WEBVTT - Friday Flight - Housing Boom Busts, AI-Induced Outrage, & Infinite Workdays #1023

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Had of Money.

0:00:01.440 --> 0:00:02.759
<v Speaker 2>I'm Joel Matt.

0:00:02.880 --> 0:00:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Today we're talking housing, boom busts, AI induced outrage, and

0:00:07.080 --> 0:00:08.000
<v Speaker 1>infinite work days.

0:00:27.760 --> 0:00:30.880
<v Speaker 2>Infinite work days sound much less appeeling than the infinite

0:00:30.960 --> 0:00:33.720
<v Speaker 2>pool that you want to be at sipping a drink

0:00:33.840 --> 0:00:34.600
<v Speaker 2>while you're on vacation.

0:00:34.640 --> 0:00:35.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna need you to come in on Sunday for

0:00:36.000 --> 0:00:37.160
<v Speaker 1>those TPS reports, Matt.

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:41.239
<v Speaker 2>Do people even understand office space references anymore?

0:00:41.400 --> 0:00:43.479
<v Speaker 1>I would hope. So it's still one of the greatest

0:00:43.479 --> 0:00:47.159
<v Speaker 1>comedies of all time. If you're a boomer, like you know,

0:00:48.200 --> 0:00:51.599
<v Speaker 1>they don't make great comedies any it is more all right,

0:00:51.640 --> 0:00:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Derek Thompson, No, they don't.

0:00:53.000 --> 0:00:55.040
<v Speaker 2>Oh I know, yeah, Yeah, that's something he harps on.

0:00:55.240 --> 0:00:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Just how it's just true.

0:00:56.320 --> 0:00:58.840
<v Speaker 2>It is true, and I think the reasons given often

0:00:58.960 --> 0:01:01.920
<v Speaker 2>are it's definitely they is. It's less something that you

0:01:01.920 --> 0:01:05.040
<v Speaker 2>can translate to other cultures and countries, right, like as

0:01:05.080 --> 0:01:08.520
<v Speaker 2>opposed to like a big action. Everyone understands fear, everyone

0:01:08.600 --> 0:01:13.480
<v Speaker 2>understands suspense. Comedy can be more of a regional certainly

0:01:13.480 --> 0:01:14.960
<v Speaker 2>a more country based thing. Yeah.

0:01:15.000 --> 0:01:17.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, Joe Dirt. I think hits in every region, Matt.

0:01:17.959 --> 0:01:20.640
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, maybe not in China, which is where Hollywood

0:01:20.640 --> 0:01:21.960
<v Speaker 1>needs to make movies that do well there.

0:01:22.000 --> 0:01:25.080
<v Speaker 2>Now the okay, so the Office Space, I feel like

0:01:25.080 --> 0:01:27.120
<v Speaker 2>it was just more of a Gen X movie as

0:01:27.120 --> 0:01:32.560
<v Speaker 2>opposed to it. Yes, our generation wasn't really watching King

0:01:32.600 --> 0:01:35.200
<v Speaker 2>of the Hill, which is like coming back, all right,

0:01:35.280 --> 0:01:38.119
<v Speaker 2>Joel over here making a case for Office Space. If

0:01:38.120 --> 0:01:40.399
<v Speaker 2>you've never seen it, go out, wash it and let's

0:01:40.400 --> 0:01:41.440
<v Speaker 2>see if it still holds up.

0:01:41.480 --> 0:01:43.560
<v Speaker 1>And you can email me if you wasted an hour

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:45.000
<v Speaker 1>and a half of your time. But I'm gonna say

0:01:45.120 --> 0:01:47.840
<v Speaker 1>a dreamail out there had a money pottedt gmail dot com.

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:49.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to read the email both of us.

0:01:50.080 --> 0:01:53.280
<v Speaker 1>I will reply just if you hate it, then you're wrong,

0:01:53.320 --> 0:01:54.120
<v Speaker 1>but you can tell me why.

0:01:54.160 --> 0:01:55.920
<v Speaker 2>All right, now, this is our Friday flight and we

0:01:55.960 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 2>are going to cover the top personal finance stories we

0:01:58.200 --> 0:02:00.680
<v Speaker 2>came across this past week, the ones that we think

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:02.720
<v Speaker 2>are gonna impact you the most, the ones that we

0:02:02.760 --> 0:02:04.600
<v Speaker 2>think that you need to be paying attention to.

0:02:04.840 --> 0:02:08.919
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, real quick. The so we bought a used Peloton

0:02:08.960 --> 0:02:11.960
<v Speaker 1>bike for Emily. She's like, we have this little sun

0:02:12.040 --> 0:02:14.280
<v Speaker 1>room that's right off are That was your.

0:02:14.160 --> 0:02:17.280
<v Speaker 2>Project for this summer. It was to reclaim the sun room.

0:02:17.360 --> 0:02:20.080
<v Speaker 1>The kids had taken it over and we had to declutter,

0:02:20.240 --> 0:02:21.760
<v Speaker 1>and we wanted it to be more of a room

0:02:21.800 --> 0:02:23.040
<v Speaker 1>that that she and I get to used. I've got

0:02:23.080 --> 0:02:25.800
<v Speaker 1>my little sona tent in there, she's got I've got

0:02:25.840 --> 0:02:27.360
<v Speaker 1>my rolling machines, she's got a little Peloton.

0:02:27.480 --> 0:02:28.880
<v Speaker 2>I feel like the first thing that's gonna break on

0:02:28.919 --> 0:02:30.959
<v Speaker 2>your portable sauna tent is the zipper.

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:34.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so far as held up surprisingly.

0:02:33.680 --> 0:02:36.400
<v Speaker 2>Well, I can totally see you go into unzip it

0:02:37.560 --> 0:02:39.239
<v Speaker 2>today and it's just gonna pull off.

0:02:39.240 --> 0:02:41.320
<v Speaker 1>And you say, that's also why I got it at

0:02:41.360 --> 0:02:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Costco because I was looking at ones on Amazon, but

0:02:44.240 --> 0:02:46.200
<v Speaker 1>I was like, I got Costco because the return policy

0:02:46.200 --> 0:02:46.639
<v Speaker 1>is much better.

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:49.519
<v Speaker 2>But would you feel how long? How many uses to

0:02:49.600 --> 0:02:52.079
<v Speaker 2>would you put it through before you would feel bad

0:02:52.080 --> 0:02:53.720
<v Speaker 2>about taking it back? Because we've talked about this is

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:55.600
<v Speaker 2>why we can't have nice things at Costco anymore, because

0:02:55.600 --> 0:02:58.440
<v Speaker 2>people abuse it. I'll probably getting to that point where, yeah,

0:02:58.440 --> 0:03:02.560
<v Speaker 2>if it broke today, since my nine month birthday, so.

0:03:02.600 --> 0:03:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, not really that long six months, So if it

0:03:05.280 --> 0:03:09.560
<v Speaker 1>broke today, I'd be morally questionable. Yeah, okay, all right, Peloton,

0:03:09.720 --> 0:03:13.000
<v Speaker 1>So Peloton bought a used Peloton on Facebook marketplace from somebody.

0:03:13.000 --> 0:03:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Even though Peloton and we talked about this, has their

0:03:15.600 --> 0:03:18.840
<v Speaker 1>own site for reselling used Pelotons now, but they're way

0:03:18.880 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 1>more expensive than buying it from the slew of people

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:23.760
<v Speaker 1>who are selling their Pelotons on Facebook. The price has

0:03:23.800 --> 0:03:25.880
<v Speaker 1>gone down dramatically because everyone's trying to get rid of

0:03:25.880 --> 0:03:29.520
<v Speaker 1>their glorified code hanger that that is their Peloton.

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:31.480
<v Speaker 2>They're like, I've been tired of looking at this thing

0:03:31.520 --> 0:03:33.280
<v Speaker 2>for the price four years, so that I got back

0:03:33.320 --> 0:03:33.919
<v Speaker 2>in twenty one.

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Yes, when Emily's other age, she's been using it, she's

0:03:37.280 --> 0:03:40.360
<v Speaker 1>been enjoying it. But the one thing I was surprised

0:03:40.680 --> 0:03:44.240
<v Speaker 1>by and a little bit frustrated about when we bought

0:03:44.440 --> 0:03:47.560
<v Speaker 1>the used Peloton. You know what Peloton is trying to

0:03:47.600 --> 0:03:52.120
<v Speaker 1>do to siphon money from users. If you buy a

0:03:52.200 --> 0:03:54.560
<v Speaker 1>used bike, they want to charge you a one hundred

0:03:54.600 --> 0:03:59.040
<v Speaker 1>dollars activation fee for switching that bike over to another account.

0:03:59.480 --> 0:04:01.680
<v Speaker 2>It is an activation fee.

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it was already activated by somebody else being used,

0:04:05.440 --> 0:04:08.240
<v Speaker 1>and you're trying to switch it over to be suited

0:04:08.240 --> 0:04:08.600
<v Speaker 1>your name.

0:04:08.640 --> 0:04:10.280
<v Speaker 2>So it would be like Apple, It's like you selling

0:04:10.280 --> 0:04:12.320
<v Speaker 2>your phone and being like yep, i've wiped it here.

0:04:12.360 --> 0:04:12.480
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:04:12.560 --> 0:04:15.200
<v Speaker 2>This one's a totally factory reset, and the Apple being

0:04:15.200 --> 0:04:16.800
<v Speaker 2>like no, no, no, we get a cut of that because

0:04:16.880 --> 0:04:18.280
<v Speaker 2>somebody else is going to know use it.

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:20.960
<v Speaker 1>It would be exactly like that. That's so stupid, like, hey,

0:04:20.960 --> 0:04:22.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to sell my book and then the author

0:04:22.720 --> 0:04:25.600
<v Speaker 1>gets actually gets paid, we get more royalty.

0:04:25.960 --> 0:04:27.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah no, that's not how it works. How they use

0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:28.599
<v Speaker 2>market works man.

0:04:28.520 --> 0:04:30.839
<v Speaker 1>Utterally ridiculous, totally, this is the kind of thing that

0:04:30.920 --> 0:04:33.840
<v Speaker 1>only a brand like Peloton could get away with where

0:04:34.080 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 1>they've they're just banking on rich customers who don't care

0:04:37.400 --> 0:04:38.800
<v Speaker 1>about money, and they're like, I guess this is just

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:39.919
<v Speaker 1>part of doing business.

0:04:39.920 --> 0:04:43.039
<v Speaker 2>But that's not what you did, right, Okay, give me

0:04:43.120 --> 0:04:46.800
<v Speaker 2>the ravocate or yeah, some eravocate success story.

