Speaker 1: All right, thanks Scott sho On on Hour two Sean Hannity Show,
Speaker 1: Toll free. Our number is eight hundred and nine to
Speaker 1: four one, Sean if you want to be a part
Speaker 1: of the program. Well, smoking gun evidence. I've been getting
Speaker 1: wind of this now from my friend John Solomon for
Speaker 1: days than he was on TV the other night.
Speaker 2: He said, I expect in.
Speaker 1: Coming days that we're going to hear a lot about
Speaker 1: and he goes and he laid out the perfect tiase
Speaker 1: for what was declassified this annex, which was released by
Speaker 1: Chuck Grassley earlier today, declassified intelligence tying Soros to Clinton's
Speaker 1: Russia gate plan for the FBI to put more oil
Speaker 1: into the fire. That's the headline on justinnews dot com.
Speaker 1: This has been a story that John Solomon has been
Speaker 1: working on for years and years of his life. He
Speaker 1: has more contacts deep within the intelligence community the f
Speaker 1: than any other person that I know on the face
Speaker 1: of this earth. And we have worked together in tandem
Speaker 1: along with a very small cast of other people, including
Speaker 1: Greg Jarrett, Sarah Carter, and then some members of Congress
Speaker 1: that were very very helpful during the process. Devin Nunas
Speaker 1: would be one, Mark Meadows Rather than me rehashing a
Speaker 1: lot of what I said in the last hour, why
Speaker 1: don't we bring John on and get his take on it,
Speaker 1: but also tie this into the declassification by Toolsey Gabbertt
Speaker 1: at the DNI. And when you put it all together,
Speaker 1: what I believe we are looking at is probably what
Speaker 1: Chuck Grassley classified is as the biggest political scandal in
Speaker 1: American history. I've been saying that this is going to
Speaker 1: make Watergate look like a Jaywalking ticket in the end,
Speaker 1: and I believe this smoking gun out today proves that
Speaker 1: comment to be correct. John Solomon, founder editor in chief
Speaker 1: investigative reporters The News dot Com, sir, well, how many
Speaker 1: years of your life have you worked on this story?
Speaker 3: Well, I remember a certain March twenty seventeen sitting in
Speaker 3: your studio and I told you what I thought was
Speaker 3: going on. He said, let's peel this onion back. And
Speaker 3: so it's been eight years, the eight years this year.
Speaker 3: It's just remarkable, and I think it really is time
Speaker 3: you've given it because it's an important It was your
Speaker 3: broll horn and your own instincts that helped drive this,
Speaker 3: and so we're very lucky now to really understand how
Speaker 3: it went down.
Speaker 1: So we have this newly declassified so called Clinton Plan intelligence,
Speaker 1: including intercepted communications from a George Soros ally by the Russians, ironically,
Speaker 1: which suggested that Hillary's campaign against Donald Trump was plotting
Speaker 1: a long term affair to demonize Trump. Now this is
Speaker 1: the information we had got a little piece of this
Speaker 1: information that even foreign actors knew that Hillary had planned
Speaker 1: this operation ahead of time. And the revelations include this,
Speaker 1: these communications or purported communications from Leonard Bernardo's It's not
Speaker 1: somebody I'd heard of before, a top official at George
Speaker 1: Soros's Open Society Foundations, and communications by Clinton Forum policy
Speaker 1: advisor Julianne Smith. Tell us what this says and what
Speaker 1: stands out the most to you, Well.
Speaker 3: It makes sense that if you're Hillary Clinton, you're going
Speaker 3: into your Democratic national nominating convention, you just survived by
Speaker 3: a whisker an email scandal that maybe others would have
Speaker 3: been indicted for, that you would tell your big benefactors,
Speaker 3: your donors, the base of your party. Hey, I've got
Speaker 3: a plan to get myself out of this hole. Yeah,
Speaker 3: I got the classified email problem. It's been hanging around
Speaker 3: my neck for two years. But I got to plan
Speaker 3: to change the topic, and you would tell your donors,
Speaker 3: you tell your benefactors. That's how a political candidate works.
