WEBVTT - Central Banks, Ukraine, And The Economy

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day, we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.479
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. All right, we heard

0:00:22.120 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>from Michael McKee was speaking with the New York Fed

0:00:24.840 --> 0:00:28.280
<v Speaker 1>President today. Rates are going higher. I think the concern

0:00:28.360 --> 0:00:31.520
<v Speaker 1>are one of the several concerns in the marketplace is

0:00:31.800 --> 0:00:35.200
<v Speaker 1>what's the risk of this Fed reserve going too far,

0:00:35.560 --> 0:00:39.960
<v Speaker 1>too fast, maybe pushing this economy into recession. Danielle di Martino,

0:00:40.040 --> 0:00:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Booth CEO and chief strategists at Quill Intelligence, joins us. Danielle,

0:00:45.320 --> 0:00:47.960
<v Speaker 1>how is your federal reserve performing rate here? How and

0:00:48.200 --> 0:00:50.560
<v Speaker 1>how do you expect them to perform for the remainder

0:00:50.560 --> 0:00:54.280
<v Speaker 1>of the year. Well, you know, I think that that

0:00:54.360 --> 0:00:58.680
<v Speaker 1>we can expect Federal Reserve officials to attempt to stay

0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:03.080
<v Speaker 1>the course oh over the next few months. People forget

0:01:03.120 --> 0:01:06.200
<v Speaker 1>that this is a mid term election year, and if

0:01:06.200 --> 0:01:09.080
<v Speaker 1>there's one unwritten rule at the Fed, it's that you

0:01:09.160 --> 0:01:14.560
<v Speaker 1>don't appear overtly political during an election year. So I

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:17.039
<v Speaker 1>think the reason that so many FED officials, including the

0:01:17.040 --> 0:01:18.640
<v Speaker 1>two most doublished the vice share of the F one,

0:01:19.160 --> 0:01:21.920
<v Speaker 1>John Williams, who was just on Bloomberg and Leo Brainerd.

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:25.240
<v Speaker 1>I think the reason that they've been corralled by J.

0:01:25.440 --> 0:01:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Powell is that they want to be consistent in their broadcasting,

0:01:29.680 --> 0:01:34.560
<v Speaker 1>that they're going to to be methodical and that they're

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:36.520
<v Speaker 1>going to raise rate, and that they're they've got a

0:01:36.520 --> 0:01:38.760
<v Speaker 1>goal of getting to neutral, and that they're going to

0:01:38.880 --> 0:01:42.440
<v Speaker 1>try and stay the course into the election, even though

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:45.200
<v Speaker 1>those last few words they're not saying, but I think

0:01:45.200 --> 0:01:47.920
<v Speaker 1>that that's really the message right now. How do you

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:50.920
<v Speaker 1>set yourself a goal of getting to neutral when you

0:01:51.000 --> 0:01:55.720
<v Speaker 1>have no idea where neutral is? I just you know,

0:01:55.840 --> 0:01:58.640
<v Speaker 1>nobody can I ask all people all the time, what's neutral?

0:01:58.800 --> 0:02:02.080
<v Speaker 1>What's your our star? And nobody he has an exact answer.

0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:06.520
<v Speaker 1>It's always kind of a wishy, washy spongy guess well,

0:02:06.680 --> 0:02:08.680
<v Speaker 1>and it's going to be right. Because J. Powell was

0:02:08.760 --> 0:02:11.400
<v Speaker 1>determined in two thousand eighteen that he was going to

0:02:11.520 --> 0:02:13.880
<v Speaker 1>get to three, it was as if he had this

0:02:14.000 --> 0:02:17.639
<v Speaker 1>neutral goal in mind. Now. You know, you listen to

0:02:17.680 --> 0:02:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Christopher Waller yesterday, governor who used to be the director

0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:24.359
<v Speaker 1>of research at the St. Louis Fete under Bullard. He said,

0:02:24.400 --> 0:02:27.960
<v Speaker 1>two point and that is the number that it seems

0:02:28.040 --> 0:02:32.200
<v Speaker 1>like things started to break last time in the markets.

0:02:32.240 --> 0:02:35.639
<v Speaker 1>So I think that they can. They can, they can

0:02:35.720 --> 0:02:38.200
<v Speaker 1>have as many models as they want. I think that

0:02:38.240 --> 0:02:41.399
<v Speaker 1>they're simply looking back in time and saying, well, look,

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:43.639
<v Speaker 1>credit credit broke when we were approaching two and a

0:02:43.680 --> 0:02:46.040
<v Speaker 1>half percent, So let's let's just shoot a little bit

0:02:46.080 --> 0:02:48.440
<v Speaker 1>under that and call it two point four. By the way,

0:02:48.880 --> 0:02:51.600
<v Speaker 1>I have Danielle has a big fan who listens to

0:02:51.600 --> 0:02:53.640
<v Speaker 1>the show every day. We got a lot of fans. No,

0:02:53.720 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean listen to our show every day. Okay, he

0:02:57.280 --> 0:02:59.560
<v Speaker 1>and I talk, but he also has heard Danielle speak

0:02:59.560 --> 0:03:01.640
<v Speaker 1>a few times. He's a big fan. He wants he's

0:03:02.000 --> 0:03:04.200
<v Speaker 1>writing in right now. He wants to do you agree

0:03:04.200 --> 0:03:06.400
<v Speaker 1>with the change in work. That's the you know, the

0:03:06.400 --> 0:03:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg function about inflation peaking and the market pricing in

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 1>fewer hikes. You know, I think I don't think that

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:18.679
<v Speaker 1>the market has priced anything definitively in look at where

0:03:18.680 --> 0:03:21.240
<v Speaker 1>the tenure you'ld is right now and this is just

0:03:21.320 --> 0:03:25.200
<v Speaker 1>off of a stormer than expect University of Michigan expectations

0:03:25.280 --> 0:03:27.320
<v Speaker 1>number that that just crossed the wires a two minutes ago.

