WEBVTT - Apple Introduces iPhone 12 With 5G

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:03.280
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser. Every day

0:00:03.279 --> 0:00:05.200
<v Speaker 1>we're bringing you the latest news from the world of

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:08.920
<v Speaker 1>business and finance, plus technology, politics. So much going on

0:00:09.000 --> 0:00:12.160
<v Speaker 1>in the world of politics, economics, and it's all harnessing

0:00:12.160 --> 0:00:14.960
<v Speaker 1>the power of Business Week reporters and editors. You can

0:00:15.000 --> 0:00:18.720
<v Speaker 1>download Bloomberg Business Week on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com.

0:00:19.040 --> 0:00:21.200
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:21.200 --> 0:00:23.960
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, and be sure to watch

0:00:24.040 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 1>us too on YouTube by searching Bloomberg Global News. Well,

0:00:27.440 --> 0:00:29.720
<v Speaker 1>I gotta say this surprised me and I actually should

0:00:29.720 --> 0:00:31.960
<v Speaker 1>go back and check out the most read because you know, Paul,

0:00:32.000 --> 0:00:34.360
<v Speaker 1>I always like to check where our daily virus updates

0:00:34.760 --> 0:00:36.760
<v Speaker 1>on the Bloomberg sit among our most read stories on

0:00:36.800 --> 0:00:40.600
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg. I had to actually go to page the

0:00:40.640 --> 0:00:46.080
<v Speaker 1>second page to find it exactly exactly, which I thought

0:00:46.120 --> 0:00:49.640
<v Speaker 1>was kind of interesting considering our enquirement. Yeah, maybe that's

0:00:49.680 --> 0:00:52.519
<v Speaker 1>it right, And we've got a bunch of headlines out.

0:00:52.520 --> 0:00:56.040
<v Speaker 1>We've got worldwidecast cases thanks for passing thirty nine million,

0:00:56.080 --> 0:00:58.200
<v Speaker 1>the U S reporting the most daily infections in two

0:00:58.240 --> 0:01:00.480
<v Speaker 1>months total cases near an eight mill and so some

0:01:00.560 --> 0:01:04.480
<v Speaker 1>of the headlines definitely jarring. Let's bring in Dr Ian

0:01:04.520 --> 0:01:07.520
<v Speaker 1>LUs Beder. We go to him every week for an

0:01:07.640 --> 0:01:10.560
<v Speaker 1>update for some clarity and perspective on the viruses, Clinical

0:01:10.560 --> 0:01:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Associate Professor of Medicine at n y U Land Good

0:01:12.760 --> 0:01:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Medical Center, and he joins us on the phone in

0:01:15.520 --> 0:01:17.679
<v Speaker 1>New York. Um, Dr LUs bed are good to have

0:01:17.800 --> 0:01:20.759
<v Speaker 1>you back with us. How are you doing this week? Okay,

0:01:20.760 --> 0:01:23.319
<v Speaker 1>thank you, Carol and Paul hope you guys are doing

0:01:23.360 --> 0:01:26.800
<v Speaker 1>well and definitely uh, a very busy news week and

0:01:26.840 --> 0:01:29.880
<v Speaker 1>certainly on the on the COVID front as well well.

0:01:29.920 --> 0:01:31.639
<v Speaker 1>Tell us what you're seeing in terms of the virus.

0:01:31.680 --> 0:01:34.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious, UM. I was actually a doctor's office today

0:01:34.600 --> 0:01:36.120
<v Speaker 1>and I'm like, are you guys seeing in an uptick?

0:01:36.160 --> 0:01:37.760
<v Speaker 1>And they're like, nope, we're not yet, but we know

0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:40.120
<v Speaker 1>that there's pockets around New York City. Where are you

0:01:40.160 --> 0:01:44.720
<v Speaker 1>seeing UM in your You know, certainly when you're at

0:01:44.720 --> 0:01:48.640
<v Speaker 1>the hospital or in your private practice. So certainly in

0:01:48.640 --> 0:01:51.440
<v Speaker 1>private practice, we are seeing a lot of the post

0:01:51.480 --> 0:01:55.040
<v Speaker 1>COVID syndrome and a lot of the long haulers. UM,

0:01:55.200 --> 0:01:58.520
<v Speaker 1>We're not really seeing a big surge in cases, although

0:01:58.520 --> 0:02:00.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of those are really more were in the

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:03.920
<v Speaker 1>in the Midwest. I mean, we certainly know nationally are

0:02:04.040 --> 0:02:09.400
<v Speaker 1>cases are up over fifty thousand a day of positive tests. Now,

0:02:09.600 --> 0:02:12.720
<v Speaker 1>obviously not everyone is ill and not everyone has so

0:02:13.320 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 1>does poorly, but certainly the number of cases increasing. And

0:02:17.200 --> 0:02:20.240
<v Speaker 1>in the New York City area we certainly have a

0:02:20.240 --> 0:02:24.240
<v Speaker 1>few pockets where uh there is uh kind of a

0:02:24.280 --> 0:02:26.799
<v Speaker 1>surge in cases. We're not seeing a lot of that

0:02:27.160 --> 0:02:31.160
<v Speaker 1>in the office yet, at least in with my colleagues,

0:02:31.760 --> 0:02:35.560
<v Speaker 1>and the hospitals too seem to have, you know, not

0:02:35.760 --> 0:02:39.720
<v Speaker 1>zero cases, but certainly not the surge that we saw previously.

0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:42.640
<v Speaker 1>So will it come hard to know? We're certainly in

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Europe and around the world we're seeing really that second

0:02:45.840 --> 0:02:49.840
<v Speaker 1>or third wave hit. So that is the challenge. So

0:02:50.200 --> 0:02:53.240
<v Speaker 1>dr at n y U Landgoing Medical Center, a huge

0:02:53.320 --> 0:02:57.000
<v Speaker 1>medical center, UM, one of the finest obviously in New

0:02:57.080 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 1>York City. How have you in the hospital as they're

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:03.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of starting to prepare yourself what might be a

0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 1>second wave? That first wave that we all experienced back

0:03:06.040 --> 0:03:08.679
<v Speaker 1>in March and April was so jarring for sin for

0:03:08.760 --> 0:03:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the medical facilities. What changes have been made? Well, it's

0:03:12.760 --> 0:03:16.520
<v Speaker 1>deferently a challenge because we're now beginning to really see

0:03:16.639 --> 0:03:19.760
<v Speaker 1>over the last month or so, all of those patients

0:03:19.800 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 1>that were afraid to come in, so elective surgery and

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:27.760
<v Speaker 1>colonoscopies and stress tests and uh, you know, all of

0:03:27.800 --> 0:03:32.640
<v Speaker 1>their general medical care is really surged two pre COVID levels,

0:03:33.000 --> 0:03:35.400
<v Speaker 1>which is good news. People are getting taken care of

0:03:35.880 --> 0:03:39.880
<v Speaker 1>everyone for sort and certainly um, whether it's surgery or

0:03:40.320 --> 0:03:44.440
<v Speaker 1>some cases, uh, they get swabbed to make sure everyone

0:03:44.480 --> 0:03:47.160
<v Speaker 1>to all the patients are in a COVID free zone.

0:03:47.600 --> 0:03:53.440
<v Speaker 1>But there's certainly awareness among hospital leadership that a similar

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:57.600
<v Speaker 1>strategy may have to be implemented where the hospital has

0:03:57.640 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 1>more beds and more areas available if if those COVID

0:04:02.400 --> 0:04:06.960
<v Speaker 1>patients come back. And certainly in terms of treatment, it's

0:04:06.960 --> 0:04:09.800
<v Speaker 1>a very dynamic area. There were just some studies that

0:04:09.880 --> 0:04:14.200
<v Speaker 1>really questioned how effective ramdesivie is. UM. There was a

0:04:14.360 --> 0:04:17.159
<v Speaker 1>w h O study and and so that is part

0:04:17.160 --> 0:04:22.120
<v Speaker 1>of the standard cocktail. President Trump got that certainly alone,

0:04:22.200 --> 0:04:26.599
<v Speaker 1>that may not be that effective. So it's really a

0:04:26.680 --> 0:04:29.880
<v Speaker 1>dynamic landscape where we're trying a number of things and

0:04:30.080 --> 0:04:33.080
<v Speaker 1>things are not completely proven. But you know, there's good

0:04:33.080 --> 0:04:36.760
<v Speaker 1>news as well. Fiser uh, coming to the end of

0:04:36.760 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 1>their Phase three study and may be able to get

0:04:40.640 --> 0:04:44.680
<v Speaker 1>vaccine approval. We're not hearing a lot of complications from

0:04:44.720 --> 0:04:47.920
<v Speaker 1>the vaccines. Now again they don't publicize all of that.

0:04:48.240 --> 0:04:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Eventually that we'll all have to go through the FDA,

0:04:51.000 --> 0:04:53.479
<v Speaker 1>But we're not hearing a lot of problems. So I'm

0:04:53.600 --> 0:04:56.200
<v Speaker 1>encouraged by the vaccine, although it certainly is going to

0:04:56.240 --> 0:04:59.640
<v Speaker 1>be months away before everyone starts getting it right, especially

0:04:59.640 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 1>when you se about the ramp up right, like we've

0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:03.880
<v Speaker 1>we've got some stories on the Bloomberg just now. States

0:05:03.880 --> 0:05:06.760
<v Speaker 1>are figuring out like there isn't one one version where

0:05:06.760 --> 0:05:08.800
<v Speaker 1>the federal government says, hey, guys, here's how we're going

0:05:08.839 --> 0:05:10.920
<v Speaker 1>to roll out the vaccine. It's states are kind of

0:05:10.920 --> 0:05:14.680
<v Speaker 1>scrambling to figure out how to do it right. Well, first,

0:05:14.800 --> 0:05:17.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, they have to be approved and if you

0:05:17.160 --> 0:05:20.960
<v Speaker 1>know approved and the data reviewed, and you know, there's

0:05:21.000 --> 0:05:23.919
<v Speaker 1>some concerns, are they really rushing it? And this is

0:05:24.040 --> 0:05:27.920
<v Speaker 1>a record time because it's not even a year. It's amazing,

0:05:27.960 --> 0:05:30.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, February March is when the first cases came

0:05:30.880 --> 0:05:34.960
<v Speaker 1>out and we're now in you know, October, so it

0:05:35.160 --> 0:05:38.080
<v Speaker 1>is really quite amazing to have developed it and with

0:05:38.240 --> 0:05:42.239
<v Speaker 1>unique technology that messager r n A, you know, Majorna Fiser.

