WEBVTT - Markets, Consumer Confidence, And ETFs

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day, we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.479
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:21.639
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. This really knocked me

0:00:21.680 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 1>off my game. Here my colleague, co host Katie Greifeld,

0:00:25.239 --> 0:00:28.240
<v Speaker 1>and my producer Eric Mullow, neither of them have seen

0:00:28.320 --> 0:00:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Top Gun. No, I can't even imagine what is about.

0:00:32.200 --> 0:00:34.560
<v Speaker 1>So the homework for the kids today is go home,

0:00:34.800 --> 0:00:38.280
<v Speaker 1>get a streaming service of your choice and stream Top Gun.

0:00:38.680 --> 0:00:40.600
<v Speaker 1>That's the homework because we are a Top Gun two

0:00:40.600 --> 0:00:42.839
<v Speaker 1>coming out, and you've gotta be prepared for that. Dan,

0:00:42.920 --> 0:00:44.720
<v Speaker 1>I know, I know Dan Genter has seen Top Gun.

0:00:44.880 --> 0:00:49.879
<v Speaker 1>Dan Genter, CEO Chairman RNC Genter Capital Management, Dan, are

0:00:49.880 --> 0:00:52.680
<v Speaker 1>you a Top Gun fan? I am absolutely a Top

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:55.360
<v Speaker 1>gust fan. I've seen it several times. I'm actually a

0:00:55.400 --> 0:00:59.000
<v Speaker 1>pilot myself, So it's like that explains it my theme movie,

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:01.760
<v Speaker 1>and I just I align with you. I can't believe

0:01:01.760 --> 0:01:03.800
<v Speaker 1>they haven't seen it. But but I have faith in

0:01:03.800 --> 0:01:05.640
<v Speaker 1>the future that they will go home and look at

0:01:05.680 --> 0:01:09.640
<v Speaker 1>this and round out their education. Yes, I can't agree more.

0:01:09.840 --> 0:01:12.120
<v Speaker 1>All right, then let's get back to these pesky markets here.

0:01:12.160 --> 0:01:14.360
<v Speaker 1>We have some green on the screen today, but the

0:01:15.000 --> 0:01:17.880
<v Speaker 1>bricks that are in this wall of worry, there's just

0:01:18.040 --> 0:01:20.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of them. How are you looking at these

0:01:20.480 --> 0:01:24.039
<v Speaker 1>markets today? What are you telling your clients? Well, I

0:01:24.080 --> 0:01:26.000
<v Speaker 1>think that what you have to do, Paul, is which

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:27.840
<v Speaker 1>you always have to do in these kind of situations

0:01:27.840 --> 0:01:30.399
<v Speaker 1>and crisis, is that the you have to really cut

0:01:30.400 --> 0:01:34.440
<v Speaker 1>through the fundamentals. It's not that you can't totally ignore

0:01:34.480 --> 0:01:36.800
<v Speaker 1>the emotion because obviously the market is going to trade

0:01:36.800 --> 0:01:38.960
<v Speaker 1>it on emotion. Otherwise we just traded a constant p

0:01:39.200 --> 0:01:41.559
<v Speaker 1>at all times. But you still have to come back

0:01:41.640 --> 0:01:43.920
<v Speaker 1>or what are the fundamentals of this market? You know,

0:01:44.000 --> 0:01:47.200
<v Speaker 1>talking about aviation you started at thirty foot Look and

0:01:47.240 --> 0:01:51.000
<v Speaker 1>you basically look at the overall economics and an essence

0:01:51.040 --> 0:01:53.240
<v Speaker 1>are we are we going into a recession and they

0:01:53.480 --> 0:01:55.440
<v Speaker 1>and the fact is, you know, we're not. You know,

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:59.280
<v Speaker 1>we're slowing, Earnings are slowing. Certainly growth is going to slow,

0:01:59.760 --> 0:02:02.960
<v Speaker 1>but but look, we're still going to be probably above

0:02:03.000 --> 0:02:05.600
<v Speaker 1>FED expectations at at least two and a half three

0:02:06.000 --> 0:02:08.400
<v Speaker 1>GDP growth, you know, going in through the mainner of

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:11.760
<v Speaker 1>this year. In three we think that earnings are certainly

0:02:11.800 --> 0:02:14.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna slow, but we're probably going to see sp earnings

0:02:14.919 --> 0:02:18.160
<v Speaker 1>up five or six percent, and so therefore you don't

0:02:18.200 --> 0:02:20.320
<v Speaker 1>have a recession. The market is probably going to be

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:24.239
<v Speaker 1>flat slightly up. We see about a eight percent market

0:02:24.560 --> 0:02:28.120
<v Speaker 1>over the next twelve months, and uh, mainly probably some

0:02:28.240 --> 0:02:31.480
<v Speaker 1>pe contraction, but earnings are going to drive the rest

0:02:31.520 --> 0:02:34.160
<v Speaker 1>of it. And so it's still it's it's now very

0:02:34.200 --> 0:02:37.240
<v Speaker 1>much of a stock pickers market, and uh, you can

0:02:37.280 --> 0:02:39.800
<v Speaker 1>buy into some of this weakness and certainly the volatility

0:02:39.840 --> 0:02:42.760
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing, and that's what we're doing. Well, let's wrap

0:02:42.880 --> 0:02:45.120
<v Speaker 1>some of the movements that we've seen in commodity markets

0:02:45.120 --> 0:02:47.519
<v Speaker 1>into that, because obviously all eyes have been on crude

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:50.560
<v Speaker 1>oil for you know, several months now, and uh, I

0:02:50.600 --> 0:02:53.760
<v Speaker 1>mean we're looking at crude oil at close to a

0:02:53.840 --> 0:02:56.400
<v Speaker 1>hundred dollars a barrel, but a hundred two dollars a barrel,

0:02:56.680 --> 0:03:00.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, assuming we stay around this range, mean, what

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:03.320
<v Speaker 1>does that mean for you know, the fundamentals of the

0:03:03.400 --> 0:03:06.399
<v Speaker 1>U S economy and for companies you know, dealing with

0:03:06.440 --> 0:03:10.359
<v Speaker 1>those input costs. Well, Katie, I mean you're absolutely right.

