WEBVTT - Bloomberg Wall Street Week: Capito, Palmisano, Mallaby

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:03.360
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Wall st Week. What's the state of

0:00:03.400 --> 0:00:06.360
<v Speaker 1>corporate governance? The deficit is a real issue. The use

0:00:06.400 --> 0:00:09.880
<v Speaker 1>economy continues to send mixed signals. The financial stories that

0:00:10.000 --> 0:00:13.000
<v Speaker 1>sheep our world fed action to con concerns over dollar

0:00:13.039 --> 0:00:16.520
<v Speaker 1>liquidity and encouraging China data. The five hundred wealthiest people

0:00:16.520 --> 0:00:19.160
<v Speaker 1>in the world. Through the eyes of the most influential

0:00:19.239 --> 0:00:22.880
<v Speaker 1>voices Larry Summers, the former Treasury Secretary, Start CEO, Kevin

0:00:22.960 --> 0:00:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Johnson sec Chairman j Clayton. Bloomberg wool Street Week with

0:00:26.760 --> 0:00:31.040
<v Speaker 1>David Weston from Bloomberg Radio. The game stops, circus moves on,

0:00:31.280 --> 0:00:33.919
<v Speaker 1>and investors turned to hopes of more help from Congress

0:00:34.159 --> 0:00:37.520
<v Speaker 1>and of more vaccines on their way. This is Bloomberg

0:00:37.520 --> 0:00:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street Week. I'm David Weston. It seems as if

0:00:40.680 --> 0:00:44.000
<v Speaker 1>everyone in America with access to a microphone has been

0:00:44.040 --> 0:00:48.559
<v Speaker 1>telling us this week with stunning hindsight, precisely why the

0:00:48.640 --> 0:00:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Dow Jones industrials took a record five d eight point

0:00:52.520 --> 0:00:55.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty two point six percent NOS dive. Monday time alone

0:00:55.920 --> 0:00:58.600
<v Speaker 1>will tell whether Black Monday enters the history book as

0:00:58.640 --> 0:01:02.080
<v Speaker 1>the day American confidence was so shaken that a premature

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:05.760
<v Speaker 1>recession resulted. That was Lewis Ruckiser on Wall Street week

0:01:05.800 --> 0:01:09.679
<v Speaker 1>back in seven after Black Monday. Markets have been shaken

0:01:09.720 --> 0:01:12.800
<v Speaker 1>again over the past two weeks as Reddit Day traders

0:01:12.959 --> 0:01:15.960
<v Speaker 1>boosted shares of companies like game Stop and sent short

0:01:16.040 --> 0:01:19.520
<v Speaker 1>selling hedge funds running, with long short funds losing six

0:01:19.560 --> 0:01:23.679
<v Speaker 1>percent overall last month and Melvin Capital alone plummeting fifty

0:01:24.880 --> 0:01:28.760
<v Speaker 1>But most hedge funds emerged unscathed, and Steve Cohen's point

0:01:28.840 --> 0:01:32.319
<v Speaker 1>seventy two even attracted one point five billion dollars in

0:01:32.360 --> 0:01:36.880
<v Speaker 1>new money. Here's SWIFEI Ramachandra, gam investment manager. I assume

0:01:36.959 --> 0:01:40.559
<v Speaker 1>hedge funds are probably reluctant to short small cat stops

0:01:40.640 --> 0:01:43.120
<v Speaker 1>right now the fear that the Reddit brigade might be

0:01:43.000 --> 0:01:45.800
<v Speaker 1>behind those. But by early this week, Game Stops to

0:01:45.959 --> 0:01:49.080
<v Speaker 1>the Moon rallies started to come back towards Earth and

0:01:49.160 --> 0:01:52.080
<v Speaker 1>not even the Reddit flash mob or changes at the

0:01:52.120 --> 0:01:55.720
<v Speaker 1>top of the company could get the irrational exuberance going again,

0:01:56.120 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 1>reminding us why hedge funds and short sellers target companies

0:01:59.680 --> 0:02:02.760
<v Speaker 1>like Hi Stop. The investor that gets caught in the

0:02:02.880 --> 0:02:06.520
<v Speaker 1>updraft on that and doesn't understand that investing while it

0:02:06.520 --> 0:02:08.600
<v Speaker 1>looks like it's all going up. Did the person who

0:02:08.639 --> 0:02:11.320
<v Speaker 1>clicked the last by understand that could happen to them

0:02:11.360 --> 0:02:15.600
<v Speaker 1>that quickly? That's former each read Financial CEO Carl Rossner.

0:02:15.639 --> 0:02:18.840
<v Speaker 1>I asked counsel on Foreign Relations Senior Fellow Sebasha Malby,

0:02:18.919 --> 0:02:22.200
<v Speaker 1>if anything will fundamentally change in the hedge fund world.

0:02:22.639 --> 0:02:24.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't really. I mean, I think that hedge funds,

0:02:24.840 --> 0:02:27.080
<v Speaker 1>which of course go back to the sixties at least,

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:31.680
<v Speaker 1>have proven to be an amazingly robust platform from which

0:02:31.720 --> 0:02:35.240
<v Speaker 1>to think creatively about risk um and so they adapt,

0:02:35.320 --> 0:02:38.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, they get new, stuff gets straight in their ways.

0:02:38.520 --> 0:02:40.800
<v Speaker 1>When they began, there was no such thing as trading

0:02:40.840 --> 0:02:45.079
<v Speaker 1>currencies because currencies world fixed together on markets hardly existed.

0:02:45.440 --> 0:02:48.640
<v Speaker 1>You had to trade stocks by appointment. And they adapted

0:02:48.680 --> 0:02:52.400
<v Speaker 1>all the way through that as everything changing, fintech um,

0:02:52.480 --> 0:02:55.320
<v Speaker 1>the advent of Reddit, the advent of robin Hood. This

0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:57.760
<v Speaker 1>is just the latest iteration in a long, long history

0:02:57.800 --> 0:03:01.160
<v Speaker 1>of financial innovation. And every time hedge funds figure it out,

0:03:01.240 --> 0:03:03.600
<v Speaker 1>you also have regulators trying to figure it out, as

0:03:03.639 --> 0:03:06.200
<v Speaker 1>it were. After the fact, we have the Treasure Secretary

0:03:06.280 --> 0:03:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Janet Yellen now saying she's meeting with regulators saying we

0:03:09.600 --> 0:03:11.040
<v Speaker 1>need to take a hard look at this about the

0:03:11.080 --> 0:03:14.760
<v Speaker 1>volatility and whether this might actually put in jeopardy some investors.

0:03:14.760 --> 0:03:17.800
<v Speaker 1>We also have hearings in Congress coming up. Do you

0:03:17.840 --> 0:03:20.840
<v Speaker 1>expect there might be some tweaking at least of the regulations.

0:03:21.000 --> 0:03:23.600
<v Speaker 1>I think with respect to robin Hood and the fact

0:03:23.600 --> 0:03:27.080
<v Speaker 1>that it had to close down access to trading on

0:03:27.120 --> 0:03:30.960
<v Speaker 1>certain stocks, that's the kind of market interruption which regulators

0:03:30.960 --> 0:03:34.680
<v Speaker 1>ought to take action on. Um. You need the infrastructure

0:03:34.680 --> 0:03:37.400
<v Speaker 1>of trading to be reversed, you you know, you need

0:03:37.440 --> 0:03:39.640
<v Speaker 1>to look at the plumbing, as some regulators put it.