0:03:28.160 --> 0:03:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Right now, markets are extremely volatile and I and and

0:03:31.800 --> 0:03:38.080
<v Speaker 1>pricing of future inflation is is really it's undetermined right well,

0:03:38.080 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 1>but everybody has been saying this is the peak, you know,

0:03:41.480 --> 0:03:44.000
<v Speaker 1>or this is likely the peak. I don't. I don't

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:47.200
<v Speaker 1>know if I personally buy that. Also, the biggest asset

0:03:47.240 --> 0:03:49.960
<v Speaker 1>managers in the world are betting that the terminal rate

0:03:50.040 --> 0:03:52.160
<v Speaker 1>is going to be about three percent, which I know

0:03:52.200 --> 0:03:54.360
<v Speaker 1>because black Rock came out today and said, Nope, it's

0:03:54.360 --> 0:03:56.480
<v Speaker 1>going to be closer to two. What do you think,

0:03:58.680 --> 0:04:02.440
<v Speaker 1>you know? I think uh, I think that what we're

0:04:02.440 --> 0:04:05.240
<v Speaker 1>seeing and what few two two people are talking about

0:04:05.560 --> 0:04:09.040
<v Speaker 1>is we're seeing that that freight that trucking in America

0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:13.000
<v Speaker 1>hit a wall on in early March. That is a

0:04:13.080 --> 0:04:14.360
<v Speaker 1>sign to you and I think that this is what

0:04:14.400 --> 0:04:18.279
<v Speaker 1>everybody's kind of kind of globbing onto. That's a sign

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:22.560
<v Speaker 1>that demand in the United States has really come under pressure,

0:04:23.560 --> 0:04:26.480
<v Speaker 1>and that's why we're not seeing all these crazy supply

0:04:26.600 --> 0:04:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Chaine disruption inflationary impulses, despite what's going on in Ukraine

0:04:32.320 --> 0:04:35.000
<v Speaker 1>and despite what's going on in China. I think the

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:37.799
<v Speaker 1>demanding the United States is really what's hit a wall,

0:04:38.200 --> 0:04:41.320
<v Speaker 1>and that that is what is going to anchor core

0:04:41.440 --> 0:04:46.400
<v Speaker 1>inflation moving forward. But we don't know what food prices

0:04:46.440 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 1>are going to do, and we're hoping that gas prices

0:04:49.760 --> 0:04:52.000
<v Speaker 1>are coming down. And by the way, University of Michigan

0:04:52.040 --> 0:04:55.280
<v Speaker 1>is a pure play the upside surprise, a pure play

0:04:55.320 --> 0:04:57.160
<v Speaker 1>on the fact that we gave back all of the

0:04:57.200 --> 0:05:00.600
<v Speaker 1>games at the gas pump and came and and pump

0:05:01.120 --> 0:05:04.080
<v Speaker 1>gas prices came down, and that's all you're looking at,

0:05:04.120 --> 0:05:06.920
<v Speaker 1>because it's still at recessionary readings. And I think that

0:05:06.920 --> 0:05:10.400
<v Speaker 1>that is something that shouldn't be shouldn't be lost, and

0:05:10.440 --> 0:05:13.960
<v Speaker 1>we should know that there is no uh Ohio State

0:05:14.279 --> 0:05:18.320
<v Speaker 1>sentiment index because we are focused on the game of football.

0:05:18.600 --> 0:05:21.239
<v Speaker 1>I admit that the University of Michigan is a great school.

0:05:21.760 --> 0:05:26.520
<v Speaker 1>It's an incredible academy. It's an institution for higher learning,

0:05:26.560 --> 0:05:29.000
<v Speaker 1>and I love ann Arbor. It's a great place to go,

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:32.240
<v Speaker 1>except for when they're playing Ohio State, because then they

0:05:32.279 --> 0:05:34.200
<v Speaker 1>lose and it's so depressed. I know, I know, I

0:05:34.240 --> 0:05:35.880
<v Speaker 1>just wanted to get get that in there. All right,

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:38.920
<v Speaker 1>So Danielle, just real quickly, here is my federal Reserve

0:05:39.000 --> 0:05:40.919
<v Speaker 1>going to deliver a soft landing for me? Or are

0:05:40.960 --> 0:05:44.640
<v Speaker 1>we gonna risk recession? Maybe next year? Oh heck no.

0:05:44.839 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 1>And I don't think recession is the next year proposition.

0:05:47.600 --> 0:05:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Oh look, look, what have we had a tenure expansion,

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:55.320
<v Speaker 1>a twelve year expansion right now we're talking about a

0:05:55.520 --> 0:05:58.560
<v Speaker 1>two and a half year expansion, give or take. Why

0:05:58.680 --> 0:06:02.960
<v Speaker 1>is the why? Why is the general operating assumption that

0:06:03.040 --> 0:06:05.919
<v Speaker 1>we're going to go into recession as slowly as we have.

0:06:06.520 --> 0:06:10.680
<v Speaker 1>We've really protracted elongated expansion. When this expansion in the

0:06:10.839 --> 0:06:14.719
<v Speaker 1>entire cycle has been compressed into a time machine. I

0:06:14.760 --> 0:06:16.880
<v Speaker 1>think that I think that I think it's species to

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:18.960
<v Speaker 1>say you're gonna have your eighteen months runway. I think

0:06:19.240 --> 0:06:22.039
<v Speaker 1>people are worried that you know, this monitor, uh what

0:06:22.080 --> 0:06:24.240
<v Speaker 1>do you call it? Modern monetary theory has brought in

0:06:24.200 --> 0:06:27.919
<v Speaker 1>an incredible inflation. And now look, Ira Jersey says, not

0:06:27.960 --> 0:06:30.560
<v Speaker 1>a question of um, you know, if we're gonna have

0:06:30.600 --> 0:06:33.919
<v Speaker 1>a recession, but what kind it's gonna be? I couldn't

0:06:33.920 --> 0:06:38.000
<v Speaker 1>agree more. We've only tacked on two trillion dollars more

0:06:38.440 --> 0:06:42.360
<v Speaker 1>in corporate debt since Operate the nineteen so more things

0:06:42.360 --> 0:06:45.200
<v Speaker 1>can break. Yep. Absolutely. Daniel D. Martino, Booth CEO and

0:06:45.240 --> 0:06:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Chief Strategies a quick intelligence giving us her thoughts. We

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:55.960
<v Speaker 1>have a great pleasure ed prices in the studio with

0:06:56.000 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 1>a senior fellow and former British trade official senior foul

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:03.960
<v Speaker 1>at at n y u and former British trade official.

0:07:04.480 --> 0:07:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Uh he's a political economist. He represented Her Majesty's government

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:14.400
<v Speaker 1>to Wall Street and uh US official sector from seventy

0:07:14.480 --> 0:07:18.200
<v Speaker 1>one and um he's Uh. I guess you specialize in

0:07:18.320 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 1>German economic history, but you look at obviously the entire world.

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Is that fair? Yes? I think, like you know, German

0:07:24.560 --> 0:07:26.360
<v Speaker 1>history is always in my mind. I think it's a

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:28.480
<v Speaker 1>good a good benchmark for a lot of things, particularly

0:07:28.480 --> 0:07:31.480
<v Speaker 1>if we're gonna talk about inflation. Of course, yeah, the

0:07:31.520 --> 0:07:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Weimar Republican the hyper inflation is um the big scare

0:07:35.240 --> 0:07:37.000
<v Speaker 1>and that's why Germans hate it so much. But I

0:07:37.000 --> 0:07:39.400
<v Speaker 1>think we all hate inflation. I mean, Ronald Reagan hated

0:07:39.440 --> 0:07:42.960
<v Speaker 1>inflation as much as any German. Um. Uh. Somebody asked

0:07:42.960 --> 0:07:45.480
<v Speaker 1>me today, who's your least favorite German politician. And I

0:07:45.520 --> 0:07:49.960
<v Speaker 1>was thinking, Um, first of all, I didn't any I like,

0:07:50.280 --> 0:07:51.800
<v Speaker 1>I like a lot of them on both sides of

0:07:51.840 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 1>the aisle. There's very there's not as much differentiation there

0:07:55.200 --> 0:07:58.000
<v Speaker 1>as there is here, at least of the two parties.

0:07:58.240 --> 0:08:00.120
<v Speaker 1>But I thought, you know what, when I was the

0:08:00.160 --> 0:08:04.600
<v Speaker 1>G twenty in Hamburg, um, angl a miracle got like

0:08:04.640 --> 0:08:07.040
<v Speaker 1>a standing ovation from all the other leaders. She was

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:11.200
<v Speaker 1>clearly leading the free world right um and and it

0:08:11.240 --> 0:08:16.240
<v Speaker 1>was amazing, like she was the hero. And now in hindsight,

0:08:16.640 --> 0:08:20.760
<v Speaker 1>we realized she's been appeasing Vladimir Putin for years and

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:25.360
<v Speaker 1>making Germany dependent on Russian oil and gas. They're basically

0:08:25.560 --> 0:08:31.280
<v Speaker 1>fun funding his war in Ukraine, these atrocities, um that

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:34.400
<v Speaker 1>we're that we're watching. How does how does Anglo miracle

0:08:34.440 --> 0:08:37.800
<v Speaker 1>go down in history? I mean it's that's a profound question,

0:08:37.920 --> 0:08:41.760
<v Speaker 1>right And to use the word appeasement um of Germans

0:08:42.200 --> 0:08:44.440
<v Speaker 1>is sort of metso ironic and you have, you know,

0:08:44.480 --> 0:08:47.000
<v Speaker 1>you have to sit down and think about that. That's

0:08:47.000 --> 0:08:50.200
<v Speaker 1>why you chose it was. I appreciate it. Um, Yeah,

0:08:50.200 --> 0:08:52.240
<v Speaker 1>how does she go down in history? Right now? Not

0:08:52.360 --> 0:08:55.760
<v Speaker 1>that well? And I suppose if you want to think

0:08:55.800 --> 0:08:59.080
<v Speaker 1>about why the Germans were taking in all that gas

0:08:59.120 --> 0:09:02.360
<v Speaker 1>and why they were appeasing Russia, maybe there was some

0:09:02.400 --> 0:09:04.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of back in their mind war guilt. You know,

0:09:05.200 --> 0:09:07.920
<v Speaker 1>we invaded the Russians twice, we caused a lot of damage,

0:09:08.240 --> 0:09:11.480
<v Speaker 1>and maybe we have some sort of historical responsibility to

0:09:11.480 --> 0:09:15.880
<v Speaker 1>bring the Russians back into the European fold. And again, ironically,

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:18.080
<v Speaker 1>they are not in the European fold, and they seem

0:09:18.120 --> 0:09:20.600
<v Speaker 1>to have used this relationship with Germany to to break

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:22.840
<v Speaker 1>away from what you might call norms. It's crazy. I

0:09:22.920 --> 0:09:25.080
<v Speaker 1>was over there for the last six years in Berlin,

0:09:25.120 --> 0:09:27.600
<v Speaker 1>and I kept running into like Dan Yet, the U

0:09:27.679 --> 0:09:30.240
<v Speaker 1>S Energy Minister. At every time, I'll tell you, Dan,

0:09:30.240 --> 0:09:31.600
<v Speaker 1>what are you doing here? He's like, I'm trying to

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:34.120
<v Speaker 1>get these guys to buy our l en g I'm

0:09:34.120 --> 0:09:35.960
<v Speaker 1>trying to get them to build more terminals so they

0:09:35.960 --> 0:09:38.480
<v Speaker 1>can accept our gas and not buy all the stuff

0:09:38.480 --> 0:09:41.160
<v Speaker 1>from Vladimir Putin and a shut down Nords dream too.

0:09:41.200 --> 0:09:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Obviously he was unsuccessful. I mean, I guess they wish

0:09:44.640 --> 0:09:48.320
<v Speaker 1>they would have now, But is it even possible for

0:09:48.679 --> 0:09:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Western Europe to cut off Russian oil and gas or

0:09:51.520 --> 0:09:54.280
<v Speaker 1>would they be kind of shooting themselves in the foot. Well,

0:09:54.280 --> 0:09:56.559
<v Speaker 1>it's certainly possible for Putin to shoot them in the

0:09:56.559 --> 0:09:59.319
<v Speaker 1>foot and cut off at least some of that gas. Right,

0:09:59.360 --> 0:10:01.920
<v Speaker 1>So I think it's definitely it's now become clear that

0:10:01.920 --> 0:10:05.280
<v Speaker 1>that's a major security risk. Uh. And so whether it's

0:10:05.320 --> 0:10:08.199
<v Speaker 1>possible to the upside, whether they can actually pivot back

0:10:08.240 --> 0:10:12.000
<v Speaker 1>to US oil production, one would hope. Um, Now, of course,

0:10:12.120 --> 0:10:13.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you guys, tell me what you think about this,

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:15.680
<v Speaker 1>but you're immediately going to drive into the wall of

0:10:15.800 --> 0:10:19.640
<v Speaker 1>the climate lobby. Um. Possibly correctly, right, But it's on

0:10:19.679 --> 0:10:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the one hand, on the other hand, situation, Um, so

0:10:22.200 --> 0:10:25.120
<v Speaker 1>we need to pump. Do you want to finance war crimes?

0:10:25.520 --> 0:10:27.319
<v Speaker 1>Do you want to mind more dirty call? Do you

0:10:27.360 --> 0:10:30.840
<v Speaker 1>want to roast to death? Which way like atomic weapons?

0:10:31.000 --> 0:10:34.719
<v Speaker 1>Or slowly? So we we heard from Christine Leguard I

0:10:34.920 --> 0:10:37.920
<v Speaker 1>m F this morning. It gives us your sense of

0:10:37.960 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 1>how the world's banks to fair. The e c B,

0:10:41.240 --> 0:10:44.320
<v Speaker 1>the Bank of England. How coordinated are they in terms

0:10:44.320 --> 0:10:47.599
<v Speaker 1>of trying to bring down inflation? We've got a reopening economy.

0:10:48.120 --> 0:10:52.280
<v Speaker 1>How are they in Canada? Don't forget forget fends, they're

0:10:52.280 --> 0:10:54.560
<v Speaker 1>all fighting the same inflation. Right, Hopefully they're on the

0:10:54.559 --> 0:10:56.959
<v Speaker 1>phone with each other, one would hope. Yeah, I think

0:10:57.000 --> 0:10:58.640
<v Speaker 1>I think the central bank has talk to each other

0:10:58.679 --> 0:11:01.800
<v Speaker 1>all the time. How coordinates coordinated there are in actual

0:11:01.840 --> 0:11:04.120
<v Speaker 1>policy terms remains to be seen, and I think the

0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:06.960
<v Speaker 1>CBS behind But if you're asking me my sense of it,

0:11:07.040 --> 0:11:09.840
<v Speaker 1>I think all central banks around the world are realizing

0:11:10.080 --> 0:11:13.000
<v Speaker 1>two two things right. Number one, fat currency is a

0:11:13.000 --> 0:11:16.079
<v Speaker 1>massive experiment, and number two, we've been running an experiment

0:11:16.120 --> 0:11:21.560
<v Speaker 1>within an experiment with endless que So an M T right, MMC,

0:11:21.640 --> 0:11:24.559
<v Speaker 1>Please don't get me started on M T R. So,

0:11:24.679 --> 0:11:26.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean how much money did we spend, not just

0:11:26.760 --> 0:11:28.920
<v Speaker 1>monetary policy, right, how much money do we spend in

0:11:28.960 --> 0:11:33.120
<v Speaker 1>fiscal um since the pandemic started, and we at least

0:11:33.160 --> 0:11:35.880
<v Speaker 1>brought ourselves out of a recession quickly. But the questions

0:11:35.880 --> 0:11:38.920
<v Speaker 1>are we headed right back down there with massive inflation

0:11:39.440 --> 0:11:41.560
<v Speaker 1>um to join it. I think the answer is yes,

0:11:41.559 --> 0:11:44.679
<v Speaker 1>So a nine trillion dollar balance sheets and absurdity. And

0:11:44.800 --> 0:11:47.920
<v Speaker 1>if you remember, we were talking about inflation being transitory passing,

0:11:48.280 --> 0:11:51.280
<v Speaker 1>we kind of moved from passing to persistent, and now

0:11:51.320 --> 0:11:53.640
<v Speaker 1>I think we need to move from persistent to pernicius

0:11:53.679 --> 0:11:55.600
<v Speaker 1>and the Fed really does need to get a handle

0:11:55.640 --> 0:11:58.000
<v Speaker 1>on this. I understand that there's a war in Ukraine.

0:11:58.040 --> 0:12:00.560
<v Speaker 1>I understand that there are all sorts of other financial

0:12:00.600 --> 0:12:03.760
<v Speaker 1>markets reasons for like, you know, keeping the juice going,

0:12:04.120 --> 0:12:06.960
<v Speaker 1>But this is going to become a disaster. Eight could

0:12:06.960 --> 0:12:08.800
<v Speaker 1>be ten, and if it's ten, you could imagine twins.

0:12:08.840 --> 0:12:11.760
<v Speaker 1>So you think they should be quicker with much QT,

0:12:12.400 --> 0:12:14.439
<v Speaker 1>much quicker with QT, much quicker with hikes. So you're

0:12:14.480 --> 0:12:17.599
<v Speaker 1>not in the camp that the CPI inflation reading we

0:12:17.720 --> 0:12:20.480
<v Speaker 1>just got is the peak. I don't think it matches

0:12:20.520 --> 0:12:22.000
<v Speaker 1>if it's the peak. I mean, what if it goes back,

0:12:22.080 --> 0:12:23.800
<v Speaker 1>goes back down to seven? I mean, who cares? This

0:12:23.840 --> 0:12:25.560
<v Speaker 1>is a major problem. This is eating into people, and

0:12:25.600 --> 0:12:27.520
<v Speaker 1>this is something like I guess one of my questions

0:12:27.559 --> 0:12:29.760
<v Speaker 1>has always been, dude, those costs don't go back down, right,

0:12:29.840 --> 0:12:33.920
<v Speaker 1>I've been watching My from in January is fifty grand.

0:12:34.200 --> 0:12:36.720
<v Speaker 1>In February, mid February they raised it to fifty three.

0:12:37.000 --> 0:12:40.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, now the beginning of March it was did

0:12:39.840 --> 0:12:44.599
<v Speaker 1>get no, I'm talking we're talking about the forward f

0:12:44.720 --> 0:12:47.120
<v Speaker 1>one fifty for Matt Miller. It's a big issue that

0:12:47.280 --> 0:12:49.480
<v Speaker 1>just that's a general term I really am trying to

0:12:49.480 --> 0:12:55.840
<v Speaker 1>decide between a GMC Sierra four X and the Chevy Stilverado.

0:12:55.920 --> 0:12:59.120
<v Speaker 1>But in any case, the point is the prices stay elevated, right,

0:12:59.120 --> 0:13:01.320
<v Speaker 1>they still sift of gas and food. Hopefully they'll come

0:13:01.320 --> 0:13:03.680
<v Speaker 1>back down. Prices upwardly sticky. Let's be weird like that.

0:13:03.880 --> 0:13:06.400
<v Speaker 1>And I've been looking at the Toyoto Super myself like

0:13:06.520 --> 0:13:09.000
<v Speaker 1>that thing looks like a beast. So you know what

0:13:09.080 --> 0:13:12.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean. Share development with BMW is a kind word. Yes, yes,

0:13:15.160 --> 0:13:18.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to be right now. Yeah, you cause I'm

0:13:18.440 --> 0:13:20.960
<v Speaker 1>a fan. Okay, cool, I'm driving a Subaru, so if

0:13:20.960 --> 0:13:22.560
<v Speaker 1>you want me to leave right nice? No, No, that's

0:13:22.600 --> 0:13:26.920
<v Speaker 1>a boxer motor. I love it and very reliable that

0:13:27.000 --> 0:13:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Consumer Reports ranks Subaru as one of the greatest brands

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 1>of all car brands in the world. So I'm feeling

0:13:32.520 --> 0:13:35.520
<v Speaker 1>good about my choice. Yeah, thank you. What's our fed dude?

0:13:35.520 --> 0:13:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Next there? And I mean fifty basis points? Do I

0:13:37.800 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 1>have multiple fifty basis point moves from my federal reserve?

0:13:40.679 --> 0:13:43.520
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to see that. Um No, probably. I mean

0:13:43.520 --> 0:13:46.080
<v Speaker 1>they're they're very hesitant, aren't they about even suggesting they'll

0:13:46.080 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 1>do one? I mean they've said they might, um, but

0:13:49.720 --> 0:13:52.839
<v Speaker 1>my guess on it says they're gonna be four coming off.

0:13:52.880 --> 0:13:54.959
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to see that too. Um. But I think

0:13:54.960 --> 0:13:57.040
<v Speaker 1>that if they do that, there's a moment in markets

0:13:57.080 --> 0:13:58.760
<v Speaker 1>right where the markets are like, oh what is this?

0:13:59.559 --> 0:14:01.200
<v Speaker 1>H If you do it once, you've kind of broken

0:14:01.200 --> 0:14:04.360
<v Speaker 1>the seal. And so they're facing two panics, right They're

0:14:04.360 --> 0:14:07.640
<v Speaker 1>facing either the real economy panicking because we can't buy

0:14:07.679 --> 0:14:09.160
<v Speaker 1>the things that we want to buy, and on the

0:14:09.160 --> 0:14:12.320
<v Speaker 1>other hand, they're facing the financial market panic potentially in

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:14.880
<v Speaker 1>which markets stone around in side. You imagine four fifty

0:14:14.880 --> 0:14:18.400
<v Speaker 1>basis point hikes. That sounds crazy, but it brings us

0:14:18.440 --> 0:14:21.720
<v Speaker 1>only to two and a quarter percent. Still nothing. So

0:14:21.760 --> 0:14:24.880
<v Speaker 1>what does normalization mean? Yeah, okay, normalization doesn't mean anything

0:14:24.920 --> 0:14:26.680
<v Speaker 1>right now, We're still going to be in a very

0:14:26.720 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 1>loose environment even with that kind of even with that

0:14:29.240 --> 0:14:31.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of piking, Good time to buy a house, all right,

0:14:31.400 --> 0:14:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Ed Brice, thank you so much, and senior fellow n

0:14:34.040 --> 0:14:37.400
<v Speaker 1>y U, former British trade official. Remember the Economic Club

0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:39.200
<v Speaker 1>of New York? Do they actually have it like a clubhouse?

0:14:39.280 --> 0:14:41.800
<v Speaker 1>That's a big deal, that's that's a big old club. Actually,

0:14:42.080 --> 0:14:43.560
<v Speaker 1>did they have a clubhouse to I mean, where do

0:14:43.640 --> 0:14:45.680
<v Speaker 1>they think they meet? They probably meet it like the

0:14:45.720 --> 0:14:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Metropolitan Club or something. And I mean I took economic time.

0:14:49.720 --> 0:14:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Can I get in there? I don't know what you

0:14:51.160 --> 0:14:54.160
<v Speaker 1>have to do to join it? Alright, thank you so much.

0:14:54.200 --> 0:15:01.040
<v Speaker 1>We appreciate it. Looking at the wall, worry a new

0:15:01.080 --> 0:15:04.280
<v Speaker 1>brick has recently been added over the past couple of months,

0:15:04.320 --> 0:15:07.640
<v Speaker 1>and that is geopolitical risk, as you have a hot

0:15:07.680 --> 0:15:10.480
<v Speaker 1>war now in Ukraine, and that there is another issue

0:15:10.480 --> 0:15:13.880
<v Speaker 1>for investors to digest. Sedec Wabba joins us. He is founder,

0:15:13.960 --> 0:15:19.040
<v Speaker 1>chairman and managing partner of I Squared Capital. Sedec. You know,

0:15:19.320 --> 0:15:23.400
<v Speaker 1>we have this hot war in Ukraine. It feels so

0:15:23.520 --> 0:15:26.200
<v Speaker 1>twentieth century that people, I think, I have a hard

0:15:26.240 --> 0:15:29.000
<v Speaker 1>time kind of really appreciating the impacts. How do you

0:15:29.080 --> 0:15:34.840
<v Speaker 1>think about that in terms of your investment outlook great

0:15:34.880 --> 0:15:37.720
<v Speaker 1>to be with you, Matt, and I appreciate the invite.

0:15:38.600 --> 0:15:43.040
<v Speaker 1>My biggest concern is the impact the war who is

0:15:43.080 --> 0:15:47.680
<v Speaker 1>having on global inflation and US inflation in particular. So

0:15:47.720 --> 0:15:50.760
<v Speaker 1>the numbers came out two days ago, eight point five

0:15:50.800 --> 0:15:56.400
<v Speaker 1>percent increase in March compared to seven point nine you

0:15:56.440 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 1>had one point to percent increase in one month. That

0:15:59.680 --> 0:16:04.800
<v Speaker 1>increase will continue, and I suspect inflation will be around

0:16:04.880 --> 0:16:08.960
<v Speaker 1>ten plus by the summer. So that puts enormous pressure

0:16:09.280 --> 0:16:13.600
<v Speaker 1>on the Federal Reserve to increase interest rates, and that

0:16:13.720 --> 0:16:17.760
<v Speaker 1>of course is not going to help the economy. My senses,

0:16:18.000 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 1>we are sleepwalking towards global economic crisis unless this Ukraine

0:16:24.200 --> 0:16:27.800
<v Speaker 1>situation get resolved. I want to jump in and say,

0:16:28.000 --> 0:16:32.200
<v Speaker 1>first of all, that was Paul. Uh, that that was Paul.

0:16:32.320 --> 0:16:36.520
<v Speaker 1>This is Matt. I'm just saying, OK, we we we

0:16:36.600 --> 0:16:40.280
<v Speaker 1>look a lot like on the radio. UM. First of all,

0:16:40.320 --> 0:16:42.520
<v Speaker 1>hello and thanks so much for joining us. Great talking

0:16:42.520 --> 0:16:46.320
<v Speaker 1>to you. UM, I want to know what you think about, UM,

0:16:46.440 --> 0:16:48.840
<v Speaker 1>you know the U s economy in this context? Are

0:16:48.880 --> 0:16:52.920
<v Speaker 1>we are we headed towards a recession with ten percent inflation?

0:16:52.960 --> 0:16:59.080
<v Speaker 1>That sounds like a horrible situation. I think if the

0:16:59.120 --> 0:17:03.080
<v Speaker 1>war in Ukraine is not resolved relatively quickly, you will

0:17:03.120 --> 0:17:07.440
<v Speaker 1>have the trifecta of a pandemic of a global logistics

0:17:07.600 --> 0:17:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Chaine supply crisis and war that has pushed energy prices,

0:17:12.160 --> 0:17:17.120
<v Speaker 1>commodity prices, food prices way way up, and that yes,

0:17:17.400 --> 0:17:21.439
<v Speaker 1>will probably lead to a recession. UM. I give you.

0:17:21.440 --> 0:17:25.880
<v Speaker 1>One simple example, we passed one point two trillion infrastructure bill.

0:17:26.320 --> 0:17:28.920
<v Speaker 1>The cost of construction has gone up by more than

0:17:30.280 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 1>that means that that infrastructure bill, at one point to trillion,

0:17:34.400 --> 0:17:39.600
<v Speaker 1>has already lost so it's lost two billion dollars of

0:17:39.680 --> 0:17:43.760
<v Speaker 1>its purchasing power. So that's a problem. So are we

0:17:43.800 --> 0:17:46.919
<v Speaker 1>going to get any more fiscal help? You think, um,

0:17:47.160 --> 0:17:50.560
<v Speaker 1>because we've fallen off this fiscal cliff. It's kind of

0:17:50.600 --> 0:17:55.359
<v Speaker 1>a cliche now, but it's true. And you know, on

0:17:55.200 --> 0:17:58.720
<v Speaker 1>one hand, a lot of that fiscal spending is to

0:17:59.160 --> 0:18:04.160
<v Speaker 1>um is getting the blame for inflation. On the other hand, Um,

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:09.600
<v Speaker 1>can we really go cold Turkey without any more? No,

0:18:09.760 --> 0:18:12.440
<v Speaker 1>you can't. So so you have to continue to invest,

0:18:12.760 --> 0:18:18.200
<v Speaker 1>but invest productively in areas where that has a positive

0:18:18.240 --> 0:18:21.919
<v Speaker 1>effect on American productivity. That has to continue to happen,

0:18:22.840 --> 0:18:25.400
<v Speaker 1>and that is in fact what the Biden administration is doing.

0:18:25.760 --> 0:18:30.720
<v Speaker 1>They're trying to ensure that the infrastructure bill, which is

0:18:30.720 --> 0:18:34.680
<v Speaker 1>the biggest bill we've ever had, is allocated properly across

0:18:34.760 --> 0:18:39.160
<v Speaker 1>productive projects across the US. So that is certainly going

0:18:39.200 --> 0:18:42.440
<v Speaker 1>to be a huge plus, and that has to continue.

0:18:42.720 --> 0:18:44.840
<v Speaker 1>I think the other element is to be able to

0:18:44.880 --> 0:18:48.960
<v Speaker 1>have a synchronized effort globally to try and stop the

0:18:49.000 --> 0:18:51.800
<v Speaker 1>war in Ukraine, because that is going to be the

0:18:51.840 --> 0:18:55.600
<v Speaker 1>biggest positive impact it can have on the global economy.

0:18:55.840 --> 0:18:59.280
<v Speaker 1>In terms of US infrastructure, select, where do you think

0:18:59.320 --> 0:19:02.320
<v Speaker 1>the priorities be. I'll take your minds minus the Gateway project,

0:19:02.359 --> 0:19:05.560
<v Speaker 1>getting some new tunnels connecting New Jersey and New York

0:19:05.600 --> 0:19:09.000
<v Speaker 1>and Amtrak. I've been lobbying that forever. Where do you

0:19:09.040 --> 0:19:13.440
<v Speaker 1>think the money should be spent? So the most efficient

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:16.320
<v Speaker 1>way today is to spend the money on things that

0:19:16.359 --> 0:19:20.320
<v Speaker 1>needs immediate repair. Why because you don't have to wait

0:19:20.359 --> 0:19:22.600
<v Speaker 1>another three or four years of planning to be able

0:19:22.640 --> 0:19:26.159
<v Speaker 1>to do that. So things that have broken bridges that

0:19:26.200 --> 0:19:29.879
<v Speaker 1>are almost falling are the easiest target. Whether is the

0:19:29.920 --> 0:19:33.000
<v Speaker 1>most impact, the biggest bank for your buck, And that

0:19:33.200 --> 0:19:36.840
<v Speaker 1>is what is in fact the administration currently doing. The

0:19:37.000 --> 0:19:42.040
<v Speaker 1>next will be to really focus on energy supply and

0:19:42.720 --> 0:19:45.560
<v Speaker 1>adopt on all of the above strategy. Right, so, we

0:19:45.640 --> 0:19:50.240
<v Speaker 1>realize that we need to ensure independence but also the

0:19:50.280 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 1>independence of allies in Europe, and so that means accelerating

0:19:55.840 --> 0:20:00.480
<v Speaker 1>energy projects and ensuring that that will allow gas to

0:20:00.600 --> 0:20:05.200
<v Speaker 1>flow into Western Europe, which I think indirectly should help

0:20:05.640 --> 0:20:09.480
<v Speaker 1>accelerate the end of the war. As an investor, sodic,

0:20:09.640 --> 0:20:14.800
<v Speaker 1>are there infrastructure projects that you think have decent returns

0:20:14.920 --> 0:20:19.480
<v Speaker 1>right now? What's the what's the what's the environment look like? Look,

0:20:19.800 --> 0:20:23.359
<v Speaker 1>the environment is generally positive. Of course, everything is expensive,

0:20:23.440 --> 0:20:27.120
<v Speaker 1>even though there's been a market adjustment, but real assets

0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:31.720
<v Speaker 1>haven't yet adjusted the way that probably should. But you

0:20:31.800 --> 0:20:35.520
<v Speaker 1>have investments in digital infrastructure, which continues to be very important.

0:20:36.240 --> 0:20:40.080
<v Speaker 1>You have investments in renewables in solar and wind, which

0:20:40.119 --> 0:20:43.080
<v Speaker 1>is going to be critical. And I think investment in

0:20:43.800 --> 0:20:49.359
<v Speaker 1>basic infrastructure associated with the transport of gas across the

0:20:49.480 --> 0:20:53.000
<v Speaker 1>US to ensure that you can unblock the supply of

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:56.720
<v Speaker 1>gas for export purposes, that's going to be an important element.

0:20:57.720 --> 0:20:59.760
<v Speaker 1>So so that at the beginning of this pandemic, you know,

0:20:59.760 --> 0:21:03.600
<v Speaker 1>when supply chain issues became so apparent to so many people,

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:08.120
<v Speaker 1>there's certainly talk about on shoring more of our supply chain.

0:21:08.359 --> 0:21:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Is that something you think this U s economy has

0:21:10.760 --> 0:21:16.480
<v Speaker 1>an appetite force, that's something that should occur. It. Look,

0:21:16.640 --> 0:21:19.000
<v Speaker 1>the strategy is from a just in time to just

0:21:19.160 --> 0:21:22.560
<v Speaker 1>in case. Uh, that just in case, of course comes

0:21:22.560 --> 0:21:27.000
<v Speaker 1>at an expense. Right The fact is Europe was buying

0:21:27.040 --> 0:21:30.840
<v Speaker 1>gas from Russia and not from other Reasians. It's because

0:21:30.840 --> 0:21:34.720
<v Speaker 1>it's cheaper. So the moment we start on shoring as

0:21:34.720 --> 0:21:38.520
<v Speaker 1>opposed to offshoring, we will by definition increase the cost

0:21:38.680 --> 0:21:42.800
<v Speaker 1>to the consumers and that will also fuel inflation. And

0:21:42.840 --> 0:21:45.720
<v Speaker 1>so from that perspective, it's a choice that consumers have

0:21:45.800 --> 0:21:49.120
<v Speaker 1>to make. I think in times of crisis that's what happens.

0:21:49.160 --> 0:21:52.720
<v Speaker 1>But I think once that stabilizes, I would not be

0:21:52.800 --> 0:21:58.280
<v Speaker 1>surprised that we returned to a more balanced offshore on

0:21:58.480 --> 0:22:01.879
<v Speaker 1>shore type of strategy. Alright, sedek Wabba, thank you so

0:22:01.960 --> 0:22:05.560
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. Todek Wabba, Founder, chairman and managing

0:22:05.600 --> 0:22:08.560
<v Speaker 1>partner of I Squared Capital. Matt, you ever think we're

0:22:08.560 --> 0:22:14.159
<v Speaker 1>gonna build a silicon chip factory here in the US, Yeah,

0:22:14.200 --> 0:22:17.000
<v Speaker 1>for sure, I'm They're they're building chip factories here in

0:22:17.040 --> 0:22:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the US right now. I believe one in the great

0:22:18.760 --> 0:22:22.440
<v Speaker 1>state of Ohio, at least one. UM And I think

0:22:22.440 --> 0:22:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Sodic makes a great point. You know it's going to

0:22:24.400 --> 0:22:28.440
<v Speaker 1>be more expensive obviously, UM, you can't treat workers here

0:22:28.520 --> 0:22:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the way you do in low costs labor nations. And UM.

0:22:35.320 --> 0:22:38.920
<v Speaker 1>On the other hand, though, maybe we're willing to spend

0:22:39.200 --> 0:22:42.000
<v Speaker 1>enough so that the workers who do build our chips

0:22:42.280 --> 0:22:44.359
<v Speaker 1>live a better life. Yep. Interesting to see how this

0:22:44.359 --> 0:22:47.480
<v Speaker 1>plays app That was certainly the on shoring of certain

0:22:47.520 --> 0:22:51.000
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing issues, supply chain issues, certainly the talk in the

0:22:51.080 --> 0:22:57.520
<v Speaker 1>beginning of this pandemic. See how this plays out. There's

0:22:57.520 --> 0:23:02.439
<v Speaker 1>a film called Trading Places. Highly recommend if you haven't

0:23:02.480 --> 0:23:05.359
<v Speaker 1>seen it. If you're working on Wall Street, watching Trading

0:23:05.359 --> 0:23:08.439
<v Speaker 1>Places is like reading Liars Poker. It's something that you

0:23:08.520 --> 0:23:13.440
<v Speaker 1>have to have done. So. Jennifer Lee, Senior Conmers Managing Director,

0:23:13.480 --> 0:23:16.679
<v Speaker 1>Femoil Capital Markets. Have you seen Trading Places, Jennifer. I

0:23:16.720 --> 0:23:19.840
<v Speaker 1>think my favorite line is when he his legs. We're

0:23:19.880 --> 0:23:21.920
<v Speaker 1>discovered that they worked, and he was like, it's a miracle.

0:23:21.960 --> 0:23:26.840
<v Speaker 1>It's a miracle. I can walk. Eddie Murphy, Jennifer's see.

0:23:26.960 --> 0:23:29.119
<v Speaker 1>Jennifer's seen, and she can stay and play with us.

0:23:29.119 --> 0:23:31.760
<v Speaker 1>All right, Jennifer talked to us about this economy. It's

0:23:31.800 --> 0:23:33.679
<v Speaker 1>bad enough I have to deal with inflation at the

0:23:33.720 --> 0:23:36.760
<v Speaker 1>gas pump in the supermarket. Now you've got some economists

0:23:36.800 --> 0:23:40.480
<v Speaker 1>talking about recession next year. How do you think about

0:23:40.560 --> 0:23:43.560
<v Speaker 1>this Federal Reserve and is a recession risk reel in

0:23:43.560 --> 0:23:48.680
<v Speaker 1>your mind. They are. Remember when we spoke about this

0:23:48.840 --> 0:23:51.160
<v Speaker 1>last month, I was saying, it's not our base case scenario,

0:23:51.240 --> 0:23:53.399
<v Speaker 1>and it's still that's still the point the case that

0:23:53.520 --> 0:23:56.399
<v Speaker 1>is not again our base case scenario. But you know,

0:23:56.480 --> 0:23:59.440
<v Speaker 1>the longer that you know, the the war last for

0:23:59.600 --> 0:24:02.280
<v Speaker 1>for Examp Bowl, you know, um, the FED communication has

0:24:02.280 --> 0:24:04.959
<v Speaker 1>been very clear that they are going to go faster

0:24:05.160 --> 0:24:08.240
<v Speaker 1>and higher um than everyone was anyone was expecting, you know,

0:24:08.280 --> 0:24:09.920
<v Speaker 1>like half a year ago or so. So I think

0:24:09.920 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 1>the risk of a hard landing is is rising. But

0:24:12.119 --> 0:24:14.359
<v Speaker 1>again it's not our base case scenario. But you know,

0:24:14.400 --> 0:24:16.040
<v Speaker 1>probably the next couple of years, you know, we're probably

0:24:16.040 --> 0:24:18.359
<v Speaker 1>gone some kind of pulled back. So what do you

0:24:18.400 --> 0:24:20.720
<v Speaker 1>expect in terms of you know, we were just talking

0:24:20.760 --> 0:24:26.200
<v Speaker 1>about some people forecasting four fifty basis point hikes. Um,

0:24:26.960 --> 0:24:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's the consensus, but we are looking

0:24:30.080 --> 0:24:32.159
<v Speaker 1>for If you take a look at the w I

0:24:32.560 --> 0:24:35.840
<v Speaker 1>RP function on the Bloomberg terminal, you can see that

0:24:35.920 --> 0:24:41.120
<v Speaker 1>the market has priced in essentially nine twenty five basis

0:24:41.160 --> 0:24:44.520
<v Speaker 1>point hikes between now and the beginning of February. What

0:24:44.560 --> 0:24:46.959
<v Speaker 1>do you think, all right, so this is a very

0:24:47.080 --> 0:24:49.920
<v Speaker 1>humbling job, by the way, and I remember pooing people

0:24:49.920 --> 0:24:52.000
<v Speaker 1>who are saying, you know, four or five, and I'm like, oh,

0:24:52.040 --> 0:24:55.679
<v Speaker 1>come on, you know, let's be reasonable. We can account anymore.

0:24:55.680 --> 0:24:58.760
<v Speaker 1>We have rate hikes um going for every single meeting

0:24:59.000 --> 0:25:02.000
<v Speaker 1>this year and I think two next year. UM. And

0:25:02.040 --> 0:25:05.159
<v Speaker 1>we're looking for fifty basis points in May and in

0:25:05.240 --> 0:25:09.760
<v Speaker 1>June twenty five and whatever after that. UM. Again, the

0:25:09.840 --> 0:25:12.320
<v Speaker 1>risk is higher. And it's not just the FED, it's

0:25:12.520 --> 0:25:15.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, as everyone knows, it's like almost all center

0:25:15.320 --> 0:25:17.080
<v Speaker 1>banks around the world. You know, this week we had

0:25:17.080 --> 0:25:19.800
<v Speaker 1>to make a Canada going fifty. We had New Zealand

0:25:19.840 --> 0:25:23.320
<v Speaker 1>going fifty. We had a governor governor less big of

0:25:23.440 --> 0:25:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Korea going twenty five, you know. So it's, uh, this

0:25:26.880 --> 0:25:29.199
<v Speaker 1>is like the story for for everyone, and it's almost

0:25:29.200 --> 0:25:31.680
<v Speaker 1>like what's that movie about them? Anyways, It's like fifty

0:25:31.800 --> 0:25:34.159
<v Speaker 1>is like the new That's sort of how I've been

0:25:34.160 --> 0:25:37.280
<v Speaker 1>thinking about it. What we had Christine Legarde, president of

0:25:37.280 --> 0:25:39.960
<v Speaker 1>the e c B, this morning speaking what was your

0:25:39.960 --> 0:25:43.320
<v Speaker 1>takeaway there? It seems like it's less clear for the

0:25:43.320 --> 0:25:47.679
<v Speaker 1>ECB their path relative to the FED reserve. Right, so

0:25:47.960 --> 0:25:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Europe has you know, it's it's a very different story

0:25:50.040 --> 0:25:52.240
<v Speaker 1>over there, um, you know, especially with with the war

0:25:52.320 --> 0:25:55.720
<v Speaker 1>and energy prices especially. UM. It was interesting because I

0:25:55.720 --> 0:25:58.920
<v Speaker 1>think that the press release it self was pretty cut

0:25:58.920 --> 0:26:01.320
<v Speaker 1>and dry, you know, saying that if that we are

0:26:01.359 --> 0:26:05.200
<v Speaker 1>basically seen enough and the A p P will end

0:26:05.320 --> 0:26:08.560
<v Speaker 1>in Q three. But during the press conference, President regard Um,

0:26:08.640 --> 0:26:11.760
<v Speaker 1>who was working from home, sounded a lot more wishy washy,

0:26:11.760 --> 0:26:14.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot more vague and in sort of like typical

0:26:14.440 --> 0:26:17.680
<v Speaker 1>of the UCB, where you know, she was emphasizing UM

0:26:17.840 --> 0:26:20.720
<v Speaker 1>flexibility and optionality, and she didn't She was like, you know,

0:26:20.720 --> 0:26:22.920
<v Speaker 1>we see it's going to end in QC Q three,

0:26:22.920 --> 0:26:24.520
<v Speaker 1>but we didn't say when, you know, is it gonna

0:26:24.520 --> 0:26:28.080
<v Speaker 1>be early or later? Um, So I think July is

0:26:28.080 --> 0:26:30.119
<v Speaker 1>still a possibility. But I've sort of tossed that one

0:26:30.200 --> 0:26:31.679
<v Speaker 1>up the window now and I think we're going to

0:26:31.720 --> 0:26:35.520
<v Speaker 1>go for a September ray hike, just given how uncertain

0:26:35.680 --> 0:26:38.960
<v Speaker 1>the the e c B was sounding UM today, it's

0:26:38.960 --> 0:26:43.520
<v Speaker 1>amazing to me that we have seen such little movement

0:26:43.960 --> 0:26:46.280
<v Speaker 1>UM in the euro For a while, I thought I

0:26:46.320 --> 0:26:48.520
<v Speaker 1>was going to go to parody as it was going

0:26:48.600 --> 0:26:50.879
<v Speaker 1>up to you know, one twelve, one thirteen. Then I

0:26:50.880 --> 0:26:53.840
<v Speaker 1>thought up is the path and now it's come back

0:26:53.880 --> 0:26:55.840
<v Speaker 1>down to to one oh eight. Where do you see

0:26:55.840 --> 0:26:58.639
<v Speaker 1>euro dollar? Um, we're a little bit more on the

0:26:58.680 --> 0:27:01.119
<v Speaker 1>bare side of things, UM. And I guess I was

0:27:01.119 --> 0:27:03.480
<v Speaker 1>just sort of anticipating that, you know, the the CP

0:27:03.560 --> 0:27:06.480
<v Speaker 1>will probably get cold feet, um, and they will probably

0:27:06.760 --> 0:27:09.960
<v Speaker 1>keep communicating and they they're already pulling back on that accommodation.

0:27:10.040 --> 0:27:12.399
<v Speaker 1>But when they're actually going to be more aggressive on

0:27:12.400 --> 0:27:13.719
<v Speaker 1>the right hike front, I don't know when that's going

0:27:13.760 --> 0:27:15.920
<v Speaker 1>to happen. But we've got the euro ending at around

0:27:16.000 --> 0:27:19.440
<v Speaker 1>one oh six by the end of this year. Um.

0:27:19.520 --> 0:27:22.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, hopefully I'm wrong on this one, but you know,

0:27:22.480 --> 0:27:24.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe around lower than where we are now. Are they

0:27:24.600 --> 0:27:28.640
<v Speaker 1>all on the phone, Jennifer? Are are Christine Leguarde and

0:27:28.760 --> 0:27:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Jerome Powell? And you know, um the Bank of England

0:27:33.560 --> 0:27:35.440
<v Speaker 1>and the Bank of Canada? Are they all talked? Because

0:27:35.440 --> 0:27:39.240
<v Speaker 1>they're fighting the same inflation right with different rate hikes? Right?

0:27:39.280 --> 0:27:41.560
<v Speaker 1>I think they were, you know, um chatting and probably

0:27:41.560 --> 0:27:43.440
<v Speaker 1>they have a WhatsApp group going on, you know, back

0:27:43.440 --> 0:27:46.159
<v Speaker 1>in But UM, now I think you know, things are

0:27:46.600 --> 0:27:50.080
<v Speaker 1>heading in different directions, you know, especially uh inflation and

0:27:50.080 --> 0:27:53.080
<v Speaker 1>then with the economies in North America a little bit stronger.

0:27:53.160 --> 0:27:55.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, the US was certainly starting on the starting

0:27:55.800 --> 0:27:59.720
<v Speaker 1>off on our stronger footing, so they have more um,

0:27:59.720 --> 0:28:02.280
<v Speaker 1>more comfort I think, in raising rates very quickly and

0:28:02.520 --> 0:28:04.879
<v Speaker 1>very aggressively. And it's that your poll and said, you know,

0:28:04.960 --> 0:28:07.440
<v Speaker 1>the labor market is strong and the economy can raise rates,

0:28:07.480 --> 0:28:10.879
<v Speaker 1>but um in here in Canada as well, but in Europe,

0:28:10.920 --> 0:28:12.520
<v Speaker 1>like I said, it's a very different story and they're

0:28:12.520 --> 0:28:15.280
<v Speaker 1>more concerned about the impact of the war. All right, Jennifer,

0:28:15.280 --> 0:28:17.280
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us again. Jennifer LEAs and

0:28:17.280 --> 0:28:20.680
<v Speaker 1>your economist managing director Demo Capital Markets, thanks for listening

0:28:20.720 --> 0:28:24.200
<v Speaker 1>to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe and listen

0:28:24.240 --> 0:28:28.520
<v Speaker 1>to interviews of Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer.

0:28:28.880 --> 0:28:32.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter at Matt Miller V

0:28:32.680 --> 0:28:35.760
<v Speaker 1>three on false Sweeney, I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney.

0:28:35.800 --> 0:28:38.479
<v Speaker 1>Before the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide at

0:28:38.480 --> 0:28:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio.