaths would not make any statistician raise an eyebrow. 230 00:17:07,730 --> 00:17:11,770 Speaker 1: It seems an uncontroversch or phrase. After all, elderly people 231 00:17:11,930 --> 00:17:15,130 Speaker 1: die all the time, don't they. But it's quite wrong. 232 00:17:15,810 --> 00:17:21,570 Speaker 1: The representativeness heuristic is soothing us into keeping our eyebrows unraised. 233 00:17:22,410 --> 00:17:28,850 Speaker 1: But statisticians don't use the representativeness heuristic. They use the data, 234 00:17:29,010 --> 00:17:32,650 Speaker 1: and any statistician given a look at the statistics behind 235 00:17:32,770 --> 00:17:37,370 Speaker 1: Harold Shipman's clinical practice would have raised more than an eyebrow. 236 00:17:38,370 --> 00:17:46,250 Speaker 1: They would have raised the alarm. Professor Sir David Spiegelhalter 237 00:17:46,530 --> 00:17:50,330 Speaker 1: is one of the UK's foremost statisticians. He's a brilliant 238 00:17:50,330 --> 00:17:53,850 Speaker 1: communicator of statistical ideas and the author of a great book, 239 00:17:54,130 --> 00:17:58,810 Speaker 1: The Art of Statistics. David was asked to provide advice 240 00:17:58,850 --> 00:18:02,410 Speaker 1: to the commissions set up after Shipman was jailed, invited 241 00:18:02,570 --> 00:18:07,130 Speaker 1: to answer the obvious question could Shipman have been stopped sooner? 242 00:18:07,850 --> 00:18:11,370 Speaker 1: And to David spiegel Alter and the other statisticians considering 243 00:18:11,370 --> 00:18:15,730 Speaker 1: the problem, that answer was, of course he could have 244 00:18:15,730 --> 00:18:19,050 Speaker 1: been stopped. All you had to do was look at 245 00:18:19,090 --> 00:18:24,010 Speaker 1: the numbers in the right way. Interrogating statistics to set 246 00:18:24,010 --> 00:18:27,210 Speaker 1: our alarm. Bells ringing was an idea developed by the 247 00:18:27,250 --> 00:18:31,370 Speaker 1: Allies during the Second World War. At Columbia University, New York, 248 00:18:31,650 --> 00:18:36,290 Speaker 1: the great Hungarian mathematician Abraham Vald was working on military 249 00:18:36,330 --> 00:18:41,610 Speaker 1: mathematics and he developed what he called sequential testing. Meanwhile, 250 00:18:41,930 --> 00:18:46,130 Speaker 1: the young mathematician named George Barnard was working in London 251 00:18:46,290 --> 00:18:50,770 Speaker 1: for the fabulously named Ministry of Supply. Because of the 252 00:18:50,810 --> 00:18:55,010 Speaker 1: wartime secrecy, Vald and Barnard weren't aware of each other's work, 253 00:18:55,410 --> 00:18:58,610 Speaker 1: but they were working on the same basic problem, which 254 00:18:58,650 --> 00:19:02,130 Speaker 1: is this. Let's say you have a process which produces 255 00:19:02,170 --> 00:19:06,330 Speaker 1: a random output. Say rolling a die, you are a one, 256 00:19:06,890 --> 00:19:15,530 Speaker 1: then a four, and another one, A two, one, five, three, one, six, 257 00:19:16,170 --> 00:19:19,530 Speaker 1: on you go. You can keep rolling as many times 258 00:19:19,570 --> 00:19:23,490 Speaker 1: as you like. So at what point do you say, Hey, 259 00:19:23,530 --> 00:19:28,010 Speaker 1: there's something strange about this dye. I'm rolling too many wands. 