WEBVTT - Unilever: Making Sustainable Living Commonplace

0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Hey, folks, Tie here just a note before we get started.

0:00:04.760 --> 0:00:08.600
<v Speaker 1>The conversation in this episode was recorded before Uni Lever's

0:00:08.640 --> 0:00:11.840
<v Speaker 1>recent announcement that Alan Job will be retiring from UNI

0:00:11.880 --> 0:00:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Lever at the end of Okay, here's the show. Unless

0:00:22.480 --> 0:00:27.040
<v Speaker 1>you're a crystal clear in your mind why it makes

0:00:27.040 --> 0:00:31.520
<v Speaker 1>you a better business, how it will drive stronger performance,

0:00:32.240 --> 0:00:36.199
<v Speaker 1>don't start the journey because this is not CSR. This

0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:39.360
<v Speaker 1>is not some offset where you can buy a clean

0:00:39.440 --> 0:00:42.920
<v Speaker 1>conscience by donating to a charity or having a park

0:00:42.960 --> 0:00:45.360
<v Speaker 1>made next to your headquarters. Unless it sits at the

0:00:45.360 --> 0:00:48.720
<v Speaker 1>heart of your business model, driving revenue growth, taking out cost,

0:00:48.800 --> 0:00:57.800
<v Speaker 1>improving your employee proposition, don't do it. Welcome to calling Bullshit.

0:00:58.400 --> 0:01:02.000
<v Speaker 1>The podcast about Purpose, a swashing the gap between what

0:01:02.040 --> 0:01:05.480
<v Speaker 1>companies say they stand for and what they actually do,

0:01:06.000 --> 0:01:08.360
<v Speaker 1>and what they would need to change to practice what

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:12.559
<v Speaker 1>they preach. I'm your host, Tie Ontogue, and I've spent

0:01:12.640 --> 0:01:15.880
<v Speaker 1>over a decade helping companies define what they stand for,

0:01:16.240 --> 0:01:19.320
<v Speaker 1>their purpose and then help them to use that purpose

0:01:19.360 --> 0:01:24.560
<v Speaker 1>to drive transformation throughout their business. In this special episode

0:01:24.760 --> 0:01:28.080
<v Speaker 1>a positive case study, we're doing a deep dive into

0:01:28.280 --> 0:01:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Unilever with their CEO, Alan job to find out how

0:01:32.680 --> 0:01:36.640
<v Speaker 1>a global company of such vast scale, with such a

0:01:36.680 --> 0:01:47.440
<v Speaker 1>complex history keeps purpose front and center. You may not

0:01:47.560 --> 0:01:50.480
<v Speaker 1>even have heard of Unilever, but I bet you've grown

0:01:50.560 --> 0:01:54.400
<v Speaker 1>up using a bunch of their products. Dove Soap, Lipped

0:01:54.400 --> 0:01:58.440
<v Speaker 1>and Ta Basiline, Ben and Jerry's, to name just a few.

0:01:59.280 --> 0:02:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Many of these brands are purpose led in their own right.

0:02:02.680 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 1>But what if the company that owns all of these

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:09.960
<v Speaker 1>household brands committed to operating under a single purpose to

0:02:10.200 --> 0:02:15.079
<v Speaker 1>make sustainable living commonplace. What if they committed to net

0:02:15.160 --> 0:02:19.200
<v Speaker 1>zero carbon and regenerative farming practices, cut their use of

0:02:19.280 --> 0:02:23.560
<v Speaker 1>virgin plastics, and ensured fair wages for everyone up and

0:02:23.600 --> 0:02:28.000
<v Speaker 1>down their supply chains. Imagine the profound impact that could

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:34.200
<v Speaker 1>have on the future of the planet. Unilever has imagined

0:02:34.200 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 1>that impact, and as the parent company to these famous

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:40.760
<v Speaker 1>brands and hundreds of others, they're in the unique position

0:02:40.840 --> 0:02:44.960
<v Speaker 1>to bring that dream to life. But how do they

0:02:45.080 --> 0:02:49.320
<v Speaker 1>pull this off? It is such an ambitious project. They

0:02:49.360 --> 0:02:53.519
<v Speaker 1>have hundreds of thousands of employees, three point four billion

0:02:53.639 --> 0:02:57.760
<v Speaker 1>customers around the globe, and over a century of complex

0:02:57.800 --> 0:03:03.200
<v Speaker 1>history to grapple with. I had the opportunity to sit

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 1>down with their CEO, Alan Joke, for an honest conversation

0:03:06.800 --> 0:03:11.520
<v Speaker 1>about the opportunities and challenges that Unilever faces and how

0:03:11.560 --> 0:03:14.640
<v Speaker 1>he plans to help you. Leaver continue the journey into

0:03:14.639 --> 0:03:23.120
<v Speaker 1>a purpose driven and ever brighter future. But first let's

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:30.880
<v Speaker 1>delve into Unilever's history. The story begins in nine century Holland,

0:03:31.040 --> 0:03:35.280
<v Speaker 1>when two butter making families, the Jurgen's and the Vandenburgh's,

0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:41.480
<v Speaker 1>turned their efforts toward a new product, Marjarine. Meanwhile, over

0:03:41.520 --> 0:03:45.200
<v Speaker 1>in England, William Lever was also making changes at his

0:03:45.400 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 1>family business, Leaver Brothers. The resulting product, Sunlight Soap, was

0:03:51.240 --> 0:03:54.600
<v Speaker 1>so popular that soon they were making four dred and

0:03:54.600 --> 0:03:59.840
<v Speaker 1>fifty tons of it every week. Consider progressive for his time,

0:04:00.240 --> 0:04:03.320
<v Speaker 1>William Lever saw his company as more than just a

0:04:03.400 --> 0:04:08.240
<v Speaker 1>profit engine. His mission was to make cleanliness commonplace and

0:04:08.320 --> 0:04:13.040
<v Speaker 1>bring hygiene and thereby help to the masses. He wanted

0:04:13.080 --> 0:04:16.839
<v Speaker 1>to do well by doing good, to grow his company

0:04:17.120 --> 0:04:20.200
<v Speaker 1>and simultaneously, where's the standard of living for both his

0:04:20.320 --> 0:04:28.240
<v Speaker 1>customers and his employees. With prosperity sharing as his guiding principle,

0:04:28.760 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 1>he built a village called Ports Sunlight, where he offered

0:04:32.240 --> 0:04:37.040
<v Speaker 1>affordable housing and other amenities to factory workers. It was here,

0:04:37.440 --> 0:04:41.000
<v Speaker 1>at a time when benefits were practically unheard of, that

0:04:41.080 --> 0:04:46.440
<v Speaker 1>he introduced innovations like sick leave, paid time off, and pensions.

0:04:48.279 --> 0:04:52.760
<v Speaker 1>After years of common interests and even some collaboration behind

0:04:52.800 --> 0:04:57.040
<v Speaker 1>the scenes, the Yurgans and the Vandenburg's officially combined their

0:04:57.080 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 1>businesses in nineteen twenty seven to create Margarine UNI. Two

0:05:02.480 --> 0:05:05.719
<v Speaker 1>years later, Lever Brothers joined the fold in what The

0:05:05.760 --> 0:05:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Economist called one of the biggest industrial amalgamations in European history.

0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:19.400
<v Speaker 1>In simpler terms, Unilever was born. Over the next half century,

0:05:19.800 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Unilever grew a lot. They continued to acquire and launch

0:05:25.080 --> 0:05:28.719
<v Speaker 1>new companies and brands, and by the nineteen eighties they'd

0:05:28.720 --> 0:05:33.400
<v Speaker 1>become the world's twenty six largest corporation. But through the

0:05:33.440 --> 0:05:37.719
<v Speaker 1>eyes of someone looking back from the company engaged in

0:05:37.880 --> 0:05:41.680
<v Speaker 1>some fairly questionable activities During this period of rapid expansion.

0:05:43.000 --> 0:05:46.920
<v Speaker 1>There were some controversial marketing campaigns for skin lightning products

0:05:46.920 --> 0:05:51.480
<v Speaker 1>in the global South, and human rights violations like child labor.

0:05:52.440 --> 0:05:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Over the years, parts of Unilever had definitely lost touch

0:05:56.760 --> 0:06:01.200
<v Speaker 1>with ports. Sunlight's founding principle of doing well by doing good.

0:06:02.520 --> 0:06:05.839
<v Speaker 1>In the late ninety nineties, with their ideals off track

0:06:06.160 --> 0:06:11.159
<v Speaker 1>and growth stalled, the business was in decline and in

0:06:13.160 --> 0:06:17.080
<v Speaker 1>they took dramatic action and cut three quarters of their

0:06:17.080 --> 0:06:23.200
<v Speaker 1>nearly six hundred brands. But even after shifting focus to

0:06:23.240 --> 0:06:28.040
<v Speaker 1>their most successful brands, the next decade really only saw

0:06:28.160 --> 0:06:32.479
<v Speaker 1>some modest returns. By the time uni Lever was hit

0:06:32.520 --> 0:06:35.880
<v Speaker 1>by the two thousand and eight recession, it was clear

0:06:36.520 --> 0:06:39.279
<v Speaker 1>that the only way forward was to get a truly

0:06:39.440 --> 0:06:43.800
<v Speaker 1>fresh perspective. The most important thing is that you pursue

0:06:43.839 --> 0:06:49.040
<v Speaker 1>your your purpose, whatever you feel strong about. Figure out

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:51.120
<v Speaker 1>where you want to make the difference. That's the first

0:06:51.120 --> 0:06:54.600
<v Speaker 1>thing you need to do. That's Paul Pullman. He had

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:59.479
<v Speaker 1>steered Unilever's rival Nestle through this financial storm as their

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:02.840
<v Speaker 1>cf OH. This caught the attention of the head haunchos

0:07:02.839 --> 0:07:07.000
<v Speaker 1>at Unilever, and instead of hiring from within, they decided

0:07:07.040 --> 0:07:11.240
<v Speaker 1>to poach Paul Pullman in two thousand and nine. He

0:07:11.320 --> 0:07:17.520
<v Speaker 1>became Unilever's new CEO. First order of business get everybody

0:07:17.560 --> 0:07:21.160
<v Speaker 1>on board with his ambitious vision. Because I came in

0:07:21.200 --> 0:07:24.080
<v Speaker 1>from the outside. Some people felt that the Troy and

0:07:24.120 --> 0:07:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Horse was let into the company. And I discovered very

0:07:27.000 --> 0:07:29.840
<v Speaker 1>early on that it was for me to prove that

0:07:30.000 --> 0:07:32.000
<v Speaker 1>I could be part of the team, instead of them

0:07:32.000 --> 0:07:34.840
<v Speaker 1>to prove that they could be part of my team.

0:07:34.840 --> 0:07:38.720
<v Speaker 1>To do this, he knew he needed a better understanding

0:07:38.760 --> 0:07:41.840
<v Speaker 1>of Unilever's history, so he turned his attention to the

0:07:41.880 --> 0:07:45.680
<v Speaker 1>company archives and started digging. And we came to some

0:07:45.800 --> 0:07:48.800
<v Speaker 1>enormous values, and one of them is certainly doing well

0:07:48.800 --> 0:07:52.480
<v Speaker 1>by doing good. He had unearthed those same principles upon

0:07:52.560 --> 0:07:56.280
<v Speaker 1>which William Lever built Ports Sunlight. We took all that

0:07:56.400 --> 0:07:58.880
<v Speaker 1>strength and said, can we not turn that into a

0:07:58.920 --> 0:08:01.200
<v Speaker 1>business model? That is that's what they needed right now.

