WEBVTT - Trump Proposes More Tariffs, Musk's X Looks To $44B Valuation

0:00:01.000 --> 0:00:05.240
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where innovation, money and power collide

0:00:05.519 --> 0:00:10.800
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:10.960 --> 0:00:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Caroline Hide and Ed Ludlow.

0:00:27.200 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 2>Live from New York.

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:31.240
<v Speaker 3>I'm Caroline Hyde and I'm Jackie Devalas in San Francisco.

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:32.879
<v Speaker 4>This is Bloomberg Technology and.

0:00:32.800 --> 0:00:36.479
<v Speaker 5>Coming up, President Trump plans to impose twenty five percent

0:00:36.600 --> 0:00:39.519
<v Speaker 5>tariffs on auto's chips and more. Will break down the

0:00:39.560 --> 0:00:43.839
<v Speaker 5>potential tech impact. Plus, Microsoft's a big quantum leak and

0:00:43.960 --> 0:00:47.159
<v Speaker 5>they have its new Mayorana chip what it means for

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:50.400
<v Speaker 5>the future of computing and Elon Musk's ex is in

0:00:50.440 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 5>talks to raise money from investors and a forty four

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:55.520
<v Speaker 5>billion dollar valuation the amount he bought it for back

0:00:55.520 --> 0:00:56.440
<v Speaker 5>in twenty twenty two.

0:00:56.480 --> 0:00:57.880
<v Speaker 2>But first we check in.

0:00:57.840 --> 0:01:00.360
<v Speaker 5>On these markets and we look at the must all

0:01:00.360 --> 0:01:04.679
<v Speaker 5>that is once again a tariff concern that drives through

0:01:04.720 --> 0:01:06.160
<v Speaker 5>the market, and we try to work out who it

0:01:06.160 --> 0:01:08.080
<v Speaker 5>helps it hinders. We're currently off by three tens percent

0:01:08.120 --> 0:01:10.200
<v Speaker 5>on the NASDAK one hundred drag lower by metal once

0:01:10.240 --> 0:01:12.720
<v Speaker 5>again in the fray after it finally stops it's run

0:01:12.800 --> 0:01:15.640
<v Speaker 5>up that we've seen in market capitalization. The socks though

0:01:15.680 --> 0:01:18.440
<v Speaker 5>the Chip Semiconductor Index that we're seeing at the moment

0:01:18.720 --> 0:01:21.279
<v Speaker 5>up four tens percent. ADI coming out with its numbers

0:01:21.280 --> 0:01:23.280
<v Speaker 5>looking good. We'll dig into what it means in terms

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:26.039
<v Speaker 5>of the overall tariffs they want individual chip makers.

0:01:25.880 --> 0:01:27.040
<v Speaker 2>Move on some individual names.

0:01:27.080 --> 0:01:28.680
<v Speaker 5>I want to shout out in the world of autos

0:01:28.720 --> 0:01:31.920
<v Speaker 5>and chips, Tesla is actually your biggest points driver to

0:01:31.959 --> 0:01:35.119
<v Speaker 5>the higher side today, Jackie, actually managing to push off

0:01:35.280 --> 0:01:37.160
<v Speaker 5>some of the selling that's going on in the Nasdaq

0:01:37.200 --> 0:01:39.320
<v Speaker 5>one hundred are up more than two percent. We'll dig into,

0:01:39.319 --> 0:01:41.600
<v Speaker 5>of course, what Elon Musk and President Trump was saying

0:01:41.600 --> 0:01:44.840
<v Speaker 5>to Fox yesterday. Intel off by almost five percent yesterday's

0:01:44.920 --> 0:01:48.200
<v Speaker 5>run up. Of course, speculation surrounding potential deals selling off

0:01:48.200 --> 0:01:51.040
<v Speaker 5>assets as much as TSMC some cold water being pulled

0:01:51.080 --> 0:01:53.280
<v Speaker 5>on that. Today we're off by five percent, but still

0:01:53.400 --> 0:01:55.760
<v Speaker 5>higher than we had been in the previous weeks. But

0:01:55.960 --> 0:01:58.400
<v Speaker 5>let's dig into the news of the day, Jackie.

0:01:58.520 --> 0:02:01.360
<v Speaker 3>Right, Let's go to Washington D's and bring in Bloomberg's

0:02:01.360 --> 0:02:04.800
<v Speaker 3>Mike Shepherd to break down President Trump's potential tariffs and

0:02:04.840 --> 0:02:07.720
<v Speaker 3>its impact. Mike, what do we know about the scope

0:02:07.760 --> 0:02:13.160
<v Speaker 3>and timing of the tariffs that Trump is proposing here, Jackie.

0:02:13.200 --> 0:02:15.520
<v Speaker 6>He gave us only a few clues yesterday, and one

0:02:15.560 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 6>of them was on the timing. He floated a date

0:02:18.080 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 6>of April second for this latest round of tariffs that

0:02:22.760 --> 0:02:26.720
<v Speaker 6>could come on autos, chips and pharmaceuticals. And this of

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:28.720
<v Speaker 6>course would come on top of a lot of other

0:02:28.840 --> 0:02:31.800
<v Speaker 6>levees that he has already rolled out or is planning

0:02:31.840 --> 0:02:34.320
<v Speaker 6>to roll out, and those include the ten percent tariffs

0:02:34.320 --> 0:02:38.280
<v Speaker 6>on all imports from China levees against Canadian and Mexican

0:02:38.320 --> 0:02:41.040
<v Speaker 6>goods that could go into effect next month, and less

0:02:41.040 --> 0:02:43.960
<v Speaker 6>our neighbors to the north and south are able to

0:02:44.200 --> 0:02:50.320
<v Speaker 6>negotiate another delay or maybe avoid those tariffs altogether and

0:02:50.360 --> 0:02:53.440
<v Speaker 6>then steal on alumin of imports as well. So we

0:02:53.720 --> 0:02:56.960
<v Speaker 6>know the broad strokes. Now what this means in particular

0:02:57.040 --> 0:03:00.839
<v Speaker 6>for chips remains unclear. Would there be exception and how

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:04.040
<v Speaker 6>far would these go? Would it be all categories of

0:03:04.040 --> 0:03:07.760
<v Speaker 6>semiconductors or only the most advanced chips. So we still

0:03:07.800 --> 0:03:11.239
<v Speaker 6>have a lot to learn before this actually gets implemented

0:03:11.440 --> 0:03:13.600
<v Speaker 6>or gets the layed or negotiated away.

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:15.840
<v Speaker 2>Mike, It's interesting, of course.

0:03:15.880 --> 0:03:19.720
<v Speaker 5>The ramifications on European stocks was felt hard, particularly in

0:03:19.760 --> 0:03:22.480
<v Speaker 5>the auto sector today Tesla rallies.

0:03:22.919 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 2>Is that a.

0:03:23.240 --> 0:03:26.079
<v Speaker 5>Competition potential and the fact that it will have less

0:03:26.120 --> 0:03:28.640
<v Speaker 5>of it from inbound and more costly at cars coming in.

0:03:28.880 --> 0:03:30.959
<v Speaker 5>Was it more what Elol Musk had to say with

0:03:31.080 --> 0:03:33.240
<v Speaker 5>Sean Hannity at Fox alongside the President.

0:03:34.520 --> 0:03:40.040
<v Speaker 6>Well, Musk's comments certainly had that kind of ameliorative effect

0:03:40.440 --> 0:03:44.360
<v Speaker 6>for anyone who wants to invest in Tesla after having

0:03:44.400 --> 0:03:47.400
<v Speaker 6>seen the company struggle a little bit. We have seen

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:50.720
<v Speaker 6>concerns raised about how quickly they are coming up with

0:03:50.800 --> 0:03:53.720
<v Speaker 6>that lower cost model that investors have been waiting for

0:03:53.840 --> 0:03:56.760
<v Speaker 6>and consumers have been waiting for, and also concerns that

0:03:56.840 --> 0:04:00.040
<v Speaker 6>maybe Elon Musk, the CEO of Tesla, is a a

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:04.400
<v Speaker 6>little bit too distracted with some other ventures, including Doge.

0:04:04.800 --> 0:04:07.440
<v Speaker 4>But let's go back to the whole chips.

0:04:07.160 --> 0:04:11.000
<v Speaker 6>And broader question that you were raising about autos. When

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:13.800
<v Speaker 6>you think about autos too, there are so many chips

0:04:13.800 --> 0:04:17.040
<v Speaker 6>in vehicles today and so many of their goods today

0:04:17.040 --> 0:04:20.240
<v Speaker 6>that the impact could be wide ranging. Now, Elon Musk,

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:23.200
<v Speaker 6>maybe I will find a way around that. Given his

0:04:23.279 --> 0:04:25.880
<v Speaker 6>proximity to the President, Well.

0:04:25.800 --> 0:04:28.039
<v Speaker 2>Said Mike, great to catch up with you. Thank you.

0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:31.440
<v Speaker 2>We got some breaking news. We do know we're anticipating

0:04:31.440 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 2>a new.

0:04:31.720 --> 0:04:34.040
<v Speaker 5>More affordable phone coming from Apple, currently off by four

0:04:34.080 --> 0:04:36.320
<v Speaker 5>tens percent as we get the details on the iPhone

0:04:36.360 --> 0:04:37.040
<v Speaker 5>sixteen E.

0:04:37.400 --> 0:04:40.040
<v Speaker 2>They call it a powerful new member of the iPhone.

0:04:39.640 --> 0:04:43.680
<v Speaker 5>Sixteen is going to have capabilities at a more affordable price.

0:04:43.760 --> 0:04:46.240
<v Speaker 5>They say, as soon as February the twenty eighth, you

0:04:46.279 --> 0:04:49.400
<v Speaker 5>can buy a white and a black iPhone sixteen E

0:04:49.760 --> 0:04:52.640
<v Speaker 5>for as little as five hundred and ninety nine dollars.

0:04:52.960 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 5>Close eye on Apple, close eye on the markets. More broadly,

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:57.839
<v Speaker 5>Martin Laton's with US chief investment strategist that in power

0:04:58.040 --> 0:05:01.760
<v Speaker 5>to really break down how in tests also take in

0:05:01.800 --> 0:05:04.600
<v Speaker 5>the deluge of headlines, particularly when you're thinking we've got

0:05:04.760 --> 0:05:07.560
<v Speaker 5>you know, launches and products still coming, but Apple affected

0:05:07.600 --> 0:05:10.960
<v Speaker 5>by potential tariffs and geopolitics, not to mention the chips

0:05:11.000 --> 0:05:13.200
<v Speaker 5>in the auto sector today, how do you see through that?

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:15.800
<v Speaker 7>Well, you know, it's so interesting because I think the

0:05:15.839 --> 0:05:19.120
<v Speaker 7>market really is trying to see through all the tariffs.

0:05:19.120 --> 0:05:22.039
<v Speaker 7>Who've had a lot of tariff noise of course during

0:05:22.040 --> 0:05:25.680
<v Speaker 7>the Trump administration, but some kind of predictions are precursors

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:28.279
<v Speaker 7>to that. With what we saw President Trump posting on

0:05:28.320 --> 0:05:31.160
<v Speaker 7>true social what he said during the campaign trail, And

0:05:31.200 --> 0:05:33.480
<v Speaker 7>by and large, we've seen a market that's largely looking

0:05:33.480 --> 0:05:36.240
<v Speaker 7>at tariffs as a negotiating tactic and able to kind

0:05:36.240 --> 0:05:39.360
<v Speaker 7>of shed it off or not let it impact kind

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:40.600
<v Speaker 7>of how the market performs.

0:05:40.839 --> 0:05:42.600
<v Speaker 2>And I think there's a kind of a.

0:05:42.680 --> 0:05:48.120
<v Speaker 7>Missing calculus there that relates to Trump's broader comments around tariffs.

0:05:48.120 --> 0:05:51.279
<v Speaker 7>He talks a lot about tariffs as a form of

0:05:51.320 --> 0:05:54.520
<v Speaker 7>federal revenue. He talks a lot about tariffs as a

0:05:54.560 --> 0:05:58.080
<v Speaker 7>way to even out trade deficits. He talks about tariffs

0:05:58.160 --> 0:06:01.119
<v Speaker 7>as a way to build manufacture here in the US,

0:06:01.440 --> 0:06:05.080
<v Speaker 7>and all of those other three elements beyond the negotiation,

0:06:05.160 --> 0:06:07.160
<v Speaker 7>which we know is part of this manu as and

0:06:07.160 --> 0:06:09.000
<v Speaker 7>the art of the deal. But all of those other

0:06:09.080 --> 0:06:12.239
<v Speaker 7>three elements really focus on tariffs that are broad based

0:06:12.360 --> 0:06:15.040
<v Speaker 7>and long lasting. And so I think this is something

0:06:15.040 --> 0:06:18.160
<v Speaker 7>that the market is potentially going to need to grapple with,

0:06:18.279 --> 0:06:20.640
<v Speaker 7>not on a case by case basis, but at the

0:06:20.640 --> 0:06:22.240
<v Speaker 7>broad level for markets.

0:06:23.080 --> 0:06:27.360
<v Speaker 3>Martin talk to us specifically about the technology industry's exposure

0:06:27.480 --> 0:06:31.080
<v Speaker 3>to some of this tariff Tip for tat, how are

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:34.800
<v Speaker 3>you thinking about positioning certain pockets of your tech portfolio

0:06:34.800 --> 0:06:35.440
<v Speaker 3>going forward.

0:06:35.720 --> 0:06:39.000
<v Speaker 7>Well, it's interesting when we think about tariffs with technology.

0:06:39.080 --> 0:06:42.160
<v Speaker 7>We've spent a lot of time thinking about areas like automotives,

0:06:42.160 --> 0:06:45.760
<v Speaker 7>but we've spent less time thinking about tariffs with technology.

0:06:45.800 --> 0:06:48.280
<v Speaker 7>And I think a lot of times investors are looking

0:06:48.279 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 7>at areas like tech and expecting some sort of I guess,

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:55.320
<v Speaker 7>get out of jail free card with some carve outs

0:06:55.560 --> 0:06:59.239
<v Speaker 7>or something along those lines. I don't think that's completely out.

0:06:59.080 --> 0:06:59.920
<v Speaker 2>Of line thinking.

0:07:00.360 --> 0:07:03.279
<v Speaker 7>When we think about one of the incentives that President

0:07:03.279 --> 0:07:08.680
<v Speaker 7>Trump has is to really make AI in USAI a superpower,

0:07:08.920 --> 0:07:11.720
<v Speaker 7>and we see a lot of enthusiasm for that within

0:07:11.760 --> 0:07:14.720
<v Speaker 7>the Trump administration. So I think there's some potential to

0:07:14.800 --> 0:07:17.480
<v Speaker 7>think that we see tariffs coming at tech and then

0:07:17.480 --> 0:07:20.520
<v Speaker 7>we see the enthusiasm for AI coming into a bit

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 7>of a collision course over the course of twenty twenty five.

0:07:23.960 --> 0:07:26.800
<v Speaker 7>But frankly, you know, the devils and the details and

0:07:26.840 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 7>the details aren't clear at this point in terms of

0:07:30.000 --> 0:07:33.800
<v Speaker 7>how and where in the impact of the tariffs that

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:36.320
<v Speaker 7>we see in technology or the broad market.

0:07:37.080 --> 0:07:39.240
<v Speaker 3>Let's zoom out of the United States for a bit.

0:07:39.440 --> 0:07:43.000
<v Speaker 3>China tech has really rallied, even though it's somewhat lagged

0:07:43.000 --> 0:07:45.800
<v Speaker 3>when it comes to AI investments coming from the private

0:07:45.840 --> 0:07:48.760
<v Speaker 3>sector and perhaps even the public sector. How are you

0:07:48.800 --> 0:07:52.600
<v Speaker 3>advising clients to take advantage of some of that diversification

0:07:53.320 --> 0:07:55.800
<v Speaker 3>given they're seeing such a big boost. Well, you know,

0:07:56.440 --> 0:07:59.800
<v Speaker 3>China tech is a really interesting investment question. Of course,

0:08:00.160 --> 0:08:03.360
<v Speaker 3>China stacks in general have been under siege. We've seen

0:08:03.640 --> 0:08:06.800
<v Speaker 3>weakness really stretching back the past few years, and a

0:08:06.840 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 3>lot of that relating to geopolitical risk, relating to regulatory concerns,

0:08:11.440 --> 0:08:14.680
<v Speaker 3>relating to economic questions as it relates to China tech,

0:08:14.720 --> 0:08:18.200
<v Speaker 3>and so we're seeing valuations that are pretty cheap. Of course,

0:08:18.200 --> 0:08:20.680
<v Speaker 3>we've had a rally that's undercut some of those valuations,

0:08:20.720 --> 0:08:24.200
<v Speaker 3>but still marginally cheaper than they were. You know, if

0:08:24.240 --> 0:08:28.120
<v Speaker 3>we're stretched back our gaze several years ago, pre pandemic,

0:08:28.680 --> 0:08:32.520
<v Speaker 3>and you have some really healthy, big tech companies in China,

0:08:32.640 --> 0:08:35.200
<v Speaker 3>some rivals to what we have here in the US.

0:08:35.200 --> 0:08:37.880
<v Speaker 3>So I think if we're looking at the valuations here

0:08:37.920 --> 0:08:40.000
<v Speaker 3>at home and they seem a bit stretched to us,

0:08:40.000 --> 0:08:42.000
<v Speaker 3>and then we cast our gaze to something like the

0:08:42.120 --> 0:08:44.640
<v Speaker 3>China valuations and there are a bit more approachable, I

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:48.920
<v Speaker 3>think a diversified approach isn't a bad strategy when it

0:08:49.000 --> 0:08:52.320
<v Speaker 3>comes to technology exposure. I think the critical question is

0:08:52.320 --> 0:08:55.400
<v Speaker 3>thinking about sizing it because of course you have these overhangs,

0:08:55.600 --> 0:08:59.080
<v Speaker 3>the geopolitical and the economic and etc. That should adjust

0:08:59.160 --> 0:09:00.679
<v Speaker 3>the position size accordingly.

0:09:00.840 --> 0:09:02.480
<v Speaker 5>I just think of China and I think back to

0:09:02.559 --> 0:09:05.280
<v Speaker 5>the market sell off we saw in that knee jote

0:09:05.280 --> 0:09:07.920
<v Speaker 5>reaction to the deep seat news. I just want to

0:09:07.960 --> 0:09:11.640
<v Speaker 5>think about market reaction forces at the moment, particularly in

0:09:11.640 --> 0:09:14.280
<v Speaker 5>this age of generative AI. And what was so interesting

0:09:14.360 --> 0:09:16.960
<v Speaker 5>is we heard from the FED Vice chair just speaking

0:09:16.960 --> 0:09:20.959
<v Speaker 5>for the supervision indeed, Michael Barr, about potential market manipulation

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:21.839
<v Speaker 5>because of generative AI.

0:09:21.880 --> 0:09:23.160
<v Speaker 2>I've just taken the listen.

0:09:22.960 --> 0:09:26.840
<v Speaker 8>Marton, as they will be directed to maximize profit. Gen

0:09:26.960 --> 0:09:31.960
<v Speaker 8>AI agents may converge on strategies to maximize returns through

0:09:32.000 --> 0:09:38.840
<v Speaker 8>coordinated market manipulation, potentially fueling acid bubbles and crashes. Speed,

0:09:38.960 --> 0:09:43.720
<v Speaker 8>automaticity and ubiquity could generate new risks at wide scale.

0:09:44.040 --> 0:09:45.920
<v Speaker 5>On this show, we talk so much about the investment

0:09:45.920 --> 0:09:49.640
<v Speaker 5>opportunity into the technology, right, but the technology is having

0:09:49.679 --> 0:09:52.720
<v Speaker 5>an effect on investment and how is that affecting you?

0:09:52.800 --> 0:09:55.079
<v Speaker 5>How you thinking about risks that come about because of

0:09:55.120 --> 0:09:55.679
<v Speaker 5>generative AI.

0:09:55.800 --> 0:09:59.440
<v Speaker 7>I mean, it's a very important question, and I think AI,

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:03.120
<v Speaker 7>as we've seen in different areas, opens up a whole

0:10:03.280 --> 0:10:06.280
<v Speaker 7>new spectrum of risk. Whether we think about fraud, we

0:10:06.320 --> 0:10:10.400
<v Speaker 7>think about market manipulation, we think about just misinformation. I

0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:13.600
<v Speaker 7>think that those risks are real with AI, and I

0:10:13.640 --> 0:10:18.720
<v Speaker 7>think there is some consideration that valuations haven't really taken

0:10:18.760 --> 0:10:21.040
<v Speaker 7>into account the downside of AI.

0:10:21.120 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 2>We think a lot about the upside.

0:10:22.520 --> 0:10:25.040
<v Speaker 7>We think especially about the improvement in earnings that we

0:10:25.080 --> 0:10:28.280
<v Speaker 7>can see certainly in technology but for the broad market overall.

0:10:28.280 --> 0:10:30.160
<v Speaker 7>But we think less about what those risks can be.

0:10:30.200 --> 0:10:32.040
<v Speaker 7>And I think it's partly because one we don't want

0:10:32.080 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 7>to think about the risk, but two it's hard to

0:10:34.520 --> 0:10:37.559
<v Speaker 7>speculate and it's hard to articulate. But I think that's

0:10:37.679 --> 0:10:42.240
<v Speaker 7>where smart regulation, smart decisions by the companies themselves and

0:10:42.280 --> 0:10:45.440
<v Speaker 7>of course by Washington, are going to really matter in

0:10:45.520 --> 0:10:49.160
<v Speaker 7>terms of how we see this deployed as across the economy.

0:10:50.120 --> 0:10:53.720
<v Speaker 3>Margin Norton, Chief Investment Strategists and Empower thank you for

0:10:53.800 --> 0:10:57.079
<v Speaker 3>joining us. Now coming up, we'll be hearing from Microsoft's

0:10:57.120 --> 0:11:00.160
<v Speaker 3>head of Strategic Missions and Technologies on the company's bran

0:11:00.280 --> 0:11:01.640
<v Speaker 3>new quantum processor.

0:11:01.920 --> 0:11:02.720
<v Speaker 4>This is Bloomberg.

0:11:14.440 --> 0:11:17.760
<v Speaker 3>Microsoft just unveiled Mayor on a one, the tech giant's

0:11:17.880 --> 0:11:21.280
<v Speaker 3>first quantum computing tip. We sat down with the company's

0:11:21.320 --> 0:11:25.559
<v Speaker 3>executive vice president of Strategic Missions and Technologies, Jason Xander,

0:11:25.880 --> 0:11:28.040
<v Speaker 3>to break down what this means for the future of

0:11:28.120 --> 0:11:29.400
<v Speaker 3>quantum Take a listen.

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:32.360
<v Speaker 9>One of the best use cases that we see is

0:11:32.400 --> 0:11:34.800
<v Speaker 9>going to be in places like chemistry. That's a place

0:11:34.800 --> 0:11:37.200
<v Speaker 9>where we use even AI now we're using to discover

0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:39.200
<v Speaker 9>new molecules and build new things.

0:11:39.400 --> 0:11:41.000
<v Speaker 10>But AI is just an approximation.

0:11:41.360 --> 0:11:45.440
<v Speaker 9>A quantum computer actually speaks the language of nature, which

0:11:45.600 --> 0:11:48.559
<v Speaker 9>is quantum mechanics. That's what makes it so powerful. So

0:11:48.640 --> 0:11:50.720
<v Speaker 9>we combine those things together, we're going to be able

0:11:50.760 --> 0:11:53.200
<v Speaker 9>to do brand new things. Like I said, I'd love

0:11:53.240 --> 0:11:55.520
<v Speaker 9>to get rid of forever chemicals. I would love to

0:11:55.520 --> 0:11:58.760
<v Speaker 9>get rid of microplastics. We're going to need to invent

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:02.360
<v Speaker 9>new technology to be able to do that. Quantum computers

0:12:02.360 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 9>are going to be able to help us accelerate it,

0:12:04.080 --> 0:12:05.439
<v Speaker 9>and it's just not something you can do on a

0:12:05.480 --> 0:12:06.480
<v Speaker 9>classic supercomputer.

0:12:07.559 --> 0:12:10.719
<v Speaker 3>Let's talk about the competition, because Microsoft isn't the only

0:12:10.760 --> 0:12:14.680
<v Speaker 3>one developing it's quantum computing tip. Google unveiled their own

0:12:14.679 --> 0:12:18.360
<v Speaker 3>in December called Willow. Theirs has one hundred and five cubits.

0:12:18.520 --> 0:12:22.160
<v Speaker 3>Microsoft is harnessing about eight Talk to us about how

0:12:22.200 --> 0:12:25.040
<v Speaker 3>we can stack these up against each other. Is it

0:12:25.040 --> 0:12:28.440
<v Speaker 3>account the cubic kind of race or is Microsoft doing

0:12:28.480 --> 0:12:31.000
<v Speaker 3>something different in the approach that makes it better.

0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:35.760
<v Speaker 9>And when you talk about cubas, there is sometimes this race,

0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:38.440
<v Speaker 9>and industry say that I've got a ton of cubits.

0:12:38.679 --> 0:12:40.800
<v Speaker 9>The real interesting question at the end of the day

0:12:40.920 --> 0:12:43.200
<v Speaker 9>is what can you do with them? And so I

0:12:43.240 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 9>could have a thousand cubic, but if they can't finish

0:12:45.960 --> 0:12:50.559
<v Speaker 9>an actual quantum workload and application, it really doesn't matter.

0:12:50.720 --> 0:12:53.240
<v Speaker 9>Or if it takes one thousand years to finish that application,

0:12:53.679 --> 0:12:56.079
<v Speaker 9>climate doesn't matter. And so at the end of the day,

0:12:56.080 --> 0:12:58.640
<v Speaker 9>what's most important is not the count of cubits. In

0:12:58.640 --> 0:13:00.400
<v Speaker 9>some ways, that's kind of a vanity, correct. You know,

0:13:00.480 --> 0:13:03.120
<v Speaker 9>that's for any vendor, not just you know, not's Google,

0:13:03.160 --> 0:13:05.559
<v Speaker 9>But it's true for everyone. What really matters at the

0:13:05.640 --> 0:13:07.200
<v Speaker 9>end of the day is can I get to that

0:13:07.280 --> 0:13:10.800
<v Speaker 9>high count but make them useful? And that's the value

0:13:10.840 --> 0:13:13.920
<v Speaker 9>of this topological conductor that we've got this topological core.

0:13:14.280 --> 0:13:18.160
<v Speaker 9>These topological cubits have error resistance built in, they're small,

0:13:18.280 --> 0:13:21.360
<v Speaker 9>they're fast, they're digitally controlled. There's just no one else

0:13:21.400 --> 0:13:23.440
<v Speaker 9>that has that. So we can get to the scale

0:13:23.520 --> 0:13:24.600
<v Speaker 9>and we can make sure.

0:13:24.400 --> 0:13:25.480
<v Speaker 10>That they're useful.

0:13:25.800 --> 0:13:27.679
<v Speaker 9>And like I said today, you're going to start off

0:13:27.679 --> 0:13:30.360
<v Speaker 9>with a small count, just like you know transitions. Originally

0:13:30.360 --> 0:13:31.800
<v Speaker 9>there weren't that many of them. There were tons of

0:13:31.840 --> 0:13:34.720
<v Speaker 9>vacuum tubes. Over time, you're going to get that transition

0:13:34.840 --> 0:13:37.160
<v Speaker 9>and that scale. That's what's going to help, you know,

0:13:37.280 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 9>in twenty years of experimentation to get us there. Now

0:13:40.480 --> 0:13:43.040
<v Speaker 9>starts the real race to go make the volume up

0:13:43.080 --> 0:13:43.720
<v Speaker 9>and go higher.

0:13:44.040 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 3>In January, Jensen Wong said that useful quantum computers are

0:13:49.000 --> 0:13:50.560
<v Speaker 3>likely twenty years away.

0:13:51.000 --> 0:13:51.480
<v Speaker 4>Is he wrong?

0:13:53.080 --> 0:13:55.160
<v Speaker 9>I think that we're getting to the point, especially with

0:13:55.200 --> 0:13:58.320
<v Speaker 9>this announcement, where we're years away, not decades away. And

0:13:58.400 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 9>you know, I believe that part of what Jensen was

0:14:00.200 --> 0:14:02.439
<v Speaker 9>referring to is some of those scale challenges that I

0:14:02.559 --> 0:14:05.520
<v Speaker 9>mentioned in some of these technologies that leaving a warehouse

0:14:05.559 --> 0:14:08.319
<v Speaker 9>size computer to make it work. We don't need that,

0:14:08.640 --> 0:14:10.320
<v Speaker 9>and so but if you did need that, then you

0:14:10.360 --> 0:14:12.160
<v Speaker 9>can imagine how it would take a long time to

0:14:12.440 --> 0:14:15.719
<v Speaker 9>get through there. But from our perspective, the fact that

0:14:15.800 --> 0:14:18.240
<v Speaker 9>I can put a million cubits on a chip that

0:14:18.280 --> 0:14:21.120
<v Speaker 9>fits the palm in my hand. They're small, they're fast,

0:14:21.160 --> 0:14:25.000
<v Speaker 9>they're digitally controlled. That means it's years, not decades. There's

0:14:25.040 --> 0:14:27.080
<v Speaker 9>still a lot of work to do, but it's not

0:14:27.120 --> 0:14:30.360
<v Speaker 9>going to be decades out. We're actually finding ways to accelerate.

0:14:29.880 --> 0:14:30.600
<v Speaker 10>Even as we speed.

0:14:31.400 --> 0:14:36.440
<v Speaker 5>Microsoft's executive vice president of Strategic Missions and Technologies, Jason Zander, there,

0:14:36.560 --> 0:14:39.080
<v Speaker 5>let's get more on this announcement with Bloomberg's map day.

0:14:39.520 --> 0:14:42.440
<v Speaker 5>I think back to the willowchip announcement of Alphabet and

0:14:42.480 --> 0:14:45.200
<v Speaker 5>the stock rallied hard for us several days. I'm looking

0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:47.760
<v Speaker 5>at the moment Microsoft has jumped about four tenser percent

0:14:47.800 --> 0:14:49.960
<v Speaker 5>trading higher now on the back of this announcement.

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:51.520
<v Speaker 2>Map, and just talk us through.

0:14:51.400 --> 0:14:54.480
<v Speaker 5>What it really means for Microsoft, what it means in

0:14:54.560 --> 0:14:56.880
<v Speaker 5>terms of pushing its own computing forward.

0:14:57.960 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 11>This means Microsoft thinks they're far enough long, they're close

0:15:00.640 --> 0:15:02.680
<v Speaker 11>enough to a workable quantum machine where they say, hey,

0:15:02.720 --> 0:15:04.840
<v Speaker 11>look we've built some hardware. Now, this isn't just a

0:15:04.880 --> 0:15:07.000
<v Speaker 11>theoretical construct from us this is something that you know,

0:15:07.080 --> 0:15:08.920
<v Speaker 11>maybe in a few years we could put in a

0:15:09.000 --> 0:15:11.840
<v Speaker 11>data center in some capacity. Right, this is them saying,

0:15:11.840 --> 0:15:13.920
<v Speaker 11>you know, this is not just a theoretical construct. This

0:15:14.000 --> 0:15:15.800
<v Speaker 11>is something we built and we think it's you know,

0:15:15.840 --> 0:15:17.480
<v Speaker 11>if not ready for prime time, they're ready to start

0:15:17.520 --> 0:15:18.280
<v Speaker 11>turning these things out.

0:15:19.440 --> 0:15:21.720
<v Speaker 3>Matt, do you have a sense of where this leaves

0:15:21.840 --> 0:15:25.560
<v Speaker 3>the artificial intelligence priority? I think quantum has been the

0:15:25.640 --> 0:15:28.160
<v Speaker 3>topic that we've all been waiting for for years, but

0:15:28.280 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 3>AI came first. Where does it leave it in terms

0:15:31.320 --> 0:15:33.920
<v Speaker 3>of what the company tackles the most over the next

0:15:33.960 --> 0:15:34.560
<v Speaker 3>coming years?

0:15:35.200 --> 0:15:36.800
<v Speaker 11>Oh go, quantum is is by no means going to

0:15:36.800 --> 0:15:39.200
<v Speaker 11>supplant AI. You know, Microsoft and all of its peers

0:15:39.200 --> 0:15:40.960
<v Speaker 11>in big cloud are still spending tens of billions of

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:43.000
<v Speaker 11>dollars on AI chips, on new data centers. None of

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:45.320
<v Speaker 11>that is going to go away. If you want a sense,

0:15:45.360 --> 0:15:47.800
<v Speaker 11>I know, Jason Xander just said years, not decades. But

0:15:47.840 --> 0:15:49.560
<v Speaker 11>it's worth checking out some of the photos of these

0:15:49.600 --> 0:15:52.600
<v Speaker 11>systems that Microsoft published this morning. You know, because we're

0:15:52.600 --> 0:15:56.120
<v Speaker 11>still talking about super culed you know, colder than space

0:15:56.400 --> 0:15:59.560
<v Speaker 11>vacuum conditions, right, these are still operating very much in

0:15:59.600 --> 0:16:02.280
<v Speaker 11>elaborate toy construct even if Microsoft built a product. So

0:16:02.480 --> 0:16:04.400
<v Speaker 11>the I revolution is going to keep churning on even

0:16:04.440 --> 0:16:06.480
<v Speaker 11>as they plug away on this in the background.

0:16:06.800 --> 0:16:08.040
<v Speaker 4>That's Bloomberg's Matt Day.

0:16:08.040 --> 0:16:15.160
<v Speaker 3>Thanks for joining us.

0:16:16.520 --> 0:16:20.960
<v Speaker 5>Today's the day for Apple, the low end iPhone, larger screen, face, ID,

0:16:21.480 --> 0:16:24.280
<v Speaker 5>in house, cellular modem chip, and we get the price point.

0:16:24.320 --> 0:16:26.920
<v Speaker 5>The sixteen E will be five hundred and ninety nine dollars.

0:16:27.160 --> 0:16:29.680
<v Speaker 5>Bloomberg's Mark gum and joins us some more. The big

0:16:29.760 --> 0:16:31.440
<v Speaker 5>unveil comes a little bit later. We're getting all the

0:16:31.440 --> 0:16:32.240
<v Speaker 5>details already.

0:16:32.880 --> 0:16:33.680
<v Speaker 10>Yes, sixteen E.

0:16:34.000 --> 0:16:38.320
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, five ninety nine, that's pretty pricey for a mid

0:16:38.320 --> 0:16:38.880
<v Speaker 12>tier phone.

0:16:38.960 --> 0:16:40.400
<v Speaker 2>Right, affordable, it's affordable.

0:16:40.440 --> 0:16:43.640
<v Speaker 12>It's more affordable five ninety nine versus something like seven

0:16:43.720 --> 0:16:47.440
<v Speaker 12>hundred dollars for the regular sixteen's one thousand dollars plus

0:16:47.480 --> 0:16:50.080
<v Speaker 12>for the sixteen Pro models. You're getting most of the

0:16:50.080 --> 0:16:52.640
<v Speaker 12>pro features here, right, You're missing a few, right, You

0:16:52.640 --> 0:16:54.800
<v Speaker 12>don't have the dynamic island. You only have one camera

0:16:54.880 --> 0:16:57.840
<v Speaker 12>versus two on the regular sixteens or three on the

0:16:57.880 --> 0:17:00.440
<v Speaker 12>sixteen Pro models. But you have a screen size of

0:17:00.480 --> 0:17:02.800
<v Speaker 12>six point one in Just so the same screen size

0:17:02.840 --> 0:17:05.720
<v Speaker 12>as the entry level iPhone sixteen or I guess the

0:17:05.720 --> 0:17:08.719
<v Speaker 12>old entry level the new mid tier, right, But this

0:17:08.760 --> 0:17:11.040
<v Speaker 12>is Apple's new low end iPhone. They want this to

0:17:11.080 --> 0:17:14.800
<v Speaker 12>do particularly well in China, places like India, Southeast Asia.

0:17:15.080 --> 0:17:17.200
<v Speaker 12>They think this phone will help ignite a new growth

0:17:17.240 --> 0:17:19.960
<v Speaker 12>story for the iPhone. Don't forget dipped one percent you

0:17:20.000 --> 0:17:22.440
<v Speaker 12>over year in the holiday period. So this is very

0:17:22.480 --> 0:17:26.080
<v Speaker 12>exciting for Apple and should be pretty exciting for shareholders consumers.

0:17:26.080 --> 0:17:28.879
<v Speaker 12>People have not upgraded their iPhone in many years. This

0:17:29.040 --> 0:17:32.080
<v Speaker 12>is this is a compelling upgrade. You got face ID,

0:17:32.520 --> 0:17:35.399
<v Speaker 12>the home button is finally gone, you have USBC, you

0:17:35.480 --> 0:17:38.639
<v Speaker 12>have fast charging, you have a very fast A eighteen processor,

0:17:38.720 --> 0:17:41.360
<v Speaker 12>you have Apple Intelligence, you have CHAGPT integration.

0:17:41.520 --> 0:17:42.119
<v Speaker 13>So it's a.

0:17:42.119 --> 0:17:45.040
<v Speaker 12>Pretty compelling phone. The price though one hundred and eighty

0:17:45.080 --> 0:17:49.800
<v Speaker 12>dollars more than the current iPhone sc it replaces mark.

0:17:49.880 --> 0:17:53.840
<v Speaker 3>I'm super curious about what this means about Apple Intelligence.

0:17:53.960 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 3>Are these phones going to have some of that new

0:17:57.040 --> 0:17:59.720
<v Speaker 3>generative AI, you know.

0:17:59.640 --> 0:18:00.720
<v Speaker 2>Boost to do it?

0:18:00.960 --> 0:18:03.879
<v Speaker 3>Because I'm curious if this actually works in a lower

0:18:03.920 --> 0:18:06.680
<v Speaker 3>cost phone. Talk to us about what we can plan

0:18:06.760 --> 0:18:09.119
<v Speaker 3>to see from an AI front and if this lower

0:18:09.160 --> 0:18:11.240
<v Speaker 3>cost strategy has worked for Apple in the past.

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:13.720
<v Speaker 12>So you're going to get the aaighteen chip and the

0:18:13.760 --> 0:18:17.159
<v Speaker 12>necessary RAM requirements in this new model to support the

0:18:17.280 --> 0:18:20.199
<v Speaker 12>on device models, the in cloud models that run as

0:18:20.280 --> 0:18:23.440
<v Speaker 12>part of Apple Intelligence. You have that open AI integration

0:18:23.640 --> 0:18:26.200
<v Speaker 12>in Siri. In the new writing tools feature, you'd be

0:18:26.280 --> 0:18:28.720
<v Speaker 12>able to download all the AI apps like deep Seek

0:18:28.840 --> 0:18:32.480
<v Speaker 12>and open Ai and Gemini and Copilot that are available

0:18:32.480 --> 0:18:35.359
<v Speaker 12>on the App Store already. So from an AI standpoint,

0:18:35.400 --> 0:18:37.240
<v Speaker 12>it's also a good citizen. But in terms of what

0:18:37.280 --> 0:18:40.480
<v Speaker 12>Apple's doing with Siri and its own generative AI models,

0:18:40.480 --> 0:18:42.400
<v Speaker 12>there are clearly a few years behind at this point,

0:18:42.440 --> 0:18:44.960
<v Speaker 12>two or three years behind. They're supposed to launch a

0:18:45.040 --> 0:18:47.560
<v Speaker 12>new AI, a fied version of Siri this year. I

0:18:47.600 --> 0:18:50.359
<v Speaker 12>reported last week it's being delayed, probably from April to

0:18:50.440 --> 0:18:53.520
<v Speaker 12>somewhere between May and June. But from an AI standpoint,

0:18:53.520 --> 0:18:55.679
<v Speaker 12>this phone, if you buy it, we'll set you up

0:18:55.720 --> 0:18:57.280
<v Speaker 12>big time to be able to run all the future

0:18:57.320 --> 0:19:00.360
<v Speaker 12>AI features that all these companies, including app are trying

0:19:00.359 --> 0:19:01.200
<v Speaker 12>to dream up right now.

0:19:01.359 --> 0:19:03.240
<v Speaker 2>It's going to be available from February twenty eighth.

0:19:03.520 --> 0:19:06.600
<v Speaker 5>Why the timing here and what we're seeing in this

0:19:06.640 --> 0:19:10.359
<v Speaker 5>focus is it that we finally saw this reduction in

0:19:10.440 --> 0:19:12.679
<v Speaker 5>revenue growth that we've seen more broadly. Is it the

0:19:12.760 --> 0:19:15.440
<v Speaker 5>China anxiety? Is it the geopolitics that plays here?

0:19:15.800 --> 0:19:20.440
<v Speaker 12>So Apple typically releases these types of products, lower end devices, iPads,

0:19:20.600 --> 0:19:23.640
<v Speaker 12>non excite, the products that are another most exciting products

0:19:23.680 --> 0:19:27.000
<v Speaker 12>in this sort of January to May time period. That

0:19:27.119 --> 0:19:29.800
<v Speaker 12>February is a little bit earlier than typical for an

0:19:29.880 --> 0:19:32.720
<v Speaker 12>SE You normally would see that somewhere between late March

0:19:32.760 --> 0:19:35.040
<v Speaker 12>and April. So I would imagine they brought the release

0:19:35.119 --> 0:19:38.600
<v Speaker 12>up a little bit. Knowing that DIP happened right six

0:19:38.640 --> 0:19:41.040
<v Speaker 12>months out. Four months out, you're still able to maneuver

0:19:41.160 --> 0:19:43.240
<v Speaker 12>things in this day and age where they're not holding

0:19:43.240 --> 0:19:45.680
<v Speaker 12>physical launch events or doing everything online. You have a

0:19:45.680 --> 0:19:48.240
<v Speaker 12>little bit more flexibility if your Apple to release these things.

0:19:48.240 --> 0:19:50.520
<v Speaker 12>So getting it out during this quarter or Q two

0:19:50.760 --> 0:19:52.919
<v Speaker 12>I think is important for Apple ahead of giving the

0:19:53.000 --> 0:19:55.120
<v Speaker 12>results in several weeks from now.

0:19:56.119 --> 0:20:01.560
<v Speaker 3>Mark you mentioned Siri has seen some some delays. What's

0:20:01.600 --> 0:20:04.280
<v Speaker 3>the status there is It's something that we can expect

0:20:04.320 --> 0:20:06.640
<v Speaker 3>coming this year and in what form will it come?

0:20:07.040 --> 0:20:09.480
<v Speaker 12>So the new series features they announced this in June

0:20:09.480 --> 0:20:12.240
<v Speaker 12>are three things. One is on screen awareness, so we

0:20:12.240 --> 0:20:14.760
<v Speaker 12>can answer questions based on analyzing what you have up

0:20:14.760 --> 0:20:16.800
<v Speaker 12>in front of you on your display. It could also

0:20:16.880 --> 0:20:19.800
<v Speaker 12>answer questions with answer questions with the context of your

0:20:19.800 --> 0:20:20.320
<v Speaker 12>own data.

0:20:20.480 --> 0:20:21.960
<v Speaker 10>So those are supposed to come in April.

0:20:22.200 --> 0:20:23.720
<v Speaker 12>Now those are probably coming closer to.

0:20:23.680 --> 0:20:26.679
<v Speaker 2>Majun always keeping us up to speed the timing. Mark Guman,

0:20:27.160 --> 0:20:28.400
<v Speaker 2>great to have him here in New York.

0:20:28.640 --> 0:20:38.880
<v Speaker 5>I'm lucky, welcome back to Nu Metechnology, and Caroline Hide

0:20:38.880 --> 0:20:39.160
<v Speaker 5>to New.

0:20:39.160 --> 0:20:41.800
<v Speaker 4>York, and I'm Jackie Devalas in San Francisco.

0:20:41.920 --> 0:20:42.680
<v Speaker 2>Quick check on these.

0:20:42.600 --> 0:20:46.080
<v Speaker 5>Markets, Jackie, because look, we're trying to understand the ramifications

0:20:46.119 --> 0:20:48.200
<v Speaker 5>of what a twenty five percent tariff on chips on

0:20:48.320 --> 0:20:50.600
<v Speaker 5>auto's might look like for the market. And we have

0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:52.760
<v Speaker 5>seen as selling on the Nasdaq. More broadly, when you're

0:20:52.760 --> 0:20:54.800
<v Speaker 5>looking at what's pulling UN down on the Nasdaq more

0:20:54.960 --> 0:20:57.280
<v Speaker 5>from a points perspective, it's actually Meta now off like

0:20:57.359 --> 0:20:59.960
<v Speaker 5>two percent yesterday's sell off as well after a twenty.

0:20:59.760 --> 0:21:00.479
<v Speaker 2>Days run up.

0:21:00.680 --> 0:21:02.879
<v Speaker 5>Yes, we start to question maybe the market capitalization and

0:21:02.880 --> 0:21:04.439
<v Speaker 5>the run up that we've seen in this stock, but

0:21:04.440 --> 0:21:07.720
<v Speaker 5>we're only down by some two percent bumble interestingly, really

0:21:07.760 --> 0:21:09.800
<v Speaker 5>falling on the back of its earnings. We of cause

0:21:09.920 --> 0:21:13.760
<v Speaker 5>dating apps, seeing executive turnover, seeing a questioning of really

0:21:13.760 --> 0:21:16.320
<v Speaker 5>how they try to update the app. And the earnings

0:21:16.359 --> 0:21:18.919
<v Speaker 5>didn't look as good as had been anticipated, or indeed

0:21:18.920 --> 0:21:19.920
<v Speaker 5>worse than had been anticipated.

0:21:20.040 --> 0:21:21.360
<v Speaker 2>Rob By twenty five percent, Big Full.

0:21:21.400 --> 0:21:23.720
<v Speaker 5>Etsy also down more than ten percent on the back

0:21:23.760 --> 0:21:26.679
<v Speaker 5>of its numbers gross merchandise sales coming in weak in

0:21:26.680 --> 0:21:29.720
<v Speaker 5>then expected first quarter forecast as well not looking so strong.

0:21:29.880 --> 0:21:32.840
<v Speaker 5>This is they do see some good profitability numbers, but

0:21:32.880 --> 0:21:35.000
<v Speaker 5>more broadly, we're worrying about numbers. Let's move on, have

0:21:35.119 --> 0:21:36.480
<v Speaker 5>a look at what's happening in the world of crypto

0:21:36.600 --> 0:21:39.000
<v Speaker 5>right now, because Bitcoin actually at one point four percent,

0:21:39.160 --> 0:21:41.240
<v Speaker 5>Remember it has been hammered hard over the last few

0:21:41.280 --> 0:21:44.639
<v Speaker 5>training days. We're currently training ah more around sort of

0:21:44.680 --> 0:21:46.600
<v Speaker 5>a ninety six thousand.

0:21:46.280 --> 0:21:48.480
<v Speaker 2>Dollars levels, so well off of those hires, Jackie.

0:21:49.440 --> 0:21:53.400
<v Speaker 3>The crypto markets enthusiasm as skyrocketed since President Trump's reelection

0:21:53.640 --> 0:21:56.920
<v Speaker 3>with hopes of a more crypto friendly regime. Bloomberg Xander

0:21:56.920 --> 0:21:59.760
<v Speaker 3>Bell Drulers spoke with Binance CEO Richard Teng, who says

0:21:59.760 --> 0:22:03.320
<v Speaker 3>the US has moved on from an oppressive crypto environment.

0:22:03.840 --> 0:22:08.680
<v Speaker 13>Under the Biden administration. Operation chip Point wards in progress. Right,

0:22:08.760 --> 0:22:13.320
<v Speaker 13>So there's a bauty of oppression in the US and

0:22:14.160 --> 0:22:18.119
<v Speaker 13>US players. Global crypto players are facing grand certing, and

0:22:18.200 --> 0:22:21.320
<v Speaker 13>governments around the world are not really very supportive of

0:22:21.359 --> 0:22:24.720
<v Speaker 13>crypto I think we have a fresh we said, and

0:22:24.840 --> 0:22:28.439
<v Speaker 13>we start now. Since President Trump's election, actually we have

0:22:28.520 --> 0:22:32.040
<v Speaker 13>gotten a lot of approaches by governments around the world

0:22:32.119 --> 0:22:34.400
<v Speaker 13>to say, hey, we want to look at this pace

0:22:34.480 --> 0:22:37.560
<v Speaker 13>huw virtue by the virgin of fact that US is

0:22:37.600 --> 0:22:40.440
<v Speaker 13>appointed that cryptos are represents that these are the two

0:22:40.520 --> 0:22:44.720
<v Speaker 13>most important industries to support all future economies around the world,

0:22:45.320 --> 0:22:49.000
<v Speaker 13>and we are seeing fresh optimism governments around the world

0:22:49.000 --> 0:22:49.560
<v Speaker 13>supporting them.

0:22:49.800 --> 0:22:53.360
<v Speaker 14>So you're talking directly with the SEC then about what

0:22:53.400 --> 0:22:55.639
<v Speaker 14>the regulatory rodemap could look like? Are you talking with

0:22:55.680 --> 0:22:57.200
<v Speaker 14>the Trump administration directly?

0:22:57.359 --> 0:23:00.879
<v Speaker 13>Well, we give inputs to governments around the role. I

0:23:00.920 --> 0:23:03.840
<v Speaker 13>think their value are inputs because we are the most

0:23:04.080 --> 0:23:07.359
<v Speaker 13>regulated exchange by now global. If we are regulated in

0:23:07.400 --> 0:23:08.679
<v Speaker 13>plenty one different jurisdiction.

0:23:09.880 --> 0:23:11.919
<v Speaker 4>What does your input to the US government look like?

0:23:11.960 --> 0:23:13.000
<v Speaker 2>What do you want to see there?

0:23:13.040 --> 0:23:13.520
<v Speaker 4>Exactly?

0:23:13.760 --> 0:23:17.720
<v Speaker 13>Well, so on the US front, you see very taught

0:23:17.800 --> 0:23:23.480
<v Speaker 13>full appointments right in terms of the different David Seccess

0:23:23.760 --> 0:23:27.560
<v Speaker 13>and Cryptosa are the different appointments to the different agencies

0:23:27.600 --> 0:23:30.880
<v Speaker 13>regulatory agencies on that front, and they want to come

0:23:30.880 --> 0:23:33.840
<v Speaker 13>out with a very good framework. So it's still early days,

0:23:34.080 --> 0:23:37.600
<v Speaker 13>but you know, as and when there are film proposals

0:23:37.600 --> 0:23:39.480
<v Speaker 13>where very different puts on that round.

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:42.080
<v Speaker 14>What exactly do you want to see that I want

0:23:42.080 --> 0:23:45.040
<v Speaker 14>to understand what would bring you back into that market?

0:23:45.080 --> 0:23:46.160
<v Speaker 4>What is it exactly?

0:23:46.960 --> 0:23:49.720
<v Speaker 13>Well, I think for every country they have their own

0:23:50.119 --> 0:23:53.119
<v Speaker 13>concerns that have own interest to take care of. But

0:23:53.320 --> 0:23:57.200
<v Speaker 13>we want to see a framework, regulatory framework that is

0:23:57.320 --> 0:24:01.680
<v Speaker 13>on the one hand managing the risks bas of the industry,

0:24:01.800 --> 0:24:04.719
<v Speaker 13>on the on hand resupport of innovation and growth aspects. Right,

0:24:04.960 --> 0:24:07.120
<v Speaker 13>if you just focus on the res aspect of it,

0:24:07.320 --> 0:24:10.120
<v Speaker 13>you're missing out on all the new innovation that's coming

0:24:10.160 --> 0:24:12.880
<v Speaker 13>into this space, right, and it's a very dynamic.

0:24:12.480 --> 0:24:12.879
<v Speaker 10>Space of that.

0:24:13.160 --> 0:24:14.840
<v Speaker 14>Do you think that the US is going to take

0:24:14.840 --> 0:24:17.000
<v Speaker 14>a more business friendly approach or do you think it's

0:24:17.040 --> 0:24:19.719
<v Speaker 14>going to take an approach that's higher on consumer protections.

0:24:19.760 --> 0:24:21.520
<v Speaker 14>I think you've kind of got to go down either

0:24:21.960 --> 0:24:25.280
<v Speaker 14>Varra for instance in Dubai, that's one that's more business friendly.

0:24:25.280 --> 0:24:28.320
<v Speaker 4>For instance, Hong Kong a bit more on the consumer side.

0:24:28.440 --> 0:24:30.320
<v Speaker 13>I think the US is going to come out and

0:24:30.760 --> 0:24:33.119
<v Speaker 13>only my speculation is it going to be a v

0:24:33.240 --> 0:24:38.399
<v Speaker 13>spoke framework that really supports innovation, supports growth, but at

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:41.360
<v Speaker 13>the same time protect consumers and all these different aspects

0:24:41.359 --> 0:24:42.320
<v Speaker 13>are actually important.

0:24:42.840 --> 0:24:45.680
<v Speaker 14>So if you get that kind of framework that's bespoke,

0:24:46.280 --> 0:24:48.240
<v Speaker 14>is it enough to bring you into the US market.

0:24:48.640 --> 0:24:52.600
<v Speaker 13>Well, we always consider global deployment, right, so we are

0:24:52.600 --> 0:24:55.320
<v Speaker 13>holding a washing grief on the US. We need to

0:24:55.320 --> 0:24:57.600
<v Speaker 13>see greater clarity coming from out from the US, and

0:24:57.600 --> 0:24:59.440
<v Speaker 13>we'll consider options at a point in time.

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:02.000
<v Speaker 2>What would that look like to you? For instance, that.

0:25:02.080 --> 0:25:06.720
<v Speaker 5>Is speculator Pushia Tang see you Finance Holding Speaking with

0:25:06.720 --> 0:25:09.600
<v Speaker 5>blievegg's Anabel Drouders a little bit earlier. Look, let's talk

0:25:09.600 --> 0:25:12.440
<v Speaker 5>about what is needed here from a regulatory perspective. Kristen

0:25:12.480 --> 0:25:16.120
<v Speaker 5>Smith of the Blockchain Association that we've had the promise

0:25:16.640 --> 0:25:21.320
<v Speaker 5>of more crypto friendly regulation legislation, but it's slow to happen,

0:25:21.320 --> 0:25:23.159
<v Speaker 5>of course, because Congress needs to weigh in.

0:25:23.480 --> 0:25:24.840
<v Speaker 2>How are you making us out of ten?

0:25:25.359 --> 0:25:27.480
<v Speaker 15>Well, I think we're on a ten out of ten

0:25:27.560 --> 0:25:29.679
<v Speaker 15>right now. I think there is obviously a lot of

0:25:29.680 --> 0:25:31.600
<v Speaker 15>work to do, and it takes a lot of time.

0:25:31.680 --> 0:25:34.600
<v Speaker 15>I think we're looking at things in sort of two phases.

0:25:34.760 --> 0:25:34.919
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:25:35.000 --> 0:25:37.720
<v Speaker 15>The first step is we need to undo the harm

0:25:38.119 --> 0:25:41.000
<v Speaker 15>that happened in the last administration, and we've seen hints

0:25:41.000 --> 0:25:43.320
<v Speaker 15>of this with the repeal of SAB one twenty one.

0:25:44.040 --> 0:25:45.400
<v Speaker 4>Congress is actually working.

0:25:45.200 --> 0:25:48.560
<v Speaker 15>On a really important bill right now, the Congressional Review Act,

0:25:48.600 --> 0:25:52.280
<v Speaker 15>to undo a rulemaking that the IRS tried to apply

0:25:52.359 --> 0:25:55.520
<v Speaker 15>to DeFi in the late hours of seventy five. Companies

0:25:55.560 --> 0:25:57.760
<v Speaker 15>wrote a letter on that this morning to Congress, and

0:25:57.760 --> 0:25:58.960
<v Speaker 15>I think we're going to get a vote on it

0:25:59.000 --> 0:26:02.720
<v Speaker 15>this week. That's really important. So it's undoing the harm,

0:26:02.800 --> 0:26:05.600
<v Speaker 15>it's stopping the litigation. But then we need to go in,

0:26:05.800 --> 0:26:08.359
<v Speaker 15>as Richard was saying, get a framework in place. We

0:26:08.400 --> 0:26:12.800
<v Speaker 15>need stable coin legislation, we need market structure legislation. These

0:26:12.840 --> 0:26:15.280
<v Speaker 15>pieces are harder because they require a lot of work,

0:26:15.640 --> 0:26:18.360
<v Speaker 15>but we're really optimistic that Congress and the White House

0:26:18.400 --> 0:26:20.040
<v Speaker 15>are aligned on this and that this is the year

0:26:20.080 --> 0:26:21.960
<v Speaker 15>to get these items done.

0:26:22.520 --> 0:26:25.320
<v Speaker 5>How much patience do you think, ultimately those that have

0:26:25.520 --> 0:26:29.560
<v Speaker 5>plowed in to cryptocurrencies as an asset of choice have

0:26:30.160 --> 0:26:33.320
<v Speaker 5>for the actual legislative process, because it feels as though

0:26:33.359 --> 0:26:35.760
<v Speaker 5>many were like, oh, they're just forming a task force.

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:36.680
<v Speaker 2>More broadly, they I'll.

0:26:36.560 --> 0:26:38.240
<v Speaker 5>Actually bring in regulations here enough.

0:26:38.440 --> 0:26:40.399
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, well, I think that the task force of the

0:26:40.440 --> 0:26:43.040
<v Speaker 15>Presidential Working Group that you've talked to spoke about is

0:26:43.040 --> 0:26:47.080
<v Speaker 15>actually incredibly important. The SEC also has their Crypto task Force.

0:26:47.640 --> 0:26:50.119
<v Speaker 15>You know, these things don't happen overnight. You want to

0:26:50.160 --> 0:26:53.320
<v Speaker 15>get the regulatory framework right, and it requires a lot

0:26:53.320 --> 0:26:55.359
<v Speaker 15>of discussion and debate. I mean, the good news is

0:26:55.359 --> 0:26:58.080
<v Speaker 15>we're not starting at zero. Congress did a lot of

0:26:58.119 --> 0:27:01.719
<v Speaker 15>work this past year to really lay the groundwork and

0:27:01.760 --> 0:27:05.240
<v Speaker 15>move the ball forward. But you know, like any draft legislation,

0:27:05.320 --> 0:27:07.159
<v Speaker 15>there are issues here there that still need to be

0:27:07.200 --> 0:27:09.240
<v Speaker 15>worked out. And so you know, one of the things

0:27:09.280 --> 0:27:11.960
<v Speaker 15>we're doing at the Blockchain Association, within our working groups

0:27:12.000 --> 0:27:14.600
<v Speaker 15>is really to get people together to focus in on

0:27:14.680 --> 0:27:17.840
<v Speaker 15>the specific issues and the details so we can bring smart,

0:27:17.840 --> 0:27:20.840
<v Speaker 15>thoughtful approaches to Congress, because I think you know, what

0:27:20.920 --> 0:27:24.920
<v Speaker 15>everybody in the industry wants is a pro competition framework

0:27:25.040 --> 0:27:27.920
<v Speaker 15>that also protects consumers. And so we're on the same

0:27:28.000 --> 0:27:30.960
<v Speaker 15>page about the goals. It's working through the details. It

0:27:31.000 --> 0:27:32.320
<v Speaker 15>takes time, but you know.

0:27:32.359 --> 0:27:35.080
<v Speaker 4>I think there was a press conference last week where.

0:27:35.320 --> 0:27:38.119
<v Speaker 15>David Sachs and the chair of the committees stood up

0:27:38.119 --> 0:27:39.399
<v Speaker 15>and said they want to get this done in the

0:27:39.400 --> 0:27:43.119
<v Speaker 15>first hundred days. I think that's pretty ambitious, but I

0:27:43.160 --> 0:27:44.000
<v Speaker 15>think they're going to try.

0:27:44.280 --> 0:27:45.200
<v Speaker 4>I think they're moving.

0:27:45.080 --> 0:27:47.240
<v Speaker 15>Very very quickly on Capitol Hill and that we're going

0:27:47.240 --> 0:27:48.160
<v Speaker 15>to see a lot of progress.

0:27:48.920 --> 0:27:50.480
<v Speaker 4>Kristin, you mentioned the consumer.

0:27:50.600 --> 0:27:53.080
<v Speaker 3>There's still plenty of people out there who are skeptical

0:27:53.160 --> 0:27:56.840
<v Speaker 3>about the safety of their assets in some of these instruments.

0:27:56.960 --> 0:28:00.920
<v Speaker 3>What policies or measures are you in fame for that

0:28:01.000 --> 0:28:02.440
<v Speaker 3>would protect consumers?

0:28:02.840 --> 0:28:04.880
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, well, I think listen, we need to make sure

0:28:04.880 --> 0:28:08.200
<v Speaker 15>that whenever there's an intermediary involved in crypto, they need

0:28:08.240 --> 0:28:11.160
<v Speaker 15>to have appropriate regulations. Right if you're handing your crypto

0:28:11.200 --> 0:28:13.000
<v Speaker 15>assets over to someone else, you want to know that

0:28:13.320 --> 0:28:15.160
<v Speaker 15>they're safe, that they're not going to be taken away

0:28:15.640 --> 0:28:17.840
<v Speaker 15>or used for harm. So we need to put those

0:28:18.000 --> 0:28:21.160
<v Speaker 15>types of frameworks into place, and I think it's fairly

0:28:21.200 --> 0:28:23.800
<v Speaker 15>easy to do. I think it's it's known. I think

0:28:23.840 --> 0:28:26.440
<v Speaker 15>some of the more complex topics are, you know, figuring

0:28:26.440 --> 0:28:28.720
<v Speaker 15>out when something is a security or a commodity that's

0:28:28.880 --> 0:28:31.320
<v Speaker 15>that's a long time issue that the industry has been

0:28:31.320 --> 0:28:33.320
<v Speaker 15>grappling with. But there are a lot of creative ideas

0:28:33.320 --> 0:28:36.400
<v Speaker 15>out there and people are talking. But yeah, we want

0:28:36.400 --> 0:28:39.320
<v Speaker 15>to make sure that consumers have confidence in using this.

0:28:39.520 --> 0:28:42.840
<v Speaker 15>I mean, you know, the irony is, it's actually oftentimes

0:28:42.920 --> 0:28:45.920
<v Speaker 15>much better in crypto. If you look at these DeFi

0:28:46.040 --> 0:28:49.200
<v Speaker 15>systems that are don't you don't have to hand your

0:28:49.240 --> 0:28:52.320
<v Speaker 15>assets over to an intermediary in order to borrow or

0:28:52.400 --> 0:28:55.320
<v Speaker 15>lend or trade. They're actually like a lot safer because

0:28:55.560 --> 0:28:58.520
<v Speaker 15>the code is there, it's autos, you can look at it.

0:28:58.600 --> 0:28:59.600
<v Speaker 4>You know what's happening.

0:29:00.080 --> 0:29:04.000
<v Speaker 15>So crypto is trying to improve the world for consumers.

0:29:04.040 --> 0:29:05.920
<v Speaker 15>But you know that, listen, there's things that are happening.

0:29:05.960 --> 0:29:08.920
<v Speaker 15>It's still very early days, and so we want to

0:29:08.920 --> 0:29:11.120
<v Speaker 15>make sure we get the regulatory framework right that gives

0:29:11.120 --> 0:29:13.160
<v Speaker 15>people the confidence to come into the market.

0:29:13.600 --> 0:29:16.200
<v Speaker 3>One of the biggest skeptics out there, longtime skeptic, is

0:29:16.280 --> 0:29:19.400
<v Speaker 3>JP Morgan's Jamie Dimond just last month said he doesn't think.

0:29:19.240 --> 0:29:20.680
<v Speaker 4>People should buy bitcoin.

0:29:21.120 --> 0:29:24.440
<v Speaker 3>What does this mean for crypto's rise long term? If

0:29:24.480 --> 0:29:28.040
<v Speaker 3>the bank, the largest bank in the country hasn't come

0:29:28.080 --> 0:29:30.640
<v Speaker 3>around yet, well, listen, I think it takes time for

0:29:30.720 --> 0:29:33.880
<v Speaker 3>these bigger institutions to change their mind, but there certainly

0:29:33.960 --> 0:29:35.440
<v Speaker 3>is a lot of demand for bitcoin.

0:29:35.480 --> 0:29:38.560
<v Speaker 15>I mean, obviously that's reflected in the price increase over

0:29:38.600 --> 0:29:41.080
<v Speaker 15>the past year. And I think this is an asset

0:29:41.200 --> 0:29:44.160
<v Speaker 15>that is really here to stay. I mean, this is

0:29:44.200 --> 0:29:48.880
<v Speaker 15>something where it's scarce, it's serving as a store of value.

0:29:49.040 --> 0:29:52.240
<v Speaker 15>It is something that you can access from anywhere in

0:29:52.280 --> 0:29:53.480
<v Speaker 15>the world without.

0:29:53.280 --> 0:29:55.280
<v Speaker 4>Needing to go through an intermediary.

0:29:55.280 --> 0:29:58.240
<v Speaker 15>So it's a truly revolutionary idea and I think it's

0:29:58.320 --> 0:30:02.080
<v Speaker 15>one that as more and more institutions become educated and

0:30:02.120 --> 0:30:06.560
<v Speaker 15>comfortable with the idea, we'll see financial advisors recommending. You

0:30:06.600 --> 0:30:09.120
<v Speaker 15>know that people include a little bit of this in

0:30:09.160 --> 0:30:11.880
<v Speaker 15>their portfolio, but no Bigquin's are wonderful innovation and I

0:30:11.880 --> 0:30:12.760
<v Speaker 15>think it's here to stay.

0:30:13.720 --> 0:30:17.080
<v Speaker 3>That's Kristin Smith, Blockchain Association CEO, thanks so much for

0:30:17.160 --> 0:30:20.440
<v Speaker 3>joining us. Coming up, we speak with Turo CEO Andre

0:30:20.520 --> 0:30:22.640
<v Speaker 3>Hadad as they drop plans to IPO.

0:30:23.200 --> 0:30:23.960
<v Speaker 4>This is Bloomberg.

0:30:36.720 --> 0:30:39.960
<v Speaker 5>More ex open ai members are setting up their own

0:30:40.000 --> 0:30:43.760
<v Speaker 5>AI startups after co founder Alias sets Koba is Now

0:30:43.920 --> 0:30:47.400
<v Speaker 5>we have the former open ai CTO Mira Maraati launching

0:30:47.400 --> 0:30:51.080
<v Speaker 5>her own AI company called Thinking Machines Lab, along with

0:30:51.120 --> 0:30:54.440
<v Speaker 5>several former open ai executives fromo showing Gafari brings us

0:30:54.480 --> 0:30:57.520
<v Speaker 5>more and everyone has been waiting with baited breath, what

0:30:57.680 --> 0:31:00.280
<v Speaker 5>will she do? And here we have it no product,

0:31:00.280 --> 0:31:03.640
<v Speaker 5>but an inspiration and a product roadmap and east to

0:31:03.640 --> 0:31:04.560
<v Speaker 5>at an extent.

0:31:06.360 --> 0:31:06.840
<v Speaker 4>That's right.

0:31:06.920 --> 0:31:10.479
<v Speaker 16>So Mira Murti, the former CTO of open Ai, is

0:31:10.640 --> 0:31:14.080
<v Speaker 16>starting a new venture and she will be building both

0:31:14.640 --> 0:31:17.920
<v Speaker 16>the research models as well as some kind of products

0:31:18.480 --> 0:31:21.040
<v Speaker 16>that are to be determined. And she's recruited quite a

0:31:21.080 --> 0:31:23.520
<v Speaker 16>few former open ai employees, or I should say that

0:31:23.640 --> 0:31:26.160
<v Speaker 16>quite a few open employees open ee employees.

0:31:25.760 --> 0:31:29.440
<v Speaker 3>Now work there, Sharine, What do we know about why

0:31:29.560 --> 0:31:33.560
<v Speaker 3>investors are so confident that a company with no product

0:31:33.760 --> 0:31:37.840
<v Speaker 3>and no super clear roadmap yet, how can it they

0:31:37.840 --> 0:31:40.880
<v Speaker 3>actually emerge as a contender in AI?

0:31:42.000 --> 0:31:44.120
<v Speaker 16>I mean, right now, there is almost it seems like

0:31:44.160 --> 0:31:49.120
<v Speaker 16>insatiable demand to invest in the next big AI company.

0:31:49.200 --> 0:31:51.760
<v Speaker 16>It's still sort of anyone's game. As we're seeing all

0:31:51.800 --> 0:31:55.040
<v Speaker 16>these AI models are becoming increasingly competitive.

0:31:54.520 --> 0:31:55.120
<v Speaker 2>With each other.

0:31:55.600 --> 0:31:58.920
<v Speaker 16>Just this week we saw Elon Musk's Xai release the

0:31:59.000 --> 0:32:02.760
<v Speaker 16>latest Grock three model that they say outperforms open Ai

0:32:02.920 --> 0:32:05.480
<v Speaker 16>and other competitors on certain evaluations.

0:32:05.640 --> 0:32:06.600
<v Speaker 4>We've seen the rise.

0:32:06.440 --> 0:32:09.720
<v Speaker 16>Of Chinese startup with deep Seek similarly come out with

0:32:09.760 --> 0:32:12.880
<v Speaker 16>a very competitive model. So it's still very early in

0:32:12.920 --> 0:32:15.920
<v Speaker 16>this big race to agi, right, and I think investors

0:32:15.960 --> 0:32:18.600
<v Speaker 16>are keen to put their money and someone who's a

0:32:18.600 --> 0:32:21.400
<v Speaker 16>big name and a trusted figure in the industry like Miramadi.

0:32:21.560 --> 0:32:23.200
<v Speaker 5>I mean, look, we were just talking about the thirty

0:32:23.200 --> 0:32:27.120
<v Speaker 5>billion dollar plus valuation that Ilios Atsugva is looking for

0:32:27.160 --> 0:32:27.960
<v Speaker 5>in the market.

0:32:28.200 --> 0:32:29.440
<v Speaker 2>What about evaluation?

0:32:29.680 --> 0:32:32.200
<v Speaker 5>A talk of people who want to be backing Mir's

0:32:32.240 --> 0:32:33.320
<v Speaker 5>new project.

0:32:34.560 --> 0:32:35.040
<v Speaker 2>That's right.

0:32:35.120 --> 0:32:37.960
<v Speaker 16>So you know, we've heard that she has been talking

0:32:37.960 --> 0:32:41.520
<v Speaker 16>to investors and that there are talks you know, to

0:32:41.840 --> 0:32:44.360
<v Speaker 16>put in money, but none of this has been finalized yet.

0:32:44.400 --> 0:32:45.800
<v Speaker 4>It's still very early.

0:32:46.400 --> 0:32:47.600
<v Speaker 2>We will see, you know.

0:32:48.520 --> 0:32:51.320
<v Speaker 16>I think that you know, there is high demand we

0:32:51.360 --> 0:32:53.840
<v Speaker 16>are hearing to put money toward her company.

0:32:54.720 --> 0:32:58.040
<v Speaker 3>That's Glutenberg Sharreingkafari, thanks so much for joining us. It's

0:32:58.040 --> 0:33:00.680
<v Speaker 3>still early into twenty twenty five, but it's already proving

0:33:00.720 --> 0:33:03.040
<v Speaker 3>to be a tough year for the IPO market, with

0:33:03.200 --> 0:33:07.360
<v Speaker 3>many companies opting to postpone or cancel their planned offerings outright.

0:33:07.720 --> 0:33:10.640
<v Speaker 3>The latest coming from car sharing company Turo, which is

0:33:10.680 --> 0:33:13.920
<v Speaker 3>scrap plans to go public three years after initially filing

0:33:13.960 --> 0:33:18.640
<v Speaker 3>for USIPO. Turo ceo Andre Hadad joins us. Now, Andre,

0:33:18.880 --> 0:33:21.880
<v Speaker 3>you're not the only company out there that's really you know,

0:33:22.200 --> 0:33:26.880
<v Speaker 3>rethinking ibo plans. But what about the market conditions made

0:33:26.920 --> 0:33:29.800
<v Speaker 3>this not the right time for you guys to go public.

0:33:29.960 --> 0:33:33.760
<v Speaker 3>Did it have to do with growth or external factors?

0:33:34.400 --> 0:33:37.360
<v Speaker 17>Well, the market definitely hasn't helped. You know, we've been

0:33:37.640 --> 0:33:40.040
<v Speaker 17>waiting for an opening for the past three years. We

0:33:40.200 --> 0:33:43.160
<v Speaker 17>filed our first S one back in late twenty twenty one,

0:33:43.560 --> 0:33:45.520
<v Speaker 17>and as you know, twenty two and twenty three were

0:33:45.640 --> 0:33:46.160
<v Speaker 17>tough years.

0:33:46.160 --> 0:33:49.600
<v Speaker 10>We thought twenty four might get better. There was some slight.

0:33:49.360 --> 0:33:53.080
<v Speaker 17>Improvements, but as we entered twenty five, we've continued to

0:33:53.120 --> 0:33:56.800
<v Speaker 17>see market conditions to be pretty choppy. There's a lot

0:33:56.800 --> 0:34:00.200
<v Speaker 17>of change going on. There's a lot of adaptations that

0:34:00.240 --> 0:34:03.560
<v Speaker 17>are happening. And you know, we have been on file

0:34:03.680 --> 0:34:07.280
<v Speaker 17>for almost three years and it's had become a bit

0:34:07.320 --> 0:34:10.000
<v Speaker 17>of a distraction to continue to file every quarter, and

0:34:10.080 --> 0:34:12.759
<v Speaker 17>since the near term prospects of going public seemed a

0:34:12.800 --> 0:34:15.440
<v Speaker 17>bit remote, we decided to postpone.

0:34:15.719 --> 0:34:19.280
<v Speaker 3>We've reported that some other late stage startups are facing

0:34:19.680 --> 0:34:22.680
<v Speaker 3>a cash crunch as they postponed plans to IPO, some

0:34:22.719 --> 0:34:24.800
<v Speaker 3>of them having to go out and raise cash again,

0:34:25.120 --> 0:34:29.040
<v Speaker 3>and they're finding a more skeptical group of venture capitalists

0:34:29.080 --> 0:34:32.239
<v Speaker 3>that are more unwilling to give them additional cash at

0:34:32.239 --> 0:34:35.680
<v Speaker 3>that stage. What does this mean for your future funding plans?

0:34:35.760 --> 0:34:38.520
<v Speaker 3>Will you have to tap VC cash again at some

0:34:38.600 --> 0:34:39.319
<v Speaker 3>point this year?

0:34:40.480 --> 0:34:42.760
<v Speaker 17>No, we don't have any plans to raise any capital.

0:34:42.960 --> 0:34:46.400
<v Speaker 17>You know, we have been seeing listen to. Fundamentals of

0:34:46.400 --> 0:34:49.000
<v Speaker 17>the business continue to be very very strong. So just

0:34:49.040 --> 0:34:50.799
<v Speaker 17>to give you a sense of where we are from

0:34:50.840 --> 0:34:54.439
<v Speaker 17>a business standpoint, you know, last year we ended twenty

0:34:54.480 --> 0:34:56.840
<v Speaker 17>twenty four with a little bit over nine hundred and

0:34:56.880 --> 0:34:59.680
<v Speaker 17>fifty million dollars of revenue, up from you one hundred

0:34:59.680 --> 0:35:00.680
<v Speaker 17>and fifty back.

0:35:00.520 --> 0:35:01.320
<v Speaker 10>In twenty twenty.

0:35:01.360 --> 0:35:03.319
<v Speaker 17>So the business has grown over six and a half

0:35:03.520 --> 0:35:06.480
<v Speaker 17>x in the last four or five years. It's been

0:35:06.520 --> 0:35:09.480
<v Speaker 17>profitable since twenty twenty one. We've been EBITDA positive for

0:35:09.520 --> 0:35:13.200
<v Speaker 17>the last three four years now, and we have a

0:35:13.280 --> 0:35:15.759
<v Speaker 17>very strong balance sheet with over two hundred and fifty

0:35:15.760 --> 0:35:19.120
<v Speaker 17>million dollars of cash. So thankfully, you know, we don't

0:35:19.160 --> 0:35:21.799
<v Speaker 17>have to go out and tap into the markets. But

0:35:21.840 --> 0:35:24.320
<v Speaker 17>I agree with you the markets have been more challenging

0:35:24.360 --> 0:35:28.120
<v Speaker 17>recently for late stage startups. In our case, we're just

0:35:28.160 --> 0:35:30.759
<v Speaker 17>going to be focused on the fundamentals, you know, for

0:35:30.800 --> 0:35:34.160
<v Speaker 17>the next few years and hoping that the markets will

0:35:34.200 --> 0:35:36.880
<v Speaker 17>be more receptive and a bit less turbilent, you know,

0:35:36.960 --> 0:35:38.919
<v Speaker 17>in maybe two to three years from now, and.

0:35:38.840 --> 0:35:42.320
<v Speaker 5>You want to be making more investments in the business

0:35:42.360 --> 0:35:43.840
<v Speaker 5>while you'll make private where.

0:35:43.840 --> 0:35:48.560
<v Speaker 17>Andre, well, you know, we still are early, frankly in

0:35:49.080 --> 0:35:52.359
<v Speaker 17>this market, you know, just you know, we're excited about

0:35:52.360 --> 0:35:54.120
<v Speaker 17>the growth and the numbers that I shared with you,

0:35:54.200 --> 0:35:57.400
<v Speaker 17>but when you think about the size of the opportunity, Caroen,

0:35:57.719 --> 0:36:00.399
<v Speaker 17>you know this market quite well and the opportunities very

0:36:00.480 --> 0:36:04.080
<v Speaker 17>very large. We have been investing in our team, We

0:36:04.120 --> 0:36:07.160
<v Speaker 17>have been investing in innovation in the product experience.

0:36:07.239 --> 0:36:08.239
<v Speaker 10>There's still a lot to build.

0:36:08.239 --> 0:36:12.920
<v Speaker 17>We launched seventy different new features last year enhancing the

0:36:12.960 --> 0:36:16.560
<v Speaker 17>host experience, the guest experience, but there's a lot more

0:36:16.600 --> 0:36:18.759
<v Speaker 17>that we want to do, and frankly, we're going to

0:36:18.800 --> 0:36:21.239
<v Speaker 17>take the opportunity of staying private for the next two

0:36:21.320 --> 0:36:24.960
<v Speaker 17>to three years or so to make some bold, longer

0:36:25.040 --> 0:36:27.400
<v Speaker 17>term investments that are part of the roadmap that we're

0:36:27.440 --> 0:36:28.920
<v Speaker 17>accelerating and bringing forward.

0:36:29.360 --> 0:36:32.640
<v Speaker 5>Andre I go to a sensitive topic here, because the

0:36:32.680 --> 0:36:35.520
<v Speaker 5>start of twenty to twenty five was pretty devastating in

0:36:35.600 --> 0:36:39.160
<v Speaker 5>terms of not one, but two tragedies that involved turo cars.

0:36:39.760 --> 0:36:42.680
<v Speaker 5>How have you thought about safety and how much in

0:36:42.719 --> 0:36:46.319
<v Speaker 5>any way the decision to delay IPO been because of that.

0:36:48.320 --> 0:36:51.640
<v Speaker 17>No, those two things are not really connected, Carolyn. Those

0:36:51.760 --> 0:36:55.200
<v Speaker 17>you know, the timing coincidence of course looks like they are,

0:36:55.320 --> 0:36:59.000
<v Speaker 17>but they're not. You know, Yes, the start of the

0:36:59.080 --> 0:37:03.120
<v Speaker 17>year has been extremely tragic for us. As you mentioned,

0:37:03.880 --> 0:37:07.600
<v Speaker 17>the events of January first, the attacks of January first

0:37:07.840 --> 0:37:08.600
<v Speaker 17>were made with.

0:37:08.600 --> 0:37:10.080
<v Speaker 10>Two Tuo vehicles.

0:37:11.360 --> 0:37:16.040
<v Speaker 17>We've been very focused on understanding what's going on and

0:37:16.080 --> 0:37:19.000
<v Speaker 17>looking inwards to our trust and safety over the last

0:37:19.239 --> 0:37:22.880
<v Speaker 17>you know, two months now. As I indicated, you know,

0:37:23.320 --> 0:37:27.840
<v Speaker 17>back in early January, you know, we ended up of

0:37:27.880 --> 0:37:32.360
<v Speaker 17>course doing a lot of investigating internally, cooperating with investigators externally,

0:37:33.200 --> 0:37:36.840
<v Speaker 17>and we found out that the perpetrators of these crimes

0:37:36.880 --> 0:37:40.280
<v Speaker 17>were you know, very legitimate people, you know, with valid

0:37:40.360 --> 0:37:43.959
<v Speaker 17>driver's licenses, with no criminal backgrounds. And so our trust

0:37:44.000 --> 0:37:46.320
<v Speaker 17>and safety system that we built over the last thirteen

0:37:46.360 --> 0:37:51.120
<v Speaker 17>years actually performed as planned. However, you know, we did

0:37:51.280 --> 0:37:53.359
<v Speaker 17>want to take a look at everything. You know, when

0:37:53.480 --> 0:37:55.279
<v Speaker 17>such a tragedy strikes, you have to re.

0:37:55.239 --> 0:37:56.560
<v Speaker 10>Look at everything, and we did.

0:37:57.400 --> 0:38:00.880
<v Speaker 17>And one thing that I wanted to mention is that

0:38:00.920 --> 0:38:03.239
<v Speaker 17>we're launching at the end of this quarter a new

0:38:03.280 --> 0:38:06.280
<v Speaker 17>way for our hosts to signal any concerns.

0:38:05.800 --> 0:38:08.280
<v Speaker 10>That they have with public safety.

0:38:08.800 --> 0:38:12.120
<v Speaker 17>So today, you know, our hosts can always cancel a

0:38:12.200 --> 0:38:15.319
<v Speaker 17>trip if they're feeling uncomfortable with anything that's going on, right,

0:38:15.760 --> 0:38:20.040
<v Speaker 17>and there's no penalties when that happens. Now, we're specifically

0:38:20.080 --> 0:38:25.359
<v Speaker 17>adding a topic which is related to public safety, and

0:38:25.400 --> 0:38:27.960
<v Speaker 17>not only we'll be able to enable our host to

0:38:28.000 --> 0:38:30.760
<v Speaker 17>cancel these trips without any penalties on their track record,

0:38:31.080 --> 0:38:34.200
<v Speaker 17>but also we'll be connecting them with a hotline of

0:38:34.280 --> 0:38:37.920
<v Speaker 17>specialized representatives that will be able to support them while

0:38:37.920 --> 0:38:39.880
<v Speaker 17>they're dealing with something that might be stressful.

0:38:40.000 --> 0:38:41.560
<v Speaker 10>That's great, So we're making this change.

0:38:41.600 --> 0:38:44.440
<v Speaker 17>We think it's important for us to be standing behind

0:38:44.440 --> 0:38:47.440
<v Speaker 17>our hosts and supporting them whenever they feel anxious about

0:38:47.440 --> 0:38:50.320
<v Speaker 17>something that looks like a public safety issue.

0:38:50.680 --> 0:38:54.640
<v Speaker 3>What about other investments you mentioned bold investments, will.

0:38:54.440 --> 0:38:57.080
<v Speaker 4>That include m and A. We only have about thirty seconds.

0:38:58.080 --> 0:38:59.759
<v Speaker 17>MNA is always an option. You know, there's been a

0:38:59.800 --> 0:39:03.799
<v Speaker 17>lot of consolidation in the space, and you know, last

0:39:04.040 --> 0:39:08.520
<v Speaker 17>last year you might recall we did announce it a

0:39:08.560 --> 0:39:11.600
<v Speaker 17>great partnership with Uber, you know, sort of taking over

0:39:11.640 --> 0:39:14.920
<v Speaker 17>their Uber car share business that they had been building

0:39:14.960 --> 0:39:15.960
<v Speaker 17>in Australia.

0:39:16.400 --> 0:39:17.879
<v Speaker 10>And we're partnering with Uber.

0:39:17.920 --> 0:39:21.400
<v Speaker 17>We're going to become part of the Uber rent products

0:39:21.800 --> 0:39:24.719
<v Speaker 17>and we'll be launching soon this integration. So there's a

0:39:24.800 --> 0:39:27.440
<v Speaker 17>lot I think a lot of consolidation happening, especially as

0:39:27.440 --> 0:39:30.200
<v Speaker 17>you pointed out, with private capital becoming more scarce and

0:39:30.239 --> 0:39:33.799
<v Speaker 17>more skeptical, I think it's pushing a lot of later

0:39:33.840 --> 0:39:35.960
<v Speaker 17>stage companies to rethink their growth plans.

0:39:36.080 --> 0:39:37.200
<v Speaker 2>And you remain independent.

0:39:39.640 --> 0:39:40.240
<v Speaker 10>That's the plan.

0:39:40.440 --> 0:39:40.640
<v Speaker 6>You know.

0:39:40.719 --> 0:39:43.399
<v Speaker 17>We think the market is really big, We think that

0:39:43.640 --> 0:39:47.640
<v Speaker 17>the fundamentals are very strong, and we have an exciting

0:39:47.719 --> 0:39:51.560
<v Speaker 17>roadmap ahead. So we'll continue to you know, chart.

0:39:51.440 --> 0:39:53.440
<v Speaker 2>Our own path, Andre Hadad, thank you.

0:39:53.640 --> 0:39:57.080
<v Speaker 5>Cro ceo x is said to be in talks to

0:39:57.200 --> 0:39:59.919
<v Speaker 5>raise money from investors that could value the company forty

0:40:00.040 --> 0:40:03.160
<v Speaker 5>four billion dollars. Katie roof joins US now forty four

0:40:03.239 --> 0:40:05.840
<v Speaker 5>billion being the amount that Elon bought Twitter for in

0:40:05.880 --> 0:40:06.640
<v Speaker 5>twenty twenty two.

0:40:07.960 --> 0:40:10.400
<v Speaker 18>Yeah, so much has been made about you know, this

0:40:10.520 --> 0:40:13.600
<v Speaker 18>acquisition price. Many people said he overpaid, and you know,

0:40:13.640 --> 0:40:16.320
<v Speaker 18>at one point they had many people fleeing the platform.

0:40:16.400 --> 0:40:19.640
<v Speaker 18>But they are now in talks to receive investment at

0:40:19.680 --> 0:40:23.080
<v Speaker 18>a forty four billion dollar valuation, same price. And you

0:40:23.160 --> 0:40:26.120
<v Speaker 18>know this is at a time when all Elon companies,

0:40:26.200 --> 0:40:30.799
<v Speaker 18>SpaceX Tesla, they're all going XAI. They're all going up

0:40:30.840 --> 0:40:35.160
<v Speaker 18>in value because partly because of Elon's ties to President

0:40:35.239 --> 0:40:37.200
<v Speaker 18>Trump and the perceived value that that could add.

0:40:39.000 --> 0:40:42.520
<v Speaker 5>And briefly, Katie, just who would be willing to give

0:40:42.560 --> 0:40:44.080
<v Speaker 5>them money and why do they need the money?

0:40:45.719 --> 0:40:48.680
<v Speaker 18>So it could be potentially from existing investors.

0:40:49.000 --> 0:40:51.640
<v Speaker 4>We know that the talks are are early.

0:40:52.960 --> 0:40:54.759
<v Speaker 18>You know, it's hard to say what they're planning to

0:40:54.920 --> 0:40:58.080
<v Speaker 18>use the money for. But you know one thing that

0:40:58.200 --> 0:41:01.200
<v Speaker 18>adds to their value is they are are a significant

0:41:01.239 --> 0:41:02.759
<v Speaker 18>shareholder in XAIS.

0:41:02.840 --> 0:41:04.480
<v Speaker 4>It turns out, so they go.

0:41:04.680 --> 0:41:09.239
<v Speaker 18>Up in value pretty much automatically when XAI goes up

0:41:09.320 --> 0:41:13.320
<v Speaker 18>in value. But usually the funding reason would be for

0:41:13.600 --> 0:41:16.200
<v Speaker 18>hiring or potentially acquisitions.

0:41:15.719 --> 0:41:18.160
<v Speaker 2>Great breaking news, Katie Roof. We appreciate it. Thank you.

0:41:18.640 --> 0:41:18.759
<v Speaker 10>Now.

0:41:18.800 --> 0:41:21.000
<v Speaker 2>That does it for this edition of Bloomberg Technology. You

0:41:21.080 --> 0:41:23.080
<v Speaker 2>do not want to forget to check out our podcasts.

0:41:23.239 --> 0:41:25.760
<v Speaker 5>Find it on the terminal as well as online on Apple, Spotify,

0:41:25.840 --> 0:41:26.400
<v Speaker 5>and iHeart.

0:41:26.960 --> 0:41:28.160
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Technology.