260 00:19:29,770 --> 00:19:32,330 Speaker 1: You can use the same idea to check products coming 261 00:19:32,370 --> 00:19:34,930 Speaker 1: off the production line. You don't want to stop the 262 00:19:34,930 --> 00:19:38,530 Speaker 1: conveyor belt just because of a single faulty product, but 263 00:19:38,810 --> 00:19:41,170 Speaker 1: neither do you want to keep the production line rolling 264 00:19:41,250 --> 00:19:45,690 Speaker 1: forever if there is a steady stream of problems. Rold 265 00:19:45,770 --> 00:19:49,210 Speaker 1: and Barnard would have been particularly focused on the manufacture 266 00:19:49,210 --> 00:19:52,730 Speaker 1: of ammunition and other armaments, but the maths can be 267 00:19:52,770 --> 00:19:56,490 Speaker 1: applied more widely. Sample some cookies to check whether they 268 00:19:56,490 --> 00:19:59,770 Speaker 1: have enough chocolate chips in them, or check the strength 269 00:19:59,770 --> 00:20:02,650 Speaker 1: of condoms by inflating them to see if they stand 270 00:20:02,690 --> 00:20:06,770 Speaker 1: up to the strain. Any product will have a failure rate. 271 00:20:07,530 --> 00:20:10,530 Speaker 1: But at what point do you say, hang on a minute, 272 00:20:11,410 --> 00:20:16,250 Speaker 1: something's wrong. David Spiegelholter and his colleagues told the Shipman 273 00:20:16,290 --> 00:20:20,610 Speaker 1: Inquiry that looking for suspicious patterns in medical records was 274 00:20:20,730 --> 00:20:24,770 Speaker 1: fundamentally similar to looking for suspicious patterns in dice rolls, 275 00:20:25,010 --> 00:20:28,370 Speaker 1: or cookies or condoms. You might want to make some 276 00:20:28,450 --> 00:20:31,850 Speaker 1: adjustments for the mix of cases. A doctor serving a 277 00:20:31,890 --> 00:20:34,570 Speaker 1: retirement community is going to have a very different case 278 00:20:34,610 --> 00:20:37,890 Speaker 1: mix from a doctor working on a military base, but 279 00:20:38,090 --> 00:20:42,090 Speaker 1: the principle is the same. Track deaths over time among 280 00:20:42,130 --> 00:20:45,610 Speaker 1: each doctor's patients, just as you might track faulty cookies 281 00:20:46,090 --> 00:20:50,930 Speaker 1: or faulty condoms. Spiegelholter and his colleagues concluded that the 282 00:20:51,010 --> 00:20:55,010 Speaker 1: kind of analysis developed by Vold and by Barnard could 283 00:20:55,010 --> 00:20:58,570 Speaker 1: have flagged Harold Shipman for close attention as early as 284 00:20:58,730 --> 00:21:03,850 Speaker 1: nineteen eighty four, fourteen years before he was eventually arrested. 285 00:21:04,330 --> 00:21:08,250 Speaker 1: More than a hundred murders could have been prevented, and 286 00:21:08,370 --> 00:21:12,570 Speaker 1: that's just statistical method. Other ways to slice the data 287 00:21:12,730 --> 00:21:16,130 Speaker 1: also raise questions. For example, there were a couple of 288 00:21:16,170 --> 00:21:19,850 Speaker 1: years in which Shipman went quiet, perhaps fearing that other 289 00:21:19,970 --> 00:21:23,050 Speaker 1: doctors in the clinic would notice what was happening. When 290 00:21:23,050 --> 00:21:25,650 Speaker 1: he left to set up shop as a lone practitioner 291 00:21:25,890 --> 00:21:30,370 Speaker 1: for the murders began again with hindsight. All this is 292 00:21:30,410 --> 00:21:33,930 Speaker 1: clear in the data. Even clearer is the fact that 293 00:21:33,970 --> 00:21:37,650 Speaker 1: so many of Shipman's patients died in the early afternoon, 294 00:21:38,250 --> 00:21:42,890 Speaker 1: a convenient time for Shipman's home visits. The pattern, says 295 00:21:42,930 --> 00:21:48,250 Speaker 1: Professor Spiegelhalter, requires no subtle statistical analysis. It is what 296 00:21:48,450 --> 00:21:54,490 Speaker 1: statisticians call interocular. Draw a graph and it hits you 297 00:21:54,570 --> 00:22:04,490 Speaker 1: between the eyes. Not all statistical anomalies result from foul play, 298 00:22:04,530 --> 00:22:07,930 Speaker 1: of course, David Spiegelhalter told me about one doctor who 299 00:22:08,010 --> 00:22:11,130 Speaker 1: had a truly extraordinary number of deaths on his watch, 300 00:22:11,530 --> 00:22:15,370 Speaker 1: even more than Harold Shipman. But there was an innocent explanation. 301 00:22:16,130 --> 00:22:19,930 Speaker 1: While Shipman's patients had often died suddenly, this doctor had 302 00:22:19,930 --> 00:22:23,410 Speaker 1: been treating terminally ill patients. He had gone to great 303 00:22:23,490 --> 00:22:26,210 Speaker 1: lengths to ensure they were able to die at home 304 00:22:26,850 --> 00:22:30,290 Speaker 1: rather than spending their final hours or days in hospital. 305 00:22:30,690 --> 00:22:33,810 Speaker 1: As a result, the doctor ended up signing a large 306 00:22:33,930 --> 00:22:38,490 Speaker 1: number of death certificates. But statistical analysis isn't designed to 307 00:22:38,570 --> 00:22:44,290 Speaker 1: prove guilt. It's designed to focus attention. Close inspection of 308 00:22:44,330 --> 00:22:48,330 Speaker 1: this doctor's work revealed a person who upheld the highest 309 00:22:48,450 --> 00:22:52,610 Speaker 1: standards of the medical profession. Close inspection of Harold Shipman's 310 00:22:52,610 --> 00:22:57,570 Speaker 1: practice would have revealed the appalling truth. A forensic analysis 311 00:22:57,570 --> 00:23:00,650 Speaker 1: of his medical record keeping, for example, would have shown 312 00:23:00,690 --> 00:23:04,810 Speaker 1: him back dating entries to invent medical problems after the fact, 313 00:23:05,290 --> 00:23:08,490 Speaker 1: and a single autopsy of one of the patients would 314 00:23:08,490 --> 00:23:12,730 Speaker 1: have revealed the lethal doses of morphine. All it would 315 00:23:12,730 --> 00:23:16,890 Speaker 1: have taken was someone to pay attention, and a simple 316 00:23:16,930 --> 00:23:20,370 Speaker 1: analysis of the numbers would have shown them which doctor 317 00:23:20,410 --> 00:23:24,690 Speaker 1: to pay attention to. But given just how simple this 318 00:23:24,810 --> 00:23:28,650 Speaker 1: statistical exercise would have been, given how many lives it 319 00:23:28,650 --> 00:23:31,450 Speaker 1: would have saved, and given the fact that we didn't 320 00:23:31,490 --> 00:23:35,770 Speaker 1: actually do it, I have a question, what else are 321 00:23:35,770 --> 00:23:45,970 Speaker 1: we missing? Cautionary tales will return in a minute. The 322 00:23:46,090 --> 00:23:49,930 Speaker 1: health authorities in the UK believe they now have statistical 323 00:23:49,930 --> 00:23:53,610 Speaker 1: alarm bells that would ring if another Harold Shipman comes along. 324 00:23:54,570 --> 00:23:58,930 Speaker 1: But what other stories are hiding in plain sight? In 325 00:23:59,010 --> 00:24:03,770 Speaker 1: twenty fourteen, and Case and Angus Deaton were spending the 326 00:24:03,810 --> 00:24:08,170 Speaker 1: summer together in a cabin in Montana. Case and Deaton 327 00:24:08,330 --> 00:24:12,450 Speaker 1: are married. Both are respected economists, and they had both 328 00:24:12,490 --> 00:24:16,490 Speaker 1: become deeply interested in the growing problem of suicide among 329 00:24:16,610 --> 00:24:21,370 Speaker 1: middle aged white Americans. To put that problem into context, 330 00:24:21,730 --> 00:24:25,250 Speaker 1: they decided to compare suicide to the more traditional forms 331 00:24:25,250 --> 00:24:29,570 Speaker 1: of death, such as heart disease and cancer. We went 332 00:24:29,610 --> 00:24:33,650 Speaker 1: to the Centers for Disease Control, downloaded the numbers, and 333 00:24:33,690 --> 00:24:37,250 Speaker 1: made the calculations. They write in their new book, Deaths 334 00:24:37,250 --> 00:24:40,970 Speaker 1: of Despair and the Future of Capitalism. To our astonishment, 335 00:24:41,330 --> 00:24:44,330 Speaker 1: it was not only suicide that was rising among middle 336 00:24:44,330 --> 00:24:49,410 Speaker 1: aged whites. It was all deaths. Not by much. But 337 00:24:49,570 --> 00:24:53,010 Speaker 1: death rates are supposed to fall year on year, so 338 00:24:53,050 --> 00:24:57,050 Speaker 1: even a pause was news, let alone an increase. We 339 00:24:57,170 --> 00:25:00,770 Speaker 1: thought we must have hit a wrong key. Constantly falling 340 00:25:00,810 --> 00:25:03,570 Speaker 1: death rates were one of the best and best established 341 00:25:03,610 --> 00:25:07,290 Speaker 1: features of the twentieth century. The finding was right there 342 00:25:07,330 --> 00:25:11,050 Speaker 1: in the data, but nobody, it seems, had thought to look. 343 00:25:11,810 --> 00:25:14,970 Speaker 1: We thought we must be wrong, because someone would know 344 00:25:15,050 --> 00:25:18,410 Speaker 1: about it. But they weren't wrong. They were just ignored. 