WEBVTT - Rates, ESG, Europe, And CVS (Podcast)

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day, we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.520
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.040
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. I have a new

0:00:22.079 --> 0:00:25.560
<v Speaker 1>problem though, what these gas stations limit the amount of

0:00:25.600 --> 0:00:27.479
<v Speaker 1>gas I can get to a hundred dollars? You know

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:34.400
<v Speaker 1>when I get to two eight, three slows down and

0:00:34.400 --> 0:00:36.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm not done filling it up. No, of course not.

0:00:36.320 --> 0:00:41.640
<v Speaker 1>You've got a shot of that idea. That's horrible. People were, Yeah,

0:00:41.640 --> 0:00:43.639
<v Speaker 1>well it's horrible. Yes, So you're a big good truck guy,

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:45.240
<v Speaker 1>all right, pre a misrab. I'm not sure if she

0:00:45.360 --> 0:00:48.200
<v Speaker 1>dressed pick up trucks, but she does cover the interest

0:00:48.280 --> 0:00:50.400
<v Speaker 1>rate world for US managing director and global head of

0:00:50.440 --> 0:00:53.440
<v Speaker 1>rate Strategy for TV Securities. Pretty I'm looking at the

0:00:53.479 --> 0:00:56.080
<v Speaker 1>bond market. Boy, that ten year treasuries off one and

0:00:56.120 --> 0:00:59.200
<v Speaker 1>three thirty seconds, pushing that yield up to three point

0:00:59.240 --> 0:01:03.240
<v Speaker 1>three two percent? Is this still kind of fallout from

0:01:04.000 --> 0:01:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Jackson Home? What's going on. I think there's a couple

0:01:07.920 --> 0:01:09.800
<v Speaker 1>of things going on. I mean, they were just back

0:01:09.840 --> 0:01:12.560
<v Speaker 1>after the long weekend. I don't think liquidity is the

0:01:12.600 --> 0:01:15.240
<v Speaker 1>best um. I mean, I think it should get better.

0:01:15.280 --> 0:01:17.720
<v Speaker 1>We're in September. But I think there's some component of

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:21.280
<v Speaker 1>we're getting exaggerated price moves. There is a lot of

0:01:21.319 --> 0:01:24.959
<v Speaker 1>corporate supply today and I think that's adding to duration pressure.

0:01:25.520 --> 0:01:28.000
<v Speaker 1>And then as as you said, there's the you know,

0:01:28.040 --> 0:01:29.880
<v Speaker 1>fallout from Jackson Hole, the fact that we have a

0:01:29.880 --> 0:01:33.119
<v Speaker 1>FED meeting in two weeks. The jobs report was strong,

0:01:33.160 --> 0:01:35.399
<v Speaker 1>and we had I M Services which is also strong,

0:01:35.480 --> 0:01:38.160
<v Speaker 1>So the U s economy seems to be holding in there.

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:40.480
<v Speaker 1>We think the pressure on the FED is still there

0:01:40.800 --> 0:01:43.320
<v Speaker 1>to keep moving those rates higher, and I think all

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 1>of that is a perfect storm to make rates go up.

0:01:45.959 --> 0:01:49.000
<v Speaker 1>QUT is also continuing. I do think it's a little overdone.

0:01:49.120 --> 0:01:52.240
<v Speaker 1>I think we're very well priced now for the FED

0:01:52.320 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 1>taking rates up to four percent, keeping it there for

0:01:54.720 --> 0:01:57.280
<v Speaker 1>a while, and then if you do start to see

0:01:57.280 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 1>slowing and growth, we think the FED does act. So

0:02:00.520 --> 0:02:02.800
<v Speaker 1>I think the market may become a little too optimistic

0:02:02.840 --> 0:02:06.160
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the ability of the economy to take

0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:08.520
<v Speaker 1>these rate hikes, which I think will have an impact

0:02:08.520 --> 0:02:10.480
<v Speaker 1>on road just with the lag. We're not seeing that

0:02:10.560 --> 0:02:14.160
<v Speaker 1>in the data just yet. What happens historically? What happens

0:02:14.200 --> 0:02:18.160
<v Speaker 1>historically when you go to UM you know a certain

0:02:18.240 --> 0:02:20.760
<v Speaker 1>level on the FED funds rate. I don't care what

0:02:20.800 --> 0:02:22.959
<v Speaker 1>it is, but let's take four percent or five percent

0:02:23.040 --> 0:02:25.240
<v Speaker 1>or six percent. What happens to ten years. Do they

0:02:25.240 --> 0:02:29.000
<v Speaker 1>eventually catch up UM treasury yields or do they always

0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:32.840
<v Speaker 1>hold below the Fed fund rate? They tend to hold

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:36.360
<v Speaker 1>below because typically, you know, the FED is not able

0:02:36.400 --> 0:02:40.000
<v Speaker 1>to get this soft landing or be able to to

0:02:40.200 --> 0:02:42.880
<v Speaker 1>keep rates at that level. So the two year or

0:02:42.880 --> 0:02:45.720
<v Speaker 1>the very front end can get up to that terminal rate,

0:02:46.200 --> 0:02:49.160
<v Speaker 1>but then the long end tends to lag because within

0:02:49.400 --> 0:02:51.920
<v Speaker 1>a year or two of the FED reaching that terminal rate,

0:02:51.919 --> 0:02:54.120
<v Speaker 1>they tend to have to start to cut rates. So

0:02:54.160 --> 0:02:55.960
<v Speaker 1>that's why the long end doesn't catch up. Now, the

0:02:56.040 --> 0:02:58.799
<v Speaker 1>one big difference this time is QUT. The FED is

0:02:58.840 --> 0:03:01.560
<v Speaker 1>also letting the balance sheet run off, and that's resulting

0:03:01.560 --> 0:03:04.240
<v Speaker 1>in more durations apply to the market. I think that

0:03:04.520 --> 0:03:07.040
<v Speaker 1>this time around is putting a little more pressure in

0:03:07.080 --> 0:03:09.280
<v Speaker 1>the long end. But I think if the FED starts

0:03:09.320 --> 0:03:12.120
<v Speaker 1>to cut rates, they're also going to stop QUT. So

0:03:12.440 --> 0:03:15.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, right now it seems to be that your

0:03:15.360 --> 0:03:17.480
<v Speaker 1>call for next year. Do you think we go into

0:03:17.520 --> 0:03:21.120
<v Speaker 1>a recession that's too deep, unemployment rises too high, American

0:03:21.120 --> 0:03:24.600
<v Speaker 1>families have trouble um keeping jobs, putting food on the table.

0:03:24.600 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 1>On the FED has to cut rates and stop QUT

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:30.840
<v Speaker 1>pretty much. Yes, you said it well, I mean we

0:03:30.919 --> 0:03:34.440
<v Speaker 1>are looking, unfortunately for the economy to slow down, and

0:03:34.480 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 1>it's hard for me to justify the FEDS four point

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:40.200
<v Speaker 1>one on the unemployment rate. I mean, if it starts

0:03:40.240 --> 0:03:43.800
<v Speaker 1>to rise. Typically the the unemployment rate doesn't rise that gradually.

0:03:44.160 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 1>It tends to rise, it tends to accelerate once it rises.

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:50.160
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, we're thinking closer to five in the second

0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:52.680
<v Speaker 1>half of next day on the unemployment rate, forcing the

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:55.080
<v Speaker 1>fight to start to cut rates when I think they'll

0:03:55.120 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 1>they'll be late in starting to cut ride because they're

0:03:57.520 --> 0:04:00.560
<v Speaker 1>fighting the inflation problem. But once they start, I do

0:04:00.640 --> 0:04:03.080
<v Speaker 1>think they're at least getting to neutral and they'd have

0:04:03.120 --> 0:04:05.280
<v Speaker 1>to stop QT at that point as well. It's hard

0:04:05.320 --> 0:04:08.800
<v Speaker 1>for them to justify cutting rates and still undertaking QT,

0:04:09.400 --> 0:04:11.440
<v Speaker 1>but I think that's not something they're going to admit

0:04:11.480 --> 0:04:13.760
<v Speaker 1>to right now, They're going to let the data determine it.

