WEBVTT - Stocks Fall Before Nvidia’s High-Stakes AI Results

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News. This is Bloomberg business

0:00:10.520 --> 0:00:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Weekdaily reporting from the magazine that helps global leaders stay

0:00:14.680 --> 0:00:18.759
<v Speaker 1>ahead with insight on the people, companies, and trends shaping

0:00:18.800 --> 0:00:23.720
<v Speaker 1>today's complex economy, plus global business finance and tech news

0:00:23.760 --> 0:00:27.720
<v Speaker 1>as it happens. The Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast with

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Carol Masser and Tim Stenebek on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:32.040 --> 0:00:35.000
<v Speaker 2>We did, though, also kick off today with something that

0:00:35.120 --> 0:00:37.320
<v Speaker 2>just kind of is staying with us, a warning from

0:00:37.360 --> 0:00:40.919
<v Speaker 2>JP Morgan Chase Vice chairman Daniel Pinto. He said and

0:00:41.159 --> 0:00:43.760
<v Speaker 2>kind of gave us all our heads up that valuations

0:00:43.800 --> 0:00:46.559
<v Speaker 2>in the AI industry are due for a reassessment. It's

0:00:46.560 --> 0:00:48.440
<v Speaker 2>something Tim and I've been trying to get into today

0:00:48.640 --> 0:00:51.120
<v Speaker 2>which could reverberate across the stock market.

0:00:51.159 --> 0:00:51.840
<v Speaker 3>Here's what he said.

0:00:52.120 --> 0:00:57.080
<v Speaker 4>It is possible there is probably a correction there, and

0:00:57.200 --> 0:01:00.920
<v Speaker 4>that correction will also create a correct in the rest

0:01:00.960 --> 0:01:05.280
<v Speaker 4>of the segments in the SMPN in the industry, because

0:01:05.800 --> 0:01:09.520
<v Speaker 4>you are probably in order to justify these valuations, you

0:01:09.600 --> 0:01:14.119
<v Speaker 4>are considering a level of productivity that it will happen,

0:01:14.160 --> 0:01:17.160
<v Speaker 4>but it not. It may not happen as fast as

0:01:17.240 --> 0:01:18.679
<v Speaker 4>the market is pricing.

0:01:19.360 --> 0:01:21.440
<v Speaker 5>Y A a JP Morgan Chase's vice chair Daniel Pento

0:01:21.520 --> 0:01:24.240
<v Speaker 5>earlier today, that was at the Bloomberg Africa Business Summit

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:28.680
<v Speaker 5>in Johannesburg. Curious what buyer sells signals. Our next guest

0:01:28.760 --> 0:01:30.920
<v Speaker 5>is seeing great to have back with us Vince Howard,

0:01:31.000 --> 0:01:34.680
<v Speaker 5>CEO and portfolio manager at Howard Capital Management, about six

0:01:34.720 --> 0:01:37.039
<v Speaker 5>billion dollars in assets under management. He joins us here

0:01:37.040 --> 0:01:40.319
<v Speaker 5>in the Bloomberg Interactive Brokers studio. This is the question

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:43.000
<v Speaker 5>we've been wanting to ask you since, you know, last

0:01:43.000 --> 0:01:46.320
<v Speaker 5>time we spoke to you. Is the HCM byline model

0:01:46.360 --> 0:01:48.760
<v Speaker 5>telling telling you to buy or sell? Right now?

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:51.280
<v Speaker 6>It's telling us to buy? The HTM byline's positive. Any

0:01:51.280 --> 0:01:54.640
<v Speaker 6>pullbacks bible till it changes trend and you know, sort

0:01:54.640 --> 0:01:57.160
<v Speaker 6>of discard the noise and just about what's actually happening.

0:01:57.200 --> 0:01:59.600
<v Speaker 6>The market's very very healthy. That six great months, I

0:01:59.640 --> 0:02:01.360
<v Speaker 6>mean not get it. Hey, do you not have a

0:02:01.360 --> 0:02:02.520
<v Speaker 6>pullback after six months?

0:02:02.600 --> 0:02:05.280
<v Speaker 5>Just one step back? Explain the HCM byline model and

0:02:05.560 --> 0:02:07.760
<v Speaker 5>it's a data it takes into account and then what

0:02:07.800 --> 0:02:08.520
<v Speaker 5>it tells you to do.

0:02:08.919 --> 0:02:11.600
<v Speaker 6>It's a non emotional, mechanical, repeatable process. Because I want

0:02:11.600 --> 0:02:13.520
<v Speaker 6>to take as much emotion out of as I possibly can,

0:02:13.560 --> 0:02:16.000
<v Speaker 6>which is incredibly challenging with the amount of things that

0:02:16.040 --> 0:02:17.920
<v Speaker 6>are throwing it at each and every one of us

0:02:17.960 --> 0:02:20.359
<v Speaker 6>every day. But it's a math based tool, and it's

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:22.640
<v Speaker 6>just a trend indicator, and we think it's a very

0:02:22.680 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 6>good trend indicator. It's been very well for us. Perfect No,

0:02:25.120 --> 0:02:25.880
<v Speaker 6>but good. Yes.

0:02:26.200 --> 0:02:29.760
<v Speaker 3>Does momentum though the momentum trade mess it up at all? No,

0:02:29.919 --> 0:02:30.359
<v Speaker 3>not at all.

0:02:30.520 --> 0:02:32.600
<v Speaker 6>But I love the momentum trade because I love to

0:02:32.639 --> 0:02:34.359
<v Speaker 6>be in those stocks. I love to be in those sectors.

0:02:34.400 --> 0:02:36.400
<v Speaker 6>You got to trade momentum. You can't sit in dead money.

0:02:36.440 --> 0:02:38.000
<v Speaker 3>Ye, Well what is momentum? Fomo?

0:02:38.240 --> 0:02:41.480
<v Speaker 2>Like you're like just tracing something without really fundamentally thinking

0:02:41.480 --> 0:02:41.880
<v Speaker 2>about it.

0:02:41.919 --> 0:02:43.639
<v Speaker 6>Well, as long as it's a big computer game, it

0:02:43.639 --> 0:02:45.560
<v Speaker 6>doesn't matter. Well it's a big computer. Yeah, it doesn't

0:02:45.560 --> 0:02:47.280
<v Speaker 6>matter anymore. It's a big computer game. I mean, you're

0:02:47.280 --> 0:02:49.639
<v Speaker 6>trading it gets algorithms anymore. It's eighty five percent of

0:02:49.680 --> 0:02:50.200
<v Speaker 6>all the volumes.

0:02:50.240 --> 0:02:51.320
<v Speaker 3>Don't fundamentals matter?

0:02:51.680 --> 0:02:54.240
<v Speaker 6>Well, they're always going to end up mattering in the end.

0:02:54.280 --> 0:02:56.640
<v Speaker 6>But look at what's happening, Carol. When you look at

0:02:56.680 --> 0:02:58.720
<v Speaker 6>what's happening with a look at what's happening with with

0:02:58.840 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 6>Tesla and that robot there coming out with Optimus. How

0:03:01.400 --> 0:03:02.920
<v Speaker 6>much is that going to make an impact on so

0:03:02.960 --> 0:03:06.000
<v Speaker 6>many companies profitabilities and earnings per shuit'.

0:03:06.840 --> 0:03:07.280
<v Speaker 3>They come out with.

0:03:07.639 --> 0:03:09.760
<v Speaker 6>Indeed, do what that's if they do come out with

0:03:09.800 --> 0:03:11.840
<v Speaker 6>the right I think twenty twenty six, he's going to.

0:03:11.840 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 3>You think, so, oh, yeah, he's not.

0:03:13.320 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 5>He doesn't always meet deadlines.

0:03:14.880 --> 0:03:16.960
<v Speaker 6>Well, but when he does, it's usually a big show.

0:03:17.000 --> 0:03:19.120
<v Speaker 6>They've got one of those things walking around Austin, Texas

0:03:19.200 --> 0:03:20.440
<v Speaker 6>right now, the cowboy hat.

0:03:20.320 --> 0:03:22.520
<v Speaker 5>On literally walking down person inside it.

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:25.160
<v Speaker 6>He stops at every red light, he stops at every

0:03:25.160 --> 0:03:27.399
<v Speaker 6>stop sidne he gets out of people's way. This thing

0:03:27.520 --> 0:03:28.200
<v Speaker 6>is amazing.

0:03:28.840 --> 0:03:30.320
<v Speaker 3>Wait, what do you think it's going to do?

0:03:30.360 --> 0:03:30.520
<v Speaker 4>Though?

0:03:30.560 --> 0:03:32.160
<v Speaker 3>How do you think it's going to impact our life?

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:32.840
<v Speaker 3>Are you really?

0:03:32.919 --> 0:03:33.160
<v Speaker 7>Come on?

0:03:33.280 --> 0:03:36.520
<v Speaker 6>We like, yeah, here's the thing, here's how it's going

0:03:36.520 --> 0:03:37.920
<v Speaker 6>to impact your life. Let's take a bit and I

0:03:38.000 --> 0:03:39.800
<v Speaker 6>thought about this a lot with our trading team. Let's

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:41.600
<v Speaker 6>just take Starbucks for instance. What if you got one

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:43.560
<v Speaker 6>person worse in the cast rest and five people that

0:03:43.600 --> 0:03:46.040
<v Speaker 6>are that are robots that are serving the coffee. This

0:03:46.080 --> 0:03:49.200
<v Speaker 6>only costs fifteen to twenty grand for optimists. The robot

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:51.360
<v Speaker 6>to make a cup of coffee, you've eliminated four or

0:03:51.400 --> 0:03:53.640
<v Speaker 6>five jobs right there. You don't have to worry about

0:03:53.840 --> 0:03:56.640
<v Speaker 6>somebody complaining, coming in for work, getting sick at.

0:03:56.600 --> 0:04:00.200
<v Speaker 3>The bots go out and buy high heels. Probably not so,

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 3>Like I.