0:04:46.800 --> 0:04:48.880
<v Speaker 1>You've got to call in and advocate for yourself. This is,

0:04:48.920 --> 0:04:51.120
<v Speaker 1>by the way, if you want like a nerdy economist term,

0:04:51.160 --> 0:04:53.200
<v Speaker 1>it's called rent seeking. And this is totally that. This

0:04:53.240 --> 0:04:56.000
<v Speaker 1>would be a great definition of rent seeking by Peloton

0:04:56.040 --> 0:04:59.160
<v Speaker 1>saying like, listen, we've already, like gott we've landed our

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:02.280
<v Speaker 1>hooks into this territory, and it's a way we can

0:05:02.320 --> 0:05:05.360
<v Speaker 1>just make extra money just fleecing people who don't deserve

0:05:05.400 --> 0:05:09.640
<v Speaker 1>to be fleeced, and it's pretty unethical also, But so

0:05:09.720 --> 0:05:11.919
<v Speaker 1>I called Peloton. I'm like, listen, we don't want to

0:05:11.920 --> 0:05:13.640
<v Speaker 1>pay this fee, Like what in the world do we

0:05:13.680 --> 0:05:15.960
<v Speaker 1>do to avoid this thing? And it took talking to

0:05:16.000 --> 0:05:18.440
<v Speaker 1>a couple of different representatives. You just kind of have

0:05:18.520 --> 0:05:22.040
<v Speaker 1>to keep pushing the envelope to get them to finally agree.

0:05:21.760 --> 0:05:24.800
<v Speaker 2>To talking to customer service people. It's not my favorite.

0:05:25.080 --> 0:05:25.600
<v Speaker 1>I wish it was.

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:27.360
<v Speaker 2>You're willing to do it, but I'm willing to do it,

0:05:27.400 --> 0:05:29.960
<v Speaker 2>especially for a hundred bucks. So it was just a

0:05:29.960 --> 0:05:33.800
<v Speaker 2>one time so you gotta waved kind of waved nice. Yeah,

0:05:33.920 --> 0:05:35.960
<v Speaker 2>very nice dude. All right, Well for all the folks.

0:05:36.240 --> 0:05:38.080
<v Speaker 2>This is for obviously for everyone other there who's thinking

0:05:38.080 --> 0:05:41.160
<v Speaker 2>about getting the secondhand Peloton, or you can just jump

0:05:41.160 --> 0:05:43.120
<v Speaker 2>on the bike that you already have mm hmm right

0:05:43.160 --> 0:05:45.520
<v Speaker 2>out there. The tradition, I like prefer to ride on

0:05:45.520 --> 0:05:48.440
<v Speaker 2>the street, the traditional bike in the wild scenario or

0:05:48.480 --> 0:05:49.720
<v Speaker 2>the winds blowing through your hair.

0:05:50.520 --> 0:05:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Emily and I differ in this regard. I bike, I

0:05:52.640 --> 0:05:53.360
<v Speaker 1>ride on my real bike.

0:05:53.440 --> 0:05:56.320
<v Speaker 2>She rides. You get the passion neighbors have a conversation

0:05:56.440 --> 0:05:58.799
<v Speaker 2>with them. Cuts down on emissions because you're not driving

0:05:58.800 --> 0:06:02.040
<v Speaker 2>your vehicle, Combine it with needing to run an errand yep,

0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:05.239
<v Speaker 2>not to mention the cost savings of the aforementioned benefits.

0:06:05.279 --> 0:06:06.400
<v Speaker 1>I'll let you talk.

0:06:06.240 --> 0:06:08.839
<v Speaker 2>To my wife about it. Hey, I'll do it. Also.

0:06:09.000 --> 0:06:10.520
<v Speaker 2>Maybe one of the things you're talking about with your

0:06:10.560 --> 0:06:13.680
<v Speaker 2>neighbors as you're riding past their house is, Oh, what

0:06:13.720 --> 0:06:15.200
<v Speaker 2>do you think about the so and so's over there?

0:06:15.240 --> 0:06:16.919
<v Speaker 2>They got their house listed for saless been sitting on

0:06:16.920 --> 0:06:19.360
<v Speaker 2>the market forever. There's one in our neighborhood. That's literally

0:06:19.400 --> 0:06:21.159
<v Speaker 2>a conversation I had with one of our neighbors, like

0:06:21.320 --> 0:06:23.320
<v Speaker 2>what's going on with it? It's like, Oh, hasn't been

0:06:23.360 --> 0:06:26.839
<v Speaker 2>renovated recently? You think the uh it's overpriced? Well, I

0:06:26.839 --> 0:06:28.400
<v Speaker 2>think it is. And I think that's one of the

0:06:28.480 --> 0:06:30.960
<v Speaker 2>questions a lot of folks are wondering, is like, has

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:34.560
<v Speaker 2>there been a housing like bubble essentially and is it

0:06:34.600 --> 0:06:37.800
<v Speaker 2>about to pop? And I would say that it's it

0:06:38.120 --> 0:06:40.360
<v Speaker 2>seems more like a slow leak as like versus just

0:06:40.360 --> 0:06:41.680
<v Speaker 2>like a sudden popping.

0:06:41.560 --> 0:06:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Right less two thousand and nine more its own thing.

0:06:44.160 --> 0:06:48.240
<v Speaker 2>Exactly yeah, yeah, numbers from almost every corner of the

0:06:48.279 --> 0:06:51.919
<v Speaker 2>market out there are showing asking price decreases. There is

0:06:51.960 --> 0:06:55.000
<v Speaker 2>showing more sellar concessions, inventory decreases as.

0:06:54.920 --> 0:06:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Well, inventory increases more I'm sorry on the market.

0:06:58.320 --> 0:07:01.400
<v Speaker 2>Yea, more homes are on the market, which, to be honest, though,

0:07:01.400 --> 0:07:05.720
<v Speaker 2>it's also just returning back to like pre pandemic norms. Essentially,

0:07:05.720 --> 0:07:08.760
<v Speaker 2>we saw a significant decline and that was in large

0:07:08.800 --> 0:07:12.720
<v Speaker 2>part why there was such an increase in housing prices.

0:07:13.240 --> 0:07:17.720
<v Speaker 2>But we're also seeing more cancellations after houses are going

0:07:17.800 --> 0:07:21.040
<v Speaker 2>under contract. Folks are basically getting cold feet during due diligence,

0:07:21.560 --> 0:07:24.080
<v Speaker 2>and this is such a far cry, dude, from a

0:07:24.080 --> 0:07:27.720
<v Speaker 2>few years ago. Homeowners obviously don't love seeing this, and

0:07:28.120 --> 0:07:31.440
<v Speaker 2>sellers of course are not pleased. You know, like back

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:34.200
<v Speaker 2>when there was an open house and buyers were lined

0:07:34.280 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 2>up around the block just to be able to get

0:07:35.800 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 2>in and see the place. It's not like that.

0:07:37.800 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Remember those calls for highest and best like two years ago,

0:07:40.920 --> 0:07:44.240
<v Speaker 1>three years ago, and the insanity of how much people

0:07:44.280 --> 0:07:46.640
<v Speaker 1>are willing to pay and bid up the price. It

0:07:46.800 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 1>was really unseen. I don't remember a time at least

0:07:50.480 --> 0:07:51.720
<v Speaker 1>in my life where that was the case.

0:07:51.800 --> 0:07:53.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So I want to put a note out there

0:07:53.880 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 2>for a lot of folks who have been thinking about

0:07:56.800 --> 0:07:59.160
<v Speaker 2>purchasing the home because I think, dude, this is my

0:07:59.200 --> 0:08:01.800
<v Speaker 2>personal opinion. I think now is the time to strike personally,

0:08:01.880 --> 0:08:04.240
<v Speaker 2>So byek I do because I don't think. I don't

0:08:04.240 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 2>think we're going to continue to see declient. So I

0:08:06.960 --> 0:08:09.640
<v Speaker 2>this morning, I pretended to be a chart analyst and I.

0:08:09.600 --> 0:08:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Pulled up the I was gonna say, how did you

0:08:11.160 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 1>come to this school?

0:08:11.880 --> 0:08:13.400
<v Speaker 2>What am I basing this on? And I pulled up

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 2>some data from the FED. I was looking at the chart,

0:08:14.880 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 2>and if you look at just the trend, So if

0:08:17.440 --> 0:08:20.040
<v Speaker 2>you look at the median home price in the US

0:08:20.760 --> 0:08:23.560
<v Speaker 2>from starting from around nine twenty ten, and if you

0:08:23.640 --> 0:08:26.360
<v Speaker 2>follow that up to pre pans so like around twenty nineteen,

0:08:26.760 --> 0:08:29.600
<v Speaker 2>there's a pretty consistent line. Uh. And then of course

0:08:29.640 --> 0:08:32.000
<v Speaker 2>what you saw slight decrease, but then you see it

0:08:32.000 --> 0:08:35.080
<v Speaker 2>shoot up. Specifically, a lot of folks are thinking about

0:08:35.080 --> 0:08:37.640
<v Speaker 2>the last fifteen years as when we saw these massive

0:08:37.640 --> 0:08:40.680
<v Speaker 2>price increases. I think all that was just kind of

0:08:40.679 --> 0:08:43.720
<v Speaker 2>catching back up to where things needed to be after

0:08:44.040 --> 0:08:47.679
<v Speaker 2>the housing crisis, price back seven eight nine exactly.

0:08:47.280 --> 0:08:49.199
<v Speaker 1>Like in twenty eleven, you could get a house for

0:08:50.160 --> 0:08:50.760
<v Speaker 1>not much money.

0:08:50.920 --> 0:08:54.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and so I think all that was relatively healthy growth.

0:08:54.480 --> 0:08:58.000
<v Speaker 2>But what we saw basically in the two years twenty

0:08:58.040 --> 0:09:01.040
<v Speaker 2>to twenty two, we saw a massive increase. It goes COVID.

0:09:01.679 --> 0:09:03.160
<v Speaker 2>It all comes back to COVID. And if you draw

0:09:03.160 --> 0:09:06.760
<v Speaker 2>that line, basically from nine to nineteen we are about

0:09:06.800 --> 0:09:10.440
<v Speaker 2>where prices should be. We saw it spike where we

0:09:10.480 --> 0:09:12.320
<v Speaker 2>got way ahead of the curve. And for the past

0:09:12.320 --> 0:09:15.880
<v Speaker 2>couple of years, two three years, we've seen prices basically plateau.

0:09:15.920 --> 0:09:17.880
<v Speaker 2>They're starting to decline just a little bit.

0:09:18.200 --> 0:09:19.880
<v Speaker 1>And it depends on local markets.