0:04:14.120 --> 0:04:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Right now. It's inflation is public enemy number one, and

0:04:16.920 --> 0:04:19.039
<v Speaker 1>that's why I think the focus is whether they go

0:04:19.120 --> 0:04:22.400
<v Speaker 1>seventy five or fifty at the September meeting. So the

0:04:22.640 --> 0:04:25.800
<v Speaker 1>TV Securities, do you guys have an official recession call

0:04:26.200 --> 0:04:30.160
<v Speaker 1>or do you think this FED can soft landed? So

0:04:30.200 --> 0:04:33.200
<v Speaker 1>we have a slowdown in growth called you know, you're

0:04:33.360 --> 0:04:36.640
<v Speaker 1>zero percent growth. When you're growing at zero doesn't take

0:04:36.680 --> 0:04:40.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot to slip into recession. So it's a shallow

0:04:40.520 --> 0:04:42.720
<v Speaker 1>slow down in growth that we do pencil in, and

0:04:43.000 --> 0:04:45.120
<v Speaker 1>that's why we've penciled in rate cuts in the end

0:04:45.120 --> 0:04:48.640
<v Speaker 1>of QT next year. All right, I'm gonna talk corporate

0:04:48.640 --> 0:04:51.600
<v Speaker 1>real estate. So TV Security, you guys are one Vanderbilt,

0:04:51.640 --> 0:04:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Is that right? It is? Yes, it's a new building

0:04:54.960 --> 0:04:59.440
<v Speaker 1>right next to Grand Central exactly. That's awesome. I mean,

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:02.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm not sure you even go there if

0:05:02.000 --> 0:05:04.280
<v Speaker 1>you work from home, but it looked when they're putting

0:05:04.279 --> 0:05:05.800
<v Speaker 1>it up, I was like, holy cow, this is gonna

0:05:05.839 --> 0:05:08.839
<v Speaker 1>be awesome. Now it's a great building. I've been in

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:12.080
<v Speaker 1>the office since, you know, for over a year, and

0:05:12.560 --> 0:05:15.200
<v Speaker 1>it's filling up now. That. I think we're we have

0:05:15.320 --> 0:05:18.039
<v Speaker 1>a few few flaws, and there's the summit. If you

0:05:18.040 --> 0:05:21.160
<v Speaker 1>haven't been to the summit, it's great. Glass Bottom. I'm

0:05:21.160 --> 0:05:24.200
<v Speaker 1>not a huge fan of heights, but it's very impressive

0:05:24.560 --> 0:05:26.800
<v Speaker 1>when you look down on the glass bottom floor and

0:05:26.839 --> 0:05:29.360
<v Speaker 1>see all of New York. So that's a good building.

0:05:29.480 --> 0:05:32.000
<v Speaker 1>I want to do that. Let's do that. Yeah, down,

0:05:32.040 --> 0:05:36.200
<v Speaker 1>we need the invite though, yes, we need the any day,

0:05:36.520 --> 0:05:40.840
<v Speaker 1>all right, pretty so, just real, real quickly here coming

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:42.640
<v Speaker 1>up in a couple of weeks from this photo reserve.

0:05:43.200 --> 0:05:45.920
<v Speaker 1>What would be a mistake where everybody goes, oh boy,

0:05:46.000 --> 0:05:50.600
<v Speaker 1>here we go. You know, you can think of two

0:05:50.600 --> 0:05:53.719
<v Speaker 1>sided mistakes. I think one mistake would be if they

0:05:53.760 --> 0:05:56.080
<v Speaker 1>suggest that they might be getting close to being done

0:05:56.760 --> 0:06:00.360
<v Speaker 1>because just because oil prices are lower and inflation seems

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:02.840
<v Speaker 1>to have beat That would be one mistake. The other

0:06:02.880 --> 0:06:05.440
<v Speaker 1>mistake would be to say, oh, no, we're going until

0:06:05.480 --> 0:06:09.600
<v Speaker 1>two on your over your inflation. I think that's a

0:06:09.680 --> 0:06:12.560
<v Speaker 1>mistake I'm really nervous about because it just inflation is

0:06:12.600 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 1>a very lagging indicator, and if they ignore growth, they're

0:06:15.560 --> 0:06:17.960
<v Speaker 1>absolutely going to overdo it because inflation is going to

0:06:18.040 --> 0:06:20.719
<v Speaker 1>take a while to come down to respond to slowing growth.

0:06:21.040 --> 0:06:23.720
<v Speaker 1>So there are two sided risks. After jacksonal I'm more

0:06:23.760 --> 0:06:27.120
<v Speaker 1>concerned about the overdoing because we need to really win

0:06:27.200 --> 0:06:31.119
<v Speaker 1>that inflation battle, even if it means a slowing growth. Alright,

0:06:31.240 --> 0:06:33.479
<v Speaker 1>this fat man. If they waited too long to raise

0:06:33.600 --> 0:06:35.400
<v Speaker 1>rates and now they're going to raise rates too late

0:06:35.440 --> 0:06:37.560
<v Speaker 1>and too long, and then maybe they'll even cut them

0:06:37.640 --> 0:06:40.800
<v Speaker 1>too soon. We have to see Premisser. She'll have insight

0:06:40.920 --> 0:06:43.120
<v Speaker 1>for us along the way. As always. Managing director and

0:06:43.160 --> 0:06:45.679
<v Speaker 1>global head of Rate Strategy for TV Security is also

0:06:45.720 --> 0:06:48.960
<v Speaker 1>an ambassador for one Vanderbilt Avenue. Got to check that

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:55.600
<v Speaker 1>building up. Alright. One of the fastest growing areas in

0:06:55.600 --> 0:07:00.560
<v Speaker 1>investing is E s G environmental social governance. Sure enough,

0:07:00.560 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 1>the largest exchange traded fund investing in s G, that

0:07:03.400 --> 0:07:06.040
<v Speaker 1>would be the I Shares E s G, AWARE M,

0:07:06.120 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 1>S C, I U S A E t F. Yep,

0:07:07.880 --> 0:07:10.160
<v Speaker 1>that's what I got it all in there increases assets

0:07:10.160 --> 0:07:14.080
<v Speaker 1>by forty seven hundred times to four billion dollars since

0:07:14.080 --> 0:07:18.320
<v Speaker 1>its inception in twenty thousand and sixteen. But Mr Rhonda

0:07:18.400 --> 0:07:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Santas the Governor of the Great State of Florida, I

0:07:21.280 --> 0:07:23.240
<v Speaker 1>don't think he's really buying into it. Let's get into

0:07:23.280 --> 0:07:25.720
<v Speaker 1>this story. Matt winklerd, Editor in chief emeritus and founder

0:07:26.040 --> 0:07:28.480
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg News joins us here in a Bloomberg Interactive

0:07:28.480 --> 0:07:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Broker Studio. Matt, thanks so much for joining us. You've

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:33.280
<v Speaker 1>got a column out today looking at Florida, looking at

0:07:33.280 --> 0:07:36.840
<v Speaker 1>the governor Rhonda Santis and his views on E s

0:07:36.880 --> 0:07:40.360
<v Speaker 1>G investing. What did you find so, Paul and Matt,

0:07:40.400 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 1>great to be with you. Rhonda Santis, governor of Florida,

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:47.880
<v Speaker 1>first term governor of Florida, highly educated, went to Yale

0:07:48.120 --> 0:07:54.520
<v Speaker 1>and Harvard Law School, has an initiative that prohibits the

0:07:54.560 --> 0:07:57.200
<v Speaker 1>state of Florida, which is the third largest state and

0:07:57.240 --> 0:08:01.760
<v Speaker 1>which has about two hundred and ten billion of assets

0:08:01.840 --> 0:08:07.280
<v Speaker 1>under management, from considering what you just mentioned as E

0:08:07.480 --> 0:08:13.440
<v Speaker 1>s G criteria for investing. The trouble is with that initiative,

0:08:13.640 --> 0:08:18.000
<v Speaker 1>it goes against Florida's own very own dictum that says,

0:08:18.120 --> 0:08:24.920
<v Speaker 1>we must consider performance total return as the yard stick,

0:08:24.960 --> 0:08:28.280
<v Speaker 1>if you like, for measuring our returns. And if you

0:08:28.360 --> 0:08:33.640
<v Speaker 1>do that, E s G absolutely crushes every other benchmark

0:08:34.840 --> 0:08:37.840
<v Speaker 1>over any time period during the past decades. So his

0:08:37.840 --> 0:08:42.640
<v Speaker 1>own initiative is it odds with the essential requirement for

0:08:42.720 --> 0:08:46.640
<v Speaker 1>the Florida Retirement System to manage on the basis of performance.