0:08:01.800 --> 0:08:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Palman implemented what he called the Sustainable Living Plan, which

0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:11.880
<v Speaker 1>aligned their global business strategy with the well being of employees, customers,

0:08:11.960 --> 0:08:17.040
<v Speaker 1>and the environment. They also started acquiring purpose led businesses

0:08:17.120 --> 0:08:21.720
<v Speaker 1>like Seventh Generation and Ben and Jerry's, and Paul brought

0:08:21.800 --> 0:08:26.120
<v Speaker 1>a new approach to Unilever's finances as well, signaling to

0:08:26.280 --> 0:08:31.200
<v Speaker 1>investors that if they weren't interested in sustainable, long term

0:08:31.400 --> 0:08:36.199
<v Speaker 1>value creation, that they should take their money elsewhere. If

0:08:36.200 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 1>you want to solve all these issues like climate chance

0:08:38.559 --> 0:08:42.000
<v Speaker 1>or food security, or poverty alleviation, or access to clean

0:08:42.080 --> 0:08:44.640
<v Speaker 1>drinking water or education. You cannot be victim to the

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:47.959
<v Speaker 1>quarterly reporting. So you need different business models. And you know,

0:08:48.000 --> 0:08:50.760
<v Speaker 1>even when I became CEO, we stopped doing quarterly reporting,

0:08:51.080 --> 0:08:54.480
<v Speaker 1>We stopped giving guidance. We moved our compensation systems to

0:08:54.640 --> 0:08:59.160
<v Speaker 1>the long term. And make no mistake, Palman said ambitious

0:08:59.240 --> 0:09:02.640
<v Speaker 1>financials for the company as well. He declared that he

0:09:02.720 --> 0:09:06.960
<v Speaker 1>expected the company to double revenue while cutting its environmental

0:09:07.000 --> 0:09:11.719
<v Speaker 1>impact in half. To put that in perspective, Unilever had

0:09:11.840 --> 0:09:16.400
<v Speaker 1>three hundred factories across the world, four hundred brands, and

0:09:16.520 --> 0:09:23.160
<v Speaker 1>two point five billion customers, no small task. When Pullman

0:09:23.240 --> 0:09:28.960
<v Speaker 1>stepped down in January, he generated a two hundred and

0:09:29.200 --> 0:09:34.839
<v Speaker 1>nine percent shareholder return. He had expanded Unilever's global market share,

0:09:35.320 --> 0:09:40.840
<v Speaker 1>and he had become a purpose driven business legend. And

0:09:40.920 --> 0:09:45.479
<v Speaker 1>the story continues with our guests today. Paul Pullman's handpicked

0:09:45.559 --> 0:09:50.760
<v Speaker 1>successor and current Unilever CEO, Alan Joe. As you'll hear,

0:09:51.160 --> 0:09:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Alan is a warm, engaging leader who has worked in

0:09:54.720 --> 0:09:58.280
<v Speaker 1>almost every part of Unilever's business around the world. I

0:09:58.400 --> 0:10:00.400
<v Speaker 1>was fortunate enough to work with him as a client

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:03.240
<v Speaker 1>when he was a senior marketer at UNI Lever and

0:10:03.360 --> 0:10:06.880
<v Speaker 1>I was an advertising creative director. We sat down to

0:10:07.000 --> 0:10:11.160
<v Speaker 1>discuss his approach to sustainability and how he keeps purpose

0:10:11.760 --> 0:10:15.600
<v Speaker 1>front and center while he runs a global corporation with

0:10:15.679 --> 0:10:27.160
<v Speaker 1>real integrity. That conversation right after the break, I am

0:10:27.200 --> 0:10:32.319
<v Speaker 1>extremely excited to introduce the CEO of UNI Leaver, Alan

0:10:32.480 --> 0:10:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Job Alan, welcome to calling bullshit. Hi Tai, thanks for

0:10:36.720 --> 0:10:38.240
<v Speaker 1>having me. It's great to be here, Nice to see

0:10:38.280 --> 0:10:41.200
<v Speaker 1>you after a while. Great to see you too. And

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:43.640
<v Speaker 1>to start out with, I thought it would be great

0:10:43.679 --> 0:10:45.880
<v Speaker 1>to just have you tell us a little bit about

0:10:45.880 --> 0:10:50.199
<v Speaker 1>yourself and your background. Sure you can maybe tell from

0:10:50.200 --> 0:10:53.120
<v Speaker 1>my accent that I'm Scottish by birth, grew up in Glasgow,

0:10:53.160 --> 0:10:56.199
<v Speaker 1>went to University in Edinburgh and then joined Unilever Streets.

0:10:56.240 --> 0:11:00.520
<v Speaker 1>After university um and the first five years in London,

0:11:00.640 --> 0:11:03.720
<v Speaker 1>then fourteen years in the United States and thirteen years

0:11:03.720 --> 0:11:06.840
<v Speaker 1>in Asia. My family and wife and I have lived

0:11:06.960 --> 0:11:10.200
<v Speaker 1>for four years in Bangkok, five years in Shanghai and

0:11:10.240 --> 0:11:13.080
<v Speaker 1>four years in Singapore. Came back to the UK just

0:11:13.160 --> 0:11:16.000
<v Speaker 1>four years ago. So after twenty seven years away, I'm

0:11:16.000 --> 0:11:18.960
<v Speaker 1>a cultural stranger in my own country. A lot of

0:11:19.000 --> 0:11:21.800
<v Speaker 1>my a lot of my time in marketing UM, but

0:11:21.920 --> 0:11:26.720
<v Speaker 1>then progressed into general management and plenty of interests outside

0:11:26.720 --> 0:11:30.160
<v Speaker 1>of work. I certainly don't live to work. But when

0:11:30.160 --> 0:11:34.480
<v Speaker 1>you became CEO, you took over from Paul Paulman, who

0:11:35.200 --> 0:11:38.160
<v Speaker 1>is the person who put Unilever on the path to

0:11:38.480 --> 0:11:42.080
<v Speaker 1>really being a purpose led organization. What has that transition

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:44.760
<v Speaker 1>been like for you taking the range yourself and also

0:11:44.920 --> 0:11:49.680
<v Speaker 1>taking over for Paul. Well, in terms of the continuity

0:11:49.760 --> 0:11:54.680
<v Speaker 1>of our sort of sustainability journey, it was relatively straightforward

0:11:54.679 --> 0:11:57.400
<v Speaker 1>for a couple of reasons. First of all, it's not

0:11:57.520 --> 0:11:59.199
<v Speaker 1>a ten year old thing. It's a hundred and ten

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:02.600
<v Speaker 1>year old thing. Our various founders and Uni Leaver are

0:12:02.679 --> 0:12:07.240
<v Speaker 1>believed in running the business on a sustainable or purposeful way.

0:12:07.720 --> 0:12:10.400
<v Speaker 1>This guy, William Lever, who found our Leaver Brothers, one

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:13.920
<v Speaker 1>of our antecedent companies, did all kinds of cool things.

0:12:14.120 --> 0:12:17.520
<v Speaker 1>He built a model village to house his workers when

0:12:17.559 --> 0:12:19.800
<v Speaker 1>his workers went off to fight in the First World War.

0:12:19.880 --> 0:12:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Not only did he hold their jobs open for them,

0:12:21.840 --> 0:12:25.520
<v Speaker 1>he paid their families their wages while they were all fighting. Um.

0:12:25.520 --> 0:12:28.560
<v Speaker 1>He kind of invented pensions. He had an elaborate system

0:12:28.640 --> 0:12:32.360
<v Speaker 1>to create libraries for those workers children, and he back

0:12:32.400 --> 0:12:36.120
<v Speaker 1>in the eighties to find the mission of the firm

0:12:36.200 --> 0:12:40.160
<v Speaker 1>as to make cleanliness commonplace and lessen the load for women.

0:12:40.640 --> 0:12:43.560
<v Speaker 1>So he was a very early on to social issues

0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:47.959
<v Speaker 1>and public health issues. Now, over the history of the company,

0:12:48.000 --> 0:12:50.839
<v Speaker 1>we have generally tried to do the right thing as

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:54.360
<v Speaker 1>a business, often after exploring every other possible alternative, and

0:12:54.520 --> 0:12:56.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of Paul snift out this DNA and did an

0:12:56.880 --> 0:13:00.080
<v Speaker 1>utterly brilliant job putting it back in the center of

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:03.400
<v Speaker 1>our business strategy and our culture. So it's something that

0:13:03.520 --> 0:13:07.080
<v Speaker 1>was very easy to carry forward. Also, frankly, I believe

0:13:07.160 --> 0:13:10.400
<v Speaker 1>strongly in in this mission as well, and maybe that's

0:13:10.400 --> 0:13:13.440
<v Speaker 1>partly why he was an enthusiastic supporter of me coming

0:13:13.440 --> 0:13:15.920
<v Speaker 1>into the role. But it's not been a difficult thing

0:13:16.000 --> 0:13:18.160
<v Speaker 1>to pick it up and run with it. Yeah, And

0:13:18.200 --> 0:13:20.800
<v Speaker 1>so it's fascinating that William Lever is kind of an

0:13:20.840 --> 0:13:23.920
<v Speaker 1>O G conscious capitalist. I would say it sounds like

0:13:24.440 --> 0:13:27.319
<v Speaker 1>in some ways he is. There is dark sides to

0:13:27.400 --> 0:13:30.640
<v Speaker 1>his history as well. So we had we had palmwell

0:13:30.679 --> 0:13:36.920
<v Speaker 1>plantations in the Congo where we suspect strongly that there

0:13:37.000 --> 0:13:39.560
<v Speaker 1>was a form of forced labor um. In fact, we've

0:13:39.600 --> 0:13:42.640
<v Speaker 1>commissioned an academic study with the University of Liverpool to

0:13:42.760 --> 0:13:44.400
<v Speaker 1>get to the bottom of that. We don't want that

0:13:44.480 --> 0:13:46.600
<v Speaker 1>to be a secret. If something bad went on back there,

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:48.520
<v Speaker 1>then we want to know all about it. But the

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:53.959
<v Speaker 1>vast majority of Leavers activities were holy positive. In fact,

0:13:54.000 --> 0:13:58.000
<v Speaker 1>I found a brochure recently where for the first football

0:13:58.000 --> 0:14:02.680
<v Speaker 1>match between Lever brother there's Port Sunlight football team versus

0:14:02.720 --> 0:14:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Everton FC. Every Everton one one I have to admit. Okay,

0:14:08.640 --> 0:14:15.680
<v Speaker 1>So pivoting to Unilever today, how do you articulate Unilever's purpose. Yeah,

0:14:15.880 --> 0:14:18.480
<v Speaker 1>we do articulate the purpose of the company as being

0:14:18.920 --> 0:14:22.800
<v Speaker 1>to make sustainable living commonplace. We want to be a

0:14:22.800 --> 0:14:25.320
<v Speaker 1>force for good as a company that, through our operations

0:14:25.320 --> 0:14:27.920
<v Speaker 1>and through our brands, we help people to live more

0:14:27.960 --> 0:14:30.560
<v Speaker 1>sustainable lives. And so I think if you ask most

0:14:30.560 --> 0:14:32.200
<v Speaker 1>people in Unilever they would be able to see, Yeah,

0:14:32.200 --> 0:14:34.680
<v Speaker 1>the purpose of the company is to make sustainable living commonplace.

0:14:35.400 --> 0:14:39.120
<v Speaker 1>It's accompanied by a very clear vision which is we

0:14:39.160 --> 0:14:41.600
<v Speaker 1>want to be the global leader and sustainable business and

0:14:41.680 --> 0:14:46.040
<v Speaker 1>we want to prove that it drives better financial outcomes. Yeah,

0:14:46.360 --> 0:14:47.960
<v Speaker 1>and I'm sure we'll get into this in a second,

0:14:48.040 --> 0:14:51.920
<v Speaker 1>but that sits right alongside our purpose, absolutely, And and

0:14:51.960 --> 0:14:54.880
<v Speaker 1>how would you characterize the dominant system that Unilever is

0:14:54.880 --> 0:14:58.680
<v Speaker 1>trying to improve upon with that purpose? Yeah, I think

0:14:58.720 --> 0:15:03.840
<v Speaker 1>this comes back to shareholder capitalism versus stakeholder capitalism. And

0:15:05.200 --> 0:15:07.880
<v Speaker 1>I would love to go to my grave having proven

0:15:07.920 --> 0:15:11.600
<v Speaker 1>two things. I'd first of all, like to prove that

0:15:11.960 --> 0:15:17.840
<v Speaker 1>there is no trade off between responsible, purposeful, sustainable business

0:15:17.880 --> 0:15:21.240
<v Speaker 1>and strong financial performance. Any time we get into discussion

0:15:21.320 --> 0:15:24.600
<v Speaker 1>of well, how do you trade off between the financial

0:15:24.640 --> 0:15:27.720
<v Speaker 1>performance of the company and the sustainability mission that you're on,

0:15:28.120 --> 0:15:32.600
<v Speaker 1>then we're doomed because ultimately the need to deliver returns

0:15:32.600 --> 0:15:35.880
<v Speaker 1>as a business will prevail. And so I want to

0:15:35.920 --> 0:15:39.720
<v Speaker 1>prove that sustainable business is a pathway to better financial performance.

