WEBVTT - All We Know About Guessing

0:00:00.480 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, everybody, stuff you should know is going on tour.

0:00:03.880 --> 0:00:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Do do do one of the deeds, my friend. Okay,

0:00:08.200 --> 0:00:11.959
<v Speaker 1>So starting August eighth in Toronto, that's in Canada. We're

0:00:12.000 --> 0:00:14.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna be at dan Fourth Music Hall. And then Chicago,

0:00:14.680 --> 0:00:16.840
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna be there the next night, August nine, at

0:00:16.840 --> 0:00:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the Harris Theater at Chicago. We want to see your faces.

0:00:20.400 --> 0:00:23.079
<v Speaker 1>Step it up, Step it Up. Vancouver or the Vote

0:00:23.079 --> 0:00:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Theater September. That's gonna be a great show, I think,

0:00:26.440 --> 0:00:28.800
<v Speaker 1>don't you. It's gonna be a great one. And then

0:00:28.800 --> 0:00:32.000
<v Speaker 1>in Minneapolis at the Pantageous Theater where we've been before.

0:00:32.040 --> 0:00:35.839
<v Speaker 1>It's lovely September. Yeah, and then we're gonna swing down

0:00:35.880 --> 0:00:38.840
<v Speaker 1>to Austin. It's gonna be during Austin City Limits, although

0:00:38.880 --> 0:00:41.400
<v Speaker 1>it has nothing to do with Austin City Limits. Will

0:00:41.440 --> 0:00:43.559
<v Speaker 1>be there October ten, yes, and then we're going to

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Lovely Lawrence, Kansas go Jayhawks on October eleven. Then, hey,

0:00:47.320 --> 0:00:49.840
<v Speaker 1>if you're in Kansas City or anywhere in that area,

0:00:49.960 --> 0:00:52.480
<v Speaker 1>this is your chance. Get in your car. Yeah. Uh,

0:00:52.520 --> 0:00:56.320
<v Speaker 1>if you are anywhere near Brooklyn, well, then you should

0:00:56.320 --> 0:01:00.440
<v Speaker 1>go to the Bellhouse October. Will be there all three

0:01:00.560 --> 0:01:02.480
<v Speaker 1>nights and finally we're gonna wrap it up here in

0:01:02.520 --> 0:01:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta at the Bucket Theater on November four for a

0:01:05.240 --> 0:01:08.240
<v Speaker 1>benefit show where we are donating all of the money's

0:01:08.720 --> 0:01:12.360
<v Speaker 1>to Lifeline Animal Project of Atlanta and the National Down

0:01:12.440 --> 0:01:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Syndrome Society. Yep. So for all this information again visually

0:01:16.640 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 1>and for links two tickets, just go to s Y

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:24.919
<v Speaker 1>s K Live dot com. Welcome to Stuff you Should

0:01:24.920 --> 0:01:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Know from House Stuff Works dot com. Hello, and welcome

0:01:35.400 --> 0:01:39.480
<v Speaker 1>to the podcast. I'm Josh Clark, There's Charles W. Chuck Bryant.

0:01:39.680 --> 0:01:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Jerry's over there in the corner. Everybody puts Jerry in

0:01:42.880 --> 0:01:47.080
<v Speaker 1>a corner, but you shouldn't, uh, and this is stuff

0:01:47.080 --> 0:01:50.280
<v Speaker 1>you should not. She's the opposite of baby. Jerry's back.

0:01:50.800 --> 0:01:54.960
<v Speaker 1>She was back from the Mall's how where she's been? Yeah?

0:01:54.960 --> 0:01:57.680
<v Speaker 1>I remember we we said that she was at the mall.

0:01:57.800 --> 0:02:00.480
<v Speaker 1>She was buying a house. She's doing all sorts of stuff. Okay,

0:02:01.440 --> 0:02:04.280
<v Speaker 1>but she's back now and things are normal again. Yeah,

0:02:04.360 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 1>she was at the beach and she's now eating in

0:02:07.600 --> 0:02:10.239
<v Speaker 1>front of me. What I ate about an hour ago?

0:02:11.040 --> 0:02:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Do you want to throw up? Nor do you want more?

0:02:13.120 --> 0:02:16.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't. It's it's this weird in between. I'm drawn

0:02:16.600 --> 0:02:18.960
<v Speaker 1>to the smell, but I'm also full, so I'm kind

0:02:18.960 --> 0:02:25.040
<v Speaker 1>of like, yeah, oh man, what a life. I know eating?

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:29.519
<v Speaker 1>Who needs it? Right? Me? I do too? I love eating?

0:02:30.160 --> 0:02:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Love it. You know what else? I love? What? Really

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:43.320
<v Speaker 1>good magic? Like illusions? Well where does uh? What do

0:02:43.360 --> 0:02:45.480
<v Speaker 1>you mean? Because that could mean two different things. Well

0:02:45.600 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 1>let me tell you, um, So I went, you mean,

0:02:48.040 --> 0:02:50.280
<v Speaker 1>and I went to New York. Recently we saw this show.

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:54.160
<v Speaker 1>It's called in and of itself. It's a one man

0:02:54.720 --> 0:02:58.680
<v Speaker 1>stage magic I guess you could call it that illusionist

0:02:58.760 --> 0:03:01.760
<v Speaker 1>show by a guy named Derek del Guadio. That's how

0:03:01.800 --> 0:03:04.480
<v Speaker 1>you say his last name. I strongly recommend anyone go

0:03:04.600 --> 0:03:07.359
<v Speaker 1>see this show. It's it's um I think they extended

0:03:07.400 --> 0:03:11.480
<v Speaker 1>it through the rest of the year, but it's it's

0:03:11.480 --> 0:03:14.320
<v Speaker 1>like a kind of his life story. It told like

0:03:14.360 --> 0:03:18.360
<v Speaker 1>through these different um these different acts, and like just

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:20.920
<v Speaker 1>the the stuff he's doing is not like, oh man,

0:03:20.960 --> 0:03:23.359
<v Speaker 1>that rabbit came out of nowhere, nothing like that. It's

0:03:23.400 --> 0:03:27.359
<v Speaker 1>all much more psychological than that. But the the basis

0:03:27.400 --> 0:03:31.480
<v Speaker 1>of it is that this guy must be just one

0:03:31.480 --> 0:03:34.560
<v Speaker 1>of the better guesters walking around today. He's just good

0:03:34.600 --> 0:03:36.560
<v Speaker 1>he's also like a card shark. It's just a really

0:03:36.600 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 1>neat show. It's really original and different. But just to

0:03:40.520 --> 0:03:45.160
<v Speaker 1>see somebody do something to where they probably are guessing,

0:03:45.560 --> 0:03:47.960
<v Speaker 1>but they're doing such an amazing job at it that

0:03:48.000 --> 0:03:50.640
<v Speaker 1>it just appears to be magic. That's one of my

0:03:50.680 --> 0:03:53.520
<v Speaker 1>favorite things in the world to see, like when he

0:03:53.920 --> 0:03:57.080
<v Speaker 1>talks to people and like think of a number, except

0:03:57.120 --> 0:03:59.720
<v Speaker 1>obviously more fun and complex than that. Yes, yeah, And

0:03:59.760 --> 0:04:01.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to give any of it away. I

0:04:01.280 --> 0:04:03.040
<v Speaker 1>don't want to give any bit of it away. Like

0:04:03.080 --> 0:04:05.360
<v Speaker 1>for anybody who's going to go see it, everyone should

0:04:05.360 --> 0:04:08.600
<v Speaker 1>go into it fresh. But um but yeah, just just

0:04:08.880 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 1>after you see it, go back and listen to this

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:15.080
<v Speaker 1>episode again and you'll be like, oh, yeah, totally now.

0:04:15.120 --> 0:04:17.039
<v Speaker 1>I think the deal a lot of times with that

0:04:17.240 --> 0:04:23.200
<v Speaker 1>situation is powers of suggestion, correct. I don't know. I

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:25.839
<v Speaker 1>don't know, man, I don't know if that's what this

0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:28.279
<v Speaker 1>guy's doing or not. No, he's not doing like cold

0:04:28.360 --> 0:04:31.080
<v Speaker 1>readings or something like that like John Edwards. No, no, no,

0:04:31.440 --> 0:04:34.039
<v Speaker 1>nothing like that. But powers of suggestion in that if

0:04:34.080 --> 0:04:37.599
<v Speaker 1>you you can lead someone to to think of a

0:04:37.640 --> 0:04:43.280
<v Speaker 1>certain thing that they then guess I guess, So get

0:04:43.279 --> 0:04:46.960
<v Speaker 1>it didn't even mean that, but that kind of dives

0:04:47.000 --> 0:04:50.960
<v Speaker 1>into what we're talking about, which is guessing in general. Um,

0:04:51.000 --> 0:04:55.120
<v Speaker 1>there's this whole like what like science really doesn't have

0:04:55.160 --> 0:04:59.599
<v Speaker 1>any idea about how we make guesses. All we know

0:04:59.839 --> 0:05:02.880
<v Speaker 1>is that we are capable of making guesses, and that

0:05:02.960 --> 0:05:06.400
<v Speaker 1>we make guesses almost constantly, and that like our our

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 1>brain is basically set up two guests, Like our construction

0:05:09.960 --> 0:05:13.400
<v Speaker 1>of reality is a series of guesses, most of which

0:05:13.400 --> 0:05:15.919
<v Speaker 1>pan out to be right, but then can also be

0:05:16.160 --> 0:05:20.600
<v Speaker 1>terribly wrong, which is what optical illusions prove, you know. Yeah,

0:05:20.640 --> 0:05:23.359
<v Speaker 1>and uh, I found this. I thought it was going

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:25.800
<v Speaker 1>to be more interesting than it was initially when I

0:05:25.839 --> 0:05:28.840
<v Speaker 1>picked this one out, so I was a little disappointed.

0:05:29.440 --> 0:05:32.000
<v Speaker 1>And then we found like other supplemental stuff that kind

0:05:32.000 --> 0:05:34.279
<v Speaker 1>of helped it. But in the end it felt a

0:05:34.279 --> 0:05:38.240
<v Speaker 1>little unwieldy. But I think that's just because of the

0:05:38.320 --> 0:05:43.320
<v Speaker 1>nature of the topic, Like there isn't a concise beginning, middle,

0:05:43.400 --> 0:05:46.200
<v Speaker 1>and end to this kind of topic, you know, no,

0:05:46.400 --> 0:05:51.080
<v Speaker 1>because again science is pretty well stumped, like even and

0:05:51.240 --> 0:05:54.360
<v Speaker 1>sometimes Chuck, if you'll remember, these can be our best episodes,

0:05:54.400 --> 0:05:57.120
<v Speaker 1>like unless the ones where there's just like a clear

0:05:57.360 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Speaker 1>cut completely understandable neat explanation are great. And then on

0:06:02.440 --> 0:06:04.840
<v Speaker 1>the other end of the spectrum like this one, the

0:06:04.839 --> 0:06:07.920
<v Speaker 1>ones where science is just kind of like maybe this

0:06:08.000 --> 0:06:10.160
<v Speaker 1>is it. I don't know, this could be it, those

0:06:10.160 --> 0:06:12.360
<v Speaker 1>are usually pretty good too, So this could this one

0:06:12.400 --> 0:06:17.360
<v Speaker 1>has has potential. Alright, that's my that's my estimation. Well,

0:06:17.400 --> 0:06:19.640
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was interesting that in our very own

0:06:19.680 --> 0:06:23.440
<v Speaker 1>house stof Works article and they started talking about um

0:06:24.160 --> 0:06:27.800
<v Speaker 1>the in days of yr with starting with took took

0:06:28.080 --> 0:06:31.800
<v Speaker 1>and you know, basically up until the point where we

0:06:31.839 --> 0:06:35.479
<v Speaker 1>could like you know, measure things or prove things, like,

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:37.200
<v Speaker 1>there was a lot of and there's still a lot

0:06:37.200 --> 0:06:39.920
<v Speaker 1>of guessing going on, but like guessing was a daily

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:44.800
<v Speaker 1>survival tactic. That's how that's how we learned. Should I

0:06:44.839 --> 0:06:47.560
<v Speaker 1>go this way and fall off a cliff, you know,

0:06:47.560 --> 0:06:50.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna take a guess? Or should I eat this thing?

0:06:50.440 --> 0:06:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Will it kill me? Or like in the case of

0:06:53.400 --> 0:06:57.839
<v Speaker 1>Lewis and Clark, I remember, um Clark estimated, and you know,

0:06:58.360 --> 0:07:00.960
<v Speaker 1>there's guesses and we'll it in different types of an

0:07:01.040 --> 0:07:03.479
<v Speaker 1>estimation is a kind of a guess, even if it's

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:08.560
<v Speaker 1>informed and well reasoned. In Clark's case, of course, he estimated.

0:07:09.360 --> 0:07:11.480
<v Speaker 1>I think he's only off about forty miles when they

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:15.800
<v Speaker 1>got to the Pacific. Uh, oh really, I don't remember that. Yeah,

0:07:15.840 --> 0:07:20.000
<v Speaker 1>he he estimated four thousand, one sixty two miles off.

0:07:20.400 --> 0:07:24.000
<v Speaker 1>He's off by forty I mean that's remarkable. Yeah, but

0:07:24.080 --> 0:07:27.080
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't a wild guess. It was Clark being a

0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:30.840
<v Speaker 1>very smart dude who probably took copious notes. Not probably,

0:07:30.880 --> 0:07:34.520
<v Speaker 1>he definitely took copious notes. Um, but I don't know.

0:07:34.560 --> 0:07:37.559
<v Speaker 1>I just never really thought about guessing back in those days.

0:07:37.720 --> 0:07:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Could you know you could? You could end up a

0:07:40.200 --> 0:07:43.360
<v Speaker 1>bad guest means the end of view, Yes, But if

0:07:43.400 --> 0:07:47.360
<v Speaker 1>your friends were standing around watching you guess that that

0:07:47.560 --> 0:07:50.360
<v Speaker 1>um lizard over there wasn't poisonous and you can just

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:52.480
<v Speaker 1>go ahead and eat it raw and then you keel

0:07:52.560 --> 0:07:56.160
<v Speaker 1>over and die, they learned from your bad guests. One

0:07:56.200 --> 0:07:59.400
<v Speaker 1>for the team very much. So yeah, that's before the

0:07:59.480 --> 0:08:04.040
<v Speaker 1>universal edibility test. Man, you were just have you been

0:08:04.080 --> 0:08:07.560
<v Speaker 1>going through the archives or something? No, but I wrote

0:08:07.560 --> 0:08:10.240
<v Speaker 1>that article back then, So that one stuck with me

0:08:11.360 --> 0:08:13.960
<v Speaker 1>because you know, I mean, we're I thought you were too.

0:08:14.000 --> 0:08:18.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm cursed with that new information in old information getting

0:08:18.400 --> 0:08:22.680
<v Speaker 1>squeezed out. Yeah, yeah. Yeah, So should we get into this.

0:08:22.920 --> 0:08:25.720
<v Speaker 1>I guess, So, I'm not I don't mean to do this.

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:30.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry what saying. I guess it's pretty commonplace, but

0:08:30.760 --> 0:08:33.760
<v Speaker 1>it does kind of under underscore just how much we

0:08:33.840 --> 0:08:36.560
<v Speaker 1>do guess in our lives, you know. Yeah, here's all right,

0:08:36.600 --> 0:08:38.040
<v Speaker 1>let's go ahead and start it with the brain then,

0:08:38.080 --> 0:08:40.760
<v Speaker 1>because while you're correct in saying that they don't know

0:08:40.920 --> 0:08:46.440
<v Speaker 1>the the pathways necessarily of a guess, um, all different

0:08:46.520 --> 0:08:49.839
<v Speaker 1>kinds of all different parts of the brain, not all

0:08:49.840 --> 0:08:51.880
<v Speaker 1>the parts, but many different parts of the brain are

0:08:51.920 --> 0:08:54.520
<v Speaker 1>at work, which makes a lot of sense when you

0:08:54.520 --> 0:08:58.920
<v Speaker 1>think about what different kinds of guesses can entail, whether

0:08:58.960 --> 0:09:02.640
<v Speaker 1>you're guessing someone's age or guessing you know, because that

0:09:02.720 --> 0:09:07.560
<v Speaker 1>involves like, you know, recognition with your eyeballs or a

0:09:07.679 --> 0:09:10.880
<v Speaker 1>memory of someone else who was a certain age who

0:09:10.960 --> 0:09:14.360
<v Speaker 1>looked like that, like you're you know, recall, Uh, there's

0:09:14.400 --> 0:09:17.400
<v Speaker 1>all different parts of the brain they're lighting up whenever

0:09:17.440 --> 0:09:21.400
<v Speaker 1>you're guessing something. Yeah, they think that it's a global,

0:09:22.120 --> 0:09:26.360
<v Speaker 1>a global phenomenon, right, like brain brain ely global, Yes,

0:09:26.440 --> 0:09:30.480
<v Speaker 1>exactly right. So, um, there's like some region of your

0:09:30.520 --> 0:09:34.000
<v Speaker 1>brain that specializes in the particular task at hand. The

0:09:34.559 --> 0:09:37.640
<v Speaker 1>thing you're guessing about, whether it's say like volume or

0:09:37.800 --> 0:09:41.040
<v Speaker 1>like you said, someone's age. UM, that region of the

0:09:41.080 --> 0:09:44.120
<v Speaker 1>brain that that has to do with say numbers, UM

0:09:44.240 --> 0:09:48.400
<v Speaker 1>would light up. I think it's the um parietal uh

0:09:48.520 --> 0:09:51.319
<v Speaker 1>anterior gyrus or something like that that lights up when

0:09:51.320 --> 0:09:54.040
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to guess someone's age based on how they look.

0:09:54.960 --> 0:09:58.800
<v Speaker 1>But then that that's just one right using the wonder machine, right,

0:09:59.559 --> 0:10:04.760
<v Speaker 1>but that it's just one functional part of the whole

0:10:04.840 --> 0:10:07.320
<v Speaker 1>process that the brain is going through. They know that

0:10:07.400 --> 0:10:12.000
<v Speaker 1>it's there's a number of different regions that are operating

0:10:12.040 --> 0:10:16.080
<v Speaker 1>at any given point in time when you're making a guess.

0:10:16.160 --> 0:10:19.920
<v Speaker 1>But they still can't say, well, if somebody's guessing this,

0:10:19.920 --> 0:10:22.000
<v Speaker 1>this is what's going to happen. Here's the here's the

0:10:22.040 --> 0:10:24.000
<v Speaker 1>cascade that's going to go through the brain. We haven't

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:27.079
<v Speaker 1>reached that point yet. Yeah, they think that, um, if

0:10:27.120 --> 0:10:30.440
<v Speaker 1>you're guessing about a visual object or subject, then your

0:10:30.440 --> 0:10:36.439
<v Speaker 1>frontal lobe and occipital lobe or at work numerical quantities

0:10:36.480 --> 0:10:40.079
<v Speaker 1>like how many uh jelly beans are in that jar.

0:10:40.160 --> 0:10:42.200
<v Speaker 1>That's kind of the common thing they mentioned that like

0:10:42.240 --> 0:10:46.360
<v Speaker 1>that still happens. Is that still a thing. Um, you know,

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:53.320
<v Speaker 1>who is a jelly bean jar guessing champions. My wife is, yes, longstanding,

0:10:53.640 --> 0:10:58.200
<v Speaker 1>her special reasoning is is outstanding. Well. Spatial reasoning and

0:10:58.320 --> 0:11:01.920
<v Speaker 1>numerical quantities are a big part of trying to guess

0:11:02.360 --> 0:11:05.920
<v Speaker 1>the quantity of something into something right, And and so

0:11:06.000 --> 0:11:09.480
<v Speaker 1>if you, if your brain is kind of specialized in

0:11:09.520 --> 0:11:13.200
<v Speaker 1>that manner, um, you are probably going to be better

0:11:13.240 --> 0:11:15.960
<v Speaker 1>at it than somebody whose brain is not right. So

0:11:16.400 --> 0:11:19.959
<v Speaker 1>Umi would beat me every time. My spatial reasoning is horrific. Right,

0:11:20.520 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 1>But um, I'm really good at recognizing faces, so I'm

0:11:24.520 --> 0:11:28.800
<v Speaker 1>probably better at at guessing the someone's age based on

0:11:28.880 --> 0:11:34.080
<v Speaker 1>their face, um or possibly how they're feeling based on

0:11:34.120 --> 0:11:37.679
<v Speaker 1>their facial expression, than she might be. That's a whole

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:40.400
<v Speaker 1>like I didn't even think about that being part of guessing.

0:11:40.440 --> 0:11:45.960
<v Speaker 1>But the emotional thing of guessing, uh yeah, like someone's feelings,

0:11:46.040 --> 0:11:49.240
<v Speaker 1>what they're thinking like that, that's a whole different thing

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:51.720
<v Speaker 1>than guessing jelly beans in a jar, which is different

0:11:51.720 --> 0:11:54.880
<v Speaker 1>than guessing someone's age. It's like all lumped into guessing.

0:11:54.880 --> 0:11:58.319
<v Speaker 1>It's really more varied than I ever considered, right, And

0:11:58.559 --> 0:12:01.440
<v Speaker 1>so with with um, well, let's talk about the different

0:12:01.520 --> 0:12:04.680
<v Speaker 1>different types of guesses you might make that. So I

0:12:04.679 --> 0:12:06.280
<v Speaker 1>think what you just kind of did, Chuck, was you

0:12:06.320 --> 0:12:13.360
<v Speaker 1>divided um guesses into um like buckets. The two buckets.

0:12:13.440 --> 0:12:15.559
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to decide what the buckets would be called, though,

0:12:15.600 --> 0:12:19.120
<v Speaker 1>So one bucket would be UM just kind of work,

0:12:19.559 --> 0:12:24.280
<v Speaker 1>working knowledge, and the other would be say, like emotional, right, Like, so,

0:12:24.480 --> 0:12:26.520
<v Speaker 1>how many jelly beans are in a jar? Would that

0:12:26.679 --> 0:12:29.960
<v Speaker 1>be in the working knowledge bucket? What somebody's feeling based

0:12:30.040 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 1>on your guests, based on say their facial expression, that's

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:39.640
<v Speaker 1>that's emotional um or or intellectual. Yeah, that's right, intellectual

0:12:39.840 --> 0:12:43.840
<v Speaker 1>or emotional buckets. Bam just carved him up. But I

0:12:43.840 --> 0:12:46.080
<v Speaker 1>think those are kind of like the two categories you

0:12:46.080 --> 0:12:48.679
<v Speaker 1>can put guesses into. Even though you can break types

0:12:48.720 --> 0:12:53.839
<v Speaker 1>of guesses down further. Yeah, and uh, breaking them down further.

0:12:54.200 --> 0:12:56.160
<v Speaker 1>You have your wild guesses. This is when you have

0:12:56.240 --> 0:13:01.480
<v Speaker 1>no information, no outside input whatsoever. And you know, you

0:13:01.559 --> 0:13:03.800
<v Speaker 1>often say, this is just a wild guess. If I

0:13:03.800 --> 0:13:08.560
<v Speaker 1>had to guess, yeah, you're saying here, listen to me,

0:13:08.600 --> 0:13:12.319
<v Speaker 1>I can speak, has no basis in factor reality or

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:15.320
<v Speaker 1>anything like that. Then you have your educated guests, which

0:13:15.360 --> 0:13:17.160
<v Speaker 1>is in the middle, and that's when you have a

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:20.480
<v Speaker 1>little bit of information. Uh. There's a military term that

0:13:20.520 --> 0:13:24.720
<v Speaker 1>I had never heard of called swag, which stands for

0:13:25.720 --> 0:13:32.679
<v Speaker 1>um stuff. We all get no scientific uh wild ass guessing,

0:13:34.280 --> 0:13:36.679
<v Speaker 1>which is like a guestimate. But it's a military term

0:13:36.720 --> 0:13:39.599
<v Speaker 1>by all accounts. Uh. Most people say it started in

0:13:39.679 --> 0:13:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Vietnam with General Westmoreland. Um. And you will hear military

0:13:43.320 --> 0:13:45.480
<v Speaker 1>people say swag, And that's when you know, I've got

0:13:45.480 --> 0:13:49.160
<v Speaker 1>a little information. I'm not just wild guessing here. This

0:13:49.280 --> 0:13:54.720
<v Speaker 1>is a ballpark educated guess, right, but it's still less

0:13:54.720 --> 0:13:58.160
<v Speaker 1>than an estimate. That's where we have a lot more information. Yeah,

0:13:58.400 --> 0:14:01.520
<v Speaker 1>not just a lot more information it you're you're pretty

0:14:01.559 --> 0:14:05.199
<v Speaker 1>familiar also with the topic that you're you're guessing at

0:14:05.320 --> 0:14:09.640
<v Speaker 1>as well. Right, So Lewis and Clark, I think both

0:14:09.679 --> 0:14:12.920
<v Speaker 1>of them, Um, we're surveyors, So they would have had

0:14:12.960 --> 0:14:16.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of training as far as you know, judging

0:14:16.600 --> 0:14:19.960
<v Speaker 1>distance goes. They would have had some information to put together.

0:14:20.000 --> 0:14:23.560
<v Speaker 1>So Clark coming up with, you know, with an estimate

0:14:23.600 --> 0:14:26.320
<v Speaker 1>of how why the continent is and just being off

0:14:26.320 --> 0:14:29.680
<v Speaker 1>by forty miles, like you said, that's remarkable. But if

0:14:29.720 --> 0:14:31.760
<v Speaker 1>you had had one of us do it, it would

0:14:31.800 --> 0:14:34.320
<v Speaker 1>have been a wild guess. So it has to do

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:38.280
<v Speaker 1>with the the training, the expertise really UM, and then

0:14:38.320 --> 0:14:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the amount of information you have. That's that's what an

0:14:41.080 --> 0:14:43.600
<v Speaker 1>estimate is. Yeah, and you may not even know that

0:14:43.640 --> 0:14:46.480
<v Speaker 1>you have information stored away in your brain that you're

0:14:46.600 --> 0:14:49.920
<v Speaker 1>recalling when you're trying to hazard a guess on something.