Speaker 3: And that's what this email, what's the Russians purported to
Speaker 3: have intercepted? Says Leonard Bernardo, top official with George Soros's
Speaker 3: Open Society Foundation, is recounting his conversations with a top
Speaker 3: advisor at the Clinton campaign, saying, all right, they're going
Speaker 3: to put a plan in place, and the plan is
Speaker 3: they're going to make it look like Donald Trump has
Speaker 3: a Russia collusion problem, maybe he was involved in the
Speaker 3: hacking of Hillary's emails. That we're going to change the
Speaker 3: subject from her email scandal to this. And by the way,
Speaker 3: we don't really know if the Russians actually couldn't emails
Speaker 3: because we don't have direct evidence of it from our vendor,
Speaker 3: the vendor that the FBI then relied on to make
Speaker 3: the claim. But hey, we're going to let it roll.
Speaker 3: Let's see where it goes. That email has extraordinary detail.
Speaker 3: And it's four days before the FBI opens up Crossfire Hurricane,
Speaker 3: and it's the day that Hilary Clinton's plan starts to
Speaker 3: go in motion. Joe Biden is going to go out
Speaker 3: and give a speech or make a comment and start
Speaker 3: the rumble. And then Jake's Sullivan and other people are
Speaker 3: out there, and Christopher Steele's coming to Washington's about to
Speaker 3: meet with Bruce or on July thirties. In this four
Speaker 3: day window, the Russians knew what was going to happen
Speaker 3: before it happened. And then you look at this intercept,
Speaker 3: is it real? Well, what the guy writes actually occurs
Speaker 3: all the way through, so he is either a fortune
Speaker 3: teller or he got read in. And Hillary Clinton really
Speaker 3: put this plan in motion.
Speaker 1: Now there's a let me give the date because I
Speaker 1: want people to understand exactly what you're saying here. July
Speaker 1: twenty seven, twenty sixteen, email from this guy Leonard Bernardo,
Speaker 1: four days before they launch Operation Crossfire Hurricane. That's right,
Speaker 1: quote HRC Hillary rodam Clinton approved Julia's idea about Trump
Speaker 1: and Russia hackers hampering US elections. That should distract people
Speaker 1: from her own missing email, especially if the affair goes
Speaker 1: to the Olympic level, then it goes on the point
Speaker 1: is making the Russian play a US domestic issue.
Speaker 3: They wanted to make it. They wanted what the Russians did.
Speaker 3: They wanted to hang it on Donald Trump, and of
Speaker 3: course that's what happens. Right. A couple of days later,
Speaker 3: a guy named Alexander Downer, who's a friend of the
Speaker 3: Clinton walks into the fay. I want to tell you
Speaker 3: about a conversation in May where I thought a Trump
Speaker 3: guy was hinting that he might have been involved in
Speaker 3: the acting of Hillary couldn't an emails Chris. We know
Speaker 3: that is true, but that got reported. Then Christopher Steele
Speaker 3: is already set in motion is DOSSI eight and he's
Speaker 3: coming to Washington, DC to meet with Bruce or on
Speaker 3: July thirtieth. So from the moment Hillary couldn't approves the
Speaker 3: plan on July twenty sixth to July thirty First, what
Speaker 3: George Soros's guy purportedly writes in his email that the
Speaker 3: Russians intercept actually plays out, so he's either a fortune
Speaker 3: teller or he knew he was on the no. And
Speaker 3: the sad part about this is that Bill Barr and
Speaker 3: John Durham had a chance to subpoena this email, so
Speaker 3: maybe see if the NSA added any of their email
Speaker 3: or phone intercepts. We can't tell from the report that
Speaker 3: they did that. It doesn't look like they did that.
Speaker 3: They left it an unfinished answer. But if this email
Speaker 3: gets corroborated, if this is truly an actual email as
Speaker 3: the Russians intercepted, and it was really sense, then this
Speaker 3: is the roadmap before proving that Hillary Clinton created a
Speaker 3: ruse and that others will get involved. And let me
Speaker 3: give you one other piece of the intelligence. The other
Speaker 3: thing that's in this chatter that the Russians had is
Speaker 3: the Russians seemed to know in advance that the FBI
Speaker 3: was going to participate in the scheme, that they were
Speaker 3: going to open up an investigation and give credence to
Speaker 3: it and put it on steroids. And so the Russians
Speaker 3: have that component as well, which means they're sitting on
Speaker 3: perhaps multiple locations and they know now what happens. Again,
Speaker 3: this is before July thirty. First, either the Russians and
Speaker 3: the people they're intercepting our fortune tellers, or they really
Speaker 3: were on top of what was going on. And this
Speaker 3: is what really happened. The FBI conspired with Hillary Clinton
Speaker 3: to make a false story look real, look legitimate, and
Speaker 3: make it an Olympic size scandal on Donald Trump so
Speaker 3: that Hillary Clinton could be taken off the hook on
Speaker 3: her email scandal. That's what this says. And that's why
Speaker 3: someone like Chuck Grassei, who chooses his words carefully. He's
Speaker 3: ninety years old, he's been in Washington fifty years. He
Speaker 3: doesn't exaggerate. He believes that this may be the greatest
Speaker 3: political scandal of his lifetime. There's a lot of work
Speaker 3: that still needs to be done. We need to authenticate
Speaker 3: these about. John Durham didn't get us all the way there. Now,
Speaker 3: what John Durham did do is find some Clinton emails
Speaker 3: that are legit. We know for sure they're not Russian.