0:03:10.560 --> 0:03:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Is that this market is driven independent of the war obviously,

0:03:14.639 --> 0:03:17.200
<v Speaker 1>which is a major factor, but from an economic standpoint,

0:03:17.680 --> 0:03:21.480
<v Speaker 1>is being driven by oil and inflation. And and even

0:03:21.480 --> 0:03:25.320
<v Speaker 1>the oil is only three percent of the inflationary inputs

0:03:25.360 --> 0:03:28.520
<v Speaker 1>now versus where it was many years ago, it's still

0:03:28.840 --> 0:03:31.120
<v Speaker 1>a major factor when you start to look at how

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:34.440
<v Speaker 1>it affects every individual and and how it affects their

0:03:34.440 --> 0:03:38.760
<v Speaker 1>disposable income. I mean, the current increases that we've had

0:03:38.760 --> 0:03:41.320
<v Speaker 1>an oil we estimate is going to cost the average

0:03:41.360 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 1>family over a thousand dollars a year more. And so

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:48.000
<v Speaker 1>something's going to give with that. So a stabilization and

0:03:48.120 --> 0:03:50.920
<v Speaker 1>oil is very key to us. We think that equal

0:03:51.160 --> 0:03:54.400
<v Speaker 1>liberal was somewhere around eighty dollars. But it's going to

0:03:54.400 --> 0:03:56.800
<v Speaker 1>affect earnings and that's part of what we're factoring in

0:03:56.800 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 1>that it's going to slow the economy from overall consumption

0:04:00.000 --> 0:04:03.120
<v Speaker 1>because we're driven by consumption. And if you take money

0:04:03.160 --> 0:04:06.360
<v Speaker 1>away from people, and increase in oil prices is basically

0:04:06.360 --> 0:04:09.400
<v Speaker 1>like a tax. Uh you basically you take it away

0:04:09.400 --> 0:04:13.360
<v Speaker 1>from people. Uh, It doesn't add anything to productivity. They

0:04:13.400 --> 0:04:15.520
<v Speaker 1>just lose the ability to spend on something else and

0:04:15.560 --> 0:04:20.000
<v Speaker 1>therefore earnings go down. It affects consumer, uh, mainly consumer

0:04:20.640 --> 0:04:23.760
<v Speaker 1>non durables, but also durables. So that's to us as

0:04:23.839 --> 0:04:27.040
<v Speaker 1>part of that slowing effect. Anytime you have you know

0:04:27.120 --> 0:04:30.240
<v Speaker 1>that displacement, if you will inflation, it goes through the

0:04:30.240 --> 0:04:33.040
<v Speaker 1>whole system. But I don't think that that takes us negative.

0:04:33.440 --> 0:04:35.880
<v Speaker 1>It just takes us to where we're at slower growth.

0:04:36.880 --> 0:04:38.840
<v Speaker 1>So that's kind of where I wanted to go Dan,

0:04:38.880 --> 0:04:41.360
<v Speaker 1>because a lot of folks are saying, boy, this Federal Reserve,

0:04:41.600 --> 0:04:44.280
<v Speaker 1>it is clearly communicated that it wants to fight inflation

0:04:44.320 --> 0:04:48.279
<v Speaker 1>in part through rate increases. But the risk is maybe

0:04:48.279 --> 0:04:51.360
<v Speaker 1>they go too far, too fast and push this economy

0:04:51.400 --> 0:04:54.640
<v Speaker 1>into a recession, and nobody wants that. How do you

0:04:54.760 --> 0:04:57.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of weigh those risks? Well, look, I think it's

0:04:57.920 --> 0:05:00.160
<v Speaker 1>baked in that one thing. You know, with regard US

0:05:00.200 --> 0:05:04.479
<v Speaker 1>two chairman policies being has been extraordinarily transparent. I believe

0:05:04.520 --> 0:05:07.200
<v Speaker 1>he's also doing that now. I don't think we're going

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:10.040
<v Speaker 1>to be surprised. And and the market is largely discounting

0:05:10.040 --> 0:05:11.719
<v Speaker 1>a lot of that already. I mean we've we've had

0:05:11.760 --> 0:05:16.520
<v Speaker 1>a hundred basis points increase, uh, not exactly a parallel shift,

0:05:16.560 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 1>but close to it. Certainly the ten years up a

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:22.840
<v Speaker 1>hundred basis points, uh since November, and so a lot

0:05:22.880 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 1>of it's baked in the cake already, and they are

0:05:25.040 --> 0:05:27.240
<v Speaker 1>going to slow it now. We feel that we'll see

0:05:27.600 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 1>definitely another seventy and almost certainly another hundred basis points

0:05:31.360 --> 0:05:34.520
<v Speaker 1>from here. You know, we've modeled that out, uh to

0:05:34.640 --> 0:05:36.760
<v Speaker 1>see what does that really do to us. We think

0:05:36.800 --> 0:05:39.080
<v Speaker 1>it's largely baked. It's baked into our numbers with what

0:05:39.120 --> 0:05:42.240
<v Speaker 1>I've mentioned earlier for SB orange growth and also for

0:05:42.279 --> 0:05:45.280
<v Speaker 1>the overall economy. Uh. Certainly it's going to squeeze the

0:05:45.320 --> 0:05:48.560
<v Speaker 1>housing market. Uh. You know, it just makes everything once

0:05:48.600 --> 0:05:51.520
<v Speaker 1>again more expensive. It really adds to inflation, if you will,

0:05:51.560 --> 0:05:54.120
<v Speaker 1>because your cost of money is going to be higher.

0:05:54.520 --> 0:05:56.760
<v Speaker 1>You know. Well, now, whether they overshoot it, I mean

0:05:56.800 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 1>personally I think that they'll go slower. Uh, they'll continue

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:04.240
<v Speaker 1>you as the as the data comes in, but it

0:06:04.240 --> 0:06:06.160
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be unusual for them to do a fifty A

0:06:06.200 --> 0:06:09.240
<v Speaker 1>matter of fact, if you look historically, usually the first

0:06:09.279 --> 0:06:13.120
<v Speaker 1>time the Fed reverses course from uh, they go fifty,

0:06:13.440 --> 0:06:16.080
<v Speaker 1>they go fifty at the beginning, whether they're raising or lower,

0:06:16.080 --> 0:06:18.279
<v Speaker 1>and they go fifty and at the end they go fifty.

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:20.760
<v Speaker 1>The signal that they've stopped. So it would not be

0:06:20.800 --> 0:06:23.120
<v Speaker 1>out of normal to see that. Hey, Dan, thanks so

0:06:23.200 --> 0:06:26.120
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us there. Always appreciate getting your prospective.

0:06:26.320 --> 0:06:30.159
<v Speaker 1>Dan Genter, CEO, ce IO and chairman. It's also a

0:06:30.240 --> 0:06:38.120
<v Speaker 1>pilot of r n C Genter Capital Management. Here. Now,

0:06:38.200 --> 0:06:39.839
<v Speaker 1>let's going to Lynn Franco and break down some of

0:06:39.839 --> 0:06:43.520
<v Speaker 1>those UM consumer confidence number. She's the director of Economic

0:06:43.520 --> 0:06:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Indicators and Surveys. At the conference board, Lynn talked to

0:06:46.640 --> 0:06:50.720
<v Speaker 1>us about the consumer today. What did your data show you, Well,

0:06:50.760 --> 0:06:54.160
<v Speaker 1>we're saying that the consumer confidence is holding steady, so

0:06:54.240 --> 0:06:56.400
<v Speaker 1>we went from one oh five seven last month to

0:06:56.520 --> 0:06:59.479
<v Speaker 1>one oh seven point two. But it really is being

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:03.159
<v Speaker 1>suppoored by the present conditions where consumers are telling us

0:07:03.160 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 1>at least the economy remains on somewhat stable footing, and

0:07:06.600 --> 0:07:09.600
<v Speaker 1>that's really just because we have very strong employment conditions,

0:07:09.600 --> 0:07:13.880
<v Speaker 1>so that's really sort of boosting consumer confidence. Looking ahead,

0:07:14.240 --> 0:07:20.040
<v Speaker 1>we've seen expectations that continue to deteriorate. UM within consumer

0:07:20.120 --> 0:07:23.760
<v Speaker 1>sighting both inflation, especially rising prices at the gas pump,

0:07:24.240 --> 0:07:27.880
<v Speaker 1>and the war in Ukraine as um, sort of the

0:07:28.000 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 1>reasons why they are a little bit more apprehensive about

0:07:31.600 --> 0:07:35.120
<v Speaker 1>the outlook. And you mentioned that, you know, there is

0:07:35.160 --> 0:07:38.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of confidence in the labor market, and looking

0:07:38.240 --> 0:07:40.480
<v Speaker 1>at this morning's data, is the sheriff consumers who said

0:07:40.480 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 1>the jobs were plentiful increased to a record high of

0:07:43.320 --> 0:07:46.480
<v Speaker 1>about fifty seven point two per cent. But I mean,

0:07:47.360 --> 0:07:49.960
<v Speaker 1>how how much work is that confidence in the labor

0:07:50.000 --> 0:07:51.960
<v Speaker 1>market doing right now? Because of course, you know, we're

0:07:51.960 --> 0:07:55.679
<v Speaker 1>dealing with record high inflation. It seems like that hasn't

0:07:55.840 --> 0:08:01.680
<v Speaker 1>undermined the labor market yet, correct, And in fact, our

0:08:01.720 --> 0:08:05.400
<v Speaker 1>inflation question hit and all time high, so it's really

0:08:05.440 --> 0:08:10.400
<v Speaker 1>being offset by strong employment conditions. Um. But you know,

0:08:10.440 --> 0:08:13.280
<v Speaker 1>we do expect inflation and you know, the war in

0:08:13.440 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine to continue to provide hig winds both to growth,

0:08:17.680 --> 0:08:21.640
<v Speaker 1>spending and confidence. So it remains to be seen just

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:25.480
<v Speaker 1>how you know, well confidence holds up, and in terms

0:08:25.520 --> 0:08:29.320
<v Speaker 1>of overall growth, we do have it somewhat weaker than

0:08:29.480 --> 0:08:34.880
<v Speaker 1>last month. Our outlook has maybe GDP growing at about

0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:37.400
<v Speaker 1>one point seven and Q one down to one point

0:08:37.480 --> 0:08:41.160
<v Speaker 1>three and Q two and also consumer spending softening as

0:08:41.160 --> 0:08:45.760
<v Speaker 1>a result of higher inflation. Lynn, I mean, the labor

0:08:45.800 --> 0:08:49.000
<v Speaker 1>markets just fascinates me. I'm still wondering where those three

0:08:49.080 --> 0:08:51.760
<v Speaker 1>four or five million people are that we're in the

0:08:51.760 --> 0:08:55.720
<v Speaker 1>workforce pre pandemic, Where are they now? Are they going

0:08:55.800 --> 0:08:59.280
<v Speaker 1>to come back? What's the data you've seen, the analysis

0:08:59.400 --> 0:09:03.360
<v Speaker 1>you've done about those people. Well, we've seen you know,

0:09:03.400 --> 0:09:06.480
<v Speaker 1>in particular, you know, women have been hard hit right

0:09:06.559 --> 0:09:09.840
<v Speaker 1>in childcare has been an issue. So this is sort

0:09:09.840 --> 0:09:13.040
<v Speaker 1>of one segment of the labor market that continues to

0:09:13.480 --> 0:09:17.240
<v Speaker 1>uh sort of hasn't quite bounced back from you know,

0:09:17.320 --> 0:09:20.640
<v Speaker 1>pre COVID pandemic levels. So I think that's going to

0:09:20.679 --> 0:09:23.680
<v Speaker 1>continue for the next couple of months. But what we're

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:25.560
<v Speaker 1>seeing here and I think what we expect to see

0:09:25.559 --> 0:09:28.200
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the week are pretty good employment numbers,

0:09:28.200 --> 0:09:32.240
<v Speaker 1>so at least that will continue to support consumer confidence

0:09:32.240 --> 0:09:35.400
<v Speaker 1>and growth in the short term. And then focusing on

0:09:35.480 --> 0:09:39.200
<v Speaker 1>the consumer, you know, a question we ask a lot is, Okay,

0:09:39.200 --> 0:09:42.560
<v Speaker 1>when does inflation increase the point where you know, people

0:09:42.600 --> 0:09:45.839
<v Speaker 1>start putting off purchases or stop spending as much money

0:09:45.880 --> 0:09:48.400
<v Speaker 1>as they have been. Um, I'm curious you know what

0:09:48.559 --> 0:09:52.319
<v Speaker 1>you see, uh. In regards to that question, well, we

0:09:52.400 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 1>see a little bit of you know, inflation, and also

0:09:55.400 --> 0:09:58.920
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, interest rate hikes and anticipation of

0:09:59.800 --> 0:10:01.920
<v Speaker 1>have being a little bit of a softening effect at

0:10:01.960 --> 0:10:04.280
<v Speaker 1>least that we're seeing over the last few months. And

0:10:04.360 --> 0:10:07.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, sort of automobile purchases, home purchases. You know,

0:10:07.280 --> 0:10:10.040
<v Speaker 1>we've seen mortgage rates of going up, so sort of

0:10:10.040 --> 0:10:13.360
<v Speaker 1>these big ticket items that are interest rate sensitive, we're

0:10:13.400 --> 0:10:16.840
<v Speaker 1>beginning to see a little bit of softening there as well. Lynn.

0:10:16.880 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Some economists are introducing the word recession into their talking points.

0:10:21.480 --> 0:10:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Is that a meaningful risk for the US economy and

0:10:23.160 --> 0:10:26.720
<v Speaker 1>your from your perspective, From our perspective, we don't see

0:10:26.720 --> 0:10:30.760
<v Speaker 1>your recession. We do see softening and growth and consumer

0:10:30.840 --> 0:10:33.720
<v Speaker 1>spending over the next several months, but at this point

0:10:33.720 --> 0:10:36.679
<v Speaker 1>so we're not forecasting recession. All right, Lynn, thank you

0:10:36.720 --> 0:10:39.520
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. As always, Lynn Franco, the

0:10:39.600 --> 0:10:42.520
<v Speaker 1>director of Economic Indicators and Surveys at the conference board

0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:45.160
<v Speaker 1>at breaking down the consumer confidence number today, which came

0:10:45.200 --> 0:10:50.240
<v Speaker 1>out a little bit better and expected. It is finally

0:10:50.320 --> 0:10:53.000
<v Speaker 1>times talk about crypto. We're going to do that with

0:10:53.040 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Greg King. He is the CEO of Osprey Funds. Uh.

0:10:56.600 --> 0:11:01.040
<v Speaker 1>They offer access to cryptos such as Salana, Bitcoin, UH,

0:11:01.200 --> 0:11:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Polka Dot, you name it via traditional vehicles. Greg, it's

0:11:04.360 --> 0:11:06.080
<v Speaker 1>great to have you with us. Let's start with a

0:11:06.120 --> 0:11:08.760
<v Speaker 1>big rebound that we've seen in the crypto space over

0:11:08.760 --> 0:11:11.360
<v Speaker 1>the past week or so. I'm looking at bitcoin at

0:11:11.480 --> 0:11:15.040
<v Speaker 1>just a hair below forty eight thousand dollars per coin.

0:11:15.559 --> 0:11:19.199
<v Speaker 1>How has that translated into flows in your funds? Are

0:11:19.200 --> 0:11:24.600
<v Speaker 1>you seeing cash come in? So the bitcoin fund that

0:11:24.640 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 1>we operate is traded on the secondary market under the

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:31.480
<v Speaker 1>ticular oh b tc UM. It's similar to UM, the

0:11:31.640 --> 0:11:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Gray Skull Trust that's been up for a long time.

0:11:33.480 --> 0:11:37.280
<v Speaker 1>It's just at a different price point, more more, less

0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:39.720
<v Speaker 1>expensive for investors. But these products trade a little bit

0:11:39.720 --> 0:11:43.120
<v Speaker 1>differently than actual bitcoin because there's a fixed supply, So

0:11:43.160 --> 0:11:46.280
<v Speaker 1>they traded premiums and discounts, and in times like this

0:11:46.320 --> 0:11:49.559
<v Speaker 1>when the price is rallying, you can see that discount narrow.

0:11:49.920 --> 0:11:52.679
<v Speaker 1>For a long time, those products traded in their premium,

0:11:52.760 --> 0:11:54.640
<v Speaker 1>but over the last year or so, they've been trading

0:11:54.640 --> 0:11:57.000
<v Speaker 1>in a discount. So it is an interesting opportunity for

0:11:57.040 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 1>investors to get ahold of bitcoin at basically less based value.

0:12:01.360 --> 0:12:05.839
<v Speaker 1>All right, Greg, So we are going into a significantly

0:12:06.000 --> 0:12:09.440
<v Speaker 1>rising interest rate environment. Do we have any data to

0:12:09.600 --> 0:12:14.319
<v Speaker 1>show how crypto performs in that type of environment. It's

0:12:14.360 --> 0:12:16.920
<v Speaker 1>a great question. I think the part that we're focused

0:12:16.960 --> 0:12:21.840
<v Speaker 1>on is real rates, right, because unfortunately real rates are

0:12:22.360 --> 0:12:25.439
<v Speaker 1>pretty severely negative with the inflation numbers we've seen seven

0:12:25.400 --> 0:12:27.600
<v Speaker 1>and a half percent and the ten years you know,

0:12:27.679 --> 0:12:30.760
<v Speaker 1>two and a half and so in those environments, the

0:12:31.200 --> 0:12:34.800
<v Speaker 1>natural comparison, of course, the bitcoin UM for those of

0:12:34.880 --> 0:12:38.400
<v Speaker 1>us kind of living in that world, is the old

0:12:38.400 --> 0:12:41.199
<v Speaker 1>world version of bitcoin gold, right, And I know a

0:12:41.240 --> 0:12:43.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of people out there are cringing when I say that,

0:12:43.160 --> 0:12:46.679
<v Speaker 1>but the reality is that bitcoin has established itself as

0:12:46.720 --> 0:12:50.000
<v Speaker 1>a digital substitute for gold, and so we would expect

0:12:50.000 --> 0:12:53.840
<v Speaker 1>it to behave similarly and negative real interest rate environments

0:12:53.880 --> 0:12:57.520
<v Speaker 1>are fantastic for gold historically, so you are seeing some

0:12:57.600 --> 0:13:00.760
<v Speaker 1>of that develop in the price a bitcoin. You've also

0:13:00.800 --> 0:13:03.360
<v Speaker 1>seen a few announcements with UM. I think it started

0:13:03.400 --> 0:13:05.920
<v Speaker 1>a few weeks ago with the White House putting out

0:13:05.960 --> 0:13:11.280
<v Speaker 1>the directive to UM, you know, responsibly innovate with digital assets.

0:13:11.600 --> 0:13:15.040
<v Speaker 1>But then more recently there were some announcements UM by

0:13:15.040 --> 0:13:18.120
<v Speaker 1>a group in Korea that you know, audience members are

0:13:18.200 --> 0:13:19.959
<v Speaker 1>not deep into the crypt of the world. They may

0:13:20.000 --> 0:13:21.720
<v Speaker 1>not have heard of it. It's a large stable coin

0:13:21.880 --> 0:13:25.839
<v Speaker 1>project UM called Terra that's buying quite a bit of

0:13:25.880 --> 0:13:29.120
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin for its reserves. And so you have these new,

0:13:29.840 --> 0:13:34.320
<v Speaker 1>uh you know, digital assets participants almost acting like miniature

0:13:34.360 --> 0:13:37.880
<v Speaker 1>central banks and using bitcoin as their own reserve asset.

0:13:38.679 --> 0:13:40.560
<v Speaker 1>And Greg, I want to circle back to a point

0:13:40.600 --> 0:13:44.120
<v Speaker 1>you made the fact that o b tc your inaugural product.

0:13:44.320 --> 0:13:46.880
<v Speaker 1>It's trading at a discount similar to the Gray Scale

0:13:46.880 --> 0:13:50.360
<v Speaker 1>product GBTC, and you know the way you framed it

0:13:50.480 --> 0:13:53.319
<v Speaker 1>as you know you can pick up bitcoin at a discount.

0:13:53.880 --> 0:13:57.319
<v Speaker 1>The pushback would be that long term holders of this trust,

0:13:57.800 --> 0:14:01.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, they they've really seen there in vestments road

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:04.160
<v Speaker 1>and they're they're now they would have been better off

0:14:04.200 --> 0:14:07.840
<v Speaker 1>holding bitcoin itself. And I'm curious, how do you fix

0:14:08.320 --> 0:14:12.720
<v Speaker 1>the discount if there is a fixed supply of your trust.

0:14:12.800 --> 0:14:15.640
<v Speaker 1>I know that Gray Scale has been buying back shares

0:14:15.679 --> 0:14:17.920
<v Speaker 1>of the trust, or rather their parent company. Has have

0:14:18.040 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 1>you considered anything similar? We have? We have. I think

0:14:22.840 --> 0:14:25.480
<v Speaker 1>that what we're focused on. We keep pretty close tabs

0:14:25.520 --> 0:14:29.600
<v Speaker 1>on the um SEC in the regulatory environment. I think

0:14:29.600 --> 0:14:32.360
<v Speaker 1>that's that's one of the themes you're seeing this year.

0:14:32.440 --> 0:14:35.840
<v Speaker 1>That's that's constructive. UM, you did get the Bitcoin features

0:14:36.440 --> 0:14:39.160
<v Speaker 1>et F approved, You've got you know, the Biden White

0:14:39.200 --> 0:14:42.000
<v Speaker 1>House putting on the directive. UM, there seems to be

0:14:42.120 --> 0:14:47.320
<v Speaker 1>movement that's establishing some amount of clarity on the regulatory side,

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:50.200
<v Speaker 1>which is all good for the prospects of something like

0:14:50.240 --> 0:14:52.880
<v Speaker 1>a bitcoin PF. And so our focus would be to

0:14:53.960 --> 0:14:58.040
<v Speaker 1>convert our fund to an EPF when that's possible, and

0:14:58.120 --> 0:15:00.480
<v Speaker 1>at that point we'd expected to trade in line with

0:15:00.560 --> 0:15:03.200
<v Speaker 1>fair value. By the way your comment earlier, I think,

0:15:03.640 --> 0:15:08.000
<v Speaker 1>I think is UM totally dependent on when investors came

0:15:08.040 --> 0:15:10.960
<v Speaker 1>into you know, either our product or other people's product.

0:15:11.520 --> 0:15:13.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, So it's it's really everybody's got their own

0:15:13.960 --> 0:15:16.760
<v Speaker 1>story in terms of when they came in UM and

0:15:16.800 --> 0:15:19.440
<v Speaker 1>when they when they came out. But you know, it's

0:15:19.480 --> 0:15:22.400
<v Speaker 1>an unfortunate situation in the sense that the regulatory environment

0:15:22.440 --> 0:15:24.920
<v Speaker 1>has just taken I mean, you had the wink of

0:15:25.000 --> 0:15:28.280
<v Speaker 1>us twins filing for the first bitcoin ETF in two

0:15:28.280 --> 0:15:32.040
<v Speaker 1>thousand thirteen, and I mean, given that we have been

0:15:32.160 --> 0:15:34.360
<v Speaker 1>waiting so long, we did get movement in October, we

0:15:34.440 --> 0:15:38.480
<v Speaker 1>got that derivatives back Bitcoin fund. That didn't seem to

0:15:38.480 --> 0:15:41.280
<v Speaker 1>be the holy grail that the crypto industry was waiting for. Though,

0:15:41.560 --> 0:15:43.920
<v Speaker 1>when do you think we could see movement and an

0:15:43.920 --> 0:15:48.400
<v Speaker 1>approval of a physically backed bitcoin ETF. Well, a couple

0:15:48.400 --> 0:15:50.560
<v Speaker 1>of your own analysts wrote an article the other day

0:15:50.600 --> 0:15:54.160
<v Speaker 1>about the SEC's proposal to expand the definition of the

0:15:54.200 --> 0:15:58.400
<v Speaker 1>word exchange and some of the regulation. Um, this could

0:15:58.520 --> 0:16:02.920
<v Speaker 1>open up the possibility for an ets sooner, um rather

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:07.320
<v Speaker 1>than later. However, when I say sooner in SEC speak,

0:16:07.400 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 1>that's you know, a year ish or more. Um. I'm

0:16:11.760 --> 0:16:15.480
<v Speaker 1>not sure personally that Mr Gensler is very keen on

0:16:15.520 --> 0:16:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the idea of a spot bitcoin ETF. He seems to

0:16:18.040 --> 0:16:20.080
<v Speaker 1>have gotten comfortable with the idea of future is based

0:16:20.080 --> 0:16:24.560
<v Speaker 1>obviously um, But primarily that's because, um, you know, the

0:16:24.560 --> 0:16:28.320
<v Speaker 1>futures are are regulated instruments, whereas bitcoin itself is not. So,

0:16:28.720 --> 0:16:32.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, the definition of the word exchange being expanded

0:16:32.400 --> 0:16:36.160
<v Speaker 1>could uh, you know, capture like a coin base, and

0:16:36.200 --> 0:16:40.400
<v Speaker 1>therefore the trading of bitcoin on that exchange would by

0:16:40.480 --> 0:16:44.080
<v Speaker 1>definition become regulated trading um, and so on and so forth,

0:16:44.120 --> 0:16:46.160
<v Speaker 1>So it would be a step in that direction, but

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:50.440
<v Speaker 1>I still think there are other factors. Consider the main

0:16:50.520 --> 0:16:54.320
<v Speaker 1>one is bitcoin trade so much offshore and that's just

0:16:54.480 --> 0:16:58.920
<v Speaker 1>really not um something that they can observe directly. All Right,

0:16:59.120 --> 0:17:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Great King, thank you so much for joining us, always

0:17:01.960 --> 0:17:04.720
<v Speaker 1>like chatting getting the updated all things crypto. Great King,

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:08.240
<v Speaker 1>CEO and founder of Osbrey Funds. Again, they've got the

0:17:08.840 --> 0:17:12.480
<v Speaker 1>uh secure, cost effective access to a select group of

0:17:12.560 --> 0:17:15.919
<v Speaker 1>crypto via traditional vehicles. That's what the folks at Osprey do.

0:17:18.640 --> 0:17:20.240
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's talk to our next guy because I

0:17:20.280 --> 0:17:23.040
<v Speaker 1>really want to get her thoughts here because I she

0:17:23.119 --> 0:17:25.280
<v Speaker 1>has a really interesting view of this market that perhaps

0:17:25.560 --> 0:17:28.560
<v Speaker 1>investors should be on the lookout for bear market rallies,

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:32.159
<v Speaker 1>which I find very interesting. Katerina semin Eddie, Senior vice president,

0:17:32.160 --> 0:17:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Private Wealth advisor from Morgan Stanley. So, Katerina, are you

0:17:35.119 --> 0:17:38.400
<v Speaker 1>buying this move higher in the markets or is this

0:17:38.880 --> 0:17:42.840
<v Speaker 1>a bear market rally? Well, thank you for having me

0:17:42.880 --> 0:17:45.560
<v Speaker 1>on um. This is a good question. Right, we had

0:17:46.240 --> 0:17:49.840
<v Speaker 1>a pretty big pullback followed by seemingly a big rally.

0:17:50.080 --> 0:17:53.400
<v Speaker 1>But the question is are we in the bear markets?

0:17:53.640 --> 0:17:56.520
<v Speaker 1>And we believe so, we believe that yes, this is

0:17:56.560 --> 0:17:59.320
<v Speaker 1>a bear market. We have been in a bear market

0:17:59.440 --> 0:18:03.400
<v Speaker 1>for quite some time. We came into this year concerned

0:18:03.440 --> 0:18:07.800
<v Speaker 1>about evaluations, fed tightening and plation growth slow down, you know,

0:18:07.880 --> 0:18:09.920
<v Speaker 1>all of the above, and of course the war in

0:18:10.080 --> 0:18:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine introduced this new component of now unpredictability and making

0:18:15.640 --> 0:18:19.960
<v Speaker 1>all these concerns that we have, you know significantly, you know, wars. Now.

0:18:20.040 --> 0:18:22.400
<v Speaker 1>This is not to say that there are no pockets

0:18:22.400 --> 0:18:25.520
<v Speaker 1>of opportunity in this market. There absolutely are. The investors

0:18:25.560 --> 0:18:28.000
<v Speaker 1>should be in position to take advantage of them. But

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:31.359
<v Speaker 1>they are bear market rallies and they have to be

0:18:31.440 --> 0:18:34.760
<v Speaker 1>seen as such, and it is very important for the

0:18:34.960 --> 0:18:37.240
<v Speaker 1>outlook for the remainder of this year and in fact

0:18:37.240 --> 0:18:41.080
<v Speaker 1>for the next year as well. And Katerina wrap in

0:18:41.119 --> 0:18:43.240
<v Speaker 1>what we're seeing in some of these mega cap tech

0:18:43.320 --> 0:18:46.120
<v Speaker 1>names in because we're looking at Apples. At Apples eleven

0:18:46.160 --> 0:18:49.000
<v Speaker 1>straight days day of gains, that is the longest streak

0:18:49.320 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 1>since two thousand three. I don't think smartphones even existed

0:18:52.119 --> 0:18:55.119
<v Speaker 1>back then. But the fact that you are seeing such

0:18:55.280 --> 0:18:59.360
<v Speaker 1>importantly big parts of the market also contribute in this.

0:18:59.760 --> 0:19:01.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, maybe it's a dead cat bounce, I mean,

0:19:01.960 --> 0:19:05.399
<v Speaker 1>how does that change the profile of this bear market?

0:19:05.440 --> 0:19:10.159
<v Speaker 1>Does that shorten the time that we might be in it. Well, Katie,

0:19:10.240 --> 0:19:13.720
<v Speaker 1>you you raise a really good point um in the

0:19:13.840 --> 0:19:18.520
<v Speaker 1>market that is volatile. That also introduced the two pockets

0:19:18.520 --> 0:19:22.919
<v Speaker 1>of speculation. UH. Investors tend to go with some of

0:19:22.960 --> 0:19:26.800
<v Speaker 1>the names and sectors that they are comfortable with. And

0:19:26.960 --> 0:19:28.800
<v Speaker 1>if you look over the last couple of years, TEX

0:19:28.920 --> 0:19:31.840
<v Speaker 1>has done extremely well, So this is a known that

0:19:32.080 --> 0:19:35.280
<v Speaker 1>for an active investor, you know, is what they go with.

0:19:36.080 --> 0:19:39.320
<v Speaker 1>But in fact, even though I agree that this is

0:19:39.359 --> 0:19:42.200
<v Speaker 1>definitely a stock picker's market, this is not a good

0:19:42.200 --> 0:19:45.320
<v Speaker 1>time to buy the index. We would guide the investors

0:19:45.320 --> 0:19:51.240
<v Speaker 1>towards more defensive sectors financial, healthcare, real estate utilities. We

0:19:51.320 --> 0:19:54.560
<v Speaker 1>would like for them to actually use the dips in

0:19:54.600 --> 0:19:58.040
<v Speaker 1>the market between the bear market rallies to increase the

0:19:58.119 --> 0:20:01.480
<v Speaker 1>quality of the investment portfolio and dig in, dig in

0:20:01.600 --> 0:20:05.119
<v Speaker 1>for the volatility, dig in for the unknown because this word,

0:20:05.200 --> 0:20:07.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, we don't know how long it's going to last,

0:20:07.440 --> 0:20:10.560
<v Speaker 1>and the fact that it is having on global economy

0:20:10.800 --> 0:20:13.280
<v Speaker 1>in terms of oil and gas prices, in terms of

0:20:13.600 --> 0:20:17.720
<v Speaker 1>supply chain interruptions, in terms of quest of transportation, and

0:20:17.760 --> 0:20:20.760
<v Speaker 1>how all of this is going to translate into our

0:20:20.800 --> 0:20:23.320
<v Speaker 1>economy and in QUOTEA beyond the global level, you know,

0:20:23.440 --> 0:20:26.160
<v Speaker 1>it is still unknown, so we have to take advantage

0:20:26.200 --> 0:20:29.479
<v Speaker 1>of the buying opportunities. But instead of just focusing on

0:20:29.520 --> 0:20:33.080
<v Speaker 1>the sectors that have done well in the past, like technology,

0:20:33.400 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 1>we think that it's a much smarter move to go

0:20:35.960 --> 0:20:39.119
<v Speaker 1>into the sectors that will be positioned well going forward

0:20:39.200 --> 0:20:44.680
<v Speaker 1>and strategically prepare the portfolios for heightened level of volatility. Katarina,

0:20:44.760 --> 0:20:47.360
<v Speaker 1>how concerned are you that perhaps this Federal Reserve does

0:20:47.600 --> 0:20:50.560
<v Speaker 1>not get it right, does not engineer soft landing, and

0:20:50.600 --> 0:20:54.240
<v Speaker 1>in fact, through their rate policy, pushes this economy into

0:20:54.240 --> 0:20:59.520
<v Speaker 1>a recession. Is that in your forecast? Oh? Um, I

0:20:59.600 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 1>think that said is taking the overall global situation and

0:21:03.600 --> 0:21:08.560
<v Speaker 1>specifically the level of inflation that is historically unprecedented very seriously.

0:21:09.000 --> 0:21:13.960
<v Speaker 1>They are, um, there's no certain terms that they said

0:21:14.240 --> 0:21:18.119
<v Speaker 1>is going to be aggressive in their rate increases, But

0:21:18.200 --> 0:21:22.080
<v Speaker 1>in my opinion, economy is strong enough to accommodate these

0:21:22.280 --> 0:21:25.320
<v Speaker 1>rate increases. So when we're looking overall of the economy,

0:21:25.359 --> 0:21:28.280
<v Speaker 1>we certain they have our share of concerns, but we're

0:21:28.320 --> 0:21:32.879
<v Speaker 1>not seeing the recession in the books for US at

0:21:32.960 --> 0:21:35.720
<v Speaker 1>least for this year. Next year remains to be seen,

0:21:36.040 --> 0:21:38.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, but we are paying close attention to earnings

0:21:38.960 --> 0:21:42.000
<v Speaker 1>of course, you know the valuations and so far valuations

0:21:42.040 --> 0:21:44.560
<v Speaker 1>have been looking you know, better than expected. But we

0:21:44.640 --> 0:21:47.960
<v Speaker 1>think that the negative revisions are going to continue, UM

0:21:48.280 --> 0:21:51.440
<v Speaker 1>and even though we're not pulling for the recession at

0:21:51.480 --> 0:21:54.879
<v Speaker 1>the moment, you know, we expect higher volatility and that

0:21:55.040 --> 0:21:58.119
<v Speaker 1>is the message that you know, we're really conveying to

0:21:58.160 --> 0:22:01.159
<v Speaker 1>our is our clients in you know a number of

0:22:01.160 --> 0:22:04.439
<v Speaker 1>different ways. That's why quality of the investment portfolios is

0:22:04.440 --> 0:22:09.119
<v Speaker 1>more important than ever positive real yield sensitivity all of

0:22:09.200 --> 0:22:11.680
<v Speaker 1>the holdings, you know, is before we were kind of

0:22:11.760 --> 0:22:14.960
<v Speaker 1>looking at the dividend income or just generally income generating

0:22:14.960 --> 0:22:18.359
<v Speaker 1>ability of portfolios from perspective of fixed income is just

0:22:18.480 --> 0:22:21.120
<v Speaker 1>to kind of value at it. Now it's more important

0:22:21.119 --> 0:22:24.560
<v Speaker 1>than ever that at this historically you know, high levels

0:22:24.560 --> 0:22:28.119
<v Speaker 1>of inflation, that that portfolios will be able to weather

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:32.160
<v Speaker 1>this storm. But in my opinion said is UM has

0:22:32.320 --> 0:22:35.040
<v Speaker 1>has very strong resolved in order to get it right

0:22:35.119 --> 0:22:38.240
<v Speaker 1>this time. All right, Katerina, thanks so much for joining us. Uh.

0:22:38.320 --> 0:22:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Yet again, we appreciate getting your views of these market

0:22:41.160 --> 0:22:44.399
<v Speaker 1>and be aware of bear market rallies is kind of

0:22:44.440 --> 0:22:47.400
<v Speaker 1>My takeaway here Katerina Seminetti, Senior vice president Private Wealth

0:22:47.440 --> 0:22:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Management at Morgan Stanley. UH, and they've got a huge

0:22:51.320 --> 0:22:55.119
<v Speaker 1>private wealth business over there, Morgan Stanley. UH. They've really

0:22:55.160 --> 0:22:57.640
<v Speaker 1>doubled down on that business order last decade. I would

0:22:57.680 --> 0:23:03.040
<v Speaker 1>say thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You

0:23:03.040 --> 0:23:06.359
<v Speaker 1>can subscribe and listen to interviews of Apple Podcasts or

0:23:06.640 --> 0:23:10.359
<v Speaker 1>whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on

0:23:10.400 --> 0:23:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at Matt Miller nineteen seventy three. Put on false Sweeney.

0:23:14.280 --> 0:23:16.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at p T Sweeney before the podcast.

0:23:16.840 --> 0:23:19.359
<v Speaker 1>You can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio