WEBVTT - IQ Tests are (Kind of) Dumb

0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Ridiculous Histories, a production of iHeartRadio. Welcome back to the show,

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:31.080
<v Speaker 1>fellow Ridiculous Historians. Thank you, as always so much for

0:00:31.200 --> 0:00:34.080
<v Speaker 1>tuning in. Let's hear for the Man, the myth, the legend,

0:00:34.200 --> 0:00:41.559
<v Speaker 1>our super producer, Max Benney Williams not with Benne like

0:00:41.640 --> 0:00:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Jean Benet, similar to do don't have the relationship. Well,

0:00:47.200 --> 0:00:49.600
<v Speaker 1>we've got a h we've got kind of a dark

0:00:49.680 --> 0:00:54.160
<v Speaker 1>turn here. Uh. This episode is following on the heels

0:00:54.320 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 1>of our recent episode. We're quite proud, proud of the title.

0:00:58.400 --> 0:01:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Did lead lead to the fall of the Roman Empire? Right?

0:01:03.160 --> 0:01:10.759
<v Speaker 2>Yes, lead lead, lead lead, you know, maybe probably not spoiler.

0:01:10.400 --> 0:01:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Alert, Yeah, contributed to Maybe you'll have to check out

0:01:14.280 --> 0:01:17.520
<v Speaker 1>the episode, folks. That is none other than the legendary

0:01:17.600 --> 0:01:20.679
<v Speaker 1>mister Noel Brown. Hello, it's you, Ben, Is it you?

0:01:20.800 --> 0:01:23.959
<v Speaker 1>I think it's you. We are all, we are all vast.

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:26.960
<v Speaker 1>We could take multitudes for tax purposes. That call me

0:01:27.080 --> 0:01:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Ben Bullen. He from the United States. We are bro.

0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:32.760
<v Speaker 2>I gotta tell you I made the mistake of briefly

0:01:32.880 --> 0:01:36.399
<v Speaker 2>dating a gen Z person. And she told me when

0:01:36.400 --> 0:01:38.640
<v Speaker 2>I said I contained multitude, said that is such a

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:39.800
<v Speaker 2>millennial thing to say.

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 1>And I was really triggered by this. Has she not

0:01:43.400 --> 0:01:47.040
<v Speaker 1>read Whitman? The relationship did not go well? Unclear.

0:01:48.160 --> 0:01:50.280
<v Speaker 2>My whole thing is I really like there's a Bob

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:54.080
<v Speaker 2>Dylan song called I Contain Multitudes, and obviously the Whitman

0:01:54.200 --> 0:01:56.280
<v Speaker 2>is what he was referencing. But it just felt like

0:01:56.320 --> 0:01:59.200
<v Speaker 2>such a dismissive thing to say. And she's the kind

0:01:59.240 --> 0:02:01.640
<v Speaker 2>of person that would say like Bedrod all the time. So,

0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, potato potato, To each their own. I wish

0:02:05.120 --> 0:02:05.520
<v Speaker 2>her well.

0:02:06.880 --> 0:02:13.799
<v Speaker 1>Dismissive dismissiveness is arguably, depending upon who you read, dismissiveness

0:02:14.000 --> 0:02:21.040
<v Speaker 1>is a sign of insecurity intelligence that do that?

0:02:21.200 --> 0:02:21.239
<v Speaker 3>Do?

0:02:28.200 --> 0:02:28.399
<v Speaker 1>Boy?

0:02:28.440 --> 0:02:31.880
<v Speaker 2>Oh boy, Ben, We're talking about a thing today related

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:35.760
<v Speaker 2>to the Lead Leading with Lead episode in that there

0:02:36.560 --> 0:02:40.320
<v Speaker 2>purports to be a way that our society claims you

0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:45.120
<v Speaker 2>can measure one's intelligence, and it's those two golden letters

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:47.160
<v Speaker 2>that people love throwing around. You know who loves thrown

0:02:47.200 --> 0:02:51.360
<v Speaker 2>around a lot? Are President as a diss low IQ individual?

0:02:52.320 --> 0:02:52.639
<v Speaker 3>Right?

0:02:52.919 --> 0:02:57.919
<v Speaker 2>Right? Uh, he's got some news coming his way, my guy. Well,

0:02:58.000 --> 0:02:59.440
<v Speaker 2>that metric, it turns.

0:02:59.120 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Out not the best. We Actually I got a little

0:03:04.320 --> 0:03:09.640
<v Speaker 1>heated up during our Led Lead Roman Empire Fall episode

0:03:09.960 --> 0:03:12.840
<v Speaker 1>A little hit up, as they would say in Tennessee,

0:03:13.240 --> 0:03:16.720
<v Speaker 1>about the concept of IQ tests, and we had to

0:03:16.840 --> 0:03:20.400
<v Speaker 1>change the title to make this a little bit more

0:03:20.840 --> 0:03:25.160
<v Speaker 1>family friendly. Maybe the best way to begin, folks is

0:03:25.360 --> 0:03:28.760
<v Speaker 1>check out our Roman Empire episode. I think we did

0:03:28.800 --> 0:03:32.240
<v Speaker 1>an all right job, and then answer us this. We'll

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:36.640
<v Speaker 1>do it first on air, fellow ridiculous historians, Noel Max,

0:03:36.800 --> 0:03:40.200
<v Speaker 1>have you guys ever taken an IQ test? No?

0:03:41.000 --> 0:03:46.320
<v Speaker 2>I did recently take one of those Enneagram tests that

0:03:46.480 --> 0:03:48.960
<v Speaker 2>measures you know, your feelings or whatever.

0:03:49.800 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 1>I NFJ.

0:03:53.560 --> 0:03:56.080
<v Speaker 2>I think I hold on, I've actually got a note

0:03:56.080 --> 0:03:59.080
<v Speaker 2>for you here. Oh no, I'm getting the beach ball

0:03:59.120 --> 0:04:01.000
<v Speaker 2>of death on my notes app So we'll come back

0:04:01.000 --> 0:04:04.040
<v Speaker 2>to that. But this was even like a step above

0:04:04.160 --> 0:04:07.000
<v Speaker 2>the regular Enneagram thing called like I think it was

0:04:07.000 --> 0:04:09.800
<v Speaker 2>called Youngian something or other. It was some kind of

0:04:09.840 --> 0:04:13.680
<v Speaker 2>Jungian thing. And it was interesting because it wasn't you know,

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:15.400
<v Speaker 2>it wasn't like taking a test. It was like having

0:04:15.400 --> 0:04:18.160
<v Speaker 2>a conversation, and then the person that was administering it

0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:21.000
<v Speaker 2>was able to make all these notes. If I'm not mistaken, Ben, Yeah,

0:04:21.120 --> 0:04:24.080
<v Speaker 2>the old IQ test is much more of a by

0:04:24.120 --> 0:04:29.200
<v Speaker 2>the numbers, less interpretive kind of you know, bubbling in

0:04:29.279 --> 0:04:31.200
<v Speaker 2>the circles test.

0:04:31.480 --> 0:04:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's a weird thing. Max. Let's hear from you.

0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:36.799
<v Speaker 1>You ever took one of those tests?

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:39.520
<v Speaker 3>But if I did, I can't remember. Maybe it had

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:42.120
<v Speaker 3>that little impact on me that I can't remember it,

0:04:42.160 --> 0:04:43.520
<v Speaker 3>but I can't say I have.

0:04:44.080 --> 0:04:47.000
<v Speaker 1>It makes sense, right what we're saying when we say

0:04:47.960 --> 0:04:52.919
<v Speaker 1>I haven't taken an IQ test. The odds are most

0:04:52.960 --> 0:04:55.240
<v Speaker 1>certainly that you did if you grew up in the

0:04:55.360 --> 0:04:59.520
<v Speaker 1>United States, even if it was not explicitly cold an

0:04:59.560 --> 0:05:03.160
<v Speaker 1>IQ test. We have a lot of capstone things, standardized

0:05:03.200 --> 0:05:06.800
<v Speaker 1>test for every child in school, and if you ever

0:05:07.040 --> 0:05:11.480
<v Speaker 1>aspire to go to college or university, you take something

0:05:11.560 --> 0:05:14.680
<v Speaker 1>that is the kissing cousin of the IQ test. Things

0:05:14.760 --> 0:05:17.680
<v Speaker 1>we call the SAT or the ACT.

0:05:17.920 --> 0:05:20.440
<v Speaker 2>See that's funny, Ben, because when I was thinking about

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:22.600
<v Speaker 2>whether or not I'd taken an IQ test, my mind

0:05:22.640 --> 0:05:24.640
<v Speaker 2>immediately went to Scantron World.

0:05:25.920 --> 0:05:31.279
<v Speaker 1>Yes, wouldn't that be a really boring amusement park? Scadorcantron World.

0:05:32.000 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 1>I maybeet me, but I really want to go because

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:41.520
<v Speaker 1>you get your results at the end of the amusement park.

0:05:41.839 --> 0:05:43.039
<v Speaker 1>What is their roller.

0:05:42.720 --> 0:05:46.120
<v Speaker 2>Coaster looks like sort of the like the nerdy equivalent

0:05:46.240 --> 0:05:48.640
<v Speaker 2>of getting that picture you know where you're making the

0:05:48.680 --> 0:05:51.479
<v Speaker 2>O face when you're on the coaster or et saying

0:05:51.520 --> 0:05:54.560
<v Speaker 2>your name at the end of the et ride at Universal.

0:05:54.880 --> 0:05:56.440
<v Speaker 1>What would the roller coaster be? You know what it

0:05:56.480 --> 0:06:01.240
<v Speaker 1>could be. It could just be roller coaster of emotion.

0:06:01.960 --> 0:06:05.680
<v Speaker 2>Because kids, they're not a huge fan of these high

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 2>stress tests, and we know that. I think we've discussed

0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:12.360
<v Speaker 2>not on this episode, but maybe a conversation you and

0:06:12.400 --> 0:06:14.600
<v Speaker 2>I were having leading up to this episode, and maybe

0:06:14.600 --> 0:06:17.560
<v Speaker 2>a brief mention in the Rome episode about how even

0:06:17.560 --> 0:06:21.719
<v Speaker 2>some of the smartest people in the world notoriously don't

0:06:21.760 --> 0:06:25.599
<v Speaker 2>test well or specifically crumble.

0:06:25.360 --> 0:06:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Under the pressure of these timed high stress tests. Yeah,

0:06:30.440 --> 0:06:34.640
<v Speaker 1>I've got some stories to share. Also, maybe maybe we

0:06:34.800 --> 0:06:38.359
<v Speaker 1>can make a solid argument in this episode that instead

0:06:38.400 --> 0:06:42.359
<v Speaker 1>of a roller coaster of stats at your sat amusement park,

0:06:42.880 --> 0:06:46.920
<v Speaker 1>you're a q amusement park, you should have the roller

0:06:46.960 --> 0:06:50.520
<v Speaker 1>coaster of love. Courtesy of Red Hot Chili Peppers and

0:06:50.760 --> 0:06:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Keatis. Yeah, Dustry for that, right, Well, their version

0:06:55.600 --> 0:06:57.120
<v Speaker 1>is a banger. Who does the original?

0:06:57.360 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 2>I remember their version from Beavis and butt Head do

0:07:00.120 --> 0:07:04.320
<v Speaker 2>America soundtrack? Right, it's a lot of Fun of Love

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:07.799
<v Speaker 2>and the Originals by the Ohio Players from nineteen hundred

0:07:07.800 --> 0:07:10.880
<v Speaker 2>and seventy five. Funk hit the top the US charts

0:07:11.640 --> 0:07:14.680
<v Speaker 2>in nineteen seventy six. Known for its energetic rhythm, the

0:07:14.720 --> 0:07:18.600
<v Speaker 2>song famously is an urban legend claiming a murder scream

0:07:18.720 --> 0:07:20.080
<v Speaker 2>was recorded in the background.

0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Oh fascinating. We have to get into that. We might

0:07:23.360 --> 0:07:24.720
<v Speaker 1>be an episode for another.

0:07:24.480 --> 0:07:27.760
<v Speaker 2>Time, maybe the very least a bullet point on a

0:07:28.240 --> 0:07:32.320
<v Speaker 2>on a listical episode about weird music urban legends that

0:07:32.360 --> 0:07:33.800
<v Speaker 2>we should. I'm just going to drop in on the

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:36.240
<v Speaker 2>spot here right now invite our buddy Jordan Runtalk to

0:07:36.320 --> 0:07:36.800
<v Speaker 2>join us for.

0:07:37.360 --> 0:07:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Oh I miss you, Jordan. I hope you're tuning into

0:07:40.000 --> 0:07:42.520
<v Speaker 1>the show. I love that guy. I'll text him after this.

0:07:43.720 --> 0:07:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Another kind of thing, another sort of standardized test that's

0:07:48.760 --> 0:07:50.560
<v Speaker 1>going to be familiar to a lot of us in

0:07:50.600 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 1>the United States, is something called the ASVAB, the Armed

0:07:55.240 --> 0:08:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Services Vocational Aptitude Battery. This is what determines whether get

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:03.400
<v Speaker 1>to work in Intel or whether you know you work

0:08:03.440 --> 0:08:06.240
<v Speaker 1>in the elevators, et cetera, et cetera. All jobs are

0:08:06.280 --> 0:08:11.000
<v Speaker 1>worthwhile the idea of placement test does make sense. They

0:08:11.080 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 1>can help set school children up for success. They can

0:08:14.880 --> 0:08:18.040
<v Speaker 1>help you get the right college or university. And of

0:08:18.040 --> 0:08:22.640
<v Speaker 1>course Uncle Sam loves the ASVAB because it helps you

0:08:22.760 --> 0:08:26.239
<v Speaker 1>figure out what a new soldier is especially talented at.

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:28.880
<v Speaker 1>It's it's weird because going back to what you said, No,

0:08:30.000 --> 0:08:33.640
<v Speaker 1>all these things that we could loosely group as IQ

0:08:33.880 --> 0:08:40.679
<v Speaker 1>or intelligent quotient tests, they are attempting to understand not

0:08:40.960 --> 0:08:46.720
<v Speaker 1>your roat memorization abilities, but your cognitive abilities like reasoning,

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:53.600
<v Speaker 1>problem solving, verbal comprehension, you know. And it's never The

0:08:53.679 --> 0:08:57.560
<v Speaker 1>tricky thing is it's not the same as say a

0:08:57.800 --> 0:09:01.240
<v Speaker 1>firearms test. Right. In a fire arms test, you are

0:09:01.280 --> 0:09:05.440
<v Speaker 1>measured by how accurate you are getting close to, say

0:09:05.440 --> 0:09:09.720
<v Speaker 1>a bullseye right with certain with certain weaponry. But with this,

0:09:10.559 --> 0:09:17.880
<v Speaker 1>your intelligence quotient attempts to quantify your level of smarts

0:09:17.920 --> 0:09:22.000
<v Speaker 1>in comparison to other people who are taking the test

0:09:22.200 --> 0:09:25.000
<v Speaker 1>or have taken the test in the past. So it's

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:30.080
<v Speaker 1>a comparison thing, not an absolute measurement. Got it. So

0:09:30.320 --> 0:09:33.120
<v Speaker 1>you're part of the sample size of home that only

0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:37.040
<v Speaker 1>includes those who have taken the test before you or

0:09:37.640 --> 0:09:41.160
<v Speaker 1>with you. Sticky wicket right, A little bit, right, a

0:09:41.200 --> 0:09:44.679
<v Speaker 1>little bit, and well we'll talk a good bit about

0:09:44.720 --> 0:09:48.200
<v Speaker 1>why no one believes. Of course, I hope not. Anyway,

0:09:48.240 --> 0:09:49.360
<v Speaker 1>we all have things to learn.

0:09:49.400 --> 0:09:53.360
<v Speaker 2>That you're perfect, you're not spoiler alert, but I think

0:09:53.400 --> 0:09:56.480
<v Speaker 2>it's really important, you know, in order to human properly,

0:09:56.559 --> 0:09:58.760
<v Speaker 2>to know the things you don't know, and know that

0:09:58.840 --> 0:10:02.920
<v Speaker 2>it's probably a smart idea to continue to learn new things.

0:10:03.000 --> 0:10:08.400
<v Speaker 2>Humans still can't agree, however, on what that knowledge base

0:10:08.760 --> 0:10:12.520
<v Speaker 2>could perhaps be quantified. As you know, it's a combination

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:17.360
<v Speaker 2>of the things you know, intuition skills, certain skills that

0:10:17.400 --> 0:10:21.640
<v Speaker 2>you might have, and that all bundled together we might

0:10:21.679 --> 0:10:23.760
<v Speaker 2>refer to as intelligence.

0:10:23.920 --> 0:10:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Right or competence or the ability to function in a

0:10:27.600 --> 0:10:33.880
<v Speaker 1>given situation. But as we said, no one thinks IQ

0:10:34.160 --> 0:10:38.959
<v Speaker 1>tests are perfect, even the biggest proponents or champions of it.

0:10:39.360 --> 0:10:44.640
<v Speaker 1>The issue is, can we really quantify all that stuff

0:10:44.720 --> 0:10:49.040
<v Speaker 1>that you just named, Noel? Can we accurately represent that

0:10:49.640 --> 0:10:54.160
<v Speaker 1>in something as boiled down as a three digit number?

0:10:54.880 --> 0:10:58.040
<v Speaker 1>How did we get here? Why do so many people

0:10:58.120 --> 0:11:02.680
<v Speaker 1>think IQ tests are you know, kind of malarkey? To

0:11:02.840 --> 0:11:06.720
<v Speaker 1>understand that, we have to understand how these things came

0:11:06.760 --> 0:11:10.240
<v Speaker 1>to be. And this is where we begin by introducing

0:11:10.280 --> 0:11:13.840
<v Speaker 1>everybody to a guy named Alfred Bennet. Now, when I

0:11:13.880 --> 0:11:17.480
<v Speaker 1>was research associate for this, I want to confess to

0:11:17.480 --> 0:11:22.400
<v Speaker 1>you guys, transparency's key to me. I accidentally wrote Alfred

0:11:22.480 --> 0:11:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Bidet quite frequently in this. It was just a slip

0:11:26.480 --> 0:11:27.959
<v Speaker 1>of the slip of the fingers.

0:11:28.120 --> 0:11:28.520
<v Speaker 2>Mm hmm.

0:11:29.040 --> 0:11:32.320
<v Speaker 3>Was it an autocorrect thing such as you've written Bedet

0:11:32.400 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 3>so many times as automatic changing to it or was

0:11:35.559 --> 0:11:37.839
<v Speaker 3>it just a mind autocorrect.

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:41.240
<v Speaker 1>I just really liked our Beidet episodes well, and we

0:11:41.440 --> 0:11:43.320
<v Speaker 1>are all admittedly Bidet boys over here.

0:11:43.360 --> 0:11:45.319
<v Speaker 2>And if that isn't the name of a fun punk

0:11:45.400 --> 0:11:47.800
<v Speaker 2>rock band, then it absolutely should.

0:11:47.440 --> 0:11:53.439
<v Speaker 1>Be tattoos we should get. I'm good with my Toto

0:11:53.600 --> 0:11:55.839
<v Speaker 1>wash lit. I know you guys should get it. You

0:11:55.880 --> 0:11:59.240
<v Speaker 1>guys should get Bidet bros. Right like where the old

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:04.880
<v Speaker 1>tramp stamp bros. Right at the right at your lombard.

0:12:04.920 --> 0:12:06.680
<v Speaker 1>I like it in theory, Ben, I don't think I

0:12:06.720 --> 0:12:08.360
<v Speaker 1>like it. I don't think you should do it. No,

0:12:08.400 --> 0:12:10.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you should do it. I think Jonathan

0:12:10.160 --> 0:12:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Stricklan should get it. Yeah right on. Oh geez, So

0:12:15.480 --> 0:12:19.560
<v Speaker 1>this guy Alfred Bennet b I n E T not

0:12:20.520 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Bidey and no relation to the Ramses, right. Yeah, so

0:12:25.920 --> 0:12:29.760
<v Speaker 1>far as we know, he is born as Alfredo Benetti.

0:12:30.080 --> 0:12:33.240
<v Speaker 2>It was one of those americanizations, right, It must have

0:12:33.320 --> 0:12:36.920
<v Speaker 2>been gotta sound a little more, a little more native born.

0:12:37.360 --> 0:12:40.480
<v Speaker 1>It's common when people, you know, immigrated in those days,

0:12:40.880 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 1>especially in France, right in the mid eighteen hundreds. He's

0:12:45.000 --> 0:12:48.800
<v Speaker 1>born on July eighth, eighteen fifty seven, so his posthumous

0:12:48.880 --> 0:12:53.440
<v Speaker 1>birthday is coming up pretty soon. His dad was a doctor,

0:12:53.800 --> 0:12:58.000
<v Speaker 1>his mom was an artist. His parents separated when he

0:12:58.080 --> 0:13:02.319
<v Speaker 1>was very young, and he was raised primarily by his mother.

0:13:03.000 --> 0:13:06.960
<v Speaker 1>She moved with him to Paris later in life so

0:13:07.000 --> 0:13:11.000
<v Speaker 1>that he could attend law school. And guys, here's the thing.

0:13:11.440 --> 0:13:14.480
<v Speaker 1>He did get his qualifications as bona fides. He was

0:13:14.520 --> 0:13:18.240
<v Speaker 1>able to practice law in eighteen seventy eight. But he

0:13:18.320 --> 0:13:22.320
<v Speaker 1>looked around at the legal landscape of France in the

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:25.439
<v Speaker 1>late eighteen hundreds and he said, no, I'm going to

0:13:25.520 --> 0:13:28.560
<v Speaker 1>be like my dad. I'm going to go into medicine.

0:13:28.640 --> 0:13:31.840
<v Speaker 1>And then soon after that he said, no, I'm going

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:37.160
<v Speaker 1>to be different. I'm going to get into hypnosis. Cool.

0:13:37.800 --> 0:13:41.920
<v Speaker 2>A very reasonable progression there, a reasonable reasonable trajectory.

0:13:43.040 --> 0:13:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so he's been several years becoming a sort of

0:13:48.000 --> 0:13:55.480
<v Speaker 1>a autodidact. He is teaching himself. He reads extensively. He

0:13:55.559 --> 0:14:00.640
<v Speaker 1>loves work by people like Alexander Bain, Charles Darwin from earlier,

0:14:00.920 --> 0:14:07.480
<v Speaker 1>John Stewart Mill. Eventually, no, he publishes his first article,

0:14:07.640 --> 0:14:12.719
<v Speaker 1>his first professional article. It is on hypnosis. He publishes

0:14:12.800 --> 0:14:17.600
<v Speaker 1>this in eighteen eighty and everyone hates it.

0:14:18.080 --> 0:14:22.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, people were not fond of this piece of writing

0:14:23.040 --> 0:14:24.240
<v Speaker 2>in eighteen eighty three.

0:14:24.480 --> 0:14:29.360
<v Speaker 1>However, he weathered the critiques and the poor reviews.

0:14:29.040 --> 0:14:32.000
<v Speaker 2>The throwing of the tomatoes, and he took a position

0:14:32.520 --> 0:14:34.800
<v Speaker 2>in the I'm gonna try my best here and make

0:14:34.920 --> 0:14:43.800
<v Speaker 2>Casey Pegrim proud that you got Sepatrier, Sepatrier cept Salpetriere.

0:14:44.240 --> 0:14:45.720
<v Speaker 1>There we go. Hospital.

0:14:45.880 --> 0:14:47.800
<v Speaker 2>I was about to say hospital, but that would be

0:14:47.840 --> 0:14:52.640
<v Speaker 2>a bridge too far. In Paris, it was a place

0:14:52.640 --> 0:14:57.240
<v Speaker 2>that allowed him to pursue research that focused on hypnosis.

0:14:57.720 --> 0:15:00.240
<v Speaker 2>He was greatly influenced by a guy by the name

0:15:00.280 --> 0:15:05.080
<v Speaker 2>of Charco and he published four articles during his time

0:15:05.120 --> 0:15:09.760
<v Speaker 2>there on hypnosis and the concept of animal magnetism, which

0:15:09.800 --> 0:15:11.480
<v Speaker 2>is another one that's a little bit of a sticky wicked.

0:15:11.560 --> 0:15:13.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I just my dog just growled when I

0:15:13.200 --> 0:15:14.479
<v Speaker 2>said animal magnetism.

0:15:14.480 --> 0:15:17.320
<v Speaker 1>What do you know that I don't know, buddy. Yeah,

0:15:17.520 --> 0:15:24.000
<v Speaker 1>we're referring to Jean Martin Charco. And this guy becomes

0:15:24.080 --> 0:15:28.720
<v Speaker 1>a mentor to our buddy Alfred. His work shines brightly,

0:15:28.880 --> 0:15:34.880
<v Speaker 1>but briefly because other peers in the world of hypnotism

0:15:35.080 --> 0:15:40.880
<v Speaker 1>or animal magnetism. Oh, Paula, can't hear me? Okay, he

0:15:41.600 --> 0:15:46.120
<v Speaker 1>sends you always seems to look in the past. I

0:15:46.200 --> 0:15:50.240
<v Speaker 1>love the vibe. So this guy is sort of his

0:15:50.680 --> 0:15:56.160
<v Speaker 1>mentor figure, right Charcot and Charco gets in a lot

0:15:56.200 --> 0:16:00.200
<v Speaker 1>of trouble because other scientists look at his work and say,

0:16:00.320 --> 0:16:03.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, man, this feels less like science. This

0:16:03.760 --> 0:16:07.240
<v Speaker 1>feels more like you sort of doing your own thing

0:16:07.400 --> 0:16:12.240
<v Speaker 1>and calling your opinions science. It's a massive, massive scandal.

0:16:12.280 --> 0:16:16.360
<v Speaker 1>It's a massive downfall, and unfortunately our buddy Al Bennet,

0:16:16.840 --> 0:16:21.400
<v Speaker 1>his reputation takes a big hit as well. It's my association. Yeah, yeah,

0:16:21.440 --> 0:16:24.680
<v Speaker 1>he caught some strays. As we would say on the

0:16:24.680 --> 0:16:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Breakfast Club.

0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:29.000
<v Speaker 2>Well we would if we were ever invited back, or

0:16:29.200 --> 0:16:32.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, for the first time, you know, Ben, This

0:16:32.160 --> 0:16:34.320
<v Speaker 2>makes me think of a recent discussion that we had

0:16:34.400 --> 0:16:36.360
<v Speaker 2>on our sister pod Stuff they Don't Want you to Know,

0:16:36.920 --> 0:16:41.600
<v Speaker 2>with the incredible host of the podcast series Mind Games,

0:16:41.640 --> 0:16:45.880
<v Speaker 2>about sort of the history of hypnosis, more specifically the

0:16:45.920 --> 0:16:50.120
<v Speaker 2>history of a controversial technique. What was the main thing

0:16:50.480 --> 0:16:55.440
<v Speaker 2>that we talked about with Zoe Lacaz Thank you, Yeah.

0:16:55.680 --> 0:17:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Focuses on the controversial group of tactics called neuro linguistic programming.

0:17:03.440 --> 0:17:08.120
<v Speaker 2>Right, and also the types of controversial forms of hypnosis

0:17:08.280 --> 0:17:11.520
<v Speaker 2>like memory regression therapy and this idea that it can

0:17:11.640 --> 0:17:15.320
<v Speaker 2>cause false memories to be quote unquote recalled. So it

0:17:15.359 --> 0:17:18.000
<v Speaker 2>makes sense to me that in the early days of

0:17:18.280 --> 0:17:23.280
<v Speaker 2>this kind of attempt to scienceify this practice, that it

0:17:23.359 --> 0:17:25.119
<v Speaker 2>might have been met with some backlash.

0:17:25.280 --> 0:17:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Oh right, And this stuff happens well after Bena has passed.

0:17:30.040 --> 0:17:36.600
<v Speaker 1>At this point where his mentor has an academic downfall

0:17:36.720 --> 0:17:42.040
<v Speaker 1>and gets hit with Look, his career is basically over.

0:17:42.600 --> 0:17:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Ben A has to pivot, as they would say in

0:17:46.400 --> 0:17:50.919
<v Speaker 1>corporate America. So he decides he is going to abandon

0:17:51.119 --> 0:17:57.199
<v Speaker 1>hypnosis in favor of studying psychological development. This is his

0:17:57.320 --> 0:18:01.720
<v Speaker 1>big switch, This is the decision that will later change

0:18:01.840 --> 0:18:05.399
<v Speaker 1>the world. And he starts. There's no other way to

0:18:05.440 --> 0:18:08.440
<v Speaker 1>say it. Folks. He starts experimenting on his own children.

0:18:08.880 --> 0:18:13.680
<v Speaker 2>Mmmmm, yeah, that's not great. I mean, we just talked

0:18:13.680 --> 0:18:15.600
<v Speaker 2>about that as well, Ben on stuff that I want

0:18:15.640 --> 0:18:19.600
<v Speaker 2>you to know in talking about the fine line between

0:18:20.040 --> 0:18:25.159
<v Speaker 2>scientific advancements in the concept of magic, and we've certainly

0:18:25.240 --> 0:18:28.800
<v Speaker 2>talked about folks that have gone all mad scientists about

0:18:28.840 --> 0:18:32.280
<v Speaker 2>things and in the pursuit of progress, but doing some

0:18:32.320 --> 0:18:37.159
<v Speaker 2>pretty horrific things in that pursuit, like human experimentation or

0:18:37.200 --> 0:18:41.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, self experimentation. Not great, definitely better than you know,

0:18:41.119 --> 0:18:46.760
<v Speaker 2>experimenting on someone who is not consenting. Not really sure

0:18:46.800 --> 0:18:48.960
<v Speaker 2>what the relationship was with the daughter. Maybe she was

0:18:49.000 --> 0:18:51.639
<v Speaker 2>into it, but still kind of doesn't matter to be honest.

0:18:52.359 --> 0:18:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, it's here's the thing. It's eighteen eighty four.

0:18:56.600 --> 0:19:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Bene Mary's his longtime spouse or a Balbiani, and together

0:19:02.560 --> 0:19:06.800
<v Speaker 1>they have two daughters, Madeleine and Alice. Madeleine's born in

0:19:06.840 --> 0:19:09.520
<v Speaker 1>eighteen eighty five, just a year after they get married.

0:19:09.800 --> 0:19:13.439
<v Speaker 1>Alice is born in eighteen eighty seven. And so this

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:17.000
<v Speaker 1>guy is not to be clear, he's not drugging his children.

0:19:17.560 --> 0:19:21.840
<v Speaker 1>He starts to study how they think, or how they

0:19:21.880 --> 0:19:27.320
<v Speaker 1>think about thinking. Their metacognitive processes. And this means that

0:19:27.440 --> 0:19:31.679
<v Speaker 1>he is the weirdest beat me here, Max, He is

0:19:31.680 --> 0:19:35.760
<v Speaker 1>the weirdest guddamn dad ever. He's not hurting the kids,

0:19:36.119 --> 0:19:39.879
<v Speaker 1>but he's asking them very strange questions, and he's making

0:19:39.920 --> 0:19:45.960
<v Speaker 1>them do little experiments that inform his research on suggestibility

0:19:46.160 --> 0:19:52.200
<v Speaker 1>and attention. Now he starts saying, how do we measure intelligence? Right?

0:19:52.240 --> 0:19:57.439
<v Speaker 1>How do personalities or how does lineage affect intelligence? And

0:19:57.480 --> 0:20:00.560
<v Speaker 1>he publishes so much stuff at this point. If we

0:20:00.720 --> 0:20:04.720
<v Speaker 1>fast forward, it's eighteen ninety two, he gets a doctorate

0:20:04.920 --> 0:20:12.480
<v Speaker 1>in natural sciences from suborne and in eighteen ninety one, Bro,

0:20:12.600 --> 0:20:15.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure how to say this, he kind of

0:20:15.520 --> 0:20:26.679
<v Speaker 1>gets a job at the Laboratory of Physiological Psychology. It

0:20:26.800 --> 0:20:31.920
<v Speaker 1>is a prestigious place, but we're saying kind of because

0:20:31.960 --> 0:20:37.360
<v Speaker 1>when he got the job it was an unpaid position.

0:20:37.480 --> 0:20:39.920
<v Speaker 1>He worked for a year and didn't see a dime

0:20:40.000 --> 0:20:40.480
<v Speaker 1>or a fronk.

0:20:40.760 --> 0:20:43.320
<v Speaker 2>Am I even do too much trouble for doing this

0:20:43.480 --> 0:20:46.520
<v Speaker 2>stuff with his daughters, because I mean it doesn't seem.

0:20:46.280 --> 0:20:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Like it's particularly.

0:20:49.560 --> 0:20:53.119
<v Speaker 2>You know, invasive of just studying suggestibility and attention. But

0:20:53.200 --> 0:20:56.160
<v Speaker 2>I guess when I immediately when I hear about someone experimenting

0:20:56.359 --> 0:20:59.000
<v Speaker 2>quote unquote on their family members, it does make me

0:20:59.080 --> 0:21:01.320
<v Speaker 2>kind of you know, ra eyebrows a little bit.

0:21:01.920 --> 0:21:05.080
<v Speaker 1>It's cringe. And we're right to be skeptical because even

0:21:05.119 --> 0:21:10.479
<v Speaker 1>if you're just asking the questions, you are never not

0:21:10.680 --> 0:21:13.760
<v Speaker 1>going to also be their parent, you know what I mean.

0:21:14.119 --> 0:21:17.080
<v Speaker 2>That's true, that's true. That can also lead to just

0:21:17.240 --> 0:21:18.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, it's just not good science, right.

0:21:19.200 --> 0:21:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Not great science. Yeah, agreed, And everybody in France disagreed

0:21:24.640 --> 0:21:28.639
<v Speaker 1>with our conclusion because they said, this guy is great.

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:31.080
<v Speaker 1>He works for a year and we don't have to

0:21:31.119 --> 0:21:36.080
<v Speaker 1>pay him. Let's make him the director of this laboratory.

0:21:36.560 --> 0:21:42.120
<v Speaker 1>And there he meets his longtime collaborator, Theodore Simone. Theodore

0:21:42.280 --> 0:21:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Simone works with Bene to do doctoral research under Benet's supervision.

0:21:48.440 --> 0:21:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Bene does some things that are unequivocably very good things.

0:21:53.800 --> 0:21:58.400
<v Speaker 1>He starts the first French journal of psychology in eighteen

0:21:58.640 --> 0:22:03.159
<v Speaker 1>ninety five, and at first he is a huge fanboy

0:22:03.280 --> 0:22:07.879
<v Speaker 1>of a guy named Francis Golton. Francis Golton earlier worked

0:22:08.080 --> 0:22:13.120
<v Speaker 1>in developing what we will call standardized test and his

0:22:13.240 --> 0:22:18.520
<v Speaker 1>thing was, we can build out a rubric to measure

0:22:18.920 --> 0:22:25.240
<v Speaker 1>individual differences in a population. So Benee adopted this approach

0:22:25.280 --> 0:22:28.640
<v Speaker 1>in his work. He later, I think it's nineteen oh three,

0:22:29.480 --> 0:22:33.879
<v Speaker 1>he publishes an article that says, hey, guys, have you

0:22:33.960 --> 0:22:40.119
<v Speaker 1>ever asked your daughters off putting strange questions.