0:04:01.200 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 5>Do think it's a really good point.

0:04:03.240 --> 0:04:06.120
<v Speaker 2>Do you think about what robots are not going to

0:04:06.120 --> 0:04:08.440
<v Speaker 2>be spending in the economy and what that means.

0:04:08.000 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 6>Longer Exactually right, I think you're going to see I

0:04:09.800 --> 0:04:13.080
<v Speaker 6>think you're going to see unemployment organically move higher, but

0:04:13.160 --> 0:04:14.720
<v Speaker 6>I think you're going to see corporate profits and a

0:04:14.720 --> 0:04:16.880
<v Speaker 6>lot of these companies move higher. Also, look at what

0:04:16.880 --> 0:04:19.480
<v Speaker 6>happened with Walmart. Walmart's a boring company in my opinion.

0:04:19.560 --> 0:04:21.520
<v Speaker 2>But what happens if there isn't a lot of consumer

0:04:21.600 --> 0:04:24.039
<v Speaker 2>spending going on, which is so much the backbone of

0:04:24.040 --> 0:04:24.600
<v Speaker 2>the economy.

0:04:24.680 --> 0:04:25.760
<v Speaker 3>Doesn't that filter through?

0:04:25.800 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 2>And do we have lower economic growth? And are people

0:04:29.360 --> 0:04:31.120
<v Speaker 2>out of work? That's not a good thing.

0:04:31.520 --> 0:04:33.760
<v Speaker 6>That's not a good thing. It's a terrible thing. But look,

0:04:33.800 --> 0:04:35.480
<v Speaker 6>I can't change it, and I can't stop it. Neither

0:04:35.560 --> 0:04:37.000
<v Speaker 6>can the three of us in the side of this room.

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:39.160
<v Speaker 6>But what we do have is the HCM bylines with

0:04:39.200 --> 0:04:40.160
<v Speaker 6>stocks want to sell off.

0:04:40.160 --> 0:04:40.480
<v Speaker 4>We got it.

0:04:40.560 --> 0:04:42.360
<v Speaker 6>We got a mechanical system to say we need to

0:04:43.000 --> 0:04:44.080
<v Speaker 6>unwind some positions.

0:04:44.640 --> 0:04:46.880
<v Speaker 5>Okay, so the last when was the last time I

0:04:46.960 --> 0:04:47.679
<v Speaker 5>told you to sell?

0:04:48.040 --> 0:04:49.960
<v Speaker 6>We had a sell signal in April when we had

0:04:49.960 --> 0:04:52.360
<v Speaker 6>the tariff tantrum and DEVI and then we came back

0:04:52.400 --> 0:04:54.159
<v Speaker 6>in and it was it was a pretty It was

0:04:54.240 --> 0:04:56.360
<v Speaker 6>not a great trade for us because it was so violent,

0:04:56.440 --> 0:04:59.160
<v Speaker 6>so volatile, because it is a trend indicator, and when

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:01.200
<v Speaker 6>the trend changes all in like forty eight hours, that's

0:05:01.240 --> 0:05:03.280
<v Speaker 6>tough to trade. So okay, so you'll remember before we

0:05:03.360 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 6>jump onto that. We remember the nasback was down twenty

0:05:05.880 --> 0:05:07.120
<v Speaker 6>eight percent in a member of days.

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:08.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's tough trade.

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:10.440
<v Speaker 5>The S and P five hundred low for the year

0:05:10.920 --> 0:05:14.800
<v Speaker 5>was back on April eighth. Did you what day did

0:05:14.800 --> 0:05:16.039
<v Speaker 5>you sell? And what did did you get back in?

0:05:16.080 --> 0:05:17.279
<v Speaker 5>Do you remember to be quite Canada?

0:05:17.279 --> 0:05:17.839
<v Speaker 6>I don't remember.

0:05:17.839 --> 0:05:19.599
<v Speaker 5>But did you miss did you miss some of the upside?

0:05:19.839 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 6>We missed some of the upside we did painfully for us.

0:05:22.800 --> 0:05:23.560
<v Speaker 6>But you know when you trade.

0:05:23.600 --> 0:05:25.520
<v Speaker 3>We found some of the downside we did, and.

0:05:25.960 --> 0:05:27.840
<v Speaker 6>We did and it was a painful trade for us.

0:05:27.839 --> 0:05:29.560
<v Speaker 6>I'm going to admit it. It wasn't a great trade for us.

0:05:29.600 --> 0:05:32.800
<v Speaker 6>Remember the biolize everybody. It feels like it's a seventy

0:05:32.839 --> 0:05:34.640
<v Speaker 6>thirty thirty percent of the time. It's not going to work.

0:05:34.920 --> 0:05:36.279
<v Speaker 6>So we're going to get whips and.

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:37.040
<v Speaker 3>Do you do you go?

0:05:37.320 --> 0:05:38.720
<v Speaker 5>Do you go all in and all out?

0:05:38.720 --> 0:05:39.159
<v Speaker 6>At times?

0:05:39.200 --> 0:05:42.160
<v Speaker 5>No, we scale, you scale, So because we were I mean,

0:05:42.480 --> 0:05:45.919
<v Speaker 5>we were talking with somebody just last week, a manager

0:05:46.279 --> 0:05:49.320
<v Speaker 5>who says that you know, he this was a really

0:05:49.360 --> 0:05:54.400
<v Speaker 5>interesting conversation. He basically said, I'm so tactical that I'm

0:05:54.400 --> 0:05:57.360
<v Speaker 5>willing to go to one hundred percent cash for all

0:05:57.400 --> 0:05:59.680
<v Speaker 5>of my clients at any given moment. Do you ever

0:05:59.720 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 5>do that?

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 6>We have before in two thousand and eight, we're one hundred percent.

0:06:02.640 --> 0:06:04.279
<v Speaker 6>The only the only way that we'll go one hundred

0:06:04.279 --> 0:06:06.520
<v Speaker 6>percent to cash is if the banks are imploding, and

0:06:06.520 --> 0:06:08.159
<v Speaker 6>that's what was happening in two thousand and eight. So

0:06:08.200 --> 0:06:10.320
<v Speaker 6>if we're thirty percent out or sixty percent out but

0:06:10.560 --> 0:06:12.400
<v Speaker 6>all are none. Game is a tough game to trade,

0:06:12.640 --> 0:06:13.000
<v Speaker 6>it is.

0:06:13.040 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 5>I mean, the tax implications of that are huge.

0:06:15.080 --> 0:06:17.560
<v Speaker 6>Well, taxing maclations, but catching both sides of the trade

0:06:17.560 --> 0:06:18.880
<v Speaker 6>perfect are really tough.

0:06:19.080 --> 0:06:21.520
<v Speaker 5>So he said, I would rather pay twenty percent taxes

0:06:21.560 --> 0:06:24.000
<v Speaker 5>than have thirty percent declines.

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:25.039
<v Speaker 1>I forget what that was.

0:06:25.080 --> 0:06:25.800
<v Speaker 3>You're right like that.

0:06:25.880 --> 0:06:30.839
<v Speaker 2>I can't remember us. I did well my the private

0:06:31.000 --> 0:06:35.400
<v Speaker 2>credit market. Oh you're ready to create something? Oh thank you,

0:06:35.839 --> 0:06:38.760
<v Speaker 2>akin to the Great Financial Crisis, because it does feel

0:06:38.800 --> 0:06:41.720
<v Speaker 2>like increasingly we're seeing things every day people are worried.

0:06:41.920 --> 0:06:43.760
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, and I think that what's going to what should

0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:45.440
<v Speaker 6>worry people as our national debt. I think that's a

0:06:45.480 --> 0:06:47.160
<v Speaker 6>tipping point. If that cracks, I think we've got a

0:06:47.160 --> 0:06:48.560
<v Speaker 6>real problem.

0:06:48.440 --> 0:06:50.240
<v Speaker 3>Like real, like the Great Financial criss.

0:06:50.240 --> 0:06:52.040
<v Speaker 6>I think, like a great financial crisis. I think you're

0:06:52.040 --> 0:06:54.080
<v Speaker 6>going to make Yeah, it's to tip. Yeah, it's gona

0:06:54.080 --> 0:06:55.960
<v Speaker 6>affect everything. I mean the banks are going to lock up.

0:06:56.000 --> 0:06:57.520
<v Speaker 6>Credit is going to lock up. People are going to

0:06:57.520 --> 0:06:58.760
<v Speaker 6>be short or long term loans.

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:01.120
<v Speaker 3>When you say banks, I mean the big banks too.

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:02.760
<v Speaker 6>I think the big banks, of course. And I think

0:07:02.760 --> 0:07:04.400
<v Speaker 6>it's gonna affect everybody. I mean, what do you got

0:07:04.640 --> 0:07:05.880
<v Speaker 6>X amount of tree? And is the death that we

0:07:05.920 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 6>currently have And every day it's getting larger and larger

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:11.080
<v Speaker 6>and larger. It's unsustainable. And if they keep printing money, Carol,

0:07:11.760 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 6>your dollar, my dollar, all of a sudden's is not

0:07:13.800 --> 0:07:16.120
<v Speaker 6>worth a dollars for a nickel. And so you got it.

0:07:16.160 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 6>That's the printing of money is going to have to

0:07:18.080 --> 0:07:18.560
<v Speaker 6>stop too.

0:07:18.920 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 2>What about the AI bubble? I shouldn't called bubble because

0:07:21.520 --> 0:07:22.760
<v Speaker 2>we don't know if it's a bubble. We just know

0:07:22.800 --> 0:07:24.600
<v Speaker 2>it's a big spend right now, which bubble?