0:03:40.360 --> 0:03:42.640
<v Speaker 1>UM So, I think that part of the system will

0:03:42.800 --> 0:03:45.920
<v Speaker 1>definitely deserve a fresh look. What about on the short

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:48.160
<v Speaker 1>selling side. There have been proposals, as you know well,

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:51.840
<v Speaker 1>for short sellers to have to disclose their positions individual positions,

0:03:52.320 --> 0:03:54.920
<v Speaker 1>which is done as I understand in Europe. Do you

0:03:54.920 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 1>think there might be a renewal of that call. And

0:03:57.000 --> 0:03:59.280
<v Speaker 1>by the way, why do we have to disclose on

0:03:59.280 --> 0:04:01.320
<v Speaker 1>the long side and not the short I'm not sure

0:04:01.320 --> 0:04:05.800
<v Speaker 1>actually that hedge funds do disclose on the long side

0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:09.560
<v Speaker 1>unless they buy more than that disclosable threshold. I believe

0:04:09.600 --> 0:04:12.960
<v Speaker 1>it's five percent or something of the company, So you

0:04:12.960 --> 0:04:17.280
<v Speaker 1>can get away with a lot without disclosing. Um. I

0:04:17.320 --> 0:04:20.480
<v Speaker 1>think you know, when you are taking a really big position,

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:24.240
<v Speaker 1>probably there's a it becomes a systemic threat to you.

0:04:24.800 --> 0:04:27.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, you might blow up if that position were

0:04:27.760 --> 0:04:30.760
<v Speaker 1>to go very badly wrong. And so regulators who care

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:34.000
<v Speaker 1>about the sundus of the system everall have a legitimate interest.

0:04:34.080 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 1>But I think, you know, small positions shouldn't have to

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:38.520
<v Speaker 1>be disclosed. But we certainly had some large hedge ones

0:04:38.560 --> 0:04:41.839
<v Speaker 1>who took a big head, uh, And I wonder whether

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:44.120
<v Speaker 1>they did suggest it could be systemic risk here. Well,

0:04:44.160 --> 0:04:47.400
<v Speaker 1>the beauty of hedge funds is that through their long

0:04:47.520 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 1>history they've proven to be small enough to fail, not

0:04:52.160 --> 0:04:54.360
<v Speaker 1>too big to fail. They actually can blow up, and

0:04:54.680 --> 0:04:59.680
<v Speaker 1>people often cite long term capital management as the big

0:04:59.680 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 1>except actually, if you go back and look at that incident,

0:05:02.880 --> 0:05:06.120
<v Speaker 1>the New York Fed convened the banks to recapitalize it,

0:05:06.160 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 1>but no taxpayer money zero went in. So free standing

0:05:11.000 --> 0:05:14.480
<v Speaker 1>hedge funds I'm not counting here the subsidiary of bare

0:05:14.520 --> 0:05:17.279
<v Speaker 1>stones that went wrong in oh It, But free standing

0:05:17.320 --> 0:05:20.560
<v Speaker 1>hedge funds have never had a taxpayer bailout. Melvin Capital

0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:22.960
<v Speaker 1>has not needed a taxpayer bailout. That's the good thing

0:05:22.960 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 1>about hedge funds. That's one of the ironies you point

0:05:25.040 --> 0:05:27.800
<v Speaker 1>out in your Wash and Post column. Actually that aunt

0:05:27.839 --> 0:05:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Reddit people were saying, look at the government bailed out

0:05:30.320 --> 0:05:32.480
<v Speaker 1>these hedge funds. In fact, they didn't get bailed out

0:05:32.480 --> 0:05:34.279
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand eight, two thousand nine at all. Pretty

0:05:34.360 --> 0:05:38.040
<v Speaker 1>much everybody did edgy and ensure all sorts of broker

0:05:38.080 --> 0:05:42.040
<v Speaker 1>dealers like you know, Best Stands and Lehman Brothers went wrong.

0:05:42.720 --> 0:05:45.359
<v Speaker 1>The money market sector, the whole thing went wrong, But

0:05:45.800 --> 0:05:48.719
<v Speaker 1>there isn't an example of a free standing hedge fund

0:05:49.360 --> 0:05:52.360
<v Speaker 1>that needed a bailout. You mentioned robin Hood and its

0:05:52.480 --> 0:05:53.640
<v Speaker 1>role in all this, and the fact that it had

0:05:53.680 --> 0:05:57.520
<v Speaker 1>to curtail trading at one point. Is there room for

0:05:57.800 --> 0:06:00.160
<v Speaker 1>requiring larger reserves coming out of to those nature As

0:06:00.200 --> 0:06:02.839
<v Speaker 1>a nine, I think it's fair to say the banks

0:06:02.839 --> 0:06:06.719
<v Speaker 1>had to have larger reserves to protect the system overall.

0:06:06.960 --> 0:06:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Did this suggest that, particularly when you come to things

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 1>like sort of flash mob phenomenon in social media, maybe

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:15.240
<v Speaker 1>the broker deals have to have larger reserves. Yes, I

0:06:15.240 --> 0:06:19.040
<v Speaker 1>do think that, and I think particularly the newer brokers

0:06:19.160 --> 0:06:22.440
<v Speaker 1>like Robin Hood which have emerged on the West coast,

0:06:22.600 --> 0:06:26.200
<v Speaker 1>or fintech. They're not a kind of traditional Wall Street firm.

0:06:26.279 --> 0:06:30.359
<v Speaker 1>And those guys have often grown so quickly that the

0:06:30.400 --> 0:06:33.320
<v Speaker 1>regulators are behind the curve. And so I think that

0:06:33.440 --> 0:06:36.080
<v Speaker 1>is the legitimate, you know, focused for for the government.

0:06:36.200 --> 0:06:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Thanks to Sebastian Maloby of the Council on Foreign Relations

0:06:39.600 --> 0:06:43.039
<v Speaker 1>coming up. Big tech gets big earnings, but that doesn't

0:06:43.120 --> 0:06:46.479
<v Speaker 1>keep Jeff Bezos at the helm of Amazon. Sam Pomisano

0:06:46.640 --> 0:06:50.200
<v Speaker 1>ran IBM and he says it's understandable. That's next on

0:06:50.240 --> 0:06:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street Week on Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg Wall Street Week.

0:07:00.120 --> 0:07:04.239
<v Speaker 1>David Weston from Bloomberg Radio. The Everything Store is getting

0:07:04.279 --> 0:07:08.160
<v Speaker 1>a new CEO. Amazon's founder Jeff Bezos is stepping down

0:07:08.160 --> 0:07:11.680
<v Speaker 1>as CEO to become executive chairman later this year. Here's

0:07:11.680 --> 0:07:15.920
<v Speaker 1>company's CFO, Brian Olsofski. I will reiterate that Jeff is

0:07:16.240 --> 0:07:19.000
<v Speaker 1>not leaving, he is getting a new job. Over the

0:07:19.080 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 1>last twenty five years under bezos leadership, an idea for

0:07:22.480 --> 0:07:25.720
<v Speaker 1>an online bookstore evolved into a one point seven trillion

0:07:25.720 --> 0:07:29.200
<v Speaker 1>dollar company that changed the face of retail. Like many

0:07:29.280 --> 0:07:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley success stories. Amazon started in a garage after

0:07:32.840 --> 0:07:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Bezos left his job as a vice president at

0:07:35.920 --> 0:07:40.480
<v Speaker 1>df SHAW in in the late nineteen nineties. The startup

0:07:40.560 --> 0:07:44.840
<v Speaker 1>expanded its offerings from books and music to include consumer goods.