0:22:39.880 --> 0:22:44.960
<v Speaker 2>All the time? What have you ever dadd before? Kind

0:22:45.000 --> 0:22:48.760
<v Speaker 2>of comes with the territory, So Ben, shall we begin

0:22:49.200 --> 0:22:49.800
<v Speaker 2>ZiT tests?

0:22:50.400 --> 0:22:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Ah Wonderbach. Also he got a lot more love for

0:22:58.200 --> 0:23:02.359
<v Speaker 1>this nineteen oh three article I did about his hypnosis stuff.

0:23:02.520 --> 0:23:04.880
<v Speaker 1>He was getting there, man, he was doing the work.

0:23:05.080 --> 0:23:08.320
<v Speaker 1>You know. They were like Al's back, als back so hard.

0:23:09.920 --> 0:23:13.840
<v Speaker 1>And he and his collaborator, as we're alluding to, they

0:23:13.880 --> 0:23:17.080
<v Speaker 1>started working on a test that was meant to help

0:23:17.160 --> 0:23:20.560
<v Speaker 1>the kids, just like Wu Tang. They said, if children

0:23:20.680 --> 0:23:24.040
<v Speaker 1>have problems in learning, we got to figure out how

0:23:24.080 --> 0:23:27.560
<v Speaker 1>to assist those kids. This is what leads to the

0:23:27.560 --> 0:23:31.960
<v Speaker 1>thing we call the benez Simone Intelligence Scale, and it

0:23:32.160 --> 0:23:33.480
<v Speaker 1>was a government project.

0:23:34.160 --> 0:23:36.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but I thought I'd maybe take a minute real

0:23:36.320 --> 0:23:38.720
<v Speaker 2>quick here, just as an aside to talk about something

0:23:38.760 --> 0:23:40.760
<v Speaker 2>that you and I talked about off Mike about this

0:23:40.840 --> 0:23:44.600
<v Speaker 2>subject in terms of helping kids to learn and this

0:23:44.800 --> 0:23:48.720
<v Speaker 2>knowledge that kids learned differently and that no two kids

0:23:48.760 --> 0:23:51.280
<v Speaker 2>are the same. I do appreciate where Bene is coming

0:23:51.280 --> 0:23:56.720
<v Speaker 2>from here specifically because my kid is given certain dispensations

0:23:57.200 --> 0:24:00.840
<v Speaker 2>through the public school system here in Atlanta, allowing them

0:24:00.880 --> 0:24:02.760
<v Speaker 2>for a little bit more time on tests. And it's

0:24:02.800 --> 0:24:04.520
<v Speaker 2>not something that you'd go so far as to maybe

0:24:04.560 --> 0:24:07.480
<v Speaker 2>call a learning disability, but it is something that after

0:24:07.520 --> 0:24:11.359
<v Speaker 2>an assessment, it is determined that a little bit of

0:24:11.400 --> 0:24:14.360
<v Speaker 2>extra time is helpful. And I just really appreciate all

0:24:14.359 --> 0:24:17.240
<v Speaker 2>the admins and teachers and you know, folks in the

0:24:17.240 --> 0:24:19.639
<v Speaker 2>school system that advocated for that kind of stuff because

0:24:19.960 --> 0:24:22.640
<v Speaker 2>to your point earlier, Ben Or we talked about some

0:24:22.680 --> 0:24:26.720
<v Speaker 2>really smart people just don't test well and it can

0:24:26.800 --> 0:24:29.400
<v Speaker 2>be a real source of anxiety if someone already has,

0:24:29.680 --> 0:24:34.160
<v Speaker 2>like say, just generalized anxiety. So just kudos to the teachers,

0:24:34.000 --> 0:24:37.320
<v Speaker 2>as we always says, and you know, this is a

0:24:37.400 --> 0:24:38.920
<v Speaker 2>it's been a very positive experience.

0:24:39.600 --> 0:24:44.200
<v Speaker 1>That's awesome. Yeah, that's not what's happening in early nineteen hundreds.

0:24:43.760 --> 0:24:47.119
<v Speaker 2>Not yet, definitely, not yet, but just again speaking to

0:24:47.240 --> 0:24:51.080
<v Speaker 2>the idea of you know, help helping the kids.

0:24:51.400 --> 0:24:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the French government it's nineteen oh four, okay, and

0:24:54.960 --> 0:25:01.280
<v Speaker 1>the French government says we need to identify special needs

0:25:01.320 --> 0:25:05.520
<v Speaker 1>in children. Specifically, the Minister of Public Instruction over in

0:25:05.600 --> 0:25:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Paris says, we have to study existing tests, or we

0:25:09.880 --> 0:25:13.080
<v Speaker 1>have to create our own tests so that we can

0:25:13.200 --> 0:25:18.879
<v Speaker 1>ensure intellectually disabled children their words, not ours, can receive

0:25:19.119 --> 0:25:22.880
<v Speaker 1>an adequate education as best as the state can do.

0:25:23.720 --> 0:25:26.800
<v Speaker 1>The minister at the time, or the ministry, i should say,

0:25:27.320 --> 0:25:33.119
<v Speaker 1>is also concerned that children who have normal intelligence are

0:25:33.240 --> 0:25:37.879
<v Speaker 1>being placed in classes for disabled children, not because of

0:25:37.920 --> 0:25:42.000
<v Speaker 1>their cognitive abilities, but because of behavior problems. And so

0:25:42.040 --> 0:25:46.720
<v Speaker 1>they look around France and they say, oh, former creepy

0:25:46.880 --> 0:25:51.600
<v Speaker 1>hypnotist fanboy, Alfred Binet, you're the guy who should be

0:25:51.600 --> 0:25:57.440
<v Speaker 1>in charge of all of this. And he took the reins,

0:25:57.520 --> 0:26:01.280
<v Speaker 1>he took it went off run And by this point

0:26:01.760 --> 0:26:05.480
<v Speaker 1>I got to tell you, I think Bene is sort

0:26:05.520 --> 0:26:09.960
<v Speaker 1>of a mercurial dude. You go from the law to medicine,

0:26:10.000 --> 0:26:12.199
<v Speaker 1>to hypnosis to psychology.

0:26:13.080 --> 0:26:16.119
<v Speaker 2>That's funny, Ben, because it's like, when I think of mercurial,

0:26:16.160 --> 0:26:18.159
<v Speaker 2>I guess I sometimes think of somebody who might be

0:26:18.240 --> 0:26:21.119
<v Speaker 2>like a jack of all trades or sort of a polymath.

0:26:21.200 --> 0:26:23.920
<v Speaker 2>But I guess maybe that you're meaning more in terms

0:26:23.960 --> 0:26:26.440
<v Speaker 2>of a little bit on the flighty side.

0:26:26.840 --> 0:26:29.920
<v Speaker 1>A little bit. He's a little bit on the flight,

0:26:30.160 --> 0:26:32.840
<v Speaker 1>you know what I mean. The guy takes flights, but hey,

0:26:32.960 --> 0:26:33.439
<v Speaker 1>so do we.

0:26:34.320 --> 0:26:36.560
<v Speaker 2>So, speaking of which I need to book a return

0:26:36.600 --> 0:26:42.280
<v Speaker 2>flight before you know it could cost one.

0:26:41.480 --> 0:26:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Oh right, yeah, that's a good time. The best time

0:26:44.359 --> 0:26:48.399
<v Speaker 1>too if you're gaming the system, if you want to

0:26:48.440 --> 0:26:52.960
<v Speaker 1>take advantage of the AI pricing or dynamic pricing, wake

0:26:53.080 --> 0:26:56.959
<v Speaker 1>up at like two to three thirty in the morning.

0:26:57.320 --> 0:27:00.679
<v Speaker 1>That's when that's when the system resets. That is not

0:27:00.840 --> 0:27:04.359
<v Speaker 1>helpful or well, hopefully it's helpful. It is not relevant

0:27:04.920 --> 0:27:08.680
<v Speaker 1>to what we're talking about. Our buddy Benet in Classic

0:27:08.760 --> 0:27:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Mercurial Nature has already at this point rejected his adoration

0:27:15.000 --> 0:27:18.880
<v Speaker 1>of Galton and Galton's ideas. He said, look, this guy

0:27:19.200 --> 0:27:23.040
<v Speaker 1>was onto something with standardized tests, but they're only measuring

0:27:23.680 --> 0:27:29.439
<v Speaker 1>trivial abilities. They're measuring things like memorization. What we need

0:27:29.560 --> 0:27:34.520
<v Speaker 1>are tests that measure the more impactful, if abstract things

0:27:34.640 --> 0:27:40.080
<v Speaker 1>like judgment, comprehension, reasoning. These are much more difficult to measure,

0:27:40.320 --> 0:27:43.000
<v Speaker 1>and he knew that going in, but he was convinced

0:27:43.119 --> 0:27:47.959
<v Speaker 1>that doing so would yield more accurate results.

0:27:48.080 --> 0:27:48.439
<v Speaker 3>In this.

0:27:50.320 --> 0:27:55.119
<v Speaker 1>Question right, and again, this question was entirely about how

0:27:56.119 --> 0:28:00.560
<v Speaker 1>to set children up for success. Right, should the kids

0:28:00.920 --> 0:28:05.840
<v Speaker 1>who maybe have learning disabilities, should they go to special

0:28:05.920 --> 0:28:11.240
<v Speaker 1>classes in regular schools or should they be sent to asylums?

0:28:11.640 --> 0:28:15.600
<v Speaker 1>And who determines whether a kid has a learning problem

0:28:15.680 --> 0:28:19.399
<v Speaker 1>in the first place. The psychologists were kind of a

0:28:19.440 --> 0:28:22.800
<v Speaker 1>cartel at this point in France, and they said, oh, yeah,

0:28:23.080 --> 0:28:25.040
<v Speaker 1>you've got to go to our boys. You've got to

0:28:25.080 --> 0:28:28.159
<v Speaker 1>go to our crew of psychologists and they'll tell you

0:28:28.200 --> 0:28:32.520
<v Speaker 1>if your child is a broken egg. And Bene and

0:28:32.760 --> 0:28:36.240
<v Speaker 1>the crew that he led in opposition, they said, no,

0:28:36.720 --> 0:28:39.800
<v Speaker 1>that's weird. You guys are being weird. Don't get me wrong.

0:28:39.960 --> 0:28:43.200
<v Speaker 1>I experimented on my daughters as well, But we should

0:28:43.320 --> 0:28:50.240
<v Speaker 1>use objective criteria because humans are fallible, So what should

0:28:50.320 --> 0:28:55.560
<v Speaker 1>be the test? And that's where they started to create

0:28:55.600 --> 0:28:59.360
<v Speaker 1>what we call the first IQ test. It probably also

0:28:59.480 --> 0:29:02.280
<v Speaker 1>did not escape this guy, or at least, here's what

0:29:02.320 --> 0:29:05.480
<v Speaker 1>I like to think, it probably didn't escape him that

0:29:05.600 --> 0:29:09.719
<v Speaker 1>the future of a lot of children rested on his shoulders,

0:29:10.200 --> 0:29:14.400
<v Speaker 1>especially since he had those earlier missteps in the world

0:29:14.520 --> 0:29:18.000
<v Speaker 1>of hypnosis. He had to get this one right, he

0:29:18.160 --> 0:29:21.840
<v Speaker 1>sure did so. Soon enough, he and Theodore Simone had

0:29:21.880 --> 0:29:25.440
<v Speaker 1>created an early prototype of the IQ test. Is an

0:29:25.480 --> 0:29:27.800
<v Speaker 1>early test, a prototype, it has to be, I'm gonna

0:29:27.800 --> 0:29:28.120
<v Speaker 1>go with that.

