WEBVTT - FFW Micro - Kyle Pitts

0:00:03.279 --> 0:00:08.680
<v Speaker 1>You found Fantasy Football Weekly Micro a deep dive on

0:00:08.920 --> 0:00:12.240
<v Speaker 1>one player in just five to ten minutes. Now, here's

0:00:12.240 --> 0:00:17.959
<v Speaker 1>your host, Paul Georgie. Welcome to an experimental edition of

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Weekly. We call Fantasy Football Weekly Micro. The

0:00:23.520 --> 0:00:28.480
<v Speaker 1>idea is to give you one of these most week

0:00:28.600 --> 0:00:31.159
<v Speaker 1>days in which we do a deep dive on a

0:00:31.240 --> 0:00:34.960
<v Speaker 1>particular player. Could be anybody. You never know what you're

0:00:35.000 --> 0:00:37.479
<v Speaker 1>gonna get, but you're gonna get one player from you know,

0:00:37.560 --> 0:00:39.479
<v Speaker 1>five to ten minutes, and the idea is to tell

0:00:39.520 --> 0:00:42.519
<v Speaker 1>you some things about that player that maybe you didn't

0:00:42.520 --> 0:00:46.120
<v Speaker 1>know or didn't remember from last year. My co host

0:00:46.159 --> 0:00:52.639
<v Speaker 1>for Fantasy Football Weekly Micro is Guillotine Leagues writer Tyler Kennabilely. Hi, Tyler, Hi,

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:54.480
<v Speaker 1>thanks for having me. Yeah, good to have you here.

0:00:54.800 --> 0:00:59.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm excited. This is your Fantasy Football Weekly premiere edition.

0:00:59.240 --> 0:01:01.240
<v Speaker 1>What do you think? I'm excited, honestly, just to talk

0:01:01.280 --> 0:01:04.480
<v Speaker 1>about some of these players. I mean, the amount of

0:01:04.480 --> 0:01:06.480
<v Speaker 1>hours I consume of fantasy football, whether it be a

0:01:06.520 --> 0:01:09.160
<v Speaker 1>YouTube via just my own interests, searching the Internet for

0:01:09.360 --> 0:01:14.280
<v Speaker 1>some stat that no one cares about is it's something

0:01:14.319 --> 0:01:17.240
<v Speaker 1>for sure. So I'm excited to actually talk to not

0:01:17.319 --> 0:01:19.720
<v Speaker 1>just myself and my own thoughts about some of like

0:01:19.720 --> 0:01:21.840
<v Speaker 1>the opinions I have on these players. That's great, and

0:01:21.840 --> 0:01:24.640
<v Speaker 1>you've done great work on this. Our first the first

0:01:24.680 --> 0:01:27.240
<v Speaker 1>guy we're going to talk about is Kyle Pitts, and

0:01:27.319 --> 0:01:30.720
<v Speaker 1>I want to encourage listeners, your feedback counts on this.

0:01:30.720 --> 0:01:34.000
<v Speaker 1>This is an experiment. We may or may not continue

0:01:34.000 --> 0:01:36.040
<v Speaker 1>doing this. We don't know yet. Do you love it?

0:01:36.280 --> 0:01:38.440
<v Speaker 1>What do you want out of it? At Paul Charchion

0:01:38.480 --> 0:01:41.680
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Tyler Knabily k n A e b

0:01:42.040 --> 0:01:45.399
<v Speaker 1>l E k n a e b l E Tyler

0:01:45.480 --> 0:01:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Knnabilely on Twitter. Okay, let's talk Kyle Pitts, one of

0:01:49.440 --> 0:01:53.360
<v Speaker 1>the most polarizing players in fantasy football, and within our

0:01:53.400 --> 0:01:56.320
<v Speaker 1>own show, Brian, we're doing Kyle Pitts without Brian here,

0:01:56.560 --> 0:01:59.400
<v Speaker 1>which feels weird. I think you're gonna be playing the

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:03.280
<v Speaker 1>role of Kyle Pitts apologist that is normally a Brian role,

0:02:04.080 --> 0:02:07.640
<v Speaker 1>and I will continue to be the Kyle Pitts not

0:02:07.760 --> 0:02:09.600
<v Speaker 1>a hater. So I'm not a hater and I want

0:02:09.680 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 1>him to be great, but I've been skeptical all along,

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:15.880
<v Speaker 1>based mostly on his draft position. But let's let's start

0:02:15.919 --> 0:02:17.680
<v Speaker 1>with Kyle Pitts, what do you how do you want

0:02:17.680 --> 0:02:19.760
<v Speaker 1>to open the conversation. Well, first off, I just want

0:02:19.760 --> 0:02:20.799
<v Speaker 1>to say I think me and Brian might have to

0:02:20.840 --> 0:02:22.880
<v Speaker 1>go get drinks and just talk about Kyle Pitts for

0:02:22.960 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe like an hour. I'm worried about where that would

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:29.120
<v Speaker 1>end up. Yeah, But first off, I mean he's going

0:02:29.240 --> 0:02:31.800
<v Speaker 1>right now adp tight end five, which is like fifth,

0:02:31.840 --> 0:02:35.160
<v Speaker 1>six fifth or sixth round in best Ball. Last year

0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:37.639
<v Speaker 1>he was the tight end twenty in average points per game,

0:02:37.840 --> 0:02:40.520
<v Speaker 1>and a note I found was Jordan Aikens tighten nineteen

0:02:40.560 --> 0:02:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Secually he was worse than Jordan and its points per

0:02:43.760 --> 0:02:45.160
<v Speaker 1>game two, which is kind of hard to believe that

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:47.120
<v Speaker 1>he finished worse than points per game than Jordan Nakens.

0:02:47.160 --> 0:02:49.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember ever going against Jordan Nakens last year

0:02:49.680 --> 0:02:51.480
<v Speaker 1>in fantasy football in any of my league, nobody ever

0:02:51.520 --> 0:02:54.560
<v Speaker 1>started Jordan Kins. No, yeah, but you started Kyle Pitts

0:02:54.600 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot, and if you're in a Guillotine league, not

0:02:57.320 --> 0:03:00.560
<v Speaker 1>for very long. Yes. Yeah, your season ended early on

0:03:00.680 --> 0:03:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Pitts potentially, so we know that to this point

0:03:04.760 --> 0:03:08.480
<v Speaker 1>he hasn't helped us very much. But we're forward facing here.

0:03:08.720 --> 0:03:10.520
<v Speaker 1>What are you thinking about if you look ahead to

0:03:10.600 --> 0:03:12.880
<v Speaker 1>this coming year, what can we learn. Well, the biggest

0:03:12.880 --> 0:03:14.800
<v Speaker 1>thing with Coppits, I think that everybody knows he's just

0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:16.560
<v Speaker 1>a talent that he can possess. I mean, he's a

0:03:16.600 --> 0:03:19.720
<v Speaker 1>generational tight end talent. He had the second most receiving

0:03:19.760 --> 0:03:22.360
<v Speaker 1>yards ever for a rookie tight end, behind only my Dicka.

0:03:22.400 --> 0:03:25.400
<v Speaker 1>You're in a four four fourty day, which take that

0:03:25.400 --> 0:03:26.920
<v Speaker 1>with a grain of salt. I guess at two hundred

0:03:26.960 --> 0:03:30.360
<v Speaker 1>forty five pounds, but that's a ninety nine percentile speed score.

0:03:30.440 --> 0:03:32.280
<v Speaker 1>That's insane for a tight end like he can run

0:03:32.280 --> 0:03:34.600
<v Speaker 1>faster than some receivers, and the two hundred forty five pounds.

