WEBVTT - SHARP NFL BETS Week 10: Ravens-Vikings, Rams-49ers, Eagles-Packers, Steelers-Chargers, Patriots-Bucs and more

0:00:01.040 --> 0:00:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Sharper Square, presented by hard Rock That.

0:00:05.000 --> 0:00:07.520
<v Speaker 2>We are part of the Volume podcast Network.

0:00:07.560 --> 0:00:10.159
<v Speaker 1>This is the show that makes the squares sharper and

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:12.080
<v Speaker 1>makes the wise guys pay attention.

0:00:12.200 --> 0:00:13.560
<v Speaker 2>I am Chad Milman, I am.

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Joined as always buy my BFF, my companion, Mike Campadre,

0:00:17.239 --> 0:00:19.120
<v Speaker 1>my co host, Professional Better Sigmon Hunter.

0:00:20.079 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 2>Hello, Simon, Chad.

0:00:23.280 --> 0:00:23.920
<v Speaker 3>Are we doing?

0:00:24.120 --> 0:00:26.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't feel like I got English enough on that.

0:00:26.600 --> 0:00:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Heedo soymon A's beat.

0:00:29.320 --> 0:00:32.160
<v Speaker 2>There you go, dude. There is so much.

0:00:32.000 --> 0:00:37.440
<v Speaker 1>News impacting the lines since the trade deadline, and there's

0:00:37.440 --> 0:00:42.239
<v Speaker 1>also just been general massive line movement overall since we

0:00:42.320 --> 0:00:44.240
<v Speaker 1>did our show on Tuesday.

0:00:44.560 --> 0:00:46.960
<v Speaker 2>Freaking wild, absolutely freaking wild.

0:00:47.000 --> 0:00:49.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you've got any deep deep thoughts

0:00:49.800 --> 0:00:51.960
<v Speaker 1>on that. Let's hold them because I want to hear

0:00:51.960 --> 0:00:54.440
<v Speaker 1>what the wise guys have to say in sharp calls.

0:00:54.480 --> 0:00:56.560
<v Speaker 1>This is our Thursday, Week ten episode. We're going to

0:00:56.640 --> 0:00:59.040
<v Speaker 1>narrow down the options on the five picks we like

0:00:59.200 --> 0:01:01.920
<v Speaker 1>the best. We're going to inch our way closer. Subscribe

0:01:01.920 --> 0:01:05.280
<v Speaker 1>to Sharper Square on YouTube, Apple Pods, Spotify. Let's get

0:01:05.280 --> 0:01:08.120
<v Speaker 1>into this thing. Every week, you know what we do.

0:01:09.240 --> 0:01:14.720
<v Speaker 1>We are going to hear from Simon's fellow professional betters

0:01:14.760 --> 0:01:18.080
<v Speaker 1>on all the conversations we had on Tuesday, they've always

0:01:18.080 --> 0:01:22.520
<v Speaker 1>got opinions. I have no doubt they'll have a lot

0:01:22.520 --> 0:01:25.119
<v Speaker 1>of things to say about what we discussed.

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:28.680
<v Speaker 2>Let's get too sharp, calls.

0:01:30.000 --> 0:01:32.600
<v Speaker 3>Hal answer, it's foot all.

0:01:32.600 --> 0:01:39.440
<v Speaker 2>Right, rain range, telephone range. Somebody said, maybe what you do.

0:01:39.600 --> 0:01:42.960
<v Speaker 4>Man, Yeah, let's start where you guys are on the

0:01:43.000 --> 0:01:45.480
<v Speaker 4>opposite of us, which you know I always always love

0:01:45.560 --> 0:01:48.360
<v Speaker 4>here on the other side. And the one that really

0:01:48.400 --> 0:01:50.760
<v Speaker 4>jumped out was the Chargers. Hearing a lot of love

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:55.160
<v Speaker 4>from the pros on the Chargers, maybe we're suckers. I

0:01:55.200 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 4>just can't get over again. Plus three here. I just

0:01:57.440 --> 0:01:58.840
<v Speaker 4>that's gonna be a fun one to break down.

0:01:58.680 --> 0:02:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Some Yeah we're gonna that's the Chargers Steelers game, and yeah,

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 1>we're definitely gonna discuss that one.

0:02:03.160 --> 0:02:03.520
<v Speaker 3>So good.

0:02:03.840 --> 0:02:08.520
<v Speaker 4>But yeah, a lot of pros love the Chargers, Big Chargers,

0:02:08.919 --> 0:02:12.200
<v Speaker 4>Chargers spot. I guess let's start with the Rams as well.

0:02:12.360 --> 0:02:15.160
<v Speaker 4>A lot of pros I talked to Tuck Rams money

0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:19.400
<v Speaker 4>shocked by that one. Commanders was a big talking point

0:02:19.440 --> 0:02:22.240
<v Speaker 4>this week. I definitely remember us, or at least myself.

0:02:22.440 --> 0:02:24.960
<v Speaker 4>I like Detroit. I still do. I'm happy they're betting

0:02:25.000 --> 0:02:27.200
<v Speaker 4>it down. That's a fun one. We can break down

0:02:27.200 --> 0:02:30.280
<v Speaker 4>some more. Patriots, couldn't believe it. A lot of love

0:02:30.280 --> 0:02:34.080
<v Speaker 4>from the Patriots. I once again, I'm dug in. I like,

0:02:34.200 --> 0:02:36.600
<v Speaker 4>really like Tampa. Starting to love it even more as

0:02:36.600 --> 0:02:38.680
<v Speaker 4>I see the injury report and what guys are healthy

0:02:38.720 --> 0:02:41.440
<v Speaker 4>for this Tampa team. So pretty interesting how much love

0:02:41.440 --> 0:02:44.640
<v Speaker 4>there is for this Patriots side and the sides we

0:02:44.720 --> 0:02:48.440
<v Speaker 4>agree on. Chad, we already knew Jets that was gonna

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:51.880
<v Speaker 4>be a pro side. Yeah, it's it's fluctuated the numbers

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:53.000
<v Speaker 4>since the trade deadline.

0:02:53.240 --> 0:02:55.560
<v Speaker 3>That's gonna be a fun one to break down. Miami.

0:02:55.680 --> 0:02:59.239
<v Speaker 4>Tons of love from the pros. Tons of love for Houston.

0:03:00.480 --> 0:03:02.560
<v Speaker 4>I'm going against the pros here. I didn't even mention

0:03:02.600 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 4>it the Raiders. Talk to some pros that really like

0:03:04.360 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 4>that one again. Another game I'll hold steady fast and

0:03:06.800 --> 0:03:10.040
<v Speaker 4>I really like Denver in that spot and the last

0:03:10.080 --> 0:03:12.400
<v Speaker 4>one that shocked me. Tons of love for the pros

0:03:12.440 --> 0:03:14.640
<v Speaker 4>on this Bear side game that I feel like we

0:03:14.680 --> 0:03:15.840
<v Speaker 4>were kind of on the other side of it.

0:03:16.160 --> 0:03:16.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, talk that we.

0:03:16.919 --> 0:03:19.520
<v Speaker 4>Kind of like the Giants. I'll give you some reasons

0:03:19.520 --> 0:03:21.040
<v Speaker 4>why they liked that Bear side.

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:22.280
<v Speaker 3>If we break that game down later.

0:03:22.520 --> 0:03:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Oh, we're going to break it down because it's one

0:03:24.000 --> 0:03:25.320
<v Speaker 1>of the games that I was thinking about, and it

0:03:25.400 --> 0:03:28.520
<v Speaker 1>was in contention for brass Balls because that number has

0:03:28.600 --> 0:03:31.040
<v Speaker 1>moved quite a bit and I haven't been able to

0:03:31.040 --> 0:03:35.200
<v Speaker 1>figure out why other than professional money coming in on

0:03:35.280 --> 0:03:38.920
<v Speaker 1>the Bears in this spot. So you also mentioned another

0:03:39.000 --> 0:03:42.120
<v Speaker 1>game that I've been getting more and more nervous about,

0:03:42.120 --> 0:03:44.680
<v Speaker 1>which is The Box, because I cannot figure out how

0:03:44.680 --> 0:03:46.440
<v Speaker 1>that line hasn't moved from two and a half to

0:03:46.480 --> 0:03:50.320
<v Speaker 1>three yet. So some pushback from the Wise guys is

0:03:50.320 --> 0:03:55.240
<v Speaker 1>probably why. But first let's get to that Raiders Broncos game. Obviously,

0:03:55.320 --> 0:03:57.040
<v Speaker 1>it's our Thursday show, so a lot of people might

0:03:57.080 --> 0:04:00.920
<v Speaker 1>not hear. I might not hear the show until after

0:04:00.960 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 1>the game. You're getting some feedback from the professionals on

0:04:06.080 --> 0:04:10.320
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders' side. We both love Denver and like this

0:04:10.440 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 1>wasn't even a question. We actually were debating if Denver

0:04:14.160 --> 0:04:17.000
<v Speaker 1>was going to be Simon Says or Chat's choice because

0:04:17.040 --> 0:04:19.400
<v Speaker 1>we both liked it so much. We liked it at

0:04:19.440 --> 0:04:21.640
<v Speaker 1>eight and a half, it's now at nine and a half.

0:04:22.520 --> 0:04:24.919
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what the Wise guys are seeing in

0:04:24.960 --> 0:04:27.680
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders. You can't take anything from that game against

0:04:28.160 --> 0:04:31.719
<v Speaker 1>a Jags team that lost their best pass rusher because

0:04:31.760 --> 0:04:35.600
<v Speaker 1>he tried to punch a guy in the face, and

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:39.760
<v Speaker 1>you're still playing against a not very good defense. Brock

0:04:39.800 --> 0:04:42.719
<v Speaker 1>Bauers was wide open every game. I mean, every play.

0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Isn't all this stuff that Broncos can account for in

0:04:46.560 --> 0:04:48.719
<v Speaker 1>a short week in a game the Raiders went to

0:04:49.360 --> 0:04:52.280
<v Speaker 1>a full overtime and they're not a very good team.

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:55.080
<v Speaker 2>I don't get it. I don't get it.

0:04:55.880 --> 0:04:57.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think mister White, guys I talked to, they

0:04:57.680 --> 0:05:00.839
<v Speaker 4>just don't trust, you know, a quarter about like bow

0:05:00.920 --> 0:05:02.960
<v Speaker 4>Knicks to be this big of a favorite in a

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:06.080
<v Speaker 4>divisional game, especially if you look at the history of Denver, right,

0:05:06.120 --> 0:05:08.240
<v Speaker 4>And this is the hardest part too, because to me,

0:05:08.360 --> 0:05:10.120
<v Speaker 4>it's a lot of it's irrelevant the history of Denver

0:05:10.240 --> 0:05:13.400
<v Speaker 4>before Champagne took over. But they have not won against

0:05:13.440 --> 0:05:16.720
<v Speaker 4>a divisional opponent in our primetime game since like twenty seventeen.

0:05:16.839 --> 0:05:18.839
<v Speaker 2>Okay, doesn't matter, doesn't matter.

0:05:19.000 --> 0:05:21.360
<v Speaker 4>That was my exact pushback. It's like, well, if you

0:05:21.400 --> 0:05:24.000
<v Speaker 4>look at those teams from those years, they were bad,

0:05:24.000 --> 0:05:26.599
<v Speaker 4>They had bad coaches, they just weren't good, and they've

0:05:26.640 --> 0:05:29.560
<v Speaker 4>been in a really competitive, tough division all throughout those years.

0:05:29.600 --> 0:05:34.440
<v Speaker 4>So that makes sense though why they'd push back because

0:05:34.480 --> 0:05:37.280
<v Speaker 4>it is technically a huge number in a divisional game in.

0:05:37.200 --> 0:05:39.400
<v Speaker 3>A short week. But I already gave it out.

0:05:39.560 --> 0:05:41.599
<v Speaker 4>I gave out that overtime stat, which to me is

0:05:41.680 --> 0:05:44.520
<v Speaker 4>just makes so much sense, and it was actually wrong.

0:05:44.560 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 3>I thought it was three and twenty three.

0:05:47.800 --> 0:05:51.679
<v Speaker 4>I forgot last year the Bears and this exact spot

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:54.840
<v Speaker 4>actually won uncovered or covered last year against the Lions.

0:05:55.080 --> 0:05:57.200
<v Speaker 4>Remember that insanely fluky game on Thanksgiving.

0:05:57.480 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, dude, where the Lions should have been up seventy

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:02.360
<v Speaker 1>two to nothing in the first half, and.

0:06:02.320 --> 0:06:04.679
<v Speaker 4>Then even then they're up twenty one nothing or twenty

0:06:04.680 --> 0:06:07.640
<v Speaker 4>one to three the first half, and somehow Bears came

0:06:07.680 --> 0:06:11.440
<v Speaker 4>back and covered really late. So you know, I'm not

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:13.640
<v Speaker 4>gonna get pushed off this one. I get where they're

0:06:13.640 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 4>coming from, and I'm with you. I just think defensively, schematically,

0:06:16.600 --> 0:06:18.640
<v Speaker 4>they can take away bowers and then what are you

0:06:18.680 --> 0:06:20.559
<v Speaker 4>going to do as an offense, Like, I know they're

0:06:20.839 --> 0:06:22.440
<v Speaker 4>trying to establish a run, but it just now has

0:06:22.440 --> 0:06:24.200
<v Speaker 4>been working. Chip Kelly whatever he's going to do. It's

0:06:24.240 --> 0:06:26.680
<v Speaker 4>not been working with that run game and Gino.

0:06:26.880 --> 0:06:28.160
<v Speaker 3>I still think.

0:06:28.440 --> 0:06:30.440
<v Speaker 4>Even in that game, as good as he looked, he

0:06:30.520 --> 0:06:33.279
<v Speaker 4>still had so many horrible throws, so much questionable moving

0:06:33.279 --> 0:06:36.599
<v Speaker 4>with his feet, and it's just a really tough spot.

0:06:36.600 --> 0:06:38.440
<v Speaker 4>Offs We talked about it being on a short week

0:06:38.480 --> 0:06:41.520
<v Speaker 4>here on the road against the Denver team that you know,

0:06:41.560 --> 0:06:42.919
<v Speaker 4>we put it as one of the best teams in

0:06:42.960 --> 0:06:46.080
<v Speaker 4>all football, like we're respecting that way defensively, especially, so

0:06:47.080 --> 0:06:49.120
<v Speaker 4>I know it's a lot to swallow bow nixt year,

0:06:49.160 --> 0:06:50.320
<v Speaker 4>but I can't get away from it.

0:06:50.360 --> 0:06:50.480
<v Speaker 3>Cha.

0:06:50.520 --> 0:06:52.560
<v Speaker 4>I really like it, And I don't know, maybe we

0:06:52.600 --> 0:06:54.480
<v Speaker 4>do put in the contest multiple figure it out because

0:06:54.480 --> 0:06:57.200
<v Speaker 4>there are five games I like this week. But people

0:06:57.240 --> 0:06:59.120
<v Speaker 4>know I really love this game. I love this matchup.

0:06:59.240 --> 0:07:01.280
<v Speaker 4>First half, full game, Debra, I'm.

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:01.720
<v Speaker 3>All over it.

0:07:01.960 --> 0:07:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, same, same, same, not shame, same. Maybe we'll be shamed,

0:07:08.520 --> 0:07:11.000
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think so. This was one like coming

0:07:11.040 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 1>out of my one in four malaise. This is one

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:16.920
<v Speaker 1>of the games that made me start to feel like, Okay,

0:07:17.480 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 1>I can see it, I have clarity, I'm feeling confident,

0:07:21.320 --> 0:07:22.560
<v Speaker 1>felt good about this one.

0:07:22.880 --> 0:07:25.280
<v Speaker 3>God we need it. We cannot start the week O one.

0:07:25.160 --> 0:07:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Dude, we freaking need it, as Bob Scuccy, our old

0:07:29.920 --> 0:07:33.720
<v Speaker 1>friend Bob Scuccy like to say, we need this for

0:07:33.760 --> 0:07:39.200
<v Speaker 1>our lungs. We are underwater, all right, New York Giants

0:07:39.480 --> 0:07:42.680
<v Speaker 1>at the Chicago Bears. This line, it.

0:07:42.560 --> 0:07:44.720
<v Speaker 2>Blew up over the last forty eight hours.

0:07:44.760 --> 0:07:46.120
<v Speaker 1>It got up to four and a half. It's down

0:07:46.160 --> 0:07:47.960
<v Speaker 1>to four at hard Rock. We've talked about hard Rock.

0:07:47.960 --> 0:07:50.960
<v Speaker 1>It's a sharp book, so that gives communication of what

0:07:51.000 --> 0:07:53.240
<v Speaker 1>the wise guys think when this line got to four

0:07:53.280 --> 0:07:53.760
<v Speaker 1>and a half.

0:07:54.440 --> 0:07:55.920
<v Speaker 2>But they also love the Bears at three.

0:07:56.000 --> 0:07:57.400
<v Speaker 1>They love the Bears at three and a half, and

0:07:57.440 --> 0:07:59.320
<v Speaker 1>some pushed it up too, from four to four and

0:07:59.320 --> 0:08:05.360
<v Speaker 1>a half. I started to see the Giants and I

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:10.000
<v Speaker 1>talked about this on Tuesday. The Bears run defense is

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 1>so bad, and I mean not their run defense. Their

0:08:13.200 --> 0:08:17.040
<v Speaker 1>past defense is so bad, and their secondary is so bad.

0:08:17.920 --> 0:08:19.880
<v Speaker 1>You could see how Jackson Dark could have a lot

0:08:19.920 --> 0:08:23.200
<v Speaker 1>of success against the Bears and a defense that, by

0:08:23.240 --> 0:08:27.800
<v Speaker 1>the way, has not been able to hold anybody under

0:08:28.000 --> 0:08:33.439
<v Speaker 1>a twenty five point game. I'm exaggerating, but that's basically

0:08:33.440 --> 0:08:38.280
<v Speaker 1>the line of demarcation here. Unless they were committing forcing

0:08:38.280 --> 0:08:40.800
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of turnovers. They won with the Commander. They

0:08:40.880 --> 0:08:44.839
<v Speaker 1>went against the Commanders because of a bad handoff that

0:08:44.960 --> 0:08:48.080
<v Speaker 1>got them to win. In that primetime game against Jayden Daniels,

0:08:48.320 --> 0:08:50.840
<v Speaker 1>they beat the Cowboys because of a bunch of turnovers.

0:08:51.000 --> 0:08:53.800
<v Speaker 1>They beat the Saints, which still came close to covering

0:08:54.160 --> 0:08:56.600
<v Speaker 1>because of a bunch of turnovers. Every other game they've had,

0:08:56.800 --> 0:08:59.280
<v Speaker 1>it's going down to the wire and it's close, and

0:08:59.320 --> 0:09:02.880
<v Speaker 1>they're winning because there's something fluky happening, and because Ben

0:09:02.960 --> 0:09:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Johnson is a miracle, not because this team is very good.

0:09:06.640 --> 0:09:09.880
<v Speaker 1>So four and a half just feels like too many points.

0:09:10.040 --> 0:09:14.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm surprised to hear the wise guys say they're liking

0:09:14.960 --> 0:09:15.960
<v Speaker 1>the Bears here.

0:09:16.760 --> 0:09:18.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I'm probably gonna have to join on me at Chad,

0:09:18.520 --> 0:09:22.040
<v Speaker 4>I if you really don't like a side here, I

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:24.160
<v Speaker 4>think there is still a value on the total. Total

0:09:24.200 --> 0:09:26.480
<v Speaker 4>is down to forty six and a half, and all

0:09:26.559 --> 0:09:28.880
<v Speaker 4>the reason behind this movement, to me is because of

0:09:28.880 --> 0:09:33.160
<v Speaker 4>the weather. People like, we're tracking models, you're getting some info,

0:09:33.200 --> 0:09:36.840
<v Speaker 4>and right now a bunch of different models are predicting

0:09:36.960 --> 0:09:40.439
<v Speaker 4>rain or snow and very cold temperature in this matchup,

0:09:40.480 --> 0:09:43.560
<v Speaker 4>which to me favors this Bears team that wants to

0:09:43.640 --> 0:09:45.880
<v Speaker 4>run the ball heavily and has one of the best

0:09:45.920 --> 0:09:48.920
<v Speaker 4>run schemes off football against the defense that is really bad.

0:09:49.000 --> 0:09:51.800
<v Speaker 3>Giants are bottom thirty in the league.

0:09:52.920 --> 0:09:55.360
<v Speaker 2>They're they're the worst, are they now?

0:09:55.640 --> 0:09:58.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so the Bears.

0:09:58.640 --> 0:10:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Like, you're right, I'm just like, obviously, I have a

0:10:01.920 --> 0:10:06.040
<v Speaker 1>strong opinion about the Bears. Their run offense has been

0:10:06.080 --> 0:10:08.880
<v Speaker 1>so good and that is a major major factor against

0:10:08.920 --> 0:10:12.200
<v Speaker 1>this team. And the weather, you're right, could be it

0:10:12.360 --> 0:10:14.280
<v Speaker 1>just might play into the way Ben Johnson wants to

0:10:14.320 --> 0:10:16.120
<v Speaker 1>play this game. It'll give an excuse not to let

0:10:16.200 --> 0:10:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Kayleb Williams throw the ball.

0:10:17.960 --> 0:10:20.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and again it's you can take these positions and

0:10:20.720 --> 0:10:23.080
<v Speaker 4>get out of it Sunday if this all blows over

0:10:23.120 --> 0:10:25.680
<v Speaker 4>and these models wire turarly off, but you know they're

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:28.720
<v Speaker 4>shooting pretty accurate. Two three days out here, the line

0:10:28.720 --> 0:10:30.679
<v Speaker 4>has come down from forty nine to forty six and

0:10:30.720 --> 0:10:33.400
<v Speaker 4>a half. They'll let you know. The books are getting

0:10:33.480 --> 0:10:36.920
<v Speaker 4>really really respected money heavily towards the under. But you're

0:10:36.920 --> 0:10:40.680
<v Speaker 4>looking at the splits right now, it's still mostly towards

0:10:40.720 --> 0:10:43.199
<v Speaker 4>the over. I mean, the tickets and the money say

0:10:43.360 --> 0:10:47.120
<v Speaker 4>towards the over. At the public obviously, like we talked about,

0:10:47.160 --> 0:10:49.559
<v Speaker 4>they're going to be on this Bears team, Like, no

0:10:49.640 --> 0:10:51.920
<v Speaker 4>one's going to be trusting the Giants right now, like

0:10:51.960 --> 0:10:53.440
<v Speaker 4>what we talked about, right That's why we kind of

0:10:53.480 --> 0:10:55.360
<v Speaker 4>like this the Ghiants team. This feels like a good

0:10:55.360 --> 0:10:57.760
<v Speaker 4>spot for them, playing against an inflated Bears team that

0:10:58.360 --> 0:11:00.640
<v Speaker 4>got really lucky. They covered all those for those people

0:11:00.679 --> 0:11:03.080
<v Speaker 4>last week, and those people are coming back now hitting

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:03.760
<v Speaker 4>the Bears again.

0:11:03.880 --> 0:11:06.520
<v Speaker 3>So I'm like you, I wanted to be on the Giants.

0:11:06.520 --> 0:11:09.320
<v Speaker 4>Were shocked to hear the professionals were taking these heavy

0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:11.080
<v Speaker 4>positions on the Bears, and now you dive into it

0:11:11.080 --> 0:11:13.240
<v Speaker 4>and see what the weather could be like, this just

0:11:13.240 --> 0:11:15.160
<v Speaker 4>feels are a great spot for the Bear scene. Compared

0:11:15.160 --> 0:11:18.600
<v Speaker 4>to a young rookie quarterback in Jackson Dart who already

0:11:18.600 --> 0:11:22.079
<v Speaker 4>has fumbling issues now playing in bad element weather, I

0:11:22.080 --> 0:11:24.319
<v Speaker 4>don't know. I just I can't get there the Giants

0:11:24.360 --> 0:11:27.120
<v Speaker 4>if I know that's scenario. So yeah, just if you

0:11:27.160 --> 0:11:28.600
<v Speaker 4>wantn't want to take as side here, I still think

0:11:28.600 --> 0:11:29.640
<v Speaker 4>the underreas value on it.

0:11:32.440 --> 0:11:33.800
<v Speaker 2>I hate the Bears in this spot.

0:11:34.400 --> 0:11:37.400
<v Speaker 3>I know it's such a Giants number, it's brutal.

0:11:37.160 --> 0:11:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Such a giant's number. I'm gonna wait. I'm just waiting.

0:11:41.120 --> 0:11:43.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's going to get to five. But

0:11:43.520 --> 0:11:46.760
<v Speaker 1>I'd rather just see the weather and know what I'm

0:11:47.120 --> 0:11:50.520
<v Speaker 1>betting into on Sunday. I don't have to bet this one,

0:11:50.640 --> 0:11:55.920
<v Speaker 1>So for me, I'm gonna wait. New Orleans at Carolina.

0:11:56.000 --> 0:12:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Carolina is a five point favorite. Five and a half,

0:12:01.679 --> 0:12:05.800
<v Speaker 1>move to five, still five at hard Rock, five and

0:12:05.800 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 1>a half in a lot of other places. I want

0:12:09.320 --> 0:12:11.840
<v Speaker 1>to say play the number, but the truth is, like

0:12:12.240 --> 0:12:17.920
<v Speaker 1>this number home or road Division dogs of five plus points,

0:12:18.400 --> 0:12:23.720
<v Speaker 1>It's basically a fifty to fifty proposition. So if you're

0:12:23.720 --> 0:12:25.720
<v Speaker 1>looking at it from that point of view, there is

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:34.160
<v Speaker 1>no real edge in terms of historical precedent. Caroline at

0:12:34.200 --> 0:12:38.560
<v Speaker 1>home is great. The Russian game is great. They're really confident.

0:12:39.240 --> 0:12:41.720
<v Speaker 1>The Saints are not. They might not have an NFL

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:42.760
<v Speaker 1>quarterback on their roster.

0:12:46.880 --> 0:12:48.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the number just spooks you. It sews me too.

0:12:49.720 --> 0:12:51.760
<v Speaker 4>I'll probably end up just taking a large position with

0:12:51.840 --> 0:12:54.520
<v Speaker 4>Carolina on the money line and just avoid this game

0:12:54.559 --> 0:12:58.679
<v Speaker 4>if I can, because it does feel like it's mispriced,

0:12:59.400 --> 0:13:01.640
<v Speaker 4>and this is a great spot for this Carolina team

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:03.960
<v Speaker 4>at home again, it's what we just said is just

0:13:04.000 --> 0:13:08.920
<v Speaker 4>a non existent offensive quarterback and could he show up

0:13:08.960 --> 0:13:10.400
<v Speaker 4>here and have a game of his life. Yeah, we've

0:13:10.440 --> 0:13:12.400
<v Speaker 4>seen that happen all the time. Right, these guys pop

0:13:12.480 --> 0:13:14.760
<v Speaker 4>for one game. But just as a betting man, I

0:13:15.280 --> 0:13:18.040
<v Speaker 4>love this number and working against the Panthers just the

0:13:18.120 --> 0:13:19.760
<v Speaker 4>issue of them being a favorite, right, I think they're

0:13:19.800 --> 0:13:22.079
<v Speaker 4>on a crazy streak. They're zero to ten as a favorite.

0:13:22.080 --> 0:13:23.920
<v Speaker 4>And that's a lot of bright young too. I think

0:13:23.960 --> 0:13:26.600
<v Speaker 4>he has three or four games mixed in there. So yeah,

0:13:26.760 --> 0:13:29.280
<v Speaker 4>I'm a game. I'm not basterly having into. It's just

0:13:29.320 --> 0:13:31.080
<v Speaker 4>I found other games this week I like a lot more.

0:13:31.120 --> 0:13:34.240
<v Speaker 4>But still on Carolina side, still taking the number at

0:13:34.240 --> 0:13:38.000
<v Speaker 4>minus five, but much more comfortable putting their money line

0:13:38.000 --> 0:13:41.080
<v Speaker 4>in it. Wow, it's up to the minus two forty five,

0:13:41.160 --> 0:13:44.400
<v Speaker 4>so people been hitting it. It was rest and yeah

0:13:44.440 --> 0:13:46.520
<v Speaker 4>it's been getting hit, this money line on the Panthers.

0:13:47.760 --> 0:13:50.880
<v Speaker 1>You know a game that we are into and I

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:54.640
<v Speaker 1>hate to say it, and maybe it's the sickos in us.

0:13:55.760 --> 0:14:01.520
<v Speaker 1>The Cleveland Browns are visiting the New York Jets on Tuesday.

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:05.600
<v Speaker 1>When we started the show, the Jets I think were

0:14:06.880 --> 0:14:09.800
<v Speaker 1>two point favorites. It had gone up from one and

0:14:09.800 --> 0:14:14.760
<v Speaker 1>a half to two. During the show, the news broke

0:14:14.840 --> 0:14:18.720
<v Speaker 1>that Sauce Gardner was being traded to the Indianapolis Colts

0:14:18.800 --> 0:14:23.360
<v Speaker 1>for multiple picks. Later in the day, it was announced

0:14:23.400 --> 0:14:27.480
<v Speaker 1>that the Jets were trading Quinn Williams, their star defensive tackle,

0:14:28.000 --> 0:14:32.080
<v Speaker 1>to the Dallas Cowboys for multiple picks. Yesterday, it was

0:14:32.120 --> 0:14:35.440
<v Speaker 1>announced that Quincy Williams, the Jets starting linebacker Quinn's brother,

0:14:36.200 --> 0:14:39.520
<v Speaker 1>All Pro in twenty twenty three, was being benched for

0:14:39.720 --> 0:14:45.480
<v Speaker 1>lack of performance. We still don't know who the quarterback

0:14:45.520 --> 0:14:49.640
<v Speaker 1>is going to be for the New York Jets. On Sunday,

0:14:49.800 --> 0:14:54.480
<v Speaker 1>the New York Jets GM said that the Jets are

0:14:54.560 --> 0:14:59.000
<v Speaker 1>still trying to win. He knows how much those guys try.

0:14:59.480 --> 0:15:02.040
<v Speaker 1>We are st trying to win this season.

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:03.560
<v Speaker 2>Quote.

0:15:05.400 --> 0:15:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Maybe he and Aaron Glenn are not in the same page,

0:15:08.440 --> 0:15:12.400
<v Speaker 1>because Aaron Glenn said yesterday, I said we would make

0:15:12.440 --> 0:15:17.720
<v Speaker 1>the fans proud. I didn't say it would be this season.

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:21.920
<v Speaker 1>That gives you a lot of confidence. Here's the problem.

0:15:23.280 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Here's the problem, Simon, You're ready. The line has moved

0:15:28.280 --> 0:15:32.360
<v Speaker 1>to Jets plus two at hard Rock plus two and

0:15:32.440 --> 0:15:37.120
<v Speaker 1>a half everywhere else and the fundamentals of this game

0:15:37.160 --> 0:15:42.080
<v Speaker 1>remained the same. It was never about the Jets defense.

0:15:43.120 --> 0:15:46.320
<v Speaker 1>It's about the Jets offense against the Browns defense. Because

0:15:46.360 --> 0:15:49.000
<v Speaker 1>we have zero expectations at Dylan Gabriel, whether he's playing

0:15:49.080 --> 0:15:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Quinn Williams or Sat Gardner, whoever else is going to

0:15:51.440 --> 0:15:54.600
<v Speaker 1>be playing in those positions, is not an NFL quarterback.

0:15:55.320 --> 0:15:57.600
<v Speaker 1>So we were betting when we liked the Jets the

0:15:57.640 --> 0:16:03.160
<v Speaker 1>other day against Dylan Gabriel. All why wouldn't we still

0:16:03.160 --> 0:16:06.680
<v Speaker 1>be betting against Dylan Gabriel. This is a massive move.

0:16:08.680 --> 0:16:11.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, a game though I needed to be Justin Field's Honestly,

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:16.680
<v Speaker 4>I know it sounds stupid, but I like his matchup

0:16:16.720 --> 0:16:20.320
<v Speaker 4>a lot against this defensive front in the Cleveland and

0:16:21.000 --> 0:16:23.600
<v Speaker 4>Shockling his career. He does really well against these type

0:16:23.600 --> 0:16:25.840
<v Speaker 4>of defensive fronts when he plays a defensive front that's

0:16:26.200 --> 0:16:28.920
<v Speaker 4>you know, got a high sack rate about four percent.

0:16:29.360 --> 0:16:31.360
<v Speaker 4>He's four and two against the spreading his career, which

0:16:31.360 --> 0:16:34.000
<v Speaker 4>again doesn't sound great if you look at Justin Field's career,

0:16:34.000 --> 0:16:37.440
<v Speaker 4>It's probably the only positive ats Daddy has when.

0:16:37.320 --> 0:16:38.040
<v Speaker 3>You really dive into it.

0:16:38.080 --> 0:16:40.320
<v Speaker 4>He's just not a covering guy his whole career he's

0:16:40.360 --> 0:16:43.120
<v Speaker 4>just had a rough go of it, and looking at

0:16:43.120 --> 0:16:46.320
<v Speaker 4>this matchup, it really is kind of weird that the

0:16:46.320 --> 0:16:49.520
<v Speaker 4>public is so comfortable hammering this brown side even with

0:16:49.560 --> 0:16:53.000
<v Speaker 4>all the trades. Even before that we were talking on

0:16:53.040 --> 0:16:55.840
<v Speaker 4>our show, they were loving him then as a favorite,

0:16:56.560 --> 0:16:58.560
<v Speaker 4>I mean as an underdog. Now they're really still loving

0:16:58.600 --> 0:17:01.240
<v Speaker 4>him as a as a favorite. And this to me is

0:17:01.280 --> 0:17:03.880
<v Speaker 4>going to come down tons of pros, I know, professional groups.

0:17:03.880 --> 0:17:07.320
<v Speaker 4>When I come on the Jets, I mean again, I

0:17:07.359 --> 0:17:09.960
<v Speaker 4>get what we're doing it, but there I am also

0:17:10.119 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 4>a little weary of betting this one because we have

0:17:11.880 --> 0:17:14.359
<v Speaker 4>to remember these arghuman beings. How are they going to

0:17:14.440 --> 0:17:18.000
<v Speaker 4>respond to what just happened from their front office? Like

0:17:18.040 --> 0:17:21.080
<v Speaker 4>their front office basically just wave the white flag on

0:17:21.119 --> 0:17:24.159
<v Speaker 4>the season like they I agree with it too. I

0:17:24.160 --> 0:17:26.479
<v Speaker 4>mean some Jet fans are complaining. It's like, dude, you guys,

0:17:27.359 --> 0:17:29.679
<v Speaker 4>that was like our dream scenario. You dump two guys

0:17:29.720 --> 0:17:32.199
<v Speaker 4>that I don't want to say they're being overpaid, but

0:17:32.320 --> 0:17:34.080
<v Speaker 4>just they're not going to help you get to where

0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:35.400
<v Speaker 4>you need to be in the next two to three years.

0:17:35.400 --> 0:17:38.960
<v Speaker 4>You need to totally tear it down. So you know, Dallas,

0:17:39.119 --> 0:17:43.600
<v Speaker 4>horrible trade. In my opinion, Colt's very questionable. But you know,

0:17:43.760 --> 0:17:46.679
<v Speaker 4>for the Jets, I love the move. You're stocking up

0:17:46.680 --> 0:17:48.119
<v Speaker 4>in what should be really good drafts. Now to have

0:17:48.160 --> 0:17:50.679
<v Speaker 4>the front office to make the right picks, that's to

0:17:50.800 --> 0:17:54.080
<v Speaker 4>be determined. So just for this game chat, I like it.

0:17:54.080 --> 0:17:56.920
<v Speaker 4>It's really about the number though, this to me is

0:17:56.960 --> 0:17:58.200
<v Speaker 4>going to come down if you can still get the

0:17:58.200 --> 0:17:59.600
<v Speaker 4>plus two plus two and a half. You hear this,

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:01.920
<v Speaker 4>I would take the position on the Jets once it

0:18:01.960 --> 0:18:04.160
<v Speaker 4>gets blowed the two. I don't know how much I'm

0:18:04.160 --> 0:18:05.920
<v Speaker 4>gonna be invested in here until I know exactly who

0:18:05.920 --> 0:18:08.399
<v Speaker 4>the quarterback is going to be, and if that is

0:18:08.400 --> 0:18:11.399
<v Speaker 4>in fact justin fields, we can re re enter this

0:18:11.400 --> 0:18:13.840
<v Speaker 4>one on Sunday morning. Talk about putting in the contest,

0:18:13.880 --> 0:18:15.520
<v Speaker 4>but you said it right now, I'm betting into the

0:18:15.560 --> 0:18:17.399
<v Speaker 4>two and a half without even knowing who the quarterback is.

0:18:17.880 --> 0:18:19.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I am as well.

0:18:21.000 --> 0:18:25.680
<v Speaker 1>The flip side of the team sort of being frustrated

0:18:25.800 --> 0:18:30.040
<v Speaker 1>is you guys get a chance to prove themselves in

0:18:30.080 --> 0:18:34.680
<v Speaker 1>a wide open situation and put on tape for somebody

0:18:34.720 --> 0:18:37.679
<v Speaker 1>for next season how well they can play.

0:18:38.400 --> 0:18:38.720
<v Speaker 2>I don't.

0:18:39.000 --> 0:18:41.280
<v Speaker 1>I just I never buy the fact that guys are

0:18:41.320 --> 0:18:44.960
<v Speaker 1>going to stop competing. When you're a professional athlete getting paid,

0:18:45.240 --> 0:18:46.359
<v Speaker 1>you want to stay in the league.

0:18:46.760 --> 0:18:48.159
<v Speaker 2>This is your best chance to do it.

0:18:48.320 --> 0:18:50.320
<v Speaker 1>There's gonna be a guy who's getting a chance to start,

0:18:50.359 --> 0:18:51.920
<v Speaker 1>a cornerback who hasn't a chance to do that.

0:18:52.200 --> 0:18:54.719
<v Speaker 4>Oh, I'm in Like on the like Breese Hall, Briesaw

0:18:54.760 --> 0:18:56.399
<v Speaker 4>had a foot out the door, was almost on the

0:18:56.480 --> 0:18:59.120
<v Speaker 4>Kansas City Chiefs. Kn't it wake up today? And he's

0:18:59.160 --> 0:19:02.080
<v Speaker 4>still on the Jets. That's got to be weird mentally,

0:19:02.240 --> 0:19:04.479
<v Speaker 4>Like yeah, and I'm sure you'll get it back. He's

0:19:04.480 --> 0:19:06.199
<v Speaker 4>a professional. I just think of all of those snares

0:19:06.240 --> 0:19:09.160
<v Speaker 4>like that, the guys on this team, you know, you're

0:19:09.200 --> 0:19:13.119
<v Speaker 4>so close to being on a winning team. Obviously not everybody.

0:19:13.160 --> 0:19:14.960
<v Speaker 4>I mean some guys went the Dallas. That's a that's

0:19:14.960 --> 0:19:18.160
<v Speaker 4>a tough trade, but you know, I just I thought

0:19:18.160 --> 0:19:21.760
<v Speaker 4>it was really interesting that they didn't move Brisoll because

0:19:21.760 --> 0:19:23.760
<v Speaker 4>they apparently wanted a third and then take a fourth

0:19:23.760 --> 0:19:25.800
<v Speaker 4>and it's like, what are you doing, Jets?

0:19:25.840 --> 0:19:27.679
<v Speaker 3>Just sell it all, man, you're trying to lose here

0:19:27.680 --> 0:19:28.840
<v Speaker 3>and Bristol.

0:19:28.840 --> 0:19:31.240
<v Speaker 4>Again and some of it's back the Jets here. I

0:19:31.240 --> 0:19:32.760
<v Speaker 4>am so happy he's still on this team, they need

0:19:32.800 --> 0:19:35.159
<v Speaker 4>them offensively. He's by far their best weapon.

0:19:35.480 --> 0:19:38.119
<v Speaker 1>Well look, the flip side is Brisall keeps showing how

0:19:38.160 --> 0:19:39.560
<v Speaker 1>good he is, and next year he just gets a

0:19:39.560 --> 0:19:43.600
<v Speaker 1>bigger deal from somebody. Yeah, so you know, so yeah,

0:19:43.920 --> 0:19:46.440
<v Speaker 1>I hate to say it, but we're kind of on

0:19:46.480 --> 0:19:49.120
<v Speaker 1>the Jets Jacksonville at Houston.

0:19:49.160 --> 0:19:49.560
<v Speaker 2>Houston.

0:19:49.600 --> 0:19:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Look, on Tuesday we talked about wanting to wait on

0:19:52.320 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 1>this game until Houston was an underdog. Houston is an underdog.

0:19:55.520 --> 0:19:57.600
<v Speaker 1>It's one at Hard rocked that one and a half

0:19:57.680 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of other places.

0:20:00.160 --> 0:20:01.399
<v Speaker 2>We're just betting on the defense.

0:20:01.440 --> 0:20:04.080
<v Speaker 1>We're not betting on Davis Mills, who we would expect

0:20:04.119 --> 0:20:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Davis Mills is going to be a little bit better

0:20:08.760 --> 0:20:11.800
<v Speaker 1>because I mean, obviously he has limitations, but he's got

0:20:11.840 --> 0:20:13.480
<v Speaker 1>a full week of practice. He's not coming in and

0:20:13.520 --> 0:20:16.640
<v Speaker 1>then end at the beginning of the second quarter any

0:20:16.640 --> 0:20:18.720
<v Speaker 1>game plan that was built for somebody else entirely. So

0:20:20.440 --> 0:20:22.399
<v Speaker 1>I like, I still like Houston here a lot. I

0:20:22.480 --> 0:20:24.040
<v Speaker 1>like him as an underdog a lot.

0:20:24.320 --> 0:20:27.679
<v Speaker 3>Simon be patient. Hard Rock here in Jersey's already just

0:20:27.760 --> 0:20:28.600
<v Speaker 3>moved the plus two.

0:20:28.920 --> 0:20:32.000
<v Speaker 4>So really, yeah, so there's gonna be money coming on

0:20:32.000 --> 0:20:34.919
<v Speaker 4>the Jaguars. The Jags have owned the Texans again their

0:20:35.000 --> 0:20:37.439
<v Speaker 4>last couple of meetings. They've just even when CJ has

0:20:37.440 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 4>been the quarterback, they've kind of owned them. It's a

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:43.160
<v Speaker 4>really weird matchup, just divisional. When you talk about time,

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:45.640
<v Speaker 4>there's a couple of divisional games this week, you'll I'll

0:20:45.680 --> 0:20:48.120
<v Speaker 4>give out the trends. There's just trends that favors certain teams,

0:20:48.160 --> 0:20:48.920
<v Speaker 4>certain matchups.

0:20:48.920 --> 0:20:51.480
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, game, I'm going with you on.

0:20:51.760 --> 0:20:54.000
<v Speaker 4>I really love the Texans here, but I'm trying to

0:20:54.000 --> 0:20:57.040
<v Speaker 4>be patient, trying to avoid this if I can, because

0:20:57.080 --> 0:20:59.200
<v Speaker 4>it's like I'm not going to force this one unless

0:20:59.200 --> 0:21:00.359
<v Speaker 4>I'm getting really good numb or so.

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:02.720
<v Speaker 3>It's two at hard Rock right now.

0:21:02.760 --> 0:21:04.280
<v Speaker 4>A couple of books, like we say hard Rock's a

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:06.240
<v Speaker 4>short book, A couple of public books have already popped

0:21:06.240 --> 0:21:09.160
<v Speaker 4>two and a half, so this could get to three

0:21:09.200 --> 0:21:11.680
<v Speaker 4>by Sunday. Like I just see the public really coming

0:21:11.720 --> 0:21:13.679
<v Speaker 4>on this Jaguars team as the week goes along. Here

0:21:13.680 --> 0:21:16.639
<v Speaker 4>again it's it's Davis Mills, Like I get it, like

0:21:18.119 --> 0:21:20.720
<v Speaker 4>there should be a great spot for this Jaguars team,

0:21:20.760 --> 0:21:25.120
<v Speaker 4>and we love Houston defense. They can only do so much,

0:21:25.160 --> 0:21:27.879
<v Speaker 4>like we say, all the time. So I'm like you,

0:21:27.960 --> 0:21:30.520
<v Speaker 4>I still like Houston. I'm gonna be patient here, get

0:21:30.520 --> 0:21:33.119
<v Speaker 4>a better number. Like I said, this is moving up people.

0:21:33.119 --> 0:21:35.200
<v Speaker 4>You can get two and a half right now, key number.

0:21:35.200 --> 0:21:36.840
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna grab down Houston.

0:21:37.359 --> 0:21:38.240
<v Speaker 2>A lot of.

0:21:40.840 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 1>A lot of sort of be patient conversation right now because.

0:21:45.600 --> 0:21:46.800
<v Speaker 3>The numbers are moving against us.

0:21:46.800 --> 0:21:48.159
<v Speaker 4>I just don't want to take bad numbers here and

0:21:48.160 --> 0:21:49.959
<v Speaker 4>when we can get it looks like we're gonna get

0:21:49.960 --> 0:21:51.720
<v Speaker 4>some good numbers this weekend, right.

0:21:51.560 --> 0:21:53.199
<v Speaker 1>So if you can get I would say, you can

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:56.119
<v Speaker 1>get Houston two and a half. Get Houston two and

0:21:56.200 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 1>a half. I don't know that it'll go to three.

0:21:58.800 --> 0:22:01.800
<v Speaker 1>At some point, there's going to be like an aggressive

0:22:01.800 --> 0:22:05.080
<v Speaker 1>amount of buyback from professionals. I'm actually surprised as getting

0:22:05.080 --> 0:22:08.280
<v Speaker 1>as high as it is, knowing that most of the

0:22:08.280 --> 0:22:12.320
<v Speaker 1>people I'm talking to like Houston as an underdog and

0:22:12.359 --> 0:22:14.160
<v Speaker 1>we're just waiting for it to get to that number.

0:22:14.280 --> 0:22:18.080
<v Speaker 1>So the fact that it's still going up, what is

0:22:18.119 --> 0:22:18.720
<v Speaker 1>that saying to me?

0:22:18.800 --> 0:22:19.160
<v Speaker 2>Right now?

0:22:22.400 --> 0:22:25.000
<v Speaker 3>What do you mean the some pro promo pro money's

0:22:25.040 --> 0:22:28.320
<v Speaker 3>in this Jaguars side. I know well that you know

0:22:28.400 --> 0:22:30.840
<v Speaker 3>it's okay.

0:22:30.520 --> 0:22:31.719
<v Speaker 2>It's a little bit nerve wracking.

0:22:32.359 --> 0:22:34.280
<v Speaker 1>I like it when we're all when we're all aligned,

0:22:34.440 --> 0:22:37.639
<v Speaker 1>when everyone's together, it's like a group sweat.

0:22:40.320 --> 0:22:41.440
<v Speaker 2>New England at Tampa Bay.

0:22:41.880 --> 0:22:43.959
<v Speaker 3>There we go, finally some good games.

0:22:44.359 --> 0:22:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay is a two and a half point favorite.

0:22:46.520 --> 0:22:49.920
<v Speaker 1>This was Chad's choice. I got to tell you, I'm

0:22:49.960 --> 0:22:53.880
<v Speaker 1>a bit disappointed that it hasn't moved even a half

0:22:53.920 --> 0:22:58.560
<v Speaker 1>point to three. It's especially concerning because while the tickets

0:22:58.600 --> 0:23:02.600
<v Speaker 1>are on the box, even more money is on the Bucks,

0:23:02.600 --> 0:23:06.280
<v Speaker 1>and so that tells me that there is some wise

0:23:06.280 --> 0:23:09.160
<v Speaker 1>guy I love for Tampa Bay despite what we talked

0:23:09.160 --> 0:23:13.560
<v Speaker 1>about in sharp calls, and I kind of don't get it.

0:23:13.600 --> 0:23:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Like the Bucks have had extra rest, which means Baker

0:23:19.640 --> 0:23:24.119
<v Speaker 1>is hopefully cured of some of the ills that ailed him.

0:23:24.800 --> 0:23:27.520
<v Speaker 1>We don't know about Bucky Irving. We know that their

0:23:27.560 --> 0:23:31.560
<v Speaker 1>offensive aligned could be improved. We know there's going to

0:23:31.560 --> 0:23:34.879
<v Speaker 1>be a lot of passing in this game. Fine, but

0:23:34.960 --> 0:23:37.400
<v Speaker 1>I like the coaching matchup. I like the Bucks at home.

0:23:37.520 --> 0:23:39.919
<v Speaker 1>I like the Bucks coming off rest. I like fading

0:23:39.960 --> 0:23:45.719
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots when they're finally playing a competitive team on

0:23:45.800 --> 0:23:49.840
<v Speaker 1>the road, a more challenging team. Give me the other

0:23:49.880 --> 0:23:53.399
<v Speaker 1>side here, unless we're both aligned and the Bucks are

0:23:53.600 --> 0:23:54.920
<v Speaker 1>going to be the ones that we love.

0:23:56.040 --> 0:23:58.520
<v Speaker 3>Ye alone too. I'm just people be cautious here.

0:23:58.720 --> 0:24:00.920
<v Speaker 4>It actually has said three a couple of times this week,

0:24:00.960 --> 0:24:04.280
<v Speaker 4>and it's been bed away very quickly. So there is

0:24:05.000 --> 0:24:07.600
<v Speaker 4>some very smart money that's resisting this at three. So

0:24:07.640 --> 0:24:09.800
<v Speaker 4>it's letting you know that professionals are betting that this

0:24:09.840 --> 0:24:11.440
<v Speaker 4>will be a close game, where me and you are

0:24:11.440 --> 0:24:14.280
<v Speaker 4>betting that this won't be honestly, because we're taking two

0:24:14.320 --> 0:24:17.240
<v Speaker 4>and a half here. We know the deal with Baker,

0:24:17.320 --> 0:24:21.240
<v Speaker 4>right Like, he wins close games, usually by a field

0:24:21.240 --> 0:24:23.120
<v Speaker 4>goal at two and a half.

0:24:23.200 --> 0:24:24.879
<v Speaker 3>Again, like, I'm like you, I can't believe we're getting

0:24:24.880 --> 0:24:25.280
<v Speaker 3>away with this.

0:24:25.320 --> 0:24:28.159
<v Speaker 4>It feels like a very very nice number with a

0:24:28.240 --> 0:24:30.320
<v Speaker 4>quarterback that tends to play close games under.

0:24:30.119 --> 0:24:30.600
<v Speaker 3>A field goal.

0:24:30.720 --> 0:24:33.760
<v Speaker 4>So I get where the pros are coming from. I

0:24:33.800 --> 0:24:35.879
<v Speaker 4>get their position on this New England team. They've been

0:24:35.960 --> 0:24:38.800
<v Speaker 4>riding them a lot this season, they've been paying them out.

0:24:39.280 --> 0:24:41.919
<v Speaker 4>This is another true test spot for New England, right, Like,

0:24:42.000 --> 0:24:44.440
<v Speaker 4>this is a game where I think we're on alignment,

0:24:44.480 --> 0:24:45.680
<v Speaker 4>Like they should get rolled here.

0:24:47.000 --> 0:24:47.960
<v Speaker 3>A lot of questions.

0:24:47.720 --> 0:24:50.159
<v Speaker 4>About the health this Bucks team, Like Chad said, we

0:24:50.200 --> 0:24:53.240
<v Speaker 4>don't know you have Bucky Irvin's back. Chris Godwin still

0:24:53.240 --> 0:24:56.919
<v Speaker 4>hasn't practiced yet this week. Those are two huge pieces

0:24:56.960 --> 0:25:00.159
<v Speaker 4>to all pros to that offense that they need in

0:25:00.200 --> 0:25:04.080
<v Speaker 4>this game. So I'm hoping they come back and when

0:25:04.080 --> 0:25:05.840
<v Speaker 4>they get cleared, the number does move.

0:25:05.880 --> 0:25:07.800
<v Speaker 3>Maybe that's what's holding up the lot line moving here.

0:25:07.840 --> 0:25:11.159
<v Speaker 4>But yeah, just breaking this one down even you know,

0:25:11.760 --> 0:25:13.119
<v Speaker 4>not just gonna give Will Campbell too hard of a

0:25:13.160 --> 0:25:15.119
<v Speaker 4>time last week because you're going to again smiles Garrett

0:25:15.200 --> 0:25:16.879
<v Speaker 4>or two weeks ago. And then he kind of got

0:25:16.920 --> 0:25:19.560
<v Speaker 4>embarrassed last week against Atlanta, like Atlanta's line got a

0:25:19.560 --> 0:25:23.560
<v Speaker 4>ton of pressure against his doingland front. You expect the

0:25:23.600 --> 0:25:26.639
<v Speaker 4>Bucks defense and the blitz scheme they run, you know,

0:25:26.760 --> 0:25:29.520
<v Speaker 4>should get pressure against Drake Man. We've seen him kind

0:25:29.520 --> 0:25:31.320
<v Speaker 4>of that's the only thing that really struggles with when

0:25:31.359 --> 0:25:33.800
<v Speaker 4>he can't do what he's so great at, which is

0:25:33.840 --> 0:25:35.919
<v Speaker 4>getting outside the pocket and uses like as running.

0:25:35.640 --> 0:25:36.160
<v Speaker 3>For ten yards.

0:25:36.160 --> 0:25:39.640
<v Speaker 4>If you keep him contained, bottle him up, he'll struggle.

0:25:39.760 --> 0:25:41.480
<v Speaker 4>And we know that's what Todd Bowles likes to do.

0:25:41.560 --> 0:25:44.280
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I'm an ertzk I'm a huge hurts guy.

0:25:44.320 --> 0:25:46.920
<v Speaker 4>Every time hers struggles against this Bulls defense. It's because

0:25:46.920 --> 0:25:49.400
<v Speaker 4>he bottles over the five in the front. So I'm

0:25:49.440 --> 0:25:52.640
<v Speaker 4>with you, Chad. It's we'll see Sunday. Maybe I can,

0:25:52.840 --> 0:25:54.520
<v Speaker 4>I'll get more info and maybe I guy talk this

0:25:54.560 --> 0:25:56.000
<v Speaker 4>out of it. But as we say to it right now,

0:25:56.480 --> 0:25:59.000
<v Speaker 4>I bet heavily into the bucks. I love the Bucks.

0:25:59.320 --> 0:26:01.399
<v Speaker 4>I think it's a great number. And I think this

0:26:01.480 --> 0:26:04.200
<v Speaker 4>Patriots team is just like last week, a little overvalued,

0:26:04.240 --> 0:26:06.240
<v Speaker 4>and I think they're are valued here. There's probably should

0:26:06.240 --> 0:26:08.119
<v Speaker 4>be three and a half. It's two and a half.

0:26:08.160 --> 0:26:09.800
<v Speaker 4>Come on, we can't avoid this one.

0:26:09.800 --> 0:26:13.600
<v Speaker 1>It's too good Tampa Bay Box. They're going to be

0:26:13.640 --> 0:26:14.960
<v Speaker 1>in the final five. It's going to be hard to

0:26:15.000 --> 0:26:15.600
<v Speaker 1>keep them out.

0:26:15.800 --> 0:26:18.320
<v Speaker 4>That's oh my god. We'll see what I talked about

0:26:18.359 --> 0:26:20.280
<v Speaker 4>this weekend. Because I'm like, if I have a really

0:26:20.280 --> 0:26:22.840
<v Speaker 4>smart group being like day, this is a pay this

0:26:22.880 --> 0:26:25.160
<v Speaker 4>is a Patriot spot. You guys got to avoid this one. Okay,

0:26:25.200 --> 0:26:27.400
<v Speaker 4>maybe I can talk to it, but I'm so bet

0:26:27.400 --> 0:26:28.520
<v Speaker 4>into it, so are you. I'm with you.

0:26:28.600 --> 0:26:30.239
<v Speaker 3>I just cannot I can't see it not being one

0:26:30.240 --> 0:26:30.760
<v Speaker 3>of our five.

0:26:31.000 --> 0:26:31.400
<v Speaker 2>Simon.

0:26:32.440 --> 0:26:38.080
<v Speaker 1>You and I are the really smart group. That's the ballgame.

0:26:38.440 --> 0:26:40.679
<v Speaker 1>You and I are the smart group. They should be

0:26:40.720 --> 0:26:43.880
<v Speaker 1>worried about us. If they're betting the Patriots, they should

0:26:43.880 --> 0:26:46.800
<v Speaker 1>be like, oh shit, Chad and Simon. There was Chad

0:26:46.960 --> 0:26:48.919
<v Speaker 1>choice this week and Simon is bet into it. Like

0:26:49.320 --> 0:26:52.600
<v Speaker 1>we got to rethink that's how it should go here.

0:26:52.800 --> 0:26:56.560
<v Speaker 4>But you know the issue, it's us, there's public, the pros, everybody,

0:26:56.640 --> 0:26:58.240
<v Speaker 4>all of us are on Tampa. I've only heard a

0:26:58.240 --> 0:27:01.320
<v Speaker 4>couple of really smart guys, and like you said, this

0:27:01.400 --> 0:27:03.600
<v Speaker 4>number is hitting so much resistance at three.

0:27:04.480 --> 0:27:05.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm just making sure we're.

0:27:05.359 --> 0:27:07.480
<v Speaker 4>Not missing something here because it's interesting, like you said,

0:27:07.480 --> 0:27:08.520
<v Speaker 4>this has not gone to three.

0:27:08.640 --> 0:27:11.200
<v Speaker 3>I thought this would for sure be three by Thursday.

0:27:11.440 --> 0:27:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm actually a little shocked myself, all that, all

0:27:14.920 --> 0:27:18.359
<v Speaker 1>that alphatak aside, I'm a little shocked myself. You know what,

0:27:18.400 --> 0:27:22.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm not shocked about that we're talking about Arizona as

0:27:22.600 --> 0:27:26.040
<v Speaker 1>a six and a half point underdog at Seattle, and

0:27:26.080 --> 0:27:30.439
<v Speaker 1>that we are going to make the Arizona Cardinals as

0:27:30.520 --> 0:27:32.320
<v Speaker 1>six and a half point underdogs.

0:27:32.720 --> 0:27:37.840
<v Speaker 2>Our brass balls better the week.

0:27:38.560 --> 0:27:41.560
<v Speaker 3>You know what it takes, It takes brass balls.

0:27:44.000 --> 0:27:45.080
<v Speaker 2>We got what we wanted.

0:27:45.920 --> 0:27:51.119
<v Speaker 1>Jacoby Brissett is starting and in what has to be

0:27:52.720 --> 0:27:57.240
<v Speaker 1>the ballsiest. I feel like we're doing this in honor

0:27:57.320 --> 0:28:02.399
<v Speaker 1>of Jonathan Gannon, because Jonathan Gannon, in three different press

0:28:02.440 --> 0:28:06.680
<v Speaker 1>conferences over the past few days, has basically said they're

0:28:06.720 --> 0:28:11.040
<v Speaker 1>benching Kyler Murray. At first, he said they were doing

0:28:11.080 --> 0:28:21.639
<v Speaker 1>this because Jacoby Brissett was continuing to perform well and

0:28:21.680 --> 0:28:24.280
<v Speaker 1>there was also issues with Kyler Murray in.

0:28:24.119 --> 0:28:25.119
<v Speaker 2>The health bucket.

0:28:25.480 --> 0:28:28.280
<v Speaker 1>And then he said, we're doing it because Jacoby Brissett

0:28:28.359 --> 0:28:30.240
<v Speaker 1>is playing well and it's better for the offense to

0:28:30.280 --> 0:28:32.760
<v Speaker 1>be able to plan with consistency over the course of

0:28:32.800 --> 0:28:35.400
<v Speaker 1>the week. They have since put Kyler Murray on ir

0:28:35.840 --> 0:28:39.240
<v Speaker 1>to quote be able to focus on his rehab, which

0:28:39.320 --> 0:28:43.160
<v Speaker 1>leads to the question what has he been doing. He

0:28:43.200 --> 0:28:47.200
<v Speaker 1>hasn't played in a month. Is he going to focus

0:28:47.240 --> 0:28:50.400
<v Speaker 1>harder over the next four weeks? Like everything about this

0:28:50.440 --> 0:28:54.520
<v Speaker 1>and this was really telling, The Arizona Republic wrote, for

0:28:54.600 --> 0:28:57.160
<v Speaker 1>the first time in seven years, Kyler Murray is not

0:28:57.160 --> 0:29:00.280
<v Speaker 1>the starting quarterback of the Arizona Cardinals. The under lying

0:29:00.320 --> 0:29:04.000
<v Speaker 1>meaning there is that Jacoby Brissett is the number one

0:29:04.040 --> 0:29:07.040
<v Speaker 1>QB and Kyler Murray has been benched. And you can

0:29:07.040 --> 0:29:09.040
<v Speaker 1>read into it any way you want about him going

0:29:09.080 --> 0:29:12.080
<v Speaker 1>on IR. That could just be all right, We're going

0:29:12.160 --> 0:29:14.040
<v Speaker 1>to take some of the pressure off of this conversation.

0:29:14.720 --> 0:29:18.120
<v Speaker 1>But before he went on IR, the coach had basically said,

0:29:18.840 --> 0:29:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Brissett is going to give us the best chance.

0:29:20.520 --> 0:29:23.880
<v Speaker 2>We're going with Brissett. That's interesting to me.

0:29:25.200 --> 0:29:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Now the question becomes are we stepping in it with

0:29:29.040 --> 0:29:30.400
<v Speaker 1>the Cardinals.

0:29:29.880 --> 0:29:31.800
<v Speaker 2>Because is it?

0:29:31.800 --> 0:29:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Does it become too public to go with a dog

0:29:35.120 --> 0:29:37.560
<v Speaker 1>that just came off a big win with a quarterback

0:29:37.600 --> 0:29:40.800
<v Speaker 1>we know has been streaking after winning on Monday night.

0:29:41.880 --> 0:29:43.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I have some good stats to go against that,

0:29:43.800 --> 0:29:46.680
<v Speaker 4>and I will say that Kylier' stuff. I was taken

0:29:46.760 --> 0:29:48.680
<v Speaker 4>back by it. I can't believe they went this route,

0:29:48.720 --> 0:29:50.880
<v Speaker 4>but it makes sense because what we talked about how

0:29:50.960 --> 0:29:53.200
<v Speaker 4>much better the team has looked so much better with

0:29:53.320 --> 0:29:56.600
<v Speaker 4>Brisett running the offense, and the fact that if you

0:29:56.600 --> 0:29:58.440
<v Speaker 4>do put him in the spot right, put him on

0:29:58.520 --> 0:30:01.240
<v Speaker 4>IR maybe does save a little face and saves a

0:30:01.240 --> 0:30:02.680
<v Speaker 4>little bit of trade value for you for trying to

0:30:02.680 --> 0:30:04.920
<v Speaker 4>get rid of him in the offseason. And I think

0:30:04.960 --> 0:30:08.040
<v Speaker 4>anybody knows, even Arizona fans, they saw this week Kyler

0:30:08.160 --> 0:30:10.480
<v Speaker 4>was practicing like he was running around out there. He

0:30:10.680 --> 0:30:13.440
<v Speaker 4>was good enough to take reps as if he was

0:30:13.480 --> 0:30:14.560
<v Speaker 4>going to play last week.

0:30:15.520 --> 0:30:17.840
<v Speaker 3>He clearly not didn't have some type of stepback unless

0:30:17.840 --> 0:30:18.400
<v Speaker 3>we missed it right.

0:30:18.480 --> 0:30:20.520
<v Speaker 4>They know more than we do. It's the team inside

0:30:20.520 --> 0:30:24.880
<v Speaker 4>the building. But yeah, this is pretty shocking turn of event.

0:30:25.800 --> 0:30:27.960
<v Speaker 4>I saw Kyler Murray. I believe he's twenty eight years old.

0:30:28.640 --> 0:30:29.520
<v Speaker 4>Still not too late.

0:30:29.600 --> 0:30:32.960
<v Speaker 3>Brother, Go back to MLB, Go get them, see if

0:30:32.960 --> 0:30:36.120
<v Speaker 3>you can make a career out of it. It's crazy.

0:30:36.120 --> 0:30:37.760
<v Speaker 4>He's one of the greatest athletes ever to come out

0:30:37.800 --> 0:30:41.520
<v Speaker 4>of high school and just shows how football it's so mental.

0:30:41.640 --> 0:30:43.960
<v Speaker 4>And he never, to me ever got that aspect down.

0:30:44.160 --> 0:30:46.680
<v Speaker 4>Was never right mentally all the time in the world.

0:30:46.920 --> 0:30:50.480
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I will always remember that play against the Raiders.

0:30:51.320 --> 0:30:52.840
<v Speaker 4>I think it was a two point conversion. He ran

0:30:52.840 --> 0:30:55.840
<v Speaker 4>around the backfield for about twenty seconds and I think

0:30:55.840 --> 0:30:58.520
<v Speaker 4>it was like a total of like eighty yards. He scrampled, yeah, yeah,

0:30:58.680 --> 0:31:00.400
<v Speaker 4>and put it right back in the end for the

0:31:00.440 --> 0:31:03.600
<v Speaker 4>two pointers. So brutal, brutal, brual end to that saga.

0:31:03.680 --> 0:31:07.400
<v Speaker 4>But for this game, let's just look at Okay, like

0:31:07.520 --> 0:31:10.680
<v Speaker 4>Chad said, isn't this a bad spot.

0:31:11.000 --> 0:31:13.719
<v Speaker 3>It's a team that won outright, on the road as

0:31:13.760 --> 0:31:15.040
<v Speaker 3>a dog on Monday night.

0:31:15.680 --> 0:31:18.720
<v Speaker 4>It's actually not terrible statistically, and the next game is

0:31:18.720 --> 0:31:21.920
<v Speaker 4>an underdog. They're nine and seven straight up, ten and

0:31:22.000 --> 0:31:24.800
<v Speaker 4>six against the spread since two thousand, it's not terrible.

0:31:24.920 --> 0:31:28.360
<v Speaker 4>So like, okay, we got a little something there. Now,

0:31:28.800 --> 0:31:32.720
<v Speaker 4>this one really jumped out to me. Seahawks and this Cardinals.

0:31:32.760 --> 0:31:36.160
<v Speaker 4>I talked about divisional matchups. This is crazy chat and

0:31:36.320 --> 0:31:38.320
<v Speaker 4>very bizarre. Again, it doesn't matter because I guess these

0:31:38.320 --> 0:31:40.239
<v Speaker 4>two quarterbacks weren't even know all these teams when all

0:31:40.280 --> 0:31:45.560
<v Speaker 4>this one down. But since twenty twenty twenty two, Seahawks

0:31:45.640 --> 0:31:47.640
<v Speaker 4>eight and oh straight up seven to one against the

0:31:47.680 --> 0:31:50.400
<v Speaker 4>spread against this Cardinals team, they've just owned them in

0:31:50.440 --> 0:31:53.120
<v Speaker 4>this division, which again we say the time that that

0:31:53.200 --> 0:31:56.040
<v Speaker 4>does happen. But I was like, okay, let me find

0:31:56.040 --> 0:31:58.040
<v Speaker 4>some good Cardinal stats, because that's the side we want

0:31:58.080 --> 0:31:58.480
<v Speaker 4>to be on.

0:31:58.760 --> 0:32:00.240
<v Speaker 3>It's a lot of Seahawks love here.

0:32:00.360 --> 0:32:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, let's find some some bias here. Let's find a

0:32:03.200 --> 0:32:03.880
<v Speaker 1>way to make a start.

0:32:04.760 --> 0:32:07.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah yeah, well, just because it feels like this is

0:32:07.200 --> 0:32:08.360
<v Speaker 4>a great number for the Cardinal team.

0:32:08.360 --> 0:32:10.080
<v Speaker 3>Because I let's let's fit.

0:32:09.960 --> 0:32:12.240
<v Speaker 2>Some Let's find some stats that fit our narrative and

0:32:12.320 --> 0:32:13.280
<v Speaker 2>what we want to do.

0:32:13.840 --> 0:32:15.200
<v Speaker 3>Every week, they've been undervalued.

0:32:15.240 --> 0:32:17.080
<v Speaker 4>So they lost to Tennessee as a seven and a

0:32:17.120 --> 0:32:19.920
<v Speaker 4>half point favorite with Kyler. The next week they were

0:32:19.960 --> 0:32:22.040
<v Speaker 4>at the Colts, he was an eight and a half

0:32:22.120 --> 0:32:24.880
<v Speaker 4>point dog. What they lose by four or five points

0:32:24.880 --> 0:32:27.280
<v Speaker 4>in that game. The following week they are seven point

0:32:27.320 --> 0:32:30.880
<v Speaker 4>doll to Green Bay at home. They lose that game

0:32:30.880 --> 0:32:32.720
<v Speaker 4>by four points, and then we just saw with Dabas

0:32:32.720 --> 0:32:34.000
<v Speaker 4>there were three and a half points. So to me,

0:32:35.040 --> 0:32:38.880
<v Speaker 4>the book keeps Undervaluabersett. That's why it's been hitting. So

0:32:39.080 --> 0:32:41.200
<v Speaker 4>I was like, Okay, what kind of numbers do we

0:32:41.240 --> 0:32:44.000
<v Speaker 4>have here for teams making a trip out to Seattle

0:32:44.040 --> 0:32:46.320
<v Speaker 4>on a short week, which I think that favors the

0:32:46.320 --> 0:32:48.680
<v Speaker 4>type of quarterback per set is a veteran quarterback that

0:32:48.800 --> 0:32:51.280
<v Speaker 4>just seems like he's totally rhythm with this offense. This

0:32:51.400 --> 0:32:53.800
<v Speaker 4>is pretty wild since twenty twenty one teams in this

0:32:53.880 --> 0:32:57.080
<v Speaker 4>exact spot heading to Seattle on a short week there's

0:32:57.120 --> 0:33:00.200
<v Speaker 4>seven and one straight up and against the spread. So

0:33:00.880 --> 0:33:05.280
<v Speaker 4>we've talked about the lost art of this Seattle home

0:33:05.280 --> 0:33:07.960
<v Speaker 4>field advantage, right like we all think back to the

0:33:08.040 --> 0:33:10.000
<v Speaker 4>Legion of Doom, but these last couple of years has

0:33:10.000 --> 0:33:11.720
<v Speaker 4>not been so. And then even this year, I've already

0:33:11.720 --> 0:33:14.080
<v Speaker 4>gave up those stats. They lost to the forty Anders

0:33:14.120 --> 0:33:15.880
<v Speaker 4>and week went at home, Okay, we threw that one out.

0:33:16.280 --> 0:33:18.320
<v Speaker 4>Their defense gave up thirty eight points to thirty five

0:33:18.320 --> 0:33:21.600
<v Speaker 4>points to Baker at home against Tampa, like it's just

0:33:22.160 --> 0:33:24.640
<v Speaker 4>night and day. There's road splits are insane, how much

0:33:24.680 --> 0:33:28.760
<v Speaker 4>dominant their defenses and offenses on the road. So I

0:33:28.840 --> 0:33:30.440
<v Speaker 4>just like this one on a cell point for the

0:33:30.520 --> 0:33:33.080
<v Speaker 4>Seattle team. So me and Chad loves to plus six

0:33:33.080 --> 0:33:34.680
<v Speaker 4>and a half people, I think this will keep moving

0:33:34.720 --> 0:33:35.120
<v Speaker 4>as well.

0:33:35.360 --> 0:33:37.680
<v Speaker 3>Like I said the book, the publics they keep.

0:33:37.600 --> 0:33:40.240
<v Speaker 4>Undervaluing per set, so I can easily set in this

0:33:40.880 --> 0:33:43.760
<v Speaker 4>get up to seven. Just like last week we talked,

0:33:44.200 --> 0:33:45.680
<v Speaker 4>I like the Cardinals there plus two and a half.

0:33:45.720 --> 0:33:47.960
<v Speaker 4>I said, if you're if you're a patient, this will

0:33:47.960 --> 0:33:49.440
<v Speaker 4>get the three against Dallas, I got up to three

0:33:49.480 --> 0:33:51.360
<v Speaker 4>and a half. Because again people just do not believe

0:33:51.360 --> 0:33:54.240
<v Speaker 4>in Brussette. So look at the splits right now. Eighty

0:33:54.280 --> 0:33:55.840
<v Speaker 4>percent of the money, eighty percent of the bets right

0:33:55.880 --> 0:33:59.760
<v Speaker 4>now are on Seattle. So I just I think.

0:33:59.600 --> 0:34:01.440
<v Speaker 3>We'll get to seven. We're giving it out right now.

0:34:01.480 --> 0:34:03.120
<v Speaker 4>It's six and a half a hard rock I love

0:34:03.120 --> 0:34:06.200
<v Speaker 4>this bet, I love this spot, and yeah, it's always

0:34:06.200 --> 0:34:08.120
<v Speaker 4>a little scary ben again to arguably the best team,

0:34:08.360 --> 0:34:10.440
<v Speaker 4>hottest team in football right now, which Seattle is. But

0:34:10.960 --> 0:34:12.640
<v Speaker 4>we're just playing the market, playing the number, and we

0:34:12.880 --> 0:34:14.439
<v Speaker 4>think this team is overvalued right now.

0:34:14.920 --> 0:34:16.879
<v Speaker 1>I would definitely say wait on the seven. I think

0:34:16.880 --> 0:34:17.600
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna get there.

0:34:17.640 --> 0:34:18.160
<v Speaker 2>This one.

0:34:18.440 --> 0:34:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Unlike the other ones that we've talked about, this one

0:34:20.800 --> 0:34:24.239
<v Speaker 1>feels like it's it's trending in that way. There doesn't

0:34:24.600 --> 0:34:30.200
<v Speaker 1>seem to be much resistance from the bookmakers, and maybe

0:34:30.200 --> 0:34:31.920
<v Speaker 1>they know they'll get it when it gets to seven.

0:34:32.040 --> 0:34:35.400
<v Speaker 1>So I'm holding off. I haven't bet it yet. I

0:34:35.440 --> 0:34:37.560
<v Speaker 1>love it. If I'm not gonna get the six and

0:34:37.560 --> 0:34:39.319
<v Speaker 1>a half, if I'm not gonna get the seven, I'll

0:34:39.360 --> 0:34:40.280
<v Speaker 1>bet the six and a half.

0:34:40.840 --> 0:34:41.799
<v Speaker 2>But I'm definitely waiting on the.

0:34:41.760 --> 0:34:43.800
<v Speaker 4>Second to get There's two sevens right now in Jersey,

0:34:43.840 --> 0:34:46.440
<v Speaker 4>so there's gonna be sevens are gonna start popping eventually.

0:34:46.280 --> 0:34:49.239
<v Speaker 1>All right, so let's get that seven, all right? Quick

0:34:49.320 --> 0:34:50.920
<v Speaker 1>quick quick word.

0:34:51.480 --> 0:34:53.479
<v Speaker 2>From our sponsor, hard rock band.

0:34:53.840 --> 0:34:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Today's show is brought to you by our new presenting sponsor,

0:34:57.520 --> 0:35:00.680
<v Speaker 1>hard Rock Bet. This this is the golden time of

0:35:00.760 --> 0:35:03.800
<v Speaker 1>year when it's not just Pro football, NBA, college football,

0:35:03.840 --> 0:35:08.600
<v Speaker 1>college hoops, and hockey all share the stage. There's always

0:35:08.640 --> 0:35:10.640
<v Speaker 1>something to bet on. If you haven't tried your first

0:35:10.640 --> 0:35:13.560
<v Speaker 1>bet on hard Rock Bet yet, there's still time for

0:35:13.600 --> 0:35:15.360
<v Speaker 1>you to get one hundred and fifty dollars in bonus

0:35:15.400 --> 0:35:17.600
<v Speaker 1>bets if you win. Just place a five dollars bet

0:35:17.640 --> 0:35:19.800
<v Speaker 1>and if it hits, you get not only your winnings,

0:35:19.800 --> 0:35:22.320
<v Speaker 1>but one hundred and fifty dollars in extra bonus bets.

0:35:22.760 --> 0:35:25.279
<v Speaker 2>And if you're looking for an edge before you lock in,

0:35:25.400 --> 0:35:27.200
<v Speaker 2>check out the hard Rock Bet Stats Hub.

0:35:27.600 --> 0:35:31.000
<v Speaker 1>It's loaded with trends, streaks, and stats to help guy

0:35:31.239 --> 0:35:34.520
<v Speaker 1>your picks. Numbers don't lie, and neither does the data

0:35:34.640 --> 0:35:37.279
<v Speaker 1>in there. Check out the stats hub now and get

0:35:37.320 --> 0:35:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the edge and bet with confidence. The hard Rock Bet

0:35:40.400 --> 0:35:44.440
<v Speaker 1>sportsbook app is the only legal sports book for whenever

0:35:44.480 --> 0:35:47.680
<v Speaker 1>you're in Florida, and it's also live in Arizona, Ohio,

0:35:47.800 --> 0:35:52.560
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey, Indiana, Tennessee, Virginia, Illinois, and Colorado. Coming soon

0:35:52.600 --> 0:35:55.799
<v Speaker 1>to more states too, and hard Rock Bet offers new

0:35:55.800 --> 0:35:59.240
<v Speaker 1>promos every single day, so whenever you're listening, just open

0:35:59.320 --> 0:36:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the app and check out what you've got. Any day

0:36:02.520 --> 0:36:05.279
<v Speaker 1>of the week. Download the hard Rock Bet app and

0:36:05.360 --> 0:36:08.600
<v Speaker 1>make your first deposit payable in bonus bets, not a

0:36:08.640 --> 0:36:11.600
<v Speaker 1>cash offer offered by the Seminole Tribe of Florida. In Florida,

0:36:11.640 --> 0:36:14.759
<v Speaker 1>offered by the Seminal hard Rock Digital l C in

0:36:14.920 --> 0:36:17.719
<v Speaker 1>all other states. Must be twenty one and over and

0:36:17.760 --> 0:36:21.840
<v Speaker 1>physically present in Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, New Jersey, Ohio, Tennessee,

0:36:21.920 --> 0:36:22.760
<v Speaker 1>or Virginia to play.

0:36:23.080 --> 0:36:24.240
<v Speaker 2>Terms and conditions apply.

0:36:24.400 --> 0:36:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Concerned about gambling in Florida called eight three three play

0:36:28.560 --> 0:36:31.040
<v Speaker 1>wise in Indiana, a few or some of you know

0:36:31.040 --> 0:36:33.040
<v Speaker 1>as a gambling problem and wants help. Call one eight

0:36:33.080 --> 0:36:35.960
<v Speaker 1>hundred and nine with it. Gambling problem called one eight

0:36:36.040 --> 0:36:39.800
<v Speaker 1>hundred gambler. Arizona, Colorado, Illinois, New Jersey, Ohio, Tennessee, Virginia.

0:36:40.360 --> 0:36:43.319
<v Speaker 1>The Los Angeles Rams are bid are visiting the San

0:36:43.320 --> 0:36:44.879
<v Speaker 1>Francisco forty nine ers.

0:36:45.560 --> 0:36:46.960
<v Speaker 2>The line right now is four.

0:36:47.960 --> 0:36:51.080
<v Speaker 1>On Sunday, it was three on Tuesday, it was three

0:36:51.080 --> 0:36:55.160
<v Speaker 1>and a half. It's four at hard Rock, Honestly, it's

0:36:55.200 --> 0:37:00.640
<v Speaker 1>four and a half almost everywhere else, like the book

0:37:00.680 --> 0:37:05.919
<v Speaker 1>makers are telling us screw off, go ahead and bet

0:37:05.960 --> 0:37:06.560
<v Speaker 1>the Niners.

0:37:07.400 --> 0:37:08.879
<v Speaker 2>We dare you.

0:37:10.280 --> 0:37:13.839
<v Speaker 1>What's interesting to me is I am seeing a much

0:37:13.880 --> 0:37:17.920
<v Speaker 1>closer split on the betting percentages meaning the number of

0:37:17.960 --> 0:37:21.720
<v Speaker 1>tickets between each side, than I am on the money,

0:37:22.040 --> 0:37:25.920
<v Speaker 1>which is heavily in favor of the Rams. You know,

0:37:25.960 --> 0:37:28.000
<v Speaker 1>you said in sharp calls, whise guys have come in

0:37:28.040 --> 0:37:30.799
<v Speaker 1>on the Rams. My question is, was that all at

0:37:30.840 --> 0:37:34.440
<v Speaker 1>three and people are ignoring it at four? Do people

0:37:34.600 --> 0:37:37.960
<v Speaker 1>like the Niners at four and a half. What's our

0:37:38.000 --> 0:37:42.200
<v Speaker 1>opportunity here? Because I got an opinion and it makes

0:37:42.239 --> 0:37:43.000
<v Speaker 1>me scared.

0:37:45.000 --> 0:37:47.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I was a little as it in here because

0:37:47.440 --> 0:37:48.000
<v Speaker 3>we talked.

0:37:48.239 --> 0:37:50.080
<v Speaker 4>I took a position on the Rams minus three, and

0:37:50.120 --> 0:37:51.960
<v Speaker 4>I said, once I got a three and a half,

0:37:52.960 --> 0:37:53.520
<v Speaker 4>I want to been the.

0:37:53.520 --> 0:37:54.000
<v Speaker 3>Four nine ers.

0:37:54.000 --> 0:37:57.040
<v Speaker 4>And I was completely wrong, obviously missed it. Like you said,

0:37:57.080 --> 0:37:58.360
<v Speaker 4>it's been met up now to four to four and

0:37:58.400 --> 0:38:01.560
<v Speaker 4>a half. It is more of a mac Jones kind

0:38:01.560 --> 0:38:04.319
<v Speaker 4>of thing where maybe the line reflects that party will

0:38:04.320 --> 0:38:06.120
<v Speaker 4>be out another week. And this is kind of settling

0:38:06.120 --> 0:38:08.839
<v Speaker 4>into what a mac Jones line is, which is four

0:38:08.920 --> 0:38:11.160
<v Speaker 4>four and a half, which seems fair to me. And

0:38:12.239 --> 0:38:13.840
<v Speaker 4>you know when you want to dive into this game,

0:38:14.840 --> 0:38:17.279
<v Speaker 4>I think it's pretty simple. You just dive into head coaches, right,

0:38:17.280 --> 0:38:21.080
<v Speaker 4>because the quarterbacks keep changing, the pieces keep changing. But

0:38:21.120 --> 0:38:22.759
<v Speaker 4>when you really get to the basis of it, it's

0:38:22.800 --> 0:38:24.719
<v Speaker 4>two of the best offensive mines in all football going

0:38:24.719 --> 0:38:28.880
<v Speaker 4>incase each other. And it does make a difference where

0:38:29.120 --> 0:38:31.600
<v Speaker 4>you know which one is the underdog, and that tends

0:38:31.600 --> 0:38:33.319
<v Speaker 4>to be the one I usually take my position on,

0:38:33.440 --> 0:38:36.840
<v Speaker 4>So just dive in this matchup. I believe this is

0:38:36.840 --> 0:38:39.160
<v Speaker 4>the eighteenth time these two guys have met up and

0:38:39.239 --> 0:38:43.000
<v Speaker 4>matched in this type of game. Shanean obviously he's done

0:38:43.000 --> 0:38:45.200
<v Speaker 4>best in this matchup. He's eleven and seven against the

0:38:45.200 --> 0:38:47.840
<v Speaker 4>spread his exact games. But what I thought it was

0:38:47.880 --> 0:38:50.560
<v Speaker 4>so interesting was diving into what is mcveighman as a favorite,

0:38:50.840 --> 0:38:53.239
<v Speaker 4>because that, to me, isn't that terrible eleven and seven.

0:38:53.400 --> 0:38:55.040
<v Speaker 4>I thought it was honestly more because it seems like

0:38:55.080 --> 0:38:59.920
<v Speaker 4>Shanneon owns them so as a favorite with Stafford McVeigh

0:39:00.080 --> 0:39:03.800
<v Speaker 4>three and six against the spread and straight up against Shanahan,

0:39:03.920 --> 0:39:06.439
<v Speaker 4>and that's including this year where they lost outright at

0:39:06.440 --> 0:39:09.360
<v Speaker 4>home as an eight point favorite against McVeigh on that

0:39:09.440 --> 0:39:11.759
<v Speaker 4>Thursday night game, we talk all the time Thursday Night

0:39:11.840 --> 0:39:14.360
<v Speaker 4>are weird games like stuff like that can just happen.

0:39:15.800 --> 0:39:18.759
<v Speaker 4>But it's even more so worrying that this game is

0:39:18.800 --> 0:39:21.240
<v Speaker 4>on the road now and McVeigh on the road against

0:39:21.239 --> 0:39:24.080
<v Speaker 4>Shannan as a favorite. He's one in three straight up

0:39:24.080 --> 0:39:27.000
<v Speaker 4>and against the spread at this exact spot. So the

0:39:27.120 --> 0:39:29.960
<v Speaker 4>numbers keep telling you you don't want to go with

0:39:30.120 --> 0:39:33.480
<v Speaker 4>McVeigh here, and then you dive into even further when

0:39:33.480 --> 0:39:37.640
<v Speaker 4>he's on the road straight up in his career against

0:39:37.719 --> 0:39:40.279
<v Speaker 4>you know, Shanahan. This is the last eight times they've

0:39:40.280 --> 0:39:44.080
<v Speaker 4>played this exact game. He's won in seven McVeigh. So

0:39:44.120 --> 0:39:47.680
<v Speaker 4>you just struggled mightily against Shannan on the road in

0:39:47.719 --> 0:39:52.200
<v Speaker 4>these type of games. And you could say, well, that's

0:39:52.280 --> 0:39:54.080
<v Speaker 4>kind of flicky because look at all the different quarterbacks

0:39:54.120 --> 0:39:55.640
<v Speaker 4>through all the years. And that's my whole point though,

0:39:55.680 --> 0:39:58.400
<v Speaker 4>it's the coaches stay the same, the schemes stay the same.

0:39:58.920 --> 0:40:02.960
<v Speaker 4>So I I liked this a lot for this forty

0:40:03.040 --> 0:40:05.920
<v Speaker 4>nine ers team, And the only hesitation I have is

0:40:05.920 --> 0:40:08.040
<v Speaker 4>instead I gave out that I want to keep hammering

0:40:08.080 --> 0:40:11.960
<v Speaker 4>home about this team. They cannot handle success, they can't

0:40:11.960 --> 0:40:14.520
<v Speaker 4>handle winning. I remember two weeks ago where I said

0:40:14.520 --> 0:40:17.040
<v Speaker 4>you had to bet Houston against the forty nine and

0:40:17.040 --> 0:40:19.160
<v Speaker 4>one of those stupid stats I gave up that's still held.

0:40:19.080 --> 0:40:21.759
<v Speaker 3>True since Christmas of twenty twenty three.

0:40:22.239 --> 0:40:25.120
<v Speaker 4>This is from our guy Evan forty nine ers one

0:40:25.120 --> 0:40:27.759
<v Speaker 4>in fourteen against the spread after a straight up win,

0:40:28.400 --> 0:40:34.080
<v Speaker 4>one in fourteen. So it's like this insane pattern. Even

0:40:34.120 --> 0:40:37.239
<v Speaker 4>more so, they're oh and three straight up after a

0:40:37.280 --> 0:40:40.239
<v Speaker 4>win when they're a dog in the next game. So

0:40:40.280 --> 0:40:42.120
<v Speaker 4>they're oh and three against the spread and straight up

0:40:42.120 --> 0:40:44.920
<v Speaker 4>as a dog in this exact spot since Christmas. And

0:40:44.960 --> 0:40:48.160
<v Speaker 4>this is just a weird thing where whatever it is,

0:40:48.320 --> 0:40:50.920
<v Speaker 4>this team doesn't handle the wins and they get over

0:40:51.040 --> 0:40:52.839
<v Speaker 4>valued by the books and they have a letdown. So

0:40:53.320 --> 0:40:54.799
<v Speaker 4>that to me might be the reason these pros are

0:40:54.840 --> 0:40:57.160
<v Speaker 4>coming on this Rams team. The trends point to it.

0:40:57.160 --> 0:41:00.000
<v Speaker 4>It's like every time this fourgners team has a big win,

0:41:00.120 --> 0:41:03.320
<v Speaker 4>especially on the road, they've come home they've laid total eggs.

0:41:03.360 --> 0:41:05.960
<v Speaker 4>And that's happened a couple of times already this season.

0:41:06.080 --> 0:41:10.319
<v Speaker 4>So I really do like the Niners here getting im

0:41:10.360 --> 0:41:12.879
<v Speaker 4>probably talking myself off of it, but I'm not going

0:41:12.880 --> 0:41:14.319
<v Speaker 4>to force it in at four. I won't take it,

0:41:14.360 --> 0:41:16.520
<v Speaker 4>but at four and a half, I'm taking forty nine

0:41:16.560 --> 0:41:18.720
<v Speaker 4>ers there once. Once you get across that key number

0:41:19.080 --> 0:41:20.600
<v Speaker 4>a four and a half, I have to take it,

0:41:20.680 --> 0:41:23.600
<v Speaker 4>especially where all those trends show mc veigh's struggles on

0:41:23.640 --> 0:41:26.120
<v Speaker 4>the road against Shanahan and this exact spot as a favorite.

0:41:26.280 --> 0:41:29.040
<v Speaker 4>When people are under you, under betting or not believing

0:41:29.040 --> 0:41:32.000
<v Speaker 4>the Niners team, they tend to shine in these exact games.

0:41:32.440 --> 0:41:37.359
<v Speaker 1>Listen to me, Listen, don't talk yourself out of it.

0:41:38.280 --> 0:41:42.160
<v Speaker 1>The Niners are the right side here, last fourteen games

0:41:42.160 --> 0:41:47.680
<v Speaker 1>in this rivalry, the favorite one to thirteen.

0:41:47.400 --> 0:41:52.320
<v Speaker 2>Against the spread. Wow, the Niners are the side.

0:41:52.640 --> 0:41:58.160
<v Speaker 1>We knew it on Tuesday. It's to me, the line

0:41:58.200 --> 0:42:00.239
<v Speaker 1>is moving not because of the trendsit. It's moving because

0:42:00.239 --> 0:42:03.759
<v Speaker 1>of the Niners defense. They're just so banged up and

0:42:03.800 --> 0:42:06.800
<v Speaker 1>they're moving. It's moving because of the Rams rush defense,

0:42:06.960 --> 0:42:09.720
<v Speaker 1>which has really become a lead. And if you're looking

0:42:09.719 --> 0:42:13.800
<v Speaker 1>at this game schematically, the best opportunity that the Niners

0:42:13.840 --> 0:42:17.720
<v Speaker 1>have is to get the ball into McCaffrey's hands thirty

0:42:17.760 --> 0:42:21.319
<v Speaker 1>five times, as they've been doing. But Matt Jones has

0:42:21.320 --> 0:42:24.760
<v Speaker 1>been showing up and he's doing exactly what Kyle Shanahan needs.

0:42:24.640 --> 0:42:25.040
<v Speaker 2>Him to do.

0:42:26.120 --> 0:42:29.080
<v Speaker 1>The number is way too big. It just it shouldn't

0:42:29.080 --> 0:42:32.279
<v Speaker 1>be four and a half points. And so that's the

0:42:32.360 --> 0:42:40.120
<v Speaker 1>side simon. You and I we have confidence niners. Niners

0:42:40.120 --> 0:42:42.920
<v Speaker 1>are the side no fear. I don't care what anyone

0:42:42.960 --> 0:42:46.080
<v Speaker 1>else is saying. Here's one of them that I do

0:42:46.160 --> 0:42:49.920
<v Speaker 1>have some concerns. This one is at two and a half.

0:42:50.200 --> 0:42:54.560
<v Speaker 1>It's the Green Bay Packers hosting the Philadelphia Eagles. It's

0:42:54.600 --> 0:42:56.839
<v Speaker 1>actually it was a two and a half, it's moved

0:42:56.840 --> 0:43:01.360
<v Speaker 1>down a bit to two. You and I both talked

0:43:01.360 --> 0:43:04.040
<v Speaker 1>about it on Sunday at two and a half. You

0:43:04.320 --> 0:43:06.560
<v Speaker 1>said you were hearing a lot of rumblings about the

0:43:06.600 --> 0:43:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Eagles at two. I don't know if anyone's going to

0:43:09.680 --> 0:43:13.640
<v Speaker 1>get to watch this game because it's a Monday night game,

0:43:13.719 --> 0:43:19.680
<v Speaker 1>and who knows where the YouTube TV ESPN standoff is

0:43:19.840 --> 0:43:20.520
<v Speaker 1>going to end.

0:43:21.280 --> 0:43:24.000
<v Speaker 2>But like shutdowns, could this be.

0:43:24.120 --> 0:43:29.640
<v Speaker 1>The moment when it's two massive fan bases that are,

0:43:30.760 --> 0:43:34.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, bringing the cable giant and the streaming TV

0:43:34.960 --> 0:43:41.920
<v Speaker 1>giant to its knees? Man Tricky, I don't think you

0:43:42.000 --> 0:43:46.840
<v Speaker 1>mentioned the Eagles and sharp calls, but I'm still going

0:43:46.920 --> 0:43:48.560
<v Speaker 1>to go with the Packers.

0:43:49.160 --> 0:43:49.719
<v Speaker 3>I am too.

0:43:49.880 --> 0:43:51.640
<v Speaker 4>I didn't mention it much because it is a little split,

0:43:51.680 --> 0:43:54.040
<v Speaker 4>but I would say, obviously most pros are on Green Bay.

0:43:54.120 --> 0:43:58.879
<v Speaker 4>But when I dove back into why my model had

0:43:58.880 --> 0:44:00.520
<v Speaker 4>this so off, like I said, I think I had

0:44:00.520 --> 0:44:06.080
<v Speaker 4>it at green Bay minus one. Maybe we're undervaluing Tucker

0:44:06.120 --> 0:44:09.080
<v Speaker 4>Craft and what he means this Green Bay team and

0:44:09.080 --> 0:44:11.040
<v Speaker 4>how big of a loss that is for this offense.

0:44:11.080 --> 0:44:13.600
<v Speaker 4>But I can't get over how great of a spot

0:44:13.640 --> 0:44:15.600
<v Speaker 4>this is for the Packers. So maybe I'll have a

0:44:15.640 --> 0:44:17.719
<v Speaker 4>stronger opinion comes today morning, I can give talk more

0:44:17.719 --> 0:44:19.640
<v Speaker 4>about There's this other games I've bet more into.

0:44:20.360 --> 0:44:21.840
<v Speaker 3>I just don't know what to do with this one.

0:44:22.080 --> 0:44:24.160
<v Speaker 4>It's another game where it might be in the twenties,

0:44:24.440 --> 0:44:26.200
<v Speaker 4>might be a little snowy on Monday night.

0:44:26.600 --> 0:44:27.839
<v Speaker 3>This could be affected by the weather.

0:44:28.600 --> 0:44:32.040
<v Speaker 4>And you know, if there's no Golden the Rooki receiver,

0:44:32.080 --> 0:44:34.840
<v Speaker 4>and now there's no Tucker Craft, it's got to be

0:44:34.880 --> 0:44:37.280
<v Speaker 4>an issue, right, Like a passing attack needs its weapons,

0:44:37.360 --> 0:44:39.719
<v Speaker 4>especially the team like Green Bay with the it's just

0:44:39.760 --> 0:44:42.640
<v Speaker 4>an unnamed receiving core. Right, it's a rotation of guys.

0:44:43.440 --> 0:44:45.040
<v Speaker 4>Now you're taking away the number one tight end and

0:44:45.080 --> 0:44:47.600
<v Speaker 4>the number two receiver. That's got to effect jord Love

0:44:47.680 --> 0:44:51.520
<v Speaker 4>at some aspects. So yeah, for me, I'm still betting

0:44:51.480 --> 0:44:54.560
<v Speaker 4>at Green Bay, especially at minus two, but I don't

0:44:54.840 --> 0:44:56.720
<v Speaker 4>feel as strongly as I did about it on Sunday

0:44:56.760 --> 0:44:58.000
<v Speaker 4>night or let alone on Tuesday.

0:44:58.680 --> 0:45:00.239
<v Speaker 2>I don't feel as strongly about it either.

0:45:00.280 --> 0:45:01.759
<v Speaker 1>I think there's been a lot of movement this week

0:45:01.800 --> 0:45:03.920
<v Speaker 1>that has made me feel better about games like the

0:45:04.000 --> 0:45:07.359
<v Speaker 1>nine Ers. I'm still bought into the box, the Cardinals,

0:45:07.480 --> 0:45:10.000
<v Speaker 1>the Jets are really interesting to me. I know we

0:45:10.120 --> 0:45:13.240
<v Speaker 1>like the Broncos too, so I do think we're starting

0:45:13.280 --> 0:45:14.960
<v Speaker 1>to find consensus on a bunch of games.

0:45:15.360 --> 0:45:16.800
<v Speaker 3>I don't know how you've missed Miami.

0:45:20.200 --> 0:45:23.839
<v Speaker 1>On Tuesday, we talked about liking Miami and it being

0:45:23.920 --> 0:45:24.480
<v Speaker 1>the side.

0:45:24.760 --> 0:45:26.879
<v Speaker 4>Yeah it that's how you should know. It's the right

0:45:27.080 --> 0:45:28.960
<v Speaker 4>that's the right bet for us and probably should.

0:45:28.680 --> 0:45:31.120
<v Speaker 3>Be one of our five comes Sunday. All right, let

0:45:31.160 --> 0:45:32.400
<v Speaker 3>me let me hit you some numbers.

0:45:32.400 --> 0:45:35.640
<v Speaker 2>Talk me into it. Hold on here, but talk me

0:45:35.640 --> 0:45:36.040
<v Speaker 2>into it.

0:45:36.120 --> 0:45:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Give me the numbers, but then tell me your hypothesis

0:45:40.360 --> 0:45:40.839
<v Speaker 1>for the game.

0:45:42.280 --> 0:45:44.840
<v Speaker 4>I just love this running matchup. I think against his

0:45:44.840 --> 0:45:47.120
<v Speaker 4>Bill's defense favors it's Miami team a lot of ways.

0:45:47.880 --> 0:45:49.279
<v Speaker 3>And it's also a unique spot.

0:45:49.280 --> 0:45:52.920
<v Speaker 4>Whether it's Tua at home with a big number, who

0:45:53.400 --> 0:45:56.400
<v Speaker 4>always covers for us in this exact spot, except.

0:45:56.000 --> 0:45:59.399
<v Speaker 2>Against the Ravens Thursday night, like a weekd that.

0:45:59.400 --> 0:46:01.399
<v Speaker 4>Was different though that wasn't a midday in the sun

0:46:01.440 --> 0:46:04.879
<v Speaker 4>type of game. That was a primetime late game. Look,

0:46:04.880 --> 0:46:06.600
<v Speaker 4>we got burned by that one, no doubt. I'm trying

0:46:06.640 --> 0:46:06.840
<v Speaker 4>not to.

0:46:06.880 --> 0:46:09.600
<v Speaker 3>Let that affect us in this game. Here, I'll hit

0:46:09.640 --> 0:46:10.600
<v Speaker 3>you with the numbers real quick.

0:46:10.600 --> 0:46:12.160
<v Speaker 2>All right, hit me with the numbers, Josh.

0:46:12.040 --> 0:46:15.200
<v Speaker 3>All, let's start with him, the Goat.

0:46:15.640 --> 0:46:17.680
<v Speaker 4>We all know how great he is, but on the

0:46:17.760 --> 0:46:20.000
<v Speaker 4>road is more than a touchdown favorite.

0:46:20.320 --> 0:46:21.319
<v Speaker 3>I think we could both agree.

0:46:21.320 --> 0:46:23.319
<v Speaker 4>It feels like he's not that great, And when you

0:46:23.360 --> 0:46:25.000
<v Speaker 4>dive into the numbers, it proves out he's two and

0:46:25.120 --> 0:46:27.160
<v Speaker 4>six against the Spring in his career on the road

0:46:27.200 --> 0:46:28.600
<v Speaker 4>as a seven a half point favorite or more.

0:46:29.120 --> 0:46:32.200
<v Speaker 3>Okay, not the biggest deal. All right, Well, let's dive

0:46:32.239 --> 0:46:32.799
<v Speaker 3>into some more.

0:46:34.000 --> 0:46:37.239
<v Speaker 4>Dolphins got blown out last week, right, they were a

0:46:37.280 --> 0:46:40.200
<v Speaker 4>dog of seven points or more. They lost by twenty

0:46:40.200 --> 0:46:44.080
<v Speaker 4>points or more last week in this exact spot. Those

0:46:44.120 --> 0:46:46.960
<v Speaker 4>type of teams and a bounce back spot fifteen and

0:46:47.040 --> 0:46:49.799
<v Speaker 4>seven against the spread. So look, we already knew it's

0:46:49.800 --> 0:46:52.239
<v Speaker 4>gonna be a by low on this Dolphins team because

0:46:52.239 --> 0:46:53.600
<v Speaker 4>they just got embarrassed and blown out.

0:46:54.000 --> 0:46:58.680
<v Speaker 1>But every week, every week is by low on the Dolphins.

0:46:58.960 --> 0:47:01.440
<v Speaker 4>Now, I mean we high last week after they blew

0:47:01.480 --> 0:47:03.520
<v Speaker 4>out Atlanta. That was again that was on us. We

0:47:03.520 --> 0:47:07.320
<v Speaker 4>should that we misread that one two of this week,

0:47:07.920 --> 0:47:10.799
<v Speaker 4>he just got embarrassed. This is his back to back,

0:47:10.960 --> 0:47:13.640
<v Speaker 4>So his second home stand game, which you know we

0:47:13.680 --> 0:47:16.560
<v Speaker 4>always talk we love to at home or indoors in

0:47:16.600 --> 0:47:20.160
<v Speaker 4>controlled environments, to a at home in this exact spot,

0:47:20.200 --> 0:47:22.479
<v Speaker 4>So his second straight home game in his career. He's

0:47:22.520 --> 0:47:25.920
<v Speaker 4>ten and two straight up, nine and three against the spread.

0:47:26.200 --> 0:47:28.440
<v Speaker 4>Oh but Chad, what's you like as an underdog in

0:47:28.440 --> 0:47:29.200
<v Speaker 4>this exact spot?

0:47:29.360 --> 0:47:31.640
<v Speaker 2>Oh, Tony Simon three and oh.

0:47:31.560 --> 0:47:34.360
<v Speaker 4>Straight up and against the spread, and this exact spot

0:47:34.560 --> 0:47:36.359
<v Speaker 4>to at home and the back to back game as

0:47:36.360 --> 0:47:39.799
<v Speaker 4>an underdog. So I kept diving into it, and it's like,

0:47:40.840 --> 0:47:42.480
<v Speaker 4>is there more stats I can pull from the good

0:47:42.520 --> 0:47:44.359
<v Speaker 4>chat to try to flip on this one? I got

0:47:44.400 --> 0:47:49.440
<v Speaker 4>another one for you to at home twenty six and

0:47:49.520 --> 0:47:53.680
<v Speaker 4>eleven straight up, and when they lose and they have

0:47:53.719 --> 0:47:56.520
<v Speaker 4>a following game again at home. He is three and

0:47:56.640 --> 0:47:59.880
<v Speaker 4>oh straight up and against the spread, covering those games

0:48:00.120 --> 0:48:04.960
<v Speaker 4>by fifteen points per game. That's and insanes that he

0:48:05.040 --> 0:48:07.640
<v Speaker 4>basically if he gets embarrassed or lose at home, he's

0:48:07.680 --> 0:48:08.920
<v Speaker 4>dominating that second.

0:48:08.680 --> 0:48:09.319
<v Speaker 3>Game at home.

0:48:09.360 --> 0:48:12.239
<v Speaker 4>And we talked, we just we've been profitable betting to

0:48:12.320 --> 0:48:14.680
<v Speaker 4>it at home in that hot sun whatever it is,

0:48:15.160 --> 0:48:17.759
<v Speaker 4>all the new shoe and the naonce it's true, like

0:48:18.280 --> 0:48:20.640
<v Speaker 4>teams get burned out, they wear on. Tool always comes

0:48:20.640 --> 0:48:22.640
<v Speaker 4>back and covers these big spreads in the second half

0:48:22.680 --> 0:48:24.879
<v Speaker 4>at him. So I just wanted to bring that game

0:48:24.960 --> 0:48:26.480
<v Speaker 4>up as a game you're going to need to take

0:48:26.480 --> 0:48:29.279
<v Speaker 4>a little closer look at I'm betting into it. I

0:48:29.280 --> 0:48:31.480
<v Speaker 4>don't feel great about slamming the table about Tua and

0:48:31.520 --> 0:48:34.040
<v Speaker 4>this Miami team, but this is a great matchup for

0:48:34.080 --> 0:48:36.560
<v Speaker 4>their offense, and I think defensively as great as Josh

0:48:36.600 --> 0:48:39.960
<v Speaker 4>Allen is and that offense is Cook is banged up.

0:48:40.040 --> 0:48:41.440
<v Speaker 4>He's been on the injury report this week and he's

0:48:41.440 --> 0:48:44.000
<v Speaker 4>not been practicing. I think I'll be interesting if their

0:48:44.040 --> 0:48:46.600
<v Speaker 4>number one running back is Ray Davis. Even though Miami

0:48:46.640 --> 0:48:49.160
<v Speaker 4>doesn't have a good front, that's a huge deal. Cook

0:48:49.239 --> 0:48:51.279
<v Speaker 4>is like a top five, top ten running back of

0:48:51.280 --> 0:48:53.759
<v Speaker 4>football right now. So that's another reason I think this

0:48:53.840 --> 0:48:57.720
<v Speaker 4>numbers dropped a little bit. Like again, there's no public

0:48:57.840 --> 0:49:01.120
<v Speaker 4>or professional level. I've honestly found this Miami team. It's

0:49:01.160 --> 0:49:03.439
<v Speaker 4>just us, buddy, and that makes me love it even more.

0:49:03.640 --> 0:49:05.680
<v Speaker 4>Everyone's left them for dead. And this the exact spot

0:49:05.719 --> 0:49:08.239
<v Speaker 4>we got to be buying this Miami Dolphins team. I

0:49:08.239 --> 0:49:09.200
<v Speaker 4>know we need to get out of here. I'll be

0:49:09.280 --> 0:49:12.560
<v Speaker 4>quick on the next one Detroit. The pros are all

0:49:12.560 --> 0:49:14.560
<v Speaker 4>over this Washingt team. This number has been bet down

0:49:14.560 --> 0:49:15.680
<v Speaker 4>now to seven and a half.

0:49:16.600 --> 0:49:17.080
<v Speaker 3>I get it.

0:49:17.120 --> 0:49:19.760
<v Speaker 4>I'm missing something. This might be a huge blind spot

0:49:19.800 --> 0:49:22.640
<v Speaker 4>once again. But I have to trust Campbell, just like

0:49:22.680 --> 0:49:25.760
<v Speaker 4>I did last week, Campbell and Golf on these spots.

0:49:26.080 --> 0:49:28.719
<v Speaker 3>I'm so freaking proudy man. That's a way to show up.

0:49:28.920 --> 0:49:29.880
<v Speaker 3>You talk about pressure.

0:49:29.920 --> 0:49:30.880
<v Speaker 2>We living pressure.

0:49:31.160 --> 0:49:32.440
<v Speaker 3>That's what we freaking thrive.

0:49:32.560 --> 0:49:34.879
<v Speaker 2>You did it again. You always find a way to win.

0:49:35.160 --> 0:49:36.200
<v Speaker 2>We're testing for this.

0:49:36.719 --> 0:49:37.640
<v Speaker 3>Just stay the course.

0:49:38.080 --> 0:49:39.680
<v Speaker 4>I've been betting it for so long, We've been making

0:49:39.719 --> 0:49:40.560
<v Speaker 4>money off for so long.

0:49:40.800 --> 0:49:41.440
<v Speaker 3>What do we do here?

0:49:41.440 --> 0:49:43.520
<v Speaker 4>We're trying to go against our instinct here, and I

0:49:43.560 --> 0:49:45.399
<v Speaker 4>know it's the very public side. It's probably the most

0:49:45.440 --> 0:49:46.960
<v Speaker 4>public side of the week. So maybe that's how we

0:49:46.960 --> 0:49:49.279
<v Speaker 4>all avoid it. It's so public, maybe we can tuck

0:49:49.280 --> 0:49:51.759
<v Speaker 4>ourselves out of it. But Golf and Campbell after a

0:49:51.800 --> 0:49:54.800
<v Speaker 4>straight up loss twenty one to eight against the spread,

0:49:55.280 --> 0:49:58.279
<v Speaker 4>like it's just what they do. They are on a

0:49:58.360 --> 0:50:02.839
<v Speaker 4>twelve game covering streak after losing the previous game right now,

0:50:03.200 --> 0:50:05.320
<v Speaker 4>So every time they've lost, they've come back and covered

0:50:05.320 --> 0:50:08.120
<v Speaker 4>the flying game for twelve straight times. So I just

0:50:08.200 --> 0:50:11.560
<v Speaker 4>wanted to bringing them up real quick. I know that

0:50:12.440 --> 0:50:13.719
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna get a ton of shit from a lot

0:50:13.760 --> 0:50:15.880
<v Speaker 4>of pros this upcoming week at the book. You know,

0:50:15.920 --> 0:50:18.920
<v Speaker 4>I'm on this public side once again because again they're

0:50:18.960 --> 0:50:20.919
<v Speaker 4>taking a victory lap in the Vikings. They were totally right,

0:50:21.280 --> 0:50:22.600
<v Speaker 4>tertoughly terrible read by me.

0:50:23.239 --> 0:50:27.000
<v Speaker 1>I do worry They've got a lot of developing injuries

0:50:28.360 --> 0:50:31.200
<v Speaker 1>in their offense, specifically in the offensive line that is

0:50:31.239 --> 0:50:33.759
<v Speaker 1>impacting their ability to block and.

0:50:33.760 --> 0:50:35.840
<v Speaker 2>Their rush game. And I talked about this on Tuesday.

0:50:36.160 --> 0:50:37.000
<v Speaker 2>I love Detroit.

0:50:37.280 --> 0:50:39.719
<v Speaker 1>Last week too, they were Chad's choice as a big

0:50:39.800 --> 0:50:42.239
<v Speaker 1>number against the Vikings because I had no faith in

0:50:42.360 --> 0:50:44.719
<v Speaker 1>JJ McCarthy and I had all the faith in the

0:50:44.719 --> 0:50:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Detroit Lions ability to run the ball against Minnesota Vikings

0:50:48.120 --> 0:50:51.400
<v Speaker 1>rush defense that hasn't been playing well this year. The

0:50:51.440 --> 0:50:55.239
<v Speaker 1>problem is, and I noted this on Tuesday, what we

0:50:55.280 --> 0:50:57.960
<v Speaker 1>saw on Sunday was a lack of success rate that

0:50:58.040 --> 0:51:00.000
<v Speaker 1>allows them to get to a position on third down

0:51:00.120 --> 0:51:02.799
<v Speaker 1>where they can execute. You could say that they will

0:51:02.800 --> 0:51:05.000
<v Speaker 1>do better against the Commanders in this spot because their

0:51:05.000 --> 0:51:08.839
<v Speaker 1>defense is just terrible. But the line's also been having

0:51:08.840 --> 0:51:11.480
<v Speaker 1>offensive line issues and some injuries on that offensive line.

0:51:11.560 --> 0:51:13.399
<v Speaker 1>So I think that has as much do with sort

0:51:13.400 --> 0:51:15.360
<v Speaker 1>of this line moving from what was it eight and

0:51:15.400 --> 0:51:17.520
<v Speaker 1>a half to eight down to seven and a half

0:51:17.800 --> 0:51:21.600
<v Speaker 1>as it does with fading the Lions overall because of

0:51:21.680 --> 0:51:23.839
<v Speaker 1>what happened last week.

0:51:24.280 --> 0:51:26.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, the biggest thing winning back Detrait this year. It's

0:51:27.120 --> 0:51:29.279
<v Speaker 4>very simple when you dive into numbers. They are at

0:51:29.280 --> 0:51:31.960
<v Speaker 4>twenty fifth and third down conversion rate and their eighteenth

0:51:32.000 --> 0:51:35.200
<v Speaker 4>and first downs but can't convert.

0:51:35.400 --> 0:51:37.160
<v Speaker 3>They can't, but this is the definition.

0:51:37.280 --> 0:51:39.480
<v Speaker 4>But get right where they're playing a defense at in

0:51:39.480 --> 0:51:42.120
<v Speaker 4>red zone efficency, they're twenty seventh in the league. They

0:51:42.160 --> 0:51:46.200
<v Speaker 4>are giving up their thirtieth in yards per play defensively,

0:51:46.520 --> 0:51:48.640
<v Speaker 4>they are their twenty ninth and giving up the most

0:51:48.640 --> 0:51:52.040
<v Speaker 4>passing yards in the league, and they're twenty third against

0:51:52.080 --> 0:51:54.879
<v Speaker 4>the rush. So this is it for Detroit. They can't

0:51:54.880 --> 0:51:57.120
<v Speaker 4>get right here. Like I said, maybe you're right, maybe

0:51:57.120 --> 0:51:58.360
<v Speaker 4>I'll swear them off for good.

0:51:58.640 --> 0:52:01.200
<v Speaker 3>And as honest as I can, I don't know.

0:52:02.560 --> 0:52:04.319
<v Speaker 4>I really don't even know how to respond to that,

0:52:05.040 --> 0:52:07.920
<v Speaker 4>you know, I mean, I'm shocked by.

0:52:07.760 --> 0:52:09.600
<v Speaker 2>That Steelers visiting their Chargers.

0:52:10.000 --> 0:52:11.919
<v Speaker 1>The game was three and a half on Sunday, it's

0:52:11.920 --> 0:52:13.960
<v Speaker 1>moved down to three. We liked it a lot at

0:52:13.960 --> 0:52:19.879
<v Speaker 1>three and a half. You said you're hearing stuff from

0:52:19.960 --> 0:52:22.840
<v Speaker 1>the wise guys on the Chargers, which is surprising to

0:52:22.880 --> 0:52:26.399
<v Speaker 1>me because Joe Alt is out and it's a game

0:52:26.440 --> 0:52:28.640
<v Speaker 1>in LA where the Steelers travel, and it's going to

0:52:28.680 --> 0:52:30.400
<v Speaker 1>feel like you're, you know.

0:52:30.719 --> 0:52:33.640
<v Speaker 2>Back at the old three Rivers. When you're playing you not.

0:52:33.719 --> 0:52:35.600
<v Speaker 3>Get it, especially when it's the plus three. I just

0:52:35.640 --> 0:52:37.200
<v Speaker 3>do not get this Chargers love.

0:52:37.320 --> 0:52:39.400
<v Speaker 4>So it's another game I'm trying to be careful on

0:52:39.440 --> 0:52:42.000
<v Speaker 4>because it does feel way too easy, like we're getting

0:52:42.680 --> 0:52:44.680
<v Speaker 4>a dog here against a team that should not be

0:52:44.719 --> 0:52:48.240
<v Speaker 4>favored against this defensive front, and you know, one takeaway

0:52:48.280 --> 0:52:51.040
<v Speaker 4>could be this defense played over seventy snaps against that

0:52:51.080 --> 0:52:53.480
<v Speaker 4>cold Steam last week, and that's not a pushover Colts team.

0:52:53.480 --> 0:52:57.160
<v Speaker 4>That's a big, physical, really tough Colts team that that

0:52:57.239 --> 0:53:00.640
<v Speaker 4>could affect this Pittsburgh defense in But it's already been

0:53:00.680 --> 0:53:02.600
<v Speaker 4>a year of very up and down play, right.

0:53:02.680 --> 0:53:03.640
<v Speaker 3>We joked about it.

0:53:03.640 --> 0:53:06.040
<v Speaker 4>They need five turnovers per game to steal these type

0:53:06.040 --> 0:53:09.120
<v Speaker 4>of games. So that's the weird here. But the one

0:53:09.120 --> 0:53:10.440
<v Speaker 4>that really jumped out to me about a couple of

0:53:10.480 --> 0:53:13.279
<v Speaker 4>people send me this stat about just Herbert and how

0:53:13.320 --> 0:53:16.080
<v Speaker 4>great he's been in these night games, which was pretty shocking,

0:53:16.160 --> 0:53:18.600
<v Speaker 4>just because it feels like before Harwall got there, they

0:53:18.640 --> 0:53:20.799
<v Speaker 4>were just so terrible, this Chargers team, and they just

0:53:20.800 --> 0:53:23.160
<v Speaker 4>did have no coaching. But he's actually in a five

0:53:23.239 --> 0:53:26.279
<v Speaker 4>game ATS streak winning night games. I think the only

0:53:26.280 --> 0:53:28.480
<v Speaker 4>one I could pop in my head was that Chiefs

0:53:28.520 --> 0:53:30.480
<v Speaker 4>game to start the year. I know that was a

0:53:30.560 --> 0:53:33.120
<v Speaker 4>night game for a fact, when they played down in Brazil.

0:53:34.600 --> 0:53:38.040
<v Speaker 4>In his career, Herbert sixteen and nine against the spread,

0:53:38.560 --> 0:53:40.520
<v Speaker 4>covering by three and a half points per game. And

0:53:40.560 --> 0:53:43.200
<v Speaker 4>this is exact night games type of game. So there's

0:53:43.200 --> 0:53:45.000
<v Speaker 4>a lot to like them here. As a favorite. He's

0:53:45.040 --> 0:53:46.880
<v Speaker 4>ten and three straight up in these type of games.

0:53:47.760 --> 0:53:50.239
<v Speaker 4>I just wanted to bring it up just because we're

0:53:50.280 --> 0:53:52.160
<v Speaker 4>just we're so in love with the Steelers. I want

0:53:52.200 --> 0:53:53.880
<v Speaker 4>to talk about the other side, why people might like

0:53:53.920 --> 0:53:55.879
<v Speaker 4>the Chargers and Herbert to bounce back.

0:53:55.920 --> 0:53:57.360
<v Speaker 3>But I'm with Chad.

0:53:57.480 --> 0:53:59.080
<v Speaker 4>I just can't get to the fact that losing Joe

0:53:59.120 --> 0:54:02.480
<v Speaker 4>Alt this this offensive front, him having no time. They

0:54:02.480 --> 0:54:04.040
<v Speaker 4>can't set up a run game either, because they can't

0:54:04.080 --> 0:54:06.800
<v Speaker 4>run block either. It's just it just feels so negative

0:54:06.800 --> 0:54:08.359
<v Speaker 4>for the Chargers team. On the flip side, I just

0:54:08.640 --> 0:54:11.279
<v Speaker 4>love Pittsburgh, So maybe again I can avoid it because

0:54:11.280 --> 0:54:15.799
<v Speaker 4>I'm lying to myself saying, well, Pittsburgh's defense seventy snaps now,

0:54:15.920 --> 0:54:18.480
<v Speaker 4>short week on the road. That's a tough spot to

0:54:18.520 --> 0:54:21.600
<v Speaker 4>put this defense is. But just man, what am I

0:54:21.640 --> 0:54:23.440
<v Speaker 4>grabbing here with this Chargers team. Other than Herbert, It

0:54:23.520 --> 0:54:24.719
<v Speaker 4>just feels like a lost bet.

0:54:25.320 --> 0:54:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Here's what if I had to predict how we're narrowing

0:54:28.040 --> 0:54:33.239
<v Speaker 1>it down on Sunday. I think we're talking about San Francisco.

0:54:33.719 --> 0:54:36.720
<v Speaker 1>I think we're talking about Arizona. I think we're talking

0:54:36.719 --> 0:54:40.440
<v Speaker 1>about Houston. I think we will have talked about Denver.

0:54:42.160 --> 0:54:46.040
<v Speaker 1>I think the Jets will be in the conversation. I

0:54:46.080 --> 0:54:48.120
<v Speaker 1>know Miami is going to be in the conversation because

0:54:49.280 --> 0:54:52.200
<v Speaker 1>I already could lean that way and you're feeling heavily,

0:54:52.480 --> 0:54:56.960
<v Speaker 1>you're feeling strongly about it. So and maybe green Bay,

0:54:57.040 --> 0:54:58.799
<v Speaker 1>well we'll have to have a conversation. I don't think

0:54:58.800 --> 0:55:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Detroit's gonna make it I don't know if the Steelers

0:55:02.200 --> 0:55:05.040
<v Speaker 1>will make it either. Maybe that's a mistake and we'll

0:55:05.239 --> 0:55:08.360
<v Speaker 1>talk it out on Sunday. But those feel like the

0:55:08.400 --> 0:55:12.480
<v Speaker 1>games to me again, Denver, which we both love Tonight

0:55:12.520 --> 0:55:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Thursday night, the Jets plus two and a half, the

0:55:16.120 --> 0:55:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Cardinals plus six and a half, which is our brass balls,

0:55:19.440 --> 0:55:22.920
<v Speaker 1>the Niners plus four and a half, Miami plus nine

0:55:22.960 --> 0:55:25.000
<v Speaker 1>and a half feel like the leading contender.

0:55:25.080 --> 0:55:26.560
<v Speaker 2>Simon, give me your biggest bets.

0:55:26.840 --> 0:55:30.920
<v Speaker 3>Pull up those pants and be a man. Obviously, people

0:55:30.960 --> 0:55:32.160
<v Speaker 3>know love Denver. Tonight.

0:55:32.520 --> 0:55:35.680
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna have a lot of money tied to them Dolphins,

0:55:36.520 --> 0:55:40.120
<v Speaker 4>but pretty big into bucks, but pretty big into and

0:55:40.320 --> 0:55:42.200
<v Speaker 4>you know a lot of these gamers waiting positions like

0:55:42.239 --> 0:55:43.800
<v Speaker 4>forty nine ers probably going to pen as a bigger

0:55:43.800 --> 0:55:46.080
<v Speaker 4>bet seeing with the Cardinals just waiting to get better

0:55:46.120 --> 0:55:47.719
<v Speaker 4>numbers on those games.

0:55:48.160 --> 0:55:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Last week underdog parlay and Favorites parlay. We are leaning

0:55:51.560 --> 0:55:54.560
<v Speaker 1>into favorites so much more. We ended up having to

0:55:54.600 --> 0:55:58.240
<v Speaker 1>do both sides of games, which we don't love doing.

0:55:58.840 --> 0:56:03.160
<v Speaker 1>So Mitchell suggestion, I think your suggestion, and we'll three.

0:56:03.520 --> 0:56:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's do three for the underdog parlay.

0:56:07.960 --> 0:56:11.120
<v Speaker 4>My dog blocks your dog, Your dog.

0:56:11.040 --> 0:56:14.680
<v Speaker 3>Blocks mo Dog. Jets plus one ten.

0:56:14.920 --> 0:56:16.759
<v Speaker 1>I was just going to say, Jets have to be

0:56:16.800 --> 0:56:21.440
<v Speaker 1>in there. Texans le see, yeah, I like that.

0:56:22.000 --> 0:56:24.160
<v Speaker 2>Niners I like that all right.

0:56:24.800 --> 0:56:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Underdog money line parlay Round Robin Jets, Houston, Niners. Favorites

0:56:36.960 --> 0:56:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Panthers Panthers, Lions.

0:56:41.280 --> 0:56:43.640
<v Speaker 3>Panthers, Lions, Ravens.

0:56:43.960 --> 0:56:48.640
<v Speaker 2>Ravens for sure. We're all in on the bucks either way.

0:56:49.200 --> 0:56:53.839
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's true, that's true. Bears are yeah. Ten.

0:56:54.040 --> 0:56:56.560
<v Speaker 2>Let's do the Bears, Bears, Let's do the Bears.

0:56:56.680 --> 0:56:56.919
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:56:57.160 --> 0:56:58.279
<v Speaker 2>I'd already forgotten about the.

0:56:58.239 --> 0:57:03.200
<v Speaker 3>Bears survivor before we get out of here. Tough, tough week.

0:57:03.840 --> 0:57:08.240
<v Speaker 4>I unfortunately to use the lines, God, I can't believe

0:57:08.280 --> 0:57:15.480
<v Speaker 4>I'm doing it. Panthers, Wow, I know, my God, I

0:57:15.480 --> 0:57:17.640
<v Speaker 4>gotta do it though. It's it's that kind of it's

0:57:17.720 --> 0:57:20.040
<v Speaker 4>it's that year where you guys start getting into.

0:57:20.440 --> 0:57:22.560
<v Speaker 3>The other teams that win each week. So I'm gonna

0:57:22.600 --> 0:57:23.280
<v Speaker 3>go Panthers.

0:57:23.440 --> 0:57:28.200
<v Speaker 2>All right, Sharp versus Square? We both lost last week?

0:57:28.680 --> 0:57:30.640
<v Speaker 2>Would you like to go first? You you had the

0:57:30.720 --> 0:57:32.040
<v Speaker 2>Chargers last week I had the Jacks.

0:57:32.120 --> 0:57:33.880
<v Speaker 3>Oh, I guess I'll flip the last week.

0:57:33.920 --> 0:57:36.480
<v Speaker 4>I went with a minus nine and a half road favorite.

0:57:36.480 --> 0:57:38.920
<v Speaker 4>Give me Miami plus nine and a half home dog. Wow.

0:57:39.680 --> 0:57:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I love that. That makes me feel even more

0:57:43.840 --> 0:57:46.040
<v Speaker 1>confident about putting in the contest, though, I will tell you.

0:57:46.000 --> 0:57:48.040
<v Speaker 3>That that's scary.

0:57:48.720 --> 0:57:49.880
<v Speaker 2>I'll go to San Francisco.

0:57:50.360 --> 0:57:52.600
<v Speaker 3>Here you go. What number? Are you taking four and

0:57:52.640 --> 0:57:53.760
<v Speaker 3>a half for.

0:57:53.520 --> 0:57:55.880
<v Speaker 2>Four and a half and you're taking Miami plus nine

0:57:55.920 --> 0:57:56.320
<v Speaker 2>and a half?

0:57:56.560 --> 0:57:57.240
<v Speaker 3>Let's go right?

0:57:57.720 --> 0:58:01.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, all right, all right. This has been Sharper Square,

0:58:01.280 --> 0:58:03.240
<v Speaker 2>part of the Volume podcast network.

0:58:03.280 --> 0:58:05.880
<v Speaker 1>We will be back. I'm Sharper Square on YouTube on

0:58:05.960 --> 0:58:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Sunday morning. As you easdrop on our intimate conversation, we

0:58:10.880 --> 0:58:13.720
<v Speaker 1>will panic, make human decisions.

0:58:13.640 --> 0:58:15.200
<v Speaker 2>Regret the rest of the day.

0:58:15.280 --> 0:58:18.560
<v Speaker 1>We'll be back on Sharper Square YouTube Sunday night, seven

0:58:18.560 --> 0:58:22.000
<v Speaker 1>point thirty ish pm to recap all the misery watcher Listen,

0:58:22.400 --> 0:58:25.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm Sharper Square YouTube, like and subscribe. You can also

0:58:25.920 --> 0:58:28.760
<v Speaker 1>download us from Spotify, Apple Pods, where you get your pods.

0:58:28.800 --> 0:58:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Rate review, subscribe, leave us five stars, state whatever you want.

0:58:31.040 --> 0:58:34.520
<v Speaker 2>Feedback is a gift. Until next time. I love you.

0:58:35.560 --> 0:58:38.680
<v Speaker 3>Hey, let's recare for