0:09:19.960 --> 0:09:22.560
<v Speaker 2>It depends on local markets, but financing as well. And

0:09:22.600 --> 0:09:25.320
<v Speaker 2>so I think personally, my personal opinion is I would

0:09:25.320 --> 0:09:29.400
<v Speaker 2>not be surprised if we see mortgage rates come down. Right,

0:09:29.400 --> 0:09:32.240
<v Speaker 2>if the FED lower's rates, which there is talk about

0:09:32.240 --> 0:09:35.800
<v Speaker 2>that potentially happening next month in September, I think that

0:09:35.840 --> 0:09:38.400
<v Speaker 2>could be the first that could be the starting line

0:09:38.480 --> 0:09:40.080
<v Speaker 2>of the market opening back up.

0:09:40.080 --> 0:09:42.960
<v Speaker 1>If mortgage rates go down, I think that will increase

0:09:43.000 --> 0:09:46.240
<v Speaker 1>buyer interest. I think you're probably right, and then maybe

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the instead of declining prices, we do start to see

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:51.200
<v Speaker 1>prices go up again. But just at a far less

0:09:51.240 --> 0:09:52.000
<v Speaker 1>accelerated pace.

0:09:52.040 --> 0:09:54.280
<v Speaker 2>It will not be at the pace that we've seen because.

0:09:54.000 --> 0:09:56.680
<v Speaker 1>That was just unsustainable. Yeah, totally, and I think but

0:09:56.720 --> 0:09:59.880
<v Speaker 1>I think this does maybe as far as advice for

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:02.839
<v Speaker 1>potential home buyers, have a plan to own longer, because

0:10:02.840 --> 0:10:05.040
<v Speaker 1>it's really hard to know where the housing market goes

0:10:05.040 --> 0:10:09.440
<v Speaker 1>from here. I appreciate your your insights, Matt, and you

0:10:09.480 --> 0:10:11.240
<v Speaker 1>really might be right my hot take. Yeah, I mean

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:14.840
<v Speaker 1>you might be right, but like my I know somebody

0:10:14.920 --> 0:10:16.920
<v Speaker 1>right now in my family who's selling a home after

0:10:16.960 --> 0:10:20.200
<v Speaker 1>owning it for two years, and that's just there's a

0:10:20.280 --> 0:10:23.080
<v Speaker 1>chance because of just what's happened with housing prices that

0:10:23.160 --> 0:10:26.200
<v Speaker 1>she's going to do okay, even after you know real

0:10:26.280 --> 0:10:30.280
<v Speaker 1>estate realtor expenses. But there's also it's a hard position

0:10:30.320 --> 0:10:32.839
<v Speaker 1>to put yourself in, and if you're planning, the longer

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:35.640
<v Speaker 1>you plan to own, the more likely it is to

0:10:35.720 --> 0:10:37.920
<v Speaker 1>be a decent decision to buy, even if you are

0:10:38.120 --> 0:10:38.960
<v Speaker 1>slightly overpaying.

0:10:39.000 --> 0:10:39.560
<v Speaker 2>Totally agree.

0:10:39.840 --> 0:10:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of agents, got an email the other day criticizing us.

0:10:43.360 --> 0:10:46.600
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about three percent fees for real estate agents. Well,

0:10:47.360 --> 0:10:49.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, if they don't charge that much anymore, is

0:10:49.559 --> 0:10:53.800
<v Speaker 1>what the emailer said, well, legally, they don't have the

0:10:53.800 --> 0:10:57.040
<v Speaker 1>same leeway to just flat out charge three percent based

0:10:57.080 --> 0:11:00.720
<v Speaker 1>on that ruling against the National Association of Realtors practice

0:11:00.920 --> 0:11:05.680
<v Speaker 1>agent compensation hasn't really changed much since that ruling, but

0:11:06.679 --> 0:11:09.640
<v Speaker 1>for savvy consumers who know how to negotiate, some people

0:11:09.720 --> 0:11:12.240
<v Speaker 1>are able to claw back some of the agent's fees

0:11:12.240 --> 0:11:15.160
<v Speaker 1>they would have paid. This is particularly happening at the

0:11:15.240 --> 0:11:18.079
<v Speaker 1>higher end of the spectrum, where someone's saying, well, you're

0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:21.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna sell my three million dollar home, Well, awesome, but

0:11:21.640 --> 0:11:23.679
<v Speaker 1>guess what I'm gonna pay you one and a half

0:11:23.720 --> 0:11:26.160
<v Speaker 1>percent instead of the three percent their agent's like, it's

0:11:26.200 --> 0:11:29.319
<v Speaker 1>still pretty good payday, I'll do it. But yeah, I

0:11:29.320 --> 0:11:32.720
<v Speaker 1>think technology too, is finally and slowly starting to make

0:11:33.000 --> 0:11:35.240
<v Speaker 1>an impact on this front. There are startups in some

0:11:35.400 --> 0:11:38.280
<v Speaker 1>states that are helping a sliver of buyers of all

0:11:38.320 --> 0:11:41.920
<v Speaker 1>price points to majorly cut transaction costs. One called Turbo Home,

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:45.400
<v Speaker 1>another one called shop prop, and another one called Arriva.

0:11:45.520 --> 0:11:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Will link to these in the show notes, but.

0:11:47.160 --> 0:11:49.920
<v Speaker 2>These I'd like to say, Arriva arrive at that and

0:11:50.240 --> 0:11:52.800
<v Speaker 2>you've arrived at your home. Arriva makes me think more

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:55.720
<v Speaker 2>of speedy Gonzales the little mouse, which I'm pretty sure

0:11:55.720 --> 0:11:56.600
<v Speaker 2>he was probably canceled or.

0:11:56.600 --> 0:11:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Also makes me think of like the coldsor medication for

0:11:58.800 --> 0:12:00.560
<v Speaker 1>some reason. Arriva, Yeah, I don't know why.

0:12:00.679 --> 0:12:04.160
<v Speaker 2>What is it called the the canker sore? It sound

0:12:04.200 --> 0:12:05.800
<v Speaker 2>like the little wand and you put it on your

0:12:06.280 --> 0:12:08.559
<v Speaker 2>sore and it like numbs. It probably what's I thought

0:12:08.559 --> 0:12:12.800
<v Speaker 2>it was called like be something, but no, it's called Burreva. No.

0:12:12.920 --> 0:12:18.160
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, all right, but for me, yeah, but

0:12:18.200 --> 0:12:22.040
<v Speaker 3>these three different startups are a potentially good way for

0:12:22.120 --> 0:12:24.559
<v Speaker 3>buyers and sellers to kind of hook up at a

0:12:24.559 --> 0:12:25.400
<v Speaker 3>fraction of the price.

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:27.560
<v Speaker 1>And this really like when you look at how much

0:12:27.800 --> 0:12:31.560
<v Speaker 1>transaction costs are in the typical transaction, you're you could

0:12:31.559 --> 0:12:34.719
<v Speaker 1>be talking about ten thousand dollars or more in savings

0:12:34.960 --> 0:12:37.280
<v Speaker 1>and awesome agents can really be worth worth the fee.

0:12:37.840 --> 0:12:40.120
<v Speaker 1>But there's also a growing place, I think, for agents

0:12:40.160 --> 0:12:42.880
<v Speaker 1>who charge reduced fees and for technology to kind of

0:12:42.880 --> 0:12:45.559
<v Speaker 1>grease the wheels of real estate transactions, making it a

0:12:45.600 --> 0:12:48.199
<v Speaker 1>little easier to buy and sell and less costly.

0:12:48.440 --> 0:12:51.000
<v Speaker 2>That's right, so a couple of years ago, I think

0:12:51.000 --> 0:12:52.840
<v Speaker 2>it was back in twenty three Joel we talked about

0:12:52.880 --> 0:12:57.480
<v Speaker 2>how medical debt below a certain threshold wouldn't affect your credit.

0:12:57.760 --> 0:13:01.680
<v Speaker 2>Well that's no longer the case. Originally, back under the

0:13:01.720 --> 0:13:05.840
<v Speaker 2>Biden administration, the CFPP, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, they

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:10.280
<v Speaker 2>instituted a medical debt rule that benefited millions of Americans

0:13:10.320 --> 0:13:13.520
<v Speaker 2>out there by not penalizing the credit for small medical debts.

0:13:13.760 --> 0:13:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah less than five hundred bucks, right, Yeah, that's right.

0:13:16.640 --> 0:13:20.240
<v Speaker 2>That was recently overturned by a judge. But even still,

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:23.600
<v Speaker 2>credit bureaus they have the ability to factor medical debt

0:13:23.640 --> 0:13:27.360
<v Speaker 2>in different ways, and all three are still not including

0:13:27.400 --> 0:13:29.400
<v Speaker 2>bounces below five hundred bucks. So that's good.

0:13:29.480 --> 0:13:32.080
<v Speaker 1>It's not legally mandated, but a choice that they're making.

0:13:32.120 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 2>It's like a yeah, And there's there's a lot of

0:13:33.960 --> 0:13:35.640
<v Speaker 2>that actually that we're going to cover today in different

0:13:35.760 --> 0:13:38.040
<v Speaker 2>in varying ways. Where there are there have been different

0:13:38.480 --> 0:13:42.080
<v Speaker 2>recommendations perhaps or even an executive order that's not necessarily

0:13:42.120 --> 0:13:45.840
<v Speaker 2>enforceable by law because it's not something that Congress is

0:13:45.880 --> 0:13:48.520
<v Speaker 2>taking any action on. But there's also a one year

0:13:48.760 --> 0:13:52.960
<v Speaker 2>grace period before overdue medical debt gets reported, So we

0:13:53.000 --> 0:13:55.320
<v Speaker 2>want we're putting this out there as a nice little PSA.

0:13:55.400 --> 0:13:58.319
<v Speaker 2>We want folks to be aware and specifically as well

0:13:58.360 --> 0:13:59.839
<v Speaker 2>to go back and listen to some of the different

0:13:59.880 --> 0:14:04.240
<v Speaker 2>up episodes that where we've discussed negotiating medical debts. If

0:14:04.240 --> 0:14:06.560
<v Speaker 2>you are finding yourself in a situation where you're like,

0:14:06.640 --> 0:14:08.640
<v Speaker 2>oh my gosh, got hit with medical bill that I

0:14:08.679 --> 0:14:10.480
<v Speaker 2>was not expecting. We don't have the money on hand

0:14:10.520 --> 0:14:12.440
<v Speaker 2>for that. Even if hey, even if you do have

0:14:12.480 --> 0:14:14.600
<v Speaker 2>the money on hand, like Joeldaes, when it comes to

0:14:14.640 --> 0:14:16.760
<v Speaker 2>some different fees that these companies are hitting you with,

0:14:17.440 --> 0:14:19.960
<v Speaker 2>it is always worth negotiating and see if you can

0:14:20.000 --> 0:14:21.240
<v Speaker 2>push back. I could pay.

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Peloton on our bucks, but I'm not going to. And

0:14:22.800 --> 0:14:24.840
<v Speaker 1>it's right basically, Well, it's been said to Matt on

0:14:24.880 --> 0:14:28.280
<v Speaker 1>the Credit Core Creditcore Front that you are the average

0:14:28.480 --> 0:14:30.480
<v Speaker 1>of the five people you spend the most time with.