0:08:46.760 --> 0:08:50.360
<v Speaker 1>But it's possible he's not as concerned about performance financial

0:08:50.360 --> 0:08:53.040
<v Speaker 1>performance as he is about politics, right, because he's made

0:08:53.040 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 1>a number of really provocative moves already that draw him

0:08:56.480 --> 0:08:58.600
<v Speaker 1>into the national spotlight and set him up for a

0:08:58.600 --> 0:09:03.400
<v Speaker 1>presidential run. Yeah. I mean it is seemingly a very

0:09:03.480 --> 0:09:09.080
<v Speaker 1>political ploy on his part because he is educated enough

0:09:09.160 --> 0:09:14.160
<v Speaker 1>to know that every fiduciary has an obligation to earn

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:18.480
<v Speaker 1>the highest return at the lowest volatility for shareholders and

0:09:18.520 --> 0:09:23.480
<v Speaker 1>bondholders alike. And if that is your focus, then you

0:09:23.559 --> 0:09:26.880
<v Speaker 1>have to consider E s G in your investing. And

0:09:26.920 --> 0:09:31.480
<v Speaker 1>if you don't, your shareholders, your bondholders, your pensioners were

0:09:31.520 --> 0:09:34.480
<v Speaker 1>all suffer. Does the data support that? Matt? What do

0:09:34.520 --> 0:09:35.880
<v Speaker 1>you What did you see? I know you and shouldn't

0:09:35.880 --> 0:09:39.320
<v Speaker 1>pay your colleague always dive into the data for your arguments.

0:09:39.360 --> 0:09:44.000
<v Speaker 1>What's the data? So it's it's very conclusive. We have

0:09:44.280 --> 0:09:46.559
<v Speaker 1>a decade's worth of data on the Bloomberg. We look

0:09:46.600 --> 0:09:52.320
<v Speaker 1>at every if you like, exchange traded fund that invests

0:09:52.400 --> 0:09:55.880
<v Speaker 1>everywhere and those that invest in what we call e

0:09:56.080 --> 0:10:01.240
<v Speaker 1>s G um are over five years, over ten years,

0:10:01.240 --> 0:10:06.880
<v Speaker 1>over two years, outperforming by orders of magnitude the benchmarks,

0:10:06.920 --> 0:10:10.840
<v Speaker 1>the traditional benchmarks of investing, whether it's the SMP five hundred,

0:10:10.880 --> 0:10:15.320
<v Speaker 1>whether it's the Russell three thousand, whether it's any fossil

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:20.880
<v Speaker 1>fuel UH index that lately has been a star because

0:10:20.960 --> 0:10:25.080
<v Speaker 1>of the war in Ukraine and the rise in in oil,

0:10:25.640 --> 0:10:29.800
<v Speaker 1>in energy, traditional energy, E s G has done better

0:10:30.000 --> 0:10:36.240
<v Speaker 1>than anything else. And that's not a secret actually or surprising, right.

0:10:36.240 --> 0:10:39.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean people, look, people started ten years ago buying

0:10:39.960 --> 0:10:42.760
<v Speaker 1>electric cars on the consumer level because they want to

0:10:43.760 --> 0:10:46.640
<v Speaker 1>guard against climate change or push back against climate change.

0:10:46.640 --> 0:10:48.720
<v Speaker 1>And obviously mom and pop investors are going to be

0:10:48.760 --> 0:10:50.560
<v Speaker 1>doing that. If they feel that way, they're gonna invest

0:10:50.600 --> 0:10:53.439
<v Speaker 1>with their hearts as well as their pocketbooks. And now

0:10:53.440 --> 0:10:55.800
<v Speaker 1>we have huge institutions coming in and doing it as well.

0:10:55.880 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 1>In Blackrock has ten trillion dollars in assets under managed,

0:11:00.240 --> 0:11:02.400
<v Speaker 1>and they are watching this. Yeah. I think that's a

0:11:02.440 --> 0:11:05.640
<v Speaker 1>great point. Uh. If you look at black Rock, people

0:11:06.440 --> 0:11:11.440
<v Speaker 1>may have forgotten that black Rock really saved the US

0:11:11.600 --> 0:11:14.720
<v Speaker 1>from the worst of the financial crisis. Black Rock was

0:11:14.840 --> 0:11:18.719
<v Speaker 1>the one institution that came in and helped the US government, UH,

0:11:18.920 --> 0:11:23.560
<v Speaker 1>sort out of what was a disaster the likes of

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:26.000
<v Speaker 1>which we hadn't seen in a couple of generations. You

0:11:26.040 --> 0:11:27.560
<v Speaker 1>have to go back to the depression. So put it

0:11:27.600 --> 0:11:33.720
<v Speaker 1>on fast forward. A company called Tesla UH making zero

0:11:33.800 --> 0:11:38.760
<v Speaker 1>mission vehicles in starting in say two thousand ten, and

0:11:38.800 --> 0:11:40.920
<v Speaker 1>when it went public and then two thousand twelve it

0:11:40.960 --> 0:11:44.800
<v Speaker 1>introduces the models. And Tesla today as a car, as

0:11:44.800 --> 0:11:49.200
<v Speaker 1>a car company, has the highest market valuation in the

0:11:49.240 --> 0:11:54.920
<v Speaker 1>world among automakers. It's more than three times uh the

0:11:55.000 --> 0:11:58.960
<v Speaker 1>value of Toyota, which sells more vehicles than anyone, but

0:11:59.760 --> 0:12:01.760
<v Speaker 1>I am by a wide margin. I mean, Tesla sells

0:12:01.800 --> 0:12:04.319
<v Speaker 1>what half a million vehicles a year in Toyota must twelve.

0:12:04.840 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 1>And so what does that tell you The market, if

0:12:06.840 --> 0:12:10.400
<v Speaker 1>you like, which is not ideological, which is not political,

0:12:11.440 --> 0:12:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the market, which is just about what's cheap and what's

0:12:14.600 --> 0:12:18.400
<v Speaker 1>expensive and relative value says Tesla is by far the

0:12:18.440 --> 0:12:22.679
<v Speaker 1>most valuable company. And that's because there is a convergence

0:12:22.720 --> 0:12:26.600
<v Speaker 1>of policy and people's preferences, and Tesla is an example

0:12:26.640 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 1>of that. And uh, it's an example of what's happening

0:12:30.480 --> 0:12:33.920
<v Speaker 1>to investing worldwide, which is why uh, you know, the

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:36.400
<v Speaker 1>total amount of money committed to E s G is

0:12:36.440 --> 0:12:39.520
<v Speaker 1>something like thirty five trillion dollars, which is obviously bigger

0:12:39.760 --> 0:12:42.600
<v Speaker 1>than the US economy. Wow. So I mean if I'm

0:12:42.800 --> 0:12:45.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, twice twice the size about right? I mean,