0:15:39.760 --> 0:15:42.680
<v Speaker 1>And the second thing I'd love to prove is that

0:15:43.720 --> 0:15:46.680
<v Speaker 1>we have multiple stakeholders. They're all important, but I think

0:15:46.680 --> 0:15:50.360
<v Speaker 1>there's a priority of sequence. If we look after our people,

0:15:50.720 --> 0:15:54.000
<v Speaker 1>the employees of Unilever, they'll look after the business. They

0:15:54.040 --> 0:15:55.720
<v Speaker 1>will be the people who will make sure that the

0:15:55.880 --> 0:15:58.120
<v Speaker 1>actions we take don't have an adverse effect on the

0:15:58.160 --> 0:16:01.800
<v Speaker 1>planet or society. And in doing so they will ensure

0:16:01.840 --> 0:16:04.760
<v Speaker 1>that our shareholders are are better rewarded. So those are

0:16:04.760 --> 0:16:07.640
<v Speaker 1>the two dominant systems I'd love to have an impact on.

0:16:07.640 --> 0:16:12.040
<v Speaker 1>One is this stakeholder model which ends up rewarding shareholders better.

0:16:12.080 --> 0:16:14.560
<v Speaker 1>And the other is scorching this notion that there's a

0:16:14.560 --> 0:16:17.600
<v Speaker 1>trade off between sustainable business and financial performance. Yeah, I

0:16:17.640 --> 0:16:20.600
<v Speaker 1>love that, And I wonder if you could talk a

0:16:20.640 --> 0:16:23.240
<v Speaker 1>little bit about the compass, which is the name for

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 1>your business strategy. Can you explain what the compass is

0:16:27.120 --> 0:16:31.520
<v Speaker 1>and how it works. Sure. Look, four years ago, we

0:16:31.600 --> 0:16:33.920
<v Speaker 1>had two documents in the company. We had our business

0:16:33.960 --> 0:16:37.520
<v Speaker 1>strategy and we had our sustainability strategy, and we felt

0:16:37.520 --> 0:16:39.680
<v Speaker 1>that didn't make a lot of sense, and so we

0:16:39.840 --> 0:16:46.160
<v Speaker 1>rewrote our business strategy and as five pretty simple elements

0:16:46.160 --> 0:16:49.280
<v Speaker 1>to it, which is some choices that we've made around

0:16:49.720 --> 0:16:52.400
<v Speaker 1>high growth spaces we want to take our portfolio into,

0:16:52.440 --> 0:16:57.080
<v Speaker 1>like hygiene and skincare and prestige beauty. We've called out

0:16:57.120 --> 0:17:00.760
<v Speaker 1>the US, China and India as particularly important markets to

0:17:00.800 --> 0:17:03.960
<v Speaker 1>win in. We've called out e commerce as a must

0:17:03.960 --> 0:17:07.199
<v Speaker 1>win channel, and we've talked about the organization and culture

0:17:07.240 --> 0:17:09.000
<v Speaker 1>that we want to build. But the first of the

0:17:09.400 --> 0:17:12.440
<v Speaker 1>first choice is win with our brands as a force

0:17:12.480 --> 0:17:17.119
<v Speaker 1>for good, powered by purpose and innovation. And then dropping

0:17:17.160 --> 0:17:21.959
<v Speaker 1>immediately below that are three areas where we think we

0:17:22.000 --> 0:17:25.760
<v Speaker 1>can bring our commitment to sustainable living to life. One

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:29.560
<v Speaker 1>is improving the health of the planet and others improving

0:17:29.600 --> 0:17:33.040
<v Speaker 1>people's health and well being. And the third is contributing

0:17:33.080 --> 0:17:36.320
<v Speaker 1>to a fair or more socially inclusive world. And again

0:17:36.440 --> 0:17:39.720
<v Speaker 1>underneath that, there are thirty eight specific commitments that we've

0:17:39.760 --> 0:17:43.000
<v Speaker 1>made so that the two sides of the coin, our

0:17:43.080 --> 0:17:47.440
<v Speaker 1>sustainability strategy and our business strategy are fully fully integrated.

0:17:47.560 --> 0:17:51.400
<v Speaker 1>And are all of Unilever's brands. Do all of them

0:17:51.440 --> 0:17:54.480
<v Speaker 1>have a defined purpose? Or are you somewhere along the

0:17:54.560 --> 0:17:57.840
<v Speaker 1>journey of defining all of those We're on the journey.

0:17:58.760 --> 0:18:00.800
<v Speaker 1>We're on a journey. Let me first will see how

0:18:00.800 --> 0:18:03.919
<v Speaker 1>we define it? Yeah, please, you'll be familiar with the

0:18:03.960 --> 0:18:07.439
<v Speaker 1>idea of continuous tracking, looking at our brands and the

0:18:07.480 --> 0:18:10.520
<v Speaker 1>competitor brands and the attributes and how we score on

0:18:10.560 --> 0:18:13.800
<v Speaker 1>those attributes in the eyes of consumers. Well, we now

0:18:13.840 --> 0:18:18.040
<v Speaker 1>have a standard question and for all categories in all countries,

0:18:18.080 --> 0:18:22.080
<v Speaker 1>where we ask, does this brand make a positive contribution

0:18:22.200 --> 0:18:27.320
<v Speaker 1>to society or the planet. And when in that country

0:18:28.080 --> 0:18:32.480
<v Speaker 1>a consumer scores our brands as well above average on

0:18:32.520 --> 0:18:35.760
<v Speaker 1>an index, then we say, okay, that brand in that

0:18:35.840 --> 0:18:40.159
<v Speaker 1>country is a purposeful brand. And at the moment, to

0:18:40.240 --> 0:18:44.639
<v Speaker 1>be precise, our turnover now comes from brands that the

0:18:44.680 --> 0:18:48.159
<v Speaker 1>consumer sets are doing something a little bit more for

0:18:48.880 --> 0:18:51.760
<v Speaker 1>society of the planet. Some of our brands are almost

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:55.080
<v Speaker 1>entirely seen that way, like Dove or Ben and Jerry's

0:18:55.080 --> 0:18:58.640
<v Speaker 1>and others are are finding their way. You can't really

0:18:58.720 --> 0:19:01.880
<v Speaker 1>superimpose a purpose. Most of our brand's purposes we find

0:19:01.920 --> 0:19:06.760
<v Speaker 1>by excavating archaeology of their DNA and where they've come from.

0:19:06.960 --> 0:19:09.720
<v Speaker 1>It's very hard to sort of suddenly force fit in

0:19:09.800 --> 0:19:11.800
<v Speaker 1>terms of the journey that you're on. Is the goal

0:19:11.840 --> 0:19:14.960
<v Speaker 1>to be a hundred percent at some point? Yeah, I

0:19:15.000 --> 0:19:17.800
<v Speaker 1>suppose it's an ambition. It happens a little bit organically.

0:19:17.920 --> 0:19:23.080
<v Speaker 1>And the reason I say that is our brands that

0:19:23.240 --> 0:19:26.560
<v Speaker 1>score highly on purpose are growing twice as fast access

0:19:26.560 --> 0:19:28.480
<v Speaker 1>a little as close to three times as fast now

0:19:28.640 --> 0:19:31.359
<v Speaker 1>as the rest of the portfolio, and so there's a

0:19:31.440 --> 0:19:37.040
<v Speaker 1>very natural migration of our portfolio into that space. So, yeah,

0:19:37.320 --> 0:19:40.160
<v Speaker 1>there will be some brands that never quite get there.

0:19:40.440 --> 0:19:43.119
<v Speaker 1>But so long as you know, six of our brands

0:19:43.119 --> 0:19:45.920
<v Speaker 1>are are scoring highly on purpose and are growing three

0:19:45.960 --> 0:19:48.960
<v Speaker 1>times faster than the rest of the portfolio. Organically, the

0:19:49.040 --> 0:19:51.520
<v Speaker 1>vast majority of our portfolio will soon be seen as

0:19:51.880 --> 0:19:55.479
<v Speaker 1>more purposeful by the consumer. Right. I was listening to

0:19:55.560 --> 0:19:58.760
<v Speaker 1>an interview of you at a recent Goldman Sachs conference

0:19:58.760 --> 0:20:02.920
<v Speaker 1>where you said that we found that setting audacious goals

0:20:04.200 --> 0:20:07.200
<v Speaker 1>goals were not sure how we're going to meet is

0:20:07.240 --> 0:20:10.560
<v Speaker 1>a very effective way of driving change in our company,

0:20:10.600 --> 0:20:12.280
<v Speaker 1>and I just wondered if you could talk a little

0:20:12.280 --> 0:20:15.639
<v Speaker 1>bit about that, For instance, how do you set those goals? Yeah,

0:20:15.760 --> 0:20:17.560
<v Speaker 1>probably the easiest way to answer this is not in

0:20:17.600 --> 0:20:21.800
<v Speaker 1>the abstract, but with a specific challenge, which was we

0:20:21.800 --> 0:20:28.120
<v Speaker 1>were looking at our decarbonization of the company, and let

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:30.399
<v Speaker 1>me maybe just set it up by saying, we're not

0:20:30.480 --> 0:20:33.320
<v Speaker 1>an n G O TI, We're a business. We're not

0:20:33.359 --> 0:20:37.040
<v Speaker 1>doing this because of the moral imperative. We're doing because

0:20:37.080 --> 0:20:39.159
<v Speaker 1>we think it makes us a stronger business with it

0:20:39.200 --> 0:20:43.639
<v Speaker 1>will have a more successful long term future. UM and

0:20:45.119 --> 0:20:48.040
<v Speaker 1>there are dimensions of the business case around growth. I've

0:20:48.040 --> 0:20:50.360
<v Speaker 1>touched on. Some of our brands are growing faster when

0:20:50.359 --> 0:20:53.879
<v Speaker 1>they embrace sustainability. There's a dimension around cost. We actually

0:20:53.880 --> 0:20:56.720
<v Speaker 1>think it should take cost out the organization. Um it

0:20:56.880 --> 0:20:59.760
<v Speaker 1>lures risk. A planet underwater or on fire is not

0:20:59.840 --> 0:21:02.600
<v Speaker 1>a place to be a consumer products company. But on

0:21:02.600 --> 0:21:06.119
<v Speaker 1>this point of cost, there will be a price on carbon.