345 00:25:19,290 --> 00:25:21,890 Speaker 1: The New England Journal of Medicine didn't want to publish 346 00:25:21,930 --> 00:25:26,090 Speaker 1: the results. The Journal of the American Medical Association rejected 347 00:25:26,130 --> 00:25:28,770 Speaker 1: us so quickly we thought it was an auto reply 348 00:25:28,890 --> 00:25:33,970 Speaker 1: because we'd used the wrong email address. Case and Dton 349 00:25:34,330 --> 00:25:38,850 Speaker 1: broadened and deepened their scrutiny of the numbers. Suicide was up, 350 00:25:39,410 --> 00:25:43,490 Speaker 1: so was chronic liver disease a sign of alcoholism. Even 351 00:25:43,530 --> 00:25:48,650 Speaker 1: more dramatically, deaths from poisoning were up. Poisoning sounds melodramatic, 352 00:25:48,850 --> 00:25:51,690 Speaker 1: like the cause of death in an Agatha Christie story, 353 00:25:52,330 --> 00:25:56,490 Speaker 1: but it usually means a fatal overdose of alcohol or drugs, 354 00:25:56,530 --> 00:26:02,210 Speaker 1: often opioids such as morphine or fentanyl. Once a rare problem, 355 00:26:02,610 --> 00:26:06,090 Speaker 1: drug overdoses have overtaken lung cancer as a cause of 356 00:26:06,130 --> 00:26:09,050 Speaker 1: death for forty five to fifty four year old white America. 357 00:26:09,090 --> 00:26:14,170 Speaker 1: And it all happened so quickly from barely being an 358 00:26:14,210 --> 00:26:17,490 Speaker 1: issue in the late nineteen nineties to making a major 359 00:26:17,570 --> 00:26:22,090 Speaker 1: dent in the mortality data just fifteen years later. It 360 00:26:22,370 --> 00:26:28,290 Speaker 1: is an ironic reversal of Harold Shipman's murderous career. Shipmen 361 00:26:28,530 --> 00:26:33,490 Speaker 1: killed vulnerable people with opioid overdoses. In the US, doctors 362 00:26:33,490 --> 00:26:39,730 Speaker 1: have simply been supplying ever more powerful opioids to vulnerable people. Misery, 363 00:26:40,090 --> 00:26:44,610 Speaker 1: pain or sheer accident have done the rest. Put these 364 00:26:44,650 --> 00:26:50,090 Speaker 1: three courses of death together, suicide, accidental overdoses, and livid disease, 365 00:26:50,690 --> 00:26:53,370 Speaker 1: and you have a category that Case and Dton named 366 00:26:53,890 --> 00:26:59,730 Speaker 1: deaths of despair. The toll dwarfs anything that one murderer 367 00:26:59,730 --> 00:27:03,570 Speaker 1: could achieve. Case and Dton found there were one hundred 368 00:27:03,610 --> 00:27:07,730 Speaker 1: and fifty eight thousand deaths of despair in twenty seventeen. 369 00:27:08,370 --> 00:27:11,170 Speaker 1: That is a similar scale to the first wave of 370 00:27:11,250 --> 00:27:15,930 Speaker 1: COVID nineteen deaths in the US. It was a catastrophe, 371 00:27:16,450 --> 00:27:19,650 Speaker 1: and it was a catastrophe that should have been plainly 372 00:27:19,770 --> 00:27:24,490 Speaker 1: visible in the statistics. Yet somehow nobody had taken the 373 00:27:24,530 --> 00:27:33,050 Speaker 1: effort to look. On the twenty fourth of June nineteen 374 00:27:33,170 --> 00:27:38,250 Speaker 1: ninety eight, Kathleen Grundy, the former Mayoress of Hyde, died 375 00:27:38,810 --> 00:27:43,450 Speaker 1: suddenly at the age of eighty one. It was a surprise. 