0:07:44.960 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 1>I emailed a thousand randomly selected customers and asked them,

0:07:49.800 --> 0:07:52.120
<v Speaker 1>besides the things we felt today, what would you like

0:07:52.160 --> 0:07:54.520
<v Speaker 1>to see us? So remember one of the answers was

0:07:55.040 --> 0:07:57.960
<v Speaker 1>I wish you sold Winshield wiper blades because I really

0:07:58.000 --> 0:08:01.480
<v Speaker 1>need Winsfield wiper blades. And I thought to myself, we

0:08:01.520 --> 0:08:05.000
<v Speaker 1>can sell anything this way. That's Jeff Bezos in two eighteen.

0:08:05.320 --> 0:08:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Even after Amazon went public, it failed to turn a

0:08:07.880 --> 0:08:11.320
<v Speaker 1>profit until two thousand one. Bezos business model of keeping

0:08:11.400 --> 0:08:14.720
<v Speaker 1>inventory low and selling products for low prices save the

0:08:14.760 --> 0:08:17.600
<v Speaker 1>company during the dot com bubble. Even his peers like

0:08:17.680 --> 0:08:21.760
<v Speaker 1>pets dot Com went bust. Here's Scott Kessler from Third Bridge.

0:08:22.080 --> 0:08:25.720
<v Speaker 1>He obviously is going to have huge influence still, but

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:29.920
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be more from a vision and strategic perspective.

0:08:30.080 --> 0:08:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Bezos returned to his passion for books when Amazon released

0:08:32.800 --> 0:08:35.440
<v Speaker 1>its first Kindle in two thousand seven, changing the way

0:08:35.480 --> 0:08:39.720
<v Speaker 1>people read books while building an e commerce empire. Bezos

0:08:39.760 --> 0:08:42.400
<v Speaker 1>also wears a couple of other hats, as the owner

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:45.000
<v Speaker 1>of The Washington Post and founder of the space company

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Blue Origin. So I think it leaves Jeff Bezos able

0:08:48.760 --> 0:08:51.600
<v Speaker 1>to concentrate on building rockets and the things that he

0:08:51.640 --> 0:08:53.840
<v Speaker 1>wants to do with someone at the helm that he

0:08:53.920 --> 0:08:57.960
<v Speaker 1>can really trust. That's Melissa Burdick, the president of pack View.

0:08:58.240 --> 0:09:02.000
<v Speaker 1>More recently, Amazon's profit and has been its cloud computing arm,

0:09:02.080 --> 0:09:06.079
<v Speaker 1>Amazon Web Services, which launched in two thousand three, AWS

0:09:06.160 --> 0:09:11.120
<v Speaker 1>accounted for six of Amazon's operating income in making Amazon

0:09:11.200 --> 0:09:14.120
<v Speaker 1>the world leader in cloud computing. And so it should

0:09:14.120 --> 0:09:16.480
<v Speaker 1>come as no surprise the Bezo successor will be the

0:09:16.520 --> 0:09:21.960
<v Speaker 1>man who runs AWS, Andy Jesse. Here's estimized CEO Lee Droken.

0:09:22.120 --> 0:09:25.520
<v Speaker 1>I think this makes total sense. I think it's underappreciated

0:09:26.400 --> 0:09:32.760
<v Speaker 1>just how amazing and innovative and important to everything that

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:36.520
<v Speaker 1>goes on basically in technology today that AWS is and

0:09:36.880 --> 0:09:40.400
<v Speaker 1>was Wall Street We contributor Sam Paul Maisano ran IBM,

0:09:40.520 --> 0:09:43.840
<v Speaker 1>and he says it's understandable that Jeff Bezos has decided

0:09:44.000 --> 0:09:46.720
<v Speaker 1>to make the transition. Well, it's not really a hard

0:09:46.800 --> 0:09:49.840
<v Speaker 1>thing to do, I mean, especially when you've built the company.

0:09:49.920 --> 0:09:52.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean one thing, I was nine to ten years

0:09:52.800 --> 0:09:54.760
<v Speaker 1>of CEO and I grew up in IBM. I love

0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:58.520
<v Speaker 1>IBM obviously, but it wasn't mine, it wasn't my creation.

0:09:58.559 --> 0:10:01.200
<v Speaker 1>It was the Watson family. And so if you're the

0:10:01.240 --> 0:10:04.199
<v Speaker 1>founder like Jeff, I can imagine it's a very very

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:07.679
<v Speaker 1>difficult decision to make. However, at the same time, he's

0:10:07.720 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 1>really not leaving the company because he's still executive chairman,

0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:12.160
<v Speaker 1>so he still has a role. But at the same time,

0:10:12.280 --> 0:10:14.760
<v Speaker 1>his role the company is really different. The company is

0:10:14.840 --> 0:10:16.880
<v Speaker 1>different at this point as well. It's not at this

0:10:17.480 --> 0:10:20.719
<v Speaker 1>Mete York rise that it's had. It's now getting the

0:10:20.800 --> 0:10:24.280
<v Speaker 1>siege by the government. Yeah, well that's exactly as quite

0:10:24.320 --> 0:10:26.199
<v Speaker 1>interesting as you know. And the same thing has happened

0:10:26.200 --> 0:10:28.920
<v Speaker 1>to other companies. We've talked about Microsoft, IBM, A, T

0:10:29.040 --> 0:10:32.640
<v Speaker 1>and T, and it's I would I look back when

0:10:32.640 --> 0:10:35.079
<v Speaker 1>it comes with success, I mean, when you're that successful,

0:10:35.120 --> 0:10:37.400
<v Speaker 1>when you get that large, people are going to come

0:10:37.440 --> 0:10:40.360
<v Speaker 1>after you, and usually it's your competition quite honestly. But

0:10:40.400 --> 0:10:43.520
<v Speaker 1>then they lobbed me the various government entities, and then

0:10:43.559 --> 0:10:46.720
<v Speaker 1>politics takes over and then you find yourself on these

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:50.880
<v Speaker 1>difficult situations. My experience, the founders have a very hard

0:10:51.000 --> 0:10:54.360
<v Speaker 1>time with that. They can't understand how that could happen.

0:10:54.400 --> 0:10:56.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying that's the case for Jeff, but my

0:10:56.320 --> 0:10:59.080
<v Speaker 1>experience with both talking with Bill Gates and spending a

0:10:59.080 --> 0:11:02.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of time because I support Mr Watson Jr. As

0:11:02.640 --> 0:11:04.520
<v Speaker 1>when I was executive assistant to the chairman and the

0:11:04.520 --> 0:11:08.000
<v Speaker 1>CEO of IBM H and I had firsthand conversations with him,

0:11:08.040 --> 0:11:10.920
<v Speaker 1>so you could see as a foundery that was a

0:11:11.040 --> 0:11:14.640
<v Speaker 1>very hard thing for him to psychologically cope with. Well,

0:11:14.679 --> 0:11:16.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you ran a big company that was under

0:11:16.679 --> 0:11:19.520
<v Speaker 1>siege from the government. Is it possible not just for

0:11:19.559 --> 0:11:22.200
<v Speaker 1>psychological reasons, is not not as much fun to defend?