0:03:35.200 --> 0:03:37.920
<v Speaker 1>You would like to think, like this year, that the

0:03:37.960 --> 0:03:40.640
<v Speaker 1>past attempts will be up. If you're apologists like myself,

0:03:40.760 --> 0:03:42.200
<v Speaker 1>you'd like to think that the past attempts will be

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:45.560
<v Speaker 1>up with a non Mariota quarterback. Atlanta was second in

0:03:45.640 --> 0:03:48.880
<v Speaker 1>rushing attempts last year, and that's a big concern exactly,

0:03:48.960 --> 0:03:51.040
<v Speaker 1>and then the second fewest past attempts at twenty four

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:53.240
<v Speaker 1>point two. So that that's the problem right now that

0:03:53.360 --> 0:03:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Lagiah Coppits is what kind of offense is he going

0:03:55.680 --> 0:03:57.800
<v Speaker 1>to be in? This year and will it change now.

0:03:57.800 --> 0:04:00.000
<v Speaker 1>One of the things that may suggest it will change

0:04:00.320 --> 0:04:02.560
<v Speaker 1>is when Desmond Ritter started the last four games, those

0:04:02.600 --> 0:04:05.520
<v Speaker 1>attempts jumped up from twenty four point two to thirty

0:04:05.520 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 1>passing attempts per game. And Ritter had two games with

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:13.920
<v Speaker 1>thirty or more passing attempts and four starts and mariotely

0:04:13.960 --> 0:04:17.080
<v Speaker 1>had two of those games in thirteen starts. Yeah, so

0:04:17.279 --> 0:04:19.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe Ritter's gonna maybe they're gonna unlock more passing with

0:04:20.000 --> 0:04:23.279
<v Speaker 1>Ritter because because last year suggested that that would be

0:04:23.279 --> 0:04:27.560
<v Speaker 1>the case. But it's still Arthur Smith. He's got the Titans,

0:04:27.640 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Mike Vrabel, you know, mindset running through his veins, and Tyler.

0:04:32.240 --> 0:04:36.640
<v Speaker 1>I worry that he's just playing, gonna run the ball

0:04:36.720 --> 0:04:39.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot no matter what, and that's just who he is.

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:45.000
<v Speaker 1>And maybe maybe that'll change some with the change at quarterback.

0:04:45.160 --> 0:04:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Maybe Desmond Ritter will alter that. But it's not like

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Desmond Ritter looks like a phenomenal passer that you need

0:04:51.839 --> 0:04:53.920
<v Speaker 1>to build an offense around. But I think he can

0:04:53.960 --> 0:04:57.160
<v Speaker 1>be a better passer than Mariota. I'm a diehard Falcons fan.

0:04:57.240 --> 0:05:00.120
<v Speaker 1>I followed this team all last year and it's think

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:03.039
<v Speaker 1>it's worth mentioning that when Matt Ryan was the quarterback

0:05:03.160 --> 0:05:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the first year Arthur Smith was there, Yeah, there were

0:05:05.120 --> 0:05:07.200
<v Speaker 1>nineteenth and passing attempts per game, which I mean, it's

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:09.120
<v Speaker 1>not like it's the top ten, but it's a lot

0:05:09.120 --> 0:05:11.760
<v Speaker 1>better than thirty first. Yes, So that's one of the

0:05:11.800 --> 0:05:14.200
<v Speaker 1>things that I was kind of gives me hope that

0:05:14.240 --> 0:05:17.800
<v Speaker 1>I think Arthur Smith is truly believes that whatever is,

0:05:17.880 --> 0:05:22.040
<v Speaker 1>whatever offense, whatever like personnel he has on the field,

0:05:22.200 --> 0:05:23.880
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna get the best out of him. Whether that's

0:05:23.920 --> 0:05:26.040
<v Speaker 1>passing the ball fifty times a game or running the

0:05:26.040 --> 0:05:27.920
<v Speaker 1>ball fifty times a game, He's going to do that. Now,

0:05:27.960 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 1>I think I will admit that he does like to

0:05:29.720 --> 0:05:31.640
<v Speaker 1>run the ball. He likes the presence of a running game.

