Speaker 1: You are entering the freedom hunt, the Democrat plan make
Speaker 1: America miserable again. Theodore Roosevelt SNATCHU is coming down here
Speaker 1: in New York City. Cancel Yale gains a lot of
Speaker 1: steam online, plus a news found in NASCAR driver's garage
Speaker 1: stall the truth about the Trump rally over weekend, and
Speaker 1: NPR says cars are now right wing weapons. Coming up.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sexton Show, where the mission or
Speaker 1: mission is to decode what really matters with passionable intelligence.
Speaker 1: Make no mistake America great here, great American again, The
Speaker 1: Buck Sexton Show begins. He's a great guy. No welcome
Speaker 1: the Buck sex this show, everybody, thank you very much
Speaker 1: for being here. An honor and a privilege, as always
Speaker 1: to get a chance to speak to you all across
Speaker 1: the country, all across the nation, in some cases all
Speaker 1: around the world. What's up, Team Buck Global. So we
Speaker 1: are in a fight, a fight that we should have
Speaker 1: been expecting all along. In fact, I don't find this
Speaker 1: even the least bit surprising, the ferocity, the nastiness. It's
Speaker 1: just the tactics and the timing that perhaps has caught
Speaker 1: some of us off guard. What really are the Democrats
Speaker 1: trying to accomplish right now. And let's understand, this is
Speaker 1: a Democrat movement. This is not something that we should
Speaker 1: just generally refer to as protesters. We should not allow
Speaker 1: this to be somehow taken off the ledger of American
Speaker 1: politics that would go under the Democrat side. What's happening
Speaker 1: right now is a Democrat cultural and political revolution, and
Speaker 1: that's why they're adopting the very tactics of revolutionaries past.
Speaker 1: In fact, much of the same rhetoric. And some of
Speaker 1: this has been a repetition of what we've seen. I've
Speaker 1: been mentioning this to you for weeks now, the Occupy
Speaker 1: Wall Street movement, the first Black Lives Matter movement, the
Speaker 1: Antifa in the early months of the Trump presidency. They've
Speaker 1: recycled a lot of what we've seen before. But the
Speaker 1: additional reasons for their power and their rise right now
Speaker 1: are we are going through a pandemic that has empowered
Speaker 1: government beyond what would have been our wildest dreams. Even
Speaker 1: six months ago. Nobody could have thought, or perhaps we
Speaker 1: should have, but nobody did think that we would go
Speaker 1: through so much tyranny with barely a peep from the
Speaker 1: general public. It seems about what's happening about the seizure
Speaker 1: of rights, the virtual suspension of the constitution. People don't
Speaker 1: seem very much bothered by this at all, but there
Speaker 1: was a tremendous amount of rage that was bottled up
Speaker 1: over time. Anger and frustration and forty million plus lost
Speaker 1: jobs and the lack of human contact, and the misery
Speaker 1: and the lies from the government, the transparent and obvious
Speaker 1: lies that we have been forced to stomach. And then
Speaker 1: you add all of that to a period of political
Speaker 1: lunacy from the left, the anti Trump delusion, the anti
Speaker 1: Trump derangement syndrome that's out there. You put these things
Speaker 1: together and you have a very combustible mix, and we
Speaker 1: are dealing with the explosion right now. It's best that
Speaker 1: we understand that, it's best that we are clear about
Speaker 1: how we got to this point, and we see that
Speaker 1: we are up against a very tenacious and a very
Speaker 1: challenging enemy here. If Donald Trump has one tagline that
Speaker 1: is most associated with them and is, of course the
Speaker 1: initial campaign slogan of twenty sixteen, Make America Great Again,
Speaker 1: which has now transitioned into keep America Great, but I
Speaker 1: think a lot of us still have a much greater
Speaker 1: affinity for the original one, make America great again. That's
Speaker 1: where the President has positioned himself right now. He talks
Speaker 1: about he told me in the Oval Office but a
Speaker 1: few weeks ago, about his plan to transition us to greatness,
Speaker 1: that we were going to get back the America that
Speaker 1: we had become used to for three years with Donald
Speaker 1: Trump as presidents. But now we see the Democrats have
Speaker 1: taken up the opposite side of that bargain, and they
Speaker 1: have no shame about it. The Democrats have decided that
Speaker 1: the inducement of misery, that widespread dissatisfaction, despair, rage, division
Speaker 1: on cultural, class, race, ethnic lines. Whatever they can do
Speaker 1: to exacerbate any sore points in the American polity, whatever
Speaker 1: they can do to make us hate each other, mad
Speaker 1: at each other, and just feel like things are going poorly,
Speaker 1: that's what they're going to do. None of the proposals
Speaker 1: that Democrats are talking about right now, you'll notice that
Speaker 1: none of the things that are of interest to rational,
Speaker 1: reasonable people as ways to really bring about a better country.
Speaker 1: That's not what they're focused on. The Democrats don't care
Speaker 1: about that. They're not trying to fix all of these problems.
Speaker 1: They're proposing things that are even more divisive. They want
Speaker 1: further lockdowns because of COVID. They want more statue toppling.
Speaker 1: They want less police, more defund police, and a greater
Speaker 1: leeway for criminals on the streets to terrorize law abiding
Speaker 1: people of all races, backgrounds, creeds, and colors. That's the
Speaker 1: position of the Democrat Party right now, because they understand
Speaker 1: that they can't inspire. There's nothing inspirational about their Marxism,
Speaker 1: their leftism, their revolutionary rhetoric which is so empty when
Speaker 1: you push on it a bit. What do they really want?
Speaker 1: Who are we going to replace with all these statues
Speaker 1: or we're just going to have Jimmy Carter and Barrocco,
Speaker 1: Obama and Bill Clinton statute as well. Bill Clinton might
Speaker 1: be a bit too me tued, But who's going to
Speaker 1: be acceptable to celebrate in the public sphere when they're done.
Speaker 1: We'll talk more today about who the latest cancelation figures are,
Speaker 1: who they're going after the explosion of this movement and
Speaker 1: the expansion of the targets just keeps going with every day.
Speaker 1: But remember this, the Democrats do not present you with
Speaker 1: ideas to make you happier and freer they present you,
Speaker 1: if you are a Trump supporter, if you are a moderate,
Speaker 1: if you are not a part of a left wing
Speaker 1: base of the Democrat Party a party, they present you
Speaker 1: with a poorer, less free, less happy, less safe America.
Speaker 1: And they want that right now. They're actively rooting for failure.
Speaker 1: I'm not shy about this. I'm going to say it.
Speaker 1: They want this country to suffer because in their minds,
Speaker 1: that's the only way that that they can force us
Speaker 1: to expunge the sin of the Trump presidency. And that
Speaker 1: is a sin for which they will not give us forgiveness. Forgiveness,
Speaker 1: there will be penance required of us. They will demand
Speaker 1: that we suffer because and they don't care that there
Speaker 1: are people who are going to suffer that didn't vote
Speaker 1: for Trump. Collective guilt, collective suffering. This is the order
Speaker 1: of the day for the Democrat Party. This is what
Speaker 1: they believe in. They want all of us to go
Speaker 1: through this, They want all of us to be caught
Speaker 1: up in this. And yes there are people who are
Speaker 1: chanting for it. Yes there are people that believe the
Speaker 1: police are the enemy, and that bringing back what is
Speaker 1: really just critical race theory stretching from the nineteen sixties
Speaker 1: and nineteen seventies, that race is the single defining characteristic
Speaker 1: of everything in our society. More so than anything else.
Speaker 1: Race influences our ideas, our politics, our culture, and that
Speaker 1: the only way to confront this is to accept that
Speaker 1: anyone who is white in America has an original sin, again,
Speaker 1: one for which they must be punished. It's not even
Speaker 1: enough to ben Venie. You have to suffer, and our
Speaker 1: communities are going to suffer. Our cities are on the decline.
Speaker 1: The American metropolis is something that will be looked upon
Speaker 1: fondly in the future as a period of history, a
Speaker 1: period of time when we could all live together with
Speaker 1: declining crime rates, with increases in household wealth, with overall prosperity,
Speaker 1: better cleaner streets, better cleaner services. You know that this
Speaker 1: was what we were seeing for the last twenty years,
Speaker 1: not in some Democrats cities, but there were some major
Speaker 1: exceptions to what things were going. Pretty well. We'll look
Speaker 1: back on that and realize that this was all taken
Speaker 1: from us and was taken by choice. And the Democrats
Speaker 1: are willing to burn down the village in order to
Speaker 1: save it, and that's what they're doing right now. If
Speaker 1: they can and have control of America. No one can.
Speaker 1: And if they can't find a way to get control
Speaker 1: by promising better ideas and a better future, they'll just
Speaker 1: make this one so miserable that people will be desperate
Speaker 1: to vote for an empty suit and nothing. As a
Speaker 1: leader like Joe Biden, it doesn't matter anything but what
Speaker 1: we have right now. Bring the country to its knees,
Speaker 1: and then make it vote for someone other than the
Speaker 1: person who they will claim is responsible for all of
Speaker 1: this misery. Meanwhile, if we had serious adults and positions
Speaker 1: of power in the media and the Democrat Party in
Speaker 1: corporate America, we would all be coming together saying, how
Speaker 1: do we get back to our lives as quickly as possible,
Speaker 1: as effectively, as safely as possible. Right now we should
Speaker 1: be entirely focused all the transition to greatness, or just
Speaker 1: the transition to normalcy, which would feel pretty great these days.
Speaker 1: But instead of looking at the forty plus million Americans
Speaker 1: without jobs, instead of looking at the millions of small
Speaker 1: businesses that may never open again, entire sectors of the
Speaker 1: economy that are at risk permanently, and finding solutions for
Speaker 1: this because there are lives in the balance futures, happiness, health,
Speaker 1: all of it. Instead of focusing on that as a country,
Speaker 1: what are we doing right now? Drag through another social
Speaker 1: studies social justice class courtesy of the psychotic left. The
Speaker 1: whole country is focused on this. This benefits no one
Speaker 1: except the people using it to seize power. This makes
Speaker 1: everybody feel less safe, less proud, less free in America.
Speaker 1: Who isn't a part of this radical movement small price
Speaker 1: to pay as far as they see it, this gives
Speaker 1: them an opportunity to do what they've been seeking to
Speaker 1: do all along, humiliate their enemies. Because you see, you
Speaker 1: have to remember, at a very fundamental level, Donald Trump
Speaker 1: is largely felt as a humiliation by the left that
Speaker 1: this and saying the things he does, believing the things
Speaker 1: he does, could turn the Republican Party away from the
Speaker 1: mechanism and romneyism of the past, just you know, using
Speaker 1: the poll tested slogans of the GOP. Basically, so we
Speaker 1: can get to progressivism, leftism and the revolutionary nonsense we
Speaker 1: say see today just a little bit slower, but we're
Speaker 1: still going there. But you know, we'll beg forgiveness a
Speaker 1: few times along the way. So The New York Times
Speaker 1: doesn't savage our leadership quite the same way they do
Speaker 1: with Trump. But that was an unforgivable sin. The rise
Speaker 1: of Trump is something for which we have to be punished.
Speaker 1: In fact, we have to be humiliated. That is their plan.
Speaker 1: They are not looking for for converts, my friends. They
Speaker 1: are seeking heretics to burn at the stake, so to speak.
Speaker 1: The left is not trying to make friends with you.
Speaker 1: They don't want a concession. They don't want to convince you.
Speaker 1: They don't want to bring you along to their side.
Speaker 1: They are true far left radicals, and they run the
Speaker 1: Democratic Party right now. So we can either accept that
Speaker 1: they are motivated by a luss for power, a rage
Speaker 1: against what is good and true and right and righteous,
Speaker 1: and we can fight back. We can be the wartime
Speaker 1: conservatives of whom I often now speak on this show
Speaker 1: and understand that we should not bend the knee, bake
Speaker 1: that cake, use the made up pronouns. We should not
Speaker 1: do this. Or we can just hope that Donald Trump
Speaker 1: is able to carry the entire movement on his shoulders
Speaker 1: and beat all of this back by himselves, by himself.
Speaker 1: I worry that that's the plan for a lot of
Speaker 1: people It's tough out there right now. There's a lot
Speaker 1: of risks in speaking out There's a lot of risk
Speaker 1: in being honest and standing up for your principles and
Speaker 1: trying to promote in trying to organize conservative and constitutional ideas.
Speaker 1: Even just reason and rationality is under assault, evidence, rule
Speaker 1: of law. These things are being discarded. Fundamental tenets of
Speaker 1: Western civilization have come under full scale assault by the left.
Speaker 1: And what do we do? Not nearly enough. I think
Speaker 1: more and more people are coming over to my side
Speaker 1: on this from the right and understanding that the time
Speaker 1: to fight back is now. We can't wait until September
Speaker 1: to figure out that this is all political, that this
Speaker 1: is all planned, this is coordinated, This is part of
Speaker 1: a movement by the left to seize power and have
Speaker 1: created the underlying political conditions through all the silencing and
Speaker 1: the canceling, to force us to bend us to their
Speaker 1: will once they have puppet Biden in place. Do you
Speaker 1: want to live in a country where you have freedom.
Speaker 1: Do you want to live in a country where you're
Speaker 1: allowed to say things that you should be able to
Speaker 1: say because they are true, or do you think it's
Speaker 1: just better to hide, to duck down to run for cover.
Speaker 1: This is the decision we're all making every day right now.
Speaker 1: And if we're going to rely on others to fight
Speaker 1: this battle for us entirely, we will lose, and Joe
Speaker 1: Biden will be president and the Democrats will take the
Speaker 1: Senate unified government at a time of left wing mass hysteria,
Speaker 1: viciousness and score settling. How do you think that's going
Speaker 1: to look in twenty twenty one? You're in the Freedom hud.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. So who's the
Speaker 1: latest in the list of cancelations? Oh? My, an expanding
Speaker 1: list with one very, very big name that the left
Speaker 1: is clearly going to celebrate as an enormous victory for
Speaker 1: their side. You have Oh, let me see here, who
Speaker 1: are the latest to get canceled? Woodrow w Wilson Monmouth
Speaker 1: University is going to rename a building that has been
Speaker 1: called the Woodrow Wilson Center or something like that. In France, Voltaire,
Speaker 1: perhaps the greatest and most beloved French language writer, at
Speaker 1: least globally speaking, he's getting canceled. Saint Junipero Sarah. I
Speaker 1: guess it's Junipero Sarah canceled. Albert Pike canceled, Ulysses s.
Speaker 1: Grant canceled, and oh yes, that's right. The one that's
Speaker 1: getting a lot of attention right now, a statue of
Speaker 1: Theodore Roosevelt out in front of the New York Museum
Speaker 1: of Natural History that also has got to go. That
Speaker 1: decision has already been made. This is not even the
Speaker 1: mob pulling it down. You see. The mob works in
Speaker 1: concert with the establishment and institutional left. The mob is
Speaker 1: not doing these things on its own. We've seen political
Speaker 1: and revolutionary movements in the past adopt a very similar position.
Speaker 1: This is what you should be expecting. The Democrat Party
Speaker 1: is just the entity for the political concessions to come through, right.
Speaker 1: The Democrat Party is they're ready to seize power. But
Speaker 1: the vanguard of the far left, the shock troops, they
Speaker 1: are doing all of these things knowing that they're trying
Speaker 1: to get the Democratic Party more. That's why fundamentally this
Speaker 1: is an anti Trump movement. This is all about power.
Speaker 1: This is not about what's right. It's not about all
Speaker 1: of a sudden a moral awakening in the country. Think
Speaker 1: of this a bit like the IRA in Ireland and
Speaker 1: shin Feg and this is true of many places. You
Speaker 1: could pick any number of political parties that also have
Speaker 1: a militant wing. I've been saying for years that Antifa
Speaker 1: is just the militant wing of the Democratic Party, and
Speaker 1: they understand that they can go with force and destruction
Speaker 1: up to a certain extent. You know, if Antifa was
Speaker 1: blowing up town squares and killing a lot of people,
Speaker 1: that would be harmful to the movement. Do I think
Speaker 1: that that's beyond the immorality and insanity of Antifa? No,
Speaker 1: But it's counterproductive to their aims. So what do they do.
Speaker 1: They use force that goes up to street violence, right,
Speaker 1: punching people, throwing bricks, attacking cops, destroying stores. But they're
Speaker 1: still effectively the militant arm of the Democratic Party. So
Speaker 1: you have these militants that make these extreme demands and
Speaker 1: do all of these violent and illegal and destabilizing things,
Speaker 1: but behind all of it's the Democratic Party there to
Speaker 1: just sort of pick up whatever they can to use
Speaker 1: this as leverage. Hey, you know, sorry, America, nice constitution
Speaker 1: you got. There be a shame if something happened to
Speaker 1: it from our buddies in Antifa, right, be a shame
Speaker 1: if something happened you know, Oh, black lives matter might
Speaker 1: have to come cancel you, but you could just vote Democrat.
Speaker 1: You could just give us a more in the Democrat
Speaker 1: Party and maybe then BLM will stop trying to cancel you,
Speaker 1: stop trying to ruin your life. I wouldn't anticipate that
Speaker 1: this is ever going to get better unless we stand
Speaker 1: up to it. Because it's working. And that's what we
Speaker 1: all have to understand. They are winning right now. And
Speaker 1: you know, people are entitled to their opinions from within
Speaker 1: the right. Of course, I can't see here a n
Speaker 1: advocate for free speech and the freedom to dissent and
Speaker 1: all this. But if I have one more person, tell me,
Speaker 1: you know, with an email or a message, don't worry.
Speaker 1: Trump has been expecting all of this. Guys know he hasn't.
Speaker 1: He is not winning right now. We are not tired
Speaker 1: of winning. We are not winning right now. I think
Speaker 1: we will be soon if we wake up. Thanks for
Speaker 1: listening to The Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe
Speaker 1: on Apple podcasts, at the iHeartRadio app or wherever you
Speaker 1: get your podcasts. Well, that statue, that specific statue, you're right,
Speaker 1: it does portray usation of Native Americans and African Americans
Speaker 1: and it's not an appropriate statue. What we need to
Speaker 1: do is have a conversation. As a country. We need
Speaker 1: to have a conversation and go through a process where
Speaker 1: we have to come to terms with some of our monuments,
Speaker 1: our statues, the names of our streets, the names of
Speaker 1: our bases, and what's appropriate for our values. And actually
Speaker 1: having that conversation. Going through that process is really important.
Speaker 1: It allows us to educate ourselves on our history, educate
Speaker 1: ourselves on the complicated course that our history has gone through.
Speaker 1: We need to go through that process and have that discussion.
Speaker 1: That discussion is valuable, but the results of that will
Speaker 1: also be valuable. Blather, abject moronic blather from a New
Speaker 1: York City councilman there on the Teddy Roosevelt statue coming down.
Speaker 1: It's been there since nineteen forty and Roosevelt's family was
Speaker 1: instrumental in the founding of the New York Museum of
Speaker 1: Natural History. I used to go there as a kid.
Speaker 1: In fact, I remember going to birthday parties that were
Speaker 1: held there. The coolest thing was I had a giant
Speaker 1: blue whale that was the actual size of a blue
Speaker 1: whale suspended from the ceiling. I always remember that. I
Speaker 1: thought that was really neat. I loved animals as a kid.
Speaker 1: I still love animals today, but it was that was
Speaker 1: that was a museum when I was really young, before
Speaker 1: I could understand what was going on in the Metropolitan
Speaker 1: Museum of Art, which has paintings and sculptures instead of
Speaker 1: lots of very large stuffed animals and things like that,
Speaker 1: I was a big fan of the Museum of Natural
Speaker 1: History and this statue of Roosevelt. He is on a horse,
Speaker 1: he is on horseback, and there is a Native American
Speaker 1: and an African American on both sides of him. I
Speaker 1: do not really understand why this is now all of
Speaker 1: a sudden, although it goes back to twenty seventeen. They
Speaker 1: threw paint on the statue. I mean, the left has
Speaker 1: been agitating about this for a while. But see now
Speaker 1: they're they're proposing this as it's just this sculpture, it's
Speaker 1: just this. They're they're tearing down Church, They're tearing down
Speaker 1: Woodrow Wilson, who is actually a bad guy in a
Speaker 1: racist but you know, as a Democrat. But they're tearing
Speaker 1: down Junipero, Sarah Juande Onnate, They're tearing down Voltaire they're
Speaker 1: tearing you know, go to Ulysses Grant, George Washington, for
Speaker 1: heaven's sakes, they're tearing down all these statues. But this
Speaker 1: time the people in power. It's not about pulling the
Speaker 1: statue down, it's making the decision to remove it. And Democrats,
Speaker 1: of course, remember, the Democrats are the political party that
Speaker 1: waits to exploit for power and for their own political ends.
Speaker 1: What the mob and the anarchists and the BLM movement
Speaker 1: are doing out there in the streets right, their militant
Speaker 1: wing is terrifying people, destroying things, breaking the law, and
Speaker 1: the Democrats sam back and say, yes, well, just do
Speaker 1: what we say and perhaps some of this will stop.
Speaker 1: We're here to negotiate. We're the civilized ones in this conversation.
Speaker 1: We the Democrat Party. We're not Antifa. Yeah. Do they
Speaker 1: condemn it, Do they take action to stop it? No,
Speaker 1: of course not. They benefit from it. They like it.
Speaker 1: Let's be honest. The Democrats like their militant wing, they
Speaker 1: like the BLM movement, they like Antifa. They think all
Speaker 1: of this is fantastic. Otherwise, they've got a bunch of
Speaker 1: in their leadership ranks, super old, out of touch, rich
Speaker 1: white people like Nancy Pelosi right, like Joe Biden, and
Speaker 1: they've got a bunch of young, up and coming leftists.
Speaker 1: This is the AOC and the squad who most of
Speaker 1: the country does not agree with on most issues, and
Speaker 1: that's putting it mildly, and who are just ignorant of
Speaker 1: economics of American history of society. But they've been trained
Speaker 1: in the left wing agitation and the rhetoric of the
Speaker 1: diversity and inclusion movement, which isn't about inclusion. If you
Speaker 1: think that some of this stuff is a bad idea,
Speaker 1: if you think that watering down standards is wrong, if
Speaker 1: you think that we should have objective metrics eristspective of
Speaker 1: race for admission into universities or for hiring, no, no,
Speaker 1: none of that is acceptable. It's inclusive except four ideas
Speaker 1: that they deem to be excluded from the conversation. And
Speaker 1: that's as we know that the continuing reality of this.
Speaker 1: But let's just go back to this Teddy Roosevelt statue
Speaker 1: for a second, because this is, dare I say, symbolic
Speaker 1: of how they're going to approach everything from here on out.
Speaker 1: They're saying it's just this statue, But if you look
Speaker 1: at what the New York Times right up of this
Speaker 1: ruckus is all about. It's much more than just this statue.
Speaker 1: But they want to see if they can get one
Speaker 1: time a cancelation of this, Well, then what else can
Speaker 1: they get canceled about? Teddy Roosevelt? What president is safe
Speaker 1: from their cancelation efforts. It's fascinating, But give it time.
Speaker 1: Even Barack Obama in time will come under stronger criticism
Speaker 1: at the left. At the logic of the left continues
Speaker 1: to be applied in this way for Obama's opposition to
Speaker 1: gain marriage as a president, not once but twice running
Speaker 1: for office. Now they'll always make excuses for Obama. Don't
Speaker 1: get me wrong, but you know, when when you look
Speaker 1: at where we are now, anybody who is not woke
Speaker 1: by today's standards from history, including on the left, including Democrats,
Speaker 1: can be attacked. No one is safe from it. And
Speaker 1: that's how the mom blanks it. No no level of heroism,
Speaker 1: no reform of one's ideas or ideology throughout one's life.
Speaker 1: You know, if you were born to a family, let's
Speaker 1: say that was supportive of slavery, and then spent your
Speaker 1: life as an adult freeing slaves and as an abolitionist. No, sorry,
Speaker 1: still still unacceptable even to celebrate that portion that was
Speaker 1: clearly righteous and moral of one's life. You know, can
Speaker 1: you celebrate someone's acts, someone's works for what they were
Speaker 1: without having to take on the defense of the individual
Speaker 1: as a whole. These are real questions we have to ask.
Speaker 1: Now they tell you that this is all about just
Speaker 1: the statue of Teddy Roosevelt, and just give it time.
Speaker 1: They're gonna have to Japanese Americans interned by FDR. They're
Speaker 1: gonna have to rename the FDR drive here in New York.
Speaker 1: You have to rename a whole bunch of things that
Speaker 1: are currently named for that guy, the other Roosevelt. Remember,
Speaker 1: the Roosevelt who didn't intern Japanese Americans is the one
Speaker 1: who's under under the scrutiny of the left currently. But
Speaker 1: they're saying it's just the statue. That's a lie. They've
Speaker 1: already started to make noise about about how Teddy Roosevelt.
Speaker 1: So if you want to say, oh, but just this,
Speaker 1: just this depiction is bad, just this depiction is out
Speaker 1: of touch. That's not what they're going to claim. They'll
Speaker 1: say this today so that you bend the nance fine, fine,
Speaker 1: pull this statue. Just as we said, you know what
Speaker 1: Confederate generals, those guys fought for the wrong side, and
Speaker 1: slavery is an evil. We all know this. So you know,
Speaker 1: I know a lot of people, I know a lot
Speaker 1: of conservatives, especially from the North, who are saying, you know,
Speaker 1: I kind of understand this, and I'm sympathetic to the
Speaker 1: impulse to fully confront the history of slavery and the
Speaker 1: Confederacy and the racism there. And I'm sympathetic to that too.
Speaker 1: I'm not sympathetic to mobs lopping off the heads of
Speaker 1: statues that are public property. And I'm not sympathetic to
Speaker 1: people making demands based upon the implied threat of mob force,
Speaker 1: even if they are right on the merits of a
Speaker 1: historical argument. Let's say this should be done through a process,
Speaker 1: but here in New York City now they are doing
Speaker 1: it through a process. I know that's going to be
Speaker 1: the transition. We'll buck look at what they're doing. Why
Speaker 1: do you oppose this because they're not being honest about
Speaker 1: what's going to happen. They're not being honest about what's next.
Speaker 1: Oh no, just this statue of Teddy Roosevelt is coming down.
Speaker 1: But they already say that Roosevelt in his later life
Speaker 1: was a eugenicist and a racist, and a certainly a colonialist.
Speaker 1: There's a lot of anger at Roosevelt for the expansion
Speaker 1: through the Spanish American War, the expansion of US territories
Speaker 1: and possessions. People look at the Caribbean, they look at
Speaker 1: the Philippines, and they say, well, hold hold on a
Speaker 1: second here, Teddy Roosevelt was an expansionist, a colonialist, So
Speaker 1: he's a bad guy too. Well, I just want to know,
Speaker 1: do we do we allow the left to just go
Speaker 1: straight up Taliban. You will recall it was years ago.
Speaker 1: Perhaps it was I think nineteen ninety six, maybe it
Speaker 1: was ninety nine, I forget. It was the late nineties
Speaker 1: when the Taliban, as part of its cleansing of society
Speaker 1: of anything deemed not Islamic enough, destroyed the Buddhas of Bamiyan,
Speaker 1: which were thousands, these massive Buddhists, thousands of years old,
Speaker 1: considered a global heritage site, I mean, considered something that
Speaker 1: all archaeologists and we were practically a wonder of the world.
Speaker 1: The Taliban barbarians came along and they didn't like this,
Speaker 1: and they felt that it was un Islamic. And so
Speaker 1: instead of just saying, look, you know you cannot go
Speaker 1: check these out for historical reasons or religious reasons, they
Speaker 1: blew them up, mostly with RPGs. They fired RPGs at
Speaker 1: these statues to destroy them, and they did. I want
Speaker 1: to know how far we are from liberals effectively arguing
Speaker 1: that we need to use RPGs to take Teddy Roosevelt's
Speaker 1: face off of Mount Rushmore. I don't think it's far away.
Speaker 1: Maybe they won't use RPGs because they're scary, but they'll
Speaker 1: bring in demolition crews, they'll bring in construction crews no more.
Speaker 1: But if you're going to take down Teddy Roosevelt, you're
Speaker 1: going to leave Washington. You know, think about this promote
Speaker 1: who gets to stay? What president are we allowed to celebrate?
Speaker 1: And what really ultimately is the purpose at this whole project.
Speaker 1: It's not to bring us together, it's not for reconciliation
Speaker 1: and national healing. This is all about division. This is
Speaker 1: about undermining fundamental, historical, historical figures that were an enormous
Speaker 1: that had an enormous impact on the country we live
Speaker 1: in today and our rights and our beliefs, and that
Speaker 1: shared idea, that is America canceled erased. Who are going
Speaker 1: to be the acceptable statues of the future. It is
Speaker 1: fascinating that this group seems to always leave anybody who
Speaker 1: is a communist alone. If you're a communist, if you're
Speaker 1: a Marxist and a white Marxist, even no one has
Speaker 1: any problem with you. On the left, the millions and
Speaker 1: millions of people murdered, the hundreds of millions of people
Speaker 1: enslaved by the communist system, stripped of all rights, stripped
Speaker 1: of all autonomy, all freedom, forced to work for the state, gunpoint,
Speaker 1: forced to have family, turn on family, which liberals now
Speaker 1: are advocating for. Make no mistake about it. They want
Speaker 1: you to inform on relatives. They're telling young people to
Speaker 1: call out publicly their own loved ones. Anyone who supports
Speaker 1: a political ideology more than their own family is morally
Speaker 1: corrupted and lost. Family first, my friends. Always, the left
Speaker 1: seeks to destroy the family. Why is that? Because there
Speaker 1: are two pillars of our society that act as a
Speaker 1: bulwark against the on rushing insanity of the left. Religion
Speaker 1: and family, belief in God, a relationship with God, and
Speaker 1: the understanding that we are all here just for a
Speaker 1: temporary period and it goes very quickly. And also that
Speaker 1: we have a family, that we have people that matter
Speaker 1: more to us than anyone else in the whole world,
Speaker 1: that matter more than any political ideology or political party
Speaker 1: or program of reform. Anyone who's willing to turn on
Speaker 1: their family because the woke mob says so is lost
Speaker 1: and we have to understand that. I don't know if
Speaker 1: we can bring them back into the light of sanity
Speaker 1: and normalcy and being reasonable. I don't know. I don't
Speaker 1: know if it's possible. But the mass hysteria that we
Speaker 1: are seeing now is a function of massive forces that
Speaker 1: have come together, the COVID pandemic, democrat hatred of Trump,
Speaker 1: and also the elites who are desperate to maintain their position.
Speaker 1: As we were increasingly aware in this country of the
Speaker 1: massive failure of those in the elite classes. They're also
Speaker 1: seeking to use this as a moment to build the
Speaker 1: to burnish their credibility with the masses after what we've
Speaker 1: seen as largely a sellout of the American people to
Speaker 1: international corporations, a sellout of the American people to on
Speaker 1: citizens who are here illegally. You know, you go down
Speaker 1: the list. What really is your allegiance to this country?
Speaker 1: If the Democrats have their way, If they if they
Speaker 1: can violate laws with impunity, they can dictate to you
Speaker 1: what you can say. They can tell you to stay
Speaker 1: in your home. Are you really free? Do you think
Speaker 1: you're free in this country? Right now? I think we
Speaker 1: are going through a massive red pilling. And I will
Speaker 1: tell you right now. I use the term red pill
Speaker 1: on my show back in twenty twelve before I had
Speaker 1: ever heard of anyone used this before. I'm not saying
Speaker 1: I was the first, but I was a big fan
Speaker 1: of the matrix, always had been, and I know now
Speaker 1: it's been coopted by other people, but I said it
Speaker 1: before any of these other groups and any of these
Speaker 1: other people I see out there were using the term,
Speaker 1: and those who original Saturday Squad know that. So hearkening
Speaker 1: back to what I said in twenty twelve, now eight
Speaker 1: years ago on this show, I do think that we
Speaker 1: are going through a mat of red pilling. I just
Speaker 1: don't know if it's too late for those who see
Speaker 1: this for what it is to be able to rally
Speaker 1: and stop this movement from doing irreparable damage to the country.
Speaker 1: You're in the freedom Heart. This is the Buck Sexton
Speaker 1: Show podcast. If Joe Biden were to become president and
Speaker 1: emboldened left will launch a full scale assault on American life.
Speaker 1: You know that. They'll expel anyone who disagrees with them.
Speaker 1: Look what happens when you disagree, You use the term
Speaker 1: that's perfect, and they're not happy with it. They call
Speaker 1: you a racist, they call you a horrible person. They
Speaker 1: want to crush religious liberty. They don't want religions, silence
Speaker 1: religious believers, indoctrinate your children with hateful and vicious lies
Speaker 1: about our country, subsidize late term abortion and after birth execution.
Speaker 1: The President is right, so that's good. I mean, he
Speaker 1: knows what's going on here. He understands what the left
Speaker 1: is trying to accomplish. But right now, the momentum is
Speaker 1: against the Trump movement and the president. Look, that executive
Speaker 1: order on law enforcement last week was a bad idea,
Speaker 1: and I said it was, and we all know it now.
Speaker 1: It was feeding the crocodile, hoping it eats us. Last
Speaker 1: bad move No more appeasement, no more concessions. The other
Speaker 1: side is not operating in good faith. Let's all remember that.
Speaker 1: But then there's also how do we get the Trump
Speaker 1: message out there more. I'm doing what I can here
Speaker 1: every day. Right we got hundreds of thousands of people
Speaker 1: listening to this show and the podcast and the stream
Speaker 1: all across the country. I'm hoping they share it. I'm
Speaker 1: hoping you share this show with as many people as
Speaker 1: you can so they feel like our voice on the
Speaker 1: right is being heard, that our argument is the correct one,
Speaker 1: and here's how to make it. This is what what
Speaker 1: I'm trying to accomplish with what I'm doing every day.
Speaker 1: But I also think the president has to go around
Speaker 1: the gatekeepers even more. Twitter is not enough. I'm seeing
Speaker 1: these days all these senators and congressmen have got their
Speaker 1: own podcasts, which I would like them to be focusing
Speaker 1: probably more on legislation than being podcast hosts. But you know, okay,
Speaker 1: they're more the merrier, I suppose in this business. Why
Speaker 1: doesn't Trump have a video podcast every day or a
Speaker 1: video clip he's putting out. Why doesn't Trump just start
Speaker 1: his own podcasts, his own TV channel? Right now? I mean,
Speaker 1: if this is what's going to happen, Democrats Republicans are
Speaker 1: all doing it, the president has to get out there
Speaker 1: and give people the message and the inspiration to fight
Speaker 1: for his side. And we can't rely just on these rallies.
Speaker 1: As we see the Democrats are trying to subvert the
Speaker 1: rallies using TikTok, the social media platform to take seats
Speaker 1: and tickets for seats that they're never going to actually use.
Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to the bus Stson Show podcasts. Remember
Speaker 1: to subscribe on ample podcasts, the radio app, or wherever
Speaker 1: you get your podcasts. Joe Biden and the Democrats want
Speaker 1: to prosecute Americans for going to church, but not for
Speaker 1: birding a church. They believe you can riot, vandalize, and destroy,
Speaker 1: but you cannot attend a peaceful pro America rally. They
Speaker 1: want to punish your thoughts, but not they're violent crimes.
Speaker 1: The Trump rally over the weekend was on point when
Speaker 1: it comes to the messaging and got much is clear,
Speaker 1: and that's certainly encouraging. But there was a smaller crowd
Speaker 1: than was anticipated, and the media has made a very
Speaker 1: big thing of that. There's been a lot of discussion
Speaker 1: about it and they're saying, oh, it shows the Trump
Speaker 1: movement doesn't have quite the same focus, doesn't have quite
Speaker 1: the same fury and support this time around. I don't
Speaker 1: see that as the case. I just think it a
Speaker 1: reminder that we are up against an opposition here. A
Speaker 1: democratic party will do whatever it has to do. And
Speaker 1: if they can scare people away by physically having psychonic,
Speaker 1: anti fostile protesters at every rally, if they can scare
Speaker 1: people away by saying that it's going to be a
Speaker 1: COVID super spreader, I mean, over the weekend, I tweeted
Speaker 1: out that I thought CNN was a BS super spreader
Speaker 1: when they started sharing that story. I think that's certainly true.
Speaker 1: I think that's a very defensible position. CNN is appalling,
Speaker 1: as are many of these other liberal networks, but the
Speaker 1: president understands what the issues are. Right now, it just
Speaker 1: doesn't feel like enough is being done. It doesn't feel
Speaker 1: like the actions are being taken that are necessary for
Speaker 1: protecting the system as it is right and I mean
Speaker 1: the system that keeps us all safe and keep society functioning.
Speaker 1: Every day. Democrats are tearing this down there, They're van guard,
Speaker 1: their radicals are doing whatever they can to undermine core
Speaker 1: aspects of our society. The Democratic Party gets to stand
Speaker 1: behind all this and be like, WHOA. That's kind of interesting,
Speaker 1: but to just bend the knee a little bit more.
Speaker 1: Just vote Democrat and everything will be better. Producer Brandon,
Speaker 1: if you would please play clip, Please play the Trump
Speaker 1: Biden clip. Joe Biden is not the leader of his party.
Speaker 1: Joe Biden is a helpless puppet of the radical left.
Speaker 1: And he's not radical left. I don't think he knows
Speaker 1: what he is anymore. But he was never radical left.
Speaker 1: But he's controlled by the radical left. And now he's
Speaker 1: really controlled. He is controlled by the radical left. The
Speaker 1: President's right here in saying this. He has no choice.
Speaker 1: Joe Biden is a machine Democrat politician. He's very old
Speaker 1: and very white, and that's not going to be good
Speaker 1: enough for the woke left. That's not going to be
Speaker 1: acceptable at all. So what does Biden have to do?
Speaker 1: What ever the heck they tell him to do, And
Speaker 1: that's what we are likely to see. But just understand
Speaker 1: right now that there will be no rules, there'll be
Speaker 1: no quarter, there'll be no good faith, there'll be no
Speaker 1: sense of fair play from the left going forward. Just
Speaker 1: understand that right now, whoever they have to destroy, whatever
Speaker 1: they have to, whoever they have to cancel, whatever previously
Speaker 1: held positions. The Democrat Party will have to abandon all
Speaker 1: of that, all of that will be done in this
Speaker 1: effort to defeat Trump because right now the radical left
Speaker 1: is ascendant, and if they can get Joe Biden to
Speaker 1: be the president, then they know that they'll be in
Speaker 1: a position to use this current momentum to the benefit
Speaker 1: of the benefit of the Democrat Party and really the
Speaker 1: socialist Democrat crowd left. We're not hearing enough about that.
Speaker 1: There are all these Marxist agitators and organizers running around.
Speaker 1: That's clear. That's obvious. They'll even say it on video.
Speaker 1: I mean, this is this is Captain obvious. Yeah, these
Speaker 1: are Marxist leftist agitators, but they are using this moment
Speaker 1: in time as well to push socialist policies, and we
Speaker 1: should not be surprised as that continues and they add,
Speaker 1: they add to this over time, they push even further.
Speaker 1: So I want us to be very clear about what
Speaker 1: the stakes are in all of this and what they're
Speaker 1: willing to do. You know, you have this moment of
Speaker 1: hashtag resistance from the US Attorney for the Southern District
Speaker 1: of New York, which is a very storied prosecutorial office
Speaker 1: here in New York, city, and this guy decided the
Speaker 1: current US attorney decided that he wasn't he wasn't going
Speaker 1: to leave his position because he was an interim appointment,
Speaker 1: and he said that he wouldn't leave. He would not
Speaker 1: leave until there was a Senate confirmed replacement for him.
Speaker 1: And I just got to tell you, you know, this
Speaker 1: stuff did not happen. I mean, to my point about
Speaker 1: how they'll undermine the day to day workings of the system,
Speaker 1: this did not happen under Obama. You never had somebody
Speaker 1: who was a Republican long term public servant and say, oh,
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, you're you're just not able. You the Attorney general.
Speaker 1: And with that, really the president, you're not able to
Speaker 1: fire me right now. No, it turns out that he
Speaker 1: was able to be fired, that he was fired the
Speaker 1: moment that he released this press conference because Attorney General
Speaker 1: Barr decided that he wasn't going to sit around and
Speaker 1: allow this nonsense. Jeffrey Burman, Jeffrey Burman is the US
Speaker 1: attorney in question here, and you know, you have to
Speaker 1: wonder how much more of this do we have to
Speaker 1: see before we understand that at the very top of
Speaker 1: the legal profession. And I mean this for legal public servants,
Speaker 1: but also at the law firms. Now the left has
Speaker 1: infiltrated them now too, this idea of George Soros and
Speaker 1: his foundation and the money that he spreads around on
Speaker 1: the left to get these to get radical policies, and
Speaker 1: acted that they're doing this by pushing for incredibly far
Speaker 1: left district district attorneys in places like Philadelphia, but also
Speaker 1: in other places and throughout the federal government. I mean,
Speaker 1: the legal profession has been infiltrated by far left activists
Speaker 1: at the very highest level. And this is where you
Speaker 1: get the much of what we saw with the deep
Speaker 1: state at the DOJ. They view Trump as a threat
Speaker 1: to what they believe in, and so they'll take actions
Speaker 1: that would be unthinkable even under really a kind of
Speaker 1: a normal whatever that means, a previous to Trump Republican administration.
Speaker 1: But you're also seeing now that they're just going to refuse.
Speaker 1: They're going to refuse to allow the system to function
Speaker 1: as it's supposed to. Sally Yates, who is a clear
Speaker 1: never Trumper, involved in the targeting of General in the
Speaker 1: ridiculous usage of the Logan Act as a pretext for
Speaker 1: that interview, she was in on all that stuff, and
Speaker 1: she refused to do her job when it came to
Speaker 1: the so called Muslim band, which the Supreme Court did
Speaker 1: end up saying was constitutional. She refused to your job
Speaker 1: and had to be fired. Now, Jeffrey Burman, who wasn't
Speaker 1: going to be fired from his job at first, at
Speaker 1: least Bill Barr, let out a scathing, very strong and
Speaker 1: scathing letter about this whole fiasco. But what Jeffrey Burman did,
Speaker 1: because its career enhancing for him and it makes him
Speaker 1: a hero on the left, is pretend, pretend that he
Speaker 1: is doing it, that he's being removed from his job
Speaker 1: because of ongoing investigations of Trump and Trump associates. That's
Speaker 1: all you have to do. Then you get on MSNBC.
Speaker 1: Then you become a hero to the left. Everyone will
Speaker 1: think of you as someone who has done his part
Speaker 1: for the hashtag resistance. And we keep seeing this happen
Speaker 1: and it is it's just you're gonna have more of this.
Speaker 1: Don't think that just because the Russia collusion force and
Speaker 1: the Ukraine impeachment fiasco did not work, that the Left
Speaker 1: is giving up any of this stuff, that they're changing
Speaker 1: their mind about any of this. Don't think that that's happening.
Speaker 1: It's not. We're just waiting to see who else will
Speaker 1: come forward. What other you know, Lieutenant Colonel Vinman's are
Speaker 1: somewhere in the flabby folds of the federal bureaucracy. You know,
Speaker 1: who else is going to come forward and decide that
Speaker 1: they have something like Oh, you mean someone for example,
Speaker 1: like Bolton. Oh yes, indeed, speaking of the legal system
Speaker 1: and all these bombshell revelations from this Bolton book, I've
Speaker 1: got to tell you Bolton is done. He's done. No
Speaker 1: intelligent human being will ever give him a job in
Speaker 1: government again after this. So I guess it's a thing
Speaker 1: that he got two million dollars. And I would note,
Speaker 1: you know, people were very nice to him, a very
Speaker 1: you know, always putting him on TV over at Fox
Speaker 1: for many years, and he was treated with real reverence
Speaker 1: based on what I mean. This guy's idea was more troops,
Speaker 1: more war, and more fighting all the time, wars that
Speaker 1: he was never going to fight it, never has fought in.
Speaker 1: He's the quintessential arm not even armchair general, armchair military strategist. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's right, Send more of your troops in there, stay
Speaker 1: there forever, fight in Afghanistan forever and President Trump and
Speaker 1: they had finally had enough of this and got rid
Speaker 1: of him. Now Bolton is in some trouble here. I
Speaker 1: think his book is effectively already published. So the demands
Speaker 1: from the White House to pull back its publication are
Speaker 1: not going to be successful because the book's already out there.
Speaker 1: I know people with copies of it. I mean, you
Speaker 1: can't stop this the horses. The horse has left the barn, right,
Speaker 1: it's all over with that, But it does seem and
Speaker 1: a judge has said, okay, fine, he's published his book,
Speaker 1: but they're very well maybe classified in there. And I've
Speaker 1: got to say this, I'm not somebody that believes in
Speaker 1: being unfair about this unduly harsh. And I know that
Speaker 1: the prepublication review process for people who have had security
Speaker 1: clearances and have national security responsibilities, I know that it
Speaker 1: can feel absurd, and it is absurd at some points.
Speaker 1: At sometimes there's stuff that gets blacked out of these books.
Speaker 1: You know, they put the they take the black marker,
Speaker 1: and they raise things that is you could find it
Speaker 1: with two seconds in Google search engine, and it's just nuts.
Speaker 1: But if you're the National Security advisor and you're writing
Speaker 1: a book while the president you served is still in office. Sorry,
Speaker 1: you got to go through the whole process, just like
Speaker 1: everybody else. Federal government should seize all should seize all
Speaker 1: of what Bolton has has received for this book, assuming
Speaker 1: that he didn't go through the full publication pre publication process,
Speaker 1: which I think at this point has been established. So
Speaker 1: they should take the two million dollar advance. They got
Speaker 1: to make an example. If you're not going to make
Speaker 1: an example of the most recent national security advisor writing
Speaker 1: a tell all book, why should someone who served in
Speaker 1: special operations who wants to write a memoir of combat,
Speaker 1: or why should somebody who was you know, a DIA
Speaker 1: analyst who wants to write about their time writing memos
Speaker 1: and making coffee because I know what that's like, That's
Speaker 1: what I was doing. Why should they have to go
Speaker 1: through all this nonsense if the National security advisor, at
Speaker 1: the very height of the national security apparatus does not
Speaker 1: have to Sorry, rules are rules, folks. I know the
Speaker 1: libs are pretending it's not the case, but we're not
Speaker 1: giving up on this. Rules are rules. And if Bolton
Speaker 1: published classified he's got to face criminal prosecution for that.
Speaker 1: You can't do that. Just because you hate Trump. Hating
Speaker 1: Trump is not an excuse to erase the rules on classification.
Speaker 1: So you know, I mean, here's for example, the left
Speaker 1: would normally hate this guy, but right now he's useful
Speaker 1: to them. Right now Bolton is their buddy because he
Speaker 1: says things like this. You described the president as erratic, foolish,
Speaker 1: behaved irrationally, bizarrely. You can't leave him alone for a minute.
Speaker 1: He saw conspiracies behind rocks. He couldn't tell the difference
Speaker 1: between his personal interests and the country's interests. I don't
Speaker 1: think he's fit for office. I don't think he has
Speaker 1: the competence to carry out the job. There really isn't
Speaker 1: any guiding principle that I was able to discern other
Speaker 1: than what's good for Donald Trump's reelection. He calls you
Speaker 1: a traitor. I mean, he's definitely disloyal, and I think
Speaker 1: you can make a case that, I mean, he's not
Speaker 1: a traitor. Well, he might have violated the Espionage Act
Speaker 1: by publishing classified information that's damaging the US national security interests.
Speaker 1: So that's bad. Other people get called very terrible thing
Speaker 1: and other people go to prison for that. You know,
Speaker 1: Captain Mustache Bolton over here. He thinks that he's just
Speaker 1: going to get away with this, and I really I
Speaker 1: think he may be overestimating because he's not a leftist. Right,
Speaker 1: if a leftist wrote this book, if a Democrat somehow, kay,
Speaker 1: And now he is saying he's gonna vote for Bidens,
Speaker 1: And maybe you can argue a Democrat now, but he's
Speaker 1: They hate Bolton on the left, they'd like him right
Speaker 1: now for obvious reasons. But this is a big change.
Speaker 1: This is a big switch from what we had been
Speaker 1: presented with as Bolton in the past. And I gotta
Speaker 1: say that you would if you were the national security
Speaker 1: advisor to a president and you really think he's unfit
Speaker 1: for office, and all you're gonna say all these terrible
Speaker 1: things about him, the lack of personal loyalty here, and
Speaker 1: the lack of caring about the mission. And just from
Speaker 1: what I've seen the excerpts of this book, I don't
Speaker 1: have a full copy of it yet, but the excerpts
Speaker 1: that I've seen published are Bolton is so petty and
Speaker 1: such a prima donna and should never be listened to
Speaker 1: by anybody ever again about anything. He should go away
Speaker 1: from the public sphere. He should be done. And I
Speaker 1: give credit to Tucker Carlson who had a really contentious
Speaker 1: interview with Bolton years ago on TV. And Tucker looks
Speaker 1: like he was spot on with all that. And you know,
Speaker 1: Tucker is the single the single most interesting commentary on
Speaker 1: Fox News right now in my for my money, no
Speaker 1: question about it. But I've also I've also got to
Speaker 1: bring this up because we believe in being truthful and
Speaker 1: being fair here in the Freedom Hud always. Trump has
Speaker 1: really bad instincts about people. I don't know who convinced
Speaker 1: him to bring in Bolton, you know, because he was
Speaker 1: an adult in the room or something. I don't know
Speaker 1: who thought this was a good idea. Bolton as opposed
Speaker 1: to Trump on policy, and Bolton was not to be
Speaker 1: trusted period, and yet they brought him in at the
Speaker 1: very top level. And now he's writing a book trashing
Speaker 1: Pompeo and Tillerson and Haley and you name it, trashing
Speaker 1: these people, no personal honor, no integrity, a slimeball. That's
Speaker 1: the former National Security advisor. I mean, you got to
Speaker 1: look at who Trump has put into these places, from
Speaker 1: whether you're talking about the mooch to Ama Rosa to
Speaker 1: Bolton to very bad choices about personnel. I think we
Speaker 1: should know who pushed for these personnel choices. Was it
Speaker 1: really Trump? I don't think so. I think we should
Speaker 1: know who in the White House was saying, Yeah, Bolton's
Speaker 1: a good idea, because I got a couple of guesses.
Speaker 1: You're in the freedom hunt. This is the Buck Sexton
Speaker 1: Show podcast. Now, this is just fascinating an example of
Speaker 1: the kind of extreme, dishonest propaganda that you will be
Speaker 1: seeing as we get into the height of this deeply
Speaker 1: contentious election season. But this is what they're This is
Speaker 1: what NPR, which is getting remember getting funding from a taxpayer, folks.
Speaker 1: This is what MPR has to say here about a
Speaker 1: phenomenon of riotous protesters or just rioters. How about that
Speaker 1: Buck used the proper term rioters who surround vehicles, which
Speaker 1: is an obvious threat and deeply terrifying to people that
Speaker 1: are stuck in the vehicle. Now, the bad guys they
Speaker 1: want the story to, that want us to believe are
Speaker 1: the people that are ramming the protesters to get away.
Speaker 1: And I mean, let me just give you the NPR
Speaker 1: version of this story. This was amazing. Over the weekend.
Speaker 1: Right wing extremists are turning cars into weapons, with reports
Speaker 1: of at least fifty vehicle ramming incidents since protests against
Speaker 1: police violence just against police actually violence erupted nationwide in
Speaker 1: late May. At least eighteen or categorizes deliberate attacks, another
Speaker 1: another two dozen or unclear as to motivation. According to
Speaker 1: a count released by a terrorism researcher at the University
Speaker 1: of Chicago Project on Security and Threats, whatever the hell
Speaker 1: that is, these twenty people facing execution include a state
Speaker 1: leader of the KKK's well the California man who is
Speaker 1: charged with attempted murder. Video footage of some of the
Speaker 1: attack show drivers threatening protesters. You need to get out
Speaker 1: of the streets and stop these protests. One of them said, Okay, look,
Speaker 1: are there some psychopaths who might try to mow down
Speaker 1: protesters with a car? Yes, but what do we make
Speaker 1: of the people who are gathering around vehicles bashing them?
Speaker 1: Smashing windows are used to put just the left belief
Speaker 1: that if you're just a person trying to drive your
Speaker 1: car and the maniacs on the streets from whatever the
Speaker 1: movement is called today, but it's always democrats in the left,
Speaker 1: you're supposed to sit there and what let them smash
Speaker 1: your windshield, smash your driver's side window, pull you out
Speaker 1: of the car, and beat you to death. If I
Speaker 1: were surrounded by an angry mob in a vehicle, guess what.
Speaker 1: I would hit the accelerator to escape to save my life,
Speaker 1: and I would not think twice about it. Maybe NPR
Speaker 1: should stop with the crap unknown motivations. How about not
Speaker 1: get beaten to death by a bunch of psychotic, whiney,
Speaker 1: cry baby left wing protesters. How about that is a
Speaker 1: motivation for the unknown motivation events. Thanks for listening to
Speaker 1: the Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts,
Speaker 1: the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. Well,
Speaker 1: I do believe there were two standards of justice during
Speaker 1: a period of time towards the end of the Obama administration,
Speaker 1: and all I can do about it is apply one
Speaker 1: standard of justice, the right standard of justice, and make
Speaker 1: sure we apply it to everybody equally. And that's what
Speaker 1: I'm trying to do. If we have two standards of justice,
Speaker 1: which we clearly do in this country for people based
Speaker 1: upon their politics, then we don't really have a justice
Speaker 1: system worthy of the name, do we. So we need
Speaker 1: dramatic accountability and reform in all of this, and the
Speaker 1: first step in that is going to be transparency. You're
Speaker 1: going to be honesty, truth, what really happened here. Now.
Speaker 1: I know that Attorney General bar who is the single
Speaker 1: most effective cabinet member in this administration, Attorney General bar
Speaker 1: is willing to let the Durham probe out of Connecticut
Speaker 1: play out, which is a good thing. We want to
Speaker 1: see what that prosecutor John Durham, We want to see
Speaker 1: what he comes up with. It was US attorney in Connecticut,
Speaker 1: and he's looking at everything that happened in the Russia
Speaker 1: Collusia case, collusion case, and we're going to find out
Speaker 1: very soon. I hope that the whole thing was really
Speaker 1: a sham. We already know it was a sham, but
Speaker 1: I mean, we're going to have the proof. We're gonna
Speaker 1: be able to point to the documents, the interviews, the intercepts,
Speaker 1: whatever it may be, to show that this whole thing
Speaker 1: was cooked up to undo the results of a presidential election.
Speaker 1: The Democrats have faced no accountability for this whatsoever. And
Speaker 1: the people in the federal bureaucracy, whether it's a Comi
Speaker 1: or a macabe or a struck or a page have
Speaker 1: faced minimal, minimal accountability for what has already proven to
Speaker 1: be what has already proven to be misdeeds on their
Speaker 1: part based entirely in politics that the president had. That
Speaker 1: President Trump had as effective a first three years in
Speaker 1: office as he did while there was a soft coup,
Speaker 1: a rolling soft coup attempt against him, is really remarkable,
Speaker 1: and I'm glad to see that at least now he
Speaker 1: has an Attorney general in place who understands this fight,
Speaker 1: understands the forces arraid against him, and will do what
Speaker 1: is necessary to get something at least approaching justice. Because
Speaker 1: I'm telling you, they are cooking up the leftist cooking
Speaker 1: up in October surprise right now. I don't know what
Speaker 1: it is, but they are working, you know, behind the scenes.
Speaker 1: People hate Trump so much that they will break their
Speaker 1: oath to the tree. They will put themselves in legal
Speaker 1: and criminal jeopardy. They'll leak, they'll break agreements, they'll break protocol,
Speaker 1: they'll do whatever they have to do to take this
Speaker 1: guy down. And that's why I'm at least pleased that
Speaker 1: the Attorney general is up for this fight. He knows
Speaker 1: this enemy, he knows who these people are and he
Speaker 1: understands what they're willing to do. There's also the latest
Speaker 1: on the chats, which the Attorney General waited. I'll get
Speaker 1: to his comments on this in a second, but I
Speaker 1: just first want to say that the Chatz in Seattle,
Speaker 1: or I think they were calling at the chop right
Speaker 1: the Capitol Hill Occupy protests, but now I'm seeing the
Speaker 1: media is still calling at the CHAZ. Maybe they've decided
Speaker 1: that branding this as part of the occupy movement is
Speaker 1: a step back for them. That has a pr issue.
Speaker 1: This is not what they want to do. But I
Speaker 1: must say the situation in Seattle continues on. There was
Speaker 1: this video that went viral over the weekend of the
Speaker 1: of a few EMS people for the City of Seattle
Speaker 1: who were being told that there was a gunshot wound
Speaker 1: inside the CHAZ in the Seattle Occupied Zone autonomous zone.
Speaker 1: No police allowed him, but they want MS to come in,
Speaker 1: and the EMS kept calling into dispatch and they were
Speaker 1: saying do we do we have permission to go in?
Speaker 1: And you had this this I think it might have
Speaker 1: even been this guy raz who is viewed as a
Speaker 1: leader of this autonomous zone, screaming at the people in
Speaker 1: the MS vehicles saying why woldn't you go in and save?
Speaker 1: And then of course it turned into oh, this is racist.
Speaker 1: It's because the person who shot is black. You're not
Speaker 1: going in. No, that's just not true. The reason they're
Speaker 1: not going in is because you guys declared it an
Speaker 1: autonomous zone and police aren't allowed in and there's a
Speaker 1: threat of violence if police try to go in. Well,
Speaker 1: if police aren't allowed, didn't guess what. Ems don't want
Speaker 1: to go in because they have no protection. They have
Speaker 1: no sense that they're not going to come under assault
Speaker 1: if they go in there. Who knows. See, the left
Speaker 1: hates rules that are enforced truly and in good faith.
Speaker 1: The left, Hey, whether it's just laws or rules or agreements,
Speaker 1: the left opposes contracts. They replace contractual agreement, They replace
Speaker 1: law with emotion. What do I feel? What do I want?
Speaker 1: This is the elevation of childishness above civilization. And this
Speaker 1: keeps playing out in different places all across the country.
Speaker 1: One of them is this Seattle protest movement. Attorney General
Speaker 1: said that he does not believe that this is going
Speaker 1: to be able to just keep going on as is.
Speaker 1: Brandon play clips six, Please they took over an area
Speaker 1: in Seattle and they're guarding it with guns. They tried
Speaker 1: to do it in Portland as well. Does the federal
Speaker 1: government have a responsibility to protect citizens of our country
Speaker 1: if the cities and states won't do it because people's
Speaker 1: property have been damaged. There are people who don't want
Speaker 1: this autonomous area in Seattle around their homes right. Well,
Speaker 1: in the first instance, it's the responsibility obviously of the
Speaker 1: local officials and then the state officials to protect the
Speaker 1: rights of their citizens. At the end of the day,
Speaker 1: the federal government does have a responsibility ability to make
Speaker 1: sure that citizens are not deprived of their federal rights.
Speaker 1: So will you challenge that autonomous city? Will you sue
Speaker 1: the mayor? What can you do? Well? I don't want
Speaker 1: to get into specifics, but we're obviously keeping an eye
Speaker 1: on it, and as the President said, in due course,
Speaker 1: we may have to do something about it, but we
Speaker 1: can't let it go on indefinitely. Keep in mind, the
Speaker 1: Democrats are all about federal intervention whenever they want it,
Speaker 1: but then when they don't want it, the federal government's
Speaker 1: not allowed to do anything. You know, they want the
Speaker 1: federal government say to pass laws to override what states
Speaker 1: have decided on the Second Amendment. They want the Supreme
Speaker 1: Court and therefore the federal government to weigh in, and
Speaker 1: it has weighed in on abortion as we know, and
Speaker 1: make that the law in all fifty states, or on
Speaker 1: gay marriage, and make that the law in all fifty states.
Speaker 1: When it's something that they want federal action, there's always
Speaker 1: a justification for federal action and the dictate of DC.
Speaker 1: But here when it comes to the fundamental safety and
Speaker 1: security of a part of the country that is still
Speaker 1: under federal jurisdiction. Everything in the United States technically falls
Speaker 1: under a degree of federal jurisdiction because it's America. Right
Speaker 1: the Seattle Autonomous Zone, Yes, it's in the city of Seattle,
Speaker 1: in the state of Washington, but it is still technically America,
Speaker 1: which means that there has to be some understanding that
Speaker 1: the people there. You know, if we had Americans in
Speaker 1: harm's way in Bulgaria or Somalia or Bolivia, the US
Speaker 1: government would be willing to or would be in a
Speaker 1: position to take action, right none, that would be a
Speaker 1: federal matters. It's outside US territory. But if people are
Speaker 1: truly in duress and in danger in a major US
Speaker 1: city and they've been abandoned by this state. What happens
Speaker 1: then the Attorney General is not going to show his
Speaker 1: cards here on what the specific the specific legal justification
Speaker 1: for a federal action there would be. But I believe
Speaker 1: if this guy's saying this can't go on indefinitely and
Speaker 1: they're going to do something, he means it. Now. I
Speaker 1: know Trump has been saying a lot about this, and
Speaker 1: I think part of the frustration that we see is
Speaker 1: that the President of the United States is saying the
Speaker 1: right things about these protest movements, is saying the right
Speaker 1: things about law and order and restoring restoring police as
Speaker 1: into their rightful place as the guaranteurs of our public safety,
Speaker 1: right especially in places like New York, Seattle, elsewhere where
Speaker 1: you can own a gun so you can't be that
Speaker 1: you can guarantee your own safety. The Attorney General saying
Speaker 1: he might do something, I think he just might. And
Speaker 1: he also was asked this is all a Maria Bartaromo
Speaker 1: show on Fox Business. He also was asked about the
Speaker 1: Bolton book, which I thought was interesting. Play clip eight. Brandon,
Speaker 1: I don't think it's too late, because what we're asking
Speaker 1: is for him to complete the process before the book
Speaker 1: is published, complete the process of taking out classified material,
Speaker 1: and in our view, there remains there remains very highly
Speaker 1: classified material in the book still and we would like
Speaker 1: him to address that. And so under the law where
Speaker 1: we are bringing a civil action to enforce his agreement
Speaker 1: that he would do that before publishing the remedy. If
Speaker 1: he doesn't complete it is that he forfeits any money
Speaker 1: from that book to the government. That's what has to happen.
Speaker 1: There's no there's no leeway on this. There's no there's
Speaker 1: no two sides to this argument. He either completes the
Speaker 1: government process here or the government can see because it's
Speaker 1: a contract. This isn't just about your your First Amendment rights.
Speaker 1: This is also about you signed a you signed a
Speaker 1: binding legal agreement with the federal government. You're violating that,
Speaker 1: so they're gonna take your money. They took I think
Speaker 1: it was seven million dollars in proceeds from the from
Speaker 1: the book written by that guy No Easy Day, where
Speaker 1: one of the Navy seals on the Bin Laden mission
Speaker 1: wrote a book about it and didn't go through the
Speaker 1: Pentagon clearance process. And guess what he sold a ton
Speaker 1: of copies of that book. He made millions of dollars
Speaker 1: and they seized every penny. How can you seize every
Speaker 1: penny that a Navy seal who was risking his life
Speaker 1: and was on that mission made by violing this process
Speaker 1: and not seize every penny from Mustache Bolton doesn't make
Speaker 1: any sense, right, You can't have that can't be in
Speaker 1: that circumstance, in that situation. The double we don't like
Speaker 1: double standards. On the right, we conservatives object to double standards. Well,
Speaker 1: there's a clear one here. If this is allowed. And
Speaker 1: I got to tell you everyone that I know who
Speaker 1: was supportive of Bolton to get this job in the
Speaker 1: first place should really be eating some humble pie. I
Speaker 1: mean that there should be accountability for the stupidity in
Speaker 1: pushing this, but I don't think that's I don't think
Speaker 1: that's going to happen. I do hope there's accountability for
Speaker 1: Bolton break breaking his contract in a well now Bar
Speaker 1: says he hasn't done it yet because they haven't. But
Speaker 1: the book, the copies of it, are already out. So
Speaker 1: I don't understand what they think will be accomplished here,
Speaker 1: other than trying to seem like they're being reasonable. But
Speaker 1: the book that's already out because there are galley copies.
Speaker 1: I have friends who have copies of this book already.
Speaker 1: Anything that's taken out of the next version of the book,
Speaker 1: everybody would know what the highly classified stuff is, which
Speaker 1: is effectively the government admitted what is highly classified that's
Speaker 1: already been published. That doesn't solve the problem at all.
Speaker 1: But they're gonna have to take They're gonna have to
Speaker 1: take Mustache Bolton's Winnings here or else or else. Nobody
Speaker 1: should have to submit their book for prepublication. Nobody should
Speaker 1: have to do that. That's what's at stake here. You're
Speaker 1: in the freedom Hunt. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast.
Speaker 1: Last week we talked about a few cases of people
Speaker 1: believing that a hate crime had occurred because of a
Speaker 1: noose that was found somewhere. This happened in Oakland, and
Speaker 1: this happened here in New York City in Harlament what
Speaker 1: is called Marcus Garvey Park. And it turned out in
Speaker 1: both instances there was no hate crime at all. It
Speaker 1: was just a rope at a tree, not meant for
Speaker 1: a noose, not meant to be a weapon of terror.
Speaker 1: It was just a rope at a tree, and one
Speaker 1: case to haul up equipment, and in another case to
Speaker 1: allow somebody to engage an exercise. In that instance, the
Speaker 1: man engaging in the exercises was himself black and said,
Speaker 1: this was not a noose, has nothing to do with that.
Speaker 1: It's just ropes, five ropes hanging from a tree. And
Speaker 1: the City of Oakland continued with its investigation and made
Speaker 1: it clear to everybody that even if you have no
Speaker 1: intent when you have a rope near a tree or
Speaker 1: on a tree, even if you have no intend to
Speaker 1: terrify anybody, if someone can come along and say, oh gosh,
Speaker 1: that reminds me of a noose, even if it's not
Speaker 1: a noose, it could be a hate crime. Intent does
Speaker 1: not matter. That was the statement of the Mayor of Oakland,
Speaker 1: which was just a shockingly absurd but also important for
Speaker 1: us to know. That's what they believe. Even if you
Speaker 1: don't intend for an inanimate object to be a weapon
Speaker 1: of terror, it will still be investigated as a hate
Speaker 1: crime if people who are easily frightened and who are
Speaker 1: acting in a kind of hysteria think that it could
Speaker 1: be a weapon of terror. So okay, now, let's get
Speaker 1: to the latest instance of a noose being found, and
Speaker 1: it is in the garage stall of NASCAR driver Bubba Wallace, who,
Speaker 1: as I understand it, and I do not know NASCAR well,
Speaker 1: so apologies if I miss any of the backstory to
Speaker 1: all of this, because I don't know much about mister
Speaker 1: Bubba Wallace. But they found this new He's the most
Speaker 1: prominent African American NASCAR driver in the country and they
Speaker 1: say that they found a noose in his garage stall.
Speaker 1: I'm so there are I have a few questions here.
Speaker 1: Sometimes when these incidents happen, I will just say no
Speaker 1: way because of X, Y or Z, because of the
Speaker 1: information we already have, I'm not there with this. There
Speaker 1: are a few possibilities. One, somebody would be heinous and
Speaker 1: stupid and evil enough to do this, although if that's
Speaker 1: the there are because of social distancing now with NASCAR
Speaker 1: and everything, there are very few people that have access
Speaker 1: to this area. There are a lot of cameras around,
Speaker 1: and it would not be hard to find out who
Speaker 1: it is. I'm not saying it's impossible. I find it,
Speaker 1: though not probable, that that is what happened. Another possibility
Speaker 1: that this was someone who wanted to be raising awareness,
Speaker 1: so using the noose as a racist symbol, but putting
Speaker 1: it there specifically so that then we could all talk
Speaker 1: about racism, even though the person putting it there themselves,
Speaker 1: they would say, well, I'm not racist, if and when
Speaker 1: they are caught. This has happened many times. There have
Speaker 1: been hundreds of hoax hate crimes where this was the
Speaker 1: rationalization of the person who did the who placed the
Speaker 1: news or whatever it was in a certain place in
Speaker 1: order to engage in a hate crime. One part of this.
Speaker 1: And I'm checking as I'm on area with you to
Speaker 1: make sure I haven't missed this. I have yet to
Speaker 1: see a photo. This was at the Talladega Speedway in Alabama.
Speaker 1: I have yet to see a photo of the news,
Speaker 1: which I find very surprising. Now the FBI is investigating.
Speaker 1: The FBI is investigating this as a as a hate crime,
Speaker 1: and I have a feeling we're going to find out
Speaker 1: a lot more in the days ahead. I don't have
Speaker 1: a clear look if it is. If someone did do this,
Speaker 1: that's a grotesque and terrible thing. And we all know
Speaker 1: that that doesn't even really it doesn't have to be
Speaker 1: said on the show because you already know. That's how
Speaker 1: I feel. But I'm wondering how this could happen given
Speaker 1: the very tight access into a garage stall for a
Speaker 1: NASCAR driver like this. And I'm also wondering why we
Speaker 1: haven't seen a photo of the noose. Wouldn't that be
Speaker 1: all over the place, wouldn't we see this? I have
Speaker 1: not yet, and I would just note that we've had
Speaker 1: a few We've had a number of noose hoaxes in
Speaker 1: the last week, so I'm not clear yet on what
Speaker 1: this is going to turn into. I'm going to watch
Speaker 1: this closely. I have a feeling we're going to find
Speaker 1: out some very interesting details in the days ahead, and
Speaker 1: we're going to find out if this is real or not.
Speaker 1: I think that's true. Keep an eye on it, though,
Speaker 1: and keep an eye on how the media puts this forward.
Speaker 1: If it happened, it's terrible and people should be punished.
Speaker 1: But let's find out who it is and let's find
Speaker 1: out what their motivations were. Thanks for listening to The
Speaker 1: Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcast,
Speaker 1: at the iHeartRadio app or wherever you get your podcasts.
Speaker 1: All right, everybody back by popular demand, of course, our
Speaker 1: friend and fellow co host on the First as well
Speaker 1: as host of The Jesse Kelly Show. Jesse Kelly is
Speaker 1: with us now. He has been getting into some naughty
Speaker 1: stuff online to upset the liberals. Mister Kelly, welcome back. Well,
Speaker 1: I don't I don't see how it's naughty. We are
Speaker 1: out here. We're going to try to right the wrongs
Speaker 1: of racism in this country. And there's no older institution
Speaker 1: that is built on the blood of black slaves, and
Speaker 1: the universities like Yale and Brown and Duke and Rice
Speaker 1: and several others. And I will not rest until these
Speaker 1: names have been torn off the walls and these buildings
Speaker 1: either raised to the ground or turned into low income housing.
Speaker 1: So Jesse, tell everybody how this all got started. You
Speaker 1: have a plan here to get Yale canceled, but you've
Speaker 1: now expanded and Yale. I've been mentioned this for a
Speaker 1: while on the show. In fact, I brought this up
Speaker 1: some years ago that if we're gonna do this whole
Speaker 1: cancelation thing because of ties to slavery, Allie who Yale,
Speaker 1: the founder of Yale, was a slave trader. And there
Speaker 1: are others as well that have come up that are
Speaker 1: names as as you point out, very highly revered on
Speaker 1: the left, and so you got cancel Yale trending on
Speaker 1: Twitter over the weekend. How's this going so far? Well,
Speaker 1: it's going very well. I'm glad. People. Look, what what
Speaker 1: we need right now is the country to come together. Bug,
Speaker 1: what we really need is more bipartisanship. You know, they
Speaker 1: love to talk about bipartisanship, and this is something people
Speaker 1: on the left and the right should agree on that.
Speaker 1: The truth of the matter is this. Everybody who has
Speaker 1: a Yale diploma on their wall, everybody who's worn a
Speaker 1: Yale shirt, everyone who's graduated from there, everyone who talks
Speaker 1: about Yale, everyone who has Yale in their bioline on
Speaker 1: their social media account is out there promoting the name
Speaker 1: of a man who was a slave trader. There's no
Speaker 1: other way around that. If you're going to tear down
Speaker 1: the statues of Robert E. Lee, Robert E. Lee didn't
Speaker 1: have any slaves. All who Yale had lots of them.
Speaker 1: The truth is Yale, the university itself, should change its name,
Speaker 1: become an all black college, and disperse its thirty billion
Speaker 1: dollar endowment to black people. His reparations, I'm just wondering
Speaker 1: has anyone in Brown University, also the founders of Brown University,
Speaker 1: we're slave slave traders. I want to know, has anyone
Speaker 1: on the left reached out to you, either publicly or
Speaker 1: in private, and said, you know what, Jessie, You're right,
Speaker 1: we do need to cancel Yale. Let's get this thing
Speaker 1: going publicly, no privately, And I'm not allowed to say
Speaker 1: who these people are. Yes that they think one they
Speaker 1: see what I'm doing. Two they said it was hilarious,
Speaker 1: and three they actually said they're totally with me on this,
Speaker 1: even if they disagree with my motivations for doing so.
Speaker 1: Let's get these names of slave owners and slave traders
Speaker 1: completely removed from our society, and maybe in so doing
Speaker 1: we can punish the people who are responsible for the
Speaker 1: fact we now have generations of Americans who hate America.
Speaker 1: That's where people learned this. So turnabouts, fair play and
Speaker 1: you know, I'm here in New York and the Duke
Speaker 1: of York, before he ascended to the throne in England,
Speaker 1: was involved in the founding of the Royal Africa Company,
Speaker 1: which had a effectively a monopoly in British trade from
Speaker 1: West Africa, which included you know, gold Gems, Ivory Tusks,
Speaker 1: and yes, African slaves. So does a New York state
Speaker 1: also have to then change its name under the new rules?
Speaker 1: I mean, I mean to your point, Jesse, you're right,
Speaker 1: these are the rules. So why should never live under
Speaker 1: the rules? But these are the rules? And Buck, I
Speaker 1: am sorry to say it. Man, it's not just New
Speaker 1: York State, it's any business that has New York and
Speaker 1: its title. Let's be honest. There's nobody who's been trying
Speaker 1: to lead on the issues of race than the New
Speaker 1: York Times. I mean they've They've been number one on this.
Speaker 1: The New York Times must change its name. Every single
Speaker 1: print edition of The New York Times, every tweet, everything
Speaker 1: they put out there that has the name New York
Speaker 1: in it is celebrating the name of a slave trader.
Speaker 1: And that's absolutely true. Until we stop that practice, we
Speaker 1: will never truly be free. Yes, if they're so excellent
Speaker 1: at journalism, calling themselves the Midtown Manhattan Tribune seems like
Speaker 1: it's a completely legitimate compromise under the circumstances. In fact, Jesse,
Speaker 1: if they won't do this, just as if Yale does
Speaker 1: not change its name, wouldn't we have to ask about
Speaker 1: their commit it meant to the cause of diversity and
Speaker 1: inclusion and facing up to our past and the inequities
Speaker 1: and the immorality of slavery. I mean, aren't they then
Speaker 1: suspect maybe they have a little bit of an affinity
Speaker 1: here for some causes and beliefs that we're just unearthing now. Well, Block,
Speaker 1: I'm starting to have serious concerns that maybe these people
Speaker 1: on the left aren't genuine about race relations. Maybe they
Speaker 1: just hate America and want to rip it apart. I
Speaker 1: certainly don't want to accuse anybody of that. But if
Speaker 1: you can print the New York Times but you have
Speaker 1: to tear down Robert E. Lee, what else am I
Speaker 1: supposed to think? Buck? We have Hillary Clinton who not
Speaker 1: only went to slave trade state, I'm talking about Yale.
Speaker 1: We have Hillary Clinton who has since returned to Yale
Speaker 1: to give speeches there. This lady is standing on the
Speaker 1: backs of dead black slaves giving speeches at Yale University.
Speaker 1: I don't know if she's serious about race relations in America.
Speaker 1: Speaking of Jesse Kelly, host if I'm right with Jesse
Speaker 1: Kelly on the first and also host of The Jesse
Speaker 1: Kelly Show, on radio Jesse. Has anyone left tried to
Speaker 1: confront you on this and make a case as to
Speaker 1: why you're wrong, because I have to say, I can't
Speaker 1: even think of what a defense based upon, as you
Speaker 1: point out the rules as they are now established and
Speaker 1: being forced upon all the rest of us. I can't
Speaker 1: even think of what the opposition could to this movement
Speaker 1: to cancel Yale, to cancel Brown University, to cancel New York,
Speaker 1: to cancel the New York Times name. I can't even
Speaker 1: think of what their good faith argument would be other
Speaker 1: than oh, no, we like this because we benefit from
Speaker 1: this name. Is there another argument? The only argument I've
Speaker 1: seen bug from this side is they'll do this thing
Speaker 1: where I got this one today where Brown University actually
Speaker 1: put out a report examining its own racist history, and
Speaker 1: that's what they'll say. They'll put out a report. Well,
Speaker 1: wait a minute, everybody knows the Confederacy was fighting against
Speaker 1: slave We've we have our report there, we have the
Speaker 1: report knowing the Confederacy was fighting for slaves. So why
Speaker 1: do we have to then remove Confederate generals? Report is
Speaker 1: not good enough. The rules are as we currently stand.
Speaker 1: If you were involved in slavery, and some of these
Speaker 1: people were heavily evolved. Your likeness, your name must be
Speaker 1: completely removed from the public square in every possible way.
Speaker 1: Those are the rules. I did not make these rules.
Speaker 1: I certainly would never have made these rules. But if
Speaker 1: that's what we've got to do, then that's what we've
Speaker 1: got to do. So it's time to burn down the
Speaker 1: American university system. Do you think that this is the
Speaker 1: only way that we can, other than buy refusing to
Speaker 1: bend a need to the mob, that we can start
Speaker 1: to effectively fight back in a cultural sense of gain
Speaker 1: about this? You know, if effectively meaning that we have
Speaker 1: to turn cancel culture on itself, that the cancellers have
Speaker 1: to become the cancel ease. The truth is bug that
Speaker 1: we are. We like to comfort ourselves with the saying
Speaker 1: that we're the silent majority. We are absolutely not numbers wise,
Speaker 1: we may be, the left owns the pillars of power
Speaker 1: in the United States of America, all of them. We
Speaker 1: even have a Republican president who's been completely hemmed in
Speaker 1: with one hundred percent bogus investigations for the first three
Speaker 1: years of his presidency. We have We're not losing the
Speaker 1: culture war. We've lost it. We've lost it. We are
Speaker 1: now the rebel guerrilla force in the United States of America,
Speaker 1: and therefore we must conduct our battles the same way
Speaker 1: a guerrilla force does, and that is using the enemy's
Speaker 1: weapons against him. It is our only choice. That's the
Speaker 1: bad news. The good news is it's a lot of fun. Well,
Speaker 1: General Jesse Kelly, what comes next in this war of
Speaker 1: attrition against the left, Well, once we have taken care
Speaker 1: of the American university system, the truth of the matter,
Speaker 1: as system, we're going to have to set our sights
Speaker 1: on corporate America. Corporate America has been very loud, very
Speaker 1: loud about how not racist they are, recently about how
Speaker 1: woke they are, and so I think once we've taken
Speaker 1: care of the university system, we will find out these corporations,
Speaker 1: do a little digging and find out really where they
Speaker 1: come from too. Jesse Kelly got canceled ye out the
Speaker 1: trend nationally on Twitter. Everybody. He wants the left to
Speaker 1: live it's own rules. You should listen to what Jesse's
Speaker 1: got to shit I got to say on the Jesse
Speaker 1: on the Jesse Kelly Show. Jesse, thanks so much, man,
Speaker 1: you're in the Freedom Hunt. This is the Buck Sexton
Speaker 1: Show podcast. I want to introduce this audience to a
Speaker 1: new voice from down in Texas, one of our absolute
Speaker 1: favorite states in this wonderful country. We have with us now,
Speaker 1: Will Douglas. He is a Dallas businessman who is challenging
Speaker 1: incumbent Democrat Retta Bowers for a seat on Texas' one
Speaker 1: hundred thirteenth district. Good to have you on, mister Will.
Speaker 1: How are you, sir? I'm doing well, bub Thanks for
Speaker 1: having me on this afternoon. So you're you're running for
Speaker 1: a seat that's east east Dallas and going out a
Speaker 1: little bit into the countryside. First, I want to ask you.
Speaker 1: We're getting a lot of national press attention on the
Speaker 1: on what's going on with Texas with COVID nineteen and
Speaker 1: the reopening. What can you tell us about things? I mean,
Speaker 1: is this is this some fear mongering from the Democrat
Speaker 1: left or are you particularly worried about how things are
Speaker 1: going in Texas and more specific in the Dallas area. Well, First,
Speaker 1: first of all, I think Governor Abbotston an incredible job
Speaker 1: here in Texas. We've we've really straddled the line on
Speaker 1: making sure that we're keeping people safe and at the
Speaker 1: same time making sure that that businesses are able to
Speaker 1: open back up and keep our economy going as strong
Speaker 1: as we possibly can. I think the spikes that you're
Speaker 1: seeing recently, UM, a lot of them are are younger people,
Speaker 1: and as we know, as restaurants and bars open back up,
Speaker 1: younger people were the ones who were going into those establishments.
Speaker 1: And they're also the ones that are less likely to
Speaker 1: be impacted by um, you know, by systemic COVID. So
Speaker 1: UM they're they're asymptomatic, they're all, you know, wandering around
Speaker 1: going into places, and they're less likely to die from it.
Speaker 1: So naturally there's there's going to be in Greeces as
Speaker 1: things open back up. And have you seen an influx
Speaker 1: into the Dallas area, because I talk on this show
Speaker 1: fairly regularly about how in New York you had four
Speaker 1: hundred thousand people who have left the city since the
Speaker 1: start of COVID, and many of them are saying they're
Speaker 1: not planning on coming back. They're trying to enroll their
Speaker 1: kids in schools Outside of New York City, where I'm
Speaker 1: currently doing this show. People are going to Texas, they're
Speaker 1: going to Florida. They're moving out of this state. Have
Speaker 1: you seen someone that influx in the Dallas area or
Speaker 1: has it not really hit? I know it's hit Austin.
Speaker 1: Yeah I haven't. I haven't seen it yet due to
Speaker 1: you know, their reasoning being from COVID. But I know
Speaker 1: it's coming and I can't blame them. Why would you not?
Speaker 1: You know, Texas, You know, I guess we have a
Speaker 1: reputation as a flyover state, but I think Texas is
Speaker 1: the future of this country. You look at what Texas
Speaker 1: has built here. I mean, we're a bashing a free
Speaker 1: market enterprise. I moved here from Oklahoma seven years ago
Speaker 1: with you know, nothing in my pocket except student loan
Speaker 1: debt and some fire my billy. And there's plenty of
Speaker 1: opportunities here. And you know, you come here, you work hard,
Speaker 1: you do the right things, you can live the American dream.
Speaker 1: And that's why I'm running us. It's important for me
Speaker 1: that Taxas stays red and the strong Republican leadership that
Speaker 1: has built that built this incredible state. We have to
Speaker 1: keep it. Um. I was bucket. One of the reasons
Speaker 1: I'm running is I tried to do business in New
Speaker 1: York in Manhattan. I tried to acquire a pharmacy up there,
Speaker 1: and you guys, y'all make it really hard on small businesses,
Speaker 1: really tough to get small businesses off the ground. No,
Speaker 1: well we are excellent, come back, we are excellent New
Speaker 1: York City at crushing ingenuity, free enterprise and the operating
Speaker 1: of the of the free market. That's really where New
Speaker 1: York City particularly does a great job. And really really
Speaker 1: high taxes. So there's that. There's that too. But if
Speaker 1: you're a huge corporation and you're connected, then you're in
Speaker 1: good shape. So that's so those folks can be very
Speaker 1: very happy about that. I mean, I just want to
Speaker 1: ask you, will before let you get back to running
Speaker 1: for your seat down in Texas east of Dallas one
Speaker 1: hundred and thirteenth Congressional district. So tell me this, what
Speaker 1: are you going to do and what's what's the top
Speaker 1: priority if you beat the liberal incumbent in that seat. Well,
Speaker 1: you know, had you asked me that six months ago, um,
Speaker 1: you know, I would have said, you know, the focus
Speaker 1: would be on small business, the focus would be on education,
Speaker 1: on crime in that district. But now post COVID, the
Speaker 1: most important thing is jobs. I mean, we've got two
Speaker 1: to three million Texans without a job, and if a
Speaker 1: politician tells you that anything else is more important than
Speaker 1: jobs in the economy, I think they're lying to you.
Speaker 1: And so that's why it's more important than ever for
Speaker 1: our state to have as many representatives with the small
Speaker 1: business experience as possible. I'm a small business owner. I have,
Speaker 1: you know, multiple employees. I had to file for PPP loans.
Speaker 1: I know firsthand what small business owners have gone through
Speaker 1: these last several months, and I have an idea of
Speaker 1: what it's going to take to get get our economy
Speaker 1: warm back and thriving again. We'll Douglas. Everybody running for
Speaker 1: Congress down in the Dallas area, well, best of luck.
Speaker 1: We hope you come out on top, and we hope
Speaker 1: you'll come back on the show and tell us what
Speaker 1: your plans are once you do. Absolutely, absolutely, thanks Buck,
Speaker 1: I appreciate it. All right. So you're seeing so much
Speaker 1: of this national reporting on the COVID situation. I just
Speaker 1: want to tell you it couldn't be more clear that
Speaker 1: they are they are drilling down specifically on Texas and
Speaker 1: Florida and saying that look at what's going on here.
Speaker 1: Oh my gosh, these these reckless Florida is not even
Speaker 1: a pure red state. Obviously, it's a bit of a
Speaker 1: purple state trending red. But but look at what they've got,
Speaker 1: a Republican governor and they've managed to beat the odds
Speaker 1: here somehow. The bad guys in this story when you
Speaker 1: look at leadership are Governor Abbott of Texas and the
Speaker 1: governor governor of Florida de Santis, and really Governor Cuomo
Speaker 1: here in New York gets a pass wells a Democrat.
Speaker 1: The Democrat he's now saying that he blames the federal
Speaker 1: government because the federal government didn't focus on COVID coming
Speaker 1: from Europe. The focus was on it coming from China,
Speaker 1: which he says was wrong, which is not true. Of course,
Speaker 1: it was from China to Europe then to the United States.
Speaker 1: But there are a whole bunch of very obvious political
Speaker 1: reasons why he has shifted that focus. But I keep
Speaker 1: looking at the numbers, and we had, at worst over
Speaker 1: the course of a week, about a four percent incline
Speaker 1: in cases nationwide. Hospitalizations for COVID, for serious COVID cases
Speaker 1: and deaths from COVID are way down, and continuing to
Speaker 1: trend down. Do not believe the fearers out there, do
Speaker 1: not believe the people that will clearly benefit from trying
Speaker 1: to turn this into something that it's you know, and
Speaker 1: yet again, you know, lockdown two point zero to turn
Speaker 1: this into oh my gosh, we've underestimated this. Where is
Speaker 1: your mask? Why aren't you wearing masks out in public? Well,
Speaker 1: because in open air, masks are effectively irrelevant. There's no
Speaker 1: reason that we should be forced to wear masks in sunshine,
Speaker 1: in the open, not in dense proximity to people and indoors.
Speaker 1: But this has become very, very political. It's also why
Speaker 1: there was such a focus on whether people were wearing
Speaker 1: masks at the Trump rally. Young people. We have data now.
Speaker 1: We did not have data in the beginning the way
Speaker 1: we do now the beginning of the pandemic. The data
Speaker 1: tells us that young people, meaning people under forty, are
Speaker 1: at very low risk. People under twenty or effectively no risk.
Speaker 1: So if you're nineteen, you know, you want to be
Speaker 1: careful that you don't get COVID and give it to
Speaker 1: grandma grandpa. But your risk from COVID is most zero,
Speaker 1: which brings us back to the early days of the
Speaker 1: spring break situation with COVID nineteen, where they were making
Speaker 1: fun of these spring breakers for not staying locked at
Speaker 1: home and everything else. Turns out they weren't really at
Speaker 1: high risk, and as long as they're careful about who
Speaker 1: they're around from the high risk population, you can certainly
Speaker 1: make a case that they should be able to live
Speaker 1: their lives again. But you see, the Left hasn't made
Speaker 1: this transition. People who were reasonable and look at the
Speaker 1: data understand that we can't keep doing the lockdown, and
Speaker 1: that has been from the beginning. You know, let's not
Speaker 1: let the cure be worse than the disease. Trump said it.
Speaker 1: This goes back to Easter. I mean, this goes back
Speaker 1: for months now. But the Left hasn't been rulling to
Speaker 1: make this concession and say, look, no matter what, we
Speaker 1: should not lockdown again the way that we have, No
Speaker 1: matter what, we can't do this. We can't put society
Speaker 1: through this. Given what we know about this disease and
Speaker 1: the lethality and the risks from it. It would be
Speaker 1: reckless and irresponsible to lockdown again, even if there is
Speaker 1: a spike in someplace, even if it trends up in
Speaker 1: some places. You know, you're you're putting so much pressure
Speaker 1: on society, and it's wrong. It's wrong that the government
Speaker 1: is making stupid decisions around this, and we cannot allow
Speaker 1: them to suspend the constitution, suspend our rights to spend,
Speaker 1: free enterprise and the huge sectors of the economy, because ultimately,
Speaker 1: this is about shutting down now so that Trump can't
Speaker 1: win the election in the fall. They'll pretend that it's
Speaker 1: all about saving lives, but if you look at the
Speaker 1: national media giving Cuomo a pass on all this, it's
Speaker 1: not about live It's about beating Trump, just like so
Speaker 1: much else that we see. Thanks for listening to The
Speaker 1: Bus Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts at
Speaker 1: the iHeart Radio app or wherever you get your podcasts.
Speaker 1: All right, roll call time, everybody, And as you know,
Speaker 1: we don't have producer Marking this week. He is off
Speaker 1: for the week. So if there's any you know, weird
Speaker 1: things that happened on the show, any weird hounds, if
Speaker 1: I forget what day it is or something like that,
Speaker 1: Mark's not here. Producer Brandon though, is keeping the house
Speaker 1: in order. But just so you know, we're kind of
Speaker 1: doing things a little differently right now, and let's get
Speaker 1: to it. Sarah is the first up. Hey Buck, thanks
Speaker 1: so much for your call for wartime Conservatives. I wanted
Speaker 1: to share what has recently happened in Washington State. Our
Speaker 1: far left state legislature passed a partisan, middle of the
Speaker 1: night bill that requires all K to twelve schools to
Speaker 1: teach comprehensive sex ed approved curricular largely provided by Planned Parenthood.
Speaker 1: The people of Washington rose up against this lunacy. We
Speaker 1: began collecting signatures to put this bill before the voters
Speaker 1: in November. We needed one hundred and thirty thousand signatures
Speaker 1: to do so. In the middle of the pandemic lockdown,
Speaker 1: we rose up and collected a historic number of signatures,
Speaker 1: two hundred and sixty six thousand, over twice what was
Speaker 1: in the highest number of signatures ever collected on any
Speaker 1: piece of legislation and virtual virtually zero coverage from the press,
Speaker 1: not a peep. Awake, Christians and Conservatives. Time to get
Speaker 1: busy and take our country back. Love the show. Keep
Speaker 1: up the good work well, Sarah, Thank you, and you
Speaker 1: keep up the good work. Look at this, getting signatures,
Speaker 1: taking action, gathering together, having your voices heard, on an
Speaker 1: issue like this, Yeah, I don't even know what this
Speaker 1: sex ed curriculum is, but k through twelve schools. First off,
Speaker 1: I would want to know at what age do they
Speaker 1: start this sex ed teaching, And I would want to
Speaker 1: know what they are teaching. And I'm sure it's a
Speaker 1: lot of stuff that people would find pre objectionable. Remember
Speaker 1: this for those who are wondering what the real implications
Speaker 1: are of that Supreme Court decision from last week, written
Speaker 1: by Gorsitch selling out constitutional conservatism so he doesn't have
Speaker 1: to be the bad guy on trans equality and trans
Speaker 1: rights and the LGBTQ plus agenda. I believe that is
Speaker 1: the I believe that is a full acronym of the movement.
Speaker 1: But what Corsage did means that you're going to see
Speaker 1: a lot more aggressive teaching. And some would argue brainwashing
Speaker 1: of very young people into the belief that you remember it.
Speaker 1: Now it's not a belief anymore. Now it's a civil
Speaker 1: rights sision because of the Supreme Court decision, hasn't been
Speaker 1: delworth by the state legislatures, has not been allowed to
Speaker 1: be voted on. No, no, no. Someone who decides without
Speaker 1: any physical or biological basis for it just because they
Speaker 1: feel someone who decides that they are a different gender
Speaker 1: is now to be, as a matter of law, treated
Speaker 1: and even spoken to as if they were that gender
Speaker 1: or else, You're gonna imagine what they're going to be
Speaker 1: teaching your kids. And anyone who brings up the science science,
Speaker 1: I thought we liked science, right. I thought the Left
Speaker 1: was all about it. And when it brings up the
Speaker 1: science on this and for example, points to the contagion
Speaker 1: that occurs among young people. When there's one twelve year
Speaker 1: old who decides that, let's say he is transgender, then
Speaker 1: there are all of a sudden or other eleven and
Speaker 1: twelve year olds who decide that they are transgender. And
Speaker 1: statistically it is not possible if this is just a
Speaker 1: pocket of transgenderism that has been discovered. This is a
Speaker 1: psychological contagious contagion effect that happens where people who are
Speaker 1: very young and impression will say, oh, that person is
Speaker 1: now getting a lot of attention, and they're all of
Speaker 1: a sudden very important to a whole bunch of adults
Speaker 1: around them. Maybe I am too, Or even if it's
Speaker 1: as simple as that person has certain feelings, I have
Speaker 1: those feelings sometimes too. But I'm not going to wait
Speaker 1: for puberty and for growth and for maturity. I'm going
Speaker 1: to make a decision now about puberty blockers and hormone
Speaker 1: therapy and perhaps even relatively radical surgery that will affect
Speaker 1: me for the rest of my life. And don't expect
Speaker 1: anyone to present you with the truth about the happiness
Speaker 1: of those who engage who have gender what is now
Speaker 1: called gender affirmation surgery, when it is clearly it is
Speaker 1: at a minimum gender transition surgery. Okay, they call it affirmation.
Speaker 1: This is a political trick. It's gender transition. And if
Speaker 1: you look at the happiness or lack thereof of people
Speaker 1: long term who have that surgery, the data is quite clear.
Speaker 1: But the data cannot be allowed to interfere with an
Speaker 1: important political narrative, and as we know, the LGBTQ plus
Speaker 1: agenda is essential to the left. There can be no
Speaker 1: challenging it. And now, as a function of law, you
Speaker 1: risk your career, you risk your money, You risk so
Speaker 1: much if you try to challenge it openly. As I've said, now,
Speaker 1: now we're at a point where you better call someone
Speaker 1: who was a he, not just a sheet, but maybe
Speaker 1: Z or they. That's right, plural pronouns for individuals. You're
Speaker 1: going to have to do this in the workplace or else,
Speaker 1: and you're not going to be You're not gonna be
Speaker 1: viewed as a hero. You're gonna be one loan voice
Speaker 1: the media destroys. You will be charging the machine gun
Speaker 1: nests my friends without a plan to take it. So
Speaker 1: don't do it. I had a friend recently asked me
Speaker 1: his company's coming under pressure from Black Lives Matter activist
Speaker 1: and he said, you know, what do you think I
Speaker 1: should do? And I said, I don't want your company
Speaker 1: to get in I don't want you to be boycott
Speaker 1: or something. You know, if this is not something where
Speaker 1: you're comfortable, if you don't have the ability right now
Speaker 1: to comfortably take that stand and you can't, don't get
Speaker 1: crushed to just be another example the left uses not
Speaker 1: everyone should be in the fight. Everyone should be in
Speaker 1: the fight in the ways that they can that are sensible.
Speaker 1: But you know, don't don't sacrifice yourself to the mob
Speaker 1: for no reason that does that does know one any good?
Speaker 1: I know there's complexity here, it's very easy. He was like, yeah,
Speaker 1: you know, get in the fight. Do it? Would no, no, no,
Speaker 1: be savvy about it. Be savvy about it. And but look,
Speaker 1: see Sarah is riding in from Washington, and she's telling
Speaker 1: us about an instance where they did they took public action,
Speaker 1: they were savvy, and they won the fight. Or they're
Speaker 1: winning the fight, I should say, so that's how you
Speaker 1: got to do it, Ryan Buck god Willing. After Trump
Speaker 1: wins a second term, is it time for him to
Speaker 1: pursue expanding the Supreme Court after the DACA ruling. I
Speaker 1: can't see any harm in the pursuit. The court has
Speaker 1: to be fixed somehow. At the very least, it puts
Speaker 1: the left on record arguing against it. My shield has
Speaker 1: been taken away by those who are supposed to hold
Speaker 1: it high. Ryan, I don't think that the answer from
Speaker 1: our side should be court packing, because that's what the
Speaker 1: left always says they want to do when they don't
Speaker 1: get their way so effectively. Once you open that door,
Speaker 1: the left will do it. They'll they'll do it even more.
Speaker 1: I don't have a good answer for you, though, about
Speaker 1: how do we deal with the fact that the left
Speaker 1: gets judges that are activist, leftist democrats and they are
Speaker 1: entirely reliable. You get a Democrat put forward a left
Speaker 1: wing judge. Guess what that judge is going to give
Speaker 1: you what you need on the big cases ninety nine
Speaker 1: times out of it, really one hundred times out of
Speaker 1: one hundred. With conservatives like Roberts and Gorcich. Oh my,
Speaker 1: it's more like a fifty fifty proposition on any case
Speaker 1: where conservative conservatives and constitutionalism are at are involved. Right,
Speaker 1: it's a fifty fifty proposition. You know, the best judge
Speaker 1: currently sit on though. The two best judges currently on
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court are Clarence Thomas and Alito. They're the
Speaker 1: two best right now. They're They're the two that are
Speaker 1: principled and stalwarts and they keep it real. Everybody else
Speaker 1: on that court, I mean, Cavanaugh's okay, He's been pretty
Speaker 1: good so far, but not great on process, though he
Speaker 1: at least is willing to say the left is insane
Speaker 1: and may it up as they go along. Like Kavanaugh
Speaker 1: will say, you're just pretending words have no meaning because
Speaker 1: you want a certain thing. That's not okay, even if
Speaker 1: I like the thing that you're trying to achieve with that.
Speaker 1: That's the Kavanaugh position. But he at least believes in
Speaker 1: the law is a thing. I mean, the left is
Speaker 1: just like, whatever you want, let's do it, and Roberts
Speaker 1: goes along with it, and even Gorsiche will go along
Speaker 1: with it. So no, Ryan, I don't think that court
Speaker 1: packing is the answer. But if you're saying, Buck, what
Speaker 1: is the answer, I don't have it right now. I
Speaker 1: don't think anybody does. I just can't. I can't think
Speaker 1: of what it would be, quite honestly, Matthew, Buck, You're awesome.
Speaker 1: Never missed the show the other day. You had an
Speaker 1: email that said Gorsiche had an ulterior motive for his
Speaker 1: ruling to define sex. You ask how that would ever
Speaker 1: come up. I think there'll be tons of lawsuits in
Speaker 1: the coming months. The biggest one that comes to mind
Speaker 1: is the recent law pass in Idaho that bands transgendered
Speaker 1: athletes from competing in its opposite their biological gender. Now,
Speaker 1: I don't think Gorstich thought many steps ahead to plan this,
Speaker 1: but it is a certainty that case will eventually get
Speaker 1: to Scotus, and in order to settle it, they will
Speaker 1: have to make a ruling on the definition of sex.
Speaker 1: Stay safe in New York. Keep the fight shields high, Matthew,
Speaker 1: I'm familiar with this. I believe the Department of Justice
Speaker 1: under Barr has said that they will defend the ban
Speaker 1: on the transgendered athletes in Idaho. But this is a
Speaker 1: very good example of just how aggressive and how fast
Speaker 1: the left moves on these issues, and how it starts
Speaker 1: with something that sounds somewhat reasonable and very rapidly changes
Speaker 1: into something else. Right, all of a sudden, it's not, Hey,
Speaker 1: let's just be nice to people and be accepting of them,
Speaker 1: even if they're even if they're having a lot of
Speaker 1: you know, emotional and psychological difficulties with this position everything else,
Speaker 1: and you know, let's make sure that we're helpful and
Speaker 1: kind to them, which you know, I think we should
Speaker 1: always be helpful and kind of people. But it goes
Speaker 1: from that to do what we say or else pretend
Speaker 1: that a two hundred pound male competing in you know,
Speaker 1: women's lacrosse doesn't have a biological advantage over all the
Speaker 1: women in that sport. You better pretend or else. Well,
Speaker 1: this is stupid, this is idiocy. You know, I see
Speaker 1: so many leftists who are so pathetic and cowardly that
Speaker 1: they'll even say things like, oh, you know this, you know,
Speaker 1: I know plenty of women Whenever a conservative brings us up.
Speaker 1: This happens all the time. I know plenty of women
Speaker 1: who could kick your butt. And it's like, no, you really,
Speaker 1: if you're talking about a two hundred pound, six foot
Speaker 1: tall male who's in who's in reasonable condition, in his
Speaker 1: thirties or forties or twenties, you don't know plenty of
Speaker 1: women who could beat him up. Okays, to stop saying.
Speaker 1: That's not being an idiot. Men are on average for
Speaker 1: the same biological structure, meaning the same basic height and
Speaker 1: even weight. Men are on average double the upper body
Speaker 1: muscle of women because of biology. All right, this is
Speaker 1: why it's so you know, it's so important to protect women.
Speaker 1: It's why it's such an odious thing for anyone to
Speaker 1: ever lay a hand on a woman. I mean, for
Speaker 1: there's a lot of reasons for it, but one of
Speaker 1: them is just that women are not able to defend
Speaker 1: themselves against even your average woman cannot defend herself with
Speaker 1: her hands effectively against an average male. Now, all policy
Speaker 1: is based upon what is generally true. There will always
Speaker 1: be exceptions in any policy. But to find to be
Speaker 1: living in a society where the existence of extremes that
Speaker 1: exceptions as allowed to undermine policy that is generally to
Speaker 1: the good and true. Then we have a country. Then
Speaker 1: we have what we have right now, where you have madness.
Speaker 1: I mean, this is absurd, This is insane. Everyone understands.
Speaker 1: I mean, if I was a decent, just decent high
Speaker 1: school athlete in a few sports, and I rode crew
Speaker 1: for two years in college, and I'm not trying to
Speaker 1: this is not about me, but I can just tell
Speaker 1: you having played I played soccer with the women's soccer
Speaker 1: team in the off season for funds. Sometimes, you know,
Speaker 1: they'd bring guys over to we do these you know,
Speaker 1: mixed team uh, you know, for exhibitions and such. I
Speaker 1: played basketball at the women's basketball team. I would have
Speaker 1: been a three sport All American in D three women's athletics.
Speaker 1: And that's not bragging because anybody, any guy that I know,
Speaker 1: was a decent high school athlete, certainly the D three
Speaker 1: level would have been the same thing. Three sport All American,
Speaker 1: maybe a D one three sport All American. Quite honestly,
Speaker 1: and we all know this, right, any any guy listening
Speaker 1: to this who's reasonably athletic, who was pretty okay at
Speaker 1: sports at the high school level, I'm not gonna talking
Speaker 1: about college, you'd be like, yeah, I could have played
Speaker 1: D one college athletics, and that's that's not bragging. This
Speaker 1: is a biological reality, folks. This is why. And you
Speaker 1: even have the left so insane now that they'll say, well,
Speaker 1: you know, a transgendered MMA fighter, and that already has
Speaker 1: happened with fallon Fox. Transgender mma fighter just annihilating women
Speaker 1: in the ring. We're supposed to believe that this is
Speaker 1: like normal and safe and okay. The left, the left
Speaker 1: will sacrifice women and womanhood and femininity and the female gender.
Speaker 1: And just ask JK Rowling about this. The female gender
Speaker 1: is being destroyed by the Left in the name of
Speaker 1: expanding gender equality. It's a I know, it's quite a conundrum,
Speaker 1: but that's what's happening. You're in the freedom hunt. This
Speaker 1: is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. All right, more roll call,
Speaker 1: come in your way now. And I just want to
Speaker 1: say that I always appreciate everybody writing in and sharing
Speaker 1: your thoughts here, and make sure you call into this week.
Speaker 1: We'll get to voicemails on Friday, maybe even some Thursday
Speaker 1: voicemails this week eight four four nine two five eight
Speaker 1: four four nine hundred Buck. Also make sure you go
Speaker 1: to buck Sexton dot com. I will have an original
Speaker 1: editorial up, if not tomorrow, certainly by the next day.
Speaker 1: Going to be writing every week as well as posting
Speaker 1: more and more from the show pieces written by the team.
Speaker 1: You need to check it out bucksexton dot com. We
Speaker 1: want as many as possibly go into this site on
Speaker 1: daily basis. You can also listen to the podcast there,
Speaker 1: and please do spread the word about the podcast. It
Speaker 1: feels like everybody and their grandma has a podcast these days.
Speaker 1: You got these major news networks that are releasing their
Speaker 1: broadcasts as podcasts. I don't know why anybody would listen
Speaker 1: to this, I mean, it's but people do. So more
Speaker 1: than ever, we really need you to spread the word
Speaker 1: and get people onto Team Buck because we want to
Speaker 1: make sure that we stay well into the top one
Speaker 1: hundred podcasts where we currently are and really want to
Speaker 1: continue to push. We got down to about top sixty
Speaker 1: at one point about a month ago, I think, and
Speaker 1: we really wanted to break into the top fifty. So
Speaker 1: we're hoping to do that and we need your help
Speaker 1: to do that by just telling people, Hey, check out
Speaker 1: this guy Buck Sexton. If every person listening to this
Speaker 1: just on podcast. Never mind the huge audience we have
Speaker 1: on radio. If every person listening on podcast across the
Speaker 1: tree shared it with one person, we would be in
Speaker 1: the top certainly in the top fifty, maybe in the
Speaker 1: top twenty five overnight. So all I need is everybody
Speaker 1: listening to the podcast. I got one person to start
Speaker 1: listening in with the team, and that would be fantastic.
Speaker 1: All right, let's get back to it. We were at
Speaker 1: let me see, John, Oh no, we'll do Matthew. I'm sorry, Buck,
Speaker 1: you're awesome. Never miss the show. Well, thank you so much.
Speaker 1: I really, I really appreciate that. And we try to
Speaker 1: be awesome here, and we're doing everything we can to
Speaker 1: be as awesome as we can. What don't we got here?
Speaker 1: He shares. The other day he said that gorsh, Oh no,
Speaker 1: matt we already did. Matthew, my bad. All right, here
Speaker 1: we go, John Buck. If you don't, I don't know
Speaker 1: if you watched Trump's rally, but I'm assuming you did.
Speaker 1: When it started, he seemed tired and somewhat defeated, but wow,
Speaker 1: once he got going, he was unstoppable. It was just
Speaker 1: what we needed. I loved his shots at the fake news,
Speaker 1: especially when he just tossed his glass of water the
Speaker 1: side to work the crowd. Feels like the tide might
Speaker 1: be turning back. Or in the worlds of Michael Scott.
Speaker 1: Oh how the turntables. Yes, indeed, John good, Michael Scott
Speaker 1: reference and God bless and thank you very much for
Speaker 1: listening to the show and honor to have you here
Speaker 1: with us. All right, everybody that's going to be it
Speaker 1: for today, thank you so much for tuning in. Please
Speaker 1: do pass the buck. Get one person that's you know
Speaker 1: in your life, one conservative or just one moderate, one
Speaker 1: one individual who needs a little more political analysis in
Speaker 1: their life to listen. We'll be back with you tomorrow,
Speaker 1: same time and place. I know you all. Miss producer Mark,
Speaker 1: I'll tell him you said, Hi Shields, Hi,