0:14:50.480 --> 0:14:53.680
<v Speaker 1>You might just be uh, you might think it's a

0:14:53.680 --> 0:14:56.840
<v Speaker 1>wild guess, but you're really kind of picking out something

0:14:57.080 --> 0:15:01.200
<v Speaker 1>that happened in your past maybe, right. Or another way

0:15:01.200 --> 0:15:04.240
<v Speaker 1>to look at it is that um is intuition, which

0:15:04.280 --> 0:15:07.640
<v Speaker 1>is um. From what I understand, intuition is kind of

0:15:07.640 --> 0:15:10.920
<v Speaker 1>its own category. But if it's most closely related to

0:15:10.960 --> 0:15:13.520
<v Speaker 1>any type of those three guess as we just mentioned,

0:15:13.720 --> 0:15:17.160
<v Speaker 1>it would be an estimate. And it comes from years

0:15:17.160 --> 0:15:21.760
<v Speaker 1>and years and years of training UM or exposure to

0:15:22.120 --> 0:15:26.200
<v Speaker 1>whatever you're guessing at to the point where your guesses

0:15:26.600 --> 0:15:28.960
<v Speaker 1>don't even seem like guesses. It just seems like for

0:15:29.280 --> 0:15:32.600
<v Speaker 1>knowledge of what you're about to do. Yeah. Like I

0:15:32.680 --> 0:15:36.680
<v Speaker 1>used to be really really bad at guessing crowd sizes,

0:15:37.720 --> 0:15:42.000
<v Speaker 1>but through our live shows, I've gotten pretty good at

0:15:42.000 --> 0:15:44.240
<v Speaker 1>it because when you go to these theaters, you know

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:46.360
<v Speaker 1>how many people are in there, and then you stand

0:15:46.400 --> 0:15:48.240
<v Speaker 1>in front of that many people, and if you do

0:15:48.280 --> 0:15:51.040
<v Speaker 1>that enough times, I can now say, like, you know,

0:15:51.080 --> 0:15:52.800
<v Speaker 1>when people when I'll go to a show or something,

0:15:52.800 --> 0:15:54.640
<v Speaker 1>they'll be like, how many people you think this place holds?

0:15:55.000 --> 0:15:56.360
<v Speaker 1>I used to be let's see, like I have no

0:15:56.440 --> 0:15:58.400
<v Speaker 1>idea I know, but now you say, you know better

0:15:58.400 --> 0:16:01.760
<v Speaker 1>around eight or nine hundred people, and you're probably pretty

0:16:01.760 --> 0:16:05.120
<v Speaker 1>close within forty miles all back. And that's just because

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:09.160
<v Speaker 1>of exposure and learning, right, And that actually brings up

0:16:09.200 --> 0:16:11.480
<v Speaker 1>a really good point that you can actually get better

0:16:11.600 --> 0:16:14.840
<v Speaker 1>at guessing. And we'll get into that right after this break.

0:16:14.840 --> 0:16:39.760
<v Speaker 1>How about that, Chuck, right mm hmmmm. Alright, So Chuck,

0:16:39.800 --> 0:16:42.480
<v Speaker 1>you said that, um, that you got better at estimating

0:16:42.520 --> 0:16:45.760
<v Speaker 1>crowd sizes by just performing at our live shows. Right,

0:16:46.360 --> 0:16:51.400
<v Speaker 1>So you were terrible at it before, but just from

0:16:51.440 --> 0:16:54.760
<v Speaker 1>from exposing yourself to it, going out on stage and

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:58.200
<v Speaker 1>exposing yourself to crowds that you could judge the size

0:16:58.240 --> 0:17:08.880
<v Speaker 1>of Um, and everybody clapped yeah, Nelson happointed and laughed. Um,

0:17:10.400 --> 0:17:12.840
<v Speaker 1>you you got better at it. And when it comes

0:17:12.880 --> 0:17:18.679
<v Speaker 1>to especially but probably both but especially intellectual guesses intellectual

0:17:18.760 --> 0:17:22.440
<v Speaker 1>bucket guesses, UM, you can train yourself to get better

0:17:22.480 --> 0:17:25.439
<v Speaker 1>at it. And part of that is making a guess,

0:17:25.840 --> 0:17:30.920
<v Speaker 1>getting um, pretty much immediate feedback, and then learning from that. Yeah,

0:17:30.960 --> 0:17:33.240
<v Speaker 1>like you're wrong, this is what the answer is. It's

0:17:33.280 --> 0:17:35.920
<v Speaker 1>like anything else exactly. Do that enough if you're gonna

0:17:35.920 --> 0:17:38.919
<v Speaker 1>get better at it. Yeah. Um. And there's this pretty

0:17:38.960 --> 0:17:42.919
<v Speaker 1>interesting um I guess. That was interesting little kind of

0:17:43.080 --> 0:17:48.200
<v Speaker 1>sidetrack that the author of the Guesses article, Aliah Hoyt Um,

0:17:49.200 --> 0:17:52.720
<v Speaker 1>and I have to say, no, it's Aliyah, it's not Alicia. No,

0:17:52.800 --> 0:17:57.760
<v Speaker 1>it's Aliyah. There's no say not only is the c silent,

0:17:57.920 --> 0:18:03.119
<v Speaker 1>it's not there, it's invisible. So Aaliyah hoyt my hats

0:18:03.119 --> 0:18:06.120
<v Speaker 1>off to her because doing supplemental research for this, there

0:18:06.160 --> 0:18:09.959
<v Speaker 1>are not a lot of people who are coming up

0:18:09.960 --> 0:18:15.800
<v Speaker 1>with really substantial stuff about guesses. It's like it's barren.

0:18:16.040 --> 0:18:20.000
<v Speaker 1>It's probably the least amount of research I've ever encountered

0:18:20.000 --> 0:18:23.439
<v Speaker 1>in all of our almost thousand plus episodes. So the

0:18:23.480 --> 0:18:26.040
<v Speaker 1>fact that she put this together, my hats off to her.

0:18:26.080 --> 0:18:29.000
<v Speaker 1>But a sidetrack she takes is to teach the reader

0:18:29.320 --> 0:18:33.560
<v Speaker 1>how to um get better at guessing. A jar full

0:18:33.600 --> 0:18:37.800
<v Speaker 1>of jelly beans. Yeah, well that was exciting. I mean

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:41.159
<v Speaker 1>that oh yeah, yeah, because always, I mean, my method

0:18:41.240 --> 0:18:46.639
<v Speaker 1>was always to pick out a smaller area, like the

0:18:46.640 --> 0:18:51.479
<v Speaker 1>bottom inch of the jar, count as many as I

0:18:51.480 --> 0:18:55.120
<v Speaker 1>could and estimate that and then multiply that out. That's

0:18:55.119 --> 0:18:59.879
<v Speaker 1>actually a great technique. Well, I don't know, I haven't

0:19:00.000 --> 0:19:02.720
<v Speaker 1>has jelly beans in a jar since I was probably twelve,

0:19:03.720 --> 0:19:05.760
<v Speaker 1>But that was always my method, which has a little

0:19:06.960 --> 0:19:08.720
<v Speaker 1>there's a little bit of method to it, but it's

0:19:08.760 --> 0:19:12.399
<v Speaker 1>definitely not as good as as this one. Okay, So

0:19:12.400 --> 0:19:16.480
<v Speaker 1>so this one it sounds a little more complex than

0:19:16.680 --> 0:19:20.119
<v Speaker 1>than it actually is. But if you say, if you

0:19:20.200 --> 0:19:22.520
<v Speaker 1>look at a jar and it's filled with jelly beans,

0:19:23.000 --> 0:19:27.240
<v Speaker 1>you can say, um, that jar is the volume of

0:19:27.280 --> 0:19:31.600
<v Speaker 1>that jar is say a court Okay, But then you

0:19:31.760 --> 0:19:35.199
<v Speaker 1>kind of wanted to begin with sure, right, But you

0:19:35.240 --> 0:19:37.320
<v Speaker 1>can learn, right, you can just look around, Like here's

0:19:37.359 --> 0:19:39.800
<v Speaker 1>the point. If you want to get good at guessing

0:19:40.320 --> 0:19:42.359
<v Speaker 1>jelly beans, it just takes a little bit of work.

0:19:43.359 --> 0:19:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Most people would walk up, say a million jelly beans,

0:19:45.920 --> 0:19:48.480
<v Speaker 1>and they're off by like nine thousand. They're like, well,

0:19:48.520 --> 0:19:50.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm terrible at guessing jelly beans. I'm going to sleep

0:19:50.880 --> 0:19:53.240
<v Speaker 1>for the rest of my life. But if you want

0:19:53.240 --> 0:19:55.399
<v Speaker 1>to get good at guessing at jelly beans. All you

0:19:55.440 --> 0:19:58.000
<v Speaker 1>have to do is poke around, learn a few things,

0:19:58.240 --> 0:20:00.879
<v Speaker 1>and then you can basically apply those every situation. And

0:20:00.920 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 1>one of the things you would need to learn is

0:20:02.960 --> 0:20:06.159
<v Speaker 1>how to judge the volume of the container to start.

0:20:06.680 --> 0:20:08.800
<v Speaker 1>So that's one part, right yeah, which you know most

0:20:08.800 --> 0:20:10.959
<v Speaker 1>people would do that that by comparing it to like

0:20:11.160 --> 0:20:13.200
<v Speaker 1>a milk jug or a two leader bottle or something

0:20:13.240 --> 0:20:15.240
<v Speaker 1>like that, right, But in this case to get a

0:20:15.280 --> 0:20:19.600
<v Speaker 1>really accurate estimate, you would want to know specifically, say

0:20:19.640 --> 0:20:24.720
<v Speaker 1>how many ounces a container held, correct um. And then

0:20:24.760 --> 0:20:27.399
<v Speaker 1>another thing you would probably do if you started researching

0:20:27.480 --> 0:20:31.520
<v Speaker 1>guessing jelly beans and jar on the internet, um, you

0:20:31.520 --> 0:20:35.240
<v Speaker 1>would you would run across some research that found that

0:20:35.400 --> 0:20:41.440
<v Speaker 1>if you have uh, spherical objects in a jar, they

0:20:41.480 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 1>typically take up about if you fill the thing up,

0:20:44.920 --> 0:20:49.880
<v Speaker 1>they take typically take up about sixty of actual volume

0:20:50.040 --> 0:20:53.280
<v Speaker 1>of the jar. And that's if it's they're just randomly dumped. Right.

0:20:53.359 --> 0:20:57.640
<v Speaker 1>So if you come across a jar and you say, um,

0:20:57.680 --> 0:21:03.399
<v Speaker 1>and it's filled with like perfectly round um, okay, perfectly

0:21:03.440 --> 0:21:07.560
<v Speaker 1>around bouncy balls, right, um, you can say, well, those

0:21:07.560 --> 0:21:11.240
<v Speaker 1>are spherical and they're taking up about six of the

0:21:11.320 --> 0:21:13.560
<v Speaker 1>jar so all I have to do is figure out

0:21:13.600 --> 0:21:17.800
<v Speaker 1>the um the basically the size of each of them

0:21:18.480 --> 0:21:23.879
<v Speaker 1>ball right, and then divide it by the volume, and

0:21:23.920 --> 0:21:26.760
<v Speaker 1>then bam, you just guessed how many are in there,

0:21:26.800 --> 0:21:30.240
<v Speaker 1>and you're probably pretty close to right. So this all

0:21:30.280 --> 0:21:33.320
<v Speaker 1>sounds mind numbing. I've got a little um, a little

0:21:33.320 --> 0:21:36.040
<v Speaker 1>trickle blood coming out of my ear right now. But

0:21:37.400 --> 0:21:40.000
<v Speaker 1>you can the whole point, and you can train yourself

0:21:40.240 --> 0:21:44.840
<v Speaker 1>to make better guesses, to estimate better. That's the whole point. Yeah.

0:21:44.840 --> 0:21:47.560
<v Speaker 1>And if it's a non sphericle, by the way, like

0:21:47.600 --> 0:21:51.680
<v Speaker 1>if it's peanuts or something like that, or ice cubes,

0:21:52.359 --> 0:21:58.560
<v Speaker 1>not disgusting circus peanuts. Oh man, that conjures up so

0:21:58.640 --> 0:22:03.760
<v Speaker 1>many memories. Did you like those? Well? I think I

0:22:03.880 --> 0:22:05.440
<v Speaker 1>might have when I was a kid, but I haven't

0:22:05.480 --> 0:22:08.480
<v Speaker 1>had one in forty years. But I still remember the

0:22:08.520 --> 0:22:11.200
<v Speaker 1>taste you me just had something. She says, they still

0:22:11.240 --> 0:22:13.560
<v Speaker 1>hold up, and I'm like, I didn't like him, then

0:22:13.600 --> 0:22:15.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna like him now. Well, they hold up

0:22:15.440 --> 0:22:18.480
<v Speaker 1>for you in a bad way, right right, Yeah, exactly.

0:22:18.600 --> 0:22:20.360
<v Speaker 1>So I know, I know I'm not supposed to yuck

0:22:20.400 --> 0:22:25.600
<v Speaker 1>anyone's young, but yuck. So uh, if it's circus peanuts.

