WEBVTT - Kick and a Miss

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Hey, folks, He's won three Super Bowls and you probably

0:00:07.000 --> 0:00:11.319
<v Speaker 1>didn't know his name. He gave one commencement speech at

0:00:11.360 --> 0:00:16.200
<v Speaker 1>a tiny college in Kansas, and now everybody is talking

0:00:16.200 --> 0:00:20.160
<v Speaker 1>about him. Welcome, folks to this episode of Amy and TJ,

0:00:20.320 --> 0:00:24.040
<v Speaker 1>a special episode that we didn't plan on doing, but

0:00:24.440 --> 0:00:27.960
<v Speaker 1>robes a lot of conversation privately here was prompted by

0:00:29.520 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 1>what we're now seeing, as I guess you could call

0:00:33.200 --> 0:00:36.880
<v Speaker 1>it backlash for the speech that Harrison Butker of the

0:00:36.960 --> 0:00:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City Chiefs gave at a college in Kansas.

0:00:39.440 --> 0:00:42.600
<v Speaker 2>That's right. I first saw some of the noise the

0:00:42.680 --> 0:00:46.839
<v Speaker 2>reaction to his speech yesterday and went on to actually

0:00:46.840 --> 0:00:49.199
<v Speaker 2>read the transcript under you actually watched the speech. I

0:00:49.240 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 2>watched some of it to see what all of the

0:00:52.080 --> 0:00:55.320
<v Speaker 2>fuss was about. But I came to you and my

0:00:55.480 --> 0:01:00.400
<v Speaker 2>jaw dropped. I was and initially felt much of what

0:01:00.480 --> 0:01:03.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm seeing A lot of women felt when they heard

0:01:04.040 --> 0:01:08.280
<v Speaker 2>or read what he said. To sum it up, he

0:01:08.319 --> 0:01:11.800
<v Speaker 2>said a lot in his speech to the graduating class

0:01:11.840 --> 0:01:14.399
<v Speaker 2>giving the commencement speech there over the weekend.

0:01:15.000 --> 0:01:17.120
<v Speaker 1>And context though who he was giving this.

0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:20.360
<v Speaker 2>He was giving the speech to the graduating class of

0:01:20.480 --> 0:01:24.800
<v Speaker 2>Benedictine College. It is a conservative Catholic college in the Midwest,

0:01:24.920 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 2>very close to where I spent my formative years in Missouri,

0:01:29.120 --> 0:01:31.760
<v Speaker 2>going and attending Catholic schools. I want to at least

0:01:31.760 --> 0:01:35.560
<v Speaker 2>put this out there. I am no longer a practicing Catholic,

0:01:35.600 --> 0:01:39.080
<v Speaker 2>but I was raised in the Catholic faith in the Midwest.

0:01:39.240 --> 0:01:42.080
<v Speaker 2>My parents are still devout Catholics, as is much of

0:01:42.120 --> 0:01:46.320
<v Speaker 2>my family. So this was all a very interesting speech

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 2>that I did take offense to. Interestingly, TJ, you had

0:01:52.360 --> 0:01:54.320
<v Speaker 2>a little bit of a different reaction initially before you

0:01:54.400 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 2>kind of got into the details of the story.

0:01:57.040 --> 0:01:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, I saw someone's reaction to what we often do,

0:02:00.600 --> 0:02:05.960
<v Speaker 1>right with social media and things that can become hot

0:02:06.000 --> 0:02:09.520
<v Speaker 1>button issues and clickable, I suppose. So I saw a

0:02:09.520 --> 0:02:11.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of the reaction I was reading about his speech

0:02:11.760 --> 0:02:15.560
<v Speaker 1>before I actually saw the speech, and once I saw

0:02:15.600 --> 0:02:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the speech and got a little more context, not in

0:02:20.080 --> 0:02:22.880
<v Speaker 1>some agreement one way or another with anything he said,

0:02:22.919 --> 0:02:26.360
<v Speaker 1>but rather where he was coming from, what he was saying,

0:02:26.400 --> 0:02:28.320
<v Speaker 1>why he was saying, and how personally it was to

0:02:28.400 --> 0:02:32.480
<v Speaker 1>him and the audience he was talking to. It changed

0:02:32.480 --> 0:02:34.680
<v Speaker 1>a little. It didn't change what he said, but it

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:37.519
<v Speaker 1>changed some of the I guess some of the things

0:02:37.520 --> 0:02:40.080
<v Speaker 1>I read, I believe were meant to be a little

0:02:40.120 --> 0:02:45.120
<v Speaker 1>more clickable if you will. And this, you know, it

0:02:45.120 --> 0:02:47.480
<v Speaker 1>always drives me crazy. And things like this happened. Everybody

0:02:47.560 --> 0:02:50.320
<v Speaker 1>just here, we go, go to our respective corners, let's

0:02:50.320 --> 0:02:52.920
<v Speaker 1>come out, let's fight, and then let's go back to

0:02:52.960 --> 0:02:56.200
<v Speaker 1>our corners. And nobody learned anything, and nobody got anywhere.

0:02:56.200 --> 0:02:59.079
<v Speaker 1>And this is just another opportunity I thought, to have

0:02:59.440 --> 0:03:02.600
<v Speaker 1>a better and a broader conversation and more understanding about

0:03:02.840 --> 0:03:06.520
<v Speaker 1>what exactly he said, but also about the church and

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:09.280
<v Speaker 1>how many other people might feel the way he does.

0:03:09.560 --> 0:03:11.919
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and there were a couple of groups who were

0:03:12.360 --> 0:03:16.360
<v Speaker 2>offended by what he said, a lot of especially working women,

0:03:16.480 --> 0:03:21.960
<v Speaker 2>I would say, and members of the LGBTQ community as well.

0:03:22.040 --> 0:03:24.200
<v Speaker 2>So there were there were two things to address. But

0:03:24.400 --> 0:03:29.600
<v Speaker 2>I'll start with the women just because, as again, I

0:03:29.639 --> 0:03:32.640
<v Speaker 2>was raised in the Catholic faith and am a working woman.

0:03:32.720 --> 0:03:34.519
<v Speaker 2>So it's an interesting position to be in.

0:03:34.800 --> 0:03:37.160
<v Speaker 1>And it's fair to say, right, there was a lot

0:03:37.200 --> 0:03:42.360
<v Speaker 1>in there. I mean, he went after President Biden on abortions.

0:03:42.440 --> 0:03:46.680
<v Speaker 1>He threw in diversity, equity and inclusion, a lot of

0:03:46.720 --> 0:03:48.800
<v Speaker 1>stuff was in there, But is it fair to say

0:03:48.840 --> 0:03:51.120
<v Speaker 1>I think I felt that way that the thing that

0:03:51.160 --> 0:03:53.160
<v Speaker 1>most people were worked up about or writing about had

0:03:53.200 --> 0:03:56.640
<v Speaker 1>to do with his comments about women and being a homemaker.

0:03:56.800 --> 0:03:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Is the word he Yes, would you say that's the

0:03:58.440 --> 0:03:59.720
<v Speaker 1>thing that got most correct?

0:03:59.800 --> 0:04:01.960
<v Speaker 2>Yes? And then and then I actually went into a

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:04.120
<v Speaker 2>deep dive as you did as well this morning, because

0:04:04.160 --> 0:04:06.440
<v Speaker 2>even though I was raised Catholic, went to Catholic school

0:04:06.920 --> 0:04:09.480
<v Speaker 2>in the Midwest, I still was a little bit unclear

0:04:09.560 --> 0:04:12.640
<v Speaker 2>about where the Catholic Church officially stands on women working

0:04:12.640 --> 0:04:14.320
<v Speaker 2>outside of the home. And I feel like I got

0:04:14.320 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 2>some clarity. Although there's always you can read anything anyway

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:21.599
<v Speaker 2>that you'd like. People take the Bible and things that

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:25.280
<v Speaker 2>Pope say, you know, literally, and sometimes people take it

0:04:25.320 --> 0:04:27.279
<v Speaker 2>to fit the context they want it to, so it's

0:04:27.440 --> 0:04:31.000
<v Speaker 2>always up for interpretation. I'll put that out there. But

0:04:32.440 --> 0:04:35.760
<v Speaker 2>the biggest thing that I took offense to look, he's

0:04:35.800 --> 0:04:39.240
<v Speaker 2>talking to a bunch of men and women who have

0:04:39.360 --> 0:04:42.080
<v Speaker 2>just spent four years at university and are graduating, And

0:04:42.520 --> 0:04:44.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean I encourage everyone to go and listen to

0:04:44.760 --> 0:04:46.800
<v Speaker 2>the speech or at least read the transcript of the

0:04:46.800 --> 0:04:49.640
<v Speaker 2>speech as well, because this is just a summation of

0:04:49.800 --> 0:04:55.039
<v Speaker 2>a few parts. But he he spoke to the women

0:04:55.160 --> 0:04:57.400
<v Speaker 2>in the in the room specifically saying I want to

0:04:57.400 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 2>speak to you directly, he says, and I'm gonna quote

0:05:00.279 --> 0:05:02.480
<v Speaker 2>him here because I think it is you, the women

0:05:02.520 --> 0:05:05.280
<v Speaker 2>who have had the most diabolical lies told to you.

0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:08.320
<v Speaker 2>How many of you are sitting here now about to

0:05:08.360 --> 0:05:10.039
<v Speaker 2>cross the stage and are thinking about all of the

0:05:10.080 --> 0:05:12.839
<v Speaker 2>promotions and titles you're going to get in your career.

0:05:13.520 --> 0:05:15.240
<v Speaker 2>He goes on to say, some of you may go

0:05:15.400 --> 0:05:17.360
<v Speaker 2>on to lead successful careers in the world, but I

0:05:17.360 --> 0:05:20.839
<v Speaker 2>would venture to guess that the majority of you are

0:05:20.880 --> 0:05:24.960
<v Speaker 2>most excited about your marriage and the children you will

0:05:24.960 --> 0:05:25.800
<v Speaker 2>bring into this world.

0:05:25.880 --> 0:05:27.560
<v Speaker 1>He goes going to stop, Yes, go ahead, and now,

0:05:27.640 --> 0:05:31.600
<v Speaker 1>so right there, where does what in that I don't

0:05:31.640 --> 0:05:34.560
<v Speaker 1>want to completely break down word for word here too much,

0:05:34.880 --> 0:05:38.280
<v Speaker 1>but in what he's saying there, you're you said you're offended.

0:05:38.400 --> 0:05:41.760
<v Speaker 1>So the offense in that I'm aware for you.

0:05:42.000 --> 0:05:45.160
<v Speaker 2>So yes, I understand the audience. And by the way,

0:05:45.320 --> 0:05:47.520
<v Speaker 2>he received a standing ovation at the end of this speech,

0:05:47.600 --> 0:05:50.880
<v Speaker 2>we should point that out. You could say he knew

0:05:50.920 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 2>his audience. This was a conservative Catholic university. But I

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:57.800
<v Speaker 2>guess I also just have initially an issue with a

0:05:57.839 --> 0:06:01.560
<v Speaker 2>man telling women saying I would venture to guess that

0:06:01.640 --> 0:06:04.520
<v Speaker 2>the majority of you. I feel like that's a very

0:06:04.560 --> 0:06:07.360
<v Speaker 2>presumptive way to start any sentence, and then to go

0:06:07.400 --> 0:06:10.120
<v Speaker 2>on to say something about, even though you just spent

0:06:10.240 --> 0:06:15.599
<v Speaker 2>four years educating yourself and getting your career, you're more

0:06:15.640 --> 0:06:17.839
<v Speaker 2>excited about being a wife and a mother. I think

0:06:17.839 --> 0:06:21.560
<v Speaker 2>that's incredibly presumptive, and that therein lies some of the offense.

0:06:21.880 --> 0:06:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Now if I'm not the weeds, but not even semantics,

0:06:27.040 --> 0:06:29.599
<v Speaker 1>but words matter. But I'm looking at this, the quote

0:06:29.640 --> 0:06:32.360
<v Speaker 1>you just read to everybody. If he would have changed

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:35.039
<v Speaker 1>that language that said, I would venture to guess that

0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:37.359
<v Speaker 1>the majority of you are most excited about your marriage

0:06:37.680 --> 0:06:39.800
<v Speaker 1>and the children you'll bring into the world. If he

0:06:39.800 --> 0:06:43.680
<v Speaker 1>would have said, but I bet some of you are

0:06:43.720 --> 0:06:46.400
<v Speaker 1>most excited, I would guess a few of you. If

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:49.039
<v Speaker 1>he would have changed that to not a presumption that

0:06:49.120 --> 0:06:51.320
<v Speaker 1>I know what most women in this room are thinking.

0:06:51.360 --> 0:06:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Would that have made a difference, It.

0:06:52.640 --> 0:06:56.720
<v Speaker 2>Would have softened it. But I think you are stepping

0:06:56.720 --> 0:06:59.680
<v Speaker 2>into dangerous territory when you are presuming, especially that the

0:06:59.680 --> 0:07:04.000
<v Speaker 2>majority of a sex you don't know anything about truly

0:07:04.080 --> 0:07:06.000
<v Speaker 2>to be and what it is to be a woman.

0:07:06.080 --> 0:07:11.320
<v Speaker 2>I think that immediately raises eyebrows and makes people feel like, wait,

0:07:11.360 --> 0:07:12.560
<v Speaker 2>who are you to speak for us?

0:07:13.120 --> 0:07:16.360
<v Speaker 1>That is, and I'll go back on a lot of

0:07:16.400 --> 0:07:18.400
<v Speaker 1>emphasis is put on him, an attention on him, but

0:07:18.400 --> 0:07:21.120
<v Speaker 1>he's speaking to an audience like you said. That gave

0:07:21.200 --> 0:07:23.960
<v Speaker 1>him a standing ovation at the end, and he was

0:07:24.000 --> 0:07:26.640
<v Speaker 1>not booed, nobody walked out. There was no protest when

0:07:26.640 --> 0:07:31.000
<v Speaker 1>he said this. Can we venture to say that this idea,

0:07:31.160 --> 0:07:34.920
<v Speaker 1>that line, that sentence is something that a lot of

0:07:34.960 --> 0:07:37.840
<v Speaker 1>people in that room, and maybe a lot of people

0:07:37.880 --> 0:07:41.800
<v Speaker 1>outside of that room in the Catholic faith would completely

0:07:41.840 --> 0:07:42.200
<v Speaker 1>agree with.

0:07:42.800 --> 0:07:46.240
<v Speaker 2>There are people inside and outside of the Catholic faith

0:07:46.280 --> 0:07:48.400
<v Speaker 2>who would agree with that. I'm sure, and I'm not

0:07:48.480 --> 0:07:53.040
<v Speaker 2>here to say that it's wrong to be excited about

0:07:53.080 --> 0:07:55.680
<v Speaker 2>those things or for that to be the thing you

0:07:55.720 --> 0:07:59.200
<v Speaker 2>want to do after getting a college education or foregoing

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:02.880
<v Speaker 2>an education, becoming a wife and a mother. I have

0:08:03.240 --> 0:08:05.400
<v Speaker 2>no issue with that at all. I mean, my mother

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:09.760
<v Speaker 2>herself was a wife and a mother before getting educated.

0:08:09.800 --> 0:08:12.440
<v Speaker 2>Waited until we went back to school to get educated,

0:08:12.640 --> 0:08:15.600
<v Speaker 2>and waited until we were well on our way before

0:08:15.640 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 2>she became a teacher. So you know, I applaud all

0:08:19.400 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 2>the women out there who are able to be able

0:08:22.200 --> 0:08:24.320
<v Speaker 2>to make that decision. And that's a clear distinction, because

0:08:24.360 --> 0:08:27.800
<v Speaker 2>so many women don't have the choice to be homemakers

0:08:27.960 --> 0:08:31.120
<v Speaker 2>or to not enter the workforce for financial reasons. So

0:08:31.640 --> 0:08:33.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, there's a whole group of women who I'm

0:08:33.600 --> 0:08:37.600
<v Speaker 2>sure feel very upset about the fact that somehow it's

0:08:37.600 --> 0:08:39.640
<v Speaker 2>a choice. It's not always a choice. I think that's

0:08:39.640 --> 0:08:42.320
<v Speaker 2>a very clear distinction to make. But also I just

0:08:42.360 --> 0:08:46.640
<v Speaker 2>want to say, being raised in the Catholic Church, in

0:08:46.679 --> 0:08:51.600
<v Speaker 2>a very conservative Catholic school in the Midwest, I never

0:08:51.679 --> 0:08:57.679
<v Speaker 2>once ever felt or heard anyone, no priest, no, certainly

0:08:57.679 --> 0:09:01.840
<v Speaker 2>not my parents, suggest that at my main vocation in life,

0:09:01.840 --> 0:09:04.200
<v Speaker 2>my main purpose in life was to become a wife

0:09:04.200 --> 0:09:06.120
<v Speaker 2>and a mother and that would be me serving the church.

0:09:06.200 --> 0:09:09.960
<v Speaker 2>I never ever heard that. Now, I will also just

0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:13.200
<v Speaker 2>say this because I want to be fully transparent. One

0:09:13.200 --> 0:09:15.240
<v Speaker 2>of the reasons, and I would say the main reason

0:09:15.320 --> 0:09:21.920
<v Speaker 2>that I felt I just didn't feel comfortable in the

0:09:21.960 --> 0:09:24.560
<v Speaker 2>Catholic Church and I ultimately left the Catholic Church was

0:09:24.600 --> 0:09:28.760
<v Speaker 2>because of many of their stances on women's reproductive rights.

0:09:29.160 --> 0:09:33.680
<v Speaker 2>So I don't agree with the Church's stance on much

0:09:33.760 --> 0:09:36.240
<v Speaker 2>to do with women, but I will firmly say that

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:42.080
<v Speaker 2>I never felt like there was not just a push

0:09:42.160 --> 0:09:46.680
<v Speaker 2>for me to not work, but even you know, a

0:09:46.800 --> 0:09:49.040
<v Speaker 2>duty of me not to work outside of the home.

0:09:49.080 --> 0:09:52.640
<v Speaker 1>But can that also be not women aren't allowed to

0:09:52.679 --> 0:09:58.600
<v Speaker 1>be priests? This idea here of the vocation there is

0:09:58.640 --> 0:10:02.319
<v Speaker 1>a sacrament right as a vocation is called. It's a

0:10:02.600 --> 0:10:05.160
<v Speaker 1>vocation of marriage in the Catholic Church, is it not? Yes?

0:10:05.320 --> 0:10:08.359
<v Speaker 2>No, And I have I have completed all the sacraments

0:10:08.400 --> 0:10:10.480
<v Speaker 2>through marriage. And both of my daughters, by the way,

0:10:10.559 --> 0:10:14.640
<v Speaker 2>have gone through Catholic school, Catholic upbringing, and have completed

0:10:14.640 --> 0:10:16.400
<v Speaker 2>all of their sacraments through confirmation.

0:10:16.600 --> 0:10:19.400
<v Speaker 1>So I'm getting in what I'm sticking with this this

0:10:19.520 --> 0:10:23.240
<v Speaker 1>quote here, the idea that someone in the Catholic Church

0:10:23.280 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 1>who is making a a devout Catholic who is making

0:10:26.240 --> 0:10:29.280
<v Speaker 1>a speech to a conservative Catholic school saying something like

0:10:29.320 --> 0:10:33.840
<v Speaker 1>this isn't far fetched? Is it? For me? It was

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:38.480
<v Speaker 1>to that that guy at that school making that speech

0:10:38.920 --> 0:10:42.600
<v Speaker 1>is not far fetched for us on the outside potentially,

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:46.439
<v Speaker 1>but for his audience, and they invited him in this.

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:48.160
<v Speaker 1>This didn't come out of left field, is what I'm

0:10:48.160 --> 0:10:49.079
<v Speaker 1>saying to this audience.

0:10:49.200 --> 0:10:51.440
<v Speaker 2>Yep, No, I hear you and I and to your point, yes,

0:10:51.640 --> 0:10:55.680
<v Speaker 2>I don't know that school intimately, obviously, I just know

0:10:55.760 --> 0:10:57.920
<v Speaker 2>that I have had the experience of being in a

0:10:57.920 --> 0:11:02.960
<v Speaker 2>conservative Catholic educational system and those points were never made.

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:04.920
<v Speaker 2>No one ever said anything like that. So this is

0:11:04.920 --> 0:11:07.000
<v Speaker 2>the first time I've ever heard that. I'm not saying

0:11:07.040 --> 0:11:10.160
<v Speaker 2>that this isn't in line with what this school teaches,

0:11:10.720 --> 0:11:14.280
<v Speaker 2>but I have I personally and I've had the experience

0:11:14.800 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 2>of being in a conservative Catholic educational system. I have

0:11:18.120 --> 0:11:21.559
<v Speaker 2>never heard anyone say anything like that.

0:11:21.679 --> 0:11:24.720
<v Speaker 1>About the idea of being excited about being married and

0:11:24.760 --> 0:11:27.560
<v Speaker 1>having children. Because I'm just looking at his wowing.

0:11:27.080 --> 0:11:29.600
<v Speaker 2>A career and being more excited about that.

0:11:30.440 --> 0:11:32.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to put words in his mouth. Where

0:11:32.960 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 1>did you see him say for tell them to forego

0:11:35.559 --> 0:11:37.559
<v Speaker 1>a career. This is one of the things I always get.

0:11:37.640 --> 0:11:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Do you know this, because we dealt with a lot

0:11:39.320 --> 0:11:39.679
<v Speaker 1>of people.

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:43.320
<v Speaker 2>May not have directly said it, TJ, but he certainly

0:11:43.360 --> 0:11:46.040
<v Speaker 2>indirectly said it because he then talked about his wife

0:11:46.240 --> 0:11:50.240
<v Speaker 2>giving up her career to be a wife and a

0:11:50.280 --> 0:11:52.839
<v Speaker 2>mother and to support him so to be his wife,

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 2>to be their children's mother. And he then went on

0:11:56.000 --> 0:11:58.080
<v Speaker 2>to say, if she has any regrets on her decision,

0:11:58.440 --> 0:12:00.840
<v Speaker 2>if you're asking that, she would laugh out loud without

0:12:00.880 --> 0:12:03.200
<v Speaker 2>hesitation and say heck no. So he was certainly applying,

0:12:03.240 --> 0:12:06.839
<v Speaker 2>and I will say this. He also said that women

0:12:07.400 --> 0:12:14.520
<v Speaker 2>and he was saying that could be much happier doing

0:12:14.559 --> 0:12:17.079
<v Speaker 2>this than being in the workplace. I'm just saying again,

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:20.079
<v Speaker 2>he is taking something that he has experienced that a

0:12:20.080 --> 0:12:22.520
<v Speaker 2>lot of people have experienced. And I'm not saying that

0:12:22.520 --> 0:12:25.360
<v Speaker 2>that isn't true, but to be saying this to a

0:12:25.360 --> 0:12:29.560
<v Speaker 2>group of women who have just spent four years preparing

0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:33.480
<v Speaker 2>to be in the workforce potentially or at least to

0:12:33.520 --> 0:12:35.800
<v Speaker 2>be educated, to have the opportunity to to say, you

0:12:35.840 --> 0:12:39.640
<v Speaker 2>could be so much happier if you disregard the outside noise.

0:12:39.920 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 2>And I'm assuming he's referring to the media and to

0:12:43.080 --> 0:12:45.160
<v Speaker 2>liberals in the world, because he does reference them throughout

0:12:45.160 --> 0:12:48.200
<v Speaker 2>this speech to move closer to God's will, implying that

0:12:48.240 --> 0:12:55.160
<v Speaker 2>God's will is for women to be wives and mothers,

0:12:55.200 --> 0:12:57.280
<v Speaker 2>and so that is where the offense or that's where

0:12:57.280 --> 0:13:00.520
<v Speaker 2>the rub lies. Therein lies the roub. I guess the phrase,

0:13:01.360 --> 0:13:04.040
<v Speaker 2>but that is where I think a lot of women

0:13:04.720 --> 0:13:05.480
<v Speaker 2>it took issue.

0:13:06.559 --> 0:13:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Well. I would encourage everybody to not even just read it,

0:13:10.000 --> 0:13:11.720
<v Speaker 1>if you greet it, if you get a chance, but

0:13:11.840 --> 0:13:14.880
<v Speaker 1>I encourage you to actually listen to it. And again

0:13:15.000 --> 0:13:21.719
<v Speaker 1>there's there's everybody can disagree about the position of or

0:13:21.760 --> 0:13:24.400
<v Speaker 1>anybody who takes a position that women should be in

0:13:24.440 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the home. That's silly, that's outdated, that's not even in

0:13:27.840 --> 0:13:31.360
<v Speaker 1>existence necessarily, or shouldn't be something we should talk about

0:13:31.400 --> 0:13:35.040
<v Speaker 1>in a serious manner. Quite frankly, I just in this

0:13:35.559 --> 0:13:38.720
<v Speaker 1>conversation where it gets it looks like everybody's dumping on

0:13:38.760 --> 0:13:40.680
<v Speaker 1>this guy. And I was trying to understand as a

0:13:40.760 --> 0:13:46.239
<v Speaker 1>whole the stance of the people in that room, of Catholics,

0:13:46.240 --> 0:13:50.720
<v Speaker 1>of Catholicism, of the religion, and what it actually says.

0:13:50.760 --> 0:13:54.360
<v Speaker 1>And in listening to him, you can infer or jump

0:13:54.360 --> 0:13:57.600
<v Speaker 1>to a conclusion. But I in him talking about his

0:13:57.679 --> 0:14:02.920
<v Speaker 1>experience gives an impression and why isn't that okay right

0:14:03.000 --> 0:14:06.240
<v Speaker 1>if his experience was as such? And the rest I

0:14:06.240 --> 0:14:08.480
<v Speaker 1>don't know if you have there as a part of

0:14:08.520 --> 0:14:11.160
<v Speaker 1>the quote you gave about marriage and children you bring

0:14:11.200 --> 0:14:14.480
<v Speaker 1>into this world. Quote he says, I can tell you

0:14:14.520 --> 0:14:16.840
<v Speaker 1>that my beautiful wife, Isabelle, would be the first to

0:14:16.880 --> 0:14:19.360
<v Speaker 1>say that her life truly started when she began living

0:14:19.400 --> 0:14:22.360
<v Speaker 1>her vocation as a wife and as a mother. I'm

0:14:22.400 --> 0:14:24.280
<v Speaker 1>on stage today enable to be the man I am

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:27.480
<v Speaker 1>because I have a wife who leans into her vocation.

0:14:28.520 --> 0:14:31.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm beyond blessed with the many talents God has given me.

0:14:31.240 --> 0:14:33.760
<v Speaker 1>But I cannot it cannot be overstated that all of

0:14:33.760 --> 0:14:36.640
<v Speaker 1>my success is made possible because of a girl I

0:14:36.800 --> 0:14:39.800
<v Speaker 1>met in band class back in middle school and would

0:14:39.840 --> 0:14:42.880
<v Speaker 1>convert to the faith, become my wife, and embrace one

0:14:42.880 --> 0:14:46.920
<v Speaker 1>of the most important titles of all homemaker. Now getting

0:14:46.920 --> 0:14:50.000
<v Speaker 1>through that quote, he was tearing up and got emotional.

0:14:50.440 --> 0:14:54.000
<v Speaker 1>After he made that quote, he got what I believe

0:14:54.080 --> 0:14:59.720
<v Speaker 1>was the only mid speech applause, and it went on

0:14:59.800 --> 0:15:03.520
<v Speaker 1>for or ten fifteen twenty seconds on that line in

0:15:03.560 --> 0:15:07.800
<v Speaker 1>that audience. Now that quote, do you also take issue

0:15:07.800 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 1>with him? He's explaining his situation, what his experience has

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:16.480
<v Speaker 1>been in the vocation of marriage.

0:15:25.240 --> 0:15:27.560
<v Speaker 2>So I would say this, first of all, he has

0:15:27.600 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 2>every right to say what he feels, and there are

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:33.040
<v Speaker 2>certainly plenty of people who want to go back to

0:15:33.160 --> 0:15:36.520
<v Speaker 2>that way of life. That and the reason why the.

0:15:36.560 --> 0:15:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Minority aren't they those people? We have to say that I.

0:15:39.640 --> 0:15:42.800
<v Speaker 2>Think so, I believe so I wouldn't. I wouldn't want

0:15:42.840 --> 0:15:45.160
<v Speaker 2>to speak to just how many people feel that way.

0:15:45.200 --> 0:15:48.400
<v Speaker 2>But I can tell you how I feel. Women have

0:15:48.520 --> 0:15:54.600
<v Speaker 2>spent the last century fighting for rights not to have

0:15:54.600 --> 0:15:57.440
<v Speaker 2>a choice. We've spent, you know, since the beginning of

0:15:57.560 --> 0:16:02.360
<v Speaker 2>history our lives as women on this planet in subservance

0:16:02.640 --> 0:16:05.800
<v Speaker 2>to men. We didn't have any rights. We couldn't own property,

0:16:05.800 --> 0:16:10.360
<v Speaker 2>we couldn't get educated, we had no opportunity beyond being

0:16:10.440 --> 0:16:15.040
<v Speaker 2>a mother and a wife. And so all of the

0:16:15.040 --> 0:16:20.040
<v Speaker 2>women who have fought for women's rights, from education to

0:16:20.160 --> 0:16:24.240
<v Speaker 2>opportunity to equal pay, all of that to hear a

0:16:24.280 --> 0:16:26.680
<v Speaker 2>man say that he gets to be the man he

0:16:26.720 --> 0:16:29.520
<v Speaker 2>wants to be because the woman is sacrificing, because the

0:16:29.560 --> 0:16:33.680
<v Speaker 2>woman is subservient, because the woman is foregoing any professional

0:16:33.720 --> 0:16:37.080
<v Speaker 2>career or aspiration she may have to serve him so

0:16:37.120 --> 0:16:39.280
<v Speaker 2>that he can be the man he needs to be.

0:16:39.440 --> 0:16:43.280
<v Speaker 2>He also invited men to lean into their masculinity. So

0:16:43.440 --> 0:16:45.560
<v Speaker 2>I just think that's why you know, you've spent all

0:16:45.560 --> 0:16:48.640
<v Speaker 2>this time trying to have But that's what it invokes.

0:16:48.640 --> 0:16:50.640
<v Speaker 2>It invokes that feeling, and that's why there's a motion

0:16:50.720 --> 0:16:51.280
<v Speaker 2>attached to it.

0:16:51.360 --> 0:16:53.280
<v Speaker 1>That's why I say that it invokes a feeling. But

0:16:53.520 --> 0:16:55.360
<v Speaker 1>I think, and I didn't want to do this here,

0:16:55.400 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 1>but there's so much context, And I say context, we're

0:16:59.160 --> 0:17:02.960
<v Speaker 1>paraphrasing some of the direct things he said and jump

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:05.760
<v Speaker 1>to conclusions about what he said. I don't want to

0:17:05.760 --> 0:17:08.000
<v Speaker 1>do that. You can have an opinion about what he said,

0:17:08.040 --> 0:17:12.520
<v Speaker 1>but to us to assign how he feels and what

0:17:12.560 --> 0:17:16.080
<v Speaker 1>he's telling everybody else based on his experience, I think,

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:19.280
<v Speaker 1>I just I want to be careful about going too

0:17:19.359 --> 0:17:22.840
<v Speaker 1>far there. Yes he said it, but some of the

0:17:22.960 --> 0:17:26.080
<v Speaker 1>idea that he is saying you need to be subservient,

0:17:26.080 --> 0:17:29.480
<v Speaker 1>you can't. He's talking to a graduating educated people who,

0:17:29.560 --> 0:17:31.800
<v Speaker 1>like you said, Now, the women in that audience do

0:17:31.920 --> 0:17:34.640
<v Speaker 1>have a choice. They have a choice about the vocation

0:17:34.720 --> 0:17:38.439
<v Speaker 1>of marriage, and they have a choice in education and

0:17:38.440 --> 0:17:39.919
<v Speaker 1>what they want to do because they just got it.

0:17:39.960 --> 0:17:40.879
<v Speaker 2>So I.

0:17:42.359 --> 0:17:47.879
<v Speaker 1>Want and I'm curious about a wider view that Catholics

0:17:47.920 --> 0:17:53.360
<v Speaker 1>have about this this idea and again, it's a vocation

0:17:53.520 --> 0:17:56.159
<v Speaker 1>of marriage, it actually is a thing that's assigned in

0:17:56.200 --> 0:17:59.200
<v Speaker 1>the Catholic Church. That's it is your role, your job,

0:17:59.240 --> 0:18:07.080
<v Speaker 1>your duty, both though, But I just I just want

0:18:07.080 --> 0:18:09.840
<v Speaker 1>to hesitate to jump to a conclusion about what I

0:18:09.880 --> 0:18:11.920
<v Speaker 1>think is in his heart versus what he said.

0:18:12.800 --> 0:18:14.760
<v Speaker 2>Oh, and I think he was extremely genuine and I

0:18:14.760 --> 0:18:16.800
<v Speaker 2>think what he is saying works for him and his

0:18:16.840 --> 0:18:19.040
<v Speaker 2>wife and his family in a beautiful way. And I

0:18:19.160 --> 0:18:21.840
<v Speaker 2>don't fault them for that. I think that's incredible. I

0:18:21.880 --> 0:18:24.040
<v Speaker 2>think to each his own in terms of what is

0:18:24.400 --> 0:18:27.000
<v Speaker 2>good for you and your family and how you view

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:27.560
<v Speaker 2>your faith.

0:18:27.640 --> 0:18:29.880
<v Speaker 1>But I'm just not full stop right now because.

0:18:29.640 --> 0:18:33.399
<v Speaker 2>He's encouraging other women, and I just feel like he

0:18:33.520 --> 0:18:36.680
<v Speaker 2>was absolutely encouraging other women and implying that they would

0:18:36.680 --> 0:18:40.840
<v Speaker 2>be happier if they leaned in on that vocation rather

0:18:41.000 --> 0:18:43.000
<v Speaker 2>than pursue a career outside that.

0:18:43.119 --> 0:18:45.600
<v Speaker 1>I just didn't see him say that anywhere. I felt that,

0:18:45.840 --> 0:18:48.280
<v Speaker 1>and nowhere did I see him make that statement that

0:18:48.359 --> 0:18:50.240
<v Speaker 1>you need to do this, do not go to work.

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:51.720
<v Speaker 2>He didn't say that, but he was encouraging.

0:18:51.800 --> 0:18:53.359
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I'm sorry, you just said it, so I just

0:18:53.400 --> 0:18:54.960
<v Speaker 1>want to make sure we're clear on that. You said.

0:18:54.960 --> 0:18:58.239
<v Speaker 1>He's encouraging them not to work and to actually just

0:18:58.280 --> 0:18:59.480
<v Speaker 1>go be homemakers.

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:03.560
<v Speaker 2>He was encouraging them to do that by saying they

0:19:03.600 --> 0:19:06.040
<v Speaker 2>would be happier if they did that.

0:19:06.280 --> 0:19:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Again, we need to go through and find the direct quote.

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:10.920
<v Speaker 1>I just I don't want to assign that to him,

0:19:10.920 --> 0:19:15.119
<v Speaker 1>and now here in this space give people an impression.

0:19:15.359 --> 0:19:17.240
<v Speaker 1>So I keep saying, go listen to it for yourselves,

0:19:17.320 --> 0:19:18.399
<v Speaker 1>or go read it for yourself.

0:19:18.240 --> 0:19:21.359
<v Speaker 2>If not that, then TJ, what would you believe his

0:19:21.840 --> 0:19:22.560
<v Speaker 2>intent was?

0:19:24.359 --> 0:19:27.000
<v Speaker 1>He knew his audience, and I do think he was

0:19:27.040 --> 0:19:33.159
<v Speaker 1>speaking from the heart, but also his intent if we

0:19:33.240 --> 0:19:36.119
<v Speaker 1>go to that being the intent is he speaking to

0:19:36.359 --> 0:19:40.960
<v Speaker 1>an audience that is welcoming that message. Meaning We've been

0:19:40.960 --> 0:19:42.720
<v Speaker 1>in Catholic school here for the past four years, a

0:19:42.760 --> 0:19:45.640
<v Speaker 1>conservative Catholic school. We've heard a lot of teachings about

0:19:45.640 --> 0:19:48.440
<v Speaker 1>the vocation of marriage and Saint Peter's saying that women

0:19:48.520 --> 0:19:52.639
<v Speaker 1>are the weaker vessel, right, So that might be in

0:19:52.680 --> 0:19:54.919
<v Speaker 1>their minds. They might be struggling with that idea. What

0:19:54.920 --> 0:19:56.640
<v Speaker 1>do I do. I want to be a good Catholic,

0:19:56.680 --> 0:19:59.680
<v Speaker 1>I want to be a successful so I don't know

0:19:59.760 --> 0:20:02.320
<v Speaker 1>that part and how welcoming it is for that audience

0:20:02.359 --> 0:20:05.639
<v Speaker 1>to hear. Ah it worked for him. Ah, it worked

0:20:05.640 --> 0:20:07.840
<v Speaker 1>for them. Oh it's okay for me to be this way.

0:20:07.840 --> 0:20:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Oh it's okay for me to express myself. Because he's

0:20:10.200 --> 0:20:14.560
<v Speaker 1>doing so, he's expressing something you could absolutely have issue with, right.

0:20:14.840 --> 0:20:17.879
<v Speaker 1>I am just trying to get more of an understanding

0:20:17.960 --> 0:20:20.080
<v Speaker 1>of his relationship to the people in that room.

0:20:20.200 --> 0:20:22.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. No, And to this, I will say this, and

0:20:22.280 --> 0:20:24.600
<v Speaker 2>I think this is true for any institution, especially a

0:20:24.640 --> 0:20:29.480
<v Speaker 2>religious institution. There are factions within churches. So the Catholic

0:20:29.560 --> 0:20:31.800
<v Speaker 2>Church is not just one unified church, even though I

0:20:31.840 --> 0:20:34.880
<v Speaker 2>know we're all under the Pope's umbrella, but you've got

0:20:35.240 --> 0:20:37.680
<v Speaker 2>the conservative faction. And then he even points out, as

0:20:37.720 --> 0:20:40.320
<v Speaker 2>you mentioned Joe Biden being a Catholic and yet supporting

0:20:40.320 --> 0:20:44.159
<v Speaker 2>abortion rights. He thought that was ludicrous. And you know,

0:20:44.320 --> 0:20:46.679
<v Speaker 2>I will argue that, you know, there are a lot

0:20:46.720 --> 0:20:49.840
<v Speaker 2>of phrases for Catholics, cafeteria Catholics, where you pick what

0:20:49.880 --> 0:20:52.760
<v Speaker 2>you like. But the point being is if you're all unified,

0:20:53.200 --> 0:20:55.959
<v Speaker 2>you know, to try and be better people. I just

0:20:56.280 --> 0:20:58.600
<v Speaker 2>I am I struggle with and I think probably a

0:20:58.600 --> 0:21:00.800
<v Speaker 2>lot of and I want to say a former Catholic,

0:21:00.800 --> 0:21:02.280
<v Speaker 2>so I don't want to put myself in that pool.

0:21:02.280 --> 0:21:07.760
<v Speaker 2>But a lot of Catholics get frustrated. They want there

0:21:07.800 --> 0:21:11.480
<v Speaker 2>to be more of a unified vision, and I think

0:21:11.480 --> 0:21:13.639
<v Speaker 2>it is confusing and different popes have different ways of

0:21:13.640 --> 0:21:16.280
<v Speaker 2>looking at it. I actually looked up some of what

0:21:17.359 --> 0:21:21.160
<v Speaker 2>religious Catholic leaders have said about women working outside of

0:21:21.320 --> 0:21:25.240
<v Speaker 2>the church, and I actually I loved reading a little

0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:28.600
<v Speaker 2>bit of what Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger spoke about because he said,

0:21:28.640 --> 0:21:32.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to quote him here, women who freely desire

0:21:33.040 --> 0:21:35.160
<v Speaker 2>will be able to devote the totality of their time

0:21:35.200 --> 0:21:38.040
<v Speaker 2>to the work of the household without being stigmatized by

0:21:38.040 --> 0:21:42.200
<v Speaker 2>society or penalized financially of aka the homemaker, while those

0:21:42.200 --> 0:21:45.440
<v Speaker 2>who wish also to engage in other work may be

0:21:45.560 --> 0:21:48.200
<v Speaker 2>able to do so with an appropriate work schedule and

0:21:48.240 --> 0:21:51.040
<v Speaker 2>not have to choose between relinquishing their family life or

0:21:51.119 --> 0:21:55.080
<v Speaker 2>enduring continual stress with negative consequences for one's own equilibrium

0:21:55.320 --> 0:21:58.800
<v Speaker 2>and the harmony of the family. And I also like

0:21:58.840 --> 0:22:02.520
<v Speaker 2>he went on to say talking about the genius of women,

0:22:03.080 --> 0:22:05.480
<v Speaker 2>and he said that women should be present in the

0:22:05.480 --> 0:22:08.480
<v Speaker 2>world of work and in the organization of society, and

0:22:08.480 --> 0:22:11.360
<v Speaker 2>that women should have access to positions of responsibility which

0:22:11.400 --> 0:22:14.399
<v Speaker 2>allow them to inspire the policies of nations and to

0:22:14.480 --> 0:22:18.920
<v Speaker 2>promote innovative solutions to economic and social problems. But they

0:22:18.960 --> 0:22:21.560
<v Speaker 2>all make the caveat that it somehow, any of that

0:22:21.640 --> 0:22:24.680
<v Speaker 2>work is in the detriment or somehow you know, is

0:22:25.080 --> 0:22:28.160
<v Speaker 2>a negative to the family life. Then the woman needs

0:22:28.160 --> 0:22:30.640
<v Speaker 2>to choose her family over work. And so that has

0:22:30.720 --> 0:22:35.360
<v Speaker 2>been an absolute current, like a consensus that women can

0:22:35.400 --> 0:22:38.040
<v Speaker 2>work unless it affects the family.

0:22:39.320 --> 0:22:44.199
<v Speaker 1>Well, I suppose any woman who makes that choice for

0:22:44.320 --> 0:22:50.000
<v Speaker 1>herself no one should take issue with. But if anyone,

0:22:50.400 --> 0:22:55.240
<v Speaker 1>any religious leader, is encouraging her to do so, there

0:22:55.280 --> 0:22:57.680
<v Speaker 1>in lies the problem.

0:22:59.040 --> 0:23:02.040
<v Speaker 2>Yes, true, yeah, yes, I mean well, yeah, the.

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Choice itself is not is just the woman makes the choice.

0:23:05.480 --> 0:23:07.919
<v Speaker 2>That's correct. But and I do think there is an

0:23:07.960 --> 0:23:10.520
<v Speaker 2>emphasis though that it is a woman's responsibility to make

0:23:10.560 --> 0:23:13.960
<v Speaker 2>sure her children and her family are good, basically in

0:23:14.000 --> 0:23:18.520
<v Speaker 2>addition to working outside of the home. But I also

0:23:18.600 --> 0:23:21.840
<v Speaker 2>love something else that the Catholic I want to try

0:23:21.840 --> 0:23:24.320
<v Speaker 2>to read something. It was something really cool about the

0:23:24.359 --> 0:23:29.639
<v Speaker 2>reference in the in the Bible to me. Sorry, I

0:23:31.080 --> 0:23:33.400
<v Speaker 2>had something I wanted to bring it up, and maybe

0:23:33.440 --> 0:23:35.920
<v Speaker 2>I thought it was it was basically not referencing that

0:23:35.960 --> 0:23:38.879
<v Speaker 2>it was a woman's responsibility or a mother's responsibility, but

0:23:38.920 --> 0:23:41.440
<v Speaker 2>it was a parent's parents responsibility. So there was no

0:23:41.520 --> 0:23:45.480
<v Speaker 2>distinguishing between women and men. That it was this was

0:23:45.520 --> 0:23:48.199
<v Speaker 2>in the this was in the Catholic doctrine, that it

0:23:48.280 --> 0:23:50.520
<v Speaker 2>wasn't specifically women, that it was parents. And I mean,

0:23:50.560 --> 0:23:54.399
<v Speaker 2>I think that's what I would argue most women, and

0:23:54.600 --> 0:23:56.600
<v Speaker 2>I think a lot of men, most men believe as

0:23:56.600 --> 0:24:00.280
<v Speaker 2>well that this is a shared responsibility, isn't solely based

0:24:00.280 --> 0:24:01.120
<v Speaker 2>on the shoulder of women.

0:24:01.400 --> 0:24:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but that same Bible we speak of says that husbands,

0:24:05.920 --> 0:24:08.400
<v Speaker 1>in the same way be considerate as you live with

0:24:08.440 --> 0:24:11.119
<v Speaker 1>your wives and treat them with respect as the weaker

0:24:11.280 --> 0:24:14.680
<v Speaker 1>partner and as airs with you of the gracious gift

0:24:14.760 --> 0:24:17.600
<v Speaker 1>of life. That's Saint Peter, right, So you can there's

0:24:17.720 --> 0:24:20.359
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of stuff later throughout there, but all this

0:24:20.400 --> 0:24:22.520
<v Speaker 1>stuff was written at different times. We all know there

0:24:22.680 --> 0:24:25.359
<v Speaker 1>is and should be equality these days. If you choose

0:24:25.800 --> 0:24:29.280
<v Speaker 1>to be only a working woman, or we want to

0:24:29.280 --> 0:24:31.240
<v Speaker 1>be a working mom, you can just be a mom.

0:24:31.480 --> 0:24:36.199
<v Speaker 1>Everybody can make that call. But if that line the

0:24:36.280 --> 0:24:38.719
<v Speaker 1>first quote you gave had been delivered to that audience

0:24:38.760 --> 0:24:40.720
<v Speaker 1>by a woman. Would you feel differently about this? Would

0:24:40.720 --> 0:24:41.880
<v Speaker 1>anybody be talking about.

0:24:42.040 --> 0:24:45.440
<v Speaker 2>Oh, it would be a little different, but I think

0:24:45.440 --> 0:24:46.879
<v Speaker 2>people would still be talking about it.

0:24:46.920 --> 0:24:49.080
<v Speaker 1>This would make the same headlines, He would get the

0:24:49.080 --> 0:24:49.520
<v Speaker 1>same back.

0:24:49.640 --> 0:24:51.160
<v Speaker 2>It would not make the same headline if.

0:24:51.440 --> 0:24:53.600
<v Speaker 1>A woman got up then said, I would venture to

0:24:53.640 --> 0:24:55.760
<v Speaker 1>guess the majority of you are most excited about your

0:24:55.800 --> 0:24:58.240
<v Speaker 1>marriage and the children you will bring into this world.

0:24:59.320 --> 0:25:01.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I don't think it would not have the same

0:25:02.080 --> 0:25:04.400
<v Speaker 2>fever pitch for sure. And didn't you say, by the way,

0:25:04.400 --> 0:25:06.800
<v Speaker 2>this is interesting and speaking to a point you made

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:10.159
<v Speaker 2>when we were talking about this before the podcast, about

0:25:10.200 --> 0:25:13.280
<v Speaker 2>the role of Benedictine College and what they knew was

0:25:13.320 --> 0:25:15.879
<v Speaker 2>going to be said and what they probably knew what

0:25:15.920 --> 0:25:17.520
<v Speaker 2>they were getting when they asked him to speak. He

0:25:17.560 --> 0:25:21.960
<v Speaker 2>gave a similar commencement address at Georgia Tech, his alma mater, correct,

0:25:22.000 --> 0:25:24.640
<v Speaker 2>and no one picked up on it.

0:25:24.640 --> 0:25:27.679
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't as long and he didn't go as hard,

0:25:27.760 --> 0:25:31.080
<v Speaker 1>but he made some of the same some of the

0:25:31.119 --> 0:25:33.560
<v Speaker 1>same claims. I think he even stopped or paused in

0:25:33.600 --> 0:25:35.600
<v Speaker 1>that one kind of tongue and she kind of smiled

0:25:35.600 --> 0:25:37.960
<v Speaker 1>a little bit where he said I'm going to say

0:25:38.000 --> 0:25:41.119
<v Speaker 1>something here about your future or something you need to

0:25:41.119 --> 0:25:44.040
<v Speaker 1>do to be successful. He said, get married, had a family.

0:25:44.520 --> 0:25:46.640
<v Speaker 1>He said this to the graduating class of Georgia Tech,

0:25:46.720 --> 0:25:49.000
<v Speaker 1>so it's not it was a shorter speech and didn't

0:25:49.040 --> 0:25:51.920
<v Speaker 1>get much attention. But yeah, this is something he has

0:25:52.000 --> 0:25:56.679
<v Speaker 1>been talking about for a while.

0:25:56.600 --> 0:25:58.600
<v Speaker 2>And it's also interesting. I just want to point out

0:25:59.080 --> 0:26:02.399
<v Speaker 2>his mother, his own mom has worked outside of the

0:26:02.400 --> 0:26:06.359
<v Speaker 2>workplace in a very distinguished way. In fact, his mom Elizabeth,

0:26:07.000 --> 0:26:11.399
<v Speaker 2>but she's a medical physicist in the Department of Radiation

0:26:11.480 --> 0:26:14.400
<v Speaker 2>Oncology at the Emory University School of Medicine in Atlanta.

0:26:14.400 --> 0:26:18.160
<v Speaker 2>They're in Georgia, so she is and was a working mom.

0:26:18.240 --> 0:26:22.399
<v Speaker 2>So it's an interesting I would be really curious to

0:26:22.400 --> 0:26:23.639
<v Speaker 2>see what she has to say. And she may be

0:26:23.640 --> 0:26:26.000
<v Speaker 2>in full support of her son and agree with everything

0:26:26.040 --> 0:26:29.960
<v Speaker 2>he said, but it is an interesting position to find

0:26:30.000 --> 0:26:32.960
<v Speaker 2>that she not only worked outside of the home, but

0:26:33.080 --> 0:26:36.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, in a very very elevated, dedicated way.

0:26:36.200 --> 0:26:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Well, we don't want to go as far as we're not.

0:26:37.720 --> 0:26:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Don't suggesting he's anti women working.

0:26:42.080 --> 0:26:44.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what he is. I mean, it just

0:26:44.680 --> 0:26:48.040
<v Speaker 2>it felt. Look, here's the deal. I will say this,

0:26:48.240 --> 0:26:51.280
<v Speaker 2>I think women who choose, And by the way, when

0:26:51.280 --> 0:26:53.960
<v Speaker 2>I say choose, not everybody has a choice, but the

0:26:53.960 --> 0:26:58.399
<v Speaker 2>women who have the incredible ability to choose not to

0:26:58.440 --> 0:27:02.240
<v Speaker 2>work for whatever reason, they're financially secure, because of their husbands,

0:27:02.320 --> 0:27:07.320
<v Speaker 2>or for whatever reason, they don't have to work outside

0:27:07.320 --> 0:27:09.679
<v Speaker 2>of the home, which is a very important caveat because

0:27:09.720 --> 0:27:11.680
<v Speaker 2>that and I know everyone says this and it sounds

0:27:11.760 --> 0:27:15.960
<v Speaker 2>even cliche, but my god, working at home as a

0:27:16.000 --> 0:27:20.240
<v Speaker 2>mother and a wife is absolutely the hardest job any

0:27:20.320 --> 0:27:24.640
<v Speaker 2>woman could undertake. It is thankless, it is selfless, it

0:27:24.680 --> 0:27:28.600
<v Speaker 2>is it never stops. You're on call twenty four to seven.

0:27:28.840 --> 0:27:33.760
<v Speaker 2>And my hat go. My hat's off to any woman

0:27:34.200 --> 0:27:37.240
<v Speaker 2>who chooses that, because to me, that is incredibly difficult

0:27:37.240 --> 0:27:41.840
<v Speaker 2>and incredibly beautiful and something to be proud of. So love,

0:27:42.359 --> 0:27:45.680
<v Speaker 2>I would have loved the idea, if you know, I'm

0:27:45.720 --> 0:27:49.200
<v Speaker 2>all about those women need more support. Those women need

0:27:49.240 --> 0:27:53.520
<v Speaker 2>to feel the love and the support from not only

0:27:53.520 --> 0:27:57.080
<v Speaker 2>their families, their husbands, but their communities and this world. Frankly,

0:27:57.160 --> 0:28:00.320
<v Speaker 2>that their jobs are important, probably the most important there

0:28:00.359 --> 0:28:02.280
<v Speaker 2>is to have. So I want to make that very

0:28:02.280 --> 0:28:05.040
<v Speaker 2>clear that I feel that way, and I think those

0:28:05.080 --> 0:28:06.960
<v Speaker 2>women need to have more support. So if he could

0:28:06.960 --> 0:28:08.320
<v Speaker 2>have freezed it in a way where it just felt

0:28:08.320 --> 0:28:13.000
<v Speaker 2>more supportive, unless you'll be happier if dot dot dot

0:28:13.400 --> 0:28:14.520
<v Speaker 2>at a commencement address.

0:28:15.200 --> 0:28:17.359
<v Speaker 1>Isn't that But if he made the commencement address at

0:28:17.359 --> 0:28:19.600
<v Speaker 1>the University of Arkansas, it would have been received differently.

0:28:19.800 --> 0:28:20.199
<v Speaker 2>It would have.

0:28:20.240 --> 0:28:22.520
<v Speaker 1>But he's making it to a place that he knows

0:28:22.680 --> 0:28:24.320
<v Speaker 1>is and maybe that's why he didn't go as hard

0:28:24.440 --> 0:28:26.160
<v Speaker 1>at Georgia Tech because it's.

0:28:26.040 --> 0:28:27.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm pretty sure why.

0:28:27.560 --> 0:28:31.280
<v Speaker 1>But the more connected people are to one another, the

0:28:31.280 --> 0:28:33.600
<v Speaker 1>more they feel alone. He said. I'm not sure the

0:28:33.680 --> 0:28:35.400
<v Speaker 1>root of this, but at least I can offer one

0:28:35.480 --> 0:28:40.720
<v Speaker 1>controversial antidote that I think though that I believe will

0:28:40.720 --> 0:28:44.400
<v Speaker 1>have a lasting impact on generations to come get married

0:28:44.600 --> 0:28:47.000
<v Speaker 1>and start a family. That's his quote from the Georgia

0:28:47.000 --> 0:28:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Tech speech. Wow, right, the techn engineer sitting out there

0:28:50.600 --> 0:28:53.840
<v Speaker 1>and he's encouraging them to do so. That tells you

0:28:53.880 --> 0:28:57.520
<v Speaker 1>he really sees in his life the importance of family

0:28:57.520 --> 0:28:59.920
<v Speaker 1>and marriage. He didn't go as far as with really

0:29:00.480 --> 0:29:05.120
<v Speaker 1>in that speech, but he was waiting on a conservative

0:29:05.240 --> 0:29:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Christian college to call, and he led loose on this

0:29:07.720 --> 0:29:10.200
<v Speaker 1>one a little bit. But at the same time, but

0:29:10.840 --> 0:29:15.600
<v Speaker 1>that idea is not crazy, It's not far fetched. Like

0:29:15.640 --> 0:29:17.360
<v Speaker 1>you said, you just had issue with.

0:29:19.400 --> 0:29:22.959
<v Speaker 2>His tone, his tone, his message. And you know, he

0:29:23.000 --> 0:29:25.840
<v Speaker 2>does not speak for all Catholics. I know that for sure,

0:29:26.000 --> 0:29:29.680
<v Speaker 2>and he certainly doesn't speak for women, and I think

0:29:29.720 --> 0:29:32.200
<v Speaker 2>that was a big part of the problem. But I

0:29:32.240 --> 0:29:34.320
<v Speaker 2>did appreciate you know, it's funny I brought this to you.

0:29:34.800 --> 0:29:37.880
<v Speaker 2>I had a very emotional reaction. Initially, I was outraged.

0:29:37.920 --> 0:29:40.680
<v Speaker 2>I actually felt it like in my chest it tightened.

0:29:41.040 --> 0:29:44.800
<v Speaker 2>I actually felt like emotional, like I felt like I

0:29:44.840 --> 0:29:49.080
<v Speaker 2>wanted to cry when I read what he said. And

0:29:49.120 --> 0:29:52.880
<v Speaker 2>then you're very measured and said, why is everybody jumping

0:29:52.880 --> 0:29:55.080
<v Speaker 2>on this guy? You know? And so it was cool

0:29:55.120 --> 0:30:00.080
<v Speaker 2>to hear your take on it from the perspective of

0:30:00.240 --> 0:30:03.520
<v Speaker 2>everyone just wants to jump on the messenger, make them

0:30:03.560 --> 0:30:07.360
<v Speaker 2>into villains, make them into bad guys, ask for an apology,

0:30:08.360 --> 0:30:12.480
<v Speaker 2>ask for I know. The NFL did respond, yeah.

0:30:12.400 --> 0:30:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Just that they don't agree that his views aren't in

0:30:15.000 --> 0:30:16.160
<v Speaker 1>line with the nfls.

0:30:15.920 --> 0:30:18.080
<v Speaker 2>And speaking to that, I think a lot of that

0:30:18.280 --> 0:30:21.360
<v Speaker 2>was in reaction to what he said about Pride month.

0:30:21.600 --> 0:30:23.400
<v Speaker 2>You have the quote right, because you know he wasn't

0:30:23.480 --> 0:30:26.160
<v Speaker 2>just women. That was probably the biggest headline, but he

0:30:26.200 --> 0:30:30.040
<v Speaker 2>also made It was a very quick one line, but

0:30:30.240 --> 0:30:31.920
<v Speaker 2>it certainly packed a punch.

0:30:31.960 --> 0:30:34.720
<v Speaker 1>And it seemed done necessary. It was the one part

0:30:34.760 --> 0:30:40.840
<v Speaker 1>of the that seemed a little mean, seemed a little unnecessary. Again,

0:30:40.960 --> 0:30:44.160
<v Speaker 1>sorry to assign mean to it, but that was the

0:30:44.240 --> 0:30:46.880
<v Speaker 1>one thing I mean made like you said you talked

0:30:46.920 --> 0:30:50.040
<v Speaker 1>about He talked about Biden and some political.

0:30:49.680 --> 0:30:51.600
<v Speaker 2>Stocks, abortion, IVF sarrogacy.

0:30:51.920 --> 0:30:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but this line, he said, I'm saying all this here.

0:31:01.720 --> 0:31:04.400
<v Speaker 1>He was hoping what he said wouldn't be met with anger,

0:31:04.480 --> 0:31:09.240
<v Speaker 1>but instead met with excitement and pride. Not the deadly

0:31:09.360 --> 0:31:12.120
<v Speaker 1>sin sort of pride that has an entire month dedicated

0:31:12.160 --> 0:31:14.680
<v Speaker 1>to it, but the true God centered pride that is

0:31:14.720 --> 0:31:16.920
<v Speaker 1>cooperating with that d D DA DA. So it was almost

0:31:16.960 --> 0:31:18.960
<v Speaker 1>a line that wasn't necessary. He just used the word

0:31:19.040 --> 0:31:21.200
<v Speaker 1>pride and took an opportunity to take a shot at

0:31:21.200 --> 0:31:23.719
<v Speaker 1>the LGBTQ plus community in Pride Month. I thought that

0:31:23.840 --> 0:31:34.720
<v Speaker 1>was a little that was a little harsh.

0:31:34.800 --> 0:31:38.360
<v Speaker 2>Here's my big issue. Look, there are a lot of

0:31:38.440 --> 0:31:41.680
<v Speaker 2>amazing Christians and Catholics out there. I would say most

0:31:41.720 --> 0:31:43.640
<v Speaker 2>of them are, but The problem is when you take

0:31:43.720 --> 0:31:46.160
<v Speaker 2>religion and then you're divisive with it. I have an

0:31:46.200 --> 0:31:48.880
<v Speaker 2>issue with that. I mean, I just the whole What

0:31:48.880 --> 0:31:51.440
<v Speaker 2>would Jesus do? What would Jesus say? I do not

0:31:51.520 --> 0:31:53.680
<v Speaker 2>believe Jesus would have said any of those things. And

0:31:53.720 --> 0:31:56.600
<v Speaker 2>I think that is the frustrating thing for me to

0:31:56.680 --> 0:32:00.680
<v Speaker 2>see someone. And he has absolutely entitled to his opinion,

0:32:01.120 --> 0:32:03.880
<v Speaker 2>but I just don't think that's in this spirit of Christianity.

0:32:03.920 --> 0:32:07.680
<v Speaker 2>That's my personal belief and judgment. There's no place for

0:32:07.720 --> 0:32:11.320
<v Speaker 2>that in a commencement address. And that's absolutely what he did.

0:32:11.400 --> 0:32:13.080
<v Speaker 2>And he chose those words. You can tell he is

0:32:13.120 --> 0:32:16.600
<v Speaker 2>an incredibly intelligent human being, the words he chose, how

0:32:16.640 --> 0:32:23.160
<v Speaker 2>he spoke. He is a thoughtful, introspective, intelligent person. So

0:32:23.240 --> 0:32:26.080
<v Speaker 2>he chose those words carefully and he chose to say them.

0:32:26.160 --> 0:32:31.080
<v Speaker 2>And so yes, people get to react based on that.

0:32:31.160 --> 0:32:34.520
<v Speaker 2>This wasn't something that he said offhanded, a quick remark

0:32:34.600 --> 0:32:36.800
<v Speaker 2>and ad lib something he didn't think through or out.

0:32:36.920 --> 0:32:39.440
<v Speaker 2>He wrote this down and he said it deliberately with

0:32:39.480 --> 0:32:40.240
<v Speaker 2>a lot of intention.

0:32:42.600 --> 0:32:45.560
<v Speaker 1>And my issue again, I was re You told me

0:32:45.600 --> 0:32:48.320
<v Speaker 1>about it, and you were fired up about it last night,

0:32:48.760 --> 0:32:51.120
<v Speaker 1>and I just wanted to I had no reaction because

0:32:51.160 --> 0:32:53.760
<v Speaker 1>based on what you were telling me and based on headlines,

0:32:54.040 --> 0:32:56.840
<v Speaker 1>I just didn't have a reaction to it. See why

0:32:56.840 --> 0:32:58.880
<v Speaker 1>people reacted, But so much of what I saw didn't

0:32:58.880 --> 0:33:03.840
<v Speaker 1>involve thought. It didn't involve a conversation, It didn't involve

0:33:03.920 --> 0:33:06.760
<v Speaker 1>any type of grace or an attempt to understand. It

0:33:06.800 --> 0:33:10.400
<v Speaker 1>was the same old stuff we do in this country

0:33:10.400 --> 0:33:12.600
<v Speaker 1>when things like this come up. This is an opportunity

0:33:12.640 --> 0:33:16.600
<v Speaker 1>for me. I learned a lot about Catholicism today because

0:33:16.600 --> 0:33:19.040
<v Speaker 1>of this guy, by looking it up and reading and researching.

0:33:19.560 --> 0:33:22.840
<v Speaker 1>But my issue was that why are we Why are

0:33:22.880 --> 0:33:24.840
<v Speaker 1>we not having a larger conversation or trying to get

0:33:24.880 --> 0:33:27.440
<v Speaker 1>some kind of an understanding to why a guy that

0:33:27.520 --> 0:33:30.320
<v Speaker 1>everybody is trying to cancel on social media, people even

0:33:30.320 --> 0:33:32.680
<v Speaker 1>calling for him to be let go by the Kansas

0:33:32.720 --> 0:33:39.240
<v Speaker 1>City chiefs. That where we're attacking this guy, then why

0:33:39.400 --> 0:33:44.280
<v Speaker 1>is there not some thought or criticism or conversation to

0:33:44.400 --> 0:33:50.480
<v Speaker 1>the college, to Catholicism, to the folks who invited him,

0:33:50.520 --> 0:33:54.240
<v Speaker 1>to the folks who I don't remember seeing a single

0:33:54.240 --> 0:33:57.680
<v Speaker 1>person sitting down at the end, and he got that ovation.

0:33:58.600 --> 0:34:02.800
<v Speaker 1>So something's going on. I'm trying to understand that better.

0:34:03.120 --> 0:34:06.920
<v Speaker 1>I understand, and it's unfortunate what happens on social media

0:34:07.040 --> 0:34:10.439
<v Speaker 1>that I get because we've been through it, and it's hate, hate,

0:34:10.719 --> 0:34:13.080
<v Speaker 1>hate that. So we might be missing an opportunity to

0:34:13.280 --> 0:34:15.879
<v Speaker 1>actually have a learn a little something about each other,

0:34:15.920 --> 0:34:17.759
<v Speaker 1>for men and women to have a better conversation, for

0:34:17.840 --> 0:34:19.440
<v Speaker 1>religious folks to have a better conversation.

0:34:19.560 --> 0:34:19.960
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

0:34:20.000 --> 0:34:21.560
<v Speaker 1>And it just sucked that was getting a.

0:34:21.520 --> 0:34:24.920
<v Speaker 2>Little lost well, you know, and I appreciate that measured response,

0:34:24.960 --> 0:34:29.040
<v Speaker 2>and thatiate Your immediate response was to learn more. Your

0:34:29.080 --> 0:34:31.799
<v Speaker 2>immediate response was to first of all, watch and read

0:34:31.800 --> 0:34:34.200
<v Speaker 2>it all, but then to actually dig in and figure

0:34:34.239 --> 0:34:36.319
<v Speaker 2>out where he was coming from. And I think that

0:34:36.480 --> 0:34:38.879
<v Speaker 2>is something that the majority people do not do. And

0:34:39.120 --> 0:34:41.480
<v Speaker 2>I will admit initially, I mean, I do have the

0:34:41.520 --> 0:34:43.800
<v Speaker 2>background of I don't believe me, I don't know everything

0:34:44.320 --> 0:34:47.239
<v Speaker 2>far from it where it comes to the Catholic Church,

0:34:47.320 --> 0:34:51.600
<v Speaker 2>but I did have, you know, a fairly intimate understanding

0:34:51.719 --> 0:34:54.239
<v Speaker 2>of my experience in the Catholic Church. So it was

0:34:54.360 --> 0:34:58.239
<v Speaker 2>just I had a very visceral emotional reaction as a

0:34:58.320 --> 0:35:01.080
<v Speaker 2>former Catholic and a woman, But it was I actually

0:35:01.160 --> 0:35:04.440
<v Speaker 2>appreciate your response because it wasn't what I thought you

0:35:04.480 --> 0:35:07.480
<v Speaker 2>would respond with, and I respect it because I feel

0:35:07.480 --> 0:35:12.800
<v Speaker 2>like if more of us can react with an open

0:35:12.840 --> 0:35:15.000
<v Speaker 2>mind and a willingness to dig in a little bit

0:35:15.040 --> 0:35:17.320
<v Speaker 2>deeper and to take the emotional part of it and

0:35:17.800 --> 0:35:19.520
<v Speaker 2>just put it aside for a little bit. I mean,

0:35:21.360 --> 0:35:23.840
<v Speaker 2>I say that as somebody who reacted emotionally when I

0:35:23.920 --> 0:35:26.400
<v Speaker 2>first saw it, and I still feel emotional about it,

0:35:26.400 --> 0:35:30.279
<v Speaker 2>and I still feel pretty strongly about it. But if

0:35:30.280 --> 0:35:32.239
<v Speaker 2>we can all have conversations about it, we can get

0:35:32.239 --> 0:35:34.680
<v Speaker 2>a little bit closer to just understanding one another. We

0:35:34.680 --> 0:35:37.040
<v Speaker 2>don't have to agree with each other, and I don't

0:35:37.040 --> 0:35:39.840
<v Speaker 2>think we ever will, but if we can just understand

0:35:40.239 --> 0:35:43.160
<v Speaker 2>each other and show a little respect, you know, that

0:35:43.200 --> 0:35:48.520
<v Speaker 2>would go a long way in the conversation. And it's

0:35:48.560 --> 0:35:53.440
<v Speaker 2>been an interesting reaction between you and me about what

0:35:53.480 --> 0:35:54.600
<v Speaker 2>we both read and saw.

0:35:54.520 --> 0:35:59.480
<v Speaker 1>And the completely miss this one. I didn't miss, but

0:35:59.560 --> 0:36:01.600
<v Speaker 1>we even forgot this one because there was so much

0:36:01.640 --> 0:36:04.400
<v Speaker 1>stuff in there the world around us says we should

0:36:04.480 --> 0:36:07.360
<v Speaker 1>keep our beliefs to ourselves whenever they go against the

0:36:07.440 --> 0:36:12.480
<v Speaker 1>tyranny diversity, equity, and inclusion. That was his other line.

0:36:12.600 --> 0:36:13.480
<v Speaker 2>It bothered me a lot.

0:36:13.600 --> 0:36:17.480
<v Speaker 1>They go against the tyranny of diversity, equity, and inclusion.

0:36:17.880 --> 0:36:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Now that's other levels. He threw it in there. Now

0:36:22.200 --> 0:36:25.960
<v Speaker 1>that one seems he didn't give any he didn't allow

0:36:26.000 --> 0:36:29.799
<v Speaker 1>for any more conversation. He made a statement there and

0:36:29.920 --> 0:36:32.920
<v Speaker 1>left it for our interpretation. But to call it the

0:36:33.560 --> 0:36:36.560
<v Speaker 1>tyranny of diversity, equity, inclusion. I know there's a movement

0:36:36.560 --> 0:36:41.040
<v Speaker 1>in this country to get rid of those offices and

0:36:41.080 --> 0:36:44.520
<v Speaker 1>whatnot in companies and schools and states around the country.

0:36:44.920 --> 0:36:47.840
<v Speaker 1>I get that, But they call it the tyranny.

0:36:48.280 --> 0:36:51.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, easy to say for a white man, I just

0:36:51.840 --> 0:36:54.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm sorry, but I think that is part of the offense,

0:36:54.960 --> 0:37:01.439
<v Speaker 2>that his experience is so singular, and most anyone who

0:37:01.440 --> 0:37:05.480
<v Speaker 2>isn't a white male, I would never say, I know

0:37:05.520 --> 0:37:07.040
<v Speaker 2>what it's like to be him. But to then say

0:37:07.400 --> 0:37:11.200
<v Speaker 2>for inclusionists and diversity and all those things to somehow

0:37:11.200 --> 0:37:16.120
<v Speaker 2>be something negative, that's also I have a I take

0:37:16.160 --> 0:37:18.120
<v Speaker 2>a huge issue with that, and again I think just

0:37:18.200 --> 0:37:25.640
<v Speaker 2>goes against the teachings of Fellowship and Christianity at its base,

0:37:25.680 --> 0:37:28.600
<v Speaker 2>at its root, we should be inclusive, we should be diverse,

0:37:28.640 --> 0:37:32.640
<v Speaker 2>we should be accepting, and certain parts of this world,

0:37:32.680 --> 0:37:36.880
<v Speaker 2>in this society do need extra support based on history

0:37:37.520 --> 0:37:39.520
<v Speaker 2>and current status. That's just the truth.

0:37:40.480 --> 0:37:43.279
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, I'm bumpstill looking at his tyranny line. It

0:37:43.320 --> 0:37:45.920
<v Speaker 1>was just it's hard to put it in full context

0:37:45.920 --> 0:37:48.000
<v Speaker 1>of what he was trying to say and why he

0:37:48.160 --> 0:37:50.000
<v Speaker 1>said it. He would have to explain I would lead

0:37:50.040 --> 0:37:52.520
<v Speaker 1>to hear what he's talking about here. But just on

0:37:52.640 --> 0:37:55.160
<v Speaker 1>its face, you you jump to a conclusion that he is,

0:37:55.320 --> 0:37:57.960
<v Speaker 1>you would the tyranny of diversity, equity and inclusion. That's

0:37:58.000 --> 0:38:02.520
<v Speaker 1>just that's just one to defend. But it just there's

0:38:02.560 --> 0:38:05.080
<v Speaker 1>no fuller context in the paragraphs. So I don't know

0:38:05.120 --> 0:38:07.160
<v Speaker 1>exactly what he was trying to say, but that that

0:38:07.239 --> 0:38:10.719
<v Speaker 1>don't look good. But yeah, it's it's we'll see what

0:38:10.760 --> 0:38:13.320
<v Speaker 1>happens that I don't I don't think as of this recording,

0:38:13.440 --> 0:38:17.920
<v Speaker 1>the Kansas City Chiefs have made a statement about it.

0:38:18.000 --> 0:38:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Then they might not. Look there's a lot of stuff

0:38:20.600 --> 0:38:24.200
<v Speaker 1>going on in the league that well, sometimes guys do

0:38:24.280 --> 0:38:27.439
<v Speaker 1>a lot worse than say some words that offend people. Yep.

0:38:27.960 --> 0:38:29.600
<v Speaker 1>So don't know if anything will come of it in

0:38:29.640 --> 0:38:32.520
<v Speaker 1>the NFL, but this was no. I appreciate it. I

0:38:32.800 --> 0:38:35.880
<v Speaker 1>didn't even want to do this episode, yes, because I

0:38:35.880 --> 0:38:37.960
<v Speaker 1>said whatever I upset about. I just don't want to

0:38:37.960 --> 0:38:42.000
<v Speaker 1>pile on or throw in some oounts. All right, Finn,

0:38:42.239 --> 0:38:44.799
<v Speaker 1>some outrage here, but I don't actually have it. And

0:38:45.760 --> 0:38:48.040
<v Speaker 1>I just saw it as a great opportunity to have

0:38:48.080 --> 0:38:51.279
<v Speaker 1>a conversation and to slow down a little bit. And

0:38:51.360 --> 0:38:54.920
<v Speaker 1>we do encourage everybody to read it or listen to

0:38:54.960 --> 0:38:57.440
<v Speaker 1>it and listen to the crowd and how the crowd

0:38:57.520 --> 0:39:01.520
<v Speaker 1>reacts to certain things. He says at times, Yeah, it

0:39:01.560 --> 0:39:03.000
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a hospital for out for him.

0:39:03.200 --> 0:39:06.520
<v Speaker 2>No, it wasn't. And so I love that we're I mean,

0:39:07.760 --> 0:39:12.600
<v Speaker 2>we're having a conversation about having a conversation before you know,

0:39:13.320 --> 0:39:16.120
<v Speaker 2>going on to social media. And I argue that most

0:39:16.120 --> 0:39:18.880
<v Speaker 2>people who have well I shouldn't say this, but I

0:39:18.880 --> 0:39:21.719
<v Speaker 2>would imagine a lot of people who are hearing or

0:39:21.719 --> 0:39:24.440
<v Speaker 2>reading about this have only heard or read about it

0:39:24.520 --> 0:39:28.240
<v Speaker 2>on social media. And so take the time for yourself

0:39:28.239 --> 0:39:31.560
<v Speaker 2>to watch it and have a measured conversation about it.

0:39:31.600 --> 0:39:33.279
<v Speaker 2>Maybe we can all learn a little bit more about

0:39:33.280 --> 0:39:33.680
<v Speaker 2>each other.

0:39:33.760 --> 0:39:38.320
<v Speaker 1>And thank you women who are mothers, thank you women

0:39:38.320 --> 0:39:41.600
<v Speaker 1>who are wives, thank you women who are daughters, thank

0:39:41.680 --> 0:39:48.000
<v Speaker 1>you women who work. That is from Pope John Paul

0:39:48.760 --> 0:39:50.480
<v Speaker 1>and a letter to women in which he was almost

0:39:50.520 --> 0:39:53.360
<v Speaker 1>it's almost a love letter to women, you could argue,

0:39:53.400 --> 0:39:55.960
<v Speaker 1>but he that's quoted a lot of times back in

0:39:56.000 --> 0:39:58.200
<v Speaker 1>nineteen ninety five to where he said thank you to

0:39:58.320 --> 0:40:02.359
<v Speaker 1>women who work. Quote, we need only think of how

0:40:02.440 --> 0:40:05.440
<v Speaker 1>the gift of motherhood is often penalized rather than rewarded.

0:40:05.480 --> 0:40:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Even though humanity owes it's very survival to this gift,

0:40:11.480 --> 0:40:14.160
<v Speaker 1>much remains to be done to prevent discrimination against those

0:40:14.200 --> 0:40:21.879
<v Speaker 1>who choose to be wives and mothers. Paul John, Paul

0:40:22.760 --> 0:40:24.239
<v Speaker 1>your guy, what used to be your guy?

0:40:24.440 --> 0:40:26.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean he's the people's the people's fault. Now

0:40:26.960 --> 0:40:31.719
<v Speaker 2>he's beloved, and that's the reason why he was canonized. Yeah, yeah,

0:40:31.760 --> 0:40:34.719
<v Speaker 2>I know. I mean, I I think I want to

0:40:34.760 --> 0:40:38.160
<v Speaker 2>close with this that you know, us women we're I

0:40:38.160 --> 0:40:43.520
<v Speaker 2>think we're we fill many roles. We work really hard,

0:40:44.120 --> 0:40:46.960
<v Speaker 2>whether we're working in the home outside of the home.

0:40:47.480 --> 0:40:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Uh.

0:40:47.960 --> 0:40:51.120
<v Speaker 2>And I just hate to make or for any woman

0:40:51.160 --> 0:40:54.400
<v Speaker 2>to feel like they're less than or more then, or

0:40:54.440 --> 0:40:57.520
<v Speaker 2>better then or worse than if they choose what's right

0:40:57.600 --> 0:40:59.600
<v Speaker 2>for them and for their family. And I think that

0:40:59.680 --> 0:41:02.960
<v Speaker 2>was my biggest issue, just you know, support women no

0:41:03.000 --> 0:41:06.040
<v Speaker 2>matter what they do, and a man shouldn't. I just

0:41:06.080 --> 0:41:08.120
<v Speaker 2>don't think a man should be encouraging a woman one

0:41:08.160 --> 0:41:09.840
<v Speaker 2>way or the other. I think we need to support

0:41:09.880 --> 0:41:13.080
<v Speaker 2>whatever a woman feels is right for her. And that

0:41:13.280 --> 0:41:15.799
<v Speaker 2>is where I would like to end my contribution to

0:41:15.880 --> 0:41:16.560
<v Speaker 2>the conversation.

0:41:16.840 --> 0:41:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Is this a thing where it's going to turn into

0:41:18.560 --> 0:41:21.040
<v Speaker 1>one of those things where you the only option you

0:41:21.160 --> 0:41:27.600
<v Speaker 1>have in commenting about this story is to absolutely condemn him,

0:41:27.920 --> 0:41:31.560
<v Speaker 1>and anything short of condemning him in everything he said,

0:41:32.160 --> 0:41:36.239
<v Speaker 1>you are then opening yourself up to criticism. Is this

0:41:36.280 --> 0:41:37.080
<v Speaker 1>one of those things?

0:41:37.160 --> 0:41:40.720
<v Speaker 2>It's a tricky It's a tricky conversation that's been had

0:41:40.760 --> 0:41:44.239
<v Speaker 2>for decades and decades, and I just don't think there's

0:41:44.239 --> 0:41:47.760
<v Speaker 2>a right answer other than supporting women and their choices

0:41:47.800 --> 0:41:51.399
<v Speaker 2>and supporting women who don't have a choice. And no

0:41:51.480 --> 0:41:55.279
<v Speaker 2>woman should feel bad or guilty about doing what's right

0:41:55.440 --> 0:41:56.960
<v Speaker 2>for her and for her family.

0:41:59.280 --> 0:42:04.920
<v Speaker 1>What would you like to do today? Meeting one? No,

0:42:05.000 --> 0:42:07.240
<v Speaker 1>I just didn't want to. I didn't want to suggest

0:42:07.360 --> 0:42:11.000
<v Speaker 1>or encourage you to do something that you didn't already.

0:42:11.680 --> 0:42:12.839
<v Speaker 1>I just want to make sure you have a choice.

0:42:13.080 --> 0:42:16.239
<v Speaker 2>Yes, yes, I appreciate that. No One, I don't feel

0:42:16.239 --> 0:42:17.680
<v Speaker 2>that pressure. Thank you. Honey.

0:42:17.800 --> 0:42:22.040
<v Speaker 1>All right, folks, I encourage you to read it or

0:42:22.040 --> 0:42:25.440
<v Speaker 1>go watch it, but thank you as always for hanging

0:42:25.440 --> 0:42:29.279
<v Speaker 1>out with the two of us and hopefully this conversation

0:42:29.560 --> 0:42:32.480
<v Speaker 1>helped and move things forward a little bit and not backwards.

0:42:33.080 --> 0:42:33.480
<v Speaker 1>See y'all.

0:42:33.520 --> 0:42:33.560
<v Speaker 2>S