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:49.760
<v Speaker 1>if if I'm a teacher in Florida, any pension holder,

0:12:50.640 --> 0:12:53.600
<v Speaker 1>I gotta say, Okay, so you're telling me my returns

0:12:53.600 --> 0:12:56.520
<v Speaker 1>are going to be lower because you have this perhaps

0:12:56.520 --> 0:12:59.280
<v Speaker 1>politically driven ideology as relates to E s G. Is

0:12:59.280 --> 0:13:02.480
<v Speaker 1>there any push from within the state or Well, what

0:13:02.559 --> 0:13:05.520
<v Speaker 1>I would like to see is exactly. I mean, It's

0:13:05.520 --> 0:13:08.240
<v Speaker 1>one thing for the governor of Florida to say this

0:13:08.320 --> 0:13:10.480
<v Speaker 1>is what we're doing. It's quite another thing to see

0:13:10.480 --> 0:13:15.560
<v Speaker 1>what Florida does. If Florida adheres to its mandate, which

0:13:15.640 --> 0:13:19.240
<v Speaker 1>is get the best or the highest total return with

0:13:19.280 --> 0:13:22.960
<v Speaker 1>the least volatility, it will have to consider E s

0:13:23.000 --> 0:13:26.520
<v Speaker 1>G investing. Whatever the initiative says, what do you what

0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:30.679
<v Speaker 1>do you think about Engine number one or ARC? I mean,

0:13:30.679 --> 0:13:33.840
<v Speaker 1>where do you think the most exciting M E s

0:13:33.880 --> 0:13:37.640
<v Speaker 1>G investments are coming from? Well? You know, look, I've

0:13:37.720 --> 0:13:40.800
<v Speaker 1>been as you well know many times with the two

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:43.160
<v Speaker 1>of you. Said that to me, Tesla is one of

0:13:43.160 --> 0:13:50.240
<v Speaker 1>the most exciting events, um because as a disruption, it

0:13:50.320 --> 0:13:54.920
<v Speaker 1>has changed really the face of the automobile industry I

0:13:54.960 --> 0:14:00.640
<v Speaker 1>think forever, and that we are inexorably going to electric vehicles.

0:14:00.760 --> 0:14:04.560
<v Speaker 1>So that that is my my choice if you like,

0:14:05.480 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 1>not just cars. I just saw some ads for electric boats,

0:14:08.960 --> 0:14:11.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean anything that has we just we just had

0:14:11.320 --> 0:14:13.760
<v Speaker 1>one come out. It has a fifty nautical mile range.

0:14:13.920 --> 0:14:16.400
<v Speaker 1>It has a cruising speed of twenty knots and a

0:14:16.520 --> 0:14:19.000
<v Speaker 1>top speed of thirty knots. And that's pretty incredible for

0:14:19.040 --> 0:14:21.680
<v Speaker 1>a dollar boat that can hold your whole family. I'm

0:14:21.680 --> 0:14:25.440
<v Speaker 1>excited about this product. All right, Matt Winkler, thank you

0:14:25.480 --> 0:14:28.040
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us as always, Matt Winkler, editor

0:14:28.040 --> 0:14:31.840
<v Speaker 1>in Chief emeritus UH and the founder of Bloomberg News

0:14:32.000 --> 0:14:34.120
<v Speaker 1>so many years ago, joining us here in a Bloomberg

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Interactive broker studio. He's got a column out here looking

0:14:36.640 --> 0:14:38.640
<v Speaker 1>at E. S G Investing, looking at it in the

0:14:38.760 --> 0:14:42.200
<v Speaker 1>lens of Florida, and the governor there ron to Santa Syn.

0:14:42.240 --> 0:14:44.040
<v Speaker 1>You can type that. You can type n I Winkler

0:14:44.120 --> 0:14:47.040
<v Speaker 1>on the Bloomberg can you he's gutting? Of course he has.

0:14:47.480 --> 0:14:50.160
<v Speaker 1>But you can also type that p I N code okay,

0:14:50.280 --> 0:14:54.360
<v Speaker 1>and they can get Bloomberg dot com slash h O

0:14:54.520 --> 0:14:57.520
<v Speaker 1>P I N Bloomberg opinion right now for those people

0:14:57.560 --> 0:15:02.200
<v Speaker 1>that use that intra web thing. Well, there's a lot

0:15:02.320 --> 0:15:06.120
<v Speaker 1>going on in the UK, potential session, surging inflation and

0:15:06.280 --> 0:15:09.400
<v Speaker 1>energy crisis and now a change in the Prime minister.

0:15:09.480 --> 0:15:12.040
<v Speaker 1>How our markets reacting to that? Well, of course we

0:15:12.080 --> 0:15:13.880
<v Speaker 1>need a voice on the UK. We go to somebody

0:15:13.880 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 1>who was born and raised outside of Rowan Oak, Virginia

0:15:17.280 --> 0:15:19.920
<v Speaker 1>and literally the middle of nowhere, but he's now in London,

0:15:20.440 --> 0:15:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Tim Craighead, Director of Research, senior European strategist for Blueberg Intelligence.

0:15:24.920 --> 0:15:27.120
<v Speaker 1>He's been in London. We had him in Hong Kong

0:15:27.200 --> 0:15:29.600
<v Speaker 1>running our business there for years. New York. The guy

0:15:29.600 --> 0:15:32.960
<v Speaker 1>has been everywhere. Uh, Tim, a lot going on. You're

0:15:32.960 --> 0:15:35.160
<v Speaker 1>on holiday because I follow you on social media and

0:15:35.200 --> 0:15:38.640
<v Speaker 1>you're biking all over the island of England. But you

0:15:38.720 --> 0:15:42.840
<v Speaker 1>were trained Goldman Sacks. That means you're on call seven.

0:15:43.160 --> 0:15:45.160
<v Speaker 1>So we need a voice on the European markets. We

0:15:45.200 --> 0:15:47.360
<v Speaker 1>go to Tim Craig Head. Tim, what's going on in

0:15:47.360 --> 0:15:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the investing markets. There's a lot across currents there are

0:15:51.040 --> 0:15:54.320
<v Speaker 1>and thanks for having me on from the sunny coast

0:15:54.360 --> 0:15:59.880
<v Speaker 1>of South Devon. But you know, the the cross currents

0:16:00.000 --> 0:16:03.360
<v Speaker 1>are crazy looking at things this afternoon. You've got oil

0:16:03.480 --> 0:16:07.120
<v Speaker 1>down three dollars a barrel if you live at Brient Crude. Um,

0:16:07.160 --> 0:16:10.440
<v Speaker 1>You've got interest rates that continue to trade up. Um,

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:15.720
<v Speaker 1>You've got economic stats that are waning new lockdowns across

0:16:15.880 --> 0:16:20.880
<v Speaker 1>China with a tumbling currency there. And on the currency front,

0:16:21.360 --> 0:16:25.120
<v Speaker 1>every every currency, it seems under the shining sun is

0:16:25.160 --> 0:16:27.680
<v Speaker 1>weak against the dollar. So you know, bring all that

0:16:27.760 --> 0:16:30.760
<v Speaker 1>to bear in in the UK here we announced and the

0:16:30.720 --> 0:16:34.040
<v Speaker 1>the probably minister and Liz Trust comes into comes in

0:16:34.080 --> 0:16:38.280
<v Speaker 1>the office post her her meeting with the Queen today

0:16:38.400 --> 0:16:43.040
<v Speaker 1>and you know she faces a storm. Um. Interesting with

0:16:43.200 --> 0:16:47.640
<v Speaker 1>all of that in context, the UK market essentially flat.