0:05:31.640 --> 0:05:34.120
<v Speaker 1>He's not Mike Leach offense where they're gonna throw it

0:05:34.240 --> 0:05:37.280
<v Speaker 1>eight times a game. So I'm not saying he's like that,

0:05:37.360 --> 0:05:39.479
<v Speaker 1>but I do think he wants to establish the run

0:05:39.520 --> 0:05:41.599
<v Speaker 1>for sure, and he definitely has an old line that

0:05:42.080 --> 0:05:43.680
<v Speaker 1>that is going to do that. The old line was

0:05:43.760 --> 0:05:46.640
<v Speaker 1>second and run. It's actually pretty good offensive line. Old

0:05:46.640 --> 0:05:49.560
<v Speaker 1>line was second in PF run blocking, their eighth and

0:05:49.560 --> 0:05:51.200
<v Speaker 1>pass blocking, so they have a good old line which

0:05:51.240 --> 0:05:54.320
<v Speaker 1>is hopefully give riders from time. It's just whether or

0:05:54.360 --> 0:05:57.160
<v Speaker 1>not that he that he just unlocks Kyle pits, which

0:05:57.200 --> 0:05:59.400
<v Speaker 1>we haven't seen fully yet. I mean, I think he

0:05:59.400 --> 0:06:01.920
<v Speaker 1>only has three touchdowns in his career in two seasons

0:06:02.640 --> 0:06:05.040
<v Speaker 1>we've seen him. I think people forget that he caught

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:08.680
<v Speaker 1>a thousand yards in his first season because not listeners

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:10.920
<v Speaker 1>to this show won't. We will not have forgotten that

0:06:11.000 --> 0:06:16.159
<v Speaker 1>because Brian Johnson will not let you forget Tyler. Now, Brian,

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:18.039
<v Speaker 1>if he were here, he would also be saying he's

0:06:18.080 --> 0:06:21.159
<v Speaker 1>not a tight end. He's a wide receiver masquerading as

0:06:21.200 --> 0:06:22.920
<v Speaker 1>a tight end. And I know you've got some data

0:06:22.920 --> 0:06:26.080
<v Speaker 1>about where Kyle Pitts has lined up. Yeah, so over

0:06:26.120 --> 0:06:28.920
<v Speaker 1>the past two seasons he is kind of pretty much

0:06:29.320 --> 0:06:32.120
<v Speaker 1>like he has almost a third in all three positions.

0:06:32.160 --> 0:06:34.560
<v Speaker 1>So in line he's played thirty four percent of his snaps,

0:06:34.800 --> 0:06:37.039
<v Speaker 1>the slot has been thirty five percent, and then out

0:06:37.040 --> 0:06:39.279
<v Speaker 1>wide he's lined up there twenty nine percent of the time.

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:41.680
<v Speaker 1>So that's a pretty good sample side of kind. He

0:06:41.720 --> 0:06:44.600
<v Speaker 1>can play literally anywhere. And I think a big piece

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:46.239
<v Speaker 1>of that is going to be that John U Smith

0:06:46.279 --> 0:06:48.839
<v Speaker 1>signing that they had, which is kind of underrated because

0:06:48.880 --> 0:06:50.920
<v Speaker 1>I think what they might end up doing is john

0:06:51.000 --> 0:06:53.600
<v Speaker 1>U Smith is going to play in line tight end.

0:06:53.640 --> 0:06:55.800
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna be the one blocking. He's gonna be the

0:06:55.800 --> 0:06:58.240
<v Speaker 1>one doing the stuff that nobody wants Kyle Pitts doing

0:06:58.240 --> 0:07:00.920
<v Speaker 1>in the fantasy football community. Yes, Kyle Pitts, I think

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:02.680
<v Speaker 1>is just going to be the wide super one. He's

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:05.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna be in this lot. He's going to be out wide.

0:07:05.279 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 1>He can just kind of line up anywhere that could be.

0:07:07.839 --> 0:07:10.080
<v Speaker 1>And you know, you don't have to sell Johnny Smith

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:13.640
<v Speaker 1>on me in his ability to help the overall offense.