0:07:24.640 --> 0:07:27.200
<v Speaker 6>The AI? Yeah, it's not a big spin. This is

0:07:27.200 --> 0:07:29.320
<v Speaker 6>different when we looked at you remember in nineteen ninety

0:07:29.400 --> 0:07:30.920
<v Speaker 6>nine and we had the three year bear market. They

0:07:30.920 --> 0:07:32.920
<v Speaker 6>had all these tech stocks that blew up. They weren't

0:07:32.960 --> 0:07:36.040
<v Speaker 6>making any money. They were not making any money. Were

0:07:36.120 --> 0:07:38.520
<v Speaker 6>going on. They're making money hand over fist. They're making

0:07:38.520 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 6>money so fast they can't spend it. What happens if

0:07:40.680 --> 0:07:43.440
<v Speaker 6>in five to seven years to ten years, Microsoft is

0:07:43.480 --> 0:07:45.280
<v Speaker 6>so profitable they're paying an eight or ten or twelve

0:07:45.280 --> 0:07:46.000
<v Speaker 6>percent dividend.

0:07:46.240 --> 0:07:48.920
<v Speaker 2>So ten seconds, you're still owning the big mag seven,

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:50.360
<v Speaker 2>the big tech, the hyperscalers.

0:07:50.440 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 5>I am here, you're buying them.

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:53.920
<v Speaker 6>I am hoping that the Vidio comes out with something

0:07:53.920 --> 0:07:55.840
<v Speaker 6>that shocks the market. They drop down so I can

0:07:55.840 --> 0:07:57.720
<v Speaker 6>buy more, because five years from now, in the video

0:07:57.800 --> 0:07:59.440
<v Speaker 6>is going to be a lot higher and is today.

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:01.000
<v Speaker 3>Shame you're not more bullish.

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 7>I'm just kidding.

0:08:03.160 --> 0:08:06.520
<v Speaker 2>Vance Howard, chief executive officer portfolio manager at Howard Capital Market,

0:08:06.560 --> 0:08:07.120
<v Speaker 2>Thanks so much.

0:08:07.360 --> 0:08:10.120
<v Speaker 5>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Business Week Daily coming

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 5>up after this.

0:08:15.040 --> 0:08:18.920
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast. Catch

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:21.720
<v Speaker 1>us live weekday afternoons from two to five ees. During that,

0:08:21.920 --> 0:08:25.120
<v Speaker 1>listen on Apple, Karplay and Android Otto with the Bloomberg

0:08:25.160 --> 0:08:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Business app or watch us live on YouTube.

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:31.520
<v Speaker 2>All right, Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed Ben Salmon at the

0:08:31.560 --> 0:08:35.120
<v Speaker 2>White House with President Trump earlier today this evening. By

0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:37.679
<v Speaker 2>the way, there's a black tie dinner, not an official

0:08:37.760 --> 0:08:40.640
<v Speaker 2>state dinner, although at that dinner we did here, Elon

0:08:40.720 --> 0:08:41.360
<v Speaker 2>Musk would be there.

0:08:41.559 --> 0:08:43.439
<v Speaker 5>Tiger Woods reportedly will be there as well.

0:08:43.559 --> 0:08:44.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, a lot of officials.

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:44.760
<v Speaker 7>Right.

0:08:45.679 --> 0:08:48.440
<v Speaker 2>There's also an investment conference plan for tomorrow that executives

0:08:48.480 --> 0:08:52.000
<v Speaker 2>from companies including Chevron Pfizer, they will be attending. So

0:08:52.360 --> 0:08:55.280
<v Speaker 2>we wanted to kind of put this in perspective because

0:08:55.320 --> 0:08:57.680
<v Speaker 2>typically you would see these two kinds of leaders meet

0:08:57.720 --> 0:08:59.440
<v Speaker 2>and you think energy policy would come up.

0:08:59.760 --> 0:09:02.760
<v Speaker 3>Really didn't. Let's get to it with doctor Allen Wall.

0:09:02.840 --> 0:09:06.000
<v Speaker 2>She's president of Transversal Consulting, Senior Fellow at the Atlanta Council,

0:09:06.320 --> 0:09:10.520
<v Speaker 2>author of Saudi Inc. Joining US from Boca Raton, Florida. Ellen,

0:09:10.760 --> 0:09:13.880
<v Speaker 2>so good to have you back here. Feels like Saudi Inc.

0:09:13.920 --> 0:09:16.839
<v Speaker 2>And US Inc. Are kind of merging. Tell me about

0:09:16.840 --> 0:09:19.240
<v Speaker 2>this meeting because it was kind of fascinating. It really

0:09:19.320 --> 0:09:22.640
<v Speaker 2>wasn't about conversations around oil or the energy markets.

0:09:23.760 --> 0:09:27.720
<v Speaker 8>It was absolutely fascinating, especially if you had an opportunity

0:09:27.760 --> 0:09:30.840
<v Speaker 8>to watch the press conference live. I think everything from

0:09:31.160 --> 0:09:34.400
<v Speaker 8>the marble fulloers to the White House, to whether or

0:09:34.480 --> 0:09:37.120
<v Speaker 8>not Sadi Ava is going to join the Abraham Accords

0:09:37.160 --> 0:09:41.800
<v Speaker 8>was covered. What's interesting is the amount of money that

0:09:42.280 --> 0:09:46.520
<v Speaker 8>Mohammed ben Salmon is talking about potentially investing in the

0:09:46.640 --> 0:09:48.840
<v Speaker 8>United States. And I think the big question on everyone's

0:09:48.880 --> 0:09:51.520
<v Speaker 8>mind is where are they getting this money from, given

0:09:51.559 --> 0:09:54.200
<v Speaker 8>that oil prices are pretty low. And I think the

0:09:54.280 --> 0:09:57.680
<v Speaker 8>answer really is you have to look at the Saudi

0:09:58.120 --> 0:10:02.040
<v Speaker 8>Investment Fund, the PIF, because that's really where they have

0:10:02.120 --> 0:10:06.080
<v Speaker 8>a lot of their investment dollars and ready to deploy,

0:10:06.880 --> 0:10:10.760
<v Speaker 8>and that fund is really independent of the price of

0:10:10.760 --> 0:10:13.600
<v Speaker 8>a barrel of oil. So I think the question of

0:10:13.640 --> 0:10:18.160
<v Speaker 8>whether Saudi can deliver this money, the answer is yes,

0:10:18.679 --> 0:10:23.440
<v Speaker 8>But whether they actually will deliver on this is another question.

0:10:23.520 --> 0:10:25.319
<v Speaker 8>And I do think that a lot of that money

0:10:25.360 --> 0:10:29.040
<v Speaker 8>is probably earmarked for defense purchases, and that really depends

0:10:29.040 --> 0:10:32.000
<v Speaker 8>on whether they do go through with this agreement to

0:10:32.120 --> 0:10:36.200
<v Speaker 8>sell Saudi Arabia F thirty five and other defense equipment

0:10:36.240 --> 0:10:40.120
<v Speaker 8>that is somewhat controversial and hasn't necessarily been sold to

0:10:40.120 --> 0:10:40.760
<v Speaker 8>Saudi Arabia.

0:10:40.800 --> 0:10:44.160
<v Speaker 5>Previously, Cherl mentioned that you're the author of saudiank The

0:10:44.200 --> 0:10:47.520
<v Speaker 5>History of Saudi Arabia and a Ramco, and I wonder

0:10:47.559 --> 0:10:52.440
<v Speaker 5>now how successful the Saudi Arabian government has been the

0:10:52.520 --> 0:10:56.800
<v Speaker 5>Kingdom of Saudi Arabia of diversifying its economy away from oil.

0:10:57.240 --> 0:10:58.280
<v Speaker 5>Has it been successful?

0:10:59.320 --> 0:11:01.680
<v Speaker 8>That is a really great question, and I think the

0:11:01.720 --> 0:11:04.960
<v Speaker 8>answer is if you're looking at and you're trying to say,

0:11:05.320 --> 0:11:07.960
<v Speaker 8>have they achieved the goals that they set out to

0:11:08.040 --> 0:11:11.320
<v Speaker 8>achieve when they announced their big plan to diversify, well,

0:11:11.400 --> 0:11:14.640
<v Speaker 8>the answer is no, they have not really achieved those goals.

0:11:14.880 --> 0:11:17.360
<v Speaker 8>I think really a lot of those goals were not

0:11:17.760 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 8>achievable goals. What they have done is they have introduced

0:11:20.800 --> 0:11:24.600
<v Speaker 8>some very important changes that I think can certainly help

0:11:24.720 --> 0:11:28.520
<v Speaker 8>make the Saudi economy more robust over time. We're talking

0:11:28.600 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 8>about making it easier for foreigners to visit the country,

0:11:32.240 --> 0:11:35.000
<v Speaker 8>both for tourism but also to work, opening up the

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:39.240
<v Speaker 8>workspace for women, and important societal changes like that. I

0:11:39.280 --> 0:11:42.239
<v Speaker 8>think in the long run will help diversify their economy.

0:11:42.520 --> 0:11:46.240
<v Speaker 8>But if you're asking whether their economy is still very

0:11:46.320 --> 0:11:49.880
<v Speaker 8>much dependent on the energy industry, the answer is yes.

0:11:50.040 --> 0:11:53.040
<v Speaker 8>A Ramco, on the other hand, has over the past

0:11:54.360 --> 0:11:58.600
<v Speaker 8>fifty years, I would say, significantly diversified itself from simply

0:11:58.960 --> 0:12:01.959
<v Speaker 8>an upstream come that sold a lot of crude oil

0:12:02.080 --> 0:12:07.160
<v Speaker 8>to a very diverse energy company that has multiple revenue streams.

0:12:07.200 --> 0:12:09.400
<v Speaker 8>So they're not just dependent on what the price of

0:12:09.400 --> 0:12:11.320
<v Speaker 8>a barrel of oil is. They make a lot of

0:12:11.320 --> 0:12:14.600
<v Speaker 8>oil products, they're getting into natural gas, they make money

0:12:14.679 --> 0:12:18.040
<v Speaker 8>off of trading oil in the financial sense, and so

0:12:18.840 --> 0:12:21.720
<v Speaker 8>they're making a lot of money that is not dependent

0:12:21.840 --> 0:12:24.160
<v Speaker 8>on whether the price of a barrel of oil is

0:12:24.200 --> 0:12:26.199
<v Speaker 8>sixty dollars or eighty dollars.

0:12:27.200 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 3>So I guess what.

0:12:29.720 --> 0:12:32.600
<v Speaker 2>This relationship that we are seeing between the United States

0:12:32.600 --> 0:12:35.840
<v Speaker 2>and Saudi Arabia. I feel like it's always been a

0:12:35.840 --> 0:12:39.120
<v Speaker 2>bit of a frenemy kind of relationship between the two nations.

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:41.240
<v Speaker 2>Having said that, there's been times where it's been stronger

0:12:41.240 --> 0:12:42.320
<v Speaker 2>at times when it has not.

0:12:44.400 --> 0:12:47.480
<v Speaker 3>Is this the relationship going forward in your view?

0:12:48.880 --> 0:12:51.760
<v Speaker 8>What's so interesting about the relationship between the US and

0:12:51.880 --> 0:12:55.200
<v Speaker 8>Saudi Arabia is that Saudi Arabia has a very different

0:12:55.280 --> 0:12:58.040
<v Speaker 8>view of the relationship than the United States does. In

0:12:58.480 --> 0:13:02.120
<v Speaker 8>the Saudi mind, the US is a best friend that

0:13:02.120 --> 0:13:04.640
<v Speaker 8>they've They've always been so close, and they've cultivated an

0:13:04.800 --> 0:13:09.400
<v Speaker 8>entire kind of aura, an idea about this friendship. They

0:13:09.400 --> 0:13:11.959
<v Speaker 8>think the US is a huge ally. If you look

0:13:11.960 --> 0:13:14.920
<v Speaker 8>at it from the US perspective, satur Arabia is at

0:13:15.040 --> 0:13:18.080
<v Speaker 8>least it can be a strategic partner. But satur Arabia

0:13:18.160 --> 0:13:20.679
<v Speaker 8>would not be considered an ally to the United States

0:13:20.720 --> 0:13:23.800
<v Speaker 8>the same way Great Britain or Canada.

0:13:23.840 --> 0:13:25.080
<v Speaker 3>Might be considered an ally.

0:13:25.200 --> 0:13:27.600
<v Speaker 8>And so I think that that leads to very different

0:13:27.640 --> 0:13:30.800
<v Speaker 8>opinions about what exactly is going to go on. So

0:13:31.480 --> 0:13:34.320
<v Speaker 8>you know whether or not you know Sadi Arabi has

0:13:34.360 --> 0:13:38.079
<v Speaker 8>a defense agreement, Yes, traditionally we have had defense agreements,

0:13:38.400 --> 0:13:41.680
<v Speaker 8>but from the US perspective that's not always so guaranteed.

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 8>If it's beneficial to the US, then it will happen.

0:13:45.600 --> 0:13:48.760
<v Speaker 8>But you know, it's not necessarily a guarantee. It's not

0:13:48.840 --> 0:13:52.840
<v Speaker 8>necessarily this ally ship that the Saudis often perceived the

0:13:52.880 --> 0:13:53.720
<v Speaker 8>relationship to be.

0:13:53.920 --> 0:13:55.720
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's interesting when you say Canada and the UK,

0:13:55.760 --> 0:13:58.400
<v Speaker 2>and in particular Canada, I feel like, you know, it

0:13:58.440 --> 0:14:01.640
<v Speaker 2>looks almost a friendly relationship between the US and Saudi

0:14:01.640 --> 0:14:03.840
<v Speaker 2>Arabia than it certainly does between US and Canada.

0:14:03.920 --> 0:14:04.280
<v Speaker 9>Right now.

0:14:04.440 --> 0:14:07.400
<v Speaker 2>I guess my question really, you know, Ellen, is are

0:14:07.440 --> 0:14:09.640
<v Speaker 2>we laying the ground for whoever is in the White

0:14:09.679 --> 0:14:13.160
<v Speaker 2>House next, be it Democrat or Republican, that this is

0:14:13.200 --> 0:14:17.040
<v Speaker 2>the relationship or could it change and get different depending again,

0:14:17.080 --> 0:14:18.120
<v Speaker 2>who is in the White House.

0:14:19.240 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 8>I think that there's always kind of a baseline, and

0:14:21.400 --> 0:14:24.160
<v Speaker 8>you could see that when Trump was kind of fishing

0:14:24.200 --> 0:14:26.520
<v Speaker 8>for a compliment from NBS as you know, oh, well,

0:14:26.560 --> 0:14:28.880
<v Speaker 8>he's the best president. You know, they've had the best

0:14:28.920 --> 0:14:31.800
<v Speaker 8>relationship with Trump, and NBS kind of answered that with, well,

0:14:31.800 --> 0:14:34.480
<v Speaker 8>we've always had, you know, Democrat or Republican, we've always

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 8>had good relations with president of the United States, and

0:14:37.120 --> 0:14:40.320
<v Speaker 8>then he mentions Reagan as a particularly good one. So

0:14:40.400 --> 0:14:42.960
<v Speaker 8>I think that NBS is certainly looking at this as

0:14:43.160 --> 0:14:46.080
<v Speaker 8>he's got to lay the groundwork for his good relationships

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:49.200
<v Speaker 8>with presidents that are going to come after Trump, whereas

0:14:49.320 --> 0:14:50.800
<v Speaker 8>Trump is seeing it as the hero and.

0:14:50.800 --> 0:14:54.040
<v Speaker 5>Now the military balance of power in the Middle East,

0:14:54.080 --> 0:14:57.920
<v Speaker 5>the potential F thirty fives that Saudi Arabia could get

0:14:57.960 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 5>as a result of making a deal with the UNI States.

0:15:00.640 --> 0:15:02.920
<v Speaker 5>President Trump said he would approve selling the F thirty

0:15:02.920 --> 0:15:06.760
<v Speaker 5>five fighter jet to Saudi Arabia. I'm just wondering how

0:15:06.760 --> 0:15:09.480
<v Speaker 5>that changes the balance of power when it comes to

0:15:09.520 --> 0:15:13.120
<v Speaker 5>the militaries in the region, especially with regard to Israel,

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:16.520
<v Speaker 5>which for years has been a US ally, And also

0:15:16.560 --> 0:15:19.560
<v Speaker 5>what US interest the US would have an interest in

0:15:19.600 --> 0:15:22.360
<v Speaker 5>selling F thirty five's apart from getting the revenue to

0:15:22.440 --> 0:15:23.640
<v Speaker 5>a US company.

0:15:25.000 --> 0:15:25.440
<v Speaker 3>Exactly.

0:15:25.440 --> 0:15:28.040
<v Speaker 8>I do think from Trump's perspective, he thinks that the

0:15:28.160 --> 0:15:31.480
<v Speaker 8>F thirty fives are the greatest airplane ever to be made,

0:15:31.560 --> 0:15:34.080
<v Speaker 8>and so he loves that everybody wants them, and so

0:15:34.120 --> 0:15:36.960
<v Speaker 8>it's more of an economic issue. I think from the

0:15:36.960 --> 0:15:39.320
<v Speaker 8>Pentagon's perspective, they're looking at it as more of a

0:15:39.320 --> 0:15:44.280
<v Speaker 8>strategic issue. Now. The UAE apparently got assurances they would

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 8>be able to purchase these when they signed the Abraham Accords,

0:15:47.520 --> 0:15:49.640
<v Speaker 8>and it was believed that this would also be a

0:15:49.680 --> 0:15:52.520
<v Speaker 8>condition for Saudi Arabia. I think it's very very clear

0:15:52.560 --> 0:15:54.360
<v Speaker 8>now that Saudi Arabia is not going to join the

0:15:54.400 --> 0:15:59.120
<v Speaker 8>Abraham Accords. They're not recognizing Israel unless they get unless

0:15:59.160 --> 0:16:02.200
<v Speaker 8>there's an absolutely there's an assured pathword to Palestinian state.

0:16:02.800 --> 0:16:05.960
<v Speaker 8>I don't see that happening anytime in the near future.

0:16:06.000 --> 0:16:07.520
<v Speaker 8>So I think we're kind of going to be at

0:16:07.560 --> 0:16:12.479
<v Speaker 8>a standstill here, and if the Pentagon has severe concerns

0:16:12.480 --> 0:16:15.480
<v Speaker 8>about it, I think it may not actually go through

0:16:15.720 --> 0:16:17.720
<v Speaker 8>as much as Trump wants it to go through.

0:16:18.000 --> 0:16:20.160
<v Speaker 2>Is that more tricky or is it the AI chips

0:16:20.200 --> 0:16:24.240
<v Speaker 2>that are more tricky and Saudi Arabia need both.

0:16:25.360 --> 0:16:27.720
<v Speaker 3>The AI chips are very tricky. I do think.

0:16:27.640 --> 0:16:31.040
<v Speaker 8>That that's really what's going to be the focus of

0:16:31.120 --> 0:16:35.440
<v Speaker 8>this investment meeting and this dinner, is that the PIF

0:16:35.520 --> 0:16:38.320
<v Speaker 8>wants to make these investments in these firms because that's

0:16:38.440 --> 0:16:42.600
<v Speaker 8>their way of kind of getting their hands on this technology.

0:16:42.880 --> 0:16:45.760
<v Speaker 8>I think from the US national security perspective, they don't

0:16:45.800 --> 0:16:50.000
<v Speaker 8>want their chips to be in any connection with Chinese

0:16:50.520 --> 0:16:54.840
<v Speaker 8>technology equipment. And so there are serious concerns cybersecurity concerns

0:16:54.880 --> 0:16:57.240
<v Speaker 8>there that are going to have to be dealt with.

