WEBVTT - BIG BOY BETS is back for Season 2!

0:00:00.840 --> 0:00:04.359
<v Speaker 1>Hey, forballers, it's your pal Dan here and listen. Listen,

0:00:04.800 --> 0:00:08.039
<v Speaker 1>I'm here real quick to remind you about the good

0:00:08.119 --> 0:00:11.720
<v Speaker 1>times that Jeff Schwartz from Fox Sports and Sirius XM

0:00:11.720 --> 0:00:14.920
<v Speaker 1>and he's a former NFL offensive lineman and I are

0:00:14.960 --> 0:00:19.239
<v Speaker 1>having each and every week during season two. I don't

0:00:19.239 --> 0:00:22.680
<v Speaker 1>know why I did that. Of Big Boy Bets, it's

0:00:22.760 --> 0:00:26.079
<v Speaker 1>our weekly college football betting preview, during which we deep

0:00:26.160 --> 0:00:29.280
<v Speaker 1>dive lines over unders, where the public where the sharps

0:00:29.280 --> 0:00:32.199
<v Speaker 1>are going as they look at the weekly college football

0:00:32.360 --> 0:00:35.239
<v Speaker 1>big Board. Do we look at trends and logic and

0:00:35.320 --> 0:00:38.680
<v Speaker 1>reason when betting? Of course? Do we sometimes come up

0:00:38.720 --> 0:00:41.560
<v Speaker 1>with theories and go with our guts with varying levels

0:00:41.560 --> 0:00:44.920
<v Speaker 1>of evidence. Yeah, of course we do. It's our show.

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:47.879
<v Speaker 1>Every episode, we each pick at least three of our

0:00:47.920 --> 0:00:51.080
<v Speaker 1>best bets and break down the variables that went into

0:00:51.120 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 1>our selections. And yes, Jeff is also known to deep

0:00:55.440 --> 0:00:58.120
<v Speaker 1>dive what it's like to be a literal big boy.

0:00:58.400 --> 0:01:02.080
<v Speaker 1>New episodes go up every Thursday morning at six am Eastern.

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:05.399
<v Speaker 1>And you know what, just for you, here's here's a

0:01:05.400 --> 0:01:06.880
<v Speaker 1>little taste of the show.

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:11.200
<v Speaker 2>We have two coaches that will kick a field goal

0:01:11.200 --> 0:01:12.640
<v Speaker 2>over going for it and a fourth down I think

0:01:12.640 --> 0:01:15.399
<v Speaker 2>every time. And so in spots where you might see

0:01:15.440 --> 0:01:18.040
<v Speaker 2>more aggressive coaches go for it on fourth and two

0:01:18.080 --> 0:01:20.320
<v Speaker 2>from the five yard line, these coaches will kick a

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:21.320
<v Speaker 2>field goal every time.

0:01:21.560 --> 0:01:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Yep.

0:01:21.840 --> 0:01:24.920
<v Speaker 2>And so I'm the under here. I was leaning Michigan

0:01:25.000 --> 0:01:28.240
<v Speaker 2>minus six minus seven around there, but their offense. I

0:01:28.240 --> 0:01:30.120
<v Speaker 2>went back and watched the offense again, kind of worries

0:01:30.120 --> 0:01:32.760
<v Speaker 2>someome dan like they kind of pack things in after

0:01:32.800 --> 0:01:34.720
<v Speaker 2>Bell got her. Now they were up by twenty twenty

0:01:34.760 --> 0:01:37.800
<v Speaker 2>eight points. I get that. But Washington play defense. Guys.

0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:39.959
<v Speaker 2>They have a great back end and secondary. The rest

0:01:39.959 --> 0:01:42.440
<v Speaker 2>of the pass here kind of med but what I

0:01:42.440 --> 0:01:44.360
<v Speaker 2>looked as a Montana scored the first drive of the

0:01:44.360 --> 0:01:48.320
<v Speaker 2>game field goal. They then had thirty three yards total

0:01:48.360 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 2>over the next nine drives. Like, so, Washington defense is good.

0:01:51.800 --> 0:01:54.560
<v Speaker 2>So I'm on the under here. It's forty eight and

0:01:54.600 --> 0:01:56.480
<v Speaker 2>a half now, I mean I had it like fifty one,

0:01:56.520 --> 0:01:58.240
<v Speaker 2>but I'll stoll bet it here.

0:01:58.640 --> 0:02:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the over is interesting to me in a normal year,

0:02:01.080 --> 0:02:02.400
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, I'm going with the under here. I have

0:02:02.400 --> 0:02:05.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven thirteen Michigan, and I think you outlined it

0:02:05.880 --> 0:02:08.000
<v Speaker 1>all pretty easily and one of the things. Michigan ten

0:02:08.040 --> 0:02:10.440
<v Speaker 1>and five as a home favorite since twenty eighteen, so

0:02:10.520 --> 0:02:13.200
<v Speaker 1>that's somewhat of an extreme number. Seventy nine percent of

0:02:13.240 --> 0:02:15.680
<v Speaker 1>the bets around Michigan seventy six percent of the money.

0:02:15.880 --> 0:02:19.480
<v Speaker 1>There's huge actual over betting in this matchup right now.

0:02:19.520 --> 0:02:22.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure why, but there is a lot of

0:02:22.240 --> 0:02:24.799
<v Speaker 1>dudes and ladies or whoever reason.

0:02:24.840 --> 0:02:26.679
<v Speaker 2>So why is they think that this is an aberration

0:02:27.040 --> 0:02:33.040
<v Speaker 2>for Washington. Well, Washington, which I don't think. I think

0:02:33.080 --> 0:02:35.239
<v Speaker 2>it was a little bit on offense, but Dan to

0:02:35.400 --> 0:02:37.600
<v Speaker 2>their offense is pooh. We talked about heading on the season,

0:02:37.720 --> 0:02:41.480
<v Speaker 2>like there's receivers. Sam Huer is not playing this week.

0:02:42.200 --> 0:02:44.720
<v Speaker 1>I really do think Washington too. If you're going to

0:02:44.760 --> 0:02:46.680
<v Speaker 1>make a case for Washington, it's that they went in

0:02:46.720 --> 0:02:48.120
<v Speaker 1>the same way a lot of teams did, which is

0:02:48.120 --> 0:02:49.720
<v Speaker 1>they're going to show nothing in Week one ahead of

0:02:49.720 --> 0:02:52.280
<v Speaker 1>a bigger Week two matchup. I'm not a fan of

0:02:52.320 --> 0:02:54.640
<v Speaker 1>the Washington offense, but there is always going to be

0:02:54.680 --> 0:02:56.840
<v Speaker 1>a jump between week one and week two as teams

0:02:56.840 --> 0:02:58.480
<v Speaker 1>figure out what they have and as they see their

0:02:58.480 --> 0:03:01.640
<v Speaker 1>players playing a game speed. So Washington's offense has to

0:03:01.680 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 1>be better, just by the law of if they hit

0:03:04.400 --> 0:03:07.040
<v Speaker 1>rock bottom last week, they have to be better. They've

0:03:07.080 --> 0:03:09.639
<v Speaker 1>got decent enough players on offense. I'm not in love

0:03:09.680 --> 0:03:11.960
<v Speaker 1>with their offense. I think they can be outschemed pretty

0:03:12.000 --> 0:03:15.280
<v Speaker 1>easily on offense, but I think they can score thirteen

0:03:15.400 --> 0:03:18.079
<v Speaker 1>seventeen points or something like that. I just think Michigan

0:03:18.280 --> 0:03:20.320
<v Speaker 1>is a little bit more complete. So I have them

0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:23.120
<v Speaker 1>at twenty seven thirteen. So yeah, I'm gonna roll with

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:25.160
<v Speaker 1>the under. I'm with you as well. I just don't

0:03:25.200 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 1>see where the points from either side are coming from.

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:30.440
<v Speaker 1>You right about the deliberate pacing of both of these teams.

0:03:31.440 --> 0:03:35.880
<v Speaker 1>All right, there's your taste. Thanks for any consideration in subscribing, following,

0:03:35.920 --> 0:03:39.240
<v Speaker 1>and lending your ears weekly during the college football season

0:03:39.560 --> 0:03:43.000
<v Speaker 1>to Big Boy Bets, your one stop shop for all

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:45.840
<v Speaker 1>big boy college football betting. Come on and you can

0:03:45.880 --> 0:03:49.280
<v Speaker 1>find all the pertinent links in one handy place, Big

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Boy Bets Dot Show. Once again, Big Boy Bets Dot Show,

0:03:54.560 --> 0:03:55.040
<v Speaker 1>See you there.