WEBVTT - "Fab Four" Chip Group Meets, G20 Wraps

0:00:03.200 --> 0:00:06.480
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Daybreak Asia for this Monday, February twenty

0:00:06.519 --> 0:00:10.680
<v Speaker 1>seventh in Hong Kong, Sunday February twenty sixth in New York,

0:00:10.720 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>and coming up today. Asian stocks may suffer after that

0:00:13.880 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>hotter than forecast inflation data. Here in the US, the

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:21.160
<v Speaker 1>biggest chipmaking countries meet to ensure a steady supply chain,

0:00:21.360 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 1>and China's Renaissance says it's missing chairman has been assisting

0:00:25.320 --> 0:00:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Chinese investigators. Our report, the US Energy Department has moderate

0:00:29.600 --> 0:00:32.880
<v Speaker 1>confidence that COVID started at a lab misshapp in China,

0:00:33.200 --> 0:00:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Macao eas's mask restrictions. US continues to put pressure on

0:00:37.360 --> 0:00:40.879
<v Speaker 1>shijimping not to provide weapons to Russia. Imed Baxter with

0:00:40.960 --> 0:00:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Global News. That's all straight ahead on Bloomberg Daybreak Asia,

0:00:47.080 --> 0:00:49.720
<v Speaker 1>the business news you need to start your day in

0:00:49.760 --> 0:00:53.920
<v Speaker 1>just one fifteen minute podcast available on Apples, Spotify, the

0:00:54.000 --> 0:01:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business app and everywhere you get your podcasts. Good morning,

0:01:00.680 --> 0:01:03.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm Brian Curtis and I'm Dog Prisoner. Here are the

0:01:03.520 --> 0:01:08.080
<v Speaker 1>stories we're following today. After a hotter than expected PC

0:01:08.440 --> 0:01:11.160
<v Speaker 1>report in the United States, FED officials came out and

0:01:11.200 --> 0:01:15.000
<v Speaker 1>flagged the risk of sticky inflation. Cleveland FED chief Lorettamesters

0:01:15.000 --> 0:01:18.360
<v Speaker 1>said policymakers need to do a little more to ensure

0:01:18.480 --> 0:01:22.520
<v Speaker 1>inflation is moving back down. Her Boston counterparts Susan Collins

0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:24.959
<v Speaker 1>said that the FED has to keep raising rates to

0:01:25.040 --> 0:01:28.600
<v Speaker 1>get them to a sufficiently restrictive level, and Saint Louis

0:01:28.600 --> 0:01:31.640
<v Speaker 1>FED President Jim Bullard also urged the Fed to move

0:01:31.720 --> 0:01:37.360
<v Speaker 1>quickly on interest rates re establish credibility. Now sometimes I

0:01:37.480 --> 0:01:41.760
<v Speaker 1>use the phrase more game theory, less econometrics. Is what

0:01:41.920 --> 0:01:44.920
<v Speaker 1>you really want is the establishment of the credibility of

0:01:44.920 --> 0:01:48.040
<v Speaker 1>the two percent inflation target. There's a certain amount of

0:01:49.160 --> 0:01:53.680
<v Speaker 1>demonstration to markets if you move quickly. In a new study,

0:01:53.680 --> 0:01:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street economists and academics argue that the Fed will

0:01:56.920 --> 0:02:01.000
<v Speaker 1>need to inflict some economic pain to get pass under control.

0:02:01.280 --> 0:02:04.720
<v Speaker 1>The study included a series of simulations to predict likely

0:02:04.760 --> 0:02:08.519
<v Speaker 1>paths for the benchmark policy rates. Now, a few moments ago,

0:02:08.639 --> 0:02:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Doug mentioned five point four percent that was being predicted

0:02:12.320 --> 0:02:15.680
<v Speaker 1>as the terminal rate. Computer models is suggesting from this study.