0:07:13.680 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 1>I am. I am to Johnny Smith with Brian Johnson

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:19.400
<v Speaker 1>is and maybe you are to Kyle Pitts. I believe

0:07:20.560 --> 0:07:22.640
<v Speaker 1>that one of the things that caught my eye about

0:07:22.680 --> 0:07:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Pitts that worries me. He had the worst catch

0:07:26.480 --> 0:07:30.239
<v Speaker 1>percentage in the entire league last year. He only caught

0:07:30.280 --> 0:07:32.600
<v Speaker 1>half of his targets. He was like forty nine point

0:07:32.640 --> 0:07:36.880
<v Speaker 1>eight percent worst in the league. Now you're gonna be

0:07:36.880 --> 0:07:39.040
<v Speaker 1>tempted to say, well, you look at his quarterbacking. He

0:07:39.080 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 1>had Marcus Mariota, and he had Desmond Ritters, and okay,

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:45.160
<v Speaker 1>I get that. But according to next Gen Stats, Mariota's

0:07:45.160 --> 0:07:51.280
<v Speaker 1>completion percentage above expectation was only negative one percent. Negative

0:07:51.320 --> 0:07:53.360
<v Speaker 1>one percent isn't great, but that was also Tom Brady

0:07:53.400 --> 0:07:55.679
<v Speaker 1>was negative one percent. Aaron Rodgers was negative one percent

0:07:55.720 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 1>over expectation. So Mario, it's not like Mariota and Ritter

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:02.840
<v Speaker 1>were just sending ground balls his way all the time.

0:08:03.360 --> 0:08:06.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, I need Kyle Pitts to not be the

0:08:06.320 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 1>lowest catch percentage player in the league. One thing that

0:08:10.880 --> 0:08:12.520
<v Speaker 1>because I was doing some digging on that too, because

0:08:12.520 --> 0:08:13.920
<v Speaker 1>I saw you put that in there, and I was

0:08:13.960 --> 0:08:18.520
<v Speaker 1>just curious my advanced my Crack research staff, and yes, yep,

0:08:18.680 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 1>we found that Mariota had the third highest poor pass

0:08:22.280 --> 0:08:25.040
<v Speaker 1>percentage in the league. The only two players that he

0:08:25.120 --> 0:08:28.480
<v Speaker 1>trailed were Zach Wilson and Davis Mills. There was the

0:08:28.480 --> 0:08:30.480
<v Speaker 1>only two players that were above him, and he also

0:08:30.480 --> 0:08:34.280
<v Speaker 1>had the second lowest on target percentage, trailing only Zach Wilson. Wow,

0:08:34.480 --> 0:08:37.640
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know. I just feel like he was

0:08:37.679 --> 0:08:40.960
<v Speaker 1>catching uncatchable He was trying to catch uncatchable balls from

0:08:40.960 --> 0:08:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Marioda specifically, and we didn't see him with Ridter obviously,

0:08:43.600 --> 0:08:46.080
<v Speaker 1>so we don't know what that's gonna be. Like, talk

0:08:46.120 --> 0:08:48.760
<v Speaker 1>to me about where Kyle Pitts is going in early

0:08:48.880 --> 0:08:52.160
<v Speaker 1>drafts so far, and if ultimately you think that he

0:08:52.320 --> 0:08:55.040
<v Speaker 1>is going in the appropriate place or if he should

0:08:55.040 --> 0:08:57.440
<v Speaker 1>be going higher or lower. So right now he's going

0:08:57.559 --> 0:09:00.240
<v Speaker 1>at tighten five again, fifth sixth round, which the little

0:09:00.240 --> 0:09:02.840
<v Speaker 1>bit a little bit of a dip last season, which actually, like,

0:09:03.040 --> 0:09:05.559
<v Speaker 1>considering the season he had last year, I'm surprised it's

0:09:05.600 --> 0:09:07.560
<v Speaker 1>not a little bit far down me too. That's just

0:09:07.600 --> 0:09:09.600
<v Speaker 1>how much people believe in Kyle Pitts. I guess the

0:09:09.640 --> 0:09:12.520
<v Speaker 1>only tight ends well, and also how a few other

0:09:12.640 --> 0:09:14.880
<v Speaker 1>tight ends there are, yeah, that you can count on

0:09:15.000 --> 0:09:18.960
<v Speaker 1>right now. Yeah, I honestly I like this. I like

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:20.320
<v Speaker 1>it a lot. You're get him out at a better

0:09:20.320 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 1>price than what you thought he was gonna be last season.

0:09:22.200 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 1>I just kind of see, you're kind of just buying

0:09:23.640 --> 0:09:26.199
<v Speaker 1>a dip a little bit with Kyle Pitts. I think

0:09:26.280 --> 0:09:28.800
<v Speaker 1>that the offense is going to turn around. I mean,

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:31.920
<v Speaker 1>he is just too good. I don't think we've seen

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:34.880
<v Speaker 1>somebody who you know, the talents there and it just

0:09:35.080 --> 0:09:36.839
<v Speaker 1>it just it just has to click at some point.

0:09:36.880 --> 0:09:38.720
<v Speaker 1>If it doesn't click this year, I don't know if

0:09:38.760 --> 0:09:40.000
<v Speaker 1>it's ever going to click. I think we said that

0:09:40.080 --> 0:09:43.800
<v Speaker 1>last year a lot too, but I'm still holding out

0:09:44.000 --> 0:09:47.480
<v Speaker 1>thirty year now. For receivers, it used to be years

0:09:47.520 --> 0:09:51.199
<v Speaker 1>ago the third years when wide receivers would tend to blossom.

0:09:51.240 --> 0:09:53.360
<v Speaker 1>That turned into year two, and now it's really turning

0:09:53.400 --> 0:09:57.479
<v Speaker 1>almost into year one, like Decembers, when you're good receivers

0:09:57.480 --> 0:10:01.160
<v Speaker 1>start to blossom. For tight ends, it's been it's been

0:10:01.240 --> 0:10:03.640
<v Speaker 1>year three for a long time, and Kyle Pitts might

0:10:03.679 --> 0:10:07.280
<v Speaker 1>walk into a great third season. I'm not taking him

0:10:07.280 --> 0:10:09.640
<v Speaker 1>a tight end five. Where would you take him? I

0:10:09.640 --> 0:10:12.000
<v Speaker 1>think he I believe I will. I haven't done my

0:10:12.200 --> 0:10:14.520
<v Speaker 1>final rankings, well not final, I haven't done my early

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:18.520
<v Speaker 1>rankings yet. I think Kyle Pitts will be roughly tight

0:10:18.640 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 1>end ten for me. So I'm not gonna I'm not

0:10:21.400 --> 0:10:24.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna be close here. I'm gonna have Dalton Sheltz Hires

0:10:24.040 --> 0:10:25.920
<v Speaker 1>to go to receiver. I don't even Knowho's throwing him

0:10:25.920 --> 0:10:28.240
<v Speaker 1>the ball yet. Um, I'm gonna have Dalton schltz Hire.

0:10:28.280 --> 0:10:29.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna have a bunch of I'm gonna have a

0:10:29.600 --> 0:10:32.200
<v Speaker 1>bunch of guys that I trust more than Kyle Pitts

0:10:32.280 --> 0:10:36.640
<v Speaker 1>in this offense. Thank Kyle Pits. Well, I guess we're

0:10:36.640 --> 0:10:38.199
<v Speaker 1>just going to agree to disagree that, aren't we. You

0:10:38.240 --> 0:10:40.920
<v Speaker 1>can have him, will you can have with Kyle Schilton.

0:10:41.679 --> 0:10:44.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to have fun with Dalton Sheltz. He's the

0:10:44.120 --> 0:10:46.520
<v Speaker 1>only receiver they've got on that team right now. You

0:10:46.640 --> 0:10:50.640
<v Speaker 1>can catch a pass, all right? Thank you. First edition

0:10:50.679 --> 0:10:54.080
<v Speaker 1>of Fantasy Football Weekly micro in the books. If you

0:10:54.160 --> 0:10:57.400
<v Speaker 1>found this uh helpful or not, let me know at

0:10:57.400 --> 0:11:00.959
<v Speaker 1>Paul Charchian, at Tyler Kennabali A n A E B

0:11:01.360 --> 0:11:04.360
<v Speaker 1>L E on Twitter. We'll talk to you tomorrow. Everybody,

0:11:04.400 --> 0:11:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Bye bye,