WEBVTT - Tesla's Strong Earnings, Nvidia's Partnership in India

0:00:01.440 --> 0:00:05.760
<v Speaker 1>From Mahard where Innovation, Money and power Collie in Silicon

0:00:05.840 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Vallet NBN.

0:00:07.080 --> 0:00:11.360
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed loved Love.

0:00:26.480 --> 0:00:28.760
<v Speaker 3>Live from New York and San Francisco. This is Bloomberg

0:00:28.800 --> 0:00:32.800
<v Speaker 3>Technology coming up. Tesla shares spike on surprisingly strong earnings

0:00:32.840 --> 0:00:36.000
<v Speaker 3>and lofty sales goals on twenty twenty five, and.

0:00:36.040 --> 0:00:39.159
<v Speaker 4>Nvidia announces a new partnership in India. More on its

0:00:39.159 --> 0:00:41.120
<v Speaker 4>plans in the new massive market.

0:00:41.280 --> 0:00:45.600
<v Speaker 3>That's an exclusive interview with Greenlight Capital's David Einhorn. The

0:00:45.720 --> 0:00:47.519
<v Speaker 3>first a focus on our top story, Ed.

0:00:48.320 --> 0:00:52.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Tesla shares of the ev maker absolutely surgeon. In fact,

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:56.200
<v Speaker 4>if this seventeen percent gain holds, it puts Tesla on

0:00:56.240 --> 0:00:58.680
<v Speaker 4>track for its biggest single day jump. Going back to

0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:01.319
<v Speaker 4>March of twenty twenty one, So in the quarter there

0:01:01.360 --> 0:01:05.080
<v Speaker 4>was a lot that investors liked. Profit was ahead of expectations.

0:01:05.120 --> 0:01:07.920
<v Speaker 4>Part of that was sales of FSD software, part of

0:01:07.959 --> 0:01:10.840
<v Speaker 4>it was regulatory credits. But they're also just lowering the

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:13.800
<v Speaker 4>costs of production. And then Caro, as you know, there's

0:01:13.880 --> 0:01:16.559
<v Speaker 4>the quarter that's gone, and then Elon Musk's best skill,

0:01:16.959 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 4>which is the outlook and keeping investors look into the

0:01:19.840 --> 0:01:20.920
<v Speaker 4>horizon and.

0:01:20.840 --> 0:01:23.680
<v Speaker 3>His best guess is ed his testa CEO El Musk

0:01:23.800 --> 0:01:25.680
<v Speaker 3>on his growth expectations in the next year.

0:01:27.160 --> 0:01:30.400
<v Speaker 2>I do want to give some some rough estimate, which

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:34.399
<v Speaker 2>they think twenty to thirty percent vehicle growth next year,

0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:39.840
<v Speaker 2>you know, notwithstanding negative external events.

0:01:41.080 --> 0:01:44.399
<v Speaker 3>Craigs Truell joins us Now from London, tell us are

0:01:44.440 --> 0:01:47.560
<v Speaker 3>these estimates lofty goals likely to be achieved?

0:01:49.120 --> 0:01:49.960
<v Speaker 5>They're very lafty.

0:01:49.960 --> 0:01:51.920
<v Speaker 6>I would agree with that assessment.

0:01:52.200 --> 0:01:56.120
<v Speaker 7>I think, you know, we can't necessarily rule out the

0:01:56.160 --> 0:01:59.320
<v Speaker 7>possibility that this is a company that won't actually increase

0:01:59.480 --> 0:02:04.040
<v Speaker 7>deliveries this year, so you know, I think part of

0:02:04.160 --> 0:02:07.760
<v Speaker 7>part of the reason for this rally was Musk's optimism

0:02:07.880 --> 0:02:12.280
<v Speaker 7>that they will have a slight increase and this twenty

0:02:12.320 --> 0:02:16.120
<v Speaker 7>to thirty percent outlook for next year. I guess I

0:02:16.240 --> 0:02:18.120
<v Speaker 7>just would like to have a better sense, if I'm

0:02:18.120 --> 0:02:20.639
<v Speaker 7>a Tesla investor, of how exactly they're going to get there,

0:02:21.240 --> 0:02:23.720
<v Speaker 7>because you know, we do know that this is a

0:02:23.720 --> 0:02:26.760
<v Speaker 7>company that has been talking for months now about more

0:02:26.800 --> 0:02:29.600
<v Speaker 7>affordable vehicles coming in the first half of next year,

0:02:29.800 --> 0:02:32.520
<v Speaker 7>but we don't know what those are. We have very

0:02:32.600 --> 0:02:36.640
<v Speaker 7>little indication from the company of any specifics around there.

0:02:36.680 --> 0:02:40.280
<v Speaker 7>Even last night during the conference call.

0:02:39.760 --> 0:02:42.240
<v Speaker 4>You know, slight growth was the call for twenty twenty four.

0:02:42.280 --> 0:02:44.120
<v Speaker 4>And if you do the math, like our colleagues at

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg and he F did, they're going to have to

0:02:46.200 --> 0:02:49.040
<v Speaker 4>deliver five hundred and fourteen thousand vehicles ish in the

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:51.680
<v Speaker 4>last three months of this year, which would be a record.

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:54.840
<v Speaker 4>Then there's the everything else bit. I mean, Musk was

0:02:54.960 --> 0:02:58.799
<v Speaker 4>very clear about autonomous driving, but I felt that we

0:02:58.919 --> 0:03:03.320
<v Speaker 4>got details or lease claims and plans about ride hailing

0:03:03.360 --> 0:03:06.400
<v Speaker 4>more than we got at the Robotaxi event in the

0:03:06.440 --> 0:03:07.320
<v Speaker 4>last two weeks.

0:03:07.320 --> 0:03:11.560
<v Speaker 7>What do we learn Craig, Yeah, the robo taxi event

0:03:11.680 --> 0:03:13.560
<v Speaker 7>was sort of concepts of a plan, and this was

0:03:13.600 --> 0:03:16.400
<v Speaker 7>a plan plan right where we we got a better

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:21.200
<v Speaker 7>indication of of, you know, plans for putting together a

0:03:21.320 --> 0:03:25.679
<v Speaker 7>ride hailing offering that would actually deploy next year in

0:03:26.200 --> 0:03:29.840
<v Speaker 7>California and Texas. It was a little unclear to me

0:03:30.040 --> 0:03:33.240
<v Speaker 7>what exactly, you know, Tesla needs from the state of

0:03:33.240 --> 0:03:37.040
<v Speaker 7>California to offer that service. You know, obviously if if

0:03:37.080 --> 0:03:39.800
<v Speaker 7>he wants to offer it with the ability for people

0:03:39.840 --> 0:03:44.200
<v Speaker 7>to not supervise, uh, you know, the wheel, it's not

0:03:44.480 --> 0:03:48.880
<v Speaker 7>really it's not really clear that that they need approval

0:03:49.040 --> 0:03:52.800
<v Speaker 7>other than because of the fact that that they need

0:03:54.000 --> 0:03:56.600
<v Speaker 7>you know, I guess, I guess they do need state

0:03:56.840 --> 0:04:00.320
<v Speaker 7>approval for that. But but you know, in tex I

0:04:00.360 --> 0:04:03.240
<v Speaker 7>think he's sounded pretty assure that that's on the way.

0:04:03.960 --> 0:04:07.760
<v Speaker 7>Whether or not though this company has the technology to

0:04:07.840 --> 0:04:10.440
<v Speaker 7>offer that safely, I think remains an open question.

0:04:11.440 --> 0:04:13.600
<v Speaker 4>Must said he'd be shocked if he didn't get those

0:04:13.600 --> 0:04:15.840
<v Speaker 4>state regulatory approvals. And as you can see on the

0:04:15.880 --> 0:04:18.839
<v Speaker 4>screen when we sent those headlines, Uber and lift stock

0:04:18.880 --> 0:04:21.560
<v Speaker 4>fell in after hours. They continue to be under pressure

0:04:21.560 --> 0:04:25.279
<v Speaker 4>in the context of some competition in Ryde hailing to

0:04:25.320 --> 0:04:28.440
<v Speaker 4>come Bloombo's creatudow in London, thank you very much. Let's

0:04:28.440 --> 0:04:31.279
<v Speaker 4>get this cell side reaction and bring in William Stein.

0:04:31.320 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 4>He's the managing director and senior analystitorist Securities. You actually

0:04:35.279 --> 0:04:39.040
<v Speaker 4>largely cover semiconductors, and you're sort of focused on this work.

0:04:38.800 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 6>Around AI that Tesla's doing.

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:42.680
<v Speaker 4>There was something that jumped out at me in the

0:04:42.760 --> 0:04:45.839
<v Speaker 4>ten Q that the CFO also mentioned, which was in

0:04:45.880 --> 0:04:49.960
<v Speaker 4>the quarter gone and Tesla recognized more than three hundred

0:04:49.960 --> 0:04:53.160
<v Speaker 4>million dollars worth of FSD revenues now take that and

0:04:53.200 --> 0:04:54.680
<v Speaker 4>tell me the story it gives you.

0:04:56.440 --> 0:04:59.040
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, the story gives me is that they released FSD

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:02.640
<v Speaker 8>on the cyber truck, So for cars that they've been

0:05:02.640 --> 0:05:07.120
<v Speaker 8>selling for a little while, they can suddenly recognize the

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:11.880
<v Speaker 8>revenue that they've already been paid for that technology that

0:05:11.920 --> 0:05:15.760
<v Speaker 8>they've already delivered and continued to deliver. So that's great,

0:05:16.040 --> 0:05:19.720
<v Speaker 8>And you know, look, I think FSD is an amazing technology.

0:05:20.200 --> 0:05:23.160
<v Speaker 8>But you know, if you've read my reviews, or if

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:26.640
<v Speaker 8>you look at any of the many reviews on YouTube

0:05:26.680 --> 0:05:30.040
<v Speaker 8>or other platforms, you could see that there are known

0:05:30.160 --> 0:05:31.919
<v Speaker 8>failure modes for this technology.

0:05:32.000 --> 0:05:34.039
<v Speaker 9>It does not work in the sense.

0:05:33.800 --> 0:05:36.760
<v Speaker 8>That you can actually run it without a driver, and

0:05:36.760 --> 0:05:38.919
<v Speaker 8>that continues to be a problem no matter what the

0:05:38.960 --> 0:05:39.960
<v Speaker 8>ten Q says.

0:05:40.440 --> 0:05:42.160
<v Speaker 9>This is a real problem for the company.

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:46.280
<v Speaker 3>Have you seen any improvements, William since last ye were

0:05:46.320 --> 0:05:48.600
<v Speaker 3>on to talk about some of those failings within FSD.

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:50.039
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:05:50.040 --> 0:05:52.360
<v Speaker 9>So we've reviewed three different versions of this.

0:05:53.080 --> 0:05:55.560
<v Speaker 8>I think the I Forget, which was the last time

0:05:55.600 --> 0:05:57.760
<v Speaker 8>I was on your show to discuss it, but certainly

0:05:58.720 --> 0:06:00.640
<v Speaker 8>this version twelve dot five, which is I think the

0:06:00.720 --> 0:06:07.200
<v Speaker 8>latest one that's broadly available to consumers, this is still

0:06:07.240 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 8>one that doesn't work.

0:06:08.839 --> 0:06:10.120
<v Speaker 9>Have there been improvements?

0:06:10.400 --> 0:06:15.560
<v Speaker 8>Certainly they mostly relate to the feel of the car

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:19.560
<v Speaker 8>in that it feels more human like, less herky jerky.

0:06:20.040 --> 0:06:22.240
<v Speaker 8>But along with that, I think there have been some

0:06:22.360 --> 0:06:27.880
<v Speaker 8>documented cases of rolling through stop signs, another let's say,

0:06:27.920 --> 0:06:33.599
<v Speaker 8>minor driving infractions that are more human like, but maybe

0:06:33.680 --> 0:06:37.120
<v Speaker 8>not exactly what one is shooting for for a driverless

0:06:37.160 --> 0:06:39.480
<v Speaker 8>car in terms of trying to maximize the safety.

0:06:39.520 --> 0:06:43.760
<v Speaker 3>Okay, not only William, does he need to improve on

0:06:43.800 --> 0:06:46.360
<v Speaker 3>the technology. Therefore, it seems like you're still saying despite

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:48.920
<v Speaker 3>the improvements, and what's so notable is they need the

0:06:48.960 --> 0:06:50.040
<v Speaker 3>regulatory approvals.

0:06:50.080 --> 0:06:52.720
<v Speaker 10>This is where you drill in the extraordinary nature.

0:06:52.520 --> 0:06:55.080
<v Speaker 3>Of one Elon Musk, because he's not only the CEO

0:06:55.120 --> 0:06:56.880
<v Speaker 3>of Tesla, but he's also potentially going to have a

0:06:56.880 --> 0:07:00.560
<v Speaker 3>political role and FSD regulation coming ed.

0:07:00.680 --> 0:07:02.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, So, William, what I wrote about last night was

0:07:02.960 --> 0:07:05.920
<v Speaker 4>Musk did not cite the election directly, and he did

0:07:05.960 --> 0:07:08.719
<v Speaker 4>not name Donald Trump. But what he did say was

0:07:08.760 --> 0:07:11.640
<v Speaker 4>that if there's going to be a Department of Government efficiency,

0:07:12.240 --> 0:07:15.840
<v Speaker 4>he would like to work on nationwide or federal level

0:07:15.920 --> 0:07:20.160
<v Speaker 4>rules for the deployment of autonomous technology on US roads,

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:22.840
<v Speaker 4>which is as close to commenting on the election as

0:07:22.880 --> 0:07:24.520
<v Speaker 4>I think you could get in the context of an

0:07:24.520 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 4>earnings call. What did you make of those comments?

0:07:28.600 --> 0:07:30.400
<v Speaker 9>Well, I think he's just.

0:07:31.920 --> 0:07:36.840
<v Speaker 8>Making some fairly logical comments about what would be the simplest,

0:07:37.000 --> 0:07:42.400
<v Speaker 8>most logical way to pardon me, to regulate this technology,

0:07:42.440 --> 0:07:45.680
<v Speaker 8>and at the federal level means you have one hurdl

0:07:45.720 --> 0:07:49.000
<v Speaker 8>to clear instead of fifty individual ones. I don't interpret

0:07:49.080 --> 0:07:52.800
<v Speaker 8>that as some super partisan view of the world. It's

0:07:52.920 --> 0:07:55.560
<v Speaker 8>just something that would make his life easier, in the

0:07:55.600 --> 0:07:57.120
<v Speaker 8>life of Tesla easier.

0:07:57.240 --> 0:07:58.640
<v Speaker 9>That's that's all I take.

0:07:58.480 --> 0:08:02.400
<v Speaker 4>That at worth looking at chez uber and Lyft again right,

0:08:02.440 --> 0:08:04.840
<v Speaker 4>because the news for me that jumped out was this

0:08:05.480 --> 0:08:08.840
<v Speaker 4>confidence that next year Tesla will offer some form of

0:08:08.920 --> 0:08:13.720
<v Speaker 4>ride hailing in Texas and California. You've critiqued FSD. My

0:08:13.880 --> 0:08:16.480
<v Speaker 4>question to you is, based on those headlines that came

0:08:16.520 --> 0:08:20.239
<v Speaker 4>out on ride hailing, are you better understanding the jump

0:08:20.280 --> 0:08:23.920
<v Speaker 4>from FSD in consumer cars to this proprietary ride haling

0:08:23.960 --> 0:08:24.920
<v Speaker 4>service in the future.

0:08:26.360 --> 0:08:28.440
<v Speaker 9>Oh so, a couple of things.

0:08:28.440 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 8>First of all, I have a colleague that covers those

0:08:30.400 --> 0:08:33.920
<v Speaker 8>ride healing stocks. I don't, but you know, I think

0:08:34.440 --> 0:08:37.680
<v Speaker 8>what should be relatively clear is these issues. A ride

0:08:37.679 --> 0:08:41.880
<v Speaker 8>healing service and full autonomy are not the same thing.

0:08:42.040 --> 0:08:46.080
<v Speaker 8>They are fairly separate. You know, this company could turn

0:08:46.080 --> 0:08:48.360
<v Speaker 8>on this ride healing service, you know, assuming they get

0:08:48.360 --> 0:08:52.360
<v Speaker 8>regulatory approval for it without having FSD at all. And

0:08:52.520 --> 0:08:55.880
<v Speaker 8>FSD is something that could come later and really has

0:08:57.240 --> 0:09:00.719
<v Speaker 8>in a way that they're certainly complementary, and having both

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:05.040
<v Speaker 8>of them together could result in significant earnings growth for

0:09:05.080 --> 0:09:10.440
<v Speaker 8>the company. But they're not perfectly linked. Ideas they are separate.

0:09:12.200 --> 0:09:15.200
<v Speaker 3>With William the amount that they need to spend, I

0:09:15.200 --> 0:09:17.320
<v Speaker 3>mean whether or not they ten on that switch or not,

0:09:17.360 --> 0:09:19.080
<v Speaker 3>and of course that ultimately means whether you have a

0:09:19.160 --> 0:09:21.760
<v Speaker 3>driver at the wheel or not. I'm interested as to

0:09:21.840 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 3>whether you think the upgrade what is it to an

0:09:23.800 --> 0:09:27.240
<v Speaker 3>eleven billion capex spend is what needs to be invested

0:09:27.320 --> 0:09:27.800
<v Speaker 3>right now.

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:28.319
<v Speaker 10>By the business.

0:09:30.000 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 8>Oh well, this is not a huge difference. Right in

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:36.320
<v Speaker 8>the prior quarter they guided this number to ten billion.

0:09:36.960 --> 0:09:40.120
<v Speaker 8>Now he's saying eleven wasn't a whole lot different from

0:09:40.120 --> 0:09:43.040
<v Speaker 8>our model. We have a similar capex number next year.

0:09:43.200 --> 0:09:46.520
<v Speaker 8>I think in a way, the you know, this might

0:09:46.600 --> 0:09:49.360
<v Speaker 8>be a sort of off the run remark, but I

0:09:49.360 --> 0:09:53.199
<v Speaker 8>think The biggest winner out of this topic is in Nvidia.

0:09:54.320 --> 0:09:59.120
<v Speaker 8>You know, he Musk emphasized how much they're spending on

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:02.640
<v Speaker 8>h one one hundred, h one hundred those are Hopper

0:10:02.679 --> 0:10:07.479
<v Speaker 8>generation GPUs from Nvidia equivalent GPUs and what they anticipate

0:10:07.520 --> 0:10:08.560
<v Speaker 8>doing over the next year.

0:10:09.720 --> 0:10:11.960
<v Speaker 9>This is a big investment in Vidia.

0:10:12.840 --> 0:10:16.120
<v Speaker 8>These are that this training capability does not come from

0:10:16.200 --> 0:10:20.079
<v Speaker 8>their internal D one chip or their Dojo computer. It's

0:10:20.120 --> 0:10:22.640
<v Speaker 8>going to be spent at least in the near term,

0:10:22.880 --> 0:10:25.559
<v Speaker 8>at least for the next year, more spending within video.

0:10:26.240 --> 0:10:27.839
<v Speaker 10>Wellenstein great to have your take.

0:10:27.880 --> 0:10:31.480
<v Speaker 3>Managing director and Senia analyst at Trust Securities has turned

0:10:31.520 --> 0:10:35.120
<v Speaker 3>our attention to a different set of earnings. IBM shares,

0:10:35.120 --> 0:10:37.439
<v Speaker 3>as you'll see now off by six percent, having its

0:10:37.440 --> 0:10:40.520
<v Speaker 3>worst day since April twenty twenty four, show to slow

0:10:40.559 --> 0:10:43.480
<v Speaker 3>down in the numbers in consulting revenue that came out

0:10:43.520 --> 0:10:46.080
<v Speaker 3>after the bell Wednesday, even though software sales look they

0:10:46.080 --> 0:10:49.360
<v Speaker 3>did rise nine percent now. The CEO Arvin Krishna told

0:10:49.360 --> 0:10:52.000
<v Speaker 3>me a little bit earlier that clients are facing several

0:10:52.040 --> 0:10:56.480
<v Speaker 3>headwinds geopolitical, political interest rate uncertainties that should aase actually

0:10:56.520 --> 0:10:58.160
<v Speaker 3>in the next six to twelve months. He also was

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:01.480
<v Speaker 3>talking about AI demand saying it's solid, but the enterprise

0:11:01.520 --> 0:11:03.000
<v Speaker 3>adoption is actually kind of being.

0:11:02.840 --> 0:11:04.800
<v Speaker 10>Held back by that right now because of what.

0:11:04.679 --> 0:11:08.040
<v Speaker 3>William was just saying, costs, costs and ensuring that data

0:11:08.080 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 3>and security is ready. However, here's what he said about

0:11:10.679 --> 0:11:12.720
<v Speaker 3>optimism for next year. Twenty twenty five is going to

0:11:12.720 --> 0:11:15.960
<v Speaker 3>be a good year despite headwinds. People want to scale

0:11:16.000 --> 0:11:19.120
<v Speaker 3>and adapt their technology. Quite bullish and what twenty twenty

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:21.319
<v Speaker 3>five will look like for enterprise.

0:11:21.040 --> 0:11:24.959
<v Speaker 4>Tech ed Okay, coming up on the program from Elon

0:11:25.080 --> 0:11:29.160
<v Speaker 4>Musk influence on Technology to some more about his impact

0:11:29.200 --> 0:11:32.600
<v Speaker 4>on politics. An important conversation and piece of reporting coming

0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:43.600
<v Speaker 4>up next. This has been bog technology.

0:11:49.320 --> 0:11:50.960
<v Speaker 3>We just want to check on some other earnings for

0:11:51.000 --> 0:11:53.560
<v Speaker 3>you because shares are moving to the higher side significantly,

0:11:53.559 --> 0:11:56.560
<v Speaker 3>so if T Mobile service now both at record highs.

0:11:56.600 --> 0:11:58.160
<v Speaker 3>Of course, these are stories that we get on the

0:11:58.160 --> 0:12:01.559
<v Speaker 3>back of T Mobile seeing strong results hit its highest

0:12:01.559 --> 0:12:03.880
<v Speaker 3>interday level on record, because basically they are one of

0:12:03.880 --> 0:12:05.439
<v Speaker 3>third collar results that beat expectations.

0:12:05.480 --> 0:12:07.480
<v Speaker 10>They're raising their full year subscribers as well.

0:12:07.520 --> 0:12:09.520
<v Speaker 3>Service now this is a story of AI out of

0:12:09.760 --> 0:12:10.880
<v Speaker 3>intelligence adoption as well.

0:12:10.920 --> 0:12:12.760
<v Speaker 10>They're rallying to record on yet.

0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:16.520
<v Speaker 3>Also strong results after the bell and they're seeing a

0:12:16.520 --> 0:12:19.120
<v Speaker 3>third called results that beat expectations, and they're giving a

0:12:19.120 --> 0:12:20.679
<v Speaker 3>pretty strong outlook as well.

0:12:21.320 --> 0:12:22.040
<v Speaker 10>And what have we got.

0:12:23.200 --> 0:12:25.760
<v Speaker 4>We're going to go to a Bloomberg data deep dive

0:12:25.920 --> 0:12:29.560
<v Speaker 4>into Elon Musk's online presence ahead of the US election.

0:12:29.720 --> 0:12:34.280
<v Speaker 4>According to a large scale Bloomberg analysis, the billionaire owner

0:12:34.600 --> 0:12:39.280
<v Speaker 4>has been spreading debunped theories of undocumented voters, swaying the

0:12:39.360 --> 0:12:42.920
<v Speaker 4>US election and growing his influence in the process, making

0:12:43.000 --> 0:12:47.840
<v Speaker 4>him the biggest promoter of anti immigrant conspiracies on X,

0:12:48.200 --> 0:12:50.640
<v Speaker 4>the social media platform he owns. I want to bring

0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 4>in Bloomberg Sarah Fryar, who's the editor that leads our

0:12:53.679 --> 0:12:56.600
<v Speaker 4>coverage of big tech. And this was a team effort

0:12:56.720 --> 0:13:00.400
<v Speaker 4>of journalists and data experts, But I I think the

0:13:00.400 --> 0:13:03.400
<v Speaker 4>best place to start, Sarah is what's the top line

0:13:03.440 --> 0:13:04.200
<v Speaker 4>of the story.

0:13:04.520 --> 0:13:06.480
<v Speaker 6>What is it that we report through.

0:13:06.320 --> 0:13:09.160
<v Speaker 4>That dense body of data.

0:13:09.360 --> 0:13:12.920
<v Speaker 11>Well, it was really interesting finding actually that we have

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:16.160
<v Speaker 11>seen mus on the campaign trail with Trump talk about

0:13:16.200 --> 0:13:20.560
<v Speaker 11>these anti immigrant theories he has he's been promoting the

0:13:20.640 --> 0:13:26.160
<v Speaker 11>idea that Democrats are shipping in immigrants to vote for them.

0:13:26.360 --> 0:13:29.960
<v Speaker 11>So this idea of math election fraud that he has

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:33.520
<v Speaker 11>been talking about on the campaign trail, and you know,

0:13:33.600 --> 0:13:36.400
<v Speaker 11>that seems like sort of a fringe thing until we

0:13:36.480 --> 0:13:41.200
<v Speaker 11>looked into the data and it showed that immigration and

0:13:42.000 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 11>election fraud and voter fraud is his top policy topic

0:13:45.800 --> 0:13:49.920
<v Speaker 11>on x He actually gets more engagement on that topic

0:13:49.960 --> 0:13:52.560
<v Speaker 11>than anything else that he talks about, and it has

0:13:52.640 --> 0:13:56.800
<v Speaker 11>become this driver of his speed, something that he talks

0:13:56.840 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 11>about ever more frequently over the past year, ever since

0:14:00.200 --> 0:14:03.679
<v Speaker 11>he visited visited the border and got more involved in

0:14:03.720 --> 0:14:08.040
<v Speaker 11>the state of Texas, and he has really become enmeshed

0:14:08.080 --> 0:14:11.839
<v Speaker 11>with this idea of immigration leading to fraud. And what

0:14:11.920 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 11>experts have told us is this narrative and the way

0:14:16.080 --> 0:14:20.840
<v Speaker 11>that Musk is really laundering it for the masters is

0:14:21.080 --> 0:14:24.480
<v Speaker 11>going to help Trump dispute the result of the election

0:14:24.640 --> 0:14:25.520
<v Speaker 11>should he not win.

0:14:25.960 --> 0:14:29.840
<v Speaker 12>So this is a very serious finding in my opinion.

0:14:29.680 --> 0:14:31.920
<v Speaker 3>And the findings are serious in the nature in which

0:14:31.960 --> 0:14:35.280
<v Speaker 3>you got them. You ran machine learning model basically on

0:14:35.400 --> 0:14:38.400
<v Speaker 3>posts to identify the subjects he was most often citing

0:14:38.440 --> 0:14:42.360
<v Speaker 3>and talking about. Thirteen hundred of Musk posts in twenty

0:14:42.440 --> 0:14:44.720
<v Speaker 3>twenty four really revolving around this issue, and I just

0:14:44.760 --> 0:14:47.240
<v Speaker 3>want to get to the facts, therefore, Sarah, of what

0:14:47.400 --> 0:14:50.840
<v Speaker 3>actually happens, because the facts are that non citizen voting

0:14:50.960 --> 0:14:52.360
<v Speaker 3>is incredibly rare.

0:14:53.520 --> 0:14:57.080
<v Speaker 11>It's incredibly rarre. Non citizens cannot vote for president, that

0:14:57.400 --> 0:15:00.640
<v Speaker 11>is not a thing. There is a very diffficult path

0:15:00.720 --> 0:15:05.400
<v Speaker 11>to citizenship in the US. So this idea that he

0:15:05.440 --> 0:15:08.840
<v Speaker 11>has been talking about is just not based in reality

0:15:08.920 --> 0:15:13.240
<v Speaker 11>or any history that we know of. And this is

0:15:13.520 --> 0:15:17.240
<v Speaker 11>this is something that we didn't just talk about in

0:15:17.280 --> 0:15:20.680
<v Speaker 11>terms of the data. Our reporters went on the ground

0:15:21.160 --> 0:15:25.120
<v Speaker 11>to aara of Colorado. Julia Luf was an Aurora, Colorado

0:15:25.160 --> 0:15:27.880
<v Speaker 11>talking to immigrants who feel like their lives are unsafe

0:15:27.880 --> 0:15:32.280
<v Speaker 11>now because Musk and Trump have talked publicly about the.

0:15:32.280 --> 0:15:33.600
<v Speaker 12>Danger of those immigrants.

0:15:34.360 --> 0:15:38.560
<v Speaker 11>They went to Butler, Pennsylvania during a rally where Trump

0:15:38.600 --> 0:15:42.520
<v Speaker 11>and Muck were speaking together and talked to a different

0:15:42.560 --> 0:15:45.920
<v Speaker 11>kind of victim, those who believe the misinformation that they

0:15:45.920 --> 0:15:48.720
<v Speaker 11>are being told. So this is this is something that

0:15:48.800 --> 0:15:51.360
<v Speaker 11>isn't just happening on the Internet. It isn't just happening

0:15:51.360 --> 0:15:53.840
<v Speaker 11>on x It is happening in the daily lives of

0:15:53.880 --> 0:15:57.480
<v Speaker 11>Americans right now with election just a few days away.

0:15:58.640 --> 0:16:01.080
<v Speaker 4>This is dates of journalism, and the team does a

0:16:01.080 --> 0:16:04.240
<v Speaker 4>great job in explaining the methodology and also chronology of

0:16:04.280 --> 0:16:06.960
<v Speaker 4>what happened. But I have to ask Sarah if have

0:16:07.080 --> 0:16:10.720
<v Speaker 4>we heard from Elon Musk or X actually about our

0:16:10.760 --> 0:16:12.880
<v Speaker 4>reporting and how they feel about it.

0:16:14.400 --> 0:16:17.000
<v Speaker 11>We haven't heard from USK X or Elon Musk, but

0:16:17.040 --> 0:16:20.200
<v Speaker 11>we did hear from the Trump campaign and they doubled down.

0:16:20.680 --> 0:16:22.880
<v Speaker 11>They said Elon Musk is not wrong.

0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:23.640
<v Speaker 13>You know, they.

0:16:23.600 --> 0:16:27.360
<v Speaker 12>Repeated some of the mids information that Musk has endorsed

0:16:27.400 --> 0:16:27.960
<v Speaker 12>on X.

0:16:27.960 --> 0:16:30.000
<v Speaker 11>And one more thing I'd point out from the data

0:16:30.200 --> 0:16:34.080
<v Speaker 11>often it's not Musk himself saying these things. He will

0:16:34.120 --> 0:16:39.120
<v Speaker 11>often quote, tweet or just put a little emoji response

0:16:39.240 --> 0:16:42.120
<v Speaker 11>to something. But with his following that upwards of two

0:16:42.200 --> 0:16:45.800
<v Speaker 11>hundred million strong, he has incredible influence. He's actually the

0:16:45.840 --> 0:16:50.080
<v Speaker 11>top influencer on the platform that he owns and has

0:16:50.120 --> 0:16:53.760
<v Speaker 11>a lot of influence over the algorithm thereof. We also

0:16:53.840 --> 0:16:57.320
<v Speaker 11>found that often his posts do not get backcheck from

0:16:57.360 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 11>the system that X uses to FactCheck. So very interesting

0:17:00.680 --> 0:17:02.359
<v Speaker 11>findings here from our data investigation.

0:17:02.840 --> 0:17:06.040
<v Speaker 3>Go read the full piece. Extraordinary, Sarah Frar, We thank

0:17:06.080 --> 0:17:09.560
<v Speaker 3>you now. Microsoft co founder Bill Gates also has his

0:17:09.640 --> 0:17:11.880
<v Speaker 3>eyes on the approaching US election. He spoke with Bloomberg

0:17:11.960 --> 0:17:14.680
<v Speaker 3>editor in chief John Micklethwaite about the role of innovation

0:17:14.720 --> 0:17:17.119
<v Speaker 3>in addressing the world's most pressing challenges. That was over

0:17:17.119 --> 0:17:20.280
<v Speaker 3>at Bloomberg and New Economy at E twenty in South

0:17:20.280 --> 0:17:23.199
<v Speaker 3>Paolo in Brazil yesterday. He also weighed in on what

0:17:23.280 --> 0:17:26.680
<v Speaker 3>Republican candidate Donald Trump's proposed tarras will mean for American

0:17:26.720 --> 0:17:28.440
<v Speaker 3>businesses and the global economy.

0:17:28.440 --> 0:17:28.960
<v Speaker 10>Just take a listen.

0:17:29.840 --> 0:17:35.880
<v Speaker 13>We will suffer overall, welfare will improve lass as. Not

0:17:35.920 --> 0:17:38.160
<v Speaker 13>only will if you have put teiff on, of course,

0:17:38.200 --> 0:17:39.800
<v Speaker 13>other people will put tariff.

0:17:39.560 --> 0:17:40.000
<v Speaker 6>On as well.

0:17:40.040 --> 0:17:45.440
<v Speaker 13>And the economic dynamism and speed of innovation will be significant,

0:17:45.880 --> 0:17:46.920
<v Speaker 13>significantly slow.

0:17:47.400 --> 0:17:49.359
<v Speaker 14>Just to push you on that dynamism point. You know,

0:17:49.400 --> 0:17:51.840
<v Speaker 14>it's very easy to make the argument that this means

0:17:51.920 --> 0:17:55.399
<v Speaker 14>higher prices for consumers. But this issue of dynamism, the

0:17:55.480 --> 0:17:58.280
<v Speaker 14>sort of you've been involved in entrepreneurship, these things most

0:17:58.280 --> 0:18:03.240
<v Speaker 14>of your life have less foreign competition, less foreign goods

0:18:03.320 --> 0:18:05.880
<v Speaker 14>that must have an impact on it. I know it's

0:18:05.920 --> 0:18:09.639
<v Speaker 14>back to a creed you've believed in, but in practice

0:18:09.960 --> 0:18:12.840
<v Speaker 14>is that argument possible to make devices?

0:18:14.400 --> 0:18:20.159
<v Speaker 13>Well, we should find articulate politicians who can make the

0:18:20.240 --> 0:18:23.640
<v Speaker 13>case if you take most of the industries I think about,

0:18:23.680 --> 0:18:26.520
<v Speaker 13>like you know, inventing a new drug, or writing a

0:18:26.520 --> 0:18:30.560
<v Speaker 13>new piece of software, or birthing a new climate technology,

0:18:31.000 --> 0:18:34.679
<v Speaker 13>you have these gigantic fixed costs, and the fact that

0:18:34.720 --> 0:18:37.919
<v Speaker 13>you can do that work and then sell it on

0:18:37.960 --> 0:18:42.600
<v Speaker 13>a global basis means that everybody's getting you faster innovation

0:18:43.040 --> 0:18:46.320
<v Speaker 13>and lower prices. And if you start to fragmant markets

0:18:46.840 --> 0:18:52.840
<v Speaker 13>because of either tariffs or regulatory barriers to that trade,

0:18:52.920 --> 0:19:00.320
<v Speaker 13>it absolutely takes away the lower prices and high speed innovation.

0:19:01.560 --> 0:19:04.440
<v Speaker 4>That was Microsoft co founder Bill Gates along with Bloomberg

0:19:04.520 --> 0:19:14.639
<v Speaker 4>editor in chief John Mechlfwaite, it's.

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:16.080
<v Speaker 6>Time for talking tech and first start.

0:19:16.119 --> 0:19:20.200
<v Speaker 4>Troubled it company Atos said its financial restructuring plan has

0:19:20.280 --> 0:19:23.280
<v Speaker 4>been approved by a French commercial court, paving the way

0:19:23.280 --> 0:19:25.959
<v Speaker 4>for creditors to take control. Under the plan, Atos will

0:19:26.000 --> 0:19:28.800
<v Speaker 4>receive one point six to one point eight billion dollars

0:19:28.800 --> 0:19:31.760
<v Speaker 4>of new money beginning in twenty twenty five, plus Shares

0:19:31.800 --> 0:19:34.399
<v Speaker 4>of sk Heinix clining to a two month high this

0:19:34.480 --> 0:19:38.320
<v Speaker 4>after the company posted record quarterly profit and revenue, a

0:19:38.359 --> 0:19:41.520
<v Speaker 4>reflection of strong demand for its memory chips used in

0:19:41.680 --> 0:19:45.400
<v Speaker 4>Nvidia AI processors. Earnings also saw a boost from robust

0:19:45.400 --> 0:19:49.560
<v Speaker 4>demand for enterprise solid state drives, and Nvidia expands its

0:19:49.600 --> 0:19:51.640
<v Speaker 4>AI infrastructure in India.

0:19:51.760 --> 0:19:52.840
<v Speaker 6>CEO Jensen One.

0:19:52.920 --> 0:19:56.679
<v Speaker 4>Has struck a deal with Asia's richest man, Maukeshambani to

0:19:56.720 --> 0:19:59.920
<v Speaker 4>build out a new data center using Nvidia's Blackworld.

0:20:00.640 --> 0:20:01.760
<v Speaker 6>Here's CEO Jenson Wong.

0:20:02.680 --> 0:20:05.760
<v Speaker 15>In order to lead an artificial intelligence you need to

0:20:05.800 --> 0:20:11.879
<v Speaker 15>have AI model technology that India has. You need to

0:20:11.920 --> 0:20:19.040
<v Speaker 15>have data, massive quantities of data and using the last

0:20:19.040 --> 0:20:25.480
<v Speaker 15>thing you need is AI infrastructure. And we're announcing that

0:20:25.480 --> 0:20:29.160
<v Speaker 15>that reliance and in video or partnering to build AI

0:20:29.280 --> 0:20:31.440
<v Speaker 15>infrastructure here in India.

0:20:32.119 --> 0:20:33.879
<v Speaker 10>Let's get more on that story New magazine.

0:20:33.920 --> 0:20:37.200
<v Speaker 3>King joins us, how significant is in Video's presence already

0:20:37.240 --> 0:20:37.800
<v Speaker 3>in India?

0:20:37.960 --> 0:20:41.920
<v Speaker 16>In yeah, I mean they've had Obviously, India has been

0:20:41.920 --> 0:20:46.160
<v Speaker 16>a long term source of very good engineering and math talent,

0:20:46.240 --> 0:20:48.480
<v Speaker 16>so there's been a lot of software efforts that they've

0:20:48.480 --> 0:20:50.840
<v Speaker 16>been there for decades. But in terms of it being

0:20:50.840 --> 0:20:53.280
<v Speaker 16>an end business for them, an n market for them,

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:55.720
<v Speaker 16>it's not particularly significant yet.

0:20:56.240 --> 0:20:58.520
<v Speaker 4>Just quickly, you and I've reported a lot. Jensen want

0:20:58.520 --> 0:21:00.280
<v Speaker 4>to spend a lot of time in the last year

0:21:00.560 --> 0:21:02.600
<v Speaker 4>trying to do deals at the nation state level. I

0:21:02.640 --> 0:21:04.359
<v Speaker 4>know this one's kind of different, but talk to me

0:21:04.359 --> 0:21:07.120
<v Speaker 4>about the strategy selling things outside of America.

0:21:07.280 --> 0:21:09.800
<v Speaker 16>Yeah, I mean, this is part of his world tour, right.

0:21:09.920 --> 0:21:12.879
<v Speaker 16>He's in India now, He's going to Japan next and

0:21:13.160 --> 0:21:15.120
<v Speaker 16>I'm sure there are going to be other of these

0:21:15.160 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 16>events scheduled around the world. He's trying to basically spread

0:21:19.040 --> 0:21:22.560
<v Speaker 16>the use of his technology away from the concentration in

0:21:22.600 --> 0:21:25.640
<v Speaker 16>the big cloud providers and get everybody involved. And this

0:21:25.720 --> 0:21:26.719
<v Speaker 16>is the big push.

0:21:26.760 --> 0:21:31.240
<v Speaker 4>It continues to be a wild week in semiconductors. TSMC

0:21:31.400 --> 0:21:34.359
<v Speaker 4>is top of mind. They identified a client that was

0:21:34.359 --> 0:21:37.359
<v Speaker 4>funding chips to Huawei and acted on it after a

0:21:37.359 --> 0:21:39.520
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg report. Any update, what do we know?

0:21:40.000 --> 0:21:42.320
<v Speaker 16>Yeah, I mean, there's been a lot of speculation about

0:21:42.320 --> 0:21:44.919
<v Speaker 16>what was going on, a lot of reports and that

0:21:44.960 --> 0:21:47.960
<v Speaker 16>we've seen, and finally TSMC of command and said, Yep,

0:21:48.040 --> 0:21:51.120
<v Speaker 16>we found a customer who wasn't the customer we thought

0:21:51.160 --> 0:21:54.040
<v Speaker 16>they were. They were supplying to Uawei and obviously that's illegal,

0:21:54.080 --> 0:21:57.080
<v Speaker 16>so we've cut them off. We don't know exactly how

0:21:57.119 --> 0:21:59.840
<v Speaker 16>that happened. We have to assume that there will be

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:02.919
<v Speaker 16>their investigations of that that the US government will look

0:22:02.960 --> 0:22:05.840
<v Speaker 16>at that seriously, because this is something I don't want.

0:22:06.480 --> 0:22:08.800
<v Speaker 3>I have a feeding that story has more room to

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:11.800
<v Speaker 3>run in King, We thank you so much. Coming up,

0:22:12.160 --> 0:22:14.159
<v Speaker 3>we've got a great conversation. You don't want to miss it.

0:22:14.520 --> 0:22:18.840
<v Speaker 3>Greenlight Capital's David Einholm, this is boom Bag technology.

0:22:25.840 --> 0:22:29.040
<v Speaker 17>We want to now welcome our Bloomberg radio and television

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:31.479
<v Speaker 17>audiences right now, I'm Shanali Bassik.

0:22:31.880 --> 0:22:32.040
<v Speaker 5>Now.

0:22:32.040 --> 0:22:35.679
<v Speaker 17>Bloomberg LP, the parent company of Bloomberg Television, is working

0:22:35.720 --> 0:22:38.959
<v Speaker 17>with the robin Hood Foundation for a staff picking competition

0:22:39.359 --> 0:22:42.040
<v Speaker 17>for ten thousand dollars that will go to charity in

0:22:42.160 --> 0:22:44.720
<v Speaker 17>order to fight poverty in New York. You pick a

0:22:44.760 --> 0:22:48.200
<v Speaker 17>long and a short investment and you can register through Monday,

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:49.360
<v Speaker 17>October twenty eighth.

0:22:49.440 --> 0:22:51.280
<v Speaker 5>You can sign up at Robinhood dot org.

0:22:51.600 --> 0:22:54.560
<v Speaker 17>The competition is for charitable purposes only and does not

0:22:54.720 --> 0:22:58.720
<v Speaker 17>constitute financial or investment advice. For more about the competition

0:22:58.840 --> 0:23:01.320
<v Speaker 17>and his own investment choices, we are joined now by

0:23:01.400 --> 0:23:05.280
<v Speaker 17>David Einhorn of green Light Capital, and perhaps first talk

0:23:05.280 --> 0:23:07.960
<v Speaker 17>about this program for a minute. Pick a ticker. You

0:23:08.000 --> 0:23:11.720
<v Speaker 17>have a sensorially gamified charity. Why did you guys do

0:23:11.800 --> 0:23:14.680
<v Speaker 17>it this way? You're closely involved with the Robin Hood Foundation,

0:23:15.080 --> 0:23:17.359
<v Speaker 17>and what do you expect out of the program?

0:23:18.119 --> 0:23:19.720
<v Speaker 18>Yeah, we just thought it would be a little bit

0:23:19.760 --> 0:23:22.159
<v Speaker 18>of a fun thing to do in conjunction with the

0:23:22.280 --> 0:23:26.560
<v Speaker 18>annual investor conference that's been going on for eleven or

0:23:26.600 --> 0:23:30.359
<v Speaker 18>twelve years. The idea is is anybody who wants to

0:23:30.400 --> 0:23:35.240
<v Speaker 18>participate and donate ten thousand dollars, pick along, pick a short,

0:23:35.640 --> 0:23:37.560
<v Speaker 18>see how it does over the next six months, and

0:23:38.119 --> 0:23:43.320
<v Speaker 18>whoever wins can gets to choose which Robinhood supported organization

0:23:43.400 --> 0:23:44.960
<v Speaker 18>get gets the chunk of the money.

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:47.600
<v Speaker 17>Now, did you participate? Are you picking it on a

0:23:47.680 --> 0:23:49.400
<v Speaker 17>long and a short for this game?

0:23:50.160 --> 0:23:52.520
<v Speaker 1>One hundred percent? Of course?

0:23:52.560 --> 0:23:53.840
<v Speaker 5>What are they?

0:23:54.000 --> 0:23:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, I'm not the shorts.

0:23:56.119 --> 0:23:58.440
<v Speaker 18>People are allowed to keep confidential, and I'm going to

0:23:58.560 --> 0:24:02.040
<v Speaker 18>keep mind confidential. But I'm going to pick Peloton, which

0:24:02.080 --> 0:24:04.240
<v Speaker 18>is the stock that I pitched yesterday at the Robin

0:24:04.240 --> 0:24:04.880
<v Speaker 18>Good Conference.

0:24:05.320 --> 0:24:07.679
<v Speaker 17>Now, talk a little more about that, because from what

0:24:07.720 --> 0:24:10.720
<v Speaker 17>I understand, you came dressed in full gear to make

0:24:10.880 --> 0:24:13.919
<v Speaker 17>this a pitch to the audience there. What is it

0:24:13.960 --> 0:24:15.199
<v Speaker 17>about Peloton that you like?

0:24:15.280 --> 0:24:16.760
<v Speaker 5>Right now? I understand that you said.

0:24:16.560 --> 0:24:19.480
<v Speaker 17>That it's undervalued, But what's the catalyst?

0:24:19.640 --> 0:24:21.720
<v Speaker 5>Is it M and A or something else that you're

0:24:21.760 --> 0:24:22.280
<v Speaker 5>looking at.

0:24:23.440 --> 0:24:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think there's a lot to like with Peloton.

0:24:27.520 --> 0:24:30.960
<v Speaker 18>They have a large customer base that hays forty four

0:24:31.000 --> 0:24:35.160
<v Speaker 18>dollars a month and is extremely engaged. Bride's and average

0:24:35.400 --> 0:24:39.600
<v Speaker 18>thirteen times a month and has very very low attrition.

0:24:39.840 --> 0:24:43.120
<v Speaker 18>So most subscription type models like this trade a really

0:24:43.200 --> 0:24:46.200
<v Speaker 18>high valuations. Peloton has suffered over the last number of

0:24:46.280 --> 0:24:48.440
<v Speaker 18>years because they thought they were going to be a

0:24:48.480 --> 0:24:51.000
<v Speaker 18>much bigger company than they've turned out to be. Maturity

0:24:51.000 --> 0:24:53.919
<v Speaker 18>has hit them a little bit sooner than they expected,

0:24:54.400 --> 0:24:57.240
<v Speaker 18>and they had a cost base which was entirely based

0:24:57.280 --> 0:24:59.520
<v Speaker 18>on Hey, the only thing that matters to us is revenues,

0:24:59.640 --> 0:25:02.199
<v Speaker 18>because you know, Wall Street values us on price to

0:25:02.240 --> 0:25:05.560
<v Speaker 18>sales and stuff like that. And so, as I said

0:25:05.560 --> 0:25:07.560
<v Speaker 18>at the conference yesterday, there's a lot of cost cutting

0:25:07.560 --> 0:25:10.920
<v Speaker 18>for Peloton to do. Peloton probably needs to spend more

0:25:10.960 --> 0:25:13.280
<v Speaker 18>time on the Peloton and if they do that, the

0:25:13.280 --> 0:25:16.040
<v Speaker 18>margins will improve a lot. And the stock is relatively

0:25:16.040 --> 0:25:20.520
<v Speaker 18>inexpensive relative to other types of subscription model type of companies.

0:25:20.880 --> 0:25:22.920
<v Speaker 18>Decides they're going to get a new CEO who should

0:25:22.920 --> 0:25:26.800
<v Speaker 18>be announced, you know, sometime relatively soon, and in the

0:25:26.800 --> 0:25:28.320
<v Speaker 18>worst case, if they're not really able.

0:25:28.160 --> 0:25:28.640
<v Speaker 1>To turn around.

0:25:28.680 --> 0:25:31.240
<v Speaker 18>This is certainly the type of company that there's a

0:25:31.320 --> 0:25:33.320
<v Speaker 18>number of larger companies I think that would be very

0:25:33.320 --> 0:25:36.040
<v Speaker 18>interested in owning this if it came down to that.

0:25:36.680 --> 0:25:39.000
<v Speaker 5>David, I also want you to weigh in over here.

0:25:39.040 --> 0:25:41.760
<v Speaker 17>It's interesting as we speak right now, Testla had come

0:25:41.800 --> 0:25:44.560
<v Speaker 17>out with earnings. Over the last twenty four hours, the

0:25:44.600 --> 0:25:47.919
<v Speaker 17>stock is up more than nineteen percent at the moment.

0:25:48.320 --> 0:25:50.560
<v Speaker 17>It's been a stock that you have been short before.

0:25:51.200 --> 0:25:54.240
<v Speaker 17>Wondering what you think about this stock at this evaluation

0:25:54.440 --> 0:25:56.920
<v Speaker 17>here and whether you would ever go short again.

0:25:58.040 --> 0:26:00.960
<v Speaker 18>Yeah, we don't really comment on our positions anymore, and

0:26:01.000 --> 0:26:03.399
<v Speaker 18>we stopped doing that a few years ago. And so

0:26:03.520 --> 0:26:06.600
<v Speaker 18>whether Tesla is a shorter potential short, it's not something

0:26:06.600 --> 0:26:07.479
<v Speaker 18>that I'm going to discuss.

0:26:07.640 --> 0:26:09.720
<v Speaker 17>Can you speak to the valuation as it stands now

0:26:09.760 --> 0:26:12.160
<v Speaker 17>and how it fits into the broader story around stock

0:26:12.200 --> 0:26:13.359
<v Speaker 17>market valuations right.

0:26:13.280 --> 0:26:16.280
<v Speaker 1>Now now, I'm really not going to go anywhere near that.

0:26:17.040 --> 0:26:19.760
<v Speaker 17>So let's talk about valuations more generally, because of course,

0:26:19.800 --> 0:26:22.960
<v Speaker 17>the AI trade in general has been a very hot

0:26:23.000 --> 0:26:25.720
<v Speaker 17>one I'm wondering if you think that if some of

0:26:25.760 --> 0:26:28.240
<v Speaker 17>these stocks have gone too far, and how you're playing

0:26:28.280 --> 0:26:29.120
<v Speaker 17>the AI trade.

0:26:30.960 --> 0:26:33.640
<v Speaker 18>Well, you know, the thing is is we don't have to,

0:26:33.800 --> 0:26:37.080
<v Speaker 18>you know, bet against things that seem like they're expensive

0:26:37.280 --> 0:26:41.000
<v Speaker 18>when there's so much excitement around them. So these stocks

0:26:41.040 --> 0:26:43.359
<v Speaker 18>are very high. There's a lot of enthusiasm. There's been

0:26:43.520 --> 0:26:46.000
<v Speaker 18>enthusiasm for a long time. I think the market as

0:26:46.000 --> 0:26:48.520
<v Speaker 18>a whole is really, you know, quite expensive, considering we're

0:26:48.600 --> 0:26:51.240
<v Speaker 18>a strong part of the economic cycle, and we're about

0:26:51.280 --> 0:26:55.199
<v Speaker 18>twenty three times earnings, So it's hard to wind up

0:26:55.200 --> 0:26:57.600
<v Speaker 18>for me as somebody who actually paid a lot of

0:26:57.600 --> 0:26:58.280
<v Speaker 18>attention to what I.

0:26:58.240 --> 0:27:01.719
<v Speaker 1>Pay for things to want to chase those things.

0:27:02.119 --> 0:27:05.040
<v Speaker 18>We do have a couple of companies that you know,

0:27:05.080 --> 0:27:09.040
<v Speaker 18>maybe have options on AI coming our direction. So for example,

0:27:09.040 --> 0:27:13.760
<v Speaker 18>we own HP which makes PCs, and PCs are due

0:27:13.760 --> 0:27:16.920
<v Speaker 18>for a regular replacement cycle because a lot we're bought

0:27:17.240 --> 0:27:20.280
<v Speaker 18>after COVID in twenty twenty and twenty twenty one, and

0:27:20.320 --> 0:27:22.840
<v Speaker 18>we could have a better than normal cycle if if

0:27:22.880 --> 0:27:25.640
<v Speaker 18>AIPCS turn out to d a thing, but definitely trace

0:27:25.720 --> 0:27:28.280
<v Speaker 18>about ten times earnings, pase a three and something percent

0:27:28.320 --> 0:27:31.639
<v Speaker 18>dividend they're spending one hundred percent of recashlow returning it

0:27:31.640 --> 0:27:34.320
<v Speaker 18>to shareholders, so you get about seven percent buyback. So

0:27:34.359 --> 0:27:37.399
<v Speaker 18>we can see you know, mid teens high teams growth

0:27:37.400 --> 0:27:38.960
<v Speaker 18>for the next couple of years, just as you go

0:27:39.080 --> 0:27:42.080
<v Speaker 18>through a cycle share account reduction, and so this you're

0:27:42.119 --> 0:27:44.640
<v Speaker 18>paying just ten times journeys, which is very reasonable from

0:27:44.640 --> 0:27:45.280
<v Speaker 18>our perspective.

0:27:45.480 --> 0:27:47.280
<v Speaker 17>You know, I totally understand that you don't want to

0:27:47.280 --> 0:27:50.919
<v Speaker 17>talk about individual short wagers. However, will you kind of

0:27:50.920 --> 0:27:53.720
<v Speaker 17>explain the thinking around short investing right now? There are

0:27:53.720 --> 0:27:55.720
<v Speaker 17>a lot of people who feel very burned in the

0:27:55.720 --> 0:27:58.760
<v Speaker 17>way that markets have really melted up in a large way.

0:27:59.160 --> 0:28:01.439
<v Speaker 17>What does the environment for shorting look like to you,

0:28:01.520 --> 0:28:03.800
<v Speaker 17>and what are the kind of parameters that you think around.

0:28:04.760 --> 0:28:07.000
<v Speaker 18>Yeah, we're actually having a pretty decent year in our

0:28:07.119 --> 0:28:10.960
<v Speaker 18>short book, particularly considering how the market has gone up.

0:28:11.880 --> 0:28:14.040
<v Speaker 18>We made a change a couple of years ago in

0:28:14.080 --> 0:28:18.359
<v Speaker 18>response to sort of the meme stuff, and what we

0:28:18.480 --> 0:28:22.800
<v Speaker 18>basically figured out is that the right tail for your

0:28:22.840 --> 0:28:24.840
<v Speaker 18>best short ideas has changed.

0:28:25.320 --> 0:28:26.240
<v Speaker 6>So it used to be.

0:28:26.200 --> 0:28:27.800
<v Speaker 18>I'd want to put the most money and whatever I

0:28:27.840 --> 0:28:29.840
<v Speaker 18>thought my best idea is, But your best idea is

0:28:29.840 --> 0:28:31.480
<v Speaker 18>probably something that you think is going to go to zero,

0:28:31.960 --> 0:28:34.800
<v Speaker 18>and that's where the crazy stuff goes on. So we've

0:28:34.880 --> 0:28:37.600
<v Speaker 18>kind of flipped the short portfolio in the sense that

0:28:37.720 --> 0:28:41.479
<v Speaker 18>our bigger shorts tend to be more boring and our

0:28:41.520 --> 0:28:44.000
<v Speaker 18>smaller shorts are tend to be a little bit more exciting,

0:28:44.320 --> 0:28:47.960
<v Speaker 18>and it's enabled us to maybe manage the volatility relating

0:28:48.040 --> 0:28:51.960
<v Speaker 18>to you, the occasional craziness that hits a one stock

0:28:52.040 --> 0:28:55.640
<v Speaker 18>or another, particularly in the more volatile and probably going

0:28:55.640 --> 0:28:57.480
<v Speaker 18>to zero part of the short bastard.

0:28:58.560 --> 0:29:00.800
<v Speaker 17>While we're talking about volatility as well, I know you

0:29:01.000 --> 0:29:03.760
<v Speaker 17>this year had written two investors basically saying that it

0:29:03.760 --> 0:29:06.320
<v Speaker 17>doesn't really matter who would win the election when it

0:29:06.360 --> 0:29:08.280
<v Speaker 17>comes down to the markets more directly.

0:29:08.360 --> 0:29:09.520
<v Speaker 5>But I am still really.

0:29:09.320 --> 0:29:12.600
<v Speaker 17>Curious about how you're thinking about the election less than

0:29:12.640 --> 0:29:15.760
<v Speaker 17>two weeks away. Uncertainty around how long it will take

0:29:16.200 --> 0:29:19.200
<v Speaker 17>to know what the votes really come out to be

0:29:19.280 --> 0:29:21.800
<v Speaker 17>at the end of the day. How do you think

0:29:21.840 --> 0:29:24.240
<v Speaker 17>about that uncertainty and investing around it.

0:29:25.920 --> 0:29:27.920
<v Speaker 18>Yeah, Look, I don't know how to handicap, but the

0:29:27.960 --> 0:29:30.480
<v Speaker 18>only real protect projection I'm going to make about the

0:29:30.520 --> 0:29:33.040
<v Speaker 18>election is it's going to be held on November fifth

0:29:33.720 --> 0:29:35.960
<v Speaker 18>and beyond that, it's really hard to know.

0:29:37.240 --> 0:29:39.240
<v Speaker 1>The election seems to be very close.

0:29:39.560 --> 0:29:41.920
<v Speaker 18>And you know, I don't know whether we'll have a

0:29:41.920 --> 0:29:45.360
<v Speaker 18>winner anytime soon. I don't know whether either candidate is

0:29:45.400 --> 0:29:47.400
<v Speaker 18>preparing to concede if it's a close election.

0:29:47.920 --> 0:29:50.640
<v Speaker 1>So we'll just have to kind of see how that plays.

0:29:50.840 --> 0:29:55.960
<v Speaker 18>I'm taking a relatively conservative posture into the election. I

0:29:56.040 --> 0:29:58.760
<v Speaker 18>view this as a potentially uncertain event.

0:29:59.080 --> 0:30:01.240
<v Speaker 17>Is there anything that could take off after the election?

0:30:01.600 --> 0:30:03.800
<v Speaker 17>We hear over and over that investors are taking a

0:30:03.880 --> 0:30:06.040
<v Speaker 17>risk off tone before that time.

0:30:06.200 --> 0:30:10.560
<v Speaker 5>So what starts to take off after Well, I.

0:30:10.480 --> 0:30:14.040
<v Speaker 18>Think if you have a clear winner and it's you know,

0:30:14.080 --> 0:30:16.760
<v Speaker 18>in the country, it's clear what direction the country is

0:30:16.800 --> 0:30:21.040
<v Speaker 18>going to go, I'm confident that investors will chase whatever's

0:30:21.120 --> 0:30:24.840
<v Speaker 18>perceived to be a beneficiary of whichever candidate that happens

0:30:24.840 --> 0:30:25.040
<v Speaker 18>to be.

0:30:25.480 --> 0:30:27.160
<v Speaker 17>I want to get your macro view on this as well,

0:30:27.200 --> 0:30:29.080
<v Speaker 17>because a lot of people are worried about the direction

0:30:29.120 --> 0:30:32.080
<v Speaker 17>of inflation. You saw the ten year really a trail

0:30:32.200 --> 0:30:35.800
<v Speaker 17>higher in recent days. Some people think it's a Trump trade.

0:30:36.040 --> 0:30:38.960
<v Speaker 17>What do you think about the direction of travel for bonds?

0:30:39.400 --> 0:30:42.640
<v Speaker 17>The macro markets more largely on the heels of this election.

0:30:44.440 --> 0:30:47.640
<v Speaker 18>Yeah, Look, I think that I think we're in We

0:30:47.760 --> 0:30:50.960
<v Speaker 18>moved from a secular deflation for many many years into

0:30:51.000 --> 0:30:55.480
<v Speaker 18>secular inflation, and we've had a you know, a reduction

0:30:55.600 --> 0:30:57.240
<v Speaker 18>in inflation from the peak from a.

0:30:57.160 --> 0:30:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Couple of years ago.

0:30:58.120 --> 0:30:59.560
<v Speaker 18>But I think a lot of that is kind of

0:30:59.640 --> 0:31:01.959
<v Speaker 18>run its course, and so there's a decent chance we

0:31:02.000 --> 0:31:05.280
<v Speaker 18>should have inflation re accelerate, probably as soon as the

0:31:05.320 --> 0:31:08.600
<v Speaker 18>next inflation reading. As far as I can tell, there's

0:31:08.600 --> 0:31:11.360
<v Speaker 18>still rents that have to flow through, Commodity prices are

0:31:11.360 --> 0:31:15.120
<v Speaker 18>getting stronger, and I think there's some other indications, you know,

0:31:15.200 --> 0:31:17.719
<v Speaker 18>labor prices still going up. You see what's going on

0:31:17.800 --> 0:31:20.920
<v Speaker 18>for example with the Boeing strike. These these wage increases

0:31:20.960 --> 0:31:24.600
<v Speaker 18>are relatively substantial still. So I actually think that the

0:31:25.040 --> 0:31:29.240
<v Speaker 18>deflationary period is kind of the disinflationary period is kind

0:31:29.240 --> 0:31:31.440
<v Speaker 18>of coming to an end. And I think that you

0:31:31.440 --> 0:31:33.840
<v Speaker 18>can see it in the inflation derivatives market, and you

0:31:33.840 --> 0:31:37.000
<v Speaker 18>can see it in the bond market. Additionally, regular growth

0:31:37.040 --> 0:31:37.479
<v Speaker 18>is pretty good.

0:31:37.480 --> 0:31:38.959
<v Speaker 1>We're running about three percent.

0:31:39.320 --> 0:31:41.959
<v Speaker 18>So for that three percent growth and we've got you know,

0:31:42.120 --> 0:31:44.360
<v Speaker 18>at least two and a half and maybe rising inflation

0:31:44.440 --> 0:31:47.120
<v Speaker 18>from there, and that's nominal GDP of five and a

0:31:47.160 --> 0:31:50.760
<v Speaker 18>half plus. It's hard to see why treasury bonds that

0:31:51.120 --> 0:31:52.920
<v Speaker 18>you know, four percent are a little bit better than

0:31:52.960 --> 0:31:55.920
<v Speaker 18>that our mispriced, or why rates should come down from that.

0:31:57.160 --> 0:31:59.720
<v Speaker 17>Another that I know that you have had on David,

0:32:00.040 --> 0:32:02.200
<v Speaker 17>it's fair to call you a gold bug. We've seen

0:32:02.240 --> 0:32:05.360
<v Speaker 17>gold hit record highs this year, and I'm wondering how

0:32:05.480 --> 0:32:07.720
<v Speaker 17>much further you think it'll go and why.

0:32:09.240 --> 0:32:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Well I think that I think that gold.

0:32:13.240 --> 0:32:15.840
<v Speaker 18>Look, we've been long gold for about you know, fifteen years,

0:32:16.000 --> 0:32:19.920
<v Speaker 18>so there's nothing new about me saying something interesting about gold.

0:32:19.960 --> 0:32:21.800
<v Speaker 1>But I think just to the point I was just

0:32:21.880 --> 0:32:22.720
<v Speaker 1>making right.

0:32:22.560 --> 0:32:26.280
<v Speaker 18>If we have the FED, it seems dependent on trying

0:32:26.320 --> 0:32:30.120
<v Speaker 18>to reduce interest rates, even as inflation you know, maybe

0:32:30.720 --> 0:32:35.400
<v Speaker 18>bottoming and about to reaccelerate, that should be pretty good

0:32:35.400 --> 0:32:37.239
<v Speaker 18>for golds, and I think you're beginning to see that

0:32:37.360 --> 0:32:39.520
<v Speaker 18>in the price of gold, and gold has had a

0:32:39.560 --> 0:32:40.320
<v Speaker 18>really strong year.

0:32:40.840 --> 0:32:41.920
<v Speaker 1>It's been a big help to us.

0:32:42.960 --> 0:32:45.200
<v Speaker 17>Last question for you before I let you go. There's

0:32:45.240 --> 0:32:48.200
<v Speaker 17>been a lot of conversation about how you've been thinking

0:32:48.200 --> 0:32:52.120
<v Speaker 17>about value investing, whether the industry has died or not,

0:32:52.320 --> 0:32:54.000
<v Speaker 17>But a lot of people are looking to get back

0:32:54.000 --> 0:32:57.840
<v Speaker 17>into that value trade, particularly that Russell two thousand value trade.

0:32:57.920 --> 0:33:00.800
<v Speaker 5>What advice would you give then, Well.

0:33:00.680 --> 0:33:04.760
<v Speaker 18>I think with so many professional value investors no longer

0:33:04.960 --> 0:33:08.760
<v Speaker 18>practicing their trade or having assets to manage, there's just

0:33:08.800 --> 0:33:11.360
<v Speaker 18>a lot less competition, and so you can find some

0:33:11.400 --> 0:33:16.120
<v Speaker 18>pretty exciting values in companies that are less talked about

0:33:16.240 --> 0:33:19.160
<v Speaker 18>or less exciting than the ones that everyone wants to

0:33:19.560 --> 0:33:22.200
<v Speaker 18>you know, you know, comment on every day that traded,

0:33:22.440 --> 0:33:26.240
<v Speaker 18>you know, fancy mostly multiples. You have a real bifurcated market,

0:33:26.600 --> 0:33:29.440
<v Speaker 18>and we can find companies that are paying large dividends

0:33:29.480 --> 0:33:30.080
<v Speaker 18>and buying.

0:33:29.880 --> 0:33:30.680
<v Speaker 1>Back lots of stock.

0:33:30.720 --> 0:33:32.680
<v Speaker 18>We're going to make a good return just from the

0:33:32.720 --> 0:33:35.320
<v Speaker 18>company giving us the money, and we don't really care

0:33:35.360 --> 0:33:36.720
<v Speaker 18>whether what other investors do.

0:33:37.400 --> 0:33:38.520
<v Speaker 5>David, we got to leave it hit there.

0:33:38.560 --> 0:33:42.600
<v Speaker 17>Of course, that is David Einhorn Greenlight Capital talking about

0:33:42.600 --> 0:33:43.440
<v Speaker 17>his favorite long pick.

0:33:43.520 --> 0:33:45.680
<v Speaker 5>Right now. We thank you very much for your time.

0:33:45.960 --> 0:33:46.400
<v Speaker 5>Back to you.

0:33:48.960 --> 0:34:00.920
<v Speaker 4>We mentioned Ali Bassek, Thank you very much. In CEO,

0:34:01.040 --> 0:34:04.200
<v Speaker 4>Ryan Roslansky says that even if you don't change your job,

0:34:04.320 --> 0:34:08.040
<v Speaker 4>your job will change due to AI. He sat down

0:34:08.040 --> 0:34:10.480
<v Speaker 4>with Bloomberg's has Lean that I'm in for an episode

0:34:10.520 --> 0:34:13.319
<v Speaker 4>of Insight, where he talks about the platform's growth, the

0:34:13.360 --> 0:34:18.120
<v Speaker 4>impact of AI on career search and development, encountering misinformation

0:34:18.400 --> 0:34:19.440
<v Speaker 4>ahead of the US election.

0:34:19.560 --> 0:34:20.040
<v Speaker 6>Listen to this.

0:34:21.120 --> 0:34:23.080
<v Speaker 19>A couple of trends that we see right now, are

0:34:23.960 --> 0:34:26.720
<v Speaker 19>you know, across the board, just just the need for

0:34:27.440 --> 0:34:29.720
<v Speaker 19>you know, people to really upskill in what they're doing.

0:34:30.680 --> 0:34:33.560
<v Speaker 19>AI skills but also human skills I think are really

0:34:33.560 --> 0:34:37.040
<v Speaker 19>on high demand across the board. For the first time

0:34:37.080 --> 0:34:39.800
<v Speaker 19>on LinkedIn, we're seeing a lot of growth outside of

0:34:39.880 --> 0:34:42.720
<v Speaker 19>kind of the core knowledge worker, and that's especially happening

0:34:43.120 --> 0:34:47.440
<v Speaker 19>in India and Indonesia, So small business owners, freelancers are

0:34:47.480 --> 0:34:50.960
<v Speaker 19>really starting to gravitate towards the platform. So, you know,

0:34:51.000 --> 0:34:52.920
<v Speaker 19>the more people that join seven per second, just the

0:34:52.960 --> 0:34:55.800
<v Speaker 19>more insights we have across the globe. It's really interesting

0:34:55.840 --> 0:34:58.959
<v Speaker 19>to see those patterns. But you know, for me, really

0:34:59.000 --> 0:35:02.319
<v Speaker 19>the idea that again, if you're not changing your job,

0:35:02.560 --> 0:35:04.560
<v Speaker 19>your job is even changing on you. It's just a

0:35:04.600 --> 0:35:07.560
<v Speaker 19>really important thing we're able to grasp right now, especially

0:35:07.600 --> 0:35:09.880
<v Speaker 19>as AI takes more shape in the labor market.

0:35:10.120 --> 0:35:11.320
<v Speaker 5>Right now, there's a lot.

0:35:11.160 --> 0:35:15.560
<v Speaker 17>Of focus on the US election and perhaps AI generated misinformation.

0:35:16.080 --> 0:35:18.640
<v Speaker 19>How are you countering that on your platform. So a

0:35:18.719 --> 0:35:21.000
<v Speaker 19>large extent, you know, LinkedIn exists as a platform to

0:35:21.040 --> 0:35:26.080
<v Speaker 19>create economic opportunity. What you share on LinkedIn is attached

0:35:26.080 --> 0:35:30.400
<v Speaker 19>to your real identity, you know, your resume online, so

0:35:30.440 --> 0:35:32.680
<v Speaker 19>we don't face a lot of the issues that a

0:35:32.719 --> 0:35:35.640
<v Speaker 19>lot of other platforms may face where there's not real identity.

0:35:36.600 --> 0:35:38.640
<v Speaker 19>But to the extent that you know, we still have

0:35:38.680 --> 0:35:40.960
<v Speaker 19>a lot of the same you know, trust in place

0:35:41.040 --> 0:35:44.040
<v Speaker 19>across the board. You know, through AI and human review,

0:35:44.120 --> 0:35:46.520
<v Speaker 19>things get reported. But there's not a lot of political

0:35:46.560 --> 0:35:49.640
<v Speaker 19>content on LinkedIn. In fact, in twenty eighteen, we actually

0:35:50.280 --> 0:35:53.799
<v Speaker 19>you know, disallowed political advertising altogether on LinkedIn, so it's

0:35:53.920 --> 0:35:56.720
<v Speaker 19>not really a place where you know, politics are happening.

0:35:57.280 --> 0:36:02.200
<v Speaker 3>LinkedIn CEO Ran Raslanski along with Heslinda Imin. And meanwhile,

0:36:02.320 --> 0:36:05.759
<v Speaker 3>Ireland's Data Protection Commission has actually just fined LinkedIn three

0:36:05.800 --> 0:36:07.160
<v Speaker 3>hundred and ten million euros that's three.

0:36:07.120 --> 0:36:08.839
<v Speaker 10>Hundred and thirty five million US dollars for.

0:36:08.840 --> 0:36:12.320
<v Speaker 3>Illegally processing the personal data of users within the EU

0:36:12.680 --> 0:36:16.960
<v Speaker 3>to deliver targeted advertising. In a statement, Deputy Commissioner Graham

0:36:16.960 --> 0:36:19.560
<v Speaker 3>Doyle called it quote a clear and serious violation of

0:36:19.640 --> 0:36:24.239
<v Speaker 3>data subjects fundamental right to data protection LinkedIn said the

0:36:24.280 --> 0:36:27.200
<v Speaker 3>case relates to claims from twenty eighteen and believes it

0:36:27.239 --> 0:36:29.760
<v Speaker 3>is now in compliance with data regulation.

0:36:38.600 --> 0:36:40.960
<v Speaker 4>This is what Tesla shares look like right now, are

0:36:41.120 --> 0:36:44.520
<v Speaker 4>almost nineteen percent of session highs, but as it stands

0:36:44.760 --> 0:36:47.400
<v Speaker 4>on track for the biggest single day jump since March

0:36:47.480 --> 0:36:50.800
<v Speaker 4>of twenty twenty one. They beat expectations in the quarter

0:36:51.239 --> 0:36:53.279
<v Speaker 4>and a lot of this is about the business of

0:36:53.360 --> 0:36:57.120
<v Speaker 4>selling evs to consumers. Really big goals for next year

0:36:57.400 --> 0:36:58.279
<v Speaker 4>and they're getting more.

0:36:58.200 --> 0:36:59.080
<v Speaker 6>Profitable at doing it.

0:36:59.160 --> 0:37:01.560
<v Speaker 4>Let's talk to Jessin a cool Well, head of insights

0:37:01.760 --> 0:37:03.720
<v Speaker 4>at Edmunds, and I want to start with this idea

0:37:04.320 --> 0:37:08.560
<v Speaker 4>that they see growth in the automotive business of twenty

0:37:08.640 --> 0:37:10.160
<v Speaker 4>to thirty percent next year.

0:37:10.600 --> 0:37:11.680
<v Speaker 6>Really interesting.

0:37:11.760 --> 0:37:14.160
<v Speaker 4>What did you make of that and does your research

0:37:14.200 --> 0:37:17.120
<v Speaker 4>and math support it well?

0:37:17.160 --> 0:37:19.399
<v Speaker 9>That indicates if they have a high volume model coming.

0:37:19.520 --> 0:37:21.719
<v Speaker 20>I mean in this market right now, I don't think

0:37:21.760 --> 0:37:24.400
<v Speaker 20>any other car company is projecting.

0:37:23.920 --> 0:37:24.880
<v Speaker 9>That type of growth.

0:37:25.280 --> 0:37:29.760
<v Speaker 20>So they have high expectations for this lower cost electric vehicle,

0:37:29.840 --> 0:37:32.400
<v Speaker 20>whether it's the three or the Y that's low cost.

0:37:33.040 --> 0:37:35.080
<v Speaker 20>But yeah, that does not track with where the auto

0:37:35.160 --> 0:37:37.920
<v Speaker 20>industry is heading. So of course, with Elon Muskus, promises.

0:37:38.320 --> 0:37:40.560
<v Speaker 20>You never know exactly what that timeline is and if

0:37:40.600 --> 0:37:42.960
<v Speaker 20>they'll actually hit those markers. But I mean, I think

0:37:43.040 --> 0:37:46.440
<v Speaker 20>those sales growth projections have to indicate an incremental volume

0:37:46.520 --> 0:37:47.360
<v Speaker 20>model for Tesla.

0:37:48.360 --> 0:37:51.000
<v Speaker 3>So if the math doesn't seem to quite add up

0:37:51.080 --> 0:37:53.600
<v Speaker 3>for what they need to achieve this quarter that we're in,

0:37:53.960 --> 0:37:57.279
<v Speaker 3>point us forward to next year as well, when we

0:37:57.360 --> 0:37:59.759
<v Speaker 3>see a play of catch up and ultimately what price

0:37:59.760 --> 0:38:02.000
<v Speaker 3>point they have to come in at for that up

0:38:02.040 --> 0:38:05.719
<v Speaker 3>to thirty percent growth. Where is the demand from real perspective.

0:38:06.800 --> 0:38:09.360
<v Speaker 20>Yeah, So the interesting thing about his comments is the

0:38:09.360 --> 0:38:11.200
<v Speaker 20>way he describes as a car market, and he's done

0:38:11.200 --> 0:38:12.080
<v Speaker 20>this on pass calls.

0:38:12.880 --> 0:38:14.279
<v Speaker 9>It feels like he assumes.

0:38:13.960 --> 0:38:16.040
<v Speaker 20>That everybody out there is a very pragmatic fire He

0:38:16.040 --> 0:38:17.960
<v Speaker 20>says things like if we hit the right price and

0:38:18.000 --> 0:38:21.160
<v Speaker 20>the demand is infinite, something like that. He's talked about

0:38:21.160 --> 0:38:22.920
<v Speaker 20>people are looking at costs per mile, and that's not

0:38:23.000 --> 0:38:25.640
<v Speaker 20>the way people, especially in the United States, buy cars.

0:38:25.880 --> 0:38:27.120
<v Speaker 20>I mean, if that was the case, we would not

0:38:27.160 --> 0:38:31.000
<v Speaker 20>have luxury brands, we would not have large suv sports cars. So,

0:38:31.280 --> 0:38:33.319
<v Speaker 20>you know, in terms of that actual volume, if there

0:38:33.520 --> 0:38:36.520
<v Speaker 20>was a you know, twenty five thousand dollars ev Would

0:38:36.520 --> 0:38:39.160
<v Speaker 20>everyone still want that, especially if it looked very much

0:38:39.239 --> 0:38:40.880
<v Speaker 20>like what exists today.

0:38:41.480 --> 0:38:44.120
<v Speaker 9>I think that is probably the biggest question I have for.

0:38:44.040 --> 0:38:46.920
<v Speaker 20>Them really next year, because people like to see new things.

0:38:46.960 --> 0:38:48.440
<v Speaker 20>They don't like to see the same old thing that

0:38:48.440 --> 0:38:50.239
<v Speaker 20>they've seen, but now just cheaper. If you want that,

0:38:50.280 --> 0:38:51.280
<v Speaker 20>you can probably go get.

0:38:51.120 --> 0:38:51.680
<v Speaker 1>A used one.

0:38:51.680 --> 0:38:53.920
<v Speaker 9>I mean it's not new, but you know it's it's

0:38:53.920 --> 0:38:54.800
<v Speaker 9>in that price range.

0:38:55.760 --> 0:38:57.920
<v Speaker 4>If you're just joining us on Bluebot Technology test. The

0:38:57.960 --> 0:39:00.640
<v Speaker 4>shares are up almost nineteen percent. The S and P

0:39:00.800 --> 0:39:03.720
<v Speaker 4>five hundred is down a little bit at ten five percent.

0:39:03.880 --> 0:39:07.319
<v Speaker 4>Here's a fun stat for everyone. The previous biggest gain

0:39:07.400 --> 0:39:09.880
<v Speaker 4>Tesla's ever posted on a day where the S and

0:39:09.920 --> 0:39:13.120
<v Speaker 4>P five hundred was down was seven and a half percent.

0:39:13.680 --> 0:39:15.960
<v Speaker 4>That's the state of play now and we're up nineteen percent.

0:39:15.960 --> 0:39:19.400
<v Speaker 4>And Jessica, A big part of it is this autonomous future.

0:39:19.960 --> 0:39:22.439
<v Speaker 4>How much have you looked into FSD and how much

0:39:22.480 --> 0:39:25.160
<v Speaker 4>do you think it resonates with the consumer at large

0:39:25.239 --> 0:39:25.640
<v Speaker 4>right now?

0:39:27.440 --> 0:39:29.600
<v Speaker 20>I don't think it's for everybody at this point in time.

0:39:29.640 --> 0:39:32.280
<v Speaker 20>I think people like the idea of a vehicle driving itself.

0:39:32.280 --> 0:39:34.000
<v Speaker 9>I mean, who who want who doesn't want that?

0:39:34.080 --> 0:39:36.640
<v Speaker 20>Time bag, But we're talking about the next few years

0:39:36.719 --> 0:39:38.880
<v Speaker 20>and are people really ready for it. I think you're

0:39:38.880 --> 0:39:40.480
<v Speaker 20>going to have a group of people that are they

0:39:40.600 --> 0:39:42.040
<v Speaker 20>like it, But I think you're gonna have a lot

0:39:42.040 --> 0:39:44.120
<v Speaker 20>of opposition as well, people that feel like they're on

0:39:44.160 --> 0:39:46.520
<v Speaker 20>the roads being subjected to these vehicles that they didn't

0:39:46.560 --> 0:39:49.480
<v Speaker 20>ask for. So I think getting the public ready is

0:39:49.520 --> 0:39:51.600
<v Speaker 20>a really big hurdle that we're not really talking about.

0:39:51.640 --> 0:39:54.319
<v Speaker 9>We're talking about the technology and the regulatory and all

0:39:54.320 --> 0:39:54.560
<v Speaker 9>of that.

0:39:54.640 --> 0:39:57.120
<v Speaker 20>I mean, that has to be solved, but also these

0:39:57.120 --> 0:39:58.960
<v Speaker 20>are going to be in our streets, and I think

0:39:58.960 --> 0:40:00.680
<v Speaker 20>there's gonna be a lot of concern out there if

0:40:00.719 --> 0:40:03.480
<v Speaker 20>we don't start talking about how this all works.

0:40:04.360 --> 0:40:08.200
<v Speaker 3>Okay, And regulation is actually something that Musk himself was

0:40:08.239 --> 0:40:11.719
<v Speaker 3>talking about potentially being able to push forward if he

0:40:11.760 --> 0:40:13.960
<v Speaker 3>does indeed get a role in the next administration. A

0:40:13.960 --> 0:40:16.279
<v Speaker 3>lot of ifs within that. Jessica, just go back to

0:40:16.320 --> 0:40:19.960
<v Speaker 3>the facts of this quarter we're currently in. Do you

0:40:20.360 --> 0:40:23.439
<v Speaker 3>believe that the targets were outlined on the call will

0:40:23.480 --> 0:40:25.600
<v Speaker 3>be made for this current court, let alone the thirty

0:40:25.600 --> 0:40:27.239
<v Speaker 3>percent being looked out for next year.

0:40:28.760 --> 0:40:30.399
<v Speaker 9>I mean, it seems likely.

0:40:30.440 --> 0:40:34.480
<v Speaker 20>It seems like this quarter will probably see some sort

0:40:34.640 --> 0:40:38.040
<v Speaker 20>of increase in sales overall. We know that, you know,

0:40:38.080 --> 0:40:39.640
<v Speaker 20>we've had a FED cut or interest rates are a

0:40:39.640 --> 0:40:42.640
<v Speaker 20>little bit a little bit easier. And then also Tesla

0:40:42.640 --> 0:40:46.000
<v Speaker 20>has been pretty aggressive with their incentives, so the fact

0:40:46.000 --> 0:40:47.640
<v Speaker 20>that they are offering.

0:40:47.640 --> 0:40:49.440
<v Speaker 9>Good deals out there is helpful.

0:40:49.520 --> 0:40:52.280
<v Speaker 20>And then also when you just think about new vehicles

0:40:52.280 --> 0:40:54.600
<v Speaker 20>in general, I mean a new Evil release.

0:40:54.560 --> 0:40:55.239
<v Speaker 9>Is the best deal.

0:40:55.400 --> 0:40:58.280
<v Speaker 20>So I think that that is working in their favor,

0:40:59.040 --> 0:41:01.600
<v Speaker 20>but it's not as nessarily going to make you know,

0:41:01.640 --> 0:41:04.960
<v Speaker 20>these massive sales jumps out they're anticipating next year.

0:41:06.040 --> 0:41:10.080
<v Speaker 4>Jessica, Tesla wants to change the relationship of an individual

0:41:10.120 --> 0:41:10.680
<v Speaker 4>with cars.

0:41:10.800 --> 0:41:12.520
<v Speaker 6>You know, I have a Tesla model. Why I believe

0:41:12.600 --> 0:41:14.920
<v Speaker 6>Caro also has a Tesla. We both use FSD.

0:41:15.680 --> 0:41:18.560
<v Speaker 4>But in the future that Tesla sees we don't necessarily

0:41:18.560 --> 0:41:21.160
<v Speaker 4>own our own cars, and if we do, we submit

0:41:21.239 --> 0:41:23.600
<v Speaker 4>them to a fleet when we're not using them in

0:41:23.640 --> 0:41:26.680
<v Speaker 4>the same way we might put homes on Airbnb. You

0:41:26.760 --> 0:41:28.960
<v Speaker 4>cover this industry, how are you going to cover it

0:41:29.000 --> 0:41:32.000
<v Speaker 4>going forward?

0:41:32.080 --> 0:41:34.000
<v Speaker 20>I mean, yeah, that's a big question, Like in terms

0:41:34.000 --> 0:41:36.680
<v Speaker 20>of personal ownership, do we own these vehicles? Because I

0:41:36.719 --> 0:41:38.120
<v Speaker 20>do think that there are a group of people that

0:41:38.160 --> 0:41:38.959
<v Speaker 20>they want their own vehicles.

0:41:39.000 --> 0:41:39.960
<v Speaker 9>They're not going to fleet it out.

0:41:39.960 --> 0:41:42.200
<v Speaker 20>They don't want their vehicle coming back in whatever state

0:41:42.239 --> 0:41:44.319
<v Speaker 20>that it's going to come out in ten hours when

0:41:44.600 --> 0:41:45.640
<v Speaker 20>they need to use it again.

0:41:46.040 --> 0:41:46.720
<v Speaker 9>But there are.

0:41:46.600 --> 0:41:48.719
<v Speaker 20>People that will use this, and I think that this

0:41:48.800 --> 0:41:50.720
<v Speaker 20>is going to be a you know, a real income

0:41:50.760 --> 0:41:53.319
<v Speaker 20>differentiator of people that have their own vehicles and people

0:41:53.360 --> 0:41:56.080
<v Speaker 20>that can get around and they're not having to worry

0:41:56.080 --> 0:41:58.560
<v Speaker 20>about a monthly payment or insurance which has gone up

0:41:58.640 --> 0:42:00.840
<v Speaker 20>so much recently just in the past year alone, and

0:42:00.880 --> 0:42:04.920
<v Speaker 20>everything that is associated with car ownership. So it's definitely

0:42:04.960 --> 0:42:07.080
<v Speaker 20>going to change, but I feel like it's going to

0:42:07.120 --> 0:42:08.960
<v Speaker 20>be a bit slower than I feel like what we're promised.

0:42:09.000 --> 0:42:10.800
<v Speaker 20>I mean, right now, we're promised all these hopes and

0:42:10.880 --> 0:42:13.240
<v Speaker 20>dreams that are happening in the next you know, five minutes.

0:42:13.320 --> 0:42:16.719
<v Speaker 20>But I think the rollout is definitely more conservative than

0:42:16.719 --> 0:42:17.560
<v Speaker 20>that in reality.

0:42:18.120 --> 0:42:20.640
<v Speaker 3>Just a cold well kind of insights of Edmunds. Great

0:42:20.680 --> 0:42:21.640
<v Speaker 3>having you, thank you.

0:42:21.640 --> 0:42:24.320
<v Speaker 10>That does it. For this addition, I'm blie big technology.

0:42:24.040 --> 0:42:26.759
<v Speaker 4>Ed Yeah, big focus on Testa's earnings and a lot

0:42:26.800 --> 0:42:28.719
<v Speaker 4>to recap on the podcast. You know where to find

0:42:28.719 --> 0:42:31.319
<v Speaker 4>it online and on the Bloomberg platform. Shout out the

0:42:31.320 --> 0:42:33.719
<v Speaker 4>team in New York and here in SSEF. This is

0:42:33.920 --> 0:42:34.920
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg Technology