0:11:22.600 --> 0:11:24.320
<v Speaker 1>But also for the stake of the company. Is it

0:11:24.360 --> 0:11:26.960
<v Speaker 1>better to have somebody a little more detached where it's

0:11:26.960 --> 0:11:30.120
<v Speaker 1>not literally their child. I think that that is that's

0:11:30.160 --> 0:11:32.680
<v Speaker 1>the way to think about it. I mean, basically what

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:36.280
<v Speaker 1>happened in IBM's example, UM and I spent a time

0:11:36.280 --> 0:11:39.360
<v Speaker 1>with Tom Watson, and I was Frank Cary who became chairman,

0:11:39.640 --> 0:11:42.440
<v Speaker 1>and then John ople who became CEO. But Mr Watson

0:11:43.160 --> 0:11:45.680
<v Speaker 1>uh made a decision and he was still the founder

0:11:45.679 --> 0:11:49.280
<v Speaker 1>in the majority shareholder, but made a decision that Kerry

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:51.760
<v Speaker 1>would become chairman and worked with the government and try

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:53.880
<v Speaker 1>to resolve the suit and John Wan around the company.

0:11:54.160 --> 0:11:56.880
<v Speaker 1>So there really was kind of a division of responsibilities.

0:11:57.240 --> 0:11:59.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that's really really important because it's really hard

0:11:59.800 --> 0:12:02.719
<v Speaker 1>not think it distracted if you look what happens long

0:12:02.840 --> 0:12:06.000
<v Speaker 1>term over these suits. IBM, we missed the thing called

0:12:06.080 --> 0:12:10.720
<v Speaker 1>client server. Microsoft obviously did extremely well there. Microsoft missed

0:12:10.760 --> 0:12:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the Internet, you know, And I think it's distraction. I

0:12:13.960 --> 0:12:16.080
<v Speaker 1>really think a lot of that is because when you

0:12:16.160 --> 0:12:18.920
<v Speaker 1>are the CEO and you're also dealing with the government suit,

0:12:19.320 --> 0:12:21.839
<v Speaker 1>between the legal pressures and the advice you're getting from

0:12:21.840 --> 0:12:24.280
<v Speaker 1>counsel and how you should proceed, how you should set strategy,

0:12:24.640 --> 0:12:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the company gets distracted for a period of time. In

0:12:27.520 --> 0:12:29.960
<v Speaker 1>our case that was almost ten years. Of Microsoft's case,

0:12:30.000 --> 0:12:31.680
<v Speaker 1>I think it was more than ten, maybe twelve. A

0:12:31.760 --> 0:12:34.040
<v Speaker 1>T and T you know, that happens, and then as

0:12:34.080 --> 0:12:36.680
<v Speaker 1>a result of that, you missed these big technological shifts.

0:12:36.800 --> 0:12:39.720
<v Speaker 1>One of the things that no one's been distracted from

0:12:39.800 --> 0:12:43.559
<v Speaker 1>is the cloud. The dramatic rise in the cloud, including

0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:46.319
<v Speaker 1>an Amazon not loomed Amazon. It's probably no coincidence that

0:12:46.400 --> 0:12:49.320
<v Speaker 1>the person is succeeding Jeff Bezos really was running the

0:12:49.320 --> 0:12:52.240
<v Speaker 1>cloud operation at Amazon. What do you make of that

0:12:52.360 --> 0:12:55.480
<v Speaker 1>change in technology overall, that huge move into the cloud. Well,

0:12:55.480 --> 0:12:58.200
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting because if you if you think about where

0:12:58.200 --> 0:13:00.720
<v Speaker 1>Amazon began, there was an engine, apes and books on

0:13:00.760 --> 0:13:04.920
<v Speaker 1>the internet. Basically right now they're the largest provider of

0:13:04.960 --> 0:13:07.200
<v Speaker 1>cloud services to AWS, which you know, as you knew

0:13:07.240 --> 0:13:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Andy was running UH at Amazon. Now having said all that, um,

0:13:12.559 --> 0:13:15.400
<v Speaker 1>it's a huge transition of the infrastructure, I think I

0:13:15.400 --> 0:13:18.200
<v Speaker 1>think you might find of interest is that if you

0:13:18.240 --> 0:13:21.120
<v Speaker 1>look at the most recent CEO appointments over the past

0:13:21.160 --> 0:13:28.680
<v Speaker 1>couple of years, they all have cloud experience. Amazon, Google, Microsoft, IVM, right,

0:13:29.200 --> 0:13:33.360
<v Speaker 1>So that indicates that the the leadership of those companies

0:13:33.360 --> 0:13:36.040
<v Speaker 1>have concluded that the skill set required for the future

0:13:36.400 --> 0:13:38.920
<v Speaker 1>is someone who understands those technologies that are going to

0:13:38.960 --> 0:13:42.319
<v Speaker 1>transition those companies and those business models into this cloud

0:13:42.400 --> 0:13:45.679
<v Speaker 1>ear and put on top of that, artificial intelligence is

0:13:45.720 --> 0:13:48.480
<v Speaker 1>the compounding of both of those things. But all those

0:13:48.520 --> 0:13:51.480
<v Speaker 1>people have those backgrounds. So I think there's a it's

0:13:51.520 --> 0:13:54.319
<v Speaker 1>an interesting pattern and emerging here becomes the leadership of

0:13:54.360 --> 0:13:57.800
<v Speaker 1>these tech companies. We've already seen dramatic growth in the

0:13:57.800 --> 0:14:01.559
<v Speaker 1>cloud business overall, just the business growing. How far along

0:14:01.600 --> 0:14:03.720
<v Speaker 1>the curve are we, I mean, how far are they

0:14:03.720 --> 0:14:05.760
<v Speaker 1>from it being a matur of business as it were.

0:14:06.240 --> 0:14:09.559
<v Speaker 1>It's very early stage. I mean, it's been going on.

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:12.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to guess ten fifteen. If you get back

0:14:12.120 --> 0:14:13.960
<v Speaker 1>to the early days of research and I was still

0:14:13.960 --> 0:14:16.160
<v Speaker 1>working back then, a lot of this stuff was in

0:14:16.240 --> 0:14:19.840
<v Speaker 1>researcher and academic institutions, and then it went from simple

0:14:19.920 --> 0:14:23.440
<v Speaker 1>things like application development to actually doing production work, you know,

0:14:23.560 --> 0:14:25.560
<v Speaker 1>real work the companies do in their core in a

0:14:25.600 --> 0:14:28.320
<v Speaker 1>safe and resilient way. So now it's going to go

0:14:28.440 --> 0:14:30.720
<v Speaker 1>beyond that. It's going to support all these advanced technologies

0:14:30.720 --> 0:14:33.720
<v Speaker 1>as far as application I mean obviously artificial intelligence and

0:14:33.760 --> 0:14:36.600
<v Speaker 1>those sorts of things. That was former IBM CEO Sam

0:14:36.640 --> 0:14:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Pomisano coming up the prospects for another round of fiscal simulus.

0:14:41.480 --> 0:14:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Senator Shelley Moore, Capital of West Virginia, says Democrats are

0:14:44.680 --> 0:14:47.560
<v Speaker 1>committed to getting it done one way or the other.

0:14:47.920 --> 0:14:55.720
<v Speaker 1>That next on Wall Street Week on Bloomberg. This is

0:14:55.760 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Wall Street Week with David Weston from Bloomberg. Rady

0:15:00.400 --> 0:15:03.400
<v Speaker 1>President Biden pressed his case for another one point nine

0:15:03.440 --> 0:15:06.200
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollars in stimulus money to support the U. S economy,

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:09.960
<v Speaker 1>including meeting at the White House with ten Republican senators

0:15:10.000 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 1>who have proposed a compromise package that would get bipartisan support.

0:15:14.120 --> 0:15:16.280
<v Speaker 1>We talked with one of those who met with the President,

0:15:16.400 --> 0:15:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Senator Shelley Moore, Capital of West Virginia, for her take

0:15:20.320 --> 0:15:23.680
<v Speaker 1>on that meeting. He didn't make any promises, He listened intently,

0:15:23.800 --> 0:15:26.400
<v Speaker 1>is very well prepared, and he seemed to be interested

0:15:26.440 --> 0:15:30.000
<v Speaker 1>in particularly in the targeting numbers on individual checks in

0:15:30.080 --> 0:15:32.320
<v Speaker 1>terms of do we really want to be sending checks

0:15:32.320 --> 0:15:35.000
<v Speaker 1>to families that are making three thousand dollars a years

0:15:35.000 --> 0:15:38.040
<v Speaker 1>whose life really have not changed. And so I think

0:15:38.080 --> 0:15:41.160
<v Speaker 1>that was the biggest area that he signaled that he

0:15:41.240 --> 0:15:44.120
<v Speaker 1>might make some make some adjustments, but that's yet to

0:15:44.120 --> 0:15:46.880
<v Speaker 1>be seen. There are some reports on the Bloomberg actually

0:15:46.920 --> 0:15:48.760
<v Speaker 1>about the very point you just made that if you

0:15:48.800 --> 0:15:51.720
<v Speaker 1>really look at the upper end before it really phases out,

0:15:51.880 --> 0:15:53.560
<v Speaker 1>there are some people who are making a fair amount

0:15:53.560 --> 0:15:55.640
<v Speaker 1>of money and as you say, maybe didn't lose their jobs.

0:15:55.920 --> 0:15:58.360
<v Speaker 1>Do you have an approach in euro compromise proposal to

0:15:58.400 --> 0:16:00.240
<v Speaker 1>deal with that, and did the President indicate maybe that

0:16:00.320 --> 0:16:02.520
<v Speaker 1>made sense that sort of approach. Well, what we did

0:16:02.600 --> 0:16:05.400
<v Speaker 1>was we lowered the the income level of which you

0:16:05.400 --> 0:16:07.760
<v Speaker 1>would be available to get a stimulus check to about

0:16:07.800 --> 0:16:10.880
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and fifty thousand per couple, and we felt

0:16:10.920 --> 0:16:13.720
<v Speaker 1>like in the statistics bear out that you're using this

0:16:13.760 --> 0:16:15.920
<v Speaker 1>a stimulus, this is money. We went back into the

0:16:15.960 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 1>economy and at those income levels where people really are hurting,

0:16:20.000 --> 0:16:22.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe can't pay their rent, by their food, Uh, they

0:16:22.600 --> 0:16:25.240
<v Speaker 1>are spending their stimulus checks. If you get up into

0:16:25.640 --> 0:16:28.560
<v Speaker 1>over two hundred or three hundred thousand dollars, people are

0:16:28.600 --> 0:16:31.480
<v Speaker 1>saving it or they're not using it to provide that

0:16:31.520 --> 0:16:34.560
<v Speaker 1>stimulus that we really need to keep this economy moving.

0:16:34.640 --> 0:16:36.600
<v Speaker 1>And and also I think do we want, really want

0:16:36.600 --> 0:16:40.080
<v Speaker 1>to be sending two expayer dollars to people who have

0:16:40.200 --> 0:16:43.280
<v Speaker 1>had really little or no effects during this pandemic. Talk

0:16:43.280 --> 0:16:45.480
<v Speaker 1>about climate for a second, because President Biden has been

0:16:45.480 --> 0:16:48.200
<v Speaker 1>fairly aggressive and executive orders so far, and your home

0:16:48.240 --> 0:16:50.600
<v Speaker 1>state of West Virginia, do you envision a world in

0:16:50.640 --> 0:16:53.600
<v Speaker 1>which you can redirect your economy into clean energy and

0:16:53.640 --> 0:16:56.360
<v Speaker 1>actually keep the jobs or even increase the jobs. Well,

0:16:56.480 --> 0:16:58.680
<v Speaker 1>let's look at what a state like West Virginia has

0:16:58.720 --> 0:17:02.040
<v Speaker 1>provided and provides for the nation. We have natural resources

0:17:02.040 --> 0:17:04.560
<v Speaker 1>of coal and natural gas that we've powered this nation

0:17:04.640 --> 0:17:07.400
<v Speaker 1>for over a century, and and we have a lot

0:17:07.440 --> 0:17:10.639
<v Speaker 1>of great, hard working people. We're looking for stability and

0:17:10.680 --> 0:17:14.040
<v Speaker 1>we're looking for easier transitions. We did not get that

0:17:14.080 --> 0:17:17.119
<v Speaker 1>in the Obama administration. The troubling thing to me is

0:17:17.240 --> 0:17:20.520
<v Speaker 1>it's the same faces and the Biden administration, and that

0:17:20.640 --> 0:17:23.080
<v Speaker 1>signals to me that they have no interest in taking

0:17:23.080 --> 0:17:28.560
<v Speaker 1>into consideration the ravage that the policies reek on places

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:31.760
<v Speaker 1>like West Virginia. But we are transitioning in West Virginia

0:17:31.800 --> 0:17:34.480
<v Speaker 1>to a more high tech economy. We're working as hard

0:17:34.520 --> 0:17:36.960
<v Speaker 1>as we can to work with research and development to

0:17:37.040 --> 0:17:42.000
<v Speaker 1>keep those energy processes moving. But we cannot just drop

0:17:42.200 --> 0:17:45.479
<v Speaker 1>certain people off of the ledge like that like we

0:17:45.480 --> 0:17:48.080
<v Speaker 1>were dropped off over the last eight years of the

0:17:48.080 --> 0:17:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Obama administration and think it's okay. Because joblessness, depression, rise

0:17:52.920 --> 0:17:56.040
<v Speaker 1>in opioid and drug addiction, it's been really devastating for

0:17:56.080 --> 0:17:57.840
<v Speaker 1>our state and tough for me to watch as a

0:17:57.920 --> 0:18:01.000
<v Speaker 1>native West Virginia. The Senate has other business it has

0:18:01.040 --> 0:18:04.800
<v Speaker 1>to attend to with a trial of former President Trump

0:18:04.840 --> 0:18:08.359
<v Speaker 1>coming up on impeachment charges, is there any prospect of

0:18:08.440 --> 0:18:11.359
<v Speaker 1>his being convicted? And specifically, as I understand it, you

0:18:11.400 --> 0:18:14.439
<v Speaker 1>were one of the Republican senators who voted to say, actually,

0:18:14.520 --> 0:18:16.720
<v Speaker 1>it shouldn't even going forward because he's no longer in office.

0:18:16.760 --> 0:18:18.920
<v Speaker 1>So those people who voted that way, there's no way

0:18:18.960 --> 0:18:20.639
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna convict him, and haven't said you shouldn't be

0:18:20.680 --> 0:18:22.359
<v Speaker 1>having a trial, right, And doesn't that take care of

0:18:22.359 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 1>the two thirds requirement? You know, I am charged as

0:18:25.040 --> 0:18:26.520
<v Speaker 1>being a jour and I'm going to listen to what

0:18:26.600 --> 0:18:29.000
<v Speaker 1>comes through on the appeachment trial. But I do believe,

0:18:29.119 --> 0:18:33.160
<v Speaker 1>as I voted, that the Constitution says that you would

0:18:33.160 --> 0:18:37.479
<v Speaker 1>remove and uh and prevent the president from running again. Well,

0:18:37.560 --> 0:18:40.600
<v Speaker 1>we can't remove an impeachment because he's not the president.