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:45.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there are a variety of techniques and all

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:49.279
<v Speaker 1>of them are really much faster than the traditional methods.

0:05:49.279 --> 0:05:51.719
<v Speaker 1>And it's amazing to be, you know, in these phase

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:55.240
<v Speaker 1>three studies, which is really sort of the before approval

0:05:55.279 --> 0:05:58.320
<v Speaker 1>and release. And I think it's encouraging if you have

0:05:58.400 --> 0:06:02.960
<v Speaker 1>thirty patients. Granted it's not millions or hundreds of millions,

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:05.680
<v Speaker 1>but if we're not really seeing significant side effects, I

0:06:05.720 --> 0:06:08.160
<v Speaker 1>think that that's encouraging. So I do want to ask

0:06:08.200 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 1>you Ian, you know, so goes Europe? Does so go

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:12.720
<v Speaker 1>the United States? And I asked that because I've been

0:06:12.760 --> 0:06:14.800
<v Speaker 1>talking with some folks over in Asia and they're like,

0:06:14.839 --> 0:06:17.360
<v Speaker 1>if you want clues of kind of maybe what happens

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:19.120
<v Speaker 1>next for you in the US, just look at what's

0:06:19.160 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 1>going on in Asia. But we know it's not apples

0:06:21.440 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 1>to apples, whether it's Asian in the U S or

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Europe in the US. So when we see those rising

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:28.920
<v Speaker 1>numbers in Europe, what should we take from that, potentially

0:06:29.720 --> 0:06:33.160
<v Speaker 1>as US citizens or nothing? Maybe? You know, I I

0:06:33.240 --> 0:06:38.000
<v Speaker 1>agree with you. I think globally we're certainly seeing another wave.

0:06:38.400 --> 0:06:41.920
<v Speaker 1>And in South America and certainly in Europe France, uh

0:06:42.400 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 1>almost declaring a state of emergency is a things borderline

0:06:46.760 --> 0:06:50.920
<v Speaker 1>and both student seasonal factors. As the weather gets cooler,

0:06:50.960 --> 0:06:55.960
<v Speaker 1>there's less outdoor distancing, there's more indoor meeting. Um until

0:06:56.000 --> 0:07:00.160
<v Speaker 1>it's not uncommon. We sold this in with very as

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:04.360
<v Speaker 1>waves of the H one N one Spanish flu. Well,

0:07:04.400 --> 0:07:11.360
<v Speaker 1>I did not see that at did not memory. Uh right,

0:07:11.920 --> 0:07:16.440
<v Speaker 1>so uh so, and without a vaccine and without effective treatment,

0:07:16.520 --> 0:07:19.840
<v Speaker 1>it's not totally shocking to see that. It is a

0:07:19.880 --> 0:07:23.880
<v Speaker 1>little hard to explain country by country variations that are

0:07:23.920 --> 0:07:28.600
<v Speaker 1>part of that is habits and mask wearing and social distancing.

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Part of it may also relate to underlying health. In

0:07:32.800 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 1>other words, there are some countries that are thinner, healthier,

0:07:36.200 --> 0:07:40.080
<v Speaker 1>and we do know that diabetes, high blood pressure, elevated weight,

0:07:40.120 --> 0:07:44.040
<v Speaker 1>and unfortunately, in the United States, we have an epidemic

0:07:44.080 --> 0:07:46.880
<v Speaker 1>of obesity, we have an epidemic of type two diabetes,

0:07:46.960 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 1>We have an epidemic um of a lot of those

0:07:50.440 --> 0:07:54.360
<v Speaker 1>health issues, and that makes us more vulnerable to the virus.

0:07:54.360 --> 0:07:58.440
<v Speaker 1>So when when people who are not in in optimal

0:07:58.480 --> 0:08:04.200
<v Speaker 1>health get exposed to the virus, higher complication rights, higher hospitalizations,

0:08:04.240 --> 0:08:07.160
<v Speaker 1>and higher death rates. So individually we need to take

0:08:07.200 --> 0:08:10.560
<v Speaker 1>care of ourselves and and do smart things like mass scoring.

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:13.080
<v Speaker 1>I certainly agree. I think we we have a good

0:08:13.120 --> 0:08:18.200
<v Speaker 1>consensus alone, that's probably not enough. And certainly people need

0:08:18.280 --> 0:08:21.520
<v Speaker 1>to get their diseases under control of better diet, lose weight,

0:08:22.400 --> 0:08:24.960
<v Speaker 1>exercise more. Should we make sure we get like the

0:08:25.280 --> 0:08:27.360
<v Speaker 1>normal flu shot things like that, just to make sure

0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:29.960
<v Speaker 1>we're not kind of, you know, more vulnerable in terms

0:08:30.000 --> 0:08:34.360
<v Speaker 1>of health. Yeah, Carol is usual, You're you're on the case,

0:08:34.840 --> 0:08:38.960
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, absolutely want to minimize co morbidities or the

0:08:38.960 --> 0:08:41.800
<v Speaker 1>worst thing would be getting flu and COVID, and most

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:45.079
<v Speaker 1>we think that that double virus hit would have a

0:08:45.160 --> 0:08:49.280
<v Speaker 1>much higher morbidity and mortality. So while we're waiting for

0:08:49.320 --> 0:08:52.360
<v Speaker 1>approval of monoclonal LANDI buddies, and while we're waiting approval

0:08:52.400 --> 0:08:56.600
<v Speaker 1>for messenger RNA and other um vaccines, we have to

0:08:56.640 --> 0:08:59.640
<v Speaker 1>be very vigilant, you know, with mass scoring and handwashing

0:08:59.720 --> 0:09:04.280
<v Speaker 1>and and some people feel Tony Faucci Vitamin D supplementation.

0:09:04.320 --> 0:09:05.839
<v Speaker 1>You don't want to take too much, you don't want

0:09:05.840 --> 0:09:07.880
<v Speaker 1>to take too little. You know, you can find your

0:09:08.360 --> 0:09:12.600
<v Speaker 1>find your levels and of course diet exercise, so weight loss.

0:09:13.200 --> 0:09:16.440
<v Speaker 1>We've seen a lot of increased in weight by people

0:09:16.480 --> 0:09:20.360
<v Speaker 1>staying indoors and eating poorly and gaining weight. So, you know,

0:09:20.400 --> 0:09:23.960
<v Speaker 1>we have to take individual control while we're waiting for

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:27.000
<v Speaker 1>some technologic breakthroughs, which I think are coming. I mean

0:09:27.000 --> 0:09:29.920
<v Speaker 1>they're they're they're here in a few months. All right, dr,

0:09:30.120 --> 0:09:32.440
<v Speaker 1>let's go there. Vaccines, We've got a lot of companies

0:09:32.440 --> 0:09:34.319
<v Speaker 1>working on them. Let's say we do, in fact to

0:09:34.360 --> 0:09:37.040
<v Speaker 1>get some vaccines, you know, late this year, maybe first

0:09:37.080 --> 0:09:39.880
<v Speaker 1>half of next year. What are your patients telling you

0:09:39.920 --> 0:09:44.920
<v Speaker 1>about they're willing us to take a vaccine? Yeah, another

0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:48.520
<v Speaker 1>good question. Certainly all the health care professionals I speak to,

0:09:48.600 --> 0:09:51.840
<v Speaker 1>they are ready to take those vaccines. I'm certainly ready

0:09:51.880 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 1>to do that because we're exposed every day. Uh, the

0:09:55.600 --> 0:09:58.520
<v Speaker 1>patients really are. Some of them are afraid that we've

0:09:58.600 --> 0:10:01.319
<v Speaker 1>rushed this. Uh. Some of them are afraid to take

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:05.280
<v Speaker 1>any vaccine, including what we recommend, you know, tetanus, pneumonias,

0:10:05.320 --> 0:10:09.240
<v Speaker 1>shingles vaccine. So there are some not anti vaxxers, but

0:10:09.360 --> 0:10:11.760
<v Speaker 1>people who are a little afraid to you know, to

0:10:11.880 --> 0:10:15.560
<v Speaker 1>take vaccines. So it may be a challenge to get

0:10:15.600 --> 0:10:18.760
<v Speaker 1>everybody on board with a COVID vaccine, and if only

0:10:18.800 --> 0:10:21.959
<v Speaker 1>a small percentage of people take it, it's obviously going

0:10:22.000 --> 0:10:25.800
<v Speaker 1>to be less effective. So I think if the first

0:10:25.880 --> 0:10:29.320
<v Speaker 1>wave of people, perhaps helf care professionals and or elderly

0:10:29.360 --> 0:10:31.880
<v Speaker 1>people in nursing homes take it, and they seem to

0:10:31.880 --> 0:10:35.360
<v Speaker 1>do well, hopefully that will encourage everyone uh to line

0:10:35.440 --> 0:10:38.719
<v Speaker 1>up and get on board in really quickly seconds. Are

0:10:38.800 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 1>you surprised or comforted by New York schools that it

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:46.079
<v Speaker 1>seems to be for the most part, going fairly well. Yes,

0:10:46.200 --> 0:10:47.920
<v Speaker 1>I I think there are a lot of reasons to

0:10:47.960 --> 0:10:50.880
<v Speaker 1>get back. I think if it's done carefully, UH, it

0:10:50.960 --> 0:10:55.080
<v Speaker 1>should be successful. This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol

0:10:55.080 --> 0:11:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Masser from Bloomberg Radio. So, Paul, kind of amazing. We're

0:11:00.240 --> 0:11:02.640
<v Speaker 1>just seventeen days. I was going to ask you, because

0:11:02.640 --> 0:11:05.360
<v Speaker 1>you're always good with how many days left? Seventeen days

0:11:05.360 --> 0:11:09.760
<v Speaker 1>and I've got a clock up on my computer. I'm serious. Well,

0:11:09.760 --> 0:11:11.000
<v Speaker 1>good for you, that's what we need. I mean, And

0:11:11.280 --> 0:11:14.319
<v Speaker 1>last night was just compelling, you know, the dueling uh

0:11:14.640 --> 0:11:18.959
<v Speaker 1>town halls, different networks, just crazy. Yeah, it's actually seventeen days,

0:11:19.000 --> 0:11:21.320
<v Speaker 1>ten hours eleven minutes twenty nine seconds. That's how how

0:11:21.400 --> 0:11:23.400
<v Speaker 1>much it's like the debt clock that we used to see.

0:11:23.440 --> 0:11:24.880
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's still in New York City. All right,

0:11:24.920 --> 0:11:26.920
<v Speaker 1>let's get to it with Bloomberg News White House correspondent

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Josh wyn Grove. He's on the phone, Um, and we

0:11:30.240 --> 0:11:32.440
<v Speaker 1>were talking about your story on the Bloomberg the most

0:11:32.520 --> 0:11:40.320
<v Speaker 1>read on the past I think eight hours, Josh about news. Yeah, well,

0:11:40.679 --> 0:11:43.600
<v Speaker 1>I hope your editors are listening. But it talks about

0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:48.600
<v Speaker 1>the president and how he's undercutting the campaign. Yeah, I mean,

0:11:49.120 --> 0:11:52.400
<v Speaker 1>this is this is just the you take the good

0:11:52.400 --> 0:11:54.960
<v Speaker 1>and the bad if you work for Donald Trump, you know. So, Yeah,

0:11:55.000 --> 0:11:58.040
<v Speaker 1>all these poles are showing him trailing. It's narrower in

0:11:58.080 --> 0:12:00.040
<v Speaker 1>the swing states, but pretty much not a lot of

0:12:00.120 --> 0:12:03.439
<v Speaker 1>science of hope and seniors in suburban women or two

0:12:03.520 --> 0:12:07.960
<v Speaker 1>groups that really stick out Trump one seniors in sixteen crucial,

0:12:08.040 --> 0:12:10.920
<v Speaker 1>particularly for states like you know, Florida, Arizona, that kind

0:12:10.920 --> 0:12:14.040
<v Speaker 1>of thing. And now he's losing to Biden by about

0:12:14.080 --> 0:12:17.360
<v Speaker 1>the same margin, a huge swing among the senior vote.

0:12:17.600 --> 0:12:20.520
<v Speaker 1>They're targeting ads and seniors. But uh, and he's as

0:12:20.520 --> 0:12:22.920
<v Speaker 1>I speak, President Trump is giving an address in Florida

0:12:23.000 --> 0:12:27.319
<v Speaker 1>aimed at seniors in particular, but that with that and

0:12:27.480 --> 0:12:31.000
<v Speaker 1>with women, he tends to sort of counteract the message

0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:33.600
<v Speaker 1>that his campaign is giving. In other words, you know,

0:12:33.720 --> 0:12:36.480
<v Speaker 1>he makes fun of Biden for, you know, belonging in

0:12:36.480 --> 0:12:38.319
<v Speaker 1>a nursing home while at the same time trying to

0:12:38.360 --> 0:12:41.680
<v Speaker 1>commence seniors to vote for him. And with women, he's

0:12:41.679 --> 0:12:44.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of has put these please you literally said this week,

0:12:44.600 --> 0:12:48.520
<v Speaker 1>suburban women, will you please like me? As as these

0:12:48.559 --> 0:12:52.720
<v Speaker 1>gender gaps just get wider with Biden. So you know

0:12:52.760 --> 0:12:55.400
<v Speaker 1>that the Trump campaign they're trying to catch up. If

0:12:55.440 --> 0:12:58.000
<v Speaker 1>you believe these polls are anything close to the sort

0:12:58.000 --> 0:13:01.680
<v Speaker 1>of ten point nine point twelve point gap range, then

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:03.760
<v Speaker 1>you then you acknowledge they've got some catching up to do,

0:13:04.200 --> 0:13:06.120
<v Speaker 1>and they're trying to do this. They kind of got

0:13:06.160 --> 0:13:08.839
<v Speaker 1>work with what the President's only to give them. Yeah, Josh,

0:13:08.880 --> 0:13:11.800
<v Speaker 1>it seems, you know, his campaign strategy seems to be

0:13:12.400 --> 0:13:15.640
<v Speaker 1>these make it America Great rallies. But as I look

0:13:15.640 --> 0:13:19.839
<v Speaker 1>at these rallies on TV, everybody's got the hat on um.

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:23.680
<v Speaker 1>It seems like there's not too many undecided uh that

0:13:23.760 --> 0:13:26.600
<v Speaker 1>are being impacted by his strategy. Here in his last

0:13:26.600 --> 0:13:29.400
<v Speaker 1>seventeen days. It seems like it's just kind of playing

0:13:29.440 --> 0:13:32.320
<v Speaker 1>to his base and he's already got those folks there.

0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:35.320
<v Speaker 1>There's a preaching to the choir risk for sure, and

0:13:35.400 --> 0:13:37.719
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a little unclear into how big that is.

0:13:38.120 --> 0:13:39.800
<v Speaker 1>The campaigns had to get a lot of data from

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:41.720
<v Speaker 1>the stuff, right, Like folks sign up for tickets, they

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:43.760
<v Speaker 1>could to sup phone number. A lot of these folks

0:13:43.840 --> 0:13:46.839
<v Speaker 1>didn't vote in twenty six Some of them are independent,

0:13:46.960 --> 0:13:49.200
<v Speaker 1>some of them are Democrats. That the campaign says, look,

0:13:49.320 --> 0:13:53.199
<v Speaker 1>these rallies, a Trump likes them, and having Donald Trump

0:13:53.200 --> 0:13:55.319
<v Speaker 1>a good mood is crucial if you work for the

0:13:55.360 --> 0:13:58.760
<v Speaker 1>Trumps campaign. But be you know, it's it's about voter

0:13:58.880 --> 0:14:02.000
<v Speaker 1>identification to certain extents. But that's how they're doing it.

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:05.240
<v Speaker 1>But look, you know, like Donald Trump's own approval rating

0:14:05.320 --> 0:14:08.360
<v Speaker 1>is pretty locked in as well, you know, but they're

0:14:08.360 --> 0:14:10.560
<v Speaker 1>not really backing off on him. In fact, keeps coming

0:14:10.559 --> 0:14:13.840
<v Speaker 1>out every day, it seems, with a rally or two rallies.

0:14:13.840 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Heel be in Georgia later tonight. Every day. You know,

0:14:18.000 --> 0:14:21.480
<v Speaker 1>it's just like more Trump all the time. So you know, there,

0:14:21.520 --> 0:14:23.160
<v Speaker 1>if they're going to turn this around their banking that

0:14:23.200 --> 0:14:25.960
<v Speaker 1>it's Donald Trump himself will be able to do it.

0:14:26.080 --> 0:14:28.840
<v Speaker 1>And you know, there's there's not a lot of evidence

0:14:28.880 --> 0:14:31.840
<v Speaker 1>in the polls that that kind of path will work,

0:14:31.960 --> 0:14:34.280
<v Speaker 1>and they're early signs that turnout is going to spike.

0:14:34.320 --> 0:14:36.480
<v Speaker 1>I think I think that was concerning to the Trump camp,

0:14:36.520 --> 0:14:39.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, really sores that that. I don't think we'll

0:14:39.760 --> 0:14:42.000
<v Speaker 1>be good news for Republicans. I mean, we've been all

0:14:42.000 --> 0:14:44.160
<v Speaker 1>talking all day on Bloomberg that, you know. I think

0:14:44.160 --> 0:14:46.320
<v Speaker 1>one of the stories I read um or and yours too,

0:14:46.360 --> 0:14:48.400
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, more than twenty one million Americans

0:14:48.960 --> 0:14:51.240
<v Speaker 1>already participating in early voting. I mean, that's a that's

0:14:51.240 --> 0:14:54.960
<v Speaker 1>a pretty big number. Two quick questions, can can either

0:14:55.040 --> 0:15:01.239
<v Speaker 1>candidate win without Florida? Trump tech the yes. But basically

0:15:01.960 --> 0:15:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Trump needs Florida a lot more than Biden does. Biden

0:15:04.160 --> 0:15:06.600
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really need Florida at all. It'd be mixed to have,

0:15:07.640 --> 0:15:10.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, but if Biden is winning Florida, we're probably

0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:14.920
<v Speaker 1>looking at a blowout as Trump needs Florida and then

0:15:15.680 --> 0:15:18.560
<v Speaker 1>some uh so, so you know, it's a it's a

0:15:18.680 --> 0:15:21.040
<v Speaker 1>very competitive state, but it really you know, they just

0:15:21.080 --> 0:15:24.840
<v Speaker 1>announced that Barack Obama is a campaign in Pennsylvania that

0:15:24.920 --> 0:15:28.000
<v Speaker 1>looks to be the real sort of tipping points state.

0:15:28.080 --> 0:15:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Biden is leading in Michigan, leading in Wisconsin. If he

0:15:31.760 --> 0:15:35.440
<v Speaker 1>wins those and takes Pennsylvania, that will probably do it.

0:15:35.840 --> 0:15:38.440
<v Speaker 1>But there's other paths to get there as well. And

0:15:38.480 --> 0:15:40.120
<v Speaker 1>we'll see. For instance, the President is going to go

0:15:40.120 --> 0:15:44.280
<v Speaker 1>to Michigan and wisconsinin this weekend, Arizona and Nevada as well.

0:15:44.800 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 1>And what about when it comes to early polling, does

0:15:47.280 --> 0:15:49.200
<v Speaker 1>that usually go more in favor I know we talked

0:15:49.200 --> 0:15:53.120
<v Speaker 1>about this, is Josh Green more in favorite Democrats versus Republicans?

0:15:53.200 --> 0:15:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Or is there something different this time around? We've seen

0:15:55.560 --> 0:15:59.160
<v Speaker 1>the lines. Yeah, yeah, I mean two things. So when

0:15:59.200 --> 0:16:01.840
<v Speaker 1>I wrote about the morning, how Trumps, the notion of

0:16:02.160 --> 0:16:05.080
<v Speaker 1>losing to Biden looks to irk Trump, right. It bothers

0:16:05.120 --> 0:16:07.120
<v Speaker 1>him that he could lose to the joke practice, and

0:16:07.160 --> 0:16:10.040
<v Speaker 1>that's starting to work its way into his speeches these

0:16:10.080 --> 0:16:12.160
<v Speaker 1>last few days. The other thing that's worked its way

0:16:12.160 --> 0:16:14.680
<v Speaker 1>and as he started talking about a red waves, he

0:16:14.800 --> 0:16:17.920
<v Speaker 1>thinks that you know, come voting day, Republicans are going

0:16:17.960 --> 0:16:20.560
<v Speaker 1>to show up in such numbers that they're gonna really

0:16:20.600 --> 0:16:24.680
<v Speaker 1>swamp the high numbers on advanced turnout and that that

0:16:24.760 --> 0:16:27.600
<v Speaker 1>speaks to the reality, which is the Democrats are far

0:16:27.800 --> 0:16:31.080
<v Speaker 1>likelier to vote in advance, either in person, advance or

0:16:31.080 --> 0:16:35.320
<v Speaker 1>by mail than Republicans are UH. And Republicans, conversely, are

0:16:35.360 --> 0:16:38.000
<v Speaker 1>far more likely to vote on the day of and

0:16:38.040 --> 0:16:41.000
<v Speaker 1>show up in person. And so you know, this is

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:43.280
<v Speaker 1>it's important to bear in mind as we prepare for

0:16:43.320 --> 0:16:46.440
<v Speaker 1>the night of November three, in the morning of November fourth,

0:16:46.800 --> 0:16:50.320
<v Speaker 1>and maybe the night of November four, because this could

0:16:50.320 --> 0:16:53.640
<v Speaker 1>take a while. Every state treat advanced vot a little differently.

0:16:53.760 --> 0:16:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Some are allowed to count them in advance, some are not.

0:16:56.840 --> 0:17:00.920
<v Speaker 1>We are seeing blowout numbers in advanced voter turn UH

0:17:00.960 --> 0:17:02.800
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of states right now. Of course, the

0:17:02.840 --> 0:17:05.159
<v Speaker 1>pandemic is playing a role in it. Hey, Josh, what

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:08.679
<v Speaker 1>do we know about the future of any debate between

0:17:08.680 --> 0:17:11.479
<v Speaker 1>now an election day? We know, well, they have one

0:17:11.480 --> 0:17:14.439
<v Speaker 1>more schedule for next Thursday, six nights from now. That

0:17:14.480 --> 0:17:17.800
<v Speaker 1>will be the last one, you know, they try. The

0:17:17.840 --> 0:17:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Trump campaign wanted to push the debate that was supposed

0:17:20.840 --> 0:17:24.440
<v Speaker 1>to be last night in its format. Excuse me. The

0:17:24.480 --> 0:17:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Biding campaign wanted to push it until next week so

0:17:26.600 --> 0:17:28.840
<v Speaker 1>they could do that. The Trump campaign wanted to push

0:17:28.880 --> 0:17:31.439
<v Speaker 1>both of them a week. Fiding campaign said no, you

0:17:31.480 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 1>know a bit of back and forth on that. That's

0:17:33.080 --> 0:17:36.679
<v Speaker 1>why you had those dueling advanced last night. So it

0:17:36.720 --> 0:17:39.600
<v Speaker 1>really all comes down to next week. You know, Traditionally

0:17:39.720 --> 0:17:42.520
<v Speaker 1>it's the people that are trailing campaigns that need debates

0:17:42.600 --> 0:17:44.920
<v Speaker 1>to catch up, right, you know, the leader gets the

0:17:45.280 --> 0:17:48.800
<v Speaker 1>luxury of autopilot, and so we'll see what Donald Trump

0:17:48.880 --> 0:17:52.600
<v Speaker 1>gets on that. Of course, we'll see. I don't know,

0:17:53.200 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm not looking more than the evance at this page.

0:17:56.520 --> 0:17:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Things like things are so fast moving in some way.

0:17:58.800 --> 0:18:00.920
<v Speaker 1>They just got about a minute left here, Josh, or

0:18:01.040 --> 0:18:04.320
<v Speaker 1>about forty five seconds. Did either one come out ahead

0:18:04.400 --> 0:18:08.760
<v Speaker 1>or gain something from last night? Um? I think the

0:18:08.880 --> 0:18:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump's answers on Q and on are going to

0:18:10.920 --> 0:18:13.520
<v Speaker 1>resonate a bit, you know, not refusing to do devow it,

0:18:14.080 --> 0:18:16.800
<v Speaker 1>but anything less than you know, a gain or a

0:18:16.840 --> 0:18:18.919
<v Speaker 1>good night for Trump. It's a wing provide. And I

0:18:18.920 --> 0:18:22.040
<v Speaker 1>think we're in that range. You know, we talked about

0:18:22.119 --> 0:18:24.159
<v Speaker 1>not a lot of undecided voters. People have made up

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:25.879
<v Speaker 1>their minds. You sort of love the president or you

0:18:25.920 --> 0:18:29.159
<v Speaker 1>don't love him. At this point, Uh, there's not a

0:18:29.160 --> 0:18:32.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of evidence of their even early ratings or the

0:18:32.400 --> 0:18:35.360
<v Speaker 1>sort of early reviews that suggest Trump hit a home run,

0:18:35.400 --> 0:18:37.800
<v Speaker 1>and anything doing a home run for Trump is probably

0:18:37.800 --> 0:18:39.639
<v Speaker 1>bad news for him because he needs to catch up.

0:18:39.800 --> 0:18:42.359
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I'm watching like some great movie, you know,

0:18:42.480 --> 0:18:45.919
<v Speaker 1>political movie, you know fiction, and then I'm like, no, no, no,

0:18:46.000 --> 0:18:48.160
<v Speaker 1>this is a this is this is our life, it's

0:18:48.200 --> 0:18:51.600
<v Speaker 1>our reality, right. Um, Josh, thank you so much, really

0:18:51.600 --> 0:18:55.119
<v Speaker 1>appreciate it. Josh wind Grove, he'ss White House correspondent. Definitely

0:18:55.200 --> 0:18:57.600
<v Speaker 1>check out all of his work on Bloomberg. You can

0:18:57.600 --> 0:19:01.120
<v Speaker 1>find him at Josh Underscore. Wind Grove Um just kind

0:19:01.160 --> 0:19:04.400
<v Speaker 1>of wild stuff. Paul, Yeah, wild stuff. And against seventeen

0:19:04.480 --> 0:19:06.359
<v Speaker 1>days to the election, I wonderfu I'm gonna have to

0:19:06.359 --> 0:19:08.480
<v Speaker 1>start counting down also to the Electoral College, you know,

0:19:08.560 --> 0:19:11.600
<v Speaker 1>certifying uh this thing. I see that number out there

0:19:11.680 --> 0:19:14.520
<v Speaker 1>as well. Hopefully this will be a clear enough decision

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:16.879
<v Speaker 1>on where they are they're on, you know, honor about

0:19:16.880 --> 0:19:21.120
<v Speaker 1>election night, and the country can begin to move forward. Yes,

0:19:21.600 --> 0:19:26.080
<v Speaker 1>this is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Masser from Bloomberg Radio.

0:19:26.400 --> 0:19:30.080
<v Speaker 1>When you talk to technology investors, two themes come up.

0:19:30.160 --> 0:19:32.359
<v Speaker 1>It just seems time and time again. One is the cloud.

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Everything's going to the cloud, and that's gonna drive spending

0:19:35.040 --> 0:19:37.400
<v Speaker 1>for the Mexican jillion years. And then the second one

0:19:37.480 --> 0:19:41.320
<v Speaker 1>is five G. How this is the future of wireless

0:19:41.520 --> 0:19:45.439
<v Speaker 1>Even Apple it got into the act this week launching

0:19:45.440 --> 0:19:48.479
<v Speaker 1>its iPhone twelve with its five G capabilities. Let's get

0:19:48.520 --> 0:19:50.600
<v Speaker 1>a sense of what this really means. And there's nobody

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:54.000
<v Speaker 1>better than Craig Moffatt, founding partner and senior analyst at

0:19:54.000 --> 0:19:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Moffatt Nathanson. And if you want to know anything that's

0:19:56.240 --> 0:19:58.600
<v Speaker 1>going on in the t MT space, you have to

0:19:58.600 --> 0:20:01.600
<v Speaker 1>get the research from Moffatt Nathanson. He joins on the

0:20:01.680 --> 0:20:03.879
<v Speaker 1>phone from New York. Craig, thanks so much for joining

0:20:03.920 --> 0:20:07.320
<v Speaker 1>us here. What did you make of Apple, the iPhone

0:20:07.359 --> 0:20:12.840
<v Speaker 1>twelve and just kind of five G in general? First

0:20:12.880 --> 0:20:14.440
<v Speaker 1>of all, thank you for having me back on, Paul.

0:20:14.440 --> 0:20:17.399
<v Speaker 1>It's good to talk to you again. You know, I

0:20:17.440 --> 0:20:20.760
<v Speaker 1>would say this, I would say that if anything, UM,

0:20:20.840 --> 0:20:24.440
<v Speaker 1>the Apple five G event, it sort of has been

0:20:24.480 --> 0:20:27.520
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of an uncomfortable reminder for everybody that

0:20:27.640 --> 0:20:30.960
<v Speaker 1>five G is not really fully baked yet UM and

0:20:31.480 --> 0:20:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the the announcement has sort of forced everybody to come

0:20:34.800 --> 0:20:39.760
<v Speaker 1>to grips with the idea that um that right now, UM,

0:20:39.760 --> 0:20:43.800
<v Speaker 1>five G is still very much um a year or

0:20:43.800 --> 0:20:47.240
<v Speaker 1>so away. And and I thought they were all kinds

0:20:47.320 --> 0:20:51.240
<v Speaker 1>of queues about that in the in the Apple launch.

0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:55.840
<v Speaker 1>So is it crazy? Um, high Craig, And I hope

0:20:55.840 --> 0:20:59.000
<v Speaker 1>you're doing well. I do what I do. Wonder you know,

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:01.840
<v Speaker 1>my husband was up at eight am or before that,

0:21:01.920 --> 0:21:04.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, because he wanted to order his new Apple iPhone,

0:21:05.040 --> 0:21:07.360
<v Speaker 1>I swear to God. And he stayed up till three

0:21:07.400 --> 0:21:09.000
<v Speaker 1>in the morning, you know, because when they open it

0:21:09.000 --> 0:21:12.240
<v Speaker 1>all up, and he's going to order my new phone

0:21:12.600 --> 0:21:14.280
<v Speaker 1>when it comes out, I think in a week or two.

0:21:14.440 --> 0:21:17.000
<v Speaker 1>And so are we crazy? We've been kind of waiting

0:21:17.080 --> 0:21:20.280
<v Speaker 1>for this. Are we crazy? Because five G isn't completely

0:21:20.280 --> 0:21:23.320
<v Speaker 1>built out here? Well, if if five G is the

0:21:23.359 --> 0:21:26.200
<v Speaker 1>reason that you're getting a new phone, then yes, that's

0:21:26.240 --> 0:21:30.320
<v Speaker 1>not that's crazy. Um, it's just not ready yet. There

0:21:30.359 --> 0:21:32.360
<v Speaker 1>are other reasons to get new phones, and if if

0:21:32.400 --> 0:21:36.159
<v Speaker 1>you like the new camera and that sort of thing. Um.

0:21:36.440 --> 0:21:39.800
<v Speaker 1>And and look, the handset cycles have been lengthening for

0:21:39.880 --> 0:21:41.840
<v Speaker 1>a long time, so there are an awful lot of

0:21:41.880 --> 0:21:45.320
<v Speaker 1>old phones out there that need replacement anyway. But five

0:21:45.440 --> 0:21:49.119
<v Speaker 1>G as a rationale. It just isn't very compelling. I mean, here,

0:21:49.200 --> 0:21:53.040
<v Speaker 1>here's the problem, and and sorry if this is a

0:21:53.040 --> 0:21:57.440
<v Speaker 1>little bit technical, but we love technical. If you deploy

0:21:57.640 --> 0:22:02.760
<v Speaker 1>five G on on low frequency spectrum to get the

0:22:02.800 --> 0:22:05.480
<v Speaker 1>coverage of the country, it's no faster than four G.

0:22:06.760 --> 0:22:09.960
<v Speaker 1>If you deploy it in very high frequency spectrum and

0:22:10.040 --> 0:22:14.479
<v Speaker 1>big spectrum blocks, it's very very fast. They demo that

0:22:14.600 --> 0:22:18.240
<v Speaker 1>with Verizon, but it's hardly ever available. It's only available

0:22:18.320 --> 0:22:21.240
<v Speaker 1>in in something like one percent of the time that

0:22:21.280 --> 0:22:24.000
<v Speaker 1>you're going to be on your phone, because the propagation

0:22:24.119 --> 0:22:27.720
<v Speaker 1>distances of those spectrum bands are so short that they're

0:22:27.800 --> 0:22:33.360
<v Speaker 1>only really usable in exceptionally dense cities and inside shopping

0:22:33.400 --> 0:22:36.760
<v Speaker 1>malls and airports and and arenas and stadiums and all

0:22:36.760 --> 0:22:39.880
<v Speaker 1>the places where nobody is anymore because of covid um.

0:22:40.040 --> 0:22:43.560
<v Speaker 1>And so the value proposition right now just isn't there yet.

0:22:43.640 --> 0:22:47.400
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna end up with a phone that is essentially

0:22:48.359 --> 0:22:51.480
<v Speaker 1>uh has a little five G light on it runs

0:22:51.480 --> 0:22:53.919
<v Speaker 1>it about the same speed as fog and drains your

0:22:53.920 --> 0:22:57.960
<v Speaker 1>battery faster for the trouble um. And that's not going

0:22:58.000 --> 0:23:01.080
<v Speaker 1>to be compelling for very many people. So again, there

0:23:01.119 --> 0:23:02.880
<v Speaker 1>may be other good reasons why you want to get

0:23:02.880 --> 0:23:05.840
<v Speaker 1>a new phone, and the new iPhones are great looking.

0:23:06.320 --> 0:23:09.119
<v Speaker 1>But then maybe you like the flat edges instead of

0:23:09.119 --> 0:23:11.800
<v Speaker 1>the curved edges. But but it's not going to be

0:23:11.800 --> 0:23:15.280
<v Speaker 1>because of five G yet. All right, So Craig, given that,

0:23:16.119 --> 0:23:19.199
<v Speaker 1>I'm surprised or are you surprised that Apple rolled it

0:23:19.240 --> 0:23:22.560
<v Speaker 1>out now as opposed to waiting. Typically their strategy has been, hey,

0:23:22.560 --> 0:23:24.280
<v Speaker 1>we don't need to be the first or even the second,

0:23:24.359 --> 0:23:28.000
<v Speaker 1>will be there when there's a market. Well, to be fair,

0:23:28.040 --> 0:23:31.120
<v Speaker 1>they've already waited. Samsung has had five G phones out

0:23:31.160 --> 0:23:35.240
<v Speaker 1>for more than a year. And and also remember that

0:23:35.320 --> 0:23:37.879
<v Speaker 1>this is not just a US story. This is also

0:23:37.920 --> 0:23:41.680
<v Speaker 1>a global story. Um and five G is a little

0:23:41.680 --> 0:23:46.240
<v Speaker 1>bit further along in China and Korea and Japan, using

0:23:46.280 --> 0:23:50.120
<v Speaker 1>the same chip sets by and large. So although interestingly

0:23:50.640 --> 0:23:54.440
<v Speaker 1>the US chips, the US Apple devices are the only

0:23:54.440 --> 0:23:58.960
<v Speaker 1>ones that will actually support millimeter wave spectrum um and

0:23:58.960 --> 0:24:02.359
<v Speaker 1>and that's a real compromise. Um it gives you those

0:24:02.400 --> 0:24:07.560
<v Speaker 1>blindingly fast speeds, but um it's again not available much

0:24:07.600 --> 0:24:10.960
<v Speaker 1>of anywhere except um a little bit of New York

0:24:10.960 --> 0:24:13.639
<v Speaker 1>and a handful of other very dead cities UM in

0:24:13.680 --> 0:24:16.840
<v Speaker 1>the US. But again drains your battery so so fast,

0:24:16.920 --> 0:24:19.800
<v Speaker 1>it generates a lot of heat UM. And so they've

0:24:19.800 --> 0:24:23.600
<v Speaker 1>decided not even not even put that in the handsets

0:24:23.600 --> 0:24:27.919
<v Speaker 1>that they're making for overseas markets. Alright, you popped my bubble.

0:24:28.000 --> 0:24:30.280
<v Speaker 1>And I've got to say Mark German was also writing

0:24:30.280 --> 0:24:32.359
<v Speaker 1>our Mark German here a Bloomberg wrote about, you know,

0:24:32.480 --> 0:24:34.359
<v Speaker 1>Apple getting ready to launch, and then we've got this

0:24:34.480 --> 0:24:37.960
<v Speaker 1>unready US market, so Verizon a T and T T Mobile,

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:40.120
<v Speaker 1>So as we're waiting for them to kind of really

0:24:40.200 --> 0:24:42.520
<v Speaker 1>roll it out in a big way five G. When

0:24:42.600 --> 0:24:44.280
<v Speaker 1>will they What are we all waiting for? Is it

0:24:44.400 --> 0:24:46.600
<v Speaker 1>just they don't want to make the investment yet? What's

0:24:46.600 --> 0:24:49.320
<v Speaker 1>holding it up? Well, there's a couple of things. But

0:24:50.200 --> 0:24:53.679
<v Speaker 1>I said a minute ago, low frequency spectrum for broad

0:24:53.760 --> 0:24:58.760
<v Speaker 1>coverage UM, but not high speed. High frequency spectrum for

0:24:58.880 --> 0:25:03.440
<v Speaker 1>high speed but but insufficient coverage. That obviously leaves the

0:25:03.480 --> 0:25:06.760
<v Speaker 1>broad medal, and the broad medal predictably is mid band

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:10.880
<v Speaker 1>spectrum UM. Right now, T Mobile has a huge advantage

0:25:10.920 --> 0:25:13.600
<v Speaker 1>and head start and that they have a very large

0:25:13.640 --> 0:25:17.600
<v Speaker 1>block of midband spectrum that they acquired in the Sprint acquisition.

0:25:17.640 --> 0:25:20.119
<v Speaker 1>In fact, you can make a good case that's really

0:25:20.160 --> 0:25:22.399
<v Speaker 1>the whole reason they bought Sprint was to get that

0:25:22.440 --> 0:25:26.760
<v Speaker 1>spectrum UM that will be the support for the first

0:25:27.280 --> 0:25:30.040
<v Speaker 1>really credible five G network in the United States, and

0:25:30.080 --> 0:25:33.280
<v Speaker 1>T Mobile will have a big advantage that could well

0:25:33.400 --> 0:25:38.800
<v Speaker 1>last for years. Verizon will probably catch up UM at

0:25:38.840 --> 0:25:41.000
<v Speaker 1>least to a degree, when they buy a big chunk

0:25:41.040 --> 0:25:45.960
<v Speaker 1>of spectrum later this year. Everyone seems to be quite

0:25:45.960 --> 0:25:48.560
<v Speaker 1>certain that they will buy what's called C band Spectrum,

0:25:48.560 --> 0:25:51.199
<v Speaker 1>which is going to be auctioned by the FEC in

0:25:51.280 --> 0:25:54.119
<v Speaker 1>December UM, but that will take them a couple of

0:25:54.200 --> 0:25:57.239
<v Speaker 1>years before they get it and then fully deploy it,

0:25:57.560 --> 0:26:00.679
<v Speaker 1>and even then it's probably not going to have quite

0:26:00.680 --> 0:26:04.600
<v Speaker 1>the same reach and coverage that T Mobile will enjoy.

0:26:04.680 --> 0:26:06.240
<v Speaker 1>And the real challenge is going to be a T

0:26:06.359 --> 0:26:08.800
<v Speaker 1>and T R. A T and T s balance sheet

0:26:08.920 --> 0:26:10.920
<v Speaker 1>is in so much trouble that it's just not clear

0:26:10.960 --> 0:26:13.520
<v Speaker 1>they have the money to be able to buy a

0:26:13.560 --> 0:26:16.000
<v Speaker 1>significant amount of spectrum or to build it out at

0:26:16.040 --> 0:26:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the pace that's going to be required to keep pace

0:26:18.119 --> 0:26:19.960
<v Speaker 1>with Verizon and a T and T. You have a

0:26:20.080 --> 0:26:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Verizon and T Mobile crag. We talked about a T

0:26:22.400 --> 0:26:24.639
<v Speaker 1>and T a little bit earlier in the earlier segment.

0:26:24.920 --> 0:26:27.080
<v Speaker 1>When I think about A T and T, now, unfortunately,

0:26:27.160 --> 0:26:29.640
<v Speaker 1>what I think about is their balance sheet here, so

0:26:29.920 --> 0:26:32.240
<v Speaker 1>you know my senses and you noted that as well,

0:26:32.960 --> 0:26:34.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, So as I look at their business, I

0:26:34.760 --> 0:26:38.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of got to start thinking about some asset disposals

0:26:38.040 --> 0:26:39.800
<v Speaker 1>to try to pay down my balance sheet. And the

0:26:39.840 --> 0:26:41.959
<v Speaker 1>thing that jumps at me is Direct TV. Can they

0:26:42.000 --> 0:26:45.200
<v Speaker 1>ever sell this thing and get any remote value out

0:26:45.200 --> 0:26:48.480
<v Speaker 1>of it? Not enough value that it's going to make

0:26:48.480 --> 0:26:50.800
<v Speaker 1>a dent in their balance sheet? You know that that

0:26:50.800 --> 0:26:53.119
<v Speaker 1>that's really the problem, right, I mean, they bought the

0:26:53.160 --> 0:26:56.679
<v Speaker 1>business for all in including the debt that they took on,

0:26:56.800 --> 0:27:00.640
<v Speaker 1>for sixty billion dollars, and New York Post reported last

0:27:00.640 --> 0:27:03.440
<v Speaker 1>week that they're getting offers just four years or five

0:27:03.480 --> 0:27:08.439
<v Speaker 1>years later for between fifteen and sixteen billion dollars, and

0:27:09.480 --> 0:27:12.560
<v Speaker 1>so just a massive destruction of value. And here's the problem.

0:27:12.600 --> 0:27:16.440
<v Speaker 1>It's still probably does something like five billion dollars of IBADA,

0:27:17.000 --> 0:27:20.119
<v Speaker 1>So you're talking about evaluation that's in the range of

0:27:20.640 --> 0:27:23.600
<v Speaker 1>three and a half times. That's their leverage. Remember, their

0:27:23.720 --> 0:27:26.680
<v Speaker 1>their leverage on the balance sheet looks like it's too

0:27:26.800 --> 0:27:31.199
<v Speaker 1>six two point six times UM cash flow, but in

0:27:31.240 --> 0:27:33.399
<v Speaker 1>fact it's it's higher than that because they have all

0:27:33.440 --> 0:27:36.960
<v Speaker 1>those operating leases that the rating agencies count as debt.

0:27:37.000 --> 0:27:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Those are the operating leases for all the cell towers

0:27:39.600 --> 0:27:42.480
<v Speaker 1>that they've got UM. And then you also have unfunded,

0:27:42.920 --> 0:27:45.920
<v Speaker 1>unfunded pension obligations and that sort of thing. So you're

0:27:45.920 --> 0:27:48.080
<v Speaker 1>really talking about a company that's levered three and a

0:27:48.119 --> 0:27:51.879
<v Speaker 1>half times, way outside the norm for investment grade credit.

0:27:52.280 --> 0:27:53.879
<v Speaker 1>And you can't sell an asset at three and a

0:27:53.920 --> 0:27:56.359
<v Speaker 1>half times and de lever it's it leaves you exactly

0:27:56.400 --> 0:27:59.360
<v Speaker 1>where you started UM. And and it's a real problem

0:27:59.440 --> 0:28:02.800
<v Speaker 1>for them be because UM, if they can't find something

0:28:02.840 --> 0:28:05.280
<v Speaker 1>to sell, it's not clear they have the headroom and

0:28:05.320 --> 0:28:07.840
<v Speaker 1>the balance sheet to buy spectrum that they really need.

0:28:07.960 --> 0:28:11.000
<v Speaker 1>So they're in they're in a very real bind here,

0:28:11.200 --> 0:28:13.520
<v Speaker 1>and you can see them trying to sell anything that

0:28:13.600 --> 0:28:16.080
<v Speaker 1>isn't nailed down right now. They're they're trying to sell

0:28:16.119 --> 0:28:20.479
<v Speaker 1>direct TV, they're trying to sell the Warner Brothers Entertainment business,

0:28:20.480 --> 0:28:24.000
<v Speaker 1>which is the video game unit small inside of Warner Brothers.

0:28:24.040 --> 0:28:26.160
<v Speaker 1>There's there's been some talk they might try to sell

0:28:26.240 --> 0:28:29.399
<v Speaker 1>Cartoon Network from inside of Turner UM. They're trying to

0:28:29.400 --> 0:28:32.480
<v Speaker 1>shop the direct TV Latin America business. UM, they haven't

0:28:32.480 --> 0:28:34.480
<v Speaker 1>been able to find any buyers for that. They're trying

0:28:34.520 --> 0:28:36.800
<v Speaker 1>to sell their advanced advertising business. They haven't been able

0:28:36.840 --> 0:28:39.880
<v Speaker 1>to find any buyers for that. And it's they're clearly

0:28:40.240 --> 0:28:44.480
<v Speaker 1>just desperately trying to raise cash. UM. One argument is

0:28:44.520 --> 0:28:46.800
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to do it to prepare for the Spectrum auction.

0:28:47.080 --> 0:28:50.240
<v Speaker 1>Another is that the rating agencies may already be breathing

0:28:50.280 --> 0:28:52.440
<v Speaker 1>down their neck and saying you've got to do something

0:28:52.760 --> 0:28:56.960
<v Speaker 1>to deliver this balance sheet faster. So, Craig, what does

0:28:57.000 --> 0:28:58.640
<v Speaker 1>a T and T want to be when it grows up?

0:28:58.680 --> 0:29:00.640
<v Speaker 1>And I just think about all of the deals that

0:29:00.720 --> 0:29:04.680
<v Speaker 1>it's done, Direct TV, Time, Warner, t C. I. I mean,

0:29:04.720 --> 0:29:06.920
<v Speaker 1>I just think about, you know, the failed purchase of

0:29:06.920 --> 0:29:11.200
<v Speaker 1>T Mobile. UM. They have done so many big things.

0:29:11.280 --> 0:29:13.880
<v Speaker 1>You have activist investors. Certainly we saw that last year

0:29:14.520 --> 0:29:17.440
<v Speaker 1>with Elliott Management. I mean, what do they need to be?

0:29:17.560 --> 0:29:20.320
<v Speaker 1>What should they be? In your view? Well, I think

0:29:20.360 --> 0:29:22.960
<v Speaker 1>they're going to have to pare back eventually to be

0:29:23.000 --> 0:29:27.480
<v Speaker 1>a communications business again. But it's breathtaking just how quickly

0:29:27.560 --> 0:29:30.440
<v Speaker 1>this has happened, right, I mean, remember they were it's

0:29:30.760 --> 0:29:34.000
<v Speaker 1>they've owned Time Warner for less than two years, um

0:29:34.280 --> 0:29:38.240
<v Speaker 1>and and already they're they're looking at unwinding the whole

0:29:38.240 --> 0:29:42.680
<v Speaker 1>strategy that that put the company together. You know, I think, Carl,

0:29:42.720 --> 0:29:45.320
<v Speaker 1>you put your finger on it when you mentioned T Mobile.

0:29:45.760 --> 0:29:49.720
<v Speaker 1>They tried to buy T Mobile in and that would

0:29:49.720 --> 0:29:53.080
<v Speaker 1>have been a perfectly rational strategy. There would have been

0:29:53.120 --> 0:29:56.680
<v Speaker 1>lots of synergies. It would have been horizontal expansion in

0:29:56.720 --> 0:30:02.240
<v Speaker 1>the US telecom market. Everything, everything we've heard since eleven said,

0:30:02.280 --> 0:30:04.400
<v Speaker 1>the d o J told them, not only can you

0:30:04.520 --> 0:30:07.000
<v Speaker 1>not do this deal, remember that deal was blocked by

0:30:07.000 --> 0:30:10.560
<v Speaker 1>the Department of Justice and never happened. Um, but but

0:30:10.760 --> 0:30:13.600
<v Speaker 1>you can't really buy any more telecom in the United States.

0:30:13.640 --> 0:30:15.320
<v Speaker 1>You're as big as we're going to let you get

0:30:15.360 --> 0:30:19.200
<v Speaker 1>in telecom. And so they were faced from eleven with

0:30:19.280 --> 0:30:21.640
<v Speaker 1>a question, which is, so do you want to go

0:30:21.800 --> 0:30:25.400
<v Speaker 1>outside the United States and buy telecom in Europe or

0:30:25.440 --> 0:30:27.320
<v Speaker 1>the rest of world, or do you want to buy

0:30:27.360 --> 0:30:29.680
<v Speaker 1>something non telecom in the US. And they felt like

0:30:29.720 --> 0:30:31.920
<v Speaker 1>they needed to do a deal to sustain the dividend.

0:30:32.400 --> 0:30:36.280
<v Speaker 1>They ultimately chose be that is, to buy something that

0:30:36.360 --> 0:30:39.840
<v Speaker 1>was essentially unrelated in the United States, UM, direct TV,

0:30:40.440 --> 0:30:42.320
<v Speaker 1>and then they tried to spend a story around it

0:30:42.400 --> 0:30:45.720
<v Speaker 1>to to pretend that it was a strategic acquisition. It

0:30:45.840 --> 0:30:49.720
<v Speaker 1>really wasn't. And when when you start strategy by saying

0:30:49.760 --> 0:30:52.480
<v Speaker 1>what can we buy and then how do we justify it?

0:30:52.880 --> 0:30:55.600
<v Speaker 1>As opposed to saying what are the the assets that

0:30:55.680 --> 0:30:58.320
<v Speaker 1>we need and how do we get them? Um, you're

0:30:58.360 --> 0:31:00.440
<v Speaker 1>starting in the wrong place and it's never going to

0:31:00.600 --> 0:31:04.080
<v Speaker 1>end well. And I think almost immediately Direct TV went

0:31:04.120 --> 0:31:06.560
<v Speaker 1>pear shaped. UM. They should have known it was going

0:31:06.640 --> 0:31:11.800
<v Speaker 1>to go pear shaped. And and because of the burden

0:31:11.840 --> 0:31:14.840
<v Speaker 1>of the dividend, they felt like they had to double

0:31:14.880 --> 0:31:18.320
<v Speaker 1>down and buy something else UM in order to keep

0:31:18.360 --> 0:31:21.600
<v Speaker 1>the free cash flow sufficient to fund the dividend, and

0:31:21.640 --> 0:31:24.800
<v Speaker 1>they bought Time Warner. And in retrospect, Time Warner had

0:31:24.800 --> 0:31:27.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the same problems as Direct TV. It

0:31:27.400 --> 0:31:31.000
<v Speaker 1>was a business that was at its at the very

0:31:31.080 --> 0:31:34.800
<v Speaker 1>tail end of its life, at least for the Turner networks. Remember,

0:31:34.920 --> 0:31:38.160
<v Speaker 1>HBO gets all the attention, the movie studio gets a

0:31:38.160 --> 0:31:40.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of attention, but the bulk of what they bought

0:31:40.560 --> 0:31:44.080
<v Speaker 1>is cable networks. UM, and they're at the tail end

0:31:44.120 --> 0:31:47.600
<v Speaker 1>of their useful life, and they're starting a secular decline,

0:31:47.680 --> 0:31:50.320
<v Speaker 1>just like Direct TV was when they bought it um

0:31:50.360 --> 0:31:52.840
<v Speaker 1>and so now they're suffering from the same problem of

0:31:52.880 --> 0:31:56.720
<v Speaker 1>this not only cyclical but secular decline. We could continue

0:31:56.760 --> 0:31:59.520
<v Speaker 1>on and on, so come back, I hope, and I

0:31:59.600 --> 0:32:01.880
<v Speaker 1>love the deep dives. I know pauled us too, So

0:32:02.080 --> 0:32:04.040
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for it, Craig, and I hope

0:32:04.080 --> 0:32:07.240
<v Speaker 1>you and your family are doing well amid this crazy time.

0:32:07.320 --> 0:32:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Craig Moffatt, founder and senior Alice at Mofatt Nathanson on

0:32:10.960 --> 0:32:17.840
<v Speaker 1>the phone in New York City, Brother, Mac Journal, Now,

0:32:17.920 --> 0:32:22.920
<v Speaker 1>but you let me drive? No, no, no home, honey, please,

0:32:23.040 --> 0:32:26.400
<v Speaker 1>I'll do the right ravel. Let me I want to drive,

0:32:29.160 --> 0:32:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Just drive, baby, good question trying. This is the drive

0:32:42.360 --> 0:32:45.520
<v Speaker 1>to the globe. Give me thanks. We'll drying up to

0:32:45.600 --> 0:32:48.680
<v Speaker 1>dawn on Bloomberg Radio. All right, just got about eleven

0:32:48.720 --> 0:32:51.240
<v Speaker 1>minutes left in today's trading session, getting ready to wrap

0:32:51.360 --> 0:32:53.880
<v Speaker 1>up the trading day and also of course the trading week.

0:32:54.000 --> 0:32:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Back with us in our time for the drive to

0:32:56.160 --> 0:32:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the close is Michael Sheldon, executive director and chief Investment

0:32:59.040 --> 0:33:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Office at R D m I Natural Group, based in Westport, Connecticut,

0:33:03.120 --> 0:33:05.440
<v Speaker 1>and that's where he joins us on the phone. How

0:33:05.480 --> 0:33:09.400
<v Speaker 1>are you Carol, Nice to see you. Um, we're still

0:33:10.200 --> 0:33:14.640
<v Speaker 1>working on the markets, looking ahead and building client portfolios.

0:33:14.640 --> 0:33:17.360
<v Speaker 1>We're still trying to figure everything out. And uh, I

0:33:17.400 --> 0:33:20.200
<v Speaker 1>think you know, it's been an interesting summer. It's been

0:33:20.240 --> 0:33:23.600
<v Speaker 1>an interesting two thousand twenty and we're not done yet.

0:33:23.680 --> 0:33:26.360
<v Speaker 1>We still have an election to get through, a little

0:33:26.360 --> 0:33:29.560
<v Speaker 1>thing called the election. I think, you know, from our perspective,

0:33:29.600 --> 0:33:31.680
<v Speaker 1>I think over the near term we could very well

0:33:31.680 --> 0:33:34.240
<v Speaker 1>see some added volatility in the markets. But I think

0:33:34.280 --> 0:33:37.840
<v Speaker 1>over the intermediate term we're probably in the early stages

0:33:37.880 --> 0:33:40.680
<v Speaker 1>of new economic cycle. And I think one thing that's

0:33:40.680 --> 0:33:45.200
<v Speaker 1>important for investors to realize is that economic expansions typically

0:33:45.280 --> 0:33:47.640
<v Speaker 1>last a number of years as opposed to just a

0:33:47.720 --> 0:33:50.400
<v Speaker 1>number of months. If you go back to, for example,

0:33:50.440 --> 0:33:54.520
<v Speaker 1>when when the UH the government started tracking GDP DAD

0:33:54.560 --> 0:33:58.040
<v Speaker 1>in the late nineteen forties, the average US economic expansion

0:33:58.080 --> 0:34:01.760
<v Speaker 1>has been almost six years, while the contract while contractions

0:34:01.760 --> 0:34:04.680
<v Speaker 1>have been about three months. So you have to sort

0:34:04.720 --> 0:34:07.840
<v Speaker 1>of take an intermediate to longer term viewpoint. UM, we

0:34:07.880 --> 0:34:10.200
<v Speaker 1>are constructive on the markets, but certainly there are a

0:34:10.280 --> 0:34:13.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of companies and industries that have been left behind,

0:34:13.560 --> 0:34:16.360
<v Speaker 1>and only of all the workers that were let go

0:34:16.840 --> 0:34:19.440
<v Speaker 1>have been rehired, so it's sort of a two speed

0:34:19.480 --> 0:34:22.360
<v Speaker 1>recovery at this point. So, Michael, what are some of

0:34:22.400 --> 0:34:25.400
<v Speaker 1>the sectors As you're constructing your portfolio, you're taking the

0:34:25.440 --> 0:34:28.640
<v Speaker 1>outlook called intermediate to longer term. What are some of

0:34:28.680 --> 0:34:31.440
<v Speaker 1>the sectors? Are you brave enough to say I can

0:34:31.480 --> 0:34:33.319
<v Speaker 1>look towards the other side of this and maybe take

0:34:33.360 --> 0:34:35.239
<v Speaker 1>a look at some of those sectors that are fundamentally

0:34:35.280 --> 0:34:38.600
<v Speaker 1>good businesses, like it's leisure or travel, but have been

0:34:38.680 --> 0:34:42.520
<v Speaker 1>knocked down because of this pandemic. Well, for the individual

0:34:42.520 --> 0:34:45.160
<v Speaker 1>stocks that we purchased, we really focus on companies with

0:34:45.160 --> 0:34:49.840
<v Speaker 1>strong balance sheets, industry leaders, companies with good outlooks. In

0:34:49.960 --> 0:34:52.080
<v Speaker 1>terms of our portfolio right now, the way we're sort

0:34:52.080 --> 0:34:54.120
<v Speaker 1>of thinking about things is we have a barbell approach.

0:34:54.480 --> 0:34:56.319
<v Speaker 1>So on the one side, you need to have some

0:34:56.480 --> 0:34:59.920
<v Speaker 1>growth in your portfolio to achieve the long term invest

0:35:00.000 --> 0:35:03.200
<v Speaker 1>and goals to meet your horizon. So we own some technology.

0:35:03.480 --> 0:35:05.760
<v Speaker 1>We have some of the stocks in the communication services

0:35:05.800 --> 0:35:08.000
<v Speaker 1>industry as well. That's sort of an interesting sector. It's

0:35:08.000 --> 0:35:10.560
<v Speaker 1>a mix, but we own some growth there. On the

0:35:10.560 --> 0:35:14.120
<v Speaker 1>other side, we own some companies in the consumer discretionary area,

0:35:14.440 --> 0:35:17.879
<v Speaker 1>as well as some industrials, because we also think we're

0:35:17.880 --> 0:35:20.919
<v Speaker 1>in the early stages of an economic expansion and then

0:35:21.160 --> 0:35:23.719
<v Speaker 1>sort of in the middle. We own some healthcare stocks.

0:35:23.880 --> 0:35:26.160
<v Speaker 1>We have exposure to healthcare. That's sort of our GARP

0:35:26.280 --> 0:35:29.279
<v Speaker 1>sector or growth at a reasonable price. You don't hear

0:35:29.320 --> 0:35:32.600
<v Speaker 1>that term that often anymore. Just saying that to somebody,

0:35:32.600 --> 0:35:34.440
<v Speaker 1>it's just kind of you're either, Carol, you're either in

0:35:34.480 --> 0:35:38.919
<v Speaker 1>the big growth camp or you're buying deepsical. Yeah, exactly. Well,

0:35:38.920 --> 0:35:46.560
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting that you say that you sound rather optimistic, Michael, No, no, no, no,

0:35:46.600 --> 0:35:50.520
<v Speaker 1>we're no optimism I say, I say, we're constructed. But

0:35:50.520 --> 0:35:52.439
<v Speaker 1>but it is important to point out that again we've

0:35:52.440 --> 0:35:55.759
<v Speaker 1>only recovered all the jobs lost. When you look at

0:35:55.840 --> 0:35:58.640
<v Speaker 1>last week weekly jobless claims, that actually went in the

0:35:58.640 --> 0:36:01.520
<v Speaker 1>wrong direction and it came out closer to nine thousand.

0:36:02.000 --> 0:36:05.560
<v Speaker 1>I think next week's weekly jobs numbers will be really important. Also,

0:36:05.640 --> 0:36:07.720
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of housing data which has been positive.

0:36:07.760 --> 0:36:10.279
<v Speaker 1>But also next week, investors should keep an eye in

0:36:10.320 --> 0:36:13.520
<v Speaker 1>the Leading Economic Index on Thursday because that tends to

0:36:13.560 --> 0:36:16.080
<v Speaker 1>forecast the direction of the economy over the next six

0:36:16.120 --> 0:36:18.759
<v Speaker 1>to twelve months, and a lot of data recently has

0:36:18.760 --> 0:36:21.080
<v Speaker 1>had a big jump after a we had a really

0:36:21.120 --> 0:36:23.920
<v Speaker 1>big decline in the economy in the second quarter, and

0:36:23.920 --> 0:36:25.880
<v Speaker 1>now we've had a really big bounce back in the

0:36:25.960 --> 0:36:28.520
<v Speaker 1>third quarter. Are thinking is that some of this data

0:36:28.520 --> 0:36:31.239
<v Speaker 1>will start to even out a little bit and we

0:36:31.360 --> 0:36:33.880
<v Speaker 1>see better times ahead over the next twelve to twenty

0:36:33.880 --> 0:36:36.000
<v Speaker 1>four months. But we think it's it's going to be

0:36:36.080 --> 0:36:38.160
<v Speaker 1>a bumpy ride as for some parts of the economy

0:36:38.200 --> 0:36:40.719
<v Speaker 1>as we move forward, can we do it without stimulus

0:36:40.800 --> 0:36:42.840
<v Speaker 1>or another round of stimulus? You see the debate, the

0:36:42.880 --> 0:36:44.920
<v Speaker 1>back and forth, and it's not only just over the

0:36:44.960 --> 0:36:47.640
<v Speaker 1>size at this point, there's a lot of Republicans and

0:36:47.719 --> 0:36:51.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe some others that think we don't really need anything. Yeah.

0:36:51.360 --> 0:36:53.120
<v Speaker 1>I think we're going to get some stimulus no matter

0:36:53.120 --> 0:36:55.400
<v Speaker 1>who the next president is, but at this point it

0:36:55.480 --> 0:36:57.520
<v Speaker 1>seems more likely that it will be in two thousand

0:36:57.600 --> 0:37:00.239
<v Speaker 1>twenty one as opposed to this year. You know, I

0:37:00.239 --> 0:37:02.319
<v Speaker 1>think in terms of the market itself, the two big

0:37:02.360 --> 0:37:06.000
<v Speaker 1>supporting factors for the market right now are stimulus talks,

0:37:06.280 --> 0:37:07.960
<v Speaker 1>which again it seems like this is more of a

0:37:08.000 --> 0:37:10.919
<v Speaker 1>two thousand twenty one issue. But we will likely get

0:37:10.960 --> 0:37:13.759
<v Speaker 1>some stimulus next year, and hopes of a vaccine, which

0:37:14.360 --> 0:37:16.279
<v Speaker 1>we have a number of different trials and Phase three

0:37:16.320 --> 0:37:18.200
<v Speaker 1>trials right now, and it seems like we're likely to

0:37:18.200 --> 0:37:21.040
<v Speaker 1>get a vaccine. Plus you combine that with the fact

0:37:21.040 --> 0:37:24.040
<v Speaker 1>again that we're probably in the early stages of an

0:37:24.040 --> 0:37:27.000
<v Speaker 1>economic cycle, which typically lasts a number of years as

0:37:27.040 --> 0:37:30.759
<v Speaker 1>opposed to a number of weeks or months. So how

0:37:30.800 --> 0:37:32.960
<v Speaker 1>are you factoring it if at all? Again, it sounds

0:37:33.000 --> 0:37:36.960
<v Speaker 1>like you're uh focus on that intermediate to longer term approach.

0:37:37.040 --> 0:37:41.480
<v Speaker 1>But Joe Biden seems to be pretty strong in the polls,

0:37:41.560 --> 0:37:44.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe even strong enough to bring the Senate along with him.

0:37:44.239 --> 0:37:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Would that change your calculus at all? Yeah, that's definitely

0:37:47.960 --> 0:37:50.160
<v Speaker 1>a risk to the to the story. I think one

0:37:50.200 --> 0:37:52.200
<v Speaker 1>of the issues with Joe Biden. Of course, on the

0:37:52.200 --> 0:37:54.960
<v Speaker 1>one hand, he's talked about raising taxes, which you never

0:37:55.000 --> 0:37:58.520
<v Speaker 1>really want to raise taxes, especially during a during an

0:37:58.560 --> 0:38:01.640
<v Speaker 1>economic recovery when things they're not at full speed. On

0:38:01.680 --> 0:38:04.440
<v Speaker 1>the other hand, he's also talked about things like infrastructure

0:38:04.480 --> 0:38:08.120
<v Speaker 1>spending and manufacturing jobs. So and and we're going to

0:38:08.440 --> 0:38:11.239
<v Speaker 1>likely get some fiscal spending and spending on areas which

0:38:11.239 --> 0:38:14.399
<v Speaker 1>could benefit companies and new companies and industries which will

0:38:14.400 --> 0:38:18.200
<v Speaker 1>open up new opportunities. So it's sort of a mixed bag.

0:38:18.280 --> 0:38:21.240
<v Speaker 1>But our thinking right now is that the stimulus spending

0:38:21.280 --> 0:38:23.879
<v Speaker 1>will probably come in the first half of his term,

0:38:24.320 --> 0:38:27.879
<v Speaker 1>and he's while he's certainly talked about raising taxes, it's

0:38:27.920 --> 0:38:31.240
<v Speaker 1>possible that if the economy is not unstable or strong footing,

0:38:31.560 --> 0:38:33.760
<v Speaker 1>he may delay that a little bit until the economy

0:38:33.800 --> 0:38:35.880
<v Speaker 1>gets on better footing and we start to see a

0:38:35.920 --> 0:38:38.920
<v Speaker 1>stronger recovery. So, but of that is something that will

0:38:38.960 --> 0:38:41.200
<v Speaker 1>certainly have to monitor. Where don't you want to be

0:38:41.239 --> 0:38:44.640
<v Speaker 1>in this market environment right now, Michael Well, I think

0:38:44.680 --> 0:38:47.080
<v Speaker 1>over the past ten years or so, we've been overweight

0:38:47.160 --> 0:38:50.640
<v Speaker 1>growth versus value, and we've been overweight the US versus

0:38:50.680 --> 0:38:53.600
<v Speaker 1>foreign and that's worked out pretty well. At some point,

0:38:53.600 --> 0:38:56.160
<v Speaker 1>these things tend to go in cycle. So we're still

0:38:56.239 --> 0:38:58.799
<v Speaker 1>keeping those overweights right now, but at some point we

0:38:58.840 --> 0:39:01.680
<v Speaker 1>probably will rotate into those areas of the market that

0:39:01.719 --> 0:39:04.879
<v Speaker 1>haven't participated, so for example, adding maybe a little bit

0:39:04.920 --> 0:39:07.600
<v Speaker 1>too far and moving more to the middle between growth

0:39:07.600 --> 0:39:09.640
<v Speaker 1>and value and picking up more in some of the

0:39:09.719 --> 0:39:12.759
<v Speaker 1>beaten down cyclical stocks or areas of the market that

0:39:12.800 --> 0:39:17.040
<v Speaker 1>haven't quite participated, but would participate if there's a more robust,

0:39:17.200 --> 0:39:21.560
<v Speaker 1>sustained economic recovery. And Michael, just about thirty seconds, is

0:39:21.560 --> 0:39:25.279
<v Speaker 1>it too early to look at small caps? Well, right now?

0:39:25.320 --> 0:39:28.480
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting more than the small cap market actually doesn't

0:39:28.520 --> 0:39:31.080
<v Speaker 1>make money right now, so um, those are more of

0:39:31.120 --> 0:39:33.400
<v Speaker 1>a risk on sort of trade. So if there is

0:39:33.440 --> 0:39:37.320
<v Speaker 1>a more robust economic recovery, then small caps should participate

0:39:37.360 --> 0:39:39.600
<v Speaker 1>and maybe even lead for a period of time. But

0:39:39.600 --> 0:39:41.040
<v Speaker 1>but you have to keep in mind that a lot

0:39:41.080 --> 0:39:43.000
<v Speaker 1>of those don't make money right now, so the or

0:39:43.080 --> 0:39:46.400
<v Speaker 1>more volatile um depending on your outlook for the market.

0:39:47.160 --> 0:39:48.840
<v Speaker 1>All right, we're gonna leave it on that note, Michael,

0:39:48.840 --> 0:39:51.000
<v Speaker 1>good to check in with. You have a great weekend.

0:39:51.360 --> 0:39:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Michael Sheldon, executive director and chief investment Officer at r

0:39:54.239 --> 0:39:56.920
<v Speaker 1>DM Financial Group. Thanks so much for listening to Bloomberg

0:39:56.960 --> 0:40:00.279
<v Speaker 1>Business Week. Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud for at

0:40:00.320 --> 0:40:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com, and be sure to check out our

0:40:02.520 --> 0:40:05.440
<v Speaker 1>daily radio show at two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio,

0:40:05.640 --> 0:40:07.759
<v Speaker 1>and be sure to watch us to on YouTube by

0:40:07.800 --> 0:40:09.520
<v Speaker 1>searching Bloomberg Global News