0:16:57.760 --> 0:17:01.240
<v Speaker 8>But I do see the PIF potentially make investments in

0:17:01.520 --> 0:17:06.520
<v Speaker 8>these firms. I don't see necessarily US producing semiconductors and

0:17:06.600 --> 0:17:09.760
<v Speaker 8>chips in Saudi Arabia, but I do think the Saudis

0:17:09.800 --> 0:17:12.919
<v Speaker 8>can make a case to try to get data centers

0:17:12.920 --> 0:17:16.080
<v Speaker 8>in the kingdom, particularly if they can assure the security

0:17:16.080 --> 0:17:19.359
<v Speaker 8>the equipment in their country, and also if they offer

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:22.760
<v Speaker 8>you know, basically free land and free energy. I could

0:17:22.840 --> 0:17:25.400
<v Speaker 8>see I could see that being a very powerful draw.

0:17:25.520 --> 0:17:28.160
<v Speaker 2>All right, great stuff, Ellen, Thank you so much, doctor

0:17:28.200 --> 0:17:30.920
<v Speaker 2>Ellen Wall, President of Transversal Consulting, Senior Fellow at the

0:17:30.960 --> 0:17:31.840
<v Speaker 2>Atlantic Council.

0:17:32.040 --> 0:17:34.760
<v Speaker 5>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Business Week Daily coming

0:17:34.880 --> 0:17:40.640
<v Speaker 5>up after this.

0:17:40.640 --> 0:17:44.480
<v Speaker 9>This is the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast. Listen live

0:17:44.600 --> 0:17:47.840
<v Speaker 9>each weekday starting at two pm Eastern on applecar Play

0:17:47.920 --> 0:17:50.560
<v Speaker 9>and the Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. You

0:17:50.600 --> 0:17:53.760
<v Speaker 9>can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship

0:17:53.840 --> 0:17:58.040
<v Speaker 9>New York station, Just Say Alexa played Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:17:59.160 --> 0:18:01.480
<v Speaker 2>All right, we're going to stay on global relationships the

0:18:01.520 --> 0:18:04.720
<v Speaker 2>economies that drive them. And turn on over to doctor

0:18:04.760 --> 0:18:08.120
<v Speaker 2>Adam Posen. He's president of the Peterson Institute for International Economics.

0:18:08.320 --> 0:18:12.920
<v Speaker 2>He joins us from I believe the nation's capital on

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:16.440
<v Speaker 2>this Tuesday, Yes, Washington, DC, Doctor Posen, good to have

0:18:16.480 --> 0:18:19.000
<v Speaker 2>you back here on Bloomberg.

0:18:18.520 --> 0:18:19.920
<v Speaker 3>And on Bloomberg BusinessWeek Daily.

0:18:20.640 --> 0:18:22.919
<v Speaker 2>These relationships, I first got to ask you, you know,

0:18:22.960 --> 0:18:26.320
<v Speaker 2>watching the relationship, what seems to be a very close

0:18:26.359 --> 0:18:30.720
<v Speaker 2>relationship between the United States and Saudi Arabia, and I

0:18:30.720 --> 0:18:32.000
<v Speaker 2>think about their economies.

0:18:32.040 --> 0:18:34.320
<v Speaker 3>How do you see it? What's significant for you here

0:18:34.440 --> 0:18:35.120
<v Speaker 3>in watching this?

0:18:36.280 --> 0:18:39.560
<v Speaker 7>Thank you Carol for having me back on Bloomberg BusinessWeek Daily.

0:18:40.160 --> 0:18:42.520
<v Speaker 7>I want to pick up on some things you discussed

0:18:42.560 --> 0:18:46.440
<v Speaker 7>with your previous guests, which is there is a huge

0:18:46.640 --> 0:18:51.919
<v Speaker 7>economic leaving aside the national security incentive for Saudi to

0:18:52.040 --> 0:18:57.320
<v Speaker 7>behave in this way in that MBS, the Crown Prince

0:18:57.480 --> 0:19:02.199
<v Speaker 7>has very definitely been seeing part of his agenda to

0:19:02.280 --> 0:19:08.600
<v Speaker 7>try to transition Saudi away from over dependence on export

0:19:08.840 --> 0:19:12.440
<v Speaker 7>of fossil fuelds. And it's the right thing for them

0:19:12.480 --> 0:19:17.000
<v Speaker 7>to do from the economic perspective. And obviously Saudi for

0:19:17.080 --> 0:19:20.920
<v Speaker 7>many decades has been accumulating surpluses of cash and trying

0:19:20.960 --> 0:19:24.919
<v Speaker 7>to invest them. They've been trying to diversify. I wouldn't

0:19:24.960 --> 0:19:27.000
<v Speaker 7>go quite as far as your previous guests did in

0:19:27.119 --> 0:19:29.640
<v Speaker 7>extolling how much a RAM cost Pirst five, but they've

0:19:29.640 --> 0:19:34.240
<v Speaker 7>been trying. I think the deeper integration with the US

0:19:34.640 --> 0:19:38.000
<v Speaker 7>is a path towards that, and it is a credible

0:19:38.080 --> 0:19:41.000
<v Speaker 7>path towards that. That's not to say they haven't been

0:19:41.040 --> 0:19:43.560
<v Speaker 7>doing a lot of good things in terms of domestic

0:19:43.600 --> 0:19:47.240
<v Speaker 7>investment and on the economic front on liberalization. They have,

0:19:47.960 --> 0:19:50.800
<v Speaker 7>and I know a lot of very serious money investors

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:54.240
<v Speaker 7>who are very excited by this, but just to say

0:19:54.280 --> 0:19:57.560
<v Speaker 7>this puts them on the path. For the US, however,

0:19:57.760 --> 0:20:01.080
<v Speaker 7>I think it's less important economically. It is more about

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:05.280
<v Speaker 7>the security relationship, or at least it should be. There's

0:20:05.400 --> 0:20:08.600
<v Speaker 7>never been a shortage of people willing to invest in

0:20:08.640 --> 0:20:11.680
<v Speaker 7>the US, or at least except with the exception of

0:20:11.720 --> 0:20:14.280
<v Speaker 7>a few years in the late seventies and early eighties,

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:19.840
<v Speaker 7>not since nineteen hundred, and that remains the case, even

0:20:19.880 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 7>though things are happening to make the US a little

0:20:22.400 --> 0:20:26.160
<v Speaker 7>less attractive. So for the US, I think there has

0:20:26.240 --> 0:20:29.959
<v Speaker 7>to be more of the security diplomatic conditionality just simply

0:20:30.000 --> 0:20:32.880
<v Speaker 7>getting Saudi investment in the US is not that big

0:20:33.200 --> 0:20:33.639
<v Speaker 7>a game.

0:20:33.800 --> 0:20:37.040
<v Speaker 5>What type of conditionality, especially in exchange for after thirty

0:20:37.040 --> 0:20:38.320
<v Speaker 5>five state of the r jets?

0:20:39.680 --> 0:20:42.320
<v Speaker 7>Well, Tim, I think that's the right question, and I

0:20:42.359 --> 0:20:44.840
<v Speaker 7>would not say it necessarily needs to be tied to

0:20:45.000 --> 0:20:47.880
<v Speaker 7>Israel recognition in the abraham Ac courts, but it needs

0:20:47.960 --> 0:20:50.680
<v Speaker 7>to be tied to something of that caliber. So maybe

0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:54.439
<v Speaker 7>it's something about how they're relating to Iran, or something

0:20:54.480 --> 0:20:58.159
<v Speaker 7>about the Saudi mutual guarantees with Pakistan, some sort of

0:20:58.520 --> 0:21:02.320
<v Speaker 7>agreement on how the Saudis influenced Pakistan, or maybe it's

0:21:02.359 --> 0:21:06.040
<v Speaker 7>about the investment which the Saudis have indicated they're willing

0:21:06.119 --> 0:21:10.160
<v Speaker 7>to do in rebuilding Gaza and dealing with what will

0:21:10.160 --> 0:21:14.239
<v Speaker 7>be refugee issues there. All I'm saying is that it

0:21:14.359 --> 0:21:18.960
<v Speaker 7>has to be something substantial, But I also think you

0:21:19.040 --> 0:21:22.879
<v Speaker 7>want the f thirty fives of course are a big carrot,

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:24.960
<v Speaker 7>but you also want to think of it in terms

0:21:24.960 --> 0:21:28.400
<v Speaker 7>of the relationship. And this is what is key, whether

0:21:28.440 --> 0:21:30.240
<v Speaker 7>it's UK or Saudi or Japan.

0:21:30.600 --> 0:21:33.320
<v Speaker 2>Adam, Adam, you talk about relationships, And I think about

0:21:33.359 --> 0:21:37.320
<v Speaker 2>something that came up questioning by reporters of the President

0:21:37.520 --> 0:21:39.720
<v Speaker 2>and MBS while at the White House, and that is

0:21:39.760 --> 0:21:43.040
<v Speaker 2>about kind of the relationships that the Trump organization has

0:21:43.080 --> 0:21:45.720
<v Speaker 2>with Saudi Arabia on business deals. And we have a

0:21:45.720 --> 0:21:48.119
<v Speaker 2>story in the Bloomberg about the Trump organization planning a

0:21:48.160 --> 0:21:51.720
<v Speaker 2>luxury resort in the Maldives with a Saudi Arabian partner.

0:21:52.680 --> 0:21:57.240
<v Speaker 3>It's just one case. I'm just curious.

0:21:57.280 --> 0:22:02.200
<v Speaker 2>You've watched, You've talked about, You've analyzed different administrations, this

0:22:02.400 --> 0:22:04.480
<v Speaker 2>kind of what seems to be a mixing melding. I

0:22:04.520 --> 0:22:06.479
<v Speaker 2>know the President answered the question, he said, I have

0:22:06.520 --> 0:22:11.280
<v Speaker 2>nothing to do with family business, But how do you

0:22:11.440 --> 0:22:11.880
<v Speaker 2>see this?

0:22:12.920 --> 0:22:16.720
<v Speaker 7>No, I appreciate your asking that, Carol, and I don't

0:22:16.760 --> 0:22:19.840
<v Speaker 7>want to be mean, but it doesn't matter whether the

0:22:19.880 --> 0:22:22.760
<v Speaker 7>president literally in the narrow sense, has nothing to do

0:22:22.840 --> 0:22:26.639
<v Speaker 7>with it or not. We had laws, and more importantly,

0:22:26.720 --> 0:22:29.879
<v Speaker 7>we had norms, and we had expectations from the press,

0:22:29.920 --> 0:22:33.040
<v Speaker 7>from the public, from the markets that the US did

0:22:33.200 --> 0:22:36.919
<v Speaker 7>not deal in family enrichment when you're in public office,

0:22:37.000 --> 0:22:40.040
<v Speaker 7>let alone when you're the president. Some of your viewers

0:22:40.119 --> 0:22:44.880
<v Speaker 7>might remember the old John Adams miniseries in which John

0:22:44.920 --> 0:22:48.040
<v Speaker 7>Adams alienated both his daughter and his son in law

0:22:48.119 --> 0:22:49.800
<v Speaker 7>or one of his sons and his son in law

0:22:50.080 --> 0:22:53.000
<v Speaker 7>because he wouldn't advance them while he was in the

0:22:53.040 --> 0:22:56.720
<v Speaker 7>White House. And what matters is this very strong perception

0:22:56.840 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 7>which is obvious and cutter in the United arabin where

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:04.560
<v Speaker 7>in Saudi, but even with the gold that was offered

0:23:04.720 --> 0:23:08.439
<v Speaker 7>just the other day to the President, that there is

0:23:08.480 --> 0:23:10.879
<v Speaker 7>this perception that you link things. Now, I don't want

0:23:10.920 --> 0:23:13.520
<v Speaker 7>to overdramatize this. There are a lot of countries in

0:23:13.560 --> 0:23:19.399
<v Speaker 7>the world, including Saudi, including Turkey, including China, where this

0:23:19.640 --> 0:23:24.040
<v Speaker 7>kind of ties go on between the leaders, families and

0:23:24.160 --> 0:23:29.240
<v Speaker 7>chosen friends and foreign policy and other governments. It's not good,

0:23:29.520 --> 0:23:33.119
<v Speaker 7>it's not fair, it's wasteful and distortionary, but it's also

0:23:33.240 --> 0:23:36.680
<v Speaker 7>not the end of the world. Businesses and investors can proceed.

0:23:38.240 --> 0:23:41.359
<v Speaker 7>But for the US, this is going back to your

0:23:41.400 --> 0:23:44.639
<v Speaker 7>original question, this is a huge step change. We've not

0:23:44.840 --> 0:23:49.040
<v Speaker 7>seen anything like this the least since Teddy Roosevelt, meaning

0:23:49.040 --> 0:23:50.280
<v Speaker 7>one hundred and twenty years.

0:23:50.800 --> 0:23:53.760
<v Speaker 2>So just to be fair, because we certainly get feedback

0:23:53.760 --> 0:23:56.080
<v Speaker 2>from our audience and to say that the President says

0:23:56.119 --> 0:23:59.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm not involved though, you know, and we've had any

0:23:59.480 --> 0:24:02.200
<v Speaker 2>president that walks into the White House, Republican or democrat

0:24:02.840 --> 0:24:07.159
<v Speaker 2>you know, certainly has allegiances to industries or so on.

0:24:07.600 --> 0:24:10.719
<v Speaker 7>I agree. I agree, it's never going to be absolute.

0:24:10.880 --> 0:24:13.679
<v Speaker 7>And we all know the stories of people going back

0:24:14.040 --> 0:24:19.520
<v Speaker 7>to Jimmy Carter's brother selling beer, that there's always relatives

0:24:19.720 --> 0:24:26.199
<v Speaker 7>who try to profit on these things. But the so again,

0:24:26.400 --> 0:24:30.240
<v Speaker 7>this isn't about ascribing the levolent intent. But you want

0:24:30.280 --> 0:24:35.639
<v Speaker 7>to have a system in place where people expect and feel,

0:24:35.840 --> 0:24:40.439
<v Speaker 7>particularly investors but also average citizens expect and feel that

0:24:40.560 --> 0:24:43.720
<v Speaker 7>this is an exception, not the rule that you occasionally

0:24:43.720 --> 0:24:47.240
<v Speaker 7>have the rogue family member, but that on the one hand,

0:24:47.359 --> 0:24:51.800
<v Speaker 7>policy choices are not being driven and being perceived as

0:24:51.920 --> 0:24:54.720
<v Speaker 7>driven by these things, and on the other hand, that

0:24:54.960 --> 0:24:58.800
<v Speaker 7>economic choices are being made on a commercial basis. And

0:24:58.880 --> 0:25:02.119
<v Speaker 7>that's why, no matter how many times people of different

0:25:02.160 --> 0:25:05.840
<v Speaker 7>parties and different administrations or appointments fail on this front,

0:25:06.640 --> 0:25:10.080
<v Speaker 7>you want to have a system of scrutiny and rules

0:25:10.600 --> 0:25:15.920
<v Speaker 7>and presumptions that it discourages our elected officials from being

0:25:16.000 --> 0:25:20.600
<v Speaker 7>so overt about it. I think, to be fair, you know,

0:25:20.680 --> 0:25:24.480
<v Speaker 7>the Trump administration and the sons of President Trump and

0:25:24.960 --> 0:25:28.640
<v Speaker 7>Secretary Ludnik and the Middle East negotiator guy and all

0:25:28.640 --> 0:25:34.280
<v Speaker 7>these people. You know, they're being very open, and I

0:25:34.359 --> 0:25:38.919
<v Speaker 7>think that in one sense does matter, like they are

0:25:38.960 --> 0:25:42.439
<v Speaker 7>with crypto, But in another sense that doesn't solve the

0:25:42.520 --> 0:25:47.960
<v Speaker 7>problem because then the perception is still people are being favored,

0:25:48.040 --> 0:25:50.680
<v Speaker 7>decisions are being made on a bad basis. You have

0:25:50.720 --> 0:25:56.080
<v Speaker 7>to offer gold crowns or hotel deals to make things happen.

0:25:55.960 --> 0:25:59.600
<v Speaker 2>And transparency doesn't necessarily gain actions, right.

0:26:00.520 --> 0:26:04.359
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, doctor Wilson, Doctor Posen, you said it's not the

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:07.760
<v Speaker 5>end of the world if we're in a situation such

0:26:07.800 --> 0:26:09.800
<v Speaker 5>as this or in a society such asist.

0:26:09.840 --> 0:26:11.240
<v Speaker 7>But it's not the end of the world.

0:26:11.480 --> 0:26:15.119
<v Speaker 5>But I'm wondering if there are potentially long term economic

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:19.920
<v Speaker 5>repercussions that happen in societies that don't necessarily have the

0:26:20.400 --> 0:26:23.200
<v Speaker 5>same rules in place, if we can look to history

0:26:23.320 --> 0:26:25.520
<v Speaker 5>or modern history to get an understanding of what the

0:26:25.520 --> 0:26:27.200
<v Speaker 5>implications of that could be in the US.

0:26:27.200 --> 0:26:30.000
<v Speaker 3>In your view, oh, I think they're enormous.

0:26:30.080 --> 0:26:33.360
<v Speaker 7>I think then, because it's the US, which, as I've

0:26:33.480 --> 0:26:36.479
<v Speaker 7>argued tim has been the lynchpin of the rules based,

0:26:36.600 --> 0:26:40.439
<v Speaker 7>law based system of economy since World War Two. It

0:26:40.520 --> 0:26:44.080
<v Speaker 7>has repercussions around the world because it means the US

0:26:44.160 --> 0:26:46.760
<v Speaker 7>is not only enforcing the norms against this kind of

0:26:46.800 --> 0:26:53.080
<v Speaker 7>corruption or perceived corruption or tied political choice making. It

0:26:53.240 --> 0:26:57.159
<v Speaker 7>means that the US is setting an example that you

0:26:57.160 --> 0:26:59.400
<v Speaker 7>can get away with it and other people should get

0:26:59.400 --> 0:27:02.080
<v Speaker 7>away with it, and it breaks down the regimes and

0:27:02.119 --> 0:27:05.880
<v Speaker 7>the operating principles we have to attorney thinks. So when

0:27:05.880 --> 0:27:07.560
<v Speaker 7>I say it's not the end of the world, I

0:27:07.720 --> 0:27:11.040
<v Speaker 7>don't mean to suggest it's not very harmful. It will

0:27:11.080 --> 0:27:14.920
<v Speaker 7>reduce the returns on capital, it will reduce the ability

0:27:14.960 --> 0:27:19.160
<v Speaker 7>of average people on normal businesses to get access to opportunities.

0:27:19.480 --> 0:27:22.600
<v Speaker 7>It will divide the world. It will increase in stability

0:27:22.640 --> 0:27:27.000
<v Speaker 7>and investment markets. It will waste public money. It's bad

0:27:27.040 --> 0:27:29.960
<v Speaker 7>in a lot of ways. I just merely want to

0:27:30.000 --> 0:27:35.520
<v Speaker 7>be very clear that though it's unusual for the US

0:27:35.520 --> 0:27:38.720
<v Speaker 7>in the last one hundred plus years to behave this way,

0:27:39.160 --> 0:27:42.159
<v Speaker 7>in our long ago history and in other countries around

0:27:42.160 --> 0:27:45.399
<v Speaker 7>the world, this has taken place, and that there have

0:27:45.520 --> 0:27:48.800
<v Speaker 7>been much small or much less overt examples of this

0:27:49.400 --> 0:27:51.320
<v Speaker 7>by you a previous US administration.

0:27:51.760 --> 0:27:54.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, and you know, just thinking about all you've just said,

0:27:54.880 --> 0:27:59.080
<v Speaker 2>doctor Posen, and then kind of squaring that with the

0:27:59.119 --> 0:28:02.120
<v Speaker 2>recent government shut down and the domestic issues that kind

0:28:02.119 --> 0:28:04.240
<v Speaker 2>of came to the forefront. You know, the one in

0:28:04.280 --> 0:28:07.720
<v Speaker 2>eight Americans who are on some kind of food assistance

0:28:07.800 --> 0:28:08.640
<v Speaker 2>or food stamps.

0:28:09.760 --> 0:28:10.360
<v Speaker 4>You know the.

0:28:10.280 --> 0:28:13.480
<v Speaker 2>Amount of Americans that are just struggling to put food

0:28:13.520 --> 0:28:15.680
<v Speaker 2>on their table, a roof over their head.

0:28:16.240 --> 0:28:17.120
<v Speaker 3>I want to bring it down.

0:28:17.200 --> 0:28:21.080
<v Speaker 2>Then, with so much focus on global issues, and so

0:28:21.200 --> 0:28:23.200
<v Speaker 2>leould say, when you're president, you have to look beyond

0:28:23.200 --> 0:28:25.720
<v Speaker 2>the US borders as well as within the US borders.

0:28:25.960 --> 0:28:29.439
<v Speaker 2>But having said that, what is it that you know

0:28:30.080 --> 0:28:33.520
<v Speaker 2>is being maybe being ignored in your view domestically, that's

0:28:33.560 --> 0:28:34.600
<v Speaker 2>really got to be.

0:28:36.080 --> 0:28:36.600
<v Speaker 3>Addressed.

0:28:38.960 --> 0:28:42.880
<v Speaker 7>Again, you're asking very profound questions. I'll just say that

0:28:43.280 --> 0:28:47.920
<v Speaker 7>in an enlightened administration, the reason you get involved in

0:28:47.960 --> 0:28:51.880
<v Speaker 7>the rest of the world is because it ultimately is

0:28:52.000 --> 0:28:54.320
<v Speaker 7>to if you set up a rest of the world

0:28:54.440 --> 0:29:00.600
<v Speaker 7>that feels safer and less corrupt and more stable unless

0:29:01.280 --> 0:29:06.520
<v Speaker 7>subject to disease and refugee flows and wars, that's ultimately

0:29:06.560 --> 0:29:09.280
<v Speaker 7>to the benefit of the average American. And if you

0:29:09.400 --> 0:29:12.520
<v Speaker 7>have open and free commerce on a rules based basis

0:29:12.960 --> 0:29:17.760
<v Speaker 7>that raises American opportunities and American citizens purchasing power. So

0:29:18.560 --> 0:29:21.560
<v Speaker 7>I agree with you, there's a question of how you prioritize.

0:29:21.640 --> 0:29:23.880
<v Speaker 7>And this goes to the point with Saudi, I'm not

0:29:24.000 --> 0:29:26.680
<v Speaker 7>sure that that should be the biggest priority of an

0:29:26.720 --> 0:29:30.440
<v Speaker 7>American administration right now. It's fine, you can walk into gum.

0:29:30.480 --> 0:29:32.720
<v Speaker 7>It can be one of the things. So when you

0:29:32.800 --> 0:29:36.440
<v Speaker 7>say what's in the domestic front, I think the removal

0:29:37.040 --> 0:29:42.280
<v Speaker 7>of health care support subsidies and access to Medicaid and

0:29:42.480 --> 0:29:47.680
<v Speaker 7>to all these Obamacare related things is going to materially

0:29:47.720 --> 0:29:51.320
<v Speaker 7>affect the health and well being of millions of human

0:29:51.360 --> 0:29:54.920
<v Speaker 7>beings in the US. And that is bad economically, but

0:29:55.000 --> 0:30:00.080
<v Speaker 7>it's bad in human terms. I think the reduction of

0:30:00.120 --> 0:30:05.800
<v Speaker 7>options through the anti migration policies, through other policies that

0:30:05.920 --> 0:30:10.120
<v Speaker 7>make it so more people, mostly women in late middle age,

0:30:10.200 --> 0:30:14.280
<v Speaker 7>have to stay home to be caregivers to elders and

0:30:14.360 --> 0:30:18.720
<v Speaker 7>to children and to disabled people, is materially bad for

0:30:18.880 --> 0:30:21.920
<v Speaker 7>humans and is a huge pressure on people. And I

0:30:21.960 --> 0:30:25.720
<v Speaker 7>think the combination of anti migration policy, attacks on the

0:30:25.720 --> 0:30:31.000
<v Speaker 7>FED tariffs deal making, some of which looks corrupt, all

0:30:31.040 --> 0:30:35.760
<v Speaker 7>adds to a more inflationary environment, which reduces real incomes

0:30:35.800 --> 0:30:37.880
<v Speaker 7>for people. So there's a whole bunch of things on

0:30:37.960 --> 0:30:40.840
<v Speaker 7>the domestic front. But I just want to say that

0:30:41.480 --> 0:30:45.200
<v Speaker 7>it's not about choosing the global versus domestic. It's about

0:30:45.280 --> 0:30:49.440
<v Speaker 7>choosing the self interested versus the public welfare.

0:30:50.360 --> 0:30:53.160
<v Speaker 3>I think we need to leave it there that I

0:30:53.200 --> 0:30:53.640
<v Speaker 3>got to say.

0:30:53.680 --> 0:30:56.160
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes I'm in awe of our guests, and I certainly

0:30:56.240 --> 0:30:59.200
<v Speaker 2>am on this Tuesday, Doctor Posen, thank you so much,

0:30:59.360 --> 0:31:02.480
<v Speaker 2>Really appreciate okay for having me same here. Thank you

0:31:02.560 --> 0:31:05.400
<v Speaker 2>for joining us, Doctor Adam Posen, president of the Peterson

0:31:05.440 --> 0:31:07.840
<v Speaker 2>Institute for International Economics.

0:31:08.800 --> 0:31:11.600
<v Speaker 5>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Business Week Daily coming

0:31:11.680 --> 0:31:12.640
<v Speaker 5>up after this.

0:31:16.560 --> 0:31:20.400
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast. Catch

0:31:20.480 --> 0:31:23.160
<v Speaker 1>us live weekday afternoons from two to five e's During

0:31:23.160 --> 0:31:26.600
<v Speaker 1>this listen on Applecarplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg

0:31:26.640 --> 0:31:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Business app, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:31:30.760 --> 0:31:32.280
<v Speaker 3>A lot to talk about with our next guest.

0:31:32.320 --> 0:31:34.520
<v Speaker 2>It is our weekly discussion on women, Money and Power,

0:31:34.560 --> 0:31:37.680
<v Speaker 2>where we explore the economic implications of the wealth shift

0:31:37.720 --> 0:31:40.880
<v Speaker 2>of money to women and really how to navigate them.

0:31:41.000 --> 0:31:44.320
<v Speaker 2>We welcome Stephanie gil She's chief investment officer at robin

0:31:44.320 --> 0:31:47.480
<v Speaker 2>Hood Market. She's here in studio. Stephanie, good to have

0:31:47.560 --> 0:31:49.960
<v Speaker 2>you here. There's a lot going on. I kind of

0:31:50.000 --> 0:31:51.760
<v Speaker 2>say that Tim and I say that it feels like

0:31:51.800 --> 0:31:55.000
<v Speaker 2>almost every day. Let's start broadly with the market environment.

0:31:55.080 --> 0:31:59.040
<v Speaker 2>We've seen quite a pullback and a lot of risk

0:31:59.120 --> 0:32:03.080
<v Speaker 2>on assets, whether it's the mag seven, whether it's Nvidia,

0:32:03.440 --> 0:32:08.520
<v Speaker 2>whether it's semiconductors, whether it's bitcoin. Is this a market reset,

0:32:08.680 --> 0:32:11.240
<v Speaker 2>a sellof or market crush that we're kind of getting

0:32:11.280 --> 0:32:12.360
<v Speaker 2>near or neither.

0:32:12.480 --> 0:32:14.640
<v Speaker 3>I think, or none of the But of the above,

0:32:14.720 --> 0:32:15.440
<v Speaker 3>I think it's correction.

0:32:15.560 --> 0:32:17.320
<v Speaker 10>So I don't know if one of those was part

0:32:17.360 --> 0:32:20.280
<v Speaker 10>of that, but I think it's a healthy correction. You

0:32:20.320 --> 0:32:22.840
<v Speaker 10>get them every once two years. Sometimes we forget that,

0:32:23.840 --> 0:32:26.760
<v Speaker 10>and we just got off of a period of no data.

0:32:28.200 --> 0:32:31.480
<v Speaker 10>Valuations had gotten really high, and there is a legitimate

0:32:31.560 --> 0:32:35.640
<v Speaker 10>question around how much companies are spending versus how much

0:32:35.680 --> 0:32:38.080
<v Speaker 10>they're making in terms of cash flow, and in the

0:32:38.160 --> 0:32:40.560
<v Speaker 10>largest company, so that's going to affect the broader.

0:32:40.240 --> 0:32:42.640
<v Speaker 3>Mar about big tech, and I'm talking about big tech.

0:32:42.440 --> 0:32:46.800
<v Speaker 10>And AI and obviously Amazon's borrowing outsizing it to fifteen

0:32:46.840 --> 0:32:48.040
<v Speaker 10>billion doesn't.

0:32:47.720 --> 0:32:49.040
<v Speaker 3>Necessarily help that narrative.

0:32:49.800 --> 0:32:51.480
<v Speaker 10>So I think you just need to start seeing proof

0:32:51.520 --> 0:32:55.400
<v Speaker 10>that there's a return on invested capital. There are other

0:32:55.520 --> 0:32:56.960
<v Speaker 10>things that are working though in the market.