0:18:40.960 --> 0:18:43.800
<v Speaker 1>So that sort of nullifies, in my view, the vision

0:18:43.840 --> 0:18:46.800
<v Speaker 1>that the founders had and making it I think a

0:18:46.840 --> 0:18:51.160
<v Speaker 1>strong constitutional argument that you can impeach a president who's

0:18:51.200 --> 0:18:53.760
<v Speaker 1>already out of office. So I think a lot of

0:18:53.800 --> 0:18:55.840
<v Speaker 1>us felt that way. I think it's gonna be difficult

0:18:55.880 --> 0:18:57.760
<v Speaker 1>to convict, but we haven't heard the evidence yet, and

0:18:57.760 --> 0:19:00.000
<v Speaker 1>I think I would reserve judgment on that the center.

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:01.639
<v Speaker 1>I want to wrap this up by letting you brag

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:03.920
<v Speaker 1>on your state here a little bit, because your vaccination

0:19:04.000 --> 0:19:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Rachel West Virginia are pretty impressive. What are you doing

0:19:06.720 --> 0:19:08.719
<v Speaker 1>in West Virginia? What can you teach the rest of us?

0:19:08.840 --> 0:19:10.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, what we're doing in West Virginia is we're

0:19:10.640 --> 0:19:13.480
<v Speaker 1>utilizing all of our local assets. Uh. The governor has

0:19:13.480 --> 0:19:15.840
<v Speaker 1>done a great job along with the National Guard, our

0:19:15.920 --> 0:19:19.760
<v Speaker 1>local pharmacies, our city mayors and counties, our county health

0:19:19.760 --> 0:19:23.280
<v Speaker 1>departments have been fantastic. The federal government laid out a

0:19:23.280 --> 0:19:27.240
<v Speaker 1>plan for vaccination delivery and and dispensing. We went away

0:19:27.240 --> 0:19:29.199
<v Speaker 1>from that and created our own plan because we know

0:19:29.280 --> 0:19:31.680
<v Speaker 1>each other best and so we have the best vaccine

0:19:31.800 --> 0:19:34.720
<v Speaker 1>vaccine distribution in the country. We're proud of it. We

0:19:34.800 --> 0:19:39.360
<v Speaker 1>have I think a a a away, a way forward

0:19:39.400 --> 0:19:41.760
<v Speaker 1>for states to get more shots in the arms quicker,

0:19:42.119 --> 0:19:43.760
<v Speaker 1>and that's what we're doing in West Virginia. We have

0:19:43.760 --> 0:19:46.800
<v Speaker 1>a vulnerable population. It is really important that we get

0:19:46.800 --> 0:19:49.480
<v Speaker 1>those nursing home and assisted living folks taking care of First.

0:19:49.760 --> 0:19:52.080
<v Speaker 1>We knew where they all were because we've been testing them.

0:19:52.119 --> 0:19:56.760
<v Speaker 1>So it's just really been a logistical win for us.

0:19:56.800 --> 0:19:58.399
<v Speaker 1>And we're really proud of it. What's I can to

0:19:58.480 --> 0:19:59.800
<v Speaker 1>do for your economy because a lot of people are

0:19:59.840 --> 0:20:01.400
<v Speaker 1>can Sara. If you can't get in vaccinaty, you can't

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:04.360
<v Speaker 1>get people back out to restaurants and things like that. Well,

0:20:04.400 --> 0:20:08.320
<v Speaker 1>our schools reopened about two weeks ago and uh, and

0:20:08.400 --> 0:20:10.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's been some pushback like we see across

0:20:10.480 --> 0:20:13.159
<v Speaker 1>the nation, but by and large they're reopened and that's big.

0:20:13.400 --> 0:20:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Our restaurants are reopening. Uh. And as we get this

0:20:15.840 --> 0:20:18.920
<v Speaker 1>back distribution, we get those double shots for the ones

0:20:18.960 --> 0:20:22.520
<v Speaker 1>that need the two shots. I think by the time

0:20:22.640 --> 0:20:26.240
<v Speaker 1>are a great tourism um season comes along in the spring.

0:20:26.280 --> 0:20:28.159
<v Speaker 1>We have a great winter one two in the spring.

0:20:28.600 --> 0:20:30.159
<v Speaker 1>It's going to be great. We have a new National

0:20:30.160 --> 0:20:31.879
<v Speaker 1>park in West Virginia. We were able to get at

0:20:31.920 --> 0:20:33.639
<v Speaker 1>the end of the year, so we got lots to see.

0:20:33.920 --> 0:20:37.520
<v Speaker 1>That was Senator Shelley Wore, Capital of West Virginia. Coming up,

0:20:37.560 --> 0:20:40.280
<v Speaker 1>we wrap up the week with special contributor Larry Summers

0:20:40.320 --> 0:20:48.560
<v Speaker 1>of Harvard. This is Wall Street Week on Bloomberg. This

0:20:48.920 --> 0:20:53.440
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Wall Street Week with David Weston from Bloomberg Radio.

0:20:53.600 --> 0:20:55.399
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna wrap up the week as always with our

0:20:55.440 --> 0:20:58.960
<v Speaker 1>special contributed Larry Summers of Harvard. So, Larry, I guess

0:20:58.960 --> 0:21:01.720
<v Speaker 1>the big news this week is about the stimulus bill

0:21:01.800 --> 0:21:04.600
<v Speaker 1>at one point nine trillion dollars President Biden is proposing.

0:21:04.920 --> 0:21:06.880
<v Speaker 1>It was thought it might be bipartisan. Now it looks

0:21:06.880 --> 0:21:08.720
<v Speaker 1>like he's going to really push it through, no matter

0:21:08.760 --> 0:21:11.560
<v Speaker 1>whether Republicans coming aboard or not. You were in the

0:21:11.720 --> 0:21:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Obama administration when you went for a big stimulus package,

0:21:16.000 --> 0:21:18.560
<v Speaker 1>and some people think you didn't go far and fast enough.

0:21:18.600 --> 0:21:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Do you agree with President Biden's approach that he's got

0:21:21.359 --> 0:21:24.080
<v Speaker 1>to get this thing through. Let me just first say

0:21:24.240 --> 0:21:27.199
<v Speaker 1>David that I don't think there's any question that in

0:21:27.320 --> 0:21:31.000
<v Speaker 1>retrospect it would have been better if we'd done larger

0:21:31.080 --> 0:21:35.480
<v Speaker 1>stimulus during the Obama administration. I think we understood that

0:21:35.600 --> 0:21:41.600
<v Speaker 1>at the time the constraint read President Obama's memoirs, was

0:21:41.720 --> 0:21:47.240
<v Speaker 1>not an economic judgment. It was a political judgment about

0:21:47.280 --> 0:21:51.200
<v Speaker 1>what could pass through the Congress, given the consensus that

0:21:51.320 --> 0:21:55.720
<v Speaker 1>existed at that time, given where Republicans were, and given

0:21:55.760 --> 0:21:59.639
<v Speaker 1>where Democrats like Senator Kemp Conrad and Iron Oregon and

0:22:00.400 --> 0:22:05.639
<v Speaker 1>Nelson uh from Nebraska were at that time. So I

0:22:05.680 --> 0:22:10.080
<v Speaker 1>think the lesson that we need more stimulus, um, we

0:22:10.160 --> 0:22:13.880
<v Speaker 1>wish we'd had more stimulus, is really a valid lesson.