0:16:47.880 --> 0:16:50.720
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, the kind of tells you something right there

0:16:50.800 --> 0:16:53.480
<v Speaker 1>from the standpoint of what's discounted in the market at

0:16:53.480 --> 0:16:55.360
<v Speaker 1>this point. Well, and right now I see a pound

0:16:55.360 --> 0:16:59.840
<v Speaker 1>trading for a dollar fifteen. Um. I'm not sure that

0:17:00.640 --> 0:17:03.200
<v Speaker 1>has as much to doo with Liz Trust as it

0:17:03.240 --> 0:17:05.400
<v Speaker 1>has to do with um, you know, everything else that's

0:17:05.560 --> 0:17:09.399
<v Speaker 1>going on there from you know, inflation. I think Goldman

0:17:09.440 --> 0:17:12.879
<v Speaker 1>Sachs put out a report saying it could go to

0:17:11.160 --> 0:17:15.960
<v Speaker 1>two concerns about an I m F bailout. Tell us

0:17:16.000 --> 0:17:20.480
<v Speaker 1>about that. Yeah, so you know, I am F bailout.

0:17:20.520 --> 0:17:23.400
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a bit on the extreme side. UM.

0:17:23.640 --> 0:17:28.320
<v Speaker 1>One thing that was key today with Trust coming into

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:32.480
<v Speaker 1>into offices, there's been a a void from the standpoint

0:17:32.480 --> 0:17:36.200
<v Speaker 1>of what government policy would be given the energy crisis

0:17:36.240 --> 0:17:39.520
<v Speaker 1>here in the UK and more broadly across Europe and

0:17:40.280 --> 0:17:44.960
<v Speaker 1>UM an ongoing growing list of big economies big government.

0:17:45.359 --> 0:17:49.399
<v Speaker 1>UM has been announcing policies to help get businesses and

0:17:49.480 --> 0:17:54.879
<v Speaker 1>consumers through the winter. And indeed, UM there was fear

0:17:54.920 --> 0:17:58.080
<v Speaker 1>in the UK that Liz Trust would come in with

0:17:58.119 --> 0:18:01.639
<v Speaker 1>an ultra right wing conservative of approach of cutting taxes

0:18:01.680 --> 0:18:04.720
<v Speaker 1>and not offering handouts as she likes to call them.

0:18:04.760 --> 0:18:08.199
<v Speaker 1>But you know, before she's even in the office, UM,

0:18:08.280 --> 0:18:13.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, Bloomberg News actually found today UM the draft

0:18:13.359 --> 0:18:16.560
<v Speaker 1>of a proposal to offer upwards of forty billion in

0:18:16.600 --> 0:18:19.359
<v Speaker 1>support to business and a hundred and thirty billion and

0:18:19.440 --> 0:18:24.040
<v Speaker 1>potential support for consumers to get through energy crisis by

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:29.600
<v Speaker 1>essentially capping energy prices now so that inflation rate would

0:18:29.600 --> 0:18:33.920
<v Speaker 1>have would have essentially been driven in large part by

0:18:34.400 --> 0:18:37.040
<v Speaker 1>huge escalations and energy prices. By the way, I love

0:18:37.119 --> 0:18:40.440
<v Speaker 1>when politicians do. I love when politicians do massive u

0:18:40.600 --> 0:18:43.840
<v Speaker 1>turns on campaign promises the day they come into office.

0:18:44.240 --> 0:18:47.919
<v Speaker 1>You know, there you go, remember read my lips, no

0:18:48.000 --> 0:18:50.480
<v Speaker 1>new taxes. Sure, yeah, that at least that took him

0:18:50.520 --> 0:18:53.880
<v Speaker 1>like a year or two. That cost him the reelection.

0:18:54.200 --> 0:18:57.800
<v Speaker 1>So Tim, go ahead, go ahead, Tim. Now, I was

0:18:57.840 --> 0:19:00.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna say part of that, part of that pound weakness

0:19:00.200 --> 0:19:03.360
<v Speaker 1>was a lot of the concern that you'd have all

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:06.879
<v Speaker 1>sorts of havoc with a you know, lower tax rates

0:19:07.000 --> 0:19:09.720
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of of of a crazy period in

0:19:09.760 --> 0:19:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the economy. And in fact, the first thing we're seeing

0:19:13.040 --> 0:19:17.040
<v Speaker 1>some support is for the domestic economy. For Footsie doesn't

0:19:17.040 --> 0:19:19.600
<v Speaker 1>really matter because as we've talked before, it's a mostly

0:19:19.640 --> 0:19:26.440
<v Speaker 1>globally oriented, a big international brand, franchises and consumer and healthcare,

0:19:26.440 --> 0:19:29.919
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. The week pounds actually a boon to those guys.

0:19:30.800 --> 0:19:33.760
<v Speaker 1>So Tim, uh Matt and I were discussing, it's been

0:19:33.760 --> 0:19:36.440
<v Speaker 1>a few years since we've been in the UK. Find

0:19:36.600 --> 0:19:42.520
<v Speaker 1>what's what's your favorite point cost you a devon today?

0:19:42.760 --> 0:19:46.440
<v Speaker 1>That's a critical question on holiday. Um, you notice I

0:19:46.480 --> 0:19:49.400
<v Speaker 1>say holiday in a vacation and I noticed two weeks

0:19:49.400 --> 0:19:51.879
<v Speaker 1>in a row. By the way, See, he's definitely getting

0:19:51.920 --> 0:19:56.920
<v Speaker 1>used as a European thing there. You go so somewhere

0:19:56.960 --> 0:19:59.640
<v Speaker 1>around uh seven or eight pounds that you could find

0:19:59.640 --> 0:20:01.800
<v Speaker 1>them at London, you know North at ten right now

0:20:01.840 --> 0:20:07.320
<v Speaker 1>if you go to the wrong pub. Really that's inflation, dude. Yeah,

0:20:07.359 --> 0:20:09.120
<v Speaker 1>I have a list, by the way, if you ever

0:20:09.560 --> 0:20:13.320
<v Speaker 1>are down in Chelsea or or Fulham. I like the

0:20:13.320 --> 0:20:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Hollywood arms a lot. I'm a big fan of the

0:20:15.840 --> 0:20:18.320
<v Speaker 1>builder's arms. I like the Duke of Clarence. I like

0:20:18.320 --> 0:20:21.560
<v Speaker 1>the Duke on the Green Um and I love the

0:20:21.600 --> 0:20:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Anglesey arms if you really want to hang with kind

0:20:23.760 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 1>of the eurotrash there. But there's so many. Yeah, the

0:20:27.400 --> 0:20:30.960
<v Speaker 1>right places the Washington in Delphize Park and that's named

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:36.240
<v Speaker 1>after George by the way, exactly all right, Tim, enjoy

0:20:36.320 --> 0:20:41.920
<v Speaker 1>the holiday biking around um southern England. Uh. He's into

0:20:41.960 --> 0:20:45.080
<v Speaker 1>this biking thing in the whole family. It's kind of yeah.

0:20:45.680 --> 0:20:48.600
<v Speaker 1>My dad's into it too. He's very philoton guy, so

0:20:48.680 --> 0:20:52.320
<v Speaker 1>you're also about He also like rock climbs too, so

0:20:52.359 --> 0:20:54.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't know what's going on. Tim Craigead,

0:20:54.640 --> 0:20:58.560
<v Speaker 1>he's a Director Research, senior European strategist for Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:20:58.600 --> 0:21:04.600
<v Speaker 1>He's based in London. What we said that in the

0:21:04.640 --> 0:21:07.399
<v Speaker 1>next life, I want to come back as a healthcare

0:21:07.680 --> 0:21:10.880
<v Speaker 1>m and a banker. Every week it seems like there's

0:21:10.880 --> 0:21:14.160
<v Speaker 1>a big, blockbuster healthcare deal and banks are getting paid

0:21:14.200 --> 0:21:17.320
<v Speaker 1>left and right. Today, CBS to buy Signify Health in

0:21:17.359 --> 0:21:21.240
<v Speaker 1>an eight billion dollar deal. CBS, you know, big pharmacy company,

0:21:21.240 --> 0:21:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Healthcare Services Company, a hundred thirty billion dollar market gap.