376 00:27:44,010 --> 00:27:47,210 Speaker 1: She had been fit and socially active. On the same day, 377 00:27:47,690 --> 00:27:51,050 Speaker 1: a will arrived at a firm of local attorneys with 378 00:27:51,170 --> 00:27:54,650 Speaker 1: a covering letter. The will purported to be that of 379 00:27:54,890 --> 00:27:58,850 Speaker 1: Kathleen Grundy. It declared her intention to leave her house 380 00:27:58,930 --> 00:28:04,650 Speaker 1: to her dear family, doctor Harold Shipman, but the attorney 381 00:28:04,730 --> 00:28:08,250 Speaker 1: had never had any dealings with Kathleen Grundy and the 382 00:28:08,290 --> 00:28:12,650 Speaker 1: signatures looked odd. A few days later, a mysterious letter 383 00:28:12,730 --> 00:28:16,930 Speaker 1: from someone called Smith told the attorney that missus Grundy 384 00:28:17,010 --> 00:28:22,810 Speaker 1: had died. Puzzled, the attorney contacted Kathleen Grundy's daughter, who 385 00:28:22,850 --> 00:28:26,490 Speaker 1: was an attorney herself and well versed in the ins 386 00:28:26,610 --> 00:28:30,850 Speaker 1: and outs of making a will. Already stunned by her 387 00:28:30,850 --> 00:28:33,890 Speaker 1: mother's death, she was even more astonished to find herself 388 00:28:33,930 --> 00:28:39,370 Speaker 1: and her children abruptly disinherited. There had been no family argument, 389 00:28:39,890 --> 00:28:42,370 Speaker 1: no sign that had changed in the will was imminent, 390 00:28:43,130 --> 00:28:47,370 Speaker 1: and the new will was odd. Why send it to 391 00:28:47,410 --> 00:28:50,690 Speaker 1: an unknown firm of attorneys, Why was it riddled with 392 00:28:50,810 --> 00:28:54,970 Speaker 1: typos when her mother was a trained typist, and why 393 00:28:54,970 --> 00:28:58,210 Speaker 1: did it show no knowledge of the fact that Kathleen 394 00:28:58,250 --> 00:29:01,210 Speaker 1: Grundy owned a second house in Hyde and a holiday 395 00:29:01,250 --> 00:29:07,930 Speaker 1: cottage too. Kathleen Grundy's daughter called the police. It didn't 396 00:29:07,930 --> 00:29:10,370 Speaker 1: take long for the police to discover that the will 397 00:29:10,490 --> 00:29:13,250 Speaker 1: was a forgery, that the cover letter had been typed 398 00:29:13,290 --> 00:29:18,250 Speaker 1: on Harold Shipman's typewriter, and that missus Grundy's medical records 399 00:29:18,450 --> 00:29:23,530 Speaker 1: had been altered after her death. If Shipman hadn't made 400 00:29:23,610 --> 00:29:28,730 Speaker 1: such crass misjudgments, who knows, he might never have been caught. 401 00:29:30,010 --> 00:29:34,050 Speaker 1: As it was. Harold Shipman was arrested. Faced with the 402 00:29:34,170 --> 00:29:39,450 Speaker 1: need to conduct autopsy examinations, the police began the terrible 403 00:29:39,570 --> 00:29:43,770 Speaker 1: task of digging up the bodies all over the town 404 00:29:43,810 --> 00:29:49,050 Speaker 1: of Hyde. The slow process of uncovering Shipman's awful crimes 405 00:29:49,650 --> 00:29:56,210 Speaker 1: had begun. In the aftermath, some local people blamed themselves 406 00:29:56,250 --> 00:30:00,450 Speaker 1: for not having spoken up sooner. John Shaw, the gentle 407 00:30:00,570 --> 00:30:04,130 Speaker 1: taxi driver who spent his days driving elderly ladies around, 408 00:30:04,570 --> 00:30:07,650 Speaker 1: knew them well enough to attend funerals when they passed away, 409 00:30:08,730 --> 00:30:13,970 Speaker 1: but were simply too many funerals. Shaw told the journalists 410 00:30:13,970 --> 00:30:17,290 Speaker 1: Brian Whittle and Jean Ritchie. I noticed that all those 411 00:30:17,330 --> 00:30:21,970 Speaker 1: who were dying went to the same doctor, doctor Shipman. Eventually, 412 00:30:22,330 --> 00:30:25,370 Speaker 1: john Shaw went to the police to discover that they 413 00:30:25,370 --> 00:30:29,770 Speaker 1: were already investigating the