0:22:14.640 --> 0:22:19.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm not in a position to judge the tactics. It's

0:22:19.040 --> 0:22:23.199
<v Speaker 1>certainly better to do things on a bipartisan basis, but

0:22:24.000 --> 0:22:28.080
<v Speaker 1>negotiation is about leverage, and if the Democrats have no

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:31.320
<v Speaker 1>capacity to act on their own, they don't have much

0:22:31.440 --> 0:22:35.160
<v Speaker 1>leverage in a bipartisan negotiation, and so if it's come

0:22:35.200 --> 0:22:39.199
<v Speaker 1>to the point where they need to do it unilaterally,

0:22:39.840 --> 0:22:43.720
<v Speaker 1>then that's where it's come to. So I'm not prepared

0:22:43.760 --> 0:22:49.040
<v Speaker 1>at all to second guess UH that UH political judgment.

0:22:49.160 --> 0:22:52.879
<v Speaker 1>It's a political judgment, not an economic UH judgment, and

0:22:52.920 --> 0:22:59.240
<v Speaker 1>it may well be necessary given the intransigence of today's

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Republican party. I think the really important issues, David Uh

0:23:04.600 --> 0:23:08.959
<v Speaker 1>go to how we think about fiscal policy over the

0:23:09.000 --> 0:23:12.440
<v Speaker 1>course of the whole year. And we need to make

0:23:12.480 --> 0:23:16.680
<v Speaker 1>sure we're supporting demand, we need to make sure that

0:23:16.720 --> 0:23:21.000
<v Speaker 1>we're helping people who are in need. We need to

0:23:21.560 --> 0:23:25.879
<v Speaker 1>take the kind of different perspective on fiscal policy that

0:23:26.320 --> 0:23:31.080
<v Speaker 1>recent economic thinking about secular stagnation, about low rates has

0:23:31.200 --> 0:23:36.440
<v Speaker 1>driven us to. But that's not a reason for blank checks.

0:23:37.119 --> 0:23:40.560
<v Speaker 1>And that's not a reason why any amount of fiscal

0:23:40.680 --> 0:23:47.879
<v Speaker 1>policy organized in any way UM is appropriate. And I

0:23:48.080 --> 0:23:52.480
<v Speaker 1>look at the fiscal stimulus under discussion, and with the

0:23:52.560 --> 0:23:57.679
<v Speaker 1>one point nine trillion dollars, you're talking about something that,

0:23:57.920 --> 0:24:02.840
<v Speaker 1>relative to the GDP APP is six times as large

0:24:03.359 --> 0:24:06.480
<v Speaker 1>as what we did in two thousand and eight. And

0:24:06.760 --> 0:24:10.920
<v Speaker 1>if that's what we're gonna do, we need to make

0:24:10.960 --> 0:24:16.359
<v Speaker 1>sure we've got a contingency plan in case we get

0:24:16.359 --> 0:24:21.200
<v Speaker 1>a perfect combination of good news. The one point six

0:24:21.320 --> 0:24:25.360
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollars and pent up savings gets spent, this fiscal

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:30.480
<v Speaker 1>stimulus gets delivered, COVID gets behind us, and people feel

0:24:30.560 --> 0:24:35.560
<v Speaker 1>free UH to spend, and we have an economy that

0:24:35.800 --> 0:24:40.520
<v Speaker 1>is literally on fire. And if that happens, we're gonna

0:24:40.520 --> 0:24:47.600
<v Speaker 1>need a framework for UH containing things. And there may

0:24:47.640 --> 0:24:50.800
<v Speaker 1>well be such a framework, but we're gonna need to

0:24:50.840 --> 0:24:54.479
<v Speaker 1>hear about it from the Treasury Secretary. We're gonna need

0:24:54.520 --> 0:24:59.320
<v Speaker 1>to hear about it from the Federal Reserve chairman. The

0:24:59.359 --> 0:25:04.400
<v Speaker 1>other question than I have is our economy had fundamental

0:25:04.680 --> 0:25:11.200
<v Speaker 1>issues before COVID, the need for green investment, the need

0:25:11.280 --> 0:25:16.600
<v Speaker 1>for investment in a totally decaying infrastructure, the need for

0:25:16.640 --> 0:25:22.679
<v Speaker 1>investment and opportunity for every child in UH the country

0:25:23.000 --> 0:25:27.639
<v Speaker 1>and the Build Back Better agenda that President Biden spoke

0:25:27.680 --> 0:25:32.520
<v Speaker 1>about so eloquently in the campaign. And if we've got

0:25:32.640 --> 0:25:38.000
<v Speaker 1>fifteen percent of GDP and stimulus being delivered this year

0:25:39.160 --> 0:25:44.119
<v Speaker 1>with nothing really that's in the Build Back Better agenda,

0:25:44.960 --> 0:25:49.720
<v Speaker 1>the question arises, how are we going to fund that vital,

0:25:49.840 --> 0:25:53.800
<v Speaker 1>build back Better agenda? And maybe the answer is will

0:25:54.160 --> 0:25:57.040
<v Speaker 1>find a way to legislate it and find a way

0:25:57.080 --> 0:26:01.080
<v Speaker 1>to pay for it through tax increases, and that could

0:26:01.080 --> 0:26:06.080
<v Speaker 1>be a very very positive strategy. But if not, we're

0:26:06.200 --> 0:26:11.160
<v Speaker 1>using up an enormous amount of fiscal space, an enormous

0:26:11.200 --> 0:26:16.880
<v Speaker 1>amount of political and economic energy on measures that are

0:26:16.960 --> 0:26:20.920
<v Speaker 1>not building back better. And as I hear people starting

0:26:20.960 --> 0:26:26.840
<v Speaker 1>to talk about making checks for most Americans into not

0:26:26.960 --> 0:26:31.600
<v Speaker 1>just a one off but a regular fiscal policy, I

0:26:31.720 --> 0:26:36.400
<v Speaker 1>become uh concerned. And so those are I think the

0:26:36.480 --> 0:26:38.840
<v Speaker 1>questions that are going to need to be debated and

0:26:38.920 --> 0:26:44.040
<v Speaker 1>discussed as we come to a conclusion on fiscal stimulus. So, Larry,

0:26:44.119 --> 0:26:46.680
<v Speaker 1>let's take a look at one point nine trillion dollar package.

0:26:46.800 --> 0:26:49.080
<v Speaker 1>As you look at it, give me something you think

0:26:49.160 --> 0:26:52.920
<v Speaker 1>is absolutely essential must go forward with. Give me something

0:26:52.960 --> 0:26:56.880
<v Speaker 1>that's sort of nice optional, or maybe we even shouldn't do.

0:26:57.320 --> 0:27:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Expending every dollar we can productively effectively spend is very

0:27:02.800 --> 0:27:07.760
<v Speaker 1>very important, and we should certainly do it on COVID,

0:27:07.920 --> 0:27:13.960
<v Speaker 1>on COVID cure, on vaccination, on testing, on contact tracing,

0:27:14.520 --> 0:27:20.400
<v Speaker 1>on epidemiological and biological research. Every dollar that can usefully

0:27:20.520 --> 0:27:24.160
<v Speaker 1>be spent on something that's costing US tens of billions

0:27:24.160 --> 0:27:27.760
<v Speaker 1>of dollars a week is an investment we absolutely should

0:27:27.760 --> 0:27:34.320
<v Speaker 1>make as a country. Do we need to be providing

0:27:34.960 --> 0:27:39.960
<v Speaker 1>my children with two thousand dollar tax credits? Do we

0:27:40.040 --> 0:27:43.840
<v Speaker 1>need to be providing families in the upper ten percent

0:27:43.920 --> 0:27:48.439
<v Speaker 1>of the income distribution with UH families of four with

0:27:48.680 --> 0:27:54.679
<v Speaker 1>eight thousand dollars in government cash? Should that be an

0:27:54.800 --> 0:28:00.320
<v Speaker 1>urgent priority UM that comes before fixing the pot holes

0:28:00.359 --> 0:28:06.960
<v Speaker 1>in the highways, that comes before green investment? I'm not sure,

0:28:07.720 --> 0:28:14.520
<v Speaker 1>And especially since the political window is short, especially since

0:28:14.600 --> 0:28:19.080
<v Speaker 1>the time to start implementing the programs is long, I

0:28:19.119 --> 0:28:23.680
<v Speaker 1>would rather see US pivot much more quickly to building

0:28:23.760 --> 0:28:29.359
<v Speaker 1>back better than see us UH in a position of

0:28:30.119 --> 0:28:34.200
<v Speaker 1>using up all the energy and having the huge big

0:28:34.359 --> 0:28:41.440
<v Speaker 1>thing be UM. The provision of funding UM in a

0:28:41.560 --> 0:28:48.680
<v Speaker 1>very general way, especially if that's a precedent setting thing

0:28:48.880 --> 0:28:53.040
<v Speaker 1>that we're then going to feel pressure to continue going forward.

0:28:53.360 --> 0:28:56.080
<v Speaker 1>So let's conclude with a rapid fire around him, Summer says,

0:28:56.080 --> 0:28:58.040
<v Speaker 1>and pick up on something you just said, number one

0:28:58.120 --> 0:29:00.760
<v Speaker 1>you referred to game stop if we end up with

0:29:00.920 --> 0:29:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Robin Hood against the regulators in Washington, because the regulators

0:29:03.680 --> 0:29:07.160
<v Speaker 1>are certainly going after this thing, who's gonna win regulators?

0:29:07.600 --> 0:29:11.960
<v Speaker 1>I think you're going to see a lot of attention

0:29:12.640 --> 0:29:21.400
<v Speaker 1>two issues around manipulation and retail protection. I don't yet,

0:29:21.480 --> 0:29:24.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't feel I know what the right public policy

0:29:24.240 --> 0:29:27.760
<v Speaker 1>answers are, but I think there's a pretty pervasive and

0:29:27.840 --> 0:29:31.840
<v Speaker 1>pretty valid sense that the spectacle of the last two

0:29:31.880 --> 0:29:36.240
<v Speaker 1>weeks and the possible systemic risk that could have happened

0:29:36.240 --> 0:29:40.720
<v Speaker 1>of another LTCM type situation in the last two weeks,

0:29:40.760 --> 0:29:44.200
<v Speaker 1>that public policy should be working to avoid that. And

0:29:44.280 --> 0:29:47.920
<v Speaker 1>I suspect that we'll see new rules and regulations. We

0:29:48.040 --> 0:29:50.240
<v Speaker 1>heard this week from the Bank of England UH and

0:29:50.240 --> 0:29:52.880
<v Speaker 1>they didn't change any of their decision making, but they

0:29:52.960 --> 0:29:55.600
<v Speaker 1>once again sort of had both ways on negative interest rates.

0:29:55.640 --> 0:29:57.440
<v Speaker 1>We're not doing it now, We're not saying we're gonna

0:29:57.440 --> 0:29:59.280
<v Speaker 1>do it, but don't be surprised we do it. At

0:29:59.280 --> 0:30:02.480
<v Speaker 1>some point down the out when history is written, well,

0:30:02.520 --> 0:30:05.240
<v Speaker 1>negative interest rates proved to have been a success or

0:30:05.280 --> 0:30:08.360
<v Speaker 1>a failure. I don't think they're going to be remembered

0:30:09.040 --> 0:30:13.160
<v Speaker 1>as a great success. I think they're gonna be remembered

0:30:13.360 --> 0:30:19.640
<v Speaker 1>more as a sign of desperation in a very difficult time.

0:30:20.200 --> 0:30:22.719
<v Speaker 1>And people are gonna wish that we had used fiscal

0:30:22.800 --> 0:30:26.160
<v Speaker 1>policy more actively, and so there have been less neat

0:30:26.240 --> 0:30:29.320
<v Speaker 1>for monetary policy. Okay, Larry, thank you so very much

0:30:29.360 --> 0:30:31.000
<v Speaker 1>for concluding the week for us, as you always do.

0:30:31.040 --> 0:30:35.840
<v Speaker 1>That's Larry Summers, our special Wall Street. We contribute from Harvard. Finally,

0:30:35.920 --> 0:30:39.600
<v Speaker 1>one more thought. Everybody's doing it now. I'm not talking

0:30:39.600 --> 0:30:42.960
<v Speaker 1>about buying call options on highly shorted stocks, or planning

0:30:43.000 --> 0:30:45.600
<v Speaker 1>vacations for whenever they let us out of this cage

0:30:45.680 --> 0:30:48.960
<v Speaker 1>that is our home, or even buying a COVID puppy. No,

0:30:49.480 --> 0:30:51.800
<v Speaker 1>the craze that has truly taken over the country is

0:30:51.840 --> 0:30:55.640
<v Speaker 1>this back that special purpose acquisition company. But going back

0:30:55.640 --> 0:30:58.840
<v Speaker 1>in is a last resort for companies they couldn't manage.

0:30:58.880 --> 0:31:02.000
<v Speaker 1>An I p O. SPACs have become all the rage

0:31:02.040 --> 0:31:05.360
<v Speaker 1>in this world of cheap money, low returns and volata

0:31:05.440 --> 0:31:08.000
<v Speaker 1>markets that make it really hard to price a traditional

0:31:08.040 --> 0:31:10.480
<v Speaker 1>I p O. If you're a private company on the rise,

0:31:11.080 --> 0:31:13.560
<v Speaker 1>just raise the money without telling anyone what you want

0:31:13.560 --> 0:31:16.680
<v Speaker 1>to buy, make a deal, and presto, change out. You

0:31:16.760 --> 0:31:19.280
<v Speaker 1>have a public company where there was a private one.

0:31:19.520 --> 0:31:22.160
<v Speaker 1>So if you're a former senior member the Trump administration,

0:31:22.240 --> 0:31:24.840
<v Speaker 1>what do you do next? Well, for former Commerce Secretary

0:31:24.880 --> 0:31:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Wilbur Ross, you create a spack and whom you bring

0:31:27.760 --> 0:31:29.960
<v Speaker 1>in to help you run it? Former Director of the

0:31:30.040 --> 0:31:33.360
<v Speaker 1>National Economic Council Larry Cudlow. They've announced plans to raise

0:31:33.440 --> 0:31:36.440
<v Speaker 1>three forty five million dollars for their news back. They

0:31:36.440 --> 0:31:39.080
<v Speaker 1>haven't said what sectors they'll be looking at, although Mr

0:31:39.160 --> 0:31:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Ross has always expressed interest in the privatization of space,

0:31:42.800 --> 0:31:45.200
<v Speaker 1>and Mr Cudlow or Mr Cutler, as we know, knows

0:31:45.240 --> 0:31:48.440
<v Speaker 1>the media rather well. But in the end, maybe the

0:31:48.440 --> 0:31:52.120
<v Speaker 1>price is right for a big private leisure and hospitality group,

0:31:52.480 --> 0:31:56.480
<v Speaker 1>something like maybe the Trump organization. It would be one

0:31:56.520 --> 0:32:00.120
<v Speaker 1>way to turn the table on your old boss. That

0:32:00.160 --> 0:32:02.000
<v Speaker 1>does it. For this episode of Wall Street Week, I'm

0:32:02.040 --> 0:32:08.880
<v Speaker 1>David Western, This is Bloomberg. See you next week. M