0:02:15.680 --> 0:02:17.959
<v Speaker 1>We just mentioned that rates would peak ay the five

0:02:18.000 --> 0:02:21.239
<v Speaker 1>point six percent, six percent, or even six and a

0:02:21.280 --> 0:02:24.480
<v Speaker 1>half percent in the second half of this year. Meantime,

0:02:24.520 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 1>we also heard from a Bloomberg opinion columnist to Mohammad

0:02:27.800 --> 0:02:31.160
<v Speaker 1>el Aryan, who is saying financial markets are starting to

0:02:31.280 --> 0:02:34.120
<v Speaker 1>doubt whether the FED can bring inflation down to that

0:02:34.160 --> 0:02:38.040
<v Speaker 1>two percent target. He says, inflation indicators are heading very

0:02:38.080 --> 0:02:40.840
<v Speaker 1>simply in the wrong direction. There's a lot of things

0:02:40.840 --> 0:02:43.679
<v Speaker 1>going on the supply side that would argue for a

0:02:43.720 --> 0:02:46.359
<v Speaker 1>slightly high inflation target. Now, of course, the FED cannot

0:02:46.400 --> 0:02:49.519
<v Speaker 1>change its inflation target after missing it for so long,

0:02:49.840 --> 0:02:52.560
<v Speaker 1>so they have a real problem there. I think the

0:02:52.600 --> 0:02:56.040
<v Speaker 1>best we can hope for, honestly, is stable inflation through

0:02:56.080 --> 0:02:58.280
<v Speaker 1>the four Now. El Aryan went on to say that

0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:01.720
<v Speaker 1>if the FED continues to pursue it's two percent inflation target,

0:03:01.840 --> 0:03:05.519
<v Speaker 1>fremendous pain will be inflicted on the American economy. Ran

0:03:06.200 --> 0:03:08.240
<v Speaker 1>In some other matters, we're getting word that the so

0:03:08.400 --> 0:03:11.960
<v Speaker 1>called Fab four Chip Group has held its first senior

0:03:12.000 --> 0:03:16.840
<v Speaker 1>officials meeting to talk about semiconductor global supply. Bloomberg's Denise

0:03:16.840 --> 0:03:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Pellegrini's tracking developments. The February sixteenth video meeting of the

0:03:20.639 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Alliance of the US, Taiwan, Japan, and South Korea focused

0:03:23.720 --> 0:03:26.720
<v Speaker 1>on supply chain resilience, and sources say the group, also

0:03:26.760 --> 0:03:29.600
<v Speaker 1>called the Chip Four, talked about an early warning system

0:03:29.680 --> 0:03:33.360
<v Speaker 1>to ensure study supply, but did not talk about export controls.

0:03:33.560 --> 0:03:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Taiwan and South Korea agreed to focus on manufacturing, Japan

0:03:36.600 --> 0:03:39.320
<v Speaker 1>on materials, the US on its role as a major market,

0:03:39.400 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 1>and the Biden administration has been trying to get global

0:03:41.920 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 1>partners to agree to curb sales on advanced chip equipment

0:03:45.000 --> 0:03:49.200
<v Speaker 1>to China so China can't challenge US dominance globally so easily.

0:03:49.360 --> 0:03:51.920
<v Speaker 1>And Taiwan is home to the world's largest contract chipmaker,

0:03:52.080 --> 0:03:54.600
<v Speaker 1>and President Seinwen has pledged in the past to make

0:03:54.640 --> 0:03:57.160
<v Speaker 1>sure partners have ample supply of what she is called

0:03:57.360 --> 0:04:01.240
<v Speaker 1>democracy chips. Denise Pellegrin Bloomberg day Break in India, the

0:04:01.320 --> 0:04:04.760
<v Speaker 1>G twenty meetings have wrapped up with no consensus agreement.