0:21:06.280 --> 0:21:08.520
<v Speaker 1>So today carbon is treated as a free good and

0:21:08.600 --> 0:21:11.359
<v Speaker 1>there's very few places where there's attacks or a price

0:21:11.400 --> 0:21:14.000
<v Speaker 1>on carbon of any sort. There absolutely will be so

0:21:14.840 --> 0:21:17.560
<v Speaker 1>both because we care about climate change, but also because

0:21:17.640 --> 0:21:20.760
<v Speaker 1>it makes good economic sense to reduce the carbon footprint

0:21:20.840 --> 0:21:24.240
<v Speaker 1>of Unilever. We wanted to lay out our plan to

0:21:24.320 --> 0:21:28.560
<v Speaker 1>decarbonized Unilever, and I suggested to our board that we

0:21:28.640 --> 0:21:31.520
<v Speaker 1>put it to shareholder vote. And this caused a few

0:21:31.560 --> 0:21:34.800
<v Speaker 1>sweaty moments in in our board meeting because we were

0:21:34.840 --> 0:21:36.800
<v Speaker 1>worried that some of our shareholders might say, what, you're

0:21:36.800 --> 0:21:38.760
<v Speaker 1>going far too far, and others might say, well, you're

0:21:38.760 --> 0:21:41.919
<v Speaker 1>not going far enough. But we wrote this carbon Transition

0:21:41.960 --> 0:21:45.359
<v Speaker 1>Action Plan and we put it to a shareholder vote

0:21:46.119 --> 0:21:49.640
<v Speaker 1>last May at our a g M. And now, coming

0:21:49.640 --> 0:21:52.439
<v Speaker 1>to actually answer your question, it has some big hairy

0:21:52.480 --> 0:21:54.640
<v Speaker 1>goals in there, one of which is to be net

0:21:54.760 --> 0:21:59.760
<v Speaker 1>zero as a company by twenty nine. Now we've got

0:22:00.040 --> 0:22:03.600
<v Speaker 1>milestones along the way. So for instance, we want reduction

0:22:03.640 --> 0:22:07.439
<v Speaker 1>and scope one and two carbon by we want a

0:22:07.520 --> 0:22:12.919
<v Speaker 1>seventy percent reduction in all emissions by but that endpoint

0:22:13.040 --> 0:22:15.960
<v Speaker 1>target and net zero by nine, we have no clue

0:22:15.960 --> 0:22:19.159
<v Speaker 1>how we're going to get there, and it will require innovation.

0:22:19.240 --> 0:22:22.480
<v Speaker 1>It will probably require reshaping of our portfolio. It will

0:22:22.480 --> 0:22:25.160
<v Speaker 1>require us to take as much carbon as we can

0:22:25.320 --> 0:22:29.280
<v Speaker 1>out of our operations. It will require us to advocate

0:22:29.960 --> 0:22:34.399
<v Speaker 1>for a decarbonization of electrical grids around the world, because

0:22:34.920 --> 0:22:37.960
<v Speaker 1>the biggest carbon footprint that you on ever has is

0:22:38.040 --> 0:22:41.520
<v Speaker 1>the energy that's used in heating the water that's used

0:22:41.520 --> 0:22:44.200
<v Speaker 1>to wash your skin, wash your hair, wash your clothes,

0:22:44.200 --> 0:22:48.359
<v Speaker 1>cook your food. That's our single biggest footprints. So and

0:22:48.440 --> 0:22:50.359
<v Speaker 1>only when we've done all that, we will probably need

0:22:50.400 --> 0:22:52.239
<v Speaker 1>to do a little bit of offsetting at the end.

0:22:52.720 --> 0:22:55.080
<v Speaker 1>So that would be an example of where we've set

0:22:55.080 --> 0:22:56.880
<v Speaker 1>a goal with no idea how we're going to get there.

0:22:57.240 --> 0:22:59.119
<v Speaker 1>But I can tell you most people in the company

0:22:59.119 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 1>of a feeling that it's the right thing to do,

0:23:01.119 --> 0:23:03.119
<v Speaker 1>and that by setting the goog will start taking the

0:23:03.119 --> 0:23:06.040
<v Speaker 1>actions that we need to take. I love that the

0:23:06.119 --> 0:23:09.879
<v Speaker 1>thing that I think that's really interesting about that is

0:23:09.960 --> 0:23:15.679
<v Speaker 1>that in traditional shareholder capitalism, companies have been conditioned to

0:23:15.840 --> 0:23:19.080
<v Speaker 1>externalize cost. It would be rare of a company, i think,

0:23:19.840 --> 0:23:23.399
<v Speaker 1>to actually think about the carbon footprint of heating the

0:23:23.440 --> 0:23:25.879
<v Speaker 1>water that people use to bathe as a part of

0:23:25.920 --> 0:23:29.719
<v Speaker 1>your responsibility. It's really inspiring that you think about it

0:23:29.760 --> 0:23:33.240
<v Speaker 1>that way. Well, two footnotes. We were the first company

0:23:33.359 --> 0:23:36.239
<v Speaker 1>in the world to put our carbon transition plan, our

0:23:36.280 --> 0:23:40.679
<v Speaker 1>climate Transition Action Plan to shareholder vote. Many have now followed,

0:23:40.720 --> 0:23:43.960
<v Speaker 1>so we're delighted to see many people now writing their plans.

0:23:44.000 --> 0:23:46.639
<v Speaker 1>And the second footnote is that it squeaked through the

0:23:46.640 --> 0:23:52.760
<v Speaker 1>shareholder vote with six shareholder support. And actually that's a

0:23:52.840 --> 0:23:56.000
<v Speaker 1>great statistics to understand that the capital markets are starting

0:23:56.040 --> 0:24:01.720
<v Speaker 1>to care about these types of matters. Absolutely, that's really positive.

0:24:02.440 --> 0:24:06.520
<v Speaker 1>You've already made tremendous strides as a company over the

0:24:06.640 --> 0:24:11.199
<v Speaker 1>last decade, and as you look at the challenges that

0:24:11.320 --> 0:24:13.720
<v Speaker 1>lie ahead, the things that you want to take on.

0:24:13.920 --> 0:24:18.639
<v Speaker 1>What are those challenges. Well, there are lots of problems

0:24:18.880 --> 0:24:22.719
<v Speaker 1>in the world right now, but our view is that

0:24:22.760 --> 0:24:26.280
<v Speaker 1>there are three that are bigger than the rest. The

0:24:26.359 --> 0:24:30.800
<v Speaker 1>first is the climate emergency that the impact of climate

0:24:30.880 --> 0:24:36.080
<v Speaker 1>change on everything is hard to overstate. It's going to

0:24:36.160 --> 0:24:38.760
<v Speaker 1>be a major major problem for the world. Even if

0:24:38.800 --> 0:24:41.439
<v Speaker 1>we do the best possible job that we can and

0:24:41.520 --> 0:24:43.720
<v Speaker 1>managed to get to one and a half degrees above

0:24:43.800 --> 0:24:46.720
<v Speaker 1>pre industrial levels, it's still going to cause a major

0:24:46.800 --> 0:24:49.200
<v Speaker 1>failure of the world food system. It's going to cause

0:24:49.240 --> 0:24:52.399
<v Speaker 1>massive migration from hard hit areas, so we better be

0:24:52.440 --> 0:24:55.280
<v Speaker 1>dealing with that. The second, and it's related as a

0:24:55.359 --> 0:24:59.480
<v Speaker 1>degradation and loss of nature combination of climate change and

0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:02.919
<v Speaker 1>us chopping down large swathes of for us putting in

0:25:03.000 --> 0:25:07.760
<v Speaker 1>monocrop agriculture, smashing by diversity. And then the third is

0:25:07.840 --> 0:25:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the dramatic increases in inequality that we're seeing country by country. Interestingly,

0:25:14.680 --> 0:25:17.320
<v Speaker 1>because China has lifted hundreds of millions of people out

0:25:17.359 --> 0:25:21.040
<v Speaker 1>of poverty, net inequality in the world is not going up,

0:25:21.280 --> 0:25:22.880
<v Speaker 1>but if you look at it on a country by

0:25:22.880 --> 0:25:27.160
<v Speaker 1>country level, the tremendous situation inequality and it's getting worse.

0:25:27.480 --> 0:25:31.000
<v Speaker 1>And those are three of the things that we hope

0:25:31.000 --> 0:25:34.440
<v Speaker 1>our business can play a role in addressing. A lot

0:25:34.480 --> 0:25:38.920
<v Speaker 1>of what Unilever uses as input materials are agricultural raw materials,

0:25:38.920 --> 0:25:41.920
<v Speaker 1>not just in our foods business, but much of what

0:25:41.960 --> 0:25:46.439
<v Speaker 1>we use in our personal care products like soap uses

0:25:46.520 --> 0:25:49.280
<v Speaker 1>agricultural raw materials. And what what we've said is that

0:25:49.320 --> 0:25:53.080
<v Speaker 1>by twenty thirty we want a hundred percent of our

0:25:53.200 --> 0:25:57.439
<v Speaker 1>agricultural raw materials to come from regenerative agriculture, where the

0:25:57.480 --> 0:26:01.720
<v Speaker 1>farming practices leave the land in better place. Let me

0:26:01.760 --> 0:26:05.200
<v Speaker 1>give you a really simple example. We buy soybean oil

0:26:05.320 --> 0:26:09.959
<v Speaker 1>that's grown in the US and uh, a soy field

0:26:10.560 --> 0:26:16.120
<v Speaker 1>generates abouts of carbon par acre. If you plant cover crops,

0:26:16.280 --> 0:26:20.560
<v Speaker 1>so low rise plants that can be harvested in amongst

0:26:20.600 --> 0:26:25.720
<v Speaker 1>the soy that's being farmed, that reduces the carbon output

0:26:26.040 --> 0:26:29.720
<v Speaker 1>of that acre by five kilograms, So it goes from

0:26:29.880 --> 0:26:35.320
<v Speaker 1>three of carbon emissions to a hundred and fifty ms

0:26:35.320 --> 0:26:39.920
<v Speaker 1>of carbon sequestration. That would be an example of regenerative

0:26:40.240 --> 0:26:44.120
<v Speaker 1>agricultural practices. We can maybe have a chat about palm oils,

0:26:44.359 --> 0:26:47.960
<v Speaker 1>material we use a lot of and it's a demonized material,

0:26:48.000 --> 0:26:50.760
<v Speaker 1>but actually I'd like to make the case for palm

0:26:50.800 --> 0:26:54.000
<v Speaker 1>oil at some point. Yeah, well, let's let's talk about

0:26:54.040 --> 0:26:56.760
<v Speaker 1>that now. I no palm oil was mentioned in the

0:26:56.800 --> 0:27:00.240
<v Speaker 1>context of the history of Unilever in the Congo, so

0:27:00.320 --> 0:27:04.040
<v Speaker 1>it's long been an ingredient in many of your products.

0:27:04.400 --> 0:27:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Where does UNI ever stand with palm oil today? Yeah,

0:27:07.640 --> 0:27:11.439
<v Speaker 1>there have been horrible things done to nature and the

0:27:11.520 --> 0:27:14.919
<v Speaker 1>animals that live in virgin forests through the clearing of

0:27:15.160 --> 0:27:18.680
<v Speaker 1>forests to grow palma. It's shocking. Actually, if you fly

0:27:18.800 --> 0:27:22.040
<v Speaker 1>over parts of Malaysia, you can see these huge parts

0:27:22.040 --> 0:27:25.120
<v Speaker 1>of the country that have just been cleared and replaced

0:27:25.119 --> 0:27:31.120
<v Speaker 1>by palm plantations. However, palm is an exceptionally productive material,

0:27:31.160 --> 0:27:33.680
<v Speaker 1>and if you were to try and replace the palm

0:27:33.680 --> 0:27:37.120
<v Speaker 1>oil that is used to make actually some very healthy

0:27:37.160 --> 0:27:39.240
<v Speaker 1>foods and a lot of things like soap and other

0:27:39.280 --> 0:27:44.120
<v Speaker 1>types of surfactants with rape seed or soy, it would

0:27:44.160 --> 0:27:49.040
<v Speaker 1>require eight times the acreage. So here's our view, where

0:27:49.040 --> 0:27:51.679
<v Speaker 1>are we to shift away from palm? We would end

0:27:51.800 --> 0:27:55.320
<v Speaker 1>up destroying large parts of the world with crops that

0:27:55.440 --> 0:27:59.719
<v Speaker 1>need more acreage. And there is perfectly sustainable ways of

0:27:59.760 --> 0:28:02.879
<v Speaker 1>growing palm right now where you use much less fertilizer,

0:28:03.359 --> 0:28:07.040
<v Speaker 1>where you don't clear virgin land. Instead of using pesticides,

0:28:07.080 --> 0:28:10.880
<v Speaker 1>we introduced owls onto the palm plantations, and the owls

0:28:11.200 --> 0:28:14.240
<v Speaker 1>keep the rodent population down, which is a sort of

0:28:14.320 --> 0:28:19.000
<v Speaker 1>romantic notion. But what Interestingly, what it requires is technology.