0:22:25.640 --> 0:22:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's say, Um, that would be between fifty and of

0:22:30.080 --> 0:22:33.440
<v Speaker 1>the space, not sixty four. Yeah, So, uh, what is

0:22:33.480 --> 0:22:36.320
<v Speaker 1>you me's method? Did you ask her? She says she

0:22:36.400 --> 0:22:42.000
<v Speaker 1>just kind of knowsh So she's a precock exactly. She

0:22:42.000 --> 0:22:44.119
<v Speaker 1>she shaves her head once a while and lays around

0:22:44.160 --> 0:22:46.800
<v Speaker 1>in a vat of liquid. Wow, that would be see,

0:22:46.880 --> 0:22:50.200
<v Speaker 1>I would that would scare me if that would if

0:22:50.200 --> 0:22:52.040
<v Speaker 1>that was my wife's answer, if she just like kind

0:22:52.040 --> 0:22:54.760
<v Speaker 1>of walked by and said I just know, right, yeah,

0:22:54.840 --> 0:22:58.320
<v Speaker 1>I would be like, well, what else do you just know? Yeah?

0:22:58.520 --> 0:23:01.600
<v Speaker 1>She's kind of unstoppable too. You have no idea how

0:23:01.600 --> 0:23:04.320
<v Speaker 1>many calves we've won at county fairs in the last

0:23:04.440 --> 0:23:09.520
<v Speaker 1>year alone. Our house is overrun with them. Um. All right,

0:23:09.600 --> 0:23:12.159
<v Speaker 1>So that's just guessing volume of a thing and a

0:23:12.280 --> 0:23:16.720
<v Speaker 1>thing that's an it's intellectual guessing, right, But you can

0:23:16.720 --> 0:23:19.760
<v Speaker 1>train yourself to guess better. What's really up for for

0:23:20.200 --> 0:23:24.520
<v Speaker 1>questioning is whether you can train yourself to get better

0:23:24.520 --> 0:23:28.520
<v Speaker 1>at the other bucket of guessing, emotional type of guessing.

0:23:28.600 --> 0:23:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Right where you're walking around and you are interacting with

0:23:32.080 --> 0:23:35.520
<v Speaker 1>other people and you're making judgments about how they're feeling. Right,

0:23:35.560 --> 0:23:39.480
<v Speaker 1>then about what they're thinking, right then what their motives are. Um,

0:23:40.760 --> 0:23:43.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, how how well they're actually listening to you

0:23:43.359 --> 0:23:46.240
<v Speaker 1>all of these things right, It's part of our interaction

0:23:46.320 --> 0:23:51.399
<v Speaker 1>with other people. And there's something that UM two researchers

0:23:51.440 --> 0:23:56.400
<v Speaker 1>called X and took great combo that back in established

0:23:56.400 --> 0:23:59.119
<v Speaker 1>this kind of field of inquiry in which they were

0:23:59.160 --> 0:24:01.359
<v Speaker 1>trying to it to the bottom of what they called

0:24:01.400 --> 0:24:06.600
<v Speaker 1>empathic accuracy, which is how accurately we can we can

0:24:06.640 --> 0:24:10.680
<v Speaker 1>surmise what someone actually is feeling or thinking just from

0:24:10.680 --> 0:24:14.199
<v Speaker 1>interacting with them. Some people are supposedly good at it,

0:24:14.440 --> 0:24:17.480
<v Speaker 1>some people are not. And from what I saw, there's

0:24:17.520 --> 0:24:21.200
<v Speaker 1>a big kind of push and pull about whether it's

0:24:21.240 --> 0:24:24.639
<v Speaker 1>worth practicing or whether you should just not do that

0:24:24.760 --> 0:24:27.040
<v Speaker 1>at all for the sake of your own sanity and

0:24:27.240 --> 0:24:30.000
<v Speaker 1>just say, if you tell me that you're in a

0:24:30.040 --> 0:24:32.520
<v Speaker 1>good mood, I'm going to take that at face value.

0:24:32.800 --> 0:24:36.439
<v Speaker 1>And if you're actually not, then you're you're covering up

0:24:36.440 --> 0:24:39.760
<v Speaker 1>your feelings for your own reasons, And that's that's fine.

0:24:39.800 --> 0:24:41.720
<v Speaker 1>If you want to just keep them to yourself, that's fine.

0:24:41.760 --> 0:24:43.760
<v Speaker 1>If you want to share them, I'm here, but I'm

0:24:43.760 --> 0:24:46.439
<v Speaker 1>gonna I'm gonna take what you're saying on face value,

0:24:46.680 --> 0:24:50.639
<v Speaker 1>so Bully, for you, that to me is sanity, like going,

0:24:51.880 --> 0:24:58.320
<v Speaker 1>how are you really feeling? That's uh, one can spend

0:24:58.320 --> 0:25:00.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of time doing that, So can I share

0:25:00.960 --> 0:25:04.320
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about myself here? I know it's weird,

0:25:04.680 --> 0:25:09.200
<v Speaker 1>it feels gross, but um. For a very long time, Chuck,

0:25:10.040 --> 0:25:14.600
<v Speaker 1>I thought that I was a born and bread and

0:25:14.800 --> 0:25:19.720
<v Speaker 1>path that like I could understand what anyone was thinking

0:25:19.760 --> 0:25:23.840
<v Speaker 1>and feeling, maybe even better than they knew how they

0:25:23.880 --> 0:25:28.399
<v Speaker 1>were thinking and feeling. And I finally finally came to

0:25:28.440 --> 0:25:32.720
<v Speaker 1>the hard truth that I was wrong almost all the time.

0:25:33.840 --> 0:25:36.520
<v Speaker 1>And in figuring this out, like this was really jarring,

0:25:36.520 --> 0:25:38.080
<v Speaker 1>and it took a little while for me to like

0:25:38.160 --> 0:25:41.480
<v Speaker 1>really for this to sink in. But once I figured

0:25:41.520 --> 0:25:45.280
<v Speaker 1>out that I'm actually terrible at reading engaging other people's

0:25:45.280 --> 0:25:47.879
<v Speaker 1>thoughts and feelings, it was one of the most liberating

0:25:47.920 --> 0:25:51.160
<v Speaker 1>things that's ever happened to me because I just stopped.

0:25:51.720 --> 0:25:54.600
<v Speaker 1>I stopped, and I realized how much of my life

0:25:54.840 --> 0:25:58.679
<v Speaker 1>I've been walking around wasting just thinking about you know,

0:25:58.720 --> 0:26:01.920
<v Speaker 1>what people really think in care? You know, do people

0:26:02.040 --> 0:26:04.720
<v Speaker 1>really like me? They probably don't? Or do they? Or

0:26:05.359 --> 0:26:08.320
<v Speaker 1>or what did they mean by that look or whatever,

0:26:09.000 --> 0:26:12.240
<v Speaker 1>and just taking people in life on face value, UM

0:26:12.400 --> 0:26:15.840
<v Speaker 1>is so much. It's just it occupies so much less

0:26:15.880 --> 0:26:18.760
<v Speaker 1>of your mind on any given moment. It's just great.

0:26:19.160 --> 0:26:22.680
<v Speaker 1>That's my prescription. Stop trying to figure out what other

0:26:22.720 --> 0:26:25.359
<v Speaker 1>people are really thinking and feeling. You should have You

0:26:25.359 --> 0:26:27.879
<v Speaker 1>should have just asked me a long time ago. And

0:26:27.920 --> 0:26:32.000
<v Speaker 1>when he told you, I was like, you're terrible at that. Yeah, yeah, yeah,

0:26:32.119 --> 0:26:33.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if I want to listen. You know,

0:26:33.600 --> 0:26:35.600
<v Speaker 1>it took it took a little while, but to walk

0:26:35.640 --> 0:26:37.480
<v Speaker 1>through their own doors. You know what I'm saying. That

0:26:37.680 --> 0:26:40.680
<v Speaker 1>is well put man, you're you're a stoic sage. So

0:26:41.480 --> 0:26:45.000
<v Speaker 1>cognitive distortion is is a phrase you hear pop up

0:26:45.000 --> 0:26:49.359
<v Speaker 1>a lot when it comes to assessing another person's emotions.

0:26:49.920 --> 0:26:52.960
<v Speaker 1>And these are these inaccurate thoughts that you have in

0:26:53.000 --> 0:26:57.000
<v Speaker 1>your brain. Sometimes they leave to negative thinking or encourage that.

0:26:57.400 --> 0:27:00.440
<v Speaker 1>I think probably most times that's probably the case. UM.

0:27:00.480 --> 0:27:04.200
<v Speaker 1>And then polarized thinking is another bucket I guess since

0:27:04.200 --> 0:27:07.959
<v Speaker 1>we're bucketting everything today, UM, which is you know, everything

0:27:08.040 --> 0:27:10.880
<v Speaker 1>is great or everything is terrible. And the example they

0:27:10.880 --> 0:27:13.920
<v Speaker 1>give in this in this article is you know, it's

0:27:13.920 --> 0:27:15.960
<v Speaker 1>simply I mean it's a little boy reading a girl's

0:27:16.000 --> 0:27:19.080
<v Speaker 1>face that you know she doesn't like me, but that

0:27:19.080 --> 0:27:21.320
<v Speaker 1>that's a kid in elementary school. You can apply this

0:27:21.359 --> 0:27:26.639
<v Speaker 1>to anyone walking into a room and basically reading either

0:27:26.840 --> 0:27:30.439
<v Speaker 1>the room or reading a person and saying like, you know,

0:27:30.720 --> 0:27:32.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't like the way that that person just looked

0:27:32.920 --> 0:27:36.960
<v Speaker 1>at me. Um, that's bad, and so I don't think

0:27:37.000 --> 0:27:39.040
<v Speaker 1>they like me. And those are both of those things

0:27:39.040 --> 0:27:43.960
<v Speaker 1>at work, cognitive distortion and polarized thinking, right, which which

0:27:44.000 --> 0:27:46.840
<v Speaker 1>I think polarized thinking is a type of cognitive distortion.

0:27:46.920 --> 0:27:49.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the umbrella term for that kind of thing, right, Yeah,

0:27:49.680 --> 0:27:52.879
<v Speaker 1>that makes sense, so um yeah, I think this is

0:27:52.960 --> 0:27:54.639
<v Speaker 1>kind of where you get to why a lot of

0:27:54.680 --> 0:27:57.720
<v Speaker 1>people are terrible at guessing or get get their guessing wrong,

0:27:57.840 --> 0:28:00.159
<v Speaker 1>especially when it comes to what other people are thinking

0:28:00.160 --> 0:28:02.800
<v Speaker 1>and feeling. Is that your guess is, whether you realize

0:28:02.800 --> 0:28:06.399
<v Speaker 1>it or not, are actually colored and come through a

0:28:06.480 --> 0:28:10.240
<v Speaker 1>lens of your past history. Right, So like if if

0:28:10.240 --> 0:28:13.600
<v Speaker 1>you were raised in a house where people your family

0:28:13.680 --> 0:28:16.720
<v Speaker 1>members are really critical of you and one another, if

0:28:16.760 --> 0:28:18.840
<v Speaker 1>you see two people in a corner like kind of

0:28:18.880 --> 0:28:22.840
<v Speaker 1>like having a quiet conversation but laughing too, you're probably

0:28:22.840 --> 0:28:25.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna think they're laughing at you, even though they may

0:28:25.359 --> 0:28:27.800
<v Speaker 1>not even be paying the least bit of attention to you.

0:28:28.600 --> 0:28:31.920
<v Speaker 1>But because of the history of how you grew up,

0:28:32.280 --> 0:28:35.000
<v Speaker 1>that's what you're gonna guess at, right. Whereas if somebody

0:28:35.119 --> 0:28:38.640
<v Speaker 1>was raised in a house where they were instilled with

0:28:38.680 --> 0:28:41.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of confidence and like a great sense of humor,

0:28:41.400 --> 0:28:44.120
<v Speaker 1>that person might just think, man, they must be talking

0:28:44.120 --> 0:28:46.640
<v Speaker 1>about something hilarious. I wish I knew what the joke was,

0:28:46.920 --> 0:28:48.880
<v Speaker 1>or they might have so much confidence in sense of

0:28:48.960 --> 0:28:51.480
<v Speaker 1>humor they might even walk up and engage them and say,

0:28:51.760 --> 0:28:54.080
<v Speaker 1>what do you guys laughing at right? Huh? And if

0:28:54.080 --> 0:28:57.720
<v Speaker 1>they nothing, never mind, then you may be onto something. Right.

0:28:57.800 --> 0:29:00.560
<v Speaker 1>But there was this, um there's this blog was a man,

0:29:00.600 --> 0:29:02.480
<v Speaker 1>I wish I could remember what the site was. I

0:29:02.720 --> 0:29:06.160
<v Speaker 1>apologize sight, but it was basically like stop trying to

0:29:06.200 --> 0:29:08.760
<v Speaker 1>read other people's minds was the gist of it. And

0:29:08.800 --> 0:29:12.560
<v Speaker 1>they actually used that example, and they went on to say, like,

0:29:12.680 --> 0:29:16.959
<v Speaker 1>even if the person who thinks that that they're laughing

0:29:17.000 --> 0:29:19.800
<v Speaker 1>at them turns out to be right, that's not the

0:29:19.840 --> 0:29:23.160
<v Speaker 1>worst thing that can happen to you. Yeah, it's fine,

0:29:23.520 --> 0:29:27.080
<v Speaker 1>who cares you know, like like some people aren't gonna

0:29:27.120 --> 0:29:30.280
<v Speaker 1>like you, some people will. It doesn't really matter. Like

0:29:30.320 --> 0:29:32.600
<v Speaker 1>if somebody doesn't like you, you've got to have a

0:29:32.600 --> 0:29:34.840
<v Speaker 1>little more self confidence than the let that just completely

0:29:34.880 --> 0:29:38.600
<v Speaker 1>derail your day. Yeah, and you and you have to

0:29:38.640 --> 0:29:42.600
<v Speaker 1>find it within yourself. Yeah. Sure. And some people get

0:29:42.600 --> 0:29:44.719
<v Speaker 1>that through years of therapy. Some people are born with it,

0:29:44.840 --> 0:29:48.360
<v Speaker 1>some people never achieve it. Yeah. I think it's you know,

0:29:48.520 --> 0:29:50.040
<v Speaker 1>even if you are born with I think you can

0:29:50.160 --> 0:29:52.240
<v Speaker 1>lose it from time to time. If you're not born

0:29:52.280 --> 0:29:53.880
<v Speaker 1>with it, you can gain it from time to time.

0:29:53.880 --> 0:29:56.520
<v Speaker 1>But it's not something I think you have every moment

0:29:56.560 --> 0:30:00.280
<v Speaker 1>of every day necessarily. Yeah. Boy, people with just much

0:30:00.280 --> 0:30:05.160
<v Speaker 1>confidence or so annoying, they really are because everyone wants that,

0:30:05.240 --> 0:30:07.520
<v Speaker 1>you know. I think that's why it's annoying. Sure, just

0:30:07.560 --> 0:30:10.320
<v Speaker 1>like man, I wish I could be that confident about everything.

0:30:10.680 --> 0:30:12.600
<v Speaker 1>I hate that guy, and then you end up in

0:30:12.600 --> 0:30:15.040
<v Speaker 1>a corner talking to somebody else about how much you

0:30:15.080 --> 0:30:18.120
<v Speaker 1>hate that person. Is so much confidence totally lost on

0:30:18.160 --> 0:30:20.480
<v Speaker 1>the other person. So I have another theory that's not

0:30:20.520 --> 0:30:22.680
<v Speaker 1>scientific at all. It's just my personal theory that when

0:30:22.720 --> 0:30:25.560
<v Speaker 1>it comes to guessing things, your own not well your

0:30:25.560 --> 0:30:28.280
<v Speaker 1>past experiences certainly influence it, but your own how you

0:30:28.320 --> 0:30:32.800
<v Speaker 1>are also influences, like oh yeah, like I think a

0:30:32.840 --> 0:30:35.320
<v Speaker 1>liar is more apt to think people are lying to

0:30:35.400 --> 0:30:39.520
<v Speaker 1>them precisely. Yeah, no, that's absolutely I agree. I was

0:30:39.520 --> 0:30:42.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna say that's absolutely true, but I agree with you. Yeah,

0:30:42.440 --> 0:30:44.800
<v Speaker 1>because who knows. It's just a theory, right, but I

0:30:44.800 --> 0:30:48.240
<v Speaker 1>mean it's it's based it's based on some pretty ancient

0:30:48.280 --> 0:30:51.360
<v Speaker 1>folk wisdom, like that whole thing about how um you know,

0:30:51.360 --> 0:30:54.000
<v Speaker 1>when you're pointing a finger at somebody three fingers pointing

0:30:54.000 --> 0:30:58.000
<v Speaker 1>at you, or judge not lest you be judged. Like

0:30:58.040 --> 0:31:01.560
<v Speaker 1>when you think about people in that way, you think

0:31:01.600 --> 0:31:03.320
<v Speaker 1>that they're doing the same thing to you, even when

0:31:03.320 --> 0:31:07.200
<v Speaker 1>they're not. It's your own, um hilarious little personal hell yeah,

0:31:07.240 --> 0:31:09.280
<v Speaker 1>and it's not always that, Like, you know, I think

0:31:09.320 --> 0:31:12.280
<v Speaker 1>that dude's ripping me off. Maybe you've been ripped off

0:31:12.320 --> 0:31:15.080
<v Speaker 1>before and that's where that's coming from. Or maybe you've

0:31:15.160 --> 0:31:17.880
<v Speaker 1>ripped someone off before, but about one of the two

0:31:17.920 --> 0:31:20.560
<v Speaker 1>has happened, I think, though. What more, what you're what

0:31:20.640 --> 0:31:24.520
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about is are like core core character traits though,

0:31:24.600 --> 0:31:29.240
<v Speaker 1>like judge, being judgmental or being a liar, or um,

0:31:29.600 --> 0:31:32.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, being a b S or something like that,

0:31:32.520 --> 0:31:35.640
<v Speaker 1>like when when you do notice that, though, what's great

0:31:35.720 --> 0:31:38.840
<v Speaker 1>is there's so much room for growth when you when

0:31:38.840 --> 0:31:40.680
<v Speaker 1>you realize that that, like, wait a minute, I think

0:31:40.680 --> 0:31:43.720
<v Speaker 1>everybody's judging me because I'm so judgmental. I need to

0:31:43.800 --> 0:31:47.360
<v Speaker 1>work on being judgmental. What's what's almost magical is that

0:31:47.400 --> 0:31:50.400
<v Speaker 1>when you when you realize that and you work on

0:31:50.560 --> 0:31:53.560
<v Speaker 1>not being judgmental, you stop thinking that other people are

0:31:53.640 --> 0:31:57.239
<v Speaker 1>judging you, and your life is just freer. Well, there

0:31:57.240 --> 0:32:01.080
<v Speaker 1>are these uh psychologists um and all over this article

0:32:01.280 --> 0:32:06.160
<v Speaker 1>that uh Aaliyah just rocked my world with that wrote,

0:32:06.240 --> 0:32:09.520
<v Speaker 1>and one of them was talking about these interpretations without evidence,

0:32:10.200 --> 0:32:13.720
<v Speaker 1>and her advice, which is very simple and it seems

0:32:13.720 --> 0:32:15.560
<v Speaker 1>like a no brainer though, is to like maybe just

0:32:15.600 --> 0:32:18.360
<v Speaker 1>focus on things you know to be true and not

0:32:18.560 --> 0:32:21.400
<v Speaker 1>inventing and surmising, like well what if what if they're

0:32:21.400 --> 0:32:23.479
<v Speaker 1>talking about this and you know you're you're just kind

0:32:23.520 --> 0:32:26.440
<v Speaker 1>of inventing all that. Like if you concentrate on what

0:32:26.520 --> 0:32:29.880
<v Speaker 1>you know to be true, then life gets a lot simpler, right,

0:32:29.920 --> 0:32:33.000
<v Speaker 1>But that that same shrink also pointed out that one

0:32:33.000 --> 0:32:36.960
<v Speaker 1>of the big problems with guessing and especially guessing incorrectly.

0:32:37.400 --> 0:32:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Is that, Um, we tend to forget that we're guessing

0:32:41.200 --> 0:32:44.160
<v Speaker 1>at stuff. We take our own guesses as as fact,

0:32:44.960 --> 0:32:49.200
<v Speaker 1>and since they can be so horribly wrong. Um, if

0:32:49.240 --> 0:32:51.719
<v Speaker 1>you if you're guessing that other people are judging you

0:32:51.760 --> 0:32:55.560
<v Speaker 1>even when they're not, Uh, you're gonna basically walk around

0:32:55.600 --> 0:32:58.080
<v Speaker 1>feeling judged all the time because you think that that's

0:32:58.120 --> 0:33:02.040
<v Speaker 1>absolutely accurate when it's when it's not necessarily fascinating. All right,

0:33:02.080 --> 0:33:03.760
<v Speaker 1>you want to take a break. I was just gonna

0:33:03.800 --> 0:33:05.920
<v Speaker 1>say the same thing. All right, Well, we'll take a

0:33:05.960 --> 0:33:08.080
<v Speaker 1>break and we're gonna come back talk a little bit

0:33:08.240 --> 0:33:11.720
<v Speaker 1>about guessing on tests, how to win it rock, paper

0:33:11.760 --> 0:33:39.200
<v Speaker 1>scissors and apes and guessing. M h all right, So

0:33:40.040 --> 0:33:43.280
<v Speaker 1>we we've talked in esoteric terms about guessing so far.

0:33:44.280 --> 0:33:47.040
<v Speaker 1>But I think what everyone really wants to know is

0:33:47.800 --> 0:33:51.640
<v Speaker 1>how do I pass a multiple choice test? Right, because

0:33:51.680 --> 0:33:54.400
<v Speaker 1>that's another kind of guessing. Um, it's you know, guessing

0:33:54.520 --> 0:33:57.920
<v Speaker 1>runs the gamut, uh, from emotional to stuff like this.

0:33:58.360 --> 0:34:01.800
<v Speaker 1>There have been different theory over the years, Like well,

0:34:01.960 --> 0:34:04.200
<v Speaker 1>first of all, back in the day and I guess

0:34:04.280 --> 0:34:07.440
<v Speaker 1>until semi recently, for like the S A T and

0:34:07.480 --> 0:34:09.400
<v Speaker 1>A C T and other standardized tests. You would be

0:34:09.760 --> 0:34:15.680
<v Speaker 1>penalized for an incorrect guest. I don't remember that, do you. Yeah, yeah,

0:34:15.760 --> 0:34:18.600
<v Speaker 1>well you gets something wrong. It's like a quarter point deduction.

0:34:18.680 --> 0:34:21.120
<v Speaker 1>I think was the deal. Oh it sounds familiar. I

0:34:21.160 --> 0:34:23.839
<v Speaker 1>think I may have blocked it out. But they don't

0:34:23.880 --> 0:34:26.000
<v Speaker 1>do that anymore. So now they say guest guest guests

0:34:26.040 --> 0:34:29.000
<v Speaker 1>if you don't know the answer, um, and you know

0:34:29.200 --> 0:34:31.959
<v Speaker 1>they're there. That has run the gamut from always guests

0:34:32.000 --> 0:34:35.160
<v Speaker 1>C because it's in the middle to uh, this one person.

0:34:35.320 --> 0:34:37.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't necessarily agree with this one, but they say,

0:34:38.080 --> 0:34:41.040
<v Speaker 1>just choose the same letter every time, like always guests B,

0:34:41.960 --> 0:34:44.560
<v Speaker 1>and you're gonna be right one out of every five

0:34:44.680 --> 0:34:47.359
<v Speaker 1>times if it's A B, C, D right. Which makes

0:34:47.400 --> 0:34:49.640
<v Speaker 1>sense though, I mean, because if you jump around, you

0:34:49.760 --> 0:34:52.200
<v Speaker 1>lessen your chances every time, whereas if you use the

0:34:52.280 --> 0:34:54.480
<v Speaker 1>same one, you have the same chances of getting it

0:34:54.600 --> 0:34:59.239
<v Speaker 1>right every time. Um. But this guy wrote a he

0:34:59.320 --> 0:35:05.759
<v Speaker 1>actually did a little studying. Um, PAULA. Pound Stone. That

0:35:05.920 --> 0:35:08.880
<v Speaker 1>wasn't his name, was it. It was William pound Stone,

0:35:09.000 --> 0:35:14.440
<v Speaker 1>her brother. Yeah, and he did actual research on He

0:35:14.560 --> 0:35:19.040
<v Speaker 1>studied tests and did a statistical analysis of one hundred

0:35:19.080 --> 0:35:24.440
<v Speaker 1>different tests, ranging from middle school, high school, college, professional exams,

0:35:24.520 --> 0:35:28.880
<v Speaker 1>driver's tests, firefighters, radio operators. He studied all kinds of

0:35:29.000 --> 0:35:33.640
<v Speaker 1>tests and he has four what he calls four ways

0:35:33.760 --> 0:35:36.000
<v Speaker 1>outsmart to multiple choice tests, and a couple of these

0:35:36.040 --> 0:35:38.680
<v Speaker 1>make a lot of sense to me. The first one,

0:35:38.760 --> 0:35:42.399
<v Speaker 1>he said, is to ignore conventional wisdom because you kind

0:35:42.440 --> 0:35:46.480
<v Speaker 1>of always have heard teachers say like avoid answers that

0:35:46.640 --> 0:35:49.320
<v Speaker 1>say never, always or none, so like all of the

0:35:49.360 --> 0:35:51.520
<v Speaker 1>above or none of the above, don't choose those, And

0:35:51.600 --> 0:35:54.520
<v Speaker 1>he found the opposite to be true. Yeah, he found

0:35:54.560 --> 0:35:56.480
<v Speaker 1>that none of the above are all of the above

0:35:56.520 --> 0:36:00.720
<v Speaker 1>are correct of the time. Yeah. So if that's offered

0:36:00.760 --> 0:36:03.399
<v Speaker 1>up as an option and you have, first of all,

0:36:03.520 --> 0:36:08.520
<v Speaker 1>we should couch this with always try and you know,

0:36:09.080 --> 0:36:13.120
<v Speaker 1>deduce the answer with intelligence, well yeah, pound Stone says,

0:36:13.160 --> 0:36:16.720
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing. None of this is meant to replace knowledge

0:36:16.760 --> 0:36:19.040
<v Speaker 1>of your subject, and you get knowledge of your subject

0:36:19.080 --> 0:36:21.759
<v Speaker 1>by studying ahead of time. But he's saying, if you're

0:36:21.800 --> 0:36:24.520
<v Speaker 1>facing a question on a multiple choice test and you

0:36:24.719 --> 0:36:29.080
<v Speaker 1>have no idea what the answer is, there's some techniques

0:36:29.080 --> 0:36:31.920
<v Speaker 1>you can choose to to to increase the likelihood that

0:36:32.000 --> 0:36:34.520
<v Speaker 1>your guests will be right. Right, So all the above

0:36:34.600 --> 0:36:36.120
<v Speaker 1>or none of the above. If you really have no

0:36:36.239 --> 0:36:39.719
<v Speaker 1>idea about that, I would I would say pick that one. Um.

0:36:39.960 --> 0:36:43.319
<v Speaker 1>That's weird though, because later on he says he says

0:36:43.360 --> 0:36:46.080
<v Speaker 1>so first he says, ignore conventional wisdom, but then later

0:36:46.200 --> 0:36:49.200
<v Speaker 1>on the one piece of conventional wisdom I've always heard,

0:36:49.760 --> 0:36:53.160
<v Speaker 1>um he says, is actually true. That is that you

0:36:53.200 --> 0:36:57.239
<v Speaker 1>want to choose the longest answer on any multiple choice test, right,

0:36:57.920 --> 0:37:02.080
<v Speaker 1>because if if you are saying something's true, most of

0:37:02.120 --> 0:37:05.920
<v Speaker 1>the time you have to add qualifying language to make

0:37:05.960 --> 0:37:09.120
<v Speaker 1>it absolutely true, because you don't want somebody come back

0:37:09.120 --> 0:37:11.440
<v Speaker 1>and be like, well, that's actually not quite true. So

0:37:11.560 --> 0:37:14.719
<v Speaker 1>when you start adding qualifying language into an answer, it

0:37:14.880 --> 0:37:17.839
<v Speaker 1>gets longer than the other ones, and the the test

0:37:17.920 --> 0:37:20.400
<v Speaker 1>writers probably not going to go to the trouble of

0:37:20.760 --> 0:37:25.800
<v Speaker 1>making the wrong answers similarly long. So the longest answer

0:37:25.920 --> 0:37:28.840
<v Speaker 1>is very frequently the correct answer. Yeah, I thought that

0:37:28.880 --> 0:37:30.960
<v Speaker 1>one was a really good piece of advice. That's the

0:37:31.040 --> 0:37:33.799
<v Speaker 1>one I always heard. That's really the only one I've

0:37:33.840 --> 0:37:39.239
<v Speaker 1>ever known. Did you remember scantron sheets? Did you ever

0:37:39.480 --> 0:37:44.120
<v Speaker 1>were you ever so recklessly wild that you like made

0:37:44.160 --> 0:37:47.680
<v Speaker 1>a Christmas tree out of a test? Did you ever

0:37:47.760 --> 0:37:50.839
<v Speaker 1>have the gall to do that. Oh, I think never

0:37:50.920 --> 0:37:53.360
<v Speaker 1>did bad because there are kids that listen to this.

0:37:54.160 --> 0:37:55.719
<v Speaker 1>But I had to take a test one time that

0:37:55.880 --> 0:37:58.000
<v Speaker 1>was not for school, but it was something I didn't

0:37:58.000 --> 0:38:01.719
<v Speaker 1>want to do. I won't into the details, but I

0:38:01.880 --> 0:38:07.120
<v Speaker 1>made a big snake and it was bad and I

0:38:07.239 --> 0:38:09.000
<v Speaker 1>looked back and I'm ashamed of it. I made a

0:38:09.040 --> 0:38:13.000
<v Speaker 1>mockery of their process. Uh. And I wasn't that kind

0:38:13.040 --> 0:38:15.240
<v Speaker 1>of kid. I don't know what happened. I was generally

0:38:15.280 --> 0:38:17.640
<v Speaker 1>a good kid and a good student. I'm surprised to

0:38:17.680 --> 0:38:20.239
<v Speaker 1>hear this, I know, but it sticks. It's I feel

0:38:20.280 --> 0:38:22.319
<v Speaker 1>so bad. It still really stands out in my mind.

0:38:23.000 --> 0:38:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Is what what a jerk move that was on my part.

0:38:25.600 --> 0:38:28.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm not only surprised, though, Chuck, I'm a little delighted

0:38:30.040 --> 0:38:35.000
<v Speaker 1>outed myself. Um alright, So one of the other pieces

0:38:35.040 --> 0:38:39.680
<v Speaker 1>of advice from Dr pound Stone doctor he's no doctor.

0:38:40.600 --> 0:38:42.960
<v Speaker 1>He did write a book, though, It's called Rock Breaks

0:38:43.080 --> 0:38:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Scissors Colon. Why does everything have to have a colon?

0:38:46.239 --> 0:38:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Now makes it smarter? Rock Breaks Scissors Colin a practical

0:38:50.880 --> 0:38:54.520
<v Speaker 1>guide outguessing and outwitting almost everybody. One of his other

0:38:54.560 --> 0:38:56.640
<v Speaker 1>ones is to look at the surrounding answers because he's

0:38:56.640 --> 0:39:01.400
<v Speaker 1>found that the correct answer choices are rarely repeated consecutively,

0:39:01.800 --> 0:39:03.960
<v Speaker 1>so you rarely get two b's in a row as

0:39:04.040 --> 0:39:07.200
<v Speaker 1>the answer. So if you definitely know the answer in

0:39:07.280 --> 0:39:09.640
<v Speaker 1>front of it and the answer behind it, then it's

0:39:09.680 --> 0:39:11.719
<v Speaker 1>probably not one of those two. So if you you've

0:39:11.760 --> 0:39:16.400
<v Speaker 1>just whittled down your options, yep, not good advice. No,

0:39:16.600 --> 0:39:20.920
<v Speaker 1>not not that at all. Um. And the last one

0:39:20.960 --> 0:39:24.040
<v Speaker 1>he's got eliminate the outliers. If there's anything that that

0:39:24.239 --> 0:39:27.279
<v Speaker 1>seems like it doesn't really fit with the rest of

0:39:27.360 --> 0:39:30.160
<v Speaker 1>the stuff, you can automatically get rid of that. And

0:39:30.239 --> 0:39:33.600
<v Speaker 1>then conversely, if there's anything if there are two answers

0:39:33.640 --> 0:39:38.160
<v Speaker 1>that seem extremely close, they probably can be gotten rid

0:39:38.200 --> 0:39:41.279
<v Speaker 1>of as well, because it's the same thing basically. So

0:39:41.440 --> 0:39:47.239
<v Speaker 1>if you have say five, five potential answers, and one

0:39:47.280 --> 0:39:49.120
<v Speaker 1>of them doesn't fit with the other four, get rid

0:39:49.160 --> 0:39:50.759
<v Speaker 1>of that. Two of them are similar, get rid of

0:39:50.800 --> 0:39:53.399
<v Speaker 1>those two. You're down to two. You got a chance

0:39:53.440 --> 0:39:55.719
<v Speaker 1>of getting at right. Yeah. I thought the example they

0:39:55.800 --> 0:39:57.839
<v Speaker 1>used in here was pretty fascinating because they didn't even

0:39:57.960 --> 0:40:01.520
<v Speaker 1>use the question or give the question shton on This

0:40:01.719 --> 0:40:03.840
<v Speaker 1>s a t practice test they just give the answer

0:40:04.719 --> 0:40:09.520
<v Speaker 1>for A, B, C, d um haphazard, uh is two radical,

0:40:10.080 --> 0:40:14.040
<v Speaker 1>inherent is, the controversial, improvises to startling, methodical is the revolutionary,

0:40:14.480 --> 0:40:17.440
<v Speaker 1>derivative is to gradual. And if you just look at

0:40:17.440 --> 0:40:21.959
<v Speaker 1>the right hand side, you have radical, controversial, startling, revolutionary,

0:40:22.040 --> 0:40:25.920
<v Speaker 1>and gradual, And obviously gradual stands out is just being

0:40:26.000 --> 0:40:30.719
<v Speaker 1>different than those other words. Radical, controversial, startling, revolutionary, gradual

0:40:31.040 --> 0:40:33.640
<v Speaker 1>doesn't makes sense, right, So that makes I mean, that's

0:40:33.680 --> 0:40:35.960
<v Speaker 1>really a good piece of advice. And then if you

0:40:36.040 --> 0:40:38.480
<v Speaker 1>look on the left hand side for A and C,

0:40:38.719 --> 0:40:42.600
<v Speaker 1>haphazard and improvised are really close. So he says you

0:40:42.640 --> 0:40:46.320
<v Speaker 1>should eliminate those two as well. Yea, I wish I

0:40:46.360 --> 0:40:48.440
<v Speaker 1>would have had this kind of advice for the S

0:40:48.520 --> 0:40:50.680
<v Speaker 1>A T. Well, I'll tell you what. That's an actual

0:40:50.880 --> 0:40:53.239
<v Speaker 1>S A T set of answers. So if you ever

0:40:53.719 --> 0:40:59.959
<v Speaker 1>run into haphazard, radical, inherent, controversial, improvised, startling, methodical, revolutionary,

0:41:00.360 --> 0:41:05.000
<v Speaker 1>and derivative gradual, you want to go with the methodical, revolutionary,

0:41:05.160 --> 0:41:08.520
<v Speaker 1>And we just got you into college, you ever wanted

0:41:08.560 --> 0:41:13.400
<v Speaker 1>to take the S A T again, Like, now, no, no,

0:41:13.640 --> 0:41:17.200
<v Speaker 1>that's funny, I really don't. I've never wanted to. I was.

0:41:17.360 --> 0:41:19.839
<v Speaker 1>I've been glad since the moment I finished that test

0:41:19.880 --> 0:41:22.239
<v Speaker 1>that I was done. I only took it twice. I

0:41:22.320 --> 0:41:24.960
<v Speaker 1>took it once and I was like, good enough. Yeah,

0:41:24.960 --> 0:41:27.279
<v Speaker 1>I took it twice. I did not score very well

0:41:27.360 --> 0:41:31.399
<v Speaker 1>the first time, and I scored pretty well the second time,

0:41:32.120 --> 0:41:33.480
<v Speaker 1>and I was like, I don't want to know which

0:41:33.520 --> 0:41:36.160
<v Speaker 1>one is the real me. I said, So I'm done. Yeah,

0:41:36.200 --> 0:41:38.880
<v Speaker 1>I scored blandly the first time, and I was like,

0:41:39.320 --> 0:41:43.000
<v Speaker 1>that's fine, that's fine, that's fine. I'll get by my

0:41:43.440 --> 0:41:46.399
<v Speaker 1>my wits and real life skills. Look at you. You've

0:41:46.400 --> 0:41:50.120
<v Speaker 1>done great. I've done okay. Um, so you want to

0:41:50.120 --> 0:41:52.440
<v Speaker 1>talk about rock paper scissors a little bit? Yeah, I

0:41:52.520 --> 0:41:55.560
<v Speaker 1>thought this was awesome. Our friends over at Motherboard and

0:41:55.640 --> 0:41:57.120
<v Speaker 1>we can say that because we used to have a

0:41:57.640 --> 0:42:03.040
<v Speaker 1>short lived column on Motherboard from vice Um. They have

0:42:03.360 --> 0:42:07.680
<v Speaker 1>a German outfit called appropriately Motherboard Germany, and they ran

0:42:07.760 --> 0:42:11.399
<v Speaker 1>a post um called win at rock paper Scissors every

0:42:11.520 --> 0:42:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Time with math colon What's with the colon's And they

0:42:17.600 --> 0:42:21.880
<v Speaker 1>basically got into how using game theory, you can win

0:42:22.000 --> 0:42:25.839
<v Speaker 1>at rock paper scissors basically all the time. Yeah they did, uh,

0:42:26.239 --> 0:42:28.000
<v Speaker 1>or they didn't do the research. But they got together

0:42:28.080 --> 0:42:32.160
<v Speaker 1>with some researchers at the University of hang Zoo in China,

0:42:33.080 --> 0:42:37.000
<v Speaker 1>and UM they got three hundred and sixty students to

0:42:38.080 --> 0:42:42.520
<v Speaker 1>pair up and play three hundred rounds each of Rock

0:42:42.600 --> 0:42:48.239
<v Speaker 1>paper scissors, And then they tracked that please please let

0:42:48.360 --> 0:42:51.680
<v Speaker 1>us stop, and they said, no, this is communist China.

0:42:51.880 --> 0:42:55.719
<v Speaker 1>Do it again again. Uh. So they charted all those

0:42:55.800 --> 0:43:00.040
<v Speaker 1>out and then summarized it, uh with some strategies. I

0:43:00.080 --> 0:43:03.360
<v Speaker 1>don't know if this would you would win every time? No,

0:43:04.040 --> 0:43:07.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean there's always like the what they call in

0:43:07.520 --> 0:43:10.959
<v Speaker 1>Rock paper scissors, the October surprise where somebody just pulls

0:43:11.000 --> 0:43:18.319
<v Speaker 1>something out of nowhere. Well, so I mean kidite, right, yeah, yeah,

0:43:18.480 --> 0:43:20.319
<v Speaker 1>those are off shoots. Remember kids that would do those?

0:43:21.960 --> 0:43:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Oh really yeah, some interesting people. Yeah, they would add

0:43:25.680 --> 0:43:31.759
<v Speaker 1>other other weapons basically, well, the the UM this the

0:43:32.360 --> 0:43:36.359
<v Speaker 1>Motherboard article talks about. UM. There's this other guy who

0:43:36.440 --> 0:43:39.480
<v Speaker 1>came up with UM a whole different variation of it.

0:43:39.880 --> 0:43:45.320
<v Speaker 1>That's like or twenty six different different possible ones. I

0:43:45.360 --> 0:43:47.800
<v Speaker 1>would never remember all of them, No, how could you?

0:43:48.239 --> 0:43:52.120
<v Speaker 1>But at least one guy does. No one can remember things, right,

0:43:53.160 --> 0:43:55.560
<v Speaker 1>but so so okay, there's a few things and this

0:43:55.760 --> 0:43:58.919
<v Speaker 1>this falls in line with learning how to get better

0:43:59.000 --> 0:44:01.839
<v Speaker 1>at guessing, um, how many jelly beans are in a jar.

0:44:02.320 --> 0:44:04.920
<v Speaker 1>If you arm yourself with a little bit of fore knowledge,

0:44:05.239 --> 0:44:08.399
<v Speaker 1>you can better guess at what your opponent's gonna come

0:44:08.400 --> 0:44:10.320
<v Speaker 1>at you with. In a game of rock paper scissors.

0:44:10.719 --> 0:44:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Starting with that, men tend to open a game with rock.

0:44:14.880 --> 0:44:17.719
<v Speaker 1>Of course they do. Yeah, that's such a man thing,

0:44:18.239 --> 0:44:22.279
<v Speaker 1>rock smash, you know, right, So if you're if your

0:44:22.400 --> 0:44:27.000
<v Speaker 1>opponent as a man, um, and there's pretty good chance

0:44:27.000 --> 0:44:30.759
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna come out with rock the first time, go paper. Yeah,

0:44:30.800 --> 0:44:34.600
<v Speaker 1>although they do say statistically the opening uh scissors is

0:44:35.160 --> 0:44:37.560
<v Speaker 1>the one that will win you the most games. But

0:44:37.760 --> 0:44:42.000
<v Speaker 1>I guess that's if you're not playing a man. They

0:44:42.080 --> 0:44:46.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of counteract themselves or contradict themselves statistically. More women

0:44:46.080 --> 0:44:49.960
<v Speaker 1>play rock paper scissors. I guess here's one I thought

0:44:50.080 --> 0:44:52.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't think, so here's one. I've been making a

0:44:52.400 --> 0:44:56.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of this stuff up in this episode. Um, here's

0:44:56.600 --> 0:44:58.680
<v Speaker 1>here's one that I thought was kind of funny. Basically,

0:44:58.920 --> 0:45:02.080
<v Speaker 1>this is like the baby ru move, say what you're

0:45:02.080 --> 0:45:05.719
<v Speaker 1>going to pick before the game, like I'm gonna pick

0:45:05.760 --> 0:45:08.560
<v Speaker 1>scissors next, and then the persons like, they're not gonna

0:45:08.600 --> 0:45:10.640
<v Speaker 1>pick scissors, but you just psyched them out. And when

0:45:10.680 --> 0:45:13.680
<v Speaker 1>you throw scissors, baby, they're gonna be blown away because

0:45:13.719 --> 0:45:15.879
<v Speaker 1>they threw paper and they thought you were gonna throw

0:45:15.880 --> 0:45:19.719
<v Speaker 1>a rock. It's like that the Princess Bride. And what

0:45:19.880 --> 0:45:22.920
<v Speaker 1>part was that with the man sitting at the place

0:45:23.719 --> 0:45:27.320
<v Speaker 1>talking about the poison drink? Oh yeah, yeah, remember like

0:45:27.760 --> 0:45:29.319
<v Speaker 1>trying to get the other guy to drink the poison

0:45:29.400 --> 0:45:38.400
<v Speaker 1>drinksh yeah, he was awesome. H inconceivable? What is another strategy?

0:45:38.640 --> 0:45:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Um to counter attacks? So if you played scissors and

0:45:42.320 --> 0:45:45.880
<v Speaker 1>your opponent plays rock on the first move, uh, and

0:45:46.000 --> 0:45:49.000
<v Speaker 1>they win, obviously the chance that they h they have

0:45:49.120 --> 0:45:51.640
<v Speaker 1>confidence now in that move, so you might be able

0:45:51.680 --> 0:45:54.680
<v Speaker 1>to guess that they will play rock again because the

0:45:54.760 --> 0:45:56.960
<v Speaker 1>chances are pretty high that they will do. So then

0:45:57.000 --> 0:46:00.520
<v Speaker 1>you anticipate that play paper. So basically it says play

0:46:00.560 --> 0:46:03.080
<v Speaker 1>the option that wasn't played in the previous round, right,

0:46:03.160 --> 0:46:07.160
<v Speaker 1>And you can also mirror um your opponent. Right, So

0:46:07.440 --> 0:46:11.840
<v Speaker 1>if you just want around, play what your opponent just played,

0:46:11.920 --> 0:46:15.399
<v Speaker 1>because they probably are thinking that you're going to play

0:46:15.480 --> 0:46:18.359
<v Speaker 1>with the same gesture that you won with a second ago.

0:46:18.920 --> 0:46:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Really throws them off. So the idea is they're probably

0:46:22.120 --> 0:46:24.040
<v Speaker 1>going to play the same thing that they just won

0:46:24.160 --> 0:46:28.120
<v Speaker 1>with and if you one don't do that, and that

0:46:28.160 --> 0:46:30.879
<v Speaker 1>will frustrate them too. That's the rock paper scissors version

0:46:30.960 --> 0:46:35.839
<v Speaker 1>of why you're hitting yourself. You get into that thing

0:46:35.920 --> 0:46:38.560
<v Speaker 1>when you're you both throw rock, and you throw rock again,

0:46:38.600 --> 0:46:40.799
<v Speaker 1>you both throw a rock and you keep That's when

0:46:40.840 --> 0:46:44.920
<v Speaker 1>the psychological warfare starts, like who's gonna break first and

0:46:45.040 --> 0:46:48.719
<v Speaker 1>go with paper and then ideally you go with scissors

0:46:49.560 --> 0:46:53.520
<v Speaker 1>and you have thus outsmarted your opponent. Right, So interesting,

0:46:54.680 --> 0:46:58.880
<v Speaker 1>So we were talking um, you mentioned that we were

0:46:58.880 --> 0:47:01.120
<v Speaker 1>going to talk about apes, right, Yeah, I didn't fully

0:47:01.200 --> 0:47:04.879
<v Speaker 1>understand this, so maybe you can help me. I don't

0:47:04.920 --> 0:47:10.360
<v Speaker 1>know that, um, that science fully understands it, but basically so,

0:47:10.760 --> 0:47:12.800
<v Speaker 1>so let me give you an example here. Okay, we

0:47:12.920 --> 0:47:15.319
<v Speaker 1>were talking about how the brain. They're trying to figure

0:47:15.360 --> 0:47:18.560
<v Speaker 1>out what regions of the brain are activated to form

0:47:18.640 --> 0:47:21.600
<v Speaker 1>like this cascade of thought that results in a guess. Right.

0:47:22.520 --> 0:47:25.920
<v Speaker 1>One of the things I ran across was one theory

0:47:26.080 --> 0:47:29.880
<v Speaker 1>of how we guess what other people are going to do, UM,

0:47:31.000 --> 0:47:34.799
<v Speaker 1>is through mirror neurons, where if we see somebody doing

0:47:34.920 --> 0:47:38.000
<v Speaker 1>something our mirror neurons are activated, and it puts us

0:47:38.040 --> 0:47:40.680
<v Speaker 1>in a mind of how we feel when we're doing something,

0:47:41.200 --> 0:47:46.160
<v Speaker 1>and we use that past experience and that current sensation

0:47:46.360 --> 0:47:49.560
<v Speaker 1>of like the example I ran across with somebody grabbing

0:47:49.600 --> 0:47:52.080
<v Speaker 1>an apple, to guess what the person is going to

0:47:52.200 --> 0:47:55.960
<v Speaker 1>do next. Right, So you would say, um, well, I

0:47:56.040 --> 0:47:58.239
<v Speaker 1>know most times when I grab an apple, I take

0:47:58.280 --> 0:48:00.160
<v Speaker 1>a bite out of it because I'm usually hung. Agree

0:48:00.200 --> 0:48:02.080
<v Speaker 1>when I grab an apple, that's after I rub it

0:48:02.160 --> 0:48:04.399
<v Speaker 1>on my shirt to give it a nice shine. Right, Well,

0:48:04.440 --> 0:48:07.120
<v Speaker 1>that's that's just showboating. If you're gonna if you guess

0:48:07.200 --> 0:48:08.640
<v Speaker 1>the person is going to rub it on their shirt

0:48:08.680 --> 0:48:11.960
<v Speaker 1>first before taking a bite, that's showing off. But that's

0:48:12.040 --> 0:48:14.160
<v Speaker 1>so your mirror neurons are the part of your brain

0:48:14.239 --> 0:48:17.880
<v Speaker 1>that's triggered that that um that that sets that off, right,

0:48:17.960 --> 0:48:21.040
<v Speaker 1>that gives you that the basis the foundation for making

0:48:21.120 --> 0:48:22.839
<v Speaker 1>a guess of what the person is going to do next.

0:48:23.440 --> 0:48:27.520
<v Speaker 1>And then it gets run through again that lens of

0:48:27.680 --> 0:48:31.080
<v Speaker 1>your past experience, your history, everything from how you were

0:48:31.200 --> 0:48:33.640
<v Speaker 1>raised to what you do with apples, to what you've

0:48:33.640 --> 0:48:36.040
<v Speaker 1>seen other people do with apples, and you come up

0:48:36.080 --> 0:48:40.800
<v Speaker 1>with a short list of possibilities of what the person

0:48:40.920 --> 0:48:43.200
<v Speaker 1>is going to do with that apple, and it includes

0:48:43.480 --> 0:48:46.600
<v Speaker 1>rubbing out on their shirt, taking a bite, putting it

0:48:46.640 --> 0:48:49.800
<v Speaker 1>away in a cupboard, throwing it at a wall. And

0:48:49.920 --> 0:48:52.480
<v Speaker 1>then you're going to pare down based on what you

0:48:52.640 --> 0:48:55.360
<v Speaker 1>know about that person, like is that person a neat freak?

0:48:55.480 --> 0:48:58.480
<v Speaker 1>If so, they're probably going to put that apple away

0:48:58.520 --> 0:49:02.120
<v Speaker 1>in a cupboard, which who as that except for neat freaks,

0:49:02.400 --> 0:49:05.560
<v Speaker 1>And you may be right at at your guess, right, well,

0:49:05.600 --> 0:49:10.919
<v Speaker 1>they're definitely not wall throwers at least right right, because yeah,

0:49:11.360 --> 0:49:14.600
<v Speaker 1>so if and that's that's how you that's how Apparently

0:49:14.680 --> 0:49:17.160
<v Speaker 1>that's one theory for how we make guesses, starting from

0:49:17.200 --> 0:49:20.280
<v Speaker 1>brain based, going through personal history and then making the guests.

0:49:20.640 --> 0:49:25.080
<v Speaker 1>And what some research found was that ultimately what we're

0:49:25.120 --> 0:49:28.840
<v Speaker 1>doing here is called theory of mind, right where we

0:49:29.120 --> 0:49:34.239
<v Speaker 1>are have a capability of bestowing the idea that other

0:49:34.360 --> 0:49:38.080
<v Speaker 1>people have thoughts and feelings on other people, right that

0:49:38.360 --> 0:49:41.160
<v Speaker 1>we it's so common to us that we take it

0:49:41.239 --> 0:49:44.760
<v Speaker 1>for granted that we can attribute mental states to other people.

0:49:45.840 --> 0:49:48.520
<v Speaker 1>But that's that's a pretty significant thing. And for a

0:49:48.640 --> 0:49:51.680
<v Speaker 1>very long time, researchers thought that just humans were capable

0:49:51.800 --> 0:49:54.960
<v Speaker 1>of of that. But they found out that no, actually

0:49:55.120 --> 0:49:58.600
<v Speaker 1>some apes, at the very least just apes UM can

0:49:58.800 --> 0:50:01.360
<v Speaker 1>do the same thing. They can attribute mental states like

0:50:01.520 --> 0:50:05.880
<v Speaker 1>thoughts and feelings and emotions to other apes. UM. And

0:50:07.000 --> 0:50:10.360
<v Speaker 1>that's that shows like a higher form of reasoning. That

0:50:10.520 --> 0:50:12.840
<v Speaker 1>was basically the gist of it. That makes sense, And

0:50:12.920 --> 0:50:17.000
<v Speaker 1>they found that true in chimpanzees, Benobo's and orangutans. H.

0:50:17.640 --> 0:50:20.480
<v Speaker 1>That's pretty neat, it is. And one of them, so

0:50:21.920 --> 0:50:27.360
<v Speaker 1>sa Um. Sasha Baron Cohen, his cousin, Simon Baron Cohen,

0:50:28.480 --> 0:50:32.839
<v Speaker 1>is one of the leaders in UM in theory of mind. Yeah,

0:50:33.080 --> 0:50:36.000
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about him before, I remember, but UM. One

0:50:36.080 --> 0:50:38.000
<v Speaker 1>of the one of the big areas that it like

0:50:38.239 --> 0:50:43.120
<v Speaker 1>influences is autism. UM that that people with autism tend

0:50:43.239 --> 0:50:47.360
<v Speaker 1>to have more difficulty attributing mental states and theory of

0:50:47.480 --> 0:50:51.839
<v Speaker 1>mind to other people than people who don't have autism. Right,

0:50:53.120 --> 0:50:54.640
<v Speaker 1>And but one of the one of the ways that

0:50:54.760 --> 0:50:56.279
<v Speaker 1>they find this out, and I think one of the

0:50:56.280 --> 0:50:59.160
<v Speaker 1>ways that they detect autism and young kids is by

0:50:59.239 --> 0:51:02.040
<v Speaker 1>attributing also beliefs to other people. This is like an

0:51:02.080 --> 0:51:05.160
<v Speaker 1>early part of human development. And apparently apes are good

0:51:05.200 --> 0:51:09.040
<v Speaker 1>at it too. Where you are an observer, right, and

0:51:09.239 --> 0:51:13.600
<v Speaker 1>you're watching a scene and there's a little boy named Tommy,

0:51:13.920 --> 0:51:15.759
<v Speaker 1>and Tommy comes in the room and he grabs the

0:51:15.840 --> 0:51:18.960
<v Speaker 1>three Musketeers off of the kitchen counter, and he walks

0:51:19.040 --> 0:51:21.640
<v Speaker 1>over to a chest of drawers and he puts it

0:51:21.680 --> 0:51:24.200
<v Speaker 1>in one of the drawers and walks out of the room. Well,

0:51:24.360 --> 0:51:28.319
<v Speaker 1>Sally comes in, and the narrator says, Sally is really

0:51:28.440 --> 0:51:31.520
<v Speaker 1>hungry for three musketeers. She knows it was last on

0:51:31.640 --> 0:51:34.279
<v Speaker 1>the table. Where is she going to look for the

0:51:34.400 --> 0:51:39.160
<v Speaker 1>three musketeers? And people with um with theory of mind,

0:51:39.400 --> 0:51:41.919
<v Speaker 1>who are able to attribute false beliefs to other people,

0:51:41.960 --> 0:51:44.600
<v Speaker 1>will say, well, Sally is gonna go look on the table,

0:51:45.040 --> 0:51:48.319
<v Speaker 1>even though it's not there any longer. Because Tommy put

0:51:48.400 --> 0:51:52.279
<v Speaker 1>it in the drawer. You can know that Sally can

0:51:52.400 --> 0:51:55.600
<v Speaker 1>believe something that's no longer correct. If you have trouble

0:51:55.680 --> 0:51:59.600
<v Speaker 1>with theory of mind, and specifically if you're testing for autism, UM,

0:52:00.320 --> 0:52:03.160
<v Speaker 1>that child, the child with autism might say, well, Sally's

0:52:03.160 --> 0:52:05.239
<v Speaker 1>gonna go look in the drawer because that's where it is.

0:52:05.520 --> 0:52:08.719
<v Speaker 1>They have trouble attributing false beliefs to people. What's true

0:52:08.880 --> 0:52:12.200
<v Speaker 1>is true and everybody would know that. And that's one

0:52:12.239 --> 0:52:14.080
<v Speaker 1>way that they test for autism. And it has to

0:52:14.160 --> 0:52:17.960
<v Speaker 1>do a theory of mine. Interesting, isn't it? And it

0:52:18.200 --> 0:52:20.960
<v Speaker 1>has with it all has to do with guessing. Man,

0:52:21.960 --> 0:52:25.120
<v Speaker 1>you got anything else? Well, just that Tommy should uh

0:52:25.480 --> 0:52:30.440
<v Speaker 1>not be so touchy? Well? Yeah, and like share the

0:52:30.480 --> 0:52:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Three Musketeers. Yeah, do you know? Do you know why

0:52:34.480 --> 0:52:38.280
<v Speaker 1>three Musketeers are called that? I have no idea, my friend.

0:52:38.560 --> 0:52:41.480
<v Speaker 1>It used to be a Neopolitan candy that came in

0:52:41.640 --> 0:52:46.279
<v Speaker 1>three different pieces, chocolate, strawberry, and vanilla, and they just

0:52:46.680 --> 0:52:49.680
<v Speaker 1>went with chocolate after a while and kept the name

0:52:49.680 --> 0:52:54.800
<v Speaker 1>because why not. Yeah. Interesting, Well, let's say it about

0:52:54.840 --> 0:52:58.239
<v Speaker 1>three Musketeers for today, and hey, Chuck, before we go

0:52:58.480 --> 0:53:02.320
<v Speaker 1>to listener mail, I want to give a huge congratulations

0:53:02.400 --> 0:53:06.280
<v Speaker 1>from us to Stephen and Jane, our buddies the Bars,

0:53:06.880 --> 0:53:10.160
<v Speaker 1>on the birth of their first born child. Yeah, how

0:53:10.239 --> 0:53:14.759
<v Speaker 1>about that congratulations you guys? Good looking baby too? Is

0:53:14.800 --> 0:53:19.240
<v Speaker 1>they're not all good looking? No? No, it's true, especially

0:53:19.360 --> 0:53:21.839
<v Speaker 1>like right after birth. And because they're New Yorkers, they

0:53:22.080 --> 0:53:25.360
<v Speaker 1>walked home from the hospital. Like, how great is that?

0:53:25.760 --> 0:53:28.080
<v Speaker 1>They I'm surprised they didn't take the subway but that's

0:53:28.080 --> 0:53:30.319
<v Speaker 1>what you do. It is. They are pretty New York.

0:53:30.400 --> 0:53:34.960
<v Speaker 1>It's awesome, so they congratulations. It's one congratulations Bars. Okay, well,

0:53:35.040 --> 0:53:41.000
<v Speaker 1>since we said congratulations Bars, it's time for a listener mail. Yeah,

0:53:41.080 --> 0:53:43.880
<v Speaker 1>this one was a little long, but it's about registering

0:53:43.920 --> 0:53:47.080
<v Speaker 1>to vote in Texas. We got an email for Monica

0:53:47.280 --> 0:53:50.800
<v Speaker 1>and her story goes as such. Uh, in two thousand thirteen,

0:53:50.800 --> 0:53:53.440
<v Speaker 1>to move from Alabama to Texas at a really horrific time,

0:53:53.480 --> 0:53:55.320
<v Speaker 1>trying to register to vote where I went to the

0:53:55.360 --> 0:53:57.680
<v Speaker 1>county clerk's office. I looked online to check what I needed,

0:53:58.040 --> 0:54:00.120
<v Speaker 1>downloaded the application so I could have a filled out

0:54:00.160 --> 0:54:04.120
<v Speaker 1>in advance. It took my Alabama driver's license, my lease,

0:54:04.560 --> 0:54:07.640
<v Speaker 1>my birth certificate, and because I am divorced, my divorce

0:54:07.800 --> 0:54:11.759
<v Speaker 1>decree stipulating my legal name change. You'd probably think that

0:54:11.760 --> 0:54:15.080
<v Speaker 1>would be else you needed, right right? No. No. Once

0:54:15.120 --> 0:54:16.640
<v Speaker 1>I got there, I was told that the lease was

0:54:16.719 --> 0:54:19.360
<v Speaker 1>not sufficient prove residency and that I would need to

0:54:19.440 --> 0:54:22.799
<v Speaker 1>bring two pieces of official mail, like utility bill, tax bill.

0:54:23.200 --> 0:54:25.120
<v Speaker 1>So I leave after spending the better part of a

0:54:25.200 --> 0:54:28.080
<v Speaker 1>day waiting in line waiting UH for my power and

0:54:28.120 --> 0:54:30.280
<v Speaker 1>gas bill to com in order to add the other documents.

0:54:30.400 --> 0:54:32.360
<v Speaker 1>A couple of weeks later, with all of the documents

0:54:32.400 --> 0:54:34.680
<v Speaker 1>in hand, I took another day off work went back

0:54:34.719 --> 0:54:37.440
<v Speaker 1>to try again. This time, the clerk looks over the

0:54:37.520 --> 0:54:40.600
<v Speaker 1>divorce decree and notices my name change wasn't to go

0:54:40.760 --> 0:54:43.799
<v Speaker 1>back to my maiden name. Uh. This was a name

0:54:43.960 --> 0:54:46.800
<v Speaker 1>change that was ordered by a court in Alabama and

0:54:46.880 --> 0:54:50.200
<v Speaker 1>explicitly spelled out in a notarized document that the clerk

0:54:50.320 --> 0:54:53.000
<v Speaker 1>was disputing its validity. When I asked what the problem was,

0:54:53.080 --> 0:54:55.719
<v Speaker 1>he said, well, that's in Alabama. If you want to

0:54:56.320 --> 0:54:58.320
<v Speaker 1>that to be your official name in Texas, you have

0:54:58.400 --> 0:55:02.959
<v Speaker 1>to go through the courts. Uh, have a a draw

0:55:03.360 --> 0:55:05.760
<v Speaker 1>at noon in the center of town with the judge,

0:55:07.080 --> 0:55:11.279
<v Speaker 1>a shootout. What's that called a quick draw? Now? He said,

0:55:11.320 --> 0:55:12.560
<v Speaker 1>you'll have to go through the courts and have it

0:55:12.640 --> 0:55:16.160
<v Speaker 1>declared here in Texas. After literally blinking at him silently

0:55:16.239 --> 0:55:18.719
<v Speaker 1>with my mouth agape for a moment, I said, you're

0:55:18.760 --> 0:55:20.839
<v Speaker 1>telling me that the divorce in Alabama is a valid

0:55:20.880 --> 0:55:23.440
<v Speaker 1>because it was judicated in Alabama, that I am going

0:55:23.520 --> 0:55:25.239
<v Speaker 1>to have to go through the whole process of getting

0:55:25.640 --> 0:55:27.640
<v Speaker 1>a divorce again for it to be official in Texas.

0:55:27.680 --> 0:55:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Is that correct? His reply was, well, when you put

0:55:29.960 --> 0:55:32.320
<v Speaker 1>it that way, it sounds silly, but yes, so I

0:55:32.400 --> 0:55:35.560
<v Speaker 1>demanded to speak with a supervisor. The clerk got the supervisor,

0:55:35.640 --> 0:55:38.160
<v Speaker 1>who looked over everything and asked why I didn't just

0:55:38.239 --> 0:55:41.279
<v Speaker 1>go back to my maiden name, which I replied, it

0:55:41.360 --> 0:55:44.120
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter what I changed my name to. You have

0:55:44.239 --> 0:55:47.120
<v Speaker 1>the official document, signed by a judge and notarized, and

0:55:47.200 --> 0:55:50.319
<v Speaker 1>this should be all you need because of the Constitution

0:55:50.440 --> 0:55:54.800
<v Speaker 1>of the United States that all judicial rulings and contracts

0:55:54.840 --> 0:55:57.279
<v Speaker 1>that are valid one state are valid in every state.

0:55:57.960 --> 0:56:01.200
<v Speaker 1>At that point, the clerk walked off. This supervisor said okay,

0:56:01.840 --> 0:56:04.680
<v Speaker 1>gave my stuff to another clerk who simply smiled, entered

0:56:04.719 --> 0:56:07.919
<v Speaker 1>my application and took my check uh, pointing me toward

0:56:07.960 --> 0:56:10.200
<v Speaker 1>the desk where I could get my picture taken. Uh.

0:56:10.280 --> 0:56:12.520
<v Speaker 1>And then she closes by saying, imagine how this would

0:56:12.520 --> 0:56:14.839
<v Speaker 1>have gone. I would have been an hourly worker, had

0:56:14.920 --> 0:56:18.080
<v Speaker 1>less of an understanding boss and not known about the

0:56:18.160 --> 0:56:21.280
<v Speaker 1>ins and outs of the Constitution, or didn't have access

0:56:21.320 --> 0:56:23.319
<v Speaker 1>to all these documents. Chances are I would have been

0:56:23.360 --> 0:56:27.400
<v Speaker 1>disenfranchised driving around with an expired license. These laws are

0:56:27.400 --> 0:56:31.440
<v Speaker 1>absolutely created to suppress voter registration and participation and they

0:56:31.480 --> 0:56:38.160
<v Speaker 1>work spectacularly well man. And that is Monica's story. Thanks Monica.

0:56:39.200 --> 0:56:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Uh and welcome to Texas too. By the way. Yeah Um.

0:56:42.920 --> 0:56:45.000
<v Speaker 1>If you want to get in touch with this and

0:56:45.080 --> 0:56:47.719
<v Speaker 1>tell us a real life adventure that has something to

0:56:47.800 --> 0:56:49.880
<v Speaker 1>do with one of our episodes, we want to hear

0:56:49.920 --> 0:56:52.399
<v Speaker 1>about it, you can tweet to us. I'm at josh

0:56:52.520 --> 0:56:55.680
<v Speaker 1>um Clark and at s Y s K podcast on Twitter.

0:56:56.440 --> 0:56:58.439
<v Speaker 1>You can hang out with Chuck at Charles W. Chuck

0:56:58.480 --> 0:57:00.919
<v Speaker 1>Brian on Facebook or at face book dot com slash

0:57:00.960 --> 0:57:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Stuff you Should Know. You can send us an email

0:57:03.239 --> 0:57:05.719
<v Speaker 1>to Stuff Podcast at how stuff Works dot com and

0:57:05.760 --> 0:57:07.480
<v Speaker 1>has always joined us at our home on the web,

0:57:07.800 --> 0:57:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Stuff you Should Know dot com. For more on this

0:57:14.320 --> 0:57:16.800
<v Speaker 1>and thousands of other topics, is it how Stuff Works

0:57:16.840 --> 0:57:17.240
<v Speaker 1>dot com