0:29:28.480 --> 0:29:31.680
<v Speaker 2>It's a type of technology. And this was known as

0:29:31.720 --> 0:29:35.680
<v Speaker 2>the Benet Simone Tests. But they wanted a little bit

0:29:35.720 --> 0:29:39.479
<v Speaker 2>more input from some other folks in the field, so

0:29:39.520 --> 0:29:41.760
<v Speaker 2>they took this early version of the test over to

0:29:42.160 --> 0:29:45.080
<v Speaker 2>Stanford University across the pond.

0:29:45.920 --> 0:29:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Ah. Yes, and here we introduce our friends at Stanford University.

0:29:52.000 --> 0:29:55.320
<v Speaker 1>So in this sense, specifically, when we say friends, we're

0:29:55.320 --> 0:29:59.520
<v Speaker 1>talking about another psychologist. His name is Lewis Turman. He

0:29:59.600 --> 0:30:03.640
<v Speaker 1>built on Bene and Simone's work and he created a

0:30:03.880 --> 0:30:08.960
<v Speaker 1>version of their test called the Stanford Bene Intelligence Scale,

0:30:09.240 --> 0:30:14.000
<v Speaker 1>introduced in nineteen sixteen. This is the IQ test. A

0:30:14.000 --> 0:30:18.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of people take. It's been revised numerous times. It's

0:30:18.920 --> 0:30:22.840
<v Speaker 1>administered individually, so you're not sitting in a big room

0:30:23.120 --> 0:30:27.560
<v Speaker 1>like when you take an SAT, and it assesses individuals

0:30:28.120 --> 0:30:32.880
<v Speaker 1>as young as two years old. It primarily focuses on children.

0:30:33.240 --> 0:30:36.000
<v Speaker 1>I just can't imagine giving a two year old a

0:30:36.120 --> 0:30:39.880
<v Speaker 1>standardized test. What do you tell to you? What are

0:30:39.920 --> 0:30:40.480
<v Speaker 1>you talking about?

0:30:40.560 --> 0:30:43.840
<v Speaker 2>Shapes Yeah, pointing at animals like that. What's that one

0:30:43.880 --> 0:30:45.960
<v Speaker 2>for dementia that Trump's always bragging about?

0:30:46.400 --> 0:30:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Oh, man, woman, person camera, something like that. Yeah, hands

0:30:50.680 --> 0:30:54.960
<v Speaker 1>on the clock TV man woman person camera. Cool like that,

0:30:55.040 --> 0:30:59.680
<v Speaker 1>we're clear. We can name five words we heard earlier.

0:30:59.760 --> 0:31:02.280
<v Speaker 2>Is this it's a square peg round hole type situation

0:31:02.480 --> 0:31:04.200
<v Speaker 2>or like one of those ones where you're putting shapes

0:31:04.240 --> 0:31:05.920
<v Speaker 2>in different order. I mean, I know the square peg

0:31:06.000 --> 0:31:08.720
<v Speaker 2>round whole thing is it doesn't work. But you know

0:31:08.760 --> 0:31:11.120
<v Speaker 2>the one where you're like recognizing patterns and things like that.

0:31:11.520 --> 0:31:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, pattern recognition. Like you see a picture in a

0:31:15.880 --> 0:31:21.520
<v Speaker 1>grid and maybe let's say it's a three by three grid, right,

0:31:21.640 --> 0:31:25.560
<v Speaker 1>so nine squares and one of the squares is left blank,

0:31:25.920 --> 0:31:29.080
<v Speaker 1>and you have to pick the image that fits in there.

0:31:29.400 --> 0:31:34.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, you've got let's say, equilateral triangle and the

0:31:34.200 --> 0:31:37.040
<v Speaker 1>bottom left corner is missing, and then you have a

0:31:37.080 --> 0:31:41.000
<v Speaker 1>couple of choices for what image would best complete that

0:31:41.080 --> 0:31:44.120
<v Speaker 1>full picture of the triangle. That's an example. Then you

0:31:44.160 --> 0:31:47.080
<v Speaker 1>know what completes my full picture of a triangle? What's that?

0:31:47.480 --> 0:31:53.880
<v Speaker 1>You shucks? The full picture of the triangle in my heart? Cool?

0:31:54.400 --> 0:31:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Shout out to olt j Ed, shout out to Max Williams, man,

0:31:57.840 --> 0:31:59.360
<v Speaker 1>you're part of the triangle as well.

0:32:00.360 --> 0:32:05.760
<v Speaker 2>That oh Max is good, he's done with us speaking

0:32:05.800 --> 0:32:10.080
<v Speaker 2>of triangles, and oh dear, okay, let's not go. We'll

0:32:10.120 --> 0:32:12.360
<v Speaker 2>have to get back into Max's good graces. But Ben,

0:32:12.440 --> 0:32:15.840
<v Speaker 2>speaking of triangles and French stuff, have you heard of

0:32:15.840 --> 0:32:20.000
<v Speaker 2>this Montreal, This French Canadian band called Angeen de Poitrine.

0:32:21.400 --> 0:32:23.360
<v Speaker 2>So they have this whole mythology.

0:32:23.400 --> 0:32:24.040
<v Speaker 1>You'd love them.

0:32:24.400 --> 0:32:26.960
<v Speaker 2>They they wear these crazy costumes, and they purport to

0:32:26.960 --> 0:32:30.479
<v Speaker 2>be aliens from another planet, and they worship triangles and

0:32:30.520 --> 0:32:34.960
<v Speaker 2>they play microtonal math rock and they wear these bonkers

0:32:35.000 --> 0:32:37.719
<v Speaker 2>costumes and they're blowing up right now, and they're a

0:32:37.720 --> 0:32:40.400
<v Speaker 2>lot of fun. They kind of have King Gizzard vibes.

0:32:40.640 --> 0:32:42.480
<v Speaker 2>But I just love I know you love a mythology,

0:32:42.560 --> 0:32:45.640
<v Speaker 2>especially a triangle based one.

0:32:46.320 --> 0:32:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, thank you for the recommendation. What's the name of

0:32:48.840 --> 0:32:49.240
<v Speaker 1>the band?

0:32:49.640 --> 0:32:54.000
<v Speaker 2>They are called Angeen Dipatin, all right, And I'm linking

0:32:54.040 --> 0:32:54.680
<v Speaker 2>you to their.

0:32:55.160 --> 0:32:59.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm linking you to their k XP performance right now. Phenomenal.

0:32:59.440 --> 0:33:04.680
<v Speaker 1>I love k Look, we also know that this idea

0:33:04.960 --> 0:33:10.720
<v Speaker 1>of this idea of measuring intelligence is tricky because even

0:33:10.880 --> 0:33:14.840
<v Speaker 1>back then and in the current day humanity has no

0:33:15.640 --> 0:33:21.560
<v Speaker 1>universally agreed upon definition of intelligence. So Ever, since nineteen sixteen,

0:33:22.360 --> 0:33:25.880
<v Speaker 1>the boffins and the eggheads and the very smart badgers

0:33:25.920 --> 0:33:32.920
<v Speaker 1>have been revising this scale, this Stanford Benet Intelligence Scale.

0:33:33.400 --> 0:33:37.280
<v Speaker 1>They have also again, it's different from a firearm test

0:33:37.360 --> 0:33:42.080
<v Speaker 1>because it is a comparative score. So modern tests are

0:33:42.160 --> 0:33:45.280
<v Speaker 1>going to use what we call deviation. They're going to

0:33:45.320 --> 0:33:48.440
<v Speaker 1>assume the average score, like in the middle of the

0:33:48.440 --> 0:33:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Bell curve is one hundred. We can get into the

0:33:52.040 --> 0:33:56.840
<v Speaker 1>weeds there later. Let's standard deviation. If I'm not mistaken, Yes, yeah,

0:33:57.040 --> 0:34:01.040
<v Speaker 1>nailed it. Standard deviation of sixteen. So if you take

0:34:01.080 --> 0:34:05.280
<v Speaker 1>a test like this and your IQ score is above

0:34:05.400 --> 0:34:10.480
<v Speaker 1>one thirty, you are considered gifted. If it's below seventy,

0:34:11.320 --> 0:34:13.680
<v Speaker 1>they're going to look at you a little bit harder

0:34:13.719 --> 0:34:18.640
<v Speaker 1>for some sort of intellectual disability, Forst. Gump style. Right.

0:34:18.760 --> 0:34:21.160
<v Speaker 2>So, as this concept kind of starts picking up steam

0:34:21.200 --> 0:34:24.160
<v Speaker 2>and expanding throughout the world, you started to see other

0:34:24.440 --> 0:34:27.080
<v Speaker 2>sort of folks styling on it a bit, giving it

0:34:27.120 --> 0:34:30.000
<v Speaker 2>their own spin, which sort of led to some other

0:34:30.560 --> 0:34:32.640
<v Speaker 2>still to this day pretty well known tests and other

0:34:32.800 --> 0:34:36.360
<v Speaker 2>kind of ideas around testing, beginning to emerge stuff like

0:34:36.400 --> 0:34:39.920
<v Speaker 2>the Wes Adult Wessler perhaps I know this one adult

0:34:40.000 --> 0:34:45.760
<v Speaker 2>Intelligent Scale and the Westler Intelligence Scale for children, which

0:34:45.960 --> 0:34:51.040
<v Speaker 2>do yield an overall intelligence quotient score, as well as

0:34:51.160 --> 0:34:55.600
<v Speaker 2>separate ones for verbal and performance subtests.

0:34:56.239 --> 0:35:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, sort of like how you get yours a gifts

0:35:00.440 --> 0:35:04.920
<v Speaker 1>right one score for verbal or communicative in your SATs

0:35:05.040 --> 0:35:07.879
<v Speaker 1>wants one score for quantitative or mathematical.

0:35:08.200 --> 0:35:09.799
<v Speaker 2>Well, so, I guess the reason a lot of this

0:35:09.840 --> 0:35:12.360
<v Speaker 2>stuff rang true to many of us in the audience,

0:35:12.400 --> 0:35:17.440
<v Speaker 2>including myself, is because, as we're learning, the basis for

0:35:17.560 --> 0:35:19.720
<v Speaker 2>so many of these standardized.

0:35:19.080 --> 0:35:21.399
<v Speaker 1>Tests is in all of this stuff. So even if,

0:35:21.400 --> 0:35:23.520
<v Speaker 1>to your point, Ben, you haven't taken a quote unquote

0:35:23.560 --> 0:35:28.319
<v Speaker 1>IQ test, which is less of a thing, it's much

0:35:28.320 --> 0:35:31.480
<v Speaker 1>more of a spectrum, you've probably taken something that was

0:35:31.600 --> 0:35:36.160
<v Speaker 1>very much inspired by the work of these folks one

0:35:36.280 --> 0:35:39.400
<v Speaker 1>hundred percent. You know, for an example of a verbal test,

0:35:39.800 --> 0:35:43.880
<v Speaker 1>it would be a vocabulary question. Performance tests would be

0:35:44.080 --> 0:35:47.479
<v Speaker 1>picture arrangement like we described just a few minutes ago.

0:35:47.920 --> 0:35:53.760
<v Speaker 1>And for us folks, fellow ridiculous historians, this actually sounds

0:35:53.800 --> 0:35:57.080
<v Speaker 1>like a lot of fun because neither of those examples

0:35:57.120 --> 0:36:00.560
<v Speaker 1>requires you to be super good at math, which is

0:36:00.600 --> 0:36:04.160
<v Speaker 1>where no offense estinal. I think we both crapped the

0:36:04.200 --> 0:36:05.040
<v Speaker 1>bag a little bit.