0:21:24.680 --> 0:21:27.600
<v Speaker 1>It's a big company. Stocks down about four percent year today,

0:21:27.640 --> 0:21:30.399
<v Speaker 1>kind of flat today. Let's dive into this deal. Jonathan Palmer,

0:21:30.480 --> 0:21:34.800
<v Speaker 1>senior equity research analyst, a team leader for Bloomberg Intelligence,

0:21:34.840 --> 0:21:38.800
<v Speaker 1>also a proud graduate of the Penn State University, which

0:21:39.040 --> 0:21:41.480
<v Speaker 1>had a good road win this weekend to start the year.

0:21:41.560 --> 0:21:44.560
<v Speaker 1>All right, Johnathan, CBS Signify Health, tell us what's going

0:21:44.600 --> 0:21:46.480
<v Speaker 1>on here? Well, Paul, you you hit the nail right

0:21:46.520 --> 0:21:49.600
<v Speaker 1>in the head when you mentioned services company. And CVS

0:21:49.680 --> 0:21:51.280
<v Speaker 1>has kind of three legs to this tool. They have

0:21:51.359 --> 0:21:53.880
<v Speaker 1>their retail stores, they have what they call their PBM

0:21:53.960 --> 0:21:57.359
<v Speaker 1>or pharmacy Benefit manager, which which manages drug benefits, and

0:21:57.359 --> 0:22:00.480
<v Speaker 1>then they have their insurer Etna, and really all these

0:22:00.520 --> 0:22:04.280
<v Speaker 1>companies in the healthcare services universe want to expand their

0:22:04.280 --> 0:22:07.880
<v Speaker 1>service offering, and Signify does that in a meaningful way

0:22:07.920 --> 0:22:10.680
<v Speaker 1>for CVS because Signify is in the home and they

0:22:10.720 --> 0:22:13.720
<v Speaker 1>have assets where they send people out to people's house

0:22:13.760 --> 0:22:16.640
<v Speaker 1>to do evaluations and managed care. And so the next

0:22:16.680 --> 0:22:19.560
<v Speaker 1>step after you know, we've had the pandemic here from

0:22:19.600 --> 0:22:23.960
<v Speaker 1>the virtual cares home care. Yeah. I mean, if if

0:22:24.000 --> 0:22:28.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm right looking at the medical industry, everything's going towards telemedicine,

0:22:29.400 --> 0:22:33.439
<v Speaker 1>UM home care or a CVS, right because there's no

0:22:33.520 --> 0:22:38.440
<v Speaker 1>reason anymore to go to the medical um offices compound

0:22:38.680 --> 0:22:41.479
<v Speaker 1>or to your local g p UM. You can do

0:22:41.520 --> 0:22:46.280
<v Speaker 1>it all by phone, by phone or by zoom and um.

0:22:46.320 --> 0:22:48.359
<v Speaker 1>You know, the only time I need to interact with

0:22:48.359 --> 0:22:50.360
<v Speaker 1>somebody is when I get my booster shot, and I'll

0:22:50.400 --> 0:22:52.879
<v Speaker 1>do that down the street. Yeah, the market is definitely

0:22:52.920 --> 0:22:55.359
<v Speaker 1>moving in that direction, and really the pandemic was a

0:22:55.400 --> 0:22:58.360
<v Speaker 1>catalyst for it. And you know, we've seen a lot

0:22:58.400 --> 0:23:00.440
<v Speaker 1>of care move out of traditional setting is into the

0:23:00.520 --> 0:23:03.440
<v Speaker 1>home in the in the virtual spaces, and we've seen

0:23:03.480 --> 0:23:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Amazon move, you know, with one medical to to kind

0:23:06.119 --> 0:23:08.879
<v Speaker 1>of follow a suit here. So is this tell us

0:23:08.880 --> 0:23:11.920
<v Speaker 1>about signify what is what's special about these guys? Why

0:23:11.960 --> 0:23:14.720
<v Speaker 1>is it worth eight billion? Well, they operate in a

0:23:14.840 --> 0:23:15.879
<v Speaker 1>niche and I don't want to bore you with the

0:23:15.880 --> 0:23:17.520
<v Speaker 1>details of what they actually do on a day to

0:23:17.600 --> 0:23:22.800
<v Speaker 1>day basis, but really they help manage Medicaid and managed care,

0:23:23.560 --> 0:23:28.160
<v Speaker 1>manage managed care, Medicaid and Medicare advantage participants. Every year,

0:23:28.200 --> 0:23:30.960
<v Speaker 1>these people need to see a doctor. Um if the

0:23:31.000 --> 0:23:33.400
<v Speaker 1>plan doesn't have them come into the office, they send

0:23:33.400 --> 0:23:36.439
<v Speaker 1>somebody out to see them doing evaluation. It's part of

0:23:36.440 --> 0:23:38.679
<v Speaker 1>the business model and it really fills a niche. And

0:23:38.720 --> 0:23:41.320
<v Speaker 1>so what CBS is hoping to do is is uh

0:23:41.600 --> 0:23:44.800
<v Speaker 1>expand that niche. There's about eighty five million people in

0:23:44.840 --> 0:23:48.320
<v Speaker 1>those those two buckets and signifies only seeing about two

0:23:48.359 --> 0:23:51.240
<v Speaker 1>million of those a year and build more services around that.

0:23:51.359 --> 0:23:54.920
<v Speaker 1>That home platform. You know, you mentioned CBS had acquired

0:23:55.359 --> 0:23:57.800
<v Speaker 1>and I've forgotten all about that deal. And when that

0:23:57.840 --> 0:24:01.119
<v Speaker 1>deal was announced, I had no idea what's CBS was doing.

0:24:01.160 --> 0:24:04.200
<v Speaker 1>How is up and it's a big insurance company. What's

0:24:04.200 --> 0:24:06.760
<v Speaker 1>a drug store company doing buying an insurance company? How

0:24:06.840 --> 0:24:09.359
<v Speaker 1>is that played out over the last a couple of years. Well,

0:24:09.400 --> 0:24:11.480
<v Speaker 1>they've finally gotten to a point where the debt level

0:24:11.560 --> 0:24:14.159
<v Speaker 1>from from the deals down and it's finally kind of

0:24:14.160 --> 0:24:17.119
<v Speaker 1>realizing the vision that they foresaw where they have this explaned,

0:24:17.160 --> 0:24:20.000
<v Speaker 1>expanded platform where they offer a little bit of everything.

0:24:20.680 --> 0:24:22.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, CVS probably doesn't really want to be in

0:24:23.000 --> 0:24:28.399
<v Speaker 1>the retail drug store business anymore. There's Amazons and but

0:24:28.440 --> 0:24:31.480
<v Speaker 1>they want to turn those locations into service centers and

0:24:31.640 --> 0:24:33.840
<v Speaker 1>they have things like health hubs that they're offering where

0:24:33.840 --> 0:24:36.560
<v Speaker 1>instead of going to your you know, your local GP,

0:24:36.680 --> 0:24:39.000
<v Speaker 1>you'll just pop into your CBS, get your blood pressure chair,

0:24:39.040 --> 0:24:42.800
<v Speaker 1>to get your meds, do an evaluation. So the evolution

0:24:42.800 --> 0:24:45.719
<v Speaker 1>of healthcare is expanding in where we see more of

0:24:45.760 --> 0:24:49.840
<v Speaker 1>the traditional players kind of spreading their tentacles out, you know,

0:24:49.840 --> 0:24:53.360
<v Speaker 1>whether it's Walgreens, whether it's Amazon, whether it's Walmart. Everybody

0:24:53.359 --> 0:24:55.360
<v Speaker 1>wants to be in the healthcare game. I can't believe

0:24:55.359 --> 0:24:56.840
<v Speaker 1>they want to get out of the drug store business.

