Speaker 1: Hey, they're folks. It is Thursday, July seventeenth, and the
Speaker 1: lead prosecutor who brought the case against Sean Ditty Combs
Speaker 1: has been fired. Forget this. Nobody thinks it has anything
Speaker 1: to do with the fact that she essentially lost that case.
Speaker 1: Welcome everybody to this episode of Amy and TJ. Robes
Speaker 1: have been We followed that case so closely, the Ditty trial.
Speaker 1: We wake up, see the headlines Marine Komi has been fired,
Speaker 1: so we automatically obviously she's been top of mind for
Speaker 1: three months now with this case. But it has nothing
Speaker 1: to do with Ditty.
Speaker 2: They're arguing, right, Well, it's funny because obviously that's where
Speaker 2: we've heard her name most recently, most often. And yes,
Speaker 2: Diddy was acquitted of the most serious charges. So my mind,
Speaker 2: fresh on top of my mind, was that she must
Speaker 2: have been fired because of that. But when you look
Speaker 2: at the headlines every single news outlet, they don't even
Speaker 2: mention Didty. In the headlines they mentioned her father, who
Speaker 2: I actually, I'm going to admit I did not know.
Speaker 2: But now it makes a lot of sense that the
Speaker 2: former FBI director James Comy is her father. Yes, that
Speaker 2: same former FBI director who Trump cannot stand and who
Speaker 2: cannot stand Trump. Do you think, well, maybe just you know,
Speaker 2: a few writings in the sand might have just illustrated
Speaker 2: perhaps we can get into that there beef that has continued,
Speaker 2: and now he's actually being investigated, So we digress. But yes,
Speaker 2: the Epstein, the Epstein case. She was a lead prosecutor
Speaker 2: in the Jeffrey Epstein case and the Gallaine Maxwell case.
Speaker 1: And she won the Glaine Maxwell case. We don't know
Speaker 1: what would have happened with Epstein. Of course, he died
Speaker 1: in prison by suicide, but the did He trial?
Speaker 3: Did he?
Speaker 2: Though? Did he?
Speaker 1: I'm kidding, don't you start that stuff now?
Speaker 3: Sorry, I was just turning the pot. Sturn the pot.
Speaker 1: They said he died by suicide. Okay, but the did
Speaker 1: He trial? This was a stinging defeat for that office,
Speaker 1: and office that doesn't lose a lot. This was a
Speaker 1: very high profile loss for them. Loss meaning he got
Speaker 1: off on the most serious charges. But you look at
Speaker 1: that and they, I mean they had egg on their face.
Speaker 1: They looked bad. So when you think, like wow, it
Speaker 1: almost made sense. Take away the Glain Maxwell, excuse me,
Speaker 1: take away the Epstein and the Komi stuff. But her Dad,
Speaker 1: is that it's not supposed to be a fireable offense
Speaker 1: to lose a case.
Speaker 2: Well, yes, I mean, if you're a prosecutor and you
Speaker 2: have to fear losing your job each and every time
Speaker 2: you lose a case, that would be an untenable position
Speaker 2: to hold because you'd be in constant worry and under
Speaker 2: constant threat that you were going to be fired.
Speaker 3: So that can't be the case.
Speaker 2: Also, of note, which was confusing when we first heard
Speaker 2: this this morning that she had been fired. There's still
Speaker 2: a lot of work to be done in the prosecutor's office.
Speaker 3: This case is not over.
Speaker 2: Sentencing still has to take place, and then of course
Speaker 2: there is going to be an appeal. So why not
Speaker 2: have your prosecutor, you're one of your lead prosecutors, who
Speaker 2: knows the case backwards and forwards, continue to see it through,
Speaker 2: at least through SENI and seeing, but also with the
Speaker 2: appeals that are absolutely.
Speaker 3: Sure to come.
Speaker 1: We know as recently as a couple I mean, who
Speaker 1: knows how many days it's been, as of a couple
Speaker 1: of weeks, she was talking to the judge and submitting
Speaker 1: paperwork having to do with ditty. She was very much
Speaker 1: active in seeing this thing through. She's out of there.
Speaker 1: Now what that does to that case, I don't know
Speaker 1: what impact that could have. But for us to have
Speaker 1: watched her and to have kept up with her and
Speaker 1: kept up with that trial, our miles kind of dropped
Speaker 1: that the person who has been leading this charge and
Speaker 1: still a lot of fighting, fighting and back and forth
Speaker 1: between Diddy's lawyers and the prosecutors still to be done,
Speaker 1: and the person leading the charge is out of there.
Speaker 1: But all of that said, so, I don't see anywhere
Speaker 1: where anybody is suggesting that her firing has anything to
Speaker 1: do with Sean Diecombs.
Speaker 2: No. In fact, I haven't seen one or heard one
Speaker 2: mention of it. They've just thrown out there oh yes,
Speaker 2: and by the way, it was almost, oh, we forgot
Speaker 2: to mention she was also the lead prosecutor in the
Speaker 2: recent Ditty trial.
Speaker 3: It was not at the top.
Speaker 2: Of anyone's minds in terms of why she possibly could
Speaker 2: have been fired, and it hasn't been stated directly. No
Speaker 2: one has said why she has been fired, although it
Speaker 2: has been interesting reading so many of these articles about
Speaker 2: why she was fired, and they did talk about a
Speaker 2: memo that was accompanying her firing, and it was referring
Speaker 2: to a power of the president, so it did certainly
Speaker 2: imply so there was a memo, according to sources, that
Speaker 2: she was being dismissed pursuant to Article two of the
Speaker 2: US Constitution. Article two of the US Constitution is the
Speaker 2: portion of the Constitution that lays out the president's powers.
Speaker 2: So one could infer people have been inferring that perhaps
Speaker 2: this goes all the way up to President Trump.
Speaker 1: And look, the President has been on a firing spree
Speaker 1: at the Justice Department since he came back into office
Speaker 1: because so many the folks there was named Jack Smith,
Speaker 1: had investigations, a couple of investigations into President Trump before
Speaker 1: he became president again, and I mean dozens of folks
Speaker 1: at the Justice Department have been let go, including prosecutors,
Speaker 1: people who worked on those investigations. So it's not odd
Speaker 1: to see that the president has fired somebody from the
Speaker 1: Justice Department. However, who this woman is, Maureen Comy. Yes,
Speaker 1: you maybe only got to know her because of the
Speaker 1: Diddy trial, But folks, we assure you this woman is
Speaker 1: a stud in that office. She is a top prosecutor.
Speaker 1: You don't get plucked and selected to try Diddy to
Speaker 1: try Epstein and to try Gallaine Maxwell. If you don't
Speaker 1: know what you're doing. She got those rolls. Those she
Speaker 1: knows what she's doing, and they have a stellar record,
Speaker 1: they say, winning record at the Southern District where she works.
Speaker 2: So yeah, for ten years she's been working there. Harvard
Speaker 2: Law graduate, obviously knows what she's doing. Comes from a
Speaker 2: family who is very well entrenched in politics and big
Speaker 2: stories and certainly big cases. This is nothing that she
Speaker 2: would have ever shied away from, and was seemingly not
Speaker 2: just fit for the job, but very qualified for the job.
Speaker 1: This is a capable lady. Yes, this is a very
Speaker 1: capable woman. And reminder at the trial, at least the
Speaker 1: highlights frobes. You just reminded me a moment ago before
Speaker 1: we started recording. She handled a lot of the questioning
Speaker 1: of Jane. Who didn't Jane spend the most time on
Speaker 1: the stand.
Speaker 2: She was up there longer than Cassi, even Toura fine
Speaker 2: was she was up there longer than me. I was,
Speaker 2: so yes, Jane I believe was the witness who testified
Speaker 2: the longest, and it did he trial.
Speaker 1: So she handled some of that questioning and Rose is
Speaker 1: not I mean, I don't want to say they put
Speaker 1: all they weighed too much with this. But the last
Speaker 1: voice that the jury heard before they went for deliberation
Speaker 1: deliberations Maureen Comy, because she handled the closing rebuttal. She
Speaker 1: was the last person to make an art argument to
Speaker 1: the jury, and.
Speaker 2: She actually took on a little bit of the snark
Speaker 2: that we saw from the defense team, because yes, Mark Agnifhillo, Yes,
Speaker 2: nailed his name finally after weeks and weeks of saying it.
Speaker 1: Who's the guy that plays with Oklahoma City.
Speaker 3: Thunder Shae.
Speaker 2: Shae something with gorgeous Shay.
Speaker 1: I can't sorry for the folks, but if you've kept
Speaker 1: up with us, Robes has been working all season on
Speaker 1: Shay Gildos Alexander Alexander.
Speaker 2: I just won the tongue yet, No, I got Shay
Speaker 2: right because I was calling him shy first, So Shae
Speaker 2: gilgis Alexander. But yes, we digress talking about Mark agn
Speaker 2: So anyway, Mark Agnifillo in his closing arguments, if you remember,
Speaker 2: was very theatrical, very animated, very sarcastic, uh cracking jokes
Speaker 2: and poking fun at the prosecution's case against Ditty, and
Speaker 2: it resonated with her and I'm sure the prosecuted prosecutor's office,
Speaker 2: who had a fairly dry closing argument.
Speaker 3: She came up.
Speaker 2: Marine Komi comes up then for the rebuttal, and she
Speaker 2: starts getting animated, and she starts kind of mirroring a
Speaker 2: little bit of what we saw from Mark Agnaphillo.
Speaker 3: So she knew what to do and she brought it home.
Speaker 2: They always say you save your best for last right,
Speaker 2: so she yes, she was the final voice of the
Speaker 2: prosecution for the ditty trial.
Speaker 1: And here we are. I don't think anyone was calling
Speaker 1: for her to be fired. There wasn't some huge somebody
Speaker 1: going off out there, some huge public outcry about she
Speaker 1: should lose her job because she didn't get the convictions
Speaker 1: for dating. Nobody was saying that. However, people have Rob's
Speaker 1: been calling for her to be fired for a different reason,
Speaker 1: and that is because she handled the Jeffrey Epstein case.
Speaker 1: She just happens to be tied up now in what
Speaker 1: Trump's tied up in, which is a Mago revolt that
Speaker 1: I'm sure you all and seeing the President has gone
Speaker 1: off on some of his supporters, even calling them past
Speaker 1: supporters who are following for this Maga hoax excuse me
Speaker 1: this Epstein hoax from the Democrat, so she now robes out.
Speaker 1: I think a lot of people are speculating that she
Speaker 1: was just so closely tied to that, and because she was,
Speaker 1: and because the president is dealing what he's dealing with
Speaker 1: with his supporters, that he's trying to I don't know,
Speaker 1: not necessarily scapegoaterer, but kind of wiping the slate clean
Speaker 1: to a certain degree of peak, just getting people out.
Speaker 1: So they're saying her connection to Epstein is one of
Speaker 1: the main reasons she's out of them.
Speaker 2: So earlier this week, Politico actually referenced her in their
Speaker 2: article about all of this, about the MAGA uproar folks
Speaker 2: just not believing that there isn't an Epstein client list.
Speaker 2: They believe there's a cover up. They believe that he
Speaker 2: was murdered in prison. They believe he did not die
Speaker 2: by suicide. But Maureen Comy had argued and has argued
Speaker 2: against the disclosure of these investigative records that are in
Speaker 2: the court but are sealed documents. Of course, the MAGA
Speaker 2: folks want all of that unsealed. But it makes sense
Speaker 2: why Maureene Comy would want these records sealed, because they
Speaker 2: believe there's a lot of information in there, and of
Speaker 2: course there is a lot of information in there that
Speaker 2: should be private. We're talking about sexual assault victims, we're
Speaker 2: talking about minors. These are sensitive cases victims of sexual violence.
Speaker 2: So that is standard operating procedure. It's not about some
Speaker 2: cover up to make sure the public never finds out
Speaker 2: what's inside these cases. They're actually trying to protect victims.
Speaker 2: And so they also said also of note, and why
Speaker 2: she another reason why she might not want any of
Speaker 2: these records being released is because Galainne Maxwell is likely
Speaker 2: and is going it actually isn't likely, has already appealed
Speaker 2: her conviction, so this stuff is going to come back
Speaker 2: up during the appeals process that she doesn't want made public.
Speaker 1: Everything you said makes sense from a prosecutor standpoint, that's
Speaker 1: going to impact my case. If I release all these
Speaker 1: documents unseal them. That actually makes sense. Nobody's going to
Speaker 1: buy that. No, No, okay, I say conspiracy theorists. They
Speaker 1: call themselves truth seekers, fine, and nobody is ever going
Speaker 1: to believe. I really do think you could open the
Speaker 1: Epstein room with all the files and let the whole
Speaker 1: public go in, and nobody is still going to believe
Speaker 1: anything other than what they believe, which is that he
Speaker 1: was murdered. And there is a long list of influential
Speaker 1: people out there that just exists.
Speaker 2: Look, and the truth is, I think most people know
Speaker 2: or a lot of people have heard about my hot
Speaker 2: mic moment. And I had been frustrated at my former
Speaker 2: network for not being able to put out these stories
Speaker 2: about Jeffrey Epstein before this all came to light with
Speaker 2: one of the victims, Virginia.
Speaker 3: And you know, every one of these victims have very.
Speaker 2: Different experiences, and they told their truth to police, they
Speaker 2: told their truth to the courts, and a lot of
Speaker 2: these documents were sealed. So there has been a lot
Speaker 2: there has been a major problem with transparency in the
Speaker 2: years leading up to Epstein even being arrest and then
Speaker 2: put behind bars. But there there's a fair amount of skepticism,
Speaker 2: and I would say that it's a fair thing for
Speaker 2: a lot of folks to be skeptical about what information
Speaker 2: has gotten out because there were a lot of powerful
Speaker 2: people implicated or names were brought up, and so then
Speaker 2: to just say, oh, nope, there's no list, there's no
Speaker 2: indication of any powerful person being on Epstein's computer or
Speaker 2: on the payroll or being a part of any on
Speaker 2: his planes. Like there's just it's hard to imagine that
Speaker 2: there isn't some sort of Maybe there isn't a formal list,
Speaker 2: but it's hard to imagine there isn't some sort of
Speaker 2: information that does have names on it.
Speaker 1: I get, I don't know. I mean, at this point,
Speaker 1: nobody out trust and who do you believe? Who has
Speaker 1: seen it? Who knows does it? Is it really just?
Speaker 1: I mean the President called it a hoax that by
Speaker 1: call me her dad rather changed comy, and President Obama.
Speaker 3: A hoax too, and Biden too to create.
Speaker 1: Some just mindset put out there that it's some list
Speaker 1: and people you dangle it in front of them like
Speaker 1: a rabbit in front of great hand, and they're just
Speaker 1: gonna chaste and they're not gonna stop. And it's working
Speaker 1: actually if that's the case. But you talk about skepticism,
Speaker 1: at what point do skepticism become go from healthy skepticism
Speaker 1: to unhealthy?
Speaker 3: That's that's a fair point.
Speaker 1: At what point do you have to believe something or
Speaker 1: stop something or I don't know that answer.
Speaker 2: Nothing pisses people off more though, I think in this
Speaker 2: country and probably around the world to think that powerful
Speaker 2: people with a lot of money can protect themselves no
Speaker 2: matter what, and you're never gonna find out because they
Speaker 2: have enough money and have enough power to protect not
Speaker 2: just themselves, but they're other rich, powerful friends and it's
Speaker 2: in us versus them situation. And this is how conspiracy
Speaker 2: theories begin. And they might begin with truth, but then
Speaker 2: they do sometimes balloon and become something larger than they
Speaker 2: ever were meant to be. It's just it's tough to
Speaker 2: find out where the truth is, you know. I have
Speaker 2: skepticism about all of this. I don't know where you stand,
Speaker 2: but certainly I do with the interviews that I had
Speaker 2: done and the research I had done for several years,
Speaker 2: I have skepticism.
Speaker 3: I don't know that.
Speaker 2: So they might be truthful when they say there isn't
Speaker 2: a client list, but it's hard for me to imagine
Speaker 2: that there aren't documents, there isn't something, There wasn't something
Speaker 2: they found they raided his homes that didn't have some
Speaker 2: sort of connection to people who don't want their names
Speaker 2: getting out.
Speaker 1: The idea there is that somebody is being protected and
Speaker 1: in some way, some powerful person is being protected in
Speaker 1: some way, Maureen Comy might have had a hand in
Speaker 1: some of that. Even if she isn't conspiring with people
Speaker 1: to do it, she's at least saying, we don't want
Speaker 1: these documents to get out, and she has her reasons
Speaker 1: for it, and so maybe she got caught up in
Speaker 1: all that. Now that was one reason they're talking about.
Speaker 1: The other reason her daddy.
Speaker 2: Welcome back everyone to this edition of Amy and TJ,
Speaker 2: where we are talking about more Comy. She has been
Speaker 2: fired from her job as a lead prosecutor in the
Speaker 2: Southern District of New York. She's been with the office
Speaker 2: for ten years. She's the daughter of James Comy. She
Speaker 2: was also a lead prosecutor in the Epstein case, in
Speaker 2: the Glene Maxwell case, and of course in the Sean
Speaker 2: Diddy Comb's case. And a lot of people are just
Speaker 2: trying to figure out why why she was suddenly let
Speaker 2: go on Wednesday after having all of that experience and
Speaker 2: having had a stellar reputation. It's unclear right now, but
Speaker 2: a lot of folks are pointing to her father, James Comy.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and we have to say that as of this recording,
Speaker 1: at least, there has been no official word from anybody
Speaker 1: explaining why but it sucks when your last name is Comy. Yeah,
Speaker 1: and you work in the Justice Department, which is under
Speaker 1: the Trump administration of a president who absolutely hates your dad. Correct,
Speaker 1: what is she supposed to do? James has been one
Speaker 1: of the top five public nemesis for sure Trump.
Speaker 2: And it only got worse back in May when her father,
Speaker 2: James Comy, decided to post something on social media on vacation.
Speaker 3: He was at the beach.
Speaker 2: He should just be enjoying his time off.
Speaker 1: That tells you a lot about this relationship. He's on
Speaker 1: the beach on vacation.
Speaker 2: Still he Trump, and he's arranging seashells. And he didn't
Speaker 2: find them that way as he tried to say, he
Speaker 2: just happened upon seashells.
Speaker 1: Did he say that he found him the way he said?
Speaker 2: He just he was just saying, I want look what
Speaker 2: I found on the beach. I mean, he was probably
Speaker 2: saying it with his tongue, tongue.
Speaker 3: In his cheek.
Speaker 2: But still, I mean, we all know he put those
Speaker 2: shells in the formation of eight six four seven, eighty
Speaker 2: six forty seven.
Speaker 3: You can figure out it's not too hard.
Speaker 2: The eighty six something is to kill something and forty seven,
Speaker 2: the number of Donald Trump.
Speaker 3: He's the forty seventh.
Speaker 2: The president states, he's saying, oh, I didn't mean that,
Speaker 2: I wasn't trying to incite violence, and look they went.
Speaker 2: I do believe that he probably was saying get rid
Speaker 2: of forty seven, which also seems a little childish for
Speaker 2: the former FBI director to be saying get rid of
Speaker 2: Donald Trump with seashells that you know, so you can
Speaker 2: say it is silly, stupid mistake. But he actually is
Speaker 2: being investigated for a call to violence against like an
Speaker 2: assassination attempt against President Trump. That's how seriously the Justice
Speaker 2: Department and the FBI said they were taking it.
Speaker 3: So, yes, he is currently under investigation by the Trump
Speaker 3: administration for inciting violence against the president of the United States.
Speaker 2: Hmm.
Speaker 3: Now his daughter just got fired.
Speaker 1: He said it was mad, that was med. So that
Speaker 1: was a couple of months ago. This goes back to
Speaker 1: friaking twenty seventeen. Trump first term came into office. Call
Speaker 1: me Me was the FBI director who had been appointed by
Speaker 1: President Obama. Before that, he was in the Justice Department
Speaker 1: serving under George W.
Speaker 2: Bush.
Speaker 1: So the guy has been around and has some experience.
Speaker 1: Trump asked him for his loyalty. The way Comy tells
Speaker 1: this story, they were at some event and Trump he
Speaker 1: was Trump, and his people asked him they wanted him
Speaker 1: to be loyal. He was so disturbed by that interaction
Speaker 1: that he went and made like a record of it.
Speaker 1: And then over the years he has been slowly putting
Speaker 1: out stuff and exposing some of the things from behind
Speaker 1: the scenes. He's been highly critical of the President, and
Speaker 1: the President eventually fired him. But that history goes back
Speaker 1: and forth. We're talking almost that's eight plus years that
Speaker 1: these two have been going at it publicly in some way.
Speaker 1: Comy wrote a book in where she called the president
Speaker 1: ego driven at some point. So these two just don't
Speaker 1: like each other. And now the Justice Department, the FBI
Speaker 1: questioned him about the Shales thing. But there's another investigation
Speaker 1: they've confirmed is going on, having to possibly do with Russia.
Speaker 2: That goes back to twenty sixteen.
Speaker 1: What are we These two don't like each Other's what
Speaker 1: I'm saying. So if Maureen Comy is working for a
Speaker 1: guy who hates her dad, and now the Epstein thing
Speaker 1: comes up and Trump is taking all kinds of heat
Speaker 1: for that, I got this woman here in the Justice
Speaker 1: debarment who was tied to Epstein. I already don't like her, daddy,
Speaker 1: and here we are.
Speaker 3: Yeah, it's a win win for him.
Speaker 2: He solved two problems by firing Maureen Kmy And that's
Speaker 2: just the truth of it.
Speaker 1: And we all know he's not funny. I'm sorry, I
Speaker 1: know I laugh at the way you put that.
Speaker 3: Cor Obviously, this is awful.
Speaker 1: A woman lost her job. I'm pretty sure she was
Speaker 1: passionate about the work she did and she worked really
Speaker 1: really hard at it. And so to have it in
Speaker 1: this way based on what not your performance, not something
Speaker 1: you did, not your record, not your you didn't even
Speaker 1: make a misstep and say something stupid. This woman ain't
Speaker 1: out there on TV every day.
Speaker 3: She's not saying she kept her.
Speaker 2: Head down to the whole thing. She was not seeking publicity.
Speaker 2: You have to say that about her. You think about
Speaker 2: the Diddy trial, all the publicity seekers there were who
Speaker 2: had different roles in there, even if they were like
Speaker 2: just satellite roles. She you never heard her ever do anything.
Speaker 2: So and look, the two of us, no more than anyone,
Speaker 2: what it's like to lose a job from a pr perspective,
Speaker 2: and that's exactly what's happening here, and it's you know,
Speaker 2: it made me very sad to see that someone who
Speaker 2: was qualified and a hard worker and had a stellar
Speaker 2: record losing her job because of politics and pr and
Speaker 2: perception and maybe even just because of one man.
Speaker 1: And nothing she actually did. It's I don't know this
Speaker 1: woman at all now, don't know anything about her background,
Speaker 1: nothing else. All I know is that she did her
Speaker 1: job and today she's out of that job. Look, she's
Speaker 1: gonna be fine. I'm sure she's gonna who knows what
Speaker 1: this is going to mean for her down the road.
Speaker 1: It's just it sucks that this is where we are
Speaker 1: and this is what we do and a woman who
Speaker 1: I don't know ropes prosecutors. I mean, we have to
Speaker 1: support them, applaud them. What do we I mean? I still,
Speaker 1: as much as we talk about the justice system, there
Speaker 1: are plenty of people out there in prosecutor's offices doing
Speaker 1: good work.
Speaker 3: Yes, and we.
Speaker 1: Need them to actually get bad people off the street.
Speaker 2: Yes. It's just a shame to think that this actually
Speaker 2: sends a message to prosecutors everywhere. We've talked a lot
Speaker 2: about Trump's influence on the media and what maybe now
Speaker 2: mainstream media networks are afraid to cover or are tailoring
Speaker 2: what they cover out of fear of lawsuits or retribution
Speaker 2: or access or denied access. Same thing with the prosecutor's office.
Speaker 2: That's also deeply concerning. If you're afraid you're going to
Speaker 2: lose your job if you do something the executive branch
Speaker 2: doesn't like. That's a scary, scary thing. And this is
Speaker 2: actually a little frightening when you take it in a
Speaker 2: macro view. It's a little concerning about what this means
Speaker 2: about the different arms of government and its influence on
Speaker 2: media and on the justice side and all that.
Speaker 1: We still have to wonder what it means for the
Speaker 1: ditty case. Yes, look, there is a battle going on
Speaker 1: in argument over how much time this man should have
Speaker 1: been in prison. Does it make an impact and not
Speaker 1: have her a part of that.
Speaker 3: It has to have an impact. It has to have
Speaker 3: an impact.
Speaker 2: She had to know that case backwards and forwards as
Speaker 2: one of the lead prosecutors, one of the lead solicitors
Speaker 2: in this.
Speaker 3: So you know, we shall see.
Speaker 2: I'll be curious to see if the defense, if anyone
Speaker 2: else has a comment about this firing and what it
Speaker 2: may mean for the ditty trial going forward, but we
Speaker 2: will of course continue to cover all the ins and
Speaker 2: outs leading up to sentencing and beyond, So thank you
Speaker 2: for listening to us. As always, I'm Amy roboch On,
Speaker 2: behalf of my partner t J. Holmes.
Speaker 3: Have a great day, everybody,