death of Kathleen Grundy. Could he 414 00:30:29,810 --> 00:30:34,450 Speaker 1: have spoken up earlier, perhaps a year or two, But 415 00:30:34,570 --> 00:30:37,570 Speaker 1: the police admitted that he might well have been ignored 416 00:30:37,810 --> 00:30:41,730 Speaker 1: if he had. After all, he was just a taxi driver, 417 00:30:42,170 --> 00:30:46,530 Speaker 1: and Harold Shipman was a respected doctor. Other people had 418 00:30:46,570 --> 00:30:50,290 Speaker 1: also been growing concerned. There was Debbie Massey, a funeral 419 00:30:50,330 --> 00:30:53,890 Speaker 1: director who was responsible for burying or cremating many of 420 00:30:53,890 --> 00:30:59,010 Speaker 1: Shipman's victims. There was Linda Reynolds, another local doctor. Massey 421 00:30:59,090 --> 00:31:02,730 Speaker 1: and Reynolds raised the alarm in March of nineteen ninety eight. 422 00:31:03,250 --> 00:31:06,450 Speaker 1: Perhaps they could have spoken up in February or January. 423 00:31:06,690 --> 00:31:09,450 Speaker 1: Perhaps the police could have been more vigorous in responding. 424 00:31:09,970 --> 00:31:13,170 Speaker 1: But it's important to recognize we're talking about a matter 425 00:31:13,210 --> 00:31:18,010 Speaker 1: of weeks or months at best. If instead we had 426 00:31:18,050 --> 00:31:22,090 Speaker 1: collected the simplest of data sets, if we had run 427 00:31:22,210 --> 00:31:25,970 Speaker 1: the most basic analysis of that data, we would never 428 00:31:26,010 --> 00:31:28,770 Speaker 1: have needed to depend on people risking the scorn of 429 00:31:28,770 --> 00:31:33,650 Speaker 1: the police and the enmity of Harold Shipman to stop him. 430 00:31:33,690 --> 00:31:38,690 Speaker 1: The statisticians, with their production line mathematics designed to inspect 431 00:31:38,730 --> 00:31:42,650 Speaker 1: condoms and chocolate chip cookies, might have stopped his murder 432 00:31:42,690 --> 00:32:12,050 Speaker 1: Spree more than a decade earlier. Essential sources on Shipman's 433 00:32:12,090 --> 00:32:16,330 Speaker 1: crimes are The Shipman Inquiry and Brian Whittle and Jeane 434 00:32:16,410 --> 00:32:22,170 Speaker 1: Rich's book Prescription for Murder, David Spiegelhalter's excellent book The 435 00:32:22,410 --> 00:32:26,290 Speaker 1: Art of Statistics covers the Shipman case, and my own 436 00:32:26,330 --> 00:32:29,850 Speaker 1: book The Data Detective makes a plea for taking the 437 00:32:29,930 --> 00:32:37,730 Speaker 1: numbers seriously. Other sources are at Tim Harford dot com. 438 00:32:37,890 --> 00:32:41,730 Speaker 1: Cautionary Tales is written by me Tim Harford with Andrew Wright. 439 00:32:42,050 --> 00:32:45,490 Speaker 1: It's produced by Ryan Dilley and Marilyn Rust. The sound 440 00:32:45,570 --> 00:32:48,930 Speaker 1: design and original music is the work of Pascal Wise. 441 00:32:49,650 --> 00:32:53,890 Speaker 1: Julia Barton edited the scripts. Starring in this series of 442 00:32:53,930 --> 00:32:59,890 Speaker 1: Cautionary Tales Helena Bonham Carter and Jeffrey Wright, alongside Nazzar Alderazzi, 443 00:33:00,530 --> 00:33:07,130 Speaker 1: Ed Gohan, Melanie Gutteridge, Rachel Hanshaw, copenaholbrook Smith, Greg Lockett, 444 00:33:07,330 --> 00:33:12,290 Speaker 1: Messiamunroe and rufless Right. This show wouldn't have been possible 445 00:33:12,330 --> 00:33:16,170 Speaker 1: without the work of Mia La Belle, Jacob Weisberg, Heather Fane, 446 00:33:16,570 --> 00:33:22,330 Speaker 1: John Schnarz, Carli mcgiori, Eric Sandler, Emily Rostick, Maggie Taylor, 447 00:33:22,730 --> 00:33:28,010 Speaker 1: An Yellow Lakhan and Maya Kanig. Cautionary Tales is a 448 00:33:28,050 --> 00:33:32,770 Speaker 1: production of Pushkin Industries. If you like the show, please 449 00:33:32,810 --> 00:33:35,890 Speaker 1: remember to rate, share and review.