WEBVTT - Michael Hudson On Why The US Risks Becoming The Next Greece

0:00:10.920 --> 0:00:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of the All Thoughts podcast.

0:00:14.560 --> 0:00:19.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tracy Allaway and I'm Joe, So Joe. I think

0:00:19.560 --> 0:00:22.640
<v Speaker 1>we've spoken about this a lot, but one of the

0:00:22.760 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 1>defining factors of the COVID crisis and its impact on

0:00:27.280 --> 0:00:31.840
<v Speaker 1>the economy has been this this idea that economic time

0:00:31.960 --> 0:00:35.720
<v Speaker 1>has sort of stopped. People weren't going out as much,

0:00:35.760 --> 0:00:39.120
<v Speaker 1>they weren't shopping as much, they weren't eating, but financial

0:00:39.240 --> 0:00:43.240
<v Speaker 1>time kept going. So even though businesses aren't getting revenue

0:00:43.240 --> 0:00:45.639
<v Speaker 1>and income, they still have to pay rent, pay back

0:00:45.680 --> 0:00:48.880
<v Speaker 1>any loans they might have, and pay taxes and things

0:00:48.920 --> 0:00:51.240
<v Speaker 1>like that. I think you actually wrote about this, uh

0:00:51.640 --> 0:00:54.920
<v Speaker 1>when we were just getting started with the coronavirus crisis. Yeah,

0:00:54.960 --> 0:00:57.960
<v Speaker 1>that was kind of like identified as the early theme,

0:00:58.000 --> 0:01:00.440
<v Speaker 1>which is like, Okay, even if we can get through

0:01:00.520 --> 0:01:04.200
<v Speaker 1>this crisis in a expedient manner, which at least in

0:01:04.240 --> 0:01:06.760
<v Speaker 1>the US, we haven't, you still have this issue of

0:01:06.800 --> 0:01:09.600
<v Speaker 1>like bills pile up today or next week or the

0:01:09.640 --> 0:01:13.639
<v Speaker 1>month later, and without revenue, Uh, those bills suddenly become

0:01:13.720 --> 0:01:18.399
<v Speaker 1>defaults and potentially bankruptcies. Right, That's exactly right. So a

0:01:18.400 --> 0:01:21.039
<v Speaker 1>lot of the policy responses we've seen so far have

0:01:21.200 --> 0:01:25.920
<v Speaker 1>been focused on bridging that gap between economic time and

0:01:25.959 --> 0:01:28.120
<v Speaker 1>financial time, if you want to call it that, and

0:01:28.120 --> 0:01:31.480
<v Speaker 1>they've been offering things like tax relief and loan forbearance.

0:01:31.560 --> 0:01:36.920
<v Speaker 1>But the question, of course is eventually, you know, people

0:01:36.959 --> 0:01:38.959
<v Speaker 1>are going to have to pony up the money that

0:01:39.040 --> 0:01:42.960
<v Speaker 1>they owe, and what happens at that point, especially after

0:01:43.120 --> 0:01:47.600
<v Speaker 1>they may have injured months, um, possibly even years of

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:50.800
<v Speaker 1>economic weakness, right, and less revenue than they would otherwise

0:01:50.840 --> 0:01:53.760
<v Speaker 1>have gotten. Yeah, I mean, I think one way to

0:01:54.040 --> 0:01:57.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of like conceptualize the policy responds, at least in

0:01:57.920 --> 0:02:00.280
<v Speaker 1>the US, is that to some extent, you have the

0:02:00.280 --> 0:02:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve having back stopped a fairly significant portion of

0:02:05.120 --> 0:02:08.000
<v Speaker 1>credit market and done a number of things that actually

0:02:08.040 --> 0:02:11.639
<v Speaker 1>caused um, sort of credit issuance to boom even in

0:02:11.680 --> 0:02:13.800
<v Speaker 1>the middle of the crisis, so that companies would have

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:17.200
<v Speaker 1>enough liquidity, and then the other side of the coin,

0:02:17.639 --> 0:02:20.919
<v Speaker 1>so to speak, would be fiscal policy makers and then

0:02:20.919 --> 0:02:24.920
<v Speaker 1>the health policy makers trying to sort of get us

0:02:24.919 --> 0:02:27.560
<v Speaker 1>to that other side so that all these bridge loans

0:02:27.600 --> 0:02:30.360
<v Speaker 1>that have been taken out can actually be paid for

0:02:30.480 --> 0:02:34.080
<v Speaker 1>at the other end. Yeah, that's right, And of course,

0:02:34.360 --> 0:02:37.360
<v Speaker 1>the concern that you hear quite a lot. Is always

0:02:37.360 --> 0:02:43.000
<v Speaker 1>that one man's or one person's repayment is another person's income. Right,

0:02:43.040 --> 0:02:45.880
<v Speaker 1>So if you stop the flow of rent, for instance,

0:02:46.120 --> 0:02:49.000
<v Speaker 1>landlords aren't going to be getting the income that they're

0:02:49.040 --> 0:02:51.120
<v Speaker 1>expecting to get. And I know there's probably not a

0:02:51.120 --> 0:02:54.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of sympathy for landlords at the moment, But the

0:02:54.120 --> 0:02:57.720
<v Speaker 1>concern is that that ends up impacting the banking system,

0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:01.480
<v Speaker 1>ends up impacting the flow of credit, which feeds back

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:05.880
<v Speaker 1>into the economy in a negative way. So today, instead

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:09.680
<v Speaker 1>of talking about debt forbearance, we're going to be focusing

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:12.600
<v Speaker 1>on something slightly different, and that is the notion of

0:03:13.000 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 1>debt forgiveness. So not just telling everyone that they can

0:03:18.000 --> 0:03:21.239
<v Speaker 1>pay their bills or their debts in a few months time,

0:03:21.280 --> 0:03:25.840
<v Speaker 1>but actually writing them off right. That is not something

0:03:25.880 --> 0:03:29.160
<v Speaker 1>that we've ever really done much in this country. There

0:03:29.200 --> 0:03:31.799
<v Speaker 1>was a lot of talk about it um after the

0:03:31.840 --> 0:03:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Great Financial Crisis, after two thousand and nine, there really

0:03:35.320 --> 0:03:38.440
<v Speaker 1>wasn't much you hear about it. With student loans, you

0:03:38.440 --> 0:03:40.680
<v Speaker 1>hear about the idea of like, Okay, this time we

0:03:40.720 --> 0:03:44.280
<v Speaker 1>need a wash. But I would say books sort of

0:03:44.400 --> 0:03:48.520
<v Speaker 1>culturally and politically we're sort of allergic to this idea

0:03:48.560 --> 0:03:52.160
<v Speaker 1>of just sort of writing them off. Yeah, I think

0:03:52.240 --> 0:03:55.880
<v Speaker 1>that's exactly right. Okay, without further ado, we're going to

0:03:55.920 --> 0:03:58.680
<v Speaker 1>get into all of that. We have the perfect guests

0:03:59.040 --> 0:04:02.920
<v Speaker 1>for this particular topic. We have Michael Hudson. He's the

0:04:02.960 --> 0:04:06.480
<v Speaker 1>president of the Institution for the Study of Long Term

0:04:06.520 --> 0:04:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Economic Trends, also a professor of economics at the University

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:14.960
<v Speaker 1>of Missouri, Kansas City. He's also the author of numerous books,

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:19.080
<v Speaker 1>including and Forgive Them Their Debts, which is a sort

0:04:19.080 --> 0:04:23.159
<v Speaker 1>of very long term history and overview of the tension

0:04:23.200 --> 0:04:26.760
<v Speaker 1>between creditors and borrowers, a really good book. So the

0:04:26.800 --> 0:04:29.360
<v Speaker 1>perfect person to give us perspective on what's going on

0:04:29.440 --> 0:04:32.760
<v Speaker 1>right now and how it compares to thousands and thousands

0:04:32.800 --> 0:04:36.840
<v Speaker 1>of years ago. Professor Hudson, thanks so much for joining us. Well,

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:38.839
<v Speaker 1>it's good to be here, Tracy, thanks for having me.

0:04:40.760 --> 0:04:45.760
<v Speaker 1>So maybe just to begin, I mean, where do we begin? Um?

0:04:45.880 --> 0:04:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Can you sort of give us your top level view

0:04:48.800 --> 0:04:53.960
<v Speaker 1>of how you view the coronavirus crisis and the impact

0:04:54.040 --> 0:04:58.120
<v Speaker 1>on the economy in terms of creditors versus borrowers, Like

0:04:58.279 --> 0:05:01.040
<v Speaker 1>where does the power actually you lie at the moment,

0:05:01.480 --> 0:05:05.520
<v Speaker 1>and where's the biggest pain threshold. Well, both of you

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:09.279
<v Speaker 1>who have already in the introduction gone over what the

0:05:09.360 --> 0:05:12.560
<v Speaker 1>problem is. And I think it's much easier to understand

0:05:12.600 --> 0:05:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the logic of debt cancelations right down if you look

0:05:17.560 --> 0:05:21.279
<v Speaker 1>at what happens if you leave business as usual, What

0:05:21.400 --> 0:05:24.880
<v Speaker 1>happens if you leave things the way they are right now? Well,

0:05:25.240 --> 0:05:28.039
<v Speaker 1>I think of restaurants, for instance, restaurants in New York

0:05:28.040 --> 0:05:31.840
<v Speaker 1>City have been closed or operating at a minimal basis

0:05:31.880 --> 0:05:37.880
<v Speaker 1>for six months. They've accrued back rents UH and taxes. UH.

0:05:37.920 --> 0:05:42.080
<v Speaker 1>There's no way that they can reopen and hope to

0:05:42.200 --> 0:05:46.160
<v Speaker 1>earn the six months rent uh in the next two

0:05:46.240 --> 0:05:49.080
<v Speaker 1>or three or maybe four years. UH. And if they

0:05:49.160 --> 0:05:52.120
<v Speaker 1>did have to pay the rents that have accrued when

0:05:52.120 --> 0:05:55.479
<v Speaker 1>there are no revenues at all, then they're going to

0:05:55.520 --> 0:05:59.000
<v Speaker 1>have to go out of business. And there's talk of

0:05:59.000 --> 0:06:02.159
<v Speaker 1>of rest Bronson, New York City going out of business.

0:06:02.240 --> 0:06:05.640
<v Speaker 1>You could say the same for Jim's. You've seen the

0:06:05.839 --> 0:06:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Metropolitan Opera closed down, UH, Carnegie Hall concert stopping. So

0:06:11.600 --> 0:06:16.680
<v Speaker 1>you're having an interruption in economic activity. And the main

0:06:16.720 --> 0:06:20.680
<v Speaker 1>effect of debt people think of debt is transferring interest

0:06:20.760 --> 0:06:23.680
<v Speaker 1>and money to the creditors. But in this case, we're

0:06:23.720 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 1>talking about transferring property to creditors. We're talking about landlords

0:06:29.200 --> 0:06:31.320
<v Speaker 1>or people who have bought a house in a mortgage.

0:06:31.680 --> 0:06:34.280
<v Speaker 1>They've lost their job or they're on a part time basis,

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:37.600
<v Speaker 1>and UH, they're in danger of defaulting on the mortgage.

0:06:37.920 --> 0:06:41.920
<v Speaker 1>And there's a danger of the same kind of decline

0:06:42.440 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 1>in home ownership today that you had after two thousand

0:06:46.440 --> 0:06:49.520
<v Speaker 1>nine when they were the widespread defaults. So the question

0:06:49.640 --> 0:06:53.440
<v Speaker 1>is radical as it seems to write down the debts.

0:06:53.920 --> 0:06:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Is even more radical to say, well, let's transfer property

0:06:58.400 --> 0:07:02.520
<v Speaker 1>at to creditors. Let's close down business family businesses that

0:07:02.560 --> 0:07:05.840
<v Speaker 1>have been there for many decades. Uh, let's not completely

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 1>leave the economy and a closed down position. The reason

0:07:10.160 --> 0:07:14.160
<v Speaker 1>people have canceled debts over the time is to restore

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:18.600
<v Speaker 1>economic normalcy. And this has been going on for over

0:07:18.880 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 1>three thousand years, five thousand years. My book, UH, what

0:07:23.280 --> 0:07:26.640
<v Speaker 1>is much of the UH news right now? Our acts

0:07:26.640 --> 0:07:30.200
<v Speaker 1>of God by insurance companies. So you can look at

0:07:30.200 --> 0:07:32.880
<v Speaker 1>the virus as being a kind of act of God.

0:07:33.240 --> 0:07:36.080
<v Speaker 1>What do you do when something happens from outside the

0:07:36.080 --> 0:07:40.480
<v Speaker 1>economy is not the fault of the income earner? Is

0:07:40.480 --> 0:07:43.120
<v Speaker 1>not the fault of the restaurant, it's not the fault

0:07:43.280 --> 0:07:46.880
<v Speaker 1>of the homeowner who's lost a job. It's just happens

0:07:46.920 --> 0:07:50.680
<v Speaker 1>from outside the economy. Well, for thousands of years, not

0:07:50.760 --> 0:07:54.240
<v Speaker 1>only in Babylonia, but in in Rome, when there was

0:07:54.280 --> 0:07:59.400
<v Speaker 1>a problem, a disease, a flood, or a drought, the

0:07:59.480 --> 0:08:02.600
<v Speaker 1>ruler would say, Okay, the taxes don't have to be paid,

0:08:03.160 --> 0:08:05.400
<v Speaker 1>and in fact, the debts don't have to be paid.

0:08:05.680 --> 0:08:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Most depths in the past where tax debts, and if

0:08:08.520 --> 0:08:11.360
<v Speaker 1>they're not paid, the problems really taxes. And here in

0:08:11.400 --> 0:08:16.600
<v Speaker 1>New York that's especially important. Uh, the transport system has

0:08:16.640 --> 0:08:20.880
<v Speaker 1>been almost empty for six months. It's run up at

0:08:20.880 --> 0:08:24.040
<v Speaker 1>dept of four billion dollars. The city has run up

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:28.440
<v Speaker 1>a debt of about six billion dollars. What is going

0:08:28.520 --> 0:08:34.679
<v Speaker 1>to happen? The mayor has talked about drastically closing city services,

0:08:35.080 --> 0:08:40.440
<v Speaker 1>laying off municipal labor, raising the transport fares on the subway.

0:08:40.640 --> 0:08:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Obviously there's going to be a break in the chain

0:08:42.679 --> 0:08:45.160
<v Speaker 1>of payments. How do you avoid that? Well, there are

0:08:45.160 --> 0:08:47.800
<v Speaker 1>a number of ways of avoiding that. One would be

0:08:48.000 --> 0:08:52.160
<v Speaker 1>for the Federal Reserve to simply create the credit to

0:08:52.840 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 1>sustain the system for people who can't pay to transfer

0:08:56.520 --> 0:09:01.720
<v Speaker 1>income to the restaurants enough to pay the costs of operation,

0:09:01.920 --> 0:09:05.640
<v Speaker 1>the rents and the labor costs to pay a carry

0:09:05.720 --> 0:09:08.880
<v Speaker 1>gate hall and the metropolitan opera enough not to go under.

0:09:09.240 --> 0:09:12.000
<v Speaker 1>The other way is to simply write down the debts,

0:09:12.040 --> 0:09:15.520
<v Speaker 1>because if you if you don't write down the state

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:19.080
<v Speaker 1>and local and public debt in this case, you're going

0:09:19.120 --> 0:09:23.959
<v Speaker 1>to have a slash of government services. And the government

0:09:24.000 --> 0:09:26.439
<v Speaker 1>has said, well, what can we sell off? We're going

0:09:26.520 --> 0:09:29.240
<v Speaker 1>to have to begin to sell off public header prises

0:09:29.280 --> 0:09:32.600
<v Speaker 1>like Chicago sold off the parking meters in the streets.

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:36.120
<v Speaker 1>We're going to have to sell off parks. Uh, we're

0:09:36.120 --> 0:09:39.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna turn roads into toll roads. You can see the

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:41.400
<v Speaker 1>problems they're going to occur. You have to look at

0:09:41.400 --> 0:09:43.720
<v Speaker 1>it as an overall system, and if you don't write

0:09:43.760 --> 0:09:48.640
<v Speaker 1>down the debts, or if you don't provide the money,

0:09:48.800 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 1>uh just print the money to let's the economy tread

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:56.240
<v Speaker 1>water what you call time out of time. Then you're

0:09:56.240 --> 0:10:01.240
<v Speaker 1>going to have a drastic uh change in shrinkage of

0:10:02.040 --> 0:10:05.200
<v Speaker 1>the overall economy and we'll end up looking like Greece

0:10:05.880 --> 0:10:21.320
<v Speaker 1>did a few years ago. So what is an example

0:10:21.600 --> 0:10:24.240
<v Speaker 1>in a history. I mean, you mentioned you you do

0:10:24.320 --> 0:10:26.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of work with history, and you mentioned this

0:10:26.760 --> 0:10:31.080
<v Speaker 1>idea of debt forgiveness going back five thousand years. What's

0:10:31.120 --> 0:10:33.720
<v Speaker 1>the what's the sort of relevant period we might look

0:10:33.720 --> 0:10:36.320
<v Speaker 1>to a specific example where a disease came or some

0:10:36.360 --> 0:10:40.760
<v Speaker 1>act of God happened in the solution was right off

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:45.280
<v Speaker 1>the debts. Well, the Laws of Hammurabi were announced around

0:10:45.280 --> 0:10:50.360
<v Speaker 1>seventy BC are an example. That's the first uh set

0:10:50.360 --> 0:10:53.199
<v Speaker 1>of laws that explicitly referred to an act of God,

0:10:53.600 --> 0:10:58.040
<v Speaker 1>in this case added the storm God. Amurabi says that

0:10:58.160 --> 0:11:02.079
<v Speaker 1>if the storm God added floods the fields or canceled

0:11:02.120 --> 0:11:05.440
<v Speaker 1>the debts floods the fields that causes a drought, then

0:11:05.640 --> 0:11:07.680
<v Speaker 1>the taxes don't have to be paid and the debts

0:11:07.880 --> 0:11:11.120
<v Speaker 1>don't have to be paid. In another part of the

0:11:11.600 --> 0:11:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Laws of Murabi, he said, if there's a disease and

0:11:14.520 --> 0:11:18.440
<v Speaker 1>the disease prevent people from operating in normal activity, then

0:11:19.000 --> 0:11:21.960
<v Speaker 1>the depths that they are canceled. Now, the reason he

0:11:22.000 --> 0:11:24.800
<v Speaker 1>did that was if he did not cancel those depths

0:11:24.840 --> 0:11:28.880
<v Speaker 1>of the cultivators. And we're talking about an agricultural economy,

0:11:29.000 --> 0:11:32.680
<v Speaker 1>low surplus economy. Then you would have the debtors fall

0:11:32.720 --> 0:11:37.440
<v Speaker 1>into bondage to the creditors, just like you have in

0:11:37.480 --> 0:11:40.679
<v Speaker 1>the Bible, a debt bondage when you can't pay the debts.

0:11:40.720 --> 0:11:45.679
<v Speaker 1>And if a debtor ended up owing his labor time

0:11:45.920 --> 0:11:50.839
<v Speaker 1>to the creditor, then he wouldn't have the opportunity to

0:11:51.160 --> 0:11:54.280
<v Speaker 1>work on corvet labor, that is public labor to build

0:11:54.280 --> 0:11:57.679
<v Speaker 1>the castle, the walls, to dig the irrigation ditches. He

0:11:57.720 --> 0:12:00.160
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be able to serve in the army. And if

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:02.839
<v Speaker 1>you have the crops to the creditor, and we're talking

0:12:02.880 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 1>about thirty three and the third percent interest for prop loans,

0:12:07.640 --> 0:12:11.360
<v Speaker 1>then he wouldn't be able to pay the taxes. So

0:12:11.720 --> 0:12:16.280
<v Speaker 1>the Hammurabi would have the palace economy would have not

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:21.199
<v Speaker 1>only collapsed, but you would have had the wealthy creditor

0:12:21.280 --> 0:12:26.600
<v Speaker 1>class emerging from the palace bureaucracy, the local local leaders,

0:12:26.880 --> 0:12:29.200
<v Speaker 1>and the first thing they would have done once they

0:12:29.240 --> 0:12:33.480
<v Speaker 1>got power was to overthrow the king, as they did

0:12:33.480 --> 0:12:37.560
<v Speaker 1>in Byzantium. UH powerful enough to overthrow the king and

0:12:37.600 --> 0:12:40.560
<v Speaker 1>take and UH prevent the king from having the power

0:12:40.600 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 1>to tax them, and the whole economy would have turned

0:12:43.880 --> 0:12:47.720
<v Speaker 1>into an oligarchy instead of a steady state system. Now,

0:12:47.880 --> 0:12:52.120
<v Speaker 1>the idea behind Hammarabi was taken over from the Sumarians

0:12:52.240 --> 0:12:55.199
<v Speaker 1>UH and their word for these depth cancelations. Think of

0:12:55.280 --> 0:12:57.960
<v Speaker 1>it as a clean slate. Everything goes back to the

0:12:57.960 --> 0:13:01.280
<v Speaker 1>way things were before the christ Us. And the word

0:13:01.360 --> 0:13:05.240
<v Speaker 1>for clean slate in Sumerian was a margie from Amma

0:13:05.679 --> 0:13:08.800
<v Speaker 1>the mother. It was the mother condition, meaning it's the

0:13:08.800 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 1>original condition. The whole idea is, how do you come

0:13:12.080 --> 0:13:14.960
<v Speaker 1>out of a crisis, whether it's a doubt, drought, or

0:13:15.120 --> 0:13:18.360
<v Speaker 1>disease and end up in the kind of way you

0:13:18.400 --> 0:13:21.760
<v Speaker 1>were before, which you assume to be rough balanced. People

0:13:21.840 --> 0:13:25.199
<v Speaker 1>produce enough to live and pay their taxes and get

0:13:25.240 --> 0:13:29.440
<v Speaker 1>by and conduct normal activity. How do you restore the

0:13:29.480 --> 0:13:32.720
<v Speaker 1>ability of life to get back to normal uh so

0:13:32.800 --> 0:13:35.440
<v Speaker 1>that the equivalent would be in modern days. How do

0:13:35.480 --> 0:13:38.920
<v Speaker 1>you let restaurants reopen without having to say, well, we're

0:13:38.960 --> 0:13:41.400
<v Speaker 1>just going to go out of business rather than pay

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:43.800
<v Speaker 1>all the money that we owe that we end up

0:13:43.800 --> 0:13:47.040
<v Speaker 1>working for the landlords and uh for the creditors through

0:13:47.120 --> 0:13:51.280
<v Speaker 1>the city. How do you enable the cities to start

0:13:51.360 --> 0:13:54.600
<v Speaker 1>their transportation system again at afford at rates that people

0:13:54.840 --> 0:13:57.800
<v Speaker 1>can afford to pay on the subway or the other transportation.

0:13:58.120 --> 0:14:02.760
<v Speaker 1>How do you prevent the economy from being permanently wounded?

0:14:03.160 --> 0:14:05.719
<v Speaker 1>And again, the only way to do it is to

0:14:06.559 --> 0:14:09.720
<v Speaker 1>write down UH say the deaths don't have to be paid.

0:14:10.040 --> 0:14:14.719
<v Speaker 1>Somebody has to suffer because as Tracy pointed out, that

0:14:14.840 --> 0:14:18.439
<v Speaker 1>one person's death is another person's claim. And uh, if

0:14:18.480 --> 0:14:21.880
<v Speaker 1>you don't pay the debt, then some uh saver or

0:14:22.120 --> 0:14:24.640
<v Speaker 1>the creditor is not going to be paid. And in

0:14:24.640 --> 0:14:27.760
<v Speaker 1>this case it would be either the landlords are not

0:14:27.800 --> 0:14:33.360
<v Speaker 1>paid or in special conditions where small small landlords, they'd

0:14:33.400 --> 0:14:36.240
<v Speaker 1>lose the property in some way. The banks and the

0:14:36.280 --> 0:14:40.880
<v Speaker 1>creditors are obliged, obliged to take the loss because they're

0:14:41.200 --> 0:14:44.880
<v Speaker 1>rich enough to take the loss without disrupting society. If

0:14:44.920 --> 0:14:48.200
<v Speaker 1>you have the debtors absorb the loss, society is disrupted

0:14:48.200 --> 0:14:52.000
<v Speaker 1>and torn apart, and the tax systems turn apart. If

0:14:52.040 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 1>the creditors lose, well they're not quite as rich as

0:14:54.880 --> 0:14:57.560
<v Speaker 1>they used to be, but they still get by. That's

0:14:57.560 --> 0:15:00.960
<v Speaker 1>why Hammurabi did not cancel the business debts debts of

0:15:01.080 --> 0:15:04.680
<v Speaker 1>merchants debts that were denominated in silver for trade. None

0:15:04.720 --> 0:15:09.400
<v Speaker 1>of the silver business steps were canceled. Only the personal

0:15:09.480 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 1>debts manly of cultivators on the land were canceled. Same

0:15:13.080 --> 0:15:16.800
<v Speaker 1>thing in Rome when UH Emperor Hadrian canceled the debts.

0:15:17.320 --> 0:15:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Roman been UH engaged in fighting with the north, with

0:15:21.320 --> 0:15:24.160
<v Speaker 1>the Germans. He canceled the debts so that you wouldn't

0:15:24.200 --> 0:15:27.520
<v Speaker 1>have the army falling into bondage the creditors so it

0:15:27.520 --> 0:15:30.840
<v Speaker 1>couldn't fight in the army anymore, and UH defend Rome.

0:15:31.040 --> 0:15:34.360
<v Speaker 1>Fifty years later Marcus Aurelius did the same thing for

0:15:34.400 --> 0:15:38.320
<v Speaker 1>the same reason. So almost every economy has in the past,

0:15:38.720 --> 0:15:41.120
<v Speaker 1>has UH come to the point where it says, well,

0:15:41.480 --> 0:15:45.000
<v Speaker 1>it's easier to make the creditors absorb the loss than

0:15:45.040 --> 0:15:47.840
<v Speaker 1>to have the rest of the economy fall into bondage

0:15:47.920 --> 0:15:53.280
<v Speaker 1>and a transfer property to U endow a creditor class

0:15:53.320 --> 0:15:56.800
<v Speaker 1>at forecloses, and UH we end up in an economy

0:15:56.880 --> 0:15:59.600
<v Speaker 1>with a very different shape. Do you really want the

0:15:59.640 --> 0:16:03.440
<v Speaker 1>econom made a change and straight that way? So I

0:16:03.720 --> 0:16:07.680
<v Speaker 1>think there's a general sense out there that debt forgiveness

0:16:07.800 --> 0:16:13.560
<v Speaker 1>or debt jubilieves are a really leftist policy. And I mean,

0:16:13.600 --> 0:16:16.960
<v Speaker 1>you just gave us all these great historical examples. Hammurabi

0:16:17.160 --> 0:16:20.760
<v Speaker 1>wasn't exactly a liberal, right. He set out some pretty

0:16:20.800 --> 0:16:24.680
<v Speaker 1>tough punishments for for crime, for I think theft. Some

0:16:24.840 --> 0:16:27.840
<v Speaker 1>thefts were punishable by death. You laid out a really

0:16:27.880 --> 0:16:31.880
<v Speaker 1>good rational economic reason why he would be interested in

0:16:31.920 --> 0:16:36.080
<v Speaker 1>depth forgiveness. But I'm curious why that rationale doesn't seem

0:16:36.160 --> 0:16:40.720
<v Speaker 1>to resonate in modern day times, especially in the US.

0:16:40.760 --> 0:16:44.120
<v Speaker 1>As Joe kind of mentioned in the intro, whenever you

0:16:44.320 --> 0:16:47.080
<v Speaker 1>talk about debt forgiveness in the States, even if it's

0:16:47.120 --> 0:16:49.840
<v Speaker 1>something like student loans, you seem to get this knee

0:16:49.920 --> 0:16:54.120
<v Speaker 1>jerk reaction from people who say, well, you know, I

0:16:54.240 --> 0:16:57.400
<v Speaker 1>paid my student loans, why do you get a free ride?

0:16:58.120 --> 0:16:59.920
<v Speaker 1>And it feels like once the system is in motion,

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:02.480
<v Speaker 1>it's very hard to change it. Why do you think

0:17:02.520 --> 0:17:06.120
<v Speaker 1>the attitudes are so different now to I guess what

0:17:06.160 --> 0:17:11.560
<v Speaker 1>they were in in ancient Samaria. I think because of unfamiliarity,

0:17:12.080 --> 0:17:15.600
<v Speaker 1>uh with with history and the fact that you meant that, uh,

0:17:15.920 --> 0:17:20.720
<v Speaker 1>the left in America doesn't discuss debt or finance. I

0:17:21.000 --> 0:17:25.320
<v Speaker 1>don't think I've had any discussions about finance or debt

0:17:25.359 --> 0:17:29.280
<v Speaker 1>for business or even monetary policy with the left at all.

0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:33.400
<v Speaker 1>I've talked with federal reserve branches. I talked to Wall

0:17:33.440 --> 0:17:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Street people, I talked to financial people, I talked to

0:17:36.800 --> 0:17:41.080
<v Speaker 1>a Republican politicians. Nobody on the left has been interested

0:17:41.119 --> 0:17:45.560
<v Speaker 1>in this. And in fact, in China, where I was

0:17:45.600 --> 0:17:49.000
<v Speaker 1>a professor for the last few years in Beijing at

0:17:49.000 --> 0:17:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Peking University, I went over a few years ago along

0:17:52.760 --> 0:17:55.600
<v Speaker 1>with David Harvey at colleague of mine from Cooney here

0:17:55.600 --> 0:17:59.159
<v Speaker 1>in New York, and UH, we didn't find any discussion

0:17:59.240 --> 0:18:01.760
<v Speaker 1>in China. What are you going to do about the

0:18:01.840 --> 0:18:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Chinese housing boom that's come up with all of the

0:18:06.480 --> 0:18:10.119
<v Speaker 1>people borrowing to buy a real estate on credit. And

0:18:10.400 --> 0:18:14.840
<v Speaker 1>because everything has to be couched in terms of Marxist

0:18:14.840 --> 0:18:17.359
<v Speaker 1>capital there, because they say that there are Marxist state

0:18:17.920 --> 0:18:21.240
<v Speaker 1>David Harvey said, well, you know Marks more than Volume

0:18:21.280 --> 0:18:24.440
<v Speaker 1>one of Capital, which is all about labor and UH,

0:18:24.440 --> 0:18:28.800
<v Speaker 1>employee employees working for their employers their volumes two and three.

0:18:28.800 --> 0:18:33.040
<v Speaker 1>In Capital, Volume three, Mark talks about how debt grows

0:18:33.320 --> 0:18:37.480
<v Speaker 1>by its own purely mathematical laws which have nothing to

0:18:37.560 --> 0:18:42.520
<v Speaker 1>do with the economic rate of growth. UH. The financial

0:18:42.560 --> 0:18:47.120
<v Speaker 1>system is wrapped around UH the economy as a whole

0:18:47.119 --> 0:18:52.640
<v Speaker 1>and really is independent from capitalism. It existed long before capitalism. Uh,

0:18:52.680 --> 0:18:57.240
<v Speaker 1>and probably and obviously is existing after capitalism In China,

0:18:57.560 --> 0:19:00.359
<v Speaker 1>they did not seem very interested in the lend of

0:19:00.440 --> 0:19:03.159
<v Speaker 1>approach at all. In fact, we could see that it

0:19:03.200 --> 0:19:06.560
<v Speaker 1>made them feel very uncomfortable to talk about that. So

0:19:06.720 --> 0:19:09.520
<v Speaker 1>I think the people who are realizing that something has

0:19:09.560 --> 0:19:13.840
<v Speaker 1>to be done about that are mainly financial. They're mainly

0:19:13.840 --> 0:19:16.840
<v Speaker 1>in Wall Street. For years I worked with Chase Manhattan

0:19:17.520 --> 0:19:20.359
<v Speaker 1>is our balance of payments economists, And it was the

0:19:20.400 --> 0:19:23.280
<v Speaker 1>banks that saw, well, wait a minute, how much can

0:19:23.520 --> 0:19:26.200
<v Speaker 1>a third world country afford to pay? How much can

0:19:26.640 --> 0:19:29.760
<v Speaker 1>such and such an industry afford to pay? The banks

0:19:29.800 --> 0:19:33.760
<v Speaker 1>know that many sectors can't pay. The rest of the

0:19:33.760 --> 0:19:36.679
<v Speaker 1>economy isn't looking at this because there's an assumption. Like

0:19:37.160 --> 0:19:40.000
<v Speaker 1>you said that, the assumption is that anybody can pay

0:19:40.320 --> 0:19:42.960
<v Speaker 1>if they just cut back on they're spending enough. But

0:19:43.040 --> 0:19:45.919
<v Speaker 1>that's not the case. Uh. You mentioned student loans, and

0:19:45.960 --> 0:19:48.920
<v Speaker 1>certainly many people think, well, I really straight by to

0:19:48.960 --> 0:19:53.120
<v Speaker 1>pay my student loans. Why would other student loans be forgiven? Well,

0:19:53.160 --> 0:19:55.600
<v Speaker 1>the answer is simple. If you were able to straight

0:19:55.680 --> 0:19:58.199
<v Speaker 1>by and pay your student loans, good for you. You

0:19:58.240 --> 0:20:01.360
<v Speaker 1>were able to survive most of the people who don't

0:20:01.359 --> 0:20:04.560
<v Speaker 1>pay their student loans are not paying because they're going

0:20:04.600 --> 0:20:07.320
<v Speaker 1>to the movies, or they're gambling, or they're consuming more.

0:20:07.560 --> 0:20:10.359
<v Speaker 1>They're paying because they really don't have the money to

0:20:10.440 --> 0:20:15.040
<v Speaker 1>do what you did to to scrape and pay, especially minorities,

0:20:15.040 --> 0:20:18.480
<v Speaker 1>so have gone to junk colleges, the sort of private

0:20:19.119 --> 0:20:21.320
<v Speaker 1>colleges that say they're going to get them a job

0:20:21.359 --> 0:20:25.920
<v Speaker 1>and manual labor some kind of technology that really doesn't work.

0:20:26.160 --> 0:20:30.120
<v Speaker 1>There are many people stuck with loans that they're unable

0:20:30.160 --> 0:20:32.800
<v Speaker 1>to pay. And if they do pay, it suppose that

0:20:33.080 --> 0:20:36.359
<v Speaker 1>all the people student loans now actually have to pay

0:20:36.640 --> 0:20:39.919
<v Speaker 1>the student loans. If they then they're not going to

0:20:39.960 --> 0:20:43.160
<v Speaker 1>have enough money to take out a mortgage to buy

0:20:43.920 --> 0:20:46.840
<v Speaker 1>a home of their own uh and form a family. UH.

0:20:46.880 --> 0:20:49.040
<v Speaker 1>They're going to have to live with their parents. UH.

0:20:49.160 --> 0:20:52.120
<v Speaker 1>They get married, what are the children going to move

0:20:52.119 --> 0:20:54.840
<v Speaker 1>in with the wife? And kids going to move in

0:20:54.840 --> 0:20:57.880
<v Speaker 1>with their parents? The having to pay the student loan

0:20:58.000 --> 0:21:01.639
<v Speaker 1>crowds out the ability to go to mortgage loan to

0:21:01.760 --> 0:21:04.040
<v Speaker 1>take out other loans you need. And then of course

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:08.560
<v Speaker 1>you have the medical UH debt that is probably the

0:21:08.600 --> 0:21:13.280
<v Speaker 1>maiden source of bankruptcy for many many people, you get sick,

0:21:13.520 --> 0:21:16.480
<v Speaker 1>you go into the hospital, or even if you get tested,

0:21:16.800 --> 0:21:20.160
<v Speaker 1>you're you're broke. And if the Federal Reserve is direct

0:21:20.240 --> 0:21:23.400
<v Speaker 1>when it said that half the Americans cannot raise four

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:27.560
<v Speaker 1>hundred dollars in an emergency, and it costs uh that

0:21:27.640 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 1>much just to have a COVID test. UH, And it

0:21:30.359 --> 0:21:33.119
<v Speaker 1>costs maybe two thousand dollars or more if you go

0:21:33.160 --> 0:21:35.520
<v Speaker 1>in and just to go and be admitted to a hospital.

0:21:35.760 --> 0:21:38.960
<v Speaker 1>You can imagine the devastation that this causes to people

0:21:39.080 --> 0:21:42.480
<v Speaker 1>that UH, not paying a debt is not a matter

0:21:42.520 --> 0:21:46.280
<v Speaker 1>of choice. It's a matter of the money, isn't there Michael,

0:21:46.320 --> 0:21:48.880
<v Speaker 1>I want to go back to something you said, which

0:21:48.920 --> 0:21:51.040
<v Speaker 1>is just that you know, you could look at the

0:21:51.080 --> 0:21:55.640
<v Speaker 1>current situation in which all these different entities, whether it's restaurants,

0:21:55.760 --> 0:22:00.480
<v Speaker 1>whether it's museums, whether it's the New York City Transit Authority, UM,

0:22:00.520 --> 0:22:02.239
<v Speaker 1>they all owe a lot of money. And there are

0:22:02.240 --> 0:22:04.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of two different paths we could take. We could

0:22:04.960 --> 0:22:07.720
<v Speaker 1>cancel all the debt or or some level of it

0:22:07.840 --> 0:22:11.520
<v Speaker 1>canceled debt, or you have the government print a lot

0:22:11.520 --> 0:22:14.560
<v Speaker 1>of money and UM sort of allow people just give

0:22:14.600 --> 0:22:16.760
<v Speaker 1>it to people to make them whole. And you also

0:22:16.840 --> 0:22:18.439
<v Speaker 1>said they're going to sort of back to the ancient

0:22:18.480 --> 0:22:20.960
<v Speaker 1>times that UM, a lot of the debt that was

0:22:21.000 --> 0:22:25.280
<v Speaker 1>in fact canceled was tax debt, so public debt essentially

0:22:25.359 --> 0:22:28.840
<v Speaker 1>that the cost of the debt cancelation would essentially be

0:22:28.880 --> 0:22:31.600
<v Speaker 1>on the public sector balance sheet. And so I'm curious

0:22:31.640 --> 0:22:37.639
<v Speaker 1>whether functionally speaking, you know, talking about debt cancelation in

0:22:37.760 --> 0:22:41.160
<v Speaker 1>terms of ripping it up sounds pretty radical. Talking about

0:22:41.520 --> 0:22:45.400
<v Speaker 1>massive fiscal aid UM so that all these different entities

0:22:45.400 --> 0:22:48.119
<v Speaker 1>could pay their bills during the crisis sounds a little

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:51.840
<v Speaker 1>less radical. But I'm curious if functionally they're kind of

0:22:51.880 --> 0:22:55.359
<v Speaker 1>the same thing. This idea that what UM sort of

0:22:55.359 --> 0:22:58.480
<v Speaker 1>in the ancient days was putting the you know, having

0:22:58.520 --> 0:23:01.400
<v Speaker 1>the public balance sheet be the bearer of the losses.

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:06.439
<v Speaker 1>It's more translatable to aggressive fiscal expansion as opposed to

0:23:06.480 --> 0:23:11.280
<v Speaker 1>pure debt ripping up per se. That happens very well. Uh.

0:23:11.520 --> 0:23:15.160
<v Speaker 1>China is able to cope with this quite well because

0:23:15.320 --> 0:23:18.679
<v Speaker 1>it's a monetary policy. It's central bank is part of

0:23:18.680 --> 0:23:22.520
<v Speaker 1>the government. Uh. There are many companies in China for

0:23:22.600 --> 0:23:26.439
<v Speaker 1>the last ten years are longer that have not been

0:23:26.480 --> 0:23:28.800
<v Speaker 1>able to pay the debt. What do you do when

0:23:28.800 --> 0:23:33.880
<v Speaker 1>a a industrial company can't pay the debt. Well, in UH,

0:23:33.920 --> 0:23:36.120
<v Speaker 1>in the West, if a company can't pay a debt,

0:23:36.200 --> 0:23:39.000
<v Speaker 1>it goes bankrupt and it's sold to the highest bidder,

0:23:39.240 --> 0:23:42.520
<v Speaker 1>and it could be a foreign buyer, and UH it

0:23:42.600 --> 0:23:46.679
<v Speaker 1>closes down and the workers are unemployed. But what the

0:23:46.720 --> 0:23:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Bank of China does. The government simply keeps creating the

0:23:50.640 --> 0:23:56.240
<v Speaker 1>credit and UH lending the bank the money that the

0:23:56.520 --> 0:23:59.840
<v Speaker 1>corporation that's the debt or the money now here that

0:24:00.359 --> 0:24:04.080
<v Speaker 1>the company would be called a zombie corporation. But China

0:24:04.119 --> 0:24:07.159
<v Speaker 1>will just keep lending it the money. And then because

0:24:07.200 --> 0:24:09.960
<v Speaker 1>it creates the money, it'll write it, write it off.

0:24:10.400 --> 0:24:12.840
<v Speaker 1>It's easy to cancel the debts when the debts you're

0:24:12.880 --> 0:24:16.399
<v Speaker 1>canceling or owe to yourself. Honorabi could cancel the debts

0:24:16.600 --> 0:24:19.200
<v Speaker 1>because most of the debts ultimately were over to the palace.

0:24:19.560 --> 0:24:24.119
<v Speaker 1>He didn't have to deal with a independent financial class

0:24:24.320 --> 0:24:25.959
<v Speaker 1>that said, wait a minute, we're going to lose if

0:24:25.960 --> 0:24:28.280
<v Speaker 1>you cancel the debts. We're going to overthrow you if

0:24:28.320 --> 0:24:31.360
<v Speaker 1>you tried to do that. He was canceling debts to themselves.

0:24:31.440 --> 0:24:34.960
<v Speaker 1>The Roman emperors were canceling debts owed to themselves, not

0:24:35.080 --> 0:24:39.359
<v Speaker 1>to the wealthy Romans now in China is canceling it

0:24:39.480 --> 0:24:43.800
<v Speaker 1>will because China's government provides the credit. It premises that

0:24:44.480 --> 0:24:47.920
<v Speaker 1>finance and banking should be a public utility. It should

0:24:48.000 --> 0:24:51.360
<v Speaker 1>not be privatized. And the advantage of having a banking

0:24:51.400 --> 0:24:54.840
<v Speaker 1>is a public utility, or like operating the Federal Reserve

0:24:54.920 --> 0:24:58.240
<v Speaker 1>here is a public utility. Is you can create the money.

0:24:58.680 --> 0:25:02.720
<v Speaker 1>You can lend to keep a restaurant afloat, or a

0:25:02.840 --> 0:25:06.960
<v Speaker 1>museum afloat, or a city UH and state afloat, and

0:25:07.000 --> 0:25:12.040
<v Speaker 1>then you can simply wipe out the debt and you're

0:25:12.040 --> 0:25:14.960
<v Speaker 1>only canceling the debt to yourself. You're not threatening to

0:25:15.000 --> 0:25:17.600
<v Speaker 1>take it away from any banker or a bond holder

0:25:17.960 --> 0:25:21.840
<v Speaker 1>or a stockholder. So by making finance a public utility,

0:25:23.040 --> 0:25:28.320
<v Speaker 1>or at least making the credit emergency credit public utility, UH,

0:25:28.359 --> 0:25:31.200
<v Speaker 1>you create the credit and then you say, okay, we've

0:25:31.200 --> 0:25:34.480
<v Speaker 1>provided you the credit. And when we provide your credit

0:25:34.640 --> 0:25:39.200
<v Speaker 1>in a shutdown, this is not inflationary. I think Germany

0:25:39.440 --> 0:25:44.600
<v Speaker 1>is paying its labor of the normal wage income. The

0:25:44.680 --> 0:25:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve could create enough credit to keep most employees

0:25:49.880 --> 0:25:53.680
<v Speaker 1>have lost the jobs able to break even. Most restaurants

0:25:53.680 --> 0:25:57.719
<v Speaker 1>and most renters who are unable to do business, they

0:25:57.720 --> 0:26:00.959
<v Speaker 1>will owe a debt to the Federal Reserve that will

0:26:01.000 --> 0:26:05.120
<v Speaker 1>continue to keep them afloat. And then when the crisis

0:26:05.200 --> 0:26:08.000
<v Speaker 1>is over and the vaccine is in and life goes

0:26:08.040 --> 0:26:11.359
<v Speaker 1>back to normal, the federals say, Okay, we've provided the credit.

0:26:11.480 --> 0:26:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Now we can just wipe it out and life can

0:26:13.600 --> 0:26:16.560
<v Speaker 1>go back to normal. The idea is to restore the

0:26:16.600 --> 0:26:20.159
<v Speaker 1>status quote on ANTI. The idea is to make the

0:26:20.200 --> 0:26:39.440
<v Speaker 1>economy is workable as it was before the crisis, since

0:26:39.480 --> 0:26:43.840
<v Speaker 1>we were touching on fiscal stimulus as as one way

0:26:44.400 --> 0:26:48.920
<v Speaker 1>to keeping the economy afloat and making sure that there

0:26:48.920 --> 0:26:52.359
<v Speaker 1>are jobs available for people. I'm Joe is going to

0:26:52.359 --> 0:26:53.720
<v Speaker 1>make fun of me for doing this, but I'm just

0:26:53.760 --> 0:26:56.639
<v Speaker 1>gonna go out, go ahead and ask you, what do

0:26:56.680 --> 0:27:01.200
<v Speaker 1>you think about m MT Modern monetary theory. It feels

0:27:01.200 --> 0:27:04.119
<v Speaker 1>like it's maybe one version of what you're saying. And

0:27:04.160 --> 0:27:06.479
<v Speaker 1>I know, um, I guess you would have worked with

0:27:06.520 --> 0:27:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Stephanie Kelton when she was at the University of Missouri

0:27:11.359 --> 0:27:14.159
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City with you, what do you think about that

0:27:14.200 --> 0:27:17.920
<v Speaker 1>policy and how much difference or daylight is there between

0:27:18.480 --> 0:27:22.200
<v Speaker 1>MMT and its policy recommendations and the kind of depth

0:27:22.200 --> 0:27:26.119
<v Speaker 1>forgiveness that you are discussing and advocating. Well, I was

0:27:26.200 --> 0:27:29.119
<v Speaker 1>one of the developers of m m T uh in

0:27:29.280 --> 0:27:34.560
<v Speaker 1>the late nine things seventies, UH, and Stephanie was our

0:27:34.640 --> 0:27:37.760
<v Speaker 1>department chairman there. We were all brought to Kansas City

0:27:37.800 --> 0:27:42.800
<v Speaker 1>together in order to popularize m m D and Stephanie

0:27:42.840 --> 0:27:46.400
<v Speaker 1>and I have gone around the world together giving lectures

0:27:46.400 --> 0:27:50.920
<v Speaker 1>on it. She usually gives the introductory lecture about how

0:27:51.640 --> 0:27:56.679
<v Speaker 1>running a deficit uh pumps money into the economy, and

0:27:56.720 --> 0:27:59.080
<v Speaker 1>then I follow up with a second and the economy

0:27:59.119 --> 0:28:03.040
<v Speaker 1>needs to be pumped up or el will have austerity.

0:28:03.119 --> 0:28:04.760
<v Speaker 1>And then I give the lecture to say, well, the

0:28:04.760 --> 0:28:09.960
<v Speaker 1>economy is really two sectors. There's the financial sector finance, insurance,

0:28:09.960 --> 0:28:12.880
<v Speaker 1>and real estate, the property sector on the one hand,

0:28:13.320 --> 0:28:16.960
<v Speaker 1>and then there's the production and consumption sector on the other. Now,

0:28:17.000 --> 0:28:21.240
<v Speaker 1>most MMT people talk about the government printing money into

0:28:21.280 --> 0:28:25.920
<v Speaker 1>the regular economy of production and consumption people who work

0:28:25.960 --> 0:28:29.480
<v Speaker 1>and produce things. But you've just seen uh. The main

0:28:29.520 --> 0:28:32.040
<v Speaker 1>practitioner of m m T, of course is Donald Trump,

0:28:32.320 --> 0:28:36.120
<v Speaker 1>and uh he just did uh the enormous uh ten

0:28:36.200 --> 0:28:39.960
<v Speaker 1>trillion U MMT example, but he didn't put He only

0:28:39.960 --> 0:28:42.720
<v Speaker 1>put two trillion of that into the economy. The rest

0:28:42.720 --> 0:28:45.800
<v Speaker 1>of the money went into the stock market, in the

0:28:45.840 --> 0:28:48.320
<v Speaker 1>bond market. So the question is who are you going

0:28:48.360 --> 0:28:50.680
<v Speaker 1>to run m m T four. Are you going to

0:28:50.760 --> 0:28:53.640
<v Speaker 1>run it, uh in just in order to pump up

0:28:53.840 --> 0:28:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the stock and bond prices and real estate prices and

0:28:57.880 --> 0:29:00.640
<v Speaker 1>to keep the death system in place, or are you

0:29:00.720 --> 0:29:03.240
<v Speaker 1>going to pump it into the economy and let the

0:29:03.280 --> 0:29:07.360
<v Speaker 1>economy survive. Something has to give either the either the

0:29:07.360 --> 0:29:11.680
<v Speaker 1>economy loses or the financial sector loses. And that really

0:29:11.920 --> 0:29:15.280
<v Speaker 1>is UH the debate an m m T. Mr Trump

0:29:15.280 --> 0:29:17.880
<v Speaker 1>didn't call what he was doing MMT, but it's exactly

0:29:17.920 --> 0:29:22.320
<v Speaker 1>what mm T is. Creating the government just simply creating

0:29:22.560 --> 0:29:26.200
<v Speaker 1>the credit. That's what quantitative easing is. Uh. That was

0:29:26.280 --> 0:29:28.920
<v Speaker 1>all m MT, but it was MMT going into the

0:29:28.960 --> 0:29:31.640
<v Speaker 1>stock market. And most of us in Kansas City are

0:29:31.880 --> 0:29:35.640
<v Speaker 1>trying to upgrade prosperity for the economy as a whole,

0:29:35.920 --> 0:29:40.960
<v Speaker 1>for labor and industry and agriculture, not simply high asset prices.

0:29:41.760 --> 0:29:44.600
<v Speaker 1>So something you brought up and I thought it was

0:29:44.640 --> 0:29:47.240
<v Speaker 1>interesting the way you framed it in comparison with China,

0:29:47.480 --> 0:29:51.520
<v Speaker 1>and then what you identified right there, you know, thinking

0:29:51.560 --> 0:29:55.400
<v Speaker 1>about MMT as a political project, or think about your

0:29:55.400 --> 0:29:58.960
<v Speaker 1>own work, of course as a political project, how much

0:29:59.040 --> 0:30:02.400
<v Speaker 1>can you ide defy it as essentially what you said

0:30:02.440 --> 0:30:06.440
<v Speaker 1>of no longer having the financial sector be this sort

0:30:06.480 --> 0:30:09.000
<v Speaker 1>of third entity out there. You have the sort of

0:30:09.040 --> 0:30:13.040
<v Speaker 1>productive capacity of the economy, you have the government. And

0:30:13.080 --> 0:30:15.240
<v Speaker 1>in China, as you described it, the sort of there

0:30:15.280 --> 0:30:18.440
<v Speaker 1>isn't much daylight between the financial sector and the government,

0:30:18.800 --> 0:30:22.120
<v Speaker 1>whereas in the US the financial sector is its own

0:30:22.800 --> 0:30:26.240
<v Speaker 1>distinct set of private interests that's distinct from the government

0:30:26.280 --> 0:30:30.240
<v Speaker 1>and distinct distinct from actual productive capacity. So how much

0:30:30.320 --> 0:30:34.680
<v Speaker 1>is in your view the solution essentially collapsing the financial

0:30:34.720 --> 0:30:38.200
<v Speaker 1>sector so that it's just it can no longer represent

0:30:38.320 --> 0:30:42.880
<v Speaker 1>its own interests distinct from everything else. Well, what are

0:30:42.960 --> 0:30:45.560
<v Speaker 1>its interests? I think you can say that a lot

0:30:45.600 --> 0:30:49.640
<v Speaker 1>of the problems that America's UH been in slowing them

0:30:50.040 --> 0:30:53.160
<v Speaker 1>for the last ten years, really slowing down since two

0:30:53.240 --> 0:30:57.840
<v Speaker 1>thousand nine, has been financialization. And the problem is that

0:30:57.960 --> 0:31:01.720
<v Speaker 1>the financial sector UH the and create credit for the

0:31:01.800 --> 0:31:04.880
<v Speaker 1>reasons that m m T would, The financial sector creates

0:31:04.920 --> 0:31:09.840
<v Speaker 1>credit against assets against collateral. Eight of bank loans are

0:31:09.960 --> 0:31:14.280
<v Speaker 1>for real estate, and so as the credit standards have

0:31:14.360 --> 0:31:17.200
<v Speaker 1>been loosened for real estate, banks will lend more and

0:31:17.240 --> 0:31:21.240
<v Speaker 1>more and more money against any given UH piece of

0:31:21.520 --> 0:31:25.080
<v Speaker 1>real estate. And the effect of financialization has been to

0:31:25.880 --> 0:31:30.240
<v Speaker 1>increase to inflate real estate prices. Banks will lend money

0:31:30.320 --> 0:31:33.280
<v Speaker 1>against stocks and bonds and UH they'll learn money to

0:31:33.920 --> 0:31:37.200
<v Speaker 1>finance corporate takeovers. And they also lend money, of course

0:31:37.200 --> 0:31:41.560
<v Speaker 1>for education. And just as a house is worth whatever

0:31:41.600 --> 0:31:44.280
<v Speaker 1>a bank will lend against it for the new buyer,

0:31:44.520 --> 0:31:47.320
<v Speaker 1>and education is going to be worth whatever a bank

0:31:47.600 --> 0:31:52.000
<v Speaker 1>is going to lend to a student to buy an education.

0:31:52.040 --> 0:31:55.960
<v Speaker 1>And as banks have made loans of government guarantees with

0:31:56.000 --> 0:31:59.760
<v Speaker 1>no risk, they've made loans without taking into account the

0:32:00.000 --> 0:32:02.760
<v Speaker 1>aility to pay. When I went into Wall Street sixty

0:32:02.840 --> 0:32:06.880
<v Speaker 1>years ago, the first question any banker would ask is

0:32:07.200 --> 0:32:11.520
<v Speaker 1>can the borrower pay well? Right now, that's not asked anymore.

0:32:11.560 --> 0:32:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Now that the f h A is guaranteeing mortgages and

0:32:15.600 --> 0:32:19.880
<v Speaker 1>the student loan are guaranteed, banks don't have to worry

0:32:19.880 --> 0:32:23.280
<v Speaker 1>about repayment. So they're just creating as much credit as

0:32:23.280 --> 0:32:26.320
<v Speaker 1>they can without reference to the ability to pay. The

0:32:26.360 --> 0:32:29.200
<v Speaker 1>government isn't looking at the ability to pay the f

0:32:29.480 --> 0:32:34.040
<v Speaker 1>h A. Now, let's mortgages be UH extended up to

0:32:34.080 --> 0:32:38.800
<v Speaker 1>the point where they absorbent of the borrower's income to

0:32:38.880 --> 0:32:42.280
<v Speaker 1>pay the mortgage that will be guaranteed. Will imagine if

0:32:42.360 --> 0:32:45.200
<v Speaker 1>the government if you're paying forty three if your income

0:32:45.400 --> 0:32:49.000
<v Speaker 1>to pay your mortgage, you're paying taxes maybe a ten,

0:32:49.080 --> 0:32:53.880
<v Speaker 1>or you're paying health insurance, you're paying f I, your

0:32:53.960 --> 0:32:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Social Security. Withholding, there's been less and less and less

0:32:58.080 --> 0:33:01.560
<v Speaker 1>income available to spend on goods services because more and

0:33:01.640 --> 0:33:04.800
<v Speaker 1>more American income is being used to pay the financial

0:33:04.800 --> 0:33:08.920
<v Speaker 1>sector and its associated real estate and UH insurance sector.

0:33:09.000 --> 0:33:11.440
<v Speaker 1>So as more money is paid to the financial sector,

0:33:11.840 --> 0:33:15.240
<v Speaker 1>is debts grow. Same thing for corporations. As corporations have

0:33:15.360 --> 0:33:20.560
<v Speaker 1>to pay more money to the bondholders UH and dividends

0:33:20.680 --> 0:33:24.000
<v Speaker 1>and the banks, there's less and less for new capital

0:33:24.040 --> 0:33:27.480
<v Speaker 1>investment in the economy's drinking, largely because there's been a

0:33:27.520 --> 0:33:31.280
<v Speaker 1>diversion of income away from the real economy, the production

0:33:31.320 --> 0:33:35.200
<v Speaker 1>and consumption economy, to the financial sector. So the financial

0:33:35.200 --> 0:33:38.680
<v Speaker 1>sector in the United States, let's face it, has become dysfunctional.

0:33:39.040 --> 0:33:43.520
<v Speaker 1>And I think almost every financial manager that I know

0:33:44.040 --> 0:33:48.440
<v Speaker 1>realizes that the sector is become dysfunctional, and they're saying,

0:33:48.440 --> 0:33:50.800
<v Speaker 1>this is a hell of a way to make a living. Uh.

0:33:51.360 --> 0:33:52.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to play by the rules of the game,

0:33:52.960 --> 0:33:55.440
<v Speaker 1>but I would be nice if the rules of the

0:33:55.440 --> 0:33:58.360
<v Speaker 1>game were for me to be a banker and I

0:33:58.440 --> 0:34:02.120
<v Speaker 1>was actually helping the economy instead of just diverting income

0:34:02.200 --> 0:34:05.840
<v Speaker 1>from the economy into the banking system. So somehow the

0:34:06.160 --> 0:34:10.080
<v Speaker 1>financial system has to be restructured so it can cope

0:34:10.160 --> 0:34:13.759
<v Speaker 1>with a coronavirus, chroma or act of God like we're

0:34:13.760 --> 0:34:17.440
<v Speaker 1>having now and be able to restore normalcy. And I

0:34:17.480 --> 0:34:20.720
<v Speaker 1>think the only way to do it UH would be UH.

0:34:21.120 --> 0:34:24.680
<v Speaker 1>China has shown the most successful way of doing it.

0:34:24.920 --> 0:34:29.040
<v Speaker 1>There was hardly any interruption of activity there. There's a

0:34:29.200 --> 0:34:31.840
<v Speaker 1>very quick recovery, and it's because of the way that

0:34:31.960 --> 0:34:36.680
<v Speaker 1>China has structured financial sector under public direction instead of

0:34:36.760 --> 0:34:41.600
<v Speaker 1>leaving it to individual banks for clothes, take over real estate,

0:34:41.960 --> 0:34:46.120
<v Speaker 1>grad factories and UH create UH make the economy look

0:34:46.200 --> 0:34:52.480
<v Speaker 1>like Greece. UM. I have a related question, but I

0:34:52.520 --> 0:34:55.880
<v Speaker 1>think when when most people think about m MT and

0:34:56.440 --> 0:34:59.960
<v Speaker 1>policy prescriptions, they think about things like a job scare

0:35:00.040 --> 0:35:03.560
<v Speaker 1>and tee or maybe a green new deal. But you

0:35:03.640 --> 0:35:07.560
<v Speaker 1>just mentioned this idea of Trump as an m m

0:35:07.600 --> 0:35:10.880
<v Speaker 1>T or himself spending lots of money, but maybe spending

0:35:10.880 --> 0:35:16.239
<v Speaker 1>it in the wrong way. How useful is an economic

0:35:16.320 --> 0:35:22.319
<v Speaker 1>theory that can lead to such different policy outcomes. The

0:35:22.400 --> 0:35:25.440
<v Speaker 1>important thing about m m T is you realize that

0:35:26.080 --> 0:35:29.760
<v Speaker 1>money doesn't Governments don't have to borrow to spend money.

0:35:30.040 --> 0:35:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Governments can create the money. Uh. They don't have to

0:35:33.000 --> 0:35:36.719
<v Speaker 1>borrow from a bank or a bond holder to lend out.

0:35:37.160 --> 0:35:39.680
<v Speaker 1>They can. The effect of borrowing from a bond holder

0:35:40.080 --> 0:35:44.040
<v Speaker 1>uh and and creating money is identical. If a central

0:35:44.080 --> 0:35:46.640
<v Speaker 1>bank will print the money to spend them to the economy.

0:35:46.920 --> 0:35:50.640
<v Speaker 1>It's no more inflationary than borrowing from a bondholder because

0:35:50.640 --> 0:35:55.600
<v Speaker 1>the bond holder do what a bank does. Simply take decide, okay,

0:35:55.640 --> 0:35:58.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to spend money on other financial assets.

0:35:58.480 --> 0:36:01.239
<v Speaker 1>A bond holder is not going to up back consumption

0:36:01.280 --> 0:36:05.280
<v Speaker 1>spending in order to lend money to the government. Definitely.

0:36:05.520 --> 0:36:08.920
<v Speaker 1>An m m T S point is that government money

0:36:08.960 --> 0:36:12.879
<v Speaker 1>creation is no more inflationary than borrowing, and you don't

0:36:12.920 --> 0:36:16.880
<v Speaker 1>have to borrow and pay interest to an independent financial

0:36:16.920 --> 0:36:20.160
<v Speaker 1>sector where you're limited to what bond holders will let

0:36:20.200 --> 0:36:23.520
<v Speaker 1>you do. You can simply print the money, and by

0:36:23.560 --> 0:36:27.400
<v Speaker 1>printing it you save the amount of taxes that have

0:36:27.600 --> 0:36:30.880
<v Speaker 1>to go to paying interest. You would save h the

0:36:30.920 --> 0:36:33.400
<v Speaker 1>amount of taxes that have to go to advertise and

0:36:33.440 --> 0:36:37.160
<v Speaker 1>pay down the debt. UH. Certainly for states and local

0:36:37.920 --> 0:36:41.440
<v Speaker 1>governments here it would be the probably the only way

0:36:41.480 --> 0:36:45.799
<v Speaker 1>the states and local governments can avoid drastic downsizing is

0:36:46.640 --> 0:36:50.440
<v Speaker 1>government lending to them, not going to private bond holders.

0:36:50.520 --> 0:36:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Because in New York, UH, if New York State borrows

0:36:53.800 --> 0:36:56.560
<v Speaker 1>from private bond holders, the bond holders will say, well,

0:36:56.640 --> 0:36:59.920
<v Speaker 1>you'll have to balance the budget by selling off proper

0:37:00.239 --> 0:37:05.160
<v Speaker 1>or cutting back public services, less transportation, and with less transportation,

0:37:05.440 --> 0:37:07.839
<v Speaker 1>people are just going to begin moving out of out

0:37:07.840 --> 0:37:10.680
<v Speaker 1>of New York. It'll become not as livable as it

0:37:10.760 --> 0:37:13.839
<v Speaker 1>used to be. So uh that that's the main thing

0:37:13.920 --> 0:37:16.680
<v Speaker 1>that m MT says that there are two ways of

0:37:16.960 --> 0:37:22.040
<v Speaker 1>creating of financing governments printing it borrowing, and the effect

0:37:22.040 --> 0:37:25.319
<v Speaker 1>on inflation is identical. I want to ask you, I

0:37:25.360 --> 0:37:28.480
<v Speaker 1>want to go back to this situation in China again

0:37:28.920 --> 0:37:31.480
<v Speaker 1>real quickly. We actually uh several months ago, we actually

0:37:31.480 --> 0:37:34.319
<v Speaker 1>talked to our Bloomberg, one of our economists here at

0:37:34.360 --> 0:37:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Tom Orlick, who is a new book, Uh, China

0:37:37.239 --> 0:37:39.759
<v Speaker 1>The Bubble That Never Pops, And we talked about some

0:37:39.880 --> 0:37:41.719
<v Speaker 1>of this, which is that due to the structure of

0:37:41.760 --> 0:37:44.839
<v Speaker 1>finance in China, um that all of this sort of

0:37:45.239 --> 0:37:48.320
<v Speaker 1>the debt bubble is about to explode fearst they're misguided,

0:37:48.360 --> 0:37:52.120
<v Speaker 1>there's sort of based on a misunderstanding. Nonetheless, I'm curious

0:37:52.120 --> 0:37:54.440
<v Speaker 1>what you see as the costs of a system like

0:37:54.480 --> 0:37:57.680
<v Speaker 1>that that because some critics would look at it and say, okay, yes,

0:37:57.719 --> 0:38:01.520
<v Speaker 1>you could certainly keep companies a lot. I've indefinitely, but

0:38:01.760 --> 0:38:06.399
<v Speaker 1>what about corruption? What about productivity? What about the sort

0:38:06.400 --> 0:38:08.640
<v Speaker 1>of what in the West we might say as well,

0:38:08.640 --> 0:38:12.640
<v Speaker 1>what about the disciplining effect of the market by having

0:38:13.080 --> 0:38:17.040
<v Speaker 1>by not allowing you know, companies to roll over their debts? Uh?

0:38:17.120 --> 0:38:21.000
<v Speaker 1>And definitely do you see costs associated with the Chinese

0:38:21.000 --> 0:38:25.759
<v Speaker 1>system whereby okay, uh, debts and bankruptcies aren't as much

0:38:25.760 --> 0:38:30.200
<v Speaker 1>of an issue necessarily or systemic, But what are but

0:38:30.320 --> 0:38:33.040
<v Speaker 1>in terms of um, you know, keeping all these companies

0:38:33.040 --> 0:38:36.360
<v Speaker 1>alive with sort of ongoing access to credit. Well, I

0:38:36.360 --> 0:38:39.200
<v Speaker 1>think the recent weeks newspapers have shown there's just as

0:38:39.280 --> 0:38:43.040
<v Speaker 1>much corruption in the United States. Uh financial system, Uh,

0:38:43.120 --> 0:38:45.600
<v Speaker 1>as there is in China. I mean, look at the

0:38:45.680 --> 0:38:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Deutsche Bank and look at all the banks that have

0:38:47.920 --> 0:38:51.719
<v Speaker 1>been uh uh involved, Um there are. Ten years ago,

0:38:51.800 --> 0:38:55.120
<v Speaker 1>corruption was a very serious problem in China, and UH

0:38:55.480 --> 0:38:57.960
<v Speaker 1>when I had lecture there to students, there was you

0:38:57.960 --> 0:39:01.160
<v Speaker 1>could see the idealism I hadn't in any other country,

0:39:01.760 --> 0:39:05.120
<v Speaker 1>an idea that they can really they'll graduate, they'll go

0:39:05.160 --> 0:39:09.120
<v Speaker 1>into government, They're going to clean up corruption. Uh. And

0:39:09.160 --> 0:39:12.160
<v Speaker 1>really they felt it was their country and they had

0:39:12.160 --> 0:39:15.040
<v Speaker 1>a chance of actually shaping the economy because it was

0:39:15.080 --> 0:39:19.319
<v Speaker 1>something entirely new. Well, the problem ten years later that

0:39:19.360 --> 0:39:22.280
<v Speaker 1>we can see is a cleaning up corruption does entail

0:39:22.400 --> 0:39:25.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of government oversight into the economy. And uh

0:39:25.840 --> 0:39:28.759
<v Speaker 1>some of the cost of cleaning up corruption is a

0:39:28.880 --> 0:39:32.520
<v Speaker 1>very heavily regulated economy. They're trying to get rid of

0:39:32.760 --> 0:39:35.960
<v Speaker 1>corruption now and that's there. Uh from what I what

0:39:36.040 --> 0:39:41.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm told by Chinese businessmen, it seems to be working

0:39:41.480 --> 0:39:44.320
<v Speaker 1>uh quite well, certainly compared to what it was before.

0:39:44.640 --> 0:39:47.400
<v Speaker 1>But getting back to the other question, UH, what is

0:39:47.440 --> 0:39:50.839
<v Speaker 1>the cost? Begin by what the benefit? The benefit is

0:39:51.200 --> 0:39:56.400
<v Speaker 1>When there's an economic downturn like a coronavirus. The company

0:39:56.440 --> 0:40:00.040
<v Speaker 1>did not go out of business layoff its employees to

0:40:00.120 --> 0:40:03.560
<v Speaker 1>be sold to foreign buyers. It was the economy was

0:40:03.640 --> 0:40:08.160
<v Speaker 1>able to maintain stability. So the cost really is UH

0:40:08.520 --> 0:40:13.400
<v Speaker 1>money is cost free if the government creates it. Borrowing

0:40:13.480 --> 0:40:15.839
<v Speaker 1>is not cost free, but money creating has cost free

0:40:15.880 --> 0:40:19.600
<v Speaker 1>as long as it's not inflationary. And China does not

0:40:20.480 --> 0:40:24.040
<v Speaker 1>create money in an inflationary way. It creates money simply

0:40:24.120 --> 0:40:28.360
<v Speaker 1>to stabilize UH employment in a way that has not

0:40:28.520 --> 0:40:31.920
<v Speaker 1>caused any more inflation there than it would here. If

0:40:31.960 --> 0:40:36.200
<v Speaker 1>New York City in New York State received money creation

0:40:36.320 --> 0:40:41.440
<v Speaker 1>to just continue up, continue operation, that wouldn't inflate prices

0:40:41.480 --> 0:40:44.839
<v Speaker 1>at all. In fact, what we're in now is that deflation.

0:40:45.239 --> 0:40:47.640
<v Speaker 1>If we don't write down the debts, then the debt

0:40:47.680 --> 0:40:51.479
<v Speaker 1>service is going to cause a deflation of prices. That's

0:40:51.520 --> 0:40:55.360
<v Speaker 1>the real problem today, not inflation, but deflation, as people

0:40:55.400 --> 0:40:58.319
<v Speaker 1>can can't afford to buy goods and services and have

0:40:58.440 --> 0:41:01.160
<v Speaker 1>to cut back their family budget and by less and

0:41:01.239 --> 0:41:05.799
<v Speaker 1>less to UH employ fewer and fewer people producing and

0:41:05.840 --> 0:41:09.759
<v Speaker 1>selling goods and services, fewer restaurants in business, and and

0:41:09.800 --> 0:41:14.440
<v Speaker 1>so on. So if if you look ahead to the future.

0:41:14.719 --> 0:41:16.960
<v Speaker 1>And you know, if you recognize that there may be

0:41:17.520 --> 0:41:23.000
<v Speaker 1>some desirable aspects of Chinese style command economy as you're describing,

0:41:23.080 --> 0:41:24.799
<v Speaker 1>or at least one where the government has a little

0:41:24.840 --> 0:41:29.480
<v Speaker 1>bit more influence over the financial industry. Do you see

0:41:29.520 --> 0:41:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the US becoming more like the Chinese system? Or alternatively,

0:41:36.800 --> 0:41:39.839
<v Speaker 1>do you see China becoming more like the U S

0:41:39.840 --> 0:41:43.879
<v Speaker 1>system because of global competition. I'd be curious to get

0:41:43.880 --> 0:41:47.520
<v Speaker 1>your views if you had to choose China. China certainly

0:41:47.560 --> 0:41:50.920
<v Speaker 1>is not going to privatize banking. It is absolutely drawing

0:41:50.960 --> 0:41:53.160
<v Speaker 1>the line. It is not going to let banking be

0:41:53.320 --> 0:41:58.879
<v Speaker 1>private because credit is the main public utility. UH An

0:41:58.880 --> 0:42:02.600
<v Speaker 1>economy is basically plan there was credit system, Who's going

0:42:02.640 --> 0:42:06.640
<v Speaker 1>to supply the credit? UH America is turning into a

0:42:06.680 --> 0:42:10.680
<v Speaker 1>centrally planned economy, not planned by Washington, but planned by

0:42:10.680 --> 0:42:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street, just like UH European countries are planned by

0:42:14.920 --> 0:42:18.520
<v Speaker 1>their financial sector. And the problem is who's going to

0:42:18.560 --> 0:42:21.000
<v Speaker 1>do the planning and what is their planning going to

0:42:21.040 --> 0:42:22.600
<v Speaker 1>be for. Is it going to be to make the

0:42:22.640 --> 0:42:25.239
<v Speaker 1>economy grow or is it going to get rich off

0:42:25.320 --> 0:42:29.279
<v Speaker 1>the economy by shrinking the economy? UH that the whole

0:42:29.360 --> 0:42:32.960
<v Speaker 1>question I don't see the United States getting more like China,

0:42:33.080 --> 0:42:37.640
<v Speaker 1>despite uh MMTV used modestly. I I see the United

0:42:37.640 --> 0:42:41.960
<v Speaker 1>States getting more like Greece. Uh in England, austerity, more

0:42:41.960 --> 0:42:46.560
<v Speaker 1>and more austerity, a slow crash, a slow debt deflation.

0:42:47.040 --> 0:42:49.640
<v Speaker 1>And uh, that's what I've outlined in my book Killing

0:42:49.640 --> 0:42:52.719
<v Speaker 1>the Host. I described debt deflation, which was discussed in

0:42:52.760 --> 0:42:57.080
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen thirties when it was actually happening and when

0:42:57.120 --> 0:43:00.160
<v Speaker 1>people had to pay their debts and couldn't have had

0:43:00.239 --> 0:43:02.760
<v Speaker 1>to buy goods and services. What happened in the Great

0:43:02.760 --> 0:43:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Depression is happening to get again today, but it's happening

0:43:06.880 --> 0:43:10.719
<v Speaker 1>in slow motion. It's interesting the Grease comparison, because I

0:43:10.760 --> 0:43:15.359
<v Speaker 1>remember the Grease comparisons like in eleven and people would say, oh,

0:43:15.360 --> 0:43:17.240
<v Speaker 1>the U. S has all this national debt, we're becoming

0:43:17.280 --> 0:43:19.360
<v Speaker 1>like Greece. But you're using it in a different way,

0:43:19.800 --> 0:43:22.400
<v Speaker 1>not that uh, we're piling on all this debt, but

0:43:22.520 --> 0:43:25.359
<v Speaker 1>that we're unwilling to spend and going into this sort

0:43:25.360 --> 0:43:27.680
<v Speaker 1>of forced austerity mode. And of course we might see

0:43:27.680 --> 0:43:30.680
<v Speaker 1>it here in New York City. Without further aid, I'm

0:43:30.680 --> 0:43:33.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna ask you a bigger question, you know. On episode

0:43:33.960 --> 0:43:37.040
<v Speaker 1>after episode, interview after interview that Tracy and I do

0:43:37.920 --> 0:43:42.040
<v Speaker 1>on this podcast, this sort of idea that like we've

0:43:42.040 --> 0:43:44.719
<v Speaker 1>had this like forty year run in a way of

0:43:44.760 --> 0:43:47.200
<v Speaker 1>the existing model seems to come up, and it comes

0:43:47.239 --> 0:43:50.880
<v Speaker 1>up when we talked to economists, we recently talked to

0:43:50.880 --> 0:43:53.839
<v Speaker 1>Paul McCulley a few others, this idea that really over

0:43:53.840 --> 0:43:57.480
<v Speaker 1>those at last forty years, we've crystallized this idea of

0:43:57.960 --> 0:44:01.880
<v Speaker 1>the sort of financialized, asset driven economy. And I'm curious

0:44:01.880 --> 0:44:04.560
<v Speaker 1>whether you um sort of see the same day as

0:44:04.640 --> 0:44:08.000
<v Speaker 1>roughly forty years ago, either some turning point or some

0:44:08.160 --> 0:44:11.520
<v Speaker 1>great acceleration towards now. And I'm curious also it's like,

0:44:12.080 --> 0:44:16.239
<v Speaker 1>is coronavirus is this crisis a turning point for that

0:44:16.360 --> 0:44:18.360
<v Speaker 1>or is it just in your view, just going to

0:44:18.440 --> 0:44:22.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of keep accelerating on the existing trajectory. Well Night

0:44:22.640 --> 0:44:25.640
<v Speaker 1>certainly was a turning point. You had Margaret Thatcher in

0:44:25.680 --> 0:44:28.959
<v Speaker 1>England and Ronald Reagan in the United States. The whole

0:44:29.000 --> 0:44:33.399
<v Speaker 1>tax system was shifted to favor real estate UH and

0:44:33.680 --> 0:44:37.080
<v Speaker 1>the financial system, not the real economy. And then you

0:44:37.200 --> 0:44:41.359
<v Speaker 1>had the shift of American corporate employment to wait low

0:44:41.400 --> 0:44:45.000
<v Speaker 1>wage countries in Asia so yes, nineteen eighty was the

0:44:45.040 --> 0:44:49.080
<v Speaker 1>turning point, and all of the trends made that from

0:44:49.120 --> 0:44:53.160
<v Speaker 1>World War two UH to nine eight for more and

0:44:53.200 --> 0:44:57.880
<v Speaker 1>more prosperity for labor were suddenly reversed. In retrospect, the

0:44:57.960 --> 0:45:00.919
<v Speaker 1>nineteen seventies looked like a golden age now, but since

0:45:01.040 --> 0:45:04.279
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighty, real wages haven't really gone up very much.

0:45:04.560 --> 0:45:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Death has gone way way up. So you've had a

0:45:07.640 --> 0:45:11.160
<v Speaker 1>depth driven economy that leverage to economy. You had the

0:45:11.160 --> 0:45:14.840
<v Speaker 1>corporate takeover UH and corporate rating movement again in the

0:45:14.880 --> 0:45:19.000
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighties. UH. You had the as interest rates came

0:45:19.080 --> 0:45:24.440
<v Speaker 1>down from my former boss that chased both workers. In

0:45:24.800 --> 0:45:28.200
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighty, you've had You had the greatest bond market

0:45:28.280 --> 0:45:33.839
<v Speaker 1>boom in history, bond prices sword, stock market sword. You had.

0:45:33.880 --> 0:45:39.879
<v Speaker 1>You created huge financial wealth without creating actual industrial and

0:45:40.200 --> 0:45:44.360
<v Speaker 1>consumer wealth. So you had a shift of the beneficiaries

0:45:44.400 --> 0:45:49.120
<v Speaker 1>of the system from labor and business to UH, finance,

0:45:49.200 --> 0:45:53.000
<v Speaker 1>the Wall Street, the real estate sector, and the insurance sector.

0:45:53.080 --> 0:45:57.000
<v Speaker 1>So the whole economy changed nineteen eighty, and it's changed

0:45:57.040 --> 0:46:00.120
<v Speaker 1>in a way that has left us now depth and

0:46:00.480 --> 0:46:03.000
<v Speaker 1>the economy's run up as much dead as it can

0:46:03.400 --> 0:46:06.680
<v Speaker 1>it can't really push up anymore, although the Federal Reserve

0:46:06.960 --> 0:46:10.440
<v Speaker 1>can certainly keep pushing up the stock market, but it

0:46:10.480 --> 0:46:12.959
<v Speaker 1>is not pushing up the economy the way it's going,

0:46:13.320 --> 0:46:16.279
<v Speaker 1>and so I don't see the economy as recovering. The

0:46:16.320 --> 0:46:20.239
<v Speaker 1>coronavirus is simply leftist idling at a low level, and

0:46:20.280 --> 0:46:22.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't see any way of getting out of the

0:46:22.840 --> 0:46:26.720
<v Speaker 1>level as long as we have to pay the debt legacy. Uh,

0:46:26.760 --> 0:46:30.279
<v Speaker 1>the arrears that have all mounted up and are just

0:46:30.920 --> 0:46:36.120
<v Speaker 1>a burden on families, on businesses, uh, and on states

0:46:36.120 --> 0:46:40.080
<v Speaker 1>and localities. They can't carry it. And UH it's crunch time.

0:46:40.480 --> 0:46:44.560
<v Speaker 1>And unless you alleviate the depth problem, you're going to

0:46:44.600 --> 0:46:48.480
<v Speaker 1>be in a slow new depression. It's always a good

0:46:48.520 --> 0:46:52.200
<v Speaker 1>podcast when you can go from Hammurabi to Mark Margaret Thatcher.

0:46:52.280 --> 0:46:56.000
<v Speaker 1>I think all right, Professor Hudson, thank you so much

0:46:56.040 --> 0:46:59.719
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. I really enjoyed that conversation. Thank you. Yeah,

0:46:59.760 --> 0:47:25.120
<v Speaker 1>that was great to be here for having so Joe,

0:47:25.160 --> 0:47:30.319
<v Speaker 1>that was a wide ranging conversation, it was, and you know,

0:47:30.480 --> 0:47:33.120
<v Speaker 1>of course it did touch on a lot of themes

0:47:33.120 --> 0:47:37.400
<v Speaker 1>that we've discussed lately. But a I liked um. I

0:47:37.480 --> 0:47:40.239
<v Speaker 1>liked his sort of obviously historical perspective, that's a big

0:47:40.280 --> 0:47:42.400
<v Speaker 1>part of what he's known for. But I thought the

0:47:43.160 --> 0:47:47.719
<v Speaker 1>comparisons to the sort of Chinese model were pretty interesting,

0:47:47.800 --> 0:47:51.040
<v Speaker 1>and it's sort of helped me crystallize, like, sort of

0:47:51.080 --> 0:47:54.440
<v Speaker 1>what are some of the tensions here, perhaps about going

0:47:54.440 --> 0:47:56.960
<v Speaker 1>at things in a different way, whether it's through much

0:47:57.000 --> 0:48:02.360
<v Speaker 1>more um fiscal fiscal authorities, central realization of credit and spending,

0:48:02.719 --> 0:48:07.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of a sort of useful, useful current counterpoint I think,

0:48:07.000 --> 0:48:10.040
<v Speaker 1>to how things work out. Yeah, and it actually reminded

0:48:10.080 --> 0:48:12.640
<v Speaker 1>me quite a bit of the episode we recorded with

0:48:12.800 --> 0:48:15.799
<v Speaker 1>Victor Schutz a few months Definitely, I think he made

0:48:15.800 --> 0:48:18.759
<v Speaker 1>similar points about what works in the Chinese model and

0:48:18.800 --> 0:48:22.160
<v Speaker 1>this idea of the US perhaps moving closer to it.

0:48:22.880 --> 0:48:25.000
<v Speaker 1>There is another thing that I was thinking about, which

0:48:25.080 --> 0:48:31.720
<v Speaker 1>is Professor Hudson's point about when something like this happens

0:48:31.760 --> 0:48:34.799
<v Speaker 1>in the economy, you know, an act of God, as

0:48:34.840 --> 0:48:36.880
<v Speaker 1>you put it, you know there's going to be pain,

0:48:37.360 --> 0:48:42.200
<v Speaker 1>and the policy prescription is basically all about finding who

0:48:42.320 --> 0:48:45.839
<v Speaker 1>can bear that pain most efficiently, or who can bear

0:48:45.880 --> 0:48:49.960
<v Speaker 1>it with minimum disruption to the economy. And you know,

0:48:50.000 --> 0:48:52.560
<v Speaker 1>as he put it, it's usually the creditors they have

0:48:52.960 --> 0:48:56.120
<v Speaker 1>lots of money, they can do this, or they could

0:48:56.120 --> 0:48:58.600
<v Speaker 1>be back stopped by the government, which has the balance

0:48:58.680 --> 0:49:04.240
<v Speaker 1>sheet to endure the pain. Yeah, I mean it's right exactly.

0:49:04.280 --> 0:49:07.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's almost like you could say that initially

0:49:07.400 --> 0:49:10.600
<v Speaker 1>in the crisis, that sort of March and April consensus

0:49:10.640 --> 0:49:13.759
<v Speaker 1>is like, nobody should have to endure the pain, right,

0:49:14.080 --> 0:49:16.440
<v Speaker 1>that this was like a true act of God. It

0:49:16.520 --> 0:49:20.160
<v Speaker 1>was extraordinary, and we're going to get things back to normal.

0:49:20.280 --> 0:49:21.880
<v Speaker 1>No one should be permanently put out of work, no

0:49:21.920 --> 0:49:24.640
<v Speaker 1>one should have to lose their businesses. And we actually

0:49:24.640 --> 0:49:26.920
<v Speaker 1>did a lot of spending that was on a scale

0:49:27.200 --> 0:49:31.279
<v Speaker 1>and sort of monot say generosity, but maybe generosity is

0:49:31.320 --> 0:49:34.719
<v Speaker 1>the word that was sort of unparalleled throughout history. I mean,

0:49:34.719 --> 0:49:39.719
<v Speaker 1>the fact that Unemployment Insurance um I was supposed to

0:49:39.760 --> 0:49:43.000
<v Speaker 1>basically be a complete replacement for the medium worker, fact

0:49:43.000 --> 0:49:46.600
<v Speaker 1>that we had no strings attached, almost paral protection program,

0:49:46.640 --> 0:49:49.360
<v Speaker 1>money for small businesses and so forth. But you know,

0:49:49.400 --> 0:49:52.800
<v Speaker 1>we did lose that appetite pretty quickly, and it's like, okay,

0:49:52.960 --> 0:49:55.600
<v Speaker 1>even though the fact that public health authorities failed to

0:49:55.640 --> 0:49:58.680
<v Speaker 1>contain the virus or people's behavior failed to a few

0:49:58.680 --> 0:50:02.319
<v Speaker 1>months later is like, right, you're kind of out of luck.

0:50:02.320 --> 0:50:04.719
<v Speaker 1>Get back to work, find a job. Do we have

0:50:04.760 --> 0:50:07.560
<v Speaker 1>to do? It's like we didn't that that appetude really

0:50:07.600 --> 0:50:10.200
<v Speaker 1>did not last very long in this country. Yeah. Well,

0:50:10.239 --> 0:50:12.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean not just that, but a lot of the

0:50:12.160 --> 0:50:15.560
<v Speaker 1>forbearance programs that were either past or the ones that

0:50:15.600 --> 0:50:19.560
<v Speaker 1>were discussed, like the payroll tax cut, all of those

0:50:19.560 --> 0:50:23.759
<v Speaker 1>are still predicated on people eventually paying that money back. So,

0:50:23.800 --> 0:50:26.080
<v Speaker 1>for instance, in the housing market, I think most of

0:50:26.120 --> 0:50:30.040
<v Speaker 1>the forbearance programs are renewed every three months, So you

0:50:30.080 --> 0:50:34.760
<v Speaker 1>can kind of see this wall of forbearance maturities coming

0:50:34.920 --> 0:50:37.560
<v Speaker 1>every three months, and at some point you get the

0:50:37.600 --> 0:50:40.040
<v Speaker 1>sense that they're not going to be rolled over, and

0:50:40.640 --> 0:50:42.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, all of a sudden, the bills are going

0:50:42.480 --> 0:50:45.200
<v Speaker 1>to come do again, and you're probably going to have

0:50:45.280 --> 0:50:48.480
<v Speaker 1>a rerun of the economic pain that we experienced in March.

0:50:49.360 --> 0:50:51.360
<v Speaker 1>The other thing to think about, it's not something that

0:50:51.400 --> 0:50:53.640
<v Speaker 1>we really went into, but you know, there's a lot

0:50:53.719 --> 0:50:56.760
<v Speaker 1>of like talk about the future of X, the future

0:50:56.800 --> 0:50:59.960
<v Speaker 1>of cities, the future of offices, the future of working

0:51:00.080 --> 0:51:02.920
<v Speaker 1>from home, the future of e commerce and stuff like that,

0:51:03.000 --> 0:51:05.520
<v Speaker 1>and you know, all that's important, but there is a

0:51:05.560 --> 0:51:09.319
<v Speaker 1>sort of sinister way to think about that, which is

0:51:09.400 --> 0:51:12.960
<v Speaker 1>because remember, you know, something that Professor Hudson said is like,

0:51:13.040 --> 0:51:14.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, the idea is like to just go back

0:51:14.640 --> 0:51:18.680
<v Speaker 1>to the previous state. And I forget the word he cited, um,

0:51:18.880 --> 0:51:22.239
<v Speaker 1>but it's like, no, the purpose of a forgiveness and

0:51:22.280 --> 0:51:25.040
<v Speaker 1>a blank slate is just just go back to the

0:51:25.040 --> 0:51:28.440
<v Speaker 1>pre the pre normal. And if you're sort of preoccupied

0:51:28.520 --> 0:51:30.640
<v Speaker 1>with thinking about the future of X and how will

0:51:30.800 --> 0:51:34.280
<v Speaker 1>coronavirus change everything, which there were like tons of articles

0:51:34.320 --> 0:51:37.280
<v Speaker 1>about for the last six months, it almost like provides

0:51:37.280 --> 0:51:41.000
<v Speaker 1>a pretext in a way for not doing the clean slate.

0:51:41.040 --> 0:51:43.080
<v Speaker 1>In other words, it's like, well, we can't just go

0:51:43.120 --> 0:51:44.840
<v Speaker 1>back to the old normal and we can't just wipe

0:51:44.840 --> 0:51:48.000
<v Speaker 1>everything out because everything is going to change post coronavirus,

0:51:48.160 --> 0:51:50.960
<v Speaker 1>and maybe something's will change. But you can sort of

0:51:51.000 --> 0:51:55.040
<v Speaker 1>see how that rhetoric becomes a sort of excuse for

0:51:55.640 --> 0:51:59.600
<v Speaker 1>not making everyone whole. I feel like there's a tension

0:51:59.680 --> 0:52:03.800
<v Speaker 1>there because on the one hand, someone like Michael Hudson

0:52:03.960 --> 0:52:06.920
<v Speaker 1>is very clear that the existing system is flawed, But

0:52:07.040 --> 0:52:09.800
<v Speaker 1>on the other hand, the whole point of the debt relief,

0:52:10.160 --> 0:52:12.759
<v Speaker 1>as you put it, is that blank slate to go

0:52:12.840 --> 0:52:15.520
<v Speaker 1>back to where we were before. So there's a tension

0:52:15.600 --> 0:52:18.960
<v Speaker 1>between wanting to fix the system and using a big

0:52:18.960 --> 0:52:22.000
<v Speaker 1>moment of change to do so, and doing maybe what

0:52:22.120 --> 0:52:25.279
<v Speaker 1>might be most economically expedient and just going back to

0:52:25.320 --> 0:52:29.240
<v Speaker 1>the system as it was before. Yeah, no, no easy,

0:52:29.280 --> 0:52:32.760
<v Speaker 1>no easy. Uh. Answers to resolving that and that always

0:52:32.800 --> 0:52:34.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of is the challenge post to sort of crisis

0:52:34.920 --> 0:52:37.719
<v Speaker 1>policy makers of how do you fix the system and

0:52:37.760 --> 0:52:39.759
<v Speaker 1>repair system at the same time, they're kind of it's

0:52:39.800 --> 0:52:42.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of different at the same time. Yeah, under immense

0:52:42.880 --> 0:52:46.160
<v Speaker 1>time pressure as well. Well, this is why we aren't policymakers.

0:52:46.239 --> 0:52:49.200
<v Speaker 1>So we just talked about it, all right, Uh, shall

0:52:49.239 --> 0:52:52.520
<v Speaker 1>we leave it there? Let's leave it there. This has

0:52:52.560 --> 0:52:56.240
<v Speaker 1>been another episode of the All Thoughts podcast. I'm Tracy Alloway.

0:52:56.320 --> 0:52:59.200
<v Speaker 1>You can follow me on Twitter at Tracy Alloway and

0:52:59.239 --> 0:53:01.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm Chill I Send though You can follow me on

0:53:01.160 --> 0:53:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at the Stalwart. Follow our producer on Twitter, Laura Carlson.

0:53:05.440 --> 0:53:08.640
<v Speaker 1>She's at Laura M. Carlson. Follow the Bloomberg head of

0:53:08.640 --> 0:53:12.640
<v Speaker 1>a podcast, Francesca Levie at Francesco Today, and check out

0:53:12.680 --> 0:53:16.120
<v Speaker 1>all of our podcasts under the handle at podcasts. Thanks

0:53:16.160 --> 0:53:16.640
<v Speaker 1>for listening,