WEBVTT - Moneyball, Soccer, and the Gap Between Analytics and the Real World

0:00:08.400 --> 0:00:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin. Around twenty ten, Sarah Rudd was rooting for this

0:00:20.079 --> 0:00:23.639
<v Speaker 1>British soccer team. It was a team called Blackpool. It

0:00:23.680 --> 0:00:26.880
<v Speaker 1>had been her great grandfather's favorite team. She was really

0:00:26.920 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 1>into it, but she started getting annoyed by this one player.

0:00:30.960 --> 0:00:32.400
<v Speaker 1>His name was Charlie Adam.

0:00:32.720 --> 0:00:36.479
<v Speaker 2>He just loved to take shots from really long distance

0:00:36.760 --> 0:00:40.080
<v Speaker 2>and it drove me crazy. Every possession just kind of

0:00:40.200 --> 0:00:43.839
<v Speaker 2>ended with him taking like these random shots and it's like,

0:00:43.920 --> 0:00:44.800
<v Speaker 2>what a waste?

0:00:44.880 --> 0:00:45.440
<v Speaker 3>What are you doing.

0:00:45.960 --> 0:00:48.879
<v Speaker 1>Sarah was living in Seattle working for Microsoft as a

0:00:48.920 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 1>software engineer, but she really wanted to get into sports analytics. Basically,

0:00:53.880 --> 0:00:56.880
<v Speaker 1>she wanted to do moneyball, but for soccer. And then

0:00:57.000 --> 0:01:00.480
<v Speaker 1>she discovered that this sports data company called stat DNA

0:01:00.760 --> 0:01:04.360
<v Speaker 1>was hosting a contest, a contest where people could use

0:01:04.400 --> 0:01:10.200
<v Speaker 1>the company's soccer tracking data to generate analytical insights. And

0:01:10.240 --> 0:01:13.399
<v Speaker 1>she thought this could be my chance, This could be

0:01:13.440 --> 0:01:16.800
<v Speaker 1>my chance to break into the industry, and also at

0:01:16.800 --> 0:01:20.120
<v Speaker 1>the same time that that guy, Charlie Adam really should

0:01:20.160 --> 0:01:22.720
<v Speaker 1>not be taking those long shots.

0:01:22.959 --> 0:01:27.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm a big fan of searching for inspiration elsewhere, so

0:01:27.720 --> 0:01:29.959
<v Speaker 2>I started just looking around and seeing like, well, what

0:01:30.040 --> 0:01:30.759
<v Speaker 2>have other people done?

0:01:30.800 --> 0:01:34.679
<v Speaker 3>In this space, and it turns out for soccer not much.

0:01:35.080 --> 0:01:38.040
<v Speaker 2>But there was some really interesting papers in other sports,

0:01:38.080 --> 0:01:40.680
<v Speaker 2>and the one that caught my eye was by a

0:01:40.720 --> 0:01:44.920
<v Speaker 2>gentleman named Keith Goldner. He had done something using NFL

0:01:45.000 --> 0:01:48.200
<v Speaker 2>data where he looked at kind of this, if the

0:01:48.240 --> 0:01:51.000
<v Speaker 2>ball is on the thirty five yard line, it's second

0:01:51.080 --> 0:01:53.920
<v Speaker 2>and ten with you know, X amount of time on.

0:01:53.920 --> 0:01:55.639
<v Speaker 3>The clock, like how likely are you to score?

0:01:56.360 --> 0:01:59.320
<v Speaker 2>And you know, I thought that was really interesting and

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:01.480
<v Speaker 2>I thought, well, isn't that kind of similar to Charlie

0:02:01.480 --> 0:02:04.640
<v Speaker 2>Adam having the ball forty yards out?

0:02:04.880 --> 0:02:08.560
<v Speaker 1>So Sarah took this methodology it's called a Markov chain

0:02:08.720 --> 0:02:12.120
<v Speaker 1>just fyi, and she applied it to soccer. She built

0:02:12.160 --> 0:02:14.480
<v Speaker 1>a model that let you look at a moment when

0:02:14.520 --> 0:02:17.280
<v Speaker 1>a player had the ball in a given location on

0:02:17.400 --> 0:02:20.840
<v Speaker 1>the field, and the model could evaluate what the player

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:25.480
<v Speaker 1>did at that moment. Specifically, the model let you ask,

0:02:25.960 --> 0:02:29.840
<v Speaker 1>did the choice the player made passing forward, passing to

0:02:29.880 --> 0:02:34.960
<v Speaker 1>the side, shooting whatever. Did this choice the player made

0:02:35.440 --> 0:02:39.760
<v Speaker 1>increase or decrease the probability of the team scoring a

0:02:39.800 --> 0:02:41.480
<v Speaker 1>goal on that possession?

0:02:41.960 --> 0:02:45.600
<v Speaker 2>And yeah, it really hadn't been done in soccer before,

0:02:45.680 --> 0:02:49.799
<v Speaker 2>which was kind of yeah, why it was kind of

0:02:49.840 --> 0:02:50.799
<v Speaker 2>a revolutionary paper.

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:52.000
<v Speaker 3>I hate to use that term, but.

0:02:52.000 --> 0:02:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Like I'm saying it listed, I'm saying that listed five

0:02:54.440 --> 0:02:56.320
<v Speaker 1>point thirty eight had like a list of the ten

0:02:56.360 --> 0:02:59.040
<v Speaker 1>big papers and figuring out this kind of thing, and

0:02:59.120 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 1>yours was the first out on the list, so it

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:04.760
<v Speaker 1>was chronological to be fair, but still big first is

0:03:04.760 --> 0:03:05.280
<v Speaker 1>a big deal.

0:03:05.520 --> 0:03:07.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and you know it was cool because I was

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:09.480
<v Speaker 2>kind of like, oh, well, I'm just doing what this

0:03:09.520 --> 0:03:12.120
<v Speaker 2>guy in the other football is doing.

0:03:12.680 --> 0:03:13.920
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, it was pretty impactful.

0:03:14.880 --> 0:03:17.280
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, what did you find out about

0:03:17.360 --> 0:03:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Charlie Adam?

0:03:18.240 --> 0:03:22.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Not good to shoot from my hearts out was

0:03:23.120 --> 0:03:26.920
<v Speaker 2>what I found out, which was really like soul soothing

0:03:27.000 --> 0:03:28.600
<v Speaker 2>for me, or it was like I was right.

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:37.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm Jacob Goldstein and this is what's your problem. Today

0:03:37.320 --> 0:03:40.320
<v Speaker 1>we have the third and final episode in our series

0:03:40.360 --> 0:03:43.440
<v Speaker 1>of interviews with people who are working at the frontiers

0:03:43.480 --> 0:03:47.440
<v Speaker 1>of technology to help a lead athletes perform better. My

0:03:47.520 --> 0:03:50.720
<v Speaker 1>guest today is Sarah Rudd. She's the co founder and

0:03:50.840 --> 0:03:55.160
<v Speaker 1>CEO at Source Football, a soccer analytics company that works

0:03:55.160 --> 0:03:58.720
<v Speaker 1>with professional soccer teams in the US, the UK, and Europe.

0:03:59.160 --> 0:04:02.600
<v Speaker 1>There are different to frame the core problem that Sarah

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 1>is trying to solve for today's show, I'm going to

0:04:05.200 --> 0:04:09.400
<v Speaker 1>go with a problem that generalizes way beyond sports. The

0:04:09.480 --> 0:04:13.320
<v Speaker 1>problem is this, how do you translate analytical insights into

0:04:13.400 --> 0:04:18.839
<v Speaker 1>meaningful changes in the real world. In our conversation, Sarah

0:04:18.839 --> 0:04:21.599
<v Speaker 1>and I talked about analytics and the challenge of getting

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:24.720
<v Speaker 1>people to change their behavior, change the way they make

0:04:24.800 --> 0:04:28.160
<v Speaker 1>decisions based on analytics. But before we got to all that,

0:04:28.240 --> 0:04:30.679
<v Speaker 1>we talked a little bit more about that first paper

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:34.039
<v Speaker 1>that Sarah wrote to prove that Charlie Adams should stop

0:04:34.040 --> 0:04:37.360
<v Speaker 1>shooting from forty yards out. Sarah told me that paper

0:04:37.440 --> 0:04:39.880
<v Speaker 1>also led to some less obvious insights.

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:43.839
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think like one of the first ones was

0:04:43.839 --> 0:04:47.120
<v Speaker 2>that crossing from kind of like wide situations, which was

0:04:47.200 --> 0:04:50.480
<v Speaker 2>real really still very popular. So if you think of

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:52.920
<v Speaker 2>like a player coming down the wings and then they're

0:04:52.960 --> 0:04:54.719
<v Speaker 2>going to kick the ball high in the air and

0:04:54.720 --> 0:04:56.800
<v Speaker 2>then hopefully a teammate is going to head it into

0:04:56.800 --> 0:04:57.360
<v Speaker 2>the goal.

0:04:57.560 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 3>That is also like pretty low value.

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:03.719
<v Speaker 2>Oh interesting, yeah, because you have like a really high

0:05:04.160 --> 0:05:06.320
<v Speaker 2>chance of like turning the ball over from that.

0:05:06.920 --> 0:05:10.120
<v Speaker 1>And was that finding contrary to the sort of conventional

0:05:10.160 --> 0:05:11.040
<v Speaker 1>wisdom of the time.

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:13.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, at that time, it was at that time there

0:05:13.640 --> 0:05:18.520
<v Speaker 2>was still a lot of teams using that tactic, and

0:05:18.560 --> 0:05:22.520
<v Speaker 2>I think, you know, going back, like people were starting

0:05:22.520 --> 0:05:25.279
<v Speaker 2>to just kind of intuitively be like, maybe there's a

0:05:25.320 --> 0:05:28.560
<v Speaker 2>better way. So it's not like it kind of like

0:05:28.600 --> 0:05:32.200
<v Speaker 2>broke soccer or football, but it just kind of I

0:05:32.240 --> 0:05:35.039
<v Speaker 2>think reinforced some of the intuitions that people had where

0:05:35.040 --> 0:05:36.600
<v Speaker 2>it's like, maybe there's a better way to do this.

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:38.880
<v Speaker 1>And just to be clear, in the time since then,

0:05:38.920 --> 0:05:42.320
<v Speaker 1>in the whatever fifteen years or so since then, have

0:05:42.920 --> 0:05:45.520
<v Speaker 1>analytics shown clearly that that's a bad call and has

0:05:45.600 --> 0:05:47.880
<v Speaker 1>that style of play decreased as a result.

0:05:48.480 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And you know, now it's actually seen as like

0:05:50.680 --> 0:05:53.159
<v Speaker 2>a sign of like ooh, the offense is struggling, like

0:05:53.200 --> 0:05:56.680
<v Speaker 2>we're resorting to this really low probability tactic.

0:05:57.240 --> 0:06:00.960
<v Speaker 1>So okay, so this paper you write, you hired by

0:06:00.960 --> 0:06:04.960
<v Speaker 1>this analytics company, and then the analytics company gets acquired

0:06:05.000 --> 0:06:08.640
<v Speaker 1>by Arsenal, the famous London soccer team, and you wind

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:13.479
<v Speaker 1>up working at Arsenal for many years. And one of

0:06:13.520 --> 0:06:17.479
<v Speaker 1>the things I've heard you talk about about that that time,

0:06:17.880 --> 0:06:20.640
<v Speaker 1>and that clearly is a big important theme that goes

0:06:20.640 --> 0:06:23.640
<v Speaker 1>beyond soccer is trying to figure out how to get

0:06:23.960 --> 0:06:27.920
<v Speaker 1>the people who make real world decisions to actually listen

0:06:28.000 --> 0:06:30.599
<v Speaker 1>to you, to you and the analytics people.

0:06:31.279 --> 0:06:34.839
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's it's really hard because like if you you know,

0:06:34.920 --> 0:06:37.719
<v Speaker 2>remove sports from it, just getting anybody to change their

0:06:37.880 --> 0:06:42.839
<v Speaker 2>opinion based on facts or evidence is really really difficult.

0:06:42.880 --> 0:06:46.800
<v Speaker 2>And now you're talking about people who are in incredibly

0:06:46.839 --> 0:06:50.799
<v Speaker 2>stressful jobs where they can lose their job really based

0:06:50.800 --> 0:06:51.240
<v Speaker 2>on like.

0:06:51.320 --> 0:06:54.080
<v Speaker 3>Some random occurrence that happens over the weekend.

0:06:54.240 --> 0:06:57.240
<v Speaker 2>Right, Like, right, the result doesn't go other way, you're fired,

0:06:57.680 --> 0:06:58.400
<v Speaker 2>Good luck to you.

0:06:58.400 --> 0:07:01.240
<v Speaker 1>Which is not the way analytics works. Right, Like, the

0:07:01.240 --> 0:07:03.680
<v Speaker 1>way analytics works is you need a large end, You

0:07:03.760 --> 0:07:05.880
<v Speaker 1>need to do the thing one hundred times, and then

0:07:06.320 --> 0:07:08.600
<v Speaker 1>sixty times it'll go the way the analytics says it.

0:07:08.640 --> 0:07:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Forty times it won't. That's just the nature of the

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:13.000
<v Speaker 1>probabilistic world we live in.

0:07:13.360 --> 0:07:16.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and you know, like analytics is also all about

0:07:16.120 --> 0:07:19.280
<v Speaker 2>separating process from outcomes, and yet these decisions are still

0:07:19.320 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 2>being made on outcomes. So I have a lot of

0:07:22.280 --> 0:07:25.120
<v Speaker 2>empathy for kind of people who are in this situation.

0:07:25.280 --> 0:07:27.720
<v Speaker 1>And a coach will get fired more likely if they

0:07:27.840 --> 0:07:30.720
<v Speaker 1>do the thing that the analytics says that's contrary to

0:07:30.760 --> 0:07:33.040
<v Speaker 1>the sort of conventional wisdom in the sport. Right. It's

0:07:33.040 --> 0:07:36.520
<v Speaker 1>like why in American football coaches for a long time

0:07:36.560 --> 0:07:39.200
<v Speaker 1>didn't go for it enough on fourth down, right when

0:07:39.280 --> 0:07:42.280
<v Speaker 1>the analytic clearly said they should, But everybody would get

0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:43.760
<v Speaker 1>pissed at them if they went for it and didn't

0:07:43.760 --> 0:07:47.920
<v Speaker 1>get it. Now that's change right because of analytics. Interestingly, although,

0:07:48.040 --> 0:07:49.880
<v Speaker 1>was it this last Super Bowl where the coach kept

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 1>going for it on fourth down and not getting it

0:07:51.400 --> 0:07:53.640
<v Speaker 1>and people are like, he did it too much? I

0:07:53.680 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 1>was like, no, he didn't. Just because it didn't work

0:07:56.000 --> 0:07:57.840
<v Speaker 1>out doesn't mean it was the wrong decision.

0:07:58.480 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And so you know, this just kind of goes

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 2>back to like you need to have kind of top

0:08:02.760 --> 0:08:05.560
<v Speaker 2>top decision makers saying like, yeah, it's okay if you're

0:08:05.560 --> 0:08:08.080
<v Speaker 2>going to do something that looks a little bit unconventional.

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:10.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we believe in it, we trust it.

0:08:11.240 --> 0:08:13.360
<v Speaker 1>So okay. So we've talked about why it's hard. Did

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 1>you figure anything out about how to get people to

0:08:16.000 --> 0:08:16.840
<v Speaker 1>change their decision?

0:08:16.960 --> 0:08:19.640
<v Speaker 2>I would say the best thing would be building trust

0:08:19.800 --> 0:08:22.840
<v Speaker 2>through a common language, And so for us, the common

0:08:22.880 --> 0:08:26.720
<v Speaker 2>language was video, so we could build a model but

0:08:26.880 --> 0:08:29.760
<v Speaker 2>like until we could show them the model outputs on

0:08:30.000 --> 0:08:33.439
<v Speaker 2>video and walk them through it and say, this is

0:08:33.480 --> 0:08:36.319
<v Speaker 2>what the model sees, this is what the model predicts.

0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:39.040
<v Speaker 2>What do you think, like, walk me through it. And

0:08:39.120 --> 0:08:42.360
<v Speaker 2>so then it became kind of like these collaborative, iterative

0:08:42.559 --> 0:08:43.800
<v Speaker 2>model building processes.

0:08:44.120 --> 0:08:46.880
<v Speaker 1>It's sort of a version of having an idea and

0:08:46.880 --> 0:08:49.959
<v Speaker 1>then convincing your boss that that idea is actually their idea,

0:08:50.440 --> 0:08:52.840
<v Speaker 1>and once they think it's their idea, then they'll do it.

0:08:52.840 --> 0:08:55.959
<v Speaker 3>It sounds like that, like maybe a little bit less cynical,

0:08:56.040 --> 0:08:56.760
<v Speaker 3>but yeah.

0:08:56.640 --> 0:09:00.199
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah. So so eventually you left Arsenal and you

0:09:00.280 --> 0:09:04.160
<v Speaker 1>started source Football, this company that you're running. Now, what

0:09:04.160 --> 0:09:05.400
<v Speaker 1>what led you to make that leap?

0:09:05.840 --> 0:09:08.840
<v Speaker 2>So, you know, part of starting this company was that,

0:09:09.160 --> 0:09:11.480
<v Speaker 2>you know, I wanted to learn and to experience as

0:09:11.520 --> 0:09:14.960
<v Speaker 2>much as possible. But the other part is that we

0:09:15.040 --> 0:09:19.040
<v Speaker 2>felt like there's a huge need for clubs to get

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:22.560
<v Speaker 2>help in terms of getting started on this analytics journey

0:09:22.559 --> 0:09:24.880
<v Speaker 2>where you know, a lot of them just don't even

0:09:25.200 --> 0:09:25.920
<v Speaker 2>know where to begin.

0:09:26.000 --> 0:09:27.680
<v Speaker 3>They don't know what's good what's bad.

0:09:28.559 --> 0:09:31.840
<v Speaker 2>So our kind of main value add is coming in

0:09:32.240 --> 0:09:34.960
<v Speaker 2>helping them get set up, helping them get started and

0:09:35.000 --> 0:09:38.920
<v Speaker 2>then once that happens, doing all of the hard work,

0:09:39.040 --> 0:09:42.959
<v Speaker 2>hard thinking that's impossible to get done within a football club.

0:09:43.920 --> 0:09:46.960
<v Speaker 2>If anyone has ever been in a training ground, Like

0:09:47.080 --> 0:09:50.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure it's the same across all sports, but they're chaotic,

0:09:51.080 --> 0:09:54.360
<v Speaker 2>they're noisy, they're loud, Like they're not good places to

0:09:54.440 --> 0:09:59.120
<v Speaker 2>do deep testosterone. Yeah, a lot of a lot of

0:09:59.120 --> 0:10:04.240
<v Speaker 2>really loud music, like humping. You know, like if your

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:06.679
<v Speaker 2>office is anywhere near the gym, like forget it. Like

0:10:06.920 --> 0:10:08.760
<v Speaker 2>you got to wait until everybody goes home before you

0:10:08.760 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 2>can actually like have a clear thought. So you know,

0:10:11.440 --> 0:10:14.640
<v Speaker 2>that was that was one of the things that we realized,

0:10:14.760 --> 0:10:16.720
<v Speaker 2>is like you can't work on solving these really hard

0:10:16.720 --> 0:10:20.240
<v Speaker 2>problems and like football is really hard to analyze in

0:10:20.320 --> 0:10:22.360
<v Speaker 2>terms of analytics, and like you just you can't do

0:10:22.400 --> 0:10:23.480
<v Speaker 2>it within a club.

0:10:24.160 --> 0:10:25.400
<v Speaker 3>So that's why we want it to be a little

0:10:25.440 --> 0:10:26.000
<v Speaker 3>bit outside.

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:28.319
<v Speaker 2>And then kind of our our long term vision is

0:10:28.360 --> 0:10:32.200
<v Speaker 2>actually like you know, we're using this consulting business to

0:10:32.280 --> 0:10:36.360
<v Speaker 2>kind of fund the development of our intelligence platform, and

0:10:36.400 --> 0:10:38.880
<v Speaker 2>then the ideas eventually to look for like a set

0:10:38.880 --> 0:10:42.600
<v Speaker 2>of investors or maybe an ownership group and you know,

0:10:42.720 --> 0:10:44.920
<v Speaker 2>take control of a club and run it in kind

0:10:44.920 --> 0:10:47.360
<v Speaker 2>of like the modern progressive way that we think they

0:10:47.360 --> 0:10:48.000
<v Speaker 2>should be run.

0:10:48.679 --> 0:10:52.240
<v Speaker 1>So what you really want to do is basically buy

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:54.720
<v Speaker 1>a soccer team and run it smarter than everybody else.

0:10:54.800 --> 0:10:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Is that what you're telling me? Yeah, of course, tell

0:10:58.000 --> 0:10:59.800
<v Speaker 1>me more about the big gream. We'll do the pieces.

0:10:59.840 --> 0:11:02.559
<v Speaker 1>But I'm curious, Like that's a big, audacious dream and

0:11:02.640 --> 0:11:03.640
<v Speaker 1>it's fun tell me about it.

0:11:03.840 --> 0:11:05.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, I think you know, one of the

0:11:05.160 --> 0:11:08.719
<v Speaker 2>things that probably everybody in analytics has experienced is that

0:11:08.960 --> 0:11:11.920
<v Speaker 2>unless you're kind of like the key decision maker, it's

0:11:12.000 --> 0:11:16.080
<v Speaker 2>always going to be kind of difficult to influence decisions

0:11:16.880 --> 0:11:19.680
<v Speaker 2>because there's always going to be somebody that has, you know,

0:11:19.800 --> 0:11:23.480
<v Speaker 2>kind of their own perspective and everything. And you know,

0:11:23.520 --> 0:11:25.560
<v Speaker 2>at Arsenal, we were really lucky because we had like

0:11:25.600 --> 0:11:27.599
<v Speaker 2>a lot of resources. But what I see at a

0:11:27.640 --> 0:11:30.760
<v Speaker 2>lot of clubs is that you know, they only hire

0:11:30.800 --> 0:11:33.600
<v Speaker 2>one or two people. The work that they do is good,

0:11:33.720 --> 0:11:36.200
<v Speaker 2>but like there's a limit to what two human beings

0:11:36.240 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 2>can do, and so like a lot of what they

0:11:39.040 --> 0:11:42.840
<v Speaker 2>produce doesn't necessarily like match the gut, and so it's

0:11:42.840 --> 0:11:46.600
<v Speaker 2>hard to get this buy in. And so then they

0:11:46.640 --> 0:11:49.120
<v Speaker 2>just say like, well, okay, thanks for that. I'm only

0:11:49.120 --> 0:11:50.640
<v Speaker 2>going to listen to you if I agree with it.

0:11:50.960 --> 0:11:52.600
<v Speaker 3>If I disagree with it, I'm going to go with

0:11:52.679 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 3>my gut, and so it just becomes difficult.

0:11:55.800 --> 0:11:58.160
<v Speaker 2>But I think also, like there's so many issues within

0:11:58.200 --> 0:12:02.960
<v Speaker 2>football clubs that go beyond just analytics or you know,

0:12:03.080 --> 0:12:05.120
<v Speaker 2>making the right decision on players. I mean, there's so

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 2>much in terms of like building good, good cultures, you know,

0:12:09.000 --> 0:12:12.640
<v Speaker 2>kind of making sure that everything is kind of set

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:15.360
<v Speaker 2>up in like a professional way, because if you think

0:12:15.400 --> 0:12:17.240
<v Speaker 2>about it, clubs are kind of run by people who've

0:12:17.240 --> 0:12:18.480
<v Speaker 2>never worked outside of football.

0:12:19.679 --> 0:12:20.719
<v Speaker 3>But I think there's a lot of.

0:12:20.720 --> 0:12:24.520
<v Speaker 2>Lessons that you can take from working outside of sports

0:12:24.840 --> 0:12:28.280
<v Speaker 2>bring them into football, and we've seen it in every

0:12:28.320 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 2>other major American sport.

0:12:30.440 --> 0:12:33.320
<v Speaker 3>Not to be like super ruthless.

0:12:32.880 --> 0:12:35.160
<v Speaker 2>And say like we got to maximize profit, maximize profit,

0:12:35.920 --> 0:12:39.559
<v Speaker 2>because I think like they are these weird social institutions

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:42.120
<v Speaker 2>that have a lot of meaning to a lot of people,

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:44.360
<v Speaker 2>and so you obviously want to respect that. And you

0:12:44.400 --> 0:12:48.000
<v Speaker 2>also have these amazing platforms to bring positive change into

0:12:48.040 --> 0:12:49.760
<v Speaker 2>the world, and so you want to take advantage of

0:12:49.760 --> 0:12:50.280
<v Speaker 2>that as well.

0:12:50.320 --> 0:12:51.760
<v Speaker 3>But like, there certainly can be a.

0:12:51.760 --> 0:12:55.760
<v Speaker 2>Lot more kind of professionalism in them than what we

0:12:55.840 --> 0:12:57.200
<v Speaker 2>experience at a lot of places.

0:12:58.120 --> 0:13:00.480
<v Speaker 1>So, now you have this company and you want to

0:13:00.559 --> 0:13:04.280
<v Speaker 1>use it eventually to take over the world. Correct, before

0:13:04.440 --> 0:13:06.840
<v Speaker 1>you use your company to take over the world, Like,

0:13:06.920 --> 0:13:09.600
<v Speaker 1>what are the what are the services you're selling to

0:13:10.120 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 1>teams to clubs?

0:13:11.600 --> 0:13:16.599
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, so clubs are in really different situations.

0:13:16.679 --> 0:13:19.160
<v Speaker 2>And then also, like you know, it's not like the

0:13:19.320 --> 0:13:22.600
<v Speaker 2>US where like every single major League baseball team is

0:13:22.640 --> 0:13:27.800
<v Speaker 2>like loaded with cash. Typically in European leagues, like you're

0:13:27.800 --> 0:13:30.400
<v Speaker 2>going to have several divisions, so like you're talking about

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 2>anywhere from like a single a baseball team to like

0:13:34.760 --> 0:13:39.280
<v Speaker 2>a Major League baseball team, Like there's huge difference in resources.

0:13:38.840 --> 0:13:42.400
<v Speaker 1>So like orders of magnitude in terms of revenue, how

0:13:42.480 --> 0:13:46.320
<v Speaker 1>much presumably they want to spend on your services, et cetera.

0:13:46.720 --> 0:13:49.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah exactly, And so like the main area where we

0:13:49.200 --> 0:13:53.200
<v Speaker 2>can help them is really recruitment, so helping them kind

0:13:53.200 --> 0:13:56.839
<v Speaker 2>of find the best players. So unlike American sports where

0:13:56.840 --> 0:14:00.320
<v Speaker 2>you kind of like trade players and draft them, everything

0:14:00.360 --> 0:14:02.280
<v Speaker 2>here is kind of like an open market where you

0:14:02.280 --> 0:14:04.400
<v Speaker 2>can buy and sell the contracts of these players.

0:14:04.440 --> 0:14:06.480
<v Speaker 3>And so if you're a small team, and you have

0:14:06.520 --> 0:14:07.439
<v Speaker 3>a really really.

0:14:07.559 --> 0:14:10.360
<v Speaker 2>Good player, like you can just sell him keep that cash,

0:14:10.440 --> 0:14:12.760
<v Speaker 2>or you can invest it back into your club.

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Huh. This is this is really echoes of Moneyball. I mean,

0:14:16.960 --> 0:14:18.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure I don't know if you're tired of hearing

0:14:18.480 --> 0:14:20.680
<v Speaker 1>about Moneyball. That book came about twenty years ago, but

0:14:20.800 --> 0:14:23.320
<v Speaker 1>like that was the basic idea there, Right, it was

0:14:24.640 --> 0:14:27.920
<v Speaker 1>better scouting essentially, right, Like you had these scouts who

0:14:27.920 --> 0:14:29.560
<v Speaker 1>were sort of using their guts and these kind of

0:14:29.560 --> 0:14:33.520
<v Speaker 1>conventional wisdom heuristics, and then you had what I'm sure

0:14:33.520 --> 0:14:37.480
<v Speaker 1>now seem like primitive analytics coming in and basically doing

0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:41.600
<v Speaker 1>a better job of predicting player success, right at some level.

0:14:41.760 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly.

0:14:42.600 --> 0:14:44.440
<v Speaker 2>And so you know, I hate to say that, like

0:14:45.040 --> 0:14:47.680
<v Speaker 2>soccer is twenty years behind baseball, but like in a lot.

0:14:47.520 --> 0:14:50.040
<v Speaker 3>Of ways we are. And so like this is still

0:14:50.080 --> 0:14:52.000
<v Speaker 3>like the main area of.

0:14:52.000 --> 0:14:54.640
<v Speaker 2>Value add for a lot of clubs because you're competing

0:14:54.680 --> 0:14:58.760
<v Speaker 2>in this open market with people with varying amounts of knowledge.

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:02.600
<v Speaker 2>So sometimes that knowledge is just hey, like we had

0:15:02.640 --> 0:15:05.080
<v Speaker 2>scouts at that game, We've seen this player once, like

0:15:05.720 --> 0:15:08.320
<v Speaker 2>this is our opinion of him. And then you have

0:15:08.520 --> 0:15:10.600
<v Speaker 2>the more sophisticated teams that are like, Okay, well, we

0:15:10.640 --> 0:15:14.280
<v Speaker 2>have a database of you know, six hundred thousand matches

0:15:14.640 --> 0:15:17.960
<v Speaker 2>in the world. We know the fifty best players in

0:15:18.040 --> 0:15:20.920
<v Speaker 2>every league at every position, we know how much they're worth.

0:15:21.920 --> 0:15:24.360
<v Speaker 2>So we help teams kind of go from like the

0:15:24.400 --> 0:15:27.040
<v Speaker 2>former to the latter and just be a little bit

0:15:27.080 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 2>more sophisticated in terms of the amount of information that

0:15:29.680 --> 0:15:29.960
<v Speaker 2>they have.

0:15:30.160 --> 0:15:32.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's sort of crass to put it this way,

0:15:32.120 --> 0:15:35.880
<v Speaker 1>but it's really like pricing assets right, like the players.

0:15:35.960 --> 0:15:38.640
<v Speaker 1>And again I realized this is kind of dehumanizing. I'm sorry,

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:43.040
<v Speaker 1>but it is analogous to people valuing a stock or

0:15:43.160 --> 0:15:48.360
<v Speaker 1>valuing anything they might buy. Right, And the better you

0:15:48.400 --> 0:15:52.640
<v Speaker 1>can model the value of the asset, the better you're

0:15:52.640 --> 0:15:55.160
<v Speaker 1>going to be at finding mispriced assets. Right. You want

0:15:55.200 --> 0:15:59.400
<v Speaker 1>to you want to find bargains. You want to get

0:15:59.400 --> 0:16:02.440
<v Speaker 1>the most you can and uh for your dollar.

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:06.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, absolutely, And so you know, there's a lot of

0:16:06.800 --> 0:16:09.320
<v Speaker 2>techniques that we can take from other industries because it's

0:16:09.360 --> 0:16:11.680
<v Speaker 2>not that different from it. Where it gets hard is

0:16:11.680 --> 0:16:14.160
<v Speaker 2>that you have to have those assets work well together.

0:16:14.560 --> 0:16:16.000
<v Speaker 1>They are in fact human beings.

0:16:16.640 --> 0:16:18.520
<v Speaker 3>Yes, that is you know the.

0:16:18.880 --> 0:16:20.720
<v Speaker 2>Kind of joke where it's like, well, the problem with

0:16:20.720 --> 0:16:23.080
<v Speaker 2>football clubs is that it's full of human beings.

0:16:23.760 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about what you can model, Like, what

0:16:27.120 --> 0:16:29.480
<v Speaker 1>are you good at modeling in this context, like in

0:16:29.560 --> 0:16:33.280
<v Speaker 1>helping in scouting, essentially in helping clubs value, you know,

0:16:33.360 --> 0:16:34.560
<v Speaker 1>players they might acquire.

0:16:35.120 --> 0:16:38.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so we're pretty good at modeling everything that happens

0:16:38.400 --> 0:16:42.640
<v Speaker 2>when a player has the ball, and unfortunately in football,

0:16:42.760 --> 0:16:45.800
<v Speaker 2>that's like a very very small portion of the gaming.

0:16:46.240 --> 0:16:48.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. And so there was this really cool.

0:16:48.040 --> 0:16:51.320
<v Speaker 2>Development in the last four or five years where a

0:16:51.400 --> 0:16:54.720
<v Speaker 2>number of companies have come out with a data source

0:16:55.080 --> 0:16:59.800
<v Speaker 2>that's basically taking the video feeds from TV and turning

0:17:00.280 --> 0:17:04.760
<v Speaker 2>into tracking data. So basically they're able to track the

0:17:04.800 --> 0:17:06.959
<v Speaker 2>location of every player that's on screen.

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:10.520
<v Speaker 3>So obviously you don't know all the players, and.

0:17:10.440 --> 0:17:12.960
<v Speaker 2>Then you know, what we've learned is that really what's

0:17:13.000 --> 0:17:17.400
<v Speaker 2>going on off screen tends to not be as relevant

0:17:17.440 --> 0:17:21.320
<v Speaker 2>and the location of those players isn't as relevant. And

0:17:21.359 --> 0:17:23.040
<v Speaker 2>so now all of a sudden, you can start doing

0:17:23.119 --> 0:17:26.879
<v Speaker 2>modeling on what people are doing off the ball and

0:17:27.040 --> 0:17:30.159
<v Speaker 2>use it for recruitment. Because prior to this, similar to

0:17:30.200 --> 0:17:32.800
<v Speaker 2>the NBA, there were cameras in all the stadiums and

0:17:32.840 --> 0:17:36.240
<v Speaker 2>you would get this full data set, but only for

0:17:37.040 --> 0:17:38.919
<v Speaker 2>your league, and so you couldn't really use it for

0:17:38.960 --> 0:17:39.440
<v Speaker 2>a recruitment.

0:17:39.440 --> 0:17:41.280
<v Speaker 3>And so this has been like a really big change.

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:45.160
<v Speaker 2>So you know, we can get much better views into

0:17:45.320 --> 0:17:48.440
<v Speaker 2>what is a player doing physically, what are they doing

0:17:48.480 --> 0:17:52.399
<v Speaker 2>defensively in terms of cutting off passing lanes, things like that.

0:17:52.920 --> 0:17:55.280
<v Speaker 2>There's still a lot we're not good at with that,

0:17:56.040 --> 0:17:58.920
<v Speaker 2>but what it's also done is allowed us to say, well,

0:17:58.920 --> 0:18:01.080
<v Speaker 2>if we're going to move a player from this league

0:18:01.080 --> 0:18:04.760
<v Speaker 2>to that league, how different is it physically? How do

0:18:04.800 --> 0:18:07.000
<v Speaker 2>we think they're going to adapt? And so this has

0:18:07.040 --> 0:18:09.119
<v Speaker 2>really opened up a lot of things. So if we

0:18:09.160 --> 0:18:12.840
<v Speaker 2>want to talk about like risk adjusted pricing of assets,

0:18:13.359 --> 0:18:16.200
<v Speaker 2>now we're starting to be able to quantify a little

0:18:16.240 --> 0:18:19.160
<v Speaker 2>bit like what's the risk of bringing in somebody from

0:18:19.240 --> 0:18:23.240
<v Speaker 2>a really really different environment into this one versus one

0:18:23.280 --> 0:18:24.880
<v Speaker 2>that's more similar, Or.

0:18:25.440 --> 0:18:29.199
<v Speaker 1>So you should apply a larger discount when you're bringing

0:18:29.200 --> 0:18:32.000
<v Speaker 1>a player from a very different league, presumably because you're

0:18:32.040 --> 0:18:32.840
<v Speaker 1>taking more risk.

0:18:33.240 --> 0:18:36.520
<v Speaker 2>Yes, yes, and if not, then it's not an undervalued

0:18:36.560 --> 0:18:38.440
<v Speaker 2>asset and maybe walk away.

0:18:39.200 --> 0:18:44.360
<v Speaker 1>So tell me more, like, is the output you have

0:18:45.119 --> 0:18:47.439
<v Speaker 1>just here is what you should pay for each of

0:18:47.480 --> 0:18:51.000
<v Speaker 1>these players, Like you have whatever ten thousand players or something,

0:18:51.040 --> 0:18:53.119
<v Speaker 1>and you put a dollar value on each one, or

0:18:53.240 --> 0:18:54.520
<v Speaker 1>like what's the output?

0:18:55.040 --> 0:18:56.959
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean I wish it was that simple.

0:18:57.000 --> 0:18:59.960
<v Speaker 2>We're still like pretty far from putting it all together

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:03.199
<v Speaker 2>there and saying like, by this player at this price.

0:19:04.200 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 2>You know, a lot of the difficulties is that there's

0:19:07.000 --> 0:19:10.200
<v Speaker 2>no good data set on pricing information.

0:19:10.000 --> 0:19:11.960
<v Speaker 1>So then what do you just have a relative like

0:19:12.040 --> 0:19:13.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of a stack rank.

0:19:14.000 --> 0:19:17.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean, there are like estimates, so in the in

0:19:17.080 --> 0:19:20.080
<v Speaker 2>the media, they'll say like, oh, this guy went for

0:19:20.440 --> 0:19:23.160
<v Speaker 2>ten million, but then a different media source will say

0:19:23.160 --> 0:19:27.000
<v Speaker 2>this guy went for fifteen million, because like the selling

0:19:27.040 --> 0:19:29.879
<v Speaker 2>club wants to report a higher price and the buying

0:19:29.920 --> 0:19:31.920
<v Speaker 2>club wants for lower price.

0:19:31.720 --> 0:19:33.560
<v Speaker 3>So there's real no truth.

0:19:33.640 --> 0:19:39.479
<v Speaker 2>And then salaries for players are not public for most leagues.

0:19:39.800 --> 0:19:42.919
<v Speaker 1>So okay, so that's a very important variable that you

0:19:43.000 --> 0:19:45.399
<v Speaker 1>don't really have access to. That's a problem. So what

0:19:45.800 --> 0:19:47.360
<v Speaker 1>is the output of your model? Then?

0:19:47.680 --> 0:19:49.639
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, so we we kind of do like

0:19:49.680 --> 0:19:53.719
<v Speaker 2>a stack ranking and like a you know, projected like

0:19:53.800 --> 0:19:56.080
<v Speaker 2>what do we think this player would do in this situation?

0:19:56.240 --> 0:19:58.399
<v Speaker 3>But like the error bars on these things are like

0:19:58.640 --> 0:19:59.359
<v Speaker 3>are pretty big.

0:19:59.480 --> 0:20:03.000
<v Speaker 2>So we're still kind of in the like subjective realm

0:20:03.080 --> 0:20:06.040
<v Speaker 2>of like based on these factors, we think this or

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:08.159
<v Speaker 2>we think that, and then you know a lot of

0:20:08.200 --> 0:20:12.760
<v Speaker 2>the like the markets change every year in football as well.

0:20:12.840 --> 0:20:15.480
<v Speaker 2>So even if we had like a really precise model

0:20:15.520 --> 0:20:17.720
<v Speaker 2>that said this guy should be worth five million, well

0:20:18.040 --> 0:20:20.359
<v Speaker 2>he should he would be worth five million last year.

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I appreciate your candor you know, so the market changes.

0:20:24.800 --> 0:20:29.040
<v Speaker 1>You don't have pricing data, there's big uncertainty even on

0:20:29.080 --> 0:20:34.560
<v Speaker 1>the outputs you do have, Like all of this seems

0:20:35.600 --> 0:20:37.639
<v Speaker 1>so what is the use of what you're doing? How

0:20:37.720 --> 0:20:38.760
<v Speaker 1>is it valuable to people?

0:20:39.280 --> 0:20:42.280
<v Speaker 2>That's the point is that we're competing with people who

0:20:43.040 --> 0:20:45.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, have gone to maybe three or four games

0:20:45.920 --> 0:20:51.919
<v Speaker 2>watch this guy in you know, unknown conditions. The human

0:20:52.200 --> 0:20:57.760
<v Speaker 2>brain is like not conditions to be like very objective

0:20:57.800 --> 0:21:00.280
<v Speaker 2>and so like, you know, there's a host of like

0:21:00.440 --> 0:21:03.919
<v Speaker 2>very known biases that like people can can fall for.

0:21:04.000 --> 0:21:07.240
<v Speaker 2>And so really what we're trying to do is just

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:10.960
<v Speaker 2>give you like a much more fair and even view

0:21:11.040 --> 0:21:15.560
<v Speaker 2>of a player, taking into account a lot of you

0:21:15.560 --> 0:21:19.000
<v Speaker 2>know the factors that these scouts are trying to account

0:21:19.000 --> 0:21:23.000
<v Speaker 2>for as well, but just doing it more objectively, more rigorously,

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:25.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, over a longer period of time.

0:21:25.800 --> 0:21:29.639
<v Speaker 1>It seems from what you've been saying, like soccer is

0:21:29.840 --> 0:21:34.200
<v Speaker 1>behind certainly baseball and perhaps other sports in analytics. I

0:21:34.240 --> 0:21:36.600
<v Speaker 1>mean your first paper, you were following somebody who had

0:21:36.640 --> 0:21:38.480
<v Speaker 1>written a paper in American football, and you're like, oh,

0:21:38.520 --> 0:21:40.760
<v Speaker 1>what if we do that for soccer? Is it true

0:21:40.760 --> 0:21:41.639
<v Speaker 1>that soccer is behind?

0:21:41.640 --> 0:21:44.240
<v Speaker 3>And if so, why, Yeah, it's true.

0:21:44.280 --> 0:21:47.160
<v Speaker 2>And I think, you know, the debate used to be like, well,

0:21:47.200 --> 0:21:49.159
<v Speaker 2>are we making any progress? I think we've made a

0:21:49.160 --> 0:21:53.600
<v Speaker 2>ton of progress, but we're still really far behind other sports.

0:21:53.600 --> 0:21:57.280
<v Speaker 2>And so one answer is that we also don't get

0:21:57.320 --> 0:22:00.640
<v Speaker 2>the funding that other sports get. So so the level

0:22:00.680 --> 0:22:03.320
<v Speaker 2>of investment just isn't there. And so if we were

0:22:03.359 --> 0:22:08.359
<v Speaker 2>behind fifteen years ago, we're certainly not keeping pace, you know.

0:22:08.400 --> 0:22:12.040
<v Speaker 2>And then I think there's other structural issues with it.

0:22:12.119 --> 0:22:16.520
<v Speaker 2>So I love to use this image that somebody else made,

0:22:16.600 --> 0:22:19.200
<v Speaker 2>but it shows the relative size of a basketball court

0:22:19.320 --> 0:22:23.040
<v Speaker 2>to a soccer pitch, And basically a basketball court can

0:22:23.080 --> 0:22:26.080
<v Speaker 2>fit into like the little tiny penalty area on a

0:22:26.119 --> 0:22:30.400
<v Speaker 2>soccer pitch, and so you know, the distances and spacing

0:22:30.440 --> 0:22:33.359
<v Speaker 2>of players is so much more variable in soccer, So

0:22:33.400 --> 0:22:35.720
<v Speaker 2>you can't say, like, oh, ten meters is a good

0:22:35.760 --> 0:22:38.480
<v Speaker 2>distance between me and a teammate, because it depends on

0:22:39.000 --> 0:22:42.080
<v Speaker 2>the situation that's happening where on the pitch, like is

0:22:42.119 --> 0:22:44.160
<v Speaker 2>it a transitional moment, is it kind of a more

0:22:44.200 --> 0:22:47.879
<v Speaker 2>controlled moment, And so there's a lot of complexities like that.

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:49.480
<v Speaker 3>You know, the game doesn't stop.

0:22:49.520 --> 0:22:51.760
<v Speaker 2>There aren't a lot of these set pieces where it's

0:22:51.760 --> 0:22:54.639
<v Speaker 2>like we have a very choreographed idea of what we

0:22:54.680 --> 0:22:58.880
<v Speaker 2>want to do, and then you know, the sad reality

0:22:58.960 --> 0:23:02.479
<v Speaker 2>is that most leagues only play thirty eight matches a season,

0:23:03.000 --> 0:23:05.639
<v Speaker 2>and so you never see a team in the same

0:23:06.040 --> 0:23:07.240
<v Speaker 2>context twice.

0:23:07.560 --> 0:23:10.280
<v Speaker 3>You either play them at home or away and then that's.

0:23:10.080 --> 0:23:12.160
<v Speaker 2>It, or maybe you play them in a cup game,

0:23:12.200 --> 0:23:15.880
<v Speaker 2>which is like a really different environment, and so all

0:23:15.920 --> 0:23:18.280
<v Speaker 2>of these things just kind of like add up and

0:23:18.359 --> 0:23:22.280
<v Speaker 2>it's like, well, we have fewer resources, it's much more complex, Like,

0:23:22.520 --> 0:23:24.280
<v Speaker 2>of course we're behind on.

0:23:24.280 --> 0:23:30.080
<v Speaker 1>This still to come on the show, the one big

0:23:30.119 --> 0:23:34.600
<v Speaker 1>strategic change that Sarah really really wants someone in soccer

0:23:34.640 --> 0:23:46.719
<v Speaker 1>to try and why nobody has tried it yet. So

0:23:46.800 --> 0:23:50.560
<v Speaker 1>we talked a lot about essentially scouting, evaluating players as

0:23:50.640 --> 0:23:53.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of one of the one of the big things

0:23:53.880 --> 0:23:56.439
<v Speaker 1>you do. What else do you do?

0:23:56.720 --> 0:23:59.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, so there's a number of different services

0:23:59.800 --> 0:24:02.760
<v Speaker 2>that we provide, so you know, it could be doing

0:24:02.800 --> 0:24:06.040
<v Speaker 2>like retrospectives of how did the team play this weekend,

0:24:06.520 --> 0:24:10.120
<v Speaker 2>or maybe some kind of I guess in US terms

0:24:10.119 --> 0:24:13.040
<v Speaker 2>they would call it advanced scouting, but delivering kind of

0:24:13.040 --> 0:24:16.280
<v Speaker 2>like a data profile on their upcoming opponent and then

0:24:16.320 --> 0:24:19.040
<v Speaker 2>going into like on field stuff, like we're doing a

0:24:19.119 --> 0:24:22.760
<v Speaker 2>lot of research now around you know, various things in

0:24:22.880 --> 0:24:26.400
<v Speaker 2>terms of you know, how can we maximize set pieces?

0:24:26.640 --> 0:24:29.240
<v Speaker 1>A set piece is like a play analogous to sort

0:24:29.240 --> 0:24:29.960
<v Speaker 1>of a play.

0:24:30.040 --> 0:24:33.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so, you know, football is really fluid.

0:24:33.480 --> 0:24:37.280
<v Speaker 2>It never really stops except for these certain moments that

0:24:37.320 --> 0:24:41.120
<v Speaker 2>are called dead balls and when a dead ball.

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:44.080
<v Speaker 3>Happens and kind of like the attacking area when you.

0:24:44.040 --> 0:24:46.639
<v Speaker 1>Have like a throw in or a penalty kick or something.

0:24:46.880 --> 0:24:49.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, penalties are pretty pretty straightforward. They're kind

0:24:49.760 --> 0:24:52.200
<v Speaker 2>of exceptional. It's like we'll just kick it into the goal.

0:24:53.119 --> 0:24:56.520
<v Speaker 2>But corners corner kicks are kind of like the most

0:24:58.040 --> 0:25:00.280
<v Speaker 2>common one because they all happen from the same location.

0:25:00.440 --> 0:25:03.680
<v Speaker 2>They happen fairly frequently. You can analyze them, you can

0:25:03.720 --> 0:25:07.160
<v Speaker 2>prepare for them. So you have this set piece opportunity,

0:25:07.240 --> 0:25:09.760
<v Speaker 2>and then it's you know, what's the strategy we're going

0:25:09.840 --> 0:25:11.679
<v Speaker 2>to use to maximize it.

0:25:12.560 --> 0:25:14.080
<v Speaker 3>So a lot of research into that.

0:25:14.240 --> 0:25:17.399
<v Speaker 1>Has analytics, in a general way changed the way people

0:25:17.520 --> 0:25:18.680
<v Speaker 1>take corners.

0:25:19.680 --> 0:25:22.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, I think it has influenced how much

0:25:22.640 --> 0:25:26.920
<v Speaker 2>time they spend thinking about it and preparing for it.

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:28.480
<v Speaker 3>So that's another one.

0:25:28.720 --> 0:25:33.280
<v Speaker 2>Ted Kinnutsen, who's the CEO of Statsbomb, he's been shouting

0:25:33.320 --> 0:25:37.040
<v Speaker 2>this from up high for the longest, but set pieces

0:25:37.080 --> 0:25:40.560
<v Speaker 2>for a long time were really valuable, but teams would

0:25:40.560 --> 0:25:42.920
<v Speaker 2>only train them for like ten minutes a week.

0:25:43.200 --> 0:25:46.680
<v Speaker 1>It's an interesting level of analytics. That's an analytical claim, right,

0:25:46.680 --> 0:25:50.080
<v Speaker 1>It's like, your training time is measurable and you should

0:25:50.119 --> 0:25:53.000
<v Speaker 1>be allocating the right proportion of it to the right things.

0:25:53.000 --> 0:25:59.240
<v Speaker 1>And he's essentially arguing that you're underfunding in time corners. Yeah.

0:25:59.320 --> 0:26:02.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the number of goals scored from corners or conceded

0:26:02.119 --> 0:26:06.119
<v Speaker 2>from corners was not at all proportional to the amount

0:26:06.160 --> 0:26:10.040
<v Speaker 2>of time spent training them. And so like that's been

0:26:10.040 --> 0:26:13.560
<v Speaker 2>a big focus on teams lately. And you know, I

0:26:13.600 --> 0:26:16.159
<v Speaker 2>still don't think they spend enough time training it. But

0:26:16.280 --> 0:26:19.360
<v Speaker 2>now you'll see, you know, certain clubs even hiring set

0:26:19.400 --> 0:26:20.520
<v Speaker 2>piece specialists.

0:26:20.560 --> 0:26:23.720
<v Speaker 3>So they'll have a member of coaching staff whose job.

0:26:23.800 --> 0:26:26.280
<v Speaker 2>Whose only job is really kind of like thinking about

0:26:26.280 --> 0:26:28.840
<v Speaker 2>these things and helping prepare the players for it.

0:26:28.920 --> 0:26:32.360
<v Speaker 1>If that person basically the corner kick coach, I.

0:26:32.280 --> 0:26:34.240
<v Speaker 2>Mean they you know, there is a guy who's like

0:26:34.280 --> 0:26:36.920
<v Speaker 2>a throwing coach as well, so you can even have

0:26:37.000 --> 0:26:39.160
<v Speaker 2>like some specialties to them.

0:26:39.280 --> 0:26:41.280
<v Speaker 1>But like guy dreams of being the corner kick.

0:26:41.200 --> 0:26:43.640
<v Speaker 3>Coach, Yeah, gets promotion too.

0:26:44.760 --> 0:26:48.280
<v Speaker 1>So I mean just thinking more generally, like it seemed

0:26:48.320 --> 0:26:53.679
<v Speaker 1>well other sports, my US centric sports knowledge, which itself

0:26:53.720 --> 0:26:59.160
<v Speaker 1>is somewhat limited. Like clearly analytics have changed. You know football,

0:26:59.200 --> 0:27:02.040
<v Speaker 1>you see people going for it on fourth down. More basketball,

0:27:02.119 --> 0:27:06.560
<v Speaker 1>obviously the demise of the mid range shot, right, somebody

0:27:06.640 --> 0:27:09.760
<v Speaker 1>just realized analytically some years ago, like don't shoot from

0:27:09.840 --> 0:27:12.320
<v Speaker 1>whatever twelve feet out right, shoot from under the basket

0:27:12.400 --> 0:27:14.480
<v Speaker 1>or take a three. And in baseball there was the shift,

0:27:14.480 --> 0:27:17.800
<v Speaker 1>like there are these big, big changes in the way

0:27:17.800 --> 0:27:21.360
<v Speaker 1>the games look because of analytics. Is there anything analogous

0:27:21.440 --> 0:27:22.280
<v Speaker 1>in soccer?

0:27:22.800 --> 0:27:25.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, probably, Like the earliest one was that the distance

0:27:25.560 --> 0:27:27.479
<v Speaker 2>from which people are shooting has changed.

0:27:27.680 --> 0:27:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Huh.

0:27:28.440 --> 0:27:29.440
<v Speaker 3>So you're not going.

0:27:29.400 --> 0:27:32.040
<v Speaker 2>To see a Charlie Adam taking a shot from forty

0:27:32.080 --> 0:27:35.680
<v Speaker 2>yards too often. And lets you know, there's like a oh,

0:27:35.680 --> 0:27:37.760
<v Speaker 2>the goalkeepers off his line is out of position. I

0:27:38.119 --> 0:27:42.040
<v Speaker 2>can get it in there, but because of you.

0:27:40.880 --> 0:27:41.639
<v Speaker 3>You know, I can't.

0:27:41.760 --> 0:27:45.480
<v Speaker 2>I can't take credit for it. It feels like, you know,

0:27:45.520 --> 0:27:47.280
<v Speaker 2>the invention of calculus, where there were a lot of

0:27:47.280 --> 0:27:49.040
<v Speaker 2>people kind of coming to this conclusion.

0:27:49.760 --> 0:27:52.199
<v Speaker 1>So you're saying, you might not be Newton, but if

0:27:52.240 --> 0:27:54.200
<v Speaker 1>you're not Newton, your liibnitz.

0:27:53.760 --> 0:27:58.960
<v Speaker 2>Yes, okay, fair enough, I'll take that. Yeah, that's probably

0:27:59.040 --> 0:28:02.200
<v Speaker 2>like the earliest one. And then again, like you can't

0:28:02.280 --> 0:28:05.760
<v Speaker 2>prove causality, but there's been a shift to this tactic

0:28:05.840 --> 0:28:08.800
<v Speaker 2>of teams putting a lot of pressure up high. So

0:28:10.080 --> 0:28:12.199
<v Speaker 2>if they have the ball in the attacking area of

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:15.320
<v Speaker 2>the pitch and they lose it, they immediately put pressure

0:28:15.359 --> 0:28:16.920
<v Speaker 2>on the other team to try to win it back

0:28:17.400 --> 0:28:18.480
<v Speaker 2>as quickly as possible.

0:28:18.600 --> 0:28:20.359
<v Speaker 1>Uh huh, kind of a full court press.

0:28:20.600 --> 0:28:21.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly.

0:28:21.640 --> 0:28:23.840
<v Speaker 2>And so I don't know if the origin of that

0:28:24.000 --> 0:28:27.200
<v Speaker 2>is based in analytics, but like analytics will tell you, yeah,

0:28:27.240 --> 0:28:28.880
<v Speaker 2>you're more likely to score a goal if you win

0:28:28.920 --> 0:28:30.240
<v Speaker 2>the ball back up pie.

0:28:31.240 --> 0:28:32.160
<v Speaker 3>So that's another one.

0:28:32.560 --> 0:28:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Huh, why do you think people didn't do it before?

0:28:35.000 --> 0:28:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Is it not intuitively obvious that that's good?

0:28:37.760 --> 0:28:41.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, because if you don't want to be tired, well yeah,

0:28:41.200 --> 0:28:44.000
<v Speaker 2>so one, it makes you tired and there is like

0:28:44.040 --> 0:28:46.280
<v Speaker 2>a risk of injury. Trying to kind of like make

0:28:46.320 --> 0:28:49.640
<v Speaker 2>the guys super fit to do this. But two, kind

0:28:49.640 --> 0:28:52.080
<v Speaker 2>of going back to like the fourth down analogy, if

0:28:52.080 --> 0:28:54.479
<v Speaker 2>you don't win the ball back, then you've committed so

0:28:54.480 --> 0:28:58.720
<v Speaker 2>many players upfield that you're going to concede kind of.

0:28:58.640 --> 0:29:00.000
<v Speaker 3>Like silly looking up.

0:29:00.120 --> 0:29:01.000
<v Speaker 1>It's risky.

0:29:01.120 --> 0:29:03.040
<v Speaker 3>It's risky. Yeah, it's a calculated.

0:29:02.640 --> 0:29:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Risk, but you expected value is positive, but the variance

0:29:05.920 --> 0:29:06.320
<v Speaker 1>is high.

0:29:06.520 --> 0:29:08.880
<v Speaker 3>Exactly what's what's what are.

0:29:08.760 --> 0:29:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Some interesting frontier problems? I mean they're sort of getting

0:29:11.960 --> 0:29:13.959
<v Speaker 1>people to listen to you, which we've talked about, but

0:29:14.080 --> 0:29:17.160
<v Speaker 1>just on the analytics side, Like, what are you trying

0:29:17.160 --> 0:29:20.880
<v Speaker 1>to figure out on on the analytics side, what's a

0:29:20.880 --> 0:29:22.480
<v Speaker 1>big problem You're trying to solve.

0:29:23.400 --> 0:29:26.520
<v Speaker 2>One area that we haven't really exploited yet, but I'm

0:29:26.640 --> 0:29:27.320
<v Speaker 2>curious about.

0:29:27.360 --> 0:29:29.520
<v Speaker 3>But we always have this problem that like we.

0:29:29.520 --> 0:29:33.960
<v Speaker 2>Can't always learn from the data because everybody's doing the

0:29:33.960 --> 0:29:34.440
<v Speaker 2>same thing.

0:29:34.600 --> 0:29:37.720
<v Speaker 1>You can't really do an ab test because everybody does a.

0:29:38.240 --> 0:29:40.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah exactly, and so it's really frustrating.

0:29:40.640 --> 0:29:44.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean, like the biggest example would be substitution patterns.

0:29:44.160 --> 0:29:48.280
<v Speaker 2>Everybody makes roughly the same type of substitution at the

0:29:48.280 --> 0:29:49.040
<v Speaker 2>same time.

0:29:49.200 --> 0:29:52.719
<v Speaker 1>And presumably it's not optimal, right, it's just conventional wisdom.

0:29:52.800 --> 0:29:54.640
<v Speaker 1>You're like, there could be a whole better world that

0:29:54.720 --> 0:29:55.680
<v Speaker 1>nobody's ever tried.

0:29:56.000 --> 0:29:59.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly, And so I think, you know, with generative AI,

0:29:59.480 --> 0:30:01.640
<v Speaker 2>like now you're kind of talking about, like what can

0:30:01.680 --> 0:30:05.680
<v Speaker 2>we do really smart, really realistic simulations on these.

0:30:05.560 --> 0:30:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Sorts of things synthetic data.

0:30:07.520 --> 0:30:09.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, that's what we're hoping.

0:30:09.720 --> 0:30:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Oh so are you trying to figure out a better

0:30:13.440 --> 0:30:16.560
<v Speaker 1>way to do substitutions? Yes, yeah, you feel like you

0:30:16.640 --> 0:30:18.000
<v Speaker 1>got it? Do you feel like you have one in

0:30:18.000 --> 0:30:19.560
<v Speaker 1>your pocket? Or you're not quite ready to say.

0:30:20.040 --> 0:30:22.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we have some theories, we haven't proven them,

0:30:22.640 --> 0:30:25.200
<v Speaker 2>but like we also need somebody to say, like, yeah,

0:30:24.960 --> 0:30:27.680
<v Speaker 2>go ahead, like mess with our substitution patterns.

0:30:27.720 --> 0:30:28.800
<v Speaker 3>We feel comfortable with us.

0:30:28.880 --> 0:30:32.040
<v Speaker 1>H It is amazing how I mean, like if you

0:30:32.040 --> 0:30:35.120
<v Speaker 1>think of the shift in baseball or whatever, like a

0:30:35.200 --> 0:30:37.920
<v Speaker 1>game can just exist for one hundred years and there

0:30:37.920 --> 0:30:40.920
<v Speaker 1>can be a way better way to do it, and

0:30:40.960 --> 0:30:44.040
<v Speaker 1>nobody ever does it just because they don't have the

0:30:44.080 --> 0:30:45.560
<v Speaker 1>imagination or the courage.

0:30:46.040 --> 0:30:46.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's it's.

0:30:46.840 --> 0:30:48.680
<v Speaker 2>Wild and I think, you know, that sort of thing,

0:30:48.920 --> 0:30:51.920
<v Speaker 2>like I hope in soccer is less common because it's

0:30:51.960 --> 0:30:55.920
<v Speaker 2>more of like an adversarial game, but it.

0:30:55.840 --> 0:30:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Maps to the world more generally, right, Like I think

0:30:59.240 --> 0:31:01.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of it is just fear, like you won't

0:31:01.120 --> 0:31:03.520
<v Speaker 1>get in trouble if you do the thing everybody else

0:31:03.560 --> 0:31:05.720
<v Speaker 1>did and you have a bad outcome, like you see

0:31:05.720 --> 0:31:09.800
<v Speaker 1>it in you know, in finance certainly, right, Like a

0:31:10.160 --> 0:31:14.240
<v Speaker 1>financial advisors just exhibit herd behavior because the way the

0:31:14.240 --> 0:31:16.440
<v Speaker 1>incentives are structured, Like if you do what everybody does

0:31:16.440 --> 0:31:18.080
<v Speaker 1>and you lose money, you're like, I was just doing

0:31:18.160 --> 0:31:19.200
<v Speaker 1>what everybody else did.

0:31:20.520 --> 0:31:23.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, and it's it's really frustrating.

0:31:23.160 --> 0:31:25.760
<v Speaker 2>And so you know, I think that again goes back

0:31:25.760 --> 0:31:28.360
<v Speaker 2>to like why we want to get control of a club,

0:31:28.400 --> 0:31:31.640
<v Speaker 2>because you know, I think there is a lot of

0:31:32.400 --> 0:31:36.400
<v Speaker 2>ways that we can optimize things, and if we're only

0:31:36.400 --> 0:31:40.600
<v Speaker 2>reporting to ourselves, then it's like, well, you know, I'm

0:31:40.640 --> 0:31:43.720
<v Speaker 2>not going to fire myself just because the theory didn't

0:31:43.720 --> 0:31:44.120
<v Speaker 2>work out.

0:31:44.280 --> 0:31:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Yes, it's hard to get to a big enough end though, right,

0:31:47.160 --> 0:31:48.959
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to get to a big enough samplicized there

0:31:49.040 --> 0:31:53.400
<v Speaker 1>just aren't that many games. So let's talk about the

0:31:53.440 --> 0:31:57.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of happy outcome for you. Say it's whatever, five

0:31:57.600 --> 0:32:01.800
<v Speaker 1>years from now and you have found capital, You've found

0:32:01.840 --> 0:32:03.920
<v Speaker 1>somebody who wants to essentially bet on you, which is,

0:32:03.920 --> 0:32:06.360
<v Speaker 1>if I understand correctly, what would have to happen, and

0:32:06.480 --> 0:32:12.560
<v Speaker 1>you are, you know, with your financy financierer partners running

0:32:12.600 --> 0:32:14.520
<v Speaker 1>a club. What's that look like?

0:32:15.960 --> 0:32:19.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean I think it would look really really different.

0:32:20.160 --> 0:32:22.280
<v Speaker 2>I think that the typical profile of who would be

0:32:22.280 --> 0:32:24.560
<v Speaker 2>working in that club would be quite different.

0:32:24.640 --> 0:32:25.160
<v Speaker 3>So I think the.

0:32:25.120 --> 0:32:31.440
<v Speaker 2>First thing is, yeah, nerdier for sure, fresh are It's

0:32:31.440 --> 0:32:33.840
<v Speaker 2>hard because like, you know, I've played a lot of

0:32:33.840 --> 0:32:36.000
<v Speaker 2>sports growing up, and so it's like, well, you know,

0:32:36.080 --> 0:32:41.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm not that nerdy. And then it's like, oh yeah, yeah,

0:32:41.600 --> 0:32:43.479
<v Speaker 2>but yeah, I mean I think it would look nerdier,

0:32:43.480 --> 0:32:45.520
<v Speaker 2>but I think it would be a lot more like

0:32:45.680 --> 0:32:49.360
<v Speaker 2>just a totally different mindset. Really a lot more people

0:32:49.360 --> 0:32:51.560
<v Speaker 2>who are like, yeah, let's do things differently, Let's have

0:32:51.640 --> 0:32:55.920
<v Speaker 2>the courage to try new things, and then let's have

0:32:56.040 --> 0:32:59.720
<v Speaker 2>kind of the thinking power behind it to not just

0:32:59.760 --> 0:33:02.760
<v Speaker 2>like let's try random things, but let's try really well

0:33:02.800 --> 0:33:06.000
<v Speaker 2>thought out, creative but courageous things.

0:33:06.160 --> 0:33:09.600
<v Speaker 1>When you talk about, like, you know, being bold and

0:33:09.640 --> 0:33:13.000
<v Speaker 1>creative and different, is there some particular thing you have

0:33:13.120 --> 0:33:15.480
<v Speaker 1>in mind? Is there's like one thing where you're like

0:33:15.640 --> 0:33:18.320
<v Speaker 1>that one thing I wish somebody would just try it.

0:33:19.360 --> 0:33:21.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean, right now, it's probably the substitution thing, because

0:33:21.760 --> 0:33:25.000
<v Speaker 2>that's like the lowest hanging fruit, and it like really

0:33:25.040 --> 0:33:26.920
<v Speaker 2>really drives me nuts.

0:33:27.000 --> 0:33:29.600
<v Speaker 1>What's your secret theory? What do you think would be better?

0:33:29.760 --> 0:33:31.200
<v Speaker 3>Oh, I think you should do early.

0:33:31.280 --> 0:33:33.120
<v Speaker 2>I think you should kind of treat it like line

0:33:33.200 --> 0:33:37.160
<v Speaker 2>changes in hockey. So I mean, like right now, what

0:33:37.200 --> 0:33:40.080
<v Speaker 2>they do is they typically try to bring on maybe

0:33:40.120 --> 0:33:42.920
<v Speaker 2>like a fast player late in the game that you

0:33:42.960 --> 0:33:45.560
<v Speaker 2>know would theoretically be running against tired legs.

0:33:46.120 --> 0:33:48.000
<v Speaker 3>But the problem is that like it's.

0:33:47.920 --> 0:33:50.720
<v Speaker 2>Too late, and so you know, our ideas basically like

0:33:50.840 --> 0:33:53.560
<v Speaker 2>bring on people who like know that they only have

0:33:53.600 --> 0:33:56.840
<v Speaker 2>thirty minutes, run as hard as you can, as crazy

0:33:56.840 --> 0:34:00.400
<v Speaker 2>as you can, get that one goal advantage, your two

0:34:00.400 --> 0:34:03.080
<v Speaker 2>goal advantage, and then adapts.

0:34:02.840 --> 0:34:06.240
<v Speaker 1>And nobody has tried that. That doesn't seem crazy, Like

0:34:06.320 --> 0:34:09.439
<v Speaker 1>there's one hundred soccer teams, all you need is one

0:34:09.560 --> 0:34:11.520
<v Speaker 1>verson to try it. It's like a free idea.

0:34:11.600 --> 0:34:12.279
<v Speaker 3>I know, I don't.

0:34:12.320 --> 0:34:14.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, you know, if we see like a change in

0:34:14.520 --> 0:34:18.400
<v Speaker 2>substitution patterns after this content, yeah, that's right. Yeah, but

0:34:18.640 --> 0:34:20.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, like the crazy thing is there used to

0:34:20.360 --> 0:34:22.920
<v Speaker 2>only be three substitutions in soccer, and so you always

0:34:22.920 --> 0:34:25.759
<v Speaker 2>wanted to keep at least one in case a player

0:34:25.800 --> 0:34:28.799
<v Speaker 2>gets injured, so that really leaves you with two. But

0:34:28.880 --> 0:34:31.759
<v Speaker 2>during COVID, they upped it to five, and so now

0:34:31.760 --> 0:34:32.359
<v Speaker 2>it's like, well you.

0:34:32.320 --> 0:34:37.239
<v Speaker 1>Have that has persisted. Yeah, so they've almost doubled the

0:34:37.320 --> 0:34:41.680
<v Speaker 1>number of substitutions allowed. Has the strategy in using them changed?

0:34:41.960 --> 0:34:46.640
<v Speaker 2>No, it's like very slightly changed, And a lot of

0:34:46.640 --> 0:34:49.919
<v Speaker 2>coaches don't even take advantage of all substitutes.

0:34:50.400 --> 0:34:54.399
<v Speaker 1>Why do you think nobody has, you know, dramatically significantly

0:34:54.480 --> 0:34:57.719
<v Speaker 1>changed their strategy around substitutions even though the rule has

0:34:57.800 --> 0:34:59.279
<v Speaker 1>changed so significant.

0:34:59.680 --> 0:35:02.200
<v Speaker 3>One, I mean, I guess there's like two explanations.

0:35:02.200 --> 0:35:04.480
<v Speaker 2>The easiest one is like, well, it's always been the

0:35:04.520 --> 0:35:05.600
<v Speaker 2>way that we've done it, so.

0:35:06.520 --> 0:35:07.880
<v Speaker 3>You know why change?

0:35:08.719 --> 0:35:11.480
<v Speaker 2>I think part of what's driving that though, is that

0:35:11.600 --> 0:35:16.200
<v Speaker 2>the way that rosters are constructed hasn't changed. And so

0:35:16.480 --> 0:35:18.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, depending on like the finances of a team,

0:35:18.560 --> 0:35:22.920
<v Speaker 2>you might not have as many like quality players to

0:35:23.000 --> 0:35:27.120
<v Speaker 2>go that deep onto the bench. But you know, if

0:35:27.120 --> 0:35:29.360
<v Speaker 2>this is your strategy, then you can change how you recruit,

0:35:29.400 --> 0:35:32.200
<v Speaker 2>you can change the profile of that squad composition.

0:35:32.560 --> 0:35:35.239
<v Speaker 1>The second answer is interesting, right, because it requires you

0:35:35.320 --> 0:35:38.120
<v Speaker 1>to think more systematically. It's like, oh, the rules are different,

0:35:38.200 --> 0:35:41.120
<v Speaker 1>so therefore we should build a different team, which is

0:35:41.200 --> 0:35:42.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of next level.

0:35:42.280 --> 0:35:46.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and yeah, that's that's not typically how teams operate.

0:35:50.040 --> 0:35:52.160
<v Speaker 1>We'll be back in a minute with the lightning round.

0:36:01.680 --> 0:36:06.240
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna finish with the lightning round. Okay, soccer or football?

0:36:06.840 --> 0:36:11.120
<v Speaker 1>I say football, frieser chips, chips, Cookies are biscuits.

0:36:12.160 --> 0:36:14.279
<v Speaker 3>So my husband is from India and he will kill

0:36:14.320 --> 0:36:15.440
<v Speaker 3>me if I say cookies.

0:36:15.480 --> 0:36:19.799
<v Speaker 1>But cookies are there other britishisms. You sign your emails cheers.

0:36:20.440 --> 0:36:24.560
<v Speaker 3>Sometimes I hate doing it. Mate is another one?

0:36:24.840 --> 0:36:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Mate?

0:36:25.200 --> 0:36:27.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, because that's what.

0:36:27.080 --> 0:36:29.479
<v Speaker 1>You call everything brilliant. I love talking to British people

0:36:29.480 --> 0:36:31.120
<v Speaker 1>because they say everything I say is brilliant, but they

0:36:31.160 --> 0:36:32.000
<v Speaker 1>don't mean it. The way I think.

0:36:32.239 --> 0:36:36.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's brilliant, bloody. Yeah, just little things.

0:36:36.600 --> 0:36:39.719
<v Speaker 1>By British guy once said blind I loved that.

0:36:40.239 --> 0:36:43.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I've not not done.

0:36:43.000 --> 0:36:43.480
<v Speaker 3>That, but yeah.

0:36:43.480 --> 0:36:45.279
<v Speaker 2>I think when I was little, my brother and I

0:36:45.360 --> 0:36:48.759
<v Speaker 2>used to antagonize my dad until he would like yell

0:36:48.760 --> 0:36:52.080
<v Speaker 2>at us in British slang, and that was like success

0:36:52.080 --> 0:36:52.520
<v Speaker 2>for us.

0:36:53.280 --> 0:36:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Give me your impression of your dad yelling at your

0:36:55.040 --> 0:36:55.600
<v Speaker 1>British slang.

0:36:56.120 --> 0:36:58.640
<v Speaker 3>It would just say, like, oh, bugger off, the.

0:36:58.719 --> 0:37:03.439
<v Speaker 1>Bugger off is good. What's one thing you learned working

0:37:03.480 --> 0:37:04.600
<v Speaker 1>at Microsoft?

0:37:06.280 --> 0:37:09.120
<v Speaker 3>It's hard to get things done in large companies.

0:37:10.560 --> 0:37:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Do you have any tips for getting things done in

0:37:12.400 --> 0:37:14.280
<v Speaker 1>large companies? Or is it just leave?

0:37:15.560 --> 0:37:18.960
<v Speaker 2>I mean my answer was leave, But yeah, I mean

0:37:19.000 --> 0:37:22.520
<v Speaker 2>I think there's there's certain behaviors that maybe I don't

0:37:22.560 --> 0:37:26.720
<v Speaker 2>necessarily possess or like love, but like aggressive, loud people

0:37:26.800 --> 0:37:28.440
<v Speaker 2>tend to get things done.

0:37:28.719 --> 0:37:33.960
<v Speaker 1>There were there in the Balmer area era. That's very

0:37:33.960 --> 0:37:40.839
<v Speaker 1>Steve Balmer vibes. Who's the most underrated player you've ever seen?

0:37:41.800 --> 0:37:46.040
<v Speaker 2>Ooh, it might be this guy named Manu Tregueros. He

0:37:46.120 --> 0:37:51.120
<v Speaker 2>plays for a club in Spain called Viriao, and I

0:37:51.160 --> 0:37:54.080
<v Speaker 2>think he's brilliant he was kind of born at a

0:37:54.120 --> 0:37:57.280
<v Speaker 2>time when Spain had like loads of really really talented

0:37:57.280 --> 0:37:59.960
<v Speaker 2>players in his position, so he never got called up

0:38:00.120 --> 0:38:01.839
<v Speaker 2>the national team or anything like that.

0:38:02.360 --> 0:38:04.400
<v Speaker 3>But his running style is like a little bit nerdy,

0:38:04.520 --> 0:38:05.359
<v Speaker 3>Like he runs very.

0:38:05.360 --> 0:38:08.840
<v Speaker 2>Much on his toes, and you know, he doesn't look

0:38:08.960 --> 0:38:13.279
<v Speaker 2>like an athlete. He actually is like a like while

0:38:13.320 --> 0:38:16.640
<v Speaker 2>he was playing professionally, he was doing his master's in education,

0:38:16.800 --> 0:38:18.040
<v Speaker 2>so he was like a student teacher.

0:38:18.080 --> 0:38:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Like, it's just it's just that you love him. It's

0:38:20.160 --> 0:38:22.640
<v Speaker 1>not that he's an amazing player. Is that I love him?

0:38:22.760 --> 0:38:26.400
<v Speaker 2>I love him, but like he was also an amazing player,

0:38:26.440 --> 0:38:29.440
<v Speaker 2>but I think like having this air of like nerdiness

0:38:29.480 --> 0:38:32.279
<v Speaker 2>around him kind of kept him a little bit under

0:38:32.280 --> 0:38:32.720
<v Speaker 2>the radar.

0:38:33.160 --> 0:38:35.279
<v Speaker 1>Who's the most overrated player you've ever seen?

0:38:36.400 --> 0:38:43.839
<v Speaker 2>Ooh, that's a yeah, that's a really hard one.

0:38:45.400 --> 0:38:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Are you afraid of getting in trouble? Is there a

0:38:47.000 --> 0:38:48.440
<v Speaker 1>name in your mind and you just don't want to

0:38:48.480 --> 0:38:50.760
<v Speaker 1>say it because you don't want to antagonize anybody.

0:38:51.080 --> 0:38:53.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, definitely, there's some of that.

0:38:53.080 --> 0:38:55.520
<v Speaker 2>And then there's like a little bit of like hindsight bias,

0:38:55.560 --> 0:38:58.520
<v Speaker 2>where it's like there were guys who were overrated at.

0:38:58.360 --> 0:39:02.680
<v Speaker 3>The moment and then like kind of crumbled and failed.

0:39:02.680 --> 0:39:05.480
<v Speaker 2>So it's like, well, if I say like Marlon Shamack,

0:39:05.560 --> 0:39:09.520
<v Speaker 2>who was a kind of like a notoriously disastrous signing

0:39:09.560 --> 0:39:11.920
<v Speaker 2>for Arsenal, everyone would say like.

0:39:11.920 --> 0:39:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Oh, yeah, too easy. Yeah, what's one piece of advice

0:39:16.400 --> 0:39:20.520
<v Speaker 1>you have for women working in male dominated fields?

0:39:21.520 --> 0:39:25.400
<v Speaker 3>Oh, that's a really good one.

0:39:26.200 --> 0:39:29.120
<v Speaker 2>It would probably be that just you belong and know

0:39:29.200 --> 0:39:32.879
<v Speaker 2>that you belong, and don't let people try to make

0:39:32.920 --> 0:39:35.920
<v Speaker 2>you feel that you don't. And one of the ways

0:39:35.920 --> 0:39:38.640
<v Speaker 2>that you can do that is talk to other women.

0:39:39.440 --> 0:39:42.000
<v Speaker 2>When I got started fifteen years ago, like there weren't

0:39:42.160 --> 0:39:46.000
<v Speaker 2>any other women. Now there's loads of women working in

0:39:46.040 --> 0:39:50.719
<v Speaker 2>all different sports and all different sorts of roles. And

0:39:51.040 --> 0:39:53.759
<v Speaker 2>a couple of years ago there's conference started called Women

0:39:53.800 --> 0:39:56.759
<v Speaker 2>in Sports Data. This year it's could be held in

0:39:56.840 --> 0:40:00.520
<v Speaker 2>Philadelphia September seventh, I think. But it's like a great

0:40:00.560 --> 0:40:03.600
<v Speaker 2>place to connect with people because to me, I find

0:40:03.640 --> 0:40:06.960
<v Speaker 2>it really powerful to be in like a gymnasium with

0:40:07.400 --> 0:40:10.200
<v Speaker 2>like a room literally full of women who are interested

0:40:10.239 --> 0:40:15.560
<v Speaker 2>in sports and data and technology. And yeah, just I

0:40:15.560 --> 0:40:18.680
<v Speaker 2>don't know, it's good for your mental health, it's good

0:40:18.680 --> 0:40:22.000
<v Speaker 2>for you know, your self esteem and everything. But yeah,

0:40:22.080 --> 0:40:24.239
<v Speaker 2>just know that that you belong, that you can do it,

0:40:25.719 --> 0:40:27.880
<v Speaker 2>and that yeah, nobody should tell you otherwise.

0:40:29.440 --> 0:40:33.000
<v Speaker 1>So Brad Pitt played Billy Bean and Moneyball. Who's going

0:40:33.080 --> 0:40:36.040
<v Speaker 1>to play you in Moneyball too? Don't call it soccer?

0:40:37.400 --> 0:40:41.680
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, I have I have no idea. I don't

0:40:41.680 --> 0:40:43.800
<v Speaker 2>watch a lot of movies, So, like, I couldn't even

0:40:44.280 --> 0:40:47.719
<v Speaker 2>name an actress right now. Maybe maybe Kiera Knightley because

0:40:47.760 --> 0:40:51.920
<v Speaker 2>she was in Bendettlake Beckham, So I'll go with Kiera Knightley.

0:40:54.680 --> 0:40:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Sarah Rudd is the co founder and CEO of Source Football.

0:40:59.600 --> 0:41:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Today's show was produced by Gabriel Hunter Cheng. It was

0:41:03.160 --> 0:41:06.640
<v Speaker 1>edited by Lyddy jeene Kott and engineered by Sarah Brugeer.

0:41:07.120 --> 0:41:10.680
<v Speaker 1>You can email us at Problem at Pushkin dot Fm.

0:41:10.840 --> 0:41:13.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm Jacob Oldstein and we'll be back next week with

0:41:13.239 --> 0:41:28.240
<v Speaker 1>another episode of What's Your Problem