0:14:30.720 --> 0:14:32.280
<v Speaker 1>And I think there's a lot of truth to that,

0:14:32.400 --> 0:14:35.200
<v Speaker 1>right that we rub off on each other, I've learned

0:14:35.240 --> 0:14:39.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot being your friend. I think what my life

0:14:39.640 --> 0:14:41.240
<v Speaker 1>would look like would be different if we didn't hang

0:14:41.240 --> 0:14:41.680
<v Speaker 1>out so much.

0:14:41.720 --> 0:14:42.960
<v Speaker 2>It wouldn't be nearly as cool.

0:14:43.280 --> 0:14:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's true, that's definitely true.

0:14:45.880 --> 0:14:48.560
<v Speaker 2>In fact, first, I wouldn't know half of the Great

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:51.040
<v Speaker 2>musical artists that I know because of you, as you're

0:14:51.080 --> 0:14:53.320
<v Speaker 2>sitting there wearing your brand new billy string shirt. And

0:14:53.360 --> 0:14:56.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm sorry that I have not even commented on. I

0:14:56.200 --> 0:14:58.400
<v Speaker 2>know you're excited about the glorious, isn't I commented on

0:14:58.440 --> 0:14:59.880
<v Speaker 2>the one that you had on yesterday. I wear a

0:15:00.480 --> 0:15:03.440
<v Speaker 2>but this one it's purple. Yeah, it is not a

0:15:03.440 --> 0:15:05.560
<v Speaker 2>lot of men out there are rock and purple purple

0:15:05.600 --> 0:15:09.720
<v Speaker 2>tieye baby, I'm I'm all for it. Uh yeah, especially

0:15:09.920 --> 0:15:12.880
<v Speaker 2>Joel's not scared, especially when I'm supporting the best guitarist

0:15:12.920 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 2>of all time.

0:15:13.560 --> 0:15:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Okay, but credit scores. This new Harvard study of twenty

0:15:17.560 --> 0:15:22.240
<v Speaker 1>five million people found that financial habits are similar to

0:15:22.560 --> 0:15:24.800
<v Speaker 1>other people who grow up in an environment like yours.

0:15:25.080 --> 0:15:28.080
<v Speaker 1>So you rub shoulders with folks for eighteen years, and

0:15:28.240 --> 0:15:31.680
<v Speaker 1>you're likely to have similar credit scores and loan delinquency rates.

0:15:32.200 --> 0:15:36.400
<v Speaker 1>And that's actually not terribly surprising to me. There are,

0:15:36.560 --> 0:15:40.720
<v Speaker 1>of course, like individual examples of folks rising above their circumstances.

0:15:41.360 --> 0:15:43.960
<v Speaker 1>But I see this as another reason to get on

0:15:44.040 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 1>the ground personal finance education into neighborhoods that need it most.

0:15:47.760 --> 0:15:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Because one of the toughest things about doing what you

0:15:50.720 --> 0:15:53.360
<v Speaker 1>and I do. Matt is realizing that there's a bunch

0:15:53.360 --> 0:15:57.280
<v Speaker 1>of people who grew up without any helpful personal finance advice,

0:15:57.280 --> 0:16:00.320
<v Speaker 1>and they're probably not like on their podcastcher saying, what

0:16:00.480 --> 0:16:02.600
<v Speaker 1>is like a good personal finance podcast that can help

0:16:02.640 --> 0:16:04.280
<v Speaker 1>me out at this point in time, it's just kind

0:16:04.280 --> 0:16:06.800
<v Speaker 1>of off their radar. And so I think it's a

0:16:06.840 --> 0:16:09.240
<v Speaker 1>good call for us to surround ourselves with folks who

0:16:09.360 --> 0:16:13.400
<v Speaker 1>encourage us on money journey. But also it's just kind

0:16:13.400 --> 0:16:15.880
<v Speaker 1>of discouraging in some ways too to realize that there

0:16:15.920 --> 0:16:18.560
<v Speaker 1>are some people who are going to be more difficult

0:16:18.600 --> 0:16:20.440
<v Speaker 1>to help. It's going to be harder to find those people.

0:16:20.480 --> 0:16:21.920
<v Speaker 2>I think a lot of those folks it's less the

0:16:21.960 --> 0:16:24.040
<v Speaker 2>advice and it's more that there's also just nobody in

0:16:24.080 --> 0:16:28.320
<v Speaker 2>their life who has lived it out essentially right, Like

0:16:28.360 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 2>oftentimes we look to mentors or just others that we

0:16:30.960 --> 0:16:33.720
<v Speaker 2>can look up to. Actually, on that note, do you

0:16:33.760 --> 0:16:38.040
<v Speaker 2>see the report by USAA about gen Z. Everyone likes

0:16:38.080 --> 0:16:40.280
<v Speaker 2>to pick on gen Z and they're saying that like

0:16:40.320 --> 0:16:42.560
<v Speaker 2>half a gen zs don't even know what their credit

0:16:42.640 --> 0:16:46.360
<v Speaker 2>score is or even like what constitutes their credit school. Yeah,

0:16:46.360 --> 0:16:48.560
<v Speaker 2>they don't know how it's made up, And I appreciate

0:16:48.640 --> 0:16:51.760
<v Speaker 2>that USA is trying to shine light on the younger generations, right,

0:16:51.800 --> 0:16:53.360
<v Speaker 2>because like that's kind of what you were speaking to

0:16:53.440 --> 0:16:56.120
<v Speaker 2>as well, like making sure that we are doing what

0:16:56.160 --> 0:16:58.160
<v Speaker 2>we can to help those around us, and maybe to

0:16:58.200 --> 0:17:00.960
<v Speaker 2>a certain extent, USAA is doing that well. But also

0:17:01.480 --> 0:17:04.280
<v Speaker 2>half of you gen Z, the gen Z generation are

0:17:04.280 --> 0:17:07.000
<v Speaker 2>like middle schoolers and high schoolers. So there's a part

0:17:07.000 --> 0:17:08.400
<v Speaker 2>of that too where I'm just like, I'm not I'm

0:17:08.400 --> 0:17:11.280
<v Speaker 2>also not going to necessarily expect a middle schooler or

0:17:11.280 --> 0:17:13.560
<v Speaker 2>a high schooler to know what their credit score is

0:17:13.600 --> 0:17:15.480
<v Speaker 2>because it's like, well, you probably don't really have a

0:17:15.520 --> 0:17:19.040
<v Speaker 2>credit I don't know. I didn't dive into that study

0:17:19.080 --> 0:17:21.720
<v Speaker 2>in depth, but I think there is a large part

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:24.919
<v Speaker 2>of that generation who they're just getting started, right, And

0:17:25.000 --> 0:17:27.160
<v Speaker 2>just like we back in the day, what did we do?

0:17:27.200 --> 0:17:30.480
<v Speaker 2>We focused on being cheap. You actually are seeing gen

0:17:30.560 --> 0:17:33.159
<v Speaker 2>Z doing more of that sort of stuff. Embracing being

0:17:33.280 --> 0:17:35.320
<v Speaker 2>frugal is something that I saw reported recently.

0:17:35.520 --> 0:17:37.480
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't have told you much about credit scores or

0:17:37.520 --> 0:17:39.280
<v Speaker 1>credit reports when I was in middle school either.

0:17:39.119 --> 0:17:40.800
<v Speaker 2>So exactly. Yeah, So I think we all just need

0:17:40.800 --> 0:17:42.880
<v Speaker 2>to kind of play our part to educating the next

0:17:42.960 --> 0:17:45.920
<v Speaker 2>generation of financial savvy Americans. Yeah.

0:17:45.920 --> 0:17:49.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think though, as you get older and

0:17:49.240 --> 0:17:52.399
<v Speaker 1>the credit score is a big part of our financial lives,

0:17:52.440 --> 0:17:55.840
<v Speaker 1>and so knowing what your credit score is, knowing how

0:17:55.960 --> 0:17:59.760
<v Speaker 1>your credit score comes about, like the factors that make

0:17:59.760 --> 0:18:02.040
<v Speaker 1>it up up is important. We've got information on that

0:18:02.359 --> 0:18:04.919
<v Speaker 1>at our website, howdomoney dot com. Matt, let's talk about

0:18:04.960 --> 0:18:08.440
<v Speaker 1>executive a new executive order for a second. That actually

0:18:08.480 --> 0:18:11.040
<v Speaker 1>makes it more likely that your workplace retirement account is

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:14.399
<v Speaker 1>going to have access to even more investment options. That

0:18:14.640 --> 0:18:20.919
<v Speaker 1>sounds like a good thing, including alternative assets cryptocurrency. The basically,

0:18:21.200 --> 0:18:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the how this was worded in the executive order is

0:18:24.800 --> 0:18:28.720
<v Speaker 1>that the Department of Labor is supposed to revisit fiduciary guidelines.

0:18:29.119 --> 0:18:32.240
<v Speaker 1>And when you kind of pull the curtain up on that,

0:18:32.240 --> 0:18:35.600
<v Speaker 1>that the only way that they can make this or

0:18:35.640 --> 0:18:39.879
<v Speaker 1>that this executive order can push retirement accounts in this

0:18:40.000 --> 0:18:43.240
<v Speaker 1>direction to offer more alternative assets and cryptocurrency is to

0:18:43.280 --> 0:18:46.720
<v Speaker 1>say that the fiduciary standard isn't as big of a deal.

0:18:47.480 --> 0:18:50.679
<v Speaker 1>And so I don't love that, Matt, because I don't

0:18:50.720 --> 0:18:54.440
<v Speaker 1>necessarily think that people need access to alternative investments and

0:18:54.480 --> 0:18:57.399
<v Speaker 1>more cryptocurrency inside of their four o one ks. And

0:18:57.480 --> 0:19:00.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of on another point, like all the you know,

0:19:00.600 --> 0:19:04.280
<v Speaker 1>working on a smart selection that doesn't overwhelm folks. There's

0:19:04.280 --> 0:19:06.600
<v Speaker 1>not sixty two different versions of Ketchup and Aldi, There's

0:19:06.600 --> 0:19:09.680
<v Speaker 1>like two, right, And so I think most people already

0:19:09.680 --> 0:19:12.280
<v Speaker 1>get overwhelmed when trying to choose what to invest in,

0:19:12.320 --> 0:19:14.879
<v Speaker 1>like which fund makes sense for them. And then a

0:19:14.920 --> 0:19:17.439
<v Speaker 1>lot of the funds that could become available in the

0:19:17.440 --> 0:19:21.720
<v Speaker 1>aftermath of this executive order, they're inferior in so many ways. Right,

0:19:21.720 --> 0:19:25.000
<v Speaker 1>They're more illiquid, they come with higher fees, and then

0:19:25.240 --> 0:19:28.600
<v Speaker 1>the kicker, they don't produce higher returns on average. So

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:31.199
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how effective this executive order is going

0:19:31.280 --> 0:19:33.560
<v Speaker 1>to be. And when you might start seeing some of

0:19:33.600 --> 0:19:36.320
<v Speaker 1>these different funds available in your four to one K.

