WEBVTT - Enigma Machine

0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly, a production of I Heart Radio.

0:00:05.960 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly from I Heart Radio,

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.080
<v Speaker 1>pure weekly source for the nation's best fantasy speculation and

0:00:14.200 --> 0:00:20.400
<v Speaker 1>advice now along with the leagues dot Com. Here's your host,

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Paul Charge. Hello and welcome to a second COVID edition

0:00:25.640 --> 0:00:28.600
<v Speaker 1>of Fantasy Football Weekly. I am Paul George, and I

0:00:28.640 --> 0:00:33.240
<v Speaker 1>am at home. My cohorts Matt Harrison and Brian Johnson

0:00:33.280 --> 0:00:35.360
<v Speaker 1>are in the studio, so they will sound great and

0:00:35.479 --> 0:00:38.920
<v Speaker 1>I will sound like garbage. Hi, guys, well we know

0:00:39.000 --> 0:00:41.640
<v Speaker 1>you look great though, Charge, no matter what. Why thank you?

0:00:41.840 --> 0:00:45.199
<v Speaker 1>Even with even with the coronavirus. My you know, my

0:00:45.280 --> 0:00:49.360
<v Speaker 1>takes last week also garbage Yours were fantastic. Really it

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:53.040
<v Speaker 1>matched the audio quality which was perfect. Um, We're gonna

0:00:53.040 --> 0:00:55.760
<v Speaker 1>try to do better. UM. I appreciate everybody sticking with

0:00:55.840 --> 0:00:58.560
<v Speaker 1>us despite the audio issue. Do intend to be back

0:00:58.600 --> 0:01:01.279
<v Speaker 1>in the studio next week? I'm our testing negative and

0:01:01.320 --> 0:01:04.160
<v Speaker 1>have been for a while, so UM that's the good news.

0:01:04.200 --> 0:01:06.320
<v Speaker 1>I think we'll be back in the studio full strength

0:01:06.720 --> 0:01:09.080
<v Speaker 1>next week, which is great. Lots to get too over

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:11.160
<v Speaker 1>the course of the show. As usual, we've got to

0:01:11.200 --> 0:01:13.319
<v Speaker 1>take a chance on me with our nine players not

0:01:13.400 --> 0:01:16.080
<v Speaker 1>normally in your starting lineup. We've got three tough questions,

0:01:16.080 --> 0:01:19.199
<v Speaker 1>the premature speculation, and we'll break down all the game's

0:01:19.520 --> 0:01:23.120
<v Speaker 1>fantasy style with our letter grades. As usual, we begin

0:01:23.240 --> 0:01:26.679
<v Speaker 1>with Brian Johnson. Lions take on the Steelers and Jamal

0:01:26.720 --> 0:01:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Williams ruled out of this game already, So hopefully de'

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Angelo Swift can make de' angelo no is that's the

0:01:36.200 --> 0:01:40.600
<v Speaker 1>coronavirus talking right there. Hopefully we will get a lot more.

0:01:41.040 --> 0:01:43.120
<v Speaker 1>We'll get a lot better game out of Swift than

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:45.920
<v Speaker 1>we got last week. We all missed de Angelo Williams

0:01:46.000 --> 0:01:48.640
<v Speaker 1>though in his PAK care he was great. But yeah,

0:01:48.680 --> 0:01:50.600
<v Speaker 1>let's start with the Andre Swift. Yeah, as you mentioned

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Dre Swift, Jamal Williams ruled out, But you know what,

0:01:54.000 --> 0:01:57.480
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't really change my prospects on Swift so much.

0:01:57.480 --> 0:01:59.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm still gonna give him a seat. It's a very

0:01:59.080 --> 0:02:02.360
<v Speaker 1>tough matchup. Has been seeing snap counts north of seventy

0:02:03.160 --> 0:02:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Swift that is, with Williams out, who will will remain out,

0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:08.800
<v Speaker 1>But again, a very tough matchup. The Steelers are the

0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:12.440
<v Speaker 1>league's third best run defense per Pro Football Focus. They've

0:02:12.480 --> 0:02:15.680
<v Speaker 1>only allowed two total touchdowns to running back, So I'm

0:02:15.680 --> 0:02:17.560
<v Speaker 1>not too high on Swift this week. You certainly have

0:02:17.600 --> 0:02:20.640
<v Speaker 1>to start them temporary expectations. I will mention, though, that

0:02:20.680 --> 0:02:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Detroit's starting left tackle, Taylor Decker, is likely to make

0:02:24.520 --> 0:02:27.280
<v Speaker 1>his season debut. Their their number one left tackle, so

0:02:27.320 --> 0:02:29.639
<v Speaker 1>that does bode well for Swift. If fully I was

0:02:29.639 --> 0:02:31.519
<v Speaker 1>allowed to give a plus or minus, I might throw

0:02:31.560 --> 0:02:34.040
<v Speaker 1>a plus on there, but I know I'm not so see,

0:02:34.520 --> 0:02:37.840
<v Speaker 1>especially when I got covid alright, alright, I won't. As

0:02:37.880 --> 0:02:41.040
<v Speaker 1>for the wide receivers or or lack thereof. Really, the

0:02:41.080 --> 0:02:45.239
<v Speaker 1>matchup is decent. Uh. Pittsburgh is allowing seventy yards and

0:02:45.360 --> 0:02:48.120
<v Speaker 1>one point to five touchdowns per game to the position.

0:02:48.520 --> 0:02:50.560
<v Speaker 1>But how do you make sense of this when you

0:02:50.560 --> 0:02:52.560
<v Speaker 1>look at Detroit's last game, which is in Week eate

0:02:52.600 --> 0:02:55.200
<v Speaker 1>by the way, they're coming off there by, Let's see

0:02:55.280 --> 0:02:59.680
<v Speaker 1>nine targets to the wide receivers for three catches and

0:02:59.720 --> 0:03:05.639
<v Speaker 1>four six scoreless yards, and they all went to I'm sorry,

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm not as fast on the button bar as chart.

0:03:07.960 --> 0:03:09.280
<v Speaker 1>I had to find that one and we didn't use

0:03:09.320 --> 0:03:11.040
<v Speaker 1>it last week, so it's probably pretty dusty. We had

0:03:11.080 --> 0:03:13.320
<v Speaker 1>to dust that one off. I'm putting them all on

0:03:13.320 --> 0:03:15.040
<v Speaker 1>the bench. If I had to pick one, I might

0:03:15.040 --> 0:03:18.160
<v Speaker 1>go with Scott Fish's boy Amanra st Brown, who was

0:03:18.160 --> 0:03:21.560
<v Speaker 1>the only wide receiver who caught any passes in Week eight.

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:23.280
<v Speaker 1>But really they're all on the bench for me. There

0:03:23.280 --> 0:03:25.320
<v Speaker 1>are better options out there. Will certainly get to some

0:03:25.400 --> 0:03:27.040
<v Speaker 1>and take a chance on me in a little bit.

0:03:27.480 --> 0:03:30.480
<v Speaker 1>As for t J Hockenson, I'm not gonna bench him mo,

0:03:30.919 --> 0:03:34.000
<v Speaker 1>but just to see for t J. Pittsburgh has only

0:03:34.040 --> 0:03:37.600
<v Speaker 1>allowed three top ten finishes to tight ends all season,

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:40.360
<v Speaker 1>but last week the Bears tight ends UH combined for

0:03:40.440 --> 0:03:43.080
<v Speaker 1>seven catches and a hundred plus yards against the Steelers.

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:45.760
<v Speaker 1>So you're certainly starting t J this week, and you

0:03:45.800 --> 0:03:49.520
<v Speaker 1>are certain you are certainly not starting Jared Goffele he

0:03:49.680 --> 0:03:52.520
<v Speaker 1>is on the bench. That's an easy call there. Over

0:03:52.520 --> 0:03:57.400
<v Speaker 1>to the Pittsburgh side and naj A Harris, Oh, you

0:03:57.440 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 1>want fantasy Fonzie. You know the matchup is good when

0:04:03.840 --> 0:04:06.560
<v Speaker 1>you can bake the Fonzie into the name. In nag

0:04:06.760 --> 0:04:10.800
<v Speaker 1>A Harris is averaging twenty five opportunities per game, that's

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:14.839
<v Speaker 1>carries plus targets. UH. The Lions are allowing on five

0:04:14.880 --> 0:04:19.120
<v Speaker 1>combo yards and two total touchdowns per game to running back.

0:04:19.160 --> 0:04:22.400
<v Speaker 1>So the easy fantasy Fonzie for Harris. I'm also gonna

0:04:22.400 --> 0:04:25.640
<v Speaker 1>give Deyonte Johnson Deonte Johnson and a H. He has

0:04:25.680 --> 0:04:28.640
<v Speaker 1>seen double digit targets in five of his last seven games,

0:04:28.880 --> 0:04:30.680
<v Speaker 1>and the Lions are allowing more than a hundred and

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:33.599
<v Speaker 1>seventy yards and nearly a touchdown per game to wide receivers.

0:04:33.960 --> 0:04:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Negative game script is kind of a concern, but Johnson

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:38.520
<v Speaker 1>is a very strong start. Going to give him an A.

0:04:38.920 --> 0:04:42.560
<v Speaker 1>But Chase Claypool gets a C. That's a lot of

0:04:42.600 --> 0:04:44.840
<v Speaker 1>seas in this line I wrote. It kind of reminds

0:04:44.880 --> 0:04:48.520
<v Speaker 1>me of my high school report cards. But see for Claypool,

0:04:49.160 --> 0:04:51.400
<v Speaker 1>who has been very quiet over the last three games

0:04:51.400 --> 0:04:58.240
<v Speaker 1>totally just nine catches for nine two scoreless yards of

0:04:58.400 --> 0:05:00.960
<v Speaker 1>those three games. I'm sorry, you gotta be ready on

0:05:01.000 --> 0:05:02.920
<v Speaker 1>that in the big chair, Matt, come on, man, h

0:05:03.120 --> 0:05:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Claypool has gotten four carries during that three game span, though,

0:05:06.080 --> 0:05:08.840
<v Speaker 1>averaging seven plus yards per carry. So so watch out,

0:05:09.080 --> 0:05:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Naji Harris. I'm just kidding with that. Of course, a

0:05:12.200 --> 0:05:15.760
<v Speaker 1>couple more guys to mention, Pat fryar Muth tight end move.

0:05:16.800 --> 0:05:19.599
<v Speaker 1>He has not been quiet. Uh sits third among tight

0:05:19.680 --> 0:05:22.520
<v Speaker 1>ends in points per game over the last three weeks.

0:05:23.160 --> 0:05:27.120
<v Speaker 1>It is quickly becoming Ben Roethlisberger's favorite end zone target,

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:30.520
<v Speaker 1>scoring three touchdowns over his last two games. Detroit isn't

0:05:30.520 --> 0:05:32.640
<v Speaker 1>giving up a ton of fantasy points to tight ends.

0:05:33.279 --> 0:05:35.360
<v Speaker 1>But Muth is tough to sit unless you have an

0:05:35.360 --> 0:05:39.000
<v Speaker 1>elite option like a Travis Kelsey or Darren Waller or

0:05:39.040 --> 0:05:41.120
<v Speaker 1>a Dan Arnold in front of him. But uh, a

0:05:41.200 --> 0:05:43.800
<v Speaker 1>B grade for Pat Fryar Muth for me, and also

0:05:43.880 --> 0:05:46.800
<v Speaker 1>a B for Ben Roethlisberger. The Lions are allowing two

0:05:47.200 --> 0:05:50.320
<v Speaker 1>sixty passing yards and two passing touchdowns per game. And

0:05:50.360 --> 0:05:52.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to make one of the boldest calls in

0:05:52.720 --> 0:05:55.600
<v Speaker 1>the history of the show and say Ben Roethlisberger throws

0:05:55.600 --> 0:05:59.840
<v Speaker 1>for multiple touchdowns today possibly so bold, so bold, and

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:04.479
<v Speaker 1>against the Lions. And that's it for this game. Brown's

0:06:04.520 --> 0:06:07.200
<v Speaker 1>teak on the Patriots. Mad for the Browns. We we

0:06:07.279 --> 0:06:09.320
<v Speaker 1>have a little bit of clarity at the running back situation.

0:06:09.360 --> 0:06:11.279
<v Speaker 1>We know it's going We're gonna see a lot of

0:06:11.400 --> 0:06:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Dearnest Johnson because it's it's about the last man standing

0:06:14.800 --> 0:06:18.640
<v Speaker 1>for Cleveland. Yeah, so Nick Chubb, Dimitric Felton and John Kelly,

0:06:18.640 --> 0:06:21.040
<v Speaker 1>who's like their fourth or fifth string back, they all

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:24.359
<v Speaker 1>have COVID. They're on the reserve list. Both Chubb and

0:06:24.400 --> 0:06:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Felton are confirmed vaccinated, but it doesn't look like they're

0:06:27.240 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna get the negative tests in time to get back

0:06:29.160 --> 0:06:32.479
<v Speaker 1>to the game. Uh. Kareem Hunt was speculated to maybe

0:06:32.480 --> 0:06:34.359
<v Speaker 1>return this week, but that's not gonna happen. So that

0:06:34.440 --> 0:06:37.000
<v Speaker 1>leaves d Ernest Johnson is the only healthy running back

0:06:37.000 --> 0:06:40.640
<v Speaker 1>on roster until they signed Brian Hill to the practice

0:06:40.680 --> 0:06:45.520
<v Speaker 1>squad earlier this week. You remember Brian Hill? Uh forget Yeah,

0:06:45.600 --> 0:06:48.240
<v Speaker 1>So the starting running back in this game, which will

0:06:48.279 --> 0:06:50.440
<v Speaker 1>be Deernest Johnson, it looks like gets an A grade.

0:06:50.440 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 1>If Chubb somehow is healthy, he's not going to alright. Well,

0:06:56.080 --> 0:06:58.360
<v Speaker 1>so the starter for the Browns has never had less

0:06:58.360 --> 0:07:02.880
<v Speaker 1>than sixty nine totally yards this season. In fact, the

0:07:02.920 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Browns have had thirteen running backs see twelve or more

0:07:06.560 --> 0:07:09.200
<v Speaker 1>touches in a game this year through only nine games,

0:07:09.200 --> 0:07:11.520
<v Speaker 1>and the average day for that running back is one

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:15.600
<v Speaker 1>hundred nine total yards and almost to score. The Patriots

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:17.840
<v Speaker 1>allow a hundred and sixty combo yards per game to

0:07:17.880 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 1>the running back position, So fire up Deerness Johnson with

0:07:20.800 --> 0:07:24.600
<v Speaker 1>an A grade. Baker Mayfield, he's on the bench. Some

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:27.559
<v Speaker 1>saw the monster bomb to d p J last week

0:07:27.880 --> 0:07:29.720
<v Speaker 1>and the fact that the Browns hung forty one on

0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:32.200
<v Speaker 1>the Bengals and thought Bakers back, but he ended that

0:07:32.240 --> 0:07:36.280
<v Speaker 1>game with only two eighteen and two scores. He's officially

0:07:36.320 --> 0:07:39.120
<v Speaker 1>a game manager now. He's only top two hundred fifty

0:07:39.160 --> 0:07:43.760
<v Speaker 1>yards twice this season, and despite allowing the eighth most completions,

0:07:43.840 --> 0:07:46.000
<v Speaker 1>the Pats don't give up much through the air. It

0:07:46.080 --> 0:07:48.640
<v Speaker 1>only two hundred forty six yards and just over a

0:07:48.640 --> 0:07:53.160
<v Speaker 1>touchdown per game. If to forty six and one excites you, can,

0:07:53.200 --> 0:07:55.880
<v Speaker 1>I interest you in Baker Mayfield because that's exactly what

0:07:55.960 --> 0:07:59.320
<v Speaker 1>he averages. So he's on your bench. I will give

0:07:59.360 --> 0:08:02.320
<v Speaker 1>a S great to Jarvis Landry. I'm gonna keep DPJ

0:08:02.520 --> 0:08:05.680
<v Speaker 1>on the bench though he's completely reliant on the big

0:08:05.720 --> 0:08:07.680
<v Speaker 1>play and the Pats keep everything in front of them.

0:08:08.000 --> 0:08:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Plus he hasn't been practicing this week with a non

0:08:10.480 --> 0:08:15.040
<v Speaker 1>injury related rest designation. Evidently Donovan People's Jones is tired.

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Uh Landry should see high volume but low yardage, since

0:08:18.320 --> 0:08:21.560
<v Speaker 1>sees only averaging ten point two yards per catch this year,

0:08:21.600 --> 0:08:23.520
<v Speaker 1>which is his lowest by a fair margin as a

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:26.880
<v Speaker 1>member of the Browns, so this type of game makes

0:08:26.920 --> 0:08:29.960
<v Speaker 1>sense for him. He was also a did not participate

0:08:30.080 --> 0:08:32.920
<v Speaker 1>at practice on Wednesday and limited on Thursday with the

0:08:33.000 --> 0:08:36.280
<v Speaker 1>knee injury, so it's only a c for Jarvis Landry.

0:08:36.400 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 1>All the tight ends on there on the bench for

0:08:38.160 --> 0:08:42.520
<v Speaker 1>the Browns. On the Patriot side, that running back situation

0:08:42.600 --> 0:08:46.120
<v Speaker 1>is almost as thorny as the Browns one. Both Damien

0:08:46.200 --> 0:08:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Harris and Ramandre Stevenson have not practiced at all this week.

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Both are in the concussion protocol and it's not looking

0:08:52.640 --> 0:08:55.120
<v Speaker 1>good for either of them to play this week. That

0:08:55.120 --> 0:08:58.560
<v Speaker 1>would leave J. J. Taylor and Brandon Bolden as your runners.

0:08:58.679 --> 0:09:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Last week, Bolden was ramped up after Harris and Stevenson

0:09:02.080 --> 0:09:04.679
<v Speaker 1>went down, but J. J. Taylor was not active for

0:09:04.720 --> 0:09:08.120
<v Speaker 1>that game. Taylor was active three weeks ago against the

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:11.199
<v Speaker 1>Jets on nine carries in a game and UH scored

0:09:11.240 --> 0:09:13.200
<v Speaker 1>twice in that one. Bolden was also a part of

0:09:13.200 --> 0:09:15.800
<v Speaker 1>that game. He had two carries for zero yards and

0:09:15.840 --> 0:09:18.200
<v Speaker 1>had six catches for seventy nine. So I would put

0:09:18.200 --> 0:09:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Bolden as the pass catcher. Taylor would be a runner.

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I'll give both of them C grades just on the

0:09:23.040 --> 0:09:26.040
<v Speaker 1>prospects of the red zone work, because the Browns have

0:09:26.080 --> 0:09:31.679
<v Speaker 1>allowed the third most receiving scores to opposing backs this season. Guy,

0:09:31.720 --> 0:09:34.640
<v Speaker 1>I've been talking for a long time. Jeez, there's already

0:09:34.679 --> 0:09:39.240
<v Speaker 1>a long matchup. Matchup Hunter Henry, I'm gonna give a

0:09:39.280 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 1>B grade to The Browns have allowed touchdowns twice in

0:09:42.200 --> 0:09:44.320
<v Speaker 1>the last five games, and they were two big end

0:09:44.400 --> 0:09:49.240
<v Speaker 1>zone target style guys, Donald Parham and Pat friar Muth.

0:09:49.960 --> 0:09:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Hunter Henry has scored in five of his last six

0:09:52.280 --> 0:09:55.559
<v Speaker 1>and has a red zone target in six straight weeks. Um,

0:09:55.600 --> 0:09:58.080
<v Speaker 1>so he's in the B grade. Jacoby Myers has now

0:09:58.160 --> 0:10:01.280
<v Speaker 1>gone thirty eight games without a touchdown. Brandon Zilstra has

0:10:01.320 --> 0:10:03.560
<v Speaker 1>appeared in about that many games and he has a touchdown.

0:10:04.200 --> 0:10:06.679
<v Speaker 1>But now that I publicly challenged Kobe Myers, he's going

0:10:06.720 --> 0:10:09.440
<v Speaker 1>to score for sure this week. But he and Kendrick

0:10:09.480 --> 0:10:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Born and Nelson Agila are all on the bench. Mac

0:10:11.360 --> 0:10:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Jones only gets a C grade. Hasn't set the world

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:15.800
<v Speaker 1>ablaze with his stats this year, but he's twisted a

0:10:15.800 --> 0:10:19.120
<v Speaker 1>few ankles. The Browns have been beatable lately, though they've

0:10:19.120 --> 0:10:22.400
<v Speaker 1>allowed the second most passing touchdowns in the league over

0:10:22.400 --> 0:10:25.000
<v Speaker 1>the last five weeks, and three of the last five

0:10:25.080 --> 0:10:27.520
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks they faced have gone over two eighties. So he's

0:10:27.559 --> 0:10:33.640
<v Speaker 1>startable with a C grade. Who that's my longest matchup

0:10:33.640 --> 0:10:36.000
<v Speaker 1>by a time. I hope that was your longest match up,

0:10:36.080 --> 0:10:40.360
<v Speaker 1>and will try to be very fast, uh, Dalvin Cooks

0:10:40.400 --> 0:10:42.840
<v Speaker 1>and obviously against the team allowing the most rushing yards

0:10:42.840 --> 0:10:44.520
<v Speaker 1>per game, and we'll just move on from there. You're

0:10:44.559 --> 0:10:48.199
<v Speaker 1>gonna start him justin Jefferson and Adam thieland clock in

0:10:48.320 --> 0:10:51.840
<v Speaker 1>with just C grades. Cornerback Asante Samuel. It turns to

0:10:51.880 --> 0:10:55.800
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers secondary um from after missing last week, but

0:10:55.840 --> 0:10:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Michael Davis is out, there's a little bit of help there.

0:10:58.160 --> 0:11:01.319
<v Speaker 1>But um, this has been a very good received a

0:11:01.480 --> 0:11:05.679
<v Speaker 1>group of of secondary members. Heck, only one receiver's top

0:11:05.720 --> 0:11:08.440
<v Speaker 1>seventy yards against the Chargers all season, Los Angeles giving

0:11:08.520 --> 0:11:11.440
<v Speaker 1>up the third FEUs yards to receivers just one thirty

0:11:11.480 --> 0:11:14.480
<v Speaker 1>two per game. Jefferson has posted at least eighty yards

0:11:14.600 --> 0:11:16.880
<v Speaker 1>or a touchdown in six of the past seven, which

0:11:17.160 --> 0:11:19.760
<v Speaker 1>gives him an edge a little bit over theland, I think,

0:11:20.200 --> 0:11:24.880
<v Speaker 1>although concerning that Jefferson only targeted on nine of seventy

0:11:24.920 --> 0:11:27.960
<v Speaker 1>three kirk cousins past attempts over the past two weeks.

0:11:28.360 --> 0:11:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Theland brings touchdowns to the table, as you already know,

0:11:30.640 --> 0:11:32.640
<v Speaker 1>but when he doesn't score, he gets you very little.

0:11:32.720 --> 0:11:34.640
<v Speaker 1>And the Chargers will only give up four touchdowns the

0:11:34.679 --> 0:11:38.480
<v Speaker 1>white Outs all year. So the probability is that Theland

0:11:38.559 --> 0:11:41.240
<v Speaker 1>doesn't score here and then you get stuck. So just

0:11:41.320 --> 0:11:44.800
<v Speaker 1>to see grade on theeling for Tyler Conklin, a by

0:11:44.960 --> 0:11:48.640
<v Speaker 1>week C grade for Conklin against a Chargers defense that's

0:11:48.679 --> 0:11:51.920
<v Speaker 1>been yielding to elite tight ends like Travis Kelsey, Darren

0:11:51.960 --> 0:11:54.199
<v Speaker 1>Waller and Mark Andrews. But that is not Tyler Conklin.

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:58.360
<v Speaker 1>Mortals are fearing much more poorly against the Chargers. But

0:11:58.400 --> 0:11:59.959
<v Speaker 1>if you were in a real pinch, you could can

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:02.240
<v Speaker 1>sitter him here and kirk Cousins is on the bench.

0:12:02.360 --> 0:12:05.200
<v Speaker 1>The only positive trend working for Kirk here is that

0:12:05.280 --> 0:12:08.319
<v Speaker 1>Joey Bosa may not play in this game. Um everything

0:12:08.400 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 1>else works against him. The receiver matchups are difficult to say,

0:12:11.120 --> 0:12:14.360
<v Speaker 1>just outlined. He's not throwing down field, either by design

0:12:14.400 --> 0:12:17.720
<v Speaker 1>or inability, Chargers having given up more than two hundred

0:12:17.800 --> 0:12:20.959
<v Speaker 1>ten passing yards in their last three contests, and Cousins

0:12:21.040 --> 0:12:24.240
<v Speaker 1>hasn't thrown for more than one hundred eighties seven yards

0:12:24.240 --> 0:12:27.559
<v Speaker 1>in back to back games, which is dismal for his standards.

0:12:28.040 --> 0:12:30.240
<v Speaker 1>On the season, the Chargers rank number three in passing

0:12:30.320 --> 0:12:32.640
<v Speaker 1>yards number two in passing touchdowns allowed. This game is

0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:34.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna be all about the groundwork, and I don't like

0:12:34.600 --> 0:12:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Cousins here, so he is on the bench. Austin Ekeler

0:12:37.800 --> 0:12:39.640
<v Speaker 1>is an obvious A. I'm only going to mention that

0:12:40.040 --> 0:12:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the Vikings are gonna be without run stuffing defensive tackle

0:12:42.520 --> 0:12:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Michael Pierce again, who apparently had a setback, and and

0:12:45.520 --> 0:12:47.960
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna open things up for Eckler to have a

0:12:48.000 --> 0:12:51.760
<v Speaker 1>good game, particularly on the ground and also potentially through

0:12:51.760 --> 0:12:54.800
<v Speaker 1>the air, because the guy who of the Vikings defensive

0:12:54.880 --> 0:12:58.640
<v Speaker 1>most commonly tracks receiving running backs is Anthony Barr and

0:12:58.679 --> 0:13:01.120
<v Speaker 1>he's out of this game too, So Eclick could be

0:13:01.120 --> 0:13:04.880
<v Speaker 1>sitting on a really pretty game here. Justin air Bear.

0:13:06.600 --> 0:13:09.320
<v Speaker 1>It's an easy A grade. By the way, I am

0:13:09.320 --> 0:13:12.600
<v Speaker 1>looking at my air Bear T shirt, my official first

0:13:12.600 --> 0:13:15.640
<v Speaker 1>effort to market air Bear T shirt and Matt it

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:18.520
<v Speaker 1>looks fantastic And if people want to see the air

0:13:18.559 --> 0:13:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Bear T shirt for themselves. Where do they go shock

0:13:21.040 --> 0:13:24.839
<v Speaker 1>fantasy dot Com slash shop. You'll find the link to

0:13:24.880 --> 0:13:27.640
<v Speaker 1>the air Bear t shirt right there. Yeah, it's very nice,

0:13:27.920 --> 0:13:31.680
<v Speaker 1>high quality cotton too. It's very comfortable. Easy A grade

0:13:31.679 --> 0:13:35.240
<v Speaker 1>against the secondary missing Patrick Peterson and potentially it's other

0:13:35.320 --> 0:13:37.800
<v Speaker 1>outside cornerback Breshot Breland, who's shaping up as a game

0:13:37.800 --> 0:13:41.000
<v Speaker 1>time decision. Without Peterson, the Vikings have allowed back to

0:13:41.080 --> 0:13:44.280
<v Speaker 1>back big games to Cooper Rush and Lamar Jackson, who

0:13:44.320 --> 0:13:47.400
<v Speaker 1>went berserk on them. The loss of edge rusher Daniel

0:13:47.440 --> 0:13:49.160
<v Speaker 1>Hunter means Herbert's gonna have a bunch of time to

0:13:49.200 --> 0:13:52.000
<v Speaker 1>scan the field and unload deep passes here. That means

0:13:52.040 --> 0:13:54.880
<v Speaker 1>I love his his primary receiver, Keenan Allen, who runs

0:13:54.960 --> 0:13:57.400
<v Speaker 1>all over the field but primarily from the slot. Rail

0:13:57.440 --> 0:14:00.800
<v Speaker 1>faced Mackenzie Alexander a good but not don dating quarterback.

0:14:01.600 --> 0:14:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Cornerback Alexander seeds a sent catch rate and a one

0:14:05.800 --> 0:14:08.640
<v Speaker 1>eight passer rating in his coverage. He allowed his first

0:14:08.679 --> 0:14:12.559
<v Speaker 1>touchdown of the season last week, and Alan just remaining

0:14:12.559 --> 0:14:15.840
<v Speaker 1>a target hog with eleven or more targets in four

0:14:15.840 --> 0:14:18.120
<v Speaker 1>of the past six games. Easy eight grade there. What

0:14:18.200 --> 0:14:20.920
<v Speaker 1>about Mike Williams, who's way Thorn here in the past

0:14:21.000 --> 0:14:24.080
<v Speaker 1>three games, he's everything just five targets and thirty five

0:14:24.120 --> 0:14:28.120
<v Speaker 1>receiving yards. But the primo matchups on the outside against

0:14:28.200 --> 0:14:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Cameron Dandler and possibly bottom of the depth chart guy

0:14:31.360 --> 0:14:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Chris Boyd is antalizing. So I've got a B grade

0:14:34.680 --> 0:14:36.640
<v Speaker 1>and what I expect to be a bounce back performance

0:14:36.640 --> 0:14:40.240
<v Speaker 1>from Mike Williams here. All of the various Los Angeles

0:14:40.280 --> 0:14:42.440
<v Speaker 1>tight ends, I think there's probably a touchdown to be

0:14:42.480 --> 0:14:44.600
<v Speaker 1>had here, But they're splitting everything up between Cook and

0:14:44.600 --> 0:14:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Anderson a Parham, and that to me feels like they

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:50.080
<v Speaker 1>are all dark throws. And so I think we put

0:14:50.120 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 1>them all on the bench, um. And if you had

0:14:54.960 --> 0:14:56.960
<v Speaker 1>if I had to pick one, I would pick I'd

0:14:57.000 --> 0:14:59.360
<v Speaker 1>pick Cook. And again the loss of bar might help

0:14:59.360 --> 0:15:01.720
<v Speaker 1>out here. Overall, I don't think you want to go

0:15:01.760 --> 0:15:04.960
<v Speaker 1>to war here with any of these tight ends. When

0:15:04.960 --> 0:15:07.520
<v Speaker 1>we come back to Fantasy Football Weekly, we will give

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:09.520
<v Speaker 1>you nine guys upon whom you can take a chance.

0:15:09.600 --> 0:15:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Many of these guys are available in the waiver wire.

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:13.680
<v Speaker 1>We'll tell you who they are when we come back

0:15:13.720 --> 0:15:40.000
<v Speaker 1>to Fantasy Football Weekly. It's take a chance on me.

0:15:40.640 --> 0:15:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Nine players not normally new started glide up many of

0:15:42.720 --> 0:15:46.160
<v Speaker 1>these guys available on the waiver wire. We begin at

0:15:46.160 --> 0:15:49.440
<v Speaker 1>the quarterback position, and Matt Harrison. I'm gonna go with

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Carson Wentz. Uh. He's probably teetering close to not take

0:15:53.520 --> 0:15:55.920
<v Speaker 1>a chance on me status after throwing I don't I

0:15:55.920 --> 0:15:58.760
<v Speaker 1>don't think so either. He's multiple scores in sixth straight

0:15:58.840 --> 0:16:00.960
<v Speaker 1>and three touchdowns in each of his last two games.

0:16:01.000 --> 0:16:04.080
<v Speaker 1>He's not putting up huge yardage totals though, but that's

0:16:04.080 --> 0:16:07.360
<v Speaker 1>okay because the Jaguars like to allow huge yardage totals

0:16:07.400 --> 0:16:10.160
<v Speaker 1>almost two eighty seven per game. So let's fire him

0:16:10.240 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 1>up and I throw a B grade on him. By

0:16:12.320 --> 0:16:16.680
<v Speaker 1>the way, all right, Brian, your take a chance on

0:16:16.760 --> 0:16:21.160
<v Speaker 1>me quarterback? I got New Orleans Trevor Simeon at the Titans. Uh.

0:16:21.360 --> 0:16:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee owns the second highest opponent passing play percentage in

0:16:25.160 --> 0:16:27.840
<v Speaker 1>the league at sixty five point seven per cent, and

0:16:27.920 --> 0:16:31.600
<v Speaker 1>that ratio is even higher in home games. Uh. The

0:16:31.640 --> 0:16:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Titans are allowing two five passing yards nearly two passing

0:16:35.120 --> 0:16:38.240
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns per game. And hey, a third string Jets quarterback

0:16:38.440 --> 0:16:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Zack Wilson can go for two, nine, seven and two

0:16:41.880 --> 0:16:45.320
<v Speaker 1>against Tennessee. I like Trevor Simeon this week, and I

0:16:45.400 --> 0:16:47.440
<v Speaker 1>might like one of his receivers a lot too. We'll

0:16:47.440 --> 0:16:50.240
<v Speaker 1>see in a minute or two. Yeah, I'm holding my breath.

0:16:50.640 --> 0:16:52.720
<v Speaker 1>I think people are thinking to think back to the

0:16:53.280 --> 0:16:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Rams game last week and be afraid of that Titan secondary.

0:16:56.000 --> 0:16:58.200
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I think it is exploitable. I like that.

0:16:58.200 --> 0:17:01.360
<v Speaker 1>That's a bold call. I'm gonna in between your two

0:17:01.400 --> 0:17:06.000
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks with Matt Ryan. Dallas ranks bottom ten in fantasy

0:17:06.000 --> 0:17:08.920
<v Speaker 1>points allowed to quarterbacks without a lot of fanfare. Ryan's

0:17:08.920 --> 0:17:11.399
<v Speaker 1>actually been really effective. He's throwing for two hundred ninety

0:17:11.400 --> 0:17:14.040
<v Speaker 1>four yards and over two touchdowns per games since the

0:17:14.119 --> 0:17:18.119
<v Speaker 1>opening week, and he's topped three hundred thirty yards and

0:17:18.200 --> 0:17:21.000
<v Speaker 1>three of the past four games. Meanwhile, Dallas has two

0:17:21.040 --> 0:17:23.800
<v Speaker 1>starting cornerbacks, Traymon Digs and Anthony Brown are along the

0:17:23.880 --> 0:17:28.080
<v Speaker 1>most and the second most yardage in their coverage. We'll

0:17:28.080 --> 0:17:30.320
<v Speaker 1>talk more about that one later on as well. Let's

0:17:30.359 --> 0:17:32.160
<v Speaker 1>go to the running back position. Matt, who's your take

0:17:32.160 --> 0:17:34.720
<v Speaker 1>a chance on me runner? I've got a J. Dillon

0:17:34.800 --> 0:17:37.240
<v Speaker 1>of the Packers. Here's the touch totals for a J.

0:17:37.400 --> 0:17:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Dillon since Week four sixteen, twelve eleven four. Then sixteen twelve.

0:17:45.200 --> 0:17:47.240
<v Speaker 1>So if you follow that pattern, he's gonna get exactly

0:17:47.280 --> 0:17:50.200
<v Speaker 1>eleven touches this week. If you actually follow the average,

0:17:50.200 --> 0:17:52.920
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna get eleven touches this week. To every running

0:17:52.920 --> 0:17:55.439
<v Speaker 1>back who's seen double digit carries against the Seahawks has

0:17:55.480 --> 0:17:59.480
<v Speaker 1>topped seventy total yards and of the nine backs, so wait,

0:17:59.520 --> 0:18:02.800
<v Speaker 1>here we go nine times, nine times of the nine

0:18:02.800 --> 0:18:06.399
<v Speaker 1>backs who've reached that mark, only to haven't topped one

0:18:06.840 --> 0:18:09.960
<v Speaker 1>yards or scored. All Right, Brian Youna, take a chance

0:18:10.000 --> 0:18:13.159
<v Speaker 1>of your runner. Buffalo is Devon Singletary at the Jets.

0:18:13.480 --> 0:18:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Zack Moss likely to return after getting knocked out last

0:18:16.359 --> 0:18:19.040
<v Speaker 1>week against the Jaguars with a concussion, so some might

0:18:19.160 --> 0:18:22.440
<v Speaker 1>stray from Singletary here, But before Moss left the game,

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Singletary was out touching and outperforming Moss. Uh And it's

0:18:26.200 --> 0:18:29.160
<v Speaker 1>quite simple here. The Jets have surrendered the most fantasy

0:18:29.160 --> 0:18:31.160
<v Speaker 1>points to opposing running back, so there should be plenty

0:18:31.200 --> 0:18:33.960
<v Speaker 1>to go around for both backs in this one. I'm

0:18:34.000 --> 0:18:36.320
<v Speaker 1>ready to throw in the towel on Moss. I'm just

0:18:36.359 --> 0:18:38.680
<v Speaker 1>don't do it, So don't do it. So disappointed, don't

0:18:38.720 --> 0:18:42.280
<v Speaker 1>do it. Kenyan Drake goes up against Kansas City. Since

0:18:42.320 --> 0:18:45.240
<v Speaker 1>the change at head coach, Kenyan Drake savaging eleven touches

0:18:45.280 --> 0:18:48.160
<v Speaker 1>for eight five total yards and one touch down per game.

0:18:48.720 --> 0:18:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Not bad um, perhaps filling some of the void left

0:18:51.680 --> 0:18:54.040
<v Speaker 1>by Henry Ruggs. He's also coming off a season high

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:56.919
<v Speaker 1>and targets, receptions and receiving yards, so they like to

0:18:56.920 --> 0:18:59.879
<v Speaker 1>throw to him. There is clearly more involved in the

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:02.960
<v Speaker 1>post brooding game. Plans has got a great opportunity against

0:19:03.040 --> 0:19:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City, especially through the air. Chiefs allowing the sixth

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:10.160
<v Speaker 1>most receiving yards and the tenth most receptions per game

0:19:10.560 --> 0:19:13.359
<v Speaker 1>to opposing running backs. All right, let's go to our

0:19:13.560 --> 0:19:18.400
<v Speaker 1>whiteouts and Matt Harrison. If you had equate one player

0:19:18.680 --> 0:19:21.280
<v Speaker 1>with me on this show, it would definitely be Dan

0:19:21.520 --> 0:19:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Arnold because I've been beating that Dan Arnold drum forever. Yeah,

0:19:27.240 --> 0:19:30.240
<v Speaker 1>that's right. Arnold continues to get targets and yards for

0:19:30.280 --> 0:19:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the Jags. The big day is coming with the touchdowns

0:19:33.520 --> 0:19:37.000
<v Speaker 1>over the last five weeks. Travis Kelsey, Mark Andrews, Mike Cassicki,

0:19:37.080 --> 0:19:40.040
<v Speaker 1>t J. Hockenson, and Kyle Pitts. Those are the only

0:19:40.080 --> 0:19:43.359
<v Speaker 1>tight ends with more targets and catches than Dan Arnold,

0:19:43.560 --> 0:19:46.840
<v Speaker 1>and all of those players are stuck in fantasy starting lineup,

0:19:46.920 --> 0:19:49.880
<v Speaker 1>So let's go with dan Arnold against the Colts this week.

0:19:49.920 --> 0:19:53.280
<v Speaker 1>They've given up double digit PPR points to five of

0:19:53.320 --> 0:19:56.680
<v Speaker 1>the last nine tight ends they faced, including touchdowns, and

0:19:56.800 --> 0:19:59.840
<v Speaker 1>each of the last two weeks to Jeff Swain and

0:20:00.200 --> 0:20:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Griffin. Dan Arnold's gonna score this week? All right?

0:20:04.080 --> 0:20:07.240
<v Speaker 1>I like it calling your shot, Brian, since you can't

0:20:07.280 --> 0:20:09.680
<v Speaker 1>have Dan Arnold, who are you taking? Talk about a layup?

0:20:09.720 --> 0:20:11.520
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't go take the easy way out with Dan

0:20:11.600 --> 0:20:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Arnold and take a chance. I'm going on. I'm going

0:20:14.920 --> 0:20:18.560
<v Speaker 1>back to the Saints and Marquez Callaway at the Titans.

0:20:18.560 --> 0:20:21.600
<v Speaker 1>The Titans are yielding twenty six plus targets per game

0:20:21.640 --> 0:20:25.000
<v Speaker 1>to wide receivers, by far the highest clip in the NFL.

0:20:25.320 --> 0:20:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee also yielding nearly five red zone targets per games

0:20:28.480 --> 0:20:31.560
<v Speaker 1>and receivers also the highest clip. And Callaway leads the

0:20:31.600 --> 0:20:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Saints with nine red red red zone targets, four of

0:20:34.760 --> 0:20:38.200
<v Speaker 1>which have been converted to touchdowns. Oh and guess what,

0:20:38.840 --> 0:20:42.600
<v Speaker 1>it's a homecoming game for the former Tennessee volunteer Marques

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:47.440
<v Speaker 1>at the Titans. Oh yeah, maybe let's do it. It

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:49.560
<v Speaker 1>would have been even better if he was a Vanderbilt guy.

0:20:49.640 --> 0:20:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Since it's in Nashville. That's a good point at the

0:20:52.080 --> 0:20:58.359
<v Speaker 1>same state. Um and and that's it did is driving distance,

0:20:58.359 --> 0:21:01.520
<v Speaker 1>So there's that true. Three weeks ago, I tried Tyler

0:21:01.600 --> 0:21:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Johnson against Chicago in a blue up in my face,

0:21:04.359 --> 0:21:07.280
<v Speaker 1>but I'm going back to Tyler Johnson again because it's

0:21:07.359 --> 0:21:10.280
<v Speaker 1>such a compelling matchup and hopefully this time it works out.

0:21:10.800 --> 0:21:14.760
<v Speaker 1>In the three games without Antonio Brown, Tyler Johnson's averaging

0:21:14.920 --> 0:21:19.159
<v Speaker 1>five targets, three catches fifty yards, not bad. Hasn't scored.

0:21:19.560 --> 0:21:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Now Tampa's without Brown for sure, and maybe Chris Godwin

0:21:23.160 --> 0:21:25.760
<v Speaker 1>as well, who's a game time decision. So I mean

0:21:26.080 --> 0:21:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Taylor Johnson can line up on the outside in replacing Brown,

0:21:29.600 --> 0:21:31.960
<v Speaker 1>you can line up in the slot replacing Godwin. And

0:21:32.000 --> 0:21:34.560
<v Speaker 1>he runs from both anyway, so he can do both.

0:21:34.880 --> 0:21:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Washington has allowed the third most yards and the second

0:21:38.280 --> 0:21:42.440
<v Speaker 1>most touchdowns to wide receivers um and whipp he does

0:21:42.480 --> 0:21:45.040
<v Speaker 1>go in the slot, he's got a juicy matchup against

0:21:45.359 --> 0:21:48.800
<v Speaker 1>safety turned slot corner Landon Collins, who has allowed the

0:21:48.880 --> 0:21:54.040
<v Speaker 1>second most yardage among all safeties. Slash I guess slot corners,

0:21:54.080 --> 0:21:56.760
<v Speaker 1>so a great opportunity for Tyler Johnson. Let's hope this

0:21:56.800 --> 0:21:58.479
<v Speaker 1>time it pays off and I don't look like an

0:21:58.480 --> 0:22:02.920
<v Speaker 1>ass like last time. Not bloody likely. Now, let's let's

0:22:02.920 --> 0:22:04.800
<v Speaker 1>hope that isn't the case, Brian. Let's go to the

0:22:04.800 --> 0:22:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Bills taking on the Jets. I just told you I'm

0:22:07.680 --> 0:22:09.879
<v Speaker 1>very nervous about Zack Moss. He's trying to get through

0:22:09.880 --> 0:22:12.240
<v Speaker 1>the concussion protocol. He looks like he's going to be

0:22:12.280 --> 0:22:14.679
<v Speaker 1>close to a game time decision on this. What are

0:22:14.680 --> 0:22:16.960
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts? And you already told us you like Singletary

0:22:17.000 --> 0:22:20.440
<v Speaker 1>in this one? Uh, tell us more about the Buffalo Bills. Yeah,

0:22:20.480 --> 0:22:22.560
<v Speaker 1>real quick, this is this is the first meeting of

0:22:22.600 --> 0:22:25.439
<v Speaker 1>the season between these divisional opponents, so we can't go

0:22:25.480 --> 0:22:28.240
<v Speaker 1>back to the first meeting quite yet. But Devin Singletary

0:22:28.359 --> 0:22:30.399
<v Speaker 1>was might take a chance on me running back. I've

0:22:30.440 --> 0:22:32.320
<v Speaker 1>heard Zack Moss is likely to play. If he does,

0:22:32.359 --> 0:22:34.600
<v Speaker 1>I give him a C two. If not, clearly will

0:22:34.640 --> 0:22:37.320
<v Speaker 1>bump up Singletary to a B level grade. But again,

0:22:37.359 --> 0:22:40.040
<v Speaker 1>the Jets surrendering the most fantasy points to opposing running back,

0:22:40.080 --> 0:22:43.159
<v Speaker 1>so if both play, it's a great matchup for both guys.

0:22:43.560 --> 0:22:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Very good matchup for Stephen Diggs as well. Going to

0:22:46.080 --> 0:22:48.840
<v Speaker 1>give him an A. The Jets lost their best player

0:22:48.840 --> 0:22:51.520
<v Speaker 1>in their secondary to a torn achilles last week. That

0:22:51.640 --> 0:22:54.960
<v Speaker 1>safety Marcus may bodes well for Digs, of course, also

0:22:55.040 --> 0:22:57.000
<v Speaker 1>bodes well at the Jets have allowed at least one

0:22:57.040 --> 0:22:59.919
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver touchdown in four of their last five games.

0:23:00.560 --> 0:23:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Over to his other starting wide receiver opposite him, Cole Beasley.

0:23:04.560 --> 0:23:07.480
<v Speaker 1>I'll give him a B and PPR and C and standard.

0:23:07.760 --> 0:23:10.679
<v Speaker 1>Over the last three games, Beasley as a whopping twenty

0:23:10.760 --> 0:23:14.000
<v Speaker 1>five catches on thirty three targets. And I'm not sure

0:23:14.040 --> 0:23:16.520
<v Speaker 1>what compelled me to make this comparison, but Allen Robinson

0:23:16.560 --> 0:23:19.439
<v Speaker 1>has just five more catches on the season than Cole Beasley.

0:23:19.480 --> 0:23:23.400
<v Speaker 1>In nine games, He's got thirty catches, Beasley has twenty five.

0:23:23.720 --> 0:23:26.359
<v Speaker 1>Over the last three weeks, uh and Beasley had eleven

0:23:26.400 --> 0:23:29.840
<v Speaker 1>catches one twelve yards and the latest meeting between these

0:23:29.880 --> 0:23:32.960
<v Speaker 1>two teams last seasons. Will love Beasley list this week

0:23:33.359 --> 0:23:36.480
<v Speaker 1>uh Manny Sanders going to give him a C. Was

0:23:36.520 --> 0:23:39.880
<v Speaker 1>worried Gabe Davis might be stealing Sanders job after Sanders

0:23:39.920 --> 0:23:42.080
<v Speaker 1>had the goose egg in week eight. But Sanders out

0:23:42.080 --> 0:23:45.040
<v Speaker 1>targeted Davis eight to two last week, so his role

0:23:45.080 --> 0:23:47.520
<v Speaker 1>as wide receiver three seems secure. So he gets a

0:23:47.560 --> 0:23:51.040
<v Speaker 1>C grade. Uh, now it's TB D who's gonna play

0:23:51.119 --> 0:23:54.200
<v Speaker 1>tight end? If it's gonna be Dawson Knox or Tom Sweeney,

0:23:54.440 --> 0:23:57.880
<v Speaker 1>I'll give us has been cleared officially, but he don't

0:23:57.880 --> 0:24:00.439
<v Speaker 1>know for sure because of the hand injury. Right is

0:24:00.840 --> 0:24:03.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, is is he able to catch as well

0:24:03.960 --> 0:24:06.560
<v Speaker 1>as he would have otherwise? Right if it's a different

0:24:06.600 --> 0:24:08.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of injury, you know, you feel you feel a

0:24:08.880 --> 0:24:11.440
<v Speaker 1>little bit more confident about starting him. But he will

0:24:11.480 --> 0:24:13.200
<v Speaker 1>be on the field on Sunday. I hope he's wearing

0:24:13.240 --> 0:24:17.240
<v Speaker 1>a club too. That that guys never wear the club anymore.

0:24:17.600 --> 0:24:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Do you remember that where they just the whole hand

0:24:19.480 --> 0:24:21.439
<v Speaker 1>was just in the big ball at the end and

0:24:21.480 --> 0:24:23.320
<v Speaker 1>they then if you were like a member of the

0:24:23.359 --> 0:24:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Steelers in the seventies, you just beat dudes with that hand.

0:24:25.920 --> 0:24:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Do people use the club thing on their steering wheels?

0:24:28.440 --> 0:24:32.359
<v Speaker 1>Still remember that? I remember that? Well? Now that Moody

0:24:32.440 --> 0:24:34.119
<v Speaker 1>is the water is it's it's a really good matchup.

0:24:34.160 --> 0:24:36.160
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, now that Knox is playing, I'm kind of scared,

0:24:36.200 --> 0:24:38.000
<v Speaker 1>So you know what, I'm gonna bench Knox and both

0:24:38.240 --> 0:24:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Sweeney tom so a bench for those guys who are

0:24:40.840 --> 0:24:42.959
<v Speaker 1>better tight ends out there. They're going to see more

0:24:42.960 --> 0:24:45.199
<v Speaker 1>work than either one of those guys and Josh Allen

0:24:45.520 --> 0:24:49.040
<v Speaker 1>lastly and easy a forget last week against Jacksonville Water

0:24:49.200 --> 0:24:51.560
<v Speaker 1>under the Bridge. Alan threw for three plus yards in

0:24:51.560 --> 0:24:54.320
<v Speaker 1>both games against the Jets last year also had rushing

0:24:54.320 --> 0:24:56.639
<v Speaker 1>totals with fifty seven and sixty one yards. He should

0:24:56.640 --> 0:24:59.399
<v Speaker 1>bounce back big time and this one. As for the Jets,

0:24:59.400 --> 0:25:01.119
<v Speaker 1>not a ton of t talk about. Michael Carter does

0:25:01.240 --> 0:25:04.160
<v Speaker 1>get a starting grade with the c Very tough matchup,

0:25:04.200 --> 0:25:07.800
<v Speaker 1>but still startable based on expected volume. Carter has touch

0:25:07.880 --> 0:25:10.640
<v Speaker 1>totals of fourteen, twenty four, and nineteen over his last

0:25:10.680 --> 0:25:14.200
<v Speaker 1>three games. He's also been targeted times during that span,

0:25:14.280 --> 0:25:17.280
<v Speaker 1>so a CEE for Carter. As for the wide receivers,

0:25:17.320 --> 0:25:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Corey Davis should make his return after missing the last

0:25:20.000 --> 0:25:22.680
<v Speaker 1>two games with a hip injury, but he, Elijah Moore,

0:25:22.800 --> 0:25:25.640
<v Speaker 1>and Jamison crowd are are all on the bench. For me.

0:25:25.920 --> 0:25:28.760
<v Speaker 1>The Bills are the toughest defense against wide receivers, allowing

0:25:28.800 --> 0:25:32.760
<v Speaker 1>just twelve catches and six yards per game total to

0:25:32.800 --> 0:25:35.600
<v Speaker 1>the unit, to wide receiver units, and just two total

0:25:35.640 --> 0:25:38.840
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns all season to the position. And lastly, Mike White.

0:25:38.920 --> 0:25:41.159
<v Speaker 1>He's a low end starter in two quarterback leagues, but

0:25:41.240 --> 0:25:43.520
<v Speaker 1>an easy bench in a brutal matchup. The Bills have

0:25:43.560 --> 0:25:46.199
<v Speaker 1>allowed the fewest points to opposing quarterbacks. You know, I

0:25:46.240 --> 0:25:48.200
<v Speaker 1>get the feeling that we could probably work in one

0:25:48.200 --> 0:25:50.119
<v Speaker 1>more matchup into this segment. Do you think you can

0:25:50.160 --> 0:25:53.679
<v Speaker 1>get Jags colds done in under three minutes? Sure? All right,

0:25:53.760 --> 0:25:56.160
<v Speaker 1>let's do it. So the Jags beat the Bills last

0:25:56.160 --> 0:25:59.639
<v Speaker 1>week nine to six and did nothing in fantasy. Trevor

0:25:59.720 --> 0:26:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Laura's only managed a hundred and eighteen passing yards. Carlos

0:26:03.400 --> 0:26:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Hyde ran for sixty seven yards on twenty one carries,

0:26:06.720 --> 0:26:09.680
<v Speaker 1>and three Jags wide receivers topped the twenty yard mark,

0:26:09.720 --> 0:26:13.240
<v Speaker 1>but none hit the thirty yard mark. What a weird win.

0:26:13.560 --> 0:26:16.160
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about this week. James Robinson did practice

0:26:16.160 --> 0:26:18.760
<v Speaker 1>for the first time since Week eight on Thursday, but

0:26:18.920 --> 0:26:21.280
<v Speaker 1>was very limited. It's fifty fifty that he goes in

0:26:21.280 --> 0:26:23.440
<v Speaker 1>this one at best. If he does go, I'll give

0:26:23.520 --> 0:26:25.879
<v Speaker 1>him a C probably, but would be a B. But

0:26:25.920 --> 0:26:28.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm worried he gets reinjured or spelled by Carlos Hide.

0:26:28.720 --> 0:26:31.080
<v Speaker 1>If Robinson doesn't go, I'll flip the sea to hide.

0:26:31.119 --> 0:26:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Who is the clear bell cow in Robinson's absence. The

0:26:33.880 --> 0:26:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Colts have been very solid at keeping opposing runners out

0:26:36.520 --> 0:26:39.199
<v Speaker 1>of the end zone, only allowing four total touchdowns to

0:26:39.200 --> 0:26:41.880
<v Speaker 1>the position on the season. Other than that, their middle

0:26:41.880 --> 0:26:43.919
<v Speaker 1>of the pack defense in terms of yards allowed, so

0:26:43.960 --> 0:26:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the bell cow will likely exit with eighty to nine yards.

0:26:46.960 --> 0:26:49.480
<v Speaker 1>The passing game is interesting, Dan Arnold was might take

0:26:49.480 --> 0:26:52.520
<v Speaker 1>a chance on me. Receiver Trevor Lawrence sees a defense

0:26:52.560 --> 0:26:56.000
<v Speaker 1>that allowed four hundred twelve passing yards and four touchdowns

0:26:56.000 --> 0:26:59.320
<v Speaker 1>to the combo of Mike White and Josh Johnson, who

0:26:59.359 --> 0:27:01.680
<v Speaker 1>sound more like guys who would open a micro brewery

0:27:01.760 --> 0:27:05.880
<v Speaker 1>in Osakis than NFL quarterbacks. So I think we'll call

0:27:05.920 --> 0:27:10.400
<v Speaker 1>the brewery Peacock Brewing Company. Yeah. Um. In fact, Davis

0:27:10.400 --> 0:27:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Mills and Jimmy g are the only quarterbacks not to

0:27:13.080 --> 0:27:15.800
<v Speaker 1>hit the multiple score mark against the Coal the Colts.

0:27:16.400 --> 0:27:19.560
<v Speaker 1>And they have roads out as well for this one. Yeah. Absolutely,

0:27:19.560 --> 0:27:21.440
<v Speaker 1>And they have a brick of and pizza food truck

0:27:21.480 --> 0:27:24.680
<v Speaker 1>outside the Peacock Brewing building. So I'll give Lawrence a

0:27:24.760 --> 0:27:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Sea in this one has still hasn't had multiple scores

0:27:27.080 --> 0:27:30.439
<v Speaker 1>since Week one, and since the London game in Week six,

0:27:30.600 --> 0:27:32.960
<v Speaker 1>the Jags have had a more focused approach to all

0:27:33.000 --> 0:27:37.000
<v Speaker 1>pass catchers. Marvin Jones, Jamal Agnew, and Dan Arnold have

0:27:37.080 --> 0:27:40.199
<v Speaker 1>all had twenty two or twenty three targets, fourteen or

0:27:40.200 --> 0:27:42.840
<v Speaker 1>fifteen catches right around a hundred and fifty yards, and

0:27:42.880 --> 0:27:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Laviska Schnalt is down as the fourth option right now,

0:27:46.119 --> 0:27:48.560
<v Speaker 1>so Jones is on the field most The snap counts

0:27:48.560 --> 0:27:51.680
<v Speaker 1>between Agnew and Schnlt are getting closer. Both take over

0:27:51.720 --> 0:27:53.720
<v Speaker 1>half their routes from the slot, but move around a

0:27:53.720 --> 0:27:55.760
<v Speaker 1>lot and I'll throw a B on Jones this week?

0:27:56.119 --> 0:28:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Who gets Xavier Roads backup? Whose name is bo Pete? Keys? Wow?

0:28:02.119 --> 0:28:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Bo Peep? Yeah, I guess bo Peep he might might

0:28:07.040 --> 0:28:12.000
<v Speaker 1>as Hey, we got one of these we can perfect

0:28:11.520 --> 0:28:14.639
<v Speaker 1>called little perfect little bo Pete. Little bo Pete has

0:28:14.760 --> 0:28:17.200
<v Speaker 1>given up a perfect passer rating this season. By the way,

0:28:17.520 --> 0:28:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Agnew and chnaltarre both take a chance of me style

0:28:20.080 --> 0:28:24.080
<v Speaker 1>sees um the colt side is really easy. Jonathan Taylor

0:28:24.160 --> 0:28:26.360
<v Speaker 1>is an a not quite an art vark, though, as

0:28:26.560 --> 0:28:28.680
<v Speaker 1>the Jags have been sneaky good against runners. Their top

0:28:28.720 --> 0:28:31.639
<v Speaker 1>six in yards per carry and rushing yards allowed, but

0:28:31.680 --> 0:28:34.560
<v Speaker 1>they have allowed the ninth most touchdowns. Carson Wentz was

0:28:34.640 --> 0:28:38.080
<v Speaker 1>might take a chance on me, Tossi Tosser and Michael Pittman.

0:28:38.160 --> 0:28:40.000
<v Speaker 1>He gets an A. The rest of the Colts wide

0:28:40.000 --> 0:28:42.280
<v Speaker 1>receivers are on the bench. It looks like t Y

0:28:42.360 --> 0:28:45.240
<v Speaker 1>Hilton will play, so that muddies things up for Zach Pascal.

0:28:45.600 --> 0:28:47.680
<v Speaker 1>But Pittman has been great and the Jags are allowing

0:28:47.720 --> 0:28:50.200
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and nine two passing yards to the wide receiver,

0:28:51.240 --> 0:28:53.840
<v Speaker 1>so he's a A. But don't start Mo Ali Cox

0:28:53.920 --> 0:28:57.480
<v Speaker 1>or Jack Doyle unless you want two targets. Yeah, that's

0:28:57.480 --> 0:28:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the problem with those guys. If they ever if they

0:28:59.560 --> 0:29:02.840
<v Speaker 1>ever bled into one human being, perhaps with four arms

0:29:02.840 --> 0:29:05.160
<v Speaker 1>and four legs, then at that point I think would

0:29:05.200 --> 0:29:09.440
<v Speaker 1>be a lot more Mo Ali Doyle or Jaguar Ali Cox.

0:29:09.840 --> 0:29:12.040
<v Speaker 1>I like that. I like that a lot better. I

0:29:12.080 --> 0:29:14.560
<v Speaker 1>like that a lot. Oh, that doesn't sound good. When

0:29:14.600 --> 0:29:18.720
<v Speaker 1>we come back Chiefs at Raiders, Patrick Mahomes, what you're

0:29:18.720 --> 0:29:22.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna do? But Patrick Mahomes, it's one of the toughest

0:29:22.200 --> 0:29:25.160
<v Speaker 1>calls of the year, believe it or not, we'll give

0:29:25.200 --> 0:29:28.760
<v Speaker 1>you advice on whether or not he's going to revert

0:29:28.880 --> 0:29:32.840
<v Speaker 1>to form against Las Vegas when we return to Fantasy

0:29:32.880 --> 0:29:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly. Welcome back Fantasy Football Weekly. I'm Paul Charchi

0:29:55.920 --> 0:29:58.800
<v Speaker 1>my coast today or Matt Harrison and Brian Johnson. It

0:29:58.920 --> 0:30:01.840
<v Speaker 1>is the COVID edition again. Like last week, I am

0:30:01.880 --> 0:30:04.400
<v Speaker 1>at home, which is why I sound like garbage and

0:30:04.480 --> 0:30:07.000
<v Speaker 1>my co host in the studio sound great. Hello, guys,

0:30:07.840 --> 0:30:11.640
<v Speaker 1>we do sound great. You know it doesn't sound great

0:30:12.720 --> 0:30:16.600
<v Speaker 1>starting Patrick Mahomes. It used to sound it sounded so

0:30:16.640 --> 0:30:18.360
<v Speaker 1>good before you didn't have to give it a thought.

0:30:18.880 --> 0:30:21.640
<v Speaker 1>But suddenly here we are in a position where you

0:30:21.720 --> 0:30:24.720
<v Speaker 1>don't know if you can start Patrick Mahomes. I believe

0:30:24.760 --> 0:30:29.240
<v Speaker 1>I have my lowest ranking on Patrick Mahomes ever on

0:30:29.560 --> 0:30:33.080
<v Speaker 1>career this week. How bad has it gotten for Patrick

0:30:33.120 --> 0:30:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Mahomes over the last three weeks. Among the teams that

0:30:36.720 --> 0:30:41.800
<v Speaker 1>have not had a bye, Patrick Mahomes has only outscored

0:30:42.240 --> 0:30:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Sam Donald. Think about that, and he was playing with

0:30:46.040 --> 0:30:49.480
<v Speaker 1>a broken shoulder and he missed, but he missed parts

0:30:49.520 --> 0:30:54.560
<v Speaker 1>of games he's Mahomes has been outscored by nine quarterbacks

0:30:54.720 --> 0:30:58.840
<v Speaker 1>who did have a bye over the last three weeks,

0:30:59.200 --> 0:31:05.040
<v Speaker 1>including Geno Smith, Taylor Heineke, and the Houston combo of

0:31:05.360 --> 0:31:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Davis Mills and and Taylor uh Tyrod Tyrod Taylor. It's

0:31:13.240 --> 0:31:15.400
<v Speaker 1>it's staggering to think that it's come to this for

0:31:15.520 --> 0:31:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Mahomes. Now as a whole, the city of Las

0:31:19.720 --> 0:31:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Vegas is filled with slump busters, but the Raiders are

0:31:24.200 --> 0:31:31.000
<v Speaker 1>not one of them. Unfortunately, Mahomes is struggling against defenses

0:31:31.080 --> 0:31:33.960
<v Speaker 1>that can generate a pass rush with their base defense,

0:31:34.480 --> 0:31:37.920
<v Speaker 1>and here comes the Raiders with Pro Football focuses number

0:31:38.040 --> 0:31:42.840
<v Speaker 1>one graded pass rush. So everything's lining up just wrong

0:31:42.920 --> 0:31:46.760
<v Speaker 1>for ma Homes here again. Now, I will say this, historically,

0:31:46.800 --> 0:31:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Mahomes has excelled against the Raiders. His average game against

0:31:50.600 --> 0:31:53.560
<v Speaker 1>them throughout his career fourteen yards, which is great, But

0:31:53.680 --> 0:31:56.200
<v Speaker 1>he's never played at the level that he's playing at

0:31:56.320 --> 0:31:59.640
<v Speaker 1>right now. And it's part of it is certainly at Mahomes,

0:31:59.720 --> 0:32:02.240
<v Speaker 1>but it's also on and I'm banged up offensive line,

0:32:02.280 --> 0:32:04.960
<v Speaker 1>which will be banged up again for this game. I

0:32:05.000 --> 0:32:07.840
<v Speaker 1>can't tell you to start Patrick Mahomes, and I only

0:32:07.880 --> 0:32:11.040
<v Speaker 1>have a C grade on Mahomes. If it were virtually

0:32:11.120 --> 0:32:14.040
<v Speaker 1>any other quarterback, this would be a straight bench grade,

0:32:14.440 --> 0:32:17.280
<v Speaker 1>But I can't do it with Mahomes because the history

0:32:17.440 --> 0:32:21.040
<v Speaker 1>and we know that he's an amazing talent and no

0:32:21.640 --> 0:32:24.320
<v Speaker 1>nobody would be surprised if Patrick Mahomes showed up with

0:32:24.360 --> 0:32:26.880
<v Speaker 1>three d yards and three touchdowns. It wouldn't surprise anybody

0:32:26.920 --> 0:32:28.840
<v Speaker 1>in the slightest including me. And I'm giving him the

0:32:28.840 --> 0:32:32.400
<v Speaker 1>C grade at the same time, based on everything we're

0:32:32.440 --> 0:32:35.880
<v Speaker 1>looking here at on paper, this this, I can't tell you.

0:32:35.960 --> 0:32:38.480
<v Speaker 1>I can't give you solid reasons why Holmes is any

0:32:38.480 --> 0:32:41.200
<v Speaker 1>better now than he would be uh than he would

0:32:41.240 --> 0:32:44.320
<v Speaker 1>be had and has been the last three weeks. Let's

0:32:44.320 --> 0:32:47.640
<v Speaker 1>go to his receivers, Tyreek Kill. Despite mahomes struggles, he's

0:32:47.640 --> 0:32:50.600
<v Speaker 1>still peppering Hill with targets at least ten in five

0:32:50.600 --> 0:32:53.840
<v Speaker 1>of the last six games, which gives Hill a sizeable

0:32:53.920 --> 0:32:57.120
<v Speaker 1>leg up um on the outside. Hill's gonna see Vegas

0:32:57.200 --> 0:32:59.920
<v Speaker 1>is best cornerback Casey Hayward, who has yet to allow

0:33:00.120 --> 0:33:02.200
<v Speaker 1>score or more than four eight yards in a game.

0:33:02.920 --> 0:33:06.080
<v Speaker 1>But Heyward's pretty slow. He's like a four six guy,

0:33:06.440 --> 0:33:10.160
<v Speaker 1>and that might be tricky against Tyreek Hill. And Hayward

0:33:10.200 --> 0:33:12.960
<v Speaker 1>doesn't travel into the slot, and Hill will run from

0:33:12.960 --> 0:33:15.360
<v Speaker 1>the slot a lot and when he runs from the slot,

0:33:15.400 --> 0:33:18.760
<v Speaker 1>he'll gets Nate Hobbs. But the weird thing is as

0:33:18.840 --> 0:33:21.280
<v Speaker 1>anonymous as Nate Hobbs is, he's been awesome too. He

0:33:21.360 --> 0:33:24.480
<v Speaker 1>ranks his Pro Football focus is number seven cornerback, and

0:33:24.520 --> 0:33:26.520
<v Speaker 1>he is not allowed to touch down all season, so

0:33:26.560 --> 0:33:29.280
<v Speaker 1>there's really nowhere where he'll goes where he's got an

0:33:29.280 --> 0:33:31.920
<v Speaker 1>easy matchup in this game. And so just the B

0:33:32.080 --> 0:33:34.000
<v Speaker 1>grade on Hill, and I think I've given Hill A

0:33:34.120 --> 0:33:36.400
<v Speaker 1>grades in every other game this year, so this is

0:33:36.440 --> 0:33:39.440
<v Speaker 1>a new low for him as well. Travis Kelsey comes

0:33:39.480 --> 0:33:42.120
<v Speaker 1>in with a B grade, averaging nine targets per game.

0:33:42.200 --> 0:33:45.480
<v Speaker 1>The volume keeps him as an automatic start. Even though

0:33:45.600 --> 0:33:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Kelsey's touchdown production he has one touchdown since Week five.

0:33:49.640 --> 0:33:53.640
<v Speaker 1>That's it. Still. Kelsey has caught all seven of his

0:33:53.680 --> 0:33:56.640
<v Speaker 1>red zone targets and he's converted four of those into touchdowns.

0:33:56.720 --> 0:33:59.920
<v Speaker 1>And you know he's always a threat to score right

0:34:00.080 --> 0:34:02.160
<v Speaker 1>us have a lot five tighten touchdowns over the last

0:34:02.240 --> 0:34:04.680
<v Speaker 1>five games. So that's why I've kept a B grade

0:34:04.680 --> 0:34:08.120
<v Speaker 1>and not a C grade on Travis Kelsey, which sounds weird,

0:34:08.239 --> 0:34:11.440
<v Speaker 1>but that's where we're at right now. Clyde Edwards, a

0:34:11.480 --> 0:34:13.960
<v Speaker 1>layer could make his return for this game, he's a

0:34:14.000 --> 0:34:16.759
<v Speaker 1>game time decision. I'll remind you guys, prior to his

0:34:16.840 --> 0:34:18.560
<v Speaker 1>knee injury, he was coming off his best set of

0:34:18.600 --> 0:34:21.439
<v Speaker 1>consecutive games in his career, and that was Weeks three

0:34:21.440 --> 0:34:24.320
<v Speaker 1>and four, with over one hundred rushing yards in both games.

0:34:25.000 --> 0:34:28.680
<v Speaker 1>And Darryl Williams hasn't been particularly good, just three point

0:34:28.760 --> 0:34:32.640
<v Speaker 1>six yards per carry. So if Edwards a Layer comes back,

0:34:32.800 --> 0:34:34.520
<v Speaker 1>I think he if he's good enough to come back,

0:34:34.560 --> 0:34:36.239
<v Speaker 1>I think he gets most of the work here because

0:34:36.239 --> 0:34:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Williams hasn't been that good, but he's no workhorse, and

0:34:39.000 --> 0:34:41.359
<v Speaker 1>he's averaging just fifteen touches per game. And if even

0:34:41.400 --> 0:34:44.399
<v Speaker 1>that drops a bit because it's his first game back. Man,

0:34:44.440 --> 0:34:46.640
<v Speaker 1>if he's at like twelve touches a game, then the

0:34:46.680 --> 0:34:48.760
<v Speaker 1>most we can probably do here is a C grade.

0:34:48.800 --> 0:34:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Even though the Raiders just got steamrolled by Devanta Booker

0:34:51.560 --> 0:34:54.600
<v Speaker 1>and Alijah Penny for a hundred and thirty five runching yards. Um,

0:34:54.680 --> 0:34:56.319
<v Speaker 1>I still think that's the best we can do out

0:34:56.320 --> 0:34:59.240
<v Speaker 1>of Hilaire. Now, if Laire doesn't go, then Darryl Williams

0:34:59.239 --> 0:35:01.600
<v Speaker 1>walks into this a C grade, and I like him

0:35:01.600 --> 0:35:05.239
<v Speaker 1>at that spot even if he hasn't been great, All right,

0:35:05.320 --> 0:35:08.279
<v Speaker 1>let's flip over to the Raiders side of this game,

0:35:08.760 --> 0:35:11.000
<v Speaker 1>and we'll begin with Derek Carr. Over his last three games,

0:35:11.000 --> 0:35:13.640
<v Speaker 1>he's everything three hundred sixteen passing yards per game. That

0:35:13.760 --> 0:35:16.160
<v Speaker 1>is third most in the league, which which I lovey

0:35:16.239 --> 0:35:19.359
<v Speaker 1>comes in playing well. Kansas City's past defense has been

0:35:19.400 --> 0:35:22.440
<v Speaker 1>better lately, and a lot of it is really hinged

0:35:22.480 --> 0:35:26.240
<v Speaker 1>on the cornerback Lagarius sneed moving from the outside into

0:35:26.280 --> 0:35:28.160
<v Speaker 1>the slot. I'm gonna talk more about that in a second.

0:35:28.160 --> 0:35:31.800
<v Speaker 1>When we talked about Hunter Hunter renfro Um, but course

0:35:31.880 --> 0:35:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Smoked car Smoked a better version of this Chiefs secondary

0:35:36.000 --> 0:35:38.040
<v Speaker 1>last year average in the average during her fifteen yards

0:35:38.040 --> 0:35:41.720
<v Speaker 1>and three touchdowns in the two games Um, and only

0:35:42.040 --> 0:35:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Jordan loved Taylor Heineken and Baker Mayfield have failed to

0:35:44.520 --> 0:35:46.600
<v Speaker 1>put up multiple touchdowns against the Chiefs. So I think

0:35:46.600 --> 0:35:48.279
<v Speaker 1>he finds his way to a couple of scores here

0:35:48.440 --> 0:35:50.360
<v Speaker 1>and around three hundred yards. And that's a B grade

0:35:50.360 --> 0:35:54.560
<v Speaker 1>for Derek Carr, a grade for his top receiver, Darren Waller.

0:35:55.040 --> 0:35:58.000
<v Speaker 1>If last week is any indication, all of Henry Ruggs's

0:35:58.080 --> 0:36:00.880
<v Speaker 1>targets are gonna go to Darren Waller, who posted his

0:36:00.960 --> 0:36:05.239
<v Speaker 1>biggest game since the opener, maybe not coincidentally in Vegas

0:36:05.239 --> 0:36:08.240
<v Speaker 1>first game without their deep threat. Waller had his highest

0:36:08.360 --> 0:36:11.720
<v Speaker 1>yards per catch game last week, so they were throwing

0:36:11.760 --> 0:36:15.560
<v Speaker 1>to Waller down field. Kansas City has given up five

0:36:15.600 --> 0:36:18.000
<v Speaker 1>tight end touchdowns over the last five weeks. That's tied

0:36:18.040 --> 0:36:20.160
<v Speaker 1>for the most during that span. And what's more, over

0:36:20.160 --> 0:36:24.040
<v Speaker 1>those five games, every opposing tight end except Green Bay's

0:36:24.560 --> 0:36:29.799
<v Speaker 1>Josiah degu Aa, I know, all of the opposing tight

0:36:29.880 --> 0:36:31.680
<v Speaker 1>ends except that guy who have caught at least two

0:36:31.719 --> 0:36:34.040
<v Speaker 1>passes have scored a touchdown against the Chief. So Waller

0:36:34.120 --> 0:36:36.839
<v Speaker 1>is an a in this one. I mentioned Hunter hunter

0:36:36.920 --> 0:36:41.759
<v Speaker 1>Renfro earlier. With rugs gone last week, the Fro led

0:36:41.840 --> 0:36:46.279
<v Speaker 1>all Raiders wide outs in targets, receptions, and yards. Fascinating

0:36:46.280 --> 0:36:49.640
<v Speaker 1>matchup in the slot against Lagaria Snead, who since moving

0:36:49.680 --> 0:36:51.560
<v Speaker 1>to the slot has been very good. Is not giving

0:36:51.640 --> 0:36:54.040
<v Speaker 1>up any scores and just a sixty eight percent catch

0:36:54.160 --> 0:36:57.360
<v Speaker 1>rate since then. Still a slight advantage here to the

0:36:57.360 --> 0:36:59.719
<v Speaker 1>Fro considering how good he's been of late and a

0:36:59.800 --> 0:37:02.840
<v Speaker 1>B grade for him. Kenyan Drake was might take a

0:37:02.920 --> 0:37:07.320
<v Speaker 1>chance on me player and running back and Josh Jacobs

0:37:07.360 --> 0:37:09.280
<v Speaker 1>also gets a and he by the way, see grade

0:37:09.280 --> 0:37:11.839
<v Speaker 1>for for Drake, a B grade for Josh Jacobs. Chiefs

0:37:11.840 --> 0:37:14.080
<v Speaker 1>are allowing one forty one total yards per game to

0:37:14.120 --> 0:37:17.319
<v Speaker 1>opposing running backs. That is tenth most. A big chunk

0:37:17.360 --> 0:37:19.719
<v Speaker 1>of that comes through the air, as I mentioned a

0:37:19.719 --> 0:37:21.440
<v Speaker 1>little bit, and we talked about Drake, and I like

0:37:21.560 --> 0:37:23.759
<v Speaker 1>Drake there too, but Jacobs is also emerging in the

0:37:23.800 --> 0:37:27.279
<v Speaker 1>passing game. He's hauled in eighteen of twenty targets on

0:37:27.360 --> 0:37:31.760
<v Speaker 1>the year. Vegas offensive line has been woeful at run blocking,

0:37:31.960 --> 0:37:34.600
<v Speaker 1>but that really hasn't effected Jacob's that much. Who's seen

0:37:34.640 --> 0:37:37.160
<v Speaker 1>his yards per carry increase in five consecutive games, So

0:37:37.160 --> 0:37:39.200
<v Speaker 1>I like him. In this one last thing, I'll mention

0:37:39.239 --> 0:37:41.120
<v Speaker 1>if you if you thought Brian Edwards might be helped

0:37:41.120 --> 0:37:43.880
<v Speaker 1>out with with Henry ruds out that did not materialize

0:37:43.880 --> 0:37:47.160
<v Speaker 1>at all last week was zero catches. Let's go to

0:37:47.200 --> 0:37:52.160
<v Speaker 1>our next matchup, which is Saints taking on the Titans. Brian,

0:37:52.200 --> 0:37:54.680
<v Speaker 1>it looks like we will have a news starting running

0:37:54.719 --> 0:37:57.319
<v Speaker 1>back for the Saints. Mark Ingram expected to get the

0:37:57.400 --> 0:38:00.440
<v Speaker 1>vast majority of the looks here for New Orleans. Alvin

0:38:00.480 --> 0:38:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Kamara ruled out, so it is mark Ingram time, albeit

0:38:03.239 --> 0:38:06.320
<v Speaker 1>in a tough matchup. Tennessee has surrendered the sixth fewest

0:38:06.360 --> 0:38:09.280
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards to opposing backs, but they do allow nearly

0:38:09.680 --> 0:38:12.320
<v Speaker 1>five catches per game to the position, and Ingram appears

0:38:12.360 --> 0:38:14.160
<v Speaker 1>to be in line for a bell cow role in

0:38:14.160 --> 0:38:15.800
<v Speaker 1>this one, so I'm gonna give him a B on

0:38:15.960 --> 0:38:19.600
<v Speaker 1>expected volume. Over to the wide receivers. Marquez Callaway was

0:38:19.680 --> 0:38:21.799
<v Speaker 1>might take a chance on the wide receiver, but I

0:38:21.800 --> 0:38:24.279
<v Speaker 1>think you can throw see darts at Deante Harris and

0:38:24.320 --> 0:38:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Trey Kwon Smith in that order I mentioned earlier. The

0:38:27.920 --> 0:38:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Titans are yielding twenty six plus targets per game to

0:38:30.560 --> 0:38:33.600
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers, by far the highest clip in the NFL.

0:38:34.080 --> 0:38:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Adam Troutlin, though tight end is on the bench. Tennessee

0:38:36.960 --> 0:38:39.320
<v Speaker 1>is allowing less than four catches in just thirty yards

0:38:39.320 --> 0:38:42.480
<v Speaker 1>per game to opposing tight ends. And Trevor simeon Us

0:38:42.560 --> 0:38:44.960
<v Speaker 1>might take a chance on me quarterback as well. Hey,

0:38:44.960 --> 0:38:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Brian Art, see darts just harpoons. Oh that's a good one. Yeah,

0:38:49.120 --> 0:38:51.719
<v Speaker 1>it is like that. You can harpoon them over to

0:38:51.880 --> 0:38:55.720
<v Speaker 1>the Titans side. Adrian Peterson gotta put him on the bench.

0:38:56.239 --> 0:38:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Lead the team and carries in his debut with ten

0:38:59.239 --> 0:39:02.560
<v Speaker 1>also scored a touchdown, but Dante Foreman and Jeremy Jeremy

0:39:02.640 --> 0:39:05.759
<v Speaker 1>McNichols combined for twelve carries and a much higher yards

0:39:05.760 --> 0:39:07.920
<v Speaker 1>per carry. They combined for four point four yards per

0:39:07.960 --> 0:39:10.920
<v Speaker 1>carry as opposed to the two point one yards per

0:39:10.960 --> 0:39:15.160
<v Speaker 1>carry from Adrian Peterson. Expect Peterson's usage to increase a

0:39:15.160 --> 0:39:17.879
<v Speaker 1>little here, but a very tough matchup. Opposing teams are

0:39:17.880 --> 0:39:19.920
<v Speaker 1>only running the ball thirty seven percent at the time

0:39:19.920 --> 0:39:22.520
<v Speaker 1>against New Orleans who has allowed just one runner to

0:39:22.640 --> 0:39:25.480
<v Speaker 1>top seventy rushing yards, and that was Christian McCaffrey in

0:39:25.560 --> 0:39:27.640
<v Speaker 1>Week two when he had seventy two rushing yards on

0:39:27.640 --> 0:39:30.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty four carries. So Peterson on the bench and this

0:39:31.000 --> 0:39:33.640
<v Speaker 1>one a J. Brown, though not on the bench, gonna

0:39:33.640 --> 0:39:36.000
<v Speaker 1>give him an A. Yes, I'll likely draw a lot

0:39:36.000 --> 0:39:39.799
<v Speaker 1>of coverage from Marshawn Lattimore, but Lattimore is seriously struggling,

0:39:40.440 --> 0:39:43.879
<v Speaker 1>surrendering five scores over his last five games. He's also

0:39:43.920 --> 0:39:46.879
<v Speaker 1>allowed at least one yards in his coverage and three

0:39:46.880 --> 0:39:50.080
<v Speaker 1>of those five games, and granted his assignments have been elite.

0:39:50.400 --> 0:39:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Lattimore as that is, but so is healthy So is

0:39:52.880 --> 0:39:54.759
<v Speaker 1>a healthy A J. Brown very elite? So in A

0:39:54.840 --> 0:39:58.160
<v Speaker 1>for a J. Brown and uh for his counterpart, Julio Jones.

0:39:58.400 --> 0:40:01.879
<v Speaker 1>Let's take a quick trip down memory lane. Julio has

0:40:01.880 --> 0:40:05.160
<v Speaker 1>faced the Saints eighteen times in his career, all with

0:40:05.239 --> 0:40:07.440
<v Speaker 1>the Falcons. Of course. Do you want to guess how

0:40:07.440 --> 0:40:10.800
<v Speaker 1>many touchdowns Julio has scored in those eighteen games against

0:40:10.840 --> 0:40:13.160
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans? It's either going to be an insane amount

0:40:13.360 --> 0:40:16.920
<v Speaker 1>or like two. It's insanely sad amount. Three touchdowns in

0:40:16.960 --> 0:40:20.160
<v Speaker 1>those eighteen games and the last one game in twenty sixteen.

0:40:20.760 --> 0:40:24.000
<v Speaker 1>But New Orleans is allowing fifteen catches, two hundred and

0:40:24.040 --> 0:40:27.520
<v Speaker 1>fifteen yards and one point to five touchdowns per game

0:40:27.560 --> 0:40:30.640
<v Speaker 1>to opposing wide receivers. So I gotta give Julio a

0:40:30.760 --> 0:40:33.879
<v Speaker 1>B in this one. Uh. As for Jeff Swaim, who

0:40:33.960 --> 0:40:36.160
<v Speaker 1>is pretty much the tight end one on the Saints, now,

0:40:36.200 --> 0:40:38.800
<v Speaker 1>I was close to giving him a C after scoring

0:40:38.800 --> 0:40:40.799
<v Speaker 1>in back to back games, but the Saints are one

0:40:40.840 --> 0:40:43.239
<v Speaker 1>of three teams that have yet to surrender a tight

0:40:43.320 --> 0:40:45.520
<v Speaker 1>end touchdown. So I got Swam on the bench and

0:40:45.600 --> 0:40:47.360
<v Speaker 1>this one to but keep an eye on him in

0:40:47.560 --> 0:40:50.200
<v Speaker 1>then tighten in the tight end waste Land and last,

0:40:50.239 --> 0:40:53.760
<v Speaker 1>but not least, Ryan Tannehill gets an easy B based

0:40:53.760 --> 0:40:56.719
<v Speaker 1>on the plus matchups for his wide receivers. Tannehill can

0:40:56.760 --> 0:40:59.480
<v Speaker 1>also do some damage on the ground. The most mobile

0:40:59.560 --> 0:41:02.600
<v Speaker 1>quarterback the scenes that faced was Taylor Heineke, who ran

0:41:02.640 --> 0:41:05.080
<v Speaker 1>for forty yards, which, of course in most fantasy leagues

0:41:05.120 --> 0:41:10.080
<v Speaker 1>equals a passing touchdown. So B for Tannehill like uh,

0:41:10.440 --> 0:41:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Tannehill is a is could be He's He's always been

0:41:13.080 --> 0:41:16.839
<v Speaker 1>a sneaky rusher for touchdowns and with Derrick Henry out

0:41:16.880 --> 0:41:19.279
<v Speaker 1>that might that might continue to be the case. Um,

0:41:19.320 --> 0:41:21.560
<v Speaker 1>we've got a few extra minutes to work with here. Guys,

0:41:21.760 --> 0:41:24.200
<v Speaker 1>talk to me about Miles Gaskin. There are a lot

0:41:24.200 --> 0:41:26.759
<v Speaker 1>of people that started him off of what had been

0:41:26.800 --> 0:41:29.279
<v Speaker 1>relatively consistent work, but he has been as boom or

0:41:29.320 --> 0:41:32.160
<v Speaker 1>bust as anybody. I think there's too many some temptations

0:41:32.160 --> 0:41:35.120
<v Speaker 1>for Miles gascon owners to just drop him out right

0:41:36.000 --> 0:41:39.840
<v Speaker 1>next week. What do you think, Yeah, it's looking pretty nasty,

0:41:40.120 --> 0:41:42.160
<v Speaker 1>just just the production that he's had in the last

0:41:42.200 --> 0:41:45.399
<v Speaker 1>couple of games. I believe he had the twenty four

0:41:45.920 --> 0:41:50.760
<v Speaker 1>worst yards in a game where a player had twenty

0:41:50.840 --> 0:41:53.880
<v Speaker 1>rushing attempts since the merger, it was it was like

0:41:53.960 --> 0:41:56.920
<v Speaker 1>absolutely ridiculous. That was two weeks ago. He's on a

0:41:56.960 --> 0:41:59.920
<v Speaker 1>weird like struggling and even weeks though and going off

0:42:00.440 --> 0:42:01.640
<v Speaker 1>in odd weeks. I don't know if you want to

0:42:01.680 --> 0:42:03.560
<v Speaker 1>drop him in week eleven because he might go off

0:42:03.600 --> 0:42:08.480
<v Speaker 1>based on that scientific fact. So I'm joking, of course. Yeah,

0:42:08.680 --> 0:42:11.560
<v Speaker 1>and only thirty isn't he is not top thirty and

0:42:11.680 --> 0:42:14.000
<v Speaker 1>looking at his stabs right now, he has not top

0:42:14.040 --> 0:42:16.319
<v Speaker 1>thirty six rushing yards in three weeks. And when he

0:42:16.440 --> 0:42:19.360
<v Speaker 1>when he when he has bad games, basically, if he

0:42:19.400 --> 0:42:22.840
<v Speaker 1>doesn't score, you're stuck on Miles Gaskon and that is

0:42:22.880 --> 0:42:24.520
<v Speaker 1>not the kind of guy I want on my roster.

0:42:24.640 --> 0:42:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Well and charge if you go every other week on it.

0:42:27.440 --> 0:42:29.439
<v Speaker 1>He didn't have a great game against the Ravens, Yeah,

0:42:29.440 --> 0:42:32.239
<v Speaker 1>that's bad. But he gets the Jets next week and

0:42:32.320 --> 0:42:35.520
<v Speaker 1>that's good. And then he get gets the Panthers the

0:42:35.520 --> 0:42:37.399
<v Speaker 1>week after that and that's bad, and then he gets

0:42:37.440 --> 0:42:39.719
<v Speaker 1>the Giants the week after that and that's good in

0:42:39.760 --> 0:42:44.719
<v Speaker 1>the odd weeks. So it's it's just he's like a

0:42:44.760 --> 0:42:47.560
<v Speaker 1>spot starter in a flex position, and it's only if

0:42:47.560 --> 0:42:49.680
<v Speaker 1>you're desperate. He's he's a he's a bench guy most

0:42:49.680 --> 0:42:51.640
<v Speaker 1>of the time. All Right. I probably asked myself if

0:42:51.640 --> 0:42:54.400
<v Speaker 1>I owned Miles Gasking, and I don't think I do

0:42:54.400 --> 0:42:57.239
<v Speaker 1>incret any of my leagues, which is great. Um, I

0:42:57.239 --> 0:42:59.040
<v Speaker 1>think I would say to myself, and I'm not starting

0:42:59.080 --> 0:43:01.399
<v Speaker 1>him against the Jets this week, then why have them

0:43:01.400 --> 0:43:03.839
<v Speaker 1>on roster? And I would pint exactly, You're gonna kick

0:43:03.960 --> 0:43:08.160
<v Speaker 1>the Gaskin down to the road. There you go. Um,

0:43:08.280 --> 0:43:11.000
<v Speaker 1>what do you do if let's say you started basically

0:43:11.080 --> 0:43:13.279
<v Speaker 1>any raven or dolphin and now you're in a deep

0:43:13.320 --> 0:43:17.279
<v Speaker 1>hole heading into Sunday because you know, you thought, you

0:43:17.280 --> 0:43:19.680
<v Speaker 1>know reasonably so, that there would point be points to

0:43:19.680 --> 0:43:23.000
<v Speaker 1>be had, especially from Baltimore. What do you do and

0:43:23.080 --> 0:43:25.279
<v Speaker 1>how does how does this change how you work your

0:43:25.320 --> 0:43:28.319
<v Speaker 1>lineup going into the weekend. You gotta hit the stack pipe.

0:43:28.360 --> 0:43:31.600
<v Speaker 1>You gotta pair a quarterback with a wide receiver or

0:43:31.600 --> 0:43:33.960
<v Speaker 1>two and it's hard to do to find, but hey,

0:43:34.000 --> 0:43:36.160
<v Speaker 1>go back to that Saints matchup. You can find Trevor

0:43:36.160 --> 0:43:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Simeon most likely on the waiver wire, or Marquez Callaway,

0:43:39.000 --> 0:43:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Yonte Harris, Trey Kuan Smith. It's a great matchup on

0:43:42.960 --> 0:43:45.600
<v Speaker 1>paper for quarterbacks and wide receivers, but you got you

0:43:45.680 --> 0:43:47.480
<v Speaker 1>gotta load up on one team and just hope they

0:43:47.480 --> 0:43:49.640
<v Speaker 1>go off, and the Saints are a great candidate to

0:43:49.680 --> 0:43:52.560
<v Speaker 1>do so. I just feel bad for people who started

0:43:52.560 --> 0:43:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Mike Gasicki in a League seven. Guillotine league specifically, though, yeah,

0:43:58.000 --> 0:44:00.600
<v Speaker 1>no kidding that that is setting up for a chop

0:44:00.719 --> 0:44:03.800
<v Speaker 1>right there, and that that is very very tricky. Speaking

0:44:03.880 --> 0:44:07.120
<v Speaker 1>guilloteam leagues, we are still making new guillotine leagues even now.

0:44:07.160 --> 0:44:09.279
<v Speaker 1>You can join a half season long Guillotine league at

0:44:09.280 --> 0:44:11.600
<v Speaker 1>guillotine leagues dot com, the freshest new way to play

0:44:11.640 --> 0:44:14.120
<v Speaker 1>fantasy sports. We encourage you to check that out, along

0:44:14.160 --> 0:44:17.360
<v Speaker 1>with all my player rankings, available for free at guillotine

0:44:17.520 --> 0:44:20.240
<v Speaker 1>leagues dot com. When we come back three tough Questions,

0:44:20.280 --> 0:44:22.200
<v Speaker 1>find out if you can go three and oh with

0:44:22.239 --> 0:44:25.600
<v Speaker 1>our panel of experts. When we return to Fantasy Putball Weekly,

0:44:43.200 --> 0:44:45.719
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to our number two Fantasy Football Weekly. I'm Paul

0:44:45.760 --> 0:44:49.359
<v Speaker 1>Scharchi and quarantined at home recovering from COVID. I'm much better,

0:44:49.440 --> 0:44:52.680
<v Speaker 1>thank you. My co hosts are in studio. They sound great.

0:44:52.760 --> 0:44:55.720
<v Speaker 1>I sound like garbage, that is Matt Harrison and Brian Johnson.

0:44:55.719 --> 0:44:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Hello guys, Hello. This is a segment we call three

0:45:00.000 --> 0:45:04.600
<v Speaker 1>off questions and it begins with this tough question number one.

0:45:05.000 --> 0:45:09.759
<v Speaker 1>Is Patrick Mahomes still the best Dynasty or Empire quarterback?

0:45:10.560 --> 0:45:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Begin with Matt Harrison? Are you talking about Patty Ice?

0:45:14.320 --> 0:45:20.439
<v Speaker 1>Patty Ice? About Patrick Mahomes? I think Patrick's Yeah, That's

0:45:20.480 --> 0:45:22.279
<v Speaker 1>that's what I mean. It was a joke. I'm glad

0:45:22.320 --> 0:45:26.040
<v Speaker 1>you got it. It just took me a little while. Um,

0:45:26.160 --> 0:45:29.360
<v Speaker 1>I still think he is the best dynasty quarterback. What's

0:45:29.360 --> 0:45:31.879
<v Speaker 1>more likely to happen here? In five years we're looking

0:45:31.920 --> 0:45:34.600
<v Speaker 1>back on this season as the one rough patch in

0:45:34.680 --> 0:45:37.960
<v Speaker 1>mahomes career, a rough patch that, by the way, still

0:45:38.000 --> 0:45:41.560
<v Speaker 1>has him averaging two yards and two point two touchdowns

0:45:41.560 --> 0:45:44.000
<v Speaker 1>per game. Or in five years, are we looking at

0:45:44.000 --> 0:45:46.080
<v Speaker 1>this and going wow, that was the beginning of the end.

0:45:46.800 --> 0:45:48.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so. He's still got the best arm

0:45:48.640 --> 0:45:50.800
<v Speaker 1>in the league. And the other options are Josh Allen,

0:45:51.360 --> 0:45:54.680
<v Speaker 1>who isn't currently matching mahomes output in his down year,

0:45:54.840 --> 0:45:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jackson, whose fantasy value is tied up in his legs.

0:45:58.120 --> 0:46:00.200
<v Speaker 1>And we've seen a lot of running quarterbacks have their

0:46:00.239 --> 0:46:05.560
<v Speaker 1>careers derailed after one knee or ankle injury Kyler air Bear.

0:46:05.680 --> 0:46:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Now I'm gonna stick with Patty Ice. He's still number

0:46:08.040 --> 0:46:11.560
<v Speaker 1>one in my book. Alright, Brian, Is Patrick Mahomes still

0:46:11.600 --> 0:46:16.279
<v Speaker 1>the best Dynasty or Empire quarterback? No, I got him

0:46:16.520 --> 0:46:18.640
<v Speaker 1>number two on my list right now. And despite the

0:46:18.640 --> 0:46:21.600
<v Speaker 1>poor performance on Thursday Night from Lamar Jackson, he is

0:46:21.680 --> 0:46:24.560
<v Speaker 1>my answer Dynasty. Of course, you want to look towards

0:46:24.560 --> 0:46:26.759
<v Speaker 1>the future a little bit. L Jacks is one and

0:46:26.760 --> 0:46:30.720
<v Speaker 1>a half years younger than Patrick Mahomes and Lamar Jackson.

0:46:31.360 --> 0:46:34.600
<v Speaker 1>The rushing upside insane. The floor keeps him very safe,

0:46:34.640 --> 0:46:37.160
<v Speaker 1>and he can throw and he's still just scratching the

0:46:37.200 --> 0:46:40.080
<v Speaker 1>surface of his throwing ability. In my opinion, I think

0:46:40.120 --> 0:46:42.480
<v Speaker 1>we might have seen the peak of Patrick Mahomes, not

0:46:42.520 --> 0:46:44.680
<v Speaker 1>saying he can't get back there and say at that level,

0:46:44.680 --> 0:46:48.080
<v Speaker 1>but Lamar Jackson, we haven't seen. The best is still

0:46:48.160 --> 0:46:49.279
<v Speaker 1>yet to come. And you have to look at the

0:46:49.280 --> 0:46:52.600
<v Speaker 1>weapons tied to each of these guys, Tyreek Kill, Travis Kelsey.

0:46:52.640 --> 0:46:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Their average age is about thirty years old. For L Jacks,

0:46:56.000 --> 0:46:59.800
<v Speaker 1>he's got Mark Andrews, Hollywood Brown and Rashad Master Bateman,

0:47:00.239 --> 0:47:07.799
<v Speaker 1>Um Andrews Just Hollywood in June and Bateman in a

0:47:07.840 --> 0:47:10.839
<v Speaker 1>few weeks. I don't sure. I'm pretty sure you can.

0:47:11.080 --> 0:47:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Why not like Master Will Smith? Master p Yeah, obviously, Okay.

0:47:16.360 --> 0:47:19.320
<v Speaker 1>I agonized over my own question. This is the toughest

0:47:19.440 --> 0:47:23.560
<v Speaker 1>question of three tough questions this year. I changed my

0:47:23.680 --> 0:47:27.600
<v Speaker 1>answer three times. Um the contenders were who you've mentioned,

0:47:27.680 --> 0:47:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Josh Al Lamar Jackson. I also I also looked into

0:47:30.239 --> 0:47:34.359
<v Speaker 1>Joe Burrow and Justin air Bear as possibilities as well,

0:47:34.400 --> 0:47:37.799
<v Speaker 1>but ultimately I threw them out because they don't have

0:47:38.200 --> 0:47:41.840
<v Speaker 1>They're not reliable rushers, despiting reliable passers and the rushing

0:47:41.880 --> 0:47:44.720
<v Speaker 1>upside that Alan and Jackson give you into a lesser extent.

0:47:44.800 --> 0:47:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Mahomes is just it just is so big. So then

0:47:48.719 --> 0:47:53.160
<v Speaker 1>I tried to delineate Josh Allen, Lamar Jackson, and Patrick

0:47:53.239 --> 0:47:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Mahomes algorithmically, and here's how close it is statistically between

0:47:57.600 --> 0:48:00.280
<v Speaker 1>these three guys over the past three years. J Baxon

0:48:00.360 --> 0:48:03.440
<v Speaker 1>has the most Fantasy points over the past three years,

0:48:03.960 --> 0:48:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Mahomes has the most highest finishes of those three, and

0:48:09.239 --> 0:48:12.960
<v Speaker 1>over the past two years, Allen leads both categories. He's

0:48:12.960 --> 0:48:15.120
<v Speaker 1>been better than either one of them across the last

0:48:15.200 --> 0:48:18.640
<v Speaker 1>two seasons. So where does that end up leaving you

0:48:20.400 --> 0:48:24.480
<v Speaker 1>for a while, I was on Allen Um but ultimately

0:48:24.520 --> 0:48:30.280
<v Speaker 1>finished on Lamar Jackson because of the intentional, consistent rushing

0:48:30.440 --> 0:48:34.040
<v Speaker 1>providing a floor and the fact that you've got the

0:48:34.080 --> 0:48:38.440
<v Speaker 1>passing upside and it was so close, and I agonized

0:48:38.440 --> 0:48:40.680
<v Speaker 1>on this so long. In a rare turn for three

0:48:40.719 --> 0:48:43.239
<v Speaker 1>tough questions, maybe the first ever and maybe it's just

0:48:43.280 --> 0:48:47.240
<v Speaker 1>the COVID talking no wrong answers this week between Alan

0:48:47.320 --> 0:48:49.160
<v Speaker 1>Jackson and Mahomes. I think you can go with any

0:48:49.200 --> 0:48:53.239
<v Speaker 1>of those three. Consider Alan Jackson, Like, if you can

0:48:53.239 --> 0:48:55.760
<v Speaker 1>start Alan Jackson country Western star, that would be great.

0:48:56.200 --> 0:48:58.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he's probably a Western star anyways. Western

0:48:58.400 --> 0:49:01.960
<v Speaker 1>even the thing anymore. We like both kind of types

0:49:01.960 --> 0:49:06.760
<v Speaker 1>of music, country and western and Western. Tough question number two.

0:49:07.800 --> 0:49:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Once Odell Beckham makes the Rams active roster, will he

0:49:12.040 --> 0:49:15.279
<v Speaker 1>be a wide receiver one for fantasy not on his team?

0:49:15.320 --> 0:49:18.640
<v Speaker 1>A wide receiver one wide receiver to flex or bench?

0:49:19.440 --> 0:49:23.279
<v Speaker 1>For this one, we begin with Brian Johnson. Um, it's

0:49:23.520 --> 0:49:25.759
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be one extreme or the other. I feel

0:49:25.760 --> 0:49:28.480
<v Speaker 1>like either a wide receiver one or a bench. I

0:49:28.480 --> 0:49:31.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I mean, Cooper Cup is just a target

0:49:31.560 --> 0:49:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Hog and understandably so, Robert Woods very established receiver in

0:49:35.719 --> 0:49:38.680
<v Speaker 1>that offense. It's gonna take some time for Odell Beckham

0:49:38.920 --> 0:49:41.759
<v Speaker 1>to get up to speed. Of course, Van Jefferson still

0:49:41.800 --> 0:49:44.759
<v Speaker 1>gonna mix in a little bit. Tyler Higbee a very

0:49:44.800 --> 0:49:47.799
<v Speaker 1>active part of that passing game. So once he is activated,

0:49:47.920 --> 0:49:49.799
<v Speaker 1>I am putting him on my bench until I can

0:49:49.800 --> 0:49:52.440
<v Speaker 1>see that he actually produces. But I don't see a

0:49:52.560 --> 0:49:55.200
<v Speaker 1>huge target shared percentage for Odell Beckham, So he he's

0:49:55.239 --> 0:49:59.520
<v Speaker 1>a bench for me until further notice, Matt. Once Ode

0:49:59.600 --> 0:50:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Beckham makes the active roster, will he be a wide receiver?

0:50:02.320 --> 0:50:05.160
<v Speaker 1>One wide receiver to flex or bench? He probably doesn't

0:50:05.160 --> 0:50:07.640
<v Speaker 1>play this week, and next week's the rams By, so

0:50:07.760 --> 0:50:10.640
<v Speaker 1>he's not gonna play next week for sure. Um. Over

0:50:10.680 --> 0:50:13.160
<v Speaker 1>the last three years, by the way, Beckham has averaged

0:50:13.200 --> 0:50:16.040
<v Speaker 1>seven point two targets per game, and no player has

0:50:16.080 --> 0:50:19.560
<v Speaker 1>done less with seven targets per game than Beckham. He's

0:50:19.560 --> 0:50:22.920
<v Speaker 1>averaging three point nine catches, fifty four yards and a

0:50:23.000 --> 0:50:25.760
<v Speaker 1>quarter of a touchdown per game in PPR. That's about

0:50:25.760 --> 0:50:28.520
<v Speaker 1>ten points per game. And then you look at the targets.

0:50:28.600 --> 0:50:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Cooper Cup is averaging eleven point four targets Robert Woods

0:50:32.640 --> 0:50:36.320
<v Speaker 1>is averaging seven points six, Both Van Jefferson and Tyler

0:50:36.400 --> 0:50:39.719
<v Speaker 1>Higbee are average, averaging just over five, and the other

0:50:39.760 --> 0:50:42.440
<v Speaker 1>receivers and Darryl Henderson add up to about six targets

0:50:42.480 --> 0:50:45.480
<v Speaker 1>per game. So where do Beckham's targets come from. Let's

0:50:45.520 --> 0:50:48.640
<v Speaker 1>give him the two from DeShawn Jackson and maybe give

0:50:48.719 --> 0:50:52.520
<v Speaker 1>him half of what Van Jefferson's getting. So I don't

0:50:52.520 --> 0:50:55.000
<v Speaker 1>think he takes anything from Woods or Cup, so he's

0:50:55.040 --> 0:50:58.080
<v Speaker 1>probably a five target maybe six targets per game guy.

0:50:58.440 --> 0:51:00.000
<v Speaker 1>So I think we're looking at a lot of three

0:51:00.120 --> 0:51:03.200
<v Speaker 1>catch forty yard games from Beckham. So he's gonna be

0:51:03.239 --> 0:51:05.040
<v Speaker 1>a bench guy. But I did pick him up in

0:51:05.040 --> 0:51:07.400
<v Speaker 1>a league where he was available, and I'm hoping I'm wrong.

0:51:08.920 --> 0:51:11.160
<v Speaker 1>The correct answer is in fact bench for many of

0:51:11.200 --> 0:51:13.680
<v Speaker 1>the reasons you outlined. You know, remember that Rams just

0:51:13.719 --> 0:51:16.520
<v Speaker 1>had a depth wide receiver and the comparatively even keeled

0:51:16.560 --> 0:51:19.520
<v Speaker 1>DeShawn Jackson quit the team because he didn't like his

0:51:19.680 --> 0:51:24.840
<v Speaker 1>role behind Woods and Cup, and you figure, like you said,

0:51:24.880 --> 0:51:27.319
<v Speaker 1>there's gonna be it's probably three weeks out before he

0:51:27.400 --> 0:51:31.319
<v Speaker 1>ends up with any meaningful action on this team. That's

0:51:31.360 --> 0:51:34.239
<v Speaker 1>a long time to get through and you also have

0:51:34.280 --> 0:51:36.200
<v Speaker 1>to figure you know, not only is there Cup and

0:51:36.200 --> 0:51:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Woods when you get Higbee and Jefferson as well to

0:51:38.960 --> 0:51:42.719
<v Speaker 1>contend with catches and frankly, the team's commitment to the

0:51:42.840 --> 0:51:46.080
<v Speaker 1>growth of Van Jefferson is far higher than its commitment

0:51:46.080 --> 0:51:51.840
<v Speaker 1>to Beckham. And we'll Beckham have some impact games and moments, sure,

0:51:52.200 --> 0:51:55.200
<v Speaker 1>probably a couple, but they'll be surrounded by to catch

0:51:55.280 --> 0:51:57.400
<v Speaker 1>performances that are gonna sink your team, and you're not

0:51:57.440 --> 0:52:03.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna know when they're coming. The correct answer is bench tough.

0:52:03.320 --> 0:52:08.359
<v Speaker 1>Question number three, what's the appropriate level of concern for

0:52:08.600 --> 0:52:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Terry McLaurin some or a Bowle loosening level of existential

0:52:15.920 --> 0:52:20.759
<v Speaker 1>dread Matt Uh Terry is still averaging nine and a

0:52:20.800 --> 0:52:24.120
<v Speaker 1>half targets per game. Charch really likes to pick on

0:52:24.200 --> 0:52:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the players who just had a bye week. By the way,

0:52:26.600 --> 0:52:30.399
<v Speaker 1>because it was only two games ago that Terry went

0:52:30.440 --> 0:52:32.520
<v Speaker 1>for seven catches, a d and twenty two yards and

0:52:32.560 --> 0:52:35.040
<v Speaker 1>a score against Green Bay. But it was three weeks ago,

0:52:35.360 --> 0:52:37.560
<v Speaker 1>so now we feel so far away from such a

0:52:37.560 --> 0:52:41.000
<v Speaker 1>good game for McLaurin. Yeah, he's had a few down games,

0:52:41.000 --> 0:52:43.360
<v Speaker 1>including his last one against one of the best secondaries

0:52:43.360 --> 0:52:46.000
<v Speaker 1>in the league, that's the Denver Broncos. But this week

0:52:46.040 --> 0:52:49.120
<v Speaker 1>he gets the Bucks. That's a plus matchup, and as

0:52:49.120 --> 0:52:51.840
<v Speaker 1>soon as hit next week he might be getting his

0:52:51.920 --> 0:52:56.160
<v Speaker 1>starting quarterback back. That's right, Stu Beard is on the horizon.

0:52:56.560 --> 0:53:00.920
<v Speaker 1>So I'm going to say no concern about Terry McLaurin. Brian,

0:53:01.000 --> 0:53:04.040
<v Speaker 1>what's the appropriate level of concern for Terry McLaurin, none,

0:53:04.440 --> 0:53:09.239
<v Speaker 1>some or blowed? I pretty much have nothing to add.

0:53:09.280 --> 0:53:11.960
<v Speaker 1>I am in full agreement with Matt. I have no

0:53:12.000 --> 0:53:16.400
<v Speaker 1>concern for Terry McLarin He's gone from being a consistent

0:53:16.440 --> 0:53:19.320
<v Speaker 1>matchup proof contributor to being an all or nothing player

0:53:19.400 --> 0:53:23.879
<v Speaker 1>with three massive dug games in his last four. It's

0:53:23.880 --> 0:53:26.640
<v Speaker 1>not a battler of talent. His talent is not in question,

0:53:26.920 --> 0:53:30.320
<v Speaker 1>but his quarterbacks talent is in plenty of question. Opponents

0:53:30.320 --> 0:53:33.399
<v Speaker 1>have broken the code on Taylor Heineke, and it did

0:53:33.440 --> 0:53:37.080
<v Speaker 1>not require an Enigma machine. He's always been a marginal

0:53:37.120 --> 0:53:40.279
<v Speaker 1>passing talent who was meant to be a backup. He's

0:53:40.360 --> 0:53:45.400
<v Speaker 1>averaging zero point seven five three quarters of one touchdown

0:53:45.440 --> 0:53:48.840
<v Speaker 1>pass per game over the last month. That's it, and

0:53:48.920 --> 0:53:52.480
<v Speaker 1>defenses know that if you take McLaren away, that virtually

0:53:52.480 --> 0:53:55.799
<v Speaker 1>eliminates the entire Washington passing attack because there's aren't enough

0:53:55.880 --> 0:53:58.719
<v Speaker 1>other good receivers on this team. Curtis Samuel still out

0:53:58.760 --> 0:54:01.359
<v Speaker 1>and probably remains out for a while. And further bad

0:54:01.400 --> 0:54:03.560
<v Speaker 1>news comes from this week's revelation that might be Love

0:54:03.600 --> 0:54:07.279
<v Speaker 1>Stupid isn't close to returning. He's probably two, three, four

0:54:07.360 --> 0:54:12.920
<v Speaker 1>weeks away from returning. Wide receiver talent isn't always enough

0:54:13.040 --> 0:54:17.160
<v Speaker 1>when everything else is going wrong. Look at Alan Robinson

0:54:17.239 --> 0:54:20.800
<v Speaker 1>is a case in point, a fantastic top ten level

0:54:20.840 --> 0:54:26.040
<v Speaker 1>talent at wide receiver who's virtually unrosterable for fantasy purposes

0:54:26.080 --> 0:54:29.480
<v Speaker 1>because everything else is wrong around him. Terry McLaurin is

0:54:29.640 --> 0:54:33.040
<v Speaker 1>almost in that spot, not quite, and that's why it's

0:54:33.160 --> 0:54:37.680
<v Speaker 1>only some level of concern. Church. I want you to

0:54:37.680 --> 0:54:41.920
<v Speaker 1>tell me more about an Enigma machine. You're not familiar

0:54:41.920 --> 0:54:45.000
<v Speaker 1>with the Enigma machine, which the British Secret Service used

0:54:45.000 --> 0:54:48.640
<v Speaker 1>to break the the German codes in World War Two. No,

0:54:49.080 --> 0:54:51.640
<v Speaker 1>tell me more. Let's let's just dedicate the rest of

0:54:51.640 --> 0:54:53.279
<v Speaker 1>the show to that. I would love, I'd love to

0:54:53.320 --> 0:54:55.800
<v Speaker 1>tell you more. You know the Germans had used encrypted

0:54:55.840 --> 0:54:59.200
<v Speaker 1>communications that used a typewriter like machine that had daily

0:54:59.280 --> 0:55:01.120
<v Speaker 1>codes in it, and you had to set a bunch

0:55:01.120 --> 0:55:03.080
<v Speaker 1>of dials with the daily code, and if you didn't

0:55:03.080 --> 0:55:08.600
<v Speaker 1>know the daily code, it was basically unhackable until the

0:55:08.640 --> 0:55:13.319
<v Speaker 1>British Secret Service found a German submarine was able to

0:55:13.400 --> 0:55:18.120
<v Speaker 1>retrieve the Enigma machine and then build effectively the world's

0:55:18.160 --> 0:55:22.879
<v Speaker 1>first computer, which could then just through through raw iteration,

0:55:23.520 --> 0:55:28.000
<v Speaker 1>was able to crack the codes of the German communications

0:55:28.520 --> 0:55:31.680
<v Speaker 1>and effectively ended up winning the war in no small

0:55:31.760 --> 0:55:33.960
<v Speaker 1>part because they knew most of what the Germans were

0:55:33.960 --> 0:55:37.120
<v Speaker 1>talking about. It's a fascinating story and one that was

0:55:37.120 --> 0:55:40.120
<v Speaker 1>was only declassified about ten years ago, and it sounds

0:55:40.160 --> 0:55:45.839
<v Speaker 1>like this, that is the Enigma machine working right there.

0:55:47.160 --> 0:55:50.240
<v Speaker 1>Panthers take on the Cardinals. Matt, We've got a quarterback

0:55:50.320 --> 0:55:52.960
<v Speaker 1>change for the Panthers that probably does not well. I mean,

0:55:53.280 --> 0:55:56.560
<v Speaker 1>all the quarterbacks are bad. Yeah, So Sam Donald not

0:55:56.560 --> 0:55:58.799
<v Speaker 1>going to play this week, leaving p J. Walker at

0:55:58.800 --> 0:56:01.560
<v Speaker 1>the Helm and then Cam Newton signed there this week.

0:56:01.600 --> 0:56:04.400
<v Speaker 1>But remember Newton hasn't played for this coaching staff before,

0:56:04.680 --> 0:56:06.440
<v Speaker 1>so he's probably gonna need some time to get up

0:56:06.440 --> 0:56:09.360
<v Speaker 1>to speed on the playbook and to read that Passing

0:56:09.400 --> 0:56:12.640
<v Speaker 1>for Dummies book that he picked up last week. Yeah,

0:56:12.680 --> 0:56:15.319
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be weird. Walker had a start last year

0:56:15.320 --> 0:56:17.840
<v Speaker 1>against the Lions where he managed to fifty eight in

0:56:17.880 --> 0:56:21.040
<v Speaker 1>a score that would be his ceiling here, and I

0:56:21.080 --> 0:56:23.759
<v Speaker 1>think by a lot. Arizona is allowing only two or

0:56:23.800 --> 0:56:27.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty five yards per game, just over one passing score

0:56:27.000 --> 0:56:29.960
<v Speaker 1>per game. By the way, the Panthers are going to

0:56:30.040 --> 0:56:33.960
<v Speaker 1>be missing center Matt Paradise and left tackle Cam Irving

0:56:34.040 --> 0:56:36.480
<v Speaker 1>both out of this game, so that's not good for

0:56:36.520 --> 0:56:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Walker either. I will give Dj Moore I start, but

0:56:39.920 --> 0:56:42.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm only giving him a C grade. I don't trust

0:56:42.160 --> 0:56:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Walker at all, so that's why Moore's downgraded all the

0:56:44.840 --> 0:56:46.960
<v Speaker 1>way to a SEA. But he does get to line

0:56:47.040 --> 0:56:50.840
<v Speaker 1>up against Marco Wilson most often, and he's allowed to

0:56:50.880 --> 0:56:54.879
<v Speaker 1>pass the rating of one in his coverage, including four touchdowns.

0:56:56.080 --> 0:56:58.200
<v Speaker 1>The only other Panther you should really think about is

0:56:58.280 --> 0:57:01.719
<v Speaker 1>Christian McCaffrey, who saw eighteen touches last week in his

0:57:01.800 --> 0:57:04.840
<v Speaker 1>first game since Week three now. He faced a really

0:57:04.840 --> 0:57:07.720
<v Speaker 1>good Patriots defense and managed a hundred and six total

0:57:07.800 --> 0:57:11.520
<v Speaker 1>yards and was on the field for only twenty nine snaps,

0:57:12.040 --> 0:57:15.480
<v Speaker 1>which was their play so half of the plays. But

0:57:15.560 --> 0:57:18.200
<v Speaker 1>he was handed the ball or targeted nineteen times out

0:57:18.200 --> 0:57:20.440
<v Speaker 1>of those, so that's like two thirds. So I think

0:57:20.480 --> 0:57:22.600
<v Speaker 1>they're going to ramp him up another ten or so

0:57:22.760 --> 0:57:25.000
<v Speaker 1>snaps this week, so he'll probably be in the twenty

0:57:25.120 --> 0:57:28.200
<v Speaker 1>three range for touches. And he's an A grade because

0:57:28.240 --> 0:57:30.400
<v Speaker 1>the Cards have been mostly good against the position. But

0:57:30.440 --> 0:57:32.880
<v Speaker 1>if you top twenty touches, you have a good day

0:57:32.920 --> 0:57:37.240
<v Speaker 1>against Arizona. Dalvin James Robinson, Darrell Henderson, Aaron Jones all

0:57:37.320 --> 0:57:41.400
<v Speaker 1>had great Fantasy days when they topped twenty touches. Kyler

0:57:41.520 --> 0:57:45.680
<v Speaker 1>and Hopkins both have not practiced yet this week. In fact,

0:57:45.680 --> 0:57:48.479
<v Speaker 1>the Cards have the Seahawks next week and then there

0:57:48.480 --> 0:57:51.280
<v Speaker 1>by after that, so it's very feasible that they could

0:57:51.320 --> 0:57:54.880
<v Speaker 1>rest both Kyler Murray and DeAndre Hopkins until after they're

0:57:54.880 --> 0:57:57.440
<v Speaker 1>by s. Murray is going to be a game time decision.

0:57:58.200 --> 0:58:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Did get some light practice in on Friday. UM. Hopkins

0:58:01.560 --> 0:58:03.720
<v Speaker 1>didn't practice all week and we can pretty much assume

0:58:03.760 --> 0:58:05.919
<v Speaker 1>he is not gonna go. Yeah, and A J. Green

0:58:05.960 --> 0:58:08.360
<v Speaker 1>also landed on the COVID list last week and didn't play.

0:58:08.480 --> 0:58:12.960
<v Speaker 1>He's very iffy for this week. UM. Without Green and Hopkins,

0:58:13.080 --> 0:58:15.720
<v Speaker 1>it was Christian Kirk leading the way, catching all six

0:58:16.160 --> 0:58:19.440
<v Speaker 1>of his Colt McCoy targets for nine one yards. Ron

0:58:19.520 --> 0:58:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Dale Moore and Antoine Wesley were both on the field

0:58:22.320 --> 0:58:26.760
<v Speaker 1>for over of the snaps, but they can't really be trusted.

0:58:26.800 --> 0:58:29.600
<v Speaker 1>So it's Kirk getting the C grade. UH. Colt McCoy

0:58:29.680 --> 0:58:33.560
<v Speaker 1>probably starts, we're thinking, so let's leave the rest of

0:58:33.600 --> 0:58:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the passing game on the bench. Caroline has been pretty

0:58:36.480 --> 0:58:39.440
<v Speaker 1>good against the past the fifth fewest passing yards allowed

0:58:39.480 --> 0:58:43.160
<v Speaker 1>at per game, and either a not very healthy Kyler

0:58:43.360 --> 0:58:47.400
<v Speaker 1>or Colt McCoy as the quarterback, that doesn't make it good. Uh.

0:58:47.720 --> 0:58:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Zach Ertz was on the field for eight of the

0:58:49.720 --> 0:58:52.680
<v Speaker 1>snaps last week and only had five targets. The targets

0:58:52.680 --> 0:58:54.440
<v Speaker 1>just weren't that good with McCoy under center, and the

0:58:54.480 --> 0:58:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Panthers are only allowing four catches and forty two yards

0:58:57.720 --> 0:59:02.200
<v Speaker 1>per game to the position Kyler or Hopkins end up playing.

0:59:02.200 --> 0:59:04.360
<v Speaker 1>I'll give them both SEA grades and you could bump

0:59:04.480 --> 0:59:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Art's up to a see if Kyler does go now

0:59:07.560 --> 0:59:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Chase Edmonds he is out for this one and might

0:59:10.400 --> 0:59:12.000
<v Speaker 1>be out for a couple more weeks with a high

0:59:12.040 --> 0:59:15.960
<v Speaker 1>ankle sprain. James Conner has seen his fantasy value hit

0:59:16.240 --> 0:59:19.640
<v Speaker 1>its second wind after one seventy three total yards and

0:59:19.720 --> 0:59:22.840
<v Speaker 1>three scores last week against the Niners. It's the most

0:59:23.000 --> 0:59:25.520
<v Speaker 1>bell Cowie he's ever been. Worth noting that, you know,

0:59:25.600 --> 0:59:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Benjamin did see nine carries in a score, and I

0:59:28.480 --> 0:59:31.600
<v Speaker 1>think he fills the Edmunds role. Connor probably looking at

0:59:31.680 --> 0:59:34.200
<v Speaker 1>fifteen touches in this game, which is probably the minimum.

0:59:34.240 --> 0:59:36.760
<v Speaker 1>And four of the five running backs who've seen fifteen

0:59:36.760 --> 0:59:39.640
<v Speaker 1>touches against the Panthers this year, well they've scored, So

0:59:39.840 --> 0:59:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Connor gets a B grade. Yeah, Connor has been an

0:59:43.560 --> 0:59:47.440
<v Speaker 1>awfully reliable touchdown score, which is which is fantastic. You know,

0:59:47.560 --> 0:59:50.160
<v Speaker 1>if Murray doesn't go or does play on this ankle,

0:59:50.240 --> 0:59:52.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, the running game hasn't been a factor for

0:59:52.440 --> 0:59:55.240
<v Speaker 1>him really since very early in the season anyway, and

0:59:55.800 --> 0:59:58.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe maybe even hobble. He ends up with

0:59:58.320 --> 1:00:01.720
<v Speaker 1>a decent game here when come back. We'll continue breaking

1:00:01.720 --> 1:00:05.400
<v Speaker 1>down games, including Tampa Bay taking on Washington and what

1:00:05.480 --> 1:00:08.080
<v Speaker 1>feels like a very one sided game. We'll tell you

1:00:08.600 --> 1:00:12.120
<v Speaker 1>what do you expect from a Washington offense, That Washington

1:00:12.160 --> 1:00:15.080
<v Speaker 1>offense that um needs to have a bounced back game,

1:00:15.080 --> 1:00:17.400
<v Speaker 1>and Antonio Gibson owners in a panic right now. We'll

1:00:17.400 --> 1:00:19.280
<v Speaker 1>tell you what to expect from him when we come back.

1:00:34.400 --> 1:00:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back Fantasy Football Weekly, the Covid edition, Cult Charichy

1:00:37.800 --> 1:00:40.840
<v Speaker 1>and you're working from home. While you're at home, you

1:00:40.880 --> 1:00:45.240
<v Speaker 1>can draft a new Guillotine League team of your very own.

1:00:45.360 --> 1:00:48.360
<v Speaker 1>There's still plenty of time. We're probably at like the

1:00:48.360 --> 1:00:51.040
<v Speaker 1>halfway point of the season. Still plenty of time left

1:00:51.040 --> 1:00:53.800
<v Speaker 1>to get in on the hottest new format and fantasy sports.

1:00:53.800 --> 1:00:56.439
<v Speaker 1>As you probably already know, instead of playing head to head,

1:00:56.840 --> 1:00:59.720
<v Speaker 1>the lowest scoring team gets chopped. All their players go

1:00:59.720 --> 1:01:02.600
<v Speaker 1>to the averwire, where you get to build a superstar

1:01:02.720 --> 1:01:04.960
<v Speaker 1>roster over the course of the season. All you have

1:01:05.000 --> 1:01:07.240
<v Speaker 1>to do is not finished last. In any given week,

1:01:07.280 --> 1:01:09.720
<v Speaker 1>the last team standing wins the whole thing. New leagues

1:01:09.760 --> 1:01:13.440
<v Speaker 1>forming at Guillotine and leagues dot Com. Plenty more matchups

1:01:13.440 --> 1:01:16.440
<v Speaker 1>to get to, including Tampa Bay taking on Washington. Tampa

1:01:16.480 --> 1:01:20.480
<v Speaker 1>will be without some key cogs here. Antonio Brown is

1:01:20.720 --> 1:01:25.040
<v Speaker 1>out for sure, Rob Gronkowski out for sure. Chris Godwin

1:01:25.160 --> 1:01:28.920
<v Speaker 1>is a maybe on a bad foot, So we'll take

1:01:28.960 --> 1:01:31.280
<v Speaker 1>that into account as we break down this game. For

1:01:31.440 --> 1:01:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Brady and Evans, they're obvious a's and the only thing

1:01:34.160 --> 1:01:36.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna mention for Evans is just how safe he

1:01:36.360 --> 1:01:39.640
<v Speaker 1>becomes when Antonio Brown is out, because the averages eight

1:01:39.760 --> 1:01:43.800
<v Speaker 1>targets in non Brown games and his average game when

1:01:43.920 --> 1:01:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Mike Evans gets h eight targets is ninety yards and

1:01:47.480 --> 1:01:50.840
<v Speaker 1>one and a half touchdowns per game. So a very

1:01:50.840 --> 1:01:53.120
<v Speaker 1>safe start for Mike Evans. One of my favorite receivers

1:01:53.160 --> 1:01:56.960
<v Speaker 1>for the entire week. Now, if Chris Godwin we're healthy,

1:01:57.080 --> 1:02:00.520
<v Speaker 1>I'd be giving him an A grade against a terrible secondary.

1:02:00.960 --> 1:02:03.320
<v Speaker 1>But on the bad foot, if he does play, I'm

1:02:03.320 --> 1:02:05.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna lower him down to a B grade just to

1:02:05.240 --> 1:02:07.320
<v Speaker 1>take into account the injury in the prospect of him

1:02:07.360 --> 1:02:10.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe not finishing the game. And then my take a

1:02:10.760 --> 1:02:13.440
<v Speaker 1>chance on me wide receiver was Tyler Johnson, as you

1:02:13.480 --> 1:02:15.520
<v Speaker 1>may recall, and he is somebody you can use in

1:02:15.560 --> 1:02:19.040
<v Speaker 1>a pinch if needed. Let's talk about O. J. Howard

1:02:19.040 --> 1:02:22.760
<v Speaker 1>and Cameron brad I'm inclined to give them the C

1:02:23.080 --> 1:02:27.960
<v Speaker 1>dark harpoon here because it's no, it's not it's a

1:02:28.000 --> 1:02:30.480
<v Speaker 1>C grade. It's a it's C. It's it's not a

1:02:30.520 --> 1:02:34.080
<v Speaker 1>C minus dart, it's a C dark. Both guys have

1:02:34.240 --> 1:02:37.680
<v Speaker 1>split snaps evenly in the games, Rob Gronkowski has missed

1:02:38.000 --> 1:02:41.320
<v Speaker 1>and Washington has allowed the fourth most tight end yards,

1:02:41.360 --> 1:02:44.520
<v Speaker 1>So you could try one of those two guys, but

1:02:44.680 --> 1:02:47.040
<v Speaker 1>really it is a true dart throw between the two

1:02:47.080 --> 1:02:50.200
<v Speaker 1>of them. Let's go to the Washington side. Washington's offensive

1:02:50.200 --> 1:02:53.320
<v Speaker 1>line should get Brandon Sheriff back and Sam caused me

1:02:53.400 --> 1:02:55.800
<v Speaker 1>back after they return to practice this week. That helps

1:02:55.840 --> 1:02:58.760
<v Speaker 1>a bit, but I'm still really down on a lot

1:02:58.800 --> 1:03:02.680
<v Speaker 1>of this Washington offense, and especially Antonio Gibson. He's still

1:03:02.760 --> 1:03:04.640
<v Speaker 1>got the he still got the stress fracture in his

1:03:04.720 --> 1:03:06.360
<v Speaker 1>leg that's probably gonna be there through the end of

1:03:06.360 --> 1:03:09.120
<v Speaker 1>the season. Even coming off the bye week, Tampa See's

1:03:09.160 --> 1:03:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the fewest rushing attempts and allows the second fewest rushing

1:03:12.840 --> 1:03:16.640
<v Speaker 1>yards and only three point eight yards per carry. Gibson

1:03:16.720 --> 1:03:19.840
<v Speaker 1>hasn't topped sixty three rushing yards since way back in

1:03:19.880 --> 1:03:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Week two, and he doesn't catch, which is a major

1:03:23.120 --> 1:03:25.000
<v Speaker 1>problem if you think Tom Brady is gonna stake his

1:03:25.040 --> 1:03:27.200
<v Speaker 1>team to a big lead, which is very likely here.

1:03:27.760 --> 1:03:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Gibson not notched just thirty five scoreless yards despite getting

1:03:32.600 --> 1:03:35.240
<v Speaker 1>sixteen touches when these two teams met in the Wild

1:03:35.240 --> 1:03:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Cowd Round last season. So for the first time this year,

1:03:38.600 --> 1:03:43.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm giving Antonio Gibson a straight up bench grade, which

1:03:43.920 --> 1:03:47.280
<v Speaker 1>is something. It's funny you say that, Matt, because when

1:03:47.280 --> 1:03:49.440
<v Speaker 1>I when I put him into the bench grade usually

1:03:49.480 --> 1:03:51.640
<v Speaker 1>on talent. I will not put guys into the bench

1:03:51.640 --> 1:03:53.640
<v Speaker 1>as willingly as you did. And I thought to myself,

1:03:53.880 --> 1:03:56.000
<v Speaker 1>this is a very Matt Harrison move, right, thank you

1:03:56.040 --> 1:03:59.160
<v Speaker 1>putting the bench grade on Antonio Gibson. Let's go to

1:03:59.160 --> 1:04:01.680
<v Speaker 1>the passing game. Taylor Heineke is also on the bench.

1:04:01.720 --> 1:04:04.800
<v Speaker 1>The Bucks secondary is expected to get back Carlton Davis

1:04:04.840 --> 1:04:07.880
<v Speaker 1>and Sean Murphy. Bunting is a game time decision, and

1:04:07.880 --> 1:04:10.440
<v Speaker 1>they've already got Jamal Dean, who is Pro Football Focus

1:04:10.480 --> 1:04:14.360
<v Speaker 1>is fourth ranked corner and they'd actually played well even

1:04:14.360 --> 1:04:17.240
<v Speaker 1>with the backups over the last three weeks. Anyway, get this,

1:04:17.840 --> 1:04:21.520
<v Speaker 1>over the last three weeks, opposing quarterbacks are averaging one

1:04:21.720 --> 1:04:26.520
<v Speaker 1>hundred forty passing yards per game. That's it against the Bucks.

1:04:26.920 --> 1:04:30.440
<v Speaker 1>So Heinek squarely on the bench. I have a wobbly

1:04:30.640 --> 1:04:33.560
<v Speaker 1>C grade on Terry McLaurin, who we talked about earlier,

1:04:33.560 --> 1:04:36.960
<v Speaker 1>and we already detailed a lot of his concerns um

1:04:37.080 --> 1:04:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the return to the health for the Bucks secondary is

1:04:39.080 --> 1:04:41.000
<v Speaker 1>a problem. So is the is the fact that no

1:04:41.080 --> 1:04:45.480
<v Speaker 1>opposing receivers top sixty yards sixty yards in three weeks.

1:04:45.520 --> 1:04:48.800
<v Speaker 1>And I mentioned earlier McLaren has been all boom or bust.

1:04:49.280 --> 1:04:51.880
<v Speaker 1>This game's got bus written all over it. So if

1:04:51.920 --> 1:04:53.560
<v Speaker 1>it's got to go one way or the other, I'm

1:04:53.760 --> 1:04:56.200
<v Speaker 1>very nervous about this being a bus grade. Fro mclarence,

1:04:56.200 --> 1:04:58.720
<v Speaker 1>and just to see grade for him, Ricky Seals Jones

1:04:58.760 --> 1:05:01.000
<v Speaker 1>gets a C grade only because it's a tight end

1:05:01.040 --> 1:05:03.120
<v Speaker 1>position in a bye week Logan Thomas is going to

1:05:03.160 --> 1:05:06.440
<v Speaker 1>miss another game. Seals bombed in his last game, but

1:05:06.520 --> 1:05:09.120
<v Speaker 1>he was averaging fifty yards per game in the three

1:05:09.160 --> 1:05:11.840
<v Speaker 1>games before that. The Bucks are the middle of the

1:05:11.920 --> 1:05:15.560
<v Speaker 1>road uh tight end defense, So if you're in a pinch,

1:05:15.600 --> 1:05:19.360
<v Speaker 1>you could still use Ricky Seals Jones unprojected volume, which

1:05:19.400 --> 1:05:21.760
<v Speaker 1>could be helpful there. I've got J. D. Mckissic on

1:05:21.800 --> 1:05:24.240
<v Speaker 1>the bench as well. Tampa allows the fifth most receptions

1:05:24.240 --> 1:05:27.000
<v Speaker 1>in the twelfth most receiving yards to opposing tight ends.

1:05:27.520 --> 1:05:30.840
<v Speaker 1>UH sorry, posing running backs through the air. But Miles

1:05:30.920 --> 1:05:33.360
<v Speaker 1>Gaskin is a single handled responsible for one fifth of

1:05:33.360 --> 1:05:38.720
<v Speaker 1>those receptions and tampas allowed really very little to other backs,

1:05:38.920 --> 1:05:41.960
<v Speaker 1>and McKissick accounted for just thirteen yards when these teams

1:05:42.000 --> 1:05:45.200
<v Speaker 1>met in the playoffs. Last year's sign also held him

1:05:45.280 --> 1:05:48.320
<v Speaker 1>with a passion too. You know, I really don't, but

1:05:49.600 --> 1:05:52.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm just I'm off mckissic, so I'm I'm keeping him

1:05:52.320 --> 1:05:55.200
<v Speaker 1>on the bench as well. You were never on kiss No,

1:05:55.320 --> 1:05:57.760
<v Speaker 1>you called him j D mcs suck it for an

1:05:57.920 --> 1:06:00.720
<v Speaker 1>entire year while half of see is in last year

1:06:00.760 --> 1:06:02.440
<v Speaker 1>and then he hearned his way off of that nickname

1:06:02.600 --> 1:06:04.400
<v Speaker 1>and I had to eat crow and I did. But

1:06:04.520 --> 1:06:06.960
<v Speaker 1>he's back on the bench and he's back to being Jadmon.

1:06:08.280 --> 1:06:12.919
<v Speaker 1>There's the crow, butte the last Yeah. Perfect. Let's talk

1:06:13.120 --> 1:06:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Eagles taking on the Broncos. Brian. You know, despite being

1:06:16.800 --> 1:06:20.800
<v Speaker 1>a very wobbly passer, Jalen Hurts finds his way two

1:06:20.800 --> 1:06:24.080
<v Speaker 1>good matchups most of the time. But man, this is

1:06:24.080 --> 1:06:26.120
<v Speaker 1>a tough one and I'm nervous about him in this

1:06:26.120 --> 1:06:29.240
<v Speaker 1>matchup against the Broncos. What do you think? I'm nervous too,

1:06:29.240 --> 1:06:30.800
<v Speaker 1>But I'm still gonna give him a b. He just

1:06:30.880 --> 1:06:34.040
<v Speaker 1>seems to come through weekend week out despite the matchup.

1:06:34.080 --> 1:06:36.480
<v Speaker 1>And it's all really about the rushing upside and the

1:06:36.520 --> 1:06:39.960
<v Speaker 1>safe looor it gives him. Denver did hold Lamar Jackson

1:06:40.200 --> 1:06:42.000
<v Speaker 1>and Check on the ground, but that was back in

1:06:42.040 --> 1:06:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Week four with basically an entire different defense. So I'm

1:06:45.600 --> 1:06:48.640
<v Speaker 1>still giving Hurts a b here. I do like the

1:06:48.680 --> 1:06:51.360
<v Speaker 1>matchup for his wide receiver Davante Smith, going to give

1:06:51.440 --> 1:06:54.440
<v Speaker 1>him a b uh. Denver will be missing starting quarterbacks

1:06:54.480 --> 1:06:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Sartan and Bryce Callahan, which is all I need

1:06:57.960 --> 1:07:00.439
<v Speaker 1>to start Smith with confidence. Denver as all so given

1:07:00.520 --> 1:07:04.080
<v Speaker 1>up big games two similar downfield threats like Hollywood Brown,

1:07:04.120 --> 1:07:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Henry Rugs, and Deonte Johnson, each holding any touchdown of

1:07:07.280 --> 1:07:10.120
<v Speaker 1>at least forty eight yards. We're not going to discuss

1:07:10.200 --> 1:07:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Reagor or Quiz Watkins in any detail. They're both

1:07:13.040 --> 1:07:16.000
<v Speaker 1>on the bench though, and just to see for Dallas

1:07:16.040 --> 1:07:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Goddard from me the Broncos. The Broncos are one of

1:07:18.760 --> 1:07:20.920
<v Speaker 1>three teams that hasn't allowed a tight end to score

1:07:20.960 --> 1:07:23.320
<v Speaker 1>this season, and on top of that, Denver has held

1:07:23.600 --> 1:07:26.200
<v Speaker 1>all but three tight ends to two receptions or less.

1:07:26.200 --> 1:07:29.440
<v Speaker 1>So ce for Goddard and lastly, the running backs. Jordan

1:07:29.480 --> 1:07:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Howard appears to be the lead back in Philly despite

1:07:32.520 --> 1:07:35.720
<v Speaker 1>getting out snapped by Boston Scott. He led Philly last

1:07:35.720 --> 1:07:38.880
<v Speaker 1>week and carries with seventeen, had seventy one yards and

1:07:38.920 --> 1:07:42.200
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown. But this is a brutal matchup for Howard

1:07:42.200 --> 1:07:44.800
<v Speaker 1>and still Scott's can eat into his work. Kenneth Gainwell

1:07:44.800 --> 1:07:46.440
<v Speaker 1>will probably take a lot of the passing work. So

1:07:46.480 --> 1:07:49.520
<v Speaker 1>all the Eagles backs are on the bench. Now over

1:07:49.640 --> 1:07:52.600
<v Speaker 1>to the Broncos side and starting with their running backs,

1:07:52.600 --> 1:07:56.280
<v Speaker 1>and we gotta talk about Javon Williams. Javonte Williams. Excuse me,

1:07:56.320 --> 1:08:00.640
<v Speaker 1>he gets a B which stands for better than Melvin Gordon. Uh,

1:08:00.760 --> 1:08:02.400
<v Speaker 1>listen to this stat and this all this is all

1:08:02.400 --> 1:08:04.640
<v Speaker 1>credit to Pro Football Focus, but I gotta pass it along.

1:08:04.840 --> 1:08:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Javante Williams is tied with Nick Chubb with the most

1:08:08.240 --> 1:08:11.280
<v Speaker 1>forced mis tackles with thirty five on the year. Williams

1:08:11.320 --> 1:08:14.680
<v Speaker 1>has done it on less touches. In fact, Williams leads

1:08:14.720 --> 1:08:18.599
<v Speaker 1>the NFL with a thirty seven percent forced miss tackle rate.

1:08:19.080 --> 1:08:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Nobody else is above thirty percent right now, and since

1:08:21.880 --> 1:08:27.040
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and six, only Marshawn Lynch and Nick Chubb

1:08:27.080 --> 1:08:29.479
<v Speaker 1>a few years ago finished with a miss tackle rate

1:08:29.479 --> 1:08:32.120
<v Speaker 1>above thirty percent. In the last fifteen years, and Javontay

1:08:32.160 --> 1:08:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Williams at thirty seven percent right now he needs more work.

1:08:35.560 --> 1:08:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Philly is top twelve in the most fantasy points allowed

1:08:37.920 --> 1:08:41.200
<v Speaker 1>to running backs. Unfortunately, Melvin Melvin Gordon still getting a

1:08:41.200 --> 1:08:43.040
<v Speaker 1>ton of carry, so he gets a C in this

1:08:43.040 --> 1:08:45.240
<v Speaker 1>this matchup, but B for Williams and we just hope

1:08:45.439 --> 1:08:47.479
<v Speaker 1>his touches will increase as well they we get later

1:08:47.479 --> 1:08:50.600
<v Speaker 1>into the season. UH. To the wide receivers for the Broncos,

1:08:51.439 --> 1:08:54.240
<v Speaker 1>just to see. For Jerry Judy, I'd still start him,

1:08:54.280 --> 1:08:57.439
<v Speaker 1>but I temper expectations. The Eagles are allowing just eleven

1:08:57.479 --> 1:09:00.280
<v Speaker 1>catches on thirty three yards per game to a moosing

1:09:00.280 --> 1:09:04.400
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers, and over their last UH four games, just

1:09:04.479 --> 1:09:07.000
<v Speaker 1>one wide receiver has scored in topped sixty yards and

1:09:07.040 --> 1:09:09.640
<v Speaker 1>they weren't the same player. And for that reason, I

1:09:09.680 --> 1:09:12.800
<v Speaker 1>put Courtland Sutton on the bench. Just six targets over

1:09:12.840 --> 1:09:15.840
<v Speaker 1>the last two games. With Jared Judy back in the lineup,

1:09:15.880 --> 1:09:19.799
<v Speaker 1>Judy has doubled up that target total, unlike Jean Claude

1:09:19.840 --> 1:09:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Van Damn. The splits are not good here for Courtland Sutton,

1:09:23.080 --> 1:09:25.479
<v Speaker 1>so he's on the bench for me. UH Noah Fant

1:09:25.600 --> 1:09:28.240
<v Speaker 1>is not though, can give him a B. Philly has

1:09:28.240 --> 1:09:31.439
<v Speaker 1>allowed the most tight end receptions and touchdowns to the

1:09:31.479 --> 1:09:34.679
<v Speaker 1>position this year, and last week against the Eagles, three

1:09:35.120 --> 1:09:38.679
<v Speaker 1>different Chargers tight ends finished inside the top twenty Two

1:09:38.720 --> 1:09:41.479
<v Speaker 1>of them finished inside the top five, and neither was

1:09:41.560 --> 1:09:44.479
<v Speaker 1>Jared Cook. It was Steven Anderson and Donald Parham. So

1:09:44.520 --> 1:09:46.320
<v Speaker 1>I like Fant a lot. Here're gonna give him a B.

1:09:46.479 --> 1:09:48.840
<v Speaker 1>But Teddy B is on the bench. For me, this

1:09:48.880 --> 1:09:50.800
<v Speaker 1>game is going to be all about the running backs

1:09:50.880 --> 1:09:54.160
<v Speaker 1>with a little fan sprinkled in so Bridgewater on the bench.

1:09:55.720 --> 1:09:57.640
<v Speaker 1>That all makes sense to me. Seahawks take on the

1:09:57.720 --> 1:10:00.720
<v Speaker 1>Packers Matt and for the se Hawks they're going to

1:10:00.720 --> 1:10:02.880
<v Speaker 1>be without Chris Carson's we have some clarity on that.

1:10:02.960 --> 1:10:05.519
<v Speaker 1>Looks like it will be an Alex Collins start again.

1:10:06.000 --> 1:10:08.840
<v Speaker 1>But for the first time for Collins, he gets to

1:10:09.000 --> 1:10:13.599
<v Speaker 1>play in a Russell Wilson led offense, and I think

1:10:13.640 --> 1:10:16.840
<v Speaker 1>that gives him some some sneaky upside in this game.

1:10:16.920 --> 1:10:19.840
<v Speaker 1>And I think there's an opportunity for Alex Collins to

1:10:20.160 --> 1:10:22.439
<v Speaker 1>be a guy that you could potentially start here. What

1:10:22.439 --> 1:10:25.519
<v Speaker 1>do you think? Yeah, I will note that Alex Collins

1:10:25.680 --> 1:10:27.839
<v Speaker 1>is dealing with a groin injury and he's been limited

1:10:27.840 --> 1:10:31.000
<v Speaker 1>in practice all week. He will go if he does,

1:10:31.120 --> 1:10:34.120
<v Speaker 1>He's probably a workhorse here. Since Carson went down with

1:10:34.160 --> 1:10:36.519
<v Speaker 1>the injury, Collins has seen fifteen or more carries in

1:10:36.600 --> 1:10:38.760
<v Speaker 1>three or four games. The one he didn't was a

1:10:38.840 --> 1:10:42.080
<v Speaker 1>blowout win against the Jaguars where they really didn't need him.

1:10:42.120 --> 1:10:44.760
<v Speaker 1>The Packers have been a middle of the pack UH

1:10:44.920 --> 1:10:48.160
<v Speaker 1>team against opposing runners, although they have allowed the seventh

1:10:48.200 --> 1:10:51.839
<v Speaker 1>most touchdowns to opposing backs and gave up three rushing

1:10:51.880 --> 1:10:54.479
<v Speaker 1>scores to the Arizona Backs just two weeks ago. So

1:10:54.760 --> 1:10:57.200
<v Speaker 1>I like Alex Collins with a B grade. In this one.

1:10:57.880 --> 1:11:00.360
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned Russell Wilson coming back with his from his

1:11:00.400 --> 1:11:03.599
<v Speaker 1>finger injury. UH. He has to go to Lambeau, which

1:11:03.680 --> 1:11:05.840
<v Speaker 1>is kind of a home coming since he played a

1:11:05.880 --> 1:11:09.200
<v Speaker 1>year at Wisconsin UH and faced the Packers defense that

1:11:09.880 --> 1:11:13.719
<v Speaker 1>hasn't really missed Jaire Alexander at all. They've held five

1:11:13.760 --> 1:11:16.400
<v Speaker 1>of the last six quarterbacks they've faced to one or

1:11:16.560 --> 1:11:20.439
<v Speaker 1>zero touchdown passes, and that list includes Patrick Mahomes and

1:11:20.560 --> 1:11:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Kyler Murray in it. So no quarterback has topped three

1:11:24.439 --> 1:11:27.879
<v Speaker 1>yards against Green Bay since Week seven of last season

1:11:28.240 --> 1:11:32.880
<v Speaker 1>when Deshaun Watson did it. And however, Jaire is still out.

1:11:33.520 --> 1:11:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Eric Stokes, who's kind of his backup, is dealing with

1:11:36.160 --> 1:11:40.800
<v Speaker 1>a knee injury. He's looking doubtful. Isaac Yaya Doom is

1:11:40.840 --> 1:11:45.679
<v Speaker 1>on the COVID list. Thank you, Aaron Rodgers. So Kevin

1:11:45.760 --> 1:11:49.799
<v Speaker 1>King has entered the chat and should get extensive snaps

1:11:49.840 --> 1:11:52.160
<v Speaker 1>this week. So I was gonna give Wilson a C grade,

1:11:52.360 --> 1:11:54.799
<v Speaker 1>but I bumped him up to a B based solely

1:11:54.840 --> 1:11:57.200
<v Speaker 1>on Kevin King being on the field for fifty snaps.

1:11:58.280 --> 1:12:01.160
<v Speaker 1>King plays the right side of the field and DK

1:12:01.320 --> 1:12:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Metcalf runs over half his routes on the offensive left

1:12:04.439 --> 1:12:06.879
<v Speaker 1>side of the field, so he gets an A grade.

1:12:07.439 --> 1:12:09.760
<v Speaker 1>King has allowed a passer rating of one thirty two

1:12:09.760 --> 1:12:12.599
<v Speaker 1>in his coverage. Even when DK flexes into the slot,

1:12:13.080 --> 1:12:16.960
<v Speaker 1>he'll see Shandon Sullivan, who has been slightly blow average.

1:12:17.040 --> 1:12:19.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm only gonna give Tyler Lockett a C grade, though

1:12:19.880 --> 1:12:22.400
<v Speaker 1>he lines up about equal time from the slot and

1:12:22.439 --> 1:12:25.160
<v Speaker 1>the right, where he'll face off against green Bay's best

1:12:25.160 --> 1:12:28.840
<v Speaker 1>corner that's Russell Douglas, who's been pretty good since he

1:12:28.960 --> 1:12:32.519
<v Speaker 1>signed in green Bay. On the other side, Aaron Jones

1:12:32.560 --> 1:12:34.640
<v Speaker 1>gets an A and I already talked up A. J.

1:12:34.800 --> 1:12:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Dillon as might take a chance on me runner. I

1:12:36.640 --> 1:12:39.920
<v Speaker 1>will just mention that opposing running backs have have been

1:12:39.960 --> 1:12:43.760
<v Speaker 1>averaging thirty three touches per game against Seattle. That's a lot,

1:12:43.840 --> 1:12:45.679
<v Speaker 1>and that's the second most in the league, so there's

1:12:45.720 --> 1:12:49.400
<v Speaker 1>plenty to go around here. Davante Adams gets an A grade.

1:12:49.400 --> 1:12:52.479
<v Speaker 1>On the assumption that Aaron Rodgers will be starting. I'll

1:12:52.560 --> 1:12:54.519
<v Speaker 1>drop him to a B if we get a Jordan's

1:12:54.600 --> 1:12:57.920
<v Speaker 1>love game, but let's talk about it as a Roger start.

1:12:58.240 --> 1:13:00.280
<v Speaker 1>He gets a B grade. The Seahawks have been better

1:13:00.320 --> 1:13:03.400
<v Speaker 1>against the past as of late, allowing only one touchdown

1:13:03.439 --> 1:13:07.200
<v Speaker 1>past to Matthew Stafford, Big Ben, Jamis Winston and Trevor

1:13:07.320 --> 1:13:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Lawrence each over the last four games. But on pure emotion,

1:13:11.560 --> 1:13:13.600
<v Speaker 1>where Rogers has been the villain and much of the

1:13:13.680 --> 1:13:16.320
<v Speaker 1>national media over the last two weeks, you know he's

1:13:16.320 --> 1:13:19.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna come out with that, I'm gonna show you all attitude.

1:13:19.880 --> 1:13:23.759
<v Speaker 1>So Rogers gets the B grade here. Um Randall Cobb,

1:13:23.840 --> 1:13:25.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna give him a C grade, by the way,

1:13:25.439 --> 1:13:27.920
<v Speaker 1>and I'm gonna talk more about Cobb next segment. But

1:13:28.000 --> 1:13:30.719
<v Speaker 1>I will mention that Cobb will line up against slot

1:13:30.760 --> 1:13:33.680
<v Speaker 1>corner Ugo Amadi for most of his snaps and a

1:13:33.760 --> 1:13:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Madi is a fill in and was targeted twelve times

1:13:36.200 --> 1:13:39.280
<v Speaker 1>by Trevor Lawrence and his only start and is currently

1:13:39.360 --> 1:13:43.280
<v Speaker 1>ranked as Pro Football focuses one sixty four ranked cornerback.

1:13:43.520 --> 1:13:47.400
<v Speaker 1>But more really good Randall Cobbs stuff coming up next?

1:13:47.400 --> 1:13:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Thing right, Yeah, I see you. You and I are

1:13:49.240 --> 1:13:51.599
<v Speaker 1>on the other side on on on Randall Cobb by

1:13:51.720 --> 1:13:56.240
<v Speaker 1>a fair margin. I'll turn you around. Maybe maybe it'll

1:13:56.240 --> 1:13:59.000
<v Speaker 1>be tough because when all when all the receivers are healthy,

1:13:59.080 --> 1:14:00.960
<v Speaker 1>he feels like the law. He feels like he's lost,

1:14:01.000 --> 1:14:02.799
<v Speaker 1>which he was through the first half of the season

1:14:03.320 --> 1:14:07.439
<v Speaker 1>when Lazard was healthy and Adams was there and MBS

1:14:07.560 --> 1:14:11.280
<v Speaker 1>was there, it felt very unreliable for me, the Cob

1:14:11.360 --> 1:14:14.680
<v Speaker 1>man out man. Uh. You will get to hear more

1:14:14.680 --> 1:14:17.280
<v Speaker 1>about Randall cob when you come back to premature speculation,

1:14:17.360 --> 1:14:21.120
<v Speaker 1>which apparently is going to involve Randall Cob everything. I'm

1:14:21.200 --> 1:14:24.280
<v Speaker 1>just just launch uh. And you'll also get too other

1:14:24.320 --> 1:14:26.920
<v Speaker 1>guys you could potentially pick up off the waiver wire

1:14:27.040 --> 1:14:29.320
<v Speaker 1>this week when everybody else is trying to pick up them.

1:14:29.560 --> 1:14:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Next week, find out who they are when we returned

1:14:31.960 --> 1:14:51.559
<v Speaker 1>to Fantasy Football Weekly. Final segment Fantasy Football Weekly, the

1:14:51.600 --> 1:14:54.200
<v Speaker 1>COVID edition, Paul charging with you. I'm the COVID guy,

1:14:54.240 --> 1:14:58.400
<v Speaker 1>which is why I am at home. My cohorts Matt

1:14:58.439 --> 1:15:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Harrison and Brian Johnson are in the stud video. You

1:15:00.400 --> 1:15:04.080
<v Speaker 1>can follow them on Twitter, where it's technically impossible to

1:15:04.240 --> 1:15:08.400
<v Speaker 1>get COVID via Twitter. I believe at explosive output for

1:15:08.479 --> 1:15:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Matt Harrison at bt X J for Brian Johnson, and

1:15:11.600 --> 1:15:14.680
<v Speaker 1>I am at Paul Charchia. This is a segment we

1:15:14.760 --> 1:15:19.120
<v Speaker 1>like to call premature speculation. We're going to give you

1:15:19.600 --> 1:15:22.320
<v Speaker 1>three players to pick up this week that people will

1:15:22.360 --> 1:15:25.960
<v Speaker 1>be trying to pick up next week. We begin with

1:15:26.080 --> 1:15:29.599
<v Speaker 1>Brian Johnson, who is your player willing with Washington tight

1:15:29.680 --> 1:15:32.240
<v Speaker 1>end Logan Thomas, who was supposed to make his return

1:15:32.280 --> 1:15:33.920
<v Speaker 1>this week, but he is not so most people have

1:15:34.000 --> 1:15:35.960
<v Speaker 1>dumped him back on the waiver wire. He's right around

1:15:37.160 --> 1:15:40.320
<v Speaker 1>rostered on in Yahoo leagues. And the reason I'm recommending Thomas,

1:15:40.360 --> 1:15:41.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's a great player and he should be

1:15:41.800 --> 1:15:46.280
<v Speaker 1>back soon, but between uh week eleven and week seventeen,

1:15:46.360 --> 1:15:49.479
<v Speaker 1>which unfortunately, Week seventeen is now a viable Fantasy Week.

1:15:49.520 --> 1:15:52.559
<v Speaker 1>It's when most championships will be held. Thomas gets to

1:15:52.600 --> 1:15:55.479
<v Speaker 1>face the Eagles twice, who I mentioned in the last segment,

1:15:55.600 --> 1:15:59.559
<v Speaker 1>or just getting absolutely shredded by opposing tight ends allowing

1:15:59.600 --> 1:16:03.040
<v Speaker 1>more than seven catches, sixty six yards and nearly one

1:16:03.080 --> 1:16:06.000
<v Speaker 1>touchdown a game. So logan Thomas could be a league

1:16:06.040 --> 1:16:07.599
<v Speaker 1>winner at tight end for you if you go grab

1:16:07.720 --> 1:16:11.760
<v Speaker 1>him right me out? Yeah? All right, Matt, who is

1:16:11.840 --> 1:16:19.880
<v Speaker 1>your premature speculation player, Marquez? No Randall Cobb. He took

1:16:19.920 --> 1:16:24.000
<v Speaker 1>a little the drama. Um. The Packers did not sign

1:16:24.080 --> 1:16:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Odell Beckham Jr. As many thought they would, but many

1:16:27.439 --> 1:16:31.880
<v Speaker 1>don't know that Randall Cobb has eight targets already this

1:16:32.000 --> 1:16:36.120
<v Speaker 1>year inside the ten yard line, which is thirty three

1:16:36.760 --> 1:16:40.639
<v Speaker 1>of the team total. They're targeting him near the end zone,

1:16:40.960 --> 1:16:46.160
<v Speaker 1>and with Robert Tonyan gone, he had six already this year,

1:16:46.600 --> 1:16:52.840
<v Speaker 1>So there's vacated infrared zone targets since since Tonyon went down.

1:16:52.920 --> 1:16:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Cobb has seen five red zone targets from the twenty

1:16:56.000 --> 1:16:59.639
<v Speaker 1>yard line in UH in those two games, and Davante

1:16:59.640 --> 1:17:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Adams did not have one in that span. So I

1:17:02.720 --> 1:17:05.679
<v Speaker 1>think that we should probably think about these vacated infrared

1:17:05.760 --> 1:17:08.479
<v Speaker 1>zone targets, and Cobb's gonna make more noise than you

1:17:08.560 --> 1:17:11.000
<v Speaker 1>think on the way out. No, you're right, it's more

1:17:11.360 --> 1:17:13.920
<v Speaker 1>more more noise than I think. You're correct about that.

1:17:14.200 --> 1:17:18.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm going with Jets backup quarterbacks, quasi starting quarterback Mike White,

1:17:18.560 --> 1:17:20.880
<v Speaker 1>who will probably get handled by the Bills this week.

1:17:21.600 --> 1:17:23.840
<v Speaker 1>But this is a forward looking segment, and if we

1:17:23.880 --> 1:17:26.240
<v Speaker 1>look forward to the schedule, he's got Miami and Houston

1:17:26.600 --> 1:17:31.600
<v Speaker 1>coming up the next two weeks, and that's a possibility

1:17:31.680 --> 1:17:34.519
<v Speaker 1>for him to look good and perhaps cement this job. Now,

1:17:35.000 --> 1:17:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Zach Wilson could end up coming back over this time frame.

1:17:38.200 --> 1:17:41.360
<v Speaker 1>But what if Mike White looks good, continues to look good,

1:17:41.400 --> 1:17:45.320
<v Speaker 1>then what do they do? I could potentially keep starting him. Um,

1:17:45.439 --> 1:17:47.720
<v Speaker 1>you already know he's been shockingly good in relief of

1:17:47.800 --> 1:17:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Zack Wilson. And you know, again, with Miami and Houston

1:17:51.240 --> 1:17:53.240
<v Speaker 1>coming up, maybe he makes a little noise here and

1:17:53.320 --> 1:17:55.800
<v Speaker 1>keeps the job and continues to look very good. Charge

1:17:55.880 --> 1:17:59.439
<v Speaker 1>that's ludicrous. It might be Zack Wilson's gonna start as

1:17:59.439 --> 1:18:05.360
<v Speaker 1>soon as he's had. The Jets aren't going for a

1:18:05.439 --> 1:18:08.200
<v Speaker 1>playoff spot. Come on, They're going to start their second

1:18:08.240 --> 1:18:12.200
<v Speaker 1>overall pick. That's absolutely I don't think it's nearly as

1:18:12.200 --> 1:18:15.439
<v Speaker 1>sure thing as you believe it is. Let's go to

1:18:15.479 --> 1:18:18.679
<v Speaker 1>the Falcons taking on the Cowboys, and let's start with

1:18:19.600 --> 1:18:21.880
<v Speaker 1>the one of the most shocking developments in the history

1:18:21.880 --> 1:18:25.320
<v Speaker 1>of fantasy football, Corderold Patterson's season. He gets an A

1:18:25.439 --> 1:18:28.320
<v Speaker 1>grade in this particular matchup. After not allowing a sixty

1:18:28.360 --> 1:18:30.960
<v Speaker 1>yard rusher through the first five games, Dallas is now

1:18:31.000 --> 1:18:33.920
<v Speaker 1>allowed four of them in the last three weeks alone.

1:18:34.320 --> 1:18:38.600
<v Speaker 1>They are Pro Football Focus is third worst run defending

1:18:38.720 --> 1:18:42.960
<v Speaker 1>and tackling unit, and Patterson's actually thirteenth among running backs

1:18:43.120 --> 1:18:47.760
<v Speaker 1>quote running backs in yards after contact at two point oh.

1:18:47.800 --> 1:18:50.559
<v Speaker 1>I mean for it, converted wide out playing running back.

1:18:50.720 --> 1:18:54.400
<v Speaker 1>It's amazing that he's good after contact. None of Dallas's

1:18:54.400 --> 1:18:56.880
<v Speaker 1>linebackers can hang with Patterson out of the backfield, and

1:18:57.000 --> 1:18:58.720
<v Speaker 1>that may be the case with their corners as well.

1:18:58.800 --> 1:19:01.800
<v Speaker 1>So we're gonna can tinue to keep starting core Darrel

1:19:01.840 --> 1:19:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Patterson with confidence, and I like him in this game.

1:19:04.680 --> 1:19:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Sticking with the running backs, Mike Davis is completely dead

1:19:07.360 --> 1:19:11.360
<v Speaker 1>to us. He's averaging a woeful three point two yards

1:19:11.360 --> 1:19:14.160
<v Speaker 1>per carry. Hasn't topped fifty three rushing yards in any

1:19:14.240 --> 1:19:17.280
<v Speaker 1>game and has two touchdowns on the year. I believe

1:19:17.320 --> 1:19:19.920
<v Speaker 1>he's straight up droppable. Matt Ryan was might take a

1:19:20.000 --> 1:19:23.120
<v Speaker 1>chance on me quarterback from earlier in the show, and

1:19:23.160 --> 1:19:26.360
<v Speaker 1>he's a C grade in this game. Kyle Pitts gets

1:19:26.360 --> 1:19:28.880
<v Speaker 1>a B grade, but I was really close to giving

1:19:28.960 --> 1:19:31.080
<v Speaker 1>him a C grade. Let's let's talk it through here.

1:19:31.400 --> 1:19:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Pitts continues to see deep targets. He actually leads

1:19:34.160 --> 1:19:37.639
<v Speaker 1>all tight ends in average depth of target at twelve yards,

1:19:38.320 --> 1:19:41.760
<v Speaker 1>and per Pro Football Focus, he's got the most intermediate

1:19:41.760 --> 1:19:45.320
<v Speaker 1>and deep receptions among all tight ends, and over half

1:19:45.360 --> 1:19:47.840
<v Speaker 1>his targets or at least ten yards down field. So

1:19:47.880 --> 1:19:49.720
<v Speaker 1>you would think with all these targets and all these

1:19:49.720 --> 1:19:52.599
<v Speaker 1>receptions being downfield, he'd be scoring touchdowns. But that isn't

1:19:52.600 --> 1:19:54.600
<v Speaker 1>the gate. He's got one touchdown all year. That's it

1:19:54.680 --> 1:19:59.880
<v Speaker 1>for Kyle Pitts. Eight eight Falcons have as many touchdowns

1:20:00.000 --> 1:20:04.280
<v Speaker 1>receptions or more than Kyle Pitts has got. Which is depressing.

1:20:06.120 --> 1:20:08.799
<v Speaker 1>Is that the vault, that's the vulture, That the vulture,

1:20:09.000 --> 1:20:12.400
<v Speaker 1>that's the vulture. Everybody's vulturing Kyle Pitts. I think you're

1:20:12.439 --> 1:20:15.439
<v Speaker 1>right Cowboys are a good tight end defense. Since getting

1:20:15.479 --> 1:20:17.760
<v Speaker 1>nuked by Gronk in the season opener, Dallas is only

1:20:17.760 --> 1:20:20.120
<v Speaker 1>giving up a quarter of one touchdown per game to

1:20:20.120 --> 1:20:22.960
<v Speaker 1>the position, So I got pitts on the speed grade,

1:20:22.960 --> 1:20:25.839
<v Speaker 1>but it's it's through what I think will be solid yardage.

1:20:25.840 --> 1:20:27.759
<v Speaker 1>But I can't give you. I can't expect a second

1:20:27.840 --> 1:20:30.880
<v Speaker 1>touchdown yet, not against the Cowboys. So just to b

1:20:31.000 --> 1:20:32.960
<v Speaker 1>grade there, and again it was close to a seat.

1:20:32.960 --> 1:20:35.040
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's go to Dallas. It looks like left

1:20:35.040 --> 1:20:37.200
<v Speaker 1>tackle Tyrone Smith is not going to play again, which

1:20:37.240 --> 1:20:40.120
<v Speaker 1>was a contributing factor for last week's total dud game.

1:20:40.439 --> 1:20:43.000
<v Speaker 1>But there's a far easier matchup and I've got strong

1:20:43.479 --> 1:20:46.640
<v Speaker 1>grades on most of your key Cowboys here, including Ezekiel.

1:20:46.680 --> 1:20:50.400
<v Speaker 1>Elliott confirmed that he will play in this game. Hasn't

1:20:50.400 --> 1:20:52.840
<v Speaker 1>scored in three straight after racking up six scores in

1:20:52.880 --> 1:20:57.280
<v Speaker 1>the previous month. Thankfully, Atlanta has allowed nine touchdown seventh

1:20:57.360 --> 1:20:59.800
<v Speaker 1>most of backs this season, and I do expect him

1:21:00.080 --> 1:21:03.360
<v Speaker 1>as well. They're also allowing the seventh most receptions and

1:21:03.439 --> 1:21:05.559
<v Speaker 1>receiving yards of the position, and Zeke's got at least

1:21:05.560 --> 1:21:08.320
<v Speaker 1>three receptions in his last three games, so he should

1:21:08.360 --> 1:21:10.960
<v Speaker 1>catch some here as well. Also an A grade on Zeke,

1:21:11.000 --> 1:21:14.080
<v Speaker 1>which is not a big surprise, giving it a grade

1:21:14.080 --> 1:21:18.320
<v Speaker 1>to um Dak Prescott a probable bounce back game coming

1:21:18.320 --> 1:21:21.679
<v Speaker 1>after last week's flop against the Falcon secondary that's faced

1:21:21.720 --> 1:21:25.960
<v Speaker 1>one of the weakest schedules of opposing quarterbacks. The only

1:21:26.120 --> 1:21:29.559
<v Speaker 1>DAK level passer the Falcons have faced is Tom Brady,

1:21:29.560 --> 1:21:33.040
<v Speaker 1>and he threw for five touchdowns. Trevor Simeon just hit

1:21:33.120 --> 1:21:35.680
<v Speaker 1>these Falcons for two fifty and two, and if we

1:21:35.720 --> 1:21:38.759
<v Speaker 1>take out bottom tier pastors like Daniel Jones, Zach Wilson,

1:21:38.800 --> 1:21:41.400
<v Speaker 1>and Sam Donald, the average passing game against the Falcons

1:21:41.400 --> 1:21:44.080
<v Speaker 1>is two eighty yards and three and a half touchdowns

1:21:44.080 --> 1:21:46.559
<v Speaker 1>per game, which is ridiculous, and we'd certainly take three

1:21:46.600 --> 1:21:49.800
<v Speaker 1>and a half touchdowns out of Dak Prescott. Ceedee Lamb

1:21:49.800 --> 1:21:52.280
<v Speaker 1>gets an A grade. I'm ignoring everything about last week's

1:21:52.280 --> 1:21:54.200
<v Speaker 1>disaster for Ceedee Lamb other than the fact that he

1:21:54.240 --> 1:21:57.360
<v Speaker 1>was targeted nine times. I'm gonna fire him up with

1:21:57.360 --> 1:22:01.160
<v Speaker 1>confidence here against this Falcons defense that I've already explained

1:22:01.160 --> 1:22:03.519
<v Speaker 1>why I think there's a great matchup for him. Mary

1:22:03.560 --> 1:22:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Cooper confirmed he's gonna play as well. His many nagging

1:22:07.240 --> 1:22:11.479
<v Speaker 1>injuries have reduced him to a touchdown dependent receiver. He's

1:22:11.520 --> 1:22:15.799
<v Speaker 1>only reached seventy yards once in the past seven games,

1:22:15.800 --> 1:22:19.160
<v Speaker 1>which is really disappointing for Cooper, and has only posted

1:22:19.200 --> 1:22:22.400
<v Speaker 1>more than three catches twice in those seven games. But

1:22:22.439 --> 1:22:25.480
<v Speaker 1>he is scoring touchdowns and Atlanta has allowed multiple touchdowns

1:22:25.640 --> 1:22:28.320
<v Speaker 1>two receivers five different times. So if I think Lamb

1:22:28.439 --> 1:22:30.320
<v Speaker 1>is gonna get one, and I do, I think Cooper

1:22:30.360 --> 1:22:33.160
<v Speaker 1>gets one here as well, so he'd be grade on Cooper.

1:22:34.360 --> 1:22:37.720
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk to Dalton Shechltz, which is a fascinating opportunity

1:22:37.720 --> 1:22:39.640
<v Speaker 1>for him. Over the last three weeks, the Falcons have

1:22:39.680 --> 1:22:42.519
<v Speaker 1>given up the third most yards and the second most

1:22:42.560 --> 1:22:45.320
<v Speaker 1>receptions to tight ends. Sheltz has had a quiet couple

1:22:45.360 --> 1:22:48.240
<v Speaker 1>of weeks and he but he still remains seventh in

1:22:48.360 --> 1:22:51.679
<v Speaker 1>yards among tight ends, hasn't scored a touchdown since Week four.

1:22:52.160 --> 1:22:53.920
<v Speaker 1>But the key thing you need to know about Dalton

1:22:53.920 --> 1:22:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Sheltz is Blake Jarwin's on I R and Schultz is

1:22:56.960 --> 1:22:59.280
<v Speaker 1>no longer competing for tight end targets, and I think

1:22:59.320 --> 1:23:01.400
<v Speaker 1>that's enough to keep him with a solid game here

1:23:01.400 --> 1:23:04.719
<v Speaker 1>and a potential bounce back with a B grade and lastly,

1:23:06.120 --> 1:23:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Tony Pollard gets a C grade. We've seen change of pace.

1:23:10.000 --> 1:23:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Backs mark Ingram and j. D. Mckissic have solid days

1:23:13.240 --> 1:23:16.599
<v Speaker 1>against Atlanta, and backs that have been in Pollard's ten

1:23:16.840 --> 1:23:19.880
<v Speaker 1>ish touch range typically typically find their way to a

1:23:19.880 --> 1:23:22.120
<v Speaker 1>good game against Atlanta. So we'll give a C grade

1:23:22.320 --> 1:23:26.519
<v Speaker 1>to Tony Pollard. Our final matchup is the Monday Night

1:23:26.600 --> 1:23:29.439
<v Speaker 1>er is it often times is Rams taking on the

1:23:29.560 --> 1:23:33.120
<v Speaker 1>forty Niners. Rams offense struggled last week. You see a

1:23:33.120 --> 1:23:36.280
<v Speaker 1>bounce back coming, Brian, Yeah, I do, and I'll make

1:23:36.400 --> 1:23:38.400
<v Speaker 1>quick mention. This is the first meeting of the season

1:23:38.400 --> 1:23:42.160
<v Speaker 1>between these divisual Divisional opponents. Starting with the running back

1:23:42.280 --> 1:23:44.560
<v Speaker 1>for l A Darryl Henderson. Gonna give him a B.

1:23:44.680 --> 1:23:47.639
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco has allowed ten touchdowns running backs. Only six

1:23:47.640 --> 1:23:50.720
<v Speaker 1>other teams have double digit scores to the position. I

1:23:50.760 --> 1:23:53.160
<v Speaker 1>expect to bounce back for Henderson and this one he

1:23:53.240 --> 1:23:56.559
<v Speaker 1>gets a B. Gonna give Cooper cup in a Cup

1:23:56.720 --> 1:24:00.360
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have the best history against San Francisco, only has

1:24:00.400 --> 1:24:03.439
<v Speaker 1>one touchdown in his last five meetings with the Niners,

1:24:03.479 --> 1:24:06.240
<v Speaker 1>and forty one yards was the most he has totaled

1:24:06.240 --> 1:24:08.600
<v Speaker 1>in a game during that span, but He's obviously on

1:24:08.640 --> 1:24:11.720
<v Speaker 1>another level this year, and the San Francisco secondary is

1:24:11.760 --> 1:24:14.400
<v Speaker 1>just super banged up. So an easy A for Cup

1:24:14.760 --> 1:24:17.080
<v Speaker 1>and an easy B for Robert Woods, who has at

1:24:17.160 --> 1:24:20.120
<v Speaker 1>least seventy yards or a touchdown in each of his

1:24:20.160 --> 1:24:24.600
<v Speaker 1>past six games. He also has at least nine targets

1:24:24.640 --> 1:24:28.400
<v Speaker 1>and back to back games, So be for Robert Woods.

1:24:28.680 --> 1:24:31.040
<v Speaker 1>I do have Van Jefferson on the bench. Despite San

1:24:31.040 --> 1:24:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Francisco secondary being very banged up. Like I just mentioned,

1:24:34.760 --> 1:24:37.120
<v Speaker 1>soon to be living in a van down by the river.

1:24:37.200 --> 1:24:40.639
<v Speaker 1>Jefferson has only topped three catches once in his last

1:24:40.960 --> 1:24:44.040
<v Speaker 1>five games. He is on the bench, as is Tyler Higbee.

1:24:44.240 --> 1:24:47.160
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco was allowing less than four catches and thirty

1:24:47.200 --> 1:24:50.599
<v Speaker 1>five yards per game to opposing tight ends, and Matt

1:24:50.640 --> 1:24:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Stafford gonna give him a B. Comparable quarterbacks like Carson Wentz,

1:24:54.240 --> 1:24:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Rodgers, Russell Wilson, and the very uncomparable Jared goff

1:24:59.200 --> 1:25:02.360
<v Speaker 1>have all throw him form multiple touchdowns against San Francisco,

1:25:02.560 --> 1:25:05.240
<v Speaker 1>and uh, I'll stay at a third time. That secondary

1:25:05.320 --> 1:25:06.920
<v Speaker 1>is very banged up. I'm a big fan of the

1:25:06.960 --> 1:25:09.400
<v Speaker 1>passing game for the Rams, and this one over to

1:25:09.400 --> 1:25:12.439
<v Speaker 1>the forty nine side, starting with George Kittle, who looked

1:25:12.439 --> 1:25:15.080
<v Speaker 1>great in his return last week. He has topped one

1:25:15.160 --> 1:25:17.800
<v Speaker 1>hundred yards end or scored a touchdown in six of

1:25:17.840 --> 1:25:20.200
<v Speaker 1>his seven career games against the Rams. The one time

1:25:20.240 --> 1:25:23.720
<v Speaker 1>he failed to meet both benchmarks was in his rookie year.

1:25:24.000 --> 1:25:26.160
<v Speaker 1>And it's a pretty good matchup on paper. L A

1:25:26.280 --> 1:25:28.880
<v Speaker 1>is allowing six catches and sixty yards per game to

1:25:28.960 --> 1:25:32.599
<v Speaker 1>opposing tight ends. Uh de boat Samuel just gonna give

1:25:32.640 --> 1:25:35.040
<v Speaker 1>him a be here. Might see a fewer targets with

1:25:35.120 --> 1:25:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Kittle back, but he still saw nine looks last week.

1:25:39.200 --> 1:25:42.639
<v Speaker 1>Debot average yards with a touchdown in his two games

1:25:42.680 --> 1:25:45.000
<v Speaker 1>against l A last year. There's a chance he's shadowed

1:25:45.000 --> 1:25:47.599
<v Speaker 1>by Jalen Ramsey, but there's no way you can bench

1:25:47.680 --> 1:25:52.639
<v Speaker 1>debo when healthy Brandon I Yuke almost back to unbengeable status,

1:25:52.920 --> 1:25:54.879
<v Speaker 1>but I'm not going to trust him in this matchup.

1:25:55.320 --> 1:25:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Uh If I puts up good numbers in this one,

1:25:57.200 --> 1:26:00.240
<v Speaker 1>I'll be a little surprised, but well, well, but if

1:26:00.240 --> 1:26:01.840
<v Speaker 1>he does do that, well, at least, no, he's back

1:26:01.880 --> 1:26:04.120
<v Speaker 1>as a viable fantasy asset, but I don't trust him

1:26:04.120 --> 1:26:05.840
<v Speaker 1>in this one. He is on the bench, as is

1:26:05.920 --> 1:26:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Garoppolo. The Rams have surrendered just just ten passing

1:26:09.920 --> 1:26:12.880
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns all season, and they're ready to add Von Miller

1:26:13.160 --> 1:26:17.559
<v Speaker 1>into their past rushing mix. And lastly, Elijah Mitchell just

1:26:17.560 --> 1:26:20.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna give him a c uh. The Rams have the

1:26:20.400 --> 1:26:23.840
<v Speaker 1>highest rated run defense according to Pro Football Focus, and

1:26:23.880 --> 1:26:27.000
<v Speaker 1>no runner has topped fifty yards against them in five

1:26:27.320 --> 1:26:31.559
<v Speaker 1>straight games. Wow. It is a tough matchup for him,

1:26:31.600 --> 1:26:33.439
<v Speaker 1>and he comes in a little bit banged up as well,

1:26:33.479 --> 1:26:36.439
<v Speaker 1>which worries me a little bit. Additionally, for Elijah Man,

1:26:36.760 --> 1:26:39.200
<v Speaker 1>the Rams are vulnerable, vulnerable through the air to the

1:26:39.200 --> 1:26:41.719
<v Speaker 1>position though allowing the ninth most receiving yards to running

1:26:41.760 --> 1:26:43.920
<v Speaker 1>backs in the twelveth most reception So that's why I

1:26:43.960 --> 1:26:47.519
<v Speaker 1>gave him the starting See Elijah Wilson is looming there too,

1:26:47.680 --> 1:26:51.880
<v Speaker 1>and James Hasty Toilson is not back yet, but is

1:26:51.960 --> 1:26:54.400
<v Speaker 1>his return is looming? And is it maybe as soon

1:26:54.439 --> 1:26:58.320
<v Speaker 1>as next week? Um guys. Cam Newton is resigned with

1:26:58.320 --> 1:27:00.559
<v Speaker 1>his old team, and something that I think most people

1:27:00.560 --> 1:27:03.000
<v Speaker 1>thought would would not end up happening. Any reason to

1:27:03.040 --> 1:27:08.479
<v Speaker 1>believe Cam Newton will be materially better in Carolina than

1:27:08.600 --> 1:27:10.720
<v Speaker 1>he was in New England, where mostly he was not

1:27:10.880 --> 1:27:17.559
<v Speaker 1>a fantasy startable quarterback. I'm not so convinced he's gonna

1:27:17.600 --> 1:27:20.960
<v Speaker 1>rekindle that magic in Carolina. He certainly didn't look good

1:27:21.360 --> 1:27:24.320
<v Speaker 1>in his last season with the Panthers. Um he does

1:27:24.400 --> 1:27:27.439
<v Speaker 1>have healthy Christian McCaffrey back that helps. D J. Moore

1:27:27.880 --> 1:27:30.960
<v Speaker 1>is certainly trending upwards. I do know that Carolina has

1:27:31.400 --> 1:27:35.800
<v Speaker 1>the eighth hardest remaining strength of schedule for quarterbacks, So UH,

1:27:36.400 --> 1:27:39.439
<v Speaker 1>don't know he's worth a roster spot, but I'm pretty bummed.

1:27:39.479 --> 1:27:41.880
<v Speaker 1>I really wanted to see what p J. Walker had

1:27:41.920 --> 1:27:43.839
<v Speaker 1>to offer. We will get to see that on Sunday

1:27:44.120 --> 1:27:46.480
<v Speaker 1>if he has a good game though against the Cardinals.

1:27:46.720 --> 1:27:48.599
<v Speaker 1>I think it's gonna be tough to to sit PJ.

1:27:48.760 --> 1:27:52.760
<v Speaker 1>But they gave Cam ridiculous amount of guaranteed money, and

1:27:53.000 --> 1:27:55.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the Panthers are still kind of in line

1:27:55.160 --> 1:27:57.639
<v Speaker 1>for that seventh wild card spot in the NFC. They're

1:27:57.640 --> 1:28:00.240
<v Speaker 1>they're in play there, so they're gonna go at the

1:28:00.240 --> 1:28:02.960
<v Speaker 1>hot hand. So we're probably gonna see some Cam Newton,

1:28:03.080 --> 1:28:06.679
<v Speaker 1>but we're calling him Scam Newton because he doesn't throw

1:28:06.720 --> 1:28:09.519
<v Speaker 1>the ball well at all anymore. And uh, I'm I'm

1:28:09.520 --> 1:28:12.040
<v Speaker 1>a little nervous that that might be the case when

1:28:12.080 --> 1:28:14.320
<v Speaker 1>we see him again, and it might torpedo d J.

1:28:14.479 --> 1:28:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Moore's value. I'd like to see them platoon Cam as

1:28:18.360 --> 1:28:20.200
<v Speaker 1>a runner and use them like a little bit of

1:28:20.200 --> 1:28:22.559
<v Speaker 1>a Taysom Hill. And he doesn't have to be your

1:28:22.560 --> 1:28:24.479
<v Speaker 1>full time quarterback, but bring him in and let him

1:28:24.560 --> 1:28:27.040
<v Speaker 1>run a little bit. Great job this week. Thanks to

1:28:27.080 --> 1:28:29.280
<v Speaker 1>all our listeners again for putting up with the audio

1:28:29.360 --> 1:28:31.720
<v Speaker 1>quality as I stay at home quarantine with COVID. I

1:28:31.760 --> 1:28:34.599
<v Speaker 1>appreciate all the support and your continued understanding With that.

1:28:34.640 --> 1:28:37.240
<v Speaker 1>We'll be back in the studio next week for another

1:28:37.360 --> 1:28:39.760
<v Speaker 1>edition of Fantasy Football Weekly, where we'll all be back

1:28:39.760 --> 1:28:42.880
<v Speaker 1>together and it will be very very special. Thanks for listening,

1:28:42.960 --> 1:28:55.599
<v Speaker 1>everybody talk to you in one week. Fantasy Football Weekly

1:28:55.760 --> 1:28:58.360
<v Speaker 1>is a production of I Heart Radio. For more podcast

1:28:58.400 --> 1:29:01.840
<v Speaker 1>from my Heart Radio, visit the I Radio app, Apple Podcasts,

1:29:01.920 --> 1:29:03.920
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.