WEBVTT - Are “Buffered” ETFs the Next Big Thing?

0:00:06.360 --> 0:00:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Trillions. I'm Joe Weber and I'm Eric Bell

0:00:08.440 --> 0:00:14.880
<v Speaker 1>tunis Eric. We have a guest, not there's one guest,

0:00:14.880 --> 0:00:19.640
<v Speaker 1>actually two guests this week. Both are legends, legends. One

0:00:19.720 --> 0:00:22.200
<v Speaker 1>is an industry legend, and one is a Bloomberg News legend.

0:00:22.520 --> 0:00:25.239
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News legend is Caroline Wilson. Carolina, welcome on the

0:00:25.239 --> 0:00:27.800
<v Speaker 1>show again. Thank you for having me and and Carolina,

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:31.360
<v Speaker 1>this is your guest. Actually, who do we have? We

0:00:31.480 --> 0:00:35.000
<v Speaker 1>have Bruce Bond here. He is co founder of Innovator

0:00:35.040 --> 0:00:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Capital Management, but you might know him a little better

0:00:38.120 --> 0:00:41.479
<v Speaker 1>potentially as the co founder of power Shares Capital Management

0:00:41.479 --> 0:00:43.519
<v Speaker 1>back in the day. And let me let's not understate

0:00:43.600 --> 0:00:47.400
<v Speaker 1>that he recognized smart Beta before it was a household name. So,

0:00:47.960 --> 0:00:50.160
<v Speaker 1>and Carolyn, what was the thing that a little spark

0:00:50.360 --> 0:00:52.160
<v Speaker 1>that made you say we should talk to Bruce Bond

0:00:52.240 --> 0:00:55.120
<v Speaker 1>right now? Sure? So, before I covered exchange traded funds,

0:00:55.160 --> 0:00:59.520
<v Speaker 1>I covered these byzantine products known as structured notes, which

0:00:59.560 --> 0:01:02.800
<v Speaker 1>have a pretty horrible reputation. It was a really fun

0:01:02.880 --> 0:01:05.480
<v Speaker 1>beat to cover. It was hated by a lot of

0:01:05.520 --> 0:01:10.039
<v Speaker 1>people with um pretty critical stories on that industry. But

0:01:10.080 --> 0:01:13.160
<v Speaker 1>what's really interesting here is that these are e t

0:01:13.360 --> 0:01:16.560
<v Speaker 1>f s that sort of make better and change the

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:18.479
<v Speaker 1>structure of a structure note and make it a bit

0:01:18.520 --> 0:01:22.480
<v Speaker 1>more accessible for investors. So it's sort of the marriage

0:01:22.520 --> 0:01:24.720
<v Speaker 1>of these two worlds that I used to cover um

0:01:24.720 --> 0:01:26.360
<v Speaker 1>and let me give you some stats on this, so

0:01:26.400 --> 0:01:29.399
<v Speaker 1>the that we call them buffer or downside protection ETFs

0:01:29.920 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 1>before Bruce is going to go into what they do,

0:01:31.800 --> 0:01:34.640
<v Speaker 1>but they're pretty instant hit um and I'm a little

0:01:34.640 --> 0:01:36.600
<v Speaker 1>shocked by the numbers. We've got one point eight billion.

0:01:37.040 --> 0:01:39.400
<v Speaker 1>There's another issue where that has some but that's quite

0:01:39.400 --> 0:01:42.440
<v Speaker 1>a bit especially I know the markets not up a

0:01:42.440 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 1>lot per se, but it's not down either. These to

0:01:45.319 --> 0:01:47.920
<v Speaker 1>me have their biggest potential when the market goes down

0:01:47.960 --> 0:01:50.360
<v Speaker 1>because people tend to search for that like after the fact.

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:52.440
<v Speaker 1>So the fact that they got this much and they're

0:01:52.440 --> 0:01:54.320
<v Speaker 1>a little more on the complicated side, which tends to

0:01:54.400 --> 0:01:56.800
<v Speaker 1>be a tougher self for e t s typically, but

0:01:57.200 --> 0:01:59.680
<v Speaker 1>I could see why they have appeal. They do limit

0:01:59.680 --> 0:02:02.720
<v Speaker 1>your side and that is a very powerful concept. So

0:02:02.960 --> 0:02:08.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm excited to dive into this time on trillions downside

0:02:08.600 --> 0:02:13.519
<v Speaker 1>protection with Bruce Bond. So Bruce, welcome to Trillions. Thank

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:15.640
<v Speaker 1>you for having me. So you're You're like, we've set

0:02:15.639 --> 0:02:18.840
<v Speaker 1>this up. You're kind of a legend in the ETF industry.

0:02:19.200 --> 0:02:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Why did you do this? What was the idea? Well, I,

0:02:22.520 --> 0:02:24.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, I really didn't intendo coming back to being

0:02:24.840 --> 0:02:28.680
<v Speaker 1>all honesty with you and uh my partner John Southard,

0:02:29.240 --> 0:02:32.680
<v Speaker 1>he bought a life insurance product that had some type

0:02:32.680 --> 0:02:35.520
<v Speaker 1>of kind of a defined outcome within the product and

0:02:35.560 --> 0:02:37.359
<v Speaker 1>he was like, you know, it's really amazing this isn't

0:02:37.400 --> 0:02:40.200
<v Speaker 1>available in an e t F. I mean, the value

0:02:40.280 --> 0:02:45.400
<v Speaker 1>proposition here is really neat and uh, it's surprising people

0:02:45.440 --> 0:02:48.280
<v Speaker 1>don't have access. What do you what is that? Look like,

0:02:48.360 --> 0:02:52.120
<v Speaker 1>what is the benefit of that? The benefit of the

0:02:52.200 --> 0:02:54.960
<v Speaker 1>defined outcome where the buffery TF is? Eric said, you know,

0:02:55.360 --> 0:02:58.800
<v Speaker 1>um is the ability for an investor to purchase an

0:02:58.840 --> 0:03:02.240
<v Speaker 1>e t F in today a to understand their outcome

0:03:02.760 --> 0:03:05.360
<v Speaker 1>a year in the future, depending on what the SMP

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:08.440
<v Speaker 1>five does. So instead of just going to the mercy

0:03:08.440 --> 0:03:11.120
<v Speaker 1>of the market hoping for the very best, hoping it

0:03:11.160 --> 0:03:14.040
<v Speaker 1>doesn't go down, which is what most people do, you

0:03:14.200 --> 0:03:17.440
<v Speaker 1>know that you have a buffer toward losses on the downside,

0:03:17.639 --> 0:03:20.880
<v Speaker 1>but you're going to participate on the upside. And until

0:03:21.080 --> 0:03:23.680
<v Speaker 1>now that has not been available in an E t F.

0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:26.959
<v Speaker 1>So let me stop you right there, because when when

0:03:26.960 --> 0:03:29.360
<v Speaker 1>someone might here participate in the upside, but let me

0:03:29.360 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 1>you're downside, they may go that that sounds too good

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:34.160
<v Speaker 1>to be true. Um, just go into that a little bit.

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Why isn't it too good to be true? And how

0:03:35.920 --> 0:03:37.640
<v Speaker 1>much of the upside do you get? Do you get

0:03:37.640 --> 0:03:40.720
<v Speaker 1>it all? No? You know, well you might get it all,

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:43.600
<v Speaker 1>and the thing is you don't really know. So the buffers,

0:03:43.840 --> 0:03:47.000
<v Speaker 1>there are three different buffers, right, There's a there's a

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:50.240
<v Speaker 1>nine percent buffer protects your first nine percent of losses.

0:03:50.520 --> 0:03:53.880
<v Speaker 1>There's a fifteen percent buffer that protects the first fifteen percent,

0:03:53.960 --> 0:03:57.680
<v Speaker 1>and then there's a thirty percent buffer, and that buffers

0:03:57.680 --> 0:04:01.840
<v Speaker 1>you from negative five to negative thirty five percent. So

0:04:01.880 --> 0:04:05.000
<v Speaker 1>there's three levels, depending on how concerned you are about

0:04:05.000 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 1>where the market is and how much capit you want

0:04:07.160 --> 0:04:10.120
<v Speaker 1>to preserve and that, and so with each level, as

0:04:10.240 --> 0:04:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Eric was pointing out, each level, it costs a little

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 1>bit more to have that buffer, and therefore your cap

0:04:15.800 --> 0:04:18.520
<v Speaker 1>is adjusted a little bit as you get more buffer.

0:04:18.920 --> 0:04:22.320
<v Speaker 1>This seems like something that should have happened already. We

0:04:22.400 --> 0:04:24.720
<v Speaker 1>thought the same thing. I think we were really shocked.

0:04:24.720 --> 0:04:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Initially we said, you know, we should do this. This

0:04:26.920 --> 0:04:31.039
<v Speaker 1>is a tremendous value to investors. Let's there must be

0:04:31.080 --> 0:04:32.960
<v Speaker 1>some reason it can be done. It's like a structural

0:04:32.960 --> 0:04:34.600
<v Speaker 1>problem you know within an e t F that it's

0:04:34.600 --> 0:04:37.800
<v Speaker 1>not or it's a regulatory probably the regulators won't allow

0:04:37.800 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 1>it because that, and the more we dug into it,

0:04:40.240 --> 0:04:42.360
<v Speaker 1>the more we looked at realize, you know, what, this

0:04:42.440 --> 0:04:45.880
<v Speaker 1>is possible. There were some structural things we had to do,

0:04:46.040 --> 0:04:48.680
<v Speaker 1>some kind of aha moments that we had to overcome

0:04:48.760 --> 0:04:50.640
<v Speaker 1>that hadn't been done in the E t F before.

0:04:50.680 --> 0:04:52.720
<v Speaker 1>And that's the reason some people, I think gave up

0:04:52.720 --> 0:04:55.680
<v Speaker 1>on the idea and never accomplished it, because effectively, you're

0:04:55.680 --> 0:04:58.160
<v Speaker 1>sort of putting an insurance policy inside an e t

0:04:58.320 --> 0:05:00.839
<v Speaker 1>F and wrapping it up in a breed in a sense,

0:05:01.240 --> 0:05:04.080
<v Speaker 1>exactly right, speaking of the burriedo, So what is it?

0:05:04.120 --> 0:05:06.560
<v Speaker 1>What is in it? So? What is in the e

0:05:06.640 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 1>t F? There are seven options positions in the E

0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:12.400
<v Speaker 1>t S So not I'm not buying equities like I

0:05:12.440 --> 0:05:14.080
<v Speaker 1>would usually do with an E t F. I'm right,

0:05:14.120 --> 0:05:17.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm getting options right, and you own options solely with

0:05:17.360 --> 0:05:21.960
<v Speaker 1>this breedo have a name. Well, well, you don't defined

0:05:22.000 --> 0:05:28.520
<v Speaker 1>outcome or you know buffer yeah exactly exactly. Buffer for

0:05:28.680 --> 0:05:30.600
<v Speaker 1>t F. I mean I think buffer e TF, so

0:05:31.720 --> 0:05:38.120
<v Speaker 1>buffer yeah exactly, that will work. Uh So basically, h

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:41.919
<v Speaker 1>there's seven positions in there, and these positions are designed

0:05:42.279 --> 0:05:46.560
<v Speaker 1>to provide you this outcome over one year period. I

0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:49.680
<v Speaker 1>think the important thing for people listening is to understand

0:05:49.760 --> 0:05:53.279
<v Speaker 1>is that, uh it runs for a year, the outcome period,

0:05:53.279 --> 0:05:55.000
<v Speaker 1>but then it just resets after a year and then

0:05:55.040 --> 0:05:57.800
<v Speaker 1>you get another, uh year of the same thing. So

0:05:58.120 --> 0:06:00.679
<v Speaker 1>what doesn't change is the length of the outcome period

0:06:00.760 --> 0:06:03.279
<v Speaker 1>is a year, and also the buffer doesn't change. So

0:06:03.320 --> 0:06:05.240
<v Speaker 1>if you bought the nine percent buffer, we're going to

0:06:05.360 --> 0:06:06.600
<v Speaker 1>have that for a year, and then it's going to

0:06:06.680 --> 0:06:08.360
<v Speaker 1>reset the next year and you're gonna have it again

0:06:08.360 --> 0:06:10.920
<v Speaker 1>for another year. Year. Is almost like a contract basically

0:06:11.320 --> 0:06:14.880
<v Speaker 1>in a sense, it's just when you buy the options positions.

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:17.919
<v Speaker 1>These are what are called flex options, and it's really

0:06:18.240 --> 0:06:20.240
<v Speaker 1>a very simple option. What it lets you allows you

0:06:20.279 --> 0:06:22.120
<v Speaker 1>to do is put a custom option together, and what

0:06:22.160 --> 0:06:24.880
<v Speaker 1>that means is you can have a specific start day

0:06:25.200 --> 0:06:28.480
<v Speaker 1>and a specific end date, and so all the options

0:06:28.640 --> 0:06:30.839
<v Speaker 1>start on one day and end on one day and

0:06:30.839 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 1>then they reset that day and go into a new

0:06:32.800 --> 0:06:35.039
<v Speaker 1>set of those the following year. And so you just

0:06:35.160 --> 0:06:37.919
<v Speaker 1>keep doing that year after year, getting as much of

0:06:37.920 --> 0:06:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the upside of the options industry will give you, but

0:06:41.080 --> 0:06:43.960
<v Speaker 1>with a nine percent buffer, fifteen or thirty. And this

0:06:44.279 --> 0:06:45.960
<v Speaker 1>is kind of solving in a way, you know that

0:06:46.000 --> 0:06:48.640
<v Speaker 1>problem we talk about with lever gtfs. They reset every

0:06:48.720 --> 0:06:53.120
<v Speaker 1>day and yeah, and therefore you don't actually get the

0:06:53.680 --> 0:06:56.560
<v Speaker 1>quarter or the month of that leverage. You only get

0:06:56.600 --> 0:06:59.440
<v Speaker 1>it one day. With this a little bit, right, Yeah,

0:06:59.440 --> 0:07:01.279
<v Speaker 1>I mean you I have to come out quarterly. Now.

0:07:01.320 --> 0:07:03.479
<v Speaker 1>You could buy them in between, but it's ideal to

0:07:03.480 --> 0:07:05.640
<v Speaker 1>buy them on that date. And essentially this is a

0:07:05.640 --> 0:07:07.720
<v Speaker 1>strategy that you could actually do on your own, right,

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 1>You're just packaging something that might be a little more

0:07:10.600 --> 0:07:13.800
<v Speaker 1>on the institutional side, Yeah, into an e t F. Yeah,

0:07:13.840 --> 0:07:15.400
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a great point. I mean, like all

0:07:15.480 --> 0:07:17.080
<v Speaker 1>e t F you could buy all those securities on

0:07:17.080 --> 0:07:18.640
<v Speaker 1>your own if you wanted to write. I mean, it's

0:07:18.720 --> 0:07:21.960
<v Speaker 1>it's just actually, this one is much more complicated than

0:07:21.960 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 1>some of those because you have to understand first of

0:07:23.640 --> 0:07:26.800
<v Speaker 1>all options, how options work. You also have to understand

0:07:26.840 --> 0:07:29.400
<v Speaker 1>how to put that position together in order to achieve

0:07:29.480 --> 0:07:32.240
<v Speaker 1>that outcome for you. So it's more complicated than it

0:07:32.280 --> 0:07:34.600
<v Speaker 1>would be to put together some type of another et

0:07:34.720 --> 0:07:39.240
<v Speaker 1>F package. UM and I think the the idea of

0:07:39.280 --> 0:07:41.440
<v Speaker 1>a one year outcome PARI. If you think about most

0:07:41.560 --> 0:07:44.360
<v Speaker 1>of the ETFs that we buy that supposedly are going

0:07:44.400 --> 0:07:49.320
<v Speaker 1>to provide some downside buffer. Typically there's a switching strategy,

0:07:49.400 --> 0:07:51.800
<v Speaker 1>switches in and out, may not switch at the right time,

0:07:51.880 --> 0:07:54.760
<v Speaker 1>might switch at the wrong time. And with these I

0:07:54.880 --> 0:07:58.000
<v Speaker 1>think the thing that can't be overstated is that an

0:07:58.080 --> 0:08:02.400
<v Speaker 1>investor advisor they can buy today and understand very clearly.

0:08:02.480 --> 0:08:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Do I think how much? Do I think the market

0:08:03.840 --> 0:08:05.240
<v Speaker 1>is gonna go out next year? Oh? I think it's

0:08:05.240 --> 0:08:07.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna be up all right. Well, I'm gonna get all

0:08:07.200 --> 0:08:08.800
<v Speaker 1>the upside of the market if I get this. But

0:08:09.440 --> 0:08:13.240
<v Speaker 1>let's say China doesn't come through, the market crashes, it

0:08:13.320 --> 0:08:15.240
<v Speaker 1>could go down tenner fitting. Well, I want to have

0:08:15.320 --> 0:08:17.080
<v Speaker 1>that buffer in there, so I'm gonna get all the

0:08:17.200 --> 0:08:19.120
<v Speaker 1>upside that I think is there, and I'm also going

0:08:19.160 --> 0:08:22.560
<v Speaker 1>to be buffered against all the potential downside I think

0:08:22.680 --> 0:08:25.680
<v Speaker 1>is there? Uh downside, I don't know what you're talking

0:08:25.720 --> 0:08:27.360
<v Speaker 1>about right now. It doesn't seem like there could be

0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:31.560
<v Speaker 1>any downside exactly. Can you take us to the one

0:08:31.640 --> 0:08:33.959
<v Speaker 1>that's maybe around this maturity and take us through the

0:08:34.040 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 1>last twelve months and what it did versus what it

0:08:37.320 --> 0:08:39.000
<v Speaker 1>was set up to do up. Yeah, I'll be happy

0:08:39.000 --> 0:08:40.320
<v Speaker 1>to And and one other thing I want to mention

0:08:40.400 --> 0:08:43.800
<v Speaker 1>to you. We started out initially offering these quarterly on

0:08:43.960 --> 0:08:48.199
<v Speaker 1>the calendar quarters, and we kind of decided early on

0:08:48.320 --> 0:08:50.600
<v Speaker 1>if we did a billion dollars in assets and these

0:08:50.679 --> 0:08:53.840
<v Speaker 1>within the calendar quarters, when we got to that asset level,

0:08:54.040 --> 0:08:57.120
<v Speaker 1>we would offer a monthly. So back in June we

0:08:57.240 --> 0:09:00.280
<v Speaker 1>started offering these funds on a monthly basis. So you

0:09:00.400 --> 0:09:04.600
<v Speaker 1>have a nine fifteen and buffer every single month being

0:09:04.679 --> 0:09:07.679
<v Speaker 1>issued the first of the month. That means, you know,

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:11.199
<v Speaker 1>there will be thirty six funds in the market achieving

0:09:11.280 --> 0:09:15.360
<v Speaker 1>these defined outcomes for investors. The reason that's really important

0:09:16.000 --> 0:09:18.280
<v Speaker 1>is that an investor can know. As Eric said, you know,

0:09:18.360 --> 0:09:20.240
<v Speaker 1>people like to buy in early or they want to

0:09:20.280 --> 0:09:22.760
<v Speaker 1>be at the beginning. I mean, that's part of how

0:09:22.880 --> 0:09:24.920
<v Speaker 1>these started. The reason they like that is they want

0:09:24.920 --> 0:09:27.679
<v Speaker 1>to know, Okay, I if I get in, I have

0:09:27.920 --> 0:09:30.600
<v Speaker 1>a buffer starting at zero. It goes down right away,

0:09:30.679 --> 0:09:32.440
<v Speaker 1>and I have all the upside right there, and they

0:09:32.440 --> 0:09:33.880
<v Speaker 1>don't want to have to think about buying in the

0:09:33.960 --> 0:09:37.120
<v Speaker 1>middle and that they just want to participate. So we

0:09:37.240 --> 0:09:41.160
<v Speaker 1>have them every single month now, and having them every

0:09:41.240 --> 0:09:44.199
<v Speaker 1>month at the beginning of every month makes some a

0:09:44.520 --> 0:09:47.800
<v Speaker 1>very powerful tool for advisors for a lot of different reasons.

0:09:48.760 --> 0:09:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Now let's talk about the portfolio, right, So is this

0:09:51.559 --> 0:09:55.360
<v Speaker 1>aiming to replace, uh, the equity portion of your portfolio,

0:09:55.480 --> 0:09:57.480
<v Speaker 1>like the whole thing, or to be like an overlay.

0:09:58.400 --> 0:10:00.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm seeing people think about all the our ways you

0:10:00.600 --> 0:10:02.880
<v Speaker 1>could do it just as an overlay over your whole

0:10:02.920 --> 0:10:05.599
<v Speaker 1>portfolio and say, you know, I want additional exposure the

0:10:05.720 --> 0:10:07.800
<v Speaker 1>SMP five hunder to the market in general, So I'm

0:10:07.800 --> 0:10:10.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna buy this, but I have a buffer built in.

0:10:11.080 --> 0:10:15.319
<v Speaker 1>But we're also seeing uh advisors some taking their entire

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:17.840
<v Speaker 1>piece of their equity exposure and just say, I'm buying

0:10:17.880 --> 0:10:20.200
<v Speaker 1>this with my for my equity exposure. I'm not going

0:10:20.320 --> 0:10:22.839
<v Speaker 1>to We're at a tenure bull market. We gotta be

0:10:22.880 --> 0:10:25.680
<v Speaker 1>getting somewhere near the top. I'm gonna buffer my clients

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:27.880
<v Speaker 1>against the loss that's going to happen here over the

0:10:28.000 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 1>next few years. I don't want to. I don't want

0:10:29.760 --> 0:10:33.120
<v Speaker 1>them exposed to that. And uh so we're seeing a

0:10:33.200 --> 0:10:34.880
<v Speaker 1>good bit of that as well. The other thing we're

0:10:34.880 --> 0:10:37.520
<v Speaker 1>seeing a lot of is gonna saying I don't want

0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:41.160
<v Speaker 1>to expose my clients to fixed income right here, rates

0:10:41.200 --> 0:10:43.240
<v Speaker 1>are super low. I'm not getting paid to hold them.

0:10:43.559 --> 0:10:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Rates move around. I'm taking a huge amount of risk.

0:10:46.200 --> 0:10:48.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna take some of that fixed income out.

0:10:48.720 --> 0:10:51.079
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna move it over into the equity market, get

0:10:51.120 --> 0:10:53.520
<v Speaker 1>a good buffer there, get the upside of the equity market,

0:10:53.559 --> 0:10:56.000
<v Speaker 1>and not risk myself in the debt market. Right now,

0:10:57.640 --> 0:10:59.959
<v Speaker 1>of all the moments in time that you could bring

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:02.839
<v Speaker 1>a product like this to market, it seems like it

0:11:02.880 --> 0:11:05.760
<v Speaker 1>would be a pretty great one. So what what have

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:08.679
<v Speaker 1>the inflo has been like? Because you guys launched when Yeah,

0:11:08.760 --> 0:11:12.280
<v Speaker 1>we launched last August basically, so about a year ago.

0:11:13.120 --> 0:11:15.920
<v Speaker 1>We launched the July series in August because we're trying

0:11:15.960 --> 0:11:17.559
<v Speaker 1>to get it, you know, to July. So we've had

0:11:17.760 --> 0:11:20.480
<v Speaker 1>one full year in that product and then in October

0:11:20.559 --> 0:11:22.760
<v Speaker 1>we'll have our next full year in that product. The

0:11:22.880 --> 0:11:24.959
<v Speaker 1>July one did exactly what it was supposed to do.

0:11:25.679 --> 0:11:27.679
<v Speaker 1>But to give you an example, we started out no

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:30.600
<v Speaker 1>one knew what they were, how they worked, or anything,

0:11:30.800 --> 0:11:32.679
<v Speaker 1>and so you know, we brought them out and we

0:11:32.800 --> 0:11:35.480
<v Speaker 1>probably in the first couple of weeks did maybe ten

0:11:35.559 --> 0:11:38.400
<v Speaker 1>million bucks in the three Across the three ended the

0:11:38.520 --> 0:11:40.960
<v Speaker 1>year we had maybe a hundred and fifty million dollars

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:44.160
<v Speaker 1>in those three and then now we're probably in the

0:11:44.240 --> 0:11:47.560
<v Speaker 1>defined outcome alone, probably around the one point three one

0:11:47.640 --> 0:11:51.080
<v Speaker 1>point four billion dollar mark. It's a pretty successful year. Yeah, yeah,

0:11:51.160 --> 0:11:54.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean listen, you know, UH there's a lot of

0:11:54.200 --> 0:11:57.680
<v Speaker 1>E t F providers uh that are struggling out there

0:11:57.960 --> 0:12:01.199
<v Speaker 1>to get visibility, to get asked uts. We're not in

0:12:01.600 --> 0:12:05.000
<v Speaker 1>any of the big distribution UH systems right now, so

0:12:05.640 --> 0:12:08.719
<v Speaker 1>we are doing this uh hand to hand, going through

0:12:08.760 --> 0:12:10.960
<v Speaker 1>the r I A channel, explain it to them how

0:12:11.040 --> 0:12:13.640
<v Speaker 1>they work, what they are, and they're being embraced by

0:12:13.720 --> 0:12:17.600
<v Speaker 1>that channel. So, like any new sensation, once you hit

0:12:17.600 --> 0:12:19.920
<v Speaker 1>a billion dollars, people start to look at look, maybe

0:12:19.920 --> 0:12:21.920
<v Speaker 1>I'll get into that. And you do have somebody filing

0:12:22.000 --> 0:12:25.160
<v Speaker 1>First Trust has put in filings to track a cbo

0:12:25.520 --> 0:12:29.520
<v Speaker 1>E index that does something very similar. There's look like

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:33.439
<v Speaker 1>it's ten percent buffer series years or nine I just

0:12:33.760 --> 0:12:35.800
<v Speaker 1>real quick try to suss out how theirs will be

0:12:35.840 --> 0:12:38.679
<v Speaker 1>different or the same as yours. Yeah, well, you know,

0:12:38.760 --> 0:12:40.480
<v Speaker 1>they've had their filings in for a while. I mean,

0:12:40.559 --> 0:12:42.560
<v Speaker 1>it took us a long time to get our filings

0:12:42.600 --> 0:12:47.600
<v Speaker 1>approved by the SEC. So they basically have duplicated our

0:12:47.679 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 1>products and just made them slightly different levels, is what

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:53.680
<v Speaker 1>they've done. So we came out with a nine percent buffer,

0:12:54.200 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 1>the fifteen buffer, and the thirty buffer. They did a

0:12:56.520 --> 0:12:59.600
<v Speaker 1>ten buffer and a twenty five buffer. So those are

0:12:59.600 --> 0:13:01.640
<v Speaker 1>the two that they have versus the three that we have.

0:13:02.080 --> 0:13:05.400
<v Speaker 1>There's another competitor to that. They're not an actually any

0:13:05.520 --> 0:13:08.080
<v Speaker 1>t F structure. They use ETFs. It's a lot of capital.

0:13:08.200 --> 0:13:10.800
<v Speaker 1>They're called M plus funds, so they're unit investment trust

0:13:10.920 --> 0:13:13.800
<v Speaker 1>or u i T that uses options on e t

0:13:14.000 --> 0:13:17.440
<v Speaker 1>f s in the underlying um, so a different legal structure.

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:20.480
<v Speaker 1>But the founders, they're the guys running these funds, are

0:13:20.559 --> 0:13:22.760
<v Speaker 1>these old school structured note guys. They ran the structure

0:13:22.840 --> 0:13:26.000
<v Speaker 1>note desk at BAML for a while, so I do

0:13:26.160 --> 0:13:29.240
<v Speaker 1>see some similarities there. They like to say they offer customization,

0:13:29.400 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 1>so you can sort of customize what that payout structure

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:34.800
<v Speaker 1>is going to look like. For your note, but another

0:13:34.880 --> 0:13:37.960
<v Speaker 1>player out there in the space. Yeah, So how big

0:13:38.040 --> 0:13:41.839
<v Speaker 1>do you think that this overall slice of the e

0:13:42.000 --> 0:13:45.640
<v Speaker 1>t F kingdom might become? And I'm asking you this

0:13:45.840 --> 0:13:48.520
<v Speaker 1>because you're somebody who is there in the beginning of

0:13:48.559 --> 0:13:51.599
<v Speaker 1>smart data, right, and that's become a huge, uh you know,

0:13:52.760 --> 0:13:55.880
<v Speaker 1>plus of the overall one billion of the overall et

0:13:56.000 --> 0:13:58.599
<v Speaker 1>F market. This seems like something that a lot of

0:13:58.640 --> 0:14:01.599
<v Speaker 1>people could say, we can do this. Yeah, well, you know,

0:14:01.760 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 1>this one is harder to do than those I mean, everybody.

0:14:04.400 --> 0:14:06.319
<v Speaker 1>The the thing about this is, remember we had the

0:14:06.440 --> 0:14:09.440
<v Speaker 1>SMP five hunter. We got different buffer levels. With those,

0:14:09.640 --> 0:14:12.600
<v Speaker 1>everybody can come out with their own slice of well,

0:14:12.679 --> 0:14:14.240
<v Speaker 1>this is how I do it, and this is how

0:14:14.400 --> 0:14:16.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's kind of like act of management almost

0:14:16.880 --> 0:14:19.920
<v Speaker 1>this one. But I would say that I think the

0:14:20.240 --> 0:14:23.320
<v Speaker 1>size of the market is tremendous. If you think about

0:14:23.440 --> 0:14:25.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the insurance products, people that invest in

0:14:26.120 --> 0:14:30.960
<v Speaker 1>structured outcomes and insurance, you know, is multiple multiples of billions.

0:14:31.000 --> 0:14:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Structure product market is you know, multiples of billions. You know,

0:14:34.440 --> 0:14:37.280
<v Speaker 1>there's probably a true one or two trillion dollars within

0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 1>that those marketplaces. So, um, we think there's a tremendous

0:14:42.200 --> 0:14:46.600
<v Speaker 1>opportunity in this space, and primarily because people don't have

0:14:46.800 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 1>reliable downside protection. You know, they have so called downside protections,

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:53.880
<v Speaker 1>but there's always things that can go wrong. Rather than

0:14:54.040 --> 0:14:56.360
<v Speaker 1>saying I know I have this buffer, this is the

0:14:56.400 --> 0:14:59.040
<v Speaker 1>buffer I have. I'm good with that. I'm totally willing

0:14:59.080 --> 0:15:01.320
<v Speaker 1>to give up some of my upside. You know, if

0:15:01.360 --> 0:15:05.800
<v Speaker 1>you think the investable assets today from individuals are in

0:15:05.840 --> 0:15:08.920
<v Speaker 1>the baby boomer's hands basically, and they're right at retirement.

0:15:09.040 --> 0:15:11.840
<v Speaker 1>They don't want to make their money with yeah, where

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:13.640
<v Speaker 1>I got and they're like they're they're like, do I

0:15:13.800 --> 0:15:15.720
<v Speaker 1>really want to lose my money? Do I really want

0:15:15.760 --> 0:15:18.200
<v Speaker 1>to take all this risk on? And and so if

0:15:18.240 --> 0:15:20.040
<v Speaker 1>they can buy something like this and say I still

0:15:20.080 --> 0:15:24.000
<v Speaker 1>have access to the upside, but I'm buffered against losses, um,

0:15:24.440 --> 0:15:27.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's a tremendous value proposition for them. But

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 1>insurance isn't free. How insurance it's seventy nine basis points

0:15:32.000 --> 0:15:35.160
<v Speaker 1>and that's all in. It's a unitary fee like most

0:15:35.200 --> 0:15:38.240
<v Speaker 1>ETFs have today. And so that's all anyone's gonna pay.

0:15:38.840 --> 0:15:41.680
<v Speaker 1>And that is if if you go out and try

0:15:41.760 --> 0:15:43.720
<v Speaker 1>to replicate this on your own, it's gonna be more

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:45.640
<v Speaker 1>expensive than that. If you go out and try to

0:15:45.680 --> 0:15:47.960
<v Speaker 1>buy a structure product, annuity, anything like that, it's gonna

0:15:47.960 --> 0:15:51.800
<v Speaker 1>be much more expensive, regardless of what the documentation says.

0:15:52.680 --> 0:15:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Um you know. Sometimes I know within the annuity products

0:15:56.000 --> 0:15:58.040
<v Speaker 1>they say they're free in this and that, But I mean,

0:15:58.120 --> 0:15:59.520
<v Speaker 1>if you try to get out any year, you know,

0:15:59.560 --> 0:16:04.120
<v Speaker 1>there's a leve percent UH redemption fee. So I think

0:16:04.200 --> 0:16:07.040
<v Speaker 1>you have to just be careful and and and look

0:16:07.080 --> 0:16:09.080
<v Speaker 1>at for what the beauty of these products is, you

0:16:09.120 --> 0:16:11.240
<v Speaker 1>can get out any time, you can buy them anytime

0:16:11.400 --> 0:16:14.040
<v Speaker 1>you're not held. You know, there's even instructured product. You know,

0:16:14.120 --> 0:16:16.680
<v Speaker 1>if they're kind of tie you up, it doesn't happen here.

0:16:17.120 --> 0:16:19.360
<v Speaker 1>You have the transparency. You can see exactly what's in

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:22.800
<v Speaker 1>the portfolio. There's no counterparty rist remember with the other ones,

0:16:22.880 --> 0:16:24.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, you're relying on the insurance company to be

0:16:24.960 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 1>in business, or you're relying on the bank that issued

0:16:27.040 --> 0:16:29.320
<v Speaker 1>the note on a structure note to be in business.

0:16:30.280 --> 0:16:32.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, like our thirty percent product. You know, i'd

0:16:32.160 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 1>like to say if the market crashes is down thirty percent,

0:16:34.840 --> 0:16:36.320
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to hope those guys are gonna stay

0:16:36.360 --> 0:16:38.240
<v Speaker 1>in business. You want to know you got what you own,

0:16:38.600 --> 0:16:41.560
<v Speaker 1>and that's the important time. Can I play a quick game, yes?

0:16:42.080 --> 0:16:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Can we guess of the nine percent know exactly what

0:16:46.360 --> 0:16:49.360
<v Speaker 1>you're doing? Yes? And the thirty percent buffer, which is

0:16:49.400 --> 0:16:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the most popular, I'm going thirty. I'm going fifteen. Also,

0:16:58.640 --> 0:17:04.680
<v Speaker 1>full disclosure, I knew the answer, but but like, break

0:17:04.720 --> 0:17:07.200
<v Speaker 1>it down. What's the percentages between each three? It's it's

0:17:07.240 --> 0:17:11.120
<v Speaker 1>probably fifteen and then the nine and then the third. Yeah, well,

0:17:11.200 --> 0:17:12.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean you're good listen to thirty. The way to

0:17:13.000 --> 0:17:15.000
<v Speaker 1>think about that is and and uh, I think we

0:17:15.040 --> 0:17:16.800
<v Speaker 1>thought it was gonna be a huge seller at the beginning.

0:17:16.840 --> 0:17:20.360
<v Speaker 1>To um is that in the cost the same, Yeah,

0:17:20.359 --> 0:17:23.040
<v Speaker 1>the costs are the same. Is that if you're in

0:17:23.080 --> 0:17:25.000
<v Speaker 1>the thirty, you're what you're saying is I'm willing to

0:17:25.080 --> 0:17:27.920
<v Speaker 1>risk five percent, right, that first five percent you can lose,

0:17:28.200 --> 0:17:31.399
<v Speaker 1>but I don't want to risk anything else. And so

0:17:32.600 --> 0:17:35.800
<v Speaker 1>that's somebody who thinks the market is really gonna completely

0:17:35.920 --> 0:17:38.320
<v Speaker 1>crash and they're willing to take the risk on the five.

0:17:38.560 --> 0:17:40.920
<v Speaker 1>The other ones they started zero, And so I think

0:17:41.000 --> 0:17:43.200
<v Speaker 1>that maybe why fifteen has been a little more that

0:17:43.359 --> 0:17:47.879
<v Speaker 1>changed through the year though, Yeah, it's interesting. Um, it

0:17:48.000 --> 0:17:51.440
<v Speaker 1>depends on where the funds are trading, the et f

0:17:51.520 --> 0:17:53.840
<v Speaker 1>s are trading in the market, because we see a

0:17:53.920 --> 0:17:56.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of people like right now, I haven't seen the

0:17:56.320 --> 0:17:59.480
<v Speaker 1>numbers for today, but like the October series is very

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:02.240
<v Speaker 1>like over the last few weeks has been very successful.

0:18:02.280 --> 0:18:05.280
<v Speaker 1>He's taking a lot of assets right now because right

0:18:05.359 --> 0:18:09.040
<v Speaker 1>around its starting point, it's starting asset our dollar price,

0:18:09.480 --> 0:18:11.359
<v Speaker 1>and so you can get in today. You can have

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the same buffer and the same cap that you did

0:18:14.720 --> 0:18:16.280
<v Speaker 1>day one, but you only got a month and a

0:18:16.320 --> 0:18:18.879
<v Speaker 1>half left. So they're saying, wow, I got a ten

0:18:18.960 --> 0:18:21.480
<v Speaker 1>percent cap and I got a fifteen percent buffer. I

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:23.480
<v Speaker 1>like that, you know, for a month and a half.

0:18:23.720 --> 0:18:25.720
<v Speaker 1>So we're seeing a lot of people participate in the middle,

0:18:25.840 --> 0:18:27.720
<v Speaker 1>which we didn't know of what happened, but we've seen

0:18:27.720 --> 0:18:36.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of assets flowing in the middle. I was

0:18:36.680 --> 0:18:39.520
<v Speaker 1>recently at an event and uh, these came up for

0:18:39.640 --> 0:18:41.800
<v Speaker 1>the downside of the buffer, ETFs came up. One of

0:18:41.840 --> 0:18:44.760
<v Speaker 1>the analysts that I was on a panel with said

0:18:44.840 --> 0:18:46.880
<v Speaker 1>something to the effect, I haven't looked into this yet

0:18:46.920 --> 0:18:49.639
<v Speaker 1>that well, you're only getting the price and it doesn't

0:18:49.640 --> 0:18:51.600
<v Speaker 1>have divot in there. So that's kind of like a

0:18:51.680 --> 0:18:54.960
<v Speaker 1>cost that you're not seeing. Can you address that? Yeah, well,

0:18:55.200 --> 0:18:57.960
<v Speaker 1>you get the price return of the SMP five with these.

0:18:58.000 --> 0:19:00.280
<v Speaker 1>You don't get the return of the SMP five hundred

0:19:00.400 --> 0:19:03.760
<v Speaker 1>with the dividend. Some people look at the dividend as

0:19:03.920 --> 0:19:06.880
<v Speaker 1>a buffer in a sense, and I think that's why

0:19:07.000 --> 0:19:10.040
<v Speaker 1>we've priced ours at a nine percent, and you know

0:19:10.160 --> 0:19:11.719
<v Speaker 1>we don't have it lower than that if you think

0:19:11.760 --> 0:19:13.800
<v Speaker 1>about it. If you if you think about it that

0:19:13.920 --> 0:19:16.560
<v Speaker 1>way as a two or three percent, then if you

0:19:16.640 --> 0:19:19.720
<v Speaker 1>look at nine percent and fiftcent, it's pretty well spaced out.

0:19:20.040 --> 0:19:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Most people, Uh, look at the two percent and they'll

0:19:23.359 --> 0:19:25.320
<v Speaker 1>make that, but that's not enough for them. They want

0:19:25.440 --> 0:19:28.639
<v Speaker 1>more buffer than that. And so you know, the dividend

0:19:28.800 --> 0:19:31.399
<v Speaker 1>isn't included. So if you think that the market is

0:19:31.440 --> 0:19:33.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna be down two percent or less, you probably go

0:19:33.760 --> 0:19:36.320
<v Speaker 1>ahead and stick with it. If you want more buffer

0:19:36.440 --> 0:19:39.119
<v Speaker 1>than that, then you need to buy these. You mentioned

0:19:39.400 --> 0:19:44.440
<v Speaker 1>sp Uh, what all do you think you could do

0:19:44.680 --> 0:19:48.080
<v Speaker 1>this for? Put this rapper around? That's a good question. Currently,

0:19:48.200 --> 0:19:50.600
<v Speaker 1>we have the SMP five hundred, we have the ms

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:53.080
<v Speaker 1>c I EFA and the ms c I Emerging Markets.

0:19:53.119 --> 0:19:55.720
<v Speaker 1>We just started that and we're gonna have those quarterly.

0:19:55.920 --> 0:19:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Why did you pick those? Really, what we're doing is

0:19:58.880 --> 0:20:02.879
<v Speaker 1>working from the trading level back because you need to

0:20:03.000 --> 0:20:07.160
<v Speaker 1>have options at trade enough that allow these UH products

0:20:07.200 --> 0:20:09.200
<v Speaker 1>to be established on them, and so you need to

0:20:09.240 --> 0:20:12.359
<v Speaker 1>have a very liquid market, and so there's only really

0:20:12.440 --> 0:20:15.040
<v Speaker 1>about five or six markets that allow that. So those

0:20:15.080 --> 0:20:18.960
<v Speaker 1>two international markets as well as the Accus and as

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:22.240
<v Speaker 1>the Russell two thousand, and we're gonna be introducing the

0:20:22.640 --> 0:20:25.760
<v Speaker 1>the Nazac one and the Russell two thousand here in October,

0:20:26.400 --> 0:20:30.200
<v Speaker 1>so we have five of them, and and and with

0:20:30.600 --> 0:20:33.119
<v Speaker 1>the emerging markets and those we just did the fifteen

0:20:33.119 --> 0:20:36.040
<v Speaker 1>percent buffer, so we don't we're not doing every month.

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:38.440
<v Speaker 1>We didn't do all three levels. It's it's it's very

0:20:38.520 --> 0:20:40.800
<v Speaker 1>expensive to bring a new product out every month for

0:20:40.880 --> 0:20:43.120
<v Speaker 1>all of them. So we're just doing the fifteen percent

0:20:43.200 --> 0:20:46.320
<v Speaker 1>buffer for each of those until they gain enough assets

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:48.920
<v Speaker 1>and enough interest and everyone's educated, and then we'll start

0:20:48.960 --> 0:20:51.359
<v Speaker 1>to introduce some more when it makes sense. What would

0:20:51.440 --> 0:20:56.520
<v Speaker 1>you like to do but looks really complicated, You know

0:20:56.840 --> 0:20:58.600
<v Speaker 1>it would be it would be a hit, but it'll

0:20:58.640 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 1>take some work to get there. You know. What we

0:21:00.920 --> 0:21:03.040
<v Speaker 1>really want to figure out a way to do and

0:21:03.160 --> 0:21:05.960
<v Speaker 1>we haven't quite got there yet, but to put together

0:21:06.480 --> 0:21:09.800
<v Speaker 1>a product similar to this that relates to people for

0:21:09.960 --> 0:21:12.959
<v Speaker 1>like lifetime fixed income, to be able to incorporate something

0:21:13.080 --> 0:21:15.800
<v Speaker 1>like that for fixed income for people within this type

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:18.320
<v Speaker 1>of structure, using the option structure to be able to

0:21:18.400 --> 0:21:23.159
<v Speaker 1>do that um like options for bonds that well, we

0:21:23.359 --> 0:21:25.399
<v Speaker 1>we've looked at a lot of different structures on how

0:21:25.480 --> 0:21:28.239
<v Speaker 1>we could do this, and we haven't arrived on one

0:21:28.280 --> 0:21:30.840
<v Speaker 1>that we like a lot, but we're we're looking at

0:21:30.880 --> 0:21:33.560
<v Speaker 1>all types of different things to to determine is there

0:21:33.600 --> 0:21:36.560
<v Speaker 1>a better way to deliver some type of an income

0:21:36.600 --> 0:21:40.399
<v Speaker 1>product of people as they're nearing retirement now kind of

0:21:40.400 --> 0:21:43.600
<v Speaker 1>the decumulation phase of you know, everybody's accumulating their assets

0:21:43.680 --> 0:21:46.280
<v Speaker 1>and they don't have a real efficient way to to

0:21:46.520 --> 0:21:48.520
<v Speaker 1>spend that down now, and so to help them do

0:21:48.640 --> 0:21:50.399
<v Speaker 1>that and make it last as long as possible, how

0:21:50.480 --> 0:21:52.800
<v Speaker 1>much you know about your consumer and their age, because

0:21:53.160 --> 0:21:56.440
<v Speaker 1>this is like if you're right around retirement age, this

0:21:56.640 --> 0:21:58.800
<v Speaker 1>is like a perfect thing, Like I'm not getting any

0:21:58.880 --> 0:22:01.800
<v Speaker 1>yield on my fixed income um and I can basically

0:22:02.080 --> 0:22:06.280
<v Speaker 1>hedge my exposure to equities. It seems great for me right. Yeah,

0:22:07.240 --> 0:22:10.440
<v Speaker 1>how much of this is actually in that baby boom, Well,

0:22:10.600 --> 0:22:12.760
<v Speaker 1>I would imagine a good bit of it. But um,

0:22:13.359 --> 0:22:17.560
<v Speaker 1>what we're seeing, like Carolina mentioned, um, advisors are getting

0:22:17.560 --> 0:22:20.159
<v Speaker 1>ahold of this for their business and they're saying, holy smokes,

0:22:20.200 --> 0:22:22.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm putting us across all my clients because it just

0:22:22.720 --> 0:22:26.080
<v Speaker 1>makes too much sense from a strategic standpoint to be

0:22:26.160 --> 0:22:29.000
<v Speaker 1>able to have better outcomes. You know, one of the

0:22:29.040 --> 0:22:32.560
<v Speaker 1>things strategi strategists want when they're investing their assets is

0:22:32.600 --> 0:22:34.919
<v Speaker 1>they want to have a better understanding of what are

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:37.720
<v Speaker 1>their risks and what outcomes will they have. This gives

0:22:37.800 --> 0:22:40.760
<v Speaker 1>them more control over the potential outcomes rather than one

0:22:40.800 --> 0:22:42.640
<v Speaker 1>of the market crashers I'm not sure what will happen.

0:22:42.880 --> 0:22:45.040
<v Speaker 1>It gives them a little more control. And so strategists,

0:22:45.080 --> 0:22:48.520
<v Speaker 1>I think, are attracted to these products because of that, Carolyn,

0:22:48.600 --> 0:22:51.240
<v Speaker 1>What could go wrong? What if the market goes down?

0:22:53.040 --> 0:22:56.960
<v Speaker 1>What the market goes down, you're gonna well in the

0:22:57.080 --> 0:22:59.480
<v Speaker 1>nine percent, you would lose thirty five last nine you know,

0:22:59.640 --> 0:23:03.080
<v Speaker 1>so you know you uh. The way I if you

0:23:03.200 --> 0:23:05.680
<v Speaker 1>think about these products, I think a great way to

0:23:05.760 --> 0:23:08.760
<v Speaker 1>really think about them is if the market goes down,

0:23:09.359 --> 0:23:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you're going to outperform the market by the amount of

0:23:11.560 --> 0:23:14.719
<v Speaker 1>the buffer, depending on how much the market is down right,

0:23:14.920 --> 0:23:16.600
<v Speaker 1>So you're gonna beat the market of the markets down.

0:23:17.240 --> 0:23:19.359
<v Speaker 1>If the market is flat, you're gonna be with the market.

0:23:19.640 --> 0:23:22.240
<v Speaker 1>And the market is up slightly but below the cap,

0:23:22.280 --> 0:23:25.320
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna meet the market. The only time you're gonna

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:27.920
<v Speaker 1>underperform the market is if the market has a huge

0:23:27.960 --> 0:23:30.280
<v Speaker 1>boom year and and you get capped out and you

0:23:30.320 --> 0:23:33.719
<v Speaker 1>don't get all the upside that And think about how

0:23:33.800 --> 0:23:38.159
<v Speaker 1>many uh, you know, funder active managers can beat the market,

0:23:39.280 --> 0:23:42.840
<v Speaker 1>very very few on the downside or the upside. And

0:23:42.960 --> 0:23:46.399
<v Speaker 1>so this gives people, you know, they're gonna beat the market,

0:23:46.480 --> 0:23:49.000
<v Speaker 1>and you know, three out of the four scenarios, it's

0:23:49.080 --> 0:23:51.879
<v Speaker 1>it's a pretty good opportunity to be able to participate

0:23:51.920 --> 0:23:56.280
<v Speaker 1>in something like this. Would you ever add leverage to

0:23:56.400 --> 0:23:59.200
<v Speaker 1>the upside and them thinking back on the traditional structured

0:23:59.280 --> 0:24:01.840
<v Speaker 1>note structure or is where you know you get two

0:24:01.960 --> 0:24:04.399
<v Speaker 1>times the underlying up to a cap and then some

0:24:04.480 --> 0:24:07.120
<v Speaker 1>buffer on the downside. Any interest from clients that you've

0:24:07.160 --> 0:24:10.080
<v Speaker 1>heard to add some juice to that upside return people

0:24:10.160 --> 0:24:14.800
<v Speaker 1>like Jews. But you know, the the SEC has moratorium

0:24:15.119 --> 0:24:19.560
<v Speaker 1>on leveraged E t F s and so right now, um,

0:24:19.880 --> 0:24:22.200
<v Speaker 1>you know that's not possible, but you know we were

0:24:22.280 --> 0:24:25.080
<v Speaker 1>hoping in time that something like that will be possible. Eric,

0:24:25.160 --> 0:24:27.520
<v Speaker 1>have you have you guys covered this at all? Yeah? So, um,

0:24:27.640 --> 0:24:30.280
<v Speaker 1>my colleague James Seffert has kind of a it's one

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:33.600
<v Speaker 1>of his focus ideas. Every one of every analyst in

0:24:33.640 --> 0:24:36.359
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence has to have a focus idea. Mine is

0:24:36.400 --> 0:24:38.560
<v Speaker 1>that there will be more more closures than launches in

0:24:38.600 --> 0:24:40.320
<v Speaker 1>the next twelve months. It's kind of a call. If

0:24:40.359 --> 0:24:42.240
<v Speaker 1>you will not something will go up and down, but

0:24:42.320 --> 0:24:45.000
<v Speaker 1>just the call in our industry, his is that these

0:24:45.040 --> 0:24:47.199
<v Speaker 1>will were bullish. We think that if they can get

0:24:47.359 --> 0:24:49.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, over a billion in this kind of market,

0:24:49.720 --> 0:24:51.560
<v Speaker 1>if the market goes down, they should really do well

0:24:51.600 --> 0:24:54.320
<v Speaker 1>because people are gonna definitely want downside protection there. So

0:24:54.920 --> 0:24:56.800
<v Speaker 1>we find that the fact that they could pull this off.

0:24:57.240 --> 0:24:58.920
<v Speaker 1>So he has a great note go to b I

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:00.720
<v Speaker 1>E t F you can read the whole things. So, yeah,

0:25:00.720 --> 0:25:03.360
<v Speaker 1>we've covered it, and that note is maybe three mini

0:25:03.440 --> 0:25:07.640
<v Speaker 1>notes for a total of like say twelve bits. I'm

0:25:07.640 --> 0:25:10.680
<v Speaker 1>wondering about the economics of this on your side, because

0:25:10.720 --> 0:25:12.960
<v Speaker 1>this is not like a typical e t F. You're

0:25:13.200 --> 0:25:17.240
<v Speaker 1>you're dealing with options. Obviously it's coming through with basis

0:25:17.320 --> 0:25:19.879
<v Speaker 1>points to the consumer, But what does it look like

0:25:20.320 --> 0:25:25.600
<v Speaker 1>on your side? UM, from a from a cost perspective, Yeah, well,

0:25:25.680 --> 0:25:29.320
<v Speaker 1>from a cost perspective, we are working with Milliman UH

0:25:29.440 --> 0:25:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Financial Essay Management. Don't know you're familiar with them out

0:25:32.480 --> 0:25:34.720
<v Speaker 1>of Chicago. They have offices around the world, but they're

0:25:34.760 --> 0:25:38.720
<v Speaker 1>the subadvisor for the products and UM. They're one of

0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:43.040
<v Speaker 1>the larger insurance overlay contractors in the world, and so

0:25:43.200 --> 0:25:46.560
<v Speaker 1>they sub advise. In fact, they recently did the Transamerica

0:25:46.760 --> 0:25:49.159
<v Speaker 1>e t F work with Transamerica on that UH and

0:25:49.280 --> 0:25:51.720
<v Speaker 1>our billion dollars, I think they seated that with So

0:25:52.359 --> 0:25:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Milliman is our sub advisor, do a very good job

0:25:54.960 --> 0:25:57.440
<v Speaker 1>and know exactly what they're doing. So we have to

0:25:57.480 --> 0:25:59.920
<v Speaker 1>pay them, and we have everyone else to pay. The reason,

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:02.920
<v Speaker 1>and this one is difficult to do and expensive to do,

0:26:03.920 --> 0:26:07.320
<v Speaker 1>is that we have to have thirty six funds, which

0:26:07.359 --> 0:26:10.479
<v Speaker 1>would normally take three funds to accomplish the same thing.

0:26:11.160 --> 0:26:14.359
<v Speaker 1>And by having to have a new fund every month

0:26:14.520 --> 0:26:17.520
<v Speaker 1>in order to bring the best value possible, there's a

0:26:17.560 --> 0:26:19.840
<v Speaker 1>big expense in doing that, and that's the reason it's

0:26:19.880 --> 0:26:22.040
<v Speaker 1>necessary for us to have a little higher expense ratio.

0:26:22.440 --> 0:26:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Although that fee is pretty much in line with some

0:26:25.240 --> 0:26:27.800
<v Speaker 1>fancier or smart data products, isn't it. Yeah, it's it's

0:26:27.840 --> 0:26:30.159
<v Speaker 1>up there. But this is a institutional kind I mean,

0:26:30.200 --> 0:26:31.800
<v Speaker 1>this is they're doing a lot of legwork and it

0:26:31.920 --> 0:26:34.480
<v Speaker 1>was first. Usually things get priced down is there are

0:26:34.520 --> 0:26:37.200
<v Speaker 1>more and more products, so I was given all you'd

0:26:37.240 --> 0:26:39.040
<v Speaker 1>have to do on your own. I mean that it

0:26:39.160 --> 0:26:42.480
<v Speaker 1>just you can just you heard Bruce describe all this.

0:26:42.600 --> 0:26:45.480
<v Speaker 1>It sounds like kind of a pain, to be honest,

0:26:45.520 --> 0:26:47.800
<v Speaker 1>whereas smart bait a lot of times it's it's there

0:26:48.000 --> 0:26:50.479
<v Speaker 1>is there is their formula, and that's their intellectual property.

0:26:50.520 --> 0:26:53.960
<v Speaker 1>But honestly, it's just holding stocks. It's not as difficult

0:26:54.040 --> 0:26:57.400
<v Speaker 1>as something like this. So and obviously the flow show

0:26:57.520 --> 0:27:00.920
<v Speaker 1>people aren't that worried about it. Out these are specialty

0:27:00.960 --> 0:27:05.600
<v Speaker 1>products like leverage ETFs, there charging nobody cares um so

0:27:06.280 --> 0:27:08.000
<v Speaker 1>and that's good for you because it is hard to

0:27:08.760 --> 0:27:10.479
<v Speaker 1>carve out a living in the et F world anymore.

0:27:10.520 --> 0:27:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Everything has been priced down pretty low. So from a

0:27:13.080 --> 0:27:17.240
<v Speaker 1>business standpoint, it's pretty remarkable. Feet what you're what you're

0:27:17.280 --> 0:27:20.160
<v Speaker 1>doing UM it is you know a lot of people

0:27:20.480 --> 0:27:22.040
<v Speaker 1>like there was a couple of lunches for zero and

0:27:22.119 --> 0:27:24.840
<v Speaker 1>negative fee that didn't get any assets. So I think

0:27:25.320 --> 0:27:28.679
<v Speaker 1>you have to innovate and next your one way around

0:27:28.760 --> 0:27:32.040
<v Speaker 1>the vanguard effect. Yeah, you know, and and I think

0:27:32.080 --> 0:27:34.480
<v Speaker 1>the thing that you don't want to lose on this

0:27:34.880 --> 0:27:38.359
<v Speaker 1>is to get this type of buffer, this type of

0:27:38.480 --> 0:27:41.120
<v Speaker 1>protection of the market. If they wanted to go buy

0:27:41.200 --> 0:27:43.840
<v Speaker 1>this somewhere else, it's going to be much more expensive.

0:27:44.480 --> 0:27:48.800
<v Speaker 1>So it is very economical for any other way that

0:27:48.920 --> 0:27:53.120
<v Speaker 1>they could buy this type of protection in the marketplace. Okay,

0:27:53.160 --> 0:27:55.479
<v Speaker 1>so you've seen a lot from where you started UM

0:27:55.920 --> 0:27:59.600
<v Speaker 1>in power Shares, rise of smart Beta. Now you've got

0:27:59.720 --> 0:28:03.560
<v Speaker 1>this new whole idea. What do you how do you

0:28:03.640 --> 0:28:06.000
<v Speaker 1>feel about the et of industry as a whole? Where's

0:28:06.000 --> 0:28:09.280
<v Speaker 1>it going? Where where else could innovate? Well, I mean

0:28:09.359 --> 0:28:12.159
<v Speaker 1>I think that Uh, you know, when when we were

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:15.080
<v Speaker 1>power Shares, we did the first thematic fund, we did

0:28:15.160 --> 0:28:17.240
<v Speaker 1>the first active fund. What was it what was the

0:28:17.240 --> 0:28:20.639
<v Speaker 1>first the metic I think it was water Oh p

0:28:20.840 --> 0:28:26.600
<v Speaker 1>h O, yeah, yeah, it's first thematic fund. Check it out. Yeah, yeah,

0:28:26.680 --> 0:28:28.560
<v Speaker 1>So you know we did we were a lot of first,

0:28:28.640 --> 0:28:30.480
<v Speaker 1>and we innovated a lot. We had the first e

0:28:30.560 --> 0:28:32.399
<v Speaker 1>t F of e t F s, you know, so

0:28:32.560 --> 0:28:35.320
<v Speaker 1>we we pushed the envelope and a lot of things.

0:28:35.640 --> 0:28:39.200
<v Speaker 1>And um, we think in this area where we're at,

0:28:39.360 --> 0:28:42.840
<v Speaker 1>where um, you can use other types of products to

0:28:42.920 --> 0:28:45.640
<v Speaker 1>deliver outcomes that people haven't really considered within the et

0:28:45.720 --> 0:28:48.560
<v Speaker 1>F structure, that there's growth potential there. We think that

0:28:48.640 --> 0:28:52.080
<v Speaker 1>the equity market, and you know, pretty much the fixed

0:28:52.120 --> 0:28:54.600
<v Speaker 1>income market has been sliced pretty thin, you know, and

0:28:55.160 --> 0:28:57.360
<v Speaker 1>there there aren't a lot of other rocks to be

0:28:57.480 --> 0:29:01.080
<v Speaker 1>turned over to. You might have people discover this new

0:29:01.160 --> 0:29:04.200
<v Speaker 1>thing that comes up and another hack or another you know,

0:29:04.440 --> 0:29:06.720
<v Speaker 1>cannabis or you know whatever or something like that. But

0:29:07.160 --> 0:29:12.640
<v Speaker 1>I think generally to establish a process of investing something

0:29:12.720 --> 0:29:15.720
<v Speaker 1>that brings true value across the portfolio, not just a

0:29:15.760 --> 0:29:18.440
<v Speaker 1>one hit wonder type of thing. You know, you have

0:29:18.520 --> 0:29:21.240
<v Speaker 1>to look at areas where there are true growth potentials

0:29:21.280 --> 0:29:24.000
<v Speaker 1>and they contribute to people, you know, across the portfolio.

0:29:24.240 --> 0:29:27.040
<v Speaker 1>And we think this area that we're in now that

0:29:27.320 --> 0:29:28.959
<v Speaker 1>you know there are there are legs there and there

0:29:28.960 --> 0:29:32.400
<v Speaker 1>are other opportunities going forward. It's um, sorry, I have

0:29:32.520 --> 0:29:35.280
<v Speaker 1>to say p h O came out in two thousand five.

0:29:36.120 --> 0:29:38.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that probably makes it the first theme ETF.

0:29:38.120 --> 0:29:40.920
<v Speaker 1>You're right, million dollars. Yeah, you know what, I think

0:29:41.000 --> 0:29:42.920
<v Speaker 1>we did. We did. I think the tickers should have

0:29:42.960 --> 0:29:44.840
<v Speaker 1>been used for the Vietnam ETF, But that's another story.

0:29:45.040 --> 0:29:48.000
<v Speaker 1>What about clean energy might have been before that? Clean

0:29:48.080 --> 0:29:49.960
<v Speaker 1>energy I would call E s G. I would call water.

0:29:50.160 --> 0:29:51.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean there's an E s G. Didn't they given

0:29:51.800 --> 0:29:55.000
<v Speaker 1>exist back? I know you were firing on all clers

0:29:59.600 --> 0:30:05.120
<v Speaker 1>we pay asked on the internet, the Internet. Yeah, so exactly.

0:30:05.760 --> 0:30:07.400
<v Speaker 1>You know the e t F better than anybody. While

0:30:07.440 --> 0:30:10.440
<v Speaker 1>we're on the topic, the SEC is wrestling internally over

0:30:10.480 --> 0:30:13.120
<v Speaker 1>whether to prove a bit coin ETF. My take is

0:30:13.160 --> 0:30:15.240
<v Speaker 1>the E t F structure can handle almost anything. You

0:30:15.280 --> 0:30:17.640
<v Speaker 1>can put Mickey Mickey mental rookie cards in it, and

0:30:17.720 --> 0:30:20.280
<v Speaker 1>it would probably be the best possible deal given the

0:30:20.400 --> 0:30:23.600
<v Speaker 1>arbitrage that the market makers can do. Um, what's your

0:30:23.680 --> 0:30:25.920
<v Speaker 1>take on that? Do you think that a bitcoin would

0:30:25.920 --> 0:30:27.320
<v Speaker 1>be fine? An e t F would all work out

0:30:27.360 --> 0:30:28.880
<v Speaker 1>and not not to say it with stuff the volatility,

0:30:29.040 --> 0:30:30.960
<v Speaker 1>but it would track it pretty well. I think probably,

0:30:31.280 --> 0:30:34.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, I would have Magnan. I'm not really up

0:30:34.560 --> 0:30:36.760
<v Speaker 1>on all the cryptocurrencies. But I think it probably would.

0:30:36.880 --> 0:30:39.080
<v Speaker 1>And and because it prices, and you can see the

0:30:39.120 --> 0:30:40.840
<v Speaker 1>prices long and the prices are reliable, you should be

0:30:40.840 --> 0:30:43.360
<v Speaker 1>able to get it. You know. Interesting thing along those lines, Eric,

0:30:43.560 --> 0:30:47.640
<v Speaker 1>is back when we had the financial crisis, and remember

0:30:47.760 --> 0:30:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Fannie May and all those guys were holding all those mortgages.

0:30:51.080 --> 0:30:53.920
<v Speaker 1>I tried to get them to take those trillion dollars

0:30:53.960 --> 0:30:56.000
<v Speaker 1>and mortgages or whatever they were and just put them

0:30:56.080 --> 0:30:58.000
<v Speaker 1>in an e t F and let the e t

0:30:58.120 --> 0:31:00.640
<v Speaker 1>F trade and let the market determine and the value

0:31:00.680 --> 0:31:03.480
<v Speaker 1>of the pool, and then that would have equitized all

0:31:03.520 --> 0:31:06.880
<v Speaker 1>that right. But you know obviously didn't listen to me there. Wow,

0:31:07.040 --> 0:31:09.360
<v Speaker 1>what a story. Yeah, I think we buried the lead.

0:31:09.800 --> 0:31:14.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, do you have that he Edits a little

0:31:14.640 --> 0:31:18.120
<v Speaker 1>magazine like you know, I tried to. I hadn't went

0:31:18.120 --> 0:31:20.000
<v Speaker 1>to d C and tried to you know, tell them, guys,

0:31:20.040 --> 0:31:21.480
<v Speaker 1>you know you want to get this, get rid of

0:31:21.520 --> 0:31:23.480
<v Speaker 1>This is a way to do it. Actually, And have

0:31:23.600 --> 0:31:28.160
<v Speaker 1>you have you gone and back tested your product and

0:31:28.560 --> 0:31:30.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, showing what it would have been like during

0:31:30.560 --> 0:31:32.720
<v Speaker 1>the financial cred We have and we we provide that

0:31:32.760 --> 0:31:35.200
<v Speaker 1>to advisors all the time. One thing that's really interesting

0:31:35.280 --> 0:31:38.440
<v Speaker 1>by this product if if you think about it, all

0:31:38.520 --> 0:31:41.160
<v Speaker 1>products that we typically buy or that I've ever sold,

0:31:41.280 --> 0:31:43.480
<v Speaker 1>or a better part of it, I've looked at historically

0:31:43.760 --> 0:31:45.560
<v Speaker 1>and I've said, okay, what has what did that do

0:31:45.720 --> 0:31:48.240
<v Speaker 1>in the past? Well, we kind of know what the SUPs,

0:31:48.600 --> 0:31:50.720
<v Speaker 1>S ANDP is done, right, So this is one product

0:31:50.760 --> 0:31:54.040
<v Speaker 1>where you actually think forward. You think about, okay, what

0:31:54.120 --> 0:31:56.040
<v Speaker 1>do I think that Margot will do next year? And

0:31:56.120 --> 0:31:57.960
<v Speaker 1>then you buy the one that you think is going

0:31:58.040 --> 0:32:00.480
<v Speaker 1>to give you the outcome that you want for that

0:32:00.640 --> 0:32:02.840
<v Speaker 1>following year. And so this is much more of a

0:32:03.040 --> 0:32:06.719
<v Speaker 1>forward looking product in than any product I've actually been

0:32:06.760 --> 0:32:08.760
<v Speaker 1>involved with in the past. One thing I would think

0:32:08.800 --> 0:32:10.680
<v Speaker 1>of if if you can and pitch me, I might say, well,

0:32:10.880 --> 0:32:12.640
<v Speaker 1>this is why I use treasuries. You know I have

0:32:12.720 --> 0:32:16.440
<v Speaker 1>treasure an allocation to treasuries and cash. That buffer is

0:32:16.520 --> 0:32:18.960
<v Speaker 1>my equity position. How do you sell against that? Or

0:32:19.000 --> 0:32:21.560
<v Speaker 1>is that somebody just probably wouldn't buy it? Well, no,

0:32:21.680 --> 0:32:23.240
<v Speaker 1>they might buy it, but I would say, okay, so

0:32:23.560 --> 0:32:29.000
<v Speaker 1>that debt exposure reduces your upside potential. Right right, market

0:32:29.040 --> 0:32:30.520
<v Speaker 1>goes up, You've got half your money in there, you

0:32:30.600 --> 0:32:34.280
<v Speaker 1>got half the upside right, potentially apparently right, and so

0:32:34.440 --> 0:32:36.120
<v Speaker 1>you buy this while you got all the upside. We

0:32:36.200 --> 0:32:38.120
<v Speaker 1>just saw the buffer in there, you know what I mean?

0:32:38.240 --> 0:32:40.880
<v Speaker 1>So it it uh, you know, that's a drag. That's

0:32:40.920 --> 0:32:43.479
<v Speaker 1>like if you think about a mutual fund manager, right,

0:32:43.520 --> 0:32:45.800
<v Speaker 1>they hold too much cash, they have cash drag, right,

0:32:45.840 --> 0:32:49.440
<v Speaker 1>So that's drag on people's portfolios. Here. You don't on that.

0:32:49.640 --> 0:32:51.440
<v Speaker 1>You put it in equities. You get the upside of

0:32:51.440 --> 0:32:54.239
<v Speaker 1>the market and you can. I think the important thing

0:32:54.280 --> 0:32:56.520
<v Speaker 1>to remember on the cap is if you get uh,

0:32:56.640 --> 0:32:58.400
<v Speaker 1>if you run up and you think you're getting slow

0:32:58.560 --> 0:33:00.360
<v Speaker 1>close to the cap, you could roll of the new

0:33:00.440 --> 0:33:02.480
<v Speaker 1>fund and the next month get a new cap and

0:33:02.720 --> 0:33:04.880
<v Speaker 1>lock in your game. You can get the step up.

0:33:05.160 --> 0:33:07.200
<v Speaker 1>So it gives you that flexibility to be able to

0:33:07.240 --> 0:33:09.360
<v Speaker 1>adjust your position as you go, which I think is

0:33:09.960 --> 0:33:13.840
<v Speaker 1>is really a phenomenal feature. He's pretty good, he's you're

0:33:13.920 --> 0:33:19.480
<v Speaker 1>very smooth. You know, how much of your day is

0:33:19.520 --> 0:33:23.240
<v Speaker 1>spent explaining these two people or how much of your week?

0:33:23.320 --> 0:33:25.280
<v Speaker 1>What percentage of your week are you? I don't know

0:33:25.520 --> 0:33:27.680
<v Speaker 1>a good bit and and uh, I mean this is

0:33:27.720 --> 0:33:30.800
<v Speaker 1>my job. We're pretty passionate about it because it's really

0:33:30.880 --> 0:33:34.120
<v Speaker 1>a neat product, and uh it you know, it has

0:33:34.160 --> 0:33:36.440
<v Speaker 1>its drawbacks. I mean, it can get capped out. I mean,

0:33:36.560 --> 0:33:39.520
<v Speaker 1>and you have those things. But even with the cap

0:33:39.640 --> 0:33:42.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I do say, remember you're not locked in there.

0:33:42.520 --> 0:33:44.080
<v Speaker 1>You could roll to the new one. If you start

0:33:44.120 --> 0:33:45.680
<v Speaker 1>to get a cap roll into the new one. I

0:33:45.760 --> 0:33:48.320
<v Speaker 1>mean they I would tell you. I mean, for John

0:33:48.360 --> 0:33:51.160
<v Speaker 1>and I to come back into the industry after selling

0:33:51.240 --> 0:33:53.840
<v Speaker 1>power shares, there was we didn't need to come back

0:33:53.960 --> 0:33:58.000
<v Speaker 1>and try in an industry that is super crowded, super difficult.

0:33:58.880 --> 0:34:01.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, the bologna has been life's pretty thin. You

0:34:01.080 --> 0:34:05.920
<v Speaker 1>know what it's left for anyone? Yeah? Yeah, blowny whether

0:34:06.480 --> 0:34:08.800
<v Speaker 1>you know we had to come back for something meaningful.

0:34:08.920 --> 0:34:11.359
<v Speaker 1>It's almost like this isn't It's like another meat. That's

0:34:11.400 --> 0:34:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the equity. You can't slice it anything. Yeah. One question,

0:34:18.120 --> 0:34:20.600
<v Speaker 1>I have you got the month option, You've got the

0:34:21.120 --> 0:34:25.080
<v Speaker 1>year option. Could you go out farther than that? I think? Yeah,

0:34:25.200 --> 0:34:28.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean now we can go longer right where you

0:34:28.960 --> 0:34:32.560
<v Speaker 1>could have a three year and you know, those are

0:34:32.600 --> 0:34:36.759
<v Speaker 1>some of the things we've evaluated. And uh, the reason

0:34:36.840 --> 0:34:39.000
<v Speaker 1>we kept it at a year and we did the

0:34:39.120 --> 0:34:41.480
<v Speaker 1>three and we're just sticking with that for now is

0:34:41.600 --> 0:34:45.440
<v Speaker 1>we want to stay with the most simple, straightforward structure

0:34:45.560 --> 0:34:47.920
<v Speaker 1>so that people can really get their minds around it.

0:34:48.440 --> 0:34:50.560
<v Speaker 1>And I think that in time, you know, as people

0:34:50.640 --> 0:34:54.000
<v Speaker 1>become very comfortable, we'll probably add some other bells and

0:34:54.040 --> 0:34:56.960
<v Speaker 1>whistles that we think add value, like maybe a longer

0:34:57.080 --> 0:35:01.360
<v Speaker 1>date or you know, other other things that we've looked Dad, Carolyna,

0:35:01.400 --> 0:35:03.560
<v Speaker 1>thanks for joining us as always, Thank you, Bruce Bond,

0:35:03.560 --> 0:35:11.200
<v Speaker 1>thanks for joining us on Trillions than thanks for listening

0:35:11.280 --> 0:35:13.480
<v Speaker 1>to Trillions until next time. You can find us on

0:35:13.480 --> 0:35:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg terminal, Bloomberg dot com, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and

0:35:17.640 --> 0:35:19.759
<v Speaker 1>wherever else you like to listen. We'd love to hear

0:35:19.800 --> 0:35:22.719
<v Speaker 1>from you. We're on Twitter, I'm at Joel Weber Show,

0:35:23.080 --> 0:35:26.640
<v Speaker 1>He's at Eric fall Tunas, and you can follow Innovator

0:35:26.719 --> 0:35:31.000
<v Speaker 1>e t F S at Innovator E t S. Trillions

0:35:31.080 --> 0:35:34.239
<v Speaker 1>is produced by Magnus Hendrickson. Francesca Levy is the head

0:35:34.320 --> 0:35:36.240
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg podcast Bye