0:36:05.320 --> 0:36:07.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Now my thing, I got a near I mean

0:36:07.040 --> 0:36:08.720
<v Speaker 2>not to bragg or anything, but I got a nearly

0:36:08.760 --> 0:36:11.320
<v Speaker 2>perfect verbal score, as I'm sure you did on the SAT.

0:36:11.840 --> 0:36:14.319
<v Speaker 2>And I don't even remember what my math was, but

0:36:14.360 --> 0:36:17.480
<v Speaker 2>it was so bad that my overall SAT score weren't impressive.

0:36:18.040 --> 0:36:21.360
<v Speaker 2>But taking taking in, you know, as as the verbal one,

0:36:21.400 --> 0:36:23.280
<v Speaker 2>that's what I always lead with when I'm talking about

0:36:23.320 --> 0:36:24.879
<v Speaker 2>the SAT, just to.

0:36:24.760 --> 0:36:27.080
<v Speaker 3>Be this guy, I was a guy who did much

0:36:27.120 --> 0:36:28.360
<v Speaker 3>better in math than verbal.

0:36:28.840 --> 0:36:31.799
<v Speaker 2>Yes, yeah, And frankly, dude, that that makes sense. You've

0:36:31.800 --> 0:36:34.239
<v Speaker 2>got a very analytical brain in that respect. But you're

0:36:34.280 --> 0:36:37.080
<v Speaker 2>also a really good communicator, So go to hell.

0:36:37.680 --> 0:36:39.320
<v Speaker 1>It's got good SAT score in general.

0:36:39.400 --> 0:36:42.080
<v Speaker 2>So right, get off, get off here and be gone

0:36:42.840 --> 0:36:44.839
<v Speaker 2>into a well with you and we're not even gonna

0:36:44.880 --> 0:36:45.520
<v Speaker 2>send last.

0:36:46.239 --> 0:36:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Stop kissing up to each other, guys, is not what's happened,

0:36:51.600 --> 0:36:55.879
<v Speaker 1>and not the gay hockey kind. The decades to go on, right,

0:36:56.000 --> 0:36:59.560
<v Speaker 1>and as we said, new versions of similar test and merge,

0:37:00.239 --> 0:37:04.120
<v Speaker 1>these things are continually getting revised. As you pointed out,

0:37:04.800 --> 0:37:08.839
<v Speaker 1>now some version of this some grandchild of this sort

0:37:08.880 --> 0:37:12.239
<v Speaker 1>of idea is found in all sorts of places. There

0:37:12.320 --> 0:37:15.319
<v Speaker 1>is no escaping it. A good score can have a

0:37:15.480 --> 0:37:20.160
<v Speaker 1>significant impact on your future in terms of your career

0:37:20.239 --> 0:37:23.440
<v Speaker 1>path and vice versa. Of course, right, there's a bit

0:37:23.480 --> 0:37:26.920
<v Speaker 1>of a feedback loop, right, And this is the ridiculous part.

0:37:27.200 --> 0:37:32.680
<v Speaker 1>These tests have always been controversial since the early nineteen hundreds,

0:37:32.800 --> 0:37:34.640
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of people are going to tell you,

0:37:35.120 --> 0:37:39.799
<v Speaker 1>including us, that these tests are far less useful than

0:37:39.840 --> 0:37:45.840
<v Speaker 1>we have been led to believe. It's never going to die,

0:37:45.960 --> 0:37:49.960
<v Speaker 1>and so on paper, it sounds pretty nifty, right to

0:37:50.000 --> 0:37:52.400
<v Speaker 1>put it simply, We love black and white.

0:37:52.440 --> 0:37:54.920
<v Speaker 2>We love being able to boil things down to like

0:37:55.040 --> 0:37:59.319
<v Speaker 2>a formula or a score. It is a human brain thing,

0:37:59.600 --> 0:38:03.840
<v Speaker 2>but typically we know that stuff can sometimes it be

0:38:03.880 --> 0:38:06.000
<v Speaker 2>a little too good to be true, or a little

0:38:06.000 --> 0:38:07.560
<v Speaker 2>too broad to.

0:38:07.560 --> 0:38:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Be nuanced, if that makes sense. The idea of quantifying

0:38:19.719 --> 0:38:23.759
<v Speaker 1>every single member of the human population by bypassing all

0:38:23.800 --> 0:38:29.399
<v Speaker 1>those things you describe nuance right, the experience right, right,

0:38:29.520 --> 0:38:32.759
<v Speaker 1>soft skills, The idea that you can just treat a

0:38:32.840 --> 0:38:35.880
<v Speaker 1>person like a file or a unit and slap a

0:38:35.960 --> 0:38:40.640
<v Speaker 1>number on their forehead. It turns out that so similar

0:38:40.760 --> 0:38:44.080
<v Speaker 1>to so many other things that sound like amazing shortcuts.

0:38:44.560 --> 0:38:48.520
<v Speaker 1>IQ tests fall far short of what they are supposed

0:38:48.520 --> 0:38:51.840
<v Speaker 1>to do. I mean, the Stanford Bene test is used

0:38:51.840 --> 0:38:57.480
<v Speaker 1>to evaluate abilities, but it has also inescapably been used

0:38:57.480 --> 0:39:02.160
<v Speaker 1>to justify racist a list beliefs and policies.

0:39:02.200 --> 0:39:08.160
<v Speaker 2>No callback with phrenology just also just came up pretty recently,

0:39:08.600 --> 0:39:13.440
<v Speaker 2>typical of these types of again very black and white

0:39:13.600 --> 0:39:17.239
<v Speaker 2>boiling down, boilings down of something that is a much

0:39:17.440 --> 0:39:20.759
<v Speaker 2>more complex issue, like feeling the bumps on someone's head

0:39:20.800 --> 0:39:23.040
<v Speaker 2>and feeling like that allows you to say that they

0:39:23.080 --> 0:39:26.520
<v Speaker 2>are not a valid member of the human race.

0:39:27.200 --> 0:39:32.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, this is the question efficacy. Efficacy for an

0:39:32.400 --> 0:39:38.120
<v Speaker 1>IQ test would be asking are these results an accurate

0:39:38.239 --> 0:39:42.759
<v Speaker 1>measure of a concept that human beings still struggle to

0:39:42.960 --> 0:39:49.000
<v Speaker 1>fully defy? Can your IQ score really predict your future performance?

0:39:49.120 --> 0:39:54.880
<v Speaker 1>The answer is, give me a record scratchbacks perfect, not

0:39:55.200 --> 0:39:59.240
<v Speaker 1>really not skirt skirt not really, not one hundred percent

0:39:59.239 --> 0:40:03.560
<v Speaker 1>of the time. Not fully. It's fairly common. I will

0:40:03.600 --> 0:40:08.320
<v Speaker 1>pause it that a lot of us know objectively brilliant

0:40:08.360 --> 0:40:12.799
<v Speaker 1>people who could maybe write amazing novels. They can make

0:40:13.120 --> 0:40:16.640
<v Speaker 1>phenomenal murals, they can do high level math, in their

0:40:16.680 --> 0:40:21.520
<v Speaker 1>heads without notes. But they still don't have financial or

0:40:21.680 --> 0:40:25.040
<v Speaker 1>social success. They're not at the top of society. And

0:40:25.080 --> 0:40:27.880
<v Speaker 1>it's not because they're dumb by any means. It's just

0:40:27.920 --> 0:40:32.320
<v Speaker 1>because they're good at taking one test, which is not

0:40:32.440 --> 0:40:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the same thing as being good at life.

0:40:34.280 --> 0:40:39.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's also, you know, worth mentioning the path dependency

0:40:39.680 --> 0:40:42.560
<v Speaker 2>maybe the wrong term. I'm a little bit stuck in

0:40:42.600 --> 0:40:47.839
<v Speaker 2>a conversation we recently had about oil and natural resources

0:40:47.840 --> 0:40:50.319
<v Speaker 2>and path dependency in that respect, but in terms of

0:40:50.400 --> 0:40:54.080
<v Speaker 2>the path towards success and this dependency that is sort

0:40:54.080 --> 0:40:57.640
<v Speaker 2>of pushed historically on kids to follow that path, and

0:40:57.920 --> 0:41:01.840
<v Speaker 2>including things like college and taking these tests and getting

0:41:01.840 --> 0:41:03.799
<v Speaker 2>good scores on these tests. We know that a lot

0:41:03.840 --> 0:41:06.920
<v Speaker 2>of that too, is sort of just gatekeeping for connections,

0:41:07.360 --> 0:41:09.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, and the types of people that you might

0:41:09.719 --> 0:41:12.719
<v Speaker 2>encounter that are ultimately the ones who put you in

0:41:12.760 --> 0:41:16.839
<v Speaker 2>the right rooms and get you, you know, a leg

0:41:16.960 --> 0:41:21.120
<v Speaker 2>up towards perhaps that journey of success. But these days,

0:41:21.719 --> 0:41:23.880
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, man, those paths are a little bit

0:41:23.960 --> 0:41:25.960
<v Speaker 2>less relevant than they used to be. And we know

0:41:26.080 --> 0:41:28.600
<v Speaker 2>that if you make the effort and put yourself out there,

0:41:29.480 --> 0:41:32.839
<v Speaker 2>you can find your people. You can find those connections

0:41:32.960 --> 0:41:35.840
<v Speaker 2>on your own, just by being part of the world

0:41:35.920 --> 0:41:38.719
<v Speaker 2>and being interested in stuff and perhaps being part of

0:41:39.239 --> 0:41:43.239
<v Speaker 2>Reddit groups or you know, making Internet content, or just

0:41:43.320 --> 0:41:46.000
<v Speaker 2>like hanging out and going to clubs and stuff like that.

0:41:46.040 --> 0:41:48.000
<v Speaker 2>So I'm not saying don't go to college, but I'm

0:41:48.040 --> 0:41:51.120
<v Speaker 2>also just saying that I think it's coming around. The

0:41:51.200 --> 0:41:54.439
<v Speaker 2>general knowledge maybe is that it's not exactly the only way.

0:41:55.040 --> 0:41:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, And part of that is because IQ tests

0:41:58.920 --> 0:42:02.680
<v Speaker 1>measure a very narrow slice of what we can call

0:42:02.880 --> 0:42:07.319
<v Speaker 1>mental horsepower. Right. It looks at your logic, your pattern recognition,

0:42:07.520 --> 0:42:11.399
<v Speaker 1>short term memory, problem solving. So these tests can tell

0:42:11.440 --> 0:42:15.080
<v Speaker 1>you how good you are taking an IQ test. They

0:42:15.080 --> 0:42:17.520
<v Speaker 1>can tell you how fast you can solve a puzzle,

0:42:17.880 --> 0:42:21.600
<v Speaker 1>but they don't they don't measure They're not able to

0:42:21.600 --> 0:42:24.439
<v Speaker 1>measure how you would do things like raise kids, or

0:42:24.520 --> 0:42:27.200
<v Speaker 1>stop your friends in the middle of a fight, or

0:42:27.239 --> 0:42:31.000
<v Speaker 1>even survive a week in the woods. The soft skills

0:42:31.440 --> 0:42:34.520
<v Speaker 1>are the key, Right. You can score incredibly high on

0:42:34.600 --> 0:42:38.319
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of tests, but you might not have emotional intelligence.

