WEBVTT - Week 9 Recap, Winners, Losers, EHHH 0:00:00.400 --> 0:00:02.760 Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast. If you want to 0:00:02.800 --> 0:00:05.160 listen live, all you have to do is download the 0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:09.400 I Heart Radio app and search for Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Also, 0:00:09.440 --> 0:00:11.119 if you want to catch this show on video, for 0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:14.040 sure to check out Zoo TV channel seven nineteen and 0:00:14.040 --> 0:00:17.200 that's where you can find sports Grids Fantasy Sports Network. 0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:21.439 Enjoy the show and thanks so much for listening and 0:00:21.600 --> 0:00:25.080 listen to me. This is the Fantasy Football Best Friends 0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:29.520 Forever show. Start listening to us, or suffer the consequences. 0:00:37.400 --> 0:01:14.560 Do dinnity? Yeah right now. Welcome your Friday from my 0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:20.680 gyro st Francis Frankday stand ball ladies and tell him 0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:28.600 in your inside of studio at thirty four this he's 0:01:28.640 --> 0:01:33.720 the BFFs. He's Frank Snaffle, I am Grank. What's happening about? 0:01:34.480 --> 0:01:39.400 Happy Monday to you. Lots to talk about obviously, j E. T. 0:01:40.000 --> 0:01:47.240 S Just and the season's season's God. How's your weekend, Greggy? 0:01:48.280 --> 0:01:52.040 He was good here yesterday working which was always a pleasure. Uh, 0:01:52.160 --> 0:01:54.720 Saturday was nice though, Man, We've got a lot accomplished Saturday. 0:01:54.760 --> 0:01:56.840 Had a really good dinner Friday night, which is awesome. 0:01:57.640 --> 0:02:00.760 Um had fun man, and could we again my last 0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:04.560 weekend as a single man. Oh when you see it 0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:10.560 like that has so much more effect. What did you 0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:12.720 do in your foot in your final single weekend? Did 0:02:12.720 --> 0:02:17.840 you hung out? All right? Well, I was hoping that 0:02:17.840 --> 0:02:20.360 would change a little bit. All right, it's fine now 0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:21.880 he has You know, we do abount your wedding stuff, 0:02:22.400 --> 0:02:25.160 wedding stuff, about your wedding stuff on Friday. Get a 0:02:25.200 --> 0:02:29.680 bounch of wedding stuff on Saturday. She's not really Saturday 0:02:29.680 --> 0:02:31.639 become of funny. I played spike ball Sunday morning, which 0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:35.480 is awesome. Um, then we went to bar a lot 0:02:35.800 --> 0:02:38.880 and that's very funny. So then Saturday night we came 0:02:38.919 --> 0:02:42.200 home and like watch going to time to leave? We 0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:44.120 went and then we're watching SNL. I was like twelve 0:02:44.160 --> 0:02:47.040 thirty five and had to be at work early on 0:02:47.080 --> 0:02:49.920 Sunday morning. I just like obviously passing the couch and 0:02:50.000 --> 0:02:51.280 she's like, all right, it's time to go to bed. 0:02:51.440 --> 0:02:54.200 I was like, im mobile. I was like, She's like, 0:02:54.200 --> 0:02:57.440 I have not I have not seen you like that ever. 0:02:57.800 --> 0:02:59.320 I couldn't even like wake you up, so I just 0:02:59.440 --> 0:03:01.760 left you there sucking on the couch for a good 0:03:01.840 --> 0:03:04.079 few hours. Dog House Greg and then I got off 0:03:04.080 --> 0:03:06.160 and I was like, I got a bed now. I 0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:09.480 don't know. The collection hasn't changed back yet. It had 0:03:09.919 --> 0:03:11.840 I've done that many times. So I'm right there with 0:03:13.040 --> 0:03:14.920 come home, hammered, passed on the couch a little bit, 0:03:14.919 --> 0:03:17.640 trying to watch the show, maybe a movie. You wake up. 0:03:17.680 --> 0:03:20.360 It's five o'clock in the moving. What am I doing here? 0:03:20.639 --> 0:03:23.919 How did I get here? It's very annoying. Looks good. 0:03:23.919 --> 0:03:25.079 It sounds like you had a good week. It wasn't 0:03:25.080 --> 0:03:28.120 really fun weekend. How's your silent discount? Silent Discount Friday? 0:03:28.200 --> 0:03:30.600 A little Halloween party is out in the story. It 0:03:30.639 --> 0:03:32.520 was a good time, it was The music was really good. 0:03:33.040 --> 0:03:35.040 If anyone has not been to a Silent disco, I 0:03:35.120 --> 0:03:36.840 recommend it. It It was actually pretty cool. You know, you 0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:39.160 get the headphones. You have three different stations. You have 0:03:39.200 --> 0:03:41.680 a hip hop station, E d M station, you have 0:03:41.760 --> 0:03:45.240 a pop slash, throwback hits, whatever kind of station. And 0:03:45.280 --> 0:03:47.360 it was good. I really enjoyed the music at nice 0:03:47.360 --> 0:03:50.000 little pre game beforehand, so I was feeling myself. Greg 0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:53.440 had the costumes over. I was out there dancing as 0:03:53.960 --> 0:03:56.560 White Goodman from GLOBOIM how did the costume go? Over. 0:03:56.920 --> 0:03:59.560 It was good. I had had a few compliments. I 0:03:59.560 --> 0:04:01.839 didn't really see anything too crazy, you know. Someone someone 0:04:01.880 --> 0:04:03.880 else asked me, did you see any crazy costumes? No? 0:04:04.080 --> 0:04:06.880 What was the most popular costume this year was the Joker. Again, 0:04:07.480 --> 0:04:09.880 I didn't really see any jokers. Maybe I was too 0:04:09.920 --> 0:04:13.120 intoxicated to notice. I had a riveting conversation with a 0:04:13.160 --> 0:04:16.640 super sayan Goku on Friday about why vegeta was better 0:04:16.800 --> 0:04:19.880 than Goku. I know you don't. You don't understand any 0:04:19.920 --> 0:04:22.400 of this. I don't think anyone understands any of this. No, 0:04:22.480 --> 0:04:26.200 it's dragon ball Z, Greg, It's very popular show. You've 0:04:26.240 --> 0:04:30.960 never heard of it. Dragon ball Z. Those are characters 0:04:30.960 --> 0:04:33.960 and dragon ball Z forgot. Greg didn't have a childhood, 0:04:34.040 --> 0:04:36.520 had a child No cartoons sitting in the dragon ball Z. 0:04:36.640 --> 0:04:40.839 No Pokemon, no dragon ball Z. Yeah I had. I 0:04:40.880 --> 0:04:42.479 had a conversation with that guy, and that was it. 0:04:42.480 --> 0:04:46.640 It's pretty much well. I remember Saturday Halloween party with 0:04:46.680 --> 0:04:49.200 my family, got all the Halloween out of my system. 0:04:49.279 --> 0:04:52.040 That's awesome, all right, So let's get to Sunday, Frank 0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:55.920 where we both washed a ton of football. Obviously, and 0:04:56.279 --> 0:04:59.280 I want to begin. I don't know, I guess we 0:04:59.360 --> 0:05:01.600 gotta begin where it ended, which was last night, because 0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:04.279 probably the biggest story over the day yesterday was Lamar 0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:07.279 Jackson and the Baltimore Ravens taking down the New England 0:05:07.279 --> 0:05:11.120 Patriots and previously undefeated New England Patriots. Ravens took it 0:05:11.200 --> 0:05:13.679 to them right from the opening whistle. Patriots got themselves 0:05:14.120 --> 0:05:16.520 back in it before halftime, before the Ravens round up 0:05:16.520 --> 0:05:20.200 pulling away in the second half. Lamar Jackson looked amazing 0:05:20.320 --> 0:05:24.719 and I've seen a lot of accolades today for what 0:05:24.760 --> 0:05:27.400 the Ravens did right, Like, they totally committed rastate quarterback 0:05:27.440 --> 0:05:28.760 that didn't fit their system. They went from a guy 0:05:28.800 --> 0:05:31.320 that was immobile and Joe Flacco the guy that's incredibly 0:05:31.360 --> 0:05:34.800 mobile but potentially inaccurate, Lamar Jackson, and they crafted their 0:05:34.960 --> 0:05:37.480 entire team around this guy. They brought it off. It's 0:05:37.560 --> 0:05:40.200 coordinator that specializes in this and Greg Roman, and they 0:05:40.360 --> 0:05:45.159 completely changed everything that they do. And at least for 0:05:45.279 --> 0:05:48.240 one night, really eight games, it's worked out really really well. 0:05:48.360 --> 0:05:50.920 John Harball and his teams are a lot of credit. Yeah, 0:05:51.000 --> 0:05:53.599 Lamar Jackson just match up proof. When it comes to 0:05:53.640 --> 0:05:56.440 a fantasy football perspective. As of now he's the QB three. 0:05:56.680 --> 0:05:59.400 We still have Dak Prescott and Daniel Jones to play tonight. 0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:02.599 Didn't light up the you know, the scoreboard in terms 0:06:02.640 --> 0:06:05.520 of throwing the ball, you seventeen that's fine. Hundred and 0:06:05.520 --> 0:06:08.120 sixty three yards seven point one yards per tempt through 0:06:08.200 --> 0:06:10.240 for a touchdown as well. But again, it's what he 0:06:10.279 --> 0:06:13.359 does on the ground and his ability to escape pressure 0:06:13.400 --> 0:06:15.960 and make plays with his legs. I mean, what he's 0:06:15.960 --> 0:06:19.479 done this year as a runner, Greg is better than 0:06:19.520 --> 0:06:21.680 what most running backs have done so far to the 0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:25.000 season in the NFL. Again on pace to shatter Michael 0:06:25.080 --> 0:06:28.680 Vicks rushing record for a single season. Another sixty one 0:06:28.720 --> 0:06:31.160 rushing yards last night, two rushing touchdowns. He is match 0:06:31.240 --> 0:06:33.279 up proof if you ever needed to see it. It 0:06:33.400 --> 0:06:35.720 was his Patriots defense that entered this game as the 0:06:35.800 --> 0:06:39.360 number one defense in the NFL. Greg, I think we 0:06:39.360 --> 0:06:43.000 were kind of reminded of the issues that the Patriots 0:06:43.040 --> 0:06:45.000 still have on this team, and I think a lot 0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:48.400 of them are offensive right like that that's kind of 0:06:48.440 --> 0:06:51.240 been hidden so far this season because their defense was 0:06:51.279 --> 0:06:53.640 scoring as many points as they were. But the Patriots 0:06:53.680 --> 0:06:55.599 only put up twenty points last night to average five 0:06:55.600 --> 0:06:57.880 point three yards per play. They were out gained by 0:06:57.880 --> 0:07:01.000 the Baltimore Ravens in this game as well. So we'll 0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:02.960 see once their offensive line starts to get a little 0:07:03.000 --> 0:07:05.560 bit healthier. I know Nikkill Harry is going to return 0:07:05.680 --> 0:07:07.920 at some point. We'll see if this offense can get better. 0:07:08.200 --> 0:07:10.680 But one of the bigger takeaways for me, Greg was 0:07:10.720 --> 0:07:14.240 that this h this Patriots offense is not clicking on 0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:17.440 all cylinders like it has in years. Passed absolutely the 0:07:17.440 --> 0:07:20.200 the offense, and this is why Tom Brady is upset 0:07:20.200 --> 0:07:22.920 because he always gives back money to New England, right 0:07:22.960 --> 0:07:25.960 and was like, hey, didn't bring me a wide receiver, 0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:27.720 and they tried to do that with Josh Gordon and 0:07:27.720 --> 0:07:30.960 Antonio Brown and it hasn't worked. Julian m fumbled last night. 0:07:31.040 --> 0:07:32.280 I mean you just look at his crew, Julian and 0:07:32.360 --> 0:07:34.320 'm in the Philip her set Mohammed Saneria, Like all right, 0:07:34.360 --> 0:07:36.880 where I assume the number one guy's is hurt or 0:07:36.920 --> 0:07:40.160 out and he's not. Maybe that can be to heal 0:07:40.400 --> 0:07:42.200 and to hell Harry who was inactive last night. They 0:07:42.200 --> 0:07:43.920 have a bye this week and then maybe he comes 0:07:43.960 --> 0:07:46.880 back and he becomes a thing. Right now, Patriots seeing 0:07:46.960 --> 0:07:50.120 out of number one wide receiver, James White did his thing, Mualtimore, Ravens, 0:07:50.720 --> 0:07:53.800 you know, Mark Jackson, and that's about it. Yeah, mark 0:07:53.880 --> 0:07:56.360 ingram as well. Marketing was awesome, and the Patriots had 0:07:56.360 --> 0:07:58.120 been really good against the run. So this is the 0:07:58.120 --> 0:08:00.720 best rushing attack in the NFL by fart, not close, right, 0:08:00.800 --> 0:08:02.720 absolutely right. When we come back, we'll get the rest 0:08:02.760 --> 0:08:05.320 of the winners, the losers of f from this weekend, 0:08:05.560 --> 0:08:14.280 we're on the FL. Want to be the next Daily 0:08:14.320 --> 0:08:17.880 Fantasy millionaire. Dunk on your NBA DFS competition with Daily 0:08:17.920 --> 0:08:21.760 Rodal dot com and dominate on fandel and DraftKings this season. 0:08:21.840 --> 0:08:24.760 Compete with the pros with Daily rodal dot Com optimizer 0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:28.480 and the most accurate projections in NBA DFS, plus line 0:08:28.520 --> 0:08:31.480 up alerts, breaking news, lake swap support, and much more. 0:08:31.600 --> 0:08:34.800 Save ten percent on winning NBA DFS advice with promo 0:08:34.880 --> 0:08:38.440 code Dunk. Visit Daily Rodal dot com backslash dunk to 0:08:38.559 --> 0:09:00.280 learn more. Back with you here on the logo. It's 0:09:00.280 --> 0:09:04.160 Frank Snaville and Greg Sauceman. Week nine has one more 0:09:04.160 --> 0:09:05.760 game Love more than a football. Will get to that 0:09:05.840 --> 0:09:08.240 in a little bit before we do. It's time to 0:09:08.280 --> 0:09:12.440 talk about the winners the losers, and from week number nine, 0:09:13.800 --> 0:09:22.480 the BFFs presents winners one one losers. You suck. You 0:09:22.600 --> 0:09:29.120 are one pathetical loser and I have no idea what's 0:09:29.160 --> 0:09:38.560 going winners and losers for week number nine around the NFL. 0:09:38.760 --> 0:09:42.280 Let's take us to Pittsburgh, frank where we learned a lot. 0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:47.640 In the Steelers and Colts game, big winner Zach Pascal 0:09:47.920 --> 0:09:51.240 of the Indianapolis called somebody had to step up without 0:09:51.320 --> 0:09:55.480 t Y Olton in the lineup. Zach Pascal than just that, Yeah, 0:09:55.480 --> 0:09:58.120 that is exactly what he did. Greg let this team 0:09:58.200 --> 0:10:02.000 in receiving with cards five receptions as well, he caught 0:10:02.000 --> 0:10:06.440 a touchdown, lead them in targets as well, had six targets, 0:10:06.600 --> 0:10:10.360 ninetent of the target, share of the air yards, a 0:10:10.520 --> 0:10:14.640 thirteen point three average depth of target. No other Colts 0:10:14.679 --> 0:10:18.000 player had an a dot higher than nine yesterday, so 0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:21.360 he's seeing targets down the field as well. Played of 0:10:21.400 --> 0:10:24.560 the snaps, ran forty routes, which was the most among 0:10:24.679 --> 0:10:27.720 all of their past catchers. Yesterday. We wanted to know 0:10:27.720 --> 0:10:29.280 who was gonna step up in the absence of t 0:10:29.440 --> 0:10:31.160 Y Hilton. We all kind of speculated that it would 0:10:31.160 --> 0:10:34.480 be Zach Pascal, and that's exactly what happened. Absolutely, we 0:10:34.480 --> 0:10:36.959 were we not right, we got one, right, We finally 0:10:37.000 --> 0:10:39.120 get one, finally got right on the back. You know, 0:10:39.360 --> 0:10:43.800 in in every league and they love Zack Pascal. One league. 0:10:43.840 --> 0:10:47.360 We we started Zack Pascal and we got a right. 0:10:47.800 --> 0:10:49.960 He doesn't have it often, but we had a winner 0:10:50.120 --> 0:10:53.160 with ty En down. We figured it out that it 0:10:53.320 --> 0:10:55.480 was gonna be Zack Faskell and it worked out. I 0:10:55.559 --> 0:10:57.320 asked you the question on the hurry up. But you 0:10:57.320 --> 0:10:59.120 can see you know a few you know, a few 0:10:59.120 --> 0:11:03.960 minutes from now. But with Ryan Hoyer at the quarterback position, 0:11:03.960 --> 0:11:06.240 and we don't know exactly what the deal of Jacobe 0:11:06.280 --> 0:11:10.080 Ver said, are you can started without Pascal going forward? No, 0:11:10.160 --> 0:11:12.640 I'm not. They still need someone to catch passes on 0:11:12.679 --> 0:11:14.839 this team obviously, and the tight ends are going to 0:11:14.880 --> 0:11:16.960 be involved. I think if you're playing deeper leagues, Chester 0:11:17.120 --> 0:11:19.920 Rodgers has my attention as well. Once Brian Hoyer came 0:11:19.960 --> 0:11:22.760 into the game yesterday, Chester Rodgers was actually the player 0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:25.720 he targeted most with five targets. Zach Pascal is still 0:11:25.720 --> 0:11:27.800 second on the team with four targets. He had two 0:11:27.800 --> 0:11:30.920 targets from Jacobe Brissette from one verset was still in 0:11:30.960 --> 0:11:32.520 the game. That's how he wound up with the six 0:11:32.559 --> 0:11:36.160 targets overall. But Zack Pascoal again still played the most snaps, 0:11:36.160 --> 0:11:38.280 he ran the most routes, and I think he's probably 0:11:38.559 --> 0:11:40.760 the most talented wide receiver left on this team. I 0:11:40.840 --> 0:11:44.000 like Paris Campbell for the future, but he's slowly being 0:11:44.000 --> 0:11:46.520 worked in. I think he's their slot receiver of the future. 0:11:46.800 --> 0:11:49.559 But overall, I think Pascal's probably the most talented one 0:11:49.880 --> 0:11:52.200 right now. I think both he and the tight ends 0:11:52.240 --> 0:11:54.160 are gonna be the most consistent ones moving forward. I 0:11:54.200 --> 0:11:56.600 agree Jack Joel also a winner with all those snaps 0:11:56.600 --> 0:11:59.480 that he played this past weekend. Ryan Hoyer was all 0:11:59.520 --> 0:12:02.840 over worked out awesomely. I totally totally agree the tight 0:12:02.920 --> 0:12:05.800 ends Zach Pascal. Definitely. When you're gonna highlight with the 0:12:05.880 --> 0:12:08.640 Indianapolis Colts, let me go to the other side, Frank 0:12:08.720 --> 0:12:12.840 and let me go with Manly mentioned Jalen Samuel who started, 0:12:12.880 --> 0:12:15.640 but like really because Trey Emmonds had a huge run 0:12:16.240 --> 0:12:18.720 on that first drive for Pittsburgh, and as a Jalen 0:12:18.760 --> 0:12:21.160 Samuel's owner, I was just like, oh my god, we 0:12:21.679 --> 0:12:23.880 I feel like it's High Johnson all over again. And 0:12:23.880 --> 0:12:26.679 then Samuel's had a similar role to that he did 0:12:27.160 --> 0:12:29.160 a few weeks back when he was healthy, and he 0:12:29.200 --> 0:12:31.360 had a huge game on one it was Sunday Night 0:12:31.360 --> 0:12:33.640 football on Monday Night Football, UM where he was wild 0:12:33.640 --> 0:12:37.000 catting and he was everything his mangels exactly and well, 0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:39.600 it doesn't really a wild cat. Yesterday we saw the 0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:41.840 same game plan, which was basically Rudolph dumping it off, 0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:44.600 dumping it off, dou'lping it off, and yes, don'tping it off. 0:12:44.760 --> 0:12:48.840 Samuels had what twelve receptions yesterday. Team receptions just set 0:12:48.840 --> 0:12:51.560 the franchise record for most receptions by running back, breaking 0:12:51.640 --> 0:12:55.760 Levian Belt's record, of course, and this offense has proven 0:12:55.840 --> 0:12:58.839 to be successful for Mason Rudolph. Don't push the ball 0:12:58.880 --> 0:13:01.120 downfield if you don't have to. You find your open, 0:13:01.280 --> 0:13:04.480 your open, close targets and let them do the dirty 0:13:04.480 --> 0:13:07.240 work on the field. Jaylen Samuels did that dirty work. 0:13:07.360 --> 0:13:09.440 And as long as James Connor's out, I think he's 0:13:09.480 --> 0:13:11.439 been PPR monster. I don't comparison. I'm gonna make fam 0:13:11.480 --> 0:13:14.040 but I wanted to hit your thoughts on at first. Yeah, 0:13:14.080 --> 0:13:17.240 I thought this was an situation. I don't think that 0:13:17.280 --> 0:13:19.880 he's necessarily a winner. The thirteen targets are very good. 0:13:19.880 --> 0:13:23.600 Thirdteen receptions seventy three yards only five point six yards 0:13:23.600 --> 0:13:26.200 per reception yesterday for Jalen Samuels, So a lot of 0:13:26.200 --> 0:13:28.080 these are close to the line of scrimmage, behind a 0:13:28.080 --> 0:13:30.200 lot of line of scrimmage. Leads a little like shovel 0:13:30.240 --> 0:13:33.440 passes that everyone's doing in the NFL nowadays. But he 0:13:33.559 --> 0:13:37.640 was severely, you know, out gained by Trey Edmund's on 0:13:37.679 --> 0:13:40.840 the ground yesterday, eight carries for Jalen Samuel's only ten 0:13:40.920 --> 0:13:43.840 rushing yards one point three yards per carry. Tray Edmunds 0:13:43.840 --> 0:13:46.280 behind the same offensive line in the same game swelve 0:13:46.320 --> 0:13:48.840 rushing attempts for seventy three yards. It's pretty crazy to 0:13:48.880 --> 0:13:52.360 me that Steelers keep finding ways to win. Mason rudolf 0:13:52.400 --> 0:13:54.200 I thought it looked a lot better, uh in Monday 0:13:54.240 --> 0:13:56.920 night football against the Dolphins than he did obviously. Yesterday, 0:13:57.120 --> 0:14:00.800 completed thirty five, had thirty five iimes complete its twenty 0:14:00.840 --> 0:14:03.280 six of them for only a hundred ninety one yards 0:14:03.320 --> 0:14:07.000 five point five yards for attempt through an ugly interception 0:14:07.080 --> 0:14:10.720 again yesterday, And I think the losers here, the clear losers, 0:14:10.760 --> 0:14:13.880 Greg are Deonta Johnson and Jujuice to the Schuster because 0:14:13.880 --> 0:14:16.679 following that game with the Dolphins, we thought, a right, 0:14:16.679 --> 0:14:18.960 maybe we're earning more trust now with the Steelers wide 0:14:18.960 --> 0:14:21.600 receivers because they're the ones who are seeing the consistent 0:14:21.640 --> 0:14:25.000 targets here with Mason Rodolph as the quarterback. And then 0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:27.680 this game was a reminder of the downside that we 0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:31.240 can get juju just five targets, three catches for sixteen yards. 0:14:31.400 --> 0:14:33.760 Deonta Johnson, who a lot of people had inside their 0:14:33.800 --> 0:14:35.800 top thirty six, is a wide receiver. Three this week 0:14:36.040 --> 0:14:40.440 there's two targets for one reception, three receiving yards. It's 0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:43.040 not like the Colts have an amazing secondary either. They 0:14:43.040 --> 0:14:45.640 are that is a secondary that can get beat up on. 0:14:45.920 --> 0:14:47.840 So I thought the clear losers here were the wide 0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:50.280 receivers Greg and we were reminded of what their floor 0:14:50.320 --> 0:14:52.920 actually can be. Absolutely, Jujuice to the Schuster man. It's 0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:55.160 been a really rough year for him all around. For 0:14:56.240 --> 0:14:58.080 I hope you sold them after that game against the Dolphins, 0:14:58.080 --> 0:15:01.680 and we try to tell you fun to him in 0:15:01.760 --> 0:15:06.720 a few moments. But when I thought about Jalen Samuels, 0:15:06.760 --> 0:15:08.360 and I saw what he did, and he went at 0:15:08.400 --> 0:15:12.560 thirteen catches for seventy seven yards. My name of Austin 0:15:12.560 --> 0:15:15.560 Ekeler a lot, and his role with the Charger, especially 0:15:15.600 --> 0:15:18.120 without Melvin Gordon aut like fine. With Melvin Gordon out 0:15:18.400 --> 0:15:20.880 like fine, that he was obviously the main ball carrier there, 0:15:21.360 --> 0:15:24.000 but it was just this don't don't, don't, let you 0:15:24.040 --> 0:15:26.360 do your thing. And then when Melvin Gordon came back, 0:15:27.000 --> 0:15:29.040 they still use Austin Neckler, only it's him and just 0:15:29.120 --> 0:15:33.240 a moment as well, but it wasn't as plentiful. I 0:15:33.280 --> 0:15:35.800 guess what do you think about comparison of Jalen Samuels 0:15:35.800 --> 0:15:38.640 to Austin Neckler. I think that's fair. It's gonna be 0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:42.400 interesting to see if the Steelers use Jalen Samuels as 0:15:42.520 --> 0:15:45.600 much as the Chargers continue to use Austin Ekeler, even 0:15:45.600 --> 0:15:47.880 with Melvin Gordon back. No, Melvin Gordon had the big 0:15:47.920 --> 0:15:50.760 game yesterday, and we'll obviously get to that, but it'll 0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:53.480 be interesting to see if the Steelers continue to use 0:15:53.560 --> 0:15:56.960 Jalen Samuels this much once James Connor is back, because, 0:15:57.240 --> 0:15:59.760 as we've seen, when James Conner has been healthy he's 0:15:59.800 --> 0:16:02.480 been the workhorse running back so far this season, but 0:16:02.840 --> 0:16:05.800 maybe the way to keep him healthy is to not 0:16:05.920 --> 0:16:07.880 use him in that role and get Jalen Samuels a 0:16:07.920 --> 0:16:10.440 little bit more involved. So I do think Samuels will 0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:14.200 have a role in PPR leagues once James Connor is back, 0:16:14.240 --> 0:16:16.080 and we don't know if that's necessarily going to be 0:16:16.240 --> 0:16:18.640 this week, but he's likely going to have a role. 0:16:18.840 --> 0:16:21.680 He'll be a low and flex and again, as long 0:16:21.800 --> 0:16:24.200 as James Connor is out, it seems like he is 0:16:24.240 --> 0:16:27.000 in that RB two discussion as a PPR back, absolutely 0:16:27.240 --> 0:16:30.280 certainly in the conversation as a a r B two 0:16:30.600 --> 0:16:32.800 um PBR back. I mentioned the Chargers. Let's get in 0:16:32.840 --> 0:16:36.360 to what the Chargers did decimating green Bay yesterday. Weird one. 0:16:36.400 --> 0:16:38.240 A lot of a lot of people are on green Bay. 0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:41.360 They thought green Bay would just crush the Chargers. They didn't. 0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:43.800 It was the other way around. J J as the coordinators, 0:16:44.080 --> 0:16:46.400 UH and vlyn is a more of a role in 0:16:46.440 --> 0:16:49.400 the play calling and it worked. Melvin Gordon certainly hit 0:16:49.400 --> 0:16:52.240 the ground running yesterday. He looked good. Austin Ekeler did 0:16:52.360 --> 0:16:55.080 his thing, so the running backs look good for the Chargers. 0:16:55.080 --> 0:16:57.520 The wide receivers. Mike Williams was good. He Nollen was not. 0:16:58.200 --> 0:17:01.200 He Alan was not good. Yeah, I have some interesting 0:17:01.240 --> 0:17:05.679 stats here. In games since Melvin Gordon has returned, Keenan 0:17:05.720 --> 0:17:08.600 Allen has not had more than sixty one yards in 0:17:08.640 --> 0:17:10.840 a single game. He has not scored a touchdown since 0:17:10.880 --> 0:17:13.600 Melvin Gordon has returned. The first four games of the 0:17:13.640 --> 0:17:16.960 season for Keenan Allen without Melvin Gordon on this team, 0:17:17.119 --> 0:17:20.280 thirty two percent target share, fort of the Chargers air 0:17:20.359 --> 0:17:23.720 yards and three receiving touchdowns. In the next five games 0:17:23.720 --> 0:17:26.480 since twenty per cent target share, thirty percent of the 0:17:26.480 --> 0:17:29.679 air yards and zero touchdowns. I think health is a 0:17:29.720 --> 0:17:31.600 part of this as well. I think Keenan Allen is 0:17:31.640 --> 0:17:34.440 a clear loser right now. I'm not ready to say 0:17:34.520 --> 0:17:37.120 that you're benching Keenan Allen because I think that they're 0:17:37.160 --> 0:17:39.480 still trying to find ways to get him the ball. 0:17:39.840 --> 0:17:42.720 But the targets are down and I do worry a 0:17:42.760 --> 0:17:45.000 little bit about his health as well. So I think 0:17:45.119 --> 0:17:47.879 Keenan Allen is a clear loser. He's nowhere near the 0:17:47.920 --> 0:17:50.040 wide receiver one he was in the first month of 0:17:50.040 --> 0:17:53.040 the season. As for Melvin Gordon, yesterday played sixty three 0:17:53.040 --> 0:17:56.720 percent of the snaps, had twenty carries, four targets, twenty 0:17:56.720 --> 0:18:00.240 four running back opportunities. Austin Ekeler played thirty four percent 0:18:00.280 --> 0:18:02.280 of the snatch, which was a season low, and saw 0:18:02.400 --> 0:18:05.080 sixteen of the running back opportunities. This was a good 0:18:05.119 --> 0:18:07.439 matchup for both of these running backs here, and they 0:18:07.480 --> 0:18:09.560 proved that the Packers allowed one of the highest yards 0:18:09.560 --> 0:18:12.679 for carry in the NFL. Um So hopefully they can 0:18:12.760 --> 0:18:14.359 keep this going. But I did think that this was 0:18:14.400 --> 0:18:16.879 the best that Melvin Gordon has Luke greg but you 0:18:16.960 --> 0:18:18.440 kind of take it with a grain of salt. Was 0:18:18.480 --> 0:18:21.479 it all match up related or was it just all right? 0:18:21.680 --> 0:18:23.840 The further he gets into the season, he's starting to 0:18:23.880 --> 0:18:25.960 get his legs underneath him. I think if you can 0:18:26.080 --> 0:18:28.960 turn Melvin Gordon into a high nd RB two based 0:18:28.960 --> 0:18:31.280 on this performance, I would look into it. But I 0:18:31.320 --> 0:18:33.560 think we're getting closer and closer to the Melvin Gordon 0:18:33.600 --> 0:18:35.520 of years past. I agree with you. It certainly seems 0:18:35.560 --> 0:18:37.520 that he's finally hit the ground running. Let's go to 0:18:37.560 --> 0:18:39.600 Green Bay the other side of things. Let's talk about 0:18:39.680 --> 0:18:44.679 them and a whole lot more. I want to be 0:18:44.680 --> 0:18:48.000 the next Daily Fantasy millionaire Dunk on your NBA DFS 0:18:48.080 --> 0:18:51.560 competition with Daily Rodal dot Com and dominate on fandel 0:18:51.680 --> 0:18:54.440 and DraftKings this season. Compete with the pros with Daily 0:18:54.880 --> 0:18:59.040 dot Com Optimizer and the most accurate projections in NBA DFS, 0:18:59.160 --> 0:19:02.119 plus line up a works, breaking news, lake swap support 0:19:02.200 --> 0:19:05.760 and much more. Safe on winning NBA DFS advice with 0:19:05.840 --> 0:19:09.520 promo code Dunk. Visit Daily road dot com backslash Dunk 0:19:09.640 --> 0:19:23.360 to learn more. You remember to follow us here on YouTube. 0:19:24.119 --> 0:19:27.840 We also follow us on sports scrat tv YouTube. You 0:19:27.880 --> 0:19:31.160 know Instagram at sports Screen TV or seems a fantastic 0:19:31.240 --> 0:19:33.479 job on Instagram. I gonna we've been following it. So 0:19:34.119 --> 0:19:36.359 do you want people to check out we have to 0:19:36.400 --> 0:19:40.119 offer on the Graham? Yeah? Absolutely, there's some really cool stuff. 0:19:40.119 --> 0:19:41.760 I know, some of our best bets end up on there. 0:19:41.840 --> 0:19:45.840 Some of our wagering youths help you become a better, 0:19:46.920 --> 0:19:49.480 better better Absolutely so, Yeah, there's some really cool stuff 0:19:49.480 --> 0:19:50.920 to make sure to check it out on the Graham 0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:53.320 at sports grade TV. We also want to remind you 0:19:53.359 --> 0:19:55.000 that you can get in the game the Draftking Sports 0:19:55.000 --> 0:19:57.520 Booklet's keep going Danny Draft King sports Book. We're listeners 0:19:57.520 --> 0:19:58.919 to the show and get a deposit bonus of up 0:19:58.960 --> 0:20:01.159 to five hundred bucks. Is that it works, Create a 0:20:01.240 --> 0:20:04.200 drafting sports book account, make a devisit place your first 0:20:04.240 --> 0:20:07.119 bet and draftings imagine with a fifty cent bonus as 0:20:07.119 --> 0:20:09.639 a finaliser bucks that's offer as eligible for all users. 0:20:09.800 --> 0:20:12.240 Most newsers were gonna be risk free. Bet two hundred dollars. 0:20:12.440 --> 0:20:15.080 Sports grade dot Com sa DK played at sports grade 0:20:15.080 --> 0:20:18.160 dot com slash d k to play you gambling from 0:20:18.560 --> 0:20:21.800 hun Gambler twenty one and over, New Jersey only. Eligibility 0:20:21.800 --> 0:20:26.600 restrictions apply the website. Okay, let's get back to the 0:20:26.640 --> 0:20:29.400 winners and losers. Frank, we were on the Chargers and 0:20:29.440 --> 0:20:31.399 we were on the Packers. Packers could not do much 0:20:31.440 --> 0:20:34.680 of anything yesterday. Aaron Rodgers played him you were lucky. 0:20:34.760 --> 0:20:36.640 I was one of those people that played him. Toy 0:20:36.640 --> 0:20:39.280 Aaron Jones that you were lucky as well. We had 0:20:39.320 --> 0:20:42.960 Aaron Jones, Frank, not nearly as lucky. What do you 0:20:43.000 --> 0:20:46.560 think this Packers performance? Yeah, they just came out super flat. 0:20:46.680 --> 0:20:48.680 I think what Aaron Rodgers said in the post game 0:20:48.680 --> 0:20:50.640 made a lot of sense. This was a little slice 0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:52.760 of humble pie for the Green Bay Packers. They were 0:20:52.760 --> 0:20:55.080 feeling themselves a little bit. They go over and face 0:20:55.320 --> 0:20:58.040 the Los Angeles Chargers and the Chargers just decimated them. 0:20:58.040 --> 0:21:00.600 The Packers had no answer in this game. They could 0:21:00.640 --> 0:21:02.919 not run the football against a defense that had just 0:21:02.960 --> 0:21:05.879 allowed a career day to David Montgomery the week before. 0:21:06.280 --> 0:21:08.920 That's why we liked Aaron Jones. We liked Jamal Williams. Again, 0:21:09.160 --> 0:21:12.480 the usage for the Packers running backs has been frustrating 0:21:12.520 --> 0:21:14.840 because you would think in a game where they're trailing, 0:21:15.280 --> 0:21:17.800