0:19:36.720 --> 0:19:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Is this like months down the road or years down

0:19:38.600 --> 0:19:41.399
<v Speaker 1>the road? I don't know, But it doesn't matter to me.

0:19:41.520 --> 0:19:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Like I think index funds the thing that we talk

0:19:43.080 --> 0:19:45.240
<v Speaker 1>about all the time, it doesn't matter if like eighty

0:19:45.240 --> 0:19:49.560
<v Speaker 1>two funds are added to your roster of choices tomorrow,

0:19:50.000 --> 0:19:51.400
<v Speaker 1>it still shouldn't change what you pick.

0:19:51.560 --> 0:19:54.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I see what you're doing. Here you are putting

0:19:54.800 --> 0:19:57.080
<v Speaker 2>head to head my love of aldi and the lack

0:19:57.119 --> 0:19:59.879
<v Speaker 2>of options there with my desire for a libertarian option

0:20:00.240 --> 0:20:02.920
<v Speaker 2>right and for the market to decide, Because on one hand,

0:20:03.280 --> 0:20:05.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm with you, I don't want there to be more

0:20:05.040 --> 0:20:07.240
<v Speaker 2>options for folks to kind of muddy the waters. But

0:20:07.520 --> 0:20:09.320
<v Speaker 2>at the same time, I want the market to decide,

0:20:09.320 --> 0:20:11.000
<v Speaker 2>and I want the market to say, is this something

0:20:11.040 --> 0:20:13.240
<v Speaker 2>that's valuable or not? And if it is, it will

0:20:13.280 --> 0:20:15.640
<v Speaker 2>succeed and do well. If it isn't, then it's something

0:20:15.680 --> 0:20:18.320
<v Speaker 2>that hopefully will in most cases most of these cases,

0:20:18.359 --> 0:20:20.400
<v Speaker 2>hopefully it'll just end up dying on the vine as

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:22.520
<v Speaker 2>opposed to being something that more and more folks get

0:20:22.560 --> 0:20:26.720
<v Speaker 2>pulled into. As we are talking about alternative assets, specifically crypto,

0:20:27.480 --> 0:20:30.840
<v Speaker 2>owning some crypto can actually help you to get a mortgage. Possibly,

0:20:31.359 --> 0:20:34.760
<v Speaker 2>Fanny and Freddy they are pivoting to factoring in your

0:20:34.800 --> 0:20:39.440
<v Speaker 2>crypto holdings when they are making loans. Now, if you were,

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:41.800
<v Speaker 2>let's say an early adopter and you've got a decent

0:20:41.960 --> 0:20:44.520
<v Speaker 2>chunk of bitcoin, well, that can help you to qualify

0:20:44.560 --> 0:20:48.080
<v Speaker 2>for a mortgage, which this could be a good idea.

0:20:48.400 --> 0:20:51.840
<v Speaker 2>I like, like they are truly assets, right, and so today,

0:20:52.000 --> 0:20:56.240
<v Speaker 2>were someone to liquidate their holdings of let's say bitcoin,

0:20:56.320 --> 0:20:58.040
<v Speaker 2>Let's say they you know, they had one bitcoin, that's

0:20:58.080 --> 0:20:59.880
<v Speaker 2>a lot of money that could go towards a down

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:04.840
<v Speaker 2>payment on two thousand dollars. It depends on the money, yeah,

0:21:04.880 --> 0:21:08.240
<v Speaker 2>exactly by the second. But given that volatility, that's also

0:21:08.280 --> 0:21:12.080
<v Speaker 2>the downside because it's just like, well, the underwriting process

0:21:12.160 --> 0:21:15.480
<v Speaker 2>is typically let's just say, it doesn't move as quickly

0:21:15.560 --> 0:21:18.480
<v Speaker 2>as crypto prices do. And so I could also see

0:21:18.480 --> 0:21:20.880
<v Speaker 2>that not being a great thing if you were counting

0:21:20.920 --> 0:21:23.560
<v Speaker 2>on some of that money for your down payment, as

0:21:23.600 --> 0:21:26.040
<v Speaker 2>opposed to actually, if you want to use some of

0:21:26.080 --> 0:21:28.320
<v Speaker 2>those funds, maybe you should go ahead and liquidate that

0:21:28.640 --> 0:21:30.679
<v Speaker 2>and then you could put that towards a down payment.

0:21:30.720 --> 0:21:33.080
<v Speaker 2>But hopefully it doesn't really matter all that much because

0:21:33.080 --> 0:21:35.880
<v Speaker 2>there aren't how the money listeners don't have an overwhelming

0:21:36.240 --> 0:21:39.159
<v Speaker 2>percentage of their portfolio in cryptocurrencies. Maybe it does a

0:21:39.160 --> 0:21:40.920
<v Speaker 2>little bit enough to be interested, And that's what I've

0:21:40.960 --> 0:21:42.520
<v Speaker 2>got going on. Yeah, it's sort of like factoring at

0:21:42.560 --> 0:21:45.879
<v Speaker 2>the margins exactly. And again this is more guidance that

0:21:45.960 --> 0:21:50.120
<v Speaker 2>has been given at the executive level. So the staying

0:21:50.200 --> 0:21:53.520
<v Speaker 2>power of this. How much it actually does impact loans

0:21:53.520 --> 0:21:55.560
<v Speaker 2>that are going to be made and moving forward is

0:21:55.760 --> 0:21:56.560
<v Speaker 2>yet to be determined.

0:21:56.680 --> 0:21:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we've got more to get to, Matt, including how

0:21:59.440 --> 0:22:04.399
<v Speaker 1>artificial and intelligence is frustrating people who travel and rent

0:22:04.400 --> 0:22:07.480
<v Speaker 1>cars regularly. We'll talk about that and some interesting workplace

0:22:07.480 --> 0:22:10.200
<v Speaker 1>trends as well. We'll get to those stories and more

0:22:10.280 --> 0:22:10.800
<v Speaker 1>right after this.

0:22:18.760 --> 0:22:21.920
<v Speaker 2>Right, buddy, we are back from the break, and now

0:22:21.920 --> 0:22:24.560
<v Speaker 2>it is time, of course, for the ludicrous headline of

0:22:24.600 --> 0:22:26.960
<v Speaker 2>the week. We're gonna spend a minute here talking about

0:22:27.800 --> 0:22:29.960
<v Speaker 2>artificial intelligence, the old AI.

0:22:30.960 --> 0:22:32.840
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of new, but it's Yeah, I don't know,

0:22:33.200 --> 0:22:33.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:22:33.640 --> 0:22:34.920
<v Speaker 2>I feel like at this point.

0:22:34.760 --> 0:22:37.440
<v Speaker 1>It does feel like there's too much talk about it much.

0:22:37.520 --> 0:22:39.560
<v Speaker 1>But this is where the rubber hits the road, right here, Matt,

0:22:39.640 --> 0:22:40.800
<v Speaker 1>with this story tifically.

0:22:40.840 --> 0:22:42.639
<v Speaker 2>I like this story a whole lot. Actually, I mean

0:22:42.680 --> 0:22:47.040
<v Speaker 2>that in a very literal sense. It does. This one's

0:22:47.040 --> 0:22:51.800
<v Speaker 2>from Sherwood headline reads Hurts says it's AI powered damage

0:22:51.840 --> 0:22:56.160
<v Speaker 2>scanners are supposed to enhance your customer experience and part Okay,

0:22:56.160 --> 0:22:58.080
<v Speaker 2>So I was just saying that I am glad that

0:22:58.160 --> 0:22:59.880
<v Speaker 2>I actually like I'm a big fan of the story.

0:23:00.320 --> 0:23:03.600
<v Speaker 2>Sherwood is out there doing some real, some real journalism.

0:23:03.680 --> 0:23:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, they are, because it's just like Robin Hood's news.

0:23:06.400 --> 0:23:08.679
<v Speaker 2>Brand, which initially when when they rolled it out. So

0:23:08.760 --> 0:23:10.959
<v Speaker 2>this is a little bit of media talk, right. So

0:23:11.000 --> 0:23:12.760
<v Speaker 2>there's some shows we listened to and they the whole

0:23:12.760 --> 0:23:14.399
<v Speaker 2>time they just talk about media and some of the

0:23:14.400 --> 0:23:17.960
<v Speaker 2>different outlets and what's wrong with the world of media specifically.

0:23:18.160 --> 0:23:19.879
<v Speaker 2>So this is gonna be our tiny little segment how

0:23:19.920 --> 0:23:22.439
<v Speaker 2>to drill down on as we as we talk about that.

0:23:22.840 --> 0:23:26.720
<v Speaker 2>But I was skeptical of Sherwood initially. First of all,

0:23:26.920 --> 0:23:29.640
<v Speaker 2>it's kind of a too catchy of a name coming

0:23:29.680 --> 0:23:32.800
<v Speaker 2>from Robinhood as a trading platform. It's like, of course

0:23:33.240 --> 0:23:36.439
<v Speaker 2>you're gonna name your your news outlet media outlet here

0:23:36.560 --> 0:23:40.640
<v Speaker 2>think Sherwood. But the author of this piece was listening

0:23:40.680 --> 0:23:44.080
<v Speaker 2>in to the Earnings Call of Hurts and that's how

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:47.560
<v Speaker 2>he discovered the fact that they were implementing some of

0:23:47.600 --> 0:23:51.920
<v Speaker 2>this AI say again quote quote unquote enhance the customer experience,

0:23:51.920 --> 0:23:54.440
<v Speaker 2>and it turns out that it's actually harming the customer.

0:23:54.560 --> 0:23:56.119
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's like the nitty gritty stuff that you have

0:23:56.160 --> 0:23:59.040
<v Speaker 1>to do as a reporter to get the good story, right, Yeah,

0:23:59.119 --> 0:24:00.880
<v Speaker 1>listen to the earnings call. And I don't know.

0:24:00.840 --> 0:24:02.679
<v Speaker 2>Because because the thing is that these companies they're not

0:24:02.680 --> 0:24:06.280
<v Speaker 2>broadcasting necessarily, some of them are, and they're learning really quickly,

0:24:06.359 --> 0:24:09.320
<v Speaker 2>ooh well yeah, when we are using this against you,

0:24:09.400 --> 0:24:12.600
<v Speaker 2>customers don't like that. But if they are quietly mentioning

0:24:12.640 --> 0:24:16.080
<v Speaker 2>it on an earnings call, they're thinking, all right, this

0:24:16.119 --> 0:24:18.399
<v Speaker 2>isn't no onman's going to hear about this except for

0:24:18.400 --> 0:24:21.000
<v Speaker 2>the investors, and it's going to positively impact our share price,

0:24:21.040 --> 0:24:23.640
<v Speaker 2>which it did in this case. But the customer out there,

0:24:23.760 --> 0:24:26.600
<v Speaker 2>the renters of vehicles, they're not going to hear about it. No,

0:24:27.119 --> 0:24:27.800
<v Speaker 2>we heard about it.

0:24:27.800 --> 0:24:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Well they are, they're hearing about it. And so so

0:24:29.600 --> 0:24:33.040
<v Speaker 1>customers are basically saying that they've received post rental bills

0:24:33.080 --> 0:24:35.399
<v Speaker 1>for damage that they didn't inflict on the car they rented.

0:24:35.440 --> 0:24:38.160
<v Speaker 1>So they're like, what the AI scanner. Yeah, I didn't

0:24:38.160 --> 0:24:39.919
<v Speaker 1>get in an accident. I didn't bump in anything like

0:24:40.000 --> 0:24:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Matt did in Scotland. Like that wasn't me so good

0:24:43.520 --> 0:24:47.720
<v Speaker 1>thing that was pre AI scanner right. Well. Sherwood says

0:24:47.720 --> 0:24:49.960
<v Speaker 1>that one customer was charged one hundred ninety five dollars

0:24:50.200 --> 0:24:53.040
<v Speaker 1>for a dent that looked like it crashed into an ant. Yeah,

0:24:53.040 --> 0:24:56.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a really funny one, great description, And I get

0:24:56.240 --> 0:24:58.920
<v Speaker 1>that Hurtz wants to save on labor costs by having

0:24:59.160 --> 0:25:03.080
<v Speaker 1>AI scan cars for damage versus using humans, But they

0:25:03.119 --> 0:25:05.480
<v Speaker 1>and other car rental companies they run the risk of

0:25:05.560 --> 0:25:10.800
<v Speaker 1>alienating their customers by fabricating these charges. And have you

0:25:10.840 --> 0:25:12.479
<v Speaker 1>seen what they look like, Matt. It looks kind of

0:25:12.520 --> 0:25:15.080
<v Speaker 1>like what humans walk through at the airport as they

0:25:15.080 --> 0:25:17.359
<v Speaker 1>go through security. Those scanners tsa scanner, it's kind of

0:25:17.400 --> 0:25:19.080
<v Speaker 1>like that for a car, and it's like taking these,

0:25:19.240 --> 0:25:21.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, three sixty videos and photos. And it has

0:25:22.040 --> 0:25:24.760
<v Speaker 1>obviously with think about how good cameras are now, how

0:25:25.119 --> 0:25:27.720
<v Speaker 1>much detail they can get into, and they can find

0:25:28.040 --> 0:25:31.760
<v Speaker 1>those seemingly insignificant scratches that you probably didn't even put

0:25:31.800 --> 0:25:33.840
<v Speaker 1>on the car. It was there already, and then they

0:25:33.840 --> 0:25:37.040
<v Speaker 1>can say, yeah, previous customer, this is on you.

0:25:37.080 --> 0:25:39.440
<v Speaker 2>But if it was there already, wouldn't it have been

0:25:39.440 --> 0:25:40.920
<v Speaker 2>caught by the previous renter.

0:25:41.000 --> 0:25:43.200
<v Speaker 1>You would think so maybe, But they're also so minor

0:25:43.240 --> 0:25:45.239
<v Speaker 1>that a human never would have done anything about it.

0:25:45.359 --> 0:25:50.240
<v Speaker 1>And typically you wouldn't be charged for a minor, minor scratch.

0:25:50.280 --> 0:25:52.080
<v Speaker 2>So I think one like the guy at Scotland. I

0:25:52.119 --> 0:25:54.080
<v Speaker 2>was just like, oh, you know kinda, He's like, oh,

0:25:54.080 --> 0:25:56.520
<v Speaker 2>don't worry about it. Yeah, I'm not going to even try.

0:25:57.640 --> 0:26:00.400
<v Speaker 1>But well, and one of the one of the people

0:26:00.440 --> 0:26:02.199
<v Speaker 1>can do to protect themselves is to just is to

0:26:02.240 --> 0:26:04.320
<v Speaker 1>take a three sixty video as you're walking around the.

0:26:04.240 --> 0:26:08.000
<v Speaker 2>Car zero your own skin. Yeah. I always take a

0:26:08.040 --> 0:26:08.560
<v Speaker 2>ton of photos.

0:26:08.600 --> 0:26:10.880
<v Speaker 1>And that way, if you get called out, you get

0:26:10.920 --> 0:26:12.199
<v Speaker 1>some sort of bill in the mail, you can be

0:26:12.240 --> 0:26:14.159
<v Speaker 1>like no, no, no, that was here before or what are

0:26:14.200 --> 0:26:16.560
<v Speaker 1>you talking about, Like do it before and after and

0:26:16.600 --> 0:26:18.640
<v Speaker 1>then say it's not on my video or I don't

0:26:18.640 --> 0:26:19.360
<v Speaker 1>see anything here.

0:26:19.520 --> 0:26:20.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:26:20.280 --> 0:26:21.920
<v Speaker 1>That way you can at least have a fighting chance.

0:26:22.000 --> 0:26:24.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I get it. I'm of two minds because on

0:26:24.320 --> 0:26:26.080
<v Speaker 2>from the renter's perspective, you don't want to get hit

0:26:26.080 --> 0:26:28.760
<v Speaker 2>with a bill for a small little ding but like

0:26:28.840 --> 0:26:31.359
<v Speaker 2>from well even from a renter's like, imagine you're the

0:26:31.359 --> 0:26:33.600
<v Speaker 2>next rent right and like, as this happens over the

0:26:33.600 --> 0:26:37.399
<v Speaker 2>course of multiple rentals, multiple renters, you end up getting

0:26:37.400 --> 0:26:38.879
<v Speaker 2>a car that's all dinged up, Like that's not what

0:26:38.920 --> 0:26:41.119
<v Speaker 2>you're paying for when you rent a bran new vehicle.

0:26:41.200 --> 0:26:43.840
<v Speaker 2>So from a renter's point of view, it's it keeps

0:26:43.840 --> 0:26:46.320
<v Speaker 2>the standard high. But then also for hurts, they're you know,

0:26:46.320 --> 0:26:49.040
<v Speaker 2>they unload these vehicles after a couple of years and

0:26:49.080 --> 0:26:50.639
<v Speaker 2>when they go to auction these things off. If if

0:26:50.680 --> 0:26:52.480
<v Speaker 2>you've got a car that's all dinged up with nothing

0:26:52.520 --> 0:26:53.920
<v Speaker 2>to show for it, well you're gonna get a whole

0:26:53.960 --> 0:26:56.439
<v Speaker 2>lot less for it. But I will say one of

0:26:56.440 --> 0:26:58.520
<v Speaker 2>the other examples was like a drop out of water

0:26:59.080 --> 0:27:02.040
<v Speaker 2>was on the car and that was initially cited by

0:27:02.119 --> 0:27:04.800
<v Speaker 2>one of the customers. It was flagged to a customer

0:27:05.280 --> 0:27:07.320
<v Speaker 2>as a dent and they're like, no, man, that's some rain.

0:27:07.440 --> 0:27:10.600
<v Speaker 2>That was like, that's water, and they apologize, really, oh sorry,

0:27:10.640 --> 0:27:12.439
<v Speaker 2>Actually I don't even even know if they apologize. But

0:27:12.440 --> 0:27:14.600
<v Speaker 2>he didn't have to pay anything because of that. So

0:27:14.640 --> 0:27:16.080
<v Speaker 2>you've got to be careful if it's not ready for

0:27:16.080 --> 0:27:18.440
<v Speaker 2>prime time. Yet. That's another reason to maybe slow the

0:27:18.520 --> 0:27:21.199
<v Speaker 2>role when it comes to implementing some of this. But

0:27:21.440 --> 0:27:24.720
<v Speaker 2>it's just fascinating because how it is that a company

0:27:25.200 --> 0:27:27.960
<v Speaker 2>rolls something like this out has such an impact on

0:27:28.320 --> 0:27:31.760
<v Speaker 2>how a company's perceived, which then therefore has an impact

0:27:31.840 --> 0:27:34.760
<v Speaker 2>on the share price of that company if it's publicly traded,

0:27:34.840 --> 0:27:36.480
<v Speaker 2>or even if you want to work for it. There's

0:27:36.520 --> 0:27:39.439
<v Speaker 2>new research from Charter that links the financial health and

0:27:39.520 --> 0:27:42.199
<v Speaker 2>the stock market returns of a company to how it

0:27:42.320 --> 0:27:45.440
<v Speaker 2>is perceived by the workforce. So, for instance, when folks

0:27:45.480 --> 0:27:48.800
<v Speaker 2>want to work for a particular employer, it has many

0:27:48.880 --> 0:27:53.280
<v Speaker 2>benefits enhancing that specific brand, right, they're attracting there and

0:27:53.320 --> 0:27:58.200
<v Speaker 2>retaining talent. It's limiting turnover, which leads to even more

0:27:58.400 --> 0:28:00.000
<v Speaker 2>positive results for that company.

0:28:00.160 --> 0:28:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. That like, the actual hiring process and training of

0:28:02.560 --> 0:28:04.879
<v Speaker 1>new employees costs so much money that if there's a

0:28:04.960 --> 0:28:07.240
<v Speaker 1>high turnover, it's an expense exactly.

0:28:07.400 --> 0:28:10.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and this then of course improves customer service and

0:28:10.160 --> 0:28:14.280
<v Speaker 2>gender's loyalty from customers. It's an upward spiral. Basically. It

0:28:14.359 --> 0:28:16.320
<v Speaker 2>just makes me think about all the different PR professionals

0:28:16.359 --> 0:28:19.119
<v Speaker 2>who are out there. If you are, if you know

0:28:19.200 --> 0:28:21.840
<v Speaker 2>somebody that has the work the title at work of

0:28:21.920 --> 0:28:24.720
<v Speaker 2>like chief Storyteller, Like all the PR folks are just

0:28:24.720 --> 0:28:27.080
<v Speaker 2>like fist pumping and just like so happy because they're like, yeah,

0:28:27.119 --> 0:28:30.520
<v Speaker 2>see what we do matters. Because truly, something like Hertz,

0:28:30.800 --> 0:28:32.399
<v Speaker 2>if they were to have rolled that out in a

0:28:32.480 --> 0:28:35.399
<v Speaker 2>very public way, they would have gotten lambasted. I mean

0:28:35.440 --> 0:28:37.919
<v Speaker 2>they they're getting called out on it already as it is,

0:28:37.960 --> 0:28:41.479
<v Speaker 2>but I've got to think that something like this is

0:28:41.960 --> 0:28:44.640
<v Speaker 2>a much easier thing to get past as opposed to

0:28:44.920 --> 0:28:47.000
<v Speaker 2>rolling this out as a new feature where they just

0:28:47.000 --> 0:28:49.400
<v Speaker 2>get ridiculed and made a fun of by the market.

0:28:49.480 --> 0:28:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Well, what you were just talking about too, with kind

0:28:52.280 --> 0:28:54.640
<v Speaker 1>of where people want to work and how that enhances

0:28:54.720 --> 0:28:56.920
<v Speaker 1>a brand. It makes me think that, like, if I

0:28:57.040 --> 0:28:59.400
<v Speaker 1>was out there looking for a job in the workforce,

0:29:00.040 --> 0:29:03.320
<v Speaker 1>instead of just looking for positions that were reflected what

0:29:03.360 --> 0:29:06.480
<v Speaker 1>I was interested in, I would be looking towards employers

0:29:06.560 --> 0:29:10.120
<v Speaker 1>who have a great reputation amongst their employees, and I

0:29:10.160 --> 0:29:12.400
<v Speaker 1>would be looking for positions at those companies that I

0:29:12.440 --> 0:29:14.720
<v Speaker 1>was interested in, absolutely, because like I want to work

0:29:14.720 --> 0:29:17.280
<v Speaker 1>for a company that treats people well, that offers great benefits,

0:29:17.280 --> 0:29:19.840
<v Speaker 1>where I could stay for a long time, instead of

0:29:19.840 --> 0:29:22.560
<v Speaker 1>just getting the position in the salary I was interested in,

0:29:23.120 --> 0:29:25.560
<v Speaker 1>because that I don't know, it might not be there

0:29:25.560 --> 0:29:27.760
<v Speaker 1>as long, it might not be as good of an experience.

0:29:27.960 --> 0:29:30.520
<v Speaker 2>Totally agree. Yeah, that's why these narratives though, are so important,

0:29:30.520 --> 0:29:33.400
<v Speaker 2>because it's almost like a self fulfilling prophecy. Yeah, if

0:29:33.400 --> 0:29:35.920
<v Speaker 2>you say that you believe in something, it attracts people

0:29:35.920 --> 0:29:38.560
<v Speaker 2>who then believe in that. A couple of brands come

0:29:38.560 --> 0:29:40.160
<v Speaker 2>to mind, but I'm not going to focus on them

0:29:40.600 --> 0:29:42.680
<v Speaker 2>at this point in time. Jo. Let's talk about hybrid work,

0:29:43.360 --> 0:29:45.400
<v Speaker 2>because I think this is an instance where we're going

0:29:45.440 --> 0:29:47.000
<v Speaker 2>to have to eat some crow. Remember we had an

0:29:47.040 --> 0:29:49.280
<v Speaker 2>episode called I think it was called hybrid work.

0:29:49.320 --> 0:29:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Is here to say that we're wrong sometimes?

0:29:53.320 --> 0:29:55.920
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, and we're going to call ourselves out on it.

0:29:56.440 --> 0:29:57.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm okay. Following on the sword here.

0:29:57.880 --> 0:30:01.880
<v Speaker 2>Hybrid work is no longer the norm, and worker leverage

0:30:02.160 --> 0:30:06.480
<v Speaker 2>is on the decline. More than half of the top

0:30:06.560 --> 0:30:10.080
<v Speaker 2>Fortune one hundred companies are requiring employees to be back

0:30:10.240 --> 0:30:12.960
<v Speaker 2>at the office full time. So I guess it's maybe

0:30:13.280 --> 0:30:16.880
<v Speaker 2>Fortune fifty companies. We got from the Fortune five hundred

0:30:16.880 --> 0:30:19.520
<v Speaker 2>to the one hundred to the fifty. But for folks

0:30:19.520 --> 0:30:22.240
<v Speaker 2>who got used to like a zero commute, basically if

0:30:22.280 --> 0:30:24.720
<v Speaker 2>they got used to having more flexible time, or maybe

0:30:24.720 --> 0:30:27.240
<v Speaker 2>even some of those folks even moved right, they're like, Oh,

0:30:27.280 --> 0:30:28.880
<v Speaker 2>location doesn't even matter.

0:30:28.920 --> 0:30:31.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm moving out to the country because I don't have

0:30:31.120 --> 0:30:33.480
<v Speaker 1>that commute. And then the employer comes to knocking and says,

0:30:33.560 --> 0:30:33.960
<v Speaker 1>yes you do.

0:30:34.160 --> 0:30:36.080
<v Speaker 2>They're like, oh, maybe I'll move to Boise, like Matt

0:30:36.200 --> 0:30:40.280
<v Speaker 2>was thinking, which is very short lived, which I'm so glad.

0:30:40.320 --> 0:30:42.280
<v Speaker 2>Oh my gosh, I'm so glad that was very short lived.

0:30:42.680 --> 0:30:44.400
<v Speaker 2>Of Course, it's nice to get paid, But is it

0:30:44.520 --> 0:30:47.920
<v Speaker 2>worth going back to this sort of old pre payan

0:30:48.240 --> 0:30:52.200
<v Speaker 2>pre COVID normalcy. There are certainly pros and cons to it.

0:30:52.200 --> 0:30:54.000
<v Speaker 2>I think there are more pros for younger workers who

0:30:54.000 --> 0:30:57.360
<v Speaker 2>are looking to show that they've got the initiative, they

0:30:57.360 --> 0:30:59.760
<v Speaker 2>got what it takes. They're trying to learn from their peers.

0:30:59.520 --> 0:31:00.240
<v Speaker 1>That face time.

0:31:00.400 --> 0:31:03.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but if your employer is pushing for some serious

0:31:03.880 --> 0:31:07.200
<v Speaker 2>back to office, you know, policies that you aren't okay with,

0:31:07.720 --> 0:31:10.760
<v Speaker 2>I would recommend to politely push back. See if this

0:31:10.840 --> 0:31:13.160
<v Speaker 2>is something that you can discuss. Is this the conversation

0:31:13.240 --> 0:31:16.600
<v Speaker 2>worth having? Hey, maybe this is maybe we can have

0:31:16.640 --> 0:31:19.360
<v Speaker 2>some sort of roundtable. This guy, I don't know, Like,

0:31:19.640 --> 0:31:21.520
<v Speaker 2>what's it called out there in the corporate world, Folks,

0:31:21.680 --> 0:31:23.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm lacking when it comes to the most latest experience

0:31:24.080 --> 0:31:25.800
<v Speaker 2>of what it's like to be in the corporate world.

0:31:26.040 --> 0:31:29.480
<v Speaker 2>That or despite the cooling labor market. I might even

0:31:29.680 --> 0:31:33.120
<v Speaker 2>be worth looking elsewhere if this is not something if

0:31:33.200 --> 0:31:35.800
<v Speaker 2>this if it has been very clearly communicated that this

0:31:35.840 --> 0:31:38.200
<v Speaker 2>isn't a conversation we're having anymore, because I still.

0:31:38.040 --> 0:31:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Think those flexible policies are gonna matter to workers and

0:31:41.800 --> 0:31:43.800
<v Speaker 1>for the best workers out there, for sure. And I

0:31:43.840 --> 0:31:46.200
<v Speaker 1>think that a lot of companies, Yeah, you can try

0:31:46.200 --> 0:31:48.720
<v Speaker 1>to go all draconian, but you will eventually have some

0:31:48.800 --> 0:31:51.040
<v Speaker 1>brain drain, and those people are gonna want to go

0:31:51.040 --> 0:31:53.640
<v Speaker 1>to companies that have a little more flexibility. I was

0:31:53.640 --> 0:31:55.720
<v Speaker 1>talking to a friend who just got a new job

0:31:56.120 --> 0:31:59.520
<v Speaker 1>at one of those big tech companies, and he was like, yeah,

0:31:59.560 --> 0:32:01.800
<v Speaker 1>I have to go in. I think I forget if

0:32:01.800 --> 0:32:04.560
<v Speaker 1>you said four or five days a week, but all

0:32:04.600 --> 0:32:06.440
<v Speaker 1>I have to do is like be there for a

0:32:06.440 --> 0:32:09.040
<v Speaker 1>little bit. So I think going in ten to two

0:32:09.160 --> 0:32:11.480
<v Speaker 1>or ten to three, and I'm avoiding traffic on both ends,

0:32:11.880 --> 0:32:14.880
<v Speaker 1>but I'm in the office, and so it's I'm giving

0:32:14.880 --> 0:32:16.400
<v Speaker 1>them what they want, but I'm kind of getting what

0:32:16.440 --> 0:32:18.360
<v Speaker 1>I want at the same time. And I do think

0:32:18.360 --> 0:32:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the companies are gonna have to be flexible.

0:32:20.640 --> 0:32:22.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, if you I think on both ends, yeah, right,

0:32:22.880 --> 0:32:24.840
<v Speaker 2>Like like for the employee. It's just like, all right, cool,

0:32:24.840 --> 0:32:26.840
<v Speaker 2>you're getting in there, you're having some of those face

0:32:26.840 --> 0:32:29.560
<v Speaker 2>to face meetings. Yeah, being a little bit more collaborative,

0:32:29.560 --> 0:32:32.280
<v Speaker 2>which is I think still easier without having to go

0:32:32.400 --> 0:32:34.160
<v Speaker 2>do it over zoom or teams or whatever.

0:32:34.240 --> 0:32:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and maybe you're doing something that in the morning,

0:32:35.760 --> 0:32:37.080
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of that when you get home, but

0:32:37.360 --> 0:32:40.080
<v Speaker 1>you're not at the office all day totally. Let's talk

0:32:40.120 --> 0:32:42.200
<v Speaker 1>about me some of the downsides of work from home.

0:32:42.240 --> 0:32:46.080
<v Speaker 1>There's this new work Trend Index report and they said

0:32:46.120 --> 0:32:48.080
<v Speaker 1>that one of the biggest downsides and this is something

0:32:48.120 --> 0:32:50.720
<v Speaker 1>I think we've seen spiral out of control, Matt. They're

0:32:50.760 --> 0:32:53.640
<v Speaker 1>calling it the infinite work day, And basically it was

0:32:53.840 --> 0:32:56.920
<v Speaker 1>a Microsoft report that found that workers are starting they're

0:32:56.920 --> 0:32:59.520
<v Speaker 1>looking at an email at six am, likely right after they

0:32:59.560 --> 0:33:03.040
<v Speaker 1>wake up, and then those workers are battling messages on

0:33:03.120 --> 0:33:06.200
<v Speaker 1>a ton of different fronts like Slack and Microsoft teams,

0:33:06.240 --> 0:33:08.440
<v Speaker 1>and then text messages and phone calls, so they feel

0:33:08.440 --> 0:33:13.640
<v Speaker 1>like they're getting inundated with requests or with coworker chatter

0:33:14.040 --> 0:33:17.880
<v Speaker 1>from every direction. Then also they're working into the evening

0:33:17.880 --> 0:33:19.600
<v Speaker 1>with a whole lot of folks. A high percentage of

0:33:19.600 --> 0:33:22.840
<v Speaker 1>people digging back into their inbox between eight and ten pm. Oh,

0:33:22.880 --> 0:33:25.280
<v Speaker 1>and then guess what. The weekends aren't free of work.

0:33:25.440 --> 0:33:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Either you're maybe expected to respond or you're at least

0:33:29.760 --> 0:33:32.320
<v Speaker 1>checking stuff trying to stay up on it even though

0:33:32.560 --> 0:33:35.960
<v Speaker 1>you're not supposed to be working. And then there's this

0:33:36.160 --> 0:33:39.160
<v Speaker 1>just the reality of work these days, where there's constant interruptions.

0:33:39.200 --> 0:33:41.880
<v Speaker 1>On average, every two minutes, you're being interrupted by a

0:33:41.960 --> 0:33:45.040
<v Speaker 1>pin from somewhere. And it makes me think of Cal Newport.

0:33:45.040 --> 0:33:47.480
<v Speaker 1>One of his first books was called Deep Work, and man,

0:33:47.560 --> 0:33:51.040
<v Speaker 1>how do you actually get deep work done when it

0:33:51.040 --> 0:33:54.320
<v Speaker 1>feels like, Okay, you're constantly playing whack a mole, right,

0:33:54.360 --> 0:33:56.600
<v Speaker 1>whether it's with messages or emails or you're just kind

0:33:56.600 --> 0:33:59.000
<v Speaker 1>of you never have that time to actually deeply focus

0:33:59.360 --> 0:33:59.960
<v Speaker 1>on a tack.

0:34:00.280 --> 0:34:01.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, what was the number? I think it was like

0:34:01.760 --> 0:34:04.640
<v Speaker 2>twenty three minutes. Once you are once you are distracted

0:34:04.640 --> 0:34:06.400
<v Speaker 2>from something, it takes you twenty three minutes to kind

0:34:06.440 --> 0:34:08.160
<v Speaker 2>of regain your focus to be able to hit that

0:34:08.200 --> 0:34:10.600
<v Speaker 2>deep work again. Yeah, which we love saying when we're

0:34:10.640 --> 0:34:14.800
<v Speaker 2>talking about distractions. But I'm also I don't know, I

0:34:14.800 --> 0:34:16.440
<v Speaker 2>don't know if I totally believe that twenty.

0:34:16.200 --> 0:34:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Three minutes like a long time lot. Sometimes your mind

0:34:19.200 --> 0:34:21.200
<v Speaker 1>wanders for a while. But I don't know, like I

0:34:21.239 --> 0:34:21.520
<v Speaker 1>get it.

0:34:21.520 --> 0:34:23.760
<v Speaker 2>I could be I get distracted easily, but I guess

0:34:23.800 --> 0:34:25.359
<v Speaker 2>even if it's half of that, Like let's just say,

0:34:25.360 --> 0:34:27.000
<v Speaker 2>even if it's ten minutes, that's a lot of time

0:34:27.680 --> 0:34:30.399
<v Speaker 2>when you are getting distracted as often as oftentimes we are.

0:34:30.480 --> 0:34:33.040
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's probably a good idea to have

0:34:33.120 --> 0:34:35.640
<v Speaker 1>some like non office hours during the day where if

0:34:35.640 --> 0:34:37.480
<v Speaker 1>you are working on a big project or you know,

0:34:37.520 --> 0:34:40.080
<v Speaker 1>some people like you mentioned pr people just a second ago, Matt,

0:34:40.800 --> 0:34:42.239
<v Speaker 1>A lot of those people like their job is to

0:34:42.280 --> 0:34:44.400
<v Speaker 1>constantly be in their inbox. So that's that's just a

0:34:44.440 --> 0:34:46.680
<v Speaker 1>different type of profession, right, But then there are other

0:34:46.719 --> 0:34:48.640
<v Speaker 1>professions where you're like, no, I have to work on

0:34:48.680 --> 0:34:51.719
<v Speaker 1>this project and I cannot be like emailing and slacking

0:34:51.760 --> 0:34:53.600
<v Speaker 1>while I'm trying to get that thing done, and you

0:34:53.840 --> 0:34:56.719
<v Speaker 1>carving out an hour in the afternoon and thirty minutes

0:34:56.760 --> 0:34:58.680
<v Speaker 1>in the morning or whatever, but carving out these specific

0:34:58.680 --> 0:35:01.160
<v Speaker 1>times where you're not responsible and kind of letting people

0:35:01.200 --> 0:35:04.560
<v Speaker 1>know that, whether it's an away from the desk message

0:35:04.640 --> 0:35:07.319
<v Speaker 1>or something like that on slack, letting your boss know Hey,

0:35:07.320 --> 0:35:09.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to be unreachable, but it's going to make

0:35:09.400 --> 0:35:12.120
<v Speaker 1>sure I'm able to meet the deadline. That's really important

0:35:12.160 --> 0:35:15.160
<v Speaker 1>to kind of set, I think, those expectations and allow

0:35:15.200 --> 0:35:17.880
<v Speaker 1>that time for yourself to do what you need to

0:35:17.960 --> 0:35:20.000
<v Speaker 1>do so that you can actually be productive and not

0:35:20.080 --> 0:35:22.440
<v Speaker 1>just be responding to whatever someone else tells you as

0:35:22.560 --> 0:35:23.160
<v Speaker 1>urgent in the moment.

0:35:23.239 --> 0:35:25.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you said it away from desk, obviously, away from

0:35:25.320 --> 0:35:27.520
<v Speaker 2>office makes it seem like you're not even on location.

0:35:27.680 --> 0:35:29.560
<v Speaker 2>Away from desk, it's just like, well, he's around, but

0:35:29.600 --> 0:35:31.520
<v Speaker 2>what's he even doing. Maybe he's over there playing ping pong.

0:35:31.640 --> 0:35:33.080
<v Speaker 2>I woul like to even call it like an away

0:35:33.080 --> 0:35:35.919
<v Speaker 2>from email or away from Slack sort of message, because

0:35:35.920 --> 0:35:37.520
<v Speaker 2>it's like, no, I'm sitting here, I'm working, I'm just

0:35:37.520 --> 0:35:39.279
<v Speaker 2>trying to do the important stuff. I just muted this

0:35:39.360 --> 0:35:42.160
<v Speaker 2>right now exactly like I'm sitting here. I'm We're all

0:35:42.200 --> 0:35:44.320
<v Speaker 2>part of this, but let's have some dedicated time to

0:35:44.360 --> 0:35:45.960
<v Speaker 2>the project at hand that we're trying to be able

0:35:46.000 --> 0:35:47.879
<v Speaker 2>to deliver in two weeks. Yeah, that sort of thing.

0:35:48.640 --> 0:35:50.640
<v Speaker 2>Or maybe you can just leave all the notifications on Joel,

0:35:50.680 --> 0:35:51.960
<v Speaker 2>but just put your plugs in. That's what I do

0:35:52.120 --> 0:35:54.640
<v Speaker 2>here in the office. Yeah, you've done it. How do

0:35:54.680 --> 0:35:56.560
<v Speaker 2>you feel when I put my ear plugs in? Because

0:35:56.560 --> 0:35:59.360
<v Speaker 2>sometimes I get even distracted by my coworkers are typing.

0:36:00.040 --> 0:36:02.440
<v Speaker 2>And when I say coworkers, everyone knows I'm talking about you.

0:36:03.040 --> 0:36:06.600
<v Speaker 1>There's not many of them. That doesn't bother me. I think,

0:36:06.640 --> 0:36:08.719
<v Speaker 1>even something super simple, if I need something, I'll let

0:36:08.760 --> 0:36:10.400
<v Speaker 1>you know. Yeah, you can, like well, wave but I.

0:36:10.400 --> 0:36:11.799
<v Speaker 2>Can kind of hear you. But it's enough to kind

0:36:11.840 --> 0:36:16.080
<v Speaker 2>of blunt the sharp stimulus of messages. Other sounds like

0:36:16.120 --> 0:36:17.880
<v Speaker 2>folks who honestly folks who go in and work in

0:36:17.920 --> 0:36:19.880
<v Speaker 2>like a coffee shop. I don't know how they do that,

0:36:20.040 --> 0:36:23.720
<v Speaker 2>and maybe I'm just overly sensitive, but I like the vibe.

0:36:23.760 --> 0:36:25.759
<v Speaker 2>I like the scene of going and working somewhere where

0:36:25.760 --> 0:36:28.160
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of people. But man, the distractions.

0:36:28.200 --> 0:36:29.200
<v Speaker 1>I'd never get anything done.

0:36:29.280 --> 0:36:31.479
<v Speaker 2>I would not. Well, I know why you wouldn't, because

0:36:31.480 --> 0:36:34.759
<v Speaker 2>you're talking to everybody. Yeah, I'm ignoring people, but then

0:36:34.760 --> 0:36:37.359
<v Speaker 2>I'm thinking about the fact that I've ignored them.

0:36:37.360 --> 0:36:38.880
<v Speaker 1>But if I if I really have to dig in

0:36:38.920 --> 0:36:42.080
<v Speaker 1>and get something done, I'm usually taking like clicking out

0:36:42.320 --> 0:36:45.000
<v Speaker 1>of the email on my like you should put nothing

0:36:45.080 --> 0:36:47.000
<v Speaker 1>down so if I see the number popping up, I'm

0:36:47.040 --> 0:36:48.560
<v Speaker 1>tempted to go over there and get in, and I

0:36:48.560 --> 0:36:49.799
<v Speaker 1>get distracted pretty quickly, and.

0:36:49.800 --> 0:36:52.040
<v Speaker 2>Then command Q on the on the mail ad.

0:36:52.080 --> 0:36:54.200
<v Speaker 1>When do I actually get back to the task. Here

0:36:54.239 --> 0:36:56.080
<v Speaker 1>you go, you know, all right, Matt, that's going to

0:36:56.160 --> 0:36:58.799
<v Speaker 1>do it for this Friday flight. The show notes we

0:36:59.080 --> 0:37:01.200
<v Speaker 1>always live up on the way website at howtomoney dot com,

0:37:01.280 --> 0:37:05.160
<v Speaker 1>along with a bunch of other money saving information. But yeah,

0:37:05.200 --> 0:37:07.120
<v Speaker 1>we'll catch you back here on Monday for a fresh

0:37:07.239 --> 0:37:11.319
<v Speaker 1>ask how to Money episode. Until next time, best Friends Out,

0:37:11.360 --> 0:37:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Best Friends Out,