1
00:00:00,600 --> 00:00:08,080
Speaker 1: This is Bloomberg Law with June Grassoe from Bloomberg Radio.

2
00:00:09,800 --> 00:00:13,240
Speaker 1: The protests were allowed at an abortion rights rally outside

3
00:00:13,240 --> 00:00:16,320
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court on Wednesday, as the Justice has heard

4
00:00:16,440 --> 00:00:19,880
Speaker 1: arguments in the court's first abortion case in four years.

5
00:00:20,400 --> 00:00:23,400
Speaker 1: Sin A minority leader, Chuck Schumer had these words for

6
00:00:23,440 --> 00:00:25,920
Speaker 1: the two newest members of the Court. I want to

7
00:00:25,960 --> 00:00:30,360
Speaker 1: tell you. I want to tell you, Kavanaugh, you have

8
00:00:30,560 --> 00:00:39,080
Speaker 1: released the whirlwind and you will pay the price. You

9
00:00:39,159 --> 00:00:42,479
Speaker 1: won't know what hit you if you go forward with

10
00:00:42,640 --> 00:00:46,559
Speaker 1: these awful decisions. That led Chief Justice John Roberts to

11
00:00:46,640 --> 00:00:51,000
Speaker 1: deliver an extraordinary rebuke of Schumer, chastising him from making

12
00:00:51,080 --> 00:00:55,960
Speaker 1: threatening statements that quote are not only inappropriate, they are dangerous.

13
00:00:56,280 --> 00:00:58,959
Speaker 1: Joining me is Carl Tobias, a professor at the University

14
00:00:58,960 --> 00:01:01,760
Speaker 1: of Richmond Law School. Call first, let me get your

15
00:01:01,760 --> 00:01:06,160
Speaker 1: take on whether Schumer's comments were inappropriate. Well, actually, there

16
00:01:06,240 --> 00:01:09,240
Speaker 1: was an exchange this morning on the Senate floor and

17
00:01:10,000 --> 00:01:14,800
Speaker 1: a senator Schumer apologized basically for his comments and saying

18
00:01:14,840 --> 00:01:19,840
Speaker 1: he didn't intend to be threatening the justices in any way.

19
00:01:20,360 --> 00:01:22,399
Speaker 1: But I think he was caught up in the rhetoric

20
00:01:22,520 --> 00:01:27,280
Speaker 1: of the moment when it was highly charged and regretted it.

21
00:01:27,360 --> 00:01:30,559
Speaker 1: He also said something about Brooklyn, and we talked tough

22
00:01:30,600 --> 00:01:34,640
Speaker 1: in Brooklyn, and so I think he's tried to walk

23
00:01:34,720 --> 00:01:40,039
Speaker 1: back and say he really wasn't in any way threatening justices,

24
00:01:40,680 --> 00:01:44,839
Speaker 1: though Leader McConnell blasted him for fifteen minutes on the floor,

25
00:01:44,920 --> 00:01:50,080
Speaker 1: apparently talking about Schumer and other Democrats undermining the institution

26
00:01:50,160 --> 00:01:55,360
Speaker 1: of the Senate, which is ludicrous coming from the majority leader,

27
00:01:55,800 --> 00:01:58,920
Speaker 1: given what he's done to the institutions of the Senate

28
00:01:59,440 --> 00:02:03,600
Speaker 1: since he became the majority leader. So it just seems

29
00:02:03,640 --> 00:02:06,160
Speaker 1: like there's a lot of rhetoric on all sides and

30
00:02:06,200 --> 00:02:08,600
Speaker 1: they need to tone that down. But much of this

31
00:02:08,639 --> 00:02:11,440
Speaker 1: has been triggered, of course, by the attacks on judicial

32
00:02:11,520 --> 00:02:14,200
Speaker 1: independence by the President of the United States and the

33
00:02:14,280 --> 00:02:18,720
Speaker 1: failure of judges to speak up about that since it

34
00:02:18,919 --> 00:02:21,480
Speaker 1: started at the time of the campaign in twenty six

35
00:02:21,800 --> 00:02:25,560
Speaker 1: and has continued, including I think last night he weighed

36
00:02:25,560 --> 00:02:28,840
Speaker 1: in on Twitter, as you referred to. In the last

37
00:02:29,120 --> 00:02:32,720
Speaker 1: year alone, Trump has attacked the integrity of the federal

38
00:02:32,800 --> 00:02:38,480
Speaker 1: judiciary in general and targeted individual judges, including the judge

39
00:02:38,480 --> 00:02:43,000
Speaker 1: and the Roger Stone case repeatedly criticized to liberal female

40
00:02:43,040 --> 00:02:47,200
Speaker 1: Supreme Court Justice is last week one for a dissenting

41
00:02:47,240 --> 00:02:51,600
Speaker 1: opinion which he misinterpreted. The Chief said nothing during all

42
00:02:51,680 --> 00:02:55,480
Speaker 1: that time. So does this look to the general public

43
00:02:55,639 --> 00:03:00,240
Speaker 1: like selective outrage. Well, that's a good question. And he

44
00:03:00,320 --> 00:03:04,600
Speaker 1: did speak up if you remember Thanksgiving eighteen about the

45
00:03:04,720 --> 00:03:09,000
Speaker 1: constant criticism from Trump about Obama judges and made a

46
00:03:09,080 --> 00:03:13,040
Speaker 1: relatively strong statement at that time. But the attacks that

47
00:03:13,040 --> 00:03:15,880
Speaker 1: have gone on from the President, but generally as to

48
00:03:15,919 --> 00:03:18,600
Speaker 1: the courts and then more specifically as to judges like

49
00:03:18,840 --> 00:03:22,360
Speaker 1: Amy Berman Jackson handling the Roger Stone case and many

50
00:03:22,440 --> 00:03:25,600
Speaker 1: other judges, especially on the Ninth Circuit, and judges who

51
00:03:25,680 --> 00:03:28,799
Speaker 1: rule against him, and the rhetoric all the way around

52
00:03:28,840 --> 00:03:31,720
Speaker 1: on to be toned down. But it's important for the

53
00:03:31,800 --> 00:03:35,760
Speaker 1: Chief Justice to speak out and defend judicial independence and

54
00:03:35,760 --> 00:03:40,520
Speaker 1: an even handed, thoughtful and careful way. And I think

55
00:03:40,560 --> 00:03:43,720
Speaker 1: people have been concerned that he hasn't spoken out enough

56
00:03:43,880 --> 00:03:47,720
Speaker 1: about the president's attacks on the federal judiciary because that

57
00:03:47,880 --> 00:03:52,680
Speaker 1: undermines respect for the judiciary and that absolutely needs to

58
00:03:52,720 --> 00:03:56,480
Speaker 1: be protected. The courts don't have either sword or the purse,

59
00:03:56,680 --> 00:03:59,960
Speaker 1: and they need to be sure that the public were

60
00:04:00,000 --> 00:04:03,880
Speaker 1: respects their rulings, and so everybody needs to work on

61
00:04:04,000 --> 00:04:07,680
Speaker 1: judicial independence and making sure that it's a paramount. It

62
00:04:07,800 --> 00:04:14,240
Speaker 1: also seems stark because Trump just recently attacked Justice Ruth

63
00:04:14,240 --> 00:04:18,120
Speaker 1: Bader Ginsburg and Justice Sonya so To Mayor and told

64
00:04:18,120 --> 00:04:23,080
Speaker 1: them that they should recuse themselves in any case related

65
00:04:23,120 --> 00:04:26,480
Speaker 1: to him. So I had expected the Chief to speak

66
00:04:26,560 --> 00:04:29,400
Speaker 1: up then, Well, I think a lot of people did.

67
00:04:29,680 --> 00:04:32,240
Speaker 1: It may be unfortunate that he didn't. Of course, the

68
00:04:32,240 --> 00:04:35,479
Speaker 1: President didn't understand what he was saying about recusal or

69
00:04:35,520 --> 00:04:39,159
Speaker 1: how that works, and there was no basis really for

70
00:04:39,200 --> 00:04:43,800
Speaker 1: asking them to recuse. In fact, what Justice Soto Mayor

71
00:04:44,200 --> 00:04:47,359
Speaker 1: said in her descent didn't speak in any way to

72
00:04:47,440 --> 00:04:50,840
Speaker 1: the President. It spoke partly to the way the government

73
00:04:50,960 --> 00:04:55,359
Speaker 1: has incessantly raced to the court to stay these lower

74
00:04:55,360 --> 00:04:58,520
Speaker 1: court rulings. That the President doesn't lie and was just

75
00:04:58,600 --> 00:05:01,880
Speaker 1: speaking to the court itself and how it should handle

76
00:05:02,040 --> 00:05:07,120
Speaker 1: those emergency requests which are accelerating with ever more vehemence

77
00:05:07,320 --> 00:05:10,760
Speaker 1: from the Solicitor General's Office, principally in the Justice Department.

78
00:05:11,120 --> 00:05:16,200
Speaker 1: In this day of extremes, where is the line between

79
00:05:16,839 --> 00:05:24,080
Speaker 1: correct criticism of opinions and attacks on the judiciary. Well,

80
00:05:24,480 --> 00:05:27,440
Speaker 1: I think it's important to not have personal attacks on

81
00:05:27,520 --> 00:05:33,200
Speaker 1: particular judges or even particular courts. But it's certainly appropriate

82
00:05:33,240 --> 00:05:38,880
Speaker 1: to analyze and criticize the opinions that judges and justices

83
00:05:39,000 --> 00:05:42,800
Speaker 1: right on their merits and show why you believe that

84
00:05:42,839 --> 00:05:47,320
Speaker 1: they're inappropriate, incorrectly decided, or whatever your view is about that,

85
00:05:47,680 --> 00:05:52,360
Speaker 1: but not to attack them personally or to suggest that

86
00:05:52,400 --> 00:05:57,240
Speaker 1: they have some hidden agenda or our only politicians in

87
00:05:57,360 --> 00:06:02,480
Speaker 1: robes those kinds of criticisms. But sometimes people are very

88
00:06:02,520 --> 00:06:06,200
Speaker 1: exercised about particular issues and they say more than probably

89
00:06:06,200 --> 00:06:09,440
Speaker 1: it is appropriate. Thanks Carl. That's Carl Tobias of the

90
00:06:09,520 --> 00:06:14,080
Speaker 1: University of Richmond Law School. Thanks for listening to the

91
00:06:14,120 --> 00:06:17,479
Speaker 1: Bloomberg Law Podcast. You can subscribe and listen to the

92
00:06:17,520 --> 00:06:21,440
Speaker 1: show on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and on Bloomberg dot com

93
00:06:21,480 --> 00:06:25,680
Speaker 1: slash podcast. I'm June Brosso. This is Bloomberg