0:32:57.440 --> 0:32:58.720
<v Speaker 5>We'll get to some of the things that are working,

0:32:58.720 --> 0:33:00.600
<v Speaker 5>but I want to know what the proof would look

0:33:00.680 --> 0:33:02.400
<v Speaker 5>like in your view, what do you need to see

0:33:02.440 --> 0:33:04.960
<v Speaker 5>from some of these companies to show, Okay, the money

0:33:04.960 --> 0:33:07.040
<v Speaker 5>that we're spending is actually paying off.

0:33:07.120 --> 0:33:10.920
<v Speaker 10>I think you need to start seeing money from the

0:33:10.960 --> 0:33:15.240
<v Speaker 10>actual investments that they're making in terms of like AI investments,

0:33:15.640 --> 0:33:18.440
<v Speaker 10>how it actually reaches the consumer, how it reaches enterprise.

0:33:18.560 --> 0:33:20.720
<v Speaker 3>Like we know in the private area.

0:33:20.480 --> 0:33:23.160
<v Speaker 10>Anthropic is doing a little bit more revenue right because

0:33:23.160 --> 0:33:26.680
<v Speaker 10>there enterprise focus versus like an open AI that's more

0:33:26.720 --> 0:33:30.240
<v Speaker 10>consumer focused. So I think if people are investing money

0:33:30.320 --> 0:33:33.640
<v Speaker 10>in places that are going to prove out that revenue comes.

0:33:33.680 --> 0:33:36.160
<v Speaker 10>I think the other thing is that you're the change

0:33:36.160 --> 0:33:38.080
<v Speaker 10>in the one big beautiful bill right gave that one

0:33:38.160 --> 0:33:40.960
<v Speaker 10>hundred percent expensing, And that's kind of something that I'm

0:33:41.000 --> 0:33:43.040
<v Speaker 10>looking forward to in the future as well, which is

0:33:43.080 --> 0:33:46.480
<v Speaker 10>like that's not just AI investing, but also in other

0:33:46.600 --> 0:33:49.160
<v Speaker 10>tech and infrastructure and like that can start to lift

0:33:49.200 --> 0:33:49.720
<v Speaker 10>the market too.

0:33:49.840 --> 0:33:51.080
<v Speaker 3>One of the things I want to ask you about.

0:33:51.080 --> 0:33:54.760
<v Speaker 2>You shared some notes with our producer Arielagami, and you

0:33:54.880 --> 0:33:58.920
<v Speaker 2>said or you noted global markets are fundamentally changed. Individual

0:33:58.920 --> 0:34:01.400
<v Speaker 2>investors are now a corporate part of the financial ecosystem,

0:34:01.440 --> 0:34:04.880
<v Speaker 2>reshaping how capital markets function. What was once the domain

0:34:04.880 --> 0:34:07.360
<v Speaker 2>of institutions is now open and accessible to millions of

0:34:07.360 --> 0:34:10.000
<v Speaker 2>individuals worldwide. I understand where you're coming from, but I

0:34:10.000 --> 0:34:13.400
<v Speaker 2>was thinking about what doctor Adam Posen, president the Peterson

0:34:13.440 --> 0:34:16.440
<v Speaker 2>Institute for International Economics, said coming off of the meeting

0:34:16.800 --> 0:34:20.240
<v Speaker 2>between President Trump and Mohammed bin Saman of Saudi Arabia,

0:34:20.280 --> 0:34:23.960
<v Speaker 2>that this idea that capital flows actually are being controlled

0:34:24.520 --> 0:34:27.759
<v Speaker 2>to some extent by moves out of the White House,

0:34:27.800 --> 0:34:31.480
<v Speaker 2>whether it's taking stakes in companies, or it's the AI

0:34:31.680 --> 0:34:34.799
<v Speaker 2>spend that is controlling so much, or it's what some

0:34:34.840 --> 0:34:38.279
<v Speaker 2>say is a transactional White House where invest here and

0:34:38.320 --> 0:34:42.560
<v Speaker 2>you get this, it's very different in some regard in

0:34:42.719 --> 0:34:45.160
<v Speaker 2>a lot of ways from what we've had in the past.

0:34:45.239 --> 0:34:47.640
<v Speaker 10>I've personally never watched so many political shows in my

0:34:47.719 --> 0:34:49.280
<v Speaker 10>career of over twenty years.

0:34:49.280 --> 0:34:51.600
<v Speaker 3>Like that is part of what you have to know

0:34:52.160 --> 0:34:52.920
<v Speaker 3>as an investment.

0:34:52.920 --> 0:34:56.279
<v Speaker 2>Makes me question, like do individual investors really still have

0:34:56.280 --> 0:34:57.040
<v Speaker 2>a lot to say here?

0:34:57.320 --> 0:34:59.240
<v Speaker 10>I think they do, but not necessarily in the biggest

0:34:59.239 --> 0:35:01.840
<v Speaker 10>companies like I, you know, I think there's they actually

0:35:01.880 --> 0:35:03.799
<v Speaker 10>are seeing some of the individual investors, I think are

0:35:03.880 --> 0:35:07.239
<v Speaker 10>seeing things before the institutional investors, and that they many

0:35:07.280 --> 0:35:09.239
<v Speaker 10>are so aligned with the White House and what they're

0:35:09.239 --> 0:35:10.920
<v Speaker 10>doing that they're like, this is what I think the

0:35:10.960 --> 0:35:14.680
<v Speaker 10>future is. I also think that it's not necessarily showing

0:35:14.760 --> 0:35:17.520
<v Speaker 10>up in the largest companies. There are other companies, smaller

0:35:17.560 --> 0:35:20.600
<v Speaker 10>ones that they kind of gather together and sort of

0:35:20.640 --> 0:35:24.120
<v Speaker 10>community invest and those aren't the biggest companies, but they

0:35:24.120 --> 0:35:26.920
<v Speaker 10>are ones that are more volatile, but they have a

0:35:26.920 --> 0:35:29.080
<v Speaker 10>longer time horizon. And most of the people on our

0:35:29.080 --> 0:35:33.279
<v Speaker 10>platform are average age of thirty five. You know, more

0:35:33.280 --> 0:35:35.560
<v Speaker 10>than two thirds of our company is one Nails and

0:35:36.160 --> 0:35:38.759
<v Speaker 10>gen Z, So that's what you know. I think it's

0:35:38.800 --> 0:35:40.960
<v Speaker 10>the same as thing as Sorry, the thing is being

0:35:40.960 --> 0:35:43.440
<v Speaker 10>on a trading desk and kind of talking about investment

0:35:43.480 --> 0:35:44.080
<v Speaker 10>ideas together.

0:35:44.160 --> 0:35:46.480
<v Speaker 3>Now they're in X doing the same thing and stuff.

0:35:46.480 --> 0:35:50.399
<v Speaker 5>They're probably watching crypto closely too. Bitcoin down twenty five

0:35:50.400 --> 0:35:52.120
<v Speaker 5>to thirty percent, depending on when you look at it

0:35:52.160 --> 0:35:54.640
<v Speaker 5>from those all time highs just last month. Yeah, what

0:35:54.680 --> 0:35:57.480
<v Speaker 5>does that do not for your customer and not for

0:35:57.520 --> 0:35:59.960
<v Speaker 5>the robinhood user, but what does that do for sentiment

0:36:00.120 --> 0:36:01.640
<v Speaker 5>or does it give any indication of sentiment.

0:36:02.320 --> 0:36:05.560
<v Speaker 10>I think it does because you have seen actually some

0:36:05.600 --> 0:36:09.719
<v Speaker 10>really big institutions sell some large positions too recently, not

0:36:09.760 --> 0:36:12.840
<v Speaker 10>just in bitcoin, but obviously in video and other names.

0:36:12.840 --> 0:36:13.160
<v Speaker 3>I think.

0:36:13.600 --> 0:36:16.520
<v Speaker 10>But then there is buyers too from Berkshire Hathaway.

0:36:16.920 --> 0:36:17.200
<v Speaker 9>I think.

0:36:18.120 --> 0:36:20.560
<v Speaker 10>I think those that play in the crypto space are

0:36:20.719 --> 0:36:24.640
<v Speaker 10>very used to large swings and they're you know, I

0:36:24.640 --> 0:36:26.640
<v Speaker 10>think there's kind of a meme out there that says

0:36:26.680 --> 0:36:28.920
<v Speaker 10>if you're invest like when stock investors have a big

0:36:29.000 --> 0:36:31.840
<v Speaker 10>drag down, they're like, you know, the crypto investors are like,

0:36:31.880 --> 0:36:34.759
<v Speaker 10>welcome to the way it feels. So I actually think

0:36:34.800 --> 0:36:36.839
<v Speaker 10>they're kind of used to it. We haven't really seen

0:36:36.880 --> 0:36:39.839
<v Speaker 10>a huge shift of anything. Most of our customers when

0:36:39.880 --> 0:36:43.120
<v Speaker 10>they're investing, they play the volatility in that when it

0:36:43.120 --> 0:36:44.640
<v Speaker 10>goes up a lot, they'll trim their positions.

0:36:44.640 --> 0:36:46.440
<v Speaker 3>When it gets down a lot, they do add we.

0:36:46.440 --> 0:36:48.600
<v Speaker 2>Have to jump so much going on, come back soon

0:36:48.600 --> 0:36:51.040
<v Speaker 2>because we would like to continue that. Stephanie Guild, chief

0:36:51.080 --> 0:36:53.040
<v Speaker 2>investment Officer at robin Hood Markets.

0:36:53.239 --> 0:36:58.719
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Business Week Daily podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:36:58.880 --> 0:37:02.920
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live weekday

0:37:02.960 --> 0:37:07.120
<v Speaker 1>afternoons from two to five pm Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:37:07.280 --> 0:37:11.080
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:37:11.239 --> 0:37:14.120
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:37:14.360 --> 0:37:16.560
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal