Speaker 1: You're in the freedom hunt. This is the Buck Sexton
Speaker 1: Show podcast. Get more from Buck by following him on
Speaker 1: social media at buck Sexton on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.
Speaker 1: Welcome friends for the Buck Sexton Show. Now it is official.
Speaker 1: I'm in telling you for days about the way they
Speaker 1: are constricting the like the tyrannical snake. They are constricting
Speaker 1: around free speech, eroding and squeezing beyond recognition the First Amendment,
Speaker 1: and doing so in the most pernicious of ways. And
Speaker 1: here we are now with the official declaration from YouTube.
Speaker 1: But you have to understand. YouTube is owned by Google,
Speaker 1: and it has a parent company, a company known as Alphabet.
Speaker 1: And this is the most powerful internet company in the world.
Speaker 1: That's actually even more powerful than Facebook or Twitter or
Speaker 1: any of the others. The only thing that comes close
Speaker 1: to it really is Amazon. But Google is effectively an
Speaker 1: internet monopolist. They can demonetize you on YouTube. Sure they've
Speaker 1: already done that to me, but they also can make
Speaker 1: sure that you are dropped down in search results. They
Speaker 1: can decide what is seen about you and what is
Speaker 1: not seen about you. Enormous amounts of power. And not
Speaker 1: only this is a private company that led the American
Speaker 1: people and led the regulators in DC, led Congress to
Speaker 1: believe for a long time that it was effectively a neutral,
Speaker 1: algorithm based internet search and communications company. I mean it
Speaker 1: does a lot of things, right your Gmail, your Google searches.
Speaker 1: I can't even name all the things that Google's involved
Speaker 1: in right now, but they've let you know because they've
Speaker 1: put out on YouTube while we're still trying to figure
Speaker 1: out what's going on this on in this election. There
Speaker 1: are lawsuits currently out there in court that are making
Speaker 1: certain declarations. If you say that you support those lawsuits,
Speaker 1: that you think they have merit, that you think they're true,
Speaker 1: you run the risk of being canceled. And this is
Speaker 1: not theoretical. This is not a conspiracy. Official statement coming
Speaker 1: out from YouTube this morning, we just shared an update
Speaker 1: on YouTube election efforts, including how we're handling community guidelines.
Speaker 1: Our policies. These are This is a quote from official
Speaker 1: YouTube Public affairs. Our policies disallow content alleging widespread fraud
Speaker 1: or errors change the outcome of a historical US presidential election.
Speaker 1: We allow this type of commentary for current elections as
Speaker 1: election officials work to finalize counts. December eighth was the
Speaker 1: safe Harbor deadline for the US presidential election, and enough
Speaker 1: states have now certified their results to determine a president elect.
Speaker 1: As such, starting today, we will remove new content uploaded
Speaker 1: on or after December ninth, twenty twenty alleging that widespread
Speaker 1: fraud or errors change the outcome of the US presidential election.
Speaker 1: For example, we will remove videos claiming that a presidential
Speaker 1: candidate won the election as a result of widespread software
Speaker 1: glitches or counting errors. This content that includes sufficient context
Speaker 1: may remain, similar to how we allow COVID information that
Speaker 1: is sufficient with ESDA content, etc. Etc. Okay, if you
Speaker 1: say that this election was stolen now on YouTube, you
Speaker 1: will get your content pulled down. You will be demonetized. Now,
Speaker 1: you may think, and this is a big problem, we
Speaker 1: have so much of conservative media. We have these places
Speaker 1: we go, we have these areas where we think, okay,
Speaker 1: at least there's there's some safety there. Talk radio is
Speaker 1: really the ultimate example of that. We still we use
Speaker 1: the really the oldest method of mass communication short of
Speaker 1: the printing press in existence to great effect. And we
Speaker 1: have one cable channel. I know there are a couple others,
Speaker 1: but they're not in the distribution that they need to
Speaker 1: be in one hundred million homes to compete. We have
Speaker 1: one major cable channel and that's it. And a lot
Speaker 1: of you, I know are I've seen your notes, I've
Speaker 1: seen your messages about what's going on over there, So
Speaker 1: I'm aware of your thoughts on that and the rest
Speaker 1: of the media ecosystem, which determines what people are reading
Speaker 1: in the news, what people think is going on in
Speaker 1: the country. How dangerous is COVID. You have no way
Speaker 1: of knowing. The only way you could know is by
Speaker 1: reading media outlets. The only way you can actually get
Speaker 1: a real sense of this nationwide is newspapers, website, TV, radio, etc.
Speaker 1: That's true of all of us. This is the flow
Speaker 1: of information, which means it is our mass perception in
Speaker 1: the public of what's happening in this country. And the
Speaker 1: most powerful companies involved in that are straight up saying,
Speaker 1: Biden one, it's over, shut up, or we'll come after you.
Speaker 1: They're straight up saying it. And if you think that
Speaker 1: this that there are some people that are going to
Speaker 1: withstand this with their websites or withstand this and you know,
Speaker 1: continue on as is, at least on these platforms. I
Speaker 1: gotta tell you something it's not going to happen because
Speaker 1: they will do this. They can demonetize YouTube doesn't need
Speaker 1: conservative creators, doesn't need them, doesn't care. Same thing with Twitter,
Speaker 1: they don't need you, they don't need us. Very very
Speaker 1: wealthy companies that can withstand this. So what happens is
Speaker 1: also other companies that rely on Google for their ads,
Speaker 1: other media organizations that have enormous budgets and have a
Speaker 1: lot of payroll to meet, they're going to start falling
Speaker 1: in line. This is like a dictate from on high.
Speaker 1: This is essentially the left wing controlled Internet telling you
Speaker 1: it's over. Shut up, you're not allowed to talk about
Speaker 1: this anymore. If you do, we'll hit you. And then
Speaker 1: what happens is they don't hit the people that go
Speaker 1: along with it, and everyone forgets why is this person
Speaker 1: growing so fast online? You don't think that people are
Speaker 1: cutting side deals with these companies. You don't think that
Speaker 1: there's controlled opposition that are so called conservatives who are
Speaker 1: basically never trumpers, but they make deals with these internet
Speaker 1: companies so that they don't get touched. You can see
Speaker 1: who's upset about this and who still profits, who still
Speaker 1: grows and has no problem here who's getting throttled and
Speaker 1: who's not. Oh yes, there's money here, there's influence, there's prestige.
Speaker 1: There's a lot at stake for people. Watch very closely.
Speaker 1: Who speaks out about this and who just has the
Speaker 1: follower account keep going up and up. Who's just minting
Speaker 1: money while being a conservative? That's the game. This is
Speaker 1: how they run the most effective influence operation imaginable on
Speaker 1: a massive scale. This is how the This is how
Speaker 1: the left wins. This is how they win. I don't
Speaker 1: have an answer. I have a rallying cry that we fight,
Speaker 1: that we talk about it, that we raise the alarm,
Speaker 1: that we demand the appeal of Section two thirty. People
Speaker 1: say it won't do, it's not perfect. Well, this is
Speaker 1: awful what we have right now? What I mean, the
Speaker 1: the advantage the internet monopolists. Yeah, maybe they'll have a
Speaker 1: competitor or ten years from now. What if the country
Speaker 1: looks like in ten years if you can't say things
Speaker 1: that you believe to be true on the internet, And
Speaker 1: remember the creators that they go after, the content creators
Speaker 1: and the pundits and the commentators and the you know,
Speaker 1: the the reporters. They all they have to do is
Speaker 1: shut them down. And then how do people that are
Speaker 1: trying to you know, operate, operate at their jobs that
Speaker 1: aren't in the media. How do they get the information
Speaker 1: they need to know what's really going on? You know,
Speaker 1: where they get it from? The websites that aren't throttled,
Speaker 1: the websites that aren't shadow band, the people who are
Speaker 1: all of a sudden having all their stuff shared freely.
Speaker 1: We had just begun to go toe to toe with
Speaker 1: the left wing mainstream media apparatus the last really the
Speaker 1: last ten years or so, because because people realize that
Speaker 1: half the country wasn't being properly served. I mean, there's
Speaker 1: a reason that Fox News is a ratings juggernaut, and
Speaker 1: there's a reason that even though there's a tremendous amount
Speaker 1: of money to be made in conservative media, there's always
Speaker 1: these hurdles. You can't get the right sponsors. You know,
Speaker 1: if you're a major corporation, you won't go with them
Speaker 1: right that they won't do that for You can't get
Speaker 1: Mercedes Benz if you're a cable news channel, they of
Speaker 1: all of the on the right, on the left, or
Speaker 1: you can be lunatic MSNBC and you know, Amazon will
Speaker 1: sponsor you and all this. These are all of the impediments.
Speaker 1: So you want to know why a party like the
Speaker 1: Democrats who are for defunding police, socialism, abortion for all
Speaker 1: nine months of a pregnancy, toxic identity, politics, open borders.
Speaker 1: You want to know how they're able to say that
Speaker 1: they now won the election because of what I'm telling you,
Speaker 1: This is how they win. We have to fight against this,
Speaker 1: We have to understand these mechanisms. I know there are
Speaker 1: people out there who want to say, oh, but you
Speaker 1: know there's someone in the administra and the Trump administration
Speaker 1: and you know, now this is eight D chess and
Speaker 1: we're gonna know. I'm telling you that's not true. They
Speaker 1: think they've got us. They think they've got us. You're
Speaker 1: going to see a drop off. You're going to see
Speaker 1: people all of a sudden, they'll they'll be this this
Speaker 1: focus on other things, palatable stories for the right, but
Speaker 1: not digging in on I mean, you know, I dig
Speaker 1: in on COVID as hard as I dig it on
Speaker 1: the election stuff, or completely being bamboozled. We're having the
Speaker 1: wool pulled over our eyes as a nation. People are
Speaker 1: losing their livelihoods, they're going bankrupt, their lives are being
Speaker 1: ruined and they're not going to be fixed. In ninety
Speaker 1: days when the vaccine starts to hit critical masks, they're
Speaker 1: not going to be They're not lives aren't going to
Speaker 1: be fixed. They're not going to be made whole. So
Speaker 1: that has to that debate, that argument that stopping the
Speaker 1: madness has to happen. Now they're shutting it all down.
Speaker 1: I'm trying to come up with better answers. I know
Speaker 1: there are these platforms, but they're nascent platforms. There are alternatives.
Speaker 1: The Trump administration still has the power of the executive branch.
Speaker 1: Maybe there are ways that they could use it to
Speaker 1: some effect. In the meantime, I know they're focused in
Speaker 1: on what's really happening with this election, But keep in
Speaker 1: mind now the people around the administration who are trying
Speaker 1: to get the word out we're trying to talk about
Speaker 1: and they do it by keyword now, So if you
Speaker 1: talk about let's say suitcases and Georgia, you are targeted.
Speaker 1: There are people who build their whole businesses on this.
Speaker 1: Google can destroy name a website that is a favorite
Speaker 1: conservative website of yours, with the possible exception of foxnews
Speaker 1: dot com. Google can basically destroy them, cut off their ads,
Speaker 1: drop them down in search. Facebook the same thing can
Speaker 1: destroy them. When I worked for a website years ago,
Speaker 1: the Facebook traffic that we were that was taken away
Speaker 1: from the site when they changed the algorithm was catastrophic,
Speaker 1: led to a lot of layoffs. This is real power
Speaker 1: and its power to determine the conversation. It's power to
Speaker 1: tell you what you can say, and to tell you
Speaker 1: what you'll see and what you'll know. The Internet was
Speaker 1: initially this free and open playing field for ideas for communications.
Speaker 1: That's what it was. That the promise of it. I'm
Speaker 1: going back now to the nineties, you know, the CompuServe
Speaker 1: an aol era, right, The Internet was this place that
Speaker 1: put us all in connection with each other, but also
Speaker 1: gave you access to this repository that was endless of
Speaker 1: ideas and information and facts. And now the left, because
Speaker 1: they are collectivists and because they are inherently totalitarian in
Speaker 1: their mindset, because they think that they have all the
Speaker 1: absolute answers and no one else can have alternative answers.
Speaker 1: Now they want to use what was the greatest, the
Speaker 1: greatest apparatus for the spread of information and the increase
Speaker 1: of communications. They are using it now in a way
Speaker 1: really similar to China to control your mind. You don't
Speaker 1: think that's what's happening. They are programming you. They're showing
Speaker 1: you what you can see, they're showing you what you
Speaker 1: can read. And anyone who tries to get in and
Speaker 1: tell you a hold on a second, that's not the truth.
Speaker 1: They shut that person down. They make them scarer, They
Speaker 1: make it so that they can't get followers, they can't
Speaker 1: pay their bills. Maybe they got to find a new job,
Speaker 1: a new industry. Maybe they got to learn to code,
Speaker 1: go work for Google. I know, for the ride. For conservatives,
Speaker 1: we're generally just culturally in our media taste, we're not
Speaker 1: as as tech involved. You know. Somehow we don't have
Speaker 1: a single major and all props in respect to parlor
Speaker 1: and Rumble, I'm not I'm all on them. I use them.
Speaker 1: They're great, But we don't have a single major, critical
Speaker 1: mass social media platform that never mind his right wing
Speaker 1: that is devoted to the ideals of free speech. For
Speaker 1: those of you who are saying you want to, you know,
Speaker 1: you want to go listen to like some local radio
Speaker 1: guy right now, he's like, wow, No, we're gonna win
Speaker 1: and we're we're gonna win and just yelling all this stuff.
Speaker 1: Let me tell you, We're not going to win if
Speaker 1: this continues. We cannot beat this machinery's message unless we
Speaker 1: attack the machinery itself. You want to see how this
Speaker 1: election fight goes and want to be able to win
Speaker 1: the election fights that will come after it, We must
Speaker 1: address this problem. It is essential and it doesn't matter
Speaker 1: if you're on Twitter or Facebook or these things. It's
Speaker 1: the most powerful tool for controlling the conversation nationally that exists,
Speaker 1: bar not no question, and it has been now weaponized
Speaker 1: officially against Trump, against his supporters. We are we are
Speaker 1: in COVID lockdown, and now we are in election information lockdown.
Speaker 1: Doesn't really feel like America, does it. Thanks for listening
Speaker 1: to the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Get the latest news
Speaker 1: and information from Bucks by heading to buck Sexton dot com.
Speaker 1: Remember Russia collusion. This was a truly bizarre, deranged, evidence
Speaker 1: free theory that the Trump campaign and then Donald Trump
Speaker 1: himself worked with the Russians to somehow steal the twenty
Speaker 1: sixteen election. This was treated as gospel by the mainstream
Speaker 1: media for three years. I mean they still do now.
Speaker 1: But this was something they continued on pretending was true.
Speaker 1: Was there any effort ever to penalize people online for
Speaker 1: the lies of Russia collusion? Has any scrubbing of social
Speaker 1: media accounts or websites occurred where they said, you know what, sorry,
Speaker 1: that was all a lie and that was used as
Speaker 1: a political weapon to undermine the sitting president President Donald J. Trump?
Speaker 1: Was there any of that, know, But now that they
Speaker 1: think the power is transferring to their hands, in fact,
Speaker 1: they're ensuring the power will transfer into their hands with
Speaker 1: moves like this, Now they're going to want to use
Speaker 1: it and they want to engage in reprisals. They're looking
Speaker 1: to make examples of people too. And they pretend that
Speaker 1: this is around some principle. I mean, why aren't we
Speaker 1: having these social media CEOs sit before the American people
Speaker 1: that explain how Russia collusion is not something that was
Speaker 1: ever throttled, band shadow, band shut down, demonetized, never led
Speaker 1: to any of that, even though it was all lies. CNN, MSNBC,
Speaker 1: The New York Times, the Washington Post, the LA Times,
Speaker 1: go down the list, PBS, all these different channels and
Speaker 1: stations just full of insane lies about Russia collusion. Oh
Speaker 1: any day now, Oh. Rachel Maddow built a huge audience
Speaker 1: at MSNBC lying to them like a bunch of idiots
Speaker 1: about how Trump was a Russian Kremlin asset, never apologize
Speaker 1: for it, never penalized for it. So I want us
Speaker 1: to understand what the new rules are. They can lie
Speaker 1: about the president, the sitting president. They can call him
Speaker 1: a traitor, they can call him a criminal, they can
Speaker 1: call him anything they want, and they can use the
Speaker 1: media ecosystem as an echo chamber. So they convince enough
Speaker 1: foolish Americans that this is actually true. But on the
Speaker 1: other side, for real questions like what are we doing
Speaker 1: on COVID and what happened to this election, they shut
Speaker 1: it down. So not only will they prevent us from
Speaker 1: getting answers, they use that same information control, that same
Speaker 1: apparatus of propaganda to lie to our very faces. They
Speaker 1: say they're doing this to prevent lying and to protect
Speaker 1: facts and accuracy until they all have to be held
Speaker 1: to account for Russia collusion. This is a farce. You're
Speaker 1: in the freedom hunt. This is the buck Sexton Show
Speaker 1: podcast from more buck Head to Bucksexton dot com and
Speaker 1: remember to subscribe to the podcast. Are now for some
Speaker 1: good news, although in a way it's also troubling that
Speaker 1: it came to this. I told you that General Flynn
Speaker 1: was pardoned by the President. You'd no doubt have seen
Speaker 1: or heard that a lot of places. It was pretty
Speaker 1: big news when it happened. And in response to that,
Speaker 1: you had Judge Emmett Sullivan produce a thirty four page
Speaker 1: opinion from the Federal Bench that shows you what final
Speaker 1: stage Trump derangement syndrome looks like. General Flynn is an
Speaker 1: innocent man. They ruined this guy, and they used the
Speaker 1: law to settle political scores against him. They ruined this guy,
Speaker 1: or tried to based on lies, deception, the destruction of
Speaker 1: his constitutional rights. It was all politicized. It was a
Speaker 1: partisan hit. That's what they did to General Flynn. We
Speaker 1: all know it. This is very clear. But it took
Speaker 1: a pardon from the President of the United States to
Speaker 1: get a federal judge to stop going after him. And
Speaker 1: then he wrote a thirty four page thirty four page
Speaker 1: opinion from the Bench where he talked about how Flynn
Speaker 1: is guilty and the administration shouldn't have done this, and
Speaker 1: this is you know, yes, they have the power, but
Speaker 1: this is a miscarriage of justice. Like a lunatic. He
Speaker 1: continued a prosecution by judge after the Department of Justice,
Speaker 1: which is the prosecutorial arm of the federal government, dropped
Speaker 1: the case and told him we never should have brought
Speaker 1: this case. But he thinks he's respecting the system by
Speaker 1: trashing it because he doesn't like a decision that they made.
Speaker 1: It was their decision. What is this guy doing? Yes,
Speaker 1: General Flynn is no longer in criminal jeopardy and he
Speaker 1: has been officially pardoned. But we also need to know
Speaker 1: that Judge Emmett Sullivan is a Trump deranged lunatic and
Speaker 1: he should be and I mean this removed from the
Speaker 1: federal bench and barred forthwith right away. That's what should happen.
Speaker 1: This guy is scary. Do you think if you're a
Speaker 1: person known in public life as a conservative, as a
Speaker 1: Trump supporter, do you think that you could get a
Speaker 1: fair trial and Judge Emmett Sullivan's courtroom. This guy's a
Speaker 1: federal circuit judge in DC. It's a pretty big deal.
Speaker 1: You think you get a fair trial? Absolutely not. This
Speaker 1: guy's a disgrace, a disgrace to the judiciary. But he
Speaker 1: shows you what we're up against. This was unheard of
Speaker 1: when the when the DJ says, the judge doesn't get
Speaker 1: to pick somebody. Does a judge get to say, you
Speaker 1: know what, I don't like this guy. I'm gonna bring
Speaker 1: him into my courtroom and prosecute him. It's basically what
Speaker 1: they did to Judge Sullivan, I mean, to General Flynn,
Speaker 1: completely insane, but I'm very so so it's good that
Speaker 1: General Flynn is no longer in criminal jeopardy, but they
Speaker 1: dragged him through four years of this madness, four years
Speaker 1: of this insanity for what, for what? To make an
Speaker 1: example of him? And unfortunately that still stands. Do you
Speaker 1: think that now people might have second thoughts, especially to
Speaker 1: support Trump if he's leaving that Oval office in January,
Speaker 1: which and I'll leave it to you. I'll leave the
Speaker 1: percentages to you, but certainly as a possibility, I think
Speaker 1: we could say it's a probability. I've been saying that
Speaker 1: for weeks if that happens. Do you think that people
Speaker 1: are going to be a little bit concerned about what
Speaker 1: could happen to them if they go forward and support
Speaker 1: Donald J. Trump? You think that may be something to
Speaker 1: consider her because I do. I do. I think there
Speaker 1: are going to be a lot of people who say, oh,
Speaker 1: what are my risks here? What's going to happen? Here
Speaker 1: is the Attorney General for New York State, Leticia James,
Speaker 1: who is straight up threatening like a mob boss, threatening
Speaker 1: prosecution of Donald Trump by her state when he leaves office.
Speaker 1: Play seven. It's important to understand he is pardoned from
Speaker 1: federal crimes, but he has not pardoned from state crimes.
Speaker 1: Last year, I introduced a bill in the state legislature
Speaker 1: which would close the pardon loophole so that individuals such
Speaker 1: as the President of the United States would not evade justice.
Speaker 1: It's important that we have this check on presidential powers,
Speaker 1: and in the legislature, the state legislature. I'm so happy
Speaker 1: they passed that bill and it is now the law
Speaker 1: in the state of New York. President Trump cannot avoid
Speaker 1: justice in the great state of New York. People have
Speaker 1: asked me, should the president pardon himself? The answer is yes.
Speaker 1: What's what happens if he pardons? If he writes a
Speaker 1: preemptive pardon for himself and his family members? Think about this? What?
Speaker 1: What what's the downside? Oh, everyone's gonna scream Oh, look
Speaker 1: what he did. He's a criminal. They're saying that. Anyway,
Speaker 1: there's no fair minded person who looks at Trump and
Speaker 1: look looks at what's going on right now and says, yeah,
Speaker 1: he'll he'll be left alone in private life. They'll they'll
Speaker 1: back all, don't let him go all, you know, go
Speaker 1: lead a quiet family life with his kids and grandkids.
Speaker 1: And nope, no, we chanted lock her up. And then
Speaker 1: hillar reevaded justice even though she did break the law.
Speaker 1: They will go after Trump and they'll fabricate crimes. That's
Speaker 1: how they play the game. We play, you know, two
Speaker 1: hand touch. We're playing flag football here in politics, they
Speaker 1: are putting on brass knuckles and hitting us in the
Speaker 1: back of the head when the ref is not looking.
Speaker 1: That's how they play the game. Unfortunately, I think we're
Speaker 1: going to get another another lesson than that here very soon.
Speaker 1: They're gonna they're gonna go after people with prosecutions. They're
Speaker 1: gonna go after people with the irs. Oh but they
Speaker 1: talk of unity, remember that in their little self congratulatory delusion.
Speaker 1: We just want the American people to unify. But remember
Speaker 1: New York State charges. It is true, you can only
Speaker 1: pardon yourself from federal charges. You can you cannot clear yourself,
Speaker 1: even as president, from state charges, and nor could he
Speaker 1: clear his family members from that. And they've been talking
Speaker 1: about this for a long time now. You might say, buck,
Speaker 1: but can they really get him? I don't know. Can
Speaker 1: they fabricate a crime? They fabricated Russia collusion. But even
Speaker 1: if they can't convict Trump or any of his family members,
Speaker 1: they can certainly investigate them, hound them, go after them,
Speaker 1: harass them. I think Ivanka Trump just what was it
Speaker 1: a week ago? Was was deposed having to do with
Speaker 1: inauguration spending? What? Yeah? Do you think there'll be any?
Speaker 1: Let the asking is, do you think there'll actually be
Speaker 1: any federal criminal charges about the inauguration spending? No? No,
Speaker 1: not not against Ivanka, not against any of the drums.
Speaker 1: Not gonna happen. But why well they they've got somebody
Speaker 1: the DJ WE dont wants to harass them. It's like
Speaker 1: it's auditioning for a bigger, better role on a Biden administration.
Speaker 1: This is what they do. It's it's appalling. Look Trump
Speaker 1: is and I want to be very clear, A Trump
Speaker 1: is not giving up the fight. He's He's staying in
Speaker 1: this to the absolute very enemy. I think he's gonna
Speaker 1: fight this until the day that the moving trucks arrive,
Speaker 1: and God bless him. Why not? Why why pretend that
Speaker 1: everything is fine here? And why pretend that the Biden
Speaker 1: administration in any way that these Democrats have acted in
Speaker 1: good faith. They put forward this quasi senile clown, and
Speaker 1: we're all supposed to say, yeah, you guys have the
Speaker 1: best interests of the nation at heart. Sure I don't
Speaker 1: think so. Not gonna happen with me. I mean, I
Speaker 1: can't speak for anybody else. Here's the president though, just
Speaker 1: just letting everybody now I'm doing a little bit of
Speaker 1: trolling Play eleven. The next administration will be the one
Speaker 1: ultimately implements a lot of the distribution of this vaccine
Speaker 1: and will oversee much of the future of the way
Speaker 1: Operation Workspeed goes forward. Why not include members of the
Speaker 1: Biden transition team as part of this summit that you're
Speaker 1: hosting today. Well, we're gonna have to see who the
Speaker 1: next administration is because we won in those swing states
Speaker 1: and there was terrible things that went on. So we're
Speaker 1: gonna have to see who the next administration is. But
Speaker 1: whichever the next administration is will really benefit by what
Speaker 1: we've been able to do with this incredible science. The doctors,
Speaker 1: all of the people that came up, the lab technicians work,
Speaker 1: the work that's been done is incredible and it will
Speaker 1: be incredible for the next administration, and hopefully the next
Speaker 1: administration will be the Trump administration. We'll see. But I
Speaker 1: like that he still goads them and he's showing them
Speaker 1: he's not backing down one bit. They think they can
Speaker 1: tame Trump as he's in these weeks of December before
Speaker 1: what could be a presidential transition, and they're wrong. He's
Speaker 1: not going to back down. He's not going to give up.
Speaker 1: And what you see now is more and more reason
Speaker 1: to continue on with that fight. Even even if we
Speaker 1: don't win. We stay unified and we show the other
Speaker 1: side that we got we got some backbone, we can
Speaker 1: dig in. We're willing to take this all the way,
Speaker 1: to take this to the match. You're in the Freedom Hunt.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Get more from
Speaker 1: Buck by following him on social media at Buck Sexton
Speaker 1: on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram. You know what the President
Speaker 1: isn't doing is telling anybody telling America's what they should
Speaker 1: do in the meantime while we're waiting for this vaccine
Speaker 1: he distributed to general population. He's not communicating the message
Speaker 1: about what they should do to curve the spread of
Speaker 1: this That's what Biden is talking about. Biden is talking,
Speaker 1: you know, obviously darker terms, obviously not putting nearly as
Speaker 1: much emphasis on the vaccine, but talking about the near term,
Speaker 1: the next few hundred days, in which basically Americans still
Speaker 1: have to do a lot to protect themselves until we
Speaker 1: can get that inoculation. That's right. This is what you're
Speaker 1: going to be told every day from now until the
Speaker 1: end of January. We haven't been told enough. Did you
Speaker 1: feel like that we haven't been told enough about social distancing?
Speaker 1: Wear a mask, wash your hands. Here's a question that
Speaker 1: I asked yesterday on Twitter, you know, before they banned me.
Speaker 1: But here's a question that they ask on Twitter, and
Speaker 1: that I asked on Twitter rather and I gotta tell you,
Speaker 1: as I look at it, it's amazing to me how
Speaker 1: unself aware so many people are. I said, about this
Speaker 1: COVID stuff that we're being told all the time, I
Speaker 1: asked the very real question, does anyone have an explanation
Speaker 1: of how it's possible. Mask compliance is the most widespread
Speaker 1: it has been all year in this country, but we
Speaker 1: now have more COVID cases than we did in March
Speaker 1: of twenty twenty and April, after months a viral spread
Speaker 1: with no mask mandates and almost no public masking at all.
Speaker 1: And I said, please answer me before Twitter bands this question,
Speaker 1: because as we know, social media companies are run by
Speaker 1: idiot libs and they can't think for themselves. Okay, so
Speaker 1: what is the answer to this. What's amazing to me,
Speaker 1: and this tells you so much, is how many people
Speaker 1: respond to this with because it's blah blah blah, Are
Speaker 1: you idiot? And there's a hundred different people with a
Speaker 1: hundred different reasons why I'm an idiot for not knowing
Speaker 1: what they're approved consensus left wing Fauci seal of approval
Speaker 1: answer is it's because people aren't masking up enough really,
Speaker 1: so they didn't really think about the question very much,
Speaker 1: did they. We went from basically no masking in March
Speaker 1: and April, very very little, very intermittent here and there,
Speaker 1: and certainly no mandates. We went from that to eighty
Speaker 1: percent ninety percent mask compliance, and somehow cases and cases
Speaker 1: are higher. Some of them were saying, because cases are
Speaker 1: not hospitalizations and deaths, idiot, Really, hospitalizations and deaths are
Speaker 1: also higher. But you just go, you go down this
Speaker 1: list because Europe figured it out and we didn't. Really,
Speaker 1: Germany just said it's all time one day death record
Speaker 1: from COVID Germany is a six the eyes of the
Speaker 1: United States. They had almost what was it, five hundred,
Speaker 1: five hundred plus dead in one day, So it's you know,
Speaker 1: two or three thousand dead in one day in Germany
Speaker 1: if you made it a comparable to the US population. Oh,
Speaker 1: and I thought the Germans figured out the whole thing.
Speaker 1: I thought the Germans had the answer. It was those
Speaker 1: dumb Trump supporters. It is so dangerous and so wrong
Speaker 1: for people to think it's okay to blame disfavored political
Speaker 1: groups in the United States and group in this case
Speaker 1: half the country that supported Donald Trump. They're the reason
Speaker 1: for this virus. This is idiocy. There's no basis for this,
Speaker 1: and they can't answer these questions when you bring them up.
Speaker 1: And my favor, of course, as I've said, is it's
Speaker 1: so obvious, you idiot. And then they tell me something
Speaker 1: and I say, well, your other liberal blue check. Friend
Speaker 1: over here who believes in the science has a different answer.
Speaker 1: So which one of you is correct? And if it's
Speaker 1: a hundred different things, maybe it's not obvious us, is it.
Speaker 1: All you have to do is ask the questions. You
Speaker 1: don't even have to take stands right now. Just just
Speaker 1: ask the questions you're not supposed to. And when you
Speaker 1: get unsatisfactory answers and you're told shut up, peasant, do
Speaker 1: what you're told. You know exactly what you're up against.
Speaker 1: Anyone can observe that what the media, the left, the
Speaker 1: Libs have been saying was going to save us. We
Speaker 1: can control this, we can flatten the curve. Clearly, that
Speaker 1: is not true. Clearly it is called an observation of
Speaker 1: reality all around us. I know people here in New
Speaker 1: York who are getting COVID. I have friends in LA
Speaker 1: who have just gotten COVID. I know people all across
Speaker 1: the country are seeing cases and hospitalizations spiking even more
Speaker 1: than they did the last at the beginning of the pandemic.
Speaker 1: So this is now called second wave that we're seeing, right,
Speaker 1: this is the second wave. But if we have gotten
Speaker 1: so much better with our people, remember we have better
Speaker 1: treatments for this now, So somehow the virus has spread
Speaker 1: more and it's spread more efficiently. Okay, maybe there's a
Speaker 1: mutation that's led to the increased spread. We don't know.
Speaker 1: That's a real answer. I could handle that as an answer.
Speaker 1: But where a mask like what Cuomo says all the time,
Speaker 1: that's not a real answer. That's not me saying that
Speaker 1: it doesn't work at all. I'm just saying the reason
Speaker 1: that we have this huge spike in cases is not
Speaker 1: lack of mass compliance. That is madness. People are masking
Speaker 1: up all over the place. I know people who are
Speaker 1: very mask conscientious. They're sick or they've gotten sick. So
Speaker 1: what are they? Is it their fault? Oh no, it's
Speaker 1: only a Republicans. When a Republican gets COVID, it's his fault.
Speaker 1: So when Rudy Giuliani gets COVID nineteen, the media says, see,
Speaker 1: he's reckless. But when Jared Polis, the governor of Colorado,
Speaker 1: big mask maniac, when he gets it and his wife
Speaker 1: gets it, it's oh, gosh, it's a virus. I guess
Speaker 1: it can really spread. Gosh, this is real contagious. Is
Speaker 1: this is tearing us apart? We should be unified against this.
Speaker 1: We should be united as a country. This is this
Speaker 1: is an external enemy that is mixing in our in
Speaker 1: all over our society, this virus. And instead people have
Speaker 1: used this as a wedge. They've used this for further division,
Speaker 1: and they refuse to deal with what we can all
Speaker 1: see and observe. They are lying to you, and just
Speaker 1: asking them to explain themselves results in them saying that
Speaker 1: you are the liar. You're in the freedom Hut. This
Speaker 1: is the Buck Sexton Show podcast from more Bucks. Head
Speaker 1: to Bucksexton dot com and remember to subscribe to the podcast.
Speaker 1: We do have Jenna Ellis of the Trump legal team.
Speaker 1: She's on the front line of this whole thing, so
Speaker 1: she's joining us now live. Jenna, thank you so much
Speaker 1: for calling in. Absolutely thanks so much for having me. So.
Speaker 1: I gave the audience a little bit of a primer
Speaker 1: on that the Supreme Court denied injunctive relief today. But
Speaker 1: that's not the same thing as saying, because I have people,
Speaker 1: is it all over? No, it is not all over.
Speaker 1: But tell people what they need to know about Pennsylvania
Speaker 1: and let's go through some of the still active legal challenges. Yes, well, importantly,
Speaker 1: this is Mike Kelly's lawsuit. It's not one of the
Speaker 1: Trump campaign's lawsuits, even though obviously there are a variety
Speaker 1: of individuals and organizations that are very concerned about election
Speaker 1: integrity as well they should be, including the Age of
Speaker 1: Texas that filed a great case that we can talk
Speaker 1: about that in front of the Supreme Court late last night.
Speaker 1: But importantly for Mike Kelly's a stute in Pennsylvania, the
Speaker 1: Supreme Court only denied what's called emergency injunctive relief, which
Speaker 1: basically he was asking the court to stay the certification
Speaker 1: of results pending the outcome of that case, and the
Speaker 1: Supreme Court denied that, But they did not deny the
Speaker 1: petition for the writ of sert, which is the legal
Speaker 1: term of course for actually going in front of the
Speaker 1: Supreme Court and having them grant hearing the appeal. So
Speaker 1: the appeal is still pending, the case is still very
Speaker 1: much alive. It's only that injunction of the certification of
Speaker 1: results that was denied today. So all of the reporters
Speaker 1: need to correct their fake news headlines. Yes, tell me
Speaker 1: this where what is the Trump campaign legal situation in Pennsylvania?
Speaker 1: Specifically said, that's Mike Kelly's case, what is your case?
Speaker 1: Right So in Pennsylvania right now, we had an appeal
Speaker 1: that went to the Third Circuit on a very narrow
Speaker 1: issue that was denied. We have not yet appealed that
Speaker 1: to the Supreme Court. We do have another case that's
Speaker 1: pending out of Pennsylvania that was the one on all
Speaker 1: of the late ballots that Justice Alito ordered to be
Speaker 1: segregated out. That case has been pending for a couple
Speaker 1: of weeks in front of the Supreme Court. Whether or
Speaker 1: not it will be heard in unison, possibly with Mike
Speaker 1: Kelly's consolidated. Sometimes the Supreme Court does that. That's very
Speaker 1: possible in this instance. But that's the case that we
Speaker 1: have pending right now in front of the Pennsylvania are
Speaker 1: out of Pennsylvania, and of course we also have the
Speaker 1: State Legislature Avenue where we have had the hearings in
Speaker 1: front of state legislatures, including Pennsylvania, asking them to exercise
Speaker 1: their authority under the Federal Constitution to say for themselves
Speaker 1: even without a court order. Listen, we look at what's
Speaker 1: happened in our states. All of the rules were blatantly violated.
Speaker 1: We can't certify false, illegal results and so we're going
Speaker 1: to take back the method of selecting our delegates and
Speaker 1: make findings a fact and determine what slate to move
Speaker 1: forward with. So that's been really the route that Mayor
Speaker 1: Giuliani and I have taken with the state legislators over
Speaker 1: the last two weeks to encourage them to exercise their
Speaker 1: constitutional authority because they're the last stop the gap, to
Speaker 1: really be the voice of the people, and to make
Speaker 1: sure that corruption does not reign in elections and make
Speaker 1: sure that they are the ones that step in and
Speaker 1: say no, we're not going to send a false flight
Speaker 1: of delegates to the Electoral College. We're speaking of Jenna Elis.
Speaker 1: She is one of the lawyers representing the Trump campaign
Speaker 1: in these various lawsuits try to get to the bottom
Speaker 1: of what really happened and what fraud was at play
Speaker 1: in this election. Jenna, you mentioned this Texas lawsuit though
Speaker 1: from the the Texas State Attorney General. Can you please
Speaker 1: tell us about this because I don't think I mean,
Speaker 1: I know the media is not covering this stuff fairly,
Speaker 1: but I don't think they've even really covered this much
Speaker 1: at all. Yeah, which is actually shocking because this is
Speaker 1: a huge thing that a state attorney general doing four
Speaker 1: other states, and so this is Texas that's doing four
Speaker 1: other states and basically telling them that you know, your
Speaker 1: states did not follow the rules in your states for elections,
Speaker 1: and so this was an election official violation of all
Speaker 1: of the state rules. And because of that, then there
Speaker 1: they are essentially disenfranchising the rest of the American public
Speaker 1: because with a certification of false results based on illegal activity,
Speaker 1: then that would tip the electoral college in favor of
Speaker 1: the candidate that didn't actually win. So this is a
Speaker 1: huge lawsuit. It has what's called, of course, original jurisdiction,
Speaker 1: where under Article three of the US Constitution that contemplates
Speaker 1: the judicial branch, when a state sues another state, then
Speaker 1: that does not go up through the traditional court route,
Speaker 1: but is filed directly in the Supreme Court. So this
Speaker 1: is bypassed the rest of the lower court and will
Speaker 1: be heard directly in front of the Supreme Court. Because
Speaker 1: it's not an appeal, they can't deny it. And even
Speaker 1: just a few minutes ago, we learned that the court,
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court put this on expedited briefing schedule, which
Speaker 1: means that they know that this is a really important case.
Speaker 1: To hear before December fourteenth. That's the date, of course,
Speaker 1: that the Electoral College is anticipated to vote, even though
Speaker 1: we do have Supreme Court precedent in prior cases and
Speaker 1: prior elections that really it's the January sixth date that
Speaker 1: is of ultimate significance. Is how the Court put it,
Speaker 1: ultimate significance, that that's the date that the Electoral College
Speaker 1: votes are counted and certified by Congress. And so that's
Speaker 1: really the date that we're looking at. Speaking of Jenna Ellis,
Speaker 1: she is one of the lawyers for the Trump campaign.
Speaker 1: And Jenna tell us what's happening in Georgia. The big
Speaker 1: least news story worry about. All this had to do
Speaker 1: with the box or the suitcase or whatever it was
Speaker 1: of ballots under the table. And within twenty four hours
Speaker 1: I was seeing everywhere it was, you know, the media
Speaker 1: was saying debunked. And then also we've had this Secretary
Speaker 1: of State for Georgia, Raffinsburger, who said it's all been counted.
Speaker 1: It's been counted three times, We've done the signature match.
Speaker 1: What's going on there? Tell us what's true, what's not,
Speaker 1: and where your where lawsuits stand with regard to what
Speaker 1: happened in Georgia. Yeah, well, importantly, Georgia is one of
Speaker 1: the four states that Texas is doing, so that's Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania,
Speaker 1: and Wisconsin. But we also do have a Trump campaign
Speaker 1: lawsuit that's going through the regular channels in Georgia that
Speaker 1: that's basically asserting the same thing that Georgia election officials
Speaker 1: didn't follow their own state law and because of that,
Speaker 1: that resulted in an irredeemably compromised vote total, and that
Speaker 1: certification it's false. And so you know, for this precarious
Speaker 1: state to just say, well, we've recounted these illegal ballots
Speaker 1: multiple times, that really gets you to the same false result.
Speaker 1: So we had to go through the recount process, had
Speaker 1: to go through some of that procedure, that fact finding investigation,
Speaker 1: before we could bring this lawsuit. But now with what
Speaker 1: we do know, especially with the witness affidavits that said
Speaker 1: that they were kicked out of that state farm arena
Speaker 1: around ten thirty and they knew that ballots were being
Speaker 1: counted late into the night. They signed those affidavits right
Speaker 1: after election day, and that video, far from being debunked,
Speaker 1: only confirmed exactly what the eyewitness testimony showed. I mean,
Speaker 1: this would be no different than in a criminal case.
Speaker 1: You know, someone saying that they were an eyewitness to
Speaker 1: an armed robbery and then later, right before trial, you
Speaker 1: find the video that confirms it. That's exactly what's going
Speaker 1: on in this case. And so for mainstream media that
Speaker 1: wants to just push this aside, say you know your
Speaker 1: legal challenges have failed, this is you know completely, you're
Speaker 1: at a time all of these different excuses, they're just
Speaker 1: trying to ignore the fact that there has been such
Speaker 1: widespread official misconduct and that these results cannot be permitted
Speaker 1: to stand. Because this is so important to election integrity.
Speaker 1: And this is not just about President Trump or the
Speaker 1: campaign wanting to overturn election results. This is about wanting
Speaker 1: to make sure that the result itself is fair, it's
Speaker 1: constitutionally sound, and it's free and fair, because that's what
Speaker 1: our constitution requires of our elections. Can you tell us
Speaker 1: what is the status of the signature match, because you
Speaker 1: hear different things about this in Georgia's specifically, yes, So
Speaker 1: the campaign just as of last week. In fact, the
Speaker 1: day before we went into the hearing, we requested through
Speaker 1: our local council for a fifth time this signature matching,
Speaker 1: so it hasn't been done. The governor Kemp, of course
Speaker 1: has called for that, but for some reason won't actually
Speaker 1: require his Secretary of State to do that. So it
Speaker 1: hasn't been done in any way meaningfully, and it certainly
Speaker 1: hasn't been done on a level that would get to
Speaker 1: every legal vote being counted. And the illegal votes, of
Speaker 1: course shouldn't be counted. And that's what the Democrats are
Speaker 1: never willing to acknowledge, that only the legal votes that
Speaker 1: are cast according to the law of the state and
Speaker 1: ultimately the United States Constitution, should be counted in any election.
Speaker 1: And so there has not been the signature match that
Speaker 1: you would because because one area here and we're speaking
Speaker 1: to Jenna Ellis for anyone who's joining us here, and
Speaker 1: she is a member of a Trump legal Trump campaign
Speaker 1: legal team in dealing with the various lawsuits in these states. Jenna,
Speaker 1: we see these things about X number of dead people voted,
Speaker 1: an X number of illegal aliens are believed to have voted. People.
Speaker 1: You say that, now, everyone jumps. That's actually the federal
Speaker 1: criminal statutory term for it, right, It's actually called the
Speaker 1: legal aliens. Still, folks, believe it or not, in federal law.
Speaker 1: But all these people that you know, we see these numbers,
Speaker 1: how do we get the proof of how do we
Speaker 1: get to stand up and say, here are people who
Speaker 1: are dead who voted, and you guys don't have an
Speaker 1: answer for this, you know what I mean. It feels
Speaker 1: like we're waiting for that, the allegations and the affidavits
Speaker 1: to turn into factual data about fraudulent voters. Can you
Speaker 1: dig into that for me a little bit? Yeah, well,
Speaker 1: we actually have that. And this is what's been so
Speaker 1: frustrating about being denied an evidentiary hearing on a court level.
Speaker 1: So for example, our case in Pennsylvania that we just
Speaker 1: talked about a few minutes ago, that's now at the
Speaker 1: Third Circuit and they denied that really narrow issue. What
Speaker 1: we appealed from was that judge that denied simply an
Speaker 1: evidentiary hearing. And he did that in a way that
Speaker 1: and I won't you bore your audience, but he did
Speaker 1: that in a way there was actually a lead really
Speaker 1: incorrect because he made a finding on the merit of
Speaker 1: the case and on the evidence when no evidence had
Speaker 1: been presented in court at all. And so for all
Speaker 1: of the media and the leftist liberals saying, where's the evidence,
Speaker 1: where's the evidence. We haven't been granted an evidentiary hearing yet,
Speaker 1: and that's what's been so frustrating. But what we have
Speaker 1: been able to do is get hearings in front of
Speaker 1: these state legislatures and put on a stample and a
Speaker 1: very important sample of our witnesses that we have, you know,
Speaker 1: fifty more one that will testify to saying, you know,
Speaker 1: I saw these these ballots come in, or there were
Speaker 1: duplicative ballots, or you know, I was told by an
Speaker 1: election official to just go ahead and allow this person
Speaker 1: to vote when they didn't have an idea, or their
Speaker 1: signature didn't match, or some other thing that was against
Speaker 1: the law in that state. And so, for example, in Arizona,
Speaker 1: we know the data and we know the numbers. We
Speaker 1: know that eleven thousand votes were an over vote in
Speaker 1: that state, meaning that eleven thousand votes were cast more
Speaker 1: than there were registered voters. So how is that even possible?
Speaker 1: And that just alone would change the outcome in Arizona.
Speaker 1: We know that thirty over thirty six thousand people who
Speaker 1: were those illegal aliens who were not eligible to vote
Speaker 1: under US laws voted in that election. We have the
Speaker 1: evidence to show that over four hundred and fifty thousand
Speaker 1: ballots were duplicated and did not show the actual intent
Speaker 1: of the voter based on all of the election officials
Speaker 1: who completely ignored the law in Arizona. So we have
Speaker 1: all of these facts, we have the witnesses, we have
Speaker 1: the data, we have the evidence. It's just a matter
Speaker 1: of being able to present that in court and to
Speaker 1: have these judges try to just deny this based on
Speaker 1: some sort of procedural issue or really just trying to
Speaker 1: pass the buck and they don't want to hear these
Speaker 1: cases should frankly outrage every American and that's what I'm
Speaker 1: really grateful that Kin Paxton and Texas are now taking
Speaker 1: this case directly to the Supreme Court, because this needs
Speaker 1: to be hurt. If we allow election officials to simply
Speaker 1: disregard the law in their state, then they're overturning an
Speaker 1: election within and they're just saying, we're going to completely
Speaker 1: ignore the law in our state and we are going
Speaker 1: to do whatever we want in the election for the
Speaker 1: outcome that we prefer. And that is not the rule
Speaker 1: of law in America. And I don't care if you
Speaker 1: supported President Trump or Joe Biden. You may like the
Speaker 1: outcome of fraud this time, but I guarantee you that
Speaker 1: is not at all what you want to have as president,
Speaker 1: because America is always built on a rule of law,
Speaker 1: not a system of rulers. Jenna Ellis of the Trump
Speaker 1: legal team, Jenna, before we let you go out, I
Speaker 1: know you are very busy. I just want to know
Speaker 1: what can the folks listening expect from the team, you know,
Speaker 1: in broad strokes in the next couple of weeks. Well,
Speaker 1: we'll definitely continue fighting. So I mean, I've been on
Speaker 1: the phone with the Mayor Leanni, and you know, we're
Speaker 1: continuing to advance both of our parallel strategies, both in
Speaker 1: the judicial branch as well as the state legislatures. Georgia
Speaker 1: has a hearing coming up this week and we're very
Speaker 1: hopeful that they will push through that resolution take back
Speaker 1: their delegates. And we're also going to be watching really
Speaker 1: eagerly to see what the Supreme Court does with this
Speaker 1: Attorney general case. So I think there's still a lot
Speaker 1: of avenues, there's still a lot of fight left for
Speaker 1: election integrity, and don't listen to the mainstream media. This
Speaker 1: is definitely not over yet. We're just getting started. Jenna
Speaker 1: Elis everybody. Jenna, thank you so much for your timing
Speaker 1: for your work. We'll talk to you soon. Thanks,