0:42:38.360 --> 0:42:42.240
<v Speaker 1>You might not be good at reading and understanding the needs,

0:42:42.360 --> 0:42:46.960
<v Speaker 1>perspectives and actions of others. Right. If you're very good

0:42:47.040 --> 0:42:53.440
<v Speaker 1>at math. But you don't feel that other people also

0:42:53.680 --> 0:42:57.279
<v Speaker 1>are equal entities in the world, then folks at your

0:42:57.320 --> 0:42:59.440
<v Speaker 1>job aren't gonna like you. You also might not be

0:42:59.480 --> 0:43:03.160
<v Speaker 1>good at hand stress. These are key things to success,

0:43:03.200 --> 0:43:06.160
<v Speaker 1>and I love what you pointed out there about things

0:43:06.239 --> 0:43:10.920
<v Speaker 1>like networking. IQ tests don't measure that, they don't measure

0:43:11.000 --> 0:43:13.320
<v Speaker 1>interpersonal intelligence.

0:43:12.680 --> 0:43:15.080
<v Speaker 2>Well, and we certainly all remember the No Child Left

0:43:15.120 --> 0:43:19.120
<v Speaker 2>Behind scandal and how inevitably scandal maybe is a strong word,

0:43:19.200 --> 0:43:24.160
<v Speaker 2>but how when these quotas are pushed upon already strained

0:43:24.640 --> 0:43:26.879
<v Speaker 2>educational systems, you're going to end up with a whole

0:43:26.880 --> 0:43:30.400
<v Speaker 2>lot of teaching the tests, which again is not a

0:43:30.440 --> 0:43:33.320
<v Speaker 2>good indicator of what that test is actually supposed to

0:43:33.400 --> 0:43:35.080
<v Speaker 2>measure in the real world.

0:43:35.160 --> 0:43:39.200
<v Speaker 1>One hundred percent. You know, Bene's original test was meant

0:43:39.200 --> 0:43:42.640
<v Speaker 1>to be a diagnostic tool, not some kind of leader board.

0:43:42.680 --> 0:43:45.319
<v Speaker 1>But the issue is, by the time it hit the

0:43:45.440 --> 0:43:48.959
<v Speaker 1>United States, the test and versions of it were being

0:43:49.040 --> 0:43:53.160
<v Speaker 1>used to brank people to gatekeeper opportunities and even to

0:43:53.520 --> 0:43:58.440
<v Speaker 1>justify eugenics programs like they would use the IQ test

0:43:58.800 --> 0:44:06.120
<v Speaker 1>results to to justify another pseudoscience up there with phrenology,

0:44:06.280 --> 0:44:10.440
<v Speaker 1>the idea that some people have to be sterilized. The

0:44:10.480 --> 0:44:14.759
<v Speaker 1>idea that you're perceived race means you are superior or

0:44:14.920 --> 0:44:16.480
<v Speaker 1>inferior to others.

0:44:16.880 --> 0:44:19.080
<v Speaker 2>And man, I'm not trying to be get on a

0:44:19.080 --> 0:44:22.640
<v Speaker 2>political soap box here, but that sure feels like the

0:44:22.640 --> 0:44:25.920
<v Speaker 2>flavor of the way the President is thrown around that term,

0:44:26.200 --> 0:44:28.440
<v Speaker 2>because he's often using it to refer to people of

0:44:28.480 --> 0:44:32.160
<v Speaker 2>color and referring to them as low IQ individuals and

0:44:32.160 --> 0:44:32.839
<v Speaker 2>stuff like that.

0:44:32.880 --> 0:44:35.120
<v Speaker 1>It just it just has echoes of what you're talking

0:44:35.160 --> 0:44:40.440
<v Speaker 1>about there, ben Oh, oh no, don't yield. We we can,

0:44:41.400 --> 0:44:43.960
<v Speaker 1>we could break, but we will not. Then it just grows.

0:44:44.040 --> 0:44:46.480
<v Speaker 2>It's again, not even if it's it's any political observation,

0:44:46.600 --> 0:44:49.520
<v Speaker 2>it's it's it's not nice. It's just rude and at

0:44:49.600 --> 0:44:53.879
<v Speaker 2>at at its very least and racist that it's at

0:44:53.880 --> 0:44:54.360
<v Speaker 2>its worst.

0:44:55.080 --> 0:44:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. In the early nineteen hundreds, Uncle Sam started using

0:44:59.320 --> 0:45:04.480
<v Speaker 1>uh these tests descended from Benay to sort students into programs.

0:45:04.719 --> 0:45:07.680
<v Speaker 1>So if you got a score on their version of

0:45:07.719 --> 0:45:10.960
<v Speaker 1>the IQ test that was above one hundred and fifteen,

0:45:11.360 --> 0:45:14.640
<v Speaker 1>that was your quotient, your deviation from the norm of

0:45:14.640 --> 0:45:19.080
<v Speaker 1>one hundred, then you were considered gifted and you then

0:45:19.239 --> 0:45:22.960
<v Speaker 1>got higher education opportunities. So you can make the most

0:45:23.000 --> 0:45:27.000
<v Speaker 1>of your abilities. If you're a normal kid, your score

0:45:27.040 --> 0:45:30.160
<v Speaker 1>is between seventy to one hundred and fifteen at this time,

0:45:30.480 --> 0:45:33.280
<v Speaker 1>you stay where you are. If your score is under

0:45:33.400 --> 0:45:36.920
<v Speaker 1>seventy for one reason or another and you don't often

0:45:36.960 --> 0:45:40.320
<v Speaker 1>get to retake the test, you are considered special needs.

0:45:40.440 --> 0:45:45.320
<v Speaker 1>You are sent to state schools, you are sent to institutions.

0:45:45.760 --> 0:45:49.759
<v Speaker 1>People begin to think that these special needs kids are

0:45:49.800 --> 0:45:54.360
<v Speaker 1>not fit for society. Only a few of them actually

0:45:54.400 --> 0:45:57.200
<v Speaker 1>had a cognitive disability. A lot of these kids were

0:45:57.200 --> 0:46:02.640
<v Speaker 1>from foster care, right, they didn't have earlier educational opportunities.

0:46:02.680 --> 0:46:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Their parents or their relatives may have substance issues, they

0:46:07.080 --> 0:46:10.640
<v Speaker 1>may have had their own sort of mental issues. These

0:46:10.760 --> 0:46:16.200
<v Speaker 1>kids get carted off to abusive foster homes and institutions.

0:46:17.560 --> 0:46:20.799
<v Speaker 1>And since we're a family show, can we just leave

0:46:20.840 --> 0:46:26.359
<v Speaker 1>it at this horrific stuff happened to these children, all

0:46:26.400 --> 0:46:31.160
<v Speaker 1>the kinds of abuse that you can imagine, and also sterilization.

0:46:31.960 --> 0:46:33.560
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, yeah, and there's you know, if you want

0:46:33.600 --> 0:46:38.239
<v Speaker 2>to dig deeper into that very disturbing topic, we've done

0:46:38.280 --> 0:46:40.640
<v Speaker 2>episodes about that very thing, on stuff that it wants

0:46:40.640 --> 0:46:43.680
<v Speaker 2>you to know. As well as our sister podcast stuff

0:46:43.719 --> 0:46:47.399
<v Speaker 2>you missed in history class, who have done I think

0:46:47.480 --> 0:46:52.440
<v Speaker 2>several episodes on sterilization and on this kind of horrific

0:46:52.480 --> 0:46:56.440
<v Speaker 2>treatment of children through these very types of programs that

0:46:56.440 --> 0:46:57.000
<v Speaker 2>we're talking about.

0:46:57.239 --> 0:47:01.120
<v Speaker 1>One hundred percent. Yeah, and these controvert continue in the

0:47:01.160 --> 0:47:05.279
<v Speaker 1>modern day. Critics will tell you intelligence tests have a

0:47:05.360 --> 0:47:11.200
<v Speaker 1>strong cultural bias, a favor people for more affluent backgrounds.

0:47:11.280 --> 0:47:16.880
<v Speaker 1>They discriminate against people from minority groups, right, whether that

0:47:17.000 --> 0:47:20.920
<v Speaker 1>be racial, ethnic, social, et cetera. We also know that

0:47:20.960 --> 0:47:25.080
<v Speaker 1>psychologists are responding to this by developing what they call

0:47:25.320 --> 0:47:31.680
<v Speaker 1>culture free tests, and the idea seems like very basic stuff. Say, say,

0:47:31.760 --> 0:47:34.880
<v Speaker 1>for instance, if we're testing kids who grew up in

0:47:34.920 --> 0:47:39.400
<v Speaker 1>the inner city, then we're going to use when we

0:47:39.480 --> 0:47:44.120
<v Speaker 1>ask questions, we're going to use urban or city settings

0:47:44.520 --> 0:47:48.200
<v Speaker 1>instead of like an outdated rural pastoral thing. Right like,

0:47:48.320 --> 0:47:52.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm a kid in Queens, I'm an upper Queens.

0:47:52.880 --> 0:47:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Why are you asking me about this? Farmer? And is

0:47:55.480 --> 0:47:59.200
<v Speaker 1>rutabagas stop it? Ruda begas?

0:47:59.280 --> 0:48:02.480
<v Speaker 2>We love rudebaks. I still don't really fully understand what

0:48:02.600 --> 0:48:04.800
<v Speaker 2>they are do. Check out stuff they don't want you

0:48:04.880 --> 0:48:08.440
<v Speaker 2>to knowse Weekly Listener Mail episodes for a brand new

0:48:08.520 --> 0:48:12.480
<v Speaker 2>root of Bega Banger every single week from our incredible

0:48:12.520 --> 0:48:16.440
<v Speaker 2>super producer Dylan the code name Tennessee pal Fagan, And

0:48:16.719 --> 0:48:19.040
<v Speaker 2>I just wanted to really quickly mention that the specific

0:48:19.080 --> 0:48:21.840
<v Speaker 2>episode that I was referencing from stuff you missed in

0:48:21.920 --> 0:48:26.400
<v Speaker 2>history class is about the Calikak family and the study

0:48:26.680 --> 0:48:32.560
<v Speaker 2>of hereditary feeble mindedness, which is another really gross term

0:48:32.880 --> 0:48:35.000
<v Speaker 2>that was thrown around and tied to these types of

0:48:36.000 --> 0:48:37.280
<v Speaker 2>standardized test scores.

0:48:37.760 --> 0:48:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that was weaponized language, for sure, But what we're

0:48:41.560 --> 0:48:46.359
<v Speaker 1>telling you is eugenics aside, cultural gatekeeping aside. There is

0:48:46.440 --> 0:48:50.400
<v Speaker 1>hope for the IQ test. These tests are not total garbage,

0:48:50.400 --> 0:48:54.520
<v Speaker 1>but they have and continue to have massive issues. They've

0:48:54.520 --> 0:49:00.080
<v Speaker 1>been weaponized, flagrantly misused. The results have been overestimated, and

0:49:00.239 --> 0:49:03.319
<v Speaker 1>on and on and on. And here's one of the

0:49:03.320 --> 0:49:06.120
<v Speaker 1>things I wish more people talked about when we talk

0:49:06.160 --> 0:49:09.520
<v Speaker 1>about IQ tests. This is one of the most ridiculous

0:49:09.560 --> 0:49:13.719
<v Speaker 1>flaws in the Origin story Noel Max. There is this

0:49:13.920 --> 0:49:18.640
<v Speaker 1>old adage in writing fiction, which is this, it is

0:49:18.719 --> 0:49:24.040
<v Speaker 1>incredibly difficult to write a super smart character because any

0:49:24.200 --> 0:49:28.239
<v Speaker 1>character can only be as intelligent as the author that

0:49:28.400 --> 0:49:32.520
<v Speaker 1>created them. IQ tests. I will posit cannot be immune

0:49:32.600 --> 0:49:36.359
<v Speaker 1>from that law. So the creators are very smart people, right,

0:49:36.400 --> 0:49:38.920
<v Speaker 1>the folks who make these tests, But they're probably not

0:49:39.040 --> 0:49:42.799
<v Speaker 1>the smartest people ever, ever, ever in history, and they're

0:49:42.840 --> 0:49:45.919
<v Speaker 1>probably not even the smartest people in their own lifetimes,

0:49:46.280 --> 0:49:50.880
<v Speaker 1>so they quite possibly are not the best candidates to

0:49:51.000 --> 0:49:54.120
<v Speaker 1>make these examinations in the first place. We need the

0:49:54.160 --> 0:49:58.759
<v Speaker 1>smartest people ever writing the test, and these are not them. No,

0:49:59.120 --> 0:50:04.200
<v Speaker 1>they're usually now, No they're not. And there's no statistical

0:50:04.280 --> 0:50:09.680
<v Speaker 1>association between your IQ score and hard measures like your wealth.

