WEBVTT - The Department of Justice V Google Ads: Part 2

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Also media.

0:00:05.280 --> 0:00:17.479
<v Speaker 2>Hello and welcome to Betrofline. I'm your host ed Ze Trones.

0:00:20.280 --> 0:00:24.000
<v Speaker 2>I am joined by Jason Kent, once again, the CEO DCN.

0:00:24.320 --> 0:00:27.000
<v Speaker 2>We'll be telling us more about the first week of

0:00:27.120 --> 0:00:30.360
<v Speaker 2>the Department of Justice versus Google ads. Jason, thank you

0:00:30.360 --> 0:00:31.360
<v Speaker 2>so much for joining.

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:33.160
<v Speaker 3>Thanks for having me back edm thrilled to be here.

0:00:33.479 --> 0:00:36.199
<v Speaker 2>So what's been happening since we lost spoke? How did

0:00:36.200 --> 0:00:36.879
<v Speaker 2>the first week go?

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:41.199
<v Speaker 1>It's a blur. I mean, it's an impressive operation. I

0:00:41.200 --> 0:00:44.400
<v Speaker 1>think we talked about how this district is known as

0:00:44.440 --> 0:00:47.520
<v Speaker 1>the Rocket Docket and that's how they got from from

0:00:47.520 --> 0:00:49.879
<v Speaker 1>filing a complaint to actual trial in like a year

0:00:49.880 --> 0:00:52.400
<v Speaker 1>and a half. So it has that reputation and you

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:55.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of we saw it in action this week. I

0:00:55.080 --> 0:00:57.680
<v Speaker 1>mean every day we started at nine am sharp, like

0:00:57.800 --> 0:01:01.080
<v Speaker 1>clockwork until six pm with you know, three or four

0:01:01.120 --> 0:01:02.920
<v Speaker 1>senior executives testified every day.

0:01:03.800 --> 0:01:05.040
<v Speaker 2>And who's testified so far?

0:01:06.720 --> 0:01:10.119
<v Speaker 3>Three or four ex Google employees. We've heard from.

0:01:10.160 --> 0:01:14.039
<v Speaker 1>We've had CEOs of all the major ad tech companies,

0:01:15.120 --> 0:01:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Casally from Index Exchange see.

0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:24.400
<v Speaker 3>What magnite and Ruba Khan actually it's now called Magnite.

0:01:24.440 --> 0:01:26.319
<v Speaker 3>And then well, else do we hear from?

0:01:26.319 --> 0:01:30.120
<v Speaker 1>We heard two different publishers executives, so we kind of

0:01:30.160 --> 0:01:33.639
<v Speaker 1>gone down the list. We've had one expert witness, computer

0:01:33.680 --> 0:01:35.360
<v Speaker 1>science professor from Carnegie Mellon.

0:01:35.600 --> 0:01:39.880
<v Speaker 2>So and so is this currently the Department of Justices case? Like,

0:01:39.920 --> 0:01:42.000
<v Speaker 2>it's them them laying out that's your case.

0:01:42.200 --> 0:01:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, this is what they call their case in

0:01:44.240 --> 0:01:46.759
<v Speaker 1>chief and they'll take probably about I think two weeks

0:01:46.760 --> 0:01:48.720
<v Speaker 1>and then Google have a chance to defend itself.

0:01:49.120 --> 0:01:51.600
<v Speaker 2>So what's the thrust of their argument other than they

0:01:51.640 --> 0:01:52.400
<v Speaker 2>have a monopoly.

0:01:52.960 --> 0:01:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, let's say you know that there are three different

0:01:55.080 --> 0:01:58.440
<v Speaker 1>markets at work here that that they have a monopoly in,

0:01:58.600 --> 0:02:00.800
<v Speaker 1>so you you know, some of the back and forth

0:02:00.960 --> 0:02:04.640
<v Speaker 1>is still Google trying to break that apart and blur

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:07.840
<v Speaker 1>into one single kind of two side and market they

0:02:07.880 --> 0:02:11.959
<v Speaker 1>call it. But but the Justice Department is their complaint

0:02:12.040 --> 0:02:15.280
<v Speaker 1>is that again that there's three markets. There's the cell side,

0:02:15.680 --> 0:02:18.320
<v Speaker 1>there's the ad exchange, and then there's the buy side.

0:02:19.120 --> 0:02:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Google in their opening statement has already tried to make

0:02:22.400 --> 0:02:25.600
<v Speaker 1>the into one market that's a two sided market, trying

0:02:25.600 --> 0:02:29.360
<v Speaker 1>to lean into a prior Supreme Court decision that involved

0:02:29.360 --> 0:02:32.400
<v Speaker 1>American Express. I don't I don't think they'll have much

0:02:32.400 --> 0:02:36.440
<v Speaker 1>success there. But once you get past proving that there's

0:02:36.480 --> 0:02:40.959
<v Speaker 1>three markets there and that they've got monopoly power in them,

0:02:41.440 --> 0:02:44.680
<v Speaker 1>then it's also a tying argument that they've used one

0:02:44.800 --> 0:02:47.040
<v Speaker 1>of them, one of those to build up and maintain

0:02:47.120 --> 0:02:52.160
<v Speaker 1>market power through through bad conduct to do that.

0:02:52.280 --> 0:02:54.880
<v Speaker 2>So don me if I break me down those three

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:57.840
<v Speaker 2>parts then and then we can get into the A grade.

0:02:58.160 --> 0:03:01.880
<v Speaker 3>Sure. So the the publisher side, the cell side.

0:03:02.400 --> 0:03:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Google has the product that a lot of people still

0:03:05.200 --> 0:03:08.040
<v Speaker 1>know as as DFP, which came from their Double Double

0:03:08.080 --> 0:03:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Click acquisition. So that's the publisher ad server, and according

0:03:13.760 --> 0:03:17.840
<v Speaker 1>to the Just Department's opening statement, they've got like ninety

0:03:17.960 --> 0:03:22.079
<v Speaker 1>one percent of the market share for the publisher side.

0:03:22.480 --> 0:03:24.720
<v Speaker 2>And a publisher in this case is like a website

0:03:24.880 --> 0:03:28.000
<v Speaker 2>and be like a website the show's Google ads.

0:03:27.760 --> 0:03:31.960
<v Speaker 1>On them exactly, And so that's the server that's it's

0:03:32.040 --> 0:03:33.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of the sort I guess what you call the

0:03:33.600 --> 0:03:35.520
<v Speaker 1>source of truth. We've always called it, but it's the

0:03:36.120 --> 0:03:39.400
<v Speaker 1>it's the ad server that says, hey, I've got this AD,

0:03:40.520 --> 0:03:42.880
<v Speaker 1>and then it takes care of deciding who wins it

0:03:42.920 --> 0:03:46.480
<v Speaker 1>and ultimately rendering and serving the ad and then actually

0:03:46.520 --> 0:03:48.760
<v Speaker 1>dealing with all the accounting.

0:03:48.400 --> 0:03:50.280
<v Speaker 3>And inventory projections, et cetera.

0:03:51.280 --> 0:03:54.080
<v Speaker 1>So that's that's the what's the cell side of the

0:03:54.360 --> 0:03:57.680
<v Speaker 1>of this auction market as real time auction market. And

0:03:57.720 --> 0:04:00.160
<v Speaker 1>then to go to the other side, you've got on

0:04:00.200 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 1>the buy side. Google has their ad demand that they

0:04:05.800 --> 0:04:09.400
<v Speaker 1>have through their ad network that they also have I

0:04:09.440 --> 0:04:11.920
<v Speaker 1>think the just Department's arguing they have like eighty some

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:17.120
<v Speaker 1>percent of that market. That's really important because a lot

0:04:17.120 --> 0:04:21.080
<v Speaker 1>of the arguments are that you couldn't use other products

0:04:21.080 --> 0:04:22.080
<v Speaker 1>and still have access to.

0:04:22.040 --> 0:04:24.279
<v Speaker 3>That Google demand, and so they use that.

0:04:24.760 --> 0:04:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Advertising demand of advertisers that want to spend money in

0:04:29.200 --> 0:04:33.800
<v Speaker 1>order to ensure that everyone else stays on their supply chain.

0:04:34.279 --> 0:04:38.800
<v Speaker 1>And then in the middle is the ad exchange which

0:04:38.920 --> 0:04:43.839
<v Speaker 1>Google is called ad X, and that's the exchange that

0:04:44.120 --> 0:04:48.080
<v Speaker 1>acts as the ability to take in bids.

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 3>Of that ad inventory and then clear them.

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:54.720
<v Speaker 2>And so it's the place where Google sells ads on

0:04:54.800 --> 0:04:55.919
<v Speaker 2>Google to Google.

0:04:56.640 --> 0:04:59.800
<v Speaker 1>No, it's the ad X would be the what would

0:04:59.839 --> 0:05:03.839
<v Speaker 1>take the cell side, So the publisher ad server, so

0:05:03.960 --> 0:05:06.360
<v Speaker 1>all the different websites that are out there across the web,

0:05:06.680 --> 0:05:08.960
<v Speaker 1>they would take their inventory and say hey, I've got

0:05:08.960 --> 0:05:12.640
<v Speaker 1>this ad impression. I'm requesting somebody to bid on it,

0:05:13.160 --> 0:05:17.560
<v Speaker 1>and then Google could handle the bid because of its demand,

0:05:17.640 --> 0:05:21.240
<v Speaker 1>but other parties could come into and bid and they

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:22.560
<v Speaker 1>would decide the highest bid.

0:05:23.640 --> 0:05:26.040
<v Speaker 2>So how are they using this as a monopolis? Then?

0:05:26.080 --> 0:05:29.080
<v Speaker 2>Where is the other than being on every single transaction?

0:05:29.600 --> 0:05:33.600
<v Speaker 2>Are they doing anything else to basically intervene and drive

0:05:33.680 --> 0:05:34.119
<v Speaker 2>up price?

0:05:35.120 --> 0:05:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean, the couple of the main themes that

0:05:38.520 --> 0:05:41.040
<v Speaker 1>are going on throughout the entire week is that that

0:05:41.160 --> 0:05:45.479
<v Speaker 1>ad X, which is the exchange, Google takes twenty percent

0:05:46.040 --> 0:05:48.920
<v Speaker 1>of the revenue and they've never had to come off

0:05:48.920 --> 0:05:49.600
<v Speaker 1>of that price.

0:05:50.320 --> 0:05:51.960
<v Speaker 3>And so.

0:05:53.880 --> 0:05:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Like the CEOs of like index Exchange and these other

0:05:56.839 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 1>exchanges that are out there were testifying and they charge

0:06:00.279 --> 0:06:00.960
<v Speaker 1>like half of.

0:06:00.880 --> 0:06:04.400
<v Speaker 3>What Google charges, sometimes even as low as five percent.

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:07.479
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Casally, the CEO of index Exchange, that they actually

0:06:07.480 --> 0:06:10.159
<v Speaker 1>went down to zero and they weren't able to take

0:06:10.240 --> 0:06:13.400
<v Speaker 1>away business from Google. So Google is able to keep

0:06:13.440 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 1>that twenty percent and extract monopoly rents. According to one

0:06:18.440 --> 0:06:21.000
<v Speaker 1>of their own internal health to give me emails go ahead.

0:06:20.760 --> 0:06:23.599
<v Speaker 2>Forgive my ignorance here. But how do they extra like

0:06:23.720 --> 0:06:25.880
<v Speaker 2>is it that just there's a bunch of ad inventory

0:06:25.880 --> 0:06:27.440
<v Speaker 2>that Google only has access to.

0:06:28.160 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 3>It's it's the opposite of it. It's actually it's the.

0:06:32.720 --> 0:06:38.000
<v Speaker 1>That you can only have access to the demand, the

0:06:38.080 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 1>AD spend that Google has if you're using ad X,

0:06:44.000 --> 0:06:47.280
<v Speaker 1>so that AD demand won't travel through any other exchange.

0:06:47.800 --> 0:06:48.560
<v Speaker 2>And why is that?

0:06:48.720 --> 0:06:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Is it just because it's a decision by Google and

0:06:51.839 --> 0:06:55.240
<v Speaker 1>so yeah, so they made the decision to only allow

0:06:55.279 --> 0:06:56.839
<v Speaker 1>their demand to go through ADX.

0:06:57.320 --> 0:07:01.680
<v Speaker 2>So what's stopping people from building their own ad X.

0:07:03.160 --> 0:07:05.719
<v Speaker 1>There's other exchanges out there that try to compete with

0:07:05.720 --> 0:07:08.719
<v Speaker 1>with add x, but they're not able to because they

0:07:08.800 --> 0:07:12.320
<v Speaker 1>can't get access to all the AD demand and that spend.

0:07:12.320 --> 0:07:16.960
<v Speaker 1>It's that critical, and everybody wants to stay on ad X,

0:07:17.000 --> 0:07:20.440
<v Speaker 1>and Google has then advantages which we can.

0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 3>Go through because of the way the ad X operates.

0:07:23.800 --> 0:07:26.040
<v Speaker 2>That's one of those advantages.

0:07:26.840 --> 0:07:27.280
<v Speaker 3>Then you know that.

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:30.120
<v Speaker 1>I think the biggest one that was part of the

0:07:30.200 --> 0:07:33.320
<v Speaker 1>opening statements is what's now last look they call it.

0:07:33.640 --> 0:07:36.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, there was something called first look, which was

0:07:36.760 --> 0:07:40.000
<v Speaker 1>really before a real before the auction's really opened up

0:07:40.040 --> 0:07:43.760
<v Speaker 1>with header bidding, and first looks kind of just the

0:07:44.400 --> 0:07:47.360
<v Speaker 1>simplify It's basically if you put in if a publisher

0:07:47.440 --> 0:07:49.960
<v Speaker 1>said Hey, I've got this ad unit and I'm willing

0:07:50.040 --> 0:07:53.080
<v Speaker 1>to sell it to anybody, and the floor the lowest

0:07:53.160 --> 0:07:56.280
<v Speaker 1>price i'll sell it for is five dollars. Then Google

0:07:56.360 --> 0:07:58.480
<v Speaker 1>always had the chance to say I'll take it before

0:07:58.480 --> 0:08:00.680
<v Speaker 1>it even goes into the auction. They could say they

0:08:00.760 --> 0:08:02.880
<v Speaker 1>had first look, and they could just say I'll take

0:08:02.920 --> 0:08:05.800
<v Speaker 1>it for five dollars and a penny basically before they

0:08:05.840 --> 0:08:09.440
<v Speaker 1>even put it in the auction. And over time that

0:08:09.880 --> 0:08:14.400
<v Speaker 1>transitioned into something called last look, so that when auctions

0:08:14.440 --> 0:08:19.760
<v Speaker 1>started to open up because of their privileged position that

0:08:19.880 --> 0:08:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Google had, they had something called last look, where after

0:08:23.840 --> 0:08:26.200
<v Speaker 1>all the auction took place, they could then look at

0:08:26.280 --> 0:08:28.480
<v Speaker 1>the winning bid and decide if they wanted to beat

0:08:28.520 --> 0:08:29.679
<v Speaker 1>it by another penny.

0:08:30.160 --> 0:08:33.120
<v Speaker 2>Oh, so they can literally just rig the dice pretty

0:08:33.200 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 2>much as they want.

0:08:35.040 --> 0:08:38.360
<v Speaker 3>Like it. I mean, that's the way it's I mean,

0:08:38.400 --> 0:08:39.480
<v Speaker 3>that's the reading in the room.

0:08:39.559 --> 0:08:42.079
<v Speaker 1>And it's interesting because you know, I think one of

0:08:42.080 --> 0:08:45.559
<v Speaker 1>the biggest questions always going into this trial was, you know,

0:08:45.600 --> 0:08:47.480
<v Speaker 1>it was originally gonna be a jury, now it's a

0:08:47.880 --> 0:08:50.319
<v Speaker 1>this judge bring them a was you know, can you

0:08:50.440 --> 0:08:55.360
<v Speaker 1>explain these live high speed trading auctions of ad tech,

0:08:55.960 --> 0:08:59.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, to the average American, and they're doing a

0:08:59.400 --> 0:09:01.679
<v Speaker 1>really good job explained. I think the judge gets it,

0:09:01.760 --> 0:09:04.319
<v Speaker 1>the people in the room get it, and you know,

0:09:04.400 --> 0:09:06.480
<v Speaker 1>I think Last Look was one of the better examples

0:09:06.520 --> 0:09:10.360
<v Speaker 1>where the Justice Department and their opening statement described it

0:09:10.480 --> 0:09:14.679
<v Speaker 1>as kind of like a classic silent auction where every

0:09:14.720 --> 0:09:17.360
<v Speaker 1>party writes down their bid on the slip of paper.

0:09:17.960 --> 0:09:21.520
<v Speaker 3>It's in a sealed envelope, and you only get to

0:09:21.559 --> 0:09:22.040
<v Speaker 3>bid ones.

0:09:22.320 --> 0:09:24.600
<v Speaker 1>And then at the end of the auction, Google gets

0:09:24.640 --> 0:09:27.240
<v Speaker 1>to peek into the envelope see what the highest bid

0:09:27.320 --> 0:09:28.880
<v Speaker 1>is and say, you know, I'll pay a penny higher.

0:09:28.760 --> 0:09:31.640
<v Speaker 2>For that, And so Google gets the big twice where

0:09:31.679 --> 0:09:32.880
<v Speaker 2>everyone else gets to bid ones.

0:09:33.160 --> 0:09:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Essentially, that's essentially what happens, right, and so they get

0:09:36.040 --> 0:09:39.679
<v Speaker 1>to pick off wherever they think there's additional value because

0:09:39.760 --> 0:09:40.920
<v Speaker 1>of the quality of the impression.

0:09:41.360 --> 0:09:44.240
<v Speaker 2>And this is in the tool that lets you let's

0:09:44.280 --> 0:09:46.720
<v Speaker 2>publish a sell adspace, right, Yeah.

0:09:46.600 --> 0:09:48.200
<v Speaker 3>It's basically what it's called an SSP.

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:52.080
<v Speaker 1>It's the supply side platform that takes their inventory puts

0:09:52.080 --> 0:09:52.760
<v Speaker 1>it out for auctions.

0:10:02.200 --> 0:10:04.720
<v Speaker 2>So as as you're finding from my litany of very

0:10:04.760 --> 0:10:07.640
<v Speaker 2>simple questions, this stuff is pretty complex. Is the judge

0:10:07.679 --> 0:10:08.079
<v Speaker 2>getting it?

0:10:08.920 --> 0:10:09.640
<v Speaker 3>I think she is.

0:10:10.040 --> 0:10:10.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:10:10.520 --> 0:10:13.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean they're you know, they're they're coming up with

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:16.400
<v Speaker 1>I think, simple ways to explain it. She's she seems

0:10:16.600 --> 0:10:19.679
<v Speaker 1>sharp as attack and she's you know, fair as can be.

0:10:19.800 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, she runs a court room like I've never seen.

0:10:23.480 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 1>But the technical aspects of it, I think they're going

0:10:26.280 --> 0:10:29.480
<v Speaker 1>as deep as they really need to. And you know,

0:10:29.559 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 1>they had an expert witness in Carnegie Mellon computer science

0:10:34.120 --> 0:10:37.920
<v Speaker 1>professor doctor Robbie and he did a really good job

0:10:38.040 --> 0:10:41.880
<v Speaker 1>of of with some visuals of explaining the kind of

0:10:41.960 --> 0:10:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the three or four kind of most important ways in

0:10:46.640 --> 0:10:50.600
<v Speaker 1>which they were quote unquote rigging or allegedly rigging the auctions.

0:10:50.640 --> 0:10:52.439
<v Speaker 3>And he kind of walked through each of those and

0:10:52.559 --> 0:10:54.199
<v Speaker 3>it was it was easy to follow.

0:10:54.720 --> 0:10:57.480
<v Speaker 2>And what was his testimony Exactly what did he get into.

0:10:57.880 --> 0:11:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, he walked through that that last look and why

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:04.120
<v Speaker 1>that was so important as an example that we just

0:11:04.200 --> 0:11:08.760
<v Speaker 1>talked about. He talked through something called dynamic revenue sharing,

0:11:09.480 --> 0:11:14.400
<v Speaker 1>which is a pretty big advantage that Google just gave

0:11:14.480 --> 0:11:19.559
<v Speaker 1>itself in addicts also where you know, they the way

0:11:19.679 --> 0:11:23.439
<v Speaker 1>he testified was that Google recognized and there's there's tons

0:11:23.440 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 1>of emails that they put up that back this up.

0:11:25.920 --> 0:11:28.800
<v Speaker 1>So it's not or maybe past the stage of having

0:11:28.840 --> 0:11:31.000
<v Speaker 1>to say their allegations because there was evidence going up

0:11:31.000 --> 0:11:35.679
<v Speaker 1>on screens. But what they did was, you know, Google

0:11:35.720 --> 0:11:39.439
<v Speaker 1>takes twenty percent, as I mentioned, of the transactions that

0:11:39.520 --> 0:11:42.240
<v Speaker 1>go through addicts, and so the other eighty percent goes

0:11:42.280 --> 0:11:46.000
<v Speaker 1>to the publisher. So in simple terms, if it's a dollar,

0:11:46.600 --> 0:11:48.960
<v Speaker 1>if it's a dollar transaction, Google's going to take twenty cents,

0:11:49.000 --> 0:11:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the Publisher's.

0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:50.440
<v Speaker 3>Going to take eighty cents.

0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:52.920
<v Speaker 1>And what they did was they said, you know what,

0:11:53.120 --> 0:11:56.240
<v Speaker 1>if we've got this last look and we know that

0:11:56.360 --> 0:11:59.160
<v Speaker 1>somebody else is going to win this ad at eighty

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:02.840
<v Speaker 1>one cents, because we're only going to get eighty cents

0:12:02.840 --> 0:12:05.600
<v Speaker 1>across to the publisher, why don't we take our revenue

0:12:05.640 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 1>share down off twenty percent to fifteen percent and.

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:12.200
<v Speaker 3>So then we'll win out and eighty five cents will

0:12:12.200 --> 0:12:13.160
<v Speaker 3>go through and will win the bid.

0:12:14.000 --> 0:12:18.240
<v Speaker 1>And so, in Google's own words, in their own email,

0:12:18.480 --> 0:12:21.480
<v Speaker 1>they described it as just another way to exploit the

0:12:21.520 --> 0:12:23.719
<v Speaker 1>fact that they had last look. So we've got this

0:12:23.880 --> 0:12:25.960
<v Speaker 1>last look, why don't we come off of our twenty

0:12:26.000 --> 0:12:29.320
<v Speaker 1>percent share if it allows us to win the impression,

0:12:30.679 --> 0:12:33.559
<v Speaker 1>and so that's a way to take. You know, it

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:37.480
<v Speaker 1>didn't actually drive that much more revenue through, but what

0:12:37.600 --> 0:12:40.160
<v Speaker 1>it did was it gave them a lot more volume

0:12:40.200 --> 0:12:42.600
<v Speaker 1>and activity. A lot more of the bids were won

0:12:42.679 --> 0:12:45.719
<v Speaker 1>through their exchange rather than the other competitive exchanges that

0:12:45.760 --> 0:12:46.160
<v Speaker 1>were out there.

0:12:46.200 --> 0:12:46.880
<v Speaker 3>If that makes sense.

0:12:47.760 --> 0:12:51.679
<v Speaker 2>It does. So you talk about them needing addicts to

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:54.640
<v Speaker 2>like forgive me in for sense to this book. The

0:12:54.800 --> 0:12:57.520
<v Speaker 2>demand that they have, that's really their secret source, the

0:12:57.559 --> 0:13:00.920
<v Speaker 2>demand that they can source. Why is an Why can't

0:13:00.960 --> 0:13:03.199
<v Speaker 2>anyone else get that kind of demand? What is it

0:13:03.280 --> 0:13:04.079
<v Speaker 2>that's stopping them?

0:13:04.679 --> 0:13:05.360
<v Speaker 3>Well it starts.

0:13:05.480 --> 0:13:07.280
<v Speaker 1>That's where this is interesting because it kind of starts

0:13:07.360 --> 0:13:12.000
<v Speaker 1>with the search trial that they just won last month, right,

0:13:12.120 --> 0:13:15.319
<v Speaker 1>and so that remember the the other case over in

0:13:15.440 --> 0:13:20.040
<v Speaker 1>DC was that Google has monopoly power over search text

0:13:20.120 --> 0:13:23.720
<v Speaker 1>advertising too, and so they've got this platform in which

0:13:24.120 --> 0:13:28.520
<v Speaker 1>advertiser going into buy ads in which they've got monopoly power.

0:13:29.400 --> 0:13:34.560
<v Speaker 3>And so trying to convince you know a lot of smaller.

0:13:34.240 --> 0:13:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Business advertisers out there, small market advertisers to go through

0:13:39.000 --> 0:13:42.839
<v Speaker 1>another platform is in itself difficult. There's friction there, and

0:13:42.960 --> 0:13:46.840
<v Speaker 1>so everybody spends money on Google already, and so they

0:13:46.880 --> 0:13:49.720
<v Speaker 1>already come in with that massive advantage, and.

0:13:49.760 --> 0:13:52.120
<v Speaker 2>It's it's more expensive to use other platforms, is it

0:13:52.200 --> 0:13:53.920
<v Speaker 2>more burdensome to set up with them?

0:13:54.679 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, we haven't really got into the quality of

0:13:56.960 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the buyside platforms. They seem, you know, to be discribed

0:14:00.200 --> 0:14:03.600
<v Speaker 1>as relatively comparable. So it's more a matter of having

0:14:03.679 --> 0:14:06.760
<v Speaker 1>one central, you know, interface in which you're buying. So

0:14:06.960 --> 0:14:09.160
<v Speaker 1>but it's clearly, you know that money is going to

0:14:09.200 --> 0:14:10.920
<v Speaker 1>be coming through from the Google site no matter what,

0:14:11.920 --> 0:14:13.839
<v Speaker 1>that's going to go to Google's platforms is going to

0:14:13.880 --> 0:14:16.320
<v Speaker 1>go to the wider web. And so they just walk

0:14:16.360 --> 0:14:18.880
<v Speaker 1>in with a massive advantage on the demand side. And

0:14:19.200 --> 0:14:22.040
<v Speaker 1>so the real, you know, the real challenge is that

0:14:22.160 --> 0:14:24.880
<v Speaker 1>that or the issue is that demand should be able

0:14:24.960 --> 0:14:28.040
<v Speaker 1>to go to other exchanges, not just to Googles. And

0:14:28.360 --> 0:14:30.760
<v Speaker 1>that's where I think Google's trying to set up its

0:14:30.800 --> 0:14:34.640
<v Speaker 1>defense is that that they shouldn't have to connect their

0:14:34.680 --> 0:14:35.880
<v Speaker 1>demand to other platforms.

0:14:36.280 --> 0:14:38.840
<v Speaker 3>There's no there's no issue with well, we'll get to

0:14:38.880 --> 0:14:39.880
<v Speaker 3>the legal piece of it, the.

0:14:39.880 --> 0:14:43.440
<v Speaker 2>Good Yeah, even though that seems a perfectly reasonable thing

0:14:43.520 --> 0:14:47.400
<v Speaker 2>to say for anything like this, right connecting. So is

0:14:47.480 --> 0:14:51.000
<v Speaker 2>this suggesting that all Google so do all Google properties

0:14:51.120 --> 0:14:53.760
<v Speaker 2>run through at X, Like you can't buy advertising on

0:14:53.960 --> 0:14:56.200
<v Speaker 2>Google Ads without going through at.

0:14:56.280 --> 0:15:02.240
<v Speaker 1>X, can't buy now, So I'm sorry to Yeah, I

0:15:02.320 --> 0:15:05.840
<v Speaker 1>wish I had my visuals we're talking, but you can't

0:15:06.920 --> 0:15:10.760
<v Speaker 1>if the advertising demand on the buy side on Google

0:15:11.480 --> 0:15:16.120
<v Speaker 1>that has to go through ad X in order to

0:15:16.240 --> 0:15:17.600
<v Speaker 1>go to other publishers.

0:15:17.680 --> 0:15:20.040
<v Speaker 3>And so right, yeah, I think that's the same thing

0:15:20.080 --> 0:15:20.520
<v Speaker 3>you were saying.

0:15:20.640 --> 0:15:24.760
<v Speaker 2>So, yes, Britty, and that demand is coming from advertisers,

0:15:24.800 --> 0:15:27.200
<v Speaker 2>as in people who want to advertise on different platforms,

0:15:27.240 --> 0:15:32.920
<v Speaker 2>that's right, But then it goes through ad X and

0:15:33.080 --> 0:15:36.080
<v Speaker 2>then Google basically gets the monkey with at the beginning

0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:38.520
<v Speaker 2>of the end of it. It's just it feels fairly,

0:15:39.680 --> 0:15:40.480
<v Speaker 2>fairly crooked.

0:15:42.400 --> 0:15:44.160
<v Speaker 1>That's the feeling when you're sitting in the room. It

0:15:44.320 --> 0:15:45.760
<v Speaker 1>very much does. And there's a lot of, you know,

0:15:45.840 --> 0:15:48.640
<v Speaker 1>emails from Google employees where you can tell they feel

0:15:48.720 --> 0:15:51.080
<v Speaker 1>like this might be a little crooked, you know.

0:15:51.320 --> 0:15:55.200
<v Speaker 2>So there was the thing The Verge quoted a particular

0:15:55.280 --> 0:15:58.640
<v Speaker 2>witness and news corp that seemed quite interesting who said

0:15:58.680 --> 0:16:03.720
<v Speaker 2>she felt like they were being held hostage by Google.

0:16:04.680 --> 0:16:07.000
<v Speaker 3>Did you I did? Yeah, she was, she was really

0:16:07.040 --> 0:16:11.040
<v Speaker 3>see laser. She no longer is with news courts. She's

0:16:11.160 --> 0:16:13.720
<v Speaker 3>actually at Amazon now, which is interesting.

0:16:13.800 --> 0:16:17.920
<v Speaker 1>But she she gave really clear evidence and testimony, and

0:16:19.160 --> 0:16:22.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, she she was explaining how there was really

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:26.200
<v Speaker 1>no choice to use any platform but DFP as their

0:16:26.240 --> 0:16:30.320
<v Speaker 1>ad server, and therefore with it, it comes with all

0:16:30.400 --> 0:16:34.200
<v Speaker 1>these other obligations. And you know, the one thing that

0:16:34.320 --> 0:16:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Google did that she seemed to really not like was

0:16:39.000 --> 0:16:41.640
<v Speaker 1>there is a point that was important in time where

0:16:41.800 --> 0:16:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Google ted to publishers you can no longer have floors

0:16:46.640 --> 0:16:49.520
<v Speaker 1>price floors on individual exchanges.

0:16:49.680 --> 0:16:51.120
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, what does that mean?

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:55.880
<v Speaker 1>Essentially, if you're a publisher, if you're a website and

0:16:56.600 --> 0:17:00.160
<v Speaker 1>you're saying, I have this AD that's available, and I

0:17:00.360 --> 0:17:05.919
<v Speaker 1>will allow five different exchanges to put forward their highest

0:17:05.960 --> 0:17:06.680
<v Speaker 1>bid for it.

0:17:06.840 --> 0:17:09.040
<v Speaker 2>And when you say AD available, you mean like space

0:17:09.160 --> 0:17:09.879
<v Speaker 2>on a website too.

0:17:10.160 --> 0:17:11.680
<v Speaker 3>They can add banner on their homepage.

0:17:11.760 --> 0:17:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so a banner on their homepage and they're making

0:17:14.600 --> 0:17:17.639
<v Speaker 1>it available to let's say five different exchanges. One of

0:17:17.680 --> 0:17:21.080
<v Speaker 1>those is ad X, but then let's say also Pobmatic

0:17:21.280 --> 0:17:25.399
<v Speaker 1>and Rubicon in exchange, these various SSP's we call them.

0:17:25.480 --> 0:17:28.960
<v Speaker 4>And for a while you could actually set a price

0:17:29.080 --> 0:17:32.480
<v Speaker 4>floor essentially the lowest price you were willing to sell

0:17:32.600 --> 0:17:36.240
<v Speaker 4>that banner on the homepage, and you could set it

0:17:36.320 --> 0:17:38.119
<v Speaker 4>individually based on the exchange.

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:40.920
<v Speaker 1>So what publishers were often doing was they were putting

0:17:40.920 --> 0:17:44.040
<v Speaker 1>a higher price floor for ad X, for Google, for

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:47.200
<v Speaker 1>add X for a number of reasons, you know. And

0:17:47.280 --> 0:17:50.440
<v Speaker 1>some of those reasons included wanting to diversify so not

0:17:50.520 --> 0:17:53.400
<v Speaker 1>all the revenue and spend was coming from Google because

0:17:53.440 --> 0:17:57.520
<v Speaker 1>that could create risk as we see. They also wanted

0:17:57.560 --> 0:17:59.600
<v Speaker 1>to manage the quality of the ads because sometimes the

0:17:59.640 --> 0:18:02.240
<v Speaker 1>ads is a high quality coming through at X. So

0:18:02.280 --> 0:18:04.080
<v Speaker 1>by having a higher price point, it kind of weeded

0:18:04.119 --> 0:18:06.399
<v Speaker 1>out some of the garbage. And so there there are

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:08.640
<v Speaker 1>a number of reasons. And at this moment in time,

0:18:08.760 --> 0:18:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Google said, you know what, you now need to have

0:18:11.320 --> 0:18:15.960
<v Speaker 1>a universal price floor across everyone, and that basically gave

0:18:16.080 --> 0:18:19.200
<v Speaker 1>ad X the same, you know, the same advantage, made

0:18:19.200 --> 0:18:21.120
<v Speaker 1>sure it had the same price floor as everyone else.

0:18:21.640 --> 0:18:24.879
<v Speaker 2>But how do they maintain a price floor across other platforms,

0:18:25.040 --> 0:18:27.680
<v Speaker 2>Like how did they just say if you violate this,

0:18:27.840 --> 0:18:29.120
<v Speaker 2>you're off of our ad platform.

0:18:29.440 --> 0:18:32.840
<v Speaker 3>Well, it all it's because again DFP, the ad server

0:18:34.119 --> 0:18:38.000
<v Speaker 3>is also Google, so it's the source of truth. Yeah.

0:18:38.160 --> 0:18:41.200
<v Speaker 2>So they so they own the place where ads negotiate,

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:43.520
<v Speaker 2>the place where ads come from, and then the server

0:18:43.640 --> 0:18:46.440
<v Speaker 2>that puts the ads on places bing go. That's really

0:18:46.920 --> 0:18:47.440
<v Speaker 2>that's good.

0:18:48.200 --> 0:18:50.520
<v Speaker 3>That seems that seems like if you can, if you

0:18:50.520 --> 0:18:51.119
<v Speaker 3>can keep it right.

0:18:51.320 --> 0:19:06.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but that might be a problem for them. So

0:19:06.760 --> 0:19:10.800
<v Speaker 2>whether on the other really cool like publisher witnesses interesting people.

0:19:11.359 --> 0:19:13.840
<v Speaker 2>So on the publisher side for listeners, we're just saying

0:19:13.880 --> 0:19:16.520
<v Speaker 2>that's the people putting ads up. Sorry, they're the ones

0:19:16.560 --> 0:19:17.840
<v Speaker 2>providing at inventory.

0:19:18.640 --> 0:19:22.159
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you know, we heard from Gannette was awesome. He

0:19:22.240 --> 0:19:25.679
<v Speaker 1>was actually the first witness Gannet, the big newspaper company.

0:19:26.600 --> 0:19:30.720
<v Speaker 1>They're head of their ad operations group. That was the

0:19:30.800 --> 0:19:34.760
<v Speaker 1>very first witness on Monday. You know, he really set

0:19:34.880 --> 0:19:39.200
<v Speaker 1>up the some of the basic foundation of the case. So,

0:19:39.480 --> 0:19:41.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think it was enough.

0:19:41.560 --> 0:19:42.760
<v Speaker 3>Really from the publisher side.

0:19:42.800 --> 0:19:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Now we're actually deeper in the weeds of the conduct

0:19:44.840 --> 0:19:46.960
<v Speaker 1>issues and some of these like you know, the revenue

0:19:46.960 --> 0:19:48.600
<v Speaker 1>sharing were going through and some of these other games

0:19:48.640 --> 0:19:52.200
<v Speaker 1>that they played. You know, I think the most actually

0:19:52.200 --> 0:19:54.600
<v Speaker 1>the most interesting one, if I can digress for a second,

0:19:55.240 --> 0:19:58.879
<v Speaker 1>the revenue the dynamic revenue sharing where they would come

0:19:59.000 --> 0:20:02.879
<v Speaker 1>off the twenty percent and drop down. They actually came

0:20:02.960 --> 0:20:07.240
<v Speaker 1>out with dynamic revenue Sharing two, where they seemed to

0:20:07.320 --> 0:20:10.000
<v Speaker 1>realize that, you know, it was hurting their margins coming

0:20:10.040 --> 0:20:13.119
<v Speaker 1>down off twenty percent in order to win the transaction,

0:20:13.760 --> 0:20:16.040
<v Speaker 1>so they decided they would also go higher than twenty

0:20:16.080 --> 0:20:20.080
<v Speaker 1>percent when they had a high enough bid already, and

0:20:20.200 --> 0:20:23.200
<v Speaker 1>that would allow them to recoup that margin. And so

0:20:23.480 --> 0:20:26.639
<v Speaker 1>they essentially described it as a bank in which they

0:20:26.720 --> 0:20:29.440
<v Speaker 1>could as the expert would have said, he described it

0:20:29.480 --> 0:20:32.760
<v Speaker 1>as imposing a debt on the publishers, where basically Google

0:20:32.800 --> 0:20:35.040
<v Speaker 1>would say, you know what, We're going to go offer

0:20:35.240 --> 0:20:38.119
<v Speaker 1>take less than twenty percent revenue share in order to

0:20:38.160 --> 0:20:40.000
<v Speaker 1>win and add but then we're going to go ahead

0:20:40.000 --> 0:20:42.600
<v Speaker 1>and hold a little debt for you publisher, and we're

0:20:42.600 --> 0:20:44.520
<v Speaker 1>going to take that money back later on and pay

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:45.200
<v Speaker 1>ourselves back.

0:20:45.720 --> 0:20:48.520
<v Speaker 2>Wait, so when they came up, so when they reduced

0:20:48.560 --> 0:20:52.640
<v Speaker 2>their car to win a bit, they would then take

0:20:52.800 --> 0:20:55.280
<v Speaker 2>the remainder of the car that they had lost and

0:20:55.400 --> 0:20:57.440
<v Speaker 2>then charge the people they were meant to give money.

0:20:57.760 --> 0:20:59.200
<v Speaker 2>So the place where the app was going.

0:20:59.520 --> 0:21:02.439
<v Speaker 1>Yes later but later on, so you know, maybe they

0:21:03.040 --> 0:21:06.480
<v Speaker 1>one ad goes through at a fifteen percent revenue share,

0:21:06.640 --> 0:21:08.760
<v Speaker 1>that they came down off twenty percent in order to

0:21:08.840 --> 0:21:12.280
<v Speaker 1>win that transaction, and then maybe the next time an

0:21:12.280 --> 0:21:14.320
<v Speaker 1>AD went through on that site they would.

0:21:14.080 --> 0:21:16.280
<v Speaker 3>Take you know, twenty four percent or whatever it is

0:21:16.280 --> 0:21:17.440
<v Speaker 3>in order to pay themselves back.

0:21:18.080 --> 0:21:20.359
<v Speaker 2>How did how the odd my friends, or how the

0:21:20.400 --> 0:21:23.360
<v Speaker 2>fuck is that lead? Like? What the that's insane?

0:21:23.640 --> 0:21:25.159
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's what we're going to find out, right, I mean,

0:21:25.600 --> 0:21:27.720
<v Speaker 1>imposing a debt on publishers. I wrote that down in

0:21:27.760 --> 0:21:29.240
<v Speaker 1>my notebook as soon as he said it, because I

0:21:29.320 --> 0:21:29.960
<v Speaker 1>was thinking.

0:21:29.800 --> 0:21:34.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's what that is. And so if the publisher didn't.

0:21:33.840 --> 0:21:36.119
<v Speaker 1>Know that that debt was being imposed on them, or

0:21:36.160 --> 0:21:39.520
<v Speaker 1>if it was unclear or they were being misled, which

0:21:39.520 --> 0:21:41.760
<v Speaker 1>seems to be the case often, then you know, that's

0:21:41.800 --> 0:21:44.960
<v Speaker 1>significant harm to the publishers. It's it's bit we're talking

0:21:45.080 --> 0:21:48.080
<v Speaker 1>billions of dollars if it's a matter of twenty percent

0:21:48.240 --> 0:21:50.800
<v Speaker 1>versus eighteen percent, you know, coming down off that number.

0:21:51.640 --> 0:21:54.080
<v Speaker 2>So are there any other harms they've discussed otherwise that

0:21:54.119 --> 0:21:55.840
<v Speaker 2>Google's actions of harmed others?

0:21:56.640 --> 0:21:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean certainly there's been harm to the other

0:21:58.359 --> 0:22:03.119
<v Speaker 1>ad exchange, to the other add tech companies too that haven't.

0:22:02.840 --> 0:22:04.720
<v Speaker 3>Been able to compete because of that monopi power.

0:22:04.760 --> 0:22:07.760
<v Speaker 1>We haven't really seen from the buy side yet in

0:22:07.880 --> 0:22:11.480
<v Speaker 1>terms of, you know, how it affects the advertisers.

0:22:12.240 --> 0:22:13.840
<v Speaker 3>We had two different.

0:22:13.600 --> 0:22:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Ad agcy executives testify, you know, it was good, it

0:22:17.920 --> 0:22:20.640
<v Speaker 1>was solid, it was kind of foundational. But I want

0:22:20.720 --> 0:22:23.920
<v Speaker 1>to really see the just department connect the dots still

0:22:24.119 --> 0:22:28.800
<v Speaker 1>on how those harmed advertisers, because it's you know, it's

0:22:28.880 --> 0:22:32.920
<v Speaker 1>fairly clear that Google's going to, as its defense, say

0:22:33.080 --> 0:22:36.040
<v Speaker 1>you know what, we made a market that yes, we

0:22:36.480 --> 0:22:38.879
<v Speaker 1>dominate the buy side the cell side, and we control

0:22:38.920 --> 0:22:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the auctions and we do all these funny business games,

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:44.480
<v Speaker 1>but we do it to be more efficient and you know,

0:22:44.600 --> 0:22:47.800
<v Speaker 1>and our advertisers are all happy, and so what's the

0:22:47.920 --> 0:22:50.320
<v Speaker 1>harm that's I mean, that's clearly where they're going.

0:22:51.000 --> 0:22:52.679
<v Speaker 3>And so I think those dots need to be connected

0:22:52.720 --> 0:22:52.919
<v Speaker 3>a bit.

0:22:53.480 --> 0:22:55.639
<v Speaker 2>It feels like they can't really say that that's the

0:22:55.720 --> 0:22:58.320
<v Speaker 2>case though, because the way this harms advertises is this

0:22:58.520 --> 0:23:02.479
<v Speaker 2>must raise prices or at least manipulate them to benefit Google.

0:23:02.960 --> 0:23:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean there's there's a boat that and then

0:23:05.720 --> 0:23:07.239
<v Speaker 1>you know what we don't know too and I think,

0:23:07.840 --> 0:23:09.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, there will be one or two economists that

0:23:09.880 --> 0:23:12.880
<v Speaker 1>will probably have testify next week, and I think that's

0:23:12.920 --> 0:23:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the part that they'll also land in.

0:23:15.200 --> 0:23:18.800
<v Speaker 2>Has anyone from Google kind of like said anything? Has that?

0:23:18.880 --> 0:23:20.720
<v Speaker 2>Have they managed to get anyone to flip on the

0:23:20.760 --> 0:23:21.400
<v Speaker 2>Google side?

0:23:21.600 --> 0:23:24.760
<v Speaker 1>There was only only one of the ex employees. I

0:23:24.960 --> 0:23:27.800
<v Speaker 1>think all the ex employees were somewhat damaging, but only

0:23:27.960 --> 0:23:32.440
<v Speaker 1>one of them that was I think really sympathetic and

0:23:32.880 --> 0:23:36.040
<v Speaker 1>the case and uh, he just seemed to have no

0:23:36.200 --> 0:23:40.040
<v Speaker 1>love for for the He called it the machine for he.

0:23:40.040 --> 0:23:43.360
<v Speaker 3>Would describe like where he knew things were not right.

0:23:44.520 --> 0:23:48.000
<v Speaker 1>They were they were not doing the right thing as

0:23:48.080 --> 0:23:52.600
<v Speaker 1>a company, and his colleagues would agree, and then they

0:23:52.680 --> 0:23:56.320
<v Speaker 1>would propose a change, and then it would get denied.

0:23:56.320 --> 0:23:58.720
<v Speaker 1>It would come back from the machine and the people

0:23:58.800 --> 0:24:02.000
<v Speaker 1>on the other side, he said, that would overrule what

0:24:02.080 --> 0:24:04.320
<v Speaker 1>they wanted to do. He never figured out who was

0:24:04.320 --> 0:24:07.600
<v Speaker 1>on the other side. He said, he'd kind of comment

0:24:07.640 --> 0:24:09.320
<v Speaker 1>on it. I never really knew where that decision was

0:24:09.359 --> 0:24:11.760
<v Speaker 1>coming from, but it would come back as a no.

0:24:12.560 --> 0:24:17.480
<v Speaker 3>And so that was I Lipki was yeah, good, good call.

0:24:17.640 --> 0:24:20.280
<v Speaker 2>Yes, Oh yeah, So that's what I'm here for. It's

0:24:20.800 --> 0:24:25.120
<v Speaker 2>it's really funny because all of this has been going

0:24:25.200 --> 0:24:28.440
<v Speaker 2>on decades. That's what really astonishes me. This isn't even

0:24:28.680 --> 0:24:32.520
<v Speaker 2>subtle what's going on. I haven't really dug too deeply

0:24:32.600 --> 0:24:36.000
<v Speaker 2>and I know why will into the discovery and actually

0:24:36.160 --> 0:24:38.920
<v Speaker 2>have they been providing a bunch of intal So you

0:24:38.920 --> 0:24:41.080
<v Speaker 2>said there's a bunch of emails that been in lots

0:24:41.119 --> 0:24:41.359
<v Speaker 2>of them.

0:24:41.560 --> 0:24:43.320
<v Speaker 3>There's been a lot, a lot of new documents.

0:24:43.400 --> 0:24:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, a lot of emails and I'd say about twenty

0:24:47.400 --> 0:24:50.040
<v Speaker 1>or thirty are going up on the department site per day.

0:24:50.080 --> 0:24:53.119
<v Speaker 3>And I think I mentioned on our opening session, but

0:24:53.640 --> 0:24:54.720
<v Speaker 3>USV Google.

0:24:54.520 --> 0:24:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Ads dot Com has all the exhibits and they're all searchable,

0:24:58.080 --> 0:25:00.879
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. They're doing a great job managing that. But

0:25:01.040 --> 0:25:03.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's a lot of material. And the other

0:25:03.320 --> 0:25:04.960
<v Speaker 1>thing that is happening, because we talked about it on

0:25:05.000 --> 0:25:07.479
<v Speaker 1>the first show, is they're really landing the bus part

0:25:07.600 --> 0:25:10.879
<v Speaker 1>is really landing that there is evidence that we're not seeing.

0:25:11.359 --> 0:25:15.000
<v Speaker 1>And so they've asked a number of the ex Google

0:25:15.040 --> 0:25:19.440
<v Speaker 1>employees about having their chats automatically deeply lead after twenty

0:25:19.480 --> 0:25:23.560
<v Speaker 1>four hours and why they didn't honor the litigation hold

0:25:23.720 --> 0:25:27.560
<v Speaker 1>and the judge leaned in several times on that where

0:25:28.480 --> 0:25:30.800
<v Speaker 1>she asked questions of the witness and said, why, you know,

0:25:31.000 --> 0:25:33.639
<v Speaker 1>when did you get this litigation hold? Why didn't you

0:25:33.760 --> 0:25:36.359
<v Speaker 1>preserve your chats? What did you understand? And so I

0:25:36.400 --> 0:25:37.760
<v Speaker 1>think that's also going to hang over.

0:25:37.680 --> 0:25:38.480
<v Speaker 3>Them the rest of the trial.

0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:41.760
<v Speaker 2>And has that been a consistent theme because I did, Yeah,

0:25:42.240 --> 0:25:45.320
<v Speaker 2>I did see a message with friend of the show,

0:25:45.400 --> 0:25:49.560
<v Speaker 2>pravagar Ragavan saying responding to someone and saying, oh wait,

0:25:49.680 --> 0:25:53.160
<v Speaker 2>this chat's on the record, which is so bad.

0:25:53.480 --> 0:25:54.320
<v Speaker 3>That's really bad.

0:25:55.480 --> 0:25:59.280
<v Speaker 1>That's really bad. Well, yeah, it's a consistent theme. And

0:25:59.440 --> 0:26:03.680
<v Speaker 1>I would get lightly if I were Google. And because

0:26:04.000 --> 0:26:06.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, she already said that she was gonna affect

0:26:06.040 --> 0:26:09.200
<v Speaker 1>the credibility of every witness, and so you've got Isazar.

0:26:09.359 --> 0:26:12.119
<v Speaker 1>We mentioned a guy named Chris Lsala who ran their

0:26:12.480 --> 0:26:17.160
<v Speaker 1>publisher operations globally testified this morning Brad Bender a couple

0:26:17.200 --> 0:26:17.640
<v Speaker 1>of days ago.

0:26:17.680 --> 0:26:19.800
<v Speaker 3>These are former employees and.

0:26:19.920 --> 0:26:23.119
<v Speaker 1>So you know, even though they weren't I think, really

0:26:23.200 --> 0:26:27.240
<v Speaker 1>damaging as witnesses. I think the judge also knows she didn't.

0:26:27.400 --> 0:26:30.280
<v Speaker 1>We're not seeing everything probably so and she has to

0:26:30.320 --> 0:26:31.080
<v Speaker 1>make that inference.

0:26:31.359 --> 0:26:32.680
<v Speaker 3>And then on top of that.

0:26:33.280 --> 0:26:35.359
<v Speaker 1>I think the first witness every day next week is

0:26:35.359 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 1>also a Google employee. I mean Monday is Monday at

0:26:39.080 --> 0:26:41.720
<v Speaker 1>nine am, will be Neil Mohan, who was the CEO

0:26:41.760 --> 0:26:43.720
<v Speaker 1>of double Click when they sold it to Google. He

0:26:43.840 --> 0:26:46.040
<v Speaker 1>was the he brought the deal in and he continued

0:26:46.080 --> 0:26:48.400
<v Speaker 1>to run it for quite some time. And now he's

0:26:48.400 --> 0:26:49.200
<v Speaker 1>the CEO of YouTube.

0:26:49.280 --> 0:26:51.800
<v Speaker 3>So so I think there'll be a.

0:26:51.800 --> 0:26:54.359
<v Speaker 1>Really important witness. He's probably one of the guys on

0:26:54.400 --> 0:26:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the other side that you know, the machine could.

0:26:58.400 --> 0:27:01.600
<v Speaker 2>So right now, the Department of Justice is making the case.

0:27:02.040 --> 0:27:05.040
<v Speaker 2>How long left do we have of that before Google

0:27:05.119 --> 0:27:07.159
<v Speaker 2>gets to make their I.

0:27:07.160 --> 0:27:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Would have to imagine at least another week to week

0:27:10.080 --> 0:27:12.880
<v Speaker 1>and a half and then Google will have another week

0:27:13.080 --> 0:27:15.240
<v Speaker 1>or so probably for their defense and we'll get to

0:27:15.240 --> 0:27:19.360
<v Speaker 1>closing arguments by the first week of October.

0:27:20.560 --> 0:27:23.080
<v Speaker 2>Very cool. And how do you think that the Development

0:27:23.119 --> 0:27:25.679
<v Speaker 2>of Justice is making the case convincingly?

0:27:26.400 --> 0:27:27.680
<v Speaker 3>I think they are. Yeah.

0:27:27.760 --> 0:27:32.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean Google's strategy in the beginning seemed to be confusion.

0:27:32.320 --> 0:27:35.960
<v Speaker 1>It was both to try to confuse the market, that's

0:27:36.000 --> 0:27:40.040
<v Speaker 1>not three markets. They've tried to argue that the display

0:27:40.160 --> 0:27:44.040
<v Speaker 1>ads are the same as TikTok ads and Facebook ads

0:27:44.080 --> 0:27:48.199
<v Speaker 1>and they've lost that. And the opening statement that they did,

0:27:49.160 --> 0:27:52.080
<v Speaker 1>which I think it got some reporting on this. It

0:27:52.160 --> 0:27:55.919
<v Speaker 1>was Karen Dunn, who's their lead defense attorney from Paul Weitz.

0:27:56.040 --> 0:27:58.520
<v Speaker 1>She did the opening statement for half an hour and

0:27:58.640 --> 0:28:01.600
<v Speaker 1>she just really tried to sandwich in just she ran

0:28:01.640 --> 0:28:02.800
<v Speaker 1>out of time and had.

0:28:02.720 --> 0:28:03.679
<v Speaker 3>To cut on the fly.

0:28:04.480 --> 0:28:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Just a lot of technical terms and a lot of

0:28:06.960 --> 0:28:10.000
<v Speaker 1>jargon from the industry. I think they try to confuse

0:28:10.080 --> 0:28:14.360
<v Speaker 1>the judge up front. She got some pressed because interesting enough,

0:28:14.440 --> 0:28:15.960
<v Speaker 1>she ran out of the room as soon as she

0:28:16.040 --> 0:28:19.280
<v Speaker 1>finished at whatever was ten am on Monday, she ran

0:28:19.320 --> 0:28:20.840
<v Speaker 1>out of the room to go because she was also

0:28:21.680 --> 0:28:26.760
<v Speaker 1>the lead advisor and coach for Kamala Harris for the debate,

0:28:27.280 --> 0:28:29.879
<v Speaker 1>and so she literally she opened up on Monday and

0:28:30.000 --> 0:28:32.520
<v Speaker 1>she's leading the defense and then she also was helping

0:28:32.600 --> 0:28:33.760
<v Speaker 1>to prep Kamala.

0:28:33.920 --> 0:28:35.400
<v Speaker 3>So busy woman.

0:28:36.200 --> 0:28:40.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so, I mean, kind of exciting, but also it

0:28:40.200 --> 0:28:42.760
<v Speaker 2>doesn't feel like Google is particularly well prepared for this.

0:28:42.840 --> 0:28:45.600
<v Speaker 2>I guess we'll see more in the defense, but it

0:28:45.640 --> 0:28:48.400
<v Speaker 2>doesn't seem like that plan is anything other than let's

0:28:48.440 --> 0:28:50.520
<v Speaker 2>confuse as much as humanly possible.

0:28:51.880 --> 0:28:54.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, I think I think that is my

0:28:54.600 --> 0:28:55.239
<v Speaker 3>read eye it too.

0:28:55.280 --> 0:28:56.680
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a good readout, even though they had

0:28:56.760 --> 0:29:00.720
<v Speaker 1>four years, I think because the state ag filed back

0:29:00.920 --> 0:29:03.720
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty, so they've had time to work through

0:29:03.760 --> 0:29:05.600
<v Speaker 1>their defense on this. But I think ultimately it's going

0:29:05.640 --> 0:29:09.360
<v Speaker 1>to come down to a legal issue. They're trying to

0:29:09.480 --> 0:29:12.920
<v Speaker 1>make the case about something that's called refusal to deal,

0:29:13.640 --> 0:29:16.880
<v Speaker 1>which there's some Supreme Court precedent on that they shouldn't

0:29:17.000 --> 0:29:22.520
<v Speaker 1>have to provide APIs or do deals with their rivals.

0:29:24.040 --> 0:29:26.880
<v Speaker 1>But with the monopoly power that they have, I don't

0:29:26.920 --> 0:29:29.640
<v Speaker 1>think that that's really the that's not the case. It's

0:29:29.680 --> 0:29:32.440
<v Speaker 1>a tying case where they're saying you can't have our

0:29:32.480 --> 0:29:35.040
<v Speaker 1>advertising demand unless you use these.

0:29:34.960 --> 0:29:37.120
<v Speaker 3>Other products where we also have monopoly power, and that's

0:29:37.320 --> 0:29:39.000
<v Speaker 3>I think that'll be enough for the just Department to win.

0:29:39.480 --> 0:29:43.080
<v Speaker 2>Also kind of feels like an argument that you could

0:29:43.120 --> 0:29:44.959
<v Speaker 2>win much better if it didn't seem like you were

0:29:45.000 --> 0:29:46.200
<v Speaker 2>deleting all this stuff.

0:29:47.120 --> 0:29:50.160
<v Speaker 3>That's exactly right, but the last smoke in the room

0:29:50.280 --> 0:29:50.600
<v Speaker 3>for sure.

0:29:51.080 --> 0:29:54.479
<v Speaker 2>So well, Jason, thank you so much for joining us

0:29:54.480 --> 0:29:56.400
<v Speaker 2>again for this. Where can people find you?

0:29:57.000 --> 0:30:00.480
<v Speaker 1>You can find me on Twitter's probably easiest Jason underscore

0:30:00.560 --> 0:30:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Kent KNT and I always look for vback okay.

0:30:04.360 --> 0:30:07.600
<v Speaker 2>And also go to usv Google ads dot com And

0:30:07.840 --> 0:30:10.480
<v Speaker 2>if any of this was slightly confusing, they have an

0:30:10.560 --> 0:30:14.560
<v Speaker 2>incredible trial resources bit with a glossary of terms with

0:30:14.680 --> 0:30:17.920
<v Speaker 2>ad tech explainers, I know, listeners. This is a lot.

0:30:18.280 --> 0:30:19.960
<v Speaker 2>It's a lot for me, and I'm steeped in this

0:30:20.080 --> 0:30:24.240
<v Speaker 2>crap all the time. But the people running usv Google

0:30:24.240 --> 0:30:25.720
<v Speaker 2>who was actually running that, Jason, do you know?

0:30:26.000 --> 0:30:28.480
<v Speaker 1>It's a coalition. But there's a group called check my

0:30:28.560 --> 0:30:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Ads that's taking lead on it. And I appreciate the

0:30:30.880 --> 0:30:33.880
<v Speaker 1>other mention of it because they're just doing a phenomenal job.

0:30:34.040 --> 0:30:38.080
<v Speaker 2>They really are, and also genuinely a lot of people

0:30:38.360 --> 0:30:40.800
<v Speaker 2>I would argue this is undercovered in the tech industry

0:30:41.000 --> 0:30:43.200
<v Speaker 2>just because this is the biggest thing happening in tech.

0:30:43.480 --> 0:30:46.120
<v Speaker 1>It is, and there's literally like three hundred billion dollars

0:30:46.160 --> 0:30:49.480
<v Speaker 1>of advertising spend you know that goes through through Google.

0:30:49.560 --> 0:30:51.240
<v Speaker 3>So it's what pays for all this journalism.

0:30:51.600 --> 0:30:53.600
<v Speaker 1>I also should mention because it's different than the search

0:30:53.680 --> 0:30:58.280
<v Speaker 1>trial that the National Press, New York Times, Washington Post, CNN,

0:30:58.440 --> 0:31:00.720
<v Speaker 1>they were all there on the first day, the wire

0:31:00.800 --> 0:31:05.520
<v Speaker 1>services were all there, the DC groups like Mlex and

0:31:05.600 --> 0:31:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Capital Form were there, but also the industry kind of

0:31:07.960 --> 0:31:11.520
<v Speaker 1>advertising trade press at Week, Digital Business Insider, marketing.

0:31:11.280 --> 0:31:15.680
<v Speaker 3>Brew and at exchange you We're all there.

0:31:15.720 --> 0:31:18.040
<v Speaker 1>There must have been thirty reporters there, many of them

0:31:18.040 --> 0:31:20.680
<v Speaker 1>were there the whole week, and there were ten cameras.

0:31:20.360 --> 0:31:23.000
<v Speaker 3>I counted outside of the courthouse, and so that actually

0:31:23.080 --> 0:31:25.680
<v Speaker 3>was a live attention on it, which is wonderful, which.

0:31:25.480 --> 0:31:28.040
<v Speaker 2>Is great, and I think everyone please go and check

0:31:28.120 --> 0:31:30.760
<v Speaker 2>out USB, Google Ads, go check out Jason, and you

0:31:30.800 --> 0:31:32.680
<v Speaker 2>can check out my various stuff that you'll hear in

0:31:32.720 --> 0:31:35.240
<v Speaker 2>a recorded clip off of this. Thank you for listening, Ei,

0:31:43.240 --> 0:31:45.640
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for listening to Better Offline. The editor and

0:31:45.680 --> 0:31:48.840
<v Speaker 2>composer of the Better Offline theme song is Metasowski. You

0:31:48.880 --> 0:31:51.080
<v Speaker 2>can check out more of his music and audio projects

0:31:51.280 --> 0:31:55.640
<v Speaker 2>at Matasowski dot com, m A. T. T OsO w

0:31:56.080 --> 0:31:59.560
<v Speaker 2>Ski dot com. You can email me an Easy at

0:31:59.600 --> 0:32:02.239
<v Speaker 2>betro line dot com or visit Better Offline dot com

0:32:02.320 --> 0:32:04.720
<v Speaker 2>to find more podcast links and of course my newsletter.

0:32:05.160 --> 0:32:07.640
<v Speaker 2>I also really recommend you go to chat dot Where's

0:32:07.680 --> 0:32:10.120
<v Speaker 2>youread dot at to visit the discord, and go to

0:32:10.200 --> 0:32:13.560
<v Speaker 2>our slash Better Offline to check out I'll Reddit. Thank

0:32:13.600 --> 0:32:17.000
<v Speaker 2>you so much for listening Better Offline is a production

0:32:17.120 --> 0:32:19.520
<v Speaker 2>of cool Zone Media. For more from cool Zone Media,

0:32:19.880 --> 0:32:23.000
<v Speaker 2>visit our website cool zonemedia dot com, or check us

0:32:23.040 --> 0:32:25.960
<v Speaker 2>out on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you

0:32:26.080 --> 0:32:26.920
<v Speaker 2>get your podcasts.