0:04:04.880 --> 0:04:07.440
<v Speaker 1>We have more from Bloomberg's Van Men. The world's top

0:04:07.480 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 1>finance chis failed to agree on a final statement. That's

0:04:10.960 --> 0:04:14.200
<v Speaker 1>because Russia and China disagree with two paragraphs on the

0:04:14.280 --> 0:04:18.279
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine War that happened clear by all other members. German

0:04:18.400 --> 0:04:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Finance Minister Christian Leonards said a shift in attitude by

0:04:21.800 --> 0:04:25.440
<v Speaker 1>China was very regrettable. There was also some disagreement on

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:29.760
<v Speaker 1>debt restructuring and obligations by various kinds of creditors, but

0:04:29.880 --> 0:04:34.120
<v Speaker 1>on most other topics participants seem to be aligned. Leaders

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:37.560
<v Speaker 1>called fighting inflation a top priority. In Hong Kong. I'm

0:04:37.560 --> 0:04:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Ivan Man Bloomberg Daybreak Asia, China Renaissance says it's missing

0:04:42.360 --> 0:04:47.000
<v Speaker 1>chairman Bao Fan, has been assisting in an unspecified Chinese investigation.

0:04:47.320 --> 0:04:51.080
<v Speaker 1>We get more from Bloomberg's David Englaze. China Renaissance says

0:04:51.200 --> 0:04:54.600
<v Speaker 1>it has learned that Bao is cooperating in the probe,

0:04:54.839 --> 0:04:57.840
<v Speaker 1>but in a statement, the firm suggests that it has

0:04:57.920 --> 0:05:00.159
<v Speaker 1>not been in touch with Bao and does not know

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:04.040
<v Speaker 1>where he actually is. The well known executive disappeared earlier

0:05:04.080 --> 0:05:08.039
<v Speaker 1>this month, unnerving China's business elite. Bao has been the

0:05:08.120 --> 0:05:11.680
<v Speaker 1>go to financier for some of the country's biggest companies,

0:05:11.720 --> 0:05:15.919
<v Speaker 1>and his disappearances race speculation of increased scrutiny for the

0:05:16.000 --> 0:05:20.479
<v Speaker 1>nation's finance industry. Several big lenders have requested more information.

0:05:20.640 --> 0:05:24.599
<v Speaker 1>They include BOCOM, China, Citic Bank, and China Merchants Bank.

0:05:24.800 --> 0:05:28.160
<v Speaker 1>In Hong Kong, I'm David Ingless bloom Brick, Day Break Asia,

0:05:28.240 --> 0:05:31.200
<v Speaker 1>and again I'm Brian Curtis along with Doug Krisner. Doug,

0:05:31.440 --> 0:05:35.599
<v Speaker 1>when the data changes, investors can be expected to change,

0:05:35.600 --> 0:05:38.560
<v Speaker 1>and we've seen that happening with the tough commentary from

0:05:38.600 --> 0:05:42.280
<v Speaker 1>the Fed in the inflation data. I would say, the data.

0:05:42.640 --> 0:05:46.640
<v Speaker 1>You can say that maybe the data is more important

0:05:46.640 --> 0:05:49.240
<v Speaker 1>than the Fed, which you have to admit all along

0:05:49.279 --> 0:05:52.840
<v Speaker 1>has been vigilant. Well, the Fed has been vigilant, I

0:05:52.880 --> 0:05:55.240
<v Speaker 1>would say, but there was a gap between what the

0:05:55.279 --> 0:05:57.760
<v Speaker 1>market was in pricing in in terms of a view

0:05:57.760 --> 0:06:00.800
<v Speaker 1>on inflation and what the FED thought. There was a

0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:03.400
<v Speaker 1>sharp pivot, and Jim Bullard, who was the head of

0:06:03.400 --> 0:06:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the Saint Louis FED Bank, was saying that yes, maybe

0:06:07.000 --> 0:06:09.960
<v Speaker 1>the Fed had some room to dial back. So the

0:06:10.080 --> 0:06:13.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of the inflection point wasn't the issue insomuch as

0:06:14.000 --> 0:06:17.640
<v Speaker 1>inflation has really remained stubbornly high. There was a decline,

0:06:17.960 --> 0:06:20.160
<v Speaker 1>but we remain at elevated levels. And I point that

0:06:20.200 --> 0:06:22.640
<v Speaker 1>out because when we were talking about the dollar right now,

0:06:22.640 --> 0:06:24.720
<v Speaker 1>the big question is whether or not the dollar can

0:06:24.760 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 1>manage further gains. It may be difficult because what the

0:06:28.279 --> 0:06:30.480
<v Speaker 1>market is thinking and what the Fed seemed to be

0:06:30.520 --> 0:06:33.880
<v Speaker 1>thinking are more in alignment right now. Yeah, I think

0:06:33.880 --> 0:06:36.160
<v Speaker 1>that's a fair point. I think we do need to

0:06:36.200 --> 0:06:39.039
<v Speaker 1>say though, it is one month's data that marked a

0:06:39.080 --> 0:06:41.960
<v Speaker 1>big change January, so we'll see whether that continues when

0:06:42.000 --> 0:06:44.960
<v Speaker 1>we look at what happens with the data in February

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:48.640
<v Speaker 1>and then even after that in March. And also in

0:06:48.680 --> 0:06:50.880
<v Speaker 1>addition to the inflation data, we've had a lot of

0:06:50.920 --> 0:06:55.440
<v Speaker 1>other factors that have played into selldown in risk assets,

0:06:55.800 --> 0:06:59.159
<v Speaker 1>the anniversary of the Ukraine War, the uneven nature of

0:06:59.240 --> 0:07:02.240
<v Speaker 1>China's room. We've also seen a big sell off in

0:07:02.320 --> 0:07:06.280
<v Speaker 1>tech here of late, and then also US China relations,

0:07:06.279 --> 0:07:08.640
<v Speaker 1>so there's a lot going on here. Well. Speaking of China,

0:07:08.720 --> 0:07:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the NPC meeting will kick off on Friday, and I

0:07:11.200 --> 0:07:13.160
<v Speaker 1>think it's fair to say that markets right now are

0:07:13.160 --> 0:07:16.520
<v Speaker 1>expecting on shore stocks to continue to do better than

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:19.800
<v Speaker 1>Hong Kong listed chairs because it is likely that the

0:07:19.840 --> 0:07:22.760
<v Speaker 1>government's going to roll out some new stimulus. Yeah, we

0:07:22.800 --> 0:07:26.000
<v Speaker 1>are in full correction mode with the Hanksang Index, which

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:28.800
<v Speaker 1>is interesting around ten percenters. So it's been a rough

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:31.560
<v Speaker 1>period here in February. All right, it's time now for

0:07:31.680 --> 0:07:36.680
<v Speaker 1>global news. The US Energy Department is saying that the

0:07:36.800 --> 0:07:41.880
<v Speaker 1>COVID pandemics origin was most likely a laboratory league misshapp

0:07:42.120 --> 0:07:44.000
<v Speaker 1>in China. Let's get to Head Baxter in the nine

0:07:44.160 --> 0:07:47.160
<v Speaker 1>sixty news room for details. Head. Yeah, that's right, Brian.

0:07:47.200 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 1>This is a classified document of the Wall Street Journal

0:07:49.520 --> 0:07:52.640
<v Speaker 1>reports one of several, but Energy believes that it was

0:07:52.720 --> 0:07:55.400
<v Speaker 1>due to a mishap at a biological lab. As you say.

0:07:55.520 --> 0:07:59.160
<v Speaker 1>National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan on CNN says this is

0:07:59.200 --> 0:08:02.320
<v Speaker 1>part of an ongoing investigation. The reference to the Department

0:08:02.360 --> 0:08:06.760
<v Speaker 1>of Energy. President Biden specifically requested that the National Labs,

0:08:06.840 --> 0:08:09.440
<v Speaker 1>which are part of the Department of Energy be brought

0:08:09.480 --> 0:08:13.440
<v Speaker 1>into this assessment because he wants to put every tool

0:08:14.000 --> 0:08:17.600
<v Speaker 1>at use to be able to figure out what happened here. Yes,

0:08:17.680 --> 0:08:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Sullivan says, key members of Congress will be involved in

0:08:20.560 --> 0:08:23.080
<v Speaker 1>the loop. Now. Macau says, by the way, it is

0:08:23.080 --> 0:08:26.320
<v Speaker 1>easing its masking policy, citing what it calls a stable

0:08:26.360 --> 0:08:30.360
<v Speaker 1>COVID nineteen situation of the territory. Starting today, people will

0:08:30.400 --> 0:08:34.280
<v Speaker 1>not be required to wear masks while outdoors. As China's

0:08:34.280 --> 0:08:37.439
<v Speaker 1>president Chiesi and paying ready to travel to Moscow, Uscia

0:08:37.520 --> 0:08:41.079
<v Speaker 1>Director William Burns on CBS has heard here on Bloomberg

0:08:41.120 --> 0:08:45.120
<v Speaker 1>says there's still the open question about supplying weapons to Russia. Well,

0:08:45.160 --> 0:08:49.600
<v Speaker 1>we're confident that the Chinese leadership is considering the provision

0:08:49.640 --> 0:08:52.880
<v Speaker 1>of lethal equipment. We also don't see that a final

0:08:52.920 --> 0:08:56.040
<v Speaker 1>decision has been made yet, and we don't see evidence

0:08:56.080 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 1>of actual shipments of lethal equipment, and Burns says that

0:08:59.880 --> 0:09:02.360
<v Speaker 1>is why it is very important that President and Secretary

0:09:02.360 --> 0:09:06.040
<v Speaker 1>of State blank and keep emphasizing what the consequences would

0:09:06.040 --> 0:09:09.240
<v Speaker 1>be if arms did flow that way. Meanwhile, Burne says

0:09:09.240 --> 0:09:13.160
<v Speaker 1>intelligence is showing Russian President Putin isolating himself with just

0:09:13.240 --> 0:09:16.520
<v Speaker 1>a handful of advisers, a sense of cockiness in Eubrius,

0:09:17.840 --> 0:09:21.080
<v Speaker 1>a sense, I think reflecting Putin's own view, his own

0:09:21.120 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 1>belief today that he can make time work for him,

0:09:24.240 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 1>that he believes he can grind down the Ukrainians, that

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:31.240
<v Speaker 1>he can wear down our European allies, that political fatigue

0:09:31.240 --> 0:09:33.800
<v Speaker 1>will eventually sit in and we'll just keep sending his

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:38.120
<v Speaker 1>military and weaponry to fight. New York City remembering today

0:09:38.120 --> 0:09:41.000
<v Speaker 1>of the nineteen ninety three terrorist attack on the World

0:09:41.000 --> 0:09:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Trade Center. More than one thousand people were injured when

0:09:44.080 --> 0:09:46.760
<v Speaker 1>a van loaded with twelve hundred pounds of explosives was

0:09:47.200 --> 0:09:51.040
<v Speaker 1>detonated under the North Tower. A tower remained until it

0:09:51.160 --> 0:09:53.320
<v Speaker 1>was taken down a nine to eleven eight years later.

0:09:53.600 --> 0:09:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Governor Kathy hokel at the memorial today, words that I

0:09:57.000 --> 0:10:01.839
<v Speaker 1>can give will never he'll the scars, the pain, but

0:10:02.040 --> 0:10:04.800
<v Speaker 1>just know that the memory of your loved one will

0:10:04.840 --> 0:10:08.200
<v Speaker 1>never ever dissipate. It is something we in New York

0:10:08.559 --> 0:10:12.640
<v Speaker 1>will always ensure that the memory is never lost. Six

0:10:12.679 --> 0:10:16.839
<v Speaker 1>people did lose their lives on that day thirty years ago.

0:10:17.640 --> 0:10:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Global News powered by more than twenty seven hundred journalists

0:10:20.520 --> 0:10:22.960
<v Speaker 1>and analysts in over one hundred and twenty countries. In

0:10:23.080 --> 0:10:27.599
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco, I'm at Baxter and this is Bloomberg. This

0:10:27.720 --> 0:10:31.120
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Gaberkasia and Brian Curtis along with Rishad Salamat.

0:10:31.120 --> 0:10:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Our guest is David Chow, global market strategists for the

0:10:33.880 --> 0:10:37.559
<v Speaker 1>Asia Pacific at Investco. David, we talked about a lot

0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:40.720
<v Speaker 1>of these uncertain factors all of a sudden, really hitting

0:10:40.800 --> 0:10:44.480
<v Speaker 1>risk assets. Are you reducing exposure here and if so,

0:10:44.600 --> 0:10:49.440
<v Speaker 1>how much? I think that it makes sense that investors

0:10:49.440 --> 0:10:53.880
<v Speaker 1>are a bit cautious given the higher than an expected

0:10:53.920 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 1>inflation print that we've seen and some of the unevenness

0:10:57.240 --> 0:11:00.880
<v Speaker 1>in China's reopening. And I think this is healthy given

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 1>you know how well risk as it have perform from

0:11:04.400 --> 0:11:06.320
<v Speaker 1>the start of the gate this year. And I think

0:11:06.360 --> 0:11:09.960
<v Speaker 1>that we're having a moment where investors sess out some

0:11:10.000 --> 0:11:13.160
<v Speaker 1>of the risks and headwinds that the market faces. And

0:11:13.240 --> 0:11:15.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that this is this is to be expected.

0:11:16.520 --> 0:11:18.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean quite in sympitive. It was just a case

0:11:18.480 --> 0:11:20.720
<v Speaker 1>of getting out of the gates too far, too fast.

0:11:22.160 --> 0:11:25.439
<v Speaker 1>I think so. I think especially on some of the

0:11:25.840 --> 0:11:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Chinese reopening play, and I think that play is essentially

0:11:30.800 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 1>over now. I think that investors will start to focus

0:11:34.040 --> 0:11:38.680
<v Speaker 1>more on fundamentals and what rich sectors and industry will

0:11:38.679 --> 0:11:40.480
<v Speaker 1>will continue to rebound in China for the rest of

0:11:40.480 --> 0:11:44.360
<v Speaker 1>the year. Well, we mentioned that it was one month's

0:11:44.440 --> 0:11:47.240
<v Speaker 1>data really that caused a change in thinking. Once you

0:11:47.320 --> 0:11:50.000
<v Speaker 1>had that Job's report, and then followed up by the

0:11:50.880 --> 0:11:54.200
<v Speaker 1>CPI and the PPI data and now the PCE, you've

0:11:54.200 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 1>seen a real change in investor behavior. Is it important

0:11:59.000 --> 0:12:03.200
<v Speaker 1>to move cautiously because that may not follow through in

0:12:03.200 --> 0:12:05.959
<v Speaker 1>February and March or do you think that that's been

0:12:05.960 --> 0:12:10.800
<v Speaker 1>the story all along. Well, that's right. One month data

0:12:10.880 --> 0:12:13.360
<v Speaker 1>does not make a trend. But how many times have

0:12:13.559 --> 0:12:17.000
<v Speaker 1>we've heard or we've expected the FED to pivot because

0:12:17.160 --> 0:12:20.720
<v Speaker 1>of inflation coming down, you know, around the corner, and

0:12:20.880 --> 0:12:23.840
<v Speaker 1>that certainly hasn't happened, and so I think that investors

0:12:24.480 --> 0:12:27.880
<v Speaker 1>could be disappointed, especially those that expect that have been

0:12:27.920 --> 0:12:32.280
<v Speaker 1>expecting a pause or a cut later on this year.

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 1>I think it's very clear that we're not going to

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:36.040
<v Speaker 1>get that cut at the end of the year. It

0:12:36.080 --> 0:12:38.160
<v Speaker 1>could be as you know, more like you know, the

0:12:38.200 --> 0:12:42.600
<v Speaker 1>middle of next year, and so it's just expectations I'm

0:12:42.679 --> 0:12:46.280
<v Speaker 1>not being met. So, you know, with that thesis as

0:12:46.320 --> 0:12:48.439
<v Speaker 1>to what you think may will be happening with the

0:12:48.520 --> 0:12:54.640
<v Speaker 1>FED reserve, how do you position yourself to gain from that? Well,

0:12:54.679 --> 0:12:58.559
<v Speaker 1>I think that it makes sense for fixed income investors

0:12:58.559 --> 0:13:01.520
<v Speaker 1>to be positioned on the shore duration short end of

0:13:01.559 --> 0:13:04.320
<v Speaker 1>the curve. The market is paying investors to wait a

0:13:04.360 --> 0:13:09.000
<v Speaker 1>short term, though I think taking on additional duration could

0:13:09.040 --> 0:13:13.559
<v Speaker 1>provide limited benefits, though it could act as a recessionary head.

0:13:15.160 --> 0:13:18.200
<v Speaker 1>We talked about all these other factors besides inflation and

0:13:18.240 --> 0:13:20.959
<v Speaker 1>the FED. It happened that it was the anniversary of

0:13:20.960 --> 0:13:23.600
<v Speaker 1>the Ukraine War, so that's very much in focus. The

0:13:23.640 --> 0:13:26.360
<v Speaker 1>reopening in China has been called into question a little,

0:13:26.400 --> 0:13:29.640
<v Speaker 1>and you have US China tensions, a sell down in tech.

0:13:30.840 --> 0:13:35.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious about the bow Fund story, and you're thinking

0:13:35.200 --> 0:13:40.120
<v Speaker 1>on that now that he's said to be cooperating according

0:13:40.200 --> 0:13:44.040
<v Speaker 1>to the company itself, does that challenge the adage of

0:13:44.160 --> 0:13:48.280
<v Speaker 1>kill the chicken to scare the monkey. Well, I am

0:13:48.320 --> 0:13:53.000
<v Speaker 1>a bit surprised that this has been telegraphed so broadly.

0:13:53.679 --> 0:13:56.040
<v Speaker 1>I was in the mindset that the government is pretty

0:13:56.120 --> 0:14:00.959
<v Speaker 1>much in the green when it comes to kind of

0:14:01.440 --> 0:14:05.240
<v Speaker 1>oversight issues, given that the focus has really been prioritized

0:14:05.320 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 1>on economic growth this year. So I think we'll really

0:14:08.920 --> 0:14:12.000
<v Speaker 1>have to see how this one plays out. But in general,

0:14:12.040 --> 0:14:14.400
<v Speaker 1>I think that the government has taken a much more

0:14:15.760 --> 0:14:19.600
<v Speaker 1>market trendly approach towards ensuring that we have growth and

0:14:19.720 --> 0:14:21.720
<v Speaker 1>that and that I think that we're pretty much out

0:14:21.720 --> 0:14:25.160
<v Speaker 1>of the regulatory woods for at least for this year. Yeah,

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:27.240
<v Speaker 1>we're always a good against some hiccups like this, I

0:14:27.280 --> 0:14:31.640
<v Speaker 1>suppose ultimately, and that always then remains that there's going

0:14:31.720 --> 0:14:35.000
<v Speaker 1>to become some sort of a discount for Chinese equities

0:14:35.040 --> 0:14:38.880
<v Speaker 1>and If so, what do you think it is. Well,

0:14:38.920 --> 0:14:43.760
<v Speaker 1>we've seen a historical discount between Chinese equities and the

0:14:43.880 --> 0:14:49.080
<v Speaker 1>US equities and developed markets, and I think that I

0:14:49.120 --> 0:14:53.080
<v Speaker 1>think that as China's economy continues to mature and become

0:14:53.120 --> 0:14:54.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's the second largest econoty of the world,

0:14:55.560 --> 0:14:58.160
<v Speaker 1>and the capital markets also start to mature as well,

0:14:58.200 --> 0:15:01.120
<v Speaker 1>I think that that historical discount to start too narrow.

0:15:01.360 --> 0:15:06.640
<v Speaker 1>But certainly there there are there are significant differences in

0:15:06.640 --> 0:15:10.640
<v Speaker 1>the political economy between China uh and the developed markets,

0:15:10.680 --> 0:15:13.040
<v Speaker 1>and I think that that will continue to be an

0:15:13.040 --> 0:15:15.880
<v Speaker 1>issue that that investors will have to see through or

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:20.120
<v Speaker 1>better understand. We had some key earnings last week in

0:15:20.160 --> 0:15:23.320
<v Speaker 1>this part of the world from Baidu and Ali Baba.

0:15:23.600 --> 0:15:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Did you learn anything in there that you didn't know before? Well,

0:15:28.480 --> 0:15:31.440
<v Speaker 1>I would say that what I cleaned is that the

0:15:31.720 --> 0:15:36.400
<v Speaker 1>consumption recovery, especially to to e commerce, continues to be

0:15:36.480 --> 0:15:39.800
<v Speaker 1>very strong. The data, the consumption data coming out of

0:15:40.040 --> 0:15:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Chinese New Year was very strong um and especially in

0:15:45.040 --> 0:15:48.560
<v Speaker 1>mobility and also on the purchases. But I would say

0:15:48.600 --> 0:15:50.840
<v Speaker 1>that the consumption recovery for the rest of the year

0:15:50.920 --> 0:15:53.280
<v Speaker 1>will will continue, but it will it could be a

0:15:53.280 --> 0:15:55.080
<v Speaker 1>bit lumpy um, and so we're not going to see

0:15:55.080 --> 0:15:57.840
<v Speaker 1>a very strong V shape recovery. We know that Chinese

0:15:57.880 --> 0:16:00.760
<v Speaker 1>household are sitting on a pile of xss CAT, but

0:16:00.880 --> 0:16:03.880
<v Speaker 1>we don't expect them to spend that as quickly. I say,

0:16:04.120 --> 0:16:09.760
<v Speaker 1>how American households did blackhum thousand and twenty one. This

0:16:10.000 --> 0:16:12.800
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Daybreak Asia, your morning brief on the stories

0:16:12.880 --> 0:16:16.040
<v Speaker 1>making news from Hong Kong to Singapore and Wall Street.

0:16:16.120 --> 0:16:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Look for us on your podcast feed every day, on Apple, Spotify,

0:16:20.320 --> 0:16:22.840
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. You can also

0:16:22.880 --> 0:16:25.480
<v Speaker 1>listen live each day on Bloomberg eleven three zero in

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 1>New York, Bloomberg ninety nine one in Washington, Bloomberg one

0:16:29.200 --> 0:16:32.480
<v Speaker 1>oh sixty one in Boston, and Bloomberg nine sixty in

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:35.840
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco. Our flagship New York station is also available

0:16:35.920 --> 0:16:40.360
<v Speaker 1>on your Amazon Alexa devices. Just say Alexa play Bloomberg

0:16:40.360 --> 0:16:43.680
<v Speaker 1>eleven thirty plus. Listen coast to coast on the Bloomberg

0:16:43.720 --> 0:16:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Business app, Sirius XM Channel one nineteen, the iHeartRadio app,

0:16:48.480 --> 0:16:52.240
<v Speaker 1>and on Bloomberg dot Com. I'm Brian Curtis and I'm

0:16:52.280 --> 0:16:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Doug Prisoner. Join us again. Tomorrow for all the news

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:58.000
<v Speaker 1>unique to start your day right here on Bloomberg Daybreak,

0:16:58.040 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Asia Hey