0:50:10.800 --> 0:50:17.080
<v Speaker 1>So look, this is a crazy thing. Humans are still

0:50:17.120 --> 0:50:20.840
<v Speaker 1>figuring out intelligence. We didn't even get to the Flynn effect,

0:50:21.000 --> 0:50:24.120
<v Speaker 1>which is kind of good news. Maybe we end on that. Noel,

0:50:24.160 --> 0:50:25.840
<v Speaker 1>have you heard of the Flint effect?

0:50:26.040 --> 0:50:29.440
<v Speaker 2>No, not till just now when I clocked it in

0:50:29.440 --> 0:50:32.520
<v Speaker 2>the outline. But please tell us about the Flint effect.

0:50:33.200 --> 0:50:39.160
<v Speaker 1>All right, here's the pickle. This is fascinating over time,

0:50:39.520 --> 0:50:43.399
<v Speaker 1>over decades and decades and decades, more than a century now,

0:50:43.880 --> 0:50:49.879
<v Speaker 1>IQ scores have shown a consistent increase across generations. It's

0:50:49.880 --> 0:50:53.760
<v Speaker 1>called the Flint effect because a guy named James Flynn

0:50:54.080 --> 0:50:59.200
<v Speaker 1>first first popularized this in the nineteen eighties and it

0:50:59.360 --> 0:51:02.560
<v Speaker 1>looks like people are scoring a higher on IQ tests,

0:51:02.600 --> 0:51:07.080
<v Speaker 1>not because they're necessarily getting smarter, but because the tests

0:51:07.200 --> 0:51:13.080
<v Speaker 1>themselves are changing. People have improved access to education and information,

0:51:13.560 --> 0:51:17.600
<v Speaker 1>and people, perhaps most importantly, have better health and nutrition.

0:51:18.800 --> 0:51:24.040
<v Speaker 1>The one thing that hasn't changed is genetic lineage. Your

0:51:24.160 --> 0:51:27.920
<v Speaker 1>genes have very little to do with your IQ test.

0:51:29.360 --> 0:51:34.240
<v Speaker 1>It's true, it's true. And so where do we land

0:51:34.280 --> 0:51:36.480
<v Speaker 1>on it? Guys? I know, always coming in a hot

0:51:36.480 --> 0:51:38.719
<v Speaker 1>and saying IQ tests are kind of beat the air

0:51:38.800 --> 0:51:43.120
<v Speaker 1>max bullshit, They're kind of dark, they're just overblown. They're

0:51:43.160 --> 0:51:43.640
<v Speaker 1>over blown.

0:51:43.719 --> 0:51:45.360
<v Speaker 2>It's true, and we already kind of knew that in

0:51:45.440 --> 0:51:47.920
<v Speaker 2>terms of these types of tests for the very reasons

0:51:47.920 --> 0:51:50.080
<v Speaker 2>that we mentioned, just the idea of it's really hard to.

0:51:50.800 --> 0:51:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Boil down the individual, unique snowflakedness that is a human

0:51:54.880 --> 0:51:56.760
<v Speaker 1>person into a number.

0:51:57.960 --> 0:52:00.160
<v Speaker 2>But then you do end the episode with a think,

0:52:00.160 --> 0:52:02.279
<v Speaker 2>a question that maybe on all of our minds is.

0:52:02.200 --> 0:52:05.720
<v Speaker 1>But who's the best, Who's got the best one, who's

0:52:05.800 --> 0:52:07.839
<v Speaker 1>the smartest? Remember when we were kids too.

0:52:07.880 --> 0:52:09.520
<v Speaker 2>That's why I think it's so funny that Trump throws

0:52:09.520 --> 0:52:11.120
<v Speaker 2>that around, where we used to probably make fun of

0:52:11.120 --> 0:52:15.600
<v Speaker 2>people by saying your IQ's negative zero or stuff.

0:52:15.280 --> 0:52:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Like that, not fully understanding anything about this world.

0:52:18.640 --> 0:52:21.400
<v Speaker 2>So who's got the highest IQ in the whole wide

0:52:21.440 --> 0:52:22.640
<v Speaker 2>world of sports?

0:52:23.040 --> 0:52:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Oh? Yeah, yeah, Oh, I've got to do one joke

0:52:26.360 --> 0:52:31.359
<v Speaker 1>for please, one joke for our Irish American friends. This

0:52:31.440 --> 0:52:33.799
<v Speaker 1>might get us in trouble, but let's do it and

0:52:33.920 --> 0:52:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Max get a MIC for this one. Hey, guys, what's

0:52:37.400 --> 0:52:42.640
<v Speaker 1>three miles long and has an IQ of forty? The

0:52:42.680 --> 0:52:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Saint Patty's Day Parade?

0:52:45.040 --> 0:52:50.719
<v Speaker 2>Because they're all really, did we even talk about what

0:52:50.760 --> 0:52:51.600
<v Speaker 2>the scale is?

0:52:51.640 --> 0:52:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Though?

0:52:52.880 --> 0:52:56.279
<v Speaker 2>The numerical scale like forty would be pretty bad, right,

0:52:56.480 --> 0:52:59.760
<v Speaker 2>forty is bad? And then we're talking about a cumulative

0:52:59.760 --> 0:53:03.120
<v Speaker 2>school or of forty. So man, they really whoever wrote

0:53:03.160 --> 0:53:04.640
<v Speaker 2>that joke really stuck it to the Irish?

0:53:04.719 --> 0:53:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Huh? It was probably a British guy, Probably it was

0:53:07.880 --> 0:53:13.240
<v Speaker 1>not us. So yes, to answer your question directly, as

0:53:13.760 --> 0:53:17.399
<v Speaker 1>as we can find in the research. Currently, we don't

0:53:17.400 --> 0:53:21.000
<v Speaker 1>know the actual smartest homo sapient alive right now, but

0:53:21.200 --> 0:53:25.800
<v Speaker 1>as of twenty twenty four, a doctor named Jung Hun

0:53:25.960 --> 0:53:30.719
<v Speaker 1>Kim has established the world record title for the world's

0:53:30.760 --> 0:53:37.400
<v Speaker 1>highest IQ person. Now, his intelligence quotient has been verified

0:53:37.680 --> 0:53:42.239
<v Speaker 1>as two one hundred and seventy six. I'm impressed. That's

0:53:42.440 --> 0:53:46.239
<v Speaker 1>what's a big number. I mean, does he do We're

0:53:46.280 --> 0:53:48.600
<v Speaker 1>not saying he's brilliant, No, you might just be very

0:53:48.640 --> 0:53:49.440
<v Speaker 1>good to take you the.

0:53:49.440 --> 0:53:55.440
<v Speaker 2>Test Crackerjack test taker. And good on you, doctor Junghun Kim.

0:53:55.760 --> 0:53:57.520
<v Speaker 2>And by the way, I do love the idea of

0:53:58.120 --> 0:54:01.200
<v Speaker 2>the non non Olympic record.

0:54:02.200 --> 0:54:06.239
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yeah, the International Non Olympic Committee. Yes, the International

0:54:06.280 --> 0:54:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Non Olympic Committee. It's very niche, very very specific. Yeah. Yeah, like,

0:54:11.840 --> 0:54:16.040
<v Speaker 1>oh uh, it's my first time going to committee meeting.

0:54:16.160 --> 0:54:19.800
<v Speaker 1>What are you guys about, well, you know, the Olympics, Yeah,

0:54:20.120 --> 0:54:24.439
<v Speaker 1>pretty much, nothing related to that. Everything else, everything, everything else.

0:54:24.480 --> 0:54:25.320
<v Speaker 1>In our house.

0:54:26.360 --> 0:54:29.319
<v Speaker 2>We also, of course have the World Memory Championships, the

0:54:29.360 --> 0:54:33.480
<v Speaker 2>World Memory Sports Council. These are wild Ben and the

0:54:33.480 --> 0:54:40.319
<v Speaker 2>official World Record trademark, right, yeah, whatever the R. What's

0:54:40.360 --> 0:54:43.239
<v Speaker 2>the R registered trademark? Yeah, it's the registered trademark. I

0:54:43.239 --> 0:54:46.960
<v Speaker 2>should remember that from our intellectual property series.

0:54:47.000 --> 0:54:48.960
<v Speaker 1>But Ben Man, excellent.

0:54:49.080 --> 0:54:50.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't know how what kind of test taker you are,

0:54:50.960 --> 0:54:53.759
<v Speaker 2>but you're sure good a research doc writer and this

0:54:53.960 --> 0:54:54.720
<v Speaker 2>was a fun one.

0:54:55.040 --> 0:54:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Ah shucks. Well, big big thanks to everybody for tuning

0:54:59.160 --> 0:55:03.759
<v Speaker 1>in big thanks to our super producer mister Max Williams.

0:55:04.040 --> 0:55:09.120
<v Speaker 1>A big thanks to Jonathan Strickland, who I bet will

0:55:09.200 --> 0:55:11.480
<v Speaker 1>lie about his IQ scores.

0:55:11.600 --> 0:55:13.400
<v Speaker 2>Maybe, and I bet he knows it too. He's the

0:55:13.440 --> 0:55:15.520
<v Speaker 2>type of guy that knows definite and that keeps it.

0:55:15.560 --> 0:55:16.920
<v Speaker 2>You know, He's probably a guy that written on the

0:55:16.960 --> 0:55:18.120
<v Speaker 2>back of his Mensa Carden.

0:55:18.480 --> 0:55:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Big thanks to aj Bahamas, Jacob's. Big thanks to Leave's

0:55:22.160 --> 0:55:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Jeffcoat and Christopher Hasiotis who else, who else? Who else?

0:55:26.000 --> 0:55:29.440
<v Speaker 2>All the people jeez Luise the Lovely Humans over a

0:55:29.480 --> 0:55:31.680
<v Speaker 2>ridiculous crime. If you dig our show, you will absolutely

0:55:32.040 --> 0:55:34.680
<v Speaker 2>dig theirs Alex Williams and composer our theme.

0:55:34.680 --> 0:55:36.360
<v Speaker 1>If you already said it, I'm staying in a second time,

0:55:36.480 --> 0:55:39.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing it. Oh, I'm just doing it. Good, Save good,

0:55:39.400 --> 0:55:43.520
<v Speaker 1>save forgot that one and one thing one thing I

0:55:43.640 --> 0:55:47.080
<v Speaker 1>never want to forget is a big thank you to you, Noel.

0:55:48.320 --> 0:55:50.239
<v Speaker 1>You're one of the smartest people I know and it's

0:55:50.280 --> 0:55:51.680
<v Speaker 1>always a pleasure to hang out with you.

0:55:51.760 --> 0:55:55.239
<v Speaker 2>Oh Ben same, you are the missing piece in the

0:55:55.360 --> 0:55:57.919
<v Speaker 2>triangle pattern recognition test of my heart.

0:55:59.080 --> 0:55:59.759
<v Speaker 1>Let's see you next time.

0:55:59.760 --> 0:56:10.040
<v Speaker 2>Put For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app,

0:56:10.080 --> 0:56:13.200
<v Speaker 2>Apple podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.