WEBVTT - Monday night recap, trade ideas, Waiver Wires, and more...

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app,

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>download the tune in app and just search for Fantasy

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on twitch, or on Periscope

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guess did Fantasy Sports Network. You'll

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>find us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening.

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:38.760
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Fantasy best

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Friends Forever to Do to Do dodd Dot to Do

0:00:56.040 --> 0:01:04.160
<v Speaker 1>didn Yo, says the Fantasy best Friends Trevor here on

0:01:04.200 --> 0:01:07.440
<v Speaker 1>the Fantasy Sports Ringer Network alongside Frankie Staffle. I am

0:01:07.560 --> 0:01:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Greg susmang. What's going on Monday, Gray. We had a

0:01:12.319 --> 0:01:15.600
<v Speaker 1>great game last night between the Chiefs and the Broncos

0:01:15.640 --> 0:01:17.920
<v Speaker 1>and nail biters down to the wires. We also had

0:01:18.040 --> 0:01:22.920
<v Speaker 1>the debut of the Halloween Baking Championship and so Patrick

0:01:23.000 --> 0:01:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Mahomes finally didn't throw for multiple touchdounds but three yards

0:01:28.240 --> 0:01:32.319
<v Speaker 1>and she barely avoided getting eliminated. He had two really

0:01:32.440 --> 0:01:36.959
<v Speaker 1>good cakes made, but he avoided elimination and unfortunately Brian

0:01:37.160 --> 0:01:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Long Island is out. Patrick Mahomes also ran for a touchdown.

0:01:40.240 --> 0:01:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Kareem Hunt had his best game of the season, nineteen

0:01:43.000 --> 0:01:45.480
<v Speaker 1>rushes for a hundred and twenty one yards and a touchdown.

0:01:45.640 --> 0:01:47.880
<v Speaker 1>He was targeted more in this game than he was

0:01:47.960 --> 0:01:51.680
<v Speaker 1>targeted the entire season coming into this game. Four targets,

0:01:51.760 --> 0:01:55.160
<v Speaker 1>three receptions, City, four yards time South, Kareem Hunt, Greggy,

0:01:56.680 --> 0:01:59.280
<v Speaker 1>it maybe time to sell Koreem Hunt, but it's not

0:01:59.440 --> 0:02:02.320
<v Speaker 1>time to sell Sicily from the Halloween Baking Championship. I

0:02:02.360 --> 0:02:04.960
<v Speaker 1>know she had a really rough first episode, but listen,

0:02:05.000 --> 0:02:06.200
<v Speaker 1>I think you can get back on the horse. I

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:08.160
<v Speaker 1>think she's an a pressient baker. It was just a really,

0:02:08.440 --> 0:02:10.760
<v Speaker 1>really tough night. Greg. I do have to commend you

0:02:10.800 --> 0:02:12.720
<v Speaker 1>for something you said yesterday. You spoke a lot about

0:02:13.280 --> 0:02:17.959
<v Speaker 1>not streaming bad players and good matchups. Case Keenum bad player,

0:02:18.560 --> 0:02:24.720
<v Speaker 1>good matchup, not good, not good at all yards zero.

0:02:25.320 --> 0:02:28.799
<v Speaker 1>It's a donut in the touchdown department. One interception. For

0:02:28.880 --> 0:02:31.200
<v Speaker 1>those of you who needed monster games out of Emanuel

0:02:31.280 --> 0:02:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Sanders and to Marius Thomas in order to win your

0:02:33.960 --> 0:02:38.160
<v Speaker 1>fantasy matchup, you probably didn't. Probably didn't. It's it's interesting.

0:02:38.200 --> 0:02:40.480
<v Speaker 1>I need I told you yesterday off the air. I

0:02:40.560 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 1>had case Keenum and it was a tough matchup. Didn't

0:02:42.760 --> 0:02:44.840
<v Speaker 1>work out. I Patrick Mahomes in a matchup, didn't get

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:46.720
<v Speaker 1>enough there. It was not a great Monday night for me,

0:02:46.760 --> 0:02:49.120
<v Speaker 1>which is why I stuck to watching the Halloween Baking Championship.

0:02:49.320 --> 0:02:51.839
<v Speaker 1>I watched the entire um fourth quarter of the game

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:57.000
<v Speaker 1>and that was it. Wow. I just checked my matchup

0:02:57.040 --> 0:02:59.320
<v Speaker 1>in the Carton League now, because I don't know why

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 1>I didn't check last night. Only one by three points.

0:03:02.880 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 1>I was going up against Kareem Hunt and Travis Kelsey.

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Remember I brought this up to you yesterday and I

0:03:07.520 --> 0:03:09.440
<v Speaker 1>had Philip and I was like, you know, I think

0:03:09.480 --> 0:03:11.840
<v Speaker 1>it's probably gonna be kind of close in the PPR League.

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Oh it was quite only one by three points, one

0:03:15.960 --> 0:03:18.880
<v Speaker 1>seventies six, one seventy three and a PPR. Those are

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:24.800
<v Speaker 1>those are some pretty nice scores there, Greggy, anything on that, No, no, no, listen.

0:03:24.960 --> 0:03:28.280
<v Speaker 1>I last night's game Creamhont was awesome. I'm not selling Creamhont.

0:03:28.280 --> 0:03:30.720
<v Speaker 1>I disagree with you. I don't want to sell him high.

0:03:31.160 --> 0:03:33.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm a cream Hunt guy. I've always been a Creamhunt guy.

0:03:33.200 --> 0:03:36.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm sticking with it. Really interesting match this weekend though

0:03:36.760 --> 0:03:39.200
<v Speaker 1>with Kansas City and Jacksonville. But that is a really

0:03:39.400 --> 0:03:42.080
<v Speaker 1>really interesting game. Yeah, I heard Gabe talking about this

0:03:42.160 --> 0:03:43.839
<v Speaker 1>on Carton and Friends. Ready, what do you I don't

0:03:43.840 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 1>know if you heard it, what do you think? The

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:47.800
<v Speaker 1>line opened up as I didn't. I didn't Casey hosting

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:56.640
<v Speaker 1>the Jaguars, Casey hosting the Jaguars. Casey is a four

0:03:56.640 --> 0:03:59.040
<v Speaker 1>and a half point favorite. All they got was the

0:03:59.080 --> 0:04:01.760
<v Speaker 1>home for all. So given a lot of respect to

0:04:01.800 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 1>the Jaguars, best defensive in the NFL. Rightfully, I'm looking

0:04:05.520 --> 0:04:08.000
<v Speaker 1>at the upcoming schedule for Kareem Hunt right now because

0:04:08.800 --> 0:04:13.640
<v Speaker 1>my immediate reaction was sell facing the Jaguars this week,

0:04:13.680 --> 0:04:16.760
<v Speaker 1>which I mean, probably not a great matchup. I know,

0:04:16.880 --> 0:04:18.920
<v Speaker 1>outside of that, see Kwon Barkley run. Like if you

0:04:18.960 --> 0:04:21.240
<v Speaker 1>look at their yards per carry, it's like under three.

0:04:21.440 --> 0:04:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Outside of that, like one se Kwon Barkley running week one.

0:04:24.080 --> 0:04:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Then the Patriots, that's a good matchup. The Bengals, who

0:04:27.040 --> 0:04:29.480
<v Speaker 1>are getting Vonta's perfect back, so their run defense is

0:04:29.520 --> 0:04:32.760
<v Speaker 1>going to be better. Denver again, which looked like a vaunting,

0:04:33.160 --> 0:04:36.720
<v Speaker 1>daunted matchup last night and he actually uh performed well

0:04:36.760 --> 0:04:40.720
<v Speaker 1>in it. And then Cleveland Arizona. The thing is, I

0:04:40.839 --> 0:04:42.960
<v Speaker 1>just see the four targets in this game, and what

0:04:43.120 --> 0:04:45.839
<v Speaker 1>he did in the receiving game, and and the fact

0:04:45.880 --> 0:04:48.120
<v Speaker 1>that it happened in primetime on Monday night. And I

0:04:48.200 --> 0:04:51.080
<v Speaker 1>know it's hard to sell Kareem Hunt, but what I

0:04:51.120 --> 0:04:53.039
<v Speaker 1>would just shop him. I would just shop. I would

0:04:53.040 --> 0:04:55.160
<v Speaker 1>see what I could get in return. But hold on,

0:04:55.240 --> 0:04:57.159
<v Speaker 1>we have to We have leagues great that we're playing

0:04:57.240 --> 0:04:58.640
<v Speaker 1>right now. Like you have a home league where you're

0:04:58.640 --> 0:05:00.640
<v Speaker 1>owing four, I have home league on one in three.

0:05:01.040 --> 0:05:04.280
<v Speaker 1>My best players really the only three players that I

0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:08.200
<v Speaker 1>have that are valuable Kareem Hunt, Mike Evans, and Zach Ertz.

0:05:08.640 --> 0:05:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Mike Evans is on a by so like if I

0:05:11.640 --> 0:05:13.920
<v Speaker 1>fall to one in four, my season is basically over.

0:05:14.400 --> 0:05:16.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to be shopping Kareem Hunt this week, just

0:05:16.800 --> 0:05:18.440
<v Speaker 1>to see what kind of depth pieces I could get.

0:05:18.640 --> 0:05:20.360
<v Speaker 1>I've already, you know, throwing some stuff out to you,

0:05:20.960 --> 0:05:23.120
<v Speaker 1>like the possibility of trading him for Marshall Lynch and

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:25.760
<v Speaker 1>James White. I think I could probably get more from

0:05:25.880 --> 0:05:28.040
<v Speaker 1>than that, but I'm gonna throw it out there. I

0:05:28.120 --> 0:05:30.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna I didn't, I wouldn't be surprised. This is Karee

0:05:30.160 --> 0:05:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Hunt's best game of the year. I disagree, man, I

0:05:33.720 --> 0:05:36.120
<v Speaker 1>really do. I think you're like you have the Kareem

0:05:36.160 --> 0:05:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Hunt in the first round. Think about how frustrated we

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:41.120
<v Speaker 1>were with him the first three weeks of this season,

0:05:41.240 --> 0:05:44.960
<v Speaker 1>especially in Week one, where you know, the Chiefs show

0:05:45.080 --> 0:05:47.280
<v Speaker 1>us again how creative they like to get inside the

0:05:47.320 --> 0:05:49.760
<v Speaker 1>red zone, inside the five, and I know since Week

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:51.960
<v Speaker 1>one they've kind of gotten away from that, like they've

0:05:52.000 --> 0:05:54.239
<v Speaker 1>been giving Kareem Hunt the carries inside the five, inside

0:05:54.279 --> 0:05:56.440
<v Speaker 1>the tent. Totally do you like that? But coming into

0:05:56.480 --> 0:05:59.120
<v Speaker 1>this game, his yards per carry was not great and

0:05:59.279 --> 0:06:01.400
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't being used in the past game. So now

0:06:01.480 --> 0:06:03.760
<v Speaker 1>in this game he kind of like bleu all of

0:06:03.839 --> 0:06:06.360
<v Speaker 1>that away. Nineteen rushes for a hundreds twenty one yards,

0:06:06.400 --> 0:06:09.640
<v Speaker 1>obviously great yards per carry average. There four targets again,

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:12.040
<v Speaker 1>more and then this one game than he had in

0:06:12.240 --> 0:06:15.760
<v Speaker 1>three games coming into week four. I wouldn't be surprised

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:18.120
<v Speaker 1>if this cream Haunts best game this season. I would

0:06:18.160 --> 0:06:19.800
<v Speaker 1>just I would try shopping. And I think you're under

0:06:19.839 --> 0:06:22.240
<v Speaker 1>any creamht man. I don't know why. I don't know, man,

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:25.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm worried. I'm worried about like his usage with

0:06:25.160 --> 0:06:29.440
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs, like they get creative inside the red zone.

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:33.200
<v Speaker 1>It's not fun when you know, when you see stuffing

0:06:33.240 --> 0:06:35.560
<v Speaker 1>that happened like it didn't Week one for Kareem Hunt.

0:06:35.560 --> 0:06:39.800
<v Speaker 1>We in illegue. Karemem Hunt and I don't together. Yeah, flex,

0:06:39.920 --> 0:06:43.840
<v Speaker 1>I have them get a wide receiver. I wouldn't do

0:06:43.839 --> 0:06:47.960
<v Speaker 1>that right now, It's probably not gonna happen. Why you

0:06:48.000 --> 0:06:51.320
<v Speaker 1>don't want my next running backster Alex Collins and carry on, Johnson,

0:06:51.839 --> 0:06:54.600
<v Speaker 1>carry on Johnson. I have Jordan Howard too, he's kind

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:56.400
<v Speaker 1>of bad. All right, let's see here I want. I'm

0:06:56.400 --> 0:06:57.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna do it right now. I'm kidding with you. You

0:06:57.720 --> 0:07:01.240
<v Speaker 1>want a wide receiver for Creamhunt? Right? You need? Oh boy,

0:07:01.279 --> 0:07:03.000
<v Speaker 1>this is an issue. Yeah, you're not gonna be able

0:07:03.040 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 1>to You're not gonna be able to get it done. Great,

0:07:05.560 --> 0:07:08.560
<v Speaker 1>this whole this, this t Y Hilton thing hurt, Oh,

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Greg Susman Hilton thing hurt. Marshawn Lynch. So what does

0:07:13.000 --> 0:07:14.000
<v Speaker 1>that mean for me? I just send you know, a

0:07:14.040 --> 0:07:17.640
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver. I would give you Marshawn lynn back maybe,

0:07:18.120 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 1>and like I would want to Vonte Adams and Marshall

0:07:22.160 --> 0:07:24.160
<v Speaker 1>and all right, I didn't finish yet. I would give

0:07:24.160 --> 0:07:26.480
<v Speaker 1>you Kareem Hunt and a wide receiver in return. I

0:07:26.560 --> 0:07:28.840
<v Speaker 1>get the better wide receiver, you get the better running back,

0:07:29.120 --> 0:07:31.320
<v Speaker 1>you get the lesser wide rate. Who's who's the wide receiver?

0:07:31.400 --> 0:07:33.720
<v Speaker 1>So I'm training you my wide receiver one and an

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:35.760
<v Speaker 1>RB two. You're trained me in RB one. I want

0:07:35.800 --> 0:07:40.360
<v Speaker 1>a wide receiver two. Makes sense? Cooper, No, he's a

0:07:40.400 --> 0:07:44.560
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver two. He sucks. But didn't you hear me yesterday?

0:07:44.560 --> 0:07:47.920
<v Speaker 1>I said so, I didn't hear That's why I'm saying no,

0:07:48.480 --> 0:07:51.600
<v Speaker 1>you didn't say bye. I would say Kareem Hunt versus

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Davante Adams in a vacuum, Dreem hunts better. I would agree,

0:07:57.080 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 1>But Davante Adams is like, who's the other running back Society?

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:03.320
<v Speaker 1>It's Marshall Barkley. Oh yeah, that doesn't make sense either.

0:08:03.480 --> 0:08:08.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't have an RB three at all, Frank, I

0:08:08.800 --> 0:08:11.960
<v Speaker 1>guess Frank Gore's RB three. It's more than Kenyan Drake.

0:08:12.120 --> 0:08:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Do you want Josh Gordon or Randall cop No? Maybe

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Josh got Josh Gordon sounds fun you, Tyler Boyd, but

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:22.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't really want to give him up. Would you

0:08:22.080 --> 0:08:25.840
<v Speaker 1>do that Kareem Hunt and Tyler Boyd for Davante Adams

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:30.080
<v Speaker 1>and Marsha Lynch. That's interesting. That's interesting. This is t

0:08:30.160 --> 0:08:33.800
<v Speaker 1>why Hilton injury really hurts me in a major, major,

0:08:34.040 --> 0:08:36.480
<v Speaker 1>major way. I don't think I want to give up

0:08:36.480 --> 0:08:38.199
<v Speaker 1>Tyler Boyd though right now I have a lot of

0:08:38.240 --> 0:08:40.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm on the board, have a lot of work on

0:08:40.400 --> 0:08:42.760
<v Speaker 1>the waiver wireons week, Yeah, we do, which is probably

0:08:42.760 --> 0:08:45.319
<v Speaker 1>where we should start. Craig is a waiver wire show,

0:08:45.360 --> 0:08:47.679
<v Speaker 1>after all, it is a waiver wire show, and you

0:08:47.760 --> 0:08:52.840
<v Speaker 1>know it's it's crazy because we haven't had maybe this week.

0:08:53.200 --> 0:08:56.199
<v Speaker 1>We haven't truly breakout guys since the Tyler Boyd John

0:08:56.240 --> 0:08:58.360
<v Speaker 1>Brown in week one or two whatever that was, like,

0:08:58.440 --> 0:09:00.520
<v Speaker 1>we haven't had guys where you gotta really break the

0:09:00.520 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 1>bank and kill target. And I feel like this way

0:09:07.080 --> 0:09:09.520
<v Speaker 1>this week is the same, like a lot of these

0:09:09.559 --> 0:09:11.640
<v Speaker 1>guys that really went off this week that maybe free

0:09:11.640 --> 0:09:15.440
<v Speaker 1>agents probably aren't break the bank guys. But there are

0:09:15.559 --> 0:09:17.319
<v Speaker 1>some guys that are interesting. And if you want to

0:09:17.360 --> 0:09:20.080
<v Speaker 1>start with Key, we could start with Kiki. We don't

0:09:20.080 --> 0:09:21.680
<v Speaker 1>have to start with k you want to start with Ki,

0:09:22.800 --> 0:09:24.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm wrestling with this one too, and I want to

0:09:24.160 --> 0:09:26.800
<v Speaker 1>get your thoughts on because I I want to be

0:09:26.880 --> 0:09:30.800
<v Speaker 1>aggressive on Kiki Kute of the Houston Texans. We don't

0:09:30.880 --> 0:09:33.240
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of information on Will Fuller right now. Again,

0:09:33.360 --> 0:09:35.480
<v Speaker 1>they said Sunday that he could have returned in the

0:09:35.559 --> 0:09:38.199
<v Speaker 1>second half. They played it safe with him, and you

0:09:38.360 --> 0:09:42.760
<v Speaker 1>really saw Kiki um benefit from that. He had fifteen targets. Again,

0:09:42.800 --> 0:09:46.000
<v Speaker 1>he broke rookie records for like fifteen targets, eleven receptions

0:09:46.040 --> 0:09:48.040
<v Speaker 1>over a hundred yards for a rookie making his debut

0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:51.160
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL. UH And I spoke a lot yesterday

0:09:51.240 --> 0:09:54.280
<v Speaker 1>about slot receivers and how again the evolution of the

0:09:54.360 --> 0:09:58.640
<v Speaker 1>game right now, slot receivers are really the most fantasy

0:09:58.800 --> 0:10:02.120
<v Speaker 1>viable right like guy like Adam Feeling, even emerging players

0:10:02.160 --> 0:10:05.080
<v Speaker 1>like Tyler Boyd Sterling Shepard just had a big game yesterday.

0:10:05.800 --> 0:10:08.480
<v Speaker 1>The Key they drafted him to be in the slot,

0:10:08.559 --> 0:10:12.000
<v Speaker 1>to be that speedy guy who you know makes life

0:10:12.040 --> 0:10:14.800
<v Speaker 1>difficult for opposing defenses, and that's exactly what he's going

0:10:14.880 --> 0:10:17.000
<v Speaker 1>to do. Look, they have DeAndre Hopkins and Will follow

0:10:17.040 --> 0:10:19.520
<v Speaker 1>on the outside, like defenses need to focus on that.

0:10:20.200 --> 0:10:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Kekey is going to get a lot of single coverage

0:10:23.120 --> 0:10:25.160
<v Speaker 1>in the slot. What did we see out of Cooper

0:10:25.240 --> 0:10:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Cup and guys like Robert Woods in the Thursday night

0:10:27.360 --> 0:10:31.719
<v Speaker 1>game when Sean McVeigh is scheming these guys up to

0:10:31.840 --> 0:10:33.560
<v Speaker 1>play in the slot and to move around all over

0:10:33.640 --> 0:10:36.920
<v Speaker 1>the field, get them lined up with linebackers and safeties

0:10:36.920 --> 0:10:40.000
<v Speaker 1>and and you know, just creating mismatches. That's going to

0:10:40.160 --> 0:10:43.439
<v Speaker 1>happen now for the Houston Texans, defenses need to double

0:10:43.520 --> 0:10:46.360
<v Speaker 1>team DeAndre Hopkins deed like safeties need to go over

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:48.840
<v Speaker 1>the top to try and stop Will Fuller from catching bombs.

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Even if Kekey isn't getting you know, double digit targets,

0:10:52.080 --> 0:10:55.160
<v Speaker 1>which is not gonna happen. If he gets six seven targets,

0:10:55.800 --> 0:10:59.400
<v Speaker 1>those are gonna be quality, quality targets based on defenses

0:10:59.440 --> 0:11:01.840
<v Speaker 1>trying to shut down the opposing weapons on the outside.

0:11:01.840 --> 0:11:03.920
<v Speaker 1>For the Texans, completely agree he will and will Fuller

0:11:03.960 --> 0:11:05.840
<v Speaker 1>has the hamstring injury, which and if he doesn't even

0:11:05.880 --> 0:11:09.599
<v Speaker 1>play this week, that makes Kicky even more five. So

0:11:09.840 --> 0:11:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you and what you're saying, but I want

0:11:11.640 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 1>to get into an injury just for a moment, because

0:11:13.679 --> 0:11:16.079
<v Speaker 1>hamstring injuries linger. We've now seen it will Fuller, and

0:11:16.080 --> 0:11:17.840
<v Speaker 1>we've seen it with Leonard four Nette. This is what's

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:20.160
<v Speaker 1>this year. This is what held him out of all

0:11:20.280 --> 0:11:23.920
<v Speaker 1>preseason and and week one. It's the same exact thing

0:11:24.000 --> 0:11:28.160
<v Speaker 1>as Leonard four Net and the Leonard Fournet hamstring injury

0:11:28.200 --> 0:11:30.760
<v Speaker 1>kept him out two weeks. He came back and reinjured it,

0:11:30.840 --> 0:11:34.560
<v Speaker 1>so he wasn't fully healthy right theoretically, So that means

0:11:34.679 --> 0:11:38.400
<v Speaker 1>this hamstring injury is probably about three week injury. Let's

0:11:38.440 --> 0:11:40.520
<v Speaker 1>say we'll talk to Dr and Virginia about it on

0:11:41.040 --> 0:11:43.800
<v Speaker 1>prediction and see if we could predict what they're going

0:11:43.880 --> 0:11:46.280
<v Speaker 1>to say. Again, I'll say it's degree to hamstring strain

0:11:46.720 --> 0:11:49.760
<v Speaker 1>to hamstring strain. Um he should probably sit out this week,

0:11:49.800 --> 0:11:52.120
<v Speaker 1>probably sit out next Now he's going to sit out

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:55.320
<v Speaker 1>this week, I'll say, and he probably his recovery time

0:11:55.400 --> 0:11:58.360
<v Speaker 1>optimals four to six weeks, but he'll probably be back

0:11:58.400 --> 0:12:00.880
<v Speaker 1>into three. I'll say his optimal recovery of times three

0:12:00.960 --> 0:12:04.719
<v Speaker 1>to four weeks. It's not as four to six like you.

0:12:04.880 --> 0:12:06.920
<v Speaker 1>I think it's because the reaggravation is making it for us.

0:12:07.960 --> 0:12:10.240
<v Speaker 1>But he should say that this week. Is he gonna though? Yes,

0:12:11.320 --> 0:12:13.880
<v Speaker 1>like Doctor Ay and inside injuries, Look, I respect the

0:12:13.960 --> 0:12:16.360
<v Speaker 1>hell out of Dr. A Virginia. What they do. They

0:12:16.880 --> 0:12:20.720
<v Speaker 1>normally taking more cautiously optimistic approach, right, like they really

0:12:20.960 --> 0:12:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Virginia's cautious austimation. They're cautious, like they're they openly say

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:27.679
<v Speaker 1>like this player should sit this week, They're probably not,

0:12:28.120 --> 0:12:30.480
<v Speaker 1>and that's going to cause re injury, like they said

0:12:30.520 --> 0:12:33.720
<v Speaker 1>that about Leonard Fournette, and look that's exactly what happened

0:12:33.760 --> 0:12:36.080
<v Speaker 1>with Leonard Fournette and even Dalvin cooked to an extent

0:12:36.200 --> 0:12:40.000
<v Speaker 1>last Thursday night. So I agree that will Fuller should

0:12:40.000 --> 0:12:42.360
<v Speaker 1>probably sit out. Is he gonna though I don't know

0:12:42.520 --> 0:12:44.000
<v Speaker 1>well the latest of Wilfuller and I saw that I

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:45.959
<v Speaker 1>don't Texas. I saw this all wrote a world and

0:12:45.960 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Wilson had it on Twitter. The removal against the

0:12:48.080 --> 0:12:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Colts was not for cautionary He has to see how

0:12:51.120 --> 0:12:54.199
<v Speaker 1>it goes this week. This hamstring is reinjury. We're basically

0:12:54.240 --> 0:12:55.839
<v Speaker 1>back to me and I could be wrong. We're back

0:12:55.880 --> 0:12:57.679
<v Speaker 1>where we were in training camp where it cost him

0:12:58.360 --> 0:13:00.880
<v Speaker 1>weeks and then and then week one. He was great

0:13:00.920 --> 0:13:03.360
<v Speaker 1>in week two. And there's clearly a connection between will

0:13:03.440 --> 0:13:06.559
<v Speaker 1>Fuller and DeShawn Watson, like no doubt about it. But

0:13:06.640 --> 0:13:10.280
<v Speaker 1>if Will Fuller's gone and Lamar Miller sucks, which he does,

0:13:11.720 --> 0:13:13.760
<v Speaker 1>There's would be a lot of passing for Deshaun Watson.

0:13:13.800 --> 0:13:15.199
<v Speaker 1>This is what this office is going to be. And

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:18.480
<v Speaker 1>K too, And this guy's electric after as great as

0:13:18.520 --> 0:13:20.880
<v Speaker 1>DeAndre Hopkins is. You want to get Keky out in

0:13:20.960 --> 0:13:23.080
<v Speaker 1>space and let him do his thing. I completely agree

0:13:23.120 --> 0:13:25.360
<v Speaker 1>with you. He's electric after the catch. Now, why wasn't

0:13:25.400 --> 0:13:29.280
<v Speaker 1>he involved at all before this? Any idea for this game?

0:13:29.320 --> 0:13:31.400
<v Speaker 1>He didn't play? Why this was his debut? I know

0:13:31.600 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 1>that Bruce Ellingson, Bruce elling hurt. Yeah, he had an injury.

0:13:35.400 --> 0:13:38.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't I don't know specifically what Bruce Ellington. Bruce

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Ellington had an injury to start the season. Okay, hamstring,

0:13:41.800 --> 0:13:44.079
<v Speaker 1>Bruce Ellington had a hamstring injury. He's on I R.

0:13:44.760 --> 0:13:48.040
<v Speaker 1>So he's cemented in is cemented as the next wide

0:13:48.040 --> 0:13:49.959
<v Speaker 1>receiver all because after that, Savy coats and we know

0:13:51.520 --> 0:13:53.400
<v Speaker 1>the snaps this week too, So he was on the

0:13:53.480 --> 0:13:56.040
<v Speaker 1>field like he's he's healthy, like they kept him out

0:13:56.080 --> 0:13:58.079
<v Speaker 1>early the first couple of weeks to make sure that

0:13:58.120 --> 0:14:01.079
<v Speaker 1>he could be healthy for this game, and which he was,

0:14:01.120 --> 0:14:03.280
<v Speaker 1>and he played of the snaps and he led the

0:14:03.320 --> 0:14:08.160
<v Speaker 1>team in targets with fifteen fourth round pick this year

0:14:08.240 --> 0:14:12.959
<v Speaker 1>out of Texas Tech. Certainly a high volume offense, certainly

0:14:13.320 --> 0:14:16.360
<v Speaker 1>in college and NFL scouts love him too, Like he's

0:14:16.360 --> 0:14:19.560
<v Speaker 1>a guy who, like Emery Hunt was all over. Okay,

0:14:20.000 --> 0:14:23.840
<v Speaker 1>so this week faces Dallas certainly a spot that he

0:14:23.920 --> 0:14:26.160
<v Speaker 1>could I don't want to repeat what he did, but

0:14:26.360 --> 0:14:28.280
<v Speaker 1>they have strong corners on the outside. Like, don't get

0:14:28.320 --> 0:14:30.640
<v Speaker 1>me wrong, but if he's playing slot, I think he's

0:14:30.640 --> 0:14:34.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna be pevered with targets. Dude, how much bid? That's

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 1>the question, right, Like I want to be aggressive with him.

0:14:38.600 --> 0:14:40.480
<v Speaker 1>I think he's the top wide receiver at like even

0:14:40.520 --> 0:14:42.800
<v Speaker 1>more so than Antonio Callaway. Like I know Callaway is

0:14:42.800 --> 0:14:46.760
<v Speaker 1>getting the targets consistently, um with Baker Mayfield now is

0:14:46.800 --> 0:14:49.840
<v Speaker 1>the quarterback too, But I'm more interested in Kiki. Like

0:14:50.320 --> 0:14:55.640
<v Speaker 1>in my home league, I have left, I might bid

0:14:55.720 --> 0:14:58.760
<v Speaker 1>like thirteen. Okay, So the number that I was going

0:14:58.880 --> 0:15:00.760
<v Speaker 1>to use, which like thirt he out of eighty one,

0:15:00.800 --> 0:15:04.800
<v Speaker 1>it's probably close to Like, so the number that I

0:15:04.960 --> 0:15:09.840
<v Speaker 1>was going to use, which it seems aggressive, is that aggressive?

0:15:11.440 --> 0:15:14.120
<v Speaker 1>It's fair? It seems like every week wide receivers emerged, though,

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:17.040
<v Speaker 1>on the waiver wire, don't they Every week we've had

0:15:17.040 --> 0:15:19.200
<v Speaker 1>a wide receiver that we talked about, Well, yeah, it's

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:21.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of our job. But no, but like more so

0:15:21.600 --> 0:15:23.960
<v Speaker 1>than running backs, like wide receiver is a position that

0:15:24.040 --> 0:15:27.120
<v Speaker 1>you can find, there's been no running wide receiver, Like

0:15:27.160 --> 0:15:28.840
<v Speaker 1>every week, there's been no running backs out there, Like

0:15:28.880 --> 0:15:30.320
<v Speaker 1>the hinds were gonna get to you a little bit,

0:15:30.360 --> 0:15:32.000
<v Speaker 1>like somebody who obviously can talk about it, not even

0:15:32.040 --> 0:15:35.320
<v Speaker 1>for his running ability. But thirteen divided by eighty one

0:15:35.360 --> 0:15:38.400
<v Speaker 1>is sixteen percent, So I'm probably liking a like fifteen

0:15:38.480 --> 0:15:43.280
<v Speaker 1>eighteen percent range? Is that fair? Do you like that? Though? Well?

0:15:43.320 --> 0:15:45.920
<v Speaker 1>I was like that. I was going to say when

0:15:45.960 --> 0:15:49.240
<v Speaker 1>I spent eleven dollars on Brandon Marshall Week one, it's

0:15:49.280 --> 0:15:52.080
<v Speaker 1>how I feel right now. Also, that eleven dollar number

0:15:52.640 --> 0:15:54.120
<v Speaker 1>seems to make sense for me when it comes to

0:15:55.480 --> 0:15:57.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if other people do this, like do

0:15:57.120 --> 0:15:59.280
<v Speaker 1>you do this in your league? Somebody can look at

0:15:59.320 --> 0:16:01.240
<v Speaker 1>my fab budge it and see that I have eighty one,

0:16:02.040 --> 0:16:04.880
<v Speaker 1>and they might say, you know, people like to put

0:16:05.120 --> 0:16:08.480
<v Speaker 1>fabit amounts that make their fab even right, so you

0:16:08.520 --> 0:16:10.880
<v Speaker 1>can be like, I'll put eleven dollars so I have seventy.

0:16:11.320 --> 0:16:14.360
<v Speaker 1>It happens all the time. Do that like everybody does it?

0:16:14.480 --> 0:16:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Like I do it too. So people might look at

0:16:16.400 --> 0:16:18.320
<v Speaker 1>my fab and say he has eighty one. If he

0:16:18.400 --> 0:16:21.960
<v Speaker 1>wants to just put a round number on this, I'm

0:16:21.960 --> 0:16:25.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna put thirteam. I do that. A lot of people

0:16:25.760 --> 0:16:28.200
<v Speaker 1>do that. I didn't know that. Yeah, do you do

0:16:28.280 --> 0:16:30.840
<v Speaker 1>that with checks as well? You got you got a restaurant,

0:16:30.880 --> 0:16:33.120
<v Speaker 1>you gotta check. Okay, you leave it, you put your

0:16:33.120 --> 0:16:36.400
<v Speaker 1>credit card, you leave it tip. So if it's the

0:16:36.760 --> 0:16:41.000
<v Speaker 1>meal cost four cents, don't tell me you do. I

0:16:43.440 --> 0:16:45.920
<v Speaker 1>feel like that's obnoxious. Why like you leave like six

0:16:46.000 --> 0:16:49.280
<v Speaker 1>dollars and seventy cents tonight to make it whatever a

0:16:49.360 --> 0:16:53.360
<v Speaker 1>round number. I don't do that. That's be like I'll

0:16:53.400 --> 0:16:56.040
<v Speaker 1>just give you six bucks. It's also easier to add

0:16:57.280 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 1>I do. I don't know. I think I like it.

0:17:00.800 --> 0:17:03.520
<v Speaker 1>You too much work too, I'm a lazy guy. Agree,

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:06.560
<v Speaker 1>let's take a break. We have a lot more wide

0:17:06.600 --> 0:17:08.280
<v Speaker 1>receivers to get to you. A bunch of running max

0:17:08.359 --> 0:17:11.280
<v Speaker 1>as well, and the most importantly, who can you drop Frankie?

0:17:11.280 --> 0:17:13.080
<v Speaker 1>And now answered that question when we come back with

0:17:13.200 --> 0:17:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the FFS Daily Rodo dot com learned from the game's

0:17:19.680 --> 0:17:23.240
<v Speaker 1>best DFS players. We don't just give you premier advice.

0:17:23.760 --> 0:17:28.320
<v Speaker 1>We play every day, all major sports, all year round.

0:17:28.720 --> 0:17:32.800
<v Speaker 1>We never stop. Industry leading DFS tools and custom projections,

0:17:33.080 --> 0:17:36.840
<v Speaker 1>and now the Daily Rodo dot Com optimized in minutes,

0:17:36.920 --> 0:17:40.680
<v Speaker 1>building optimized line up for cast games and turneys learned

0:17:40.680 --> 0:17:44.760
<v Speaker 1>from the game's best DFS players joined Daily Rodo dot com.

0:17:56.440 --> 0:17:58.399
<v Speaker 1>Thevonas all these guys in concert last night? How was

0:17:58.440 --> 0:18:02.119
<v Speaker 1>it the Vona you know what? For everything that happened

0:18:02.119 --> 0:18:04.280
<v Speaker 1>to me yesterday, I was very, very thankful that I

0:18:04.359 --> 0:18:06.719
<v Speaker 1>did not have any issues and it was a very

0:18:06.800 --> 0:18:08.720
<v Speaker 1>and it turned out to be an excellent concert. I

0:18:08.800 --> 0:18:10.600
<v Speaker 1>had a great time. What are the what's the name

0:18:10.600 --> 0:18:13.600
<v Speaker 1>of these guys? These guys are called Chromeo. I know this.

0:18:13.720 --> 0:18:16.200
<v Speaker 1>I would enjoy stuff like this. Yeah, it was a

0:18:16.640 --> 0:18:19.600
<v Speaker 1>like this. It was at Brooklyn Steel Frank. It was

0:18:19.600 --> 0:18:21.359
<v Speaker 1>actually it was a really good show. These guys are

0:18:21.400 --> 0:18:23.639
<v Speaker 1>like they're kind of like the way I put them

0:18:23.720 --> 0:18:28.119
<v Speaker 1>is like take Daft Punked Beats prints. I gotta get

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:31.080
<v Speaker 1>in on this. I gotta get in on this. How

0:18:31.119 --> 0:18:34.000
<v Speaker 1>are you Burned? Frank an album? I could do that.

0:18:34.600 --> 0:18:38.239
<v Speaker 1>There you go, what is burned me an album? Why

0:18:38.280 --> 0:18:40.560
<v Speaker 1>do you make me a video cassette while you're at it?

0:18:41.520 --> 0:18:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Tap recorder earlier? It doesn't make sense. Whatever, the cassette

0:18:46.440 --> 0:18:49.080
<v Speaker 1>is a place, not not a recorder. What were those

0:18:49.119 --> 0:18:53.240
<v Speaker 1>things called a little walkmansk ye? But what were the

0:18:53.280 --> 0:18:57.400
<v Speaker 1>things that you put inside of them tds? You put

0:18:57.400 --> 0:19:01.120
<v Speaker 1>a CD and a CD player, right walk, you put

0:19:01.520 --> 0:19:04.440
<v Speaker 1>the set thing inside of It's not called tape recorder.

0:19:04.520 --> 0:19:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Tape recorders. Take the recorder tape of quorders like what

0:19:07.960 --> 0:19:10.960
<v Speaker 1>they had in home alone too, right, that was a

0:19:11.000 --> 0:19:13.560
<v Speaker 1>tape recorder. Agree, I had. I I went through all

0:19:13.560 --> 0:19:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the phases of like music in life, so I obviously

0:19:15.840 --> 0:19:18.520
<v Speaker 1>had one of those cassette things that you put it

0:19:19.720 --> 0:19:26.880
<v Speaker 1>whatever its Yeah, sure, okay, thanks Chris. You know what's

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:28.639
<v Speaker 1>interesting about CD players back in the day when you

0:19:28.720 --> 0:19:31.200
<v Speaker 1>put the CD, like if you would bang the CD

0:19:31.320 --> 0:19:34.160
<v Speaker 1>player at all or like move it around, it would skip. Yes,

0:19:34.560 --> 0:19:36.280
<v Speaker 1>I like the CD players that would like lock on

0:19:36.320 --> 0:19:39.320
<v Speaker 1>the side. Those young uns now will never know. Greg

0:19:41.520 --> 0:19:44.639
<v Speaker 1>her Fantasy Factor is the only DFS site with exclusively

0:19:44.640 --> 0:19:47.040
<v Speaker 1>single entry contest. It's fun and a recreational place to

0:19:47.119 --> 0:19:49.440
<v Speaker 1>play with smaller leagues and Fladder prize pools. They have

0:19:49.480 --> 0:19:51.960
<v Speaker 1>great free promos like Survivors, super Bowl Squares and March

0:19:52.000 --> 0:19:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Mandess Bracket Contest. Sign up today when you go to

0:19:54.160 --> 0:19:57.359
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Factor dot com. That's Fantasy Factor dot com, Frankie.

0:19:57.359 --> 0:19:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Before we get some of these other waiver wire moves,

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:02.800
<v Speaker 1>I want to hit on Levyan Bell cannot yesterday late.

0:20:02.920 --> 0:20:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Levyan Bell will be returning to the NFL week number

0:20:06.640 --> 0:20:09.399
<v Speaker 1>seven during these Steelers by he could have waited all

0:20:09.400 --> 0:20:11.399
<v Speaker 1>the way to week ten. Instead, he'll come back for

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:16.359
<v Speaker 1>Week eight, which is at home against Cleveland. Now do

0:20:16.440 --> 0:20:19.399
<v Speaker 1>you by that? Like, does it have to happen now?

0:20:19.480 --> 0:20:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Just because it was reported doesn't have to happen. I did.

0:20:23.160 --> 0:20:26.040
<v Speaker 1>So the question is, now, how do you value Levan Bell?

0:20:26.200 --> 0:20:27.679
<v Speaker 1>Like if you're four or oh, do you go out

0:20:27.720 --> 0:20:30.440
<v Speaker 1>and try and trade for him? Yes? I think that's

0:20:30.480 --> 0:20:31.840
<v Speaker 1>the only way you do it. Like I think if

0:20:31.880 --> 0:20:34.119
<v Speaker 1>you're anything less than four, no, like even if I'm

0:20:34.200 --> 0:20:36.159
<v Speaker 1>three in one, but depending on points, right, like the

0:20:36.280 --> 0:20:38.000
<v Speaker 1>three and one the most points in the league. I

0:20:38.040 --> 0:20:40.840
<v Speaker 1>don't think if I'm I would do it if I'm four.

0:20:40.880 --> 0:20:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Now if I'm anything less, I just don't know that

0:20:43.000 --> 0:20:45.680
<v Speaker 1>you can afford to be without because you're gonna have

0:20:45.680 --> 0:20:47.280
<v Speaker 1>to give up something to to get for him. And

0:20:47.320 --> 0:20:49.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at some of these Yahoo trades again just

0:20:49.920 --> 0:20:52.080
<v Speaker 1>to get an idea of how people are valuing him.

0:20:52.480 --> 0:20:54.520
<v Speaker 1>For example, mark Ingram just got traded for Levyan Bell.

0:20:55.560 --> 0:20:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Who would you rather have Levan Bell? I think I

0:20:58.960 --> 0:21:01.000
<v Speaker 1>would too, just because Arking is gonna miss one of

0:21:01.040 --> 0:21:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the two next games anyway, so that you have that

0:21:03.800 --> 0:21:05.760
<v Speaker 1>week six. So here it is right when you are

0:21:06.040 --> 0:21:07.720
<v Speaker 1>four no or three and one at the ton of point,

0:21:07.720 --> 0:21:09.159
<v Speaker 1>it's not like a flukey three and one, You're a

0:21:09.200 --> 0:21:11.520
<v Speaker 1>real three and one. If you have running back depth,

0:21:11.560 --> 0:21:13.679
<v Speaker 1>it makes it easier to do obviously, here's the thing.

0:21:13.920 --> 0:21:15.359
<v Speaker 1>If you're three and one with a ton of points,

0:21:15.440 --> 0:21:19.720
<v Speaker 1>you're four. Now my future, I'm looking in the future.

0:21:20.359 --> 0:21:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Lebyan Bell is a championship move. On Bell is a

0:21:23.800 --> 0:21:25.640
<v Speaker 1>championship move. You're getting a running back of that miss

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the entire first half, his legs are fresh, and you

0:21:27.600 --> 0:21:29.960
<v Speaker 1>have somebody for the entire stretch, run into the into

0:21:29.960 --> 0:21:31.720
<v Speaker 1>the super Bowl, who is a number two or number

0:21:31.720 --> 0:21:33.639
<v Speaker 1>one overall pick and fantasy football leagues. That is what

0:21:33.720 --> 0:21:35.600
<v Speaker 1>you do when you're trying to win a championship. If

0:21:35.600 --> 0:21:37.240
<v Speaker 1>you have the ability to go and make that move,

0:21:37.359 --> 0:21:40.480
<v Speaker 1>you do it. Now. A lot is dependent on where

0:21:40.600 --> 0:21:42.760
<v Speaker 1>is Levy I been Bell owner right? Can he have

0:21:42.880 --> 0:21:44.720
<v Speaker 1>four at this? Is he oh in four? If he's

0:21:44.760 --> 0:21:46.520
<v Speaker 1>oh in four and knows he's not getting Bell back

0:21:46.560 --> 0:21:48.479
<v Speaker 1>for the next three weeks, he's gonna have to make

0:21:48.520 --> 0:21:52.200
<v Speaker 1>a desperation move. If he's one in three, depending on

0:21:52.240 --> 0:21:54.720
<v Speaker 1>the point situation, he's gonna have to make a desperation move.

0:21:55.320 --> 0:21:57.160
<v Speaker 1>That's the way you go and get leby on Bell.

0:21:57.359 --> 0:21:59.800
<v Speaker 1>But I think this is good regardless, Like if you

0:22:00.000 --> 0:22:02.000
<v Speaker 1>start off slow and you drafted Levian Bell and you've

0:22:02.000 --> 0:22:04.640
<v Speaker 1>been burned and you didn't get James Conner, at least

0:22:04.680 --> 0:22:07.080
<v Speaker 1>now you can get something for Levian Bell, if that

0:22:07.200 --> 0:22:09.600
<v Speaker 1>makes sense, because before if you tried to trade him

0:22:09.680 --> 0:22:12.800
<v Speaker 1>last week or two weeks ago, Like people are constantly

0:22:12.800 --> 0:22:15.200
<v Speaker 1>asking us questions about should I do this trade for

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Levian Bell, And my immediate response was, how can you

0:22:17.880 --> 0:22:19.480
<v Speaker 1>trade for this guy? You have no idea if he's

0:22:19.480 --> 0:22:22.240
<v Speaker 1>even going to play this year at all. At least now,

0:22:23.000 --> 0:22:24.800
<v Speaker 1>if you're owing four or one and three or even

0:22:24.840 --> 0:22:26.520
<v Speaker 1>two and two and you just want to try and

0:22:26.600 --> 0:22:29.080
<v Speaker 1>get something for Levian Bell. At least now you can

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:32.080
<v Speaker 1>make that happen because he has value with this report

0:22:32.160 --> 0:22:35.120
<v Speaker 1>coming out that he's gonna return throughout during the week

0:22:35.200 --> 0:22:37.639
<v Speaker 1>seven by and then be back for weeks eight. I

0:22:37.680 --> 0:22:40.560
<v Speaker 1>think on the flip side, you gotta ask what do

0:22:40.640 --> 0:22:42.920
<v Speaker 1>you do with James Connor? Right Like, obviously, if you

0:22:42.960 --> 0:22:45.119
<v Speaker 1>own Connor and Levian Bell, you you just continue to

0:22:45.160 --> 0:22:47.360
<v Speaker 1>hold onto them because if something happens to Levian Bell

0:22:47.480 --> 0:22:49.280
<v Speaker 1>and you know, maybe it doesn't come back, or if

0:22:49.280 --> 0:22:52.479
<v Speaker 1>he's traded, then you still have James Conner. But if

0:22:52.520 --> 0:22:54.440
<v Speaker 1>you have James Connor and you don't own Levian Bell,

0:22:55.880 --> 0:22:57.840
<v Speaker 1>you just kind of hold him now because it seems

0:22:57.880 --> 0:23:01.560
<v Speaker 1>like you're not gonna get adequate value for him. It's hard,

0:23:01.920 --> 0:23:05.479
<v Speaker 1>it's really really hard to make that, to make that decision. Ultimately, Um,

0:23:05.760 --> 0:23:07.879
<v Speaker 1>you can't just keep relating the Bell up for you

0:23:07.920 --> 0:23:10.320
<v Speaker 1>can't get fleeced. Of course, you can't alter the balance

0:23:10.359 --> 0:23:13.960
<v Speaker 1>of power in your league. It's really all dependent on

0:23:14.040 --> 0:23:19.119
<v Speaker 1>the offer on your standing. There's no there's no there's

0:23:19.160 --> 0:23:22.440
<v Speaker 1>no all encompassing answer to that question. Frank, Yeah, And

0:23:22.480 --> 0:23:24.879
<v Speaker 1>that's pretty much how it's been all year. Long, Like

0:23:25.200 --> 0:23:27.320
<v Speaker 1>there's no just right or wrong, Like, yeah, you should

0:23:27.320 --> 0:23:30.080
<v Speaker 1>trade Levion Bell now because this is when he's coming back. Um,

0:23:30.200 --> 0:23:33.879
<v Speaker 1>there's no you know, you shouldn't trade him because he's

0:23:33.920 --> 0:23:37.160
<v Speaker 1>coming back next week. At least now we have an idea. Again,

0:23:37.200 --> 0:23:39.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't I don't know that just because of reports

0:23:39.560 --> 0:23:41.800
<v Speaker 1>says that he's going to report throughout the week seven

0:23:41.880 --> 0:23:44.680
<v Speaker 1>by that it's definitely going to happen. But at least

0:23:44.760 --> 0:23:48.159
<v Speaker 1>we have something now, whereas we didn't have anything before. Um,

0:23:49.000 --> 0:23:52.200
<v Speaker 1>some trades involving James Conner, Like would you do this

0:23:52.280 --> 0:23:54.159
<v Speaker 1>if you were a James Conner owner right now? Trade

0:23:54.320 --> 0:23:56.520
<v Speaker 1>trade James Conner away to get Lashawn McCoy and John

0:23:56.560 --> 0:24:02.639
<v Speaker 1>Brown Like that's cross. I don't want anything to do

0:24:02.680 --> 0:24:06.960
<v Speaker 1>with creat James Conner and d D. Westbrook to get

0:24:07.000 --> 0:24:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Davontae Freeman and Allen Robinson. Like that makes a little

0:24:09.680 --> 0:24:14.760
<v Speaker 1>bit more sense. Yes, but James Conner three weeks from

0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:17.560
<v Speaker 1>now to be a backup, that's giving you nothing. I

0:24:17.640 --> 0:24:19.400
<v Speaker 1>get it, man, they could help you in the next

0:24:19.400 --> 0:24:21.720
<v Speaker 1>three weeks. Freeman could at least, you know, maybe he's

0:24:21.720 --> 0:24:24.200
<v Speaker 1>a high n RB two he re injures himself. I

0:24:24.240 --> 0:24:26.159
<v Speaker 1>mean there's risk on both sides. Yeah, fest Man, we

0:24:26.200 --> 0:24:28.800
<v Speaker 1>need a good week this week as our team. Look,

0:24:30.200 --> 0:24:31.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, I haven't looked at it yet. We're

0:24:31.520 --> 0:24:33.080
<v Speaker 1>look at it right now. Yes see. Wow, we only

0:24:33.160 --> 0:24:36.800
<v Speaker 1>lost by uh, you know, seventy five points. And that's

0:24:36.880 --> 0:24:40.560
<v Speaker 1>with Taylor Gabriel in our lineup. You drafting Rob Gronkowski

0:24:40.720 --> 0:24:42.639
<v Speaker 1>is not as fun as everyone makes it out to be.

0:24:43.200 --> 0:24:46.639
<v Speaker 1>Not so much, you know what. To be honest, nobody

0:24:46.680 --> 0:24:49.639
<v Speaker 1>said it was fun. We probably just should have listened.

0:24:50.880 --> 0:24:53.000
<v Speaker 1>He was pretty sick this week. All right, So let's

0:24:53.000 --> 0:24:55.960
<v Speaker 1>set the line up right now. And I just said, no, don't.

0:24:56.440 --> 0:24:59.960
<v Speaker 1>I can't do it without me Cam Newton. It's obvious

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:02.040
<v Speaker 1>their quarterback. I put in too many put in too

0:25:02.040 --> 0:25:07.760
<v Speaker 1>many flexes. Sorry. Adrian Peterson is in for Jamal Williams. Wow,

0:25:07.920 --> 0:25:10.879
<v Speaker 1>you know he's good. We're gonna have some questions this week.

0:25:10.920 --> 0:25:13.640
<v Speaker 1>If Devantae Freeman is back, we use him in our flex. Look,

0:25:13.720 --> 0:25:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Markingham's playing. We've waited this long. He's he's in our lineup.

0:25:17.040 --> 0:25:19.520
<v Speaker 1>We're putting him in our flex, and then we're gonna

0:25:19.560 --> 0:25:22.679
<v Speaker 1>have to decide whether we want to use all right,

0:25:22.760 --> 0:25:24.960
<v Speaker 1>forget it, let's let's do waivers because we're sitting it

0:25:24.960 --> 0:25:26.680
<v Speaker 1>at the same time and now there's just like way

0:25:26.680 --> 0:25:29.560
<v Speaker 1>too many players. I'm fixing it. I'm fixing it, all right.

0:25:29.600 --> 0:25:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Well I'm almost done. All right. For those of you

0:25:31.800 --> 0:25:34.040
<v Speaker 1>who are in by week, hell, say you drafted Mike

0:25:34.080 --> 0:25:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Evans and Alan Robinson and Chris God you might need

0:25:40.119 --> 0:25:43.879
<v Speaker 1>a wide receiver this week, alright. Going over to the

0:25:44.000 --> 0:25:46.600
<v Speaker 1>G S T lineup for the suggestion of Greg Suce,

0:25:47.080 --> 0:25:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Cam Newton, Devanta Freeman, Adrian Peterson, Antonio Brown, Golden Tape,

0:25:50.840 --> 0:25:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Robert was this is the bestest line is looked in

0:25:52.600 --> 0:25:55.800
<v Speaker 1>the years. Freaking Rock Renkowski at tight end, who we

0:25:55.880 --> 0:25:57.440
<v Speaker 1>might not even have. We have to pick up a

0:25:57.480 --> 0:26:00.440
<v Speaker 1>tight end, mark Ingram and the flex brod those defense

0:26:00.480 --> 0:26:04.160
<v Speaker 1>give the Jets love it. Adam and it's Harry going forward.

0:26:04.200 --> 0:26:07.840
<v Speaker 1>I believe he just broke his on the bat. Jaron

0:26:07.920 --> 0:26:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Jones and Taylor Gabriel who has by Yeah, but we

0:26:10.400 --> 0:26:12.720
<v Speaker 1>still have does Bryant. It's hilarious. But this is a

0:26:12.880 --> 0:26:16.000
<v Speaker 1>deep league. It's like there's nobody on the waiver wire

0:26:16.040 --> 0:26:18.080
<v Speaker 1>at this point. Just how good is that starting line up?

0:26:18.560 --> 0:26:20.680
<v Speaker 1>It's good beings. I kind of want to get Aaron

0:26:20.760 --> 0:26:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Jones in again Detroit rellowing the most fantasy points supposing

0:26:24.160 --> 0:26:27.720
<v Speaker 1>running back we played this week. They're screwed. We're probably

0:26:27.760 --> 0:26:30.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna still lose. I don't think so. You're just wrong

0:26:30.600 --> 0:26:34.480
<v Speaker 1>about that. Growing up against Chris Vaccarrow, how's his name?

0:26:34.920 --> 0:26:37.680
<v Speaker 1>He has Shaun Watson, he has Todd Gurley, Hey Ji,

0:26:38.320 --> 0:26:40.800
<v Speaker 1>and he still is not good. Nelson Aguilar are not good.

0:26:41.000 --> 0:26:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Mike Evans on a bye. Yeah, the return of the BFFs.

0:26:45.960 --> 0:26:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Graham, he's like whatever in PPR. Marvin Jones, who's

0:26:49.920 --> 0:26:56.720
<v Speaker 1>like whatever, it nice bench not looking too good. We

0:26:56.760 --> 0:27:00.600
<v Speaker 1>could get Joe Mixon back. That would be unfortunate. Nah,

0:27:00.800 --> 0:27:03.280
<v Speaker 1>don't make it. Inn in back this week? Screw that? Right,

0:27:04.040 --> 0:27:05.880
<v Speaker 1>who's gonna put in as a wide receiver to fill

0:27:05.920 --> 0:27:07.560
<v Speaker 1>it from Mike Evans? He has Danny, Ammon Dola or

0:27:07.560 --> 0:27:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Shard Matthews who is currently unemployed, Amred Meredith? All right,

0:27:12.960 --> 0:27:17.080
<v Speaker 1>we can win. Things are looking up. The flex Marvin

0:27:17.119 --> 0:27:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Jones was the wide receiver? You missed that? I mean,

0:27:19.640 --> 0:27:22.360
<v Speaker 1>all right, whatever, he's gonna flex the tight end tight

0:27:24.080 --> 0:27:26.280
<v Speaker 1>feel good this week? So what I was saying, Greggy,

0:27:26.480 --> 0:27:29.040
<v Speaker 1>if you're in bi week Hell at the wide receiver position.

0:27:30.520 --> 0:27:32.440
<v Speaker 1>The Colts wide receivers are gonna be interesting this week,

0:27:32.560 --> 0:27:36.159
<v Speaker 1>But Tee why Hilton out? The question is which Cults

0:27:36.200 --> 0:27:38.639
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver do you pick up? Because Ryan Grant is

0:27:38.640 --> 0:27:41.440
<v Speaker 1>owning just twelve percent of leagues, Chester Rogers and owning

0:27:41.480 --> 0:27:43.800
<v Speaker 1>two percent of leagues, and they're going up against the

0:27:43.880 --> 0:27:47.359
<v Speaker 1>Patriots secondary, who I know their defense looked a lot

0:27:47.440 --> 0:27:49.840
<v Speaker 1>better this week against Miami, but still they've been prone

0:27:49.880 --> 0:27:54.119
<v Speaker 1>to giving up fantasy points too wide receivers. And if

0:27:54.119 --> 0:27:56.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm not mistaken, that's one of the highest over unders

0:27:56.560 --> 0:27:59.520
<v Speaker 1>already this week between the Colts and the Patriots. So

0:28:00.320 --> 0:28:02.520
<v Speaker 1>expect Andrew Luck to kind of build off what he

0:28:02.600 --> 0:28:05.640
<v Speaker 1>did last week. Obviously not do that again, but he's

0:28:05.640 --> 0:28:06.879
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to throw the ball, and it looks like

0:28:06.960 --> 0:28:08.600
<v Speaker 1>t why Hilton is going to be out that over

0:28:08.720 --> 0:28:10.960
<v Speaker 1>under right now? Since at fifty one and a half points,

0:28:11.320 --> 0:28:13.600
<v Speaker 1>if you had to choose one between Chester Rogers and

0:28:13.720 --> 0:28:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Grant, Greggy, I'd said, right, So I recommended Nael

0:28:17.480 --> 0:28:20.359
<v Speaker 1>hurry up. Spoiler alert, I recommended Ryan Grant. I think, um,

0:28:20.440 --> 0:28:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I love the present of just Naps He's playing who

0:28:23.080 --> 0:28:26.280
<v Speaker 1>is the unknown White receiver for Colts, Zak Pascal, Zack Pascal.

0:28:26.720 --> 0:28:28.960
<v Speaker 1>He was Yeah, he got a touch and he was

0:28:29.000 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 1>targeted at another time in the end zone too. Facing

0:28:31.640 --> 0:28:33.840
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots, they're gonna be passing a lot. Could be

0:28:33.880 --> 0:28:36.840
<v Speaker 1>a big Ebron game. I guess, yeah, you have to

0:28:36.880 --> 0:28:39.760
<v Speaker 1>see what happens with Jack Doyle. But yeah, again, Eric

0:28:39.840 --> 0:28:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Ebron was great. I'm with you, Eilean Ryan Grant just

0:28:43.720 --> 0:28:46.960
<v Speaker 1>because Elean Ryan Grant and Chester Rodgers, both of them over.

0:28:47.680 --> 0:28:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Pascal doesn't look like t why Hilton is gonna play

0:28:50.080 --> 0:28:51.720
<v Speaker 1>in this game. So I would expect those two wide

0:28:51.760 --> 0:28:54.400
<v Speaker 1>receivers to kind of be the outside guys and then

0:28:54.800 --> 0:28:57.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe we get a little Niheim Hines, a player who

0:28:57.480 --> 0:28:59.840
<v Speaker 1>we need to talk about now as well. Um, because

0:28:59.840 --> 0:29:01.800
<v Speaker 1>they can't run the football. They just can't, Marlon Mack,

0:29:01.840 --> 0:29:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Wilkins. They can't run the football. Again, they're using

0:29:04.800 --> 0:29:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Niheim Hines as an extension of the run game. They're

0:29:08.080 --> 0:29:09.800
<v Speaker 1>throwing these short passes to them, and they even lined

0:29:09.840 --> 0:29:13.160
<v Speaker 1>them up wide out wide last week on that touchdown

0:29:13.160 --> 0:29:15.360
<v Speaker 1>and they really just threw a jump ball and Nineheim

0:29:15.400 --> 0:29:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Hines came down with it. So I would expect a

0:29:18.120 --> 0:29:21.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of Rogers, Ryan Grant, Ebron and Niheim Hines. I

0:29:21.760 --> 0:29:23.239
<v Speaker 1>don't think they're gonna run the ball. I think all

0:29:23.320 --> 0:29:25.760
<v Speaker 1>four of those guys can be targeted, you know, seven

0:29:25.840 --> 0:29:27.600
<v Speaker 1>plus times. Let me start with the wider re seivers

0:29:27.600 --> 0:29:28.760
<v Speaker 1>and we'll get them the heat lines at a moment.

0:29:28.800 --> 0:29:32.120
<v Speaker 1>How much do you spending on Ryan Grant? This is

0:29:32.560 --> 0:29:35.560
<v Speaker 1>these are both short term plays, Like when Hilton is

0:29:35.600 --> 0:29:37.760
<v Speaker 1>back like useless, it's gonna be hard to figure out

0:29:37.760 --> 0:29:40.920
<v Speaker 1>weekend and week out? Is Tessa Rodgers the number two guy?

0:29:41.280 --> 0:29:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Is you know is uh Is Ryan Grant the number

0:29:45.080 --> 0:29:48.360
<v Speaker 1>two guy? So I think this offense really revolved around

0:29:48.440 --> 0:29:50.240
<v Speaker 1>weekend and week out. It's gonna be Hilton, it's gonna

0:29:50.240 --> 0:29:51.920
<v Speaker 1>be the tight ends, and it's gonna be Hines. I

0:29:52.120 --> 0:29:54.440
<v Speaker 1>do believe that. So there's just a short term play.

0:29:55.120 --> 0:29:57.960
<v Speaker 1>But if you have bad matchups or you hurt by

0:29:57.960 --> 0:30:00.440
<v Speaker 1>the bye weeks, I could see going a sighs like

0:30:00.480 --> 0:30:04.920
<v Speaker 1>five to seven percent on you know Ryan Great. I'm

0:30:04.920 --> 0:30:06.680
<v Speaker 1>not gonna break the bank, but I do think these

0:30:06.720 --> 0:30:12.040
<v Speaker 1>guys can be serviceable on on Thursday Night against Patriots. Okay, uh,

0:30:12.680 --> 0:30:14.239
<v Speaker 1>I agree, you don't give me a number at all,

0:30:14.400 --> 0:30:17.440
<v Speaker 1>But Okay, I mystified the percent. I thought you just

0:30:17.480 --> 0:30:19.880
<v Speaker 1>would be serviceable. The only thing is you're you're only

0:30:19.920 --> 0:30:22.080
<v Speaker 1>spending five seven percent if you're starting in this week,

0:30:22.280 --> 0:30:23.719
<v Speaker 1>if you're not gonna wind up starting in this week,

0:30:23.760 --> 0:30:25.960
<v Speaker 1>there's a point on them. Yeah. Absolutely, And that doesn't

0:30:26.000 --> 0:30:27.520
<v Speaker 1>involve in the heame Hinds. Again, we're gonna get to

0:30:27.560 --> 0:30:31.400
<v Speaker 1>what we're done with the wide receivers. Um Vin the

0:30:31.480 --> 0:30:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Jacksonville Donte Moncrief and D D. Westbrook. D You Westbrook

0:30:33.960 --> 0:30:36.719
<v Speaker 1>had an awesome, awesome game last week. Dante montcif has

0:30:36.760 --> 0:30:40.680
<v Speaker 1>has been a red zone guy for Jacksonville. Now they're

0:30:40.720 --> 0:30:44.840
<v Speaker 1>facing Kansas City here this week. Huge Blake Bortles game.

0:30:44.840 --> 0:30:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Blake Bortles a streaming quarterback this week. I'm comfortable playing

0:30:48.600 --> 0:30:53.080
<v Speaker 1>how much you're spending the jacksonvill wide receivers. I'm more

0:30:53.200 --> 0:30:55.880
<v Speaker 1>so intrigued in D D. Westbrook for the long term.

0:30:56.320 --> 0:30:58.960
<v Speaker 1>I figure that Ante Moncrief only owned a nine percent

0:30:59.040 --> 0:31:01.280
<v Speaker 1>of leagues. Again, this is a bye week play, a

0:31:01.360 --> 0:31:04.920
<v Speaker 1>short term play. UM, I don't done. Moncrief has been

0:31:04.920 --> 0:31:08.240
<v Speaker 1>incredibly inconsistent. He's had two big games, he's had two duds.

0:31:08.440 --> 0:31:10.640
<v Speaker 1>So this is just a matchup play against the Kansas

0:31:10.680 --> 0:31:13.040
<v Speaker 1>City Chiefs. Maybe there's a chance that he catches a

0:31:13.080 --> 0:31:16.600
<v Speaker 1>long touchdown or whatever. But Dante Moncrief his targets through

0:31:16.680 --> 0:31:19.160
<v Speaker 1>four weeks five and week one than nine, than three,

0:31:19.240 --> 0:31:21.800
<v Speaker 1>than five, So his targets have been a little inconsistent. Um,

0:31:21.960 --> 0:31:24.800
<v Speaker 1>I think you can say that about everyone on this team. Again,

0:31:24.880 --> 0:31:27.360
<v Speaker 1>the Jaguars wide receivers is kind of like a sum

0:31:27.680 --> 0:31:30.040
<v Speaker 1>of its parts, kind of like add up for Blake

0:31:30.120 --> 0:31:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Bortles to be good this week. But Dd Westbrook thirteen targets, Um,

0:31:34.480 --> 0:31:36.360
<v Speaker 1>that was a career high. Again, he was a rookie

0:31:36.480 --> 0:31:39.200
<v Speaker 1>last year, so it's kind of a brief career. But

0:31:39.960 --> 0:31:42.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, he he's the guy who I think more

0:31:42.560 --> 0:31:45.920
<v Speaker 1>has more long term potential, more staying power for the

0:31:46.000 --> 0:31:48.239
<v Speaker 1>Jacksonville Jaguars. The way that he's used and the way

0:31:48.280 --> 0:31:49.840
<v Speaker 1>he was used against the Jets in the middle of

0:31:49.920 --> 0:31:53.440
<v Speaker 1>the field, you know, lining up inside, lining up outside,

0:31:53.520 --> 0:31:55.600
<v Speaker 1>he can make things happen after the catch. Again, he

0:31:55.880 --> 0:31:58.400
<v Speaker 1>is electric and he would have gone higher in the

0:31:58.560 --> 0:32:00.560
<v Speaker 1>NFL draft last year if it weren't for off the

0:32:00.680 --> 0:32:04.560
<v Speaker 1>field concerns. So against the Chiefs, I'm more so. Um,

0:32:05.400 --> 0:32:07.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm more so in on d D. But again, if

0:32:07.040 --> 0:32:08.440
<v Speaker 1>you just need a streamer for this week, I think

0:32:08.520 --> 0:32:13.000
<v Speaker 1>mon Creef is in that mix. As high as ten

0:32:13.080 --> 0:32:15.800
<v Speaker 1>to twelve percent on d D. Moncrief is in that

0:32:16.200 --> 0:32:19.000
<v Speaker 1>streaming this week. He's in that cult discussions like the

0:32:19.000 --> 0:32:21.000
<v Speaker 1>seven person I agree with that with d D. But

0:32:21.120 --> 0:32:22.680
<v Speaker 1>d D I'm more I'm more so like ten to

0:32:22.720 --> 0:32:26.240
<v Speaker 1>twelve percent. Yeah, yeah, I agree with that. I agree

0:32:26.240 --> 0:32:29.120
<v Speaker 1>with that whole hardly. So still he's your favorite so far,

0:32:29.200 --> 0:32:33.520
<v Speaker 1>so yes. Uh. In terms of staying power long term,

0:32:33.640 --> 0:32:39.400
<v Speaker 1>partial Antonio Callaway I think is in that mix with

0:32:39.480 --> 0:32:41.880
<v Speaker 1>d D as well. Would you rather have Callowe or

0:32:41.920 --> 0:32:45.320
<v Speaker 1>d D. Westbrook right now? I think I would take

0:32:45.400 --> 0:32:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Callaowe because I feel like there's less mouths to feed

0:32:49.480 --> 0:32:53.240
<v Speaker 1>I in Cleveland, like it's Landry, it's in Joku, but

0:32:53.280 --> 0:32:56.640
<v Speaker 1>they're not using Duke Johnson. That's very close for me.

0:32:56.880 --> 0:32:59.960
<v Speaker 1>It is close what Calogy has been getting the tard

0:33:00.000 --> 0:33:03.440
<v Speaker 1>it's too consistently. I'd like the DD plays Casey this week. Yeah,

0:33:03.880 --> 0:33:06.720
<v Speaker 1>for sure, this week it's close. It's very because the

0:33:06.760 --> 0:33:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Browns are going up against Baltimore and they're getting Jimmy

0:33:09.280 --> 0:33:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Smith back. You have to remember, all those suspended players

0:33:11.840 --> 0:33:15.920
<v Speaker 1>are eld to return to Julian Edelman, Mark Jimmy Smith's

0:33:15.960 --> 0:33:18.080
<v Speaker 1>perfect too. So that's gonna help the Bengals rush defense

0:33:18.160 --> 0:33:20.360
<v Speaker 1>as well. UM, so you have to keep that in mind.

0:33:20.400 --> 0:33:22.760
<v Speaker 1>I think definitely for this week. I like those Jaguars

0:33:22.800 --> 0:33:25.840
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers more so than I do Callawaycloy has been

0:33:25.880 --> 0:33:28.360
<v Speaker 1>getting the target definitely, and eventually he's going to convert

0:33:28.440 --> 0:33:31.880
<v Speaker 1>some of these targets into long touchdowns. Now, Mitchell Drobiski

0:33:32.000 --> 0:33:35.200
<v Speaker 1>The truth this past week went off in Chicago, UM

0:33:35.400 --> 0:33:37.680
<v Speaker 1>and the bfs not me. That's really a Frank and

0:33:37.760 --> 0:33:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Mike thing all over. Taylor Gabriel. Florio had talked about

0:33:40.880 --> 0:33:44.240
<v Speaker 1>it on his podcast, UM and Frankie actually started Taylor

0:33:44.280 --> 0:33:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Gabriel in our land out this weekend. We got crushed,

0:33:46.600 --> 0:33:49.200
<v Speaker 1>but no thanks to Taylor Gabriel, who was absolutely amazing.

0:33:50.200 --> 0:33:52.880
<v Speaker 1>He's on a bye I wish you spent a Taylor Gabriel.

0:33:55.040 --> 0:34:00.040
<v Speaker 1>This depends. Obviously, you have to have a player on

0:34:00.120 --> 0:34:02.400
<v Speaker 1>your bench you're willing to drop. UM get to that

0:34:02.440 --> 0:34:06.800
<v Speaker 1>in a bit, But I think he's I think he's

0:34:06.960 --> 0:34:09.400
<v Speaker 1>in that same mix, may be a little bit more

0:34:09.440 --> 0:34:12.120
<v Speaker 1>aggressive on him more so than de d and callaway

0:34:12.200 --> 0:34:14.040
<v Speaker 1>just because if you look at the targets, people don't

0:34:14.080 --> 0:34:17.239
<v Speaker 1>realize this. Taylor Gabriel has twenty four targets over the

0:34:17.320 --> 0:34:20.440
<v Speaker 1>last three weeks. He's averaging eight targets a game. He

0:34:20.560 --> 0:34:23.680
<v Speaker 1>has a twenty two point four percent targets share on

0:34:23.719 --> 0:34:26.160
<v Speaker 1>the season, whereas Allen Robinson is twenty four point eight.

0:34:26.520 --> 0:34:29.000
<v Speaker 1>So they're very close. Like Alan Robinson is still the guy,

0:34:29.200 --> 0:34:32.520
<v Speaker 1>but Taylor Gabriel's number two. And we're realizing now the

0:34:32.560 --> 0:34:34.840
<v Speaker 1>way that Matt Maggie is using Taylor Gabriel in this

0:34:35.000 --> 0:34:38.480
<v Speaker 1>offense greg is similar to how Tyreek Hill is being

0:34:38.560 --> 0:34:43.080
<v Speaker 1>used in the Chiefs off like sweep things where like

0:34:43.120 --> 0:34:45.240
<v Speaker 1>he's running across the line, he's little like touch passes.

0:34:45.600 --> 0:34:47.759
<v Speaker 1>We saw Taylor Gabriel score touched on that he can

0:34:47.800 --> 0:34:50.640
<v Speaker 1>stretch the field, which saw just two years ago he

0:34:50.760 --> 0:34:53.440
<v Speaker 1>was a fantasy viable wide receiver in the Falcons offense

0:34:53.440 --> 0:34:56.360
<v Speaker 1>because they found creative ways to use him. There's you know,

0:34:56.480 --> 0:34:59.360
<v Speaker 1>outside of like Sean McVeigh and Andy Reid, there might

0:34:59.400 --> 0:35:02.319
<v Speaker 1>not be more creative offensive mind calling place right now

0:35:02.400 --> 0:35:06.719
<v Speaker 1>then Matt Naggie. So Taylor Gabriel I'm gonna be aggressive

0:35:06.800 --> 0:35:09.399
<v Speaker 1>on him. You have to be able to obviously wait

0:35:09.440 --> 0:35:11.600
<v Speaker 1>because he's on the buy. I'm more so willing to

0:35:11.640 --> 0:35:15.240
<v Speaker 1>do this if I have a record over five, because

0:35:15.480 --> 0:35:17.239
<v Speaker 1>the pickups that you make this week, if you're two

0:35:17.280 --> 0:35:19.719
<v Speaker 1>and two or less, you need to win, you do so.

0:35:19.880 --> 0:35:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Taylor Gabriel, I'm more so inclined to be in on

0:35:22.520 --> 0:35:24.879
<v Speaker 1>if I'm three and one or better, you know, maybe

0:35:24.960 --> 0:35:27.800
<v Speaker 1>two and two. I'm fine, have deep benches and he's available,

0:35:28.160 --> 0:35:30.759
<v Speaker 1>but I would bid more on him than I would

0:35:30.840 --> 0:35:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Callaway or D D. Westbert. I don't know if you

0:35:32.560 --> 0:35:35.279
<v Speaker 1>agree that is close. I think it's close. When we

0:35:35.360 --> 0:35:37.799
<v Speaker 1>come back, who are dropping for these players? We're gonna

0:35:37.880 --> 0:35:39.320
<v Speaker 1>let you know and go back over some of the

0:35:39.400 --> 0:35:40.759
<v Speaker 1>running backs and the tight ends that you can pick

0:35:40.840 --> 0:35:42.680
<v Speaker 1>up this week in Fantasy foot Box stick out, you'd

0:35:42.680 --> 0:35:46.879
<v Speaker 1>be a fat back after this. There's only one place

0:35:46.920 --> 0:35:49.360
<v Speaker 1>to listen to the best fantasy advice, and that's the

0:35:49.440 --> 0:35:52.279
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Sports Radio Network. By downloading the n T S

0:35:52.360 --> 0:35:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Y Radio Network GAPP, you'll be blessed with having the

0:35:54.560 --> 0:35:57.560
<v Speaker 1>top fantasy experts bright in your pocket. You'll get award

0:35:57.600 --> 0:36:00.480
<v Speaker 1>winning and entertaining programs like the world to expert splits,

0:36:00.520 --> 0:36:05.560
<v Speaker 1>cocka Doodle do it, Fantasy best Friends Forever, Carton and Friends, Yeah,

0:36:06.840 --> 0:36:08.759
<v Speaker 1>and so much more. Warm you feel what I'm saying,

0:36:08.800 --> 0:36:10.800
<v Speaker 1>download the F and T s Y Sports Radio Network

0:36:10.840 --> 0:36:13.480
<v Speaker 1>app now and take the most trusted fantasy experts with

0:36:13.640 --> 0:36:28.680
<v Speaker 1>you wherever you go. Back with you Fantasy best Friends

0:36:28.760 --> 0:36:34.080
<v Speaker 1>forever here on the Fantasy Sports Radio Network. It's not

0:36:34.200 --> 0:36:36.319
<v Speaker 1>time to day to remind you. And if you enjoy

0:36:36.360 --> 0:36:38.640
<v Speaker 1>playing daily fantasy sports but are sick of dealing with

0:36:38.760 --> 0:36:42.000
<v Speaker 1>professionals using algorithms to select hundreds of lineups and entries,

0:36:42.160 --> 0:36:44.279
<v Speaker 1>try to problems Pillar tool at my booky dot a G.

0:36:44.600 --> 0:36:46.960
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna have to create multiple lineups, ditched the hassle

0:36:47.120 --> 0:36:49.719
<v Speaker 1>of dealing with late scratches and avoid experts winning ninety

0:36:49.719 --> 0:36:51.640
<v Speaker 1>per some of the money. Invest in the players that

0:36:51.680 --> 0:36:54.040
<v Speaker 1>you want without salary caps. And if you sign up

0:36:54.040 --> 0:36:55.879
<v Speaker 1>for a new account using the promo code f fan

0:36:55.960 --> 0:36:59.160
<v Speaker 1>t S why, you can receive a fifty percent deposit bonus.

0:36:59.400 --> 0:37:01.360
<v Speaker 1>No more dealing late line of scratches, no experts to

0:37:01.360 --> 0:37:03.360
<v Speaker 1>compete against, just you and the prop that you choose.

0:37:03.560 --> 0:37:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Go to my Bookye dot AJ the probo code is

0:37:05.680 --> 0:37:07.759
<v Speaker 1>fn T s Y and choose your matchup. He's in

0:37:07.760 --> 0:37:10.320
<v Speaker 1>the prop pillar tool. That's my bookie dot AJ. The

0:37:10.360 --> 0:37:13.400
<v Speaker 1>pro bo code is f and TS. Why would you

0:37:13.400 --> 0:37:16.839
<v Speaker 1>think of that song? Frank? Not a fan? Now you're

0:37:16.920 --> 0:37:19.799
<v Speaker 1>you're bopping though, Well, just because I like to bring

0:37:19.920 --> 0:37:21.440
<v Speaker 1>energy to the show. I like to dance when the

0:37:21.480 --> 0:37:24.960
<v Speaker 1>intra music comeback comes back in? Right, But not a

0:37:25.040 --> 0:37:26.800
<v Speaker 1>huge fan? Who was that? Do you think it was?

0:37:28.440 --> 0:37:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Can I hear it again? Is that possible? Can you

0:37:30.920 --> 0:37:33.120
<v Speaker 1>play that? That intro? It's like one of these, like

0:37:33.200 --> 0:37:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Elton John or like Billy Joel Guys, that's correct, that

0:37:35.960 --> 0:37:39.560
<v Speaker 1>that's correct? Actually, which one do you think I need

0:37:39.640 --> 0:37:48.960
<v Speaker 1>to hear to go? He's Billy Joe very good. Do

0:37:49.040 --> 0:37:51.600
<v Speaker 1>you know the song? I heard it like a million

0:37:51.640 --> 0:37:54.560
<v Speaker 1>times in my life. I don't know the great song.

0:37:55.840 --> 0:38:00.080
<v Speaker 1>My thing is, Greg, I grew up with my dad. You.

0:38:00.719 --> 0:38:02.920
<v Speaker 1>I grew up with both of my parents, but my

0:38:03.120 --> 0:38:05.839
<v Speaker 1>dad um laid a lot of music when I was younger,

0:38:06.080 --> 0:38:08.520
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of it was classic rock, like heavy metal.

0:38:08.640 --> 0:38:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Love it. So now whenever I hear any of those songs,

0:38:10.880 --> 0:38:12.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm kind of they're kind of just like I'm done

0:38:12.960 --> 0:38:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with him. I don't want to hear them anymore. Does

0:38:15.640 --> 0:38:18.279
<v Speaker 1>Miami seven and crack your top five Billies Joel songs?

0:38:18.400 --> 0:38:20.560
<v Speaker 1>It is absolutely my top five, not only that's my

0:38:20.680 --> 0:38:24.520
<v Speaker 1>number one song to go for in karaoke. Really, Oh yes,

0:38:25.280 --> 0:38:26.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that would be a tough one to do.

0:38:26.800 --> 0:38:29.800
<v Speaker 1>My seventeen is tough. What other songs that Billy Joel do?

0:38:30.760 --> 0:38:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Only the good Diane classics. That's my good too, Actually, Bavona,

0:38:34.280 --> 0:38:36.480
<v Speaker 1>I like that one. You mean like greatest hits here

0:38:36.920 --> 0:38:39.080
<v Speaker 1>there's a piano man. Oh well, piano man just as

0:38:39.080 --> 0:38:42.560
<v Speaker 1>two easy It's just two easy scenes from Italian restaurants. Amazing.

0:38:42.600 --> 0:38:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Obviously there's a old music that I hate. Sorry, guys,

0:38:47.840 --> 0:38:52.680
<v Speaker 1>dreams is so good. I love Village Dude. That does

0:38:52.719 --> 0:38:55.879
<v Speaker 1>not surprise me one bit. The fact that Bivona likes him,

0:38:55.960 --> 0:38:58.600
<v Speaker 1>it's not surprising one bit either. It's I mean, it's

0:38:58.600 --> 0:39:00.440
<v Speaker 1>not a bad thing. It's just you got strike me

0:39:00.480 --> 0:39:03.360
<v Speaker 1>as like Billy Dooelguys, we are very much. I like

0:39:03.480 --> 0:39:05.960
<v Speaker 1>to bounce around a little bit like I'm kind of

0:39:06.000 --> 0:39:09.080
<v Speaker 1>going through like this. I like the music that Bavona

0:39:09.120 --> 0:39:10.880
<v Speaker 1>played last time coming in because I'm going through this

0:39:10.960 --> 0:39:17.360
<v Speaker 1>phase of like eighties discoe, technoi whatever. I don't know

0:39:17.640 --> 0:39:20.280
<v Speaker 1>like what that genres called, but like daft punk sounds

0:39:20.280 --> 0:39:23.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot like it. Um anything that kind of sounds

0:39:23.280 --> 0:39:25.000
<v Speaker 1>like that. I'm you know, so I'm gonna go download

0:39:25.000 --> 0:39:28.400
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of that music that I have some Kia

0:39:29.440 --> 0:39:32.919
<v Speaker 1>I like, I've heard some of his hers. I don't

0:39:32.920 --> 0:39:35.320
<v Speaker 1>know if it's hate or not. It's do you have

0:39:35.400 --> 0:39:38.000
<v Speaker 1>any other Billy Joel greatest hittance have a lot, But

0:39:38.080 --> 0:39:39.560
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to know that right now. You don't

0:39:39.560 --> 0:39:42.320
<v Speaker 1>talking about some waivers? Yes, okay, so we give you

0:39:42.320 --> 0:39:43.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of wide receivers. And I think I was

0:39:43.920 --> 0:39:46.680
<v Speaker 1>thinking about it during the break. It's really hard for

0:39:46.719 --> 0:39:49.320
<v Speaker 1>me because mean the Taylory Gabriel and d Westbrook and

0:39:49.320 --> 0:39:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Antonio Callawan. If I had to rank those three, uh,

0:39:52.440 --> 0:39:55.040
<v Speaker 1>if I down Girls a great song, great song, I

0:39:55.080 --> 0:39:58.480
<v Speaker 1>would say, I'm gonna rank it. We didn't start the

0:39:58.520 --> 0:40:00.680
<v Speaker 1>fire great song. I'm gonna rank it too. Deo Callaway,

0:40:00.760 --> 0:40:04.839
<v Speaker 1>d D Westbrook and then Taylor Gabriel Gabriel third, are

0:40:04.840 --> 0:40:06.640
<v Speaker 1>you still out on Taylor Gabriel? STI let him out

0:40:06.680 --> 0:40:08.600
<v Speaker 1>on him? I just don't know. I just feel like

0:40:08.640 --> 0:40:11.719
<v Speaker 1>the other I don't know. I don't I don't know.

0:40:12.280 --> 0:40:14.320
<v Speaker 1>I think the others really like the target share that

0:40:14.360 --> 0:40:17.319
<v Speaker 1>he's seeing right now, Like on the season, twenty two

0:40:17.480 --> 0:40:20.839
<v Speaker 1>point four percent of the target share. That's a very

0:40:21.000 --> 0:40:23.960
<v Speaker 1>very strong number for a waiver wire wide receiver. I'm

0:40:24.000 --> 0:40:26.160
<v Speaker 1>not saying like this guy is going to emerge and

0:40:26.200 --> 0:40:28.680
<v Speaker 1>become a kids consistent wide receiver three for you, but

0:40:29.120 --> 0:40:30.840
<v Speaker 1>I think he's a guy who can cover by weeks,

0:40:30.960 --> 0:40:32.520
<v Speaker 1>who you know you might be able to play based

0:40:32.560 --> 0:40:35.880
<v Speaker 1>on the right matchup. Was the right matchup against Tampa Bay, obviously,

0:40:36.360 --> 0:40:38.759
<v Speaker 1>I wrote him up. Fantasy pros asked me to write

0:40:38.800 --> 0:40:41.160
<v Speaker 1>up like a really deep sleeper and a bust inside

0:40:41.239 --> 0:40:44.080
<v Speaker 1>like the top forty. So I wrote up Taylor Gabriel

0:40:44.120 --> 0:40:45.920
<v Speaker 1>as like a really deep sleeper last week, and so

0:40:46.640 --> 0:40:49.680
<v Speaker 1>that worked out well. Um, I think I think they're

0:40:49.680 --> 0:40:53.160
<v Speaker 1>all close the Jacksonville Jaguars. To me, I like the

0:40:53.200 --> 0:40:55.279
<v Speaker 1>town of d. D. Westbrook a lot. But again, it's

0:40:55.880 --> 0:40:58.480
<v Speaker 1>one week. It's healing Cole. When week gets d D. Westbrook,

0:40:58.520 --> 0:41:00.440
<v Speaker 1>When week gets mon Creef, when we gets t. J.

0:41:00.560 --> 0:41:02.719
<v Speaker 1>Yelden catching passes out of the backfield, we're probably gonna

0:41:02.719 --> 0:41:05.560
<v Speaker 1>get an Austin Safarian Jenkins a week. I just trust

0:41:07.080 --> 0:41:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Callaway's targets and Taylor Gabriel's targets a little bit more.

0:41:11.520 --> 0:41:13.600
<v Speaker 1>And I mean, how can you not be encouraged by

0:41:13.640 --> 0:41:15.719
<v Speaker 1>the Bears passing game after what we saw this past week.

0:41:15.920 --> 0:41:18.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna go ahead and say, you know, Trabinsky

0:41:18.280 --> 0:41:22.360
<v Speaker 1>is a top ten quarterback already, but he made strides

0:41:22.400 --> 0:41:25.240
<v Speaker 1>in that game. Matt Naggi's offense is clearly very creative.

0:41:25.520 --> 0:41:29.719
<v Speaker 1>Defenses are focusing on trying to stop Allen Robinson, trying

0:41:29.760 --> 0:41:32.640
<v Speaker 1>to stop Trey Burton, trying to stop you know, Tarik

0:41:32.680 --> 0:41:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Cohen catching passes out of the back to like between

0:41:35.239 --> 0:41:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Tarik Cohen and Taylor Gabriel. There's a lot of speed

0:41:38.200 --> 0:41:40.160
<v Speaker 1>on this Bears so much speed, and that's what we

0:41:40.280 --> 0:41:43.480
<v Speaker 1>load the other Matten Needdie higher in the first place. Frank,

0:41:43.600 --> 0:41:45.759
<v Speaker 1>let me get some players to drop before we get

0:41:45.760 --> 0:41:54.600
<v Speaker 1>the yes, sir, can you drop Randall Cobb? Uh for

0:41:54.719 --> 0:41:58.880
<v Speaker 1>any of the players we obviously we've mentioned. Yeah, I know,

0:41:59.000 --> 0:42:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Rodgers hasn't like himself. The Packers offense hasn't been

0:42:03.040 --> 0:42:06.200
<v Speaker 1>overall that great, and people have been talking of Geronimo Allison.

0:42:06.280 --> 0:42:08.320
<v Speaker 1>He has been getting it done weekend a weekes, but

0:42:09.320 --> 0:42:12.239
<v Speaker 1>before last week he was consistently being out targeted by

0:42:12.320 --> 0:42:14.839
<v Speaker 1>Randall Cob. Absolutely in the first three weeks, Randall Cobb

0:42:14.880 --> 0:42:17.040
<v Speaker 1>had double digit targets in two of the first three games.

0:42:17.880 --> 0:42:21.000
<v Speaker 1>So if you're getting that many targets in the Packers offense,

0:42:22.880 --> 0:42:26.160
<v Speaker 1>I still I trust Randal cob more, especially in PPR

0:42:26.960 --> 0:42:28.560
<v Speaker 1>and those other guys, just because if you look at

0:42:28.840 --> 0:42:32.319
<v Speaker 1>Taylor Gabriel and Callaway and d D. Westbrook, they're all

0:42:32.480 --> 0:42:35.920
<v Speaker 1>arguably the number three option in their on their respective teams.

0:42:36.800 --> 0:42:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Randall Cobb when he was healthy, even with Geronimo Allison

0:42:39.440 --> 0:42:41.640
<v Speaker 1>like he was out targeting, like he was the numbered

0:42:42.000 --> 0:42:44.919
<v Speaker 1>two or even number three target in the Packers pass game.

0:42:45.239 --> 0:42:47.120
<v Speaker 1>And I just trust Aaron Rodgers more than those other guys.

0:42:47.200 --> 0:42:48.839
<v Speaker 1>Maybe to a fault, did you drop him for any

0:42:48.880 --> 0:42:51.480
<v Speaker 1>of those players? It ten seeming Leaue, I wouldn't have

0:42:51.480 --> 0:42:56.279
<v Speaker 1>a problem in a twelve teamer. I still buying into

0:42:57.080 --> 0:42:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Rodgers and the Packers offense. I agree with you.

0:42:59.360 --> 0:43:02.680
<v Speaker 1>I agree, would you drop I just had one good

0:43:02.760 --> 0:43:05.279
<v Speaker 1>question though, thank you, um oh my god, I just

0:43:05.360 --> 0:43:09.160
<v Speaker 1>had a really good one. Mary's good. Marky's good. I

0:43:09.200 --> 0:43:10.800
<v Speaker 1>wrote him in on the rundown. You know we're in

0:43:10.880 --> 0:43:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Saint Patuco. That's so funny. I would drop Marky's good

0:43:13.560 --> 0:43:16.680
<v Speaker 1>one for all three of them. I agree, I think here.

0:43:17.800 --> 0:43:19.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what more do you need to see? What

0:43:19.040 --> 0:43:23.840
<v Speaker 1>about Jamie Crowder, Well, you held onto him throughout the

0:43:23.880 --> 0:43:28.160
<v Speaker 1>bye week. He's probably again, he's probably like the number

0:43:28.200 --> 0:43:30.520
<v Speaker 1>three target on his team too. I would say Jordan

0:43:30.560 --> 0:43:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Reed and Chris Thompson probably are consistently going to stay.

0:43:33.440 --> 0:43:34.640
<v Speaker 1>I think I'd rather have some of these guys and

0:43:34.719 --> 0:43:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Jamie Crowder. I agree with you, just because Paul Richardson

0:43:38.160 --> 0:43:40.560
<v Speaker 1>is kind of in the mix. Josh Jockson, Actually, I

0:43:40.680 --> 0:43:42.960
<v Speaker 1>got a decent number of targets in that Week three

0:43:43.000 --> 0:43:46.239
<v Speaker 1>game before there before the Week four by there's just

0:43:46.320 --> 0:43:49.359
<v Speaker 1>too many players in the Washington offense, and I don't

0:43:49.400 --> 0:43:51.640
<v Speaker 1>trust Alex Smith to get the ball to Jamison Crowder

0:43:51.680 --> 0:43:53.640
<v Speaker 1>all that much. Now, maybe they rectified that throughout the

0:43:53.680 --> 0:43:56.160
<v Speaker 1>bye week. Maybe they made that a point of emphasis, like, look,

0:43:56.480 --> 0:43:58.960
<v Speaker 1>we scored a touchdown with Jamison Crowder in Week three,

0:43:59.200 --> 0:44:00.720
<v Speaker 1>Like he needs to be more involved in the offense.

0:44:00.760 --> 0:44:05.239
<v Speaker 1>There's certainly a chance that that happens, I think I

0:44:05.360 --> 0:44:09.160
<v Speaker 1>would drop him for Gabriel. I would drop him for Callaway.

0:44:10.280 --> 0:44:16.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember westbrook Man, which dropping for key Love Kiki.

0:44:16.960 --> 0:44:19.160
<v Speaker 1>I would drop him for all of them, everybody. Everybody

0:44:19.160 --> 0:44:21.319
<v Speaker 1>had advanswer on it. And if Jameson Crowder goes out

0:44:21.320 --> 0:44:22.880
<v Speaker 1>and scores two touchdowns, you can kill me for it.

0:44:22.960 --> 0:44:25.080
<v Speaker 1>This week, I would drop him for all those players,

0:44:25.160 --> 0:44:28.759
<v Speaker 1>for everybody that picks up Mike's not off. I don't

0:44:28.800 --> 0:44:31.160
<v Speaker 1>hear you. It's it's not off a everyone that picks

0:44:31.200 --> 0:44:34.520
<v Speaker 1>up KICKI like that. Have to change our team name, right, Yeah,

0:44:34.560 --> 0:44:39.640
<v Speaker 1>of course, yeah, say yesterday? I agree. Are you sure

0:44:39.640 --> 0:44:43.480
<v Speaker 1>your Mike is on? I'm quite positive is his Mike on? Yeah?

0:44:43.520 --> 0:44:45.920
<v Speaker 1>I know it's it's on. Man. People in the YouTube chat,

0:44:45.960 --> 0:44:49.120
<v Speaker 1>tell me if fix your headphones, dude, I don't hear

0:44:49.160 --> 0:44:53.200
<v Speaker 1>you talking. I promise you. I'm here, okay, how to

0:44:53.280 --> 0:45:00.160
<v Speaker 1>hear you? It's going in and out, dude. Those head

0:45:00.160 --> 0:45:04.360
<v Speaker 1>flood suck it all right, We're back. We have circled

0:45:04.360 --> 0:45:07.840
<v Speaker 1>around Niahis which Buffalo bills? Are we picking it up?

0:45:07.880 --> 0:45:12.120
<v Speaker 1>This week? We've circled Naheim Hines around. He's on CBS.

0:45:12.200 --> 0:45:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Leagues right now. Um, Frank, you keeps saying it's for

0:45:15.680 --> 0:45:18.360
<v Speaker 1>real how much he's spending on the mines in a

0:45:18.440 --> 0:45:23.920
<v Speaker 1>PPR league. I will go as high as which might

0:45:24.000 --> 0:45:27.480
<v Speaker 1>sound crazy, but the Colts cannot run the football. And

0:45:27.560 --> 0:45:29.759
<v Speaker 1>we've seen this in the past with teams, you know,

0:45:29.800 --> 0:45:33.120
<v Speaker 1>guys like Theo Riddic in years past, consistently finishing as

0:45:33.480 --> 0:45:36.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, high end flex running backs in PPR league.

0:45:36.680 --> 0:45:40.239
<v Speaker 1>It's because their respective teams cannot run the football. That's

0:45:40.280 --> 0:45:42.520
<v Speaker 1>exactly what we have here. The Colts cannot run the football.

0:45:42.640 --> 0:45:44.680
<v Speaker 1>They have a lot of injuries on defense now too,

0:45:44.960 --> 0:45:47.680
<v Speaker 1>so they're gonna be in shootouts and in those games,

0:45:47.800 --> 0:45:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Nihem Hines is going to be on the field and

0:45:49.520 --> 0:45:53.200
<v Speaker 1>they're using him creatively. Frank Reich, who's come over from

0:45:53.280 --> 0:45:56.840
<v Speaker 1>the Philadelphia Eagles offense, the Philadelphia Eagles always had that

0:45:56.880 --> 0:45:59.279
<v Speaker 1>pass catcher two and they always employ a lot of

0:45:59.400 --> 0:46:03.480
<v Speaker 1>running backs in the rushing attack too. So that's exactly

0:46:03.520 --> 0:46:05.799
<v Speaker 1>what we're seeing here. Ninhem Heines is getting the opportunity.

0:46:05.920 --> 0:46:08.399
<v Speaker 1>He's making the most of it. I mentioned yesterday, he's

0:46:08.440 --> 0:46:10.719
<v Speaker 1>on pace for over a hundred targets. He's on pace

0:46:10.840 --> 0:46:13.840
<v Speaker 1>for eighty eight receptions, he's not gonna get there. Can

0:46:13.920 --> 0:46:17.279
<v Speaker 1>you catch seventy plus balls this year? Yeah? And if

0:46:17.320 --> 0:46:19.960
<v Speaker 1>that happens, And we were drafting today and I told

0:46:20.000 --> 0:46:22.960
<v Speaker 1>you that he Heines is catching seventy balls, He's being

0:46:23.040 --> 0:46:25.040
<v Speaker 1>drafted as like an RB three, RB four or for

0:46:25.080 --> 0:46:27.920
<v Speaker 1>PPR leagues. So if you can get at like a

0:46:28.000 --> 0:46:32.040
<v Speaker 1>flex running back in PPR or even in half PPR

0:46:32.160 --> 0:46:34.200
<v Speaker 1>is probably more of like a low end flex running back,

0:46:34.280 --> 0:46:37.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe like a high end RB four and half PPR,

0:46:38.000 --> 0:46:43.560
<v Speaker 1>I would go like in full PPR A lot. It's

0:46:43.600 --> 0:46:46.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot. It's warranted, and it's hard to find running

0:46:46.040 --> 0:46:49.040
<v Speaker 1>backs right now, especially if you can find a guy

0:46:49.840 --> 0:46:58.560
<v Speaker 1>like Hines in PPR right now. PPR sot is you

0:46:58.640 --> 0:47:04.440
<v Speaker 1>have before something of that? Have you eight? You're spending

0:47:05.200 --> 0:47:10.439
<v Speaker 1>a lot? Man? Right over on my calculator A five

0:47:11.080 --> 0:47:17.560
<v Speaker 1>you're spending you're spending twenty bucks. Spend eighty five is

0:47:17.600 --> 0:47:23.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty five point five. Yeah, that's what I'm doing. I

0:47:23.920 --> 0:47:25.399
<v Speaker 1>don't know if I can go that high. I really

0:47:25.440 --> 0:47:28.680
<v Speaker 1>don't know. A guy running macks are hard to find

0:47:28.800 --> 0:47:31.440
<v Speaker 1>right now. Man, Like who's emerging? Who do you want

0:47:31.440 --> 0:47:33.480
<v Speaker 1>from this group? T J Yelden his own in sixty

0:47:33.520 --> 0:47:36.560
<v Speaker 1>eight percent of leagues, but honestly, he's probably owned everywhere

0:47:37.560 --> 0:47:39.560
<v Speaker 1>by Leonard four Nett owners. If he's available. If you

0:47:39.640 --> 0:47:40.960
<v Speaker 1>play in a ten team league and you need a

0:47:41.040 --> 0:47:43.160
<v Speaker 1>running back plug and play this week, t J. Gellvin

0:47:43.280 --> 0:47:46.360
<v Speaker 1>is unquestionably your guy. Like regardless off you need a

0:47:46.400 --> 0:47:48.239
<v Speaker 1>plug and play, t J. Yelden is your guy because

0:47:48.360 --> 0:47:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Leonard four Net this is going to be a thing

0:47:50.160 --> 0:47:51.800
<v Speaker 1>all year long. And if you were listening to me

0:47:51.840 --> 0:47:54.320
<v Speaker 1>in the preseason, I told you do not draft Leonard Fournett.

0:47:54.400 --> 0:47:58.120
<v Speaker 1>I was out. Hem Hines is the next guy, Ronald Jones.

0:47:59.000 --> 0:48:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Do you really want to invest in the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. Nope,

0:48:02.200 --> 0:48:06.640
<v Speaker 1>running game in deeper leagues, fourteen teamers. He's only owning league,

0:48:06.680 --> 0:48:09.799
<v Speaker 1>so fourteen teamers, maybe some deeper twelve team leagues. If

0:48:09.840 --> 0:48:11.359
<v Speaker 1>you just want to take a shot on, like your

0:48:11.440 --> 0:48:15.000
<v Speaker 1>RB six, your RB five, whatever, it might be Ronald Jones.

0:48:15.400 --> 0:48:18.239
<v Speaker 1>There were reports that coming out of the by it's

0:48:18.280 --> 0:48:20.560
<v Speaker 1>going to be Jameis Winston as the quarterback. Ronald Jones

0:48:20.600 --> 0:48:22.120
<v Speaker 1>is a running back and that's kind of like the

0:48:22.200 --> 0:48:24.839
<v Speaker 1>starting tandem. But they can't run the football either. Mike

0:48:25.000 --> 0:48:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Davis one percent owned. Do you want one third of

0:48:29.280 --> 0:48:33.239
<v Speaker 1>a Seattle Seahawks mess of a backfield behind an offensive line?

0:48:33.280 --> 0:48:35.880
<v Speaker 1>That's not great. Yeah, he just scored two touchdowns, but

0:48:35.880 --> 0:48:39.080
<v Speaker 1>he did it against the Arizona Cardinals, who allowed six

0:48:39.200 --> 0:48:41.279
<v Speaker 1>total touchdowns of running backs heading into last week. Now

0:48:41.280 --> 0:48:43.879
<v Speaker 1>they've allowed eight total touchdowns to running backs through four games.

0:48:44.000 --> 0:48:46.000
<v Speaker 1>It was a great matchup, don't get me wrong. And

0:48:46.080 --> 0:48:47.960
<v Speaker 1>if I own Chris Carson, then yeah, I probably go

0:48:48.000 --> 0:48:49.880
<v Speaker 1>out and want to pick up Mike Davis. But just

0:48:50.000 --> 0:48:52.920
<v Speaker 1>in a vacuum. If I need a free agent running back,

0:48:53.400 --> 0:48:55.160
<v Speaker 1>am I rushing out to get Mike Davis? No, I'm not.

0:48:56.040 --> 0:48:58.640
<v Speaker 1>If nightheam Hines available and he's only owning thirty three

0:48:58.680 --> 0:49:00.600
<v Speaker 1>percent of leagues, that's the guy where if I need

0:49:00.640 --> 0:49:03.279
<v Speaker 1>a running back, I'm rushing out and getting him. I

0:49:03.360 --> 0:49:05.040
<v Speaker 1>get it. I think it makes fair. Will you drop

0:49:05.160 --> 0:49:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Kanyan Drake for him in a ten team league? Yes? Confidently,

0:49:09.560 --> 0:49:12.080
<v Speaker 1>says yes, not a second thought. In a twelve team

0:49:12.160 --> 0:49:15.279
<v Speaker 1>PPR league, I will drop Kenyan Drake for nineteen mins.

0:49:16.040 --> 0:49:18.759
<v Speaker 1>Twelve team PPR, would you be a frank wore? I

0:49:18.760 --> 0:49:21.480
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't want to because I feel like you're dropping Kenyan

0:49:21.520 --> 0:49:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Drake at your at his lowest point of the season

0:49:23.760 --> 0:49:26.200
<v Speaker 1>in terms of value, I would try my best to

0:49:26.239 --> 0:49:27.960
<v Speaker 1>find anybody else on my team that I could drop

0:49:28.040 --> 0:49:30.440
<v Speaker 1>for nine mines. If there's nobody else, if you're stacked

0:49:30.480 --> 0:49:33.480
<v Speaker 1>at wide receiver, all your other running backs, your backup

0:49:33.520 --> 0:49:35.680
<v Speaker 1>running backs are great. Kenyan Drake is the one who's

0:49:35.760 --> 0:49:38.759
<v Speaker 1>killing I'm dropping him in PPR for nine eight four

0:49:38.880 --> 0:49:40.920
<v Speaker 1>four eight four three six seven nine. That's gonna do

0:49:40.960 --> 0:49:42.759
<v Speaker 1>it for us? On YouTube today, cut up next to

0:49:42.800 --> 0:49:47.200
<v Speaker 1>fantasy football Frenzy, Corey Parson, Corey Parson, Fantasy Executive, Uh,

0:49:47.320 --> 0:49:49.600
<v Speaker 1>The Closer, Chris Venture and of course the Fantasy tas

0:49:49.719 --> 0:49:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Jim Day. If you're listening on the podcast or live

0:49:51.520 --> 0:49:53.080
<v Speaker 1>on the radio going in another five minutes or so,

0:49:53.360 --> 0:49:56.520
<v Speaker 1>make sure you subscribe to our channel, subscribe to the podcast,

0:49:56.800 --> 0:49:59.680
<v Speaker 1>make sure you give us five stars. Please leave comment

0:50:00.200 --> 0:50:02.799
<v Speaker 1>and uh give us some reaction. We we obviously very

0:50:02.880 --> 0:50:05.000
<v Speaker 1>very much appreciated. Let me take a call here, Frank

0:50:05.320 --> 0:50:07.680
<v Speaker 1>and help the brothers out. Go to Mike Little Rock.

0:50:07.719 --> 0:50:11.359
<v Speaker 1>What's up, Mike? Hey, how's it going guys? It's going great, dude,

0:50:11.360 --> 0:50:15.320
<v Speaker 1>what's going on? Uh? Well, I need some help for

0:50:15.400 --> 0:50:17.440
<v Speaker 1>running back. I don't listening to what you were saying,

0:50:17.520 --> 0:50:21.239
<v Speaker 1>but I don't know really what to do. Um, I'm

0:50:21.280 --> 0:50:25.080
<v Speaker 1>in a twelve team PPR. I am sitting at two

0:50:25.120 --> 0:50:30.520
<v Speaker 1>and two now. I have Georgan's uh, Josh Gordon, I mean,

0:50:30.520 --> 0:50:37.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, Jordan Howard, Melvin Gordon, Corey Clemmens and Williams

0:50:37.280 --> 0:50:40.560
<v Speaker 1>from Green Bay, and of course Howard is off this week,

0:50:41.280 --> 0:50:43.440
<v Speaker 1>and I really don't know what to do at running back.

0:50:44.880 --> 0:50:47.879
<v Speaker 1>So is there anyone that we've mentioned throughout the show

0:50:47.920 --> 0:50:53.120
<v Speaker 1>today that's available on your waiver wire? Unfortunately, the the

0:50:53.239 --> 0:50:56.600
<v Speaker 1>only thing that's really out there is Mike Davis, Nick

0:50:56.719 --> 0:50:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Chubb or Frank Gore. Those are really the three that

0:50:59.280 --> 0:51:07.480
<v Speaker 1>you kind of touched on. Yeah, mm hmm. Jordan Howard receiver,

0:51:07.600 --> 0:51:10.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm stacked, and I'm kind of at a point looking

0:51:10.800 --> 0:51:14.239
<v Speaker 1>at maybe trading to get and I'm great, okay, So

0:51:14.280 --> 0:51:19.000
<v Speaker 1>which we're which wide receivers you have? Ah, the Marrius Thomas,

0:51:19.760 --> 0:51:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Stepan Diggs, h Cooper cup Melbourne, I mean, Marvin Jones,

0:51:26.520 --> 0:51:30.440
<v Speaker 1>kend Of coll and Antonio Galloway. So I've got receivers,

0:51:32.200 --> 0:51:39.160
<v Speaker 1>he said, Golladay. M huh, Callaway, I'm sorry, callaway, callaway,

0:51:39.200 --> 0:51:41.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, I'm sorry. All right, So you have so

0:51:42.040 --> 0:51:43.640
<v Speaker 1>you want to keep digs in cup that's your wide

0:51:43.640 --> 0:51:45.520
<v Speaker 1>receiver one and wide receiver two, and then you kind

0:51:45.560 --> 0:51:49.000
<v Speaker 1>of have al right, you have to Marrius Thomas and

0:51:49.040 --> 0:51:53.279
<v Speaker 1>Marvin Jones. Yeah, I would probably stop one of those

0:51:53.360 --> 0:51:55.360
<v Speaker 1>guys just to see if you can get like a

0:51:55.520 --> 0:51:57.719
<v Speaker 1>flex running back in return. That's something that I would

0:51:57.760 --> 0:52:00.680
<v Speaker 1>try to do. If not, well, Lliams is going up

0:52:00.680 --> 0:52:02.640
<v Speaker 1>against the Bills this week. Like, if I had to

0:52:02.760 --> 0:52:04.799
<v Speaker 1>choose one running back to start out of the guys

0:52:04.840 --> 0:52:08.400
<v Speaker 1>that you mentioned, it would be Jamal Williams. But I

0:52:08.440 --> 0:52:14.600
<v Speaker 1>would put a bid in on Frank Gore or Mike Davis.

0:52:14.960 --> 0:52:17.359
<v Speaker 1>You know too. That was more of a long term play,

0:52:17.440 --> 0:52:19.000
<v Speaker 1>like he needs someone to plug in this week. So

0:52:19.239 --> 0:52:21.440
<v Speaker 1>if you need somebody this week, obviously, Chris car Chris

0:52:21.520 --> 0:52:23.839
<v Speaker 1>Carson is out. The answers Mike Davis like that, that's

0:52:23.920 --> 0:52:26.680
<v Speaker 1>quite obviously. The already kind of hinted at Chris Carson returning,

0:52:26.800 --> 0:52:29.840
<v Speaker 1>but they told us he was playing last week. So

0:52:29.960 --> 0:52:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Mike Davis over Frank Gore for you, I think it

0:52:31.680 --> 0:52:33.880
<v Speaker 1>makes sense if you just want a bid on one

0:52:33.920 --> 0:52:35.920
<v Speaker 1>of them. I know, I just poo pooed Mike Davis,

0:52:36.000 --> 0:52:38.520
<v Speaker 1>But you know, when you're in this predicament and you

0:52:38.560 --> 0:52:40.560
<v Speaker 1>know some of those other running backs that you mentioned

0:52:41.200 --> 0:52:43.880
<v Speaker 1>are the best guys available, then yeah, it's probably Mike Davis,

0:52:44.040 --> 0:52:47.560
<v Speaker 1>but Jamal William going up against the Bills, Um, that

0:52:47.719 --> 0:52:50.279
<v Speaker 1>might be the guy that you play. If not, try

0:52:50.320 --> 0:52:52.239
<v Speaker 1>and shop one of the Marris Thomas or Marvin Jones

0:52:52.320 --> 0:52:54.359
<v Speaker 1>just to see if you can get, you know, an

0:52:54.520 --> 0:52:57.960
<v Speaker 1>RB three in return, a flex running back, especially in PPR.

0:52:58.920 --> 0:53:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Would you trade Marvin Jones get n Y Hinds right now,

0:53:01.480 --> 0:53:05.399
<v Speaker 1>PPR League, It's a really really good question. If you're

0:53:05.400 --> 0:53:07.480
<v Speaker 1>if you're running backs from Melvin Gordon and Jordan Howard

0:53:07.560 --> 0:53:10.360
<v Speaker 1>and you have no running back depth, I'd probably do it.

0:53:11.719 --> 0:53:15.920
<v Speaker 1>That's a really really good question. Um. But though that's

0:53:15.920 --> 0:53:17.920
<v Speaker 1>what you're looking like, you're trying to give up. I

0:53:18.000 --> 0:53:20.000
<v Speaker 1>get it Marvin Jones or to Marries Thomas here because

0:53:20.040 --> 0:53:21.440
<v Speaker 1>you have a little bit of wide receiver depth and

0:53:21.480 --> 0:53:24.960
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to get one of those PPR backs that

0:53:25.040 --> 0:53:27.520
<v Speaker 1>can help you throughout your bye weeks right now, because

0:53:28.360 --> 0:53:31.000
<v Speaker 1>I know Jordan Howard sucked and he hurt, he burned

0:53:31.000 --> 0:53:34.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people this week. I personally believe better

0:53:34.680 --> 0:53:37.600
<v Speaker 1>days are coming for Jordan Howard. He's gonna be your

0:53:37.640 --> 0:53:39.439
<v Speaker 1>RB two. But you're gonna need guys for bye weeks

0:53:39.480 --> 0:53:41.600
<v Speaker 1>and if injuries take place. So shop one of those

0:53:41.600 --> 0:53:43.040
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers and see if you could get one of

0:53:43.080 --> 0:53:46.360
<v Speaker 1>those PPR specialist kind of running backs in return, just

0:53:46.480 --> 0:53:50.200
<v Speaker 1>to plug in being help. There you go. A frenzy

0:53:50.400 --> 0:53:52.719
<v Speaker 1>is up next running back. Not easy to find, man,

0:53:52.880 --> 0:53:55.280
<v Speaker 1>just simply not easy to find. We appreciate you washing

0:53:55.440 --> 0:53:58.879
<v Speaker 1>and listening. Frankie Stample. My name is Greg Sussman. Yeah,

0:53:58.920 --> 0:54:01.400
<v Speaker 1>that's We'll try to do it all again tomorrow. Wh