Speaker 3: Really emails that show the plan was being activated the
Speaker 3: way the Russians said it was going to be activated,
Speaker 3: the way the Sorow's intercepted communication. So there's contemporaneous evidence
Speaker 3: that that plan was put in motion. Out tomorrow, I'm
Speaker 3: going to give you one of the components of the plan.
Speaker 3: You're going to see text messages where the Clinton campaign
Speaker 3: is trying to get Joe Biden to take the first
Speaker 3: shot at Clinton. Let's have the vice president take a
Speaker 3: first shot and accused Donald Trump of being a Russian
Speaker 3: stooge and we're going to show you Joe Biden actually
Speaker 3: delivers the goods. He fires the first shot. A lot
Speaker 3: of people forgot this. I didn't the first shot of
Speaker 3: the Russia collusion.
Speaker 1: Can you give us a little bit of this preview
Speaker 1: of coming attractions?
Speaker 2: What did Biden say?
Speaker 3: First? There are the text messages of the Clinton campaign
Speaker 3: scrambling to get Joe Biden to give some credence to this,
Speaker 3: and then he has an interview and in the interview
Speaker 3: he says, I think Donald Trump to bastardize NATO so
Speaker 3: that the Russians could take over Europe or something to
Speaker 3: that effect. Leans right into Donald Trump is a Russian stooge.
Speaker 3: And then a couple days later you start to see
Speaker 3: other elements of this story come out, and you've got
Speaker 3: all of a sudden, you've got the DNT lawyers going
Speaker 3: to the FBI dropping off a packets saying here's Alpha Bank.
Speaker 3: We know that was bank a bunk, but they deliver that.
Speaker 3: You've got the Christopher Steele thing coming over. Either these
Speaker 3: are the most incredible coincidences in all of history, or
Speaker 3: the Russians really did stumble onto the plot, and you
Speaker 3: can see the actual contemporaneous evidence match is what the
Speaker 3: Russians thought was going to happen because they were sitting
Speaker 3: on Hillary Clinton's communications. I think that's what we're going
Speaker 3: to find out. I think there's one important line I
Speaker 3: want to point out to everybody. I want to remind
Speaker 3: everybody a story that you allowed me come on your
Speaker 3: show and break back. In twenty twenty one, the official
Speaker 3: assessment of the United States government is that the Russians
Speaker 3: did hack into the Democratic National Committee. Now they have
Speaker 3: good evidence, excellent evidence that they ha into John Pedesta's emails.
Speaker 3: There's not as good an evidence on the Russian hack
Speaker 3: into the DNC because the FBI never went and got
Speaker 3: the servers. Instead, they trusted the DNC vendor, the security vendor,
Speaker 3: to look at it, and we in twenty one I
Speaker 3: came on your show and I had this testimony from
Speaker 3: that vendor, a former FBI agent, and he admitted that
Speaker 3: they had no evidence that emails were exfltrated. Meeting. All right,
Speaker 3: the Russians got on the servers, but we don't see
Speaker 3: any evidence that they pulled anything off of it. That
Speaker 3: has always been a red flag. Congress jumped all over that.
Speaker 3: Jim George jumped on and Mark Meadows. I've always kept
Speaker 3: that in the back of my mind, which says, hey,
Speaker 3: if they didn't see the emails leave the server, how
Speaker 3: do you know that the hack actually occurred. Well, in
Speaker 3: this email today, in the George Shows email, there's a
Speaker 3: line in there that says, hey, that vendor, that security
Speaker 3: vendor doesn't have direct proof of the hack. That's exactly
Speaker 3: what the security vendor was trying to tell Congress at
Speaker 3: the testimony. I think even that evaluation, we have to
Speaker 3: go back and look and see, well, why do the
Speaker 3: FBI say it so conclusively when because they were relying
Speaker 3: on Hillary Coulton's security vendor, and the security vendor said
Speaker 3: I didn't have direct evidence of it. Perhaps another part
Speaker 3: of the ruse.
Speaker 1: All right, clickbreak more with John Solomon, Founder, editor in chief,
Speaker 1: chief investigative reporter Justinnews dot com than your calls on
Speaker 1: the other side, eight hundred and ninety four one, Shawn
Speaker 1: Hry We continue now. The Durham Report declassified annex out today.
Speaker 1: John Solomon, Founder, editor in chief, chief investigator reporter Justinnews
Speaker 1: dot com. Let's go to the declassification that Tulsey Gabbert
Speaker 1: released last week and what have we learned.
Speaker 2: We learned in.
Speaker 1: December there was a post mortem on the twenty sixteen election.
Speaker 1: We learned that senior career intelligence officials determined and ascertained
Speaker 1: that there was no such thing as Trump Russia collusion
Speaker 1: in the election and played no impact on that election
Speaker 1: at all whatsoever. That's the intelligent assessment conclusion that they
Speaker 1: came up with. And then there was a meeting in
Speaker 1: December of twenty sixteen after this report came out by
Speaker 1: senior career intelligence people saying it didn't happen and they
Speaker 1: didn't like the results of that conclusion, and then they
Speaker 1: decided to do another assessment, and career intelligence senior career
Speaker 1: intelligence people warned, you know, very very clearly that including
Speaker 1: the Steele dossier, for example, and doing the second assessment
Speaker 1: was absolutely wrong to do. The second assessment directly contradicted
Speaker 1: the first assessment. We have about a minute, minute and
Speaker 1: a half. How do you interpret all of that based
Speaker 1: on the knowledge we got today.
Speaker 3: It's very important that the three people in that August
Speaker 3: third meeting, Barack Obama, James Comy, and John Brennan during
Speaker 3: the August meeting, they know the truth that Hillary Clinton
Speaker 3: may have just done this as a dirty trick. Are
Speaker 3: the same guys that decide in December where they're going
Speaker 3: to do a do over right? Obama orders it, John
Speaker 3: Brennan leads it, James Comy insists to put the debunk
Speaker 3: Steele d'Assi into it. The same three guys that knew
Speaker 3: back in August that this was a dirty trick are
Speaker 3: the guys in December hijacking the intelligence and flipping it
Speaker 3: on its head. And I want to remind you of
Speaker 3: one thing why James Coby is going to be so
Speaker 3: important going forward. He is a guy that submits the
Speaker 3: vice of warrants, he signs them right, and that vice
Speaker 3: of warrant is based on the Steele Dassis. And by December,
Speaker 3: the Steele Dasi is discredited. Steel has been fired, the
Speaker 3: CIA's warned he's been penetrated by Russian intelligence. They've done
Speaker 3: an assessment and they can't find any proof that anything
Speaker 3: in the think is true, and they've debunk something. They
Speaker 3: are hanging out there with the fis of Court. One
Speaker 3: way the FBI could save face with the vice of
Speaker 3: Court is if the Intelligence Committee suddenly decided to treat
Speaker 3: the Steel Dahsi legitimately in a bogus intelligence assessment. A
Speaker 3: lot of people are going to ask that question. But
Speaker 3: that James Comey's motive for sticking that bad document in
Speaker 3: the intelligence community session, we don't know, but it needs
Speaker 3: to be investigated.
Speaker 1: But we do know one and remember under oath, wasn't
Speaker 1: Brennan asked if, in fact he included it and lied
Speaker 1: and said no.
Speaker 3: They said it was just in the appendix. But we
Speaker 3: now know that conclusions in the main part of it
Speaker 3: rested on the on the stealed ose. So now see
Speaker 3: why Cash Brittel opened up the Grand conspiracy case. You
Speaker 3: start to see these things and it can't be bumbling.
Speaker 3: It looks like intentionality, and that's where the strike force
Speaker 3: has to begin. It's worth validate, prove well, arrogate, see
Speaker 3: if there's crimes.
Speaker 1: John Solomon, we'll have more coverage of this tonight on
Speaker 1: Hannity nine Easterns that you DVR. I would say, am
Speaker 1: I right in my assessment? The biggest political scandal perhaps
Speaker 1: in the history of the country certainly.
Speaker 3: Feels moving in that direction. I think I went all
Speaker 3: the proofs and it probably rises to that level.
Speaker 1: Founder Editor in Chief, Chief Investigative Reporter, justinnews dot com.
Speaker 1: Well done, my friend, Thank you. We appreciate your time
Speaker 1: as always. All right, twenty five now till the top
Speaker 1: of the hour. We'll get to your calls here in
Speaker 1: a minute. Eight hundred and nine to four one sean.
Speaker 1: If you want to be a part of the program.
Speaker 1: This is it the biggest political scandal, I believe now
Speaker 1: in history, with the smoking gun. We can talk more
Speaker 1: about that. We'll take some of your calls on it
Speaker 1: as well. Again the number eight hundred nine four one sean. Look,
Speaker 1: there is a ceasefire in Israel, he asks the people
Speaker 1: of Israel, if they feel peace, You're going to hear
Speaker 1: a very different story. I know because I have so
Speaker 1: many friends there. You have bombed out, entire neighborhoods and
Speaker 1: homes and families torn apart. Kids can play outside, they're
Speaker 1: playing in underground bunkers. Believe it or not, playground bunkers.
Speaker 1: The violence may have slowed, the fear hasn't disappeared, and
Speaker 1: you have tens and tens of thousands of Israelis that
Speaker 1: are displaced, that are in desperate need of humanitarian assistance.
Speaker 1: That's why our partnership in the work of the International
Speaker 1: Fellowship of Christians and Jews. The IFCJ is more vital
Speaker 1: than ever. Maybe others have moved on the IFCJ, they
Speaker 1: remain steadfast. They are bringing that life saving aid, long
Speaker 1: term support to the people of Israel as they have
Speaker 1: been fighting for the very survival. I mean, they are
Speaker 1: feeding the displaced, the sick, the elderly, Holocaust survivors, children,
Speaker 1: you name it, food, water, medicines, clothing, shelter. They're providing
Speaker 1: all of it, and they just need as much help
Speaker 1: as possible. Whatever you can do, whatever you can donate.
Speaker 1: All of this money goes directly to the people in need,
Speaker 1: and the need is great. Please go to their website
Speaker 1: IFCJ dot org. That's IFCJ dot org. Two day. All
Speaker 1: right to our busy, busy telephones. Let us say hi
Speaker 1: to James's in my free state of Florida. James, how
Speaker 1: are you glad you called?
Speaker 3: Hi? Sean?
Speaker 4: Thanks taking my call, first time caller.
Speaker 5: I've been listening to you forever.
Speaker 2: I thank you. What took you so long to call?
Speaker 6: Work?
Speaker 1: I'm so that's a fair answer. You're allowed to work
Speaker 1: and make money.
Speaker 5: I'm a social worker, so we're always busy, and I
Speaker 5: wanted to give my perspective of this community police and
Speaker 5: idea that people seem to have that solial workers are
Speaker 5: somehow going to magically make policing grade Again, it's just
Speaker 5: an insane idea to think that a social worker has
Speaker 5: the ability to deal with a domestic violence situation.
Speaker 1: Well, let me, let me let's go back to yesterday,
Speaker 1: and you have a comrade or Marxist mum, Donnie, and
Speaker 1: what he said yesterday, he tried to walk back his
Speaker 1: twenty twenty comments when he said very very clearly that
Speaker 1: he wants to defund the police.
Speaker 2: And here's what he said.
Speaker 6: My statements in twenty twenty were ones made amidst a
Speaker 6: frustration that many New Yorkers help at the murder of
Speaker 6: George Floyd and the inability to deliver on what Eric
Speaker 6: Adams of all people described as the right for all
Speaker 6: of us to be able to enjoy safety and justice.
Speaker 6: I am not defunding the police. I'm not running to
Speaker 6: defund the police. Andrew Cuomo is far more comfortable living
Speaker 6: his life in the past and then attacking tweets of
Speaker 6: twenty twenty than in running against the campaign that we
Speaker 6: have been leading for the last eight months.
Speaker 2: Uh huh.
Speaker 1: And then here's mom Donnie opposing the NYPD Strategic Response
Speaker 1: Group because they violate civil rights. This is the very
Speaker 1: group that showed up on Monday when the shooting took place.
Speaker 1: They're the people that are most trained, most capable. And
Speaker 1: here's what he said about that.
Speaker 6: And as it pertains, the Strategic Response Group, when it
Speaker 6: was first formed, there was an intention for its use
Speaker 6: to be more akin to the manner in which it
Speaker 6: was deployed earlier this week. What we have found, however,
Speaker 6: is the city has come to rely upon the Strategic
Speaker 6: Response Group as its primary means of response to acts
Speaker 6: of protests across the city when New Yorkers exercise their
Speaker 6: First Amendment rights. And that decision, in asking the members
Speaker 6: of that unit to respond to protests as opposed to
Speaker 6: what was the stated reason, is a decision that has
Speaker 6: led to the violation of a number of New Yorkers
Speaker 6: civil rights. And it's a decision that has been the
Speaker 6: basis of my critique of the use of the group
Speaker 6: towards that end.
Speaker 1: Well, there's your guy, mom, Donnie. Now, by the way,
Speaker 1: yours how long you've been a social worker.
Speaker 5: I've been a social worth for about nineteen now doing
Speaker 5: a child the Beast investigations and working with the elderly.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 1: Well, look, there is a great need for social workers.
Speaker 1: But the idea that we're going to send social workers
Speaker 1: into violence situations where you know, people of the lives
Speaker 1: of being threatened.
Speaker 2: I mean, what are you supposed to do.
Speaker 1: Is there anything that maybe happened in your childhood is
Speaker 1: that has triggered these these feelings of violence and your
Speaker 1: desire to kill people. No, you need people with guns
Speaker 1: that can save the lives of innocent people. We had
Speaker 1: Billy Cunningham on earlier in the program.
Speaker 3: Today.
Speaker 1: You saw that violent riot where this woman, you know,
Speaker 1: got got blindsided and knocked out, and the pictures of
Speaker 1: the brutal beating she took and this guy took this
Speaker 1: beating and they're kicking and pounding on this man's head.
Speaker 1: You know, how this guy doesn't have a brain bleed
Speaker 1: or brain damage at this point is pretty remarkable. There's
Speaker 1: a place for it, institutional settings, helping people that are homeless,
Speaker 1: helping people with mental illness, giving them a place, you know,
Speaker 1: to stay. And by the way, President Trump has come
Speaker 1: out and said he wants to get these people off
Speaker 1: the streets and into facilities those that are mentally ill,
Speaker 1: because they do cause a risk risk to the rest
Speaker 1: of society. Now there's a fine line. I mean, you
Speaker 1: could take healthy people and want to commit them, and
Speaker 1: certainly there has to be some process by which you
Speaker 1: and some criteria which you follow. But I mean, what's
Speaker 1: what they're doing now by allowing people with mental health
Speaker 1: issues and drug addiction issues on the streets. That's not
Speaker 1: working and it's putting everybody else, every law abiding citizen
Speaker 1: at risk. Anyway, my friend, I appreciate your call.
Speaker 2: Thank you.
Speaker 1: Eight hundred and ninety four one, Shawn is a number
Speaker 1: if you want to be a part of the program.
Speaker 1: Missouri Sherry next on the Sean Hennity Show.
Speaker 7: Hi, Hi, thanks for taking my call.
Speaker 4: Love your show.
Speaker 7: I'm just calling in about Sydney Sweeney and her ad
Speaker 7: which I watched it. Tried really hard to find something
Speaker 7: wrong with it. I found nothing. It's just a pretty
Speaker 7: girl advertising gene. But my thing is that the people
Speaker 7: that have a problem with this, that are saying while
Speaker 7: blonde hair, blue eye, did not have a problem with
Speaker 7: the blonde hair, blue eyed trans woman that Vogue hired
Speaker 7: as a model or the blonde hair, blue eye cover girl,
Speaker 7: trans woman, and there's others. But they didn't have a
Speaker 7: problem with that. And they're saying it's Nazism. But yet
Speaker 7: the same people go out and say from the river
Speaker 7: to the sea. So it makes no sense to me.
Speaker 2: Listen, I can only say this. I like her more.
Speaker 1: You know why, because at least up to now, she's
Speaker 1: not given into the woke media mob. He's not given in.
Speaker 1: The gene company's not given in. Just the opposite has occurred.
Speaker 1: They're selling out of these genes like crazy. The campaign
Speaker 1: is the exact opposite of Dilla mulvaney and the disaster
Speaker 1: with bud Light. And she's not backing down, the gene
Speaker 1: Company's not backing down, and people are responding by buying
Speaker 1: the jeens. I happen to like jeans. I'd never heard
Speaker 1: of this particular brand. Did they make them for guys, Lynda?
Speaker 1: I don't even know. I assume they do, right, they
Speaker 1: always make it for guys that they do, all right.
Speaker 1: So she's a pretty young woman clearly, and okay, a
Speaker 1: play on words. She's he's selling genes j e A
Speaker 1: n s uh. So she's an attractive young woman. Oh,
Speaker 1: jeens g E n e s. How do you get
Speaker 1: from there to eugenics the Nazi Germany? You know, only
Speaker 1: a crazy, insane liberal could do could could pull that off.
Speaker 1: But that's how insane they are. And if this is
Speaker 1: where their minds are at, I mean, let them stay there,
Speaker 1: let them stay in mom donning Land.
Speaker 2: I don't care about that either. Anyway. It's crazy.
Speaker 1: This this party has lost their collective minds.
Speaker 7: Crazy. Yeah, and so it doesn't make any sense.
Speaker 1: So well, I it makes no sense. It makes none anyway. Sherry, good,
Speaker 1: good call, appreciate it. I believe it's Nathania. Is that
Speaker 1: how you say it? New York, New York? How you doing, Nathania?
Speaker 1: What's going on?
Speaker 4: Sean? Thank you for taking my call, long time listener,
Speaker 4: first time caller, because I can never get through.
Speaker 1: I'm glad you got through. And you do not have
Speaker 1: a thick New York accent at all?
Speaker 2: I try, No, you actually do. I'm in case you
Speaker 2: didn't know.
Speaker 1: When I first started in broadcasting, I did not know
Speaker 1: that I had a thick New York accent, and I
Speaker 1: worked hard at trying to minimize it. I don't know
Speaker 1: if I'm successful or not. Because I don't listen to
Speaker 1: my own show.
Speaker 4: No, I can't listen to myself either, And I'm so
Speaker 4: glad I'm not hearing the feedback, so thank you for that.
Speaker 4: My question is about Mom Donnie, and I'm panicked like
Speaker 4: everybody else. I don't live in the city. I live
Speaker 4: in Long Island. But where I live, and where most
Speaker 4: people live in Long Island, most people commute into the city.
Speaker 4: My fear is that if he wins, and at this
Speaker 4: point I think it's a foregone conclusion, maybe we'll get lucky.
Speaker 4: I don't know. But my fear is that all of
Speaker 4: these companies and all of these real estate farms that
Speaker 4: are going to start pulling out of me New York City,
Speaker 4: and the financial firms, all these people that live out
Speaker 4: here and work in the city are no longer going
Speaker 4: to have jobs. So how is that going to ripple
Speaker 4: out to the suburbs of the Tri State area of
Speaker 4: New York City.
Speaker 1: That's my bigin going to ripple out big time. And
Speaker 1: you know, for my friends in New York, I don't
Speaker 1: want this to happen to them. You know, I'm thoughtful
Speaker 1: enough now for my free state of Florida. It's gonna
Speaker 1: be gonna it's gonna be a mass exodus. It's going
Speaker 1: to be a jail break, and it's going to increase
Speaker 1: property values, the direct opposite of what's going to happen
Speaker 1: in New York.
Speaker 2: What a lot of people don't know.
Speaker 1: And I do know because I used to live in
Speaker 1: your state, and I left your state for a lot
Speaker 1: of reasons, not the least of which is they didn't
Speaker 1: want me there. I could, I could read a room,
Speaker 1: and there were too many people that might that I
Speaker 1: would trigger by my very presence. Believe it or not,
Speaker 1: I know that sounds absurd, but it's true. And so
Speaker 1: I left. And I can tell you in my free
Speaker 1: state of Florida, every one of those investment firms, every
Speaker 1: one of those insurance companies, every one of those big banks,
Speaker 1: they all Morgan Stanley, you name any big company, they
Speaker 1: all have offices. And they're building out more offices in
Speaker 1: South Florida and they call it Wall Street South. My
Speaker 1: prediction is they're gonna pull up stakes and they're gonna
Speaker 1: probably headquarter completely down in Florida, and they're probably gonna
Speaker 1: cut ties. What does that mean for people in New York?
Speaker 1: That means they're either gonna move to Florida themselves, means
Speaker 1: property values will precipitously decline in the short term. Look,
Speaker 1: New York is a pretty resilient place. It might come back.
Speaker 1: I don't think it will ever be the city at
Speaker 1: once was. That's my own personal belief. I don't think
Speaker 1: there's gonna be a course correct because I think most
Speaker 1: people have seen like I have seen, the handwriting is
Speaker 1: on the wall. I can't stop it, so I might
Speaker 1: as well move on to friendlier territory.
Speaker 2: And that's that. That was a big part of my decision.
Speaker 1: Now, for the people that live in Long Island, like yourself,
Speaker 1: I think that you'll see yet a lot of homes
Speaker 1: for sale. I think home prices will decline. I think,
Speaker 1: you know, people that maybe thought their home was worth
Speaker 1: actually going to find that it's worth why and and
Speaker 1: less than what they thought it was, And they're going
Speaker 1: to be getting out. It's probably a scenario where the quicker,
Speaker 1: the earlier you get out, the better you're going to be.
Speaker 1: As of today, this guy wins, can something change? Maybe
Speaker 1: are people going to buy this election? In your conversion
Speaker 1: conversion of Mom, Donnie, I don't know. It's sad though, it.
Speaker 4: Is anyway, but thank you for confirming what I've been
Speaker 4: thinking and it's helping me.
Speaker 1: Nathaniel. I wish you and your friends all the best.
Speaker 1: I really do, a lot of innocent people are going
Speaker 1: to get hurt by all of this in madness. All right,
Speaker 1: quick break right back to our bit. Here's our toll
Speaker 1: free number. It's eight hundred and nine, Sean, if you
Speaker 1: want to be a part of the program. All right,
Speaker 1: let's get back to our busy phones. We love to
Speaker 1: hear from you. Eight hundred ninety four one, sewn George
Speaker 1: again in my free state of Florida.
Speaker 2: Hey George, how are you? What's going on?
Speaker 3: Hey, Sean?
Speaker 1: How you doing? Hey?
Speaker 8: Beginning, I wanted to thank you for inviting me over
Speaker 8: the Clearwater. My wife and I loved you, and last
Speaker 8: month we had a great time, a great evening with
Speaker 8: like minded people and stuff. So it was just a
Speaker 8: great even show. I want to thank you.
Speaker 3: Very much for that.
Speaker 1: Oh, I'm so glad that, Kim, we had a great time.
Speaker 1: We're we're going to have an announcement soon. We're going
Speaker 1: to be adding at least one show, maybe two shows,
Speaker 1: and we also have upcoming the Fox Nation Patriot Awards
Speaker 1: and some other stuff. So we're getting out on the
Speaker 1: road a little bit more than we we have them
Speaker 1: in the past. So looking forward to seeing everybody.
Speaker 8: Yeah, my wife said, if you do it anymore, you
Speaker 8: have to have some T shirts made and some stuff
Speaker 8: that we can buy stuff out at the front. So
Speaker 8: and for this, you know, you you start doing it regularly.
Speaker 3: I like to see if.
Speaker 8: Sean Hannity did and Jimmy shirt or something.
Speaker 3: So it was.
Speaker 8: There was a great time.
Speaker 3: But the reason why I called is with the Hillary.
Speaker 8: Emails and stuff that's coming out. When I'm with the
Speaker 8: Russian Hopes, the Democrats do things very well. They would
Speaker 8: basically they repeat. They usually repeat themselves on any cop
Speaker 8: of playbooks and stuff. Everybody's looking in twenty sixteen. But Shawn,
Speaker 8: you need to go back to twenty fifteen where uh
Speaker 8: Plan Planned Parenthood was caught on under cover of videos
Speaker 8: and they hired with George Soros a a research a
Speaker 8: research film because a correction, a research firm called uh
Speaker 8: GBS Jusion GPS.
Speaker 1: No remember it was hired by Hillary law firm Fusion
Speaker 1: GPS Christopher Steele. Dirty dossier, all debunked, all used and
Speaker 1: then they manufactured. As we see, this was completely manufactured
Speaker 1: out of thin air. Everybody knew about it before it happened.
Speaker 1: They all then contributed to a post election to make
Speaker 1: to sabotage the Trump presidency. They tried to do more
Speaker 1: in twenty sixteen fifty one former Intel officials. They knew
Speaker 1: it was a very real laptop. They used law fair
Speaker 1: and weaponization in twenty twenty four. That is the Grand Conspiracy,
Speaker 1: the biggest political scandal by far in the history of
Speaker 1: our country, and we're going to continue to talk about it.
Speaker 1: We have a lot on this tonight on Hannity nine
Speaker 1: Eastern on the Fox News Channel.