WEBVTT - Hour 1 – SEC Vs. LSU, Dan Orlovsky

0:00:00.720 --> 0:00:03.560
<v Speaker 1>You are listening to the Dan Patrick Show on Fox

0:00:03.600 --> 0:00:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio.

0:00:04.740 --> 0:00:07.120
<v Speaker 2>We did it. We made it to a Friday. It's

0:00:07.160 --> 0:00:10.090
<v Speaker 2>hour one. It's a meat Friday. Dylan will run down

0:00:10.130 --> 0:00:14.830
<v Speaker 2>the menu. The gang's here. Fritzy, yes, four consecutive shows

0:00:14.970 --> 0:00:20.630
<v Speaker 2>after getting four stitches in his finger. Congratulations. And once again,

0:00:20.670 --> 0:00:21.810
<v Speaker 2>another round of applause.

0:00:21.829 --> 0:00:22.229
<v Speaker 3>Emotional.

0:00:22.489 --> 0:00:25.770
<v Speaker 2>For heroic. Heroic. One day for each stitch. Come back.

0:00:25.829 --> 0:00:29.380
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, Tom. Dylan in the back row. Marvin, Paula,

0:00:29.390 --> 0:00:32.479
<v Speaker 2>yours truly. The backroom guys as well. We'll get to

0:00:32.540 --> 0:00:37.420
<v Speaker 2>phone calls coming up. 877-3DP-SHOW. Operator Tyler sitting by. He'll

0:00:37.460 --> 0:00:40.229
<v Speaker 2>take those calls. Play of the Day poll questions, stat

0:00:40.250 --> 0:00:42.470
<v Speaker 2>of the day, all of that forthcoming. Good morning if

0:00:42.490 --> 0:00:45.300
<v Speaker 2>you're watching the show on Peacock and NBC Sports Now

0:00:45.900 --> 0:00:49.780
<v Speaker 2>or listening on our radio affiliates now numbering 440 cities

0:00:50.260 --> 0:00:54.620
<v Speaker 2>that carry this occasionally. award-nominated program stat of the day

0:00:55.030 --> 0:00:57.400
<v Speaker 2>brought to you by panini america the official trading cards

0:00:57.440 --> 0:01:00.120
<v Speaker 2>of the program you guys jumped all over this new

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:05.420
<v Speaker 2>merchandise thank you available at danpatrick.com we've got dp show

0:01:05.480 --> 0:01:09.550
<v Speaker 2>gear for the entire family available also right after this

0:01:09.590 --> 0:01:13.429
<v Speaker 2>show at noon eastern nine pacific it'll be not so

0:01:13.490 --> 0:01:17.740
<v Speaker 2>fast with papston perloff the all-new show airing weekdays from

0:01:17.780 --> 0:01:22.500
<v Speaker 2>noon to 1 right here on Peacock and NBC Sports Now.

0:01:23.800 --> 0:01:27.300
<v Speaker 2>Poll question for today. Now, let's do the menu first here. Dylan,

0:01:27.440 --> 0:01:29.820
<v Speaker 2>what are we whipping up on this Meat Friday?

0:01:30.300 --> 0:01:34.740
<v Speaker 4>Well, Dan, it's Labor Day, college football real opening weekend,

0:01:34.840 --> 0:01:37.200
<v Speaker 4>so I figure we'll do a little kind of tailgate barbecue.

0:01:37.390 --> 0:01:37.690
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:01:38.030 --> 0:01:39.620
<v Speaker 5>So we got deluxe cheeseburgers.

0:01:40.250 --> 0:01:40.970
<v Speaker 2>What's that mean?

0:01:41.590 --> 0:01:44.180
<v Speaker 5>So that's literally just with lettuce and tomato, I think, right?

0:01:44.240 --> 0:01:46.039
<v Speaker 4>Todd talked about on the Toddcast how he takes the

0:01:46.060 --> 0:01:49.800
<v Speaker 4>lettuce and tomato off the burger and makes a free

0:01:49.880 --> 0:01:50.889
<v Speaker 4>side salad with it.

0:01:51.220 --> 0:01:53.200
<v Speaker 6>But the burger deluxe, at least at the diners I

0:01:53.240 --> 0:01:54.820
<v Speaker 6>went to in Brooklyn, that comes with french fries and

0:01:54.860 --> 0:01:55.220
<v Speaker 6>onion rings.

0:01:55.240 --> 0:01:56.360
<v Speaker 3>So are we getting that too today?

0:01:56.920 --> 0:01:58.330
<v Speaker 6>When you get the deluxe beef burger.

0:01:58.110 --> 0:01:59.570
<v Speaker 2>Platter, it comes with french fries and onion rings. Because

0:01:59.590 --> 0:02:00.090
<v Speaker 2>you continue, Dylan.

0:02:00.130 --> 0:02:02.450
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, we don't have either of those. But we do

0:02:02.470 --> 0:02:03.850
<v Speaker 5>have chili dogs as well.

0:02:04.310 --> 0:02:06.770
<v Speaker 2>Mm-hmm. Smoked brats. Mm-hmm.

0:02:07.150 --> 0:02:08.130
<v Speaker 5>Potato salad.

0:02:08.270 --> 0:02:08.390
<v Speaker 3>Mm-hmm.

0:02:09.560 --> 0:02:10.359
<v Speaker 5>And corn on the cob.

0:02:10.520 --> 0:02:11.720
<v Speaker 2>Who has it better than we do?

0:02:12.060 --> 0:02:13.120
<v Speaker 3>Nobody.

0:02:13.419 --> 0:02:17.840
<v Speaker 2>It is the game of the year so far. UMass

0:02:18.020 --> 0:02:25.170
<v Speaker 2>over Rutgers last night, 37-21. Rutgers was a 29.5-point favorite.

0:02:26.470 --> 0:02:32.250
<v Speaker 2>UMass on a 16-game losing streak. UMass gets $ 1. 55 million

0:02:32.290 --> 0:02:37.000
<v Speaker 2>to play Rutgers, one of the largest losses by paycheck

0:02:37.400 --> 0:02:43.450
<v Speaker 2>in college football history. Auburn, $ 1. 85 million paid to New

0:02:43.510 --> 0:02:47.609
<v Speaker 2>Mexico State. And that was the birth of Diego Pavia.

0:02:48.110 --> 0:02:51.700
<v Speaker 2>Texas A &amp; M, $ 1. 5 million paid to App State.

0:02:52.180 --> 0:02:56.179
<v Speaker 2>They lost. Two massive college football brands, and they had

0:02:56.220 --> 0:02:59.620
<v Speaker 2>the money. And they decided it was a good idea.

0:03:00.060 --> 0:03:04.370
<v Speaker 2>Somebody did that. Rutgers is going to shell out $ 1. 5 million.

0:03:04.530 --> 0:03:05.050
<v Speaker 1>Plus!

0:03:05.790 --> 0:03:05.870
<v Speaker 3>Plus!

0:03:05.889 --> 0:03:11.030
<v Speaker 2>Plus! They had a fireworks display that they were going to.

0:03:12.850 --> 0:03:15.109
<v Speaker 2>I guess it was win or lose. The fireworks were

0:03:15.150 --> 0:03:18.750
<v Speaker 2>going to go off at Rutgers. And that's probably a

0:03:18.770 --> 0:03:21.010
<v Speaker 2>couple of hundred thousand dollars that they were going to

0:03:21.050 --> 0:03:28.730
<v Speaker 2>have a fireworks display in a loss. This wasn't close. UMass,

0:03:28.870 --> 0:03:32.940
<v Speaker 2>the Minutemen. They lasted a little bit longer than Fritzie does.

0:03:33.560 --> 0:03:35.280
<v Speaker 2>It was a couple of hours there.

0:03:35.300 --> 0:03:37.480
<v Speaker 6>Again, I tell you something in confidence is what you did.

0:03:38.700 --> 0:03:42.850
<v Speaker 2>But UMass, a big winner here. And look, when you

0:03:42.930 --> 0:03:46.190
<v Speaker 2>see that a program is going to pay another program,

0:03:46.670 --> 0:03:50.810
<v Speaker 2>and I understand $ 1. 5 million, that can help the entire

0:03:51.930 --> 0:03:54.970
<v Speaker 2>athletic department at UMass. It's not just about football. That'll

0:03:54.990 --> 0:03:58.470
<v Speaker 2>help basketball. It'll help the other secondary sports as well.

0:03:59.340 --> 0:04:02.760
<v Speaker 2>But when you pay that money, you expect to win.

0:04:02.780 --> 0:04:05.170
<v Speaker 2>You don't expect it to be a close game. If

0:04:05.210 --> 0:04:09.330
<v Speaker 2>it's a close game, OK, but you're paying for a

0:04:09.390 --> 0:04:16.110
<v Speaker 2>sacrificial lamb. Rutgers, a 29 and a half point favorite. Now,

0:04:16.150 --> 0:04:19.520
<v Speaker 2>the game of the weekend is still LSU and Clemson and.

0:04:20.470 --> 0:04:25.130
<v Speaker 2>We saw that LSU, they found a judge in Baton Rouge,

0:04:25.170 --> 0:04:28.430
<v Speaker 2>of course, who is going to side with them and

0:04:28.529 --> 0:04:32.070
<v Speaker 2>allowed an injunction. The players who played in the NFL,

0:04:32.100 --> 0:04:34.800
<v Speaker 2>at least during the preseason, they get to play for

0:04:34.960 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 2>LSU this weekend or at least get to suit up

0:04:37.580 --> 0:04:41.000
<v Speaker 2>against Clemson. I said that this would come down to

0:04:41.040 --> 0:04:45.180
<v Speaker 2>the SEC against LSU. That's what this is all about.

0:04:45.640 --> 0:04:49.580
<v Speaker 2>No other programs, LSU and the SEC together. And the

0:04:49.720 --> 0:04:53.050
<v Speaker 2>SEC is not done with this. They're still going to

0:04:53.089 --> 0:04:56.650
<v Speaker 2>go after LSU to prevent this from happening. And maybe

0:04:56.890 --> 0:05:00.790
<v Speaker 2>these two players play this weekend. But for such a

0:05:00.850 --> 0:05:04.359
<v Speaker 2>big game, this feels like it's whoever loses will be

0:05:04.400 --> 0:05:07.479
<v Speaker 2>the storyline. Imagine if Lane Kiffin, through all of this,

0:05:08.420 --> 0:05:12.100
<v Speaker 2>and there's a lot of this, loses this game at home,

0:05:12.380 --> 0:05:17.070
<v Speaker 2>his debut on Saturday night. You've brought in these two players.

0:05:17.510 --> 0:05:21.130
<v Speaker 2>The conference is coming after you. An article in Vanity

0:05:21.190 --> 0:05:24.279
<v Speaker 2>Fair talking about how you were kind of creepy towards

0:05:24.320 --> 0:05:28.500
<v Speaker 2>sorority girls at Alabama. There's a lot. You leave Ole Miss,

0:05:28.940 --> 0:05:31.840
<v Speaker 2>middle of the playoffs, to go to LSU. There's a

0:05:31.860 --> 0:05:35.250
<v Speaker 2>lot riding on this. You are a 10-point favorite. As

0:05:35.310 --> 0:05:40.650
<v Speaker 2>for Dabo Sweeney, Clemson has 14 losses in the last

0:05:40.690 --> 0:05:44.770
<v Speaker 2>three seasons. And this will be, if he loses to LSU,

0:05:44.950 --> 0:05:48.990
<v Speaker 2>more of the, has Dabo evolved enough to change with

0:05:49.029 --> 0:05:52.250
<v Speaker 2>the times? Now, keep in mind, Clemson last year at

0:05:52.290 --> 0:05:56.589
<v Speaker 2>this time was ranked fourth in the country. They were

0:05:56.630 --> 0:05:59.930
<v Speaker 2>a popular national title pick by a lot of experts here.

0:06:01.070 --> 0:06:05.490
<v Speaker 2>If Clemson loses, they're expected to. How much they lose by,

0:06:06.390 --> 0:06:09.530
<v Speaker 2>then this might be a referendum on Dabo Sweeney. Now,

0:06:09.630 --> 0:06:13.210
<v Speaker 2>everybody keeps telling me he's safe. everything he's done there.

0:06:13.730 --> 0:06:19.330
<v Speaker 2>That's great. It's great until we've seen coaches get relieved

0:06:19.370 --> 0:06:25.230
<v Speaker 2>of their duties or fired after winning a championship. Gene

0:06:25.330 --> 0:06:30.310
<v Speaker 2>Chizik at Auburn. Thank you, Gene. See ya. This happens.

0:06:30.770 --> 0:06:36.300
<v Speaker 2>Happens in the NBA. Major League Baseball. Hey, you know,

0:06:36.900 --> 0:06:41.400
<v Speaker 2>you've Won a World Series here, but that's a couple

0:06:41.420 --> 0:06:48.299
<v Speaker 2>of years ago here. Joe Maddon was fired. A hundred years.

0:06:48.420 --> 0:06:51.620
<v Speaker 2>Over a hundred years you're waiting for a World Series title. Yeah,

0:06:51.660 --> 0:06:53.500
<v Speaker 2>but I don't know. What have you done for us

0:06:53.560 --> 0:06:59.270
<v Speaker 2>lately here? It happens. Now, maybe Clemson is loyal to Dabo,

0:06:59.630 --> 0:07:02.370
<v Speaker 2>and it doesn't matter. He's on scholarship no matter what happens.

0:07:02.930 --> 0:07:05.650
<v Speaker 2>But if you win seven games.

0:07:07.060 --> 0:07:09.739
<v Speaker 2>I think, you know, we start to circle the wagons

0:07:09.800 --> 0:07:14.000
<v Speaker 2>a little bit. That's where the alumni go. Can we

0:07:14.040 --> 0:07:17.360
<v Speaker 2>move on? What's it cost to move on? Whenever you

0:07:17.420 --> 0:07:20.870
<v Speaker 2>see this, whenever you see somebody sign a contract, I

0:07:20.900 --> 0:07:24.930
<v Speaker 2>always go, what's the buyout? With all of them, because

0:07:25.010 --> 0:07:27.910
<v Speaker 2>it feels like Jimbo Fisher. Although I saw where Jimbo

0:07:27.950 --> 0:07:30.910
<v Speaker 2>Fisher says he wants to come back and coach. If

0:07:30.950 --> 0:07:33.429
<v Speaker 2>he comes back and coaches for free, that'd be great.

0:07:34.530 --> 0:07:37.380
<v Speaker 2>But He's still getting paid an awful lot of money.

0:07:38.160 --> 0:07:40.679
<v Speaker 2>But I always want to know, what's that buyout? Because

0:07:40.980 --> 0:07:43.980
<v Speaker 2>eventually we're going to get to, what is that buyout

0:07:44.080 --> 0:07:46.620
<v Speaker 2>for these coaches? I don't care who it is. What's

0:07:46.680 --> 0:07:49.430
<v Speaker 2>the buyout? It's really rare when you can go, you

0:07:49.440 --> 0:07:53.390
<v Speaker 2>know what? I'm done with this. It's usually you stay,

0:07:53.410 --> 0:07:56.310
<v Speaker 2>and then all of a sudden they go, man, we

0:07:56.330 --> 0:07:59.390
<v Speaker 2>got some nice parting gifts for you. Yes, Marvin.

0:08:00.530 --> 0:08:03.910
<v Speaker 6>Now, going forward, say if Clemson decides to fire Dabo Sweeney.

0:08:04.270 --> 0:08:04.490
<v Speaker 3>Okay.

0:08:05.350 --> 0:08:09.429
<v Speaker 6>The next coach, they shouldn't have national championship expectations any longer.

0:08:09.910 --> 0:08:11.690
<v Speaker 3>No. Okay.

0:08:12.070 --> 0:08:14.830
<v Speaker 2>But they don't have national title expectations. I'm just saying

0:08:14.870 --> 0:08:18.710
<v Speaker 2>just overall. Yeah, I don't think you're bringing somebody in

0:08:18.770 --> 0:08:23.990
<v Speaker 2>and go, I mean, look at Alabama. Now, maybe you're thinking, hey,

0:08:24.010 --> 0:08:30.350
<v Speaker 2>we got national title aspirations here. That quickly settled. Now

0:08:30.410 --> 0:08:33.930
<v Speaker 2>you're just a really good program or a formidable team.

0:08:34.540 --> 0:08:37.280
<v Speaker 2>It's not like we look at Alabama and go, hey,

0:08:37.320 --> 0:08:40.040
<v Speaker 2>they're the team to beat. It's been a little while

0:08:40.100 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 2>for that. Yeah, Mark.

0:08:41.650 --> 0:08:44.990
<v Speaker 6>So going forward, if Dabo keeps winning 9 to 10 games,

0:08:45.290 --> 0:08:47.189
<v Speaker 6>he's all right. But 7 is unacceptable, correct?

0:08:47.250 --> 0:08:47.450
<v Speaker 5>Yes.

0:08:47.570 --> 0:08:47.790
<v Speaker 3>Okay.

0:08:48.309 --> 0:08:51.770
<v Speaker 2>And you can't lose to Syracuse at home. Like there's

0:08:51.820 --> 0:08:55.720
<v Speaker 2>certain losses where you go, that's going to count as 2.

0:08:55.720 --> 0:08:58.319
<v Speaker 2>And that counted as maybe 3, where you're going, oh,

0:08:58.520 --> 0:09:00.050
<v Speaker 2>my God. Yeah, Paulie.

0:09:00.320 --> 0:09:03.099
<v Speaker 7>It does feel like a pivot year at Alabama. Kalen

0:09:03.120 --> 0:09:06.000
<v Speaker 7>DeBoer was 9-4, filling in for Saban that year, taking

0:09:06.080 --> 0:09:11.460
<v Speaker 7>over for Saban. 5-3 in the conference. Last year, 11-4, much,

0:09:11.540 --> 0:09:13.840
<v Speaker 7>much better. It didn't feel like a national title team,

0:09:13.860 --> 0:09:14.819
<v Speaker 7>but it felt in the mix.

0:09:15.760 --> 0:09:17.329
<v Speaker 2>And that's what you want. You want to be in

0:09:17.350 --> 0:09:20.230
<v Speaker 2>the conversation. But what's going to happen is when we

0:09:20.250 --> 0:09:23.429
<v Speaker 2>go to 2014 playoff, now all of a sudden, a

0:09:24.550 --> 0:09:28.580
<v Speaker 2>team that might have three losses, maybe four, they're going

0:09:28.600 --> 0:09:31.900
<v Speaker 2>to get into the playoffs. Therefore, that kind of smooths over,

0:09:32.000 --> 0:09:34.900
<v Speaker 2>disguises that maybe you're not great, but you're good enough

0:09:34.950 --> 0:09:38.689
<v Speaker 2>to get into the playoffs here. Whereas before, it was

0:09:39.030 --> 0:09:40.910
<v Speaker 2>two teams, then it was four teams, now we go

0:09:40.950 --> 0:09:45.429
<v Speaker 2>to 12. You go to 24, you don't have to

0:09:45.470 --> 0:09:48.040
<v Speaker 2>be a great team to make the playoffs. You're going

0:09:48.080 --> 0:09:49.319
<v Speaker 2>to have to be a great team to win the

0:09:49.360 --> 0:09:54.140
<v Speaker 2>national title. But There are certain programs where we go, OK,

0:09:54.700 --> 0:09:57.280
<v Speaker 2>we just sort of accept that this is who they

0:09:57.400 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 2>are now, as opposed to when Saban was there. or

0:10:00.820 --> 0:10:03.280
<v Speaker 2>even Dabo. But, you know, back in the day, they

0:10:03.300 --> 0:10:07.660
<v Speaker 2>were in the conversation and that's changed dramatically. Yes, Dylan.

0:10:08.300 --> 0:10:10.550
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I didn't think in my adult life I would

0:10:10.590 --> 0:10:14.730
<v Speaker 4>see Alabama enter the season as the 13th ranked team.

0:10:14.790 --> 0:10:16.689
<v Speaker 4>It just seemed like they were going to be a

0:10:16.710 --> 0:10:18.969
<v Speaker 4>top five team in perpetuity.

0:10:19.720 --> 0:10:22.199
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's Saban. I mean, we all grew up with

0:10:22.500 --> 0:10:25.640
<v Speaker 2>Saban and you understand that Saban was always going to

0:10:25.679 --> 0:10:28.860
<v Speaker 2>have a formidable team. I go back when he met

0:10:28.920 --> 0:10:33.359
<v Speaker 2>with the boosters, I think in Birmingham, and he said, basically, hey,

0:10:34.440 --> 0:10:38.120
<v Speaker 2>these schools are spending money and we need to keep

0:10:38.230 --> 0:10:41.890
<v Speaker 2>up with Texas A &amp; M. And that opened my

0:10:42.050 --> 0:10:47.809
<v Speaker 2>eyes like, oh, OK, Saban saw the future. And that

0:10:47.850 --> 0:10:52.630
<v Speaker 2>future is we're not getting everybody that we need. And

0:10:52.990 --> 0:10:55.110
<v Speaker 2>we talked to RG3 earlier in the week and he said,

0:10:55.170 --> 0:10:57.190
<v Speaker 2>you know, the SEC, they were going to pay you

0:10:57.230 --> 0:10:59.170
<v Speaker 2>under the table. Well, you don't have to do that now,

0:10:59.250 --> 0:11:02.380
<v Speaker 2>but do they have that money to be able to

0:11:02.420 --> 0:11:07.000
<v Speaker 2>keep up with some of these other programs? Dylan, with

0:11:07.040 --> 0:11:08.820
<v Speaker 2>your Clemson t-shirt on today.

0:11:09.400 --> 0:11:10.580
<v Speaker 5>I'm rocking the colors, Dan.

0:11:10.679 --> 0:11:11.020
<v Speaker 3>Okay.

0:11:11.500 --> 0:11:17.650
<v Speaker 2>Um, Orange is not flattering. It's fattening, actually. It is.

0:11:18.110 --> 0:11:19.949
<v Speaker 2>Orange is fattening.

0:11:19.970 --> 0:11:21.810
<v Speaker 4>I don't know if there's data to back that up,

0:11:21.850 --> 0:11:25.330
<v Speaker 4>but in my own mind, I have some orange shirts

0:11:25.370 --> 0:11:26.710
<v Speaker 4>and I always look at them and I'm like, this

0:11:26.730 --> 0:11:27.410
<v Speaker 4>doesn't look great.

0:11:27.429 --> 0:11:29.780
<v Speaker 2>What were you going to say?

0:11:30.820 --> 0:11:33.040
<v Speaker 4>Well, it's totally changed where it's like there is a

0:11:33.360 --> 0:11:36.080
<v Speaker 4>long period of time where If you were a top recruit,

0:11:36.140 --> 0:11:38.460
<v Speaker 4>you went to Alabama just based on pedigree. You're like,

0:11:39.040 --> 0:11:41.860
<v Speaker 4>I'm going here probably three, four years, going to win

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:44.600
<v Speaker 4>a title. And now it's truly just the highest bidder.

0:11:44.640 --> 0:11:46.479
<v Speaker 4>And it's hard to, you can't just be like, do

0:11:46.500 --> 0:11:48.300
<v Speaker 4>you want to come probably win a title or do

0:11:48.330 --> 0:11:49.329
<v Speaker 4>you want to make $ 6 million?

0:11:49.370 --> 0:11:53.210
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the loyalty is the bottom line and that's making money.

0:11:53.770 --> 0:11:57.490
<v Speaker 2>Like this is a business for everybody now. The players

0:11:58.010 --> 0:12:01.880
<v Speaker 2>couldn't make it a business before, but now they can. Therefore,

0:12:01.929 --> 0:12:05.980
<v Speaker 2>when somebody says, why are you going there? Well, because

0:12:06.000 --> 0:12:09.800
<v Speaker 2>they paid me the most. Oh, okay. It's not, do

0:12:09.870 --> 0:12:12.350
<v Speaker 2>I have the best chance to win a national championship?

0:12:12.750 --> 0:12:16.570
<v Speaker 2>It feels like it's how much and then how good

0:12:16.590 --> 0:12:18.390
<v Speaker 2>are we going to be? Am I going to play

0:12:18.429 --> 0:12:21.150
<v Speaker 2>right away? And that'll be commensurate to how much you're

0:12:21.170 --> 0:12:23.050
<v Speaker 2>going to pay me. You're going to bring in a

0:12:23.030 --> 0:12:27.220
<v Speaker 2>$ 5 million quarterback. He's going to play right away. Yes, Marv.

0:12:27.700 --> 0:12:30.380
<v Speaker 6>In my lifetime, Alabama with Saban was kind of like

0:12:30.440 --> 0:12:33.600
<v Speaker 6>Miami in the late 90s and early 2000s where the

0:12:33.660 --> 0:12:36.450
<v Speaker 6>backup's could have won a national championship for that team

0:12:36.490 --> 0:12:38.750
<v Speaker 6>because of all the studs that they had backing up.

0:12:39.080 --> 0:12:42.000
<v Speaker 6>Frank Gore didn't play on the 0-1 team. Wilson McGahee,

0:12:42.059 --> 0:12:44.400
<v Speaker 6>these guys were riding the bench. This is how deep

0:12:44.420 --> 0:12:45.960
<v Speaker 6>they were. And the same thing, I always go back

0:12:45.980 --> 0:12:48.880
<v Speaker 6>to Alvin Kamara was like the fifth string running back

0:12:49.020 --> 0:12:49.660
<v Speaker 6>at Alabama.

0:12:50.160 --> 0:12:53.920
<v Speaker 2>But this is what's happening with college football. Because of

0:12:54.000 --> 0:12:57.370
<v Speaker 2>the amount of money that you can spend, these players

0:12:57.429 --> 0:13:01.250
<v Speaker 2>are bouncing around. You don't have depth. Ohio State and

0:13:01.309 --> 0:13:05.410
<v Speaker 2>Michigan and Oklahoma and Nebraska are They just gathered all

0:13:05.460 --> 0:13:07.320
<v Speaker 2>the talent because they were going to keep it away

0:13:07.380 --> 0:13:12.020
<v Speaker 2>from you. Imagine Oklahoma State having Thurman Thomas, but they

0:13:12.140 --> 0:13:16.920
<v Speaker 2>also had Barry Sanders. That wouldn't happen now. You would

0:13:16.960 --> 0:13:20.660
<v Speaker 2>get one or the other, maybe, but that's what's happened

0:13:20.679 --> 0:13:23.559
<v Speaker 2>with college football. It's about depth and how much depth

0:13:23.760 --> 0:13:26.940
<v Speaker 2>do you have. And most of these schools, they spent

0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:32.990
<v Speaker 2>their money on their starting roster. All righty, 877-3DP-SHOW, email address,

0:13:33.010 --> 0:13:38.050
<v Speaker 2>dp at danpatrick.com, Twitter handle at dpshow. Deion Sanders with

0:13:38.130 --> 0:13:41.870
<v Speaker 2>a win against Georgia Tech, and they were the better team,

0:13:42.390 --> 0:13:44.750
<v Speaker 2>but they blocked a field goal. That was one of

0:13:44.790 --> 0:13:47.829
<v Speaker 2>those games I kept waiting, like, what do you got

0:13:47.870 --> 0:13:50.829
<v Speaker 2>here for me? Is anybody any good here? And you

0:13:50.850 --> 0:13:53.050
<v Speaker 2>had a good drive there at the end of the game.

0:13:53.490 --> 0:13:56.410
<v Speaker 2>Georgia Tech, I kept waiting for Georgia Tech to be good,

0:13:56.960 --> 0:13:59.800
<v Speaker 2>and it never happened. But for Deion, that's a big win.

0:14:00.370 --> 0:14:02.630
<v Speaker 2>Big win on the road. And I mentioned this a

0:14:02.670 --> 0:14:06.109
<v Speaker 2>couple of days ago. Everybody wanted to be part of

0:14:06.150 --> 0:14:09.430
<v Speaker 2>Colorado football. You had all the pregame shows. You had

0:14:09.610 --> 0:14:13.699
<v Speaker 2>all the celebrities, the former players. This is when Deion

0:14:13.760 --> 0:14:18.880
<v Speaker 2>needs you. Not back then. Now he needs you to

0:14:18.920 --> 0:14:22.359
<v Speaker 2>support the program. But that was a big win last night.

0:14:23.240 --> 0:14:24.820
<v Speaker 2>A surprising win. Yes, Marvin.

0:14:25.180 --> 0:14:27.210
<v Speaker 6>And I was also super disappointed because they were playing

0:14:27.260 --> 0:14:30.490
<v Speaker 6>in Atlanta last night. There's plenty of celebrities that were

0:14:30.510 --> 0:14:34.480
<v Speaker 6>down in Atlanta that went to Colorado two or three

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:37.109
<v Speaker 6>years ago when Shador and Travis Hunter and they were rolling.

0:14:38.080 --> 0:14:42.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, where is Usher and everybody else? Where are the Migos? Yeah,

0:14:42.480 --> 0:14:46.020
<v Speaker 2>where's Beyonce or whoever else maybe would have shown up there?

0:14:46.680 --> 0:14:50.200
<v Speaker 2>This first hour brought to you by ChatGPT Work. You

0:14:50.220 --> 0:14:53.230
<v Speaker 2>give it a goal, help turn scattered materials into finished work.

0:14:53.250 --> 0:14:57.070
<v Speaker 2>Get started at ChatGPT.com by selecting Work Mode, available on

0:14:57.130 --> 0:15:00.190
<v Speaker 2>Plus and Pro plans. We gave you the menu for

0:15:00.210 --> 0:15:04.550
<v Speaker 2>Meet Friday. We'll dive into the situation at North Carolina,

0:15:04.930 --> 0:15:07.739
<v Speaker 2>and it's not pretty. But they got a win in

0:15:07.760 --> 0:15:11.000
<v Speaker 2>the first week. Ross Tucker a little bit later on.

0:15:11.380 --> 0:15:14.890
<v Speaker 2>But coming up next, Dan Orlovsky. Dan Orlovsky made a

0:15:14.930 --> 0:15:17.390
<v Speaker 2>headline or two this week when he said if Matthew

0:15:17.430 --> 0:15:20.490
<v Speaker 2>Stafford wins another Super Bowl, he'll be a top five

0:15:20.570 --> 0:15:24.940
<v Speaker 2>quarterback of all time. He'll explain. We'll take a break.

0:15:25.100 --> 0:15:28.140
<v Speaker 2>Just getting started. Back after this, Dan Patrick Show.

0:15:28.820 --> 0:15:30.980
<v Speaker 1>Be sure to catch the live edition of the Dan

0:15:31.020 --> 0:15:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Show weekdays at 9 a.m. Eastern, 6 a.m. Pacific

0:15:34.980 --> 0:15:37.800
<v Speaker 1>on Fox Sports Radio and the iHeartRadio app.

0:15:38.260 --> 0:15:41.280
<v Speaker 8>Hey, it's Covino and Rich from Fox Sports Radio. Now,

0:15:41.360 --> 0:15:43.960
<v Speaker 8>in addition to hearing us live weekdays from.

0:15:43.600 --> 0:15:44.280
<v Speaker 1>5 to 7 p.m.

0:15:44.400 --> 0:15:47.460
<v Speaker 8>Eastern, 2 to 4 Pacific on Fox Sports Radio, we're

0:15:47.480 --> 0:15:50.920
<v Speaker 8>excited to announce a brand new YouTube channel for the show.

0:15:51.020 --> 0:15:51.900
<v Speaker 5>Yup, that's right.

0:15:51.970 --> 0:15:54.450
<v Speaker 8>You can now watch Covino and Rich live on YouTube

0:15:54.690 --> 0:15:57.550
<v Speaker 8>every day. All you gotta do, search Covino and Rich

0:15:57.650 --> 0:16:01.710
<v Speaker 8>FSR on YouTube. Again, go to YouTube, search Covino and

0:16:01.790 --> 0:16:06.170
<v Speaker 8>Rich FSR. Check us out on YouTube, subscribe, hit that

0:16:06.210 --> 0:16:08.050
<v Speaker 8>thumbs up icon, and comment away.

0:16:08.550 --> 0:16:10.830
<v Speaker 6>Our guest coming up says Matthew Stafford might be a

0:16:10.850 --> 0:16:11.890
<v Speaker 6>top five quarterback.

0:16:12.050 --> 0:16:12.770
<v Speaker 2>Of all time.

0:16:12.930 --> 0:16:14.370
<v Speaker 6>He might be the king of wishful thinking.

0:16:14.830 --> 0:16:15.690
<v Speaker 1>Oh, okay.

0:16:15.730 --> 0:16:18.770
<v Speaker 2>And you got your UConn basket. Was that your Rip

0:16:18.790 --> 0:16:19.650
<v Speaker 2>Hamilton shirt?

0:16:19.910 --> 0:16:20.210
<v Speaker 9>It is.

0:16:20.350 --> 0:16:22.780
<v Speaker 2>Oh, it's all love. Come on, Motor City champs. Motor

0:16:22.800 --> 0:16:29.180
<v Speaker 2>City Bowl champs. Legendary UConn, Connecticut quarterback. UConn, Connecticut. UConn quarterback.

0:16:29.980 --> 0:16:33.420
<v Speaker 2>Dan Orlovsky also works part-time for ESPN as well or

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:34.840
<v Speaker 2>doing something like that.

0:16:34.860 --> 0:16:40.390
<v Speaker 3>How you doing? I, uh, about 30 seconds ago, I

0:16:40.430 --> 0:16:43.490
<v Speaker 3>was great. And then Mars took a shot. Um, you

0:16:43.530 --> 0:16:46.470
<v Speaker 3>called it Yukon, Connecticut, our time. So I'm a little

0:16:46.510 --> 0:16:48.140
<v Speaker 3>bit in flux right now. No, I'm great.

0:16:48.180 --> 0:16:48.540
<v Speaker 10>How are you?

0:16:48.700 --> 0:16:50.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm good. I'm good. Okay.

0:16:50.280 --> 0:16:50.480
<v Speaker 10>Okay.

0:16:51.270 --> 0:16:53.480
<v Speaker 2>You did surprise me when you said, I know you

0:16:53.500 --> 0:16:58.440
<v Speaker 2>love Stafford and you being a former line quarterback and teammate.

0:16:58.900 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 2>But give me the rationale that if he wins another

0:17:00.900 --> 0:17:03.440
<v Speaker 2>Super Bowl, you're going to put him in your top five,

0:17:03.500 --> 0:17:06.080
<v Speaker 2>which is, you know, it's your opinion. But I just

0:17:06.140 --> 0:17:08.939
<v Speaker 2>I'm curious the rationale that you came to that he

0:17:08.980 --> 0:17:10.180
<v Speaker 2>would be top five all time.

0:17:10.880 --> 0:17:13.659
<v Speaker 3>Well, a couple things. One, I said top five to

0:17:13.700 --> 0:17:17.490
<v Speaker 3>top seven conversation. So I just think he gets into that, hey,

0:17:17.670 --> 0:17:22.750
<v Speaker 3>is he in your conversation? You know, Dan, the foreshadowing

0:17:23.050 --> 0:17:27.359
<v Speaker 3>of if they win the Rams, another one this year.

0:17:28.240 --> 0:17:31.760
<v Speaker 3>And to do that, his stats would probably be something

0:17:32.000 --> 0:17:33.740
<v Speaker 3>similar to what they've been over the course of the

0:17:33.820 --> 0:17:37.119
<v Speaker 3>past couple years. That would give him two Super Bowl championships.

0:17:37.220 --> 0:17:39.050
<v Speaker 3>I don't know how many quarterbacks have won two Super

0:17:39.070 --> 0:17:41.830
<v Speaker 3>Bowls in their career, I would imagine five. 10, 15.

0:17:41.830 --> 0:17:43.270
<v Speaker 3>I don't know what that number is. That would give

0:17:43.290 --> 0:17:46.109
<v Speaker 3>him two Superbowl championships. It would give him an MVP.

0:17:46.710 --> 0:17:50.330
<v Speaker 3>He would be top 10 all time in wins. And

0:17:50.430 --> 0:17:52.940
<v Speaker 3>he would be top six all time in passing yards

0:17:53.000 --> 0:17:56.440
<v Speaker 3>and passing touchdowns. I think if you just took that

0:17:56.580 --> 0:18:01.080
<v Speaker 3>player and got rid of the, you know, the, the Detroit,

0:18:01.100 --> 0:18:03.360
<v Speaker 3>and I guess you can't, but like, oh my gosh,

0:18:03.400 --> 0:18:06.520
<v Speaker 3>he was on the lions and they stunk. If you

0:18:06.560 --> 0:18:11.169
<v Speaker 3>just took that accomplished resume, that player would have to

0:18:11.210 --> 0:18:14.750
<v Speaker 3>be in that conversation along with other quarterbacks. And so

0:18:15.190 --> 0:18:17.410
<v Speaker 3>I'm not telling everybody he's a lock, but I do

0:18:17.510 --> 0:18:20.520
<v Speaker 3>think it would get him into that at least conversation

0:18:20.580 --> 0:18:21.920
<v Speaker 3>seat at the table type of thing.

0:18:22.060 --> 0:18:26.580
<v Speaker 2>Okay, but we're looking at Brady, Mahomes, Montana to start, correct?

0:18:26.900 --> 0:18:27.540
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, sure.

0:18:28.400 --> 0:18:28.820
<v Speaker 2>Elway?

0:18:29.800 --> 0:18:32.859
<v Speaker 10>Yeah. Peyton?

0:18:33.920 --> 0:18:37.810
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Yeah. But this would also lend to my point

0:18:37.970 --> 0:18:42.869
<v Speaker 3>is I hate the fives. Give me your top five.

0:18:42.890 --> 0:18:45.449
<v Speaker 3>Give me your top 10 because inevitably you're leaving out,

0:18:45.570 --> 0:18:47.130
<v Speaker 3>like we're not going to put Drew Brees in there.

0:18:47.740 --> 0:18:50.890
<v Speaker 3>We're not going to put Marino in there. I'm sure

0:18:50.930 --> 0:18:56.490
<v Speaker 3>there's Dan Fouts and Eli's and Filler's, Favre, Rogers. And so,

0:18:56.510 --> 0:18:59.109
<v Speaker 3>you know, when I, when I have the comment of

0:18:59.150 --> 0:19:02.980
<v Speaker 3>like top five, top seven conversation, you know, it's not

0:19:03.119 --> 0:19:06.260
<v Speaker 3>as a literal thing. It's more of like that conversation,

0:19:06.300 --> 0:19:07.919
<v Speaker 3>but yo, this guy's one of the great quarterbacks of

0:19:07.960 --> 0:19:10.540
<v Speaker 3>all time type of thing. So yeah. Because if you say,

0:19:10.560 --> 0:19:13.040
<v Speaker 3>give me your top five, you're leaving somebody out there

0:19:13.080 --> 0:19:16.180
<v Speaker 3>that absolutely warrants being in your top five. That's where

0:19:16.220 --> 0:19:20.820
<v Speaker 3>these lists sometimes become very subjective and a little disrespectful.

0:19:21.000 --> 0:19:25.350
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I hate the list, but it drives our business.

0:19:26.050 --> 0:19:28.330
<v Speaker 2>I get it. But if I said Matthew Stafford, two

0:19:28.369 --> 0:19:30.869
<v Speaker 2>Super Bowls and an MVP, Aaron Rodgers.

0:19:34.240 --> 0:19:37.350
<v Speaker 3>I would have told you two years ago, Rodgers. I

0:19:37.390 --> 0:19:39.149
<v Speaker 3>would have said that. I mean, I grew up playing

0:19:39.190 --> 0:19:40.950
<v Speaker 3>in the division with them, at least being on the

0:19:41.010 --> 0:19:44.290
<v Speaker 3>sideline watching them. I'd be like, yo, this dude's freaking unbelievable.

0:19:44.850 --> 0:19:47.350
<v Speaker 3>One of the great throwers in football. But I think

0:19:47.430 --> 0:19:51.000
<v Speaker 3>if Matthew goes and gets another one, he's probably going

0:19:51.020 --> 0:19:53.440
<v Speaker 3>to be 15, 20 wins shy of him. I think

0:19:53.460 --> 0:19:55.440
<v Speaker 3>he's going to be right there with yards and touchdowns.

0:19:55.500 --> 0:19:58.960
<v Speaker 3>And so another Super Bowl trophy. And also, I go

0:19:59.010 --> 0:20:01.390
<v Speaker 3>back to this is part of the Eli conversation because

0:20:01.410 --> 0:20:03.510
<v Speaker 3>when Eli comes up for the Hall of Fame and

0:20:03.570 --> 0:20:05.510
<v Speaker 3>everyone goes, no, he's not a Hall of Famer because

0:20:05.570 --> 0:20:09.689
<v Speaker 3>touchdown interception ratio or record, I go, you have to

0:20:09.810 --> 0:20:15.490
<v Speaker 3>equate the way they accomplished the top of the mountain climb,

0:20:16.330 --> 0:20:20.250
<v Speaker 3>the journey that Eli went through to get those two

0:20:20.350 --> 0:20:24.080
<v Speaker 3>rings is different than the journey that another quarterback that

0:20:24.100 --> 0:20:30.340
<v Speaker 3>was a good player, like, you know, a Brad Johnson,

0:20:30.840 --> 0:20:33.260
<v Speaker 3>you know? And so Matthew, if you watch that, remember

0:20:33.300 --> 0:20:36.470
<v Speaker 3>that Superbowl run, it was clutch, clutch. It's one of

0:20:36.510 --> 0:20:40.330
<v Speaker 3>the clutch Superbowl runs of all time. If he goes

0:20:40.390 --> 0:20:43.210
<v Speaker 3>on another clutch Super Bowl run and he knocks off,

0:20:44.030 --> 0:20:46.390
<v Speaker 3>this is such a hypothetical thinking, but if you beat

0:20:46.450 --> 0:20:48.490
<v Speaker 3>Josh Allen in the Super Bowl and Josh throws for

0:20:48.490 --> 0:20:51.000
<v Speaker 3>400 yards and you beat Mahomes and Burrow on the way,

0:20:51.020 --> 0:20:55.399
<v Speaker 3>I think that has to provide context to the conversation.

0:20:55.460 --> 0:20:58.190
<v Speaker 3>So he's probably not going to be in people's argument, but....

0:20:59.340 --> 0:21:02.780
<v Speaker 2>If Mahomes ends his career with this many Super Bowls,

0:21:04.020 --> 0:21:05.440
<v Speaker 2>will it be a disappointment?

0:21:06.130 --> 0:21:09.439
<v Speaker 3>Oh, yeah. Yeah, absolutely. Yeah. Oh, yeah. I mean, because

0:21:10.040 --> 0:21:13.270
<v Speaker 3>the rocket ship that was when he took off, you know,

0:21:13.330 --> 0:21:18.679
<v Speaker 3>and the attachment to a head coach that you know,

0:21:18.720 --> 0:21:20.560
<v Speaker 3>is in the conversation for one of the great head

0:21:20.619 --> 0:21:24.220
<v Speaker 3>coaches of all time, an offensive wizard. He had an

0:21:24.880 --> 0:21:28.369
<v Speaker 3>attachment to a tight end that is in the conversation

0:21:28.390 --> 0:21:30.690
<v Speaker 3>for one of the greatest of all times, the wide

0:21:30.730 --> 0:21:33.410
<v Speaker 3>receiver that he was with Tyree kill in his generations.

0:21:33.490 --> 0:21:36.090
<v Speaker 3>One of the best players of his generation at that position,

0:21:36.650 --> 0:21:39.510
<v Speaker 3>defensive tackle, one of the best players at his position.

0:21:39.930 --> 0:21:43.110
<v Speaker 3>And so, and then organization that has a reputation for

0:21:43.170 --> 0:21:45.669
<v Speaker 3>being a high end organization. So I think if he

0:21:45.950 --> 0:21:50.530
<v Speaker 3>ends that, You know, you're always questioning how it gets

0:21:50.590 --> 0:21:53.090
<v Speaker 3>to that point. But if it ends with the same

0:21:53.130 --> 0:21:55.510
<v Speaker 3>amount of Super Bowls now or in the future that

0:21:55.530 --> 0:21:57.419
<v Speaker 3>it does now, I do think. Because I think you're

0:21:57.440 --> 0:22:00.200
<v Speaker 3>expecting to win two more or so. Three more.

0:22:00.560 --> 0:22:03.640
<v Speaker 2>Andy Reid going to stay around to have the all-time

0:22:03.700 --> 0:22:04.360
<v Speaker 2>record for wins?

0:22:05.530 --> 0:22:07.070
<v Speaker 3>I would think so. I would hope so. I don't

0:22:07.090 --> 0:22:08.910
<v Speaker 3>know how shy he is. I know it's not that

0:22:09.730 --> 0:22:12.010
<v Speaker 3>much of a journey he's got left, but I would

0:22:12.050 --> 0:22:15.100
<v Speaker 3>hope so. And, you know, he's always said, I've got

0:22:15.140 --> 0:22:17.740
<v Speaker 3>this quarterback, I've got this quarterback. So as long as

0:22:17.780 --> 0:22:20.640
<v Speaker 3>Patrick's healthy and playing like Patrick, it's going to come

0:22:20.700 --> 0:22:22.940
<v Speaker 3>quicker than it would for others. And I would I

0:22:22.980 --> 0:22:26.629
<v Speaker 3>would hope that he's there and Patrick's his quarterback to

0:22:26.670 --> 0:22:27.650
<v Speaker 3>go and get that done.

0:22:28.320 --> 0:22:32.580
<v Speaker 2>Talking to Dan Orlovsky, the UConn legend quarterback. You can

0:22:32.600 --> 0:22:35.600
<v Speaker 2>catch him on NFL Live every weekday at 4 Eastern,

0:22:36.000 --> 0:22:38.900
<v Speaker 2>as well as appearances on Get Up and First Take.

0:22:39.200 --> 0:22:42.940
<v Speaker 2>Give me the most confusing team. The one that you're

0:22:42.980 --> 0:22:47.310
<v Speaker 2>just not quite sure how good, how bad, what they are,

0:22:47.380 --> 0:22:47.850
<v Speaker 2>who they are.

0:22:50.109 --> 0:22:54.070
<v Speaker 3>I'd probably tell you the Washington Commanders. I'd go back

0:22:54.130 --> 0:23:00.620
<v Speaker 3>to the 24 season. That was unbelievable. Jaden Daniels is

0:23:01.020 --> 0:23:05.240
<v Speaker 3>Offensive Rookie of the Year, and we've got this superstar quarterback.

0:23:05.520 --> 0:23:08.560
<v Speaker 3>These fourth quarter comebacks, they go to the NFC Championship game.

0:23:08.960 --> 0:23:13.619
<v Speaker 3>Dan Quinn, his energy, the positivity, it's awesome. And the

0:23:13.700 --> 0:23:16.480
<v Speaker 3>off the field stuff, it was this washing of such

0:23:16.619 --> 0:23:20.729
<v Speaker 3>negative and just this infusion of Fun. And then they

0:23:20.790 --> 0:23:24.200
<v Speaker 3>didn't do much that off season. They got very old

0:23:24.320 --> 0:23:27.140
<v Speaker 3>on defense going into the 25 season. And it was

0:23:27.240 --> 0:23:32.460
<v Speaker 3>a little bit of some of the result and the, the,

0:23:32.609 --> 0:23:35.010
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to say the, the luck that they had,

0:23:35.070 --> 0:23:37.409
<v Speaker 3>but just the catching all the breaks at the end

0:23:37.430 --> 0:23:40.790
<v Speaker 3>of those games, jotted what you really were as a team,

0:23:40.830 --> 0:23:43.290
<v Speaker 3>the fourth down conversions, all that. Then you go to

0:23:43.330 --> 0:23:47.640
<v Speaker 3>last year, And you don't play as well as you should.

0:23:47.720 --> 0:23:51.520
<v Speaker 3>Your defense is old. Your quarterback gets hurt. The offensive

0:23:51.580 --> 0:23:56.429
<v Speaker 3>coordinator leaves. And so now, one, you're going into this

0:23:56.570 --> 0:24:00.210
<v Speaker 3>third and pivotal season. You got a brand new offensive coordinator,

0:24:00.250 --> 0:24:04.230
<v Speaker 3>David Blau, super young. I'm hoping he's amazing. I don't

0:24:04.270 --> 0:24:05.629
<v Speaker 3>know a ton about him. I know he's got a

0:24:05.650 --> 0:24:08.510
<v Speaker 3>pass with Arizona. So there's a little bit of, you know,

0:24:09.050 --> 0:24:11.899
<v Speaker 3>you know, Ben Johnson element to him because of Detroit.

0:24:11.920 --> 0:24:14.940
<v Speaker 3>And there's a, a pet singing element because Arizona. So

0:24:15.140 --> 0:24:17.240
<v Speaker 3>what's the offense actually going to be? You lose your

0:24:17.280 --> 0:24:19.619
<v Speaker 3>left tackle who you just made the highest paid left

0:24:19.640 --> 0:24:21.700
<v Speaker 3>tackle in football and all your fans are like, we'll

0:24:21.720 --> 0:24:24.230
<v Speaker 3>be okay. Those two things can't happen at the same time.

0:24:25.770 --> 0:24:29.570
<v Speaker 3>It's the third most expensive defense in the NFL. Third,

0:24:29.750 --> 0:24:33.010
<v Speaker 3>if you asked NFL people, who's the third most expensive

0:24:33.030 --> 0:24:35.330
<v Speaker 3>defense in the NFL, no one would say Washington. So

0:24:35.770 --> 0:24:39.560
<v Speaker 3>it's in an unbelievably expensive defense, but a little bit

0:24:39.600 --> 0:24:41.719
<v Speaker 3>unproven because there's so many, I think there's six or

0:24:41.760 --> 0:24:44.640
<v Speaker 3>seven new starters on that unit. And so it could

0:24:44.680 --> 0:24:47.380
<v Speaker 3>go really good if they gel and those high end

0:24:47.420 --> 0:24:49.080
<v Speaker 3>paid players play at such a high level and the

0:24:49.119 --> 0:24:50.820
<v Speaker 3>free agent signings and the draft picks play at such

0:24:50.840 --> 0:24:55.260
<v Speaker 3>a high level, or it could be a season of

0:24:55.300 --> 0:25:01.420
<v Speaker 3>question of, of, okay, where's this organization headed? And, you know,

0:25:01.940 --> 0:25:04.460
<v Speaker 3>a second year of maybe some up and down from

0:25:04.500 --> 0:25:07.520
<v Speaker 3>Jamie Daniels. I'm bullish on them, but I'm just not

0:25:08.240 --> 0:25:09.580
<v Speaker 3>all in to see how it plays out.

0:25:10.119 --> 0:25:13.160
<v Speaker 2>More pressure on Josh Allen or Lamar Jackson this year?

0:25:16.980 --> 0:25:19.619
<v Speaker 3>I always put them in their own category because of

0:25:20.400 --> 0:25:24.419
<v Speaker 3>the history and the success, but I tell you, Josh Allen,

0:25:25.140 --> 0:25:27.660
<v Speaker 3>I'm of the belief. I think the roster is better

0:25:27.700 --> 0:25:30.800
<v Speaker 3>than the public perception. I'll go back to last year

0:25:30.859 --> 0:25:33.620
<v Speaker 3>when Josh Allen have enough to go win it. Absolutely.

0:25:33.680 --> 0:25:39.420
<v Speaker 3>He does. If top five offensive line, top five running back,

0:25:39.680 --> 0:25:43.130
<v Speaker 3>a great play caller. A head coach that in part

0:25:43.250 --> 0:25:46.720
<v Speaker 3>got that job probably because of your relationship. I think

0:25:46.760 --> 0:25:49.280
<v Speaker 3>the pass catching group from tight end and wide receiver

0:25:49.780 --> 0:25:53.420
<v Speaker 3>is plenty good. Plenty good. Two really good tight ends.

0:25:53.480 --> 0:25:55.420
<v Speaker 3>Three good tight ends. Two really good pass catchers. They're

0:25:55.460 --> 0:25:58.050
<v Speaker 3>four or five deep at the wide receiver position. All

0:25:58.109 --> 0:26:00.950
<v Speaker 3>have different roles. DJ Moore, obviously that addition. I think

0:26:00.970 --> 0:26:04.070
<v Speaker 3>the defensive line is young and athletic. They've got young

0:26:04.150 --> 0:26:06.469
<v Speaker 3>and athletic speedsters on the back end that they have

0:26:06.510 --> 0:26:09.800
<v Speaker 3>to play well. And I think Jim Leonard's a stud.

0:26:09.859 --> 0:26:15.619
<v Speaker 3>So not to knock anything in Baltimore, Lamar's amazing. Jesse Minter,

0:26:15.640 --> 0:26:17.640
<v Speaker 3>we think, is going to be great, but probably more

0:26:17.740 --> 0:26:18.560
<v Speaker 3>pressure on Josh.

0:26:19.880 --> 0:26:21.949
<v Speaker 2>More likely to get back to the Super Bowl, the

0:26:21.990 --> 0:26:23.190
<v Speaker 2>Patriots or Seahawks?

0:26:26.290 --> 0:26:32.860
<v Speaker 3>Hmm. I think the Patriots are probably going to be

0:26:32.880 --> 0:26:36.110
<v Speaker 3>a better team this year. Maybe not have as good

0:26:36.150 --> 0:26:38.990
<v Speaker 3>or better record. We all know the schedule was historically

0:26:39.090 --> 0:26:41.310
<v Speaker 3>easy last year. That will not be the case this year.

0:26:41.869 --> 0:26:44.869
<v Speaker 3>Offensive lines should be significantly improved. I think they're impossible

0:26:44.910 --> 0:26:48.320
<v Speaker 3>to match up against man-to-man for most teams. Quarterback is

0:26:48.359 --> 0:26:52.700
<v Speaker 3>an absolute... He's going to play for the next 10

0:26:52.700 --> 0:26:54.790
<v Speaker 3>years as a top five quarterback in the NFL. The

0:26:54.850 --> 0:26:57.990
<v Speaker 3>defense is fantastic. Dan, I went and watched or rewatched

0:26:58.030 --> 0:27:00.330
<v Speaker 3>the Super Bowl yesterday to start to get ready for

0:27:00.390 --> 0:27:05.060
<v Speaker 3>next Wednesday's game. And one of my takeaways was, holy smokes,

0:27:05.080 --> 0:27:07.780
<v Speaker 3>that New England defense was good. I mean, obviously Seattle's

0:27:07.800 --> 0:27:10.859
<v Speaker 3>was great as well. But that was going against a

0:27:11.180 --> 0:27:14.020
<v Speaker 3>very good offensive unit in Seattle. And that New England

0:27:14.040 --> 0:27:17.900
<v Speaker 3>defense was fantastic. And so I just think that they're

0:27:17.920 --> 0:27:19.800
<v Speaker 3>going to be a really good team this year that

0:27:19.880 --> 0:27:22.080
<v Speaker 3>maybe doesn't have, I don't know what they were, 14-3

0:27:22.340 --> 0:27:27.290
<v Speaker 3>last year. Seattle, still very good. I'm of the belief

0:27:27.330 --> 0:27:29.930
<v Speaker 3>calling plays in the NFL is an unbelievably difficult job.

0:27:30.609 --> 0:27:34.770
<v Speaker 3>And Brian Fleury, who's stepping in for Clint Kubiak, has

0:27:34.830 --> 0:27:37.730
<v Speaker 3>never called plays before in the NFL. Never called plays.

0:27:38.290 --> 0:27:40.830
<v Speaker 3>We've seen that happen four times with the defending Super

0:27:40.869 --> 0:27:43.550
<v Speaker 3>Bowl champion over the last, I think, 10 to 12 years.

0:27:44.390 --> 0:27:47.620
<v Speaker 3>All four times, the offense has dropped at least 15

0:27:47.619 --> 0:27:51.480
<v Speaker 3>points in that ranking of one through 32, 15 slots.

0:27:51.520 --> 0:27:55.220
<v Speaker 3>So that's a tall task and big shoes to fill.

0:27:56.510 --> 0:27:59.350
<v Speaker 2>I'm looking at the odds and the Rams' overwhelming favorites,

0:27:59.890 --> 0:28:02.110
<v Speaker 2>but I went back and looked at the last 20

0:28:02.109 --> 0:28:06.710
<v Speaker 2>teams who had odds similar or better to win the

0:28:06.780 --> 0:28:10.420
<v Speaker 2>Super Bowl. All 20 did not win the Super Bowl

0:28:10.460 --> 0:28:10.880
<v Speaker 2>that year.

0:28:11.560 --> 0:28:11.859
<v Speaker 10>Yeah.

0:28:12.740 --> 0:28:14.020
<v Speaker 2>How did the Rams not win?

0:28:14.040 --> 0:28:18.760
<v Speaker 3>I think there's two things. Health, we all know that, right?

0:28:18.900 --> 0:28:22.379
<v Speaker 3>There's only so many teams that you say, if they're healthy,

0:28:22.950 --> 0:28:25.190
<v Speaker 3>are they good enough? There are teams that just aren't

0:28:25.210 --> 0:28:27.550
<v Speaker 3>good enough. If they're healthy, are they good enough? The Rams,

0:28:27.609 --> 0:28:30.770
<v Speaker 3>if they're healthy, are good enough to the schedule is brutal.

0:28:30.970 --> 0:28:33.500
<v Speaker 3>And the travel schedule is brutal, just like it was

0:28:33.560 --> 0:28:37.899
<v Speaker 3>last year, you know? And so how they manage that,

0:28:38.480 --> 0:28:40.560
<v Speaker 3>I think it's a little bit, I think this, this,

0:28:41.400 --> 0:28:43.840
<v Speaker 3>season i have said if they're healthy no one plays

0:28:43.880 --> 0:28:46.790
<v Speaker 3>them within single digits in a meaningful game so do

0:28:46.870 --> 0:28:50.030
<v Speaker 3>i think that there's a hiccup here in week 10

0:28:50.030 --> 0:28:52.510
<v Speaker 3>or 11 or 12 where they might just become tired

0:28:52.550 --> 0:28:54.670
<v Speaker 3>and bored thursday night football i don't know what it

0:28:54.770 --> 0:28:57.630
<v Speaker 3>is yeah maybe um but if they're healthy i just

0:28:57.670 --> 0:29:01.090
<v Speaker 3>don't see how anyone can handle this offensive line the

0:29:01.130 --> 0:29:04.320
<v Speaker 3>quarterback and play caller together the different personnel groupings they

0:29:04.340 --> 0:29:08.480
<v Speaker 3>can play and this defense is so talented so um

0:29:09.500 --> 0:29:13.180
<v Speaker 3>Do I expect them to maybe try to peak at

0:29:13.220 --> 0:29:13.960
<v Speaker 3>the right time?

0:29:13.980 --> 0:29:15.060
<v Speaker 2>I do.

0:29:15.700 --> 0:29:17.290
<v Speaker 3>I think it's going to be a little bit like

0:29:17.390 --> 0:29:20.930
<v Speaker 3>an elite golfer as they get later into their career,

0:29:21.010 --> 0:29:23.690
<v Speaker 3>trying to peak in those four majors. A little bit

0:29:23.750 --> 0:29:27.010
<v Speaker 3>like the NBA, where you might manage some guys throughout

0:29:27.050 --> 0:29:32.020
<v Speaker 3>the season. But I truly don't believe that if they're healthy,

0:29:32.680 --> 0:29:35.080
<v Speaker 3>anyone is good enough to beat them if they're healthy.

0:29:35.100 --> 0:29:37.880
<v Speaker 2>Did you ever get run over on the sidelines?

0:29:40.440 --> 0:29:45.960
<v Speaker 3>I don't think so. I was usually behind the play, though.

0:29:46.420 --> 0:29:49.720
<v Speaker 3>I was often probably five or ten yards behind the

0:29:49.760 --> 0:29:53.120
<v Speaker 3>play trying to see things that I could share information-wise.

0:29:53.220 --> 0:29:55.540
<v Speaker 3>I was very rarely on the defensive side, kind of

0:29:55.560 --> 0:29:57.700
<v Speaker 3>where the ball was going. So I don't think so,

0:29:58.000 --> 0:29:59.260
<v Speaker 3>but I got a bad memory.

0:30:00.360 --> 0:30:02.060
<v Speaker 2>But you normally stand by the coach.

0:30:04.340 --> 0:30:06.960
<v Speaker 3>Different situations, different moments. I've been a part of teams

0:30:06.980 --> 0:30:09.250
<v Speaker 3>when the coach would call the play into me. And

0:30:09.290 --> 0:30:11.590
<v Speaker 3>then I would walkie talkie to play into the quarterback.

0:30:12.050 --> 0:30:14.090
<v Speaker 3>So I wouldn't want to stand next to the coach

0:30:14.210 --> 0:30:17.310
<v Speaker 3>that close, probably 10 yards away. I've been in places

0:30:17.370 --> 0:30:22.500
<v Speaker 3>where the offensive coordinators in the booth, um, So standing

0:30:22.540 --> 0:30:27.320
<v Speaker 3>near the coach wasn't necessarily a constant thing, unless situational,

0:30:27.380 --> 0:30:29.940
<v Speaker 3>your two-minute drive and you're trying to signal stuff in

0:30:29.960 --> 0:30:30.360
<v Speaker 3>or whatnot.

0:30:30.860 --> 0:30:33.200
<v Speaker 2>Did you ever change the play that the coach or

0:30:33.260 --> 0:30:34.640
<v Speaker 2>offensive coordinator gave you?

0:30:34.660 --> 0:30:38.620
<v Speaker 3>Oh, absolutely. Absolutely. Really?

0:30:39.240 --> 0:30:39.800
<v Speaker 9>Oh, yeah.

0:30:39.960 --> 0:30:42.640
<v Speaker 3>I mean, Dan, you've got to remember where I was

0:30:42.720 --> 0:30:43.280
<v Speaker 3>at times.

0:30:43.320 --> 0:30:44.900
<v Speaker 10>So, yeah.

0:30:45.040 --> 0:30:49.800
<v Speaker 3>I mean, and, you know, there are times when, I

0:30:49.840 --> 0:30:52.480
<v Speaker 3>would have the play call come in and I just

0:30:52.600 --> 0:30:57.450
<v Speaker 3>know this play call stinks and have some form of

0:30:57.510 --> 0:31:00.469
<v Speaker 3>communication with the starting quarterback to be like, Oh, you

0:31:00.490 --> 0:31:02.270
<v Speaker 3>didn't get it. You know, now you got to call

0:31:02.310 --> 0:31:05.510
<v Speaker 3>your own play. So those were always prior planned things,

0:31:05.530 --> 0:31:09.390
<v Speaker 3>you know, that that's, that's trying to get everybody to

0:31:10.210 --> 0:31:12.370
<v Speaker 3>you know, if a play call comes in, I think

0:31:12.410 --> 0:31:14.390
<v Speaker 3>a lot of times as the quarterback, you can just,

0:31:14.670 --> 0:31:16.550
<v Speaker 3>you just know if this is a good, now sometimes

0:31:16.570 --> 0:31:17.880
<v Speaker 3>you think it's a bad play call and it hits,

0:31:17.910 --> 0:31:21.180
<v Speaker 3>you know? So, Um, but I, I definitely had moments

0:31:21.260 --> 0:31:24.640
<v Speaker 3>when play call came in and either did not give

0:31:24.760 --> 0:31:27.120
<v Speaker 3>a play call and the quarterback that started with new

0:31:27.340 --> 0:31:30.120
<v Speaker 3>would know what that meant or change the play call.

0:31:30.520 --> 0:31:32.260
<v Speaker 3>I I've shared, I think I've shared this story with you.

0:31:32.320 --> 0:31:33.940
<v Speaker 3>I was at a place where the quarterback was a

0:31:33.960 --> 0:31:37.950
<v Speaker 3>really good player, but non-confrontational. And I don't know the

0:31:37.990 --> 0:31:41.730
<v Speaker 3>why behind the non-confrontational. And we had this first time

0:31:41.770 --> 0:31:44.270
<v Speaker 3>play caller, really good football coach, but again, play calling

0:31:44.290 --> 0:31:47.239
<v Speaker 3>is hard. And he would constantly call plays, uh, For

0:31:47.260 --> 0:31:50.940
<v Speaker 3>the quarterback that he had come from his previous and

0:31:50.960 --> 0:31:54.380
<v Speaker 3>the quarterback that we had as our starter didn't like

0:31:55.460 --> 0:31:57.860
<v Speaker 3>the plays out of certain formations. Hey, I like this play,

0:31:57.880 --> 0:31:59.600
<v Speaker 3>but I want it out of this formation, especially in

0:31:59.640 --> 0:32:03.330
<v Speaker 3>crucial moments. And, you know, he would just continue to

0:32:03.370 --> 0:32:05.010
<v Speaker 3>call that play. And finally, I'd go to the coach

0:32:05.030 --> 0:32:07.370
<v Speaker 3>and be like, you have to stop calling these plays

0:32:07.410 --> 0:32:09.110
<v Speaker 3>out of these formations. He wants them out of this.

0:32:10.020 --> 0:32:12.880
<v Speaker 3>And that never changed. And so I would just start

0:32:12.920 --> 0:32:16.400
<v Speaker 3>changing the play to the one that the quarterback preferred

0:32:16.440 --> 0:32:17.720
<v Speaker 3>more than the one the coach called.

0:32:18.080 --> 0:32:18.940
<v Speaker 2>Was it Matt Schaub?

0:32:20.080 --> 0:32:22.880
<v Speaker 3>It was not Schaub. When I was with Schaub, that

0:32:22.920 --> 0:32:26.050
<v Speaker 3>was with Kubiak. Kubiak, I mean, he can call plays

0:32:26.830 --> 0:32:30.270
<v Speaker 3>as a corpse. I mean, he was sensational. No coach

0:32:30.310 --> 0:32:34.150
<v Speaker 3>I've ever been around had a feel calling plays to

0:32:34.190 --> 0:32:36.030
<v Speaker 3>get quarterbacks in rhythm like him. So it was not Schaub,

0:32:36.050 --> 0:32:36.350
<v Speaker 3>you know.

0:32:36.710 --> 0:32:37.310
<v Speaker 2>Josh Freeman.

0:32:38.570 --> 0:32:42.430
<v Speaker 3>Not Freebird, no. But Freebird, Josh was such a talented kid,

0:32:42.450 --> 0:32:45.310
<v Speaker 3>but sometimes Josh would be all over the place.

0:32:46.550 --> 0:32:48.290
<v Speaker 2>Mike Glennon seems not.

0:32:48.330 --> 0:32:52.450
<v Speaker 3>No, Mikey G. No, not Mikey G, because we had

0:32:52.490 --> 0:32:55.280
<v Speaker 3>a shrunk playbook for Mike because he was a rookie then.

0:32:55.660 --> 0:32:56.220
<v Speaker 5>Good player, though.

0:32:56.340 --> 0:32:58.520
<v Speaker 3>Good player. Previous to that stop.

0:32:59.120 --> 0:32:59.800
<v Speaker 2>Great to talk to you.

0:33:00.620 --> 0:33:01.940
<v Speaker 3>Thank you, boss. You as well. Thanks.

0:33:03.870 --> 0:33:12.250
<v Speaker 2>Dan Orlovsky, UConn, Connecticut quarterback. I wanted to give him

0:33:12.290 --> 0:33:15.570
<v Speaker 2>the opportunity. It's easy to pile on when he's going

0:33:15.590 --> 0:33:18.230
<v Speaker 2>to bring up top five Matthew Stafford. I'm like, okay.

0:33:18.820 --> 0:33:22.420
<v Speaker 2>He loves Matthew Stafford. There are a lot of young

0:33:22.460 --> 0:33:27.220
<v Speaker 2>quarterbacks in the NFL who idolize Matthew Stafford. Matthew Stafford

0:33:27.260 --> 0:33:33.280
<v Speaker 2>with his second ring and an MVP, those yards. Okay.

0:33:34.400 --> 0:33:37.920
<v Speaker 2>And once again, it's somebody's opinion. I give my opinion.

0:33:38.180 --> 0:33:41.060
<v Speaker 2>You don't have to like it. You can criticize it,

0:33:41.090 --> 0:33:42.330
<v Speaker 2>but it's still my opinion.

0:33:42.390 --> 0:33:42.870
<v Speaker 3>It's okay.

0:33:42.890 --> 0:33:46.290
<v Speaker 2>That's the fun part of it. Having an opinion, now

0:33:46.370 --> 0:33:49.270
<v Speaker 2>backing it up. Play of the day. Up next.

0:33:49.610 --> 0:33:52.510
<v Speaker 1>Fox Sports Radio has the best sports talk lineup in

0:33:52.530 --> 0:33:57.350
<v Speaker 1>the nation. Catch all of our shows at foxsportsradio.com. And

0:33:57.390 --> 0:34:00.950
<v Speaker 1>within the iHeartRadio app, search FSR to listen live.

0:34:01.680 --> 0:34:02.680
<v Speaker 3>Oh, my God.

0:34:02.720 --> 0:34:05.260
<v Speaker 2>The play of the day.

0:34:05.320 --> 0:34:12.089
<v Speaker 3>This is the play of the day. Check this out.

0:34:12.650 --> 0:34:13.770
<v Speaker 10>Swings, line, drive.

0:34:13.969 --> 0:34:15.130
<v Speaker 2>Left center field.

0:34:15.290 --> 0:34:17.490
<v Speaker 9>That's going to split the outfielders. Go to the wall.

0:34:17.790 --> 0:34:21.050
<v Speaker 2>Edmund comes around to score. Here comes Betts around third.

0:34:21.230 --> 0:34:25.900
<v Speaker 2>He'll get to the plate. Dodgers win. Dodgers win. Dodgers win.

0:34:27.310 --> 0:34:31.620
<v Speaker 2>That's courtesy of AM570 LA Sports, the Dodgers radio network.

0:34:31.660 --> 0:34:35.899
<v Speaker 2>Dodgers have eight walk-off wins this season, tied for fifth

0:34:35.980 --> 0:34:40.340
<v Speaker 2>most in Major League Baseball. That's your play of the day.

0:34:41.219 --> 0:34:44.049
<v Speaker 2>Can you give me early poll results there, Dylan? And

0:34:44.070 --> 0:34:45.810
<v Speaker 2>we'll get to some phone calls as well.

0:34:47.310 --> 0:34:50.350
<v Speaker 5>We actually haven't settled on one yet, Dan.

0:34:51.730 --> 0:34:54.509
<v Speaker 2>Would you like to settle on one, please? Yeah, okay.

0:34:56.160 --> 0:34:58.259
<v Speaker 4>If you're a recruit right now, would you be more

0:34:58.300 --> 0:35:02.259
<v Speaker 4>inclined to pick a school if guaranteed a title in

0:35:02.300 --> 0:35:06.460
<v Speaker 4>your tenure there or just the highest bidder? Because obviously,

0:35:06.700 --> 0:35:10.120
<v Speaker 4>like Mendoza made a lot of money off of that.

0:35:09.980 --> 0:35:12.360
<v Speaker 2>Title win, I think. And the Heisman.

0:35:12.610 --> 0:35:12.820
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:35:14.030 --> 0:35:18.069
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but that's rare. Let me take somebody like that

0:35:18.150 --> 0:35:20.630
<v Speaker 2>out of the equation here. Let's say you're just a

0:35:20.850 --> 0:35:25.230
<v Speaker 2>defensive back or you're an offensive lineman. How much are

0:35:25.250 --> 0:35:29.210
<v Speaker 2>you capitalizing? I think everybody, no, I shouldn't say everybody.

0:35:29.590 --> 0:35:32.590
<v Speaker 2>I think a majority of these kids look at the money.

0:35:33.310 --> 0:35:36.590
<v Speaker 2>You're looking at opportunity. Who's the head coach? What's the style?

0:35:37.150 --> 0:35:40.390
<v Speaker 2>What conference are you playing in? National TV? I understand

0:35:40.510 --> 0:35:43.090
<v Speaker 2>all of those things. I don't know how important the

0:35:43.140 --> 0:35:46.440
<v Speaker 2>bottom line is of winning. Let's say you win a

0:35:46.480 --> 0:35:50.700
<v Speaker 2>conference championship. How important is that to how much money

0:35:50.739 --> 0:35:53.299
<v Speaker 2>am I making? And can I go someplace else to

0:35:53.340 --> 0:35:58.620
<v Speaker 2>make more money What is my NFL future? I think

0:35:58.700 --> 0:36:01.680
<v Speaker 2>we get caught up in the rah-rah, we won a championship,

0:36:01.739 --> 0:36:05.180
<v Speaker 2>a conference championship. I don't know if they are. The

0:36:05.219 --> 0:36:09.830
<v Speaker 2>loyalty is different to what we grew up, what I

0:36:09.870 --> 0:36:12.969
<v Speaker 2>grew up with. These guys look back fondly and you

0:36:12.989 --> 0:36:14.840
<v Speaker 2>have the group and they all get together and you

0:36:14.880 --> 0:36:17.879
<v Speaker 2>have a reunion and I think that's wonderful. I don't know.

0:36:18.180 --> 0:36:20.580
<v Speaker 2>Like these players, I might be there for one year.

0:36:20.600 --> 0:36:23.739
<v Speaker 2>And then I can actually have a couple of reunions.

0:36:23.980 --> 0:36:25.940
<v Speaker 2>Like Bo Nix could go back and go, I'm going

0:36:25.960 --> 0:36:30.279
<v Speaker 2>to the Auburn reunion. I'm going to the Oregon reunion. Yes, Dylan.

0:36:31.180 --> 0:36:33.530
<v Speaker 4>Do you think the title has kind of been cheapened

0:36:33.910 --> 0:36:36.970
<v Speaker 4>a little bit? And look, I'm not going to throw

0:36:37.410 --> 0:36:42.670
<v Speaker 4>any slight towards Indiana. But you could argue that we

0:36:42.690 --> 0:36:46.080
<v Speaker 4>should start counting titles regularly. historically in the last, you know,

0:36:46.100 --> 0:36:49.660
<v Speaker 4>since NIL started, like there's, if all that stuff doesn't change,

0:36:49.680 --> 0:36:51.300
<v Speaker 4>that never happens.

0:36:52.020 --> 0:36:55.500
<v Speaker 2>I don't know how important it is. So I can't

0:36:55.540 --> 0:36:57.480
<v Speaker 2>sit here and say one way or another, but it

0:36:57.820 --> 0:37:01.219
<v Speaker 2>certainly feels like the, the amount of money you can

0:37:01.280 --> 0:37:04.719
<v Speaker 2>make and the opportunity to be able to play and

0:37:04.739 --> 0:37:08.070
<v Speaker 2>then maybe use that to go and get even more

0:37:08.110 --> 0:37:10.770
<v Speaker 2>money the following season, by the way, play of the

0:37:10.810 --> 0:37:13.509
<v Speaker 2>day brought to you by rec tech, R E C

0:37:13.570 --> 0:37:16.669
<v Speaker 2>T E Q. We got our tailgate going on today,

0:37:16.690 --> 0:37:22.470
<v Speaker 2>our meat Friday. So if you want to do brisket, wings, ribs,

0:37:22.989 --> 0:37:25.670
<v Speaker 2>all on a Rec Tech. Set the temperature, control it

0:37:25.710 --> 0:37:29.110
<v Speaker 2>from your phone, and watch the game shop. Woodfire Grills

0:37:29.200 --> 0:37:35.400
<v Speaker 2>at rectech.com, R-E-C-T-E-Q.com. Drew in Nashville. Hi, Drew. What do

0:37:35.420 --> 0:37:36.219
<v Speaker 2>you have for me today?

0:37:37.770 --> 0:37:39.310
<v Speaker 10>Danny, you're making me hungry.

0:37:41.219 --> 0:37:45.460
<v Speaker 11>I thought you'd appreciate this here. Per your sponsor, JetGPT,

0:37:46.420 --> 0:37:50.239
<v Speaker 11>the fine that was levied against Ballmer in accordance with

0:37:50.300 --> 0:37:53.750
<v Speaker 11>his net worth is the equivalent to an American household

0:37:53.770 --> 0:37:56.590
<v Speaker 11>that makes $ 100, 000 a year paying a $ 20 fine.

0:37:56.690 --> 0:37:59.370
<v Speaker 3>All right.

0:37:59.650 --> 0:38:02.270
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, Drew. Sounds like a stat of the day, Marvin.

0:38:10.969 --> 0:38:13.710
<v Speaker 2>Brought to you by Panini America, the official trading cards

0:38:13.930 --> 0:38:17.320
<v Speaker 2>of the program. James in Virginia. Hi, James.

0:38:20.360 --> 0:38:21.990
<v Speaker 10>Thank you for taking my call, brother.

0:38:22.010 --> 0:38:22.930
<v Speaker 9>Happy Friday.

0:38:23.010 --> 0:38:26.490
<v Speaker 10>DT, DNS, salute the commanders, man. Big time, all the time,

0:38:26.550 --> 0:38:30.109
<v Speaker 10>every time. Man, Orlowski was great, man. So I hate

0:38:30.130 --> 0:38:32.310
<v Speaker 10>to push back on him, man, because the Redskins talk,

0:38:32.550 --> 0:38:35.790
<v Speaker 10>or the commanders talk, I definitely agree with everything that

0:38:35.810 --> 0:38:39.589
<v Speaker 10>he said, man. But Matt Stafford is no way top five, man.

0:38:40.050 --> 0:38:44.379
<v Speaker 9>No way. You got Montana, Brady, Elway. Mahomes, and I'm

0:38:44.400 --> 0:38:46.739
<v Speaker 9>taking Terry Bradshaw, man. Some of the greatest plays in

0:38:46.760 --> 0:38:50.600
<v Speaker 9>sterile history were passes, man. Stallworth down the sideline, Lynn

0:38:50.620 --> 0:38:53.500
<v Speaker 9>Swan down the sideline, the Immaculate Recession. Someone had to

0:38:53.520 --> 0:38:56.459
<v Speaker 9>throw that ball, and he threw an amazing deep ball, man.

0:38:56.760 --> 0:38:59.560
<v Speaker 9>And one last thing, I totally forgot what it was.

0:38:59.600 --> 0:39:01.260
<v Speaker 9>So y'all have a great weekend, gentlemen.

0:39:01.280 --> 0:39:02.279
<v Speaker 10>Salute the commanders.

0:39:02.520 --> 0:39:08.100
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, James. Always in a good mood. In fairness

0:39:08.120 --> 0:39:11.400
<v Speaker 2>to Orlovsky, he said, if Matthew Stafford wins another Super Bowl,

0:39:12.130 --> 0:39:17.779
<v Speaker 2>he would be in the five to seven category. So seven,

0:39:17.989 --> 0:39:19.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to give him a little bit of leeway there.

0:39:19.739 --> 0:39:23.100
<v Speaker 2>Do I think Matthew Stafford would be a top five quarterback? No,

0:39:23.180 --> 0:39:27.490
<v Speaker 2>I don't. But, you know, if we're looking at numbers,

0:39:27.730 --> 0:39:30.219
<v Speaker 2>you've got an MVP, you have two Super Bowls and

0:39:30.239 --> 0:39:32.160
<v Speaker 2>you've got an MVP. Now you go into a different

0:39:32.180 --> 0:39:37.399
<v Speaker 2>category there. But it's his opinion. It's okay. People get

0:39:37.600 --> 0:39:41.760
<v Speaker 2>apoplectic with this sometimes. I'm going, it's okay. It's all right.

0:39:43.219 --> 0:39:45.400
<v Speaker 2>I can't believe that you don't like the Grateful Dead.

0:39:45.700 --> 0:39:46.500
<v Speaker 2>It's okay.

0:39:46.760 --> 0:39:47.240
<v Speaker 6>I don't.

0:39:48.400 --> 0:39:48.839
<v Speaker 2>Yes, Dylan.

0:39:49.590 --> 0:39:52.590
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I unsurprisingly have gotten crushed for some of those

0:39:53.170 --> 0:39:53.930
<v Speaker 4>opinions of mine.

0:39:54.210 --> 0:39:56.050
<v Speaker 5>You know which one I didn't get crushed for? A

0:39:56.810 --> 0:39:58.850
<v Speaker 5>lot of people backed me up on the U2 thing.

0:40:00.410 --> 0:40:05.560
<v Speaker 2>I said U2 was at one time the biggest rock

0:40:05.739 --> 0:40:07.740
<v Speaker 2>band in the world, and you said they were not,

0:40:08.219 --> 0:40:11.140
<v Speaker 2>and they were. You said the biggest. They were the

0:40:11.239 --> 0:40:14.340
<v Speaker 2>biggest rock and roll band in the world at one point.

0:40:14.800 --> 0:40:17.060
<v Speaker 4>But our initial thing was, are they good or not?

0:40:17.080 --> 0:40:20.340
<v Speaker 4>And I said, they are great. Well, a lot of people.

0:40:20.180 --> 0:40:21.140
<v Speaker 3>Agreed with me that they're not.

0:40:21.180 --> 0:40:21.719
<v Speaker 2>That's okay.

0:40:22.060 --> 0:40:22.620
<v Speaker 3>That's okay.

0:40:22.820 --> 0:40:24.739
<v Speaker 5>Everything else, people got really mad at me about.

0:40:24.760 --> 0:40:29.850
<v Speaker 2>I would go see U2 again. I saw them when

0:40:29.870 --> 0:40:33.970
<v Speaker 2>they had the heart. You could be inside the heart,

0:40:34.330 --> 0:40:37.770
<v Speaker 2>and then Bono and Edge, they walked around the stage,

0:40:37.810 --> 0:40:42.340
<v Speaker 2>so there were two stages. Edge also.

0:40:42.360 --> 0:40:42.980
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:40:43.260 --> 0:40:45.520
<v Speaker 2>Incredibly overrated guitar player.

0:40:45.560 --> 0:40:45.779
<v Speaker 3>Wow.

0:40:45.820 --> 0:40:46.500
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I'm going in.

0:40:46.600 --> 0:40:47.300
<v Speaker 2>Yes, Paul.

0:40:47.480 --> 0:40:50.680
<v Speaker 7>According to Rolling Stone magazine, U2 is the fourth highest

0:40:50.719 --> 0:40:52.899
<v Speaker 7>grossing rock band on tour of all time.

0:40:54.790 --> 0:40:59.730
<v Speaker 2>Marvin is in the confessional wearing his Rip Hamilton UConn jersey.

0:41:00.330 --> 0:41:04.690
<v Speaker 2>We will dive into the mess that is North Carolina football. Boy,

0:41:04.730 --> 0:41:07.609
<v Speaker 2>good thing they won their opener. One hour in the books.

0:41:07.650 --> 0:41:10.339
<v Speaker 2>Two more to go in this meet Friday. Back after this.