Speaker 1: You are entering the freedom much Will this finally be
Speaker 1: the end of the impeachment trade? Plus Elizabeth Warren releases
Speaker 1: her plan to criminalize disinformation and then how about this
Speaker 1: a felon and Iowa convicted of sex crimes as a
Speaker 1: man no longer deemed a threat because of a gender change.
Speaker 1: We're going to get into all that and so much
Speaker 1: more coming up. This is the buck Sexton Show, where
Speaker 1: the mission or mission is to decode what really matters
Speaker 1: with passionable intelligence. Make no mistake American. Ready, you're a
Speaker 1: great American? Again, the buck Sexton Show begins. He's a
Speaker 1: great guy? Is buck Sexton? No, Hey, everyone, and welcome
Speaker 1: to the buck Sexton Show. It's Madison Jessieto here in
Speaker 1: the Hut today for Buck Sexton in New York City.
Speaker 1: Thank you so much for being with us today. And
Speaker 1: we have a lot to get to, but you know,
Speaker 1: I got to start with impeachment. This might be the
Speaker 1: world's driest impeachment trial ever. The ratings are down. We've
Speaker 1: heard it over and over again. Why because no one
Speaker 1: is watching. It's a joke, and the American people know
Speaker 1: that there's a million better things we could be doing
Speaker 1: than watching this because it has no constitutional grounds. I mean,
Speaker 1: there's no reason for it. And everybody recognizes. I mean,
Speaker 1: even many Democrats that I talked to have recognize the
Speaker 1: fact that since the day this president was elected, they
Speaker 1: do nothing. Democrats have devoted all their time and their
Speaker 1: energy to try and to remove our duly elected president
Speaker 1: from office. Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, Adam Schiff, they've all
Speaker 1: lied since the very beginning. And of course their behavior
Speaker 1: is despicable. But it's no surprise because as we've seen
Speaker 1: time and time again, the elite is left and the
Speaker 1: mainstream media have not only continually smeared in Trump, but
Speaker 1: they smeared his supporters. Buck talked about this yesterday in
Speaker 1: regards to the Don Lemons, and they're totally out of
Speaker 1: touch with the American people. And I really wonder if
Speaker 1: some of them have even read the Constitution. But you know,
Speaker 1: we have to get real here. Why are they doing this?
Speaker 1: Their actions are out of fear, fear of knowing that
Speaker 1: not one of their Democratic socialist candidates has a chance
Speaker 1: to beat President Trump. In November, and we watched President
Speaker 1: Trump's defense team and including Pambondi, dismantle three days of
Speaker 1: the Democrats case in just two hours, correctly pointing out,
Speaker 1: of course, the lack total lack of qualifications for Hunter
Speaker 1: Biden to serve on the board of Barisma while he
Speaker 1: meanwhile got paid tens of thousands of dollars a month. Insane.
Speaker 1: Imagine if this was Donald Trump Junior, what they do
Speaker 1: to him. Pam Bondi, of course, also referenced clip of
Speaker 1: Joe Biden antagonizing Ukraine to fire the prosecutor who is
Speaker 1: looking into corruption or to lose a billion dollars in
Speaker 1: loan guarantees from the Obama Biden administration. And I have
Speaker 1: one question, you know, isn't that quid pro quo exactly
Speaker 1: what they want to accuse President Trump of? But now
Speaker 1: you know they want to say that they're going to
Speaker 1: come save the day with John Bolton. He's so credible,
Speaker 1: he's so great. What he has to say is so important.
Speaker 1: But let's look back to two thousand and five, what
Speaker 1: did Adam Ship had to say about him. Then let's
Speaker 1: check out this clip the president and that is nuclear terrorism.
Speaker 1: Mister Bolton has been a wall. He's more focused on
Speaker 1: the next job than doing well at the last job.
Speaker 1: And particularly given the history where we've had the politicization
Speaker 1: of intelligence over WMD. Why we would pick someone who
Speaker 1: the very same issue has been raised repeatedly, and that
Speaker 1: is John Bolton's politicization of the intelligence he guard in
Speaker 1: Cuba and on other issues. Why we want someone with
Speaker 1: that lack of credibility? I can't understand. Why would we
Speaker 1: want someone with that lack of credibility? I can't understand.
Speaker 1: This is Adam Shift two thousand and five talking about
Speaker 1: John Bolton. Well, if you think that's too I'll let's
Speaker 1: take a listen to Adam Shift in twenty eighteen in
Speaker 1: clip three talking about John Bolton once again. Well, I
Speaker 1: think Bolton is not only a bad choice, it's honestly
Speaker 1: difficult to consider a worst choice. This is someone who's
Speaker 1: likely to exaggerate the dangerous impulses of the president towards belligerents,
Speaker 1: his proclivity to act without thinking, and his love of
Speaker 1: conspiracy theorists theories. And I'll just add one data point
Speaker 1: to what you were talking about earlier. John Bolton once
Speaker 1: suggested on Fox News that the Russian hack of the
Speaker 1: DNC was a false flag operation that had been conducted
Speaker 1: by the Obama administration. So You add that kind of
Speaker 1: thinking to Joe Degeneva, and you have another big dose
Speaker 1: of reality in the White House. So the Bolton appointment
Speaker 1: really scares me on Iran, on North Korea, on feeding
Speaker 1: this kind of conspiracy thinking about the President. But the
Speaker 1: firing of Doubt also ought to alarm all of us
Speaker 1: because it's yet another signal that he intends to have
Speaker 1: a much more aggressive approach to Bob Muller, and we're
Speaker 1: I think, a step closer to a potential firing of
Speaker 1: Bob Muller twenty eighteen. It's difficult to consider a worse choice.
Speaker 1: You have another big dose of unreality in the White House.
Speaker 1: This is what Adam Schiff had to say about John Bolton.
Speaker 1: Credible not credible. It seems that it's a choice of
Speaker 1: convenience for Adam Schiff as to when he considers Bolton
Speaker 1: to be credible. But of course, none of this changes
Speaker 1: the fact that the allegations in the book don't even
Speaker 1: change the key facts and the impeachment. We have legal
Speaker 1: scholars across the country talking about the fact that nothing
Speaker 1: in the revelations, even if proven to be true, would
Speaker 1: rise to the level of an abuse of power or
Speaker 1: an impeachable offense. And of course we have glaring issues
Speaker 1: in the New York Times story on the leaked manuscript.
Speaker 1: Not only does it omitdract quotes from the manuscript, it
Speaker 1: doesn't cite named sources. And of course, what a convenient
Speaker 1: time to leak the info the same day, same time
Speaker 1: pre orders are made available for John Bolton's book on Amazon.
Speaker 1: Not surprising. And if none of this is enough, let's
Speaker 1: listen to John Bolton himself, in the words of the
Speaker 1: President on Twitter. Game over, We'll be meeting President Lensky.
Speaker 1: He and President Trump have already spoken twice. President called
Speaker 1: to congratulate President Zelenski on his election and then on
Speaker 1: his success in the parliamentary election. They were very warm
Speaker 1: and cordial calls. We're hoping that they'll be able to
Speaker 1: meet in Warsaw and have a few minutes together. Because
Speaker 1: the success of Ukraine, maintaining its freedom, its system of
Speaker 1: representative government, a free market economy free of corruption, and
Speaker 1: dealing with the problems of the don Bess and the
Speaker 1: CRIMEA are high priorities here, obviously, but high priorities for
Speaker 1: the United States as well. No quid pro quo, there
Speaker 1: no concerns from John Bolton. We're going to be back
Speaker 1: with more on impeachment and with special guest Mark Latter.
Speaker 1: After this break, you're in the Freedom Hide. This is
Speaker 1: the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Welcome back to the Buck
Speaker 1: Sexton Show. It's Madison Jessiato in today for Buck and
Speaker 1: I want to keep talking about impeachment and I want
Speaker 1: to bring in Mark Latter. Many of you know Mark.
Speaker 1: He's the Trump campaign director of Strategic Communication and former
Speaker 1: special assistant to the President. Mark. Thanks for joining us, Oh,
Speaker 1: thanks for having so you know, the war over witnesses
Speaker 1: has begune to monopolize both sides. What do you think
Speaker 1: we're going to see moving forward when it comes to
Speaker 1: this impeachment trial and are we going to see witnesses? Well,
Speaker 1: it doesn't look like it. And I think that the
Speaker 1: fact of the matter is what we've got to come
Speaker 1: to an understanding is that it does not matter who
Speaker 1: they may or may not call as witnesses. It's not
Speaker 1: going to change the fundamental facts of this case that
Speaker 1: we've read the trade, we read the transcript, there was
Speaker 1: no quid pro quo. The Ukrainians admitted, there was no pressure,
Speaker 1: The aid was released and there were no investigations announced,
Speaker 1: and there is no witness that could be called that's
Speaker 1: going to change any of the fundamental facts in this case, right,
Speaker 1: And you know, we see that the president's defense team
Speaker 1: went up there, they delivered their closing arguments, which many feel,
Speaker 1: you know, really collapse the Democrats case for impeachment, of course,
Speaker 1: and a lot of people now are talking about the
Speaker 1: fact that policy agreements don't merit the grounds for impeachment.
Speaker 1: And while this may be great for the president for
Speaker 1: the campaign, when it comes to people going to that
Speaker 1: ballot box November of twenty twenty, what do you think
Speaker 1: the long term implications could be for our country and
Speaker 1: for the pal of impeachment turning into a partisan tool
Speaker 1: or don't well, this is a this is a disastrous
Speaker 1: for our country long term. Never in the history of
Speaker 1: our country have we ever had a one party, purely
Speaker 1: partisan impeachment. And that's what this was. Despite the fact
Speaker 1: that in the nineties you had Democrats saying you couldn't
Speaker 1: have a partisan impeachment. You even had Nancy Pelosi last
Speaker 1: spring saying you can't have a one party impeachment, and
Speaker 1: yet here we are, I think, you know, it's not
Speaker 1: only Nancy Pelosi Adam Schiff. I think you know, Thelma
Speaker 1: and Louise joined the squad, and they took this party
Speaker 1: right off the cliff. And it is a dangerous president
Speaker 1: that they are setting here. And it will be even
Speaker 1: more dangerous if it gets to the point where any
Speaker 1: future president or this president cannot have a robust discussion
Speaker 1: and even disagreements with members of his senior staff or
Speaker 1: with a national security advisor because they're afraid that they're
Speaker 1: going to get hauled before a hostile Congress of a
Speaker 1: hostile party and have all of those disagreements exposed. It
Speaker 1: will put national security at risk, regardless of what party
Speaker 1: future presidents may represent. But isn't the Democrats argument that
Speaker 1: this is in the interest of national security? Mark is
Speaker 1: now that we keep hearing from them. Apparently it was
Speaker 1: such a national security threat that they had to wait
Speaker 1: thirty days to even turn these impeachment articles over, and
Speaker 1: that they could not use the tools at hand. I mean,
Speaker 1: as much as they're talking about complaining about witnesses, they
Speaker 1: didn't the subpoena of these witnesses, and they didn't want
Speaker 1: to avail themselves of the courts to decide on the
Speaker 1: president's right of executive privilege and having these conversations, which
Speaker 1: is something that presidents of both parties going back to
Speaker 1: the foundings of our republic have defended. I mean, it
Speaker 1: just shows you that if it weren't for double standards,
Speaker 1: the Democrats wouldn't have standards at all. Sure, and you know,
Speaker 1: the polls continue to show mark that Americans are broadly
Speaker 1: opposed impeachment, while the support for the president can and
Speaker 1: used to grow. And so you know, as the Democrats
Speaker 1: impeachment sham continues, and you know, we're not quite at
Speaker 1: the end yet. But I think one of the things
Speaker 1: to note here, maybe you can touch on this a
Speaker 1: little bit for our listeners, is the scrutiny of the
Speaker 1: Biden's family business practices. I think that's finally increasing. So this,
Speaker 1: you know, may have had backfired more than the Democrats
Speaker 1: had expected, you know, especially just days before we head
Speaker 1: into the Iowa caucus. It really is backfiring, and for
Speaker 1: good reason. I mean, the American people you don't have
Speaker 1: to know all to fine details, but you can understand
Speaker 1: when the sitting vice president of the United States is
Speaker 1: leading policy discussion and his son is getting paid by
Speaker 1: whether it's Ukraine and or China. And now we're coming
Speaker 1: out and we're finding that there were even more sweetheart
Speaker 1: deals for the members of the Biden family, involving his
Speaker 1: brother and getting the land deals and contracts which he
Speaker 1: was not qualified to get. There's been other members of
Speaker 1: the family that have now just recently been exposed of
Speaker 1: also getting sweetheart deals. And the American people get that,
Speaker 1: they realize that this spinks. We wouldn't tolerate a city
Speaker 1: councilperson who's getting their family paid on the backside while
Speaker 1: they're making these official decisions, and we shouldn't hope, we
Speaker 1: should expect the same thing, that it's wrong than vice
Speaker 1: president of the United States and someone who's running for
Speaker 1: president to get those same sweetheart deals. And to put
Speaker 1: a fine point on this, you know, Biden is in
Speaker 1: trouble when they've actually had to come out and say, well, now,
Speaker 1: if if he's nominated or if he wins, we won't
Speaker 1: do that anymore, right of course, and you know when
Speaker 1: we look going back to impeachment, and you know how
Speaker 1: this has all kind of come out when it comes
Speaker 1: to the Bidens. We see even multiple Democrats, of course
Speaker 1: in swing states coming forward saying they're undecided on the
Speaker 1: President's guild and they may even come over and vote
Speaker 1: with the Republicans. Joe Manson of West Virginia, Christen Cinema
Speaker 1: of Arizona, Doug Jones of Alabama, how do you think
Speaker 1: this is going to play out? And give our listeners
Speaker 1: a previ of what you think the next steps in
Speaker 1: the conclusion of this impeachment hearing and trial is going
Speaker 1: to be. Well, I think there's no question that he
Speaker 1: will be exonerated by the Senate, and again then there's
Speaker 1: a very high likelihood that, just like in the House
Speaker 1: of Representatives, in the Senate, you will have a bipartisan
Speaker 1: vote of no. I don't see any Republicans crossing over,
Speaker 1: which means that this will have been entirely and engineered
Speaker 1: Democrat hoax that has been rebuked by bipartisan votes in
Speaker 1: both houses of Republicans and Democrats saying no. And so
Speaker 1: I think that will obviously serve as a strong platform.
Speaker 1: We've seen the president's polls numbers going up, impeachment numbers
Speaker 1: going down, and there is not a single person on
Speaker 1: this campaign for President Trump that wanted to go this way.
Speaker 1: We'd rather talk about the issues, the economy, rising paychecks.
Speaker 1: But since Democrats went down this path, you can be
Speaker 1: assured that we're going to defend and maximize it to
Speaker 1: the most that we can. And we're seeing it. Hundreds
Speaker 1: of thousands of people are crossing over and signing up
Speaker 1: to volunteer and to donate. And you could look at
Speaker 1: that rally we just had the other night in New Jersey,
Speaker 1: of all places, deep Blue New Jersey, most requested number
Speaker 1: of tickets ever for a presidential rally, And when we
Speaker 1: look at the data even further, a quarter of the
Speaker 1: people who were there were Democrats. I mean that shows
Speaker 1: you this president is bringing new people into the party.
Speaker 1: It's one of those reasons why I think, combined with
Speaker 1: the fact that you've got a self about socialist and
Speaker 1: communist sympathizer and Bernie Sanders who's leading their ticket, I
Speaker 1: think every state in the Union is now in play,
Speaker 1: with the exception probably of being the People's Republic of California. Right.
Speaker 1: And you know, when it comes to this impeachment, what
Speaker 1: do you think the effect is going to be that
Speaker 1: it has in the election. We're obviously seeing a lot
Speaker 1: of energy very far out from November for the president
Speaker 1: atleast rallies, which we covered on the first just a
Speaker 1: few days ago. Do you think that ultimate effects is
Speaker 1: going to be and do you truly believe that the
Speaker 1: Democrats are only doing this because they know they will
Speaker 1: lose in November. And we have American people, of course,
Speaker 1: very irritated with that because they see this and they
Speaker 1: see the Russian inclusion hoax the same way. This is
Speaker 1: time and tax peer money that's been wasted with no
Speaker 1: result or direct benefit to the American people. Well, I
Speaker 1: think the American people are seeing it, and I think
Speaker 1: that's one of the reasons why the president support is
Speaker 1: rising to the highest levels we've seen since he's taken
Speaker 1: office in multiple goals. And the Democrats know that they're
Speaker 1: in trouble. And yet you have to wonder because you've
Speaker 1: got crazy Maxine Waters and others out there who are saying,
Speaker 1: we're not done, We're going to impeach him again. I mean,
Speaker 1: they're already talking about going down this path, knowing they're
Speaker 1: going to lose this impeachment and openly talking about impeaching
Speaker 1: him again. I mean, this is just going to be
Speaker 1: a never ending cycle. They wanted him impeach from the
Speaker 1: day he was elected, and they're not going to stop
Speaker 1: until the American people remove them from power in the
Speaker 1: House of Representatives and also send this president back to
Speaker 1: the White House. And before we close out, Mark, you know,
Speaker 1: I'm want to ask you a question. We're we're talking
Speaker 1: a little bit later in the show about the chance
Speaker 1: of a broker convention for the Democrats. Obviously, you look
Speaker 1: at who's on the ballot for them and these primaries
Speaker 1: and going into Diowa Caucus, it doesn't seem like any
Speaker 1: of these candidates could beat President Trump. Do they recognize that?
Speaker 1: Do you think they're going to go to a broker convention?
Speaker 1: Is there even anybody out there that that could even
Speaker 1: compete in November against this president? I mean, when we
Speaker 1: see the economic numbers and we see the promises made,
Speaker 1: promises kept from twenty fifteen, twenty sixteen, all the way
Speaker 1: till now, hundreds of promises that have been kept, do
Speaker 1: you think there's anybody out there? And could the Democrats
Speaker 1: even trying to Pulson make that this summer, Well, it
Speaker 1: looks more and more likely that they might, because you
Speaker 1: do have Bernie Sanders who's leading in the polls, and
Speaker 1: now you're seeing a lot of the DNC and the
Speaker 1: mainstream Democrats coming out against him because they're afraid. It's
Speaker 1: almost like twenty six team again, where they're trying to
Speaker 1: gang up and keep him from getting the nomination, but
Speaker 1: they can't agree on who should get the nomination, and
Speaker 1: it's very possible that they could go into a brokered convention.
Speaker 1: But regardless, we really don't care which one of them
Speaker 1: comes out of their nominating process. They're all going to
Speaker 1: have endorsed such radical policies as taking away people's private
Speaker 1: health insurance, eliminating the energy independence that our country has
Speaker 1: now achieved, and that's going to drive up people's utility bills.
Speaker 1: They're talking about eliminating millions of people's jobs and just
Speaker 1: telling them, well, you can learn to code. I mean,
Speaker 1: that's not how we work in America. So it will
Speaker 1: be fairly easy for us to take on whichever one
Speaker 1: of those crazies actually comes out of their nomination, and
Speaker 1: we're fully prepared to go to battle again for them.
Speaker 1: Mark Clatter, thank you so much for joining us. We're
Speaker 1: going to have more on the twenty twenty elections coming
Speaker 1: up on the Box Exton Show. Thanks for listening to
Speaker 1: the bus Essence podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcast,
Speaker 1: the iHeart Radio app four, wherever you get your podcasts.
Speaker 1: Hey everyone, and welcome back to the Buck Sexton Show.
Speaker 1: It's Madison Jessiato here in the Freedom Hunt filling in
Speaker 1: for Buck Sexton today and I want to talk twenty twenty.
Speaker 1: I want to talk about the Democrats, the potential of
Speaker 1: a Broker convention, and of course who's surging but Bernie Sanders.
Speaker 1: We'll take a look at these poll numbers. I'm looking
Speaker 1: at the Real Clear Politics average right now nationwide, we're
Speaker 1: still seeing Biden up in most of the polls over
Speaker 1: Bernie just a little bit CNN poll though Bernie is
Speaker 1: shown up by three. But we're only a few days
Speaker 1: away from the Iowa caucus and we're heading into New
Speaker 1: Hampshire shortly after that. And right now we're seeing Bernie
Speaker 1: Sanders searching. We're seeing him leading in Iowa, We're seeing
Speaker 1: him leading in New Hampshire. He's up in the betting odds.
Speaker 1: You know, is Bernie Sanders going to be that nominee?
Speaker 1: And who else is rounding out that top five nationally? Well,
Speaker 1: we have Biden Bernie the only ones in the twenties
Speaker 1: behind them down at around fourteen percent. Elizabeth Warren under her,
Speaker 1: we have Bloomberg in Buddha, Judge, is Biden? Is Bernie?
Speaker 1: Who's going to be that nominee? Could it be neither
Speaker 1: of them? Because you got to keep in mind the
Speaker 1: reality of what the Democrats are facing right now, and
Speaker 1: the reality is that the Democrats are up against a
Speaker 1: president who is made and kept promises to the American people.
Speaker 1: Hundreds of promises made, promises kept. And the president has
Speaker 1: a website Promises Kept dot com I think it is,
Speaker 1: and you can go look at all of them and
Speaker 1: they're in categories the Economy Accords, the list goes on immigration,
Speaker 1: and he's made and kept these promises. A lot of people,
Speaker 1: you know, back in twenty fifteen, twenty sixteen, even a
Speaker 1: lot of Conservatives were hesitant to vote for this president
Speaker 1: because they didn't know if they believed he would do
Speaker 1: what he said he was going to do. And we've
Speaker 1: seen it time and time again with politicians, both Democrat
Speaker 1: and Republican, for many many years, make all the promises
Speaker 1: in the world, get into office and forget who they're
Speaker 1: there to serve us, the American people, or you know
Speaker 1: on a more local or state level when it comes
Speaker 1: to Congress or other elected officials, but presidents all the
Speaker 1: saying they made all the promises and they didn't keep them.
Speaker 1: So people were hesitant, especially when we talked about pro
Speaker 1: life issues constitutional issues. Was President Trump if he were
Speaker 1: to become president in twenty sixteen, people thought going to
Speaker 1: protect the lives of the unborn? Was he going to
Speaker 1: protect our Second Amendment rights? And ultimately that's exactly what
Speaker 1: he did. He not only performed, but he overperformed on
Speaker 1: these issues. And this is what the Democrats are up against.
Speaker 1: I mean, we had the first president Republican or Democrat
Speaker 1: ever to speak at the March for Life just last week.
Speaker 1: People are really happy with what he's done, of course,
Speaker 1: nominating and securing two seats on the Supreme Court with
Speaker 1: originalist justices who believe in the text of the Constitution,
Speaker 1: not liberal activists on the bench. And of course we
Speaker 1: see that and I'm gonna talk a little bit more
Speaker 1: about this later, but we're seeing that in all levels
Speaker 1: of the courts, when it comes to the district courts
Speaker 1: and the Court of Appeals, circuit courts. So we're seeing this.
Speaker 1: The Democrats recognize this, yet they've continued to do nothing.
Speaker 1: They waste money, they waste time. We saw what they
Speaker 1: did on the Russian collusion hoax and the Maller investigation,
Speaker 1: promise that they had evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that
Speaker 1: President Trump and the Trump campaign colluded with Russia. Of
Speaker 1: course we find out that's not true. They are now
Speaker 1: promising that he's in pete. He you know, he committed
Speaker 1: to pinchable offenses and that he should be removed from office.
Speaker 1: Not going to happen. You see the energy. You know,
Speaker 1: we're months and months and months out from November and
Speaker 1: we covered just two days ago, we covered the rally
Speaker 1: in New Jersey, and there's gonna be a rally I
Speaker 1: think tonight today right now in Iowa. And thousands and
Speaker 1: thousands people not only filling the venue, but we saw
Speaker 1: thousands of people outside, people watching in the cold on
Speaker 1: screens outside these venues. Says something in politics we haven't
Speaker 1: seen in a very very long time, if ever. I mean,
Speaker 1: you would think these people are there for the super
Speaker 1: Bowl or sporting event. Politics isn't supposed to be this fun,
Speaker 1: and people love going to Trump rallies. So he's been
Speaker 1: able to energize his base, energize his supporters, and make
Speaker 1: it exciting. How can these Democrats compete with that? And
Speaker 1: I think the DNC and the Democratic Party they recognize
Speaker 1: that because the policies not only are unaffordable and unrealistic,
Speaker 1: but these candidates don't exude or inspire energy from their supporters.
Speaker 1: I mean, Women for Trump launched in the summer in
Speaker 1: July of twenty nineteen. The President wasn't an at the launch,
Speaker 1: and there was over a thousand women completely maxed out
Speaker 1: capacity to be there for this. Some of Joe Biden's
Speaker 1: events where he's at the events himself, there's thirty people.
Speaker 1: I mean, how can you compete with that? And we
Speaker 1: saw Hillary struggle with this of course in twenty sixteen,
Speaker 1: and it's something that the Democrats have to face, and
Speaker 1: so they recognize that they're going to have to do
Speaker 1: something because none of these candidates are going to be
Speaker 1: able to beat President Trump. Could they go to a
Speaker 1: broker convention the summer. I think it's a very real possibility,
Speaker 1: especially now seeing that we're going to see probably Bernie
Speaker 1: and Biden both win a lot of primaries, a lot
Speaker 1: you potentially Bernie of course winning that Iowa caucus. So
Speaker 1: could we end up in a broker convention the summer.
Speaker 1: Could Hillary Clinton come in and save the day for
Speaker 1: the Democrats? Maybe? Could it be someone we're not even
Speaker 1: thinking about. Maybe will any of them, even Hillary, or
Speaker 1: someone that they could bring in the summer, be able
Speaker 1: to beat President Trump. I don't think so. And when
Speaker 1: we talk about you know, Bernie specifically, you know, you
Speaker 1: look back to sixteen people, a lot of even Democrats,
Speaker 1: they stonewalled him, they made fun of his message. Now
Speaker 1: they're all embracing it. They're putting forward the socialist policies.
Speaker 1: Of course, none of them affordable. We saw Bernie Sanders
Speaker 1: grilled by CBS on his plans last week, estimates of
Speaker 1: sixty trillion dollars total spending over the next ten years.
Speaker 1: If Bernie were to implement some of these plans, he
Speaker 1: of course doesn't know or care what they cost. Some
Speaker 1: experts are saying over one hundred tillion dollars can't afford this.
Speaker 1: Medicare for all, a climate plan, forgiveness of student loan debt,
Speaker 1: free college tuition, and of course the best yet, free
Speaker 1: healthcare for illegal immigrants. And it's not just Bernie it's Biden, Steer,
Speaker 1: Warren among others talking about this, and we saw them
Speaker 1: raise their hands at the I think the first debate
Speaker 1: or second debate saying that you know, they support this.
Speaker 1: But the funny thing is they want to say, you know,
Speaker 1: Bernie's not part of the swamp. That's what his team
Speaker 1: wants to tell you. You know, he's always held these positions.
Speaker 1: You know, I want to play this clip clip forum
Speaker 1: Bernie where he definitely didn't hold this position previously. So
Speaker 1: that gets listening to the immigration. If poverty is increasing
Speaker 1: and if wages are going down, I don't know why
Speaker 1: we need millions of people to be coming into this
Speaker 1: country as guests workers who will work for lower wages
Speaker 1: than American workers and drive wages sound even lower than
Speaker 1: the All right now, I don't know why we need
Speaker 1: millions of people coming into this country as guest workers.
Speaker 1: Isn't this what we've been saying? Oh wait, this is
Speaker 1: also what Bernie used to say, and President Obama used
Speaker 1: to say, flip flop, flip flop. Bernie Sanders is part
Speaker 1: of the swamp, just like the rest of them. He
Speaker 1: said he's going to change Washington, but don't be fooled
Speaker 1: by his message. He's just as much as much as
Speaker 1: part of the problem as his fellow candidates, just like Biden.
Speaker 1: You know, these establishment politicians, they want to protect the
Speaker 1: swamp against President Trump, and he clearly represents a genuine
Speaker 1: threat to the racket that they've seen in their halls
Speaker 1: of power in Washington, DCA. And Sanders, you know, he's
Speaker 1: a self proclaimed socialist. He's called for a political revolution,
Speaker 1: but he's no different. He protects his special insider friends
Speaker 1: who profit from the culture of corruption and greed that
Speaker 1: has long prevailed in our capital. You know. Peter Schweitzer's
Speaker 1: book Profiles Corruption outlines this quite nicely, talking about Sanders
Speaker 1: having used public office to siphon off millions of tax
Speaker 1: pier dollars to his own family and friends over the
Speaker 1: past thirty years. One of the things that really stuck
Speaker 1: out to me was eighty million dollars in payments to
Speaker 1: a media buying firm owned by two good friends of
Speaker 1: Sanders's wife. Of course, there's also the case of Burlington College,
Speaker 1: which was forced to close down. Guess who was mismanaging
Speaker 1: the case. Sanders's wife president of the school. She secured
Speaker 1: expensive loans on inflated donor commitments, and some suggest that
Speaker 1: Sanders may have used his influence to pressure the bank
Speaker 1: into approving the loan despite several inconsistencies in the documentation.
Speaker 1: And so while the government investigated, they closed the investigation
Speaker 1: on this, they didn't exonerate Sanders or his wife. Even
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton, who is the queen of the swamp herself,
Speaker 1: thinks that the shick against corruption is a fraud when
Speaker 1: it comes to Bernie. She told the Hollywood Reporter he
Speaker 1: was a career politician and it's all bologny, and I
Speaker 1: feel so bad that people got sucked into it. Now.
Speaker 1: I don't agree with Hillary Clinton on much. In fact,
Speaker 1: I rarely agree with Hillary Clinton at all, but on
Speaker 1: this one, she is one hundred percent right. Bernie's a
Speaker 1: career politician and people are getting sucked in to a
Speaker 1: completely fake message. He's deeply immersed in the swamp. He
Speaker 1: doesn't even want to call out o Biden, who, as
Speaker 1: you know that former Vice President cozied up to Delaware
Speaker 1: credit card companies and banks when he was in the
Speaker 1: Senate leading the bankruptcy legislation that protected the predatory companies
Speaker 1: at the expense of the American citizens, and we all
Speaker 1: know about his efforts to protect his son from the
Speaker 1: corruption probe in Ukraine. We're seeing it play out right
Speaker 1: now throughout this impeachment trial, and it's of course all
Speaker 1: thanks to a liberal crusade to remove our great president
Speaker 1: from office. We got to get to the bottom of this.
Speaker 1: But Sanders, of course refuses to call out Biden or
Speaker 1: a son by name. He insists that on many occasions
Speaker 1: that Biden's not corrupt, and he even repudiated his own
Speaker 1: supporters that called Albiden for obvious ethical shortcomings. And even
Speaker 1: if you wanted to say Sanders is trying to avoid
Speaker 1: appearing too critical of his Democratic opponents, the timidity makes
Speaker 1: it clear that he could not be counted on to
Speaker 1: confront the corruption from the White House. And what do
Speaker 1: we want as American people. We want to see the
Speaker 1: end of the corruption, and our nation deserves better. Our
Speaker 1: President's been fighting, He's been fighting for us on this.
Speaker 1: This is something that Democrats and Republicans let simmer for
Speaker 1: far too long. It's time to put the fire out.
Speaker 1: We can't afford any more corruption in Washington, DC. The
Speaker 1: times now, there is no more time that we can
Speaker 1: waste letting more corrupt career politicians go to Washington, and
Speaker 1: I don't just mean for the presidency. We need to
Speaker 1: be keeping an eye on this when we vote for
Speaker 1: Congress as well. But Bernie Sanders is definitely part of
Speaker 1: that swamp, and he's no different than the rest of them.
Speaker 1: You know, We're gonna have more on this and so
Speaker 1: much more when we're back on the Buck Sexton Show.
Speaker 1: You're in the Freedom Heart. This is the Buck Sexton
Speaker 1: Show podcast. Welcome back to the Buck Sexton Show. It's
Speaker 1: Madison Joy Seattle in today for Buck Sexton. Get this.
Speaker 1: An Iowa man convicted of sex crimes a felon, is
Speaker 1: no longer deemed a threat because of his gender change
Speaker 1: to a woman. So the officials and Iowa have determined
Speaker 1: that a convicted child molester is to be released from incarceration.
Speaker 1: They explain that the offender's reduction and testosterone levels from
Speaker 1: his transition from a man to a woman puts the
Speaker 1: individual at a lower risk of reoffending. And people and
Speaker 1: Iowa are furious, and I'm with them. This is insane.
Speaker 1: It's something that I don't think ten years ago we
Speaker 1: would have even imagined. Now, of course, it's somewhat of
Speaker 1: a loophole when it comes to how this happened. But
Speaker 1: people are speaking up about this. So a spokesperson for
Speaker 1: the Attorney General's offices, you know, they don't believe that
Speaker 1: they have evidence sufficient to prove that Josie Smith, which
Speaker 1: is the man's now female name, which used to be
Speaker 1: Joseph Matthew Smith, has a significant chance of reoffending. So
Speaker 1: they talk about those hormone levels. Now he's she's going
Speaker 1: to be released from confinement. But the costs for the
Speaker 1: motion to dismiss the case are going to be taxed
Speaker 1: to the state, paid for by the people. I wouldn't
Speaker 1: want to pay for this. This is ridiculous. Now, there's
Speaker 1: one thing somewhat positive in this, and that's the fact
Speaker 1: that Smith is still going to be subject to strict
Speaker 1: sex offender reporting requirements for those that commit these crimes.
Speaker 1: But is this a loophole that people start taking advantage of.
Speaker 1: Any time that you commit a sex offense, you're going
Speaker 1: to change your gender and get out of prison. I
Speaker 1: want to keep an eye on this story. And while
Speaker 1: this really bothers me, there's something out that else out
Speaker 1: there that's really bothered me. Super Bowl ad of abortion survivors.
Speaker 1: Take a listen to this clip we have of the ad.
Speaker 1: Will you look me in the eye. Can you look
Speaker 1: me in the eye and tell me that shouldn't be alive?
Speaker 1: Can you tell me that I didn't deserve to survive?
Speaker 1: One reality binds us together, share one choice, try to
Speaker 1: steal out lives. So we survived. We are the survivors
Speaker 1: of choice. Are the faces of Choices. I am the
Speaker 1: face of Choice. If that doesn't pull your heart strings,
Speaker 1: I don't know what does. It's an ad from the
Speaker 1: pro life group Faces of Choice, and they're calling out
Speaker 1: Fox Sports for allegedly refusing to approve the ad that
Speaker 1: they wanted to run during this year Super Bowl. I'm
Speaker 1: actually heading down to the Super Bowl this weekend, but
Speaker 1: for all those that are going to be watching from home,
Speaker 1: they're not going to see this ad. Faces of Choice
Speaker 1: submitted the ad to Fox didn't hear anything. They were
Speaker 1: originally told by Fox that they would receive word on
Speaker 1: whether or not their application had been accepted by October.
Speaker 1: Of course, no answer was given. They were repeatedly stone stonewalled.
Speaker 1: The ad was submitted in July and Gillett of the
Speaker 1: Faces of Choice group says she thinks it's clever or
Speaker 1: what they're doing. If they directly said no, then they
Speaker 1: could say this. Of course, A z Ass and I
Speaker 1: look at the suitable ad that Fox rejected, but they
Speaker 1: didn't directly say no, and she's claimed that they've ignored them,
Speaker 1: wasted their time, and refused to give an answer to
Speaker 1: avoid having to run the ad. Abortion survivors once again
Speaker 1: being ignored. It's not the first time we've seen this,
Speaker 1: and we've seen the discrimination not only against abortion survivors
Speaker 1: but against the pro life movement. This is something that
Speaker 1: many of you know, and I've talked about on Buck Show,
Speaker 1: that I experienced as a law student at Ohio State,
Speaker 1: even receiving threats of violence and threats of rape in
Speaker 1: death because of my views on abortion. And it's rampant
Speaker 1: in Hollywood, it's rampant in the television industry. There's no
Speaker 1: respect or protection for the lives of the unborn. It's
Speaker 1: something we've been working towards. We need to see a
Speaker 1: change in I'm disappointed that we're not going to see
Speaker 1: this add on Sunday, and I think they should keep
Speaker 1: speaking up about this because I can tell you right
Speaker 1: now We're not going to sit back and let this happen.
Speaker 1: It's simply unacceptable. We'll be back for another hour of
Speaker 1: The Buck Sexton Show right after this. Thanks for listening
Speaker 1: to The bus Sexton Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on
Speaker 1: Apple Podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcast. Hey. Everyone,
Speaker 1: we're back for another hour of The Buck Sexton Show.
Speaker 1: It's Madison Jessieato here in the Freedom Hut filling in
Speaker 1: for Buck Sexton, and we're gonna be talking about the economy.
Speaker 1: We're gonna be talking about millennials and socialism, the coronavirus,
Speaker 1: and more. But first I want to bring in a
Speaker 1: special guest we have with us in this hour, Kaylee MCKININNY.
Speaker 1: She's the Trump twenty twenty campaign press secretary. She's the
Speaker 1: former spokesperson at the RNC and Harvard Law graduate. Kaylee,
Speaker 1: thanks so much for joining us. Hey, thanks for having
Speaker 1: me Madison. You know, I want to talk to you
Speaker 1: about women for Trump. So this Boston Globe article comes
Speaker 1: out a few days ago and they quote a woman
Speaker 1: named Alice from Michigan, and she talks about, you know,
Speaker 1: they ask her about the prospect of a female president.
Speaker 1: She says, you know, it would make me so excited
Speaker 1: to vote for a woman for president. I do think
Speaker 1: i'll see one in my lifetime, and as the mother
Speaker 1: of a daughter, it would especially thrill me. But of course,
Speaker 1: as we hear all across the country, Aliston vote for
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton in twenty sixteen, she vote for Donald Trump
Speaker 1: in twenty sixteen, and she's expecting to vote for him again.
Speaker 1: And when they asked her why, she said, Hillary is
Speaker 1: an elatest Democrat who doesn't care about women like me.
Speaker 1: She wondered if liberal women would even be willing to
Speaker 1: vote for female candidates like Nicki Haley of Uncle Trump
Speaker 1: or Condoleeza Rice if you know these were to be
Speaker 1: candidates in the future. Is this something you're hearing on
Speaker 1: the campaign trail when you talk to women. Absolutely. I
Speaker 1: mean she makes a good point. Look, if you are
Speaker 1: a person who cares about issues that women care about,
Speaker 1: which I would argue you are the full panoply of issues,
Speaker 1: but specifically issues like child care, pay family, he's an
Speaker 1: issues that motivate new moms. For instance. You can't help
Speaker 1: but look at President Trump and see he is the
Speaker 1: most pro woman president we've ever had the results don't lie,
Speaker 1: and you're in it. I have to passy there because
Speaker 1: you're a new mom yourself. That's what you understand this.
Speaker 1: You know better than anybody right now as to why
Speaker 1: women are thinking about out the future of this nation
Speaker 1: and why they're thinking about who's going to produce the
Speaker 1: most prosperous future for their children exactly, and on an
Speaker 1: issue like paid family leave in particular, which Ivanka Trump
Speaker 1: has heralded and President Trump has pushed forward two point
Speaker 1: one million federal employees, and I'll have access to it.
Speaker 1: It's so important. I know more than ever with a
Speaker 1: ten week old, how important it is ought to be
Speaker 1: able to be with your young one. And now more women,
Speaker 1: more families have access to that because of this president.
Speaker 1: And so I think conservative voters around the country, conservative
Speaker 1: women look and say, hey, we'd love to have a
Speaker 1: female president sometime, but we want to president who implements
Speaker 1: results that best affect us in our families. And the
Speaker 1: answer is very clearly President Trump and none of the
Speaker 1: crazies over on the Democrats side. Absolutely. And you know,
Speaker 1: since all the way back in twenty fifteen, there's been
Speaker 1: this narrative out there coming from the mainstream media and
Speaker 1: coming from the Democrats that President Trump doesn't support women.
Speaker 1: And as a woman who's worked you know, obviously with
Speaker 1: President Trump, I've talked about my experience as to why
Speaker 1: I don't believe this is true, and it certainly hasn't
Speaker 1: been my experience. But I'd love for you to tell
Speaker 1: our listeners a little bit about your experience working for
Speaker 1: the President and how he's supported you and other women
Speaker 1: on the campaign trail. Yeah, he absolutely does. You know,
Speaker 1: he's someone who truly listens and takes counsel from all
Speaker 1: those around him. If you notice, the people he's put
Speaker 1: in power are women, are Kelly and Conway and Sarah
Speaker 1: Sanderstephanie Grisham all throughout the White House on our campaign.
Speaker 1: The same thing. You know, he's someone who he really listens.
Speaker 1: When he talked to him, He'll ask for your opinion,
Speaker 1: he asked about your family. He truly cares about the
Speaker 1: individual and has chosen to empower women all throughout the
Speaker 1: White House in the campaign. He's someone who is completely
Speaker 1: demonized by the media. But you know, I can tell
Speaker 1: you firsthand as you can Madison, that he's truly a
Speaker 1: great guy who truly is motivated by working for the
Speaker 1: American people as the Democrats pursue impeachment. Yeah, you know,
Speaker 1: and as someone who supports women. President Trump has has
Speaker 1: made it a focus to of course make policies and
Speaker 1: push policy that make the lives of American women better.
Speaker 1: And so since inauguration Day in twenty seventeen, what do
Speaker 1: you think have maybe been a few of the highlights
Speaker 1: of what he's been able to do, outside of what
Speaker 1: you mentioned earlier, to benefit women in this country. Yeah,
Speaker 1: if you look at you first, the unemployment rate sixty
Speaker 1: five year low for women. Will always say I'm sorry
Speaker 1: about that. I wish it was an historic low, as
Speaker 1: it is for black and Hispanics Americans, But sixty five
Speaker 1: year low is pretty amazing for female unemployment. And if
Speaker 1: there is an article recently that more women are now
Speaker 1: being employed in the workforce and men, that's a huge deal.
Speaker 1: Women are really succeeding in the Trump economy. But at
Speaker 1: the same time, I mean treasuring families. Another thing that
Speaker 1: he's done, which I think is so important is he's
Speaker 1: almost doubled the federal budget for childcare. So for women
Speaker 1: in low income communities who we all know childcare is
Speaker 1: exorbitantly extensive daycare or whatever you choose to pursue. And
Speaker 1: for him to double the federal budgets help low income
Speaker 1: women pursue their working professional goals, but also to have
Speaker 1: access to childcare a very big deal. I mean, those
Speaker 1: are just a few. There's many more that the President
Speaker 1: has accomplished. And there's so many more. And one of
Speaker 1: the things I think the President has taken pride and
Speaker 1: is the fact that he's someone who stood up for
Speaker 1: the forgotten man and women of the United States of America.
Speaker 1: And so not only has he been there and of
Speaker 1: course supported women, but he's helping everybody rise. He's made
Speaker 1: the country a place where businesses and families can succeed,
Speaker 1: people off of food stamps once again feeding their families.
Speaker 1: There's you know that's priceless. You've been traveling the country
Speaker 1: and you were, I think at the rally a couple
Speaker 1: days ago in Iowa. Today. What are you hearing? What
Speaker 1: are you seeing? I mean, it's incredible the energy I
Speaker 1: think that we're seeing when it comes to people at
Speaker 1: these rallies, not only filling the venues, but thousands of
Speaker 1: people watching from outside. And you've posted some really great
Speaker 1: videos talking to some of these people that wait for hours,
Speaker 1: sometimes days to see their great president. Tell me about
Speaker 1: what you're seeing out there across the country. Yeah, you know,
Speaker 1: it was amazing, Madison, because I do go to every
Speaker 1: single rally and beyond that other events like bus tours
Speaker 1: and speeches, so I really do get to see a
Speaker 1: wide array of voters in the United States and talk
Speaker 1: to them. And I can tell you I have never
Speaker 1: before at any other rally seeing what I saw in
Speaker 1: New Jersey. You know, it's it's routine for President Trump
Speaker 1: to pack a house with people waiting outside watching from
Speaker 1: a JumboTron. It's routine to see people camping out the
Speaker 1: night before. But what has not been routine is in
Speaker 1: a deep, deep, deep blue state like New Jersey to
Speaker 1: see literally thousands of people in sleeping bags the night
Speaker 1: before the rally. I showed up and it was just
Speaker 1: so evident. You could feel that that something's going on
Speaker 1: in this country on maybe in nineteen eighty four type
Speaker 1: landslide like Ronald Reagan had where that map was just
Speaker 1: redder and redder and redder. Because what I saw, the
Speaker 1: kind of support he got in New Jersey is really
Speaker 1: something to behold you know, Joe Biden can't feel a
Speaker 1: front row in a blue state, but boy go to
Speaker 1: a red state, and I wonder, you know, who would
Speaker 1: show up for Joe or Bernie or whomever. But President
Speaker 1: Trump doesn't matter where he goes. He packs the house.
Speaker 1: And you mentioned a little bit earlier about impeachment. Do
Speaker 1: you think part of this is a result of the
Speaker 1: way the American people feel about impeachment, about the Russian
Speaker 1: collusion hoax, about the waste of taxpayer time and money
Speaker 1: that's been spent in Congress. I have no doubt that
Speaker 1: that's the case. It's the contrast. You know, we just
Speaker 1: saw the President signs the USMCA a huge deal, ripped
Speaker 1: up NAFTA, and he negotiated a better deal with Canada
Speaker 1: and Mexico. And you contrast that with what were then saw,
Speaker 1: you know, sut screen of Adam shifts up there. The
Speaker 1: House manager is trying to take down a sitting president,
Speaker 1: overturn the will of the American people. The contrast couldn't
Speaker 1: be more evident in this impeachment proceeding. I think I
Speaker 1: just put a lightning rod through the Trump base. I
Speaker 1: also think it's added to the Trump base. I think
Speaker 1: there's more Democrats coming over, more independence coming over. Our
Speaker 1: polling show how vulnerable congressional Democrats are who are a
Speaker 1: district that President Trump won after their impeachment vote, So
Speaker 1: there's something going on. Impeachment certainly has been a motivator
Speaker 1: for the Trump coalition in a huge issue back on
Speaker 1: the campaign around twenty fifteen and twenty sixteen, of course,
Speaker 1: was immigration, and this is I think something that's going
Speaker 1: to continue to remain front and center as we head
Speaker 1: towards November. What do you think are some of the
Speaker 1: President's biggest wins on immigration? Of course, we had the
Speaker 1: Scotus decision come out on the side of the president
Speaker 1: just this month. So what do you think we can
Speaker 1: expect moving forward on that issue? Yeah, you know, I
Speaker 1: think the wall, certainly, you're going to see miles and
Speaker 1: miles of sensing and wall border barriers, you know, what
Speaker 1: is appropriate in the given area built by election day,
Speaker 1: and many much of it already built already. So building
Speaker 1: the wall is big immigration enforcement, also making sure that
Speaker 1: the people coming into our country are good, hard working
Speaker 1: people who you know, are pursuing the American dream, making
Speaker 1: sure that legal immigration, that there's a place for that.
Speaker 1: You know, that's something that I think is under emphasized.
Speaker 1: You know, I was at the rally two nights ago
Speaker 1: in New Jersey and a woman came up to me
Speaker 1: and said, you know, my brother waited seven years and
Speaker 1: lying again this country. He did it the legal way,
Speaker 1: waiting to come here, and just today he got his
Speaker 1: papers saying he's welcome, he can come to this country.
Speaker 1: And she said, my mom is just overjoyed. So, you know,
Speaker 1: there's a place for legal immigration, but there's a place,
Speaker 1: an important place for border security and finding that balance
Speaker 1: is what this president has done. So I'm very proud
Speaker 1: of his accomplishments on immigration, as I think many across
Speaker 1: the nation are sure, and so many of us have
Speaker 1: stories of family members that have come and done it
Speaker 1: the right way, and you waited a long time to
Speaker 1: do that, and so we definitely sympathize understand, and you know,
Speaker 1: we're really proud of this president on the issue of immigration. Kaylee,
Speaker 1: thank you so much for joining us. Congratulations to you
Speaker 1: and your husband on the addition to your beautiful family,
Speaker 1: and we look forward to seeing your videos from tonight's
Speaker 1: rally in Iowa. Thank you, Madison. I'm a show. Thanks.
Speaker 1: We'll be back with more on the economy after this break.
Speaker 1: You're in the Freedom mind. This is the buck Sexton
Speaker 1: Show podcast. Hey everyone, and welcome back to The buck
Speaker 1: Sexton Show. As we had through another hour and we
Speaker 1: just talked to Kaylee MCKININNY and she mentioned a lot
Speaker 1: about the economy, but I think it's important to take
Speaker 1: it an even deeper dive into the economy. We've seen
Speaker 1: the president fight every single day since elected four American families,
Speaker 1: and what has been his strongest point the economy. The
Speaker 1: economic numbers. More than seven point three million jobs added
Speaker 1: since he took office. Of course, over half of these
Speaker 1: going to women. One and a half million women alone
Speaker 1: lifted out of poverty in just two years of President
Speaker 1: Trump administration alone. And from the very beginning, we heard
Speaker 1: the Democrats talk about recession. We're going to see a
Speaker 1: recession three, four or five times. Everybody needs to brace
Speaker 1: for the next great recession. I'm still waiting. We haven't
Speaker 1: seen a recession. And as you know, the country awoke
Speaker 1: to the news that President Trump had won and guess
Speaker 1: what happened. The stock market sky rocketed upwards. Yet we
Speaker 1: saw liberal economists Paul Krugman inexplicably prophesized in The New
Speaker 1: York Times that we're going to face a global recession
Speaker 1: with no end in sight. Less than a week later,
Speaker 1: he wrote about the impeding Trump slump. And he wasn't
Speaker 1: the only one. Matt Krantz USA Today thought a recession
Speaker 1: was on the way because Trump's Republican president. And that
Speaker 1: was before Trump even took office. And you know, we
Speaker 1: come to his inauguration, we saw strong growth, impressive job creation,
Speaker 1: like I mentioned, over seven million jobs created. In the
Speaker 1: media continue with this pessimistic tuny for just a few
Speaker 1: months ago. Quinn Hillier was certain last year that the
Speaker 1: recession was on the horizon because of the tariffs of
Speaker 1: the Trump administration. Get ready for rough times, he wrote,
Speaker 1: predicting the crash is going to come by this past
Speaker 1: fall and advising people to buy gold, horde cash stalked
Speaker 1: up on canned foods. Even when the end of the
Speaker 1: year came, no recession had arrived. Economist Evancraft absurdly accused
Speaker 1: Trump of readying a scapegoat for his eventual failure. During
Speaker 1: the whole time period, economic growth across the nation's been strong. Unemployment,
Speaker 1: of course, historic lows. We've heard it over and over again.
Speaker 1: A fifty year low, overall, all time low for women,
Speaker 1: all time low for Black Americans, all time low for
Speaker 1: Hispanic Americans. Wages are growing at the fastest rate and
Speaker 1: over a decade, by virtually any conceivable measure of progress
Speaker 1: in the economy, in the labor market. The Trump presidency
Speaker 1: has been a resounding success from the beginning, from day one.
Speaker 1: But here we are again, and now we're seeing that
Speaker 1: it's the inverted yield curve. And we heard about this,
Speaker 1: I think a year ago two on treasury bonds that
Speaker 1: has journalists convinced, of course their stock market experts now
Speaker 1: to all the journalists, but they're convinced that we're going
Speaker 1: to fall off the economic cliff. They're poorly concealed glee,
Speaker 1: which is I think the sickest part about all of it.
Speaker 1: You hear a lot of these mainstream media commentators and
Speaker 1: journalists talk about this almost as if they want to
Speaker 1: see us head into a recession. Maybe it wouldn't affect
Speaker 1: them or their families. Maybe it's not going to affect
Speaker 1: Nancy Pelosi or Bernie Sanders who have become rich off
Speaker 1: of corruption, but it'll affect my family and your family,
Speaker 1: families across Middle America and the rest of the country.
Speaker 1: Recession could destroy us. So they're poorly concealed glee in
Speaker 1: the press corps at the thought of economic calamity is
Speaker 1: just unconsciable. This just drives me, I think nuts more
Speaker 1: than anything else when it comes to their commentary on
Speaker 1: the economy and the idea that millions of Americans could
Speaker 1: plunge into hardship, really seems to do nothing but damn
Speaker 1: in their excitement over one thing that would give them
Speaker 1: a chance of defeating Trump in the twenty election. That's
Speaker 1: all they want. They know that with a strong economy
Speaker 1: and historically, knowing that people vote based off their pocketbooks.
Speaker 1: You know, are you better now than you were three
Speaker 1: years ago? That's all to make question. And people are
Speaker 1: better now than they were three years ago. So I
Speaker 1: have some bad news for these folks. Trump has great
Speaker 1: odds of winning re election. There's no way that this
Speaker 1: is not going to have an impact. The economy, of course,
Speaker 1: moves in cycles, but we're seeing an economy that is
Speaker 1: so strong like really, nothing we've seen lead, nothing I've
Speaker 1: seen in my lifetime, nothing we've seen as a country
Speaker 1: in a very long time. I want to hit these
Speaker 1: numbers one more time. Over seven million jobs created, five
Speaker 1: hundred thousand manufacturing jobs created since the president was elected.
Speaker 1: Remember when Obama told us that manufacturing jobs would never
Speaker 1: come back. Will guess what, America, They're back. Unemployment rate
Speaker 1: at that fifty year low of three point five percent.
Speaker 1: We had a highlight of you know, those recent jobs
Speaker 1: reports in November December, both higher than what had been expected.
Speaker 1: African American unemployment record low around five percent, five point
Speaker 1: five percent, Hispanic unemployment again near record low four point
Speaker 1: two percent, Asian American unemployment two point six percent, a
Speaker 1: historic low. Women unemployment remained steady at that near record
Speaker 1: low of three point five percent. And of course, the
Speaker 1: approval writing of this president among small business owners sixty
Speaker 1: in all time high Dow Jones industrial average records over
Speaker 1: one hundred times under this president six point two over
Speaker 1: six point two. Now million people have come off of
Speaker 1: food stamps, and the Congress, work with of course supported
Speaker 1: the President, passed the historic Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.
Speaker 1: This was a relief not only for businesses, but for
Speaker 1: the hard working men and women of our nation. As
Speaker 1: a result of these tax cuts, and in the Jobs Act,
Speaker 1: we were able to see nine thousand opportunity zones created
Speaker 1: in all fifty states, DC and five territories. So what
Speaker 1: are the opportunity zones going to do? Well, guess what.
Speaker 1: These are going to spur one hundred billion dollars in
Speaker 1: private capital investment and impact nearly thirty five million Americans.
Speaker 1: We doubled the childcare tax credit, which was great for
Speaker 1: American families, and we rolled back, you know, those unnecessary
Speaker 1: job killing regulations. This is something as business owners, as citizens,
Speaker 1: we've been complaining about for a long time, all the
Speaker 1: red tape, all the regulations. So I was certainly happy
Speaker 1: when this administration cut eight and a half regulations for
Speaker 1: every new role, and that, of course, far exceeded their
Speaker 1: promise to us, which was to cut two regulations for everyone. Added.
Speaker 1: As a result of this, we've seen regulatory cost completely
Speaker 1: slashed nearly fifty billion dollars, and it saved taxpayers two
Speaker 1: twenty billion dollars once all implemented. The deregulation efforts are
Speaker 1: even helping individual American households at an estimated thirty one
Speaker 1: hundred dollars a year. The economy is strong. The economy
Speaker 1: is booming. It's a result of these conservative economic policies
Speaker 1: put into effect by our president. Economic confidence rebounded to
Speaker 1: a record high under our president, and we saw years
Speaker 1: of economic despair under President Obama. People voted in twenty
Speaker 1: sixteen for change, the change that was promised to them
Speaker 1: in two and eight. They wanted real economic change and
Speaker 1: they're seeing that under President Trump. We're going to be
Speaker 1: back on The Buck Sexton Show in a few minutes.
Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to The Bus Seston Show podcasts. Remember
Speaker 1: to subscribe on Apple Podcasts, the iHeart Radio app, or
Speaker 1: wherever you get your podcasts. Welcome back to the Buck
Speaker 1: Sexton Show. I'm Madison Jessiato filling in today for Buck Sexton.
Speaker 1: So this is a very interesting one. We have Elizabeth
Speaker 1: Warren unveiling her plan to police disinformation. She wants to
Speaker 1: make it a crime. She's proposed a plan that seems
Speaker 1: to have two main parts. One promising to hold people
Speaker 1: who knowingly disseminate false information about when and how to
Speaker 1: vote in US elections accountable. The other promises is to
Speaker 1: hold social media platforms accountable, which of course is very
Speaker 1: sticky territory. So we'll see ultimately how this plan pans out.
Speaker 1: But what's rich about this the fact that Elizabeth Warren,
Speaker 1: the Massachusetts Center, has built her campaign on a foundation
Speaker 1: of misinformation, misrepresentations, and exaggerations the non native Native American
Speaker 1: Elizabeth Warren. You know it's common knowledge by now that Warren,
Speaker 1: one of the top four contenders right now for that
Speaker 1: twenty twenty Democratic presidential nomination, identified as Native American for
Speaker 1: personal gain? Was she Native American? One twenty fourth? Maybe
Speaker 1: not even a percent? She had zero experience and tribal life.
Speaker 1: Of course, this isn't her only misrep presentation. But let's
Speaker 1: take a listen to this clip of her apology for
Speaker 1: this one and clip nine. I want to say this,
Speaker 1: like anyone who's being honest with themselves, I know that
Speaker 1: I have made mistakes. I am sorry for harm I
Speaker 1: have caused. I have listened, and I have learned a lot,
Speaker 1: and I am grateful for the many conversations that we've
Speaker 1: had together. It is a great honor to be able
Speaker 1: to partner with Indian country, and that's what I've tried
Speaker 1: to do as a Senator, and that's what I promise
Speaker 1: I will do as President of the United States of America.
Speaker 1: You know, it still blows my mind that this didn't
Speaker 1: completely sink her in the Democratic Party. It's like they
Speaker 1: don't even here. If it were someone in the Republican
Speaker 1: Party that pretended to be a Native American when they weren't,
Speaker 1: they'd be demolished. Elizabeth Warren goes on her interview before
Speaker 1: this apology saying that you know, she's sorry that at
Speaker 1: some point in time she identified as Native American, but
Speaker 1: that's just what she believed. She thought maybe she was
Speaker 1: Native American, but she knew it was wrong, but she
Speaker 1: did it anyways. Of Course, like I said before, it
Speaker 1: doesn't stop here. The non native Native American Elizabeth Warren
Speaker 1: isn't the only lie. Let's talk about when she misled
Speaker 1: voters about sending her son to private school, repeatedly telling
Speaker 1: people her kids went to public school. No, her son
Speaker 1: went to private school. And of course this is a
Speaker 1: woman campaigning against the school choice program, which of course
Speaker 1: would give other children advantages that her children had. But
Speaker 1: you know, we see this time and time again with
Speaker 1: the elitist just like when we talk about the gun
Speaker 1: control issue. They don't want us to have guns to
Speaker 1: protect ourselves, our families, our communities, they don't want people
Speaker 1: in dangerous areas to be able to protect themselves. Look
Speaker 1: at Chicago, look at New York City, look at a
Speaker 1: lot of these urban areas where people need to be
Speaker 1: able to protect themselves more than ever, and they can't,
Speaker 1: but they have armed security to protect them. They don't
Speaker 1: want to put a border wall on her southern border,
Speaker 1: but guess what, they have fences and security around their homes.
Speaker 1: It's another example of complete hypocrisy. And Elizabeth Warren is
Speaker 1: one of the worst when it comes to this. And
Speaker 1: let's not forget the fact that she's repeatedly invoked tales
Speaker 1: but her family's economic strugles. She talks about growing up,
Speaker 1: and she talks about this on the campaign trail, and
Speaker 1: of course she wants to win these blue collar voters
Speaker 1: on her appeal to the middle class. But she's now
Speaker 1: a multi millionaire. Elizabeth Warren isn't part of the middle class.
Speaker 1: She's fibbed more than once on her family's background. Her brother,
Speaker 1: Elizabeth Warren's own brother told the Boston Globe, my dad
Speaker 1: was never her janitor and said it makes him furious. Furious.
Speaker 1: I quote him that Warren has repeatedly claimed otherwise on
Speaker 1: the campaign trail ask her constituents in Massachusetts, she promised
Speaker 1: to serve her full Senate term after reelected. Of course,
Speaker 1: she runs her president announces just a few weeks after,
Speaker 1: and let's not forget about this. Elizabeth Warren claims that
Speaker 1: she was fired for being pregnant, but her own interview
Speaker 1: from earlier on seems to say otherwise. Take a listen. So,
Speaker 1: my first teaching position was as a special needs teacher
Speaker 1: there we Go. I worked. It was in a public
Speaker 1: school system, but I worked with the children with disabilities.
Speaker 1: I loved that job. But by the end of the
Speaker 1: first school year, I was quite visibly pregnant, and I
Speaker 1: was pregnant with my first baby. So I had a
Speaker 1: baby and stayed home for a couple of years, and
Speaker 1: I was really casting about thinking what am I going
Speaker 1: to do? And my husband's view of it was stay home.
Speaker 1: And the principal didn't invite me back for the next
Speaker 1: school year. And I did that for a year, and
Speaker 1: then that summer I actually didn't have the education courses,
Speaker 1: so I was on an emergency certificate, it was called,
Speaker 1: and I went back to graduate school and took a
Speaker 1: couple of courses in education and said, I didn't think
Speaker 1: this is going to work out for me, and the
Speaker 1: principal didn't invite me back for the next school year.
Speaker 1: And the principal didn't invite me back for the next
Speaker 1: school year. I actually didn't have the education courses, so
Speaker 1: I was on an emergency certificate. I didn't think this
Speaker 1: is going to work out for me. Elizabeth Warren fired
Speaker 1: for being pregnant doesn't sound like that was the case.
Speaker 1: You heard her in her own words. What is she
Speaker 1: going to do? Her husband told her stay home, and
Speaker 1: then she says she didn't have the courses, she had
Speaker 1: to go back to school. She has a history in
Speaker 1: a long time relationship with exaggerating the truth. But somehow
Speaker 1: she's still up there. And we look back at those
Speaker 1: poles we talked about earlier, and I look at those
Speaker 1: Real Clear politics and we see Elizabeth Warren in the
Speaker 1: top four in Iowa, in the top four in New Hampshire,
Speaker 1: in the top four in the betting odds, in the
Speaker 1: top four in the Real Clear Politics average of all poles.
Speaker 1: It's unreal the hypocrisy on the left, because again, if
Speaker 1: this were someone on the right doing the same thing,
Speaker 1: if this were Ivanka Trump saying she got fired from
Speaker 1: somewhere because she had been pregnant. They would destroy her.
Speaker 1: If this were any Republican saying they were Native American
Speaker 1: when they weren't Native American, it would be the end
Speaker 1: of their political careers. But somehow Elizabeth Warren has nine
Speaker 1: lives in the Democratic Party. It's just not right. We're
Speaker 1: gonna be talking about some more hypocrisy when it comes
Speaker 1: to millennials in socialism. After this break, you're in the
Speaker 1: Freedom Life. This is the buck Sexton Show podcast. Hey everyone,
Speaker 1: welcome back as we finish out the second hour of
Speaker 1: The buck Sexton Show. I'm Madison Jessiato here in for
Speaker 1: Buck Sexton in New York City. I want to talk
Speaker 1: about millennials in socialism. I'm a millennial myself, and these
Speaker 1: poles that continue to come out just astound me. Pew
Speaker 1: recently put out a pole where a third of young
Speaker 1: Americans say other countries are better than the United States,
Speaker 1: and nearly half of young Democrats in that same pole
Speaker 1: say that other countries are better than the United States.
Speaker 1: Of course, we need to couple this with the Yugov
Speaker 1: pole we've all heard about previously, where forty four percent
Speaker 1: of people between the ages of sixteen and twenty nine
Speaker 1: say they'd prefer to live in a socialist nation over
Speaker 1: a capitalist country. But of course these people don't even
Speaker 1: know what socialism is. In the Ugov Pole, only thirty
Speaker 1: three percent of respondents we're able to accurately define socialism.
Speaker 1: Here in the United States, seventy percent a millennials say
Speaker 1: they'd vote for a socialist candidate. The reality is this
Speaker 1: socialism leads to destitution, it leads to misery. Socialism has
Speaker 1: killed millions and millions of people worldwide. Yet you have
Speaker 1: people like Bernie Sanders out there, and of course, as
Speaker 1: you know, he's surging. As we talked about before, we
Speaker 1: see those poll numbers. His policies are completely socialist, similar
Speaker 1: to what we see in some of these failed countries.
Speaker 1: They would never work. She tries to point to countries
Speaker 1: like Norway, saying, oh, but look, socialism does work completely
Speaker 1: of course, annoying the failures of countries like Albania, Algeria, Angola, Burma,
Speaker 1: the Congo, Cuba, Ethiopia, Laos, Somalia, Vietnam, Yemen, Venezuela. I mean,
Speaker 1: Bernie Sanders and all millennials have seen the effects of
Speaker 1: socialism on Venezuela. We've seen the people who have been
Speaker 1: devastated by socialism in Venezuela with our own eyes with
Speaker 1: news coverage just over the past year. Socialism is not
Speaker 1: the future of this country. We've heard our presidents say
Speaker 1: many times that we will never be a socialist country.
Speaker 1: And while of course this remains true, I don't believe
Speaker 1: wherever going to become a socialist country. It doesn't change
Speaker 1: the fact that we're seeing many millennials supporting or saying
Speaker 1: that they support socialism again, seventy percent of millennials saying
Speaker 1: they'd vote for a socialist candidate in a pull from October.
Speaker 1: Why are we seeing this well, I think there's many reasons.
Speaker 1: One of those reasons being misinformation fake news. We see
Speaker 1: the rapid spread of misinformation on social media on the Internet,
Speaker 1: of course, with many millennials going to places like Facebook
Speaker 1: and Twitter as their first source of news, having no
Speaker 1: idea where this is coming from, much of it being
Speaker 1: completely false. We've seen the studies done where fake informations
Speaker 1: put out there, and even after corrected, if it comes
Speaker 1: from a regular news source, most people don't ever see
Speaker 1: the corrections. I mean, we even see that with some
Speaker 1: of the more famous rape cases where people were falsely
Speaker 1: accused of rape, the alleged victims are proven to be liars.
Speaker 1: That comes out that these guys never raped anybody, but
Speaker 1: still to this day their lives are devastated from these allegations.
Speaker 1: So the fake news is rampant. And we see this
Speaker 1: with socialism, and we see a lot of young people
Speaker 1: talking about Bernie supporters specifically talking about socialism on Twitter,
Speaker 1: attacking those who don't believe in socialism. It's very cult
Speaker 1: like when you see some of the supporters views on this.
Speaker 1: But it's not just that. We have to take a
Speaker 1: look at our schools, high schools, college campuses and liberal indoctrination.
Speaker 1: No Bucks talked about this, We've all talked about this
Speaker 1: for many years now. In the liberal indoctrination that we're seeing.
Speaker 1: I think we're finally starting to see the effects of
Speaker 1: that and the views of these millennials, because the reality
Speaker 1: is they're not getting an accurate lesson on history, not
Speaker 1: only on the history of our nation, but on the
Speaker 1: history of the world. They don't understand the dangers of
Speaker 1: socialism or communism the way that our parents and grandparents
Speaker 1: understood these dangers. They believe the misinformation. They're not receiving
Speaker 1: any real information in their schooling and as a result,
Speaker 1: look at the poll numbers, look at what we're seeing.
Speaker 1: Of course, some people talk about the economic crisis of
Speaker 1: two thousand and eight, two thousand and nine that may
Speaker 1: have an impact on people wanting young people, I guess,
Speaker 1: wanting to shift away from capitalism. I don't believe that.
Speaker 1: I don't buy that. I think it's a complete lack
Speaker 1: of understanding, a complete unwillingness to understand the real facts.
Speaker 1: And then when you have them pushing socialism, and when
Speaker 1: asked about it, of course they don't even know how
Speaker 1: you could pay for it. Take a listen to this clip.
Speaker 1: I feel like everyone should have like free education and healthcare.
Speaker 1: How are we going to pay for those? Oh? God,
Speaker 1: I mean us that gas. Who in your mind should
Speaker 1: pay for all of the free things? All of the
Speaker 1: free things? Well, some of it should come from taxes,
Speaker 1: but the government should pay for it. But the government
Speaker 1: is funny by taxes. Yeah, I don't know where the
Speaker 1: money would come from, but they can figure it out. Okay.
Speaker 1: The people with a good idea and a good reason
Speaker 1: to spend their tax money. Wouldn't mind actually paying more taxes.
Speaker 1: They don't know where the money's going to come from,
Speaker 1: because guess what, there's not enough money to pay for
Speaker 1: all of the policies that people like Bernie Sanders are
Speaker 1: putting forward. Bernie Sanders being slammed by his own party
Speaker 1: and some of the mainstream media over this over the
Speaker 1: past few months. We saw it an ACBS interview. Even
Speaker 1: one of his socialist proposals, like Medicare for all, estimated
Speaker 1: to cost over thirty two trillion dollars. Even with an
Speaker 1: extreme tax on the wealth that the Democrats have talked about,
Speaker 1: you wouldn't even be able to pay for a portion
Speaker 1: of one of these plans, let alone all of them,
Speaker 1: which some experts estimate would cost over a hundred trillion dollars.
Speaker 1: They're unaffordable, they wouldn't work. They've never worked in other countries.
Speaker 1: They're certainly not going to work here. And I can
Speaker 1: tell you right now, as much as we have a
Speaker 1: lot of millennials and a lot of people might just
Speaker 1: disappointing as it is, that are very misinformed and belate
Speaker 1: and believe this to a certain extent, this isn't going
Speaker 1: to be the future of our country, and we have
Speaker 1: to do more now to prevent future generations from falling
Speaker 1: into the same traps that some of these millennials have
Speaker 1: fallen into. It's more frustrating than anything. We have to
Speaker 1: put a stop to this. And we're going to be
Speaker 1: back after this break with more on The Buck Sexton Show.
Speaker 1: We're going to be talking about the coronavirus. Stay tuned.
Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to The bus Sex and Show podcasts.
Speaker 1: Remember to subscribe on Apple podcast, the iHeartRadio app for
Speaker 1: wherever you get your podcasts. Hey everyone, and welcome back
Speaker 1: to The Buck Sexton Show. We're an hour three and
Speaker 1: we have a lot to cover this hour, but I
Speaker 1: want to get started talking about the coronavirus. And we're
Speaker 1: really lucky to have a great guest on to share
Speaker 1: some very valuable insight with you. I have doctor Ray
Speaker 1: Kashari on the phone right now, Doctor Shari, internal medicine, physician, pulmonologists,
Speaker 1: intensive care specials. Thank you so much for joining us.
Speaker 1: Well the beat Her Madison. You know, so people across
Speaker 1: the country and across the world are very concerned about
Speaker 1: the coronavirus. First of all, can you kind of fill
Speaker 1: people in what exactly is the coronavirus? Where to get
Speaker 1: its name? What is it? What should people be worried about?
Speaker 1: So this is a group of viruses that include the
Speaker 1: SARS virus and the mers virus. Both of those viruses
Speaker 1: occurred in the past, and they tend to affect people
Speaker 1: a lot like the common cold. The virus gets its
Speaker 1: name from the way it looks. It looks like a crown,
Speaker 1: So that's where the coronavirus comes from. It has absolutely
Speaker 1: nothing to do with alcohol or beer or Mexico. So
Speaker 1: so let's get that on the table right away. That
Speaker 1: has nothing to do with that. Okay, So is this
Speaker 1: cause for alarm? Should people be as concerned as there
Speaker 1: or should they be more? We're concerned than what we're
Speaker 1: seeing right now. I think that actually there's been some
Speaker 1: sensationalism regarding the risk to people in the United States.
Speaker 1: The virus is new. It's called a novel virus because
Speaker 1: it doesn't it hasn't existed before this time. Therefore, nobody
Speaker 1: in the world has immunity to this virus. So that's
Speaker 1: what gives people cause for alarm because they are concerned
Speaker 1: that they don't have immunity In addition, there's no vaccine
Speaker 1: for the virus, again because it's a new virus, and
Speaker 1: there is no treatment for the virus, so that all
Speaker 1: creates cause for alarm. However, and let's put the virus
Speaker 1: in perspective. In the United States this year, there have
Speaker 1: been fifteen million people affected with influenza virus. There have
Speaker 1: been unfortunately, eight thousand deaths due to influenza virus. The
Speaker 1: coronavirus has resulted in seven cases in the United States.
Speaker 1: All of those cases have been due to travel. There's
Speaker 1: been no human to human transmission into United States. There's
Speaker 1: been no deaths in the United States. There has been
Speaker 1: seven thousand infections worldwide and one hundred and seventy deaths worldwide,
Speaker 1: all of those in China. So the death rate is
Speaker 1: not as high as it is with the stars virus.
Speaker 1: So yes, you have to be concerned, but certainly put
Speaker 1: it in perspective. And this is not the apocalyptic event
Speaker 1: that is being talked about on television. Right now. We
Speaker 1: are getting a first report in that it has been
Speaker 1: confirmed that we've had our first human to human transmission
Speaker 1: here in the United States. Is that something people should
Speaker 1: be worried about or do you still think this is
Speaker 1: an oversensationalized concern that people have right now, Well, human
Speaker 1: to human transmission is obviously the pivotal thing to be
Speaker 1: concerned about, because that is that implies the virus has
Speaker 1: mutated to that point, and it also implies that the
Speaker 1: virus has a high degree of contagiousness. So that's obviously
Speaker 1: a concern. And the reports out of China that medical
Speaker 1: the medical personnel are getting the virus, that is also
Speaker 1: a concern. And the reason that's a concern is that
Speaker 1: medical personnel in general are very careful in terms of
Speaker 1: their technique. So when it's spread like that to medical personnel,
Speaker 1: it implies a higher degree of contagiousness than, for example,
Speaker 1: the common cold or something like that. Right, And when
Speaker 1: we mentioned China, and we've seen that they've closed down
Speaker 1: an entire city and one of the largest quarantines we've
Speaker 1: ever seen. They have a news block out there. Obviously
Speaker 1: the news is evolving daily on this. But do you
Speaker 1: think China is being one hundred percent honest about the
Speaker 1: number of cases they've seen or do you think there's
Speaker 1: a chance we'll find out that they're not giving us
Speaker 1: accurate information Here in the United states, Well, they did
Speaker 1: not give us accurate information with the Stars virus, and
Speaker 1: that was a problem. But we think that they've kind
Speaker 1: of learned from that and that they're they're being more
Speaker 1: accurate with this. Now. There are reports that they delayed
Speaker 1: acting on this, and those delays may have been related
Speaker 1: to the kind of way medicine is practiced in China.
Speaker 1: I guess one of the health officials said that he
Speaker 1: had to get permission from the central authority to actually,
Speaker 1: you know, put into place some of the quarantine and
Speaker 1: to tell the world about it. You know, I'm not
Speaker 1: in a position to comment on that. Obviously, we are
Speaker 1: depending on China to give us an idea about the
Speaker 1: incubation period, which is very important, and to give us
Speaker 1: an idea of the death rates from soa on. When
Speaker 1: you mentioned Stars back in two thousand and three, and
Speaker 1: I think it's very interesting when we look at then
Speaker 1: versus now, when we look at the Chinese economy. Back
Speaker 1: then was a one point five trillion dollar economy with
Speaker 1: four percent of the global GDP. Right now, China is
Speaker 1: a fourteen point three trillion dollar economy with sixteen percent
Speaker 1: of the global GDP and a big change in China
Speaker 1: is the fact that sixty percent of people back then
Speaker 1: lived in rural areas in China. Now we're seeing a
Speaker 1: sixty percent urban Chinese population. They're very integrated, obviously as
Speaker 1: a country in the global process, a big point of
Speaker 1: demand for global companies, so we can see this effect
Speaker 1: the economy. They're more densely packed, and they travel a
Speaker 1: lot more eighty million passenger journeys by air in two
Speaker 1: thousand and three compared to six hundred and sixty million now.
Speaker 1: And when it comes to air travel, people in the
Speaker 1: United States and across the world are very concerned about
Speaker 1: potentially contracting the coronavirus. What specifically when it comes to
Speaker 1: air travel plants should people be aware of or do
Speaker 1: to protect themselves. Well, of course, first I would not
Speaker 1: go to China right now. I don't think that makes
Speaker 1: any kind of sense. When you get on an airplane,
Speaker 1: you don't know what biomass has been on that plane
Speaker 1: before you get on it. And years ago the plane
Speaker 1: used to sit idle for two to three hours before
Speaker 1: they reloaded them. Now they turn the plane over in
Speaker 1: fifteen minutes, So that means that the viruses, the bacteria,
Speaker 1: anything that has been on that plane is going to
Speaker 1: still be viable. And that what that means is when
Speaker 1: you get on the plane, if you touch something, the
Speaker 1: virus is now on your hands. If your hands then
Speaker 1: touch your eyes, your nose, or your mouth, you have
Speaker 1: a chance of contracting that virus. So if anybody does
Speaker 1: plane travel right now, what you want to do is
Speaker 1: get on the plane, clean the area that around you,
Speaker 1: clean everything you're going to touch, and clean your own hands,
Speaker 1: and then keep your hands away from your face. That's
Speaker 1: the best thing you can do right now. The other
Speaker 1: thing you can do is where cotton gloves and cotton
Speaker 1: gloves do a couple things. One, they don't tend to
Speaker 1: pick the viruses up from what you touch as much.
Speaker 1: And they also kind of prevent you from touching your
Speaker 1: face because you're aware that you have something on your hands,
Speaker 1: so you're less likely to touch your face, all right,
Speaker 1: that's the kind of the way it works, right And
Speaker 1: outside of plane travel, is there anything else people can
Speaker 1: be doing to prevent the spread of the virus? Now?
Speaker 1: Like I said, as we have reports coming in now
Speaker 1: that we've seen that very first human to human contact
Speaker 1: transmission of the virus, what can people be aware of
Speaker 1: not even just here, but you know, all around the
Speaker 1: world if they're traveling, even to other countries where someone
Speaker 1: may have come from China and you could be infected
Speaker 1: or not even know yet when we talk about not
Speaker 1: knowing the exact incubation period on this new virus, well,
Speaker 1: I think around the world people are screening everybody coming
Speaker 1: from China, so that's a good thing. And the other thing,
Speaker 1: of course is if you're an environment where there's somebody coughing, sneezing,
Speaker 1: try to avoid the droplets and then practice the hand
Speaker 1: hygiene I already talked about. I think the World Health
Speaker 1: Organization is pretty much on top of this. The one
Speaker 1: thing they're trying to do, and the CDC is trying
Speaker 1: to do this too, is get a faster identification test.
Speaker 1: Because right now, if you suspect coronavirus, you have to
Speaker 1: take a sample and then nail it to the CDC.
Speaker 1: The CDC gets a report and gets back to you.
Speaker 1: Well that's like a two day process. So they're trying
Speaker 1: to get a more rapid test which will help tremendously. Okay, now,
Speaker 1: when it comes to population specifically outside of obviously people,
Speaker 1: their populations that are at the most risk right now. Well,
Speaker 1: always with viral infections, it's the old, to the young,
Speaker 1: and the infirmed. So people who are old over sixty
Speaker 1: five to seventy, and people who are young less than
Speaker 1: one year, and people who have illnesses for other reasons,
Speaker 1: certainly cancer, chemotherapy patients or patients who are on any
Speaker 1: kind of immune suppressants are the most likely to be
Speaker 1: affected seriously. Okay, And when it comes to the vaccine
Speaker 1: that you mentioned earlier, obviously we don't have one yet,
Speaker 1: but I understand there's human trials starting. How long can
Speaker 1: people expect until they may be able to go and
Speaker 1: get a vaccine for the coronavirus. Well, normally vaccines take
Speaker 1: bunths to years to develop. Now they're trying to develop
Speaker 1: a rapid vaccine, and there is some technology that may
Speaker 1: indicate that this can be done, but at the moment
Speaker 1: we don't know if that technology will work. And gen
Speaker 1: when you get a brand new vaccine, you test it
Speaker 1: to find out are there side effects and is the
Speaker 1: vaccine effective? Well, there won't be time for that, so
Speaker 1: this is all very new ground. They're trying to develop
Speaker 1: a vaccine within three to six months, and then they
Speaker 1: have to they have to do some kind of testing
Speaker 1: to make sure that it's at least safe. So I
Speaker 1: don't think the vaccine is going to work. It's going
Speaker 1: to get us out of this. It may get us
Speaker 1: out of the next one, but it's probably not going
Speaker 1: to get us out of this one. And until we
Speaker 1: have a vaccine, if young, healthy people are to get this,
Speaker 1: can they fight it. Oh? Absolutely yeah. Most of the
Speaker 1: people who get this particular coronavirus have a very mild illness.
Speaker 1: I mean, over eighty percent have an illness equivalent to
Speaker 1: like the common cold. There's only less than five percent
Speaker 1: that actually die, and the remaining fifteen percent have a
Speaker 1: kind of a serious illness that doesn't result in any permanence. Equally,
Speaker 1: so the overwhelming majority of the people who get the
Speaker 1: virus are recovering. That's definitely good news to hear. We're
Speaker 1: going to be keeping a close eye on this, and
Speaker 1: we appreciate you for coming on, doctor Kashari. All right, Madison,
Speaker 1: thank you, thank you, and we'll be back shortly on
Speaker 1: the buck Sexton Show. You're in the Freedom Hunt. This
Speaker 1: is the buck Sexton Show podcast. Welcome back to the
Speaker 1: buck Sexton Show. Here in the Freedom Hunt, Madison Jusiato,
Speaker 1: I'm filling in today for Buck Sexton. USMCA signed seal
Speaker 1: delivered finally free, fair, reciprocal trade. That's what President Trump
Speaker 1: has been pushing for since day one, and of course
Speaker 1: wanting to put America first instead of letting us continue
Speaker 1: to be taken advantage of by other countries, which is
Speaker 1: what we saw happen under both Republican and Democratic administrations past.
Speaker 1: The President treated out, tweeted out. For the first time
Speaker 1: in American history, We've replaced a disastrous trade deal that
Speaker 1: rewarded outsourcing with a truly fair and reciprocal trade deal
Speaker 1: that will keep jobs, wealth and growth right here in America.
Speaker 1: After being on the table for almost a year, President
Speaker 1: Trump signed to the bipartisan agreement, of course, only having
Speaker 1: to wait the year because of the Democrats like Nancy
Speaker 1: Pelosi who held out on the trade deal, refusing to
Speaker 1: bring it to a vote. And of course who did
Speaker 1: she hurt. The American farmers, the American ranchers, the American workers.
Speaker 1: That's who paid for this. That's who she did this
Speaker 1: at the expense of She didn't care. And of course
Speaker 1: Nancy now wants to take credit, but it only took
Speaker 1: her twenty seconds of talking about this to start insulting
Speaker 1: the president. Take a listen to clip six. I want
Speaker 1: to say that the bill what the President will be
Speaker 1: signing is quite different from what the President has sent us,
Speaker 1: and because it's a work of the House Democrats under
Speaker 1: the leadership of Ritchie Neal with his task force and
Speaker 1: made tremendous differences and what was proposed originally. And the
Speaker 1: President will be signing today. I hope he understands what
Speaker 1: he's signing today. She hopes he understands what he's signing today. Sure,
Speaker 1: he understands it. He's the one that got it done.
Speaker 1: He's the one that made the deal. President Trump, before
Speaker 1: he's a president, when he was just Donald J. Trump
Speaker 1: here in New York City, was known all across the
Speaker 1: world for being the best deal maker. He made deals
Speaker 1: in business, which is part of why some people voted
Speaker 1: for him and felt he was such a valuable asset
Speaker 1: to our government, to our nation as a leader as
Speaker 1: somebody who could make deal. We saw Clinton, even George W.
Speaker 1: Bush in a lot of instances an Obama who promised
Speaker 1: to make all the deals in the world but never
Speaker 1: made the deals. Thanks to President Trump, We're getting stricter
Speaker 1: on trade deals. American farmers are no longer going to
Speaker 1: have to be taken. Advantage of this trade deal, the
Speaker 1: USMCA is expected to add sixty eight billion dollars into
Speaker 1: the United States economy and to add approximately one hundred
Speaker 1: and seventy six thousand jobs. And so, while Nancy Pelosi
Speaker 1: and the Democrats wanted to play political games, Prisider Trump
Speaker 1: worked hard and he wanted to ensure that we'd have
Speaker 1: the best policy, the best deal for the American people.
Speaker 1: And here's what he had to say. After NAFTA's adoption
Speaker 1: more than twenty five years ago, the United States lost
Speaker 1: nearly one fourth of all of its manufacturing jobs, including
Speaker 1: more than one in five vehicle manufacturing jobs. Think of
Speaker 1: that one in five jobs lost so needlessly. Thousands of
Speaker 1: factories were shuttered, millions of manufacturing jobs who were destroyed,
Speaker 1: and entire communities were devastated, from Ohio to Pennsylvania, Michigan
Speaker 1: to Maine, and California to North Carolina devastated. Two decades
Speaker 1: of politicians ran for office vowing to replace the NAFTA.
Speaker 1: And this was a catastrophe, the NAFTA catastrophe. Yet once elected,
Speaker 1: they never even tried, They never even gave it a shot.
Speaker 1: They sold out. But I'm not like those other politicians,
Speaker 1: I guess in many ways, I keep my promises, and
Speaker 1: I'm fighting for the American worker. And we're all fighting
Speaker 1: for the American worker. Everybody here is fighting for the
Speaker 1: American worker. And of course USMCA is just one example
Speaker 1: of his fight for the American worker. Of course, it's
Speaker 1: a big improvement over the outdated NAFTA. Our trade relationship
Speaker 1: with Canada and Mexico is now going to be taken
Speaker 1: to the twenty first century. It's going to expand market
Speaker 1: access and remove unfair trade barriers for our farmers. And
Speaker 1: what I think is really great is this isn't end.
Speaker 1: It just doesn't end with Canada and Mexico. But earlier
Speaker 1: this month, President Trump signed the monumental Phase one China
Speaker 1: trade Deal, and since October, President Trump has signed deals
Speaker 1: with our four largest trading partners, of course, China, Japan, Mexico,
Speaker 1: and Canada. This is something that just hasn't been done.
Speaker 1: But I think the best part, in the funniest part
Speaker 1: about this is that he snubbed the Democrats at the
Speaker 1: signing of USMCA because of course, like I said, they
Speaker 1: delayed USMCA and then they wanted to take credit for
Speaker 1: it when originally they had no interest in pushing it
Speaker 1: through or calling it to a vote at all. So
Speaker 1: we had Democrats coming out on Wednesday slamming the President
Speaker 1: from him not having them at the signing ceremony. We
Speaker 1: had a Richard Neil from Massa choose to say, perhaps
Speaker 1: we were not invited to today's event on the South
Speaker 1: Lawn because our presence would be a prominent reminder of
Speaker 1: our critical leadership in achieving this deal. I don't know
Speaker 1: what planet these democrats are living on. There was no
Speaker 1: critical leadership on behalf of Nancy Pelosi or Richard Neil
Speaker 1: on USMCA. The critical leadership came from President Trump fighting
Speaker 1: for the American farmer, fighting for the American worker, and
Speaker 1: refusing to stop until he made a deal, a deal
Speaker 1: that produced free, fair, reciprocal trade and a better result
Speaker 1: for the American people. We're gonna be back on the
Speaker 1: Buck Sexton Show with Moore after this. Thanks for listening
Speaker 1: to the bus Sex and Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe
Speaker 1: on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get
Speaker 1: your podcasts. Hey everyone, welcome back to the Buck Sexton Show.
Speaker 1: I'm Madison Jessiato in for Buck Sexton. Back in twenty
Speaker 1: fifteen and twenty sixteen, something that I really really looked
Speaker 1: at as a supporter of President Trump was the courts.
Speaker 1: And I looked at the state of where we were
Speaker 1: at and where we could potentially go, and we look
Speaker 1: at many people who support the right to life and
Speaker 1: are avid supporters of the pro life movement, and the
Speaker 1: potential of overturning Rov Wade, which at one point seemed
Speaker 1: like it would be impossible. With the makeup of the Court,
Speaker 1: that might not be as far from reality as it
Speaker 1: once was. And that, of course was due to President
Speaker 1: Trump's commitment to putting originalist justices and judges on the bench.
Speaker 1: These are justices and judges. Of course, we have two
Speaker 1: amazing Supreme Court justices put in put in by President Trump,
Speaker 1: Justice Neil Gorsich and Justice Brett Kavanaugh, who, as you know,
Speaker 1: was just treated horrifically throughout his confirmation process. But regardless,
Speaker 1: we have two incredible justices now on the bench. And
Speaker 1: these justices are originalists. They look to the text of
Speaker 1: the Constitution and to what the founders put in the
Speaker 1: Constitution to make their decisions. It might seem like common
Speaker 1: sense to you and I, but to some people it's
Speaker 1: just totally crazy because guess what, some people support liberal
Speaker 1: activists judges. These liberal activists judges are more dangerous than
Speaker 1: you can even imagine. These liberal activist judges put in
Speaker 1: reading between the lines whatever they want, so they come
Speaker 1: to the conclusion of what they want to see the
Speaker 1: result be, and then they find a way to get
Speaker 1: there instead of looking to the Constitution to determine what
Speaker 1: the answer should be. So, when it comes to the
Speaker 1: lasting legacy of President Trump, I really believe it's going
Speaker 1: to lie in his court nominations, in the judges that
Speaker 1: he put on the district courts, in the circuit courts,
Speaker 1: in these Supreme Court justices. Yes he has two already,
Speaker 1: but there's a chance we could see one or two
Speaker 1: more if he's elected. So we look forward to November
Speaker 1: twenty twenty, and this is going to be a more
Speaker 1: critical time, I think than ever before, because he continues
Speaker 1: to reshape the federal judiciary, and he's doing it at
Speaker 1: a record pace, which is something I don't think many
Speaker 1: people expected. You know, there were people that doubted whether
Speaker 1: he would do it at all, let alone do it
Speaker 1: at a record pace. He promised to appoint judges that
Speaker 1: would uphold the Constitution and the role of law, and
Speaker 1: that's exactly what he did. So the Senate's confirmed twelve
Speaker 1: more of his judicial nominees. As I said, he's continuing
Speaker 1: to reshape that judiciary, which is critically important to us
Speaker 1: when it comes to the protection of the First Amendment,
Speaker 1: the Second Amendment, the lies of the unborn, all of
Speaker 1: the things that we as conservatives and as patriotic Americans
Speaker 1: really care about. He's installed more Federal Court judges than
Speaker 1: any president in the past four decades forty years, we
Speaker 1: haven't seen a president put more judges on the bench.
Speaker 1: He's nominated and the Senate's confirmed a grand total of
Speaker 1: a hundred and seventy four Article three judges. Of course,
Speaker 1: you already know about those two Supreme Court justices, but
Speaker 1: on top of that, we have fifty Circuit Court judges
Speaker 1: and one hundred and thirty three District Court judges. This
Speaker 1: is truly incredible, and two Court of International Trade judges.
Speaker 1: He's really made a substantial impact already. So what we
Speaker 1: have to think is what impact could he make with
Speaker 1: four more years. Relacting him could mean we see Rovie
Speaker 1: Wade overturned. It could mean that our rights will be
Speaker 1: protected for our children, our children's children, and for so
Speaker 1: much longer after that. Something we have to keep in mind.
Speaker 1: And we're gonna be right back on the Buck Sexton Show.
Speaker 1: You're in the Freedom of Mind. This is the buck
Speaker 1: Sexton Show podcast. Hey, everybody, welcome back to the Buck
Speaker 1: Sexton Show. I'm Madison Jesseato here in New York City
Speaker 1: in the Freedom Hut filling in for Buck Sexton. Listen
Speaker 1: to this a new gallop pull out saying race relations
Speaker 1: see a double digit improvement since Trump entered the White House,
Speaker 1: and I want to bring in my guest on this one.
Speaker 1: I have Bruce Lavell here with me, executive director for
Speaker 1: the National Diversity Coalition for Trump and someone who's known
Speaker 1: Trump for a very long time. Bruce, Thanks for coming on, Hey,
Speaker 1: thanks for having appreciate it. Of course we're happy to
Speaker 1: have you. So you've seen this new gallop pull out
Speaker 1: and it indicates the satisfaction with race relations and the
Speaker 1: position of minorities in America have significantly increased since President
Speaker 1: Trump took office. You know, they deliver a significant blow
Speaker 1: to this media fiction that President Trump is a racist.
Speaker 1: And you and I have heard this on the campaign
Speaker 1: trail for many years. You know, first touch a little
Speaker 1: bit on your experience personally with the president as a
Speaker 1: person of calling, what you're experience has been like, and
Speaker 1: then we're going to get into this poll. Yeah, well, yeah,
Speaker 1: thanks for having me. You know, medicine is interesting because
Speaker 1: I feel like I'm like an expert on the subject,
Speaker 1: is I You know, I, of course I'm like yourself.
Speaker 1: I've did a little over four hundred shows, and probably
Speaker 1: two thirds of those shows from CNN, MSBCN or related
Speaker 1: to something race. So when I say expert, I think
Speaker 1: I am in that category. But you know, interesting, I
Speaker 1: recall back in twenty fifteen on the twenty sixth floor,
Speaker 1: back in August, and I remember we were sitting at
Speaker 1: a round table about five one hundred plus folks that
Speaker 1: we're attending. Ninety percent plus African American were attending, mainly pastors.
Speaker 1: Pastor Darryl was there, my big brother from another mother,
Speaker 1: love them to death. Is that I recall the presidents saying, well,
Speaker 1: at that time, Ken Trump saying he says, you know,
Speaker 1: the disconnect, especially in the black community, is the opportunity
Speaker 1: and hope and jobs. And he says, when I get
Speaker 1: become president, I'm gonna I'm gonna be a champion in
Speaker 1: terms of getting that unemployment down and watch this mess.
Speaker 1: And he said the other thing too, is restoring black
Speaker 1: wealth and generational wealth in these black communities, otherwise building
Speaker 1: small business. So like some of the other other colleagues
Speaker 1: who have generational wealth through the business team out of
Speaker 1: his mouth Madison in twenty fifteen. And so in terms
Speaker 1: of you know, like yourself, you know the president very well,
Speaker 1: I know him very well, and uh, you know, I
Speaker 1: was totally just, you know, just really upset the fact
Speaker 1: that the mainstream media and all the folks are trying
Speaker 1: to paint a narrative as him being a racist when
Speaker 1: he's not. So how does a man say forty plus
Speaker 1: years in the limelight for many years, Oprah actually telling
Speaker 1: him in nineteen eighty nine you should run for president
Speaker 1: on her show, viral on Twitter and giving Jesse Jackson,
Speaker 1: you know, rental space for his forty Wall Street. In
Speaker 1: terms of the Rainbow Wish Coalition helping you know, al
Speaker 1: Sharpton with some of his initiatives in New York. You know,
Speaker 1: the list goes on and on and on. Friends with
Speaker 1: herschel Walker, get friend of mine here in Atlanta. It's
Speaker 1: a narrative change for the media. Bruce did it not
Speaker 1: because of the fact that he was running for president,
Speaker 1: because of the fact that he was running for president.
Speaker 1: As a publican. You have always said, it's interesting, Madison,
Speaker 1: one of the biggest voter suppressions out there in the
Speaker 1: land is to intimidate and persecute a person of color
Speaker 1: if they think anything outside of the Democrat Party. And
Speaker 1: it's a tool that's been used for many, many generations.
Speaker 1: Because you know, I'm a lifetime Republican. I'm a Reagan Republican.
Speaker 1: You know, my first job in the campaign and high
Speaker 1: school was stuffing envelopes or rolla Reagan. So that's all
Speaker 1: I've ever known, and my dad and my granddad and so.
Speaker 1: But I recall as growing through the George H. Administration,
Speaker 1: the Reagan administration, when Bob Dole was on the ticket.
Speaker 1: Of course when Clinton beat us, you know, it was
Speaker 1: always a constant persecution, intimidation, name calling if anyone of
Speaker 1: color even thought about the Conservative movement or the GOLP.
Speaker 1: So it's nothing new in that regards, but for some
Speaker 1: reason it was extremely harsh. You know, in twenty sixteen,
Speaker 1: it was like, oh, my lord, where is this coming from?
Speaker 1: Is because they saw there was an opportunity that when
Speaker 1: the president says, what the heck do you have to lose?
Speaker 1: You know, it was very profound and you bring up
Speaker 1: a great point there, because he's right, what not only
Speaker 1: for minorities, but what did we have to lose as
Speaker 1: American people? After eight years of economic disparity the way
Speaker 1: I would describe it under President Obama. And when we
Speaker 1: look at the survey from Gallup, they demonstrate numerous categories
Speaker 1: in which the president has improved the lives of people
Speaker 1: in minorities status, you know, compared to Barack Obama, you
Speaker 1: know when he took off in twenty seventeen. Here's all
Speaker 1: the way that life has gotten better, and of course
Speaker 1: some of those being economic related, and we know the
Speaker 1: economy has been strong. How how do you think this
Speaker 1: has played an effect on the president's support um and
Speaker 1: race relations when it comes to the rising, booming economy. Well,
Speaker 1: you know, black folk are waking up in the morning Madison,
Speaker 1: and there's there's like, you know what, I got a job.
Speaker 1: They're starting to see, especially here in Atlanta and parts
Speaker 1: of Charlotte and Tampa, where I'm starting to see black
Speaker 1: business flourish, you know. And you know it gets down
Speaker 1: to this too. You know, when people are gainfully employed
Speaker 1: and they're taking care of their families and they're able
Speaker 1: to support their families, they're off food stamps. Yeah, essentially. Yeah.
Speaker 1: And you know the thing is is that one thing
Speaker 1: I love about this president that people were given credit
Speaker 1: for when he first came out and he was campaigning,
Speaker 1: he talked about how vital and important the faith based
Speaker 1: community is and he knew that's why he met so
Speaker 1: many pastors from different congregations, methods, Episcopals, you know, Catholics, Evangelicals,
Speaker 1: and now I was there during the campaign just as
Speaker 1: well as you are. He knew that that was essentially
Speaker 1: the nucleus of success of the community, not government, that right,
Speaker 1: and we saw him, as I mentioned earlier in the show,
Speaker 1: as the first president, Republican or Democrat to ever attend
Speaker 1: March for Life and support the lives of Ord Warren, which,
Speaker 1: as you know, we as Christians, you know, support here
Speaker 1: to me because I'm you know, I'm a I was
Speaker 1: rescued from an orphanage. I think I sent you that
Speaker 1: artistle I went viral about when the president just says,
Speaker 1: you know, adoption, adoption, adoption. You know, I was in
Speaker 1: an orphanage and I was rescued. So you know, in
Speaker 1: terms of I tell people when something is a core
Speaker 1: issue in you and you're hired to be, well you're
Speaker 1: elected president or senator, or you've become a CEO of
Speaker 1: a Fortune five hundred company, that core value stays with you.
Speaker 1: And the great thing about President Trump is the consistency
Speaker 1: of saying, you know, this is how I am, and
Speaker 1: when I become president, this is how I am. There
Speaker 1: was no wavering, there's no changes, and he mocks and
Speaker 1: makes fun I was like, well, I need to talk
Speaker 1: presidential and all that, and basically is what he says,
Speaker 1: like he is making sure that he keeps the organtic
Speaker 1: and authenticity of who he is. You know, it's kind
Speaker 1: of like, you know, if I'm a Christian, which I am,
Speaker 1: if I get elected something, I'm not going to just like, well,
Speaker 1: now that's an elected I'm not a Christian. No, that's
Speaker 1: your value that comes with you. And I try to
Speaker 1: tell people, I don't understand why you didn't, Marshal, I said,
Speaker 1: because that's a core value. A core value doesn't change.
Speaker 1: It's because you get promoted or you get elected or whatever,
Speaker 1: and you need to understand now now. Unfortunately, Madison, historically
Speaker 1: the American people have been duped on both sides the
Speaker 1: aisle saying, well, now they're elected, I guess they have
Speaker 1: to change this way. And the president SHOs like, no,
Speaker 1: be who you are. And I admire that, respectfully, exactly
Speaker 1: who he is, one hundred percent authentic, and that's I
Speaker 1: think part of why he's been so successful as president
Speaker 1: as a candidate before he was elected. And you know,
Speaker 1: you mentioned something a little bit earlier which I think
Speaker 1: was also reflected in this gallop pole, which we now know,
Speaker 1: of course, have these hard numbers on when when. The narrative,
Speaker 1: of course is that this is not true and that
Speaker 1: you know, minority Americans, black Americans specifically hate the president
Speaker 1: and that their lives aren't better. But the reality is
Speaker 1: lies are better for many people. We talk about people
Speaker 1: feeding their families, we talk about people getting off food samps,
Speaker 1: getting jobs, people who hard working Americans who had been
Speaker 1: searching for jobs Bruce for many years that weren't able
Speaker 1: to get jobs. And so we look at this report
Speaker 1: and Gallup reports an increase in the position of blacks
Speaker 1: and other racial minorities, the distribution of income and wealth
Speaker 1: and the opportunity for a person to get ahead through
Speaker 1: hard work. And isn't that the foundation of what our
Speaker 1: country is built on. That's certainly why my family immigrated
Speaker 1: to the United States. Is that not the case? Yeah, well,
Speaker 1: you know, it's interesting. Let's pivot on this for a second.
Speaker 1: How many presidents in the past had come up and well,
Speaker 1: I don't even know if they even cared or promise anything.
Speaker 1: As it relates to prison reform, right now, there's no secret.
Speaker 1: Unfortunately our great nation has some some some wounds that
Speaker 1: we're trying to heal historically from what we've did, especially
Speaker 1: through segregation and some unjustice. As relates to our prison
Speaker 1: system and our justice system. Do we have a seventy
Speaker 1: two year old New York and white man that becomes
Speaker 1: the largest champion in saying wait a minute, now, there's
Speaker 1: something not right with this. As it relates to the
Speaker 1: Clinton Crimeville in ninety four, which totally disenfranchised after American community.
Speaker 1: Oh absolutely, I mean devastated them. He jumped out there
Speaker 1: and look what happened in the Prison Step one Act.
Speaker 1: And this is something he received so much bipartisan support
Speaker 1: on Bruce and I want to play a clip for
Speaker 1: you from CBS journalist Major Garrett, which I think is
Speaker 1: very interesting and really reflecting on the fact that I
Speaker 1: think even some Democrats, there's some Democrats at all, not
Speaker 1: as many as we like, are starting to recognize what's
Speaker 1: going on. And he got slammed for this. Take a listen.
Speaker 1: This administration, because of President Trump's quiet prodding, has done
Speaker 1: quite a bit for funding of historically black colleges and universities.
Speaker 1: The first setback, which was a massive first step toward
Speaker 1: criminal justice reform just a couple of weeks ago, in
Speaker 1: this newly signed Defense bill, there is a law that
Speaker 1: says if you are seeking work for the federal government
Speaker 1: or any contractor, you don't have to be asked and
Speaker 1: you cannot be asked about your criminal history until right
Speaker 1: toward the end. That's a significant change long sought by
Speaker 1: criminal justice advocates. Plus opportunity zones and the tax bill
Speaker 1: directed at communities of color, that is a legacy on
Speaker 1: the agenda side that almost any president after three years
Speaker 1: would want to claim. I'd like to get you to
Speaker 1: react to that one, Bruce. Yeah, Well, you know it's
Speaker 1: interesting you heard opportunity zones. You heard to step one,
Speaker 1: which you've talked earlier, is that you know, there's really
Speaker 1: no one that's just literally stood up and speak it
Speaker 1: into existence. You know a lot of times, you know,
Speaker 1: the success for all of us in life is when
Speaker 1: our parents or someone speaks something into existence. The president
Speaker 1: speaks to the existence. What do you have to lose.
Speaker 1: Let me tell you what's going on here. Let me
Speaker 1: tell you about how you can take an underserved community
Speaker 1: and build a business in in a forgotten area that's
Speaker 1: been left behind, which is the opportunity zones in terms
Speaker 1: of how you can go open up as we did
Speaker 1: here in Atlanta. A twenty six year old four months ago,
Speaker 1: first black young subway franchise owner under the Trump administration.
Speaker 1: A young African American woman who owns the Slutty Vegan
Speaker 1: that makes the best veggie burghers and French fries on
Speaker 1: this side of the Mason Dixon line has a line
Speaker 1: out the door based on just the Oval Office and
Speaker 1: the administration and all the leadership, and these are just
Speaker 1: and these, Bruce, are just a few of the many
Speaker 1: stories that we hear from all across the country of
Speaker 1: opportunity that's been created by this present for minority communities.
Speaker 1: We're going to have to leave it there, but we
Speaker 1: appreciate you so much for joining, for joining us this evening. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I appreciate it. It's an honor. Thank you so much.
Speaker 1: Thank you so much, Bruce. Well, it's been a great show.
Speaker 1: Thank you guys for inviting me in to your cars,
Speaker 1: to your homes here into the Freedom Hut as I
Speaker 1: fill in for Buck Sexton on the Buck Sexton Show.
Speaker 1: Have a great night.