0:28:19.000 --> 0:28:24.320
<v Speaker 1>It needs real time geo mapping coupled with cell phone

0:28:24.359 --> 0:28:30.960
<v Speaker 1>tracking of truck drivers, coupled with some advanced AI technology.

0:28:31.200 --> 0:28:35.040
<v Speaker 1>And we are very confident now that something like of

0:28:35.080 --> 0:28:40.720
<v Speaker 1>our palm comes from certifiably sustainable planting. That last two

0:28:40.840 --> 0:28:45.920
<v Speaker 1>or that last one or two percent is we're working hard,

0:28:46.000 --> 0:28:47.920
<v Speaker 1>spending a lot of money on figuring out how do

0:28:48.000 --> 0:28:50.480
<v Speaker 1>we get that out of our supply chain. So I

0:28:50.520 --> 0:28:54.280
<v Speaker 1>touched a bit there on um the climate crisis and

0:28:54.320 --> 0:28:56.240
<v Speaker 1>some of the things we're doing, some of things we're

0:28:56.240 --> 0:28:59.280
<v Speaker 1>doing on nature and the degradation of nature. And we've

0:28:59.320 --> 0:29:01.880
<v Speaker 1>got a lot of programs running. But I think one

0:29:01.920 --> 0:29:04.560
<v Speaker 1>that we're very proud of is there's a concept of

0:29:04.600 --> 0:29:07.760
<v Speaker 1>a fair living wage. It's more than a minimum wage.

0:29:08.000 --> 0:29:13.480
<v Speaker 1>It's enough money that a family of four could feed, clothes, house,

0:29:14.240 --> 0:29:18.480
<v Speaker 1>educate and transport themselves. And Unilever, of course pays a

0:29:18.520 --> 0:29:22.240
<v Speaker 1>fair living wage already to anyone working in our business.

0:29:22.240 --> 0:29:25.240
<v Speaker 1>But that's only a hundred and fifty thou people. There's

0:29:25.280 --> 0:29:28.280
<v Speaker 1>about five million people in our supply chain. And what

0:29:28.320 --> 0:29:31.800
<v Speaker 1>we've said is that by t anyone who's not able

0:29:31.840 --> 0:29:35.240
<v Speaker 1>to prove they're paying a fair living wage to their

0:29:35.280 --> 0:29:39.760
<v Speaker 1>employees will not be a supplier to Unilever, and that

0:29:40.240 --> 0:29:43.719
<v Speaker 1>we think is the single biggest redistributive action that we

0:29:43.760 --> 0:29:48.000
<v Speaker 1>can take to try and address inequality through our own operations.

0:29:48.120 --> 0:29:51.440
<v Speaker 1>I love that once again, just most businesses don't think

0:29:51.440 --> 0:29:54.200
<v Speaker 1>about the world that way. And obviously I agree with you.

0:29:54.360 --> 0:29:56.400
<v Speaker 1>Like the fact that you're getting ahead of it is great,

0:29:56.440 --> 0:30:00.400
<v Speaker 1>but you're getting ahead of it because it's better business

0:30:00.680 --> 0:30:05.640
<v Speaker 1>that are ultimately operating in an unsustainable manner. Put the

0:30:05.680 --> 0:30:09.400
<v Speaker 1>time horizon on your survival essentially as a company. Yeah,

0:30:09.520 --> 0:30:10.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, we've got a pretty good feel for what

0:30:11.040 --> 0:30:15.240
<v Speaker 1>that time horizon is and it's because of different attitudes

0:30:15.840 --> 0:30:21.040
<v Speaker 1>amongst different age cohorts in society. Yes, so baby boomers

0:30:21.640 --> 0:30:24.840
<v Speaker 1>at least are honest. They don't really claim that they

0:30:24.920 --> 0:30:30.080
<v Speaker 1>change their brand choices according to sustainability considerations. I I

0:30:30.280 --> 0:30:33.440
<v Speaker 1>just creep into gen X and we're worse. We say

0:30:33.440 --> 0:30:36.920
<v Speaker 1>that we care about sustainability, but don't actually modify our

0:30:37.000 --> 0:30:40.960
<v Speaker 1>purchasing behavior, So we're dishonest. Gen Y millennials to make

0:30:41.080 --> 0:30:46.240
<v Speaker 1>gross simplifications, Millennials care about sustainability but are not prepared

0:30:46.280 --> 0:30:49.400
<v Speaker 1>to pay more and won't accept it if the product

0:30:49.400 --> 0:30:53.720
<v Speaker 1>performs more poorly as a consequence, jensennials the kind of

0:30:53.800 --> 0:30:58.520
<v Speaker 1>next generation consummate cup coming into the consumption classes. Practically

0:30:58.560 --> 0:31:01.440
<v Speaker 1>the only thing driving and choice is the values of

0:31:01.480 --> 0:31:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the brand and the values of the company behind the brand.

0:31:04.440 --> 0:31:08.440
<v Speaker 1>And so this is simply about relevance for the future.

0:31:08.520 --> 0:31:10.560
<v Speaker 1>And if you want to be a brand that's still

0:31:10.800 --> 0:31:14.840
<v Speaker 1>a company, that's still a healthy, successful, thriving company ten

0:31:14.960 --> 0:31:18.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty thirty years from now, you better be modifying your

0:31:18.240 --> 0:31:21.400
<v Speaker 1>business practices in a way that are acceptable to the

0:31:21.480 --> 0:31:24.720
<v Speaker 1>gen's annials that are coming through the population right now.

0:31:25.080 --> 0:31:30.040
<v Speaker 1>It's so important. In fact, we're called calling bullshit because

0:31:30.280 --> 0:31:33.720
<v Speaker 1>such a huge number of young people in particular are

0:31:33.760 --> 0:31:38.800
<v Speaker 1>just calling BS on shareholder capitalism. Um. The entire generation

0:31:38.880 --> 0:31:41.960
<v Speaker 1>of consumers is calling BS. And it's a clarion call.

0:31:42.120 --> 0:31:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Right If you want to run a business, if you

0:31:43.640 --> 0:31:45.440
<v Speaker 1>want to sell a product in the future, you had

0:31:45.480 --> 0:31:49.040
<v Speaker 1>better pay attention to this. So I could not agree more.

0:31:49.120 --> 0:31:51.800
<v Speaker 1>And and when I get challenged about, hey, why are

0:31:51.800 --> 0:31:53.800
<v Speaker 1>you so obsessed to putting purpose in your brands? You

0:31:53.840 --> 0:31:57.160
<v Speaker 1>know you some sort of woke capitalist, the answer is hell, no,

0:31:57.560 --> 0:31:59.600
<v Speaker 1>I just want to make sure that our brands remain

0:31:59.720 --> 0:32:03.320
<v Speaker 1>real event for the generations that are coming through into

0:32:03.360 --> 0:32:08.360
<v Speaker 1>society today. Yeah, exactly. Okay, So I'd love to pivot

0:32:08.440 --> 0:32:12.239
<v Speaker 1>again and talk a little bit about your leadership and

0:32:12.280 --> 0:32:14.800
<v Speaker 1>purpose led business. One of the things that I really

0:32:14.800 --> 0:32:19.320
<v Speaker 1>believe is that no company is is perfect, That being

0:32:19.360 --> 0:32:24.160
<v Speaker 1>purpose led is a journey, right, and and every company

0:32:24.200 --> 0:32:27.880
<v Speaker 1>is somewhere along that timeline. First of all, do you

0:32:28.160 --> 0:32:31.240
<v Speaker 1>agree with that? You know, I mentioned earlier that we've

0:32:31.280 --> 0:32:35.480
<v Speaker 1>we've got these thirty eight specific targets and commitments that

0:32:35.520 --> 0:32:38.920
<v Speaker 1>sit in our compass. Our executive team looks at progress

0:32:38.960 --> 0:32:43.760
<v Speaker 1>on those every quarter, and in the last review, which

0:32:43.800 --> 0:32:45.880
<v Speaker 1>was a couple of weeks ago, all of those thirty

0:32:45.920 --> 0:32:50.120
<v Speaker 1>eight six were green, most of the rest were read.

0:32:50.320 --> 0:32:54.840
<v Speaker 1>And so so we are a massively a work in progress.

0:32:54.960 --> 0:32:58.440
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, I guess it goes with setting somewhat stretching ambitions.

0:32:58.560 --> 0:33:01.360
<v Speaker 1>But we've got so much hard work ahead of is

0:33:01.400 --> 0:33:04.720
<v Speaker 1>it's a little daunting that last two of palm oil

0:33:04.760 --> 0:33:07.120
<v Speaker 1>that we're not sure is sustainable. It's going to take

0:33:07.200 --> 0:33:10.320
<v Speaker 1>tons of heart. We're gonna have to co invent technology

0:33:10.360 --> 0:33:13.160
<v Speaker 1>with Microsoft to fix that. I'll tell you one that's

0:33:13.200 --> 0:33:16.040
<v Speaker 1>really haunting me at the moment is our plastics commitment.

0:33:16.080 --> 0:33:20.320
<v Speaker 1>We've said that by which is just around the corner,

0:33:20.840 --> 0:33:23.840
<v Speaker 1>we will have reduced our use of virgin plastic by

0:33:24.680 --> 0:33:28.400
<v Speaker 1>by using recycled material and sums through an absolute reduction

0:33:29.240 --> 0:33:32.960
<v Speaker 1>or replacement with other materials like aluminium or would even

0:33:33.000 --> 0:33:39.520
<v Speaker 1>can you believe wouldn't there you go? So I'm kind

0:33:39.520 --> 0:33:43.720
<v Speaker 1>of trembling knees about this plastic commitment because there's a

0:33:43.760 --> 0:33:48.240
<v Speaker 1>worldwide shortage of recycled plastic. The premium for recycled plastic

0:33:48.360 --> 0:33:53.520
<v Speaker 1>over virgin material, perversely is rising. And so that's an

0:33:53.520 --> 0:33:56.280
<v Speaker 1>example where tie we've got our work cut out. I'm

0:33:56.320 --> 0:33:58.360
<v Speaker 1>not exactly sure how we'll get there, but we're very

0:33:58.440 --> 0:34:01.480
<v Speaker 1>much a work in progress. So that that leads to

0:34:01.520 --> 0:34:05.360
<v Speaker 1>another question, which is do you think that leading a

0:34:05.440 --> 0:34:08.799
<v Speaker 1>purpose led business is harder? For instance, you have so

0:34:08.880 --> 0:34:12.880
<v Speaker 1>many more stakeholders to think about, then the CEO of

0:34:12.920 --> 0:34:18.000
<v Speaker 1>a traditional shareholder led business, is it is the job harder?

0:34:18.600 --> 0:34:20.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so. Really, No, tell me a business

0:34:20.880 --> 0:34:25.000
<v Speaker 1>leader who doesn't care about her employees, her customers, are consumers,

0:34:25.400 --> 0:34:28.799
<v Speaker 1>her business partners, societies that you're doing business and the

0:34:28.880 --> 0:34:31.520
<v Speaker 1>planet and I think I'll be able to show you

0:34:31.680 --> 0:34:33.840
<v Speaker 1>a business leader that's not getting good results, so it

0:34:33.880 --> 0:34:37.520
<v Speaker 1>doesn't deserve to get good results. So it's not unnatural

0:34:37.640 --> 0:34:41.319
<v Speaker 1>to care for those different stakeholders and make sure their

0:34:41.320 --> 0:34:44.160
<v Speaker 1>interests are being looked after. And if you do it

0:34:44.200 --> 0:34:46.920
<v Speaker 1>with deep conviction that the shareholder will be better rewarded

0:34:46.920 --> 0:34:49.800
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day. Now, we're also working

0:34:49.840 --> 0:34:52.319
<v Speaker 1>progress on that. By the way, our financial performance needs

0:34:52.360 --> 0:34:55.359
<v Speaker 1>to step up to prove this model. But we've we've

0:34:55.400 --> 0:34:57.080
<v Speaker 1>got a little bit of momentum. We've just did our

0:34:57.080 --> 0:34:59.399
<v Speaker 1>fastest year of growth for nine years. Yeah, you've done

0:34:59.400 --> 0:35:02.280
<v Speaker 1>well in the US here, things are, things are coming along.

0:35:02.760 --> 0:35:05.680
<v Speaker 1>We have a theory of change, a model that we

0:35:05.840 --> 0:35:08.480
<v Speaker 1>use on pretty much all the big issues that we're

0:35:08.520 --> 0:35:15.480
<v Speaker 1>trying to address, whether that's climate or our gender or inequality.

0:35:15.600 --> 0:35:18.399
<v Speaker 1>Let me use gender as an example. Think of four

0:35:18.440 --> 0:35:23.240
<v Speaker 1>concentric rings, and that the innermost ring is our own operations.

0:35:23.280 --> 0:35:26.640
<v Speaker 1>So my job one is to make sure that there's

0:35:26.680 --> 0:35:31.560
<v Speaker 1>proper gender representation inside Unilever. And we've gone over the

0:35:31.640 --> 0:35:34.160
<v Speaker 1>last eight years from a position where thirty eight percent

0:35:34.200 --> 0:35:37.520
<v Speaker 1>of our managers were women to now of our managers

0:35:37.560 --> 0:35:40.120
<v Speaker 1>are women. That we've got nine non execs on our board,

0:35:40.239 --> 0:35:43.440
<v Speaker 1>five women, four men, so we're okay on that. Then

0:35:43.480 --> 0:35:45.479
<v Speaker 1>the next ring is what we call our value chain.

0:35:45.920 --> 0:35:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Are we making sure that there's good gender representation in

0:35:49.480 --> 0:35:53.520
<v Speaker 1>our suppliers, in our distributors, and in some of the

0:35:53.560 --> 0:35:56.960
<v Speaker 1>business models that we involve third parties in. That's the

0:35:56.960 --> 0:35:59.160
<v Speaker 1>next impact that we can have. Then we go to

0:35:59.239 --> 0:36:01.279
<v Speaker 1>the next level when we think about the impact that

0:36:01.320 --> 0:36:04.840
<v Speaker 1>our brands can have. We go from reaching millions of

0:36:04.880 --> 0:36:07.440
<v Speaker 1>people to tens of millions of people. When Dove gets

0:36:07.480 --> 0:36:12.680
<v Speaker 1>busy helping girls not carry unrealistic images of beauty, or

0:36:12.760 --> 0:36:16.160
<v Speaker 1>when sunset, it's creating opportunities for women to set up

0:36:16.160 --> 0:36:19.200
<v Speaker 1>their own hair salons. And then the outer most ring

0:36:19.320 --> 0:36:22.719
<v Speaker 1>is what we call advocacy, and that's where partnerships come

0:36:22.760 --> 0:36:27.799
<v Speaker 1>in and we work with civil society, government, academia to

0:36:27.880 --> 0:36:32.000
<v Speaker 1>try and change the system. And I think those first

0:36:32.080 --> 0:36:35.960
<v Speaker 1>three rings most business leaders have to deal with. We

0:36:36.040 --> 0:36:39.799
<v Speaker 1>have an unusually active advocacy program and that is a

0:36:39.800 --> 0:36:42.160
<v Speaker 1>little bit of extra work. In fact, I just came

0:36:42.200 --> 0:36:44.880
<v Speaker 1>from a board meeting of the World Business Council for

0:36:44.960 --> 0:36:48.239
<v Speaker 1>Sustainable Development. But you know what, it's very rewarding and

0:36:48.280 --> 0:36:50.799
<v Speaker 1>worthwhile work. So it's a little bit of extra work,

0:36:50.840 --> 0:36:54.360
<v Speaker 1>but not really, but you love it. Yeah, it's satisfying,

0:36:54.480 --> 0:36:59.840
<v Speaker 1>feeds the soul. So are there other leaders of purpose

0:37:00.040 --> 0:37:05.080
<v Speaker 1>had businesses that particularly inspire you? Oh? Lots, yes, lots

0:37:05.080 --> 0:37:09.800
<v Speaker 1>and lots. To me, the iconic one is Patagonia, and

0:37:09.880 --> 0:37:12.480
<v Speaker 1>you know of Asinar and everything that he has set

0:37:12.600 --> 0:37:14.959
<v Speaker 1>up there and which has been carried on by his successors.

0:37:15.719 --> 0:37:18.440
<v Speaker 1>And there's a survey comes out every year of opinion

0:37:18.520 --> 0:37:21.719
<v Speaker 1>leaders and their views on companies and whether sustainabilities at

0:37:21.719 --> 0:37:25.000
<v Speaker 1>the heart of their strategy. I'm embarrassed by the fact

0:37:25.040 --> 0:37:26.919
<v Speaker 1>that you don Leaver just for the last few years

0:37:26.920 --> 0:37:30.600
<v Speaker 1>scored number one in Patagonia number two, because I don't

0:37:30.600 --> 0:37:33.040
<v Speaker 1>think we deserve it at all compared with the deep

0:37:33.680 --> 0:37:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Remember if are discontinued his his metal petons, which was

0:37:38.239 --> 0:37:41.120
<v Speaker 1>the core product in his business, because he felt they

0:37:41.160 --> 0:37:43.399
<v Speaker 1>were damaging the very rock that he was so lovely.

0:37:43.600 --> 0:37:46.480
<v Speaker 1>We're leaving him stuck in the rock, and he exactly.

0:37:46.719 --> 0:37:50.280
<v Speaker 1>So I really admire almost everything that they keep reinventing themselves.

0:37:50.320 --> 0:37:54.319
<v Speaker 1>You're making fleeces out of PT bottles, encouraging people not

0:37:54.440 --> 0:37:56.560
<v Speaker 1>to buy a new jacket, come and get it repaired.

0:37:56.680 --> 0:38:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Their sourcing policies and they're just fantastic. Another one is, yes,

0:38:00.600 --> 0:38:04.960
<v Speaker 1>we're broadened. Who runs Ikea? Ikea have done such deep

0:38:05.120 --> 0:38:09.680
<v Speaker 1>work on understanding the climate and social footprint or so

0:38:09.880 --> 0:38:13.520
<v Speaker 1>the planetary and social footprint of their business, their supply chain,

0:38:13.680 --> 0:38:18.160
<v Speaker 1>their stores. And I'll give you one more um that

0:38:18.280 --> 0:38:20.880
<v Speaker 1>you may never have heard of. A food company that

0:38:21.000 --> 0:38:24.319
<v Speaker 1>grows fruit and vegetables around the world called Alam. They

0:38:24.320 --> 0:38:27.680
<v Speaker 1>were founded by a guy called Sonny Vergas. Sonny lives

0:38:27.680 --> 0:38:31.120
<v Speaker 1>in Singapore, and he has built one of the world's

0:38:31.239 --> 0:38:37.840
<v Speaker 1>leading agricultural production companies, and he's done it with extraordinary

0:38:37.840 --> 0:38:42.319
<v Speaker 1>attention to purpose and sustainability. So there's one, and then,

0:38:42.320 --> 0:38:43.680
<v Speaker 1>of course there's a whole lot of other lists, but

0:38:43.719 --> 0:38:47.839
<v Speaker 1>there's three that I particularly admire. Today there are so

0:38:47.920 --> 0:38:52.920
<v Speaker 1>many more purpose led businesses that actually started with a purpose.

0:38:53.000 --> 0:38:56.640
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of young companies begin that way, but

0:38:56.800 --> 0:39:00.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of older companies sounds like unlike Unilever, didn't

0:39:00.400 --> 0:39:03.279
<v Speaker 1>begin that way and are now trying to figure out

0:39:03.360 --> 0:39:06.960
<v Speaker 1>how to make that transition. What advice would you have

0:39:07.160 --> 0:39:11.640
<v Speaker 1>for other CEOs who are beginning that purpose of the journey.

0:39:11.719 --> 0:39:15.279
<v Speaker 1>The first point I would make is entirely predictable, which is,

0:39:15.560 --> 0:39:20.560
<v Speaker 1>unless you're crystal clear in your mind why it makes

0:39:20.600 --> 0:39:25.080
<v Speaker 1>you a better business, how it will drive stronger performance,

0:39:25.800 --> 0:39:29.759
<v Speaker 1>don't start the journey because this is not CSR. This

0:39:29.840 --> 0:39:32.799
<v Speaker 1>is not some offset where you can buy a clean

0:39:32.880 --> 0:39:36.960
<v Speaker 1>conscience by donating to a charity or or having a

0:39:37.000 --> 0:39:40.400
<v Speaker 1>park made a part built next to your headquarters. Unless

0:39:40.400 --> 0:39:42.640
<v Speaker 1>it sits at the heart of your business model, driving

0:39:42.680 --> 0:39:47.440
<v Speaker 1>revenue growth, taking out cost, improving your employee proposition, don't

0:39:47.480 --> 0:39:50.560
<v Speaker 1>do it because then it's not sustainable. And the second

0:39:50.840 --> 0:39:53.720
<v Speaker 1>is you don't have to go from zero to perfect,

0:39:54.040 --> 0:39:56.480
<v Speaker 1>just get started with a few inistas. And it's so

0:39:57.640 --> 0:40:03.120
<v Speaker 1>rewarding economically and emotionally. It's such a strong thing to

0:40:03.160 --> 0:40:06.680
<v Speaker 1>build a company culture around that. I believe it will

0:40:06.680 --> 0:40:09.040
<v Speaker 1>snowball and catch momentum. And you know, it has to

0:40:09.040 --> 0:40:12.040
<v Speaker 1>be authentic, but it doesn't have to be perfect. Let's

0:40:12.120 --> 0:40:15.680
<v Speaker 1>use that as a pivot too, company culture, because it's

0:40:15.719 --> 0:40:18.320
<v Speaker 1>such a huge part of it. How would you describe

0:40:18.640 --> 0:40:22.280
<v Speaker 1>the Unilever company culture? We want our company to be human,

0:40:23.160 --> 0:40:25.759
<v Speaker 1>to be purposeful, and to be accountable. You don't even

0:40:26.520 --> 0:40:29.880
<v Speaker 1>does have a culture where we treat each other with respect.

0:40:30.040 --> 0:40:32.840
<v Speaker 1>If you get the job done, but you're an asshole

0:40:33.000 --> 0:40:35.960
<v Speaker 1>and you leave a kind of a trail of people

0:40:36.040 --> 0:40:42.080
<v Speaker 1>who would love to need afterwards, right exactly, then I

0:40:42.120 --> 0:40:45.080
<v Speaker 1>think our company would tissue reject you like a badly

0:40:45.120 --> 0:40:48.440
<v Speaker 1>matched Oregon quicker than the average company. So being human

0:40:48.440 --> 0:40:51.200
<v Speaker 1>and with that comes you know a lot of friendships.

0:40:51.400 --> 0:40:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Not too hierarchical. I mean every company is get some hierarchic.

0:40:54.360 --> 0:40:57.120
<v Speaker 1>We're not too hierarchical. Um, So that's the human The

0:40:57.120 --> 0:41:01.040
<v Speaker 1>second is purposeful. We believe that, Um, this is a

0:41:01.040 --> 0:41:04.520
<v Speaker 1>bit slogany, but we do believe that brands with purpose growth,

0:41:04.520 --> 0:41:08.280
<v Speaker 1>that companies with purpose last, and that people with purpose thrive.

0:41:08.960 --> 0:41:12.799
<v Speaker 1>And we've putting out fifty thou people through purpose workshops

0:41:12.800 --> 0:41:16.080
<v Speaker 1>to try and understand is the thing that makes them

0:41:16.080 --> 0:41:19.120
<v Speaker 1>take well aligned with the work that they're doing it

0:41:19.200 --> 0:41:22.600
<v Speaker 1>you'll leave. And when people find that alignment, my goodness,

0:41:22.640 --> 0:41:26.120
<v Speaker 1>it cements their commitment to the company that you can

0:41:26.160 --> 0:41:29.080
<v Speaker 1>see job satisfaction scores that are through the roof. And

0:41:29.120 --> 0:41:31.520
<v Speaker 1>so that's the purposeful part of our culture, more human,

0:41:31.600 --> 0:41:34.520
<v Speaker 1>more purposeful. And then the accountable bit is we want

0:41:34.520 --> 0:41:37.719
<v Speaker 1>people who are prepared to take risks. We want people

0:41:37.719 --> 0:41:40.160
<v Speaker 1>who are prepared to have a go for people who

0:41:40.400 --> 0:41:43.280
<v Speaker 1>understand that, you know, poor performance plus a good excuse

0:41:43.440 --> 0:41:46.640
<v Speaker 1>is still poor performance. And and those are the kind

0:41:46.640 --> 0:41:48.480
<v Speaker 1>of three ways we describe our culture. I think it's

0:41:48.640 --> 0:41:53.640
<v Speaker 1>one thing it doesn't capture, which is we are extraordinarily international.

0:41:53.760 --> 0:41:57.239
<v Speaker 1>There is no dominant nationality in our business. And I

0:41:57.320 --> 0:42:00.000
<v Speaker 1>love that. I'm sort of looking out my office here

0:42:00.040 --> 0:42:03.319
<v Speaker 1>and I can see a melting pot of different nationalities.

0:42:03.320 --> 0:42:05.680
<v Speaker 1>And typically a French company would be full of French people,

0:42:05.719 --> 0:42:09.280
<v Speaker 1>and American company full of Americans and so on. Truly global.

0:42:09.600 --> 0:42:12.040
<v Speaker 1>And are there certain things that you look for in

0:42:12.120 --> 0:42:16.520
<v Speaker 1>a new employee? Is there a Unilever type? Over the

0:42:16.640 --> 0:42:20.480
<v Speaker 1>years I've been trained on all these different competency frameworks

0:42:20.520 --> 0:42:23.560
<v Speaker 1>and what to look for a reference to that have

0:42:23.680 --> 0:42:27.520
<v Speaker 1>stuck with me. One is very simple. It's that people

0:42:27.520 --> 0:42:31.440
<v Speaker 1>are successful in our company tend to be strong masters

0:42:31.480 --> 0:42:34.720
<v Speaker 1>of their inner game, so that they're very self aware,

0:42:34.880 --> 0:42:38.399
<v Speaker 1>they control their emotions reasonably well, and they operate out

0:42:38.400 --> 0:42:41.960
<v Speaker 1>of a sense of service and purpose. And that is

0:42:42.000 --> 0:42:45.600
<v Speaker 1>a precursor to mastering your outer game, which is your

0:42:45.760 --> 0:42:50.040
<v Speaker 1>expressed leadership, your drive for business performance, your passion for

0:42:50.080 --> 0:42:53.919
<v Speaker 1>consumers and customers. I think it's an interesting concept that

0:42:54.239 --> 0:42:56.040
<v Speaker 1>you have an inner game in an outer game and

0:42:56.120 --> 0:42:58.680
<v Speaker 1>both need to be performing at a high level for

0:42:58.680 --> 0:43:01.520
<v Speaker 1>for someone to do well. The simple kind of Alan

0:43:01.600 --> 0:43:05.759
<v Speaker 1>Joke criteria after thirty odd years of kindiring people is

0:43:06.360 --> 0:43:09.160
<v Speaker 1>I want people who are are smart. Uh, got a

0:43:09.160 --> 0:43:11.480
<v Speaker 1>bit of EQ and a bit of i Q. Who

0:43:11.560 --> 0:43:15.239
<v Speaker 1>are quite driven. They've got they can show that they

0:43:15.280 --> 0:43:18.439
<v Speaker 1>get around obstacles. And the third is that they're nice,

0:43:18.560 --> 0:43:21.080
<v Speaker 1>kind people that other people want to be around. And

0:43:21.760 --> 0:43:24.120
<v Speaker 1>I could just think of my kind of leadership team.

0:43:24.280 --> 0:43:27.160
<v Speaker 1>They are all bright, they are all driven, and they

0:43:27.160 --> 0:43:29.319
<v Speaker 1>are all someone you'd want to appear with. Yeah. Yeah.

0:43:29.440 --> 0:43:31.520
<v Speaker 1>One of the criteria I use is if I were

0:43:31.600 --> 0:43:36.120
<v Speaker 1>stuck in an airport with this person for an unexpectedly

0:43:36.200 --> 0:43:38.040
<v Speaker 1>long period of time, would that be a good thing

0:43:38.120 --> 0:43:43.120
<v Speaker 1>or a bad thing? Exactly? Uh. One of the things

0:43:43.120 --> 0:43:45.279
<v Speaker 1>that you touched on that I'd love to just talk

0:43:46.080 --> 0:43:51.560
<v Speaker 1>about a little bit more is talent and the effect

0:43:51.640 --> 0:43:55.719
<v Speaker 1>that being purpose lad has on your ability to attract talent. Yeah.

0:43:55.960 --> 0:44:02.160
<v Speaker 1>We measure our attractive us as an employer for undergrads

0:44:03.000 --> 0:44:06.600
<v Speaker 1>coming out of university in h forty four countries around

0:44:06.640 --> 0:44:11.360
<v Speaker 1>the world. In forty two of them were the employer

0:44:11.400 --> 0:44:14.000
<v Speaker 1>of choice in our sector, and ten years ago that

0:44:14.080 --> 0:44:19.239
<v Speaker 1>was seventeen. So we have no problem attracting really high

0:44:19.360 --> 0:44:22.960
<v Speaker 1>quality graduates coming out of university. In fact, we get

0:44:22.960 --> 0:44:26.839
<v Speaker 1>two million job applications a year across the company. But

0:44:27.320 --> 0:44:30.560
<v Speaker 1>I think what's maybe more interesting is we've been able

0:44:30.600 --> 0:44:34.920
<v Speaker 1>to attract some really senior executives and indeed board members

0:44:35.400 --> 0:44:38.319
<v Speaker 1>who would have a pick of the places they could work.

0:44:38.960 --> 0:44:42.759
<v Speaker 1>And the universal reason is because they want to understand

0:44:42.840 --> 0:44:46.239
<v Speaker 1>or be part of a company um that is operating

0:44:46.239 --> 0:44:49.000
<v Speaker 1>in a responsible fashion. Whether you call it purposeful or

0:44:49.040 --> 0:44:52.840
<v Speaker 1>responsible or sustainable, it's the same threat that is acting

0:44:52.880 --> 0:44:56.120
<v Speaker 1>and to attract senior and junior folks, and we've got

0:44:56.600 --> 0:44:58.840
<v Speaker 1>really hard data on this guy. I was surprised to

0:44:58.880 --> 0:45:02.160
<v Speaker 1>hear that we're the third most followed company on the

0:45:02.160 --> 0:45:05.960
<v Speaker 1>world on LinkedIn, after Apple and Google. You know, a

0:45:05.960 --> 0:45:09.719
<v Speaker 1>sleepy old soap maker. Not bad, very cool. Okay, I

0:45:09.760 --> 0:45:11.919
<v Speaker 1>have a couple of questions that I want to ask

0:45:11.960 --> 0:45:14.480
<v Speaker 1>you to wrap up. I'm just curious about this. You've

0:45:14.480 --> 0:45:17.760
<v Speaker 1>acquired a number of certified B corps over the years,

0:45:18.360 --> 0:45:20.960
<v Speaker 1>I think seven or eight of them, and I just

0:45:21.000 --> 0:45:23.279
<v Speaker 1>wondered if there were any plans to become a B

0:45:23.520 --> 0:45:27.759
<v Speaker 1>corp at the group level. Yeah, we've studied this at

0:45:27.840 --> 0:45:32.280
<v Speaker 1>least twice that I know of, in in excruciatingly detail.

0:45:32.560 --> 0:45:36.160
<v Speaker 1>BE corps certification is not designed for enterprises the skill

0:45:36.239 --> 0:45:40.319
<v Speaker 1>of Unilever. We would need to create an entire industry

0:45:40.400 --> 0:45:44.480
<v Speaker 1>of certification around the company, every operation in a hundred

0:45:44.520 --> 0:45:49.879
<v Speaker 1>and ninety countries, multiple divisions, multiple brands, and it would

0:45:49.960 --> 0:45:54.560
<v Speaker 1>cost an absolute fortune. And it is It is doable.

0:45:54.600 --> 0:45:57.480
<v Speaker 1>It's just about doable. I would love for you Deliver

0:45:57.560 --> 0:46:00.279
<v Speaker 1>to be a B corp. But the bragging right, so

0:46:00.360 --> 0:46:04.280
<v Speaker 1>becoming a B carp are not commensurate with the cost

0:46:04.320 --> 0:46:07.640
<v Speaker 1>an effort that would be required to achieve that certification. Yeah,

0:46:07.680 --> 0:46:12.640
<v Speaker 1>now that completely resonate. Okay, so two questions to wrap up.

0:46:12.640 --> 0:46:15.480
<v Speaker 1>First of all, what have I not asked you about

0:46:15.560 --> 0:46:18.799
<v Speaker 1>that you think that our listeners should know about you

0:46:19.040 --> 0:46:21.239
<v Speaker 1>or about you know Leaver? You know I asked you know.

0:46:21.320 --> 0:46:23.279
<v Speaker 1>The share price has been languishing a little bit for

0:46:23.360 --> 0:46:27.719
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of years, and I I think, in

0:46:27.800 --> 0:46:32.640
<v Speaker 1>the spirit of the name of the podcast, all these

0:46:32.680 --> 0:46:35.440
<v Speaker 1>all these fine words that I've been saying about all

0:46:35.440 --> 0:46:37.720
<v Speaker 1>the wonderful things that we're doing in the world, Well,

0:46:38.000 --> 0:46:40.279
<v Speaker 1>why you know, shouldn't it be more visible in the

0:46:40.280 --> 0:46:43.920
<v Speaker 1>share price? That's the that's the really sting or tough question.

0:46:44.800 --> 0:46:48.600
<v Speaker 1>And the short answer is we've surprised the stock market

0:46:48.600 --> 0:46:52.319
<v Speaker 1>three times in the last three years. We under undergrew

0:46:52.520 --> 0:46:54.520
<v Speaker 1>what we said we would do in two thousand nineteen.

0:46:54.560 --> 0:46:57.640
<v Speaker 1>So in December two thousand nineteen we announced the sales

0:46:57.640 --> 0:47:00.279
<v Speaker 1>warning and that called the market off guard. In the

0:47:00.320 --> 0:47:04.200
<v Speaker 1>first year of COVID twenty are operating margin went backwards

0:47:04.200 --> 0:47:06.879
<v Speaker 1>by sixty basis points when the market wasn't expecting it.

0:47:07.680 --> 0:47:09.560
<v Speaker 1>And then the third one, I think is a little harsh.

0:47:09.560 --> 0:47:12.200
<v Speaker 1>We were the first company at the gate um to

0:47:12.920 --> 0:47:16.680
<v Speaker 1>call attention to inflationary pressures that were coming in mid

0:47:16.719 --> 0:47:20.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty and so we are well exactly, but the one

0:47:21.120 --> 0:47:26.120
<v Speaker 1>day dropping our share price on those three days explains

0:47:26.160 --> 0:47:29.120
<v Speaker 1>the entire discount to our sector and what it says.

0:47:29.120 --> 0:47:31.320
<v Speaker 1>It's great to be sustainable, what's great to a super

0:47:31.400 --> 0:47:34.440
<v Speaker 1>year of growth last year, but in our particular sector,

0:47:35.080 --> 0:47:40.320
<v Speaker 1>the sort of predictability and reliability of performance really matters

0:47:40.360 --> 0:47:43.160
<v Speaker 1>as well, and there's I make no excuse for that.

0:47:43.200 --> 0:47:45.680
<v Speaker 1>There's no reason why UNI leavers shouldn't deliver what we

0:47:45.760 --> 0:47:49.440
<v Speaker 1>call four G growth, which is consistent growth, competitive growth,

0:47:49.800 --> 0:47:53.160
<v Speaker 1>profitable growth, and responsible growth. And that's still in the

0:47:53.400 --> 0:47:55.560
<v Speaker 1>to do list. And just to follow up to that,

0:47:55.640 --> 0:47:58.879
<v Speaker 1>you discontinued quarterly reporting a while ago, a decade ago.

0:48:00.080 --> 0:48:03.359
<v Speaker 1>Does that help or or hurt? Yeah? When we say

0:48:03.360 --> 0:48:08.240
<v Speaker 1>we dis continued quarterly reporting, kind of so we still

0:48:08.280 --> 0:48:13.600
<v Speaker 1>report our top line and our growth every quarter, and

0:48:13.880 --> 0:48:17.360
<v Speaker 1>we report our fool p and now the bottom line

0:48:17.560 --> 0:48:20.839
<v Speaker 1>semi annually, so at the mid year. So really what

0:48:20.880 --> 0:48:24.160
<v Speaker 1>we stopped doing was reporting profits at the end of

0:48:24.239 --> 0:48:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Q one and the end of Q three. And I

0:48:27.480 --> 0:48:31.400
<v Speaker 1>would say it's materially helpful. It gives us flexibility to

0:48:31.520 --> 0:48:35.000
<v Speaker 1>invest in the business within a half rather than constrained

0:48:35.000 --> 0:48:37.560
<v Speaker 1>by the particular phasing that a quarter would demand. I

0:48:37.600 --> 0:48:40.239
<v Speaker 1>think it's a good thing, but it's not all the

0:48:40.280 --> 0:48:43.200
<v Speaker 1>way to you know, we abandoned quarterly reporting, I don't

0:48:43.239 --> 0:48:46.160
<v Speaker 1>think right. Okay, now, thank you for the clarification on that.

0:48:46.280 --> 0:48:52.120
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate it. Okay, Allen on calling bs UM, we

0:48:52.200 --> 0:48:55.080
<v Speaker 1>have a question that we ask every guest So we

0:48:55.200 --> 0:48:59.960
<v Speaker 1>define BS as the gap between word indeed in the organization,

0:49:00.000 --> 0:49:02.640
<v Speaker 1>and we have a tool that we call the BS

0:49:02.719 --> 0:49:07.439
<v Speaker 1>scale where we rate organizations on that gap, zero being

0:49:07.480 --> 0:49:10.520
<v Speaker 1>the best zero gap between word indeed and a hundred

0:49:10.520 --> 0:49:15.600
<v Speaker 1>being the worst total bullshit. So, taking into consideration that

0:49:15.719 --> 0:49:19.440
<v Speaker 1>everything is a journey, where would you rate Unilever on

0:49:19.440 --> 0:49:24.040
<v Speaker 1>that scale today? That's interesting. So if it was the

0:49:24.080 --> 0:49:28.279
<v Speaker 1>gap between ambition and where we are today, uh, then

0:49:28.320 --> 0:49:30.960
<v Speaker 1>it's a high number. It's a high numbers, you know, sixty.

0:49:31.160 --> 0:49:33.799
<v Speaker 1>If it's the gap between what we say and what

0:49:33.840 --> 0:49:36.719
<v Speaker 1>we're really doing in the company, then it's quite a

0:49:36.719 --> 0:49:40.239
<v Speaker 1>low number because we are very transparent. No, I think

0:49:40.239 --> 0:49:42.759
<v Speaker 1>it's the latter. I think it's gap between what you

0:49:42.840 --> 0:49:46.680
<v Speaker 1>say you stand for and where what your intention truly is.

0:49:47.080 --> 0:49:49.759
<v Speaker 1>Then I would say, I think we are quite transparent,

0:49:49.920 --> 0:49:53.000
<v Speaker 1>and we report a lot, and there's not a huge

0:49:53.000 --> 0:49:54.560
<v Speaker 1>gap between what we say we're doing and what we

0:49:54.600 --> 0:49:57.400
<v Speaker 1>really are doing. So I'd give us, but there's obviously

0:49:57.440 --> 0:50:00.920
<v Speaker 1>some so I'd say, I don't know, live and in

0:50:00.960 --> 0:50:04.120
<v Speaker 1>a in a company of your scale, I just have

0:50:04.280 --> 0:50:08.600
<v Speaker 1>to say, I think that's extraordinarily low. So I'm very

0:50:08.640 --> 0:50:11.799
<v Speaker 1>inspired by what you're doing, and I want to thank

0:50:11.840 --> 0:50:13.840
<v Speaker 1>you for being on the show today. This has been great.

0:50:14.040 --> 0:50:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Does that mean you're not going to wrap up by

0:50:16.440 --> 0:50:21.040
<v Speaker 1>saying you're fool of sh it? Nope, you're off the hook,

0:50:21.239 --> 0:50:24.120
<v Speaker 1>not full of ship not but not on our scale. Okay,

0:50:24.200 --> 0:50:27.200
<v Speaker 1>not on our scale. Well, it's uh been a while

0:50:27.200 --> 0:50:29.000
<v Speaker 1>since we saw each other. Thank you very much for

0:50:29.040 --> 0:50:31.520
<v Speaker 1>having me on, and uh maybe we can follow it

0:50:31.600 --> 0:50:35.360
<v Speaker 1>up sometime and me meanwhile, look forward to that beer together.

0:50:35.520 --> 0:50:39.359
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for having me. I'd like to end the show

0:50:39.440 --> 0:50:42.440
<v Speaker 1>today by giving you a lever our official BS score.

0:50:43.239 --> 0:50:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Our scale goes from zero to a hundred. A zero

0:50:46.640 --> 0:50:50.240
<v Speaker 1>means zero gap between word and deed, and a hundred

0:50:50.360 --> 0:50:55.040
<v Speaker 1>means the gap is huge. Total BS Alan gave you

0:50:55.120 --> 0:50:58.520
<v Speaker 1>a lever between a twenty and five. Based on what

0:50:58.600 --> 0:51:01.080
<v Speaker 1>I've heard today, I'm going to agree and give him

0:51:01.080 --> 0:51:04.160
<v Speaker 1>a twenty. I see all kinds of promising signs that

0:51:04.280 --> 0:51:08.960
<v Speaker 1>this company is really trying, starting with leadership. The sheer

0:51:09.040 --> 0:51:11.600
<v Speaker 1>size of this company makes it much harder to live

0:51:11.640 --> 0:51:14.160
<v Speaker 1>up to their purpose, but it also means that when

0:51:14.160 --> 0:51:18.200
<v Speaker 1>they do meet their ambitious goals, the impacts are huge.

0:51:19.840 --> 0:51:23.279
<v Speaker 1>Alan is clearly passionate about getting things right, and his

0:51:23.520 --> 0:51:28.480
<v Speaker 1>enthusiasm informs every aspect of the business, driving real change.

0:51:29.000 --> 0:51:32.400
<v Speaker 1>The company is also quick to admit when it falls short,

0:51:32.880 --> 0:51:36.760
<v Speaker 1>and they're willing to acknowledge the problematic areas of their history,

0:51:36.840 --> 0:51:40.400
<v Speaker 1>which is why as time passes, I expect their score

0:51:40.600 --> 0:51:45.239
<v Speaker 1>to actually go down. But Alan's retirement announcement comes at

0:51:45.239 --> 0:51:48.520
<v Speaker 1>a time when the company is under intense pressure to

0:51:48.640 --> 0:51:52.560
<v Speaker 1>focus on short term financial results rather than on the

0:51:52.680 --> 0:51:57.239
<v Speaker 1>long term goal of building a sustainable global company. While

0:51:57.280 --> 0:52:00.680
<v Speaker 1>he's still at the helm, Alan is using unili purpose

0:52:00.920 --> 0:52:03.880
<v Speaker 1>to steer the ship, but we'll be keeping a close

0:52:03.920 --> 0:52:08.719
<v Speaker 1>eye on what happens once leadership actually changes. To weigh

0:52:08.760 --> 0:52:12.120
<v Speaker 1>in with your thoughts, visit our website Calling Bullshit Podcast

0:52:12.200 --> 0:52:14.160
<v Speaker 1>dot com. You'll be able to see where you know

0:52:14.280 --> 0:52:17.040
<v Speaker 1>leave our ranks on BS compared to the other companies

0:52:17.040 --> 0:52:20.560
<v Speaker 1>and organizations we feature on the show. And if you're

0:52:20.600 --> 0:52:23.640
<v Speaker 1>starting a purpose led business or you're thinking about beginning

0:52:23.680 --> 0:52:26.640
<v Speaker 1>the journey of transformation to become one, here are three

0:52:26.680 --> 0:52:33.000
<v Speaker 1>things that you can take away from this episode. One

0:52:34.040 --> 0:52:38.400
<v Speaker 1>set ambitious goals. As Alan pointed out, it's by setting

0:52:38.400 --> 0:52:42.320
<v Speaker 1>goals that at first seemed unachievable that real change happens

0:52:42.320 --> 0:52:46.479
<v Speaker 1>in an organization. The goal keeping him awake right now

0:52:46.600 --> 0:52:49.960
<v Speaker 1>is cutting the use of plastics by in one of

0:52:50.000 --> 0:52:55.920
<v Speaker 1>the largest package goods companies in the world. So what's yours? Two?

0:52:56.800 --> 0:53:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Your business strategy and your purpose are not separate things.

0:53:01.520 --> 0:53:04.560
<v Speaker 1>There are two aspects of one thing. The problem in

0:53:04.560 --> 0:53:08.440
<v Speaker 1>the world that you exist to solve. Your purpose is why.

0:53:08.680 --> 0:53:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Your business strategy is how, and when you get it right,

0:53:12.880 --> 0:53:19.040
<v Speaker 1>profitability is a natural outcome. Three. There is a timer

0:53:19.080 --> 0:53:22.000
<v Speaker 1>taking on businesses that don't make the shift to being

0:53:22.080 --> 0:53:26.000
<v Speaker 1>purpose led, and it's going off in about ten years,

0:53:26.480 --> 0:53:31.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe even less than that. Why Gen's annuals, they're voting

0:53:31.600 --> 0:53:33.880
<v Speaker 1>with their wallets for companies that are trying to solve

0:53:33.920 --> 0:53:37.399
<v Speaker 1>some of the big problems in the world. They will

0:53:37.440 --> 0:53:41.840
<v Speaker 1>decide what businesses thrive and what businesses fail in the future.

0:53:42.440 --> 0:53:46.439
<v Speaker 1>Don't wait to establish a relationship with them. Start now.

0:53:50.160 --> 0:53:53.920
<v Speaker 1>And if you had fun on this trip across the universe,

0:53:54.400 --> 0:53:57.319
<v Speaker 1>subscribe to the Calling Bullshit podcast on the I Heart

0:53:57.400 --> 0:54:01.840
<v Speaker 1>radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to people

0:54:02.040 --> 0:54:06.080
<v Speaker 1>speaking to your ears. And thanks to our production team,

0:54:06.120 --> 0:54:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Hannah Beal, Amanda Ginsburg Andy kim D s Moss, Hayley Pascalites,

0:54:12.480 --> 0:54:17.720
<v Speaker 1>Parker Silzer, Basil Soaper and me Jean Zulu. Calling Bullshit

0:54:18.000 --> 0:54:20.920
<v Speaker 1>was created by co Collective and is hosted by Me

0:54:21.320 --> 0:54:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Time Monte You thanks for listening.