WEBVTT - Week 4 injury updates with Dr. A, TNF preview, rankings, and more...

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app,

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>download the tune in app and just search for Fantasy

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on twitch, or on Periscope

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guess did Fantasy Sports Network. You'll

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>find us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening.

0:00:30.160 --> 0:00:38.720
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Fantasy Best

0:00:38.760 --> 0:00:52.479
<v Speaker 1>Friends Forever. M Do to to do Do Do Do

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do do do

0:00:55.720 --> 0:01:04.479
<v Speaker 1>don't to yo, says the Fantasy best Friends Forever here

0:01:04.520 --> 0:01:07.880
<v Speaker 1>on the Fantasy Sports for your Networks alongside Frankie Stample.

0:01:08.000 --> 0:01:12.320
<v Speaker 1>I am Greg soumangg. That's going on, Bundy, Greg. We

0:01:12.440 --> 0:01:15.080
<v Speaker 1>have a great game tonight between the Vikings and ram excellent.

0:01:15.240 --> 0:01:17.920
<v Speaker 1>What should be a great game. Perhaps a preview of

0:01:17.959 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 1>the NFC Hunference Championship we'll be talking about later on

0:01:22.840 --> 0:01:26.360
<v Speaker 1>this potentially, do Greg, can we get a Kavanaugh update?

0:01:27.000 --> 0:01:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Do you actually like havinga d Yeah? Okay, it doesn't

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:34.720
<v Speaker 1>matter what's going on in the Kavanaugh case. All right,

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:38.600
<v Speaker 1>onto football Greg, how's everything going. It's just trial? How long?

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:40.360
<v Speaker 1>How long did you was not a trial either? A

0:01:40.480 --> 0:01:47.880
<v Speaker 1>right hearing. Yeah, I'm gonna Things are good, man, Things

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:50.120
<v Speaker 1>are good. Thanks for the socks, by the way. Yeah,

0:01:50.120 --> 0:01:53.400
<v Speaker 1>you're welcome to a nice dress shock. Nice dress socks.

0:01:54.120 --> 0:01:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Here you go, some dress socks. My man, Gregg, he

0:01:56.080 --> 0:01:58.240
<v Speaker 1>hooked me up. He got black. He didn't hook me

0:01:58.320 --> 0:02:01.080
<v Speaker 1>up with his his foot locker look up, um, but

0:02:01.120 --> 0:02:04.480
<v Speaker 1>he did with some dress socks. Also, Greg, I thought

0:02:04.480 --> 0:02:06.680
<v Speaker 1>I would let you know that I'm using a new

0:02:06.720 --> 0:02:09.760
<v Speaker 1>hair product. Hey, what do you think it like? The

0:02:09.760 --> 0:02:12.440
<v Speaker 1>hair looks more shiny, but like it's still there's just

0:02:12.440 --> 0:02:15.800
<v Speaker 1>too much of it. I'm gonna just shave my head. Hey,

0:02:15.880 --> 0:02:17.720
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna come soon. I'm just gonna shave my head.

0:02:17.760 --> 0:02:20.600
<v Speaker 1>I can't do this. So oh wow, I didn't even

0:02:20.600 --> 0:02:22.959
<v Speaker 1>see this. What's something on the run down? Let me

0:02:22.960 --> 0:02:25.840
<v Speaker 1>get to something on the run down? Yankees? See nothing

0:02:25.840 --> 0:02:29.120
<v Speaker 1>with the Yankees? No, No, what is it? Ja happ

0:02:29.320 --> 0:02:32.120
<v Speaker 1>j Happ, Lancelin and Luis Severino are starting in Boston

0:02:33.240 --> 0:02:36.240
<v Speaker 1>this weekend, which means you're wild Games wild Card game starter.

0:02:36.880 --> 0:02:40.640
<v Speaker 1>He's out of cc Sabathia or Massa, Hero, Tanaka or

0:02:40.919 --> 0:02:44.079
<v Speaker 1>Jap one of those three guys started, which means it

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:49.280
<v Speaker 1>will not be Louis Severino. Wow, that's interesting. Well, I

0:02:49.320 --> 0:02:51.880
<v Speaker 1>know this is the Football Show, but that that's a

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:55.119
<v Speaker 1>little unexpected, isn't it? Both Cashman? It could be Jap still,

0:02:55.240 --> 0:02:57.239
<v Speaker 1>but I know some people have thrown out Tanaka that

0:02:57.280 --> 0:02:59.840
<v Speaker 1>they be the guy. Both Cashman and Aaron Boone in

0:02:59.880 --> 0:03:03.799
<v Speaker 1>the catd that it's gonna be a majority bullpen game essentially, Yeah,

0:03:03.840 --> 0:03:06.320
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna get David Robertson for another three innings. Yeah,

0:03:06.320 --> 0:03:08.320
<v Speaker 1>I think I And honestly, I think you're hoping that

0:03:08.480 --> 0:03:11.520
<v Speaker 1>the starter makes it like your opener essentially makes it

0:03:11.720 --> 0:03:14.639
<v Speaker 1>three innings. I think that's like they want. I think ideally,

0:03:14.639 --> 0:03:16.640
<v Speaker 1>if you get through the lineup twice, that's probably what

0:03:16.639 --> 0:03:20.080
<v Speaker 1>they want. I think, so digree with that. Yeah, No,

0:03:20.240 --> 0:03:21.680
<v Speaker 1>I do disagree. I think you have a little lot

0:03:21.720 --> 0:03:24.959
<v Speaker 1>of ones. They're pubems seriously alright, because you get to

0:03:24.960 --> 0:03:28.880
<v Speaker 1>do the line up twice, that's six innings. Well yeah,

0:03:28.880 --> 0:03:32.000
<v Speaker 1>if you're throwing a perfect game, yeah, which you want?

0:03:32.400 --> 0:03:37.480
<v Speaker 1>You want? You want three innings whatever at whatever that is. Yeah,

0:03:38.120 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 1>that's the inche of different today. How about some football updates, Greg,

0:03:41.840 --> 0:03:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Let's do it. Ramsey Vikings tonight. As you said, it

0:03:44.440 --> 0:03:48.200
<v Speaker 1>could be a preview of the NFC Championship game. The

0:03:48.280 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Ramsey best offense in the NFL. The spar Viking is

0:03:51.200 --> 0:03:55.000
<v Speaker 1>a very surprising loss to Buffalo, and in all honesty, Frankie,

0:03:55.320 --> 0:03:57.400
<v Speaker 1>the spread reflects that. Right. It is a seven and

0:03:57.440 --> 0:04:01.280
<v Speaker 1>a half point game right now, so a lot of points,

0:04:01.320 --> 0:04:05.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of points. Yeah, the Rams are laying seven

0:04:05.080 --> 0:04:06.760
<v Speaker 1>as of right now. I think it opened at seven

0:04:06.800 --> 0:04:09.040
<v Speaker 1>and a half, It went down as far as six

0:04:09.080 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 1>and a half at one point, and now we're back

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:13.720
<v Speaker 1>up to seven. So I actually agree with Carton said

0:04:13.760 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 1>towards the end of the show. If you wanted to

0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:17.000
<v Speaker 1>get in on it, I think you buy the hook

0:04:17.040 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 1>there a plus seven and a half um. But I

0:04:19.240 --> 0:04:21.279
<v Speaker 1>think this game is closer than people realize. Look, the

0:04:21.320 --> 0:04:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Rams are three and oh both on the season straight

0:04:25.600 --> 0:04:27.960
<v Speaker 1>up and against the spread. The Vikings are one one

0:04:27.960 --> 0:04:29.479
<v Speaker 1>and one and they're one and two against the spread.

0:04:29.520 --> 0:04:33.360
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I think this spread for tonight's game is

0:04:33.440 --> 0:04:37.800
<v Speaker 1>very reflective of last week and the Vikings just he's

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:41.240
<v Speaker 1>crapping the bed, to be honest, against the Buffalo Bills

0:04:41.240 --> 0:04:42.799
<v Speaker 1>in a game that they were favored by like sixteen

0:04:42.839 --> 0:04:45.640
<v Speaker 1>or seventeen points, whatever it was towards the end. Uh.

0:04:45.680 --> 0:04:49.599
<v Speaker 1>There the problem that I have right when looking at trends.

0:04:49.640 --> 0:04:52.359
<v Speaker 1>I know a lot of a lot of betting people

0:04:52.360 --> 0:04:57.440
<v Speaker 1>like to look at trends, like historical trends, like whenever

0:04:57.520 --> 0:04:59.520
<v Speaker 1>the Rams, like the Rams on a three game winning

0:04:59.560 --> 0:05:03.479
<v Speaker 1>treat what like things change, Like even the thing even

0:05:03.480 --> 0:05:05.400
<v Speaker 1>the numbers that we have, the statistical trends that we

0:05:05.440 --> 0:05:07.880
<v Speaker 1>have this season with the Los Angeles Rams, as good

0:05:07.880 --> 0:05:10.560
<v Speaker 1>as their defense has been, I think they're like bottom

0:05:10.600 --> 0:05:12.520
<v Speaker 1>five and like total yards allowed to get out of

0:05:12.600 --> 0:05:18.480
<v Speaker 1>here bottom five and totally yards allowed, Like they're missing

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:20.680
<v Speaker 1>two of their best defensive pieces tonight. So like we

0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:22.599
<v Speaker 1>can't really use the stats that we have this year.

0:05:22.720 --> 0:05:25.160
<v Speaker 1>We kind of need to project forward. Keep to Leave

0:05:25.240 --> 0:05:27.120
<v Speaker 1>is definitely not gonna play. They're saying Marcus Peters is

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:30.040
<v Speaker 1>still questionable, but I don't think he's going to play either.

0:05:30.240 --> 0:05:33.200
<v Speaker 1>What worries me most is the fact that Kirk Cousins

0:05:33.440 --> 0:05:36.640
<v Speaker 1>and the Vikings offensive line got demolished by the Bills

0:05:36.760 --> 0:05:39.280
<v Speaker 1>last week, and now they're going up against a top

0:05:39.360 --> 0:05:42.719
<v Speaker 1>two defensive line tonight maybe the best. I mean, the

0:05:42.760 --> 0:05:45.240
<v Speaker 1>Bears are obviously in that discussion as well, but with

0:05:45.279 --> 0:05:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Donald and Dominican Sue coming at you against the

0:05:48.920 --> 0:05:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Vikings offensive line, which has not been good, I will

0:05:50.960 --> 0:05:53.520
<v Speaker 1>say they might be better tonight because they're expected to

0:05:53.520 --> 0:05:55.760
<v Speaker 1>get Pat Flyn back, their center, who has not played

0:05:55.800 --> 0:05:57.800
<v Speaker 1>in a game yet this year, and they could certainly

0:05:57.920 --> 0:06:00.600
<v Speaker 1>use him. But I do think of the Vikings are

0:06:00.600 --> 0:06:02.279
<v Speaker 1>gonna shot this up tonight. I mean, they were just

0:06:02.440 --> 0:06:04.760
<v Speaker 1>a joke defensively. They were joked all around, and I

0:06:04.800 --> 0:06:07.040
<v Speaker 1>think Mike Zimmer is a better head coach in that,

0:06:07.320 --> 0:06:10.320
<v Speaker 1>and I think they right the ship. I don't really

0:06:10.320 --> 0:06:12.320
<v Speaker 1>have a lean on the total, to be honest, like

0:06:12.360 --> 0:06:14.280
<v Speaker 1>four year and a half, but I do like the

0:06:14.360 --> 0:06:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Vikings to I'm gonna tell this would be a thousand

0:06:16.000 --> 0:06:18.920
<v Speaker 1>times better than where this past Sunday, like a thousand times.

0:06:19.040 --> 0:06:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Don't get embarrassed like that They're gett embarrassed by Buffalo.

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:26.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm quite sure that Mike Zimmer ran this team into

0:06:26.080 --> 0:06:28.560
<v Speaker 1>the ground over the last day or two, and I

0:06:28.560 --> 0:06:30.440
<v Speaker 1>think it's actually the perfect opportunity for the Vikings to

0:06:30.480 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 1>get back on the horse. Four days later, right, I

0:06:31.960 --> 0:06:33.880
<v Speaker 1>didn't have a week stew about this. This is four

0:06:33.960 --> 0:06:36.320
<v Speaker 1>days ago, and they got embarrassed. And there is that

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:37.880
<v Speaker 1>mental part of the game where you got embarrassed by

0:06:37.960 --> 0:06:40.040
<v Speaker 1>arguably the worst team in the NFL. I think they

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:41.520
<v Speaker 1>go out to l A. We're there now seven a

0:06:41.520 --> 0:06:43.880
<v Speaker 1>half point dogs. We would have done this a week ago.

0:06:44.200 --> 0:06:46.560
<v Speaker 1>You talk about a three point three point differential. He

0:06:46.600 --> 0:06:50.119
<v Speaker 1>would have just been the home number. Gave him four

0:06:50.200 --> 0:06:53.040
<v Speaker 1>and a half. Because of what happened this past Sunday.

0:06:53.160 --> 0:06:55.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't personally think the Rams are seven and a

0:06:55.440 --> 0:06:57.520
<v Speaker 1>half points better than the Vikings. I get it, it's home.

0:06:57.560 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 1>I understand how great the Rams have looked. I think

0:06:59.880 --> 0:07:01.080
<v Speaker 1>they come back out of earth a little bit. I

0:07:01.200 --> 0:07:04.680
<v Speaker 1>really really like the Vikings tonight, really really like the Vikings. Yeah,

0:07:04.760 --> 0:07:07.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm right there with you again. I think the total,

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:10.160
<v Speaker 1>it's an interesting number. I think totals are kind of

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:13.040
<v Speaker 1>hard on Thursday Night football because look at a short week.

0:07:13.160 --> 0:07:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Defenses are usually banged up on the short week. And

0:07:16.520 --> 0:07:18.880
<v Speaker 1>we even saw it like with the Bengals and the

0:07:19.400 --> 0:07:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Ravens game two weeks ago, like everybody was hammering the

0:07:22.080 --> 0:07:24.600
<v Speaker 1>under We looked at statistical trends and years past. I

0:07:24.600 --> 0:07:26.040
<v Speaker 1>think stuff like that it's kind of thrown out the

0:07:26.040 --> 0:07:28.800
<v Speaker 1>window for Thursday night football because anything can happen in

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 1>these games. So I don't really have a strong lean

0:07:31.320 --> 0:07:34.960
<v Speaker 1>on on the total, but I will say Daily Rodo

0:07:35.000 --> 0:07:38.120
<v Speaker 1>their prop tools love Adam Feeland's night Greig with his

0:07:38.200 --> 0:07:40.280
<v Speaker 1>prop at eight seven and a half yards, which is

0:07:40.320 --> 0:07:42.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot. Lot. It is a lot. He's gone over

0:07:42.960 --> 0:07:44.800
<v Speaker 1>a hundred yards each of the first three games in

0:07:44.840 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Daily Rodo has Adam Feeland projected for about like receiving yards.

0:07:49.640 --> 0:07:53.200
<v Speaker 1>So um. They have this really cool tool for the

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:55.760
<v Speaker 1>under the prop bets where you can look at the

0:07:55.800 --> 0:07:59.440
<v Speaker 1>biggest difference between what the Daily Rodo projection is and

0:07:59.480 --> 0:08:02.360
<v Speaker 1>what the prop number is, and Adam Feeland has the

0:08:02.360 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 1>biggest number tonight, so they like him a lot over

0:08:05.600 --> 0:08:07.840
<v Speaker 1>where I love Stefon Diggs a lot tonight because he

0:08:07.880 --> 0:08:09.560
<v Speaker 1>was not really involved this past Sunday. I think that's

0:08:09.600 --> 0:08:12.440
<v Speaker 1>another thing they get corrected tonight. Um. I think both

0:08:12.800 --> 0:08:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Diggs and Feeling have big nights without a key to

0:08:15.160 --> 0:08:17.280
<v Speaker 1>leave about Marcus Peters on the other side, I think

0:08:17.320 --> 0:08:19.240
<v Speaker 1>both could go off if Kirk Cousins has the time

0:08:19.280 --> 0:08:22.960
<v Speaker 1>to throw. What do they think about Stefon Diggs tonight? Uh,

0:08:23.040 --> 0:08:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Stefon Diggs, his prop is at seventy two, so it's

0:08:27.000 --> 0:08:29.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot. Yeah, that's a lot. So so the oddsmakers

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:31.880
<v Speaker 1>are expecting a bounce back from the Vikings wide receivers,

0:08:31.920 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's just a further indication that those

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 1>cornerbacks are not gonna play. We know for short to

0:08:37.240 --> 0:08:39.880
<v Speaker 1>leave isn't gonna play. But I think Vegas is certainly

0:08:39.880 --> 0:08:42.280
<v Speaker 1>expecting that Marcus Peters is not going to play in

0:08:42.280 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 1>this game either, So I agree with you. I think

0:08:44.480 --> 0:08:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Stefon Diggs and Adam Feeland could both be in for

0:08:47.040 --> 0:08:50.319
<v Speaker 1>big games. I have Adam Feeling inside my top twelve.

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:52.360
<v Speaker 1>I have Stefon Diggs just out. I think I haven't

0:08:52.360 --> 0:08:54.160
<v Speaker 1>met like wide receiver fifteen or sixteen. He's still a

0:08:54.160 --> 0:08:56.360
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver too. But I think based on the target

0:08:56.400 --> 0:08:58.400
<v Speaker 1>share that Adam Feeling is getting right now, you have

0:08:58.440 --> 0:09:00.480
<v Speaker 1>to trust him more than Stefon Diggs. I think. So

0:09:00.480 --> 0:09:02.120
<v Speaker 1>it's too and it's not just hard to share, right.

0:09:02.120 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 1>It's like the game we're kind of expecting, which is

0:09:03.840 --> 0:09:06.200
<v Speaker 1>the Los Angeles Rams defensive line being as good as

0:09:06.200 --> 0:09:08.200
<v Speaker 1>it is being as perocious as it is ever. Seeing

0:09:08.240 --> 0:09:11.000
<v Speaker 1>what happened with Minnesota and Buffalo on Sunday, there's not

0:09:11.040 --> 0:09:12.839
<v Speaker 1>gonna be as much time potentially for Kirk Cousins and

0:09:12.880 --> 0:09:15.679
<v Speaker 1>throw the ball. So you're gonna throw it exactly. You're

0:09:15.679 --> 0:09:17.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna throw it to your safety receiver, which is your

0:09:17.360 --> 0:09:19.360
<v Speaker 1>slot receiver, you're tight end, which is how Kirk Um

0:09:19.440 --> 0:09:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Kyle of Rude Ill pick up a ton towards the

0:09:21.120 --> 0:09:23.599
<v Speaker 1>end of that game against Buffalo. So I think I

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:26.280
<v Speaker 1>think Theeland's probably the safer option. I could certainly cease

0:09:26.320 --> 0:09:27.839
<v Speaker 1>to find things having a bigger game, but I think

0:09:28.000 --> 0:09:30.000
<v Speaker 1>if you're looking for the safer option, it's Adam Land.

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:35.000
<v Speaker 1>I've got this question today between Jared Goff or Kirk Cousins,

0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:36.320
<v Speaker 1>who do you like more? And I think it's really

0:09:36.360 --> 0:09:39.440
<v Speaker 1>interesting to me personally. I still need Jared Goff just

0:09:39.480 --> 0:09:41.440
<v Speaker 1>because the offense that he plays in the receivers that

0:09:41.480 --> 0:09:45.400
<v Speaker 1>they have Robert Woods, Brandon cooks Um and Cooper Cup.

0:09:45.440 --> 0:09:47.920
<v Speaker 1>And it's not a knock on the Vikings, but overall,

0:09:47.960 --> 0:09:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the Rams offensive line is just better. Their offense is

0:09:50.600 --> 0:09:53.400
<v Speaker 1>moving the ball more effectively. They have Todd Gurley, one

0:09:53.400 --> 0:09:55.840
<v Speaker 1>of the best running backs in the game, so it's

0:09:55.920 --> 0:09:58.079
<v Speaker 1>very close to me. I have Kirk. I have Jared

0:09:58.080 --> 0:10:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Goff rank one spot higher than Kirk. I have him

0:10:00.480 --> 0:10:02.480
<v Speaker 1>as my QB twelve, and I have Kirk Cousins as

0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:05.040
<v Speaker 1>my QB thirteen, So I think both are viable. They're

0:10:05.080 --> 0:10:07.480
<v Speaker 1>right there is like low end QB ones. But I

0:10:07.480 --> 0:10:08.840
<v Speaker 1>wanted to ask you what you think if you had

0:10:08.880 --> 0:10:10.800
<v Speaker 1>to choose one between Goff and Kirk Cousins tonight, because

0:10:10.800 --> 0:10:12.679
<v Speaker 1>I've been getting that question. Yeah, that's really hard. I've

0:10:12.679 --> 0:10:15.840
<v Speaker 1>gotten golf and Baker Mayfield as well. Um, people still

0:10:15.840 --> 0:10:17.960
<v Speaker 1>take golf just because it's been so safe. I agree.

0:10:18.000 --> 0:10:20.280
<v Speaker 1>I said my answer was golf there. I think Govin

0:10:20.320 --> 0:10:22.960
<v Speaker 1>kirk Cousins really is really really hard. I think I'm

0:10:23.000 --> 0:10:25.560
<v Speaker 1>going golf just it's just at home. The weapons are there.

0:10:25.640 --> 0:10:28.199
<v Speaker 1>You know, he's gonna get up plenty of attempts um

0:10:28.360 --> 0:10:30.920
<v Speaker 1>to pass the ball down field. Shan Skinny has just

0:10:30.960 --> 0:10:33.719
<v Speaker 1>been fantastic over the first couple of weeks, so I

0:10:33.720 --> 0:10:36.600
<v Speaker 1>would lean golf as well tonight. I also like Kyle

0:10:36.640 --> 0:10:39.199
<v Speaker 1>Rudolf tonight as well. Yeah, I think I'll check it

0:10:39.360 --> 0:10:42.559
<v Speaker 1>right now. I have him ranked as my fifth tight end,

0:10:43.000 --> 0:10:47.800
<v Speaker 1>just because the Rams are allowing to four or six

0:10:48.400 --> 0:10:51.920
<v Speaker 1>the eighth most fantasy points to opposing tight ends this season.

0:10:52.200 --> 0:10:55.920
<v Speaker 1>And we saw in week one against the Raiders they

0:10:55.960 --> 0:10:59.360
<v Speaker 1>allow two hundred yards receiving. Last week against Antonio Gates,

0:10:59.480 --> 0:11:03.880
<v Speaker 1>the the old Vet, the trusty Old. I mean he's

0:11:03.920 --> 0:11:08.720
<v Speaker 1>basically like bag of dust at this point, a bag

0:11:08.760 --> 0:11:11.119
<v Speaker 1>of dust, bag of dust, something like that bag of bones,

0:11:11.440 --> 0:11:14.800
<v Speaker 1>whatever it is. Um he had fifty one receiving yards

0:11:14.840 --> 0:11:16.440
<v Speaker 1>as well. So I think Kyle Rudolph is in for

0:11:16.640 --> 0:11:19.240
<v Speaker 1>a solid nights and night in half point PBR. Kyle Rudolph,

0:11:19.280 --> 0:11:21.440
<v Speaker 1>who people were a little concerned about after the first

0:11:21.480 --> 0:11:24.360
<v Speaker 1>week or two. He's pointed in week one he only

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:27.000
<v Speaker 1>had one two targets. One reception, of course, was for

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:30.040
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown. In week two seven or seventy two, a

0:11:30.080 --> 0:11:31.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of that came in the fourth quarter and overtime.

0:11:31.559 --> 0:11:34.079
<v Speaker 1>They pointed to that last week all garbage time five

0:11:34.160 --> 0:11:36.959
<v Speaker 1>or forty eight and the touchdown. So whatever you want,

0:11:37.480 --> 0:11:40.360
<v Speaker 1>call out Kylo Rudolph, whatever you want, stop five time

0:11:40.440 --> 0:11:44.800
<v Speaker 1>end right now, literally exactly. So top five tight end

0:11:44.920 --> 0:11:48.559
<v Speaker 1>and included also in there is Jared cook O J

0:11:48.720 --> 0:11:51.079
<v Speaker 1>Howard who people still have question marks about and then

0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:53.839
<v Speaker 1>you have Urthson Kelsey, So Kyle Rudolph exactly like, I

0:11:53.880 --> 0:11:55.360
<v Speaker 1>don't care how it comes, Like I said that all

0:11:55.360 --> 0:11:57.760
<v Speaker 1>the time Fantasy. It doesn't matter how it comes when

0:11:57.760 --> 0:12:00.240
<v Speaker 1>it comes to a tight end, us a touchdown. Kyl

0:12:00.320 --> 0:12:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Rodolf's giving you a touchdown two or three weeks he's

0:12:02.640 --> 0:12:04.000
<v Speaker 1>been great and in the other game he give you

0:12:04.040 --> 0:12:08.360
<v Speaker 1>what seven receiving n and you know, instead of being

0:12:08.360 --> 0:12:11.079
<v Speaker 1>the guy who's chasing Will dis Lee and Austin who's

0:12:11.120 --> 0:12:13.680
<v Speaker 1>McDonald every single week. This is why we were hammering

0:12:13.720 --> 0:12:17.680
<v Speaker 1>guys like like Kyl Rodolph, like Jordan Reid, Jordan Reads

0:12:17.679 --> 0:12:20.320
<v Speaker 1>getting it done to Jordan Reed is six seven, eight nine,

0:12:20.360 --> 0:12:22.600
<v Speaker 1>he's in the tenth. He's tight end tend but that's

0:12:22.600 --> 0:12:24.480
<v Speaker 1>where he was being drafted. Absolutely giving me a top

0:12:24.480 --> 0:12:26.640
<v Speaker 1>tense tight end. I'm absolutely And Rob and you look

0:12:26.679 --> 0:12:29.520
<v Speaker 1>at the tight ends right like ERNs Howard Cook, Kelsey, Fine,

0:12:30.200 --> 0:12:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Jesse James and Will Dislier that we know what Jesse

0:12:32.200 --> 0:12:36.840
<v Speaker 1>James did last week. Rob Gronkowski, Fine, Eric ebron this

0:12:36.920 --> 0:12:39.360
<v Speaker 1>is the thing, right, Like you have Kylo Rodolf, you

0:12:39.440 --> 0:12:42.080
<v Speaker 1>may get that one for eight outing we get a touchdown.

0:12:42.120 --> 0:12:44.880
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna happen with every tight end. Kyli Rodolf is

0:12:44.880 --> 0:12:47.200
<v Speaker 1>is really safe. I think, um, some of what we

0:12:47.200 --> 0:12:49.760
<v Speaker 1>were concerned about going into the season a bit overblown.

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:52.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm very comfl with Kyli Rodolf tonight and going forward. Yeah,

0:12:52.520 --> 0:12:55.280
<v Speaker 1>for sure. Um. And we've seen that the Rams have

0:12:55.320 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 1>struggled against tight ends, mostly because when they have those

0:12:59.400 --> 0:13:02.200
<v Speaker 1>strong corn backs, the way you attack them is with

0:13:02.320 --> 0:13:04.640
<v Speaker 1>the tight end against the linebacker against the safety. Play

0:13:04.679 --> 0:13:07.800
<v Speaker 1>there of the Rams. But you know, maybe tonight with

0:13:07.920 --> 0:13:10.800
<v Speaker 1>them with the corners being out, we see a little

0:13:10.840 --> 0:13:12.719
<v Speaker 1>more targets to the wide receiver. But I still like

0:13:12.800 --> 0:13:15.160
<v Speaker 1>HIF a lot. I think Dalvin Cook is going to

0:13:15.200 --> 0:13:19.360
<v Speaker 1>be an interesting discussion obviously. Um. And did you include

0:13:19.360 --> 0:13:23.839
<v Speaker 1>them four inside injuries? I don't think, I really, Greg,

0:13:24.480 --> 0:13:27.200
<v Speaker 1>you hammered me last week or two weeks ago whatever,

0:13:27.520 --> 0:13:30.800
<v Speaker 1>for whoever it was. I mean that was yeah, it

0:13:30.840 --> 0:13:32.760
<v Speaker 1>didn't matter because he didn't play. It's probably not gonna

0:13:32.760 --> 0:13:35.040
<v Speaker 1>play this week. You hammered me for that on a

0:13:35.200 --> 0:13:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Thursday night game when people need to know about Dalvin

0:13:38.840 --> 0:13:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Cook and his availability. Terrible You didn't include him on

0:13:45.720 --> 0:13:47.240
<v Speaker 1>the list of inside You know why we put the

0:13:47.280 --> 0:13:49.360
<v Speaker 1>list together yesterday morning. I thought it was gonna either

0:13:49.400 --> 0:13:51.360
<v Speaker 1>be very very clear he was playing or very very

0:13:51.360 --> 0:13:55.240
<v Speaker 1>clear he wasn't. And it's unclear right in the middle.

0:13:55.559 --> 0:13:59.800
<v Speaker 1>And unfortunately dr A only goes by the list. I

0:13:59.800 --> 0:14:02.319
<v Speaker 1>don't blame him. The guy gets prepared for what he's

0:14:02.320 --> 0:14:08.200
<v Speaker 1>prepared for him. Yeah, and you this one seems this

0:14:08.200 --> 0:14:10.280
<v Speaker 1>one seems on me like I think Dalvin Cook, if

0:14:10.320 --> 0:14:13.400
<v Speaker 1>he plays tonight, he's a solid RB two. I would

0:14:13.400 --> 0:14:16.319
<v Speaker 1>say he's like in that believe I have him sixteenth

0:14:16.400 --> 0:14:19.040
<v Speaker 1>or something because I still think he'll be limited to

0:14:19.720 --> 0:14:23.320
<v Speaker 1>somewhat of a degree. But if he plays, they're going

0:14:23.360 --> 0:14:25.720
<v Speaker 1>to use him like he's gonna get like fifteen sixteen

0:14:25.760 --> 0:14:27.280
<v Speaker 1>touches for game. If he plays, are gonna use them

0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:28.920
<v Speaker 1>that they're going to activate him to just send him

0:14:28.920 --> 0:14:30.720
<v Speaker 1>on the bench. So so there's two loves of him

0:14:30.720 --> 0:14:34.400
<v Speaker 1>at sixteen. He's right behind for net Lynch and Collins,

0:14:34.480 --> 0:14:37.000
<v Speaker 1>right ahead of Lamar Miller, Kenyans Ray, Chris Carson. Does

0:14:37.000 --> 0:14:38.880
<v Speaker 1>that sound okay? Sounds exactly right to me. You know,

0:14:38.920 --> 0:14:41.200
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting when we talked about this last Friday, we

0:14:41.200 --> 0:14:43.560
<v Speaker 1>were saying Dalvin Cook not gonna play this weekend, probably

0:14:43.680 --> 0:14:45.880
<v Speaker 1>in preparation for this game one Thursday night. Bigger game

0:14:46.000 --> 0:14:47.320
<v Speaker 1>would be the Bills with Adam. You don't need that

0:14:47.400 --> 0:14:48.720
<v Speaker 1>last week? Did you see the quote where he was

0:14:48.760 --> 0:14:50.920
<v Speaker 1>like he said the word definitely like five times in

0:14:50.960 --> 0:14:54.280
<v Speaker 1>one since he's like, I'm definitely definitely, definitely definitely playing

0:14:54.320 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 1>next week. Right, So there's two. There's two loves of

0:14:58.760 --> 0:15:00.320
<v Speaker 1>thinking about it. Like I said, right, like you held

0:15:00.360 --> 0:15:03.480
<v Speaker 1>him out that on Sunday for tonight, certainly possible. The

0:15:03.520 --> 0:15:05.360
<v Speaker 1>other side as you hold him out tonight, he literally

0:15:05.360 --> 0:15:07.440
<v Speaker 1>had like almost three weeks off for two and a

0:15:07.440 --> 0:15:10.000
<v Speaker 1>half weeks off um before we had to play again,

0:15:10.080 --> 0:15:12.000
<v Speaker 1>which is which is massive UM for a guy that

0:15:12.040 --> 0:15:15.160
<v Speaker 1>the battle the knee injury last year UM, and had

0:15:15.160 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 1>some recurring hamstring issues this year. So I'm gonna know

0:15:17.080 --> 0:15:21.520
<v Speaker 1>who their next game. They both sides Philly. It's tough.

0:15:21.640 --> 0:15:26.360
<v Speaker 1>That sucks. That's tough. That sucks. Yeah, um, speaking of injury,

0:15:26.680 --> 0:15:29.400
<v Speaker 1>speaking of injury issues that somebody else will I don't

0:15:29.520 --> 0:15:33.040
<v Speaker 1>think is on the list for Dr A No, It's okay,

0:15:33.040 --> 0:15:35.120
<v Speaker 1>he's not. It's Aaron Rodgers. You knew Aaron Rodgers gonna

0:15:35.120 --> 0:15:37.360
<v Speaker 1>play this Sunday. Um, but I just read from Iman

0:15:37.440 --> 0:15:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Rappleport just came out on my Twitter that, um, Aaron

0:15:40.560 --> 0:15:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Rodgers is practicing today, I believe limited to the interday's practice,

0:15:45.560 --> 0:15:48.920
<v Speaker 1>which means this improvement. Right. He did not practice the

0:15:48.960 --> 0:15:51.840
<v Speaker 1>last two weeks until Saturday, which is their Friday practice

0:15:51.840 --> 0:15:54.600
<v Speaker 1>for the Packers. UM, So some improvement with Aaron Rodgers

0:15:54.640 --> 0:15:57.760
<v Speaker 1>which hopefully will gain him a little bit more mobility

0:15:57.800 --> 0:16:01.160
<v Speaker 1>this week against Buffalo defense that cleared that clearly, UM

0:16:01.240 --> 0:16:04.360
<v Speaker 1>is better than we originally thought. Yeah, and I was

0:16:04.560 --> 0:16:06.880
<v Speaker 1>hammering that for a while I thought this Buffalo Bills

0:16:06.920 --> 0:16:09.560
<v Speaker 1>defense was still very good. I think they were being

0:16:10.080 --> 0:16:13.160
<v Speaker 1>underappreciated their first couple of weeks just because they got

0:16:13.160 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 1>blown out. I mean, look what you could say whatever

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:18.360
<v Speaker 1>for whatever reason, whether they weren't prepared or whatever it was.

0:16:18.560 --> 0:16:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you know, Vante Davis quitting on them at halftime,

0:16:21.200 --> 0:16:24.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, gave him a kick in the caboose. But

0:16:25.120 --> 0:16:26.760
<v Speaker 1>this defense is not as bad as they showed the

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:28.440
<v Speaker 1>first couple of weeks. And they're going to bring some

0:16:28.480 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 1>pressure on Aaron Rodgers. I think that makes a lot

0:16:31.160 --> 0:16:33.840
<v Speaker 1>of sense because he doesn't have that normal mobility, UM

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:36.520
<v Speaker 1>that we see out of Aaron Rodgers. So that's another

0:16:36.560 --> 0:16:39.520
<v Speaker 1>big line to the Packers are laying ten points at

0:16:39.560 --> 0:16:43.120
<v Speaker 1>home right now gets the Buffalo Bills, So that's that's

0:16:43.120 --> 0:16:44.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of points. Yeah, I don't know if I

0:16:44.520 --> 0:16:46.680
<v Speaker 1>would touch that one either way. Imagine going to Minnesota

0:16:46.720 --> 0:16:51.080
<v Speaker 1>and then Green Bay and knocking off both shocked the world.

0:16:51.480 --> 0:16:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Is this crazy? I'm starting Josh Allen in my Super

0:16:54.160 --> 0:17:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Flex League over Blake Bortles this week were Vision Jets

0:17:02.240 --> 0:17:04.359
<v Speaker 1>with the thirty eight and a half game total. No,

0:17:04.520 --> 0:17:06.280
<v Speaker 1>I think I like it because if either the Bills

0:17:06.280 --> 0:17:12.200
<v Speaker 1>getting down, he's four four net back for Jacksonville. We've

0:17:12.200 --> 0:17:14.520
<v Speaker 1>seen in games that four net plays. Yeah, they typically

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:16.240
<v Speaker 1>run the ball. I'm cool with it. We'll take a

0:17:16.280 --> 0:17:18.040
<v Speaker 1>break here. When we come back, we'll be joined by

0:17:18.160 --> 0:17:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Dr A from Inside Injuries. The Good Doctor will join

0:17:21.040 --> 0:17:22.480
<v Speaker 1>us and use the latest and all the injuries of

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:31.240
<v Speaker 1>the leagues. Look around more fs rats. Daily Rodo dot

0:17:31.240 --> 0:17:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Com learned from the game's best DFS players. We don't

0:17:35.160 --> 0:17:39.680
<v Speaker 1>just give you premier advice. We play every day, all

0:17:39.720 --> 0:17:43.920
<v Speaker 1>major sports, all year round. We never stop. Industry leading

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:47.960
<v Speaker 1>DFS tools and custom projections, and now the Daily Rodo

0:17:48.119 --> 0:17:51.600
<v Speaker 1>dot Com optimize that in minutes, building optimize, line up

0:17:51.720 --> 0:17:54.840
<v Speaker 1>for cash games and turneys learned from the game's best

0:17:54.960 --> 0:18:10.560
<v Speaker 1>DFS players joined Daily Rodo dot com. Frankie got the

0:18:10.560 --> 0:18:16.639
<v Speaker 1>Lions defense. Hey, congrets, we're talking about the sistrue. I

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:18.200
<v Speaker 1>got them in my home league as well. This is

0:18:18.200 --> 0:18:20.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna be the classic like le Town. Yeah, he picked

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 1>up the Detroit Lions. They're going up against the poorest

0:18:22.840 --> 0:18:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys offense. This is gonna be the week the Cowboys

0:18:25.560 --> 0:18:30.600
<v Speaker 1>scored thirty. I also spent I spent a dollar on Broadway,

0:18:31.040 --> 0:18:35.720
<v Speaker 1>Baker Broadway, Baker Baker Mania, running wild in Cleveland. What

0:18:35.720 --> 0:18:40.560
<v Speaker 1>do you think? Sure? Cool? I like it. You're Dr Schniff.

0:18:40.600 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm back there dry inside injuries. What's going on? Man?

0:18:45.200 --> 0:18:47.399
<v Speaker 1>Hey guys, how's that? How are you guys doing today?

0:18:48.000 --> 0:18:51.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing great. We're doing absolutely fantastic. Um a lot

0:18:51.720 --> 0:18:54.080
<v Speaker 1>of injuries talk about we're doing well. Why how are you, sir?

0:18:54.840 --> 0:18:57.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing great. I'm doing great. Just you know, living

0:18:57.680 --> 0:19:02.920
<v Speaker 1>the dream, right, yep, exactly exactly. Hey, doc, I want

0:19:02.920 --> 0:19:06.000
<v Speaker 1>to start um in Cincinnati where A. J. Green practiced

0:19:06.200 --> 0:19:08.560
<v Speaker 1>yesterday and we thought that the groin injury could linger

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:10.879
<v Speaker 1>a little bit freak and economy in a prediction of

0:19:10.920 --> 0:19:13.680
<v Speaker 1>what you would say to this question, Um, but what's

0:19:13.720 --> 0:19:16.240
<v Speaker 1>the deal with A J. Green? Yeah, so it looks

0:19:16.280 --> 0:19:19.600
<v Speaker 1>like a what we call a blunt forced trauma type

0:19:19.600 --> 0:19:22.399
<v Speaker 1>of injury. So he literally landed on the right side.

0:19:22.680 --> 0:19:24.600
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't quite sure. It didn't look like there was

0:19:24.640 --> 0:19:27.440
<v Speaker 1>any torque motion. So it looks like it's just bruising

0:19:27.480 --> 0:19:30.000
<v Speaker 1>and sort of a soft tissue. That's why are our

0:19:30.040 --> 0:19:35.560
<v Speaker 1>algorithm labeled it as a Grade one groin slash hip injury. Uh.

0:19:35.600 --> 0:19:38.199
<v Speaker 1>It is a two week optimal overcover time, and my

0:19:38.280 --> 0:19:41.000
<v Speaker 1>suggestion to A. J. Green and the Bengals is to

0:19:41.080 --> 0:19:44.520
<v Speaker 1>take the full two weeks because of his injury past. Um,

0:19:44.880 --> 0:19:48.240
<v Speaker 1>he was at peak health up to this point, but

0:19:48.320 --> 0:19:51.199
<v Speaker 1>it took him a long time to get there in

0:19:51.320 --> 0:19:54.760
<v Speaker 1>terms of our metrics. Now that he has this, unfortunately,

0:19:55.160 --> 0:19:57.800
<v Speaker 1>it has really it's sort of almost like the you know,

0:19:57.840 --> 0:20:00.160
<v Speaker 1>the straw that broke the camel's back. He has now

0:20:00.680 --> 0:20:05.840
<v Speaker 1>immediately escalated to pent injury risks. So any he's may

0:20:05.880 --> 0:20:08.840
<v Speaker 1>have been limited to the UH Wednesday in practice. If

0:20:08.840 --> 0:20:11.280
<v Speaker 1>he does play this weekend, it is bad. It is

0:20:11.320 --> 0:20:14.240
<v Speaker 1>a very bad sign in terms of I would stay

0:20:14.240 --> 0:20:17.400
<v Speaker 1>away from him from a fantasy standpoint because he will

0:20:17.440 --> 0:20:21.240
<v Speaker 1>still be at high injury risk. And Frank nailed it,

0:20:21.800 --> 0:20:24.520
<v Speaker 1>and Greg, that's exactly what we said yesterday. That's literally

0:20:26.119 --> 0:20:28.240
<v Speaker 1>exactly that I thought Doctor would have and I think

0:20:28.240 --> 0:20:31.400
<v Speaker 1>it makes sense. I just worried that A. J. Green

0:20:31.520 --> 0:20:33.080
<v Speaker 1>so much wants to play in this game because he

0:20:33.119 --> 0:20:35.760
<v Speaker 1>went to Georgia University, because he's been compared to Julio

0:20:35.840 --> 0:20:38.919
<v Speaker 1>Jones throughout, you know, his entire NFL career, being drafted

0:20:38.920 --> 0:20:41.320
<v Speaker 1>in the same draft together going back to Atlanta, I

0:20:41.359 --> 0:20:42.800
<v Speaker 1>think he really wants to get into this game, so

0:20:42.800 --> 0:20:45.280
<v Speaker 1>I think he's gonna try his best to play. But

0:20:45.480 --> 0:20:48.159
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you, Doc, I think there's a pretty

0:20:48.160 --> 0:20:51.480
<v Speaker 1>good chance for him to re injure this big game. Um,

0:20:51.520 --> 0:20:54.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, it wouldn't be a segment with inside injuries

0:20:54.080 --> 0:20:55.800
<v Speaker 1>if we didn't bring up Doug Baldwin to get a

0:20:55.840 --> 0:20:57.960
<v Speaker 1>weekly update on Doug Baldwin, and we actually got some

0:20:58.280 --> 0:21:02.240
<v Speaker 1>optimistic news yesterday that he returned to practice on a

0:21:02.280 --> 0:21:06.399
<v Speaker 1>limited basis. Now, Doctor, let us let us know. Is

0:21:06.440 --> 0:21:09.120
<v Speaker 1>he returning too soon? Um? Is he gonna be ready

0:21:09.160 --> 0:21:11.280
<v Speaker 1>to play this week? If he plays, what is his

0:21:11.359 --> 0:21:14.040
<v Speaker 1>chance for re injury within the game. What's the latest

0:21:14.080 --> 0:21:17.400
<v Speaker 1>on Doug Balbin. Yeah, so you know he had right

0:21:17.440 --> 0:21:20.960
<v Speaker 1>before the preseason, you had the what we are predicting

0:21:21.040 --> 0:21:23.480
<v Speaker 1>was a meniscus tear. The team has not released that,

0:21:23.920 --> 0:21:26.320
<v Speaker 1>but he missed all of preseason with it, and now

0:21:26.359 --> 0:21:28.760
<v Speaker 1>he has an m c L we which we've labeled

0:21:28.760 --> 0:21:31.800
<v Speaker 1>as a grade too. So from an m c L standpoint,

0:21:32.080 --> 0:21:34.240
<v Speaker 1>it's not a grade three, so it's not torn. But

0:21:34.960 --> 0:21:38.760
<v Speaker 1>combining both knee injuries with all the previous injuries he's had,

0:21:38.800 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, he was already elevated injury risk. It's pushed

0:21:41.359 --> 0:21:44.800
<v Speaker 1>him now. He still remains at twenty eight percent injury

0:21:44.880 --> 0:21:49.080
<v Speaker 1>risk and that's high. And his his HPF is literally

0:21:49.119 --> 0:21:53.080
<v Speaker 1>below average still, so if he does start playing in

0:21:53.119 --> 0:21:56.119
<v Speaker 1>the next four or five days, or even in the

0:21:56.119 --> 0:21:58.560
<v Speaker 1>next seven or ten days, he will not have the

0:21:58.640 --> 0:22:02.440
<v Speaker 1>right metrics to really be confident as a fantasy player. However,

0:22:02.880 --> 0:22:05.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, week five is where we're seeing that he'll

0:22:05.359 --> 0:22:09.640
<v Speaker 1>probably be at the best possible location from a metrics

0:22:09.640 --> 0:22:13.159
<v Speaker 1>standpoint that he can be. His HPF probably will get

0:22:13.280 --> 0:22:16.880
<v Speaker 1>to above average, and he'll be at elevated and above average.

0:22:17.119 --> 0:22:20.159
<v Speaker 1>That's the best he's gonna do. If you ask me,

0:22:20.200 --> 0:22:21.919
<v Speaker 1>I don't think Doug Baldwin plays this week. I know

0:22:21.960 --> 0:22:25.640
<v Speaker 1>he's returned on a limited basis, but I'm just speaking

0:22:25.680 --> 0:22:28.240
<v Speaker 1>from what I would imagine the Seahawks perspective is is

0:22:28.280 --> 0:22:31.000
<v Speaker 1>that they're going up against the Cardinals. They probably don't

0:22:31.040 --> 0:22:34.240
<v Speaker 1>need him, They're facing him what we did this last

0:22:34.240 --> 0:22:37.879
<v Speaker 1>week withalpan Cook. It's very true, but yeah, I just

0:22:37.920 --> 0:22:40.919
<v Speaker 1>don't think we five Baldwin. If I had to make

0:22:40.960 --> 0:22:42.880
<v Speaker 1>a prediction, I would say he doesn't play this week,

0:22:42.920 --> 0:22:44.679
<v Speaker 1>and he does return a week five. So I actually

0:22:44.720 --> 0:22:47.159
<v Speaker 1>I think he does play this week. Um, I'm not

0:22:47.200 --> 0:22:48.800
<v Speaker 1>saying he should. I agree with you, Doc, but I

0:22:48.800 --> 0:22:51.200
<v Speaker 1>think he ultimately does play this week. Practicing on a Wednesday,

0:22:51.320 --> 0:22:53.440
<v Speaker 1>and from what I was doing the research on Doug

0:22:53.480 --> 0:22:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Baldwin yesterday, and I think they planned all along for

0:22:57.920 --> 0:23:00.880
<v Speaker 1>this to be the week, um where they are wanting

0:23:00.880 --> 0:23:02.560
<v Speaker 1>to get This is a game that they should win.

0:23:02.600 --> 0:23:04.239
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you, Fra, they probably don't need him

0:23:04.240 --> 0:23:07.480
<v Speaker 1>to but ultimately it's a game they need to win,

0:23:08.200 --> 0:23:10.479
<v Speaker 1>and I think they'll do whatever means necessary to make

0:23:10.480 --> 0:23:11.760
<v Speaker 1>it happen. And I think you'll see Doug ball in

0:23:11.760 --> 0:23:13.479
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. Yeah, well I would. I would say

0:23:13.520 --> 0:23:16.920
<v Speaker 1>in retrospect what we were saying right before a game one.

0:23:17.080 --> 0:23:19.440
<v Speaker 1>We said Doug Baldwin should not play in week one

0:23:19.640 --> 0:23:21.560
<v Speaker 1>because his metrics are not there. I think if they

0:23:21.560 --> 0:23:24.560
<v Speaker 1>had waited to week two and gotten him to low

0:23:24.640 --> 0:23:27.040
<v Speaker 1>injury risks, then boom, he could have played week two

0:23:27.080 --> 0:23:29.320
<v Speaker 1>and maybe he would not have suffered this now second

0:23:29.600 --> 0:23:32.440
<v Speaker 1>knee injury, which is the m c L. And that's that. Yeah,

0:23:32.480 --> 0:23:34.640
<v Speaker 1>I completely hear that. But this week sounds a lot

0:23:34.720 --> 0:23:37.640
<v Speaker 1>like Week one with what dr As they bring him

0:23:37.640 --> 0:23:39.919
<v Speaker 1>back too soon, then we're gonna get another two or

0:23:39.920 --> 0:23:42.920
<v Speaker 1>three week absence, and I totally agree with that. And listen,

0:23:42.920 --> 0:23:45.359
<v Speaker 1>it's been how desperate the Seahawks are. They were desperate

0:23:45.400 --> 0:23:46.920
<v Speaker 1>in Week one they played him and didn't work out.

0:23:47.000 --> 0:23:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Are they desperate enough in a week four? I think

0:23:48.600 --> 0:23:51.960
<v Speaker 1>we'll say I'll lock it absolutely getting it done right now. Yes,

0:23:52.040 --> 0:23:54.399
<v Speaker 1>indeed he is. Evan Ingram expected him. It's two to

0:23:54.440 --> 0:23:56.960
<v Speaker 1>four weeks with a knee injury. I believe it's the

0:23:57.040 --> 0:24:01.320
<v Speaker 1>same spring MCL that Dog Baldwin that I want the

0:24:01.359 --> 0:24:04.119
<v Speaker 1>Giants and Giants fan to be cautious about how serious

0:24:04.119 --> 0:24:07.080
<v Speaker 1>does it look for Evan Ingram? Okay, so it's a

0:24:07.119 --> 0:24:09.560
<v Speaker 1>great two m c L so it's not torn again,

0:24:09.800 --> 0:24:12.760
<v Speaker 1>it is it's a it's a mild to moderate sprain.

0:24:12.920 --> 0:24:15.840
<v Speaker 1>So that's you know, that's good news for Evan Ingram.

0:24:15.920 --> 0:24:19.240
<v Speaker 1>But you know, he was elevated and below average before

0:24:19.720 --> 0:24:22.439
<v Speaker 1>um this injury. So you know, he we knew that

0:24:22.480 --> 0:24:24.280
<v Speaker 1>he was at a higher risk to get this. Now

0:24:24.520 --> 0:24:28.240
<v Speaker 1>he has moved into high injury risk and at health.

0:24:28.359 --> 0:24:31.200
<v Speaker 1>So you know, right now this is a three week

0:24:31.240 --> 0:24:34.480
<v Speaker 1>optimal recovery time and it's a healthy to return at

0:24:34.520 --> 0:24:37.600
<v Speaker 1>week six. So we're kind of in line with what

0:24:37.640 --> 0:24:40.320
<v Speaker 1>the giants are saying. Missing two to four weeks, it's

0:24:40.359 --> 0:24:43.000
<v Speaker 1>probably going to be three UM, and you know, if

0:24:43.000 --> 0:24:45.280
<v Speaker 1>he has any setbacks, it will probably be four and

0:24:45.240 --> 0:24:47.560
<v Speaker 1>it'll be week seven. But the earliest we see that

0:24:47.600 --> 0:24:50.480
<v Speaker 1>he should come back right now is week six. But

0:24:50.560 --> 0:24:52.720
<v Speaker 1>his metrics are not going to be that great. When

0:24:52.720 --> 0:24:55.080
<v Speaker 1>he comes back, he may be up to above average,

0:24:55.080 --> 0:24:57.840
<v Speaker 1>but he will still be at elevated injury risk most likely,

0:24:58.200 --> 0:25:01.080
<v Speaker 1>and so you know, Evan ingramoners to really consider that,

0:25:02.000 --> 0:25:04.760
<v Speaker 1>right just from a giant's perspective. This week we said

0:25:04.760 --> 0:25:07.119
<v Speaker 1>this the other day. In games where Evan Ingram misses,

0:25:07.160 --> 0:25:09.760
<v Speaker 1>I think sting Shepherd instantly steps up as a high

0:25:09.840 --> 0:25:12.720
<v Speaker 1>end wide receiver three, And especially in this week's matchup

0:25:12.760 --> 0:25:15.000
<v Speaker 1>against the New Orleans Saints where they just lost their

0:25:15.000 --> 0:25:17.520
<v Speaker 1>slot cornerback Patrick Robinson, he got placed on I R

0:25:18.000 --> 0:25:20.119
<v Speaker 1>I like Sterling separate at the top twenty wide receiver.

0:25:20.160 --> 0:25:22.160
<v Speaker 1>It might be aggressive, but I'm ranking him that way.

0:25:22.160 --> 0:25:23.919
<v Speaker 1>He s been at a dollar Mike Yaller, Ray Alison.

0:25:25.200 --> 0:25:27.520
<v Speaker 1>It depends how desperate you are. Obviously, if you were

0:25:27.520 --> 0:25:29.359
<v Speaker 1>an Evan Ingram owner, there are a few other places

0:25:29.400 --> 0:25:32.440
<v Speaker 1>I would look first. I would look at Um and Watson.

0:25:32.440 --> 0:25:34.639
<v Speaker 1>I would look advance McDonald. But if guys like that

0:25:34.640 --> 0:25:36.960
<v Speaker 1>are already gone, then yeah, Rrett Ellison's probably the next

0:25:36.960 --> 0:25:39.119
<v Speaker 1>man up. And I would also say about Evan Ingram,

0:25:39.119 --> 0:25:41.680
<v Speaker 1>don't forget he suffered a concussion in the preseason, right,

0:25:41.720 --> 0:25:45.199
<v Speaker 1>so this is now a second injury. Concussions, especially the

0:25:45.200 --> 0:25:47.840
<v Speaker 1>guys that catch the ball, are much more impactful than

0:25:47.880 --> 0:25:51.159
<v Speaker 1>anything else. So Evan Ingram omer's owners, you know, should

0:25:51.359 --> 0:25:52.960
<v Speaker 1>you know? I don't know if this is the best

0:25:52.960 --> 0:25:56.359
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna get this season. It's it's possible. Doc, I

0:25:56.400 --> 0:25:58.399
<v Speaker 1>asked you about Doug Baldwin earlier, I want to ask

0:25:58.440 --> 0:26:00.800
<v Speaker 1>you about another wide receiver who's making his way back

0:26:00.800 --> 0:26:03.840
<v Speaker 1>from injury, trying to return, and that's Alshon Jeffrey with

0:26:03.880 --> 0:26:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the shoulder injury. Now he's been cleared for contact, and

0:26:07.280 --> 0:26:09.239
<v Speaker 1>I don't personally, I don't know what that means. Does

0:26:09.280 --> 0:26:10.680
<v Speaker 1>that mean he's going to play this week? Does that

0:26:10.720 --> 0:26:12.680
<v Speaker 1>mean he's practicing? Because I feel like a lot of

0:26:12.760 --> 0:26:15.680
<v Speaker 1>fantasy owners are getting excited over this, over the possibility

0:26:15.680 --> 0:26:18.280
<v Speaker 1>of Alshon Jeffrey playing this week just because he's cleared

0:26:18.320 --> 0:26:21.400
<v Speaker 1>for contact. Does that mean we see him in week four?

0:26:21.640 --> 0:26:23.919
<v Speaker 1>Or is this another case like Doug baldin ware they

0:26:23.920 --> 0:26:26.560
<v Speaker 1>should rest him until he's fully ready to go and

0:26:26.560 --> 0:26:29.359
<v Speaker 1>then it's more likely we see him in week five. Yeah,

0:26:29.400 --> 0:26:31.639
<v Speaker 1>So cleared for contact does not mean that he's going

0:26:31.680 --> 0:26:33.960
<v Speaker 1>to start. I mean, it basically means that now guys

0:26:33.960 --> 0:26:37.320
<v Speaker 1>in practice can tackle him, you know, and so you know, uh,

0:26:37.359 --> 0:26:40.560
<v Speaker 1>and so he's nowhere near um in terms of this week,

0:26:40.640 --> 0:26:42.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, saying that you know he's going to be

0:26:42.160 --> 0:26:44.200
<v Speaker 1>ready to play in the game. What we're what we're

0:26:44.320 --> 0:26:46.679
<v Speaker 1>looking at, you know, and and just to reiterate, we

0:26:46.680 --> 0:26:48.720
<v Speaker 1>talked about Alshan Jeffrey all the time, and this guy

0:26:48.760 --> 0:26:51.840
<v Speaker 1>had a completely torn rotator cough, you know, and so

0:26:52.080 --> 0:26:54.120
<v Speaker 1>it is so hard to come back from this injury

0:26:54.600 --> 0:26:57.280
<v Speaker 1>and so finally being cleared for contact, and it's the

0:26:57.359 --> 0:26:59.359
<v Speaker 1>right time to clear him for contact. That he's at

0:26:59.400 --> 0:27:02.800
<v Speaker 1>peak health right now, um, according to our metrics, but

0:27:03.600 --> 0:27:06.840
<v Speaker 1>he's at elevated injury risk. At This is a high risk,

0:27:06.920 --> 0:27:10.000
<v Speaker 1>high reward kind of guy. So if he's up against

0:27:10.040 --> 0:27:12.560
<v Speaker 1>the defense, um, you know, if if he's up against

0:27:12.680 --> 0:27:16.440
<v Speaker 1>a m a defense that is very weak, you may

0:27:16.560 --> 0:27:19.080
<v Speaker 1>want to put him in your lineup because but he

0:27:19.240 --> 0:27:21.840
<v Speaker 1>is a high risk, high reward type of guy. Week

0:27:22.040 --> 0:27:26.720
<v Speaker 1>four right now is where we're considering his optimal recovery

0:27:26.760 --> 0:27:29.280
<v Speaker 1>time way back in the day was thirty weeks. So

0:27:29.520 --> 0:27:32.399
<v Speaker 1>week four now is the culmination of those thirty weeks.

0:27:32.880 --> 0:27:36.040
<v Speaker 1>We're talking to Dr A from inside Injuries. The Eagles

0:27:36.080 --> 0:27:38.639
<v Speaker 1>having smartly and rightfully so cautious what it comes to

0:27:38.680 --> 0:27:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Alsian Jeffrey completely tearing that rotator cuff um and looks

0:27:43.680 --> 0:27:45.840
<v Speaker 1>like when they get him back, he'll be ready to go. Yeah,

0:27:45.880 --> 0:27:49.359
<v Speaker 1>and his value is directly tied two guys like um

0:27:49.359 --> 0:27:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Nelson and even Dallas got herd. You asked me about

0:27:52.960 --> 0:27:55.679
<v Speaker 1>Red Allison. If Alshon Jeffrey doesn't go, I like Dallas

0:27:56.040 --> 0:27:58.480
<v Speaker 1>more than him this week as well. We saw last

0:27:58.480 --> 0:28:01.200
<v Speaker 1>week when Alshon Jeffrey was still out, they really employed

0:28:01.440 --> 0:28:04.240
<v Speaker 1>the two tight end sets, definitely Zach Earth and Dallas Goddard,

0:28:04.240 --> 0:28:06.479
<v Speaker 1>and he was targeted seven times in that game. They

0:28:06.560 --> 0:28:08.280
<v Speaker 1>used them a lot, and he actually scored a touchdown.

0:28:08.320 --> 0:28:10.560
<v Speaker 1>So if Alson Jeffrey is a no go, I like

0:28:10.640 --> 0:28:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Goddard more so than I do Read Ellison. If

0:28:13.080 --> 0:28:15.200
<v Speaker 1>you're streaming the tight end I completely agree with. And

0:28:15.600 --> 0:28:17.000
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that will tell you about Alshean

0:28:17.080 --> 0:28:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Jeffrey is that because he's been away and absent for

0:28:19.560 --> 0:28:21.440
<v Speaker 1>so long, I mean, the Eagles are not going to

0:28:21.560 --> 0:28:24.399
<v Speaker 1>throw him in and do like you know out He

0:28:24.440 --> 0:28:27.040
<v Speaker 1>may play limited snaps. He may just because he's starting

0:28:27.080 --> 0:28:29.400
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean he's going full fled. So you know, owners

0:28:29.400 --> 0:28:30.960
<v Speaker 1>need to know that. You know, if he's not on

0:28:30.960 --> 0:28:32.840
<v Speaker 1>the field half the time, it doesn't help them as well.

0:28:32.840 --> 0:28:34.640
<v Speaker 1>It's a great point too, He's definitely not gonna play

0:28:34.720 --> 0:28:36.600
<v Speaker 1>his normal percentage of snaps right out of the game.

0:28:36.600 --> 0:28:38.400
<v Speaker 1>He's not ready. This is his preseason. Even if he

0:28:38.480 --> 0:28:40.920
<v Speaker 1>plays this week, you can't start. I don't think he's playing.

0:28:41.000 --> 0:28:46.200
<v Speaker 1>He's probably around like which might be twenty plays. Yeah,

0:28:46.240 --> 0:28:48.440
<v Speaker 1>I think that makes sense. We talked about Evan Ingroom

0:28:48.520 --> 0:28:51.080
<v Speaker 1>and Dallas Goddard you mentioned and with the only tight ends,

0:28:51.080 --> 0:28:54.120
<v Speaker 1>and that brings me to Jack Doyle, who not a

0:28:54.160 --> 0:28:58.720
<v Speaker 1>missing practice last Friday. Eric Ebron was a popular DFS play.

0:28:58.960 --> 0:29:00.920
<v Speaker 1>He got it going garbage a little bit. The receptions

0:29:00.920 --> 0:29:02.880
<v Speaker 1>were there, obviously, the yordage was not dropped. A couple

0:29:02.880 --> 0:29:06.000
<v Speaker 1>of touchdowns and penalties and whatnot. Um, how serious is

0:29:06.040 --> 0:29:09.000
<v Speaker 1>injury to Jack Doyle? What's the latest on him? Well,

0:29:09.200 --> 0:29:11.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's a great two hip injury, so, um,

0:29:11.360 --> 0:29:13.840
<v Speaker 1>it's not it's not a soft tissue or one. It

0:29:13.960 --> 0:29:16.080
<v Speaker 1>is a two and it's but it's not a three

0:29:16.120 --> 0:29:17.719
<v Speaker 1>or four. So he's right in the middle. The problem

0:29:17.760 --> 0:29:19.880
<v Speaker 1>with is that it's a hip injury on tight ends

0:29:19.880 --> 0:29:22.960
<v Speaker 1>and those things are just like concussions, can be significantly

0:29:23.000 --> 0:29:26.600
<v Speaker 1>impactful specifically to these guys. Just is what our data

0:29:26.640 --> 0:29:30.120
<v Speaker 1>algorithm is showing. So you know, our algorithm is well

0:29:30.160 --> 0:29:33.160
<v Speaker 1>piste off at Jack Doyle because it. Uh. You know,

0:29:33.440 --> 0:29:35.640
<v Speaker 1>we we had him at low injury risk and peak

0:29:35.640 --> 0:29:39.160
<v Speaker 1>health you know, before this injury. Um, but uh um,

0:29:39.520 --> 0:29:41.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's kind of a little bit of a conundrum.

0:29:41.360 --> 0:29:44.160
<v Speaker 1>But now that we know that, we are pretty sure

0:29:44.200 --> 0:29:46.600
<v Speaker 1>that he has a great two hip injury um h

0:29:46.920 --> 0:29:49.280
<v Speaker 1>h g R is week five. That means he'll be

0:29:49.320 --> 0:29:51.440
<v Speaker 1>back week five, most like that's when he should be back.

0:29:51.560 --> 0:29:55.040
<v Speaker 1>And um, he's at high injury risk at We do

0:29:55.120 --> 0:29:57.719
<v Speaker 1>not like the word hip injury for tight ends. And

0:29:57.760 --> 0:30:00.840
<v Speaker 1>so when he does come back, you know, it's still

0:30:01.000 --> 0:30:03.520
<v Speaker 1>going to be not at low injury risk, he'll be

0:30:03.560 --> 0:30:06.680
<v Speaker 1>at elevated injury risk and below to above average. You

0:30:06.680 --> 0:30:09.560
<v Speaker 1>know this, This hip injury is pretty debilitating throughout the

0:30:09.600 --> 0:30:13.440
<v Speaker 1>season for tight ends. And I think any game that

0:30:13.520 --> 0:30:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Jack Doyle miss is obviously Eric Ebron is a top

0:30:16.120 --> 0:30:18.240
<v Speaker 1>ten tight end. He currently ranks as tight end nine.

0:30:18.240 --> 0:30:20.080
<v Speaker 1>We spoke about him a little bit earlier, Greg, So

0:30:20.320 --> 0:30:23.160
<v Speaker 1>if Jack Doyle misses this week again, Eric Ebron looks

0:30:23.200 --> 0:30:25.680
<v Speaker 1>like a tight end one. Doc. I wanted to ask

0:30:25.720 --> 0:30:27.920
<v Speaker 1>you about two running backs playing in the same game

0:30:28.000 --> 0:30:29.920
<v Speaker 1>this week, a game that we really like. It's actually

0:30:29.920 --> 0:30:33.480
<v Speaker 1>the Falcons against the Cincinnati Bengals with a fifty one

0:30:33.520 --> 0:30:35.760
<v Speaker 1>game total, so Vegas is expecting a lot of points

0:30:35.760 --> 0:30:39.920
<v Speaker 1>in this one. But obviously Joe Mixon and DeVonta Freeman,

0:30:39.920 --> 0:30:44.880
<v Speaker 1>they're availability instantly affects guys like Geo Bernard and Tevin Coleblan,

0:30:44.880 --> 0:30:47.480
<v Speaker 1>guys who we have ranked very highly this week as

0:30:47.600 --> 0:30:50.680
<v Speaker 1>RB ones. So what's the latest on both of those guys.

0:30:50.720 --> 0:30:52.840
<v Speaker 1>I know DeVonta Freeman didn't practice yesterday. It looks like

0:30:52.920 --> 0:30:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Joe Mixon didn't practice today. Is this another week where

0:30:55.720 --> 0:30:58.600
<v Speaker 1>both of those running backs are sitting out. Yeah, there's

0:30:58.640 --> 0:31:00.520
<v Speaker 1>no reason for them to be in the game. I mean,

0:31:00.600 --> 0:31:03.560
<v Speaker 1>they need to sit out. We have DeVante Freeman at

0:31:03.720 --> 0:31:06.120
<v Speaker 1>week five, and we have Joe Mixon all the way

0:31:06.160 --> 0:31:09.280
<v Speaker 1>to week eight, and so, um, you know, I don't

0:31:09.360 --> 0:31:12.000
<v Speaker 1>think that, Uh, if we do see them start in

0:31:12.040 --> 0:31:14.360
<v Speaker 1>the game, that's a very very that's not that's not

0:31:14.400 --> 0:31:16.920
<v Speaker 1>a good decision. But um, at the end of the day,

0:31:17.040 --> 0:31:21.000
<v Speaker 1>remember Devonte Freeman has multitude of injuries and concussions, and

0:31:21.080 --> 0:31:23.239
<v Speaker 1>he was injured in week one, and so he's at

0:31:23.240 --> 0:31:25.320
<v Speaker 1>thirty one percent injury risk right now, he's all the

0:31:25.320 --> 0:31:28.160
<v Speaker 1>way down to thirty eight percent and um, you know

0:31:28.360 --> 0:31:31.440
<v Speaker 1>had health. So it's just not not a good thing

0:31:31.440 --> 0:31:33.600
<v Speaker 1>in Joe Mixon. You know, he just went he just

0:31:33.680 --> 0:31:36.120
<v Speaker 1>underwent knee surgery last week, and he had there was

0:31:36.120 --> 0:31:38.080
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of loose particles that they had to remove.

0:31:38.280 --> 0:31:40.480
<v Speaker 1>They had to train in meniscus because of his miniscus there.

0:31:40.480 --> 0:31:43.040
<v Speaker 1>So it was a great three knee injury. And and

0:31:43.480 --> 0:31:45.239
<v Speaker 1>there's no I mean, I know the team gave him

0:31:45.240 --> 0:31:47.560
<v Speaker 1>a two to four week recovery time. That is. I

0:31:47.560 --> 0:31:49.320
<v Speaker 1>don't know if that's games been shipped or not, but

0:31:49.360 --> 0:31:51.480
<v Speaker 1>there's no way a great three knee injury is gonna

0:31:51.480 --> 0:31:53.480
<v Speaker 1>have a two to four week recovery time. It is

0:31:53.480 --> 0:31:55.560
<v Speaker 1>a six week minimum. And that's why we have him

0:31:55.560 --> 0:31:59.040
<v Speaker 1>at HTR week eight, right, And I know that might

0:31:59.120 --> 0:32:01.760
<v Speaker 1>scare some people who listening, and obviously like what Joe

0:32:01.800 --> 0:32:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Mixon was doing early on in the season, you want

0:32:03.560 --> 0:32:06.040
<v Speaker 1>him to come back, definitely. As a fantasy owner, you

0:32:06.200 --> 0:32:09.160
<v Speaker 1>almost rather the Bengals take a cautious approach and just

0:32:09.200 --> 0:32:11.360
<v Speaker 1>rest him until he's completely healthy so that you can

0:32:11.400 --> 0:32:14.280
<v Speaker 1>have Joe Mixon from week I mean whenever we get

0:32:14.360 --> 0:32:16.720
<v Speaker 1>him back, whether it's six, seven, eight, I know eight

0:32:16.840 --> 0:32:19.719
<v Speaker 1>is the optimal recovery time according to Inside Injuries. But

0:32:20.000 --> 0:32:23.120
<v Speaker 1>you want him to be fully healthy once he returns

0:32:23.280 --> 0:32:25.240
<v Speaker 1>and not for the Bengals to rush him back. Yeah,

0:32:25.400 --> 0:32:27.320
<v Speaker 1>you absolutely, because you want to have the same guy

0:32:27.360 --> 0:32:28.760
<v Speaker 1>that was on the field week one that you were

0:32:28.800 --> 0:32:31.240
<v Speaker 1>excited about in particularly Week two. Uh, and not a

0:32:31.280 --> 0:32:33.320
<v Speaker 1>guy that we have shelled himself and not not running

0:32:33.320 --> 0:32:37.160
<v Speaker 1>scared but running a bit um not the lad running

0:32:37.160 --> 0:32:39.800
<v Speaker 1>a bit as it's in prohibited. I guess is has

0:32:40.000 --> 0:32:42.480
<v Speaker 1>hesitants a really good word too. So that's what you

0:32:42.520 --> 0:32:45.320
<v Speaker 1>need from Joe Mixon. Speaking of young running back Sonny

0:32:45.360 --> 0:32:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Michelle is the starting running back now in New England

0:32:47.680 --> 0:32:50.720
<v Speaker 1>as Rex Burkhead hits the i R with a neck injury.

0:32:50.960 --> 0:32:53.040
<v Speaker 1>How serious is his neck injury is? Is there a

0:32:53.120 --> 0:32:56.600
<v Speaker 1>chance that he's back later this season? What is what

0:32:56.680 --> 0:32:58.480
<v Speaker 1>are you reading and seeing and hearing when it comes

0:32:58.520 --> 0:33:01.320
<v Speaker 1>to Rex Burkhead? Yeah? You see you guys see me

0:33:01.360 --> 0:33:04.880
<v Speaker 1>shaking my head, right. So, I mean we've talked about

0:33:04.920 --> 0:33:07.960
<v Speaker 1>this all the time with the Rex Burkhead. I mean

0:33:07.960 --> 0:33:10.920
<v Speaker 1>he was high injury risk before the season. We knew

0:33:10.960 --> 0:33:13.200
<v Speaker 1>that it was just a matter of time, you know,

0:33:13.400 --> 0:33:16.080
<v Speaker 1>our high injury risk in the preseason means that there

0:33:16.160 --> 0:33:18.480
<v Speaker 1>is a chance of injury in the first four or

0:33:18.480 --> 0:33:21.840
<v Speaker 1>five games, and and a pretty significant one in this

0:33:22.160 --> 0:33:24.160
<v Speaker 1>The fact that they put him on I R can

0:33:24.240 --> 0:33:26.680
<v Speaker 1>only mean one of a couple of things. Um that

0:33:26.720 --> 0:33:30.600
<v Speaker 1>he has a very subtle or small fracture in his neck,

0:33:31.120 --> 0:33:34.360
<v Speaker 1>or he has a discarniation of some sort like that.

0:33:34.400 --> 0:33:36.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean that that is the only thing that would

0:33:36.840 --> 0:33:39.920
<v Speaker 1>really significantly put you know, a guy on I R

0:33:40.000 --> 0:33:42.920
<v Speaker 1>like this right away. The team is obviously not coming

0:33:42.920 --> 0:33:45.120
<v Speaker 1>out with it. But he was high before, he's high now,

0:33:45.160 --> 0:33:47.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean he's he you know, I think this is

0:33:48.240 --> 0:33:50.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if we'll see him back this season. Um,

0:33:50.760 --> 0:33:53.120
<v Speaker 1>that's why I mean, are we have week thirteen right

0:33:53.120 --> 0:33:55.760
<v Speaker 1>now potentially? Well? Is that is that is that eight week? More?

0:33:55.920 --> 0:33:57.920
<v Speaker 1>That is that eight week mar whre Riskburg can come

0:33:57.920 --> 0:34:00.400
<v Speaker 1>back potentially, So you get him for the player front

0:34:00.680 --> 0:34:02.400
<v Speaker 1>A get it, you're gonna you're gonna drop the Obviously

0:34:02.400 --> 0:34:04.040
<v Speaker 1>he's not I run list if you haven't, or you

0:34:04.120 --> 0:34:06.360
<v Speaker 1>have my rs, but your stash him there. Um, but

0:34:06.400 --> 0:34:08.799
<v Speaker 1>I would counter wrest brokehead at all ten weeks by

0:34:08.840 --> 0:34:11.680
<v Speaker 1>the way, it's ten weeks, yeah, yeah, ten weeks excuse me, sorry,

0:34:12.160 --> 0:34:15.160
<v Speaker 1>ten weeks away, um, which allows him to come off

0:34:15.280 --> 0:34:17.240
<v Speaker 1>the I r S. Think you with New England here, Frankie.

0:34:17.480 --> 0:34:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Josh Gordon acquired last week by the Patriots did not

0:34:20.640 --> 0:34:23.319
<v Speaker 1>play either due to not knowing the playbook well enough

0:34:23.600 --> 0:34:26.120
<v Speaker 1>or that hamstring injury. What's the latest on Josh Gordon

0:34:26.160 --> 0:34:29.879
<v Speaker 1>from a health perspective? Okay, so um, the very fact

0:34:29.960 --> 0:34:31.719
<v Speaker 1>that he has been off the field for so long

0:34:31.880 --> 0:34:35.359
<v Speaker 1>that he had no injuries. So even this minor it's

0:34:35.360 --> 0:34:38.560
<v Speaker 1>a very minor hamstring tweak. Um it it's only two

0:34:38.560 --> 0:34:42.000
<v Speaker 1>weeks um right now, week four, um is what we're

0:34:42.040 --> 0:34:44.600
<v Speaker 1>showing that he should be back. But it didn't really

0:34:44.640 --> 0:34:47.319
<v Speaker 1>affect his numbers too much. Um, he's still he's he

0:34:47.480 --> 0:34:51.040
<v Speaker 1>almost pushed him into elevated uh injury risk and he's

0:34:51.040 --> 0:34:53.439
<v Speaker 1>at the border of low and elevated. So another week

0:34:53.480 --> 0:34:56.200
<v Speaker 1>of rest and boom he'll be back to low and peak.

0:34:56.520 --> 0:34:59.799
<v Speaker 1>Basically week four dry real quick. We only have a

0:35:00.000 --> 0:35:02.439
<v Speaker 1>and it left Marcus Mariota. We know he's been dealing

0:35:02.440 --> 0:35:04.719
<v Speaker 1>with the nerve issue. They've already confirmed that he will

0:35:04.760 --> 0:35:07.200
<v Speaker 1>start in week four. Is that a smart decision by

0:35:07.239 --> 0:35:09.239
<v Speaker 1>the Tennessee titles. You know, I don't know if they

0:35:09.280 --> 0:35:11.440
<v Speaker 1>have any other decision though, you know, with what happened

0:35:11.920 --> 0:35:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Blaine Gabbett right, so um, whether it's smart or not,

0:35:15.000 --> 0:35:16.840
<v Speaker 1>it's just I don't think they have a choice. The

0:35:16.880 --> 0:35:19.680
<v Speaker 1>issue with Marcus Mariota is the fact that this sounds

0:35:19.719 --> 0:35:22.400
<v Speaker 1>like cubital tunnel syndrome. And what that is is the

0:35:22.440 --> 0:35:25.719
<v Speaker 1>allnern nerve passes through the elbow and they're spurring right

0:35:25.760 --> 0:35:28.880
<v Speaker 1>around that area, so it keeps rubbing up against those spurs,

0:35:29.239 --> 0:35:31.399
<v Speaker 1>and so that's what this sounds like. And if that's

0:35:31.440 --> 0:35:34.240
<v Speaker 1>the case, he has to be operated on to release

0:35:34.280 --> 0:35:36.279
<v Speaker 1>and open that space up, which is a six to

0:35:36.360 --> 0:35:39.160
<v Speaker 1>eight week recovery. So I don't think they can afford

0:35:39.200 --> 0:35:41.560
<v Speaker 1>to lose him for eight games. And so you know,

0:35:41.600 --> 0:35:45.319
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna try to inject that area, could become pain free,

0:35:45.400 --> 0:35:47.640
<v Speaker 1>keep the inflammation down, and keep throwing it. But a

0:35:47.680 --> 0:35:51.200
<v Speaker 1>whole game of throwing will affect an impact. And I

0:35:51.200 --> 0:35:53.759
<v Speaker 1>don't know he appreciated. Doctor, you go, dr A from

0:35:53.760 --> 0:35:56.880
<v Speaker 1>inside injuries. We appreciate it. We're back here after this.

0:35:58.000 --> 0:36:00.760
<v Speaker 1>There's only one place to listen to the best fantasy advice,

0:36:00.960 --> 0:36:03.840
<v Speaker 1>and that's the Fantasy Sports Radio Network. By downloading the

0:36:03.880 --> 0:36:06.080
<v Speaker 1>fan t s Y Radio Network app, you'll be blessed

0:36:06.080 --> 0:36:08.880
<v Speaker 1>with having the top fantasy experts right in your pocket.

0:36:08.960 --> 0:36:11.520
<v Speaker 1>You'll get award winning and entertaining programs like the World

0:36:11.560 --> 0:36:14.359
<v Speaker 1>to Experts, Let's Cock a Doodle Do It, Fantasy Best

0:36:14.360 --> 0:36:19.959
<v Speaker 1>Friends Forever, Carton and Friends, Yeah, and so much more.

0:36:20.440 --> 0:36:22.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying, download the f and T s Y Sports

0:36:22.320 --> 0:36:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Radio Network App now and take the most trusted fantasy

0:36:25.040 --> 0:36:51.680
<v Speaker 1>experts with you wherever you go. To jail sauce they

0:36:51.719 --> 0:36:54.480
<v Speaker 1>don't know to utter dot com. It's the industry's leading

0:36:54.600 --> 0:36:57.759
<v Speaker 1>daily fantasy site. There's produce seven separate FanDuel and d

0:36:57.960 --> 0:37:02.080
<v Speaker 1>K million dollar term winners. They also produced millions more

0:37:02.239 --> 0:37:05.000
<v Speaker 1>in smaller prizes for countless subscribers. Once there, you click

0:37:05.040 --> 0:37:06.759
<v Speaker 1>on the premium and you can use the same daily

0:37:06.760 --> 0:37:09.640
<v Speaker 1>fantasy line optimizers. There's some daily road of customers achieve

0:37:09.719 --> 0:37:13.000
<v Speaker 1>such remarkable success. End of sports ranging that you're into.

0:37:13.200 --> 0:37:15.319
<v Speaker 1>Click on the new sports betting tab where you can

0:37:15.360 --> 0:37:17.320
<v Speaker 1>be able to use the same tools that have produced

0:37:17.320 --> 0:37:19.799
<v Speaker 1>all those daily fantasy winnings for money line picks, picks

0:37:19.800 --> 0:37:22.319
<v Speaker 1>against the spread, game totals, and player props. So go

0:37:22.360 --> 0:37:24.320
<v Speaker 1>to Daily rodor dot com entwer f n T s

0:37:24.480 --> 0:37:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Y for a special discount. That's Daily road of dot com,

0:37:27.280 --> 0:37:31.799
<v Speaker 1>the industry website where millionaires are made, quite literally, Frank,

0:37:32.000 --> 0:37:35.200
<v Speaker 1>your rankings are up right now over at road to

0:37:35.280 --> 0:37:38.160
<v Speaker 1>experts dot com. Yes they are. They are free. I'm

0:37:38.160 --> 0:37:40.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna tweet out the link after the show. But you

0:37:40.600 --> 0:37:42.200
<v Speaker 1>can go to road to Experts dot com right now.

0:37:42.239 --> 0:37:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Just hit on the NFL tab or it's also like

0:37:44.480 --> 0:37:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the first thing in the slide show, so you can

0:37:46.200 --> 0:37:47.960
<v Speaker 1>just click on it there and you can see my

0:37:48.360 --> 0:37:50.960
<v Speaker 1>weekly rankings for week four and five players that I'm

0:37:51.040 --> 0:37:54.000
<v Speaker 1>higher on than the consensus. Okay, so that's pretty good.

0:37:54.000 --> 0:37:55.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna actually do that right now. How about that,

0:37:55.600 --> 0:37:57.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go to ro to experts dot com. Two

0:37:57.440 --> 0:37:59.239
<v Speaker 1>people's calls with a line of line of questions too,

0:37:59.320 --> 0:38:02.640
<v Speaker 1>or we say that tomorrow we can take if you

0:38:02.719 --> 0:38:05.200
<v Speaker 1>have questions about involving players in tonight's game. I think

0:38:05.200 --> 0:38:07.880
<v Speaker 1>we'll take your car. It's fair, Frase being very specific

0:38:07.880 --> 0:38:09.640
<v Speaker 1>about the calls, and I knew that. That's why I

0:38:09.680 --> 0:38:13.120
<v Speaker 1>asked yesterday we want to trade questions. We got like

0:38:13.160 --> 0:38:16.160
<v Speaker 1>a star sit Oh, we're calling when day started, sit

0:38:16.239 --> 0:38:18.319
<v Speaker 1>is kind of hard interesting, So we're calling up more

0:38:18.360 --> 0:38:21.880
<v Speaker 1>and more prepared? Are we calling the high five? You're

0:38:21.880 --> 0:38:23.239
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to go to the king for I'm gonna

0:38:23.360 --> 0:38:26.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you don't name your own. It's like, hey,

0:38:26.040 --> 0:38:27.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna give you five players, and I'm hired on

0:38:27.800 --> 0:38:29.799
<v Speaker 1>than the rest of people. I mean, if you want it,

0:38:29.960 --> 0:38:33.640
<v Speaker 1>what should we call it? Frank's five, the Fab five? Probably?

0:38:34.080 --> 0:38:36.520
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking the friendly five BF type of friendly five.

0:38:36.800 --> 0:38:40.920
<v Speaker 1>It's not bad, I can I could run that by Scott.

0:38:40.920 --> 0:38:43.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure he won't have any issues with it. Best

0:38:43.160 --> 0:38:45.920
<v Speaker 1>friendly five, best friendly. It might be a little bit

0:38:46.000 --> 0:38:51.480
<v Speaker 1>best friendly fives BF. Yeah, I like that. Frank's that's

0:38:51.480 --> 0:38:53.720
<v Speaker 1>why you're in charge. That's why you're an executive. Greg, Oh,

0:38:53.719 --> 0:38:58.160
<v Speaker 1>stop freaking. I had a conversation yesterday. Frank hates executives

0:38:58.520 --> 0:39:02.239
<v Speaker 1>being or having all executives. Oh yeah, No, I'm not

0:39:02.239 --> 0:39:04.120
<v Speaker 1>built for this kind of thing. Now. You you are

0:39:04.239 --> 0:39:07.160
<v Speaker 1>very much so built for you think so yes, you

0:39:07.320 --> 0:39:09.520
<v Speaker 1>know that's like you're doing a good job or like

0:39:09.680 --> 0:39:11.920
<v Speaker 1>you're I mean you're doing that, you are doing a

0:39:11.920 --> 0:39:14.520
<v Speaker 1>good job. I can openly say that you are more

0:39:14.560 --> 0:39:16.959
<v Speaker 1>executive worthy than I am, because you can tell people

0:39:17.000 --> 0:39:20.560
<v Speaker 1>like it is right, like you you have backbone. I'm

0:39:20.600 --> 0:39:22.840
<v Speaker 1>not like I'll look at someone doing something wrong and

0:39:22.880 --> 0:39:25.400
<v Speaker 1>be like, hey, look man, like give you like a

0:39:25.400 --> 0:39:29.400
<v Speaker 1>pad on the bag. You probably shouldn't be doing this

0:39:29.480 --> 0:39:31.320
<v Speaker 1>like this. So a lot of times somethings like dude,

0:39:31.520 --> 0:39:33.560
<v Speaker 1>what the heck are you doing? You need to do

0:39:33.600 --> 0:39:35.360
<v Speaker 1>it like this. I don't think. I don't think I

0:39:35.440 --> 0:39:37.920
<v Speaker 1>react like that. I think I'm pretty close. Um. I

0:39:37.960 --> 0:39:39.440
<v Speaker 1>think there's a lot of times where there's something that

0:39:39.480 --> 0:39:41.520
<v Speaker 1>has to happen and Franks has his headphones on. I'm

0:39:41.520 --> 0:39:45.799
<v Speaker 1>pretending he's not listening all the time, and he thinks

0:39:45.800 --> 0:39:47.359
<v Speaker 1>I think there's sound playing, but I see that he's

0:39:47.400 --> 0:39:50.000
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter and there's not anything anything. So sometimes I'm

0:39:50.040 --> 0:39:52.360
<v Speaker 1>listening to things on Twitter more like he's just the

0:39:52.360 --> 0:39:55.880
<v Speaker 1>conversations against the machine. Likely it's just a conversation in

0:39:55.920 --> 0:40:00.920
<v Speaker 1>the room that you're listening to. You no, or you know,

0:40:00.960 --> 0:40:02.840
<v Speaker 1>I'll here's something that happens, and then quickly opened up

0:40:02.840 --> 0:40:06.760
<v Speaker 1>premier like oh no, editing, sorry, Frank's best friendly five's

0:40:06.800 --> 0:40:08.719
<v Speaker 1>up right now over at Rohado experts dot com. I'll

0:40:08.760 --> 0:40:10.640
<v Speaker 1>start at the quarterbacks. We talked it's a bit downstairs

0:40:10.680 --> 0:40:12.960
<v Speaker 1>before the show began. You Annie Dalton inside your top

0:40:13.000 --> 0:40:15.839
<v Speaker 1>five is significantly higher than the consensus. You believe he's

0:40:15.880 --> 0:40:18.080
<v Speaker 1>better than Aaron Rodgers this week, better than Big Bad,

0:40:18.200 --> 0:40:21.000
<v Speaker 1>better than Tom Brady and DeShawn Watson. What makes you

0:40:21.040 --> 0:40:24.080
<v Speaker 1>like any Daltons so much? Yeah? This is really really aggressive, Greg,

0:40:24.280 --> 0:40:25.759
<v Speaker 1>and I told with it last night. I'm like, do

0:40:25.800 --> 0:40:27.560
<v Speaker 1>you have them too high? But then I just stuck

0:40:27.560 --> 0:40:29.560
<v Speaker 1>to my guns. Look, we we like to We like

0:40:29.680 --> 0:40:31.879
<v Speaker 1>this matchup a lot. This week. The game total again

0:40:31.920 --> 0:40:34.240
<v Speaker 1>fifty one points. It's tied for the second highest total

0:40:34.560 --> 0:40:37.399
<v Speaker 1>this week. Um And look the Falcons defense. Since they've

0:40:37.440 --> 0:40:39.839
<v Speaker 1>lost Kian O'Neil and Dion Jones and now they've lost

0:40:39.920 --> 0:40:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Ricardo Allen as well, they're starting free safety. They have

0:40:42.640 --> 0:40:45.160
<v Speaker 1>not been good the last two weeks. They've allowed at

0:40:45.200 --> 0:40:48.239
<v Speaker 1>least three hundred and thirty five passing yards and three

0:40:48.280 --> 0:40:51.680
<v Speaker 1>bunch sounds in each game. Greg three five passing yards

0:40:51.680 --> 0:40:54.000
<v Speaker 1>to Cam Newton. There's a guy who typically throws for

0:40:54.080 --> 0:40:56.319
<v Speaker 1>less than two hundred. He threw for nearly three and

0:40:56.360 --> 0:40:59.680
<v Speaker 1>for fifty yards against the Falcons defense. And then we

0:40:59.680 --> 0:41:02.040
<v Speaker 1>saw Drew Brees did last week. You threw for even

0:41:02.080 --> 0:41:03.879
<v Speaker 1>more than that. He threw for three touchdowns. He rushed

0:41:03.920 --> 0:41:05.840
<v Speaker 1>for two more. We know that Andy Dalton has the

0:41:05.880 --> 0:41:07.960
<v Speaker 1>ability to rush to football as well make plays with

0:41:08.000 --> 0:41:11.080
<v Speaker 1>his legs. Um, he can score touchdowns too. So I

0:41:11.120 --> 0:41:12.680
<v Speaker 1>just think there's a lot of points scored in this game.

0:41:12.840 --> 0:41:15.640
<v Speaker 1>I think the Falcons defense is just reeling right now,

0:41:16.080 --> 0:41:18.160
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's gonna go back and forth. I

0:41:18.160 --> 0:41:19.759
<v Speaker 1>think we're gonna get a lot of points in this game.

0:41:19.800 --> 0:41:24.160
<v Speaker 1>I could see performance three yards and and three touchdowns.

0:41:24.200 --> 0:41:26.279
<v Speaker 1>I can I can certainly see that in the Roman

0:41:26.280 --> 0:41:28.120
<v Speaker 1>possibility for Andy Dalton in Week four. That's why I

0:41:28.120 --> 0:41:30.040
<v Speaker 1>haven't ranked so high. You know, it's interesting I was.

0:41:30.239 --> 0:41:33.120
<v Speaker 1>I said to you, I think during the break that, um,

0:41:33.160 --> 0:41:35.120
<v Speaker 1>it was a sign between Ryan It's Patrick, Andrew Look

0:41:35.120 --> 0:41:37.360
<v Speaker 1>and Baker Mayfield this week and you, Ryan, It's Patrick

0:41:37.400 --> 0:41:39.600
<v Speaker 1>actually inside your top tens at number ten because Sensus

0:41:39.680 --> 0:41:45.160
<v Speaker 1>rankings over did you to me? Ryan Fitzpatrick is one

0:41:45.160 --> 0:41:48.879
<v Speaker 1>of the hardest players to rank this week because on

0:41:48.880 --> 0:41:50.359
<v Speaker 1>one hand, you want to say, let's just ride him

0:41:50.360 --> 0:41:52.080
<v Speaker 1>always hot, right, like, let me just continue to rank

0:41:52.160 --> 0:41:54.040
<v Speaker 1>him highly and the wheels fall off the bus. So

0:41:54.040 --> 0:41:55.440
<v Speaker 1>the thing is, you know, at some point it's just

0:41:55.440 --> 0:41:57.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna all crumble. It is all gonna crumble, and what

0:41:57.640 --> 0:41:59.399
<v Speaker 1>better place for it to crumble than on the road

0:41:59.440 --> 0:42:02.680
<v Speaker 1>in Chica, in Chicago with this Buck's offensive line not

0:42:02.920 --> 0:42:05.000
<v Speaker 1>very good. We saw the Steelers get a ton of

0:42:05.040 --> 0:42:07.360
<v Speaker 1>pressure last week. And what happened when they got pressure?

0:42:07.600 --> 0:42:10.600
<v Speaker 1>He threw termorble throws. He had three interceptions what honestly

0:42:10.640 --> 0:42:12.920
<v Speaker 1>could have been four five interceptions. Yes, and that is

0:42:13.040 --> 0:42:15.920
<v Speaker 1>all true. However, he was still a gun slinger and

0:42:16.200 --> 0:42:20.720
<v Speaker 1>throwing and throwing and throwing a huge fantasy nights, scoring

0:42:20.760 --> 0:42:22.239
<v Speaker 1>a lot of points. And for the Bucks have to

0:42:22.239 --> 0:42:25.040
<v Speaker 1>go back and forth at good point. That's a good point,

0:42:25.320 --> 0:42:28.840
<v Speaker 1>drop right, the wheels falling off like I dropped. I

0:42:28.920 --> 0:42:31.839
<v Speaker 1>dropped down to seventeen. Down to seven might be too much,

0:42:31.880 --> 0:42:34.000
<v Speaker 1>but I just really liked the matchups for guys like

0:42:34.000 --> 0:42:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Eli Manning going up against New Orleans. The Saints are

0:42:36.560 --> 0:42:38.880
<v Speaker 1>lying the most fantasy points to quarterbacks this year, and

0:42:38.880 --> 0:42:41.239
<v Speaker 1>I tweeted out earlier in the week Drink that the

0:42:41.320 --> 0:42:43.360
<v Speaker 1>last two times that Eli Manning has faced the Saints,

0:42:43.360 --> 0:42:45.360
<v Speaker 1>he's thrown for at least three hundred and fifty yards.

0:42:45.520 --> 0:42:47.400
<v Speaker 1>One of those games he threw for zero touchdowns and

0:42:47.480 --> 0:42:50.200
<v Speaker 1>zero interceptions. The other game he threw for six touchdowns

0:42:50.320 --> 0:42:52.400
<v Speaker 1>and zero interceptions. So you know he's gonna throw the

0:42:52.400 --> 0:42:54.200
<v Speaker 1>ball at least forty times. He's gonna give you over

0:42:54.239 --> 0:42:56.359
<v Speaker 1>three hundred yards. And you have to imagine if he's

0:42:56.400 --> 0:42:58.160
<v Speaker 1>throwing the ball that much, he's gonna at least have

0:42:58.480 --> 0:43:00.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, one or two touchdowns, maybe be a few picks,

0:43:01.080 --> 0:43:04.319
<v Speaker 1>but there's a lot of points scored there against the Patriots. Yeah,

0:43:04.320 --> 0:43:06.839
<v Speaker 1>so it's gonna get into You have Eli fifteen right now.

0:43:06.840 --> 0:43:08.560
<v Speaker 1>I guess he's moving U because Fitzpatrick's dwags. You have

0:43:08.600 --> 0:43:11.839
<v Speaker 1>Eli at fourteen, Tannehill at fifteen, and those are two

0:43:11.840 --> 0:43:14.480
<v Speaker 1>guys that are really constreamers for this week. Um. In

0:43:14.520 --> 0:43:16.200
<v Speaker 1>my situation personally, when you get to your calls in

0:43:16.239 --> 0:43:19.359
<v Speaker 1>just a second, my situation personally, I have Andrew Luck.

0:43:19.400 --> 0:43:22.160
<v Speaker 1>I picked the baker Mayfield for this week. You have

0:43:22.200 --> 0:43:26.040
<v Speaker 1>both Mayfield and Luck behind those guys Manning and Tannehill

0:43:26.080 --> 0:43:30.440
<v Speaker 1>this week. Mayfield since at nineteen looks it's at twenty one. Um,

0:43:30.600 --> 0:43:32.560
<v Speaker 1>how come I guess Andrew Luck is so low at

0:43:32.960 --> 0:43:35.440
<v Speaker 1>one UM to a Houston defense. Just a lot of

0:43:35.440 --> 0:43:38.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of yards, a really good game from Eli Manning,

0:43:38.160 --> 0:43:39.799
<v Speaker 1>and I think a lot of people are feeling low

0:43:39.880 --> 0:43:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Baker this week. How come you're not? I like Baker,

0:43:43.560 --> 0:43:46.080
<v Speaker 1>and I think ranking him at nineteen is not a

0:43:46.120 --> 0:43:48.120
<v Speaker 1>bad ranking. I still kind of want to see him

0:43:48.160 --> 0:43:49.560
<v Speaker 1>go out and do it. I don't think the Raiders

0:43:49.560 --> 0:43:51.680
<v Speaker 1>defense is great by any means, but it's just the

0:43:51.680 --> 0:43:53.440
<v Speaker 1>guys that I have ranked just ahead of him. I

0:43:53.480 --> 0:43:56.440
<v Speaker 1>like those matchups more. Plus we've seen those guys do

0:43:56.560 --> 0:43:59.680
<v Speaker 1>it before. Again, this is Baker Mayfield's first start on

0:43:59.719 --> 0:44:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the road, and again I like him for the season long.

0:44:02.160 --> 0:44:04.439
<v Speaker 1>I just like these guys more for their Week four

0:44:04.440 --> 0:44:07.359
<v Speaker 1>matchup again, Eli against the Saints, a lot of points

0:44:07.360 --> 0:44:10.759
<v Speaker 1>scored there. Tannehill against the Patriots. Their secondary has looked

0:44:10.800 --> 0:44:14.040
<v Speaker 1>absolutely brutal Vegas. I was expecting a lot of points there.

0:44:14.160 --> 0:44:16.719
<v Speaker 1>Plus the Dolphins could be playing from behind Um and

0:44:16.760 --> 0:44:19.480
<v Speaker 1>in case Keenum going up against the Chiefs defense. The

0:44:19.560 --> 0:44:24.279
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs defense makes every single offense look good. Their their

0:44:24.280 --> 0:44:27.160
<v Speaker 1>secondary is just not good. And this game is actually

0:44:27.200 --> 0:44:28.919
<v Speaker 1>at home in Denver, so I think it's a little

0:44:28.920 --> 0:44:31.600
<v Speaker 1>bit more of a competitive game. Uh So for those reasons,

0:44:31.640 --> 0:44:33.560
<v Speaker 1>I like those guys more than Baker. It's not a

0:44:33.600 --> 0:44:36.560
<v Speaker 1>matter of me not liking Baker. I just like those

0:44:36.560 --> 0:44:40.319
<v Speaker 1>guys more than him. A week before and Andrew Luck,

0:44:40.360 --> 0:44:43.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm just overall worried. Five point one yards per a

0:44:43.239 --> 0:44:45.000
<v Speaker 1>tenth on the year, that's by far the lowest of

0:44:45.040 --> 0:44:46.960
<v Speaker 1>his career. Said that he can make all the throws,

0:44:47.040 --> 0:44:49.120
<v Speaker 1>yet they took him out of the game late last

0:44:49.160 --> 0:44:53.600
<v Speaker 1>week for Jacoby Brusett. So look, if Andrew Luk burns

0:44:53.640 --> 0:44:55.920
<v Speaker 1>me this week, I'm completely fine with that happening. Like

0:44:56.000 --> 0:44:58.719
<v Speaker 1>if he if he's on my bench and he goes off,

0:44:58.760 --> 0:45:01.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm fine with that happening. Because is what has Andrew

0:45:01.320 --> 0:45:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Luck done to this point to inspire confidence in him?

0:45:03.480 --> 0:45:06.319
<v Speaker 1>There's nothing, no, he hasn't And I get it, man,

0:45:06.440 --> 0:45:09.080
<v Speaker 1>I completely get it. For four eight, four, three, six,

0:45:09.400 --> 0:45:12.120
<v Speaker 1>seven nine. Let me go to Nathan in New Jersey.

0:45:12.120 --> 0:45:17.680
<v Speaker 1>What's going on? Nathan? Thanks for yeah? Oh you hear you?

0:45:17.680 --> 0:45:20.239
<v Speaker 1>What's up? Man? Alright? So I got a few lot

0:45:20.280 --> 0:45:23.920
<v Speaker 1>of questions for this week. Uh First, on the running

0:45:24.200 --> 0:45:26.840
<v Speaker 1>phos running back position. I have one of my teams

0:45:26.840 --> 0:45:29.799
<v Speaker 1>that have Sony Michelle and Corral. But I just want

0:45:29.840 --> 0:45:32.759
<v Speaker 1>to know if I Corral over Sony Michell or it's

0:45:32.760 --> 0:45:35.799
<v Speaker 1>Monny Mischill over Correl this week. So I'm gonna start

0:45:35.800 --> 0:45:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Sony Michelle over Crow this week. Cruell clearly at a

0:45:38.360 --> 0:45:40.520
<v Speaker 1>time share right now with Bla p how obviously is

0:45:40.520 --> 0:45:42.120
<v Speaker 1>the extra rest of Thursday Night. But you had a

0:45:42.160 --> 0:45:44.839
<v Speaker 1>huge game, um against Cleveland, But so did Blap Howell.

0:45:44.840 --> 0:45:47.000
<v Speaker 1>The touchdowns were obviously there for the Crow show, Um

0:45:47.080 --> 0:45:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Blah Pow. I believe I touched him in that game,

0:45:49.920 --> 0:45:52.439
<v Speaker 1>and Carol facing a very tough Jacksonal defense. I don't

0:45:52.440 --> 0:45:54.000
<v Speaker 1>know that we ruined the run. I'm excited to see

0:45:54.000 --> 0:45:55.640
<v Speaker 1>what Sony Michelle could do against Miami. I like, I

0:45:55.680 --> 0:45:59.840
<v Speaker 1>like Sony Michelle. Yeah, and then and then the RoCE.

0:46:00.000 --> 0:46:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Look at this one. I got Tyler Board or Microcoxy

0:46:03.200 --> 0:46:06.040
<v Speaker 1>for the plex. That's a good one. That's a very

0:46:06.040 --> 0:46:08.399
<v Speaker 1>good one. Tyler Boyd. I might have these guys back

0:46:08.400 --> 0:46:12.920
<v Speaker 1>to back, Tyler Boyd against Atlanta, right and Michael Crabtree

0:46:13.040 --> 0:46:18.040
<v Speaker 1>versus Pittsburgh Joe Hayden back obviously. Yeah, I'm gonna use

0:46:18.040 --> 0:46:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Tyler Boyd just based on the way he's being used targets, Yeah, Crabtree,

0:46:23.040 --> 0:46:25.640
<v Speaker 1>I believe it's double digit targets and back to back games. Again,

0:46:25.680 --> 0:46:27.800
<v Speaker 1>it's like a one A one B with John Brown

0:46:28.000 --> 0:46:30.480
<v Speaker 1>and the Steelers secondary has not been good. So I

0:46:30.480 --> 0:46:32.200
<v Speaker 1>like both of these guys a lot. Honestly, I would

0:46:32.200 --> 0:46:33.399
<v Speaker 1>try to find a way to get both of them

0:46:33.400 --> 0:46:35.479
<v Speaker 1>in my lineup. But I lean Tyler Boyd just based

0:46:35.520 --> 0:46:38.799
<v Speaker 1>on what he's doing and the injuries to the Yeah,

0:46:38.840 --> 0:46:43.879
<v Speaker 1>because my other two receivers and Antonio Brown, Okay, yeah,

0:46:43.880 --> 0:46:45.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean those guys that are must start player. So yeah,

0:46:45.440 --> 0:46:48.960
<v Speaker 1>I would go to Tyler Boyd, but it's close. Hys

0:46:49.320 --> 0:46:52.000
<v Speaker 1>four four eight four three six seven nine. My buddy

0:46:52.040 --> 0:46:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Max uh, friend of the program, supposed to be traded

0:46:55.719 --> 0:46:57.120
<v Speaker 1>and he wanted me to can't call him, but he

0:46:57.120 --> 0:47:02.800
<v Speaker 1>wanted He's unavailably so us where does Max work? It

0:47:03.000 --> 0:47:05.920
<v Speaker 1>was in New Jersey? What is New Jersey now? It's

0:47:05.920 --> 0:47:11.040
<v Speaker 1>in It's in Brooklyn. Max does um logistical stuff, probably

0:47:11.040 --> 0:47:12.720
<v Speaker 1>something where he could just spend a bunch of people's

0:47:12.719 --> 0:47:15.239
<v Speaker 1>other their money. And no, I think it's kind of

0:47:15.280 --> 0:47:18.520
<v Speaker 1>just that was that was a fab thing. He spends

0:47:18.520 --> 0:47:21.400
<v Speaker 1>all his fab with, reckless abandoned you can tell me

0:47:21.440 --> 0:47:24.719
<v Speaker 1>though logistics something about some of the logistics. All right, yeah,

0:47:24.760 --> 0:47:28.400
<v Speaker 1>that's like way over my head. Um, So anyway, I

0:47:28.440 --> 0:47:31.200
<v Speaker 1>have Odell beckhaman trade he offered me Odell Beckham for

0:47:31.360 --> 0:47:35.360
<v Speaker 1>the fifteen dollars Fabbiots left. Um Isaiah Crowell, Derrick Henry,

0:47:35.360 --> 0:47:39.480
<v Speaker 1>DeVante Freeman to Marii Cooper. Yeah, I'm gonna tell you

0:47:39.480 --> 0:47:41.240
<v Speaker 1>what I told you downstairs. I want I want everyone

0:47:41.239 --> 0:47:43.640
<v Speaker 1>to hear it. Yeah, I'm not doing that trade because A,

0:47:43.880 --> 0:47:46.799
<v Speaker 1>you're trading for an injured player in DeVonta Freeman, and

0:47:46.800 --> 0:47:49.920
<v Speaker 1>we just heard Dr a say, um, all the injuries

0:47:49.920 --> 0:47:52.040
<v Speaker 1>that he's dealing with, he's going to be injury prone

0:47:52.080 --> 0:47:53.440
<v Speaker 1>for the rest of the season. So even if he's

0:47:53.440 --> 0:47:55.319
<v Speaker 1>ready to return, it's not gonna be this week. And

0:47:55.360 --> 0:47:57.120
<v Speaker 1>you need to win this week and you need to

0:47:57.160 --> 0:48:00.359
<v Speaker 1>help this week. Isaiah crow Well, he's a flexi ning back.

0:48:00.360 --> 0:48:02.319
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't really push the needle for me. It's just if

0:48:02.320 --> 0:48:05.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm trading away Odell Beckham, like I told you downstairs,

0:48:05.360 --> 0:48:08.120
<v Speaker 1>and I need depth. I want two players that are

0:48:08.120 --> 0:48:10.960
<v Speaker 1>going to be starting worthy players on my team. Like

0:48:11.000 --> 0:48:13.160
<v Speaker 1>I want a low end wide receiver one and high

0:48:13.239 --> 0:48:16.520
<v Speaker 1>end RB two. Or vice versa. I need to like

0:48:16.760 --> 0:48:20.600
<v Speaker 1>top FEF team players at their position in order to

0:48:20.600 --> 0:48:24.200
<v Speaker 1>trade Odell Beckham. Maybe I rank I view him too highly,

0:48:24.280 --> 0:48:25.520
<v Speaker 1>but I think this is the week where he goes

0:48:25.520 --> 0:48:29.600
<v Speaker 1>absolutely ballistic. Right, It's possible I would probably hold him

0:48:29.600 --> 0:48:30.680
<v Speaker 1>this week and then try and trade him at for

0:48:30.719 --> 0:48:32.799
<v Speaker 1>next week because he's gonna go off. Okay, I'm calling

0:48:32.880 --> 0:48:37.080
<v Speaker 1>a hundred yards and two touchdowns at least beam. That's

0:48:37.120 --> 0:48:40.239
<v Speaker 1>that's very exciting. Four eight, four, three, six, eight seven nine.

0:48:40.320 --> 0:48:41.279
<v Speaker 1>Let me get to your tight en ings. I want

0:48:41.360 --> 0:48:43.000
<v Speaker 1>to say the running backs, the wider sivers for tomorrow,

0:48:43.000 --> 0:48:44.960
<v Speaker 1>and before I do, I want to sign up YouTube now.

0:48:45.480 --> 0:48:47.360
<v Speaker 1>I thank you for watching the Fantasy Football Frenzy with

0:48:47.400 --> 0:48:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Corey Parson and of course Jim Day Chris Venture. They

0:48:50.920 --> 0:48:52.719
<v Speaker 1>come your way next for us, we'll go the next

0:48:52.760 --> 0:48:56.839
<v Speaker 1>five minutes on our podcast naturally and of course live

0:48:56.920 --> 0:48:59.319
<v Speaker 1>on the radio. Subscribe podcast, give us five stars, leave

0:48:59.360 --> 0:49:01.920
<v Speaker 1>us a comment, and and like I said, most importantly subscribe.

0:49:02.160 --> 0:49:04.440
<v Speaker 1>That will really help us, and we thank you very

0:49:04.520 --> 0:49:07.480
<v Speaker 1>very much. Bet ds I is celebrating twenty years is

0:49:07.520 --> 0:49:09.879
<v Speaker 1>the industry's biggest and safest betting site. They have great

0:49:09.880 --> 0:49:12.359
<v Speaker 1>customer service and fast, easy payment of winnings. You believe

0:49:12.400 --> 0:49:14.440
<v Speaker 1>virtually every sport at bet ds I, with hundreds of

0:49:14.440 --> 0:49:17.600
<v Speaker 1>wagering options, including live in game wagering on all major

0:49:17.600 --> 0:49:19.680
<v Speaker 1>sporting events, where you can make your play at any

0:49:19.719 --> 0:49:21.839
<v Speaker 1>time during the game. Bet d s I is now

0:49:21.880 --> 0:49:24.120
<v Speaker 1>offering up to a thousand dollar bonus on your first

0:49:24.160 --> 0:49:27.239
<v Speaker 1>deposit if you use promo code F and T s Y.

0:49:27.640 --> 0:49:29.840
<v Speaker 1>That's bet d s I dot com. The promo code

0:49:30.080 --> 0:49:33.799
<v Speaker 1>is f N T s Y. Head on over to

0:49:33.920 --> 0:49:38.480
<v Speaker 1>bet d s I and start winning today. Frankie ending

0:49:38.520 --> 0:49:40.239
<v Speaker 1>else with the quarterbacks before he gets the tight ends

0:49:40.239 --> 0:49:44.160
<v Speaker 1>for you at the quarterback position. Now, we spoke a

0:49:44.200 --> 0:49:46.839
<v Speaker 1>lot about the Thursday Night guys playing tonight. I could

0:49:46.840 --> 0:49:48.960
<v Speaker 1>see this as a bounceback performance for Russell Wilson. I

0:49:49.000 --> 0:49:51.640
<v Speaker 1>have him as my tenth rand quarterback. Everything else is

0:49:51.680 --> 0:49:53.319
<v Speaker 1>pretty much status quo if you're playing in a a super

0:49:53.320 --> 0:49:55.600
<v Speaker 1>flex or two QB league. I think there's some upside

0:49:55.600 --> 0:49:58.400
<v Speaker 1>for Joe Flackle this week going up against the Steelers defense. Obviously,

0:49:58.440 --> 0:50:00.399
<v Speaker 1>if we like John Brown, we like micro A Tree,

0:50:00.719 --> 0:50:02.319
<v Speaker 1>we have to like the person who's throwing him the ball,

0:50:02.360 --> 0:50:04.239
<v Speaker 1>and that's Joe Flaco. I just think he's sneaky and

0:50:04.239 --> 0:50:08.320
<v Speaker 1>super flex le Okay, so there you go, um getting

0:50:08.360 --> 0:50:11.600
<v Speaker 1>the tight end position. We talked I at half point,

0:50:11.680 --> 0:50:13.919
<v Speaker 1>pbr up. I know that's not how you really meant

0:50:13.960 --> 0:50:16.279
<v Speaker 1>to do it, but that's how I have the top

0:50:16.280 --> 0:50:18.360
<v Speaker 1>five tight ends or very much? Do you expect Kelsey

0:50:18.400 --> 0:50:21.839
<v Speaker 1>and Art's ground Rudolph Graham that that's fine. I'm trying

0:50:21.840 --> 0:50:23.680
<v Speaker 1>to look something that stands out, and the person thing

0:50:23.680 --> 0:50:25.640
<v Speaker 1>that stands out to me, Frankie is at number nine,

0:50:25.960 --> 0:50:28.640
<v Speaker 1>and that's George Kittle. George Kittle remains inside your top

0:50:28.640 --> 0:50:30.839
<v Speaker 1>ten with c. J. Bethard throwing in the ball. In

0:50:30.840 --> 0:50:33.360
<v Speaker 1>case you've forgotten, c J. Bethard went to college with

0:50:33.360 --> 0:50:37.440
<v Speaker 1>George Kittle at Iowa. They're best friends, they love each other, whatever, No,

0:50:37.560 --> 0:50:41.400
<v Speaker 1>we're best friends. We're the best friends forever forever. George

0:50:41.440 --> 0:50:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Kittle still inside your top ten despite the lost Jimmy Garoppolo.

0:50:46.120 --> 0:50:49.399
<v Speaker 1>Kittle has let people down week after week consistently thus far.

0:50:49.719 --> 0:50:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Why do you think he remains a top ten tight

0:50:51.640 --> 0:50:54.400
<v Speaker 1>end this week? That's for the reason you mentioned Greg.

0:50:54.440 --> 0:50:58.480
<v Speaker 1>It's together. Yeah, Look, they have familiarity with each other

0:50:58.560 --> 0:51:00.560
<v Speaker 1>on and off the field, they've played, they're going back

0:51:00.560 --> 0:51:03.120
<v Speaker 1>to their days at college, and we know that C. J.

0:51:03.239 --> 0:51:05.359
<v Speaker 1>Bethord is a guy that's more so going to check

0:51:05.400 --> 0:51:07.480
<v Speaker 1>the ball down. I think that helps the running backs

0:51:07.520 --> 0:51:10.759
<v Speaker 1>of pass catching running backs here and obviously the tight ends,

0:51:10.800 --> 0:51:13.399
<v Speaker 1>like he's going to be a safety blanket for him

0:51:13.640 --> 0:51:15.719
<v Speaker 1>plays over the middle of the field. Uh. And just

0:51:15.719 --> 0:51:18.480
<v Speaker 1>because they have that familiarity, Um, we know that young

0:51:18.560 --> 0:51:20.879
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks tend to lean on the tight end positions. So

0:51:21.560 --> 0:51:23.359
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of similar to what we said about Josh

0:51:23.440 --> 0:51:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Rosen and Christian Kirk earlier in the week, is that

0:51:26.640 --> 0:51:29.600
<v Speaker 1>they've they've practiced together, they run together as the backups,

0:51:29.760 --> 0:51:32.080
<v Speaker 1>and I just think having that rapport going back to

0:51:32.080 --> 0:51:35.160
<v Speaker 1>their days at college. Um, George Kittle is still going

0:51:35.200 --> 0:51:37.760
<v Speaker 1>to see a pretty decent target share, and for that reason,

0:51:37.880 --> 0:51:39.359
<v Speaker 1>I still think he's a low and tight end one

0:51:41.400 --> 0:51:43.880
<v Speaker 1>stree with any of that. Yeah, listen, it takes a

0:51:44.400 --> 0:51:47.160
<v Speaker 1>crapshoot position. It's like he's still gonna get targets. Like

0:51:47.160 --> 0:51:48.839
<v Speaker 1>I think I like Tyler Effort a little bit better

0:51:48.840 --> 0:51:51.600
<v Speaker 1>this week than I do George Kittle. Like I think Effort,

0:51:51.719 --> 0:51:55.040
<v Speaker 1>you can make that argument. Yeah, I mean Ifford Sport teen,

0:51:55.160 --> 0:51:57.919
<v Speaker 1>Kittle's nine for you. There's a bunch of people in there.

0:51:58.280 --> 0:51:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Um I'm excited about and Joe Who and Iffor Who

0:52:00.000 --> 0:52:02.760
<v Speaker 1>of thirteen and fourteen. I think that both their targets

0:52:02.760 --> 0:52:04.120
<v Speaker 1>could go off and gonna be big weeks for both

0:52:04.120 --> 0:52:07.400
<v Speaker 1>of them. Baker within Joeku and certainly Effort being healthy

0:52:07.400 --> 0:52:09.719
<v Speaker 1>getting involved the offense last week. Maybe it's a sign

0:52:09.719 --> 0:52:11.719
<v Speaker 1>of things to come. Even high on Ben Watson all week.

0:52:11.760 --> 0:52:14.560
<v Speaker 1>He sits at number eleven for you, which makes sense.

0:52:14.840 --> 0:52:17.719
<v Speaker 1>We mentioned Red Ellison Dallas got it before Ellison got

0:52:17.760 --> 0:52:21.240
<v Speaker 1>it both seventeen and eighteen for you, higher Ricky Seals

0:52:21.320 --> 0:52:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Jones and higher than Will Display. Yeah. Will Disley just

0:52:24.360 --> 0:52:26.040
<v Speaker 1>fell off the face of the earth last week, and

0:52:26.040 --> 0:52:28.239
<v Speaker 1>I think that's gonna be a frustrating situation dis leave

0:52:28.360 --> 0:52:30.839
<v Speaker 1>versus Vannette. And then also At Dixon's gonna be back

0:52:30.880 --> 0:52:33.680
<v Speaker 1>in the mix this week. It's either this week or

0:52:33.719 --> 0:52:35.440
<v Speaker 1>next week. It was weeks six, so he's I think

0:52:35.440 --> 0:52:37.360
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna miss the first four I thought it was

0:52:37.560 --> 0:52:39.720
<v Speaker 1>the first of the spot whatever first three or four weeks. Anyway,

0:52:39.719 --> 0:52:41.359
<v Speaker 1>At Dixon is coming back at some point, so it's

0:52:41.360 --> 0:52:44.000
<v Speaker 1>just gonna jumble up that situation. UM, So I don't

0:52:44.000 --> 0:52:46.880
<v Speaker 1>really trust him overall, and these are just lower end

0:52:46.920 --> 0:52:49.120
<v Speaker 1>streaming guys. If al Shon Jeffrey doesn't go, we saw

0:52:49.120 --> 0:52:52.600
<v Speaker 1>the way Dallas Goddard was used, um and I think

0:52:52.960 --> 0:52:57.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Eagles can kind of employ uh a

0:52:57.520 --> 0:53:00.600
<v Speaker 1>two tight end set here where both guys are fantasy viable.

0:53:00.640 --> 0:53:02.880
<v Speaker 1>It's not really something that we've we see done often.

0:53:02.960 --> 0:53:05.600
<v Speaker 1>It's not really something we've seen successful since the days

0:53:05.680 --> 0:53:10.160
<v Speaker 1>of Rocklandkowski and Aaron Hernandez. But Alice Goddard is that athletic,

0:53:10.280 --> 0:53:11.840
<v Speaker 1>he is that good of a pass catcher. He was

0:53:11.920 --> 0:53:14.479
<v Speaker 1>the top tight end coming out of college. So maybe

0:53:14.520 --> 0:53:16.640
<v Speaker 1>they can be that successful. I think I certainly think

0:53:16.680 --> 0:53:18.880
<v Speaker 1>so for this week. If Alston Jeffrey doesn't play, that

0:53:18.960 --> 0:53:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Goddard is in the mix, and then Rehet Ellison

0:53:21.480 --> 0:53:24.239
<v Speaker 1>looks as Eli Manning is always going to target tight

0:53:24.320 --> 0:53:26.279
<v Speaker 1>end at least, you know, four or five times a

0:53:26.320 --> 0:53:28.640
<v Speaker 1>handful of times you're just kind of hoping that he

0:53:28.680 --> 0:53:30.680
<v Speaker 1>scores a touchdown in that high scoring game against the scenes.

0:53:30.800 --> 0:53:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Last known with tight ends, Frank has advanced McDonald at

0:53:33.000 --> 0:53:35.239
<v Speaker 1>sixteen Jesse James all the way down at twenty two.

0:53:35.320 --> 0:53:37.959
<v Speaker 1>Frank buying the hype on Advanced McDonald after last week's

0:53:38.000 --> 0:53:41.239
<v Speaker 1>break out performance. Yeah, I think it's gonna be kind

0:53:41.239 --> 0:53:43.279
<v Speaker 1>of hard to figure out weekend and week out, but

0:53:43.360 --> 0:53:45.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna kind of play the trends, like, whoever

0:53:45.719 --> 0:53:48.040
<v Speaker 1>is trending more so in the right direction, I'll take

0:53:48.080 --> 0:53:50.919
<v Speaker 1>that player. So Vance McDonald had the big game. Uh,

0:53:51.000 --> 0:53:53.360
<v Speaker 1>he had five or six targets, turned it into the

0:53:53.400 --> 0:53:55.400
<v Speaker 1>long stiff arm touchdown. We all saw it. So I

0:53:55.400 --> 0:53:57.440
<v Speaker 1>will ride the hot hand in Vance McDonald if I

0:53:57.480 --> 0:54:01.000
<v Speaker 1>need a tight end. Streams, Rams and Vikings Tonight. Rams

0:54:01.000 --> 0:54:03.279
<v Speaker 1>are seven point favorites. I absolutely love the Vikings. Give

0:54:03.320 --> 0:54:05.359
<v Speaker 1>me the Vikings and the over tonight, Frank your pick.

0:54:05.719 --> 0:54:08.200
<v Speaker 1>I'll take the Vikings. I'll take the Adam Feeling prop

0:54:08.280 --> 0:54:10.520
<v Speaker 1>for the over. I'm not touching the games. Over bettas

0:54:10.520 --> 0:54:12.520
<v Speaker 1>football Freendsie comes your way next. For Frank's stample, my

0:54:12.600 --> 0:54:14.000
<v Speaker 1>name is Greg Sussel. He so much for watching the

0:54:14.040 --> 0:54:16.080
<v Speaker 1>BFF do it all gonnamorrow, We hope