0:24:56.920 --> 0:24:59.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's where it's like a one stop shop

0:24:59.520 --> 0:25:02.400
<v Speaker 1>for every Yeah, well except for cigarettes, right, I can't

0:25:02.400 --> 0:25:04.800
<v Speaker 1>buy cigarettes of CBS, right, No, not for a while,

0:25:05.760 --> 0:25:08.320
<v Speaker 1>but well I remember when that came across, and obviously

0:25:08.280 --> 0:25:10.000
<v Speaker 1>it makes perfect sense, but I wonder if they're going

0:25:10.040 --> 0:25:12.320
<v Speaker 1>to ever start selling weed, you know, because they do

0:25:12.400 --> 0:25:16.080
<v Speaker 1>CBD already. Right, that's a good question. I don't know

0:25:16.160 --> 0:25:18.560
<v Speaker 1>that fits in the mantra of CVS health, but well,

0:25:18.600 --> 0:25:21.520
<v Speaker 1>we'll see mental health. So talk to us about just

0:25:21.560 --> 0:25:24.400
<v Speaker 1>your space general thirty seconds, Jonathan, what's the hot area

0:25:24.440 --> 0:25:26.600
<v Speaker 1>that that you're covering right now? What if your investor

0:25:26.640 --> 0:25:28.639
<v Speaker 1>clients want to talk about the most Yeah, well, I

0:25:28.720 --> 0:25:31.600
<v Speaker 1>think that one of the key areas is actually this

0:25:31.800 --> 0:25:33.639
<v Speaker 1>this space that we're talking about right now, which is

0:25:33.680 --> 0:25:37.400
<v Speaker 1>technology enabled assets. And so we've seen a big retreat

0:25:37.440 --> 0:25:41.040
<v Speaker 1>invaluations from the peak of the pandemic last year where

0:25:41.040 --> 0:25:43.840
<v Speaker 1>everybody was really boiled up on virtual care, and now

0:25:43.840 --> 0:25:45.800
<v Speaker 1>we're starting to see now that these stock prices have

0:25:45.880 --> 0:25:48.520
<v Speaker 1>come back. You know, one Medical getting picked up by Amazon,

0:25:48.680 --> 0:25:51.879
<v Speaker 1>we see Signify getting picked up by CBS. We think

0:25:51.880 --> 0:25:53.800
<v Speaker 1>there's more to come. What is Amazon going to do

0:25:53.840 --> 0:25:56.920
<v Speaker 1>in healthcare? That sounds like a monster vertical they could do. Well.

0:25:56.960 --> 0:25:59.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the that's the plan, although they haven't

0:25:59.280 --> 0:26:02.480
<v Speaker 1>executed so far. I mean, their pharmacy is really nowhere

0:26:02.600 --> 0:26:05.840
<v Speaker 1>right now. They had a business for employers called Amazon Care,

0:26:05.880 --> 0:26:08.360
<v Speaker 1>which they just announced that they're gonna fold which they're

0:26:08.359 --> 0:26:10.960
<v Speaker 1>now going to use one medical probably to be the

0:26:10.960 --> 0:26:14.480
<v Speaker 1>beach head there. So healthcare is hard. Yeah, it's hard

0:26:14.520 --> 0:26:17.120
<v Speaker 1>to have and I don't understand it at all. That's

0:26:17.119 --> 0:26:19.600
<v Speaker 1>why we have smart people like Jonathan Palmer to kind

0:26:19.600 --> 0:26:20.840
<v Speaker 1>of walk us through some of the stuff. All right.

0:26:20.880 --> 0:26:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Palmer, senior equity research analysts and team leader. He

0:26:23.840 --> 0:26:26.520
<v Speaker 1>covers it, does all the healthcare stuff here, manages the

0:26:26.560 --> 0:26:31.639
<v Speaker 1>team of analysts we have here, a Bloomberg intelligence. All right,

0:26:31.680 --> 0:26:34.120
<v Speaker 1>let's talk cybersecurity. I kind of been telling my kids

0:26:34.160 --> 0:26:36.280
<v Speaker 1>have been entering the workforce over the last several years.

0:26:36.600 --> 0:26:40.119
<v Speaker 1>It's not plastics is the future. It's cyber security. I

0:26:40.160 --> 0:26:42.800
<v Speaker 1>think that's going to be a long term growth story.

0:26:42.800 --> 0:26:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Shawn Joyce, Global Cybersecurity and Privacy leader at p w

0:26:46.640 --> 0:26:50.800
<v Speaker 1>S c sean give us a sense of I don't

0:26:50.800 --> 0:26:53.240
<v Speaker 1>know the the C suite folks you talked to, the

0:26:53.320 --> 0:26:57.119
<v Speaker 1>board members you talked to do you think they're putting

0:26:57.160 --> 0:27:03.520
<v Speaker 1>cybersecurity risk? They're giving it an enough attention. So I

0:27:03.560 --> 0:27:07.240
<v Speaker 1>think it's a great question, and I think that it

0:27:07.480 --> 0:27:10.359
<v Speaker 1>is coming to the forefront of the board of agenda

0:27:11.000 --> 0:27:13.600
<v Speaker 1>and there probably isn't the boardroom that I go into

0:27:13.640 --> 0:27:17.119
<v Speaker 1>where they're not talking about a digital transformation. And I

0:27:17.119 --> 0:27:22.320
<v Speaker 1>would argue that within that digital transformation technology is that

0:27:22.440 --> 0:27:26.720
<v Speaker 1>central nervous system for many companies in confirming that the

0:27:26.920 --> 0:27:31.040
<v Speaker 1>data is secure and protected is really and can be

0:27:31.200 --> 0:27:35.000
<v Speaker 1>brand defining, you know. And I would just add, you know,

0:27:35.520 --> 0:27:40.720
<v Speaker 1>the boardroom became very concerned during the Russian Ukrainian conflict

0:27:40.920 --> 0:27:44.080
<v Speaker 1>or war, and you know, what should we do? Do

0:27:44.160 --> 0:27:47.520
<v Speaker 1>we have any business there operations? And I would just

0:27:47.560 --> 0:27:52.000
<v Speaker 1>say that is the first time that we're really seen

0:27:52.880 --> 0:27:56.080
<v Speaker 1>cyber as a risk come to the forefront from from

0:27:56.080 --> 0:28:00.800
<v Speaker 1>this perspective. First, it's over cyber cyber warfare are in

0:28:01.280 --> 0:28:04.920
<v Speaker 1>between Ukraine and Russia. We're seeing seven Wiper viruses that

0:28:04.960 --> 0:28:09.680
<v Speaker 1>have been deployed, We're seeing infrastructure being targeted, satellites being targeted,

0:28:09.720 --> 0:28:13.679
<v Speaker 1>and obviously an ongoing informational war. The second thing is

0:28:14.160 --> 0:28:18.720
<v Speaker 1>we're actually seeing crowd sourcing in civilian groups acting on

0:28:18.840 --> 0:28:22.399
<v Speaker 1>behalf of nation states. So not only are you seeing

0:28:22.440 --> 0:28:25.840
<v Speaker 1>it coming to the forefront on the board agenda, but

0:28:26.080 --> 0:28:30.520
<v Speaker 1>this threat is becoming more complex and I think a

0:28:30.560 --> 0:28:35.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of companies struggle to really handle this risk effectively.

0:28:35.680 --> 0:28:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Does a major company automatically outsource this or do they

0:28:38.640 --> 0:28:42.600
<v Speaker 1>does anybody try and take it on themselves. I think

0:28:42.640 --> 0:28:45.920
<v Speaker 1>you'll see some of the more mature companies, especially when

0:28:45.920 --> 0:28:50.400
<v Speaker 1>you're talking financial services, defense contractors, a lot of them

0:28:50.600 --> 0:28:55.000
<v Speaker 1>take it on themselves because it's critical to what they

0:28:55.040 --> 0:28:57.080
<v Speaker 1>do each and every day and part of their brand.

0:28:57.120 --> 0:28:59.640
<v Speaker 1>And I would add to tech companies too. I think

0:28:59.680 --> 0:29:04.719
<v Speaker 1>there are other sectors and companies that should outsource different

0:29:04.760 --> 0:29:08.760
<v Speaker 1>aspects of this cyber risk. Right, we're talking about cyber risk,

0:29:09.240 --> 0:29:12.160
<v Speaker 1>and really if it's not the main part of what

0:29:12.240 --> 0:29:14.960
<v Speaker 1>they do as a business, I would say I would

0:29:15.040 --> 0:29:17.840
<v Speaker 1>outsource that to someone who has that expertise. By the way,

0:29:17.840 --> 0:29:19.600
<v Speaker 1>do you have any headline numbers? I mean, we always

0:29:19.600 --> 0:29:23.080
<v Speaker 1>talk about how many hundreds of billions of dollars are

0:29:23.120 --> 0:29:26.800
<v Speaker 1>stolen in crypto every year, but it seems to me, um,

0:29:27.200 --> 0:29:31.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, much more damage can be done. Um, when

0:29:31.640 --> 0:29:36.640
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about huge financial entities like the big Wall

0:29:36.680 --> 0:29:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Street banks or you know a Walmart or um, you know,

0:29:40.680 --> 0:29:44.880
<v Speaker 1>signa healthcare how much damage is done in dollar terms

0:29:45.000 --> 0:29:49.800
<v Speaker 1>via cyber crime every year? I would say easily tens

0:29:49.800 --> 0:29:53.200
<v Speaker 1>of billions of dollars being done by you know, cyber

0:29:53.240 --> 0:29:56.600
<v Speaker 1>criminals in Nation States each every year. And that's not

0:29:56.720 --> 0:30:00.000
<v Speaker 1>just you know, through cyber crime and fraud and account

0:30:00.040 --> 0:30:03.840
<v Speaker 1>takeover is it's all through also through the theft of

0:30:04.000 --> 0:30:08.840
<v Speaker 1>intellectual property from companies. Just recently, we saw a breach

0:30:08.960 --> 0:30:12.840
<v Speaker 1>or a ransomware event of the US company and they

0:30:12.920 --> 0:30:16.920
<v Speaker 1>lost a hundred million dollars just in operations and the

0:30:16.960 --> 0:30:22.080
<v Speaker 1>inability to actually produce their products. So this definitely is

0:30:22.160 --> 0:30:26.720
<v Speaker 1>having a critical effect on business operations. And I think,

0:30:26.760 --> 0:30:29.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, unlike what you probably talked about on your

0:30:29.240 --> 0:30:32.000
<v Speaker 1>show when you talk about credit risk and market risk,

0:30:32.760 --> 0:30:36.520
<v Speaker 1>fiber risk is newer, and I think a lot of

0:30:36.520 --> 0:30:42.040
<v Speaker 1>people because of the educational gap and not being digital natives.

0:30:42.560 --> 0:30:45.000
<v Speaker 1>As I said, it's a challenge to really deal with

0:30:45.040 --> 0:30:48.680
<v Speaker 1>this risk versus some of the other traditional risk that

0:30:48.920 --> 0:30:51.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, you and I have heard of historically that

0:30:51.480 --> 0:30:55.560
<v Speaker 1>many people are familiar with. Sean, your deputy director of

0:30:55.560 --> 0:30:59.080
<v Speaker 1>the FBI, I'd love to get your perspective on, you know,

0:30:59.160 --> 0:31:01.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of how pair do you think the US government

0:31:02.000 --> 0:31:05.160
<v Speaker 1>is and all of the interests aligned with the government

0:31:05.240 --> 0:31:07.920
<v Speaker 1>is for cybersecurity, because it just seems like the risk

0:31:08.360 --> 0:31:11.480
<v Speaker 1>whether it's coming from you know, Nation States or others

0:31:11.480 --> 0:31:14.600
<v Speaker 1>are just almost impossible. Is that a Pentagon issue or

0:31:14.640 --> 0:31:16.960
<v Speaker 1>does that fall under Does the FBI have its own

0:31:17.880 --> 0:31:21.360
<v Speaker 1>division there, does the you know, um, the White House

0:31:21.360 --> 0:31:23.920
<v Speaker 1>have its own cybersecurity people or or do you have

0:31:24.000 --> 0:31:28.280
<v Speaker 1>one branch that overlooks it for everybody? So currently in

0:31:28.320 --> 0:31:31.120
<v Speaker 1>the administration, so to answer your question directly, there is

0:31:31.160 --> 0:31:35.800
<v Speaker 1>not one agency that handles everything. Uh. And I believe

0:31:35.960 --> 0:31:39.040
<v Speaker 1>there should be an approach and a whole of government

0:31:39.040 --> 0:31:42.840
<v Speaker 1>approach for those agencies to come together. However, I think

0:31:42.840 --> 0:31:47.200
<v Speaker 1>this administration has done some great steps forward, you know

0:31:47.280 --> 0:31:51.000
<v Speaker 1>with the establishment you know, SISSA as you know, just

0:31:51.120 --> 0:31:55.600
<v Speaker 1>pushed through in legislation the National Cyber Incident Reporting Act. Right,

0:31:55.680 --> 0:31:58.400
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing them do things like Shields Up, which is

0:31:58.480 --> 0:32:01.120
<v Speaker 1>really companies coming together and how do they help protect

0:32:01.200 --> 0:32:05.120
<v Speaker 1>each other? Um. Sister has also established the Joint Cyber

0:32:05.200 --> 0:32:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Defense Collaborative. Right. When you look at the FBI, they

0:32:09.280 --> 0:32:14.240
<v Speaker 1>have really pushed on their public private partnerships how they're

0:32:14.240 --> 0:32:17.720
<v Speaker 1>actually helping companies defend along with the n s A.

0:32:18.480 --> 0:32:22.280
<v Speaker 1>So it is really a collection of agencies, um. And

0:32:22.400 --> 0:32:24.880
<v Speaker 1>like you're saying, though, I think that needs to be

0:32:24.920 --> 0:32:28.800
<v Speaker 1>revisited and look at how can the government approach this

0:32:29.000 --> 0:32:33.120
<v Speaker 1>from more of the next century approach versus maybe historically,

0:32:33.160 --> 0:32:37.080
<v Speaker 1>how they how they've done that. The bureau, specifically the FBI,

0:32:37.240 --> 0:32:40.160
<v Speaker 1>they have a cyber division. They have over a thousand

0:32:40.160 --> 0:32:42.600
<v Speaker 1>people that are working this each and every day throughout

0:32:42.680 --> 0:32:46.720
<v Speaker 1>the country and overseas. So they're coordinating with many different

0:32:46.720 --> 0:32:49.080
<v Speaker 1>agencies and that, as you know, is one of their

0:32:49.160 --> 0:32:52.160
<v Speaker 1>highest priorities of what they do each and every day.

0:32:52.840 --> 0:32:54.719
<v Speaker 1>All Right, Sean, thank you so much for joining us.

0:32:54.720 --> 0:32:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Really appreciate that. Shawn Joyce, Global Cybersecurity and Privacy Leader

0:32:59.320 --> 0:33:02.720
<v Speaker 1>for PW. You see again, it was a debut director

0:33:02.760 --> 0:33:05.080
<v Speaker 1>at the FBI, so he kind of gets it from

0:33:05.200 --> 0:33:08.640
<v Speaker 1>um the you know, the private company side as well

0:33:08.640 --> 0:33:13.280
<v Speaker 1>as the governmental side. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg

0:33:13.320 --> 0:33:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Markets podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews with

0:33:16.760 --> 0:33:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller.

0:33:21.840 --> 0:33:25.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at Matt Miller three, pt on Fall

0:33:25.720 --> 0:33:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Sweeney I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast,

0:33:28.680 --> 0:33:31.440
<v Speaker 1>you can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio.