Speaker 1: I take questioning elections seriously. I don't believe it should
Speaker 1: be done, and necessarily it's an important thing to raise questions,
Speaker 1: to raise doubt, to cast out on elections. We have
Speaker 1: to have faith in the election process. We have to
Speaker 1: have faith in the system. But what happened in Arizona
Speaker 1: deserves to be questioned. Even Maricopa County election officials have
Speaker 1: admitted that at least sixty voting locations experienced issues with
Speaker 1: their ballot on demand printers. The Attorney General's Office also
Speaker 1: has concerns because they launched an investigation into a series
Speaker 1: of complaints and raising questions if Maricopa County complied with
Speaker 1: Arizona election law. Instead of being truthful and instead of
Speaker 1: trying to answer questions, it looks like Maricopa County's leaders
Speaker 1: are just trying to cover things up. I mean, listen
Speaker 1: to what Maricopa County Board of Supervisor's chairman Bill Gates
Speaker 1: had to say. Hi, I'm Bill Gates, and I'm chairman
Speaker 1: of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, and I want
Speaker 1: to talk to you today about voters suppress. Unfortunately, that
Speaker 1: phrase has been thrown around in our county since election
Speaker 1: day people have claimed that there was voters suppression because
Speaker 1: we had issues with the printers, which did not reveal
Speaker 1: themselves when we tested these printers before election day. I
Speaker 1: hate that this happened, and my colleagues and I are
Speaker 1: committed to figuring out exactly what happened so that it
Speaker 1: never happens again. But that does not constitute voter suppression.
Speaker 1: We know what voter suppression looks like in our country.
Speaker 1: The inconvenience and the lines that people experience were unfortunate.
Speaker 1: But the fact is every voter had the opportunity to
Speaker 1: cast a vote on election day. Now, you gotta remember
Speaker 1: that Mercoba County is Arizona's most populous county. You also
Speaker 1: have to remember who's turning out on election day. It's
Speaker 1: Republican voters. It's not Democrats being disenfranchised. Its Republicans. And
Speaker 1: what raises suspicions is that Thomas Liddy, the division in
Speaker 1: chief for the Civil Services Division of the Maricoba County's
Speaker 1: Attorney's Office. So he's trying to say that no voter
Speaker 1: was disenfranchised because of the difficulty the county experienced with
Speaker 1: some of its printers. How is that possible when you
Speaker 1: have issues at least sixty voting locations. So even that
Speaker 1: response from Mericoba County makes no sense. It flies in
Speaker 1: the face of logic, it flies in the face of
Speaker 1: the truth. So what really happened in Maricoba County and
Speaker 1: what happened in Arizona, We're gonna get to the bottom
Speaker 1: of it with a Bama Day, who is the Attorney
Speaker 1: general candidate for Republicans. He's currently facing a recount in
Speaker 1: the election. He's down by just a little over five votes,
Speaker 1: so what happened matters a lot to him and could
Speaker 1: mean if he ends up being the Attorney General or not.
Speaker 1: So he's launched a lawsuit and uh he waiting to
Speaker 1: see the results of that and also waiting to see
Speaker 1: the results of the recount. But he's not giving up
Speaker 1: the fight, and I don't believe he should because there
Speaker 1: are questions about what happened in Maricopa County, and it
Speaker 1: doesn't sound like the Mericopa County election officials there want
Speaker 1: to give answers. So here's a you know, a right now,
Speaker 1: we've got the certification taking place of what happened in Arizona,
Speaker 1: but there's a lot of questions about what went down
Speaker 1: on election day. Maricopa County officials have admitted that at
Speaker 1: least sixty voting locations experienced issues with their ballot on
Speaker 1: demand partners. What happened on election day, Well, that's a
Speaker 1: good question, and you know, a lot more journalist should
Speaker 1: be asking this because supposedly what happened in a Merricopa
Speaker 1: county was that they tested all the issue all the
Speaker 1: machines and the printers the night before and then suddenly,
Speaker 1: you need imediately, as polls opened up at six am,
Speaker 1: what we saw was so many of the printers and
Speaker 1: the machines malfunctioning. So a lot of what happened. I mean,
Speaker 1: I voted in personal election day too, and I witnessed
Speaker 1: firsthand people bout their ballots being rejected constantly by these machines,
Speaker 1: and so it took them hours and hours to finally
Speaker 1: figure out what was wrong. And what the county is
Speaker 1: saying was that the printers were not printing dark enough,
Speaker 1: which is quite odd since they say that this is
Speaker 1: the same settings that they've had it on for the
Speaker 1: primary in August and also the primary and general election
Speaker 1: back in So you know, it's really concerning that the county,
Speaker 1: you know, what happened. Besides this, the long lines to
Speaker 1: the long lines are what really doesn't franchise so many people.
Speaker 1: I mean, the lines were taking some of them are
Speaker 1: up to three or four hours long. People were leaving
Speaker 1: the lines. At the Republican National Committee and Carry Lake
Speaker 1: and Blake Masters, you know, we all wanted to extend
Speaker 1: to voting hours because of these issues, and at the time,
Speaker 1: the judge rejected it. So the polls closed at seven PM.
Speaker 1: And I only highlight that because in my race for
Speaker 1: Attorney General, I mean, we are down five hundred and
Speaker 1: ten votes, and as you can imagine, I mean there's
Speaker 1: a hundred and twenty voting centers Americopa County. If you
Speaker 1: can imagine it for three hours, you know, just grabbing
Speaker 1: another five voters, you know, it would be pretty impactful
Speaker 1: because on election day here in Arizona, the Republicans we're
Speaker 1: winning seventy five percent to I mean, that's how much
Speaker 1: of a stark difference it was. So that's why you know,
Speaker 1: we filed our lawsuit earlier this week with Republican National
Speaker 1: Committee because ultimately we want every voters, uh there, they're
Speaker 1: votes to actually be counted, and we want justice for
Speaker 1: what happened on election day we all know is a
Speaker 1: botched election. Well, and what's important to point out is
Speaker 1: this isn't just a disenfranchisement of voters. It's a disenfranchisement
Speaker 1: of Republican voters, because as we know from this election
Speaker 1: in the past couple of actions, it's Republicans who are
Speaker 1: turning out on election day at much more significant rates
Speaker 1: than Democrats. Yeah, exactly, and that's you know, across the state,
Speaker 1: we are winning election day voters in every single county,
Speaker 1: right and even Blue County. So and here America seventy
Speaker 1: five percent. I mean, can you imagine seventy That definitely
Speaker 1: had changed and altered the outcome of this election. But
Speaker 1: you know, ultimately we need to find out what went wrong.
Speaker 1: And I think the Hubrists of America, the county is
Speaker 1: what's so shocking is that, you know, the smugness, they
Speaker 1: don't want to admit fault, and you know, they're telling
Speaker 1: people to put these ballots in the door three. I
Speaker 1: don't know if you've heard about that, but the door
Speaker 1: three situation, so that they would be tabulated later on
Speaker 1: and then at the voting centers they were mixing in
Speaker 1: the door three ballots that are uncounted with other ballots
Speaker 1: that were counted. It was just a complete mess. So
Speaker 1: you know, right now, the certifications are going on across
Speaker 1: the state. UM here in the in the county needs
Speaker 1: and one county just today in Coaches County, they just
Speaker 1: voted to delay certification, which is quite interesting because that's
Speaker 1: never happened as far as I can tell in Arizona
Speaker 1: history because statutorially, they're mandated to UH to certify the
Speaker 1: election twenty days after UM the election day, which would
Speaker 1: be today. So it's it's really interesting, but it's really
Speaker 1: Americopa County's incompetence has thrown Arizona into a laughing stock
Speaker 1: across the country. And what our lawsuit is saying is
Speaker 1: that Arizona shouldn't have to suffer due to the incompetence
Speaker 1: of Americapa County. And you're exactly right. It was Republican
Speaker 1: voters who are disenfranchised, and imagine if this was the
Speaker 1: other way around. And this is this has actually happened before.
Speaker 1: In sixteen, there were long lines because they switched this
Speaker 1: voting center model away from precincts voting. And what happened
Speaker 1: then with a phoenix mayor at the time now Congressman
Speaker 1: Greg Stanton, Liberal Democrat. He actually called for a Department
Speaker 1: of Justice investigation into disenfranchise. So, you know, it's really
Speaker 1: interesting how the media is carrying the latter for Americopa
Speaker 1: County when you know, these the so called guardians of democracy,
Speaker 1: they're the ones who should be asking these questions. Why
Speaker 1: did the machines go down, what were the contingencies, and
Speaker 1: why was there a failure in how to we prefend
Speaker 1: this from happening again? Well, and the Attorney General's office
Speaker 1: is asking these questions. Jennifer Wright, the Assistant Attorney General,
Speaker 1: wrote a letter to Thomas Liddy, the Civil Division Chief,
Speaker 1: and the Maricope Counties Attorney's Office raising a lot of
Speaker 1: concerns about the door three ballots which you mentioned, as
Speaker 1: well as the printer configuration settings. Questions about that as
Speaker 1: well as election day checkout procedures that took place as well.
Speaker 1: Do you know what the update is on the Attorney
Speaker 1: General's investigation and the questions that they opposed to Maricopa County. Well,
Speaker 1: the county just released a statement answering some of the
Speaker 1: questions yesterday. And it's really interesting because you know, our
Speaker 1: lawsuit that we filed with the Republican National Committee, it
Speaker 1: actually alleges many of these issues where the out procedure,
Speaker 1: So once you're going into go voting, to go vote
Speaker 1: at voting center, you have to check in right, and
Speaker 1: that basically says that, Okay, this person voted UM at
Speaker 1: the time, the county has told them that they could
Speaker 1: go to a different location if they didn't want to
Speaker 1: put their ballot in the box three. So a lot
Speaker 1: of people were leaving the voting centers without having checked
Speaker 1: out because nobody knew first of all, how to check
Speaker 1: people out. It was, you know, pretty complicated. So you know,
Speaker 1: the county seems to have wanted to they answered this
Speaker 1: question to the A G. S Office. But it's really
Speaker 1: odd because at our lawsuit that we filed last week,
Speaker 1: you know, we were we were in communication with the
Speaker 1: county and they never told us what the number was.
Speaker 1: But conveniently yesterday told us it was a hundred and
Speaker 1: twenty two that they that they found who left the
Speaker 1: voting center without checking out, and they counted a hundred
Speaker 1: and nine of them, you know, which, uh, you know,
Speaker 1: it would be nice to have that information prior to
Speaker 1: us filing the lawsuit, like we were asking them constantly,
Speaker 1: and we actually learned about that from a newspaper article
Speaker 1: that that they were talking to the media, not to
Speaker 1: the attorneys, but you know, the AG's office. I'm glad
Speaker 1: they're stepping in right now to to get some of
Speaker 1: these questions answered. But you know, when you have a
Speaker 1: rogue county like Americopa County who doesn't want to admit faults,
Speaker 1: what they're doing is kicking the can down the road
Speaker 1: and trying to hope this goes away in time for
Speaker 1: the inauguration. But you know, my race, since it's so close,
Speaker 1: my race is the closest statewide race in Arizona history.
Speaker 1: That's a margin of point zero two percent of votes
Speaker 1: out of two point five million. UM. We are going
Speaker 1: to be going into an automatic recount probably next week,
Speaker 1: and it's gonna take weeks for that too, for that
Speaker 1: to settle as well. But what we're trying to do is,
Speaker 1: I mean, we all understand that our voters were showing
Speaker 1: up at the voting polls on election day, they didn't
Speaker 1: extend the hours, and they had all of these issues,
Speaker 1: and suddenly what we just saw was just a total
Speaker 1: disenfranchisement of Republican voters particularly, But I hope the AGS
Speaker 1: office gets the bottom of it, but I'm not confident
Speaker 1: that the county to answer these questions quick break more
Speaker 1: on this crazy election in Arizona. And to your point,
Speaker 1: I'm looking at the response from Maricopa County now and
Speaker 1: Thomas Lidy, the division chief for the Civil Services Division
Speaker 1: a Meercoba County, is saying that no voter was disenfranchised
Speaker 1: because of the difficulty the county experience with some of
Speaker 1: its printers. But how can you make such a declarative
Speaker 1: statement when we know that there were so many issues
Speaker 1: with the printers, and then also there might have been
Speaker 1: comigling of these ballots, of the door three ballots, So
Speaker 1: how how how is it possible to to make such
Speaker 1: a declarative statement such as that it's because they're hoping
Speaker 1: to sweep this under the road, Lisa, But I mean
Speaker 1: you're right. I mean what we witnessed and what we
Speaker 1: have people saying is that there are a lot of
Speaker 1: busses from retirement homes that we're going to the voting locations,
Speaker 1: and a lot of them left without voting because they
Speaker 1: couldn't stand in line for two hours, you know, or
Speaker 1: three hours. So and there's this They had no timeline
Speaker 1: and when they were gonna get these ballot machines to
Speaker 1: be working in operational again, that's what's concerning. For him
Speaker 1: to make that type of statement without the facts right
Speaker 1: now is pretty shocking, right. I mean, even in our loss,
Speaker 1: it was pretty measured and what we were alleging. But
Speaker 1: you know this, this is the uh, the Hubrists of
Speaker 1: the county and and I hope that justice is ultimately
Speaker 1: done with what happened. But I mean to to suggest
Speaker 1: that when you have sixty or seventy voting locations out
Speaker 1: of a hundred and twenty have malfunctions for hours before
Speaker 1: I was actually remedied, you know, clearly there were people
Speaker 1: who left the lines, who didn't vote because I mean,
Speaker 1: people have other things to do, and uh it is
Speaker 1: they have lives to live. So it is a little
Speaker 1: shocking that they're suggesting this and it has determined the outcome.
Speaker 1: I mean, five ten votes, this is absolutely this is
Speaker 1: a statistical dead heat, right and uh we know that
Speaker 1: this was you know, clearly affecting Republicans because sevent in
Speaker 1: meercoa County voted for Republicans on election. I try to
Speaker 1: be careful in questioning elections because I believe, you know,
Speaker 1: working in the media, responsibility to get my facts straight
Speaker 1: into not you know, unnecessarily cast out on things. But
Speaker 1: I mean there are questions we asked when you know
Speaker 1: there's reports in town. I believe human events rather that
Speaker 1: Arizona's Merica County Recorder Stephen Richer wrych Er whatever his
Speaker 1: name is, and Supervisor Chairman Bill Gates that they had
Speaker 1: started a political action committee to stop Maga County candidates
Speaker 1: in two thousand twenty one. Uh, and the whole goal
Speaker 1: was to uh support Republicans running for non federal offices
Speaker 1: who acknowledged the validity of the election and condemned the
Speaker 1: events of January six. So, I mean, you know, these
Speaker 1: are some of the people in charge of Merico County
Speaker 1: and ensuring that, you know, there's integrity in the process.
Speaker 1: Yet they've already declared an animus against candidates, uh, you know,
Speaker 1: like you who support Trump. So it's hard to have
Speaker 1: confidence in that. Yeah, And I think if you look
Speaker 1: at what happened, I mean, those two that you mentioned
Speaker 1: or they are Republicans basically a name only at this point,
Speaker 1: if they had spent their efforts in their time to
Speaker 1: actually take you know, issues and take election integrity issues seriously,
Speaker 1: we may not have had the problems we just witnessed
Speaker 1: in Americo, PA County. But instead what they were doing
Speaker 1: was starting a political action committee and trying to promote
Speaker 1: their agenda and try to undermine people like myself, Carry
Speaker 1: Lake and Blake masters Um. So that that's what's so
Speaker 1: appalling about this because and honestly, so this is backfired.
Speaker 1: I mean, even people who are not skeptical of the
Speaker 1: election now have become you know, skeptics of this election.
Speaker 1: So I think this is ultimately back started in a
Speaker 1: big way against these two because I'm telling you, this
Speaker 1: is gonna be the top issue of voters mind, at
Speaker 1: least in Arizona going forward. I mean, I just I
Speaker 1: can't fathom how the incompetence that was displayed on election
Speaker 1: day and the smugness and the unwillingness to take responsibility
Speaker 1: for what occurred, especially given that we know how high
Speaker 1: the stakes are and all the rhetoric you know, going
Speaker 1: around this and a lot of the conspiracies, but a
Speaker 1: lot of now has come to fruition. So It's really
Speaker 1: made a lot of people who are not conspiracy theorists
Speaker 1: into now being questioning the the elections. So it is
Speaker 1: totally backfired on Bill Gates and Stephen Richard. But you know,
Speaker 1: this is totally their own doing. And can you imagine
Speaker 1: the people in charge of the elections creating a superpack,
Speaker 1: you know, the ones were in charge of tabulating the
Speaker 1: votes creating a superpack to undermine specific candidates who will
Speaker 1: be on that ballot. It it is shocking and it
Speaker 1: shows a clear, you know, display of you know that
Speaker 1: that have no integrity. It is really it's really surprising.
Speaker 1: But you know, here in America, the county are elections
Speaker 1: have become a laughing stock all across the country, and
Speaker 1: you know, it's something that we absolutely need to fix.
Speaker 1: And you know, we thought we were on the right track,
Speaker 1: but you know, now look at the consequences of what's happened.
Speaker 1: The Democrats have taken over are taking over every single
Speaker 1: statewide office. This is gonna be so detrimental and it's
Speaker 1: due to the incompetence of America accounting well, you know.
Speaker 1: And then of course it raises questions because Katie Hobbs
Speaker 1: is the secretary of stage. You know, it looks like
Speaker 1: she might end up being the governor of this state now,
Speaker 1: but she was the Democrat candidate in the race. So
Speaker 1: that raises concerns as well that you just have all
Speaker 1: these individuals in charge of elections that already have a
Speaker 1: preconceived animus against the political opponents running in the race
Speaker 1: just obviously cast out. And then to your point earlier,
Speaker 1: I think it would make things a lot more believable
Speaker 1: and more trustworthy if the individuals in charge acknowledged their
Speaker 1: errors and acknowledged what seems to be the basic truth
Speaker 1: that there were voters who are disenfranchised just by you know,
Speaker 1: common sense and logic. So I think the outright denial
Speaker 1: of that, obviously, you know, raises additional suspicions and questions.
Speaker 1: People aren't stupid, right, And you know today, actually we're
Speaker 1: going to be our case that we filed last week
Speaker 1: on Tuesday. Today is the first hearing in a few hours,
Speaker 1: so you know, we're gonna see the Secretary of State
Speaker 1: Katie Hobbs and my opponents they're seeking emotions dismissed that case.
Speaker 1: But I mean, there are a lot of issues that
Speaker 1: need to be answered, and that's why you know, we
Speaker 1: feel so strongly about our about our case. I mean
Speaker 1: votes right now, how many ballots have they not counted
Speaker 1: at the county Because of these issues and these errors,
Speaker 1: we don't know, you know, I no longer trust what
Speaker 1: the county is saying. So this is why the lawsuit
Speaker 1: is necessary for us to go in have discovery and
Speaker 1: to litigate some of these issues. I mean, this has
Speaker 1: ability to have ramifications for the next four years. Right
Speaker 1: with this election, and with this being the closest race
Speaker 1: in statewide history. Of course we're going to file the
Speaker 1: lawsuit and fight it. And uh, you know it is,
Speaker 1: you know, to question election. It's really it's really surprising
Speaker 1: because Democrats were the you know, they were the best
Speaker 1: at it for a while. Now. I mean, if you
Speaker 1: remember Outgore in two thousand, remember Stacy Abraham's refusing to concede.
Speaker 1: So this is where when we have actionable reports that
Speaker 1: suggests that the machines failed, they were not operational, and
Speaker 1: you have people disenfranchised because they were waiting for hours
Speaker 1: and unsure if they wanted to drop off this ballot
Speaker 1: into a a box three that they didn't know where
Speaker 1: it would go to. Ultimately, you know, it's it's really
Speaker 1: sadly so, because I'm really worried about Republicans not showing
Speaker 1: up to vote anymore because they no longer have trust
Speaker 1: in the system. Because the same people who vote on
Speaker 1: election day already suspicious of you know, early voting and
Speaker 1: mail and voting, and they already suspicious of the voting
Speaker 1: process in general. So now if the courts don't take
Speaker 1: these issues seriously, it's going to destroy whatever faith that
Speaker 1: they had left in our elections. And that's what's so
Speaker 1: status see, and that's why I'm fighting this all the
Speaker 1: way to the end to be able to restore confidence
Speaker 1: in our elections, to get justice, and to see what
Speaker 1: happened in November eight. Well, I'm glad you are. You know,
Speaker 1: before we go, I wanted to ask you about that
Speaker 1: conundrum that Republicans are facing because you know, again, you know,
Speaker 1: the only election really questioned as Republicans initially was which
Speaker 1: was unprecedented with mail and ballots. So I think it's
Speaker 1: completely a fair to question something that's new people were
Speaker 1: totally unprepared for, and you know, you have issues like
Speaker 1: signature matching and things of that nature, Whereas to your point,
Speaker 1: Democrats have question pretty much every election that Republicans have win,
Speaker 1: regardless of the y behind it. But you know, I
Speaker 1: want to ask you about that conundrum that we're in
Speaker 1: because it's almost like the game has changed since COVID
Speaker 1: and Democrats have been able to win I think in
Speaker 1: the mid terms because they've weaponized mail about it, mail
Speaker 1: and balloting and early voting. I mean, the Republicans in
Speaker 1: some respect have to play that game in order to
Speaker 1: win and to hopefully change it. Absolutely, that's ultimately we
Speaker 1: have to do. And if you look at Florida, I mean,
Speaker 1: the Florida results are beautiful, right, I mean here Ron
Speaker 1: de Santi governor to Santes barely won against Andrew Gilli.
Speaker 1: I mean that was very close race too, and now
Speaker 1: he defeated Charlie chris By. But isn't it also convenient
Speaker 1: that the voting system was improved and Florida in that
Speaker 1: time period. And uh so that's what that's ultimately what
Speaker 1: what we have to do is you know, actually get
Speaker 1: into office and take power. And if you look at
Speaker 1: Arizona and you look how close these margins are five
Speaker 1: ten votes for me and carries down about sixteen thousand votes.
Speaker 1: But you know, the Democrats. They've they've understood that it's
Speaker 1: not about getting voters, it's about getting ballots. And here
Speaker 1: in Arizona, I don't know, um if I don't think
Speaker 1: it was widely reported, but the Arizona State University voting
Speaker 1: precinct was going in favor of the Democrats seven percent.
Speaker 1: It was like nine thousand plus of votes went to
Speaker 1: the Democrats and only a few hundred went for the Republicans.
Speaker 1: And that's something that we have to take a look
Speaker 1: at too. How many college kids are voting in multiple
Speaker 1: states right by these mail and ballots that that the
Speaker 1: Democrats rely on to win. So now this is why
Speaker 1: it was this election is so critical, and this is
Speaker 1: why we're fighting because we know what the left wants.
Speaker 1: They want to give felons their voting rights right, and
Speaker 1: they felons are have they have been known to have
Speaker 1: been voting in elections even though they're not allowed to
Speaker 1: in those are illegal ballots. So this you're exactly right.
Speaker 1: We have to fight fire with fire. We have to
Speaker 1: play the game and the sandbox that they've created until
Speaker 1: we take back power, just like what Ronda Santis was
Speaker 1: able to effectively do back in and now We've seen
Speaker 1: how Florida has become a purple state into bright red
Speaker 1: and that's ultimately what we're hoping for Arizona to become.
Speaker 1: But you know it, it is really it's really scary
Speaker 1: what we've witnessed over the past few weeks and the
Speaker 1: incompetence and the smugness of Americopa County, Lisa, and uh,
Speaker 1: you know, I'm not gonna put up with it. I'm
Speaker 1: fighting this in court. I'm glad the Republican National Committee
Speaker 1: is with us, and uh, you know, our recount is
Speaker 1: still going to start next week. But you know that
Speaker 1: it is unimaginable, and I I feel for so many
Speaker 1: Arizona's right now who no longer have faith in our
Speaker 1: in our elections. And you know that is something that
Speaker 1: we're all going to work on to make sure it happens.
Speaker 1: Because if you look at all the polling, I mean,
Speaker 1: Carrie Lake was up in the polls by and to
Speaker 1: have this become totally inverted is just it's shocking, and
Speaker 1: it's it's it's almost unbelievable, especially given the botched election
Speaker 1: that we witnessed here in America County. Yeah, I've I've
Speaker 1: got a ton of questions. And you know, as a
Speaker 1: Florida and I can say governor of Santa's also has
Speaker 1: just done a hell of a job. But to your point,
Speaker 1: that did make a bunch of integrity changes to the elections,
Speaker 1: which is vital and really important. I've got questions about
Speaker 1: what happened to Carry Lake as well. Um, I you know,
Speaker 1: I wish she was governor. I hope she still could be.
Speaker 1: She she would be amazing. But Abe, I appreciate you're
Speaker 1: keeping up the fight. You have every right to keep
Speaker 1: fighting this out. Five hundred ballots is not a lot
Speaker 1: in the grand scheme of things, and in the way
Speaker 1: that you know, they could have just done you dirty.
Speaker 1: So I'm glad you're fighting this and you know, keep
Speaker 1: us updated and thank you for taking the time. Appreciate it. Yeah,
Speaker 1: those ay of him a day running for attorney general.
Speaker 1: And Arizona still you know we're going into a recount.
Speaker 1: You know, who knows what's going to happen, but crazy
Speaker 1: what's been going on in Arizona. I hope you enjoyed
Speaker 1: the episode. Thanks so much for listening. I hope you
Speaker 1: leave us a review on Apple Podcast. I want to
Speaker 1: thank John Cassio for putting this together every Monday and Thursday,
Speaker 1: but you can listen throughout the week until next time.