WEBVTT - 5/15 Part 2: MLB recap, Kershaw and Paddack stats, and more...

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app,

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>download the tune and app and just search for Fantasy

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:20.960
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on twitch, or on Periscope

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guess dude Fantasy Sports Network. You'll

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 1>find us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening.

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:36.720
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Did let

0:00:36.760 --> 0:00:52.440
<v Speaker 1>me just become best friends? Fantasy best Friends forever? Our

0:00:52.560 --> 0:00:56.240
<v Speaker 1>number two Fantasy best Friends Forever, Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Frankxtample,

0:00:56.320 --> 0:01:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Gregg Susman here for our number two, and we begin

0:01:02.040 --> 0:01:04.600
<v Speaker 1>where we began last hour with the Jets firing head coach,

0:01:05.680 --> 0:01:10.040
<v Speaker 1>firing general manager Mike mccagnan, and Brian Heiberdinger who is

0:01:10.080 --> 0:01:12.840
<v Speaker 1>in their front office Adam Gaze currently the interim GM.

0:01:12.840 --> 0:01:15.440
<v Speaker 1>And it looks like the Jets are going to bring in, uh,

0:01:15.520 --> 0:01:18.360
<v Speaker 1>someone that Gaze really trusts, whether it's Joe Douglas from

0:01:18.360 --> 0:01:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Philadelphia or Daniel Jeremiah from the NHL, from the NFL

0:01:21.880 --> 0:01:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Network or both of them. Just making some changes here Frank, Yeah,

0:01:26.360 --> 0:01:28.160
<v Speaker 1>they absolutely are. If you want to go back and

0:01:28.520 --> 0:01:31.480
<v Speaker 1>watch the first hour of my rant regarding the New

0:01:31.560 --> 0:01:35.240
<v Speaker 1>York Jets and Mike mccagnan, Adam Gaze's entire situation, I'll

0:01:35.280 --> 0:01:38.200
<v Speaker 1>just summing up for you real quickly. It's just incompetence

0:01:38.240 --> 0:01:42.200
<v Speaker 1>at its finest, over and over again, they continue to

0:01:42.240 --> 0:01:44.320
<v Speaker 1>make just terrible decisions. I don't know what Adam Gays

0:01:44.360 --> 0:01:47.160
<v Speaker 1>has done to earn this type of role, this much

0:01:47.200 --> 0:01:50.680
<v Speaker 1>power in an organization, but the Jet's gonna jet. Gregy

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Jets are going to Jet. Also, of course, top stories

0:01:54.280 --> 0:01:57.000
<v Speaker 1>include the NBA Draft a lottery with the New York

0:01:57.080 --> 0:02:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Knicks finished and number three for pick overall goes to

0:02:00.800 --> 0:02:03.200
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans Pelicans. Number two, he's Ben Fish, number four,

0:02:03.400 --> 0:02:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the latt Lakers game Skime one, or the Western Conference Finals,

0:02:07.080 --> 0:02:09.560
<v Speaker 1>what Steph Curry and the Warriors. And then we get

0:02:09.600 --> 0:02:11.280
<v Speaker 1>to a whole lot of baseball from last night. The

0:02:11.320 --> 0:02:14.799
<v Speaker 1>main event last night in Major League Baseball was Chris

0:02:14.840 --> 0:02:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Paddock Clayton Kershaw, and Paddock got roughed out for the

0:02:18.800 --> 0:02:22.240
<v Speaker 1>first time in his career. Frank, Yeah, he did here,

0:02:22.280 --> 0:02:25.360
<v Speaker 1>but look he's going up against the Los Angeles Dodgers.

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:28.960
<v Speaker 1>It's obviously a really tough spot to be in. Um

0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:31.280
<v Speaker 1>it was in Los Angeles. It's going up against a

0:02:31.320 --> 0:02:33.520
<v Speaker 1>tough lineup. He gives up a home run to Jack Peterson,

0:02:33.600 --> 0:02:36.040
<v Speaker 1>he gives up a home run to Cody Bellinger as well.

0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:37.760
<v Speaker 1>You know what, if you're gonna give up a home

0:02:38.080 --> 0:02:40.680
<v Speaker 1>to home runs to lefties, that's a pretty good duo

0:02:40.720 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 1>to give up home runs too. So uh, not really

0:02:43.520 --> 0:02:46.720
<v Speaker 1>worried about Paddick. Overall, gives up six total runs, but

0:02:46.800 --> 0:02:49.400
<v Speaker 1>it was three earned runs. So the defense kind of

0:02:49.480 --> 0:02:51.600
<v Speaker 1>let him down here a little bit as well. The

0:02:51.600 --> 0:02:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Padres had one error here behind him. Um wasn't necessarily efficient.

0:02:56.160 --> 0:02:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Ninety two pitches in four and two thirds ending's pitched.

0:02:59.240 --> 0:03:02.440
<v Speaker 1>And we spoke about this a little bit after after

0:03:02.520 --> 0:03:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Chris paddox dominant performance against the Mets where he struck

0:03:06.080 --> 0:03:09.640
<v Speaker 1>out eleven and he went absolutely nuts. There was gonna

0:03:09.680 --> 0:03:12.799
<v Speaker 1>be some regression at some point, you know, the sub

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:15.720
<v Speaker 1>two e r A, the underlying numbers are all very good,

0:03:16.160 --> 0:03:20.480
<v Speaker 1>but he was still hovering around a three x fips though.

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:22.840
<v Speaker 1>There are going to be some performances, and look if

0:03:22.840 --> 0:03:25.200
<v Speaker 1>they come against the Los Angeles Dodgers of all team

0:03:25.440 --> 0:03:28.000
<v Speaker 1>in Los Angeles. I don't have a huge problem with that.

0:03:28.040 --> 0:03:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Greg fair enough, Chris Paddock says, watched me into my

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:36.960
<v Speaker 1>next start after what happened last night. He's already to

0:03:36.960 --> 0:03:40.160
<v Speaker 1>get back on the mound. Uh And I have no

0:03:40.240 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 1>idea that would be against the Pittsburgh Pirates. Pretty good

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:48.200
<v Speaker 1>team to bounce back against, unless, of course he's gotta

0:03:48.200 --> 0:03:50.600
<v Speaker 1>face Josh Bell, who is we'll get doing a second,

0:03:50.880 --> 0:03:52.840
<v Speaker 1>the honest hitter in baseball. Avengers not even here to

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:59.320
<v Speaker 1>talk about him. Who knows if Clinton Kershaw seven a things,

0:03:59.400 --> 0:04:01.839
<v Speaker 1>five hits, three runs, he walked, one he struck out

0:04:01.840 --> 0:04:04.120
<v Speaker 1>of five allowed to him runs. The ball is flying

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:07.360
<v Speaker 1>out of Dodgers Stadium last night. Frand mill Ray has

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:10.880
<v Speaker 1>hit one in the first and Manny Machadow connected with

0:04:10.920 --> 0:04:13.800
<v Speaker 1>one in the fourth. Forth Machado, He's ninth over of

0:04:13.800 --> 0:04:15.440
<v Speaker 1>the year. It was a quiet ninth over the year

0:04:15.480 --> 0:04:17.760
<v Speaker 1>for Manny Machado, who has the average of sixty five. Now.

0:04:17.800 --> 0:04:19.840
<v Speaker 1>By the way, yeah, and I spoke about him a

0:04:19.839 --> 0:04:22.240
<v Speaker 1>few weeks ago. You're one of my biggest by low candidates.

0:04:22.640 --> 0:04:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Regarding Manny Machado. You know, I saw the first home run.

0:04:26.760 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 1>The home run to Friend mill rais that Clayton Kershaw allowed.

0:04:29.960 --> 0:04:33.080
<v Speaker 1>And if you watch Clayton Kershaw's body language after he

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:34.719
<v Speaker 1>gets the ball back and he's walking around the mound

0:04:34.760 --> 0:04:37.120
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, he's kind of you can tell about

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:40.839
<v Speaker 1>his facial expressions. He's like, Wow, that tells you what

0:04:40.880 --> 0:04:42.760
<v Speaker 1>you need to know about Friend mill Rays. I mean

0:04:42.800 --> 0:04:45.040
<v Speaker 1>that tells me Clayton Kershaw thought that he made a

0:04:45.040 --> 0:04:48.159
<v Speaker 1>pretty good pitch and Friend mill Rays was just a

0:04:48.200 --> 0:04:50.479
<v Speaker 1>little bit better. And that's exactly what I've been saying

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:53.440
<v Speaker 1>about him. This kid is gonna be legit. Strikeouts could

0:04:53.480 --> 0:04:54.800
<v Speaker 1>be a bit of an issue at time, but he's

0:04:54.839 --> 0:04:56.880
<v Speaker 1>a big, massive human being's he's starting to cut down

0:04:56.880 --> 0:05:00.200
<v Speaker 1>the strikeouts a little bit as well, makes optimal contact.

0:05:00.600 --> 0:05:02.240
<v Speaker 1>The home runs are gonna be there. He hits in

0:05:02.279 --> 0:05:05.040
<v Speaker 1>a good part of the lineup, really really like Friend Milrays.

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:09.040
<v Speaker 1>I I liked seeing that reaction from Clayton Kershaw because

0:05:09.040 --> 0:05:12.599
<v Speaker 1>it almost reassured how I feel about Fran Milrays. But

0:05:12.800 --> 0:05:15.680
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to Kershaw, it's more of the same here. Greg.

0:05:15.720 --> 0:05:19.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's been really solid. He's only allowed more

0:05:19.080 --> 0:05:21.800
<v Speaker 1>than three runs once in a start so far this season.

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Through six starts, uh, he's allowed three ye and runs

0:05:24.360 --> 0:05:27.520
<v Speaker 1>or less. Yesterday another quality start. Not that the Padres

0:05:27.520 --> 0:05:29.960
<v Speaker 1>have been a great offense, They've been a little bit

0:05:30.000 --> 0:05:33.560
<v Speaker 1>inconsistent here, but put together a quality start gets a win.

0:05:34.320 --> 0:05:36.840
<v Speaker 1>He's three and all on the season. The strikeouts aren't

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:38.800
<v Speaker 1>where they used to be, but he's actually getting more

0:05:38.880 --> 0:05:42.640
<v Speaker 1>groundballs this year three point three percent groundball rate. I

0:05:42.640 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 1>think if you drafted Clayton Kershaw, you might want a

0:05:45.240 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 1>toy with the idea of selling him now, because I

0:05:47.680 --> 0:05:50.560
<v Speaker 1>do think at some point he's probably gonna get hurt again.

0:05:51.080 --> 0:05:55.359
<v Speaker 1>But he's performing like a top twenty starting pitcher. And

0:05:55.400 --> 0:05:57.680
<v Speaker 1>admittedly I didn't have him ranked there. I think I

0:05:57.720 --> 0:06:00.799
<v Speaker 1>had him ranked closer to thirty, so I was worried

0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 1>about him. I still am kind of worried that at

0:06:02.520 --> 0:06:05.240
<v Speaker 1>some point he probably gets hurt again, Greg, But he's

0:06:05.240 --> 0:06:07.360
<v Speaker 1>performing like a top twenty starting picture right now. So

0:06:07.560 --> 0:06:11.200
<v Speaker 1>if you can get a top twenty return for him

0:06:11.279 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 1>from a starting picture that you expect to be around

0:06:13.240 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 1>longer this year, Greg, and you don't have the injury concerns,

0:06:15.320 --> 0:06:17.080
<v Speaker 1>then it is something that I would look into. If

0:06:17.080 --> 0:06:19.000
<v Speaker 1>you could turn Kershaw on into Jack Flaherty. I'm just

0:06:19.040 --> 0:06:20.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna keep going back to Jack Flaerty. I know he

0:06:20.720 --> 0:06:23.039
<v Speaker 1>walked a ton of guys yesterday and the walks the

0:06:23.040 --> 0:06:25.400
<v Speaker 1>past couple of starts have been alarming. But this kid

0:06:25.440 --> 0:06:29.000
<v Speaker 1>has filthy stuff. If I could start turn Kershaw into

0:06:29.040 --> 0:06:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Flaherty right now, Greg, I would Kershaw into Flaherty. Yeah,

0:06:34.160 --> 0:06:36.279
<v Speaker 1>how do you think I'm with you? Like? I like

0:06:36.320 --> 0:06:39.719
<v Speaker 1>Jack Kershaw has performed well, so like people are gonna

0:06:39.800 --> 0:06:41.919
<v Speaker 1>have a pause here and they're gonna say, well, I pause.

0:06:41.960 --> 0:06:44.000
<v Speaker 1>He only has one start, which wasn't a quality start.

0:06:45.279 --> 0:06:46.880
<v Speaker 1>He's got a three four oh ear a and three

0:06:46.880 --> 0:06:49.520
<v Speaker 1>four two xfit, so he's been pretty damn good. You

0:06:49.600 --> 0:06:51.719
<v Speaker 1>have to expect that at some point he's gonna back

0:06:51.720 --> 0:06:54.600
<v Speaker 1>start turning, to land on the back start turning. He's

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:58.919
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to happen. Yeah, it's nothing crazy for Clint Kershaw.

0:06:59.040 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 1>If I could do it with Flowerty, I might listen.

0:07:01.839 --> 0:07:04.680
<v Speaker 1>You d have the Clayton Kershon thrilled. You're absolutely thrilled, right, Yeah,

0:07:04.680 --> 0:07:06.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people on draft here you're getting huge

0:07:06.360 --> 0:07:08.359
<v Speaker 1>discount on the get him at your SP three sometimes

0:07:08.360 --> 0:07:11.280
<v Speaker 1>you're SP four And I remember writing about this on

0:07:11.280 --> 0:07:13.680
<v Speaker 1>my Patreon before the season, I said, if I could

0:07:13.680 --> 0:07:15.720
<v Speaker 1>get this guy at my SP as my SP four,

0:07:16.000 --> 0:07:18.840
<v Speaker 1>if he continues to drop that far, like it's at

0:07:18.880 --> 0:07:21.240
<v Speaker 1>that point where, yeah, I'll take on the risk of

0:07:21.280 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 1>a Clayton Kershaw even if he gets hurt. He's your

0:07:23.560 --> 0:07:25.480
<v Speaker 1>SP four. He's not one of the guys that you're

0:07:25.600 --> 0:07:28.520
<v Speaker 1>counting on weekend and week out. Once you start getting

0:07:28.520 --> 0:07:31.320
<v Speaker 1>into Sar, he's my SP two, and you know that's

0:07:31.320 --> 0:07:33.200
<v Speaker 1>a guy that you're you're counting on and you need

0:07:33.280 --> 0:07:35.840
<v Speaker 1>him to be there for for the longevity of the season.

0:07:36.160 --> 0:07:37.920
<v Speaker 1>But I I even said this, Craig, if you're getting

0:07:37.960 --> 0:07:39.960
<v Speaker 1>him as your like SP four in that range continues

0:07:40.000 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 1>to fall, that's a great value. What it ulderly turned

0:07:43.480 --> 0:07:46.480
<v Speaker 1>out to be a fantastic value, just like Jock Peterson

0:07:46.720 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 1>was and youth. Peterson and Belinger Homer both in the

0:07:50.320 --> 0:07:53.840
<v Speaker 1>same game once again. Peterson's thirteenth of the year, Bellinger's

0:07:53.880 --> 0:07:56.120
<v Speaker 1>fifteenth of the season. All the Belinger. It feels like

0:07:56.120 --> 0:07:58.040
<v Speaker 1>I haven't hit one in a while despite still batting

0:07:58.040 --> 0:08:02.320
<v Speaker 1>over four last I really he's still hitting four hundred.

0:08:02.320 --> 0:08:04.040
<v Speaker 1>That's crazy. We haven't talked about him in a while,

0:08:04.080 --> 0:08:07.040
<v Speaker 1>but he's still batting over four Yeah, and Jock Peterson

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:10.600
<v Speaker 1>is doing what Jock Peterson always does, mashing against right

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 1>handed pitching. The batting average is not good, but if

0:08:13.200 --> 0:08:14.920
<v Speaker 1>you're playing an ob P league, if you're playing a

0:08:14.960 --> 0:08:18.040
<v Speaker 1>points league, I understand you want volume in points leagues.

0:08:18.080 --> 0:08:20.960
<v Speaker 1>But I think Jock Peterson might be the lone exception

0:08:21.000 --> 0:08:25.440
<v Speaker 1>because when he plays against right handed pitching, he performs

0:08:25.560 --> 0:08:28.640
<v Speaker 1>really damn well. The walk rate up around ten percent,

0:08:29.440 --> 0:08:32.600
<v Speaker 1>the strikeout rate has been down the past three seasons.

0:08:33.440 --> 0:08:36.400
<v Speaker 1>That's fine, it's right around league average. Batting average overall

0:08:36.720 --> 0:08:39.160
<v Speaker 1>not good at two twenty, but he's got a fifty

0:08:39.280 --> 0:08:46.160
<v Speaker 1>percent hard hit rate rate. He does exactly what you

0:08:46.160 --> 0:08:48.160
<v Speaker 1>want him to do. And if you saw last night though,

0:08:48.200 --> 0:08:50.640
<v Speaker 1>the home run that he hit, an absolute missile off

0:08:50.640 --> 0:08:52.360
<v Speaker 1>the bat. It was a line drive. It's not like

0:08:52.400 --> 0:08:56.120
<v Speaker 1>it was like this towering flyball. This was a rocket

0:08:56.480 --> 0:08:59.160
<v Speaker 1>off of one of the better starting pitchers in baseball

0:08:59.400 --> 0:09:02.760
<v Speaker 1>in Chris pat But what's the problem for Chris Pattick

0:09:02.760 --> 0:09:05.480
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to going against Jock Peterson. He's a

0:09:05.520 --> 0:09:10.600
<v Speaker 1>right handed picture Greg sorry advantage, Jock. We talked about

0:09:10.679 --> 0:09:13.800
<v Speaker 1>some of the uh, some of the young players that

0:09:13.800 --> 0:09:16.360
<v Speaker 1>have come up. Let's talk about Oscar Mercado as well,

0:09:16.440 --> 0:09:20.160
<v Speaker 1>because his debut didn't go exactly how you would have hoped.

0:09:20.200 --> 0:09:24.400
<v Speaker 1>He was over three with three strikeouts, did reach based

0:09:24.400 --> 0:09:26.720
<v Speaker 1>on a hit by a pitch, came around to score

0:09:26.800 --> 0:09:30.840
<v Speaker 1>another greatest debut for him yesterday afternoon. But hey, thing's

0:09:30.840 --> 0:09:33.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna go up from here unless your carter keep him.

0:09:33.160 --> 0:09:36.280
<v Speaker 1>A lot of home runs yesterday for Cleveland, including Josie

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Ramiers as you were upset about Frank, Jake Bower's, Ryan

0:09:38.960 --> 0:09:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Luplow and Roberto Perez all going deep for Cleveland. They

0:09:43.400 --> 0:09:46.200
<v Speaker 1>were led by Carlos Carrasco, who was wonderful in his

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:49.840
<v Speaker 1>seven things of work, six hits, six strikeouts. There. Yeah,

0:09:49.840 --> 0:09:53.240
<v Speaker 1>this was a nice little, nice little performance for Carlos

0:09:53.280 --> 0:09:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Carrasco over the last two starts, both had been against

0:09:55.840 --> 0:09:57.839
<v Speaker 1>the White Sox, and I believe his last start was

0:09:57.880 --> 0:10:00.520
<v Speaker 1>even a shortened start because the game either went into

0:10:00.520 --> 0:10:02.839
<v Speaker 1>a delay or ended after five innings. But it was

0:10:02.840 --> 0:10:05.400
<v Speaker 1>the last two starts twelve innings pitched, eight hit, zero

0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:08.760
<v Speaker 1>earned runs, zero walks, twelve strikeouts, again both of those

0:10:08.760 --> 0:10:11.720
<v Speaker 1>coming against the Chicago White Sox, but Hey, you're supposed

0:10:11.720 --> 0:10:13.880
<v Speaker 1>to dominate against the teams that you're supposed to dominate.

0:10:13.880 --> 0:10:16.560
<v Speaker 1>So good performance here for Carlos Carrasco, and you need

0:10:16.640 --> 0:10:19.200
<v Speaker 1>him to continue to build off this, because even after

0:10:19.280 --> 0:10:22.880
<v Speaker 1>seven shoutout endings yesterday four point one eight e r A,

0:10:23.000 --> 0:10:24.880
<v Speaker 1>that's not going to get the job done for Carrasco.

0:10:25.040 --> 0:10:26.640
<v Speaker 1>And I owned him last year in a few leagues

0:10:27.320 --> 0:10:29.320
<v Speaker 1>and it kind of felt similar. He got off to

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:32.480
<v Speaker 1>like a slow ish start, but by season's end, he

0:10:32.520 --> 0:10:35.040
<v Speaker 1>was the Carlos Carrasco we know and love, and I'm

0:10:35.080 --> 0:10:37.560
<v Speaker 1>pretty much expecting the same thing this year. So someone

0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:41.280
<v Speaker 1>in your league is worried about Carrasco one year older,

0:10:41.559 --> 0:10:44.480
<v Speaker 1>sees the overall ear A over four right now, that

0:10:44.600 --> 0:10:46.280
<v Speaker 1>is someone that I would try and take advantage of it.

0:10:46.320 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 1>I would try and acquire Carlos Carrasco because I still

0:10:49.120 --> 0:10:50.840
<v Speaker 1>think he's gonna be Carlos Carrasco by the end of

0:10:50.840 --> 0:10:53.800
<v Speaker 1>the season. Um, Jake Bowers coming around a little bit

0:10:53.800 --> 0:10:56.040
<v Speaker 1>greg the batting average starting to creep up. I know

0:10:56.080 --> 0:10:57.600
<v Speaker 1>he was in the low two hundreds for a lot

0:10:57.840 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 1>of the season, but now up to two forty six hits.

0:11:00.480 --> 0:11:03.200
<v Speaker 1>His fourth home run of the season yesterday. This seems

0:11:03.200 --> 0:11:05.079
<v Speaker 1>like this is what we said about every player for

0:11:05.120 --> 0:11:07.400
<v Speaker 1>the Cleveland Indians to start the year. Everyone's gotten off

0:11:07.440 --> 0:11:11.439
<v Speaker 1>to a slow start. We spoke extensively about Jose ramr

0:11:11.600 --> 0:11:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Is yesterday. It's a home run. It was upset about

0:11:14.400 --> 0:11:16.040
<v Speaker 1>it because I'm going up against him in one of

0:11:16.040 --> 0:11:17.920
<v Speaker 1>my head to head leagues where I'm two and four

0:11:18.160 --> 0:11:19.640
<v Speaker 1>and I don't want to drop to two in five.

0:11:19.679 --> 0:11:22.720
<v Speaker 1>But obviously, if you're a Jose Ramierror's owner Greg, something

0:11:22.760 --> 0:11:25.439
<v Speaker 1>that you need to see clearly. Man Man got hurt

0:11:25.480 --> 0:11:27.199
<v Speaker 1>and he won four innings, a lot of five runs

0:11:27.240 --> 0:11:31.760
<v Speaker 1>and four hits. Man ma'am man bam. Yeah, did you

0:11:31.760 --> 0:11:36.160
<v Speaker 1>give you permission to use that nickname? Model? Thirteen stolen

0:11:36.160 --> 0:11:38.079
<v Speaker 1>bases on the year now for two Managerson still banting

0:11:38.080 --> 0:11:42.720
<v Speaker 1>three twenty. Uh, he's amazing. So that's good. Anything else

0:11:42.760 --> 0:11:44.920
<v Speaker 1>here for the White Sox not really, obviously, we just

0:11:44.920 --> 0:11:47.200
<v Speaker 1>spoke about how dominant Carrasco was, so there wasn't really

0:11:47.280 --> 0:11:49.840
<v Speaker 1>much going off for the White Sox. Yeah, I got,

0:11:49.880 --> 0:11:52.079
<v Speaker 1>I got, I got nothing else there, your boy a

0:11:53.000 --> 0:11:55.440
<v Speaker 1>year nominal, So I was gonna mention that I was like,

0:11:55.440 --> 0:11:57.520
<v Speaker 1>I can't I mention this is just so useless. It

0:11:57.640 --> 0:12:02.240
<v Speaker 1>is useless. It's it's like your love for jimmyka Bonus. Yeah,

0:12:02.280 --> 0:12:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Yakobonus. How's he doing the miners? I don't know.

0:12:05.640 --> 0:12:08.080
<v Speaker 1>You want to talk about useless. Let's not talk about that.

0:12:08.640 --> 0:12:12.920
<v Speaker 1>I do love random relievers. Let's see Jimmy Yaco Bonus

0:12:12.960 --> 0:12:15.000
<v Speaker 1>is dealing with the miners. We should probably like move

0:12:15.040 --> 0:12:16.920
<v Speaker 1>on to another game. All right, is there again that

0:12:16.960 --> 0:12:19.520
<v Speaker 1>you like to move on to? Frank Um, I'll pick it.

0:12:19.840 --> 0:12:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Noah Syndergard dominated Washington last night as the Mets defeat

0:12:24.000 --> 0:12:26.800
<v Speaker 1>the National sixth to synder God when he ends a

0:12:26.840 --> 0:12:30.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of four hits to run struck out six for

0:12:30.360 --> 0:12:33.360
<v Speaker 1>the Metsies, who were led by Wilson Rowlis, finally connecting

0:12:33.400 --> 0:12:35.680
<v Speaker 1>on one his second homer of the year Dominic Smith

0:12:35.720 --> 0:12:37.800
<v Speaker 1>also his first hold run of the year. He believe

0:12:37.800 --> 0:12:39.319
<v Speaker 1>that was his first homer of the year. No, he

0:12:39.360 --> 0:12:41.920
<v Speaker 1>doesn't play all that often, but still, yeah, I can

0:12:42.000 --> 0:12:44.760
<v Speaker 1>believe it. Okay, it just doesn't play. He barely plays,

0:12:44.840 --> 0:12:46.320
<v Speaker 1>and he's not really known as a home run hitter,

0:12:46.360 --> 0:12:49.319
<v Speaker 1>so I think it's pretty believable. Greet all right, Darolas

0:12:49.360 --> 0:12:51.640
<v Speaker 1>and his seventh run of the season, and it feels

0:12:51.679 --> 0:12:53.080
<v Speaker 1>like at least three or four of those have come

0:12:53.120 --> 0:12:57.960
<v Speaker 1>off Syndergard this year. Does this was at least his third? Yes,

0:12:58.280 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 1>you might have three or four of his seven hold

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:02.679
<v Speaker 1>runs against nowhere Cyndergard. So can we get Victor Robost

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:05.480
<v Speaker 1>against nowhare Cyndergard, everybody, please? I don't know why of

0:13:05.520 --> 0:13:08.800
<v Speaker 1>old pictures to dominate, Noahs, cynder Card is the one

0:13:09.040 --> 0:13:12.559
<v Speaker 1>that Victor robosts chooses. But the batting average slipping a

0:13:12.559 --> 0:13:14.520
<v Speaker 1>little bit here for Victor robos gred. He's down to

0:13:14.559 --> 0:13:17.200
<v Speaker 1>two fifty. The county stats are all still really good.

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:20.800
<v Speaker 1>He's got the seven home runs, um only sixteen ribbies

0:13:20.800 --> 0:13:23.320
<v Speaker 1>because he's he's been betting ninth and now he's betting second.

0:13:24.000 --> 0:13:27.120
<v Speaker 1>But all right, let's let's pick a back up a

0:13:27.160 --> 0:13:28.840
<v Speaker 1>little bit here. Victor Robost I don't I don't want

0:13:28.880 --> 0:13:30.680
<v Speaker 1>him to kind of fall in to some kind of

0:13:30.720 --> 0:13:33.760
<v Speaker 1>extended slump, which it seems like the whole Washington Nationals lineup,

0:13:33.960 --> 0:13:36.720
<v Speaker 1>like I understand, they're missing players like heronic O Para's

0:13:36.720 --> 0:13:40.079
<v Speaker 1>batting fifth for this team right now. Brian doeser surprise

0:13:40.120 --> 0:13:43.800
<v Speaker 1>surprise over three batting one. Can we get Carter Keeping

0:13:43.840 --> 0:13:46.280
<v Speaker 1>back up? Can we get him back up? Play second?

0:13:46.280 --> 0:13:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Mase here, Ryan Dozer, what are we doing? What are

0:13:48.640 --> 0:13:51.240
<v Speaker 1>we doing? When it comes to Brian Dozer? No Synderguard here, Greg?

0:13:51.360 --> 0:13:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Interesting start? Um. I do think that streaming you're starting

0:13:54.559 --> 0:13:58.040
<v Speaker 1>pittures against the Washington Nationals a profitable strategy right now.

0:13:58.120 --> 0:14:00.880
<v Speaker 1>I actually use noh Syndergard on Fandel Lad tonight and

0:14:00.920 --> 0:14:03.480
<v Speaker 1>he came through. Unfortunately not enough because I didn't have

0:14:03.520 --> 0:14:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Chris Sale my lineup. Get to that a little bit

0:14:05.160 --> 0:14:07.920
<v Speaker 1>later on, but it was a good start for Syndergard,

0:14:07.960 --> 0:14:10.160
<v Speaker 1>but an interesting one. He had six strikeouts, Greg, he

0:14:10.200 --> 0:14:13.760
<v Speaker 1>only had seven swinging strikes. Continue should just be a

0:14:13.800 --> 0:14:16.040
<v Speaker 1>baffling year. Obviously the result are here, so you'll take

0:14:16.040 --> 0:14:18.400
<v Speaker 1>it like you're fine with it, But just the underlying

0:14:18.480 --> 0:14:23.000
<v Speaker 1>numbers for Syndergard seven swinging strikes consist Nationals lineup right now,

0:14:23.040 --> 0:14:25.280
<v Speaker 1>they're missing a bunch of guys and they're prone to

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:29.880
<v Speaker 1>striking out and only get seven swinging strikes. Swinging strikes

0:14:29.880 --> 0:14:33.800
<v Speaker 1>overall had been down this year for Syndergard, just weird overall.

0:14:33.840 --> 0:14:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Like you'll take the you'll take the results, but I

0:14:36.320 --> 0:14:40.040
<v Speaker 1>do want to see more swinging strikes from Syndergard moving forward. Okay,

0:14:40.800 --> 0:14:46.480
<v Speaker 1>after the start, is he Syndergarden? Yes, I I agree

0:14:46.480 --> 0:14:51.320
<v Speaker 1>with pretty we kind of tell a little bit about here.

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's let let's let people know what exactly did Frank

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:57.320
<v Speaker 1>two for three yesterday with a walk as well. He

0:14:57.360 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 1>was on based three times in his debut with Brewers,

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:03.240
<v Speaker 1>defeated Philadelphia by the score of six to one. Brandon

0:15:03.240 --> 0:15:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Woodroffe weird out because he walked five guys were there,

0:15:05.760 --> 0:15:08.160
<v Speaker 1>only allowed one hit, five strikeouts. The walk did not

0:15:08.360 --> 0:15:10.840
<v Speaker 1>come walks did not come back to hurt him. Uh.

0:15:10.880 --> 0:15:14.040
<v Speaker 1>He allowed no runs on the evening while Corbyn burns

0:15:14.120 --> 0:15:16.720
<v Speaker 1>him and afterwards, Uh, two hits, one run. It wasn't

0:15:16.720 --> 0:15:19.560
<v Speaker 1>earned he did. He did strikeout four. Jaredikoff came back

0:15:19.560 --> 0:15:21.760
<v Speaker 1>down an earth, gets a tough lineup in Milwaukee four

0:15:21.760 --> 0:15:24.320
<v Speaker 1>and he's five runs, eight hits, two walks, two strikeouts,

0:15:24.360 --> 0:15:28.760
<v Speaker 1>his worst outing of the season. Yeah, poor Jaredikof here

0:15:28.840 --> 0:15:31.720
<v Speaker 1>going up against the Milwaukee Brewers again in Citizens Bank Park.

0:15:32.720 --> 0:15:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Ideally I would like to avoid both of these starting

0:15:35.280 --> 0:15:37.680
<v Speaker 1>pitchers in this matchup, but they both have to start weeks,

0:15:37.720 --> 0:15:40.480
<v Speaker 1>so admittedly I would have had Woodroff in my line up.

0:15:40.520 --> 0:15:42.200
<v Speaker 1>I did have him in the lineup. I would have

0:15:42.200 --> 0:15:44.400
<v Speaker 1>had Jared i Cough in my lineup as well, based

0:15:44.440 --> 0:15:46.880
<v Speaker 1>on how he was pitching. But when you get these

0:15:46.920 --> 0:15:49.000
<v Speaker 1>singles starts in a week and you see the Phillies

0:15:49.040 --> 0:15:50.680
<v Speaker 1>on the other side of that matchup, you see the

0:15:50.720 --> 0:15:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Brewers on the other side of that matchup. Unless it's

0:15:53.240 --> 0:15:58.240
<v Speaker 1>like your top starting pitchers overall in fantasy, I really

0:15:58.280 --> 0:16:01.320
<v Speaker 1>want to bench starting pitchers against these teams. They're just really,

0:16:01.320 --> 0:16:04.680
<v Speaker 1>really tough matchups. And Brandon Wouldroff here. I think this

0:16:04.760 --> 0:16:07.320
<v Speaker 1>speaks to how good his stuff really is. The fact

0:16:07.360 --> 0:16:10.680
<v Speaker 1>that he walked five guys and still got through six

0:16:10.800 --> 0:16:16.040
<v Speaker 1>innings unscathed, only allowed one hit, no runs, five strikeouts

0:16:16.120 --> 0:16:19.760
<v Speaker 1>against this Phillies lineup. That speaks to how good his

0:16:19.840 --> 0:16:22.200
<v Speaker 1>stuff really is. And I know Modica talked about him

0:16:22.200 --> 0:16:23.840
<v Speaker 1>a little bit on Monday. We've been talking about him

0:16:23.880 --> 0:16:26.440
<v Speaker 1>for weeks now. He's basically been doing what we wanted

0:16:26.480 --> 0:16:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Corbyn Martin to do. We spoke about Martin and Freddie Peralta,

0:16:30.800 --> 0:16:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Corbyn Martin, Corbin Burns rather Corbin Burns, Freddie Peralta and

0:16:37.120 --> 0:16:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Woodruff before this season as like the young starting

0:16:40.000 --> 0:16:42.560
<v Speaker 1>pitcher crop coming up for the Milwaukee Brewers, and we

0:16:42.600 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 1>all said that they have upside. But the one person

0:16:44.720 --> 0:16:47.440
<v Speaker 1>that has capitalized on that has Brandon Woodruff. If you

0:16:47.440 --> 0:16:49.080
<v Speaker 1>own him, you pick him up for the two star week,

0:16:49.360 --> 0:16:50.840
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna want to keep him around. I think there's

0:16:50.880 --> 0:16:53.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot to like about Brandon. Would would you have

0:16:53.560 --> 0:16:59.600
<v Speaker 1>absolutely getting done? All back there? Absolutely getting it done? No,

0:17:00.040 --> 0:17:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Luckey and Fantasy owners at this point, keep him, hold

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:05.520
<v Speaker 1>on to him and enjoy the ride while you're on it.

0:17:05.640 --> 0:17:07.639
<v Speaker 1>Was there a break here? When we come back, all

0:17:07.680 --> 0:17:10.560
<v Speaker 1>the Fantasy best friends forever, It's Chris sale time as

0:17:10.600 --> 0:17:12.879
<v Speaker 1>he did his best start of the season of his

0:17:12.960 --> 0:17:17.560
<v Speaker 1>career last night and didn't get the wind. In fact,

0:17:18.040 --> 0:17:20.000
<v Speaker 1>red Socks didn't need to get the wind. Let's talking

0:17:20.000 --> 0:17:31.320
<v Speaker 1>about the sale and he's an astroisk Next, lose weight

0:17:31.440 --> 0:17:35.440
<v Speaker 1>now got a fat one dot com. Lose that unwanted

0:17:35.520 --> 0:17:38.920
<v Speaker 1>belly fat today and get free information at fat one

0:17:39.560 --> 0:17:42.280
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Fit in the dress or pets or bathing

0:17:42.280 --> 0:17:46.040
<v Speaker 1>suits you've always wanted to go to fat dot com.

0:17:46.280 --> 0:17:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Lose ten twenty or more pounds immediately go to fat

0:17:50.119 --> 0:17:53.480
<v Speaker 1>one dot com. For free information on how you can

0:17:53.600 --> 0:17:58.240
<v Speaker 1>lose weight, go to fat dot com, fat one dot com,

0:17:58.280 --> 0:18:03.160
<v Speaker 1>that's fat dot com. What's your I R S problem?

0:18:03.240 --> 0:18:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Do you owe back taxes? Is there a lean placed

0:18:06.320 --> 0:18:10.120
<v Speaker 1>on your property? Have your bank accounts been frozen or seized?

0:18:10.600 --> 0:18:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Have your wages been garnished? Are you being audited by

0:18:14.200 --> 0:18:17.000
<v Speaker 1>the I R S? Are they sending you letters that

0:18:17.080 --> 0:18:20.959
<v Speaker 1>demand actions and have urgent due dates? Well, solving your

0:18:21.000 --> 0:18:24.760
<v Speaker 1>tax problems is as easy as calling Taxes three to one.

0:18:25.480 --> 0:18:28.159
<v Speaker 1>The I R S is the largest collection agency in

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the world. You need the best representation to give you

0:18:31.560 --> 0:18:35.400
<v Speaker 1>peace of mind. You need experienced professionals that can cut

0:18:35.440 --> 0:18:38.720
<v Speaker 1>through the red tape and stop the collection process. If

0:18:38.760 --> 0:18:40.879
<v Speaker 1>you have a serious problem with the I r S,

0:18:41.000 --> 0:18:44.520
<v Speaker 1>called the taxes three to one network Today We'll get

0:18:44.560 --> 0:18:48.760
<v Speaker 1>them off your back. Eight hundred nine six one thirty

0:18:48.800 --> 0:18:52.640
<v Speaker 1>six thirty one, eight hundred nine six one thirty six

0:18:52.680 --> 0:18:56.920
<v Speaker 1>thirty one, eight hundred nine six one thirty six thirty one,

0:18:57.320 --> 0:19:03.119
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred nine six one three six three one We

0:19:03.320 --> 0:19:06.320
<v Speaker 1>get Fantasy Update. I see a lot of problems in Jacksonville.

0:19:06.359 --> 0:19:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Look at all the stories this week. The linebacker not

0:19:08.480 --> 0:19:10.520
<v Speaker 1>even gonna play football this. I told her I wanted

0:19:10.560 --> 0:19:13.879
<v Speaker 1>to get on Jacksonville wins total. It's already it's already changed.

0:19:13.960 --> 0:19:15.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it's gone. Like I like under, I don't

0:19:16.000 --> 0:19:17.720
<v Speaker 1>think the Jags are gonna do anything. I know they've

0:19:17.760 --> 0:19:20.800
<v Speaker 1>got some real nice defensive parts, but I just don't.

0:19:20.920 --> 0:19:22.720
<v Speaker 1>I just don't believe in their team. I think they're

0:19:22.760 --> 0:19:24.840
<v Speaker 1>like when what are they actually eight and a half here,

0:19:25.000 --> 0:19:27.879
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the Jaguars win nine games nowhere. Saturday

0:19:27.880 --> 0:19:30.320
<v Speaker 1>and Sunday eleven a m. Eastern on the Fantasy Sports

0:19:30.320 --> 0:19:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Network on your popular podcast Providers, the Warriors easily cover

0:19:52.080 --> 0:19:54.080
<v Speaker 1>the seven half point spread up points bet last night

0:19:54.960 --> 0:19:57.280
<v Speaker 1>two points Did you get in on the easy money

0:19:57.600 --> 0:20:00.439
<v Speaker 1>to the points bet dot com slash great It and

0:20:00.520 --> 0:20:03.399
<v Speaker 1>opened up point bet sports wagering account and to the

0:20:03.400 --> 0:20:07.399
<v Speaker 1>promo code grid and you'll get to risk free beats

0:20:07.880 --> 0:20:14.560
<v Speaker 1>up to one thousand dollars points bet dot Com slash

0:20:15.040 --> 0:20:23.480
<v Speaker 1>grides Grid Frank going off the grid last night. That

0:20:23.600 --> 0:20:28.119
<v Speaker 1>was Chris Sale because he was absolutely awesome in his

0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:31.640
<v Speaker 1>outing at home against the Colorado Rocky Shore. The Rockies

0:20:31.800 --> 0:20:33.640
<v Speaker 1>are not what they have been over the past couple

0:20:33.680 --> 0:20:36.919
<v Speaker 1>of years, struggling both in Denver and away from Denver.

0:20:37.760 --> 0:20:41.040
<v Speaker 1>But still, I don't think anybody expected this. Through seven

0:20:41.119 --> 0:20:47.400
<v Speaker 1>innings last night, Chrysale struck out seven teen batters seventeen

0:20:47.520 --> 0:20:51.240
<v Speaker 1>strikeouts in seven innings. That means he got twenty one

0:20:51.240 --> 0:20:54.800
<v Speaker 1>batters out last night, seventeen of them a game by

0:20:54.880 --> 0:21:01.600
<v Speaker 1>strike out, twenty one outs, seven teen by ricouts, and

0:21:01.720 --> 0:21:05.080
<v Speaker 1>yet three hits two runs. Of course, those runs bill

0:21:05.080 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 1>come into seven ending off the bat of No. One hour,

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:12.440
<v Speaker 1>not an inning later, Brandon Workman blows it. Ryan Brazier

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:17.040
<v Speaker 1>blows it again later, and the Red Sox fall to

0:21:17.080 --> 0:21:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Colorado by the score of five to four. What an

0:21:20.600 --> 0:21:24.280
<v Speaker 1>outing like Chris Sale, who seems okay, absolutely ridiculous. He

0:21:24.359 --> 0:21:27.960
<v Speaker 1>has four double digit strikeout performances in his last five starts.

0:21:28.040 --> 0:21:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Now his seventy three strikeouts in fifty one endings pitched. Uh.

0:21:33.000 --> 0:21:34.600
<v Speaker 1>I think we're good. I think we're good now with

0:21:34.640 --> 0:21:36.240
<v Speaker 1>christ I feel good. I think we're all right. I

0:21:36.240 --> 0:21:38.399
<v Speaker 1>think we're feeling all right here and shout out to

0:21:38.400 --> 0:21:40.399
<v Speaker 1>a rod I'm gonna keep going back to this what

0:21:40.560 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 1>he said on the first day of the season, opening

0:21:43.600 --> 0:21:45.840
<v Speaker 1>day with Chris Sale on ESPN, going up against the

0:21:45.840 --> 0:21:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Seattle Marriagers. He said, by May, middle of May, this

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:52.760
<v Speaker 1>guy's gonna be in in mid season four. He's got

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:54.200
<v Speaker 1>to get his legs underneath him. He didn't have his

0:21:54.280 --> 0:21:57.760
<v Speaker 1>spring training. April was his spring training. May is the

0:21:57.800 --> 0:22:00.440
<v Speaker 1>start of his season. Let's look at what he's done

0:22:00.440 --> 0:22:03.560
<v Speaker 1>in the month of May. Oh, that's only three straight

0:22:03.640 --> 0:22:09.280
<v Speaker 1>games with double digit strikeouts ten, fourteen, and seventeen last

0:22:09.400 --> 0:22:13.199
<v Speaker 1>night against the Colorado Rockies. The team that does is

0:22:13.200 --> 0:22:16.960
<v Speaker 1>prone to striking out, but twenty four swinging strikes. The

0:22:17.040 --> 0:22:19.280
<v Speaker 1>v low has been right around ninety three per hour

0:22:19.359 --> 0:22:21.480
<v Speaker 1>on the fastball each of his past three starts. And

0:22:21.480 --> 0:22:24.000
<v Speaker 1>you know what, I'm good with that. We don't need

0:22:24.080 --> 0:22:26.240
<v Speaker 1>ninety five. We don't need ninety six. Chris Sale. If

0:22:26.280 --> 0:22:29.200
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna work at ninety three and give me seventeen strikeouts,

0:22:29.840 --> 0:22:32.760
<v Speaker 1>we're all right. We're good with that. And you give

0:22:32.840 --> 0:22:34.359
<v Speaker 1>up two runs. If you're gonna give it up to

0:22:34.359 --> 0:22:37.040
<v Speaker 1>anyone it's non Arronado. That's fine, man, I'll give you

0:22:37.080 --> 0:22:39.480
<v Speaker 1>a pass. You gave me seventeen strikeouts. In the main event,

0:22:40.480 --> 0:22:46.560
<v Speaker 1>I love you. I'm sure everyone else does too. Going

0:22:46.600 --> 0:22:49.479
<v Speaker 1>up against Chris Sale. Don't love him. Are you going

0:22:49.560 --> 0:22:52.360
<v Speaker 1>up against him? I'll not say if that that would

0:22:52.359 --> 0:22:54.119
<v Speaker 1>have been the icing on the cake. If you've got

0:22:54.200 --> 0:22:57.119
<v Speaker 1>like to Vladdy home runs in a seventeen strikeout Chris

0:22:57.200 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Sale game, that's the I c on the cake. On

0:22:59.880 --> 0:23:03.160
<v Speaker 1>the other side, Kyle Freeland with six innings start, three runs,

0:23:03.200 --> 0:23:07.520
<v Speaker 1>five inch, I don't want to strike as he did.

0:23:07.920 --> 0:23:09.960
<v Speaker 1>He didn't allow just want to run. He left three.

0:23:10.320 --> 0:23:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Come on, Red Sox, you kidd Kyle Freeland. You let

0:23:13.400 --> 0:23:15.679
<v Speaker 1>this guy get a quality start against me. Look at

0:23:15.720 --> 0:23:17.920
<v Speaker 1>what he's done the past couple of started. Gotta get

0:23:17.960 --> 0:23:21.960
<v Speaker 1>an ear a over six entering this start. Gosh, But

0:23:22.160 --> 0:23:23.840
<v Speaker 1>if you're a Kyle Freeland owner, I don't know why

0:23:23.920 --> 0:23:26.639
<v Speaker 1>you would have been. And spoke to Modiq about this

0:23:26.720 --> 0:23:29.800
<v Speaker 1>on Monday. If I own that was the tell tale.

0:23:29.800 --> 0:23:31.840
<v Speaker 1>If you can't start Kyle Freeland on a two start

0:23:31.880 --> 0:23:34.320
<v Speaker 1>week on the road with neither of those starts coming

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:37.359
<v Speaker 1>in course field, and he probably shouldn't be owned. So admittedly,

0:23:37.480 --> 0:23:39.760
<v Speaker 1>if I owned him, I would have dropped him. He

0:23:39.840 --> 0:23:41.280
<v Speaker 1>would have not been in my line for this one.

0:23:41.359 --> 0:23:44.560
<v Speaker 1>But overall, it is a good start, quality start here

0:23:44.600 --> 0:23:46.560
<v Speaker 1>for Kyle Freeland. But even after it with the seven

0:23:46.600 --> 0:23:48.840
<v Speaker 1>strike Aus got a five six eight e r A

0:23:50.000 --> 0:23:52.480
<v Speaker 1>fact that he pitches in Colorado. It's I just don't

0:23:52.520 --> 0:23:54.320
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of faith in Kyle Freeland. And it's

0:23:54.320 --> 0:23:57.159
<v Speaker 1>nothing against him. I mean, he was really good last year, Greg,

0:23:57.359 --> 0:23:59.240
<v Speaker 1>he was he was like a sub three e r

0:23:59.280 --> 0:24:01.280
<v Speaker 1>A last year and he figured out how to pitch

0:24:01.320 --> 0:24:03.159
<v Speaker 1>in corpse field. But for whatever reason, this year it

0:24:03.720 --> 0:24:06.280
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been the same case. So maybe later on down

0:24:06.520 --> 0:24:08.080
<v Speaker 1>down the line the season, if he starts to figure

0:24:08.119 --> 0:24:09.439
<v Speaker 1>it out again. Is the guy that you could pick up.

0:24:09.440 --> 0:24:10.840
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think that he should be on roster's

0:24:10.920 --> 0:24:14.360
<v Speaker 1>right now. Michael Javis, j D Martinez, Raffie Dever's all

0:24:14.680 --> 0:24:18.400
<v Speaker 1>go boom against Kyle Freeland. Here, Michael Javis, man can't stop,

0:24:18.440 --> 0:24:22.400
<v Speaker 1>won't stops slumping, came back back. It's the seventh whole

0:24:22.440 --> 0:24:25.040
<v Speaker 1>run of the season for Javis Devers, only his third

0:24:25.640 --> 0:24:29.280
<v Speaker 1>JE eight. Really wish that I picked up Michael Javis

0:24:29.320 --> 0:24:33.040
<v Speaker 1>instead of Carter keep him Greg. Sorry, Frank, it's not

0:24:33.119 --> 0:24:36.639
<v Speaker 1>your fault. I had as much of a you know,

0:24:36.760 --> 0:24:40.119
<v Speaker 1>as much of a handle on my own doing. It

0:24:40.240 --> 0:24:41.720
<v Speaker 1>wasn't you. It wasn't you who put the bid in

0:24:41.800 --> 0:24:44.880
<v Speaker 1>it was me. So without looking Raffie Devers, even though

0:24:44.880 --> 0:24:47.280
<v Speaker 1>he has three home runs, never mind, what I had

0:24:47.320 --> 0:24:53.040
<v Speaker 1>to say without lookings is his averages. He's crushing it

0:24:53.200 --> 0:24:55.119
<v Speaker 1>right now. I mean, you want more power, and its

0:24:55.119 --> 0:24:57.000
<v Speaker 1>starting to come. I feel like he's hit all three

0:24:57.000 --> 0:24:58.520
<v Speaker 1>of these home runs in the past week or two,

0:24:59.119 --> 0:25:00.960
<v Speaker 1>so it's starting to come a little bit. And and

0:25:01.119 --> 0:25:02.960
<v Speaker 1>mind you, last night it was still really cold. It

0:25:03.080 --> 0:25:04.760
<v Speaker 1>was cold here in the Northeast. It was really cold,

0:25:04.800 --> 0:25:06.680
<v Speaker 1>and Boston it was it was a gloomy weather. And

0:25:07.119 --> 0:25:10.080
<v Speaker 1>with all of that being said, is just hitting one.

0:25:10.760 --> 0:25:12.760
<v Speaker 1>So I think that as the weather starts to heat

0:25:12.800 --> 0:25:14.400
<v Speaker 1>up a little bit, maybe we don't get the same

0:25:14.520 --> 0:25:17.240
<v Speaker 1>power that we wanted starting into this coming into the season.

0:25:17.560 --> 0:25:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Maybe we don't get like the plus home runs we're

0:25:20.400 --> 0:25:22.920
<v Speaker 1>expecting from Devers. But if he gives you twenty to

0:25:23.000 --> 0:25:26.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty two with a three batting average in the middle

0:25:26.160 --> 0:25:28.200
<v Speaker 1>of this lineup, the county stats are gonna be there.

0:25:28.600 --> 0:25:30.840
<v Speaker 1>I think you'll take that, Greg, so you'll sacrifice some

0:25:30.880 --> 0:25:32.240
<v Speaker 1>of the power you didn't get from Devors. If you

0:25:32.240 --> 0:25:34.760
<v Speaker 1>give you a three batting average, you'll take that. And

0:25:34.840 --> 0:25:37.200
<v Speaker 1>this this is part of the player that I wanted

0:25:37.320 --> 0:25:39.200
<v Speaker 1>last year just it just didn't come to fruition. I

0:25:39.320 --> 0:25:43.600
<v Speaker 1>was one year early, Endeavors, one year earlier, Raphael never, Frank,

0:25:43.960 --> 0:25:47.280
<v Speaker 1>we're in this together, as we are in everything. Houston

0:25:47.480 --> 0:25:49.520
<v Speaker 1>went into Detroit last night. Can we not move on

0:25:49.640 --> 0:25:50.920
<v Speaker 1>yet really quickly? I just want to start at the

0:25:51.000 --> 0:25:53.000
<v Speaker 1>top here of the of the Red Sox lineup against

0:25:53.000 --> 0:25:57.399
<v Speaker 1>the lefty. Then Intendee over six four strikeouts, continues to

0:25:57.400 --> 0:26:00.480
<v Speaker 1>struggle against lefties. How Freeland not like he's the best

0:26:00.560 --> 0:26:05.600
<v Speaker 1>lefty of all time either, So I didn't over six

0:26:05.800 --> 0:26:08.879
<v Speaker 1>to sixty five batting average. Now for ben Intende O P.

0:26:09.119 --> 0:26:11.240
<v Speaker 1>S oh Along. What I said about him, Greg was

0:26:11.680 --> 0:26:13.800
<v Speaker 1>you take him at the like two three turn. You're

0:26:13.800 --> 0:26:16.080
<v Speaker 1>expecting him to take a step that he's never he's

0:26:16.119 --> 0:26:18.439
<v Speaker 1>never done yet, and it doesn't look like he's doing

0:26:18.480 --> 0:26:20.600
<v Speaker 1>that right now either. There still a lot of time

0:26:20.640 --> 0:26:22.920
<v Speaker 1>to go, like he can turn it around, but he's

0:26:22.920 --> 0:26:24.520
<v Speaker 1>got it, you know, get that out of the way.

0:26:24.600 --> 0:26:26.000
<v Speaker 1>It's a double pat of the back day for you.

0:26:28.160 --> 0:26:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Then Detroit fell to Houston eleven of four, and our

0:26:31.640 --> 0:26:33.520
<v Speaker 1>guys knew and everybody knew he used to be going

0:26:33.560 --> 0:26:36.120
<v Speaker 1>to Detroit and just crushed them, and they did. Wait,

0:26:36.240 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Miley didn't get a quality start though, six and things

0:26:38.600 --> 0:26:41.320
<v Speaker 1>seven hits, four runs, two walks, five strikeouts, but Houston

0:26:41.440 --> 0:26:44.800
<v Speaker 1>was all bombs away is George Springer is now in

0:26:44.880 --> 0:26:46.480
<v Speaker 1>the lead for the most home runs in the American

0:26:46.560 --> 0:26:49.280
<v Speaker 1>League with sixteen of them. Don't pat yourselfing back for

0:26:49.320 --> 0:26:51.199
<v Speaker 1>that one. No, I will not. You can pat your

0:26:51.480 --> 0:26:53.720
<v Speaker 1>cell phone the back for that one, Greggy Um. I

0:26:53.880 --> 0:26:56.760
<v Speaker 1>apologize to John Lester and Madison Bumgarner early on in

0:26:56.840 --> 0:27:00.240
<v Speaker 1>the season. Now was the time to apologize to George. Here.

0:27:00.280 --> 0:27:03.479
<v Speaker 1>I am sorry George, because what you were doing right

0:27:03.520 --> 0:27:07.040
<v Speaker 1>now is just otherworldly. Look, he has sixteen home runs

0:27:07.080 --> 0:27:09.560
<v Speaker 1>in forty three games this year. He hit twenty two

0:27:09.640 --> 0:27:12.240
<v Speaker 1>home runs in a hundred and forty games last year.

0:27:12.359 --> 0:27:15.200
<v Speaker 1>So something, whatever you're doing, just keep doing it because

0:27:15.200 --> 0:27:17.360
<v Speaker 1>it's working. And he's got four stolen bases on top

0:27:17.400 --> 0:27:20.119
<v Speaker 1>of that. He had six and all of last season.

0:27:20.560 --> 0:27:23.719
<v Speaker 1>What we've what we've said about Springer was he has

0:27:23.760 --> 0:27:28.040
<v Speaker 1>the athleticism athleticism to steal bases. He just hasn't been

0:27:28.160 --> 0:27:30.000
<v Speaker 1>very efficient at doing so. Look at the past couple

0:27:30.040 --> 0:27:33.600
<v Speaker 1>of years, six for ten, five for twelve, nine for nineteen,

0:27:33.680 --> 0:27:36.000
<v Speaker 1>he hasn't been efficient. But so far this year or

0:27:36.119 --> 0:27:41.000
<v Speaker 1>for five nine batting average, sixteen homers, thirty nine runs,

0:27:41.359 --> 0:27:45.240
<v Speaker 1>thirty nine r b i s, fifty percent hard hit rate.

0:27:45.680 --> 0:27:47.320
<v Speaker 1>I was a little worried about Springer coming into this

0:27:47.400 --> 0:27:49.199
<v Speaker 1>year because he had never posted a hard hit rate

0:27:49.240 --> 0:27:52.520
<v Speaker 1>above Last year he was thirty three percent. He was

0:27:52.600 --> 0:27:56.760
<v Speaker 1>below league average. So I think the process of having

0:27:56.880 --> 0:28:01.000
<v Speaker 1>question marks regarding George Springer heading into the season was accurate.

0:28:01.480 --> 0:28:04.120
<v Speaker 1>But he's putting together and he's been like nothing we've

0:28:04.160 --> 0:28:06.159
<v Speaker 1>ever seen from him before. And shout out to Springer man,

0:28:06.160 --> 0:28:09.240
<v Speaker 1>he's getting it done again. Hard hit rate, he's absolutely

0:28:09.320 --> 0:28:11.959
<v Speaker 1>mashing um. He's got a career high eleven point eight

0:28:12.000 --> 0:28:16.680
<v Speaker 1>percent walk great. Right now, this Houston Nastrols lineup, Creig,

0:28:16.680 --> 0:28:19.040
<v Speaker 1>they're putting up video game numbers. Yea. I tweeted this

0:28:19.080 --> 0:28:20.840
<v Speaker 1>out last night. It's it's like they're playing the show

0:28:20.880 --> 0:28:23.600
<v Speaker 1>on rookie mode. Everything, like they're seeing the baseball like

0:28:23.640 --> 0:28:27.200
<v Speaker 1>it's a beach ball right now. Everybody or those Korea

0:28:27.240 --> 0:28:30.480
<v Speaker 1>went off last night, going off. He's been going off

0:28:30.800 --> 0:28:33.359
<v Speaker 1>lead Miss Diaz another home run, fifth home run of

0:28:33.400 --> 0:28:35.879
<v Speaker 1>the season, with the on the I l hey man,

0:28:36.000 --> 0:28:38.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's you just want to exposeure to this

0:28:38.080 --> 0:28:41.520
<v Speaker 1>lineup right now. And you know what, you know who

0:28:41.640 --> 0:28:43.680
<v Speaker 1>hit a home run last night as well? It might

0:28:43.760 --> 0:28:45.760
<v Speaker 1>just be an organizational thing all the way down the line.

0:28:46.240 --> 0:28:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Tucker hit a home run last night too. You

0:28:48.840 --> 0:28:52.680
<v Speaker 1>know who went oh for five with three strikeouts d

0:28:52.960 --> 0:28:57.320
<v Speaker 1>H four the Astros. That's Tyler White bringing up Greggy.

0:28:58.120 --> 0:29:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Are we getting close to Kyle Tucker time? Very much? So?

0:29:00.720 --> 0:29:02.640
<v Speaker 1>I think we are very much so. I think we are.

0:29:02.720 --> 0:29:04.320
<v Speaker 1>And that means it's not necessarily close to you were

0:29:04.360 --> 0:29:06.920
<v Speaker 1>in Alvarez time, not on the forty. It's closer to

0:29:07.040 --> 0:29:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Tucker time. And it's not a knock on Alvaist who.

0:29:09.720 --> 0:29:11.200
<v Speaker 1>I know a lot of people are stashing your on

0:29:11.240 --> 0:29:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Alvarez and they're excited about him, and you should be.

0:29:13.440 --> 0:29:15.520
<v Speaker 1>He's been the number one hitter in the minors this year.

0:29:15.800 --> 0:29:17.960
<v Speaker 1>But he's not on the forty man roster for the Astros.

0:29:18.360 --> 0:29:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Now they could finagle things quite easily. Nikki Lopez was

0:29:21.440 --> 0:29:23.320
<v Speaker 1>not on the forty man roster, I believe for the Royals,

0:29:23.520 --> 0:29:25.880
<v Speaker 1>and he get paid like French Windel like. It's very

0:29:25.920 --> 0:29:28.840
<v Speaker 1>easy to do like the Astros. If they want your

0:29:28.840 --> 0:29:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Don Alvarez is they probably would have done it by now.

0:29:31.880 --> 0:29:33.800
<v Speaker 1>They would have defaide someone moved someone to the sixty

0:29:33.880 --> 0:29:36.360
<v Speaker 1>day I l and then you get your on Alvarez

0:29:36.400 --> 0:29:39.280
<v Speaker 1>on the forty man. But they haven't, And Kyle Tucker

0:29:39.320 --> 0:29:41.000
<v Speaker 1>is starting to pick it up in a major way.

0:29:41.000 --> 0:29:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Of the past couple of weeks, he's been matching. It's

0:29:42.840 --> 0:29:45.080
<v Speaker 1>another home run last night. I think we might be

0:29:45.080 --> 0:29:47.920
<v Speaker 1>getting close to either Kyle Tucker coming up and being

0:29:48.000 --> 0:29:50.240
<v Speaker 1>the right feeler for the Astros. They'll move Reddick to

0:29:50.360 --> 0:29:52.800
<v Speaker 1>d H or or vice versa. We're getting close. When

0:29:52.800 --> 0:29:59.400
<v Speaker 1>you said you who else? Homeward? Last night Rooney his

0:29:59.600 --> 0:30:03.160
<v Speaker 1>six homer of the season. This guy packs a punch, man.

0:30:03.600 --> 0:30:06.480
<v Speaker 1>He's like, he's like this little stocky middle infilar dude,

0:30:06.520 --> 0:30:09.080
<v Speaker 1>and he just packs a punch. Two more hits last night,

0:30:09.600 --> 0:30:13.760
<v Speaker 1>six runs, three ribbis. But we picked him up a

0:30:13.800 --> 0:30:15.360
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks ago. I picked him up in in

0:30:15.400 --> 0:30:17.360
<v Speaker 1>a few leeks, and I've been reading all these benefits.

0:30:17.400 --> 0:30:19.840
<v Speaker 1>He had a multi home run game over the weekend

0:30:19.920 --> 0:30:22.840
<v Speaker 1>as well. Get this guy on your roster, especially if

0:30:22.840 --> 0:30:26.520
<v Speaker 1>you're playing Yahoo. He has like every position eligibility except

0:30:26.560 --> 0:30:29.120
<v Speaker 1>catcher and pictures. So I'm finding a way to get

0:30:29.200 --> 0:30:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Ronnie Rodriguez on my team. Keeps getting it done, Grege, Yes,

0:30:32.280 --> 0:30:35.400
<v Speaker 1>he does a Ronnie Rodriguez a potential replacement as well

0:30:35.480 --> 0:30:38.360
<v Speaker 1>for Elvis Andres for those at last for sure. Yeah, um,

0:30:40.000 --> 0:30:42.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna save it. But let's not say, let's have

0:30:42.760 --> 0:30:47.080
<v Speaker 1>some fun. Josh Bell Man, Josh Bell I dropped him

0:30:47.320 --> 0:30:49.080
<v Speaker 1>week one. This is when my early jobs come back

0:30:49.080 --> 0:30:51.960
<v Speaker 1>to haunt me. Oh gosh. Yeah. In the pit League,

0:30:52.440 --> 0:30:54.960
<v Speaker 1>had Josh Bell drafted Josh Bell, I was like, you

0:30:55.040 --> 0:30:56.960
<v Speaker 1>know what, he was really cold at the first week

0:30:57.040 --> 0:30:58.960
<v Speaker 1>or two. Just be a lesson to you, Greig and

0:30:59.000 --> 0:31:01.800
<v Speaker 1>everyone out there who has a quick trigger finger, especially

0:31:01.800 --> 0:31:03.680
<v Speaker 1>in fantasy baseball. Man, it's so hard to have a

0:31:03.760 --> 0:31:07.560
<v Speaker 1>quick trigger finger. So long had it and a job.

0:31:07.680 --> 0:31:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Josh Bell, dude, I want you're gonna You're about to

0:31:13.640 --> 0:31:18.480
<v Speaker 1>guess where he ranks in all statcast categories, average eggs, velocity.

0:31:18.600 --> 0:31:24.120
<v Speaker 1>What percentile would you say is hard hit rate? Say

0:31:26.320 --> 0:31:31.080
<v Speaker 1>you're off again x wOBA expected whoba, You're off again?

0:31:31.600 --> 0:31:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Expected slugging percentage should have stuck with ninety eight expected

0:31:36.760 --> 0:31:44.959
<v Speaker 1>batting average, don't sell him short man three batting average,

0:31:44.960 --> 0:31:48.360
<v Speaker 1>a multi homer game, twelve home runs, thirty nine ribbies.

0:31:48.440 --> 0:31:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Admittedly wasn't really a Josh Bell guy coming into the season.

0:31:51.480 --> 0:31:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Shout out to Venture, Shout out to Matt Modica. Two

0:31:53.800 --> 0:31:57.720
<v Speaker 1>guys that I know we're advocates of Josh Bell, and

0:31:57.760 --> 0:32:01.080
<v Speaker 1>he's stuck by him the prospect pedigree, and he's just

0:32:01.200 --> 0:32:03.600
<v Speaker 1>getting it done. Man. Last year his average eggs velocity

0:32:03.680 --> 0:32:08.080
<v Speaker 1>nine pretty good, this year five point three. He's just

0:32:08.160 --> 0:32:10.920
<v Speaker 1>seeing the ball more clearly. And what we've said about

0:32:10.960 --> 0:32:12.680
<v Speaker 1>him kind of similar to yell it over the past

0:32:12.720 --> 0:32:14.800
<v Speaker 1>couple of years. If he started to raise the ball

0:32:14.840 --> 0:32:16.720
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, raises launch angle, hit a little bit

0:32:16.760 --> 0:32:19.880
<v Speaker 1>more line drives, hit some fly balls, the guy could

0:32:19.920 --> 0:32:22.920
<v Speaker 1>take off. And he's a big human being, he's strong,

0:32:23.280 --> 0:32:26.360
<v Speaker 1>and he's doing exactly that he's talked about it. Uh,

0:32:26.400 --> 0:32:28.920
<v Speaker 1>it's something he's consciously trying to do. Last year, his

0:32:29.000 --> 0:32:32.720
<v Speaker 1>average launch angle nine point two degrees on average, this

0:32:32.840 --> 0:32:35.480
<v Speaker 1>year eleven point four. So hitting more line drives, putting

0:32:35.520 --> 0:32:38.280
<v Speaker 1>the ball in the air. He's expected batting averages three

0:32:38.360 --> 0:32:43.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty his barrel percentage, that's optimal contact. You're getting the

0:32:43.080 --> 0:32:46.680
<v Speaker 1>barrel on the ball se of his batted balls. Man,

0:32:46.880 --> 0:32:50.440
<v Speaker 1>It's just he's crushing it. He's been absolutely unbelievable. All

0:32:50.440 --> 0:32:53.840
<v Speaker 1>the credit for that one. Yeah, I know Matt Modigo

0:32:53.920 --> 0:32:55.320
<v Speaker 1>was on him too, but yeah, Chris Venture, that was

0:32:55.360 --> 0:32:56.960
<v Speaker 1>this guy. He was all over it. He's got good

0:32:56.960 --> 0:33:01.040
<v Speaker 1>places just when he walks as well. He's absolutely man.

0:33:01.240 --> 0:33:05.800
<v Speaker 1>I've heard people ask questions of Joey Vodo or Josh Bell.

0:33:05.880 --> 0:33:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Do you know do I still have faith in Joey Votto? No, man,

0:33:10.480 --> 0:33:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Josh Bell the top ten first basement this year, he's

0:33:12.760 --> 0:33:17.240
<v Speaker 1>absolutely legit. I'm buying in. He's made a change and

0:33:17.280 --> 0:33:20.400
<v Speaker 1>the results are paying off. If you're asking me Matt

0:33:20.600 --> 0:33:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Carpenter or Josh Bell, Joey Vodo or Josh Bell, any

0:33:24.160 --> 0:33:28.280
<v Speaker 1>of like these middling veterans, I'm taking Josh Bell. Maybe

0:33:28.320 --> 0:33:31.560
<v Speaker 1>not Jose You love your middling veterans. You'r a huge

0:33:31.560 --> 0:33:35.320
<v Speaker 1>middling veteran guy. You want altlet pools this week, Well

0:33:35.360 --> 0:33:38.600
<v Speaker 1>that's because Josh Bell isn't available. Greg. But I don't

0:33:38.640 --> 0:33:40.600
<v Speaker 1>have Joey Vado on any of my teams, like you

0:33:40.640 --> 0:33:42.560
<v Speaker 1>don't have Matt Carpenter or on any of my teams.

0:33:43.440 --> 0:33:46.120
<v Speaker 1>No you don't. I do have Jose Bravey because the

0:33:46.160 --> 0:33:48.280
<v Speaker 1>price was right. So I guess it's just middling. Um,

0:33:48.840 --> 0:33:52.240
<v Speaker 1>it's just middling pictures vetteran pictures that you like. I

0:33:52.320 --> 0:33:56.280
<v Speaker 1>get behind that. Uh, Joe Muska rebounded a big, big way.

0:33:56.400 --> 0:33:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Seven innings, one hit, two walks, five strike as. Excellent

0:34:00.120 --> 0:34:03.320
<v Speaker 1>start for Joe Musgrove. Will only threw seventy five pitches

0:34:03.360 --> 0:34:05.000
<v Speaker 1>in this one. So why didn't he go eight? That's

0:34:05.040 --> 0:34:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the question that I have. Maybe they just wanted to

0:34:06.960 --> 0:34:08.960
<v Speaker 1>get him out. We get couldn't hurt along the line

0:34:08.960 --> 0:34:10.480
<v Speaker 1>because I want to I want to know. Well, I

0:34:10.520 --> 0:34:12.239
<v Speaker 1>can tell you why, because it looks like in the

0:34:12.360 --> 0:34:16.160
<v Speaker 1>eighth inning the Pirates, uh Diamondbacks were sending up some big,

0:34:16.200 --> 0:34:18.560
<v Speaker 1>big boppers. You know, he's got pitched hit fourth though

0:34:18.600 --> 0:34:22.400
<v Speaker 1>maybe they had a rally going maybe potentially. Yeah, I

0:34:22.440 --> 0:34:26.000
<v Speaker 1>mean this is a big hi haters. Joe musgro Performance here,

0:34:26.440 --> 0:34:29.520
<v Speaker 1>shutting up all the haters here, seven shutout an. He's

0:34:29.520 --> 0:34:33.120
<v Speaker 1>greg one hit, two walks, five strikeouts. The walks you

0:34:33.239 --> 0:34:34.879
<v Speaker 1>really wanted to see the command come back here because

0:34:34.920 --> 0:34:37.160
<v Speaker 1>in his previous start it was either four or five walks.

0:34:37.200 --> 0:34:39.080
<v Speaker 1>And that's not like Joe Musgrove. This is the guy

0:34:39.080 --> 0:34:41.239
<v Speaker 1>who prides himself and having good come in and not

0:34:41.400 --> 0:34:44.560
<v Speaker 1>giving up. You know, people on bass paths via the walk,

0:34:44.840 --> 0:34:47.400
<v Speaker 1>and he bounced back only two walks, only one hit.

0:34:47.719 --> 0:34:50.919
<v Speaker 1>Not that the Diamondbacks are murderers row, but you need

0:34:51.080 --> 0:34:54.440
<v Speaker 1>to see a guy bounce back somewhat after a performance.

0:34:54.520 --> 0:34:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Two performances that he just had. So even with everything

0:34:57.600 --> 0:35:00.879
<v Speaker 1>that's gone on start off the season really high had

0:35:00.920 --> 0:35:03.960
<v Speaker 1>a hiccup, two or three pretty bad performances in a

0:35:04.080 --> 0:35:06.320
<v Speaker 1>row as a lights out performance last night at the

0:35:06.360 --> 0:35:09.399
<v Speaker 1>ear A. Greg still sits at three point five nine

0:35:09.840 --> 0:35:12.040
<v Speaker 1>and last week when we were talking about Musgrove, that's

0:35:12.040 --> 0:35:14.040
<v Speaker 1>exactly where I said he's probably gonna live. He's probably

0:35:14.040 --> 0:35:16.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna live in that three five to three seven e

0:35:16.200 --> 0:35:20.200
<v Speaker 1>r A range. He's a good picture. Maybe we've overrated

0:35:20.280 --> 0:35:21.839
<v Speaker 1>him a little bit over the past couple of years,

0:35:22.640 --> 0:35:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Joe Musgrove, but he is a good picture, and I

0:35:26.120 --> 0:35:29.080
<v Speaker 1>think he's he's gonna he's gonna sit in that three

0:35:29.160 --> 0:35:31.200
<v Speaker 1>five to three seven range with a good whip because

0:35:31.680 --> 0:35:33.680
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't walk all that many batters. Luke, we will

0:35:33.719 --> 0:35:36.000
<v Speaker 1>give you a quality start with six innings of seven hits,

0:35:36.040 --> 0:35:39.600
<v Speaker 1>three runs, two walks, and five strikeouts. Zack Godley comes

0:35:39.600 --> 0:35:41.920
<v Speaker 1>in to relieve. Not great, Bob. He has the home runs,

0:35:42.120 --> 0:35:44.520
<v Speaker 1>uh to Cool Tucker and one of them to Josh Bell.

0:35:44.800 --> 0:35:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Greg Holland came in in a mop up role, trying

0:35:47.160 --> 0:35:49.160
<v Speaker 1>to get back on track, allow to hit a walk,

0:35:49.320 --> 0:35:52.520
<v Speaker 1>did strike out too well? Greg, you said not great,

0:35:52.560 --> 0:35:55.719
<v Speaker 1>Bob regarding Zack Godley, and I would like to say,

0:35:56.120 --> 0:36:00.480
<v Speaker 1>as somebody who starts my hitters against that godly great job, Bob,

0:36:00.760 --> 0:36:02.680
<v Speaker 1>I actually would like to see more z god so

0:36:02.719 --> 0:36:05.200
<v Speaker 1>that we could get some more home runs in fantasy baseball.

0:36:05.440 --> 0:36:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Luke Weaver puts together quality start here. The guy has

0:36:08.000 --> 0:36:10.239
<v Speaker 1>been money all year. I mean three point one six

0:36:10.320 --> 0:36:12.959
<v Speaker 1>e r eight, five strikeouts in six and he's pitched.

0:36:13.400 --> 0:36:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you were expecting something a little bit better here

0:36:15.600 --> 0:36:18.520
<v Speaker 1>against the Pirates lineup, but are you really going to

0:36:18.560 --> 0:36:21.160
<v Speaker 1>complain of our quality start? Luke Weaver was going outside

0:36:21.200 --> 0:36:24.080
<v Speaker 1>the top sixties starting pitchers this year, maybe outside the

0:36:24.120 --> 0:36:26.000
<v Speaker 1>top seventy, and look what he's done for you so

0:36:26.080 --> 0:36:28.200
<v Speaker 1>far this year. So he's really been one of the

0:36:28.239 --> 0:36:30.400
<v Speaker 1>biggest surprises. Greg, I would say maybe outside of like

0:36:30.480 --> 0:36:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Caleb Smith as someone who was going outside the top

0:36:33.200 --> 0:36:35.879
<v Speaker 1>sixty seventy starting pitchers who has returned the most value

0:36:35.880 --> 0:36:38.319
<v Speaker 1>of those far. We talked about Luke Weaver though we did,

0:36:38.440 --> 0:36:40.359
<v Speaker 1>we were, we were, we were, we were perfectly because

0:36:40.400 --> 0:36:45.040
<v Speaker 1>we were on him, but not enough and we ended

0:36:45.120 --> 0:36:46.960
<v Speaker 1>up not drafted. Did we draft Hi anywhere? I don't

0:36:47.000 --> 0:36:48.400
<v Speaker 1>think we did, Like you might have got him. Did

0:36:48.400 --> 0:36:50.759
<v Speaker 1>we get him in the auction? That's what I was

0:36:50.760 --> 0:36:53.160
<v Speaker 1>about to say, Like we were definitely talking about him

0:36:53.160 --> 0:36:56.200
<v Speaker 1>and talking about I don't know that before. Yeah, he

0:36:56.320 --> 0:36:59.120
<v Speaker 1>was definitely on our radar at that spot, so we

0:36:59.200 --> 0:37:00.759
<v Speaker 1>talked him up at little bit. I think we were

0:37:00.800 --> 0:37:02.320
<v Speaker 1>thrown off a little bit by the spring and like

0:37:02.440 --> 0:37:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the early season struggles for Luke Weaver, um, hey man,

0:37:07.280 --> 0:37:09.600
<v Speaker 1>it's really turned it around. And again, outside of Caleb Smith,

0:37:10.800 --> 0:37:12.640
<v Speaker 1>he's been one of the starting pitchers that's return the

0:37:12.680 --> 0:37:15.040
<v Speaker 1>most value. We'll take a break. We mentioned it earlier

0:37:15.120 --> 0:37:17.080
<v Speaker 1>and that was Jack Flaherty. We'll tell you what he

0:37:17.160 --> 0:37:19.319
<v Speaker 1>did last night. You might get Yang in studio too.

0:37:19.360 --> 0:37:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Let's do what have when we come back. Mike woldon Evits'

0:37:22.000 --> 0:37:25.080
<v Speaker 1>struggling too. He's all right right now, he's eight. We'll

0:37:25.120 --> 0:37:26.640
<v Speaker 1>break it down. How worry you should be in ut

0:37:26.640 --> 0:37:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Haldy on next. Made Sailors is the leading cleaning service

0:37:31.320 --> 0:37:34.840
<v Speaker 1>in New York City and Boston. We service homes, offices,

0:37:35.040 --> 0:37:38.840
<v Speaker 1>corporate departments, and Airbnb turnarounds. Give us a call or

0:37:38.840 --> 0:37:43.359
<v Speaker 1>a text at two and two zero to book now.

0:37:43.640 --> 0:37:48.680
<v Speaker 1>That's two one two zero. Use the promo code f

0:37:48.920 --> 0:37:52.000
<v Speaker 1>n t s Y for off your first cleaning. For

0:37:52.160 --> 0:37:55.839
<v Speaker 1>more information, go to maid sailors dot com. That's made

0:37:55.920 --> 0:38:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Sailors dot com right nets make it rain. The minute

0:38:03.400 --> 0:38:07.200
<v Speaker 1>that it was announced the Pelicans, he was obviously not happy.

0:38:07.440 --> 0:38:10.040
<v Speaker 1>He was really hoping for the next like everybody else.

0:38:10.200 --> 0:38:13.239
<v Speaker 1>But that didn't come to fruition. And who knows, could

0:38:13.320 --> 0:38:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Zion's people turn around and be like, yeah, trade us

0:38:16.239 --> 0:38:18.759
<v Speaker 1>because we're not coming to play for New Orleans. I

0:38:18.800 --> 0:38:20.920
<v Speaker 1>don't know if we've ever had that at basketball. It's

0:38:20.960 --> 0:38:23.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of a football thing. Put Zion be the guy

0:38:23.239 --> 0:38:25.960
<v Speaker 1>to start that trend and weekdays six and nine am

0:38:26.000 --> 0:38:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on the Fantasy Sports networking on your popular podcast

0:38:28.880 --> 0:38:32.400
<v Speaker 1>providers More Salad two thousand and fifteen. Two thousands and

0:38:32.440 --> 0:38:36.840
<v Speaker 1>sixteen European Long Drive Tour champion two thousand seventeen World

0:38:36.920 --> 0:38:43.680
<v Speaker 1>number one. Me personally, I keep my game face on

0:38:43.800 --> 0:38:49.200
<v Speaker 1>me all the time, especially coming out with the bunker,

0:38:50.400 --> 0:38:54.840
<v Speaker 1>leaving the range, or even leaving the ports. What's your story?

0:38:55.360 --> 0:38:57.279
<v Speaker 1>Go to game face grooming dot com from all your

0:38:57.320 --> 0:39:02.520
<v Speaker 1>athletic facial wipes and body cleansing needs the morning after.

0:39:03.160 --> 0:39:05.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't like anty Days. I think he's a great player.

0:39:05.719 --> 0:39:08.080
<v Speaker 1>I lost all respect for him after last year. You

0:39:08.120 --> 0:39:09.840
<v Speaker 1>could have waited until the offseason and try to do

0:39:09.960 --> 0:39:13.800
<v Speaker 1>the stuff you did. He's clearly influenced by Lebron's cronies.

0:39:14.360 --> 0:39:16.759
<v Speaker 1>Guy shows up with it. That's all folks. T shirt

0:39:16.800 --> 0:39:18.719
<v Speaker 1>the last game, but the year I remember because it

0:39:18.960 --> 0:39:21.839
<v Speaker 1>was laid out for me. I don't dress myself four

0:39:21.920 --> 0:39:24.279
<v Speaker 1>year old kids. I don't want him anywhere near Zion.

0:39:24.680 --> 0:39:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Sweet Days not Ammy. Starting on F and T, s

0:39:27.000 --> 0:39:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Y Radio and on your popular podcast Providers. Dude, we

0:39:51.560 --> 0:39:54.880
<v Speaker 1>saw last night Ladimir Guerrero mash He's to home runs

0:39:55.640 --> 0:39:57.239
<v Speaker 1>line up with three hits for r v I. If

0:39:57.280 --> 0:39:59.960
<v Speaker 1>you weren't swinging to the fences, you can get anybody's

0:40:00.200 --> 0:40:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the fantasy optimizer. Well you may have had them in

0:40:03.120 --> 0:40:07.080
<v Speaker 1>DUFs last night you should play daily Fantasy Baseball well

0:40:07.239 --> 0:40:09.600
<v Speaker 1>every day using Daily Roder dot com because the eighth

0:40:09.640 --> 0:40:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Daily Rodo lineup optimizer win a million bucks in fanuel

0:40:13.560 --> 0:40:15.600
<v Speaker 1>or DraftKings tournament. Or you can go one of the

0:40:15.640 --> 0:40:17.760
<v Speaker 1>count's number of people who have won thousands of dollars.

0:40:18.080 --> 0:40:20.439
<v Speaker 1>If you're playing m l B dfs and not using

0:40:20.480 --> 0:40:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Daily Roder dot com, they're using it wrong. Enter promo

0:40:23.600 --> 0:40:25.719
<v Speaker 1>code fncs Y for a temper cent discount and you'll

0:40:25.719 --> 0:40:29.120
<v Speaker 1>get line of alerts, projected ownership percentages, weather updates, fantasy

0:40:29.160 --> 0:40:34.000
<v Speaker 1>projections that use the same Daily Rodo lineup optimizers that

0:40:34.120 --> 0:40:37.960
<v Speaker 1>have produced millions in DFS winnings. That's the twenty nineteen

0:40:38.280 --> 0:40:40.680
<v Speaker 1>l Daily Roado Premium package at Daily rodor dot com.

0:40:41.040 --> 0:40:42.759
<v Speaker 1>Use the promo code fn t s Y and get

0:40:42.800 --> 0:40:49.000
<v Speaker 1>your temper cent discount today Daily road dot Com. For

0:40:49.080 --> 0:40:52.320
<v Speaker 1>the Cardinals, yesterday, Jack Flaherty led the Cards to a

0:40:52.440 --> 0:40:55.080
<v Speaker 1>four team of three victory with a quality start. You

0:40:55.160 --> 0:40:57.919
<v Speaker 1>walked five guys not so good, struck out six. That's better,

0:40:58.200 --> 0:41:02.360
<v Speaker 1>three hits, three runs for Clarerty. Yeah, I was watching

0:41:02.440 --> 0:41:05.520
<v Speaker 1>this start to head shut off once the NBA Draft

0:41:05.560 --> 0:41:07.239
<v Speaker 1>lottery came around. But I was watching him early on.

0:41:07.320 --> 0:41:09.719
<v Speaker 1>He looked really sharp. Ran into some trouble in the

0:41:09.800 --> 0:41:12.720
<v Speaker 1>middle endings here where he gave up a few singles.

0:41:12.800 --> 0:41:14.520
<v Speaker 1>He walked a few guys that believe he walked in

0:41:14.560 --> 0:41:17.920
<v Speaker 1>a run as well. So I don't like what I've

0:41:17.920 --> 0:41:21.360
<v Speaker 1>seen in terms of the walks. The past three starts

0:41:21.520 --> 0:41:25.480
<v Speaker 1>five walks, three walks, eight four walks, So he's had

0:41:25.560 --> 0:41:30.040
<v Speaker 1>twelve total walks over his last three starts overall here, Greg,

0:41:30.239 --> 0:41:32.239
<v Speaker 1>but still gives you a strikeout for ending, still only

0:41:32.280 --> 0:41:34.279
<v Speaker 1>gives you a three year and runs gives you the

0:41:34.360 --> 0:41:37.040
<v Speaker 1>quality start earlier on in the season. In his first

0:41:37.120 --> 0:41:42.280
<v Speaker 1>let's see to four six starts, he allowed just six walks,

0:41:42.440 --> 0:41:44.440
<v Speaker 1>and now over his last three he has twelve. So

0:41:45.080 --> 0:41:46.719
<v Speaker 1>this is something that was a huge issue for him

0:41:46.800 --> 0:41:48.520
<v Speaker 1>last year. And once I saw those first six starts

0:41:48.560 --> 0:41:50.719
<v Speaker 1>and said, wow, he's really he's gotten past the walks here,

0:41:51.520 --> 0:41:52.960
<v Speaker 1>spoke a little bit too soon. When it comes to

0:41:53.040 --> 0:41:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Jack Flaherty, the stuff is still really good. Fifty three

0:41:56.520 --> 0:42:00.200
<v Speaker 1>strikeouts in forty seven and two thirds endings pitched. He

0:42:00.360 --> 0:42:02.560
<v Speaker 1>has a four point three four e r A, but

0:42:02.760 --> 0:42:06.360
<v Speaker 1>the x FIPS stands at three point eight zero twelve

0:42:07.280 --> 0:42:10.000
<v Speaker 1>swing strike create the first bit strike percentage much better

0:42:10.080 --> 0:42:13.600
<v Speaker 1>this year as well. Uh, the O swing is down

0:42:13.680 --> 0:42:15.200
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, and I gotta look into this. I

0:42:15.239 --> 0:42:18.239
<v Speaker 1>think the O swing might be down across the league

0:42:18.320 --> 0:42:21.640
<v Speaker 1>right now because as we've seen, hitters are just laying

0:42:21.680 --> 0:42:24.160
<v Speaker 1>off pitches outside the strike zone. They're not swinging at

0:42:24.200 --> 0:42:26.000
<v Speaker 1>pitches outside the strike zone as much as they have

0:42:26.560 --> 0:42:28.359
<v Speaker 1>in years past. So it's something that I'm gonna look

0:42:28.360 --> 0:42:30.919
<v Speaker 1>into and see if the chase rate overalls is down

0:42:31.000 --> 0:42:34.160
<v Speaker 1>this year because it teams, like many starting pitchers are

0:42:34.280 --> 0:42:37.279
<v Speaker 1>walking more batters and not getting as many swings and

0:42:37.320 --> 0:42:40.200
<v Speaker 1>misses outside the strike zone. So I'm gonna look into that.

0:42:40.320 --> 0:42:42.960
<v Speaker 1>But overall, still getting a lot of strikeouts from Jack Flaherty,

0:42:43.360 --> 0:42:45.480
<v Speaker 1>and I still think there's a lot of like he's

0:42:45.560 --> 0:42:47.960
<v Speaker 1>he's got to write these these walks again. Though he

0:42:48.040 --> 0:42:49.759
<v Speaker 1>did it in the first six starts, which means he's

0:42:49.800 --> 0:42:52.440
<v Speaker 1>capable of doing it. We've seen him do it, but

0:42:52.560 --> 0:42:54.359
<v Speaker 1>now he's really kind of reverted back to last year

0:42:54.360 --> 0:42:56.399
<v Speaker 1>over these past three starts, So I think he will

0:42:56.440 --> 0:42:59.279
<v Speaker 1>get better. And and and if anyone in your league

0:42:59.320 --> 0:43:02.279
<v Speaker 1>does not trust Act Flaherty, I'm buying Low. I love

0:43:03.320 --> 0:43:06.040
<v Speaker 1>moving forward. Let's just get past these walks. Loves Jack

0:43:06.080 --> 0:43:09.279
<v Speaker 1>Flaherty moving forward, his favorite by Low at the moment

0:43:09.320 --> 0:43:11.440
<v Speaker 1>you heard of any Machado a couple of weeks ago.

0:43:11.680 --> 0:43:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Jack Flaherty now takes that mantle for Frank Standfell. What

0:43:14.920 --> 0:43:17.360
<v Speaker 1>do I say? You're not buying Low might fold of Navitch?

0:43:17.600 --> 0:43:19.560
<v Speaker 1>You were not, you know, on him as much as

0:43:19.560 --> 0:43:21.759
<v Speaker 1>some other people were coming into this season. Four and

0:43:21.800 --> 0:43:25.360
<v Speaker 1>two thirds, seven hits, eight runs, three walks, four strikeouts.

0:43:25.400 --> 0:43:28.640
<v Speaker 1>He gets bombed last night by the St. Louis Cardinals.

0:43:28.680 --> 0:43:31.160
<v Speaker 1>It was all kind of not going great and it

0:43:31.239 --> 0:43:33.440
<v Speaker 1>just only got worse as the night what went on.

0:43:34.120 --> 0:43:35.799
<v Speaker 1>He has been just awful as the r right now,

0:43:35.880 --> 0:43:39.160
<v Speaker 1>State's over eight. It is his last three stars. I

0:43:39.200 --> 0:43:40.799
<v Speaker 1>know what the quality, they know the urn runs say,

0:43:40.960 --> 0:43:42.880
<v Speaker 1>but he's allowed eight runs, five runs, six runs and

0:43:42.920 --> 0:43:44.720
<v Speaker 1>four runs. He has yet to have a quality start

0:43:45.320 --> 0:43:49.759
<v Speaker 1>on the season. He's been abysmal. There's just no other

0:43:49.840 --> 0:43:51.920
<v Speaker 1>way to put it. Is he's still dealing with some

0:43:52.080 --> 0:43:54.279
<v Speaker 1>kind of injury. I mean he was dealing with with

0:43:54.400 --> 0:43:57.680
<v Speaker 1>a significant injury. Was dealing with an elbow strain, right

0:43:57.760 --> 0:44:01.440
<v Speaker 1>right elbow strain. Pretty see nificant. Is he holding back

0:44:01.719 --> 0:44:03.600
<v Speaker 1>some velocity? Is he holding back on some of his

0:44:03.719 --> 0:44:06.440
<v Speaker 1>breaking pitches? He hasn't looked the same. And again, I

0:44:06.480 --> 0:44:10.960
<v Speaker 1>didn't like Fulton Evits coming into the season because the

0:44:11.080 --> 0:44:13.440
<v Speaker 1>swinging strike rate and the strikeouts just didn't add up

0:44:13.440 --> 0:44:15.640
<v Speaker 1>from last year. It seems like everything kind of broke

0:44:15.760 --> 0:44:18.440
<v Speaker 1>right for Fulton Evage last year, and he's still young

0:44:18.560 --> 0:44:20.040
<v Speaker 1>enough where he can kind of figure all this out.

0:44:20.080 --> 0:44:21.759
<v Speaker 1>He's only twenty seven years old, so I'm not writing

0:44:21.840 --> 0:44:24.400
<v Speaker 1>him off completely, but he just can't be in your

0:44:24.400 --> 0:44:26.680
<v Speaker 1>lineup right now. He like I would go as far

0:44:26.719 --> 0:44:30.440
<v Speaker 1>as to say he might. Can you drop He's got

0:44:30.600 --> 0:44:33.839
<v Speaker 1>eight point zero two e r A. He's under six

0:44:33.960 --> 0:44:38.120
<v Speaker 1>case per nine, he's over three walks per nine. He's

0:44:38.160 --> 0:44:40.439
<v Speaker 1>getting crushed, he has he's given up eight home runs

0:44:40.520 --> 0:44:44.640
<v Speaker 1>in four starts. There's just not a lot of good

0:44:44.719 --> 0:44:46.719
<v Speaker 1>going on. I mean, there's nothing good. There's nothing good

0:44:46.760 --> 0:44:48.839
<v Speaker 1>going on when it comes to Mike Fulton Evite right now.

0:44:48.920 --> 0:44:52.080
<v Speaker 1>So look in deeper leagues. I would try to hold

0:44:52.120 --> 0:44:55.120
<v Speaker 1>onto him and keep her dynasty. I would try to

0:44:55.200 --> 0:44:57.239
<v Speaker 1>hold onto him because we saw what his upside was

0:44:57.400 --> 0:45:00.239
<v Speaker 1>last year. But in your standard redraft it's of these

0:45:00.239 --> 0:45:02.560
<v Speaker 1>starting pitchers are floating out there, like Brandon Woodroffe or

0:45:02.880 --> 0:45:05.960
<v Speaker 1>any other other of these like Fringey, starting pitcher worthy

0:45:06.600 --> 0:45:10.720
<v Speaker 1>type players are available abably dropping Fulton Navage, Fulton Image,

0:45:10.760 --> 0:45:14.040
<v Speaker 1>somebody that certainly is in the conversation with all these

0:45:14.080 --> 0:45:16.000
<v Speaker 1>prospects that are out there. You made someone to drop

0:45:16.600 --> 0:45:19.560
<v Speaker 1>faulty ultimately maybe your guy. That's how bad it's gotten

0:45:19.760 --> 0:45:22.719
<v Speaker 1>from my Fulton Image. Yelina his fourth homer, although the

0:45:22.760 --> 0:45:28.280
<v Speaker 1>season duster thankster fail. Rather he did his second Marcelo Juna,

0:45:28.800 --> 0:45:33.520
<v Speaker 1>He's twelfth gold along last from the past, last from

0:45:33.560 --> 0:45:36.320
<v Speaker 1>the past, like a month ago passed. Yes, if you

0:45:36.400 --> 0:45:38.560
<v Speaker 1>have to guess how many RBI's Yadia Molina has in

0:45:38.640 --> 0:45:41.520
<v Speaker 1>the season, what would you say, Well, I just read

0:45:41.560 --> 0:45:43.800
<v Speaker 1>to you that he is fourth home run. Okay, so

0:45:43.880 --> 0:45:46.279
<v Speaker 1>he's got four homers. I'll also tell you that he's

0:45:46.320 --> 0:45:48.799
<v Speaker 1>hinting two eighty three. I don't know why the number

0:45:48.840 --> 0:45:50.960
<v Speaker 1>twelve came to mind. Do you have twelve? An agents

0:45:51.040 --> 0:45:56.560
<v Speaker 1>know he's thirty? What's a catcher, dude, I'm reliable, man.

0:45:56.680 --> 0:45:58.040
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was going the other way when I

0:45:58.160 --> 0:46:00.919
<v Speaker 1>was I was on him again. He just every year

0:46:01.280 --> 0:46:03.319
<v Speaker 1>people are I want to be one year earlier rather

0:46:03.400 --> 0:46:06.640
<v Speaker 1>than one year for the drop off for Molina, Well,

0:46:06.640 --> 0:46:11.960
<v Speaker 1>when is it coming? When it's not happening this year,

0:46:12.120 --> 0:46:14.480
<v Speaker 1>didn't happen last year. The guy just keeps getting it done.

0:46:14.520 --> 0:46:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Another multi hit game. Three. Ribby's up to thirty RBIs

0:46:17.480 --> 0:46:20.520
<v Speaker 1>two eight three batting average, only four home runs. He's

0:46:20.520 --> 0:46:21.880
<v Speaker 1>not gonna hit for a ton of power. If he

0:46:21.880 --> 0:46:24.600
<v Speaker 1>gives you fifteen home runs for the season fifteen and twenty,

0:46:25.239 --> 0:46:26.840
<v Speaker 1>that's fine. That's pretty much the range that he was

0:46:26.880 --> 0:46:30.440
<v Speaker 1>in last year. But thirty RBIs right now in this lineup.

0:46:30.960 --> 0:46:33.400
<v Speaker 1>He's batting in the middle. He's been batting fifth or

0:46:33.440 --> 0:46:36.040
<v Speaker 1>six for most of the season, so the RBI opportunities

0:46:36.080 --> 0:46:37.759
<v Speaker 1>are going to be there for him. And as long

0:46:37.800 --> 0:46:39.759
<v Speaker 1>as he's performing, he's gonna keep driving in runs. So

0:46:40.480 --> 0:46:42.279
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at a catcher who could potentially give you

0:46:42.719 --> 0:46:45.120
<v Speaker 1>seventy five RBIs this year, maybe even more than that

0:46:45.360 --> 0:46:48.200
<v Speaker 1>fifteen twenty home runs. He just continues to be a steal.

0:46:48.239 --> 0:46:50.239
<v Speaker 1>People don't want you, Audiar Malina because he's old. They

0:46:50.280 --> 0:46:52.600
<v Speaker 1>want the shiny new toy. They want Francisco Mahia, they

0:46:52.640 --> 0:46:56.319
<v Speaker 1>want Danny Jansen, they want all these young guys. Let's

0:46:56.360 --> 0:46:58.239
<v Speaker 1>keep draffing out of her Malia. That's what it comes

0:46:58.280 --> 0:47:01.359
<v Speaker 1>down to. Great. He had Relina and the Cardinals arch

0:47:01.480 --> 0:47:04.800
<v Speaker 1>rivals Chicago Cubs last night. They went into Cincinnati defeat

0:47:04.840 --> 0:47:07.160
<v Speaker 1>of the Reds by the score three to one. Kyle

0:47:07.239 --> 0:47:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Hendricks rank eight innings, three hits, one run, one walk,

0:47:11.320 --> 0:47:14.200
<v Speaker 1>seven strikeouts. The only run that he allowed came on

0:47:14.320 --> 0:47:20.400
<v Speaker 1>a Joey Vado solo shot. He was magnificent yesterday, Yle Hendricks,

0:47:20.400 --> 0:47:23.279
<v Speaker 1>putting it right in my eye. Greggy must have heard

0:47:23.320 --> 0:47:26.560
<v Speaker 1>me talking smack about him, because over his last three

0:47:26.760 --> 0:47:33.440
<v Speaker 1>starts one t five innings pitched, twelve hits, one earned

0:47:33.560 --> 0:47:37.240
<v Speaker 1>run that came on a solo home run, one walk.

0:47:38.040 --> 0:47:40.359
<v Speaker 1>Where his last three starts at twenty five innings pitch,

0:47:40.400 --> 0:47:43.680
<v Speaker 1>he's gone complete game three starts to going against the Cardinals,

0:47:43.880 --> 0:47:48.840
<v Speaker 1>eight innings against the Marlins, eight innings yesterday against the

0:47:49.000 --> 0:47:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Cincinnati Reds, he's allowed wonder and run to twenty five

0:47:53.080 --> 0:47:55.520
<v Speaker 1>innings pitched. He does have a three five five xfit

0:47:55.640 --> 0:47:57.960
<v Speaker 1>during that time, but I mean even I pitched to

0:47:58.000 --> 0:47:59.839
<v Speaker 1>him mid three z r A, I mean you would

0:48:00.200 --> 0:48:03.560
<v Speaker 1>gladly take that from Kyle Hendricks, and he's doing it

0:48:03.680 --> 0:48:06.799
<v Speaker 1>in classic Kyle Hendricks fashion. Six point one two case

0:48:06.840 --> 0:48:09.719
<v Speaker 1>for nine over his last three starts again only one walk,

0:48:09.800 --> 0:48:13.040
<v Speaker 1>so he's giving you the good command. Um. He's turned

0:48:13.080 --> 0:48:15.600
<v Speaker 1>it around. He's he's he's making me look dumb. Um.

0:48:15.719 --> 0:48:18.520
<v Speaker 1>As much as I like Cole Hamil's, it seemed like

0:48:18.560 --> 0:48:20.719
<v Speaker 1>they were on like a similar playing field at least

0:48:20.800 --> 0:48:23.120
<v Speaker 1>entering this week. And you know, maybe Kyle Hendricks has

0:48:23.719 --> 0:48:26.800
<v Speaker 1>has surpassed him now, but I still think Kyle Hendricks

0:48:26.880 --> 0:48:28.560
<v Speaker 1>is the picture that we know him to be greg

0:48:29.280 --> 0:48:31.319
<v Speaker 1>the ear a when it's all said and done. As

0:48:31.360 --> 0:48:33.480
<v Speaker 1>good as he's pitching right now, and he's got a

0:48:33.520 --> 0:48:35.520
<v Speaker 1>two point eight ear a, the x fip is three

0:48:35.560 --> 0:48:38.080
<v Speaker 1>point eight one, so he might be in that Joe

0:48:38.160 --> 0:48:40.239
<v Speaker 1>muscro range, which is fine for him if he could

0:48:40.320 --> 0:48:43.920
<v Speaker 1>just you know, three six, three seven, that's fine. But

0:48:44.200 --> 0:48:46.239
<v Speaker 1>as good as he starts to bend, I still think

0:48:46.239 --> 0:48:48.359
<v Speaker 1>that we're going to get as blow ups moving forward.

0:48:48.400 --> 0:48:50.840
<v Speaker 1>That's just to Kyle Hendricks is I do want to

0:48:50.920 --> 0:48:53.080
<v Speaker 1>note Kyle Ryan came in to start the ninth, got

0:48:53.200 --> 0:48:55.920
<v Speaker 1>the first batter out and they brought Steve C. Shack

0:48:56.000 --> 0:48:59.759
<v Speaker 1>in for the last two batters like that job, and

0:49:00.040 --> 0:49:03.040
<v Speaker 1>it's the third save of the season. On the other side,

0:49:03.120 --> 0:49:06.600
<v Speaker 1>four Cincinnati Tenner Roark when five innings allowed three runs

0:49:06.680 --> 0:49:08.719
<v Speaker 1>on eight hits, he walked when he struck out six.

0:49:09.239 --> 0:49:12.799
<v Speaker 1>Rowork's ear A sits now Frank at three point five zero,

0:49:13.120 --> 0:49:14.560
<v Speaker 1>and I we talk like last week a lot about

0:49:14.560 --> 0:49:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Tyler Molly Rowerk on the season has an ear A

0:49:18.280 --> 0:49:22.400
<v Speaker 1>at three five and a five at three thirty x

0:49:22.480 --> 0:49:24.920
<v Speaker 1>fit much worse at four six three. Caper nine right

0:49:24.920 --> 0:49:26.360
<v Speaker 1>now is eight point three five, walking a lot of

0:49:26.400 --> 0:49:28.960
<v Speaker 1>guys as his walks per nine is close to four.

0:49:29.600 --> 0:49:31.480
<v Speaker 1>What can you tell me about Tenner Roar? He's kind

0:49:31.520 --> 0:49:33.080
<v Speaker 1>of a mixed bag right now, and you look into

0:49:33.120 --> 0:49:36.160
<v Speaker 1>these underlying numbers, he's giving you more strikeouts this year.

0:49:36.239 --> 0:49:37.880
<v Speaker 1>The eight point three five k per nine is a

0:49:37.920 --> 0:49:40.880
<v Speaker 1>career high as of now, but also walking more batters

0:49:40.880 --> 0:49:42.600
<v Speaker 1>than we're used to seeing out of him three point

0:49:42.680 --> 0:49:45.279
<v Speaker 1>eight eight walks per nine his previous career high three

0:49:45.320 --> 0:49:47.680
<v Speaker 1>point one eight walks per nine. And you see the

0:49:47.880 --> 0:49:51.239
<v Speaker 1>x fit much higher because his home run the five

0:49:51.280 --> 0:49:54.000
<v Speaker 1>ball ratio is four point three percent. Now, mind you,

0:49:54.120 --> 0:49:56.839
<v Speaker 1>league average home run the five ball ratio is ten

0:49:56.960 --> 0:50:00.480
<v Speaker 1>to twelve percent. It's in that range. So basically, if

0:50:00.560 --> 0:50:03.239
<v Speaker 1>his home run the fireball ratio were league average in

0:50:03.320 --> 0:50:05.040
<v Speaker 1>that range and he were giving up more home runs

0:50:05.560 --> 0:50:07.759
<v Speaker 1>like he probably should be because he's more of a

0:50:07.840 --> 0:50:11.240
<v Speaker 1>flyball pitcher and he pitches in Cincinnati, in great American

0:50:11.280 --> 0:50:14.080
<v Speaker 1>small park, then they're telling hims that his ear RA

0:50:14.120 --> 0:50:16.279
<v Speaker 1>should probably closer to a mid four e r RA.

0:50:16.560 --> 0:50:19.719
<v Speaker 1>So a mixed bag here. Should he be owned in

0:50:20.400 --> 0:50:23.360
<v Speaker 1>deeper leagues? Maybe you stream him in like some fifteen

0:50:23.400 --> 0:50:25.920
<v Speaker 1>team mixed roto and only sure because he has a

0:50:26.600 --> 0:50:29.920
<v Speaker 1>job in a rotation. That's fine, but I'm just not

0:50:30.040 --> 0:50:33.080
<v Speaker 1>buying it, Greg, twelve teamers. I see the three point

0:50:33.120 --> 0:50:35.080
<v Speaker 1>five zero ear A, but I just don't trust it.

0:50:35.239 --> 0:50:37.000
<v Speaker 1>The balls starts to fly out a little bit more

0:50:37.760 --> 0:50:39.479
<v Speaker 1>once the weather starts to heat up, and he pitches

0:50:39.520 --> 0:50:42.760
<v Speaker 1>in Cincinnati, So I'm out on Sanna roar. He's perfect

0:50:42.840 --> 0:50:48.880
<v Speaker 1>for your category players like the Yeah, Noah, he's not.

0:50:49.160 --> 0:50:53.680
<v Speaker 1>He's not nearly as good as cold handles. Come on. Well,

0:50:53.719 --> 0:50:56.400
<v Speaker 1>I I said earlier, Danny Duffy is probably like a

0:50:56.440 --> 0:50:58.799
<v Speaker 1>fifteen teamer and a l only, so we're good there.

0:50:58.840 --> 0:51:01.120
<v Speaker 1>He goes, Hannah ro arc is your n L Danny

0:51:01.160 --> 0:51:03.359
<v Speaker 1>Duffy perfect, you get behind that, you know, think Caleb

0:51:03.440 --> 0:51:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Smith before Frank Smith pick up his first loss of

0:51:05.960 --> 0:51:07.520
<v Speaker 1>the season last night, I mean five in the third,

0:51:07.560 --> 0:51:09.480
<v Speaker 1>four hits, two runs, two walks, eight strike and still

0:51:09.520 --> 0:51:13.640
<v Speaker 1>pitch very well. Only um only runs that he allowed

0:51:13.719 --> 0:51:16.319
<v Speaker 1>where thanks to have On Garcia. We had a solo

0:51:16.400 --> 0:51:20.080
<v Speaker 1>homer in the second and well got involved in the

0:51:20.160 --> 0:51:24.239
<v Speaker 1>six with RBI single as well. That's it. And before

0:51:24.280 --> 0:51:26.840
<v Speaker 1>everyone starts going all crazy like, oh well, this is

0:51:26.840 --> 0:51:29.399
<v Speaker 1>why you can't draft Marlin's pictures. You're never gonna get wins,

0:51:29.440 --> 0:51:31.719
<v Speaker 1>You're gonnaly gonna get losses. This was his first loss

0:51:31.719 --> 0:51:34.120
<v Speaker 1>of the season. He was three and o entering the start.

0:51:34.239 --> 0:51:36.000
<v Speaker 1>So that tells you everything that you need to know

0:51:36.080 --> 0:51:40.000
<v Speaker 1>about Caleb Smith. Now, the winds are still gonna be

0:51:40.080 --> 0:51:42.319
<v Speaker 1>hard to come by, as we saw yesterday. Charlie Morton,

0:51:42.400 --> 0:51:45.520
<v Speaker 1>on the other side, pitched very well. The chicken or

0:51:45.560 --> 0:51:47.120
<v Speaker 1>the egg? Did he pitch well or was it because

0:51:47.160 --> 0:51:49.160
<v Speaker 1>he was going against the Marlins, doesn't matter. I think

0:51:49.200 --> 0:51:51.120
<v Speaker 1>Charlie Morton is a pretty good picture, so I will

0:51:51.120 --> 0:51:54.760
<v Speaker 1>give him some credit here and another eighteen swing strikes

0:51:54.840 --> 0:51:57.560
<v Speaker 1>for Caleb Smith going up against a pretty tough lineup

0:51:57.600 --> 0:52:00.759
<v Speaker 1>in the Tampa Bay Rays as well, so navigates his

0:52:00.840 --> 0:52:03.239
<v Speaker 1>way through it. Not the he doesn't go that deep

0:52:03.280 --> 0:52:04.759
<v Speaker 1>into the game, only five and a third, but still

0:52:04.800 --> 0:52:08.160
<v Speaker 1>gives you eight strikeouts. Doesn't hurt your ratios. Uh six

0:52:08.280 --> 0:52:10.120
<v Speaker 1>combined hits and walks that were five and a third,

0:52:10.160 --> 0:52:13.040
<v Speaker 1>so it doesn't hurt your whip only two earned runs. Um,

0:52:14.000 --> 0:52:16.359
<v Speaker 1>I still love Caleb Smith man. I mean, he's he's

0:52:16.400 --> 0:52:21.320
<v Speaker 1>elevated himself into he is firmly inside the top thirty

0:52:21.360 --> 0:52:23.840
<v Speaker 1>starting pitchers right now, maybe even top twenty five or

0:52:23.880 --> 0:52:25.719
<v Speaker 1>song pitchers. The way that he is going right now.

0:52:26.120 --> 0:52:28.759
<v Speaker 1>I mean we were we were giving um Tyler Glass

0:52:28.800 --> 0:52:31.000
<v Speaker 1>now a bunch of credit for getting strikeouts and going

0:52:31.080 --> 0:52:34.840
<v Speaker 1>deeper into games and and making strides in terms of

0:52:34.920 --> 0:52:38.040
<v Speaker 1>not walking batters calebe Smith is doing the same exact thing.

0:52:38.280 --> 0:52:41.239
<v Speaker 1>So I know. I mentioned Luke Weaver as as one

0:52:41.239 --> 0:52:43.400
<v Speaker 1>of those pictures who was drafted later on who's returned

0:52:43.440 --> 0:52:46.239
<v Speaker 1>the most value. The number one guy right now is

0:52:46.680 --> 0:52:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Caleb Smith based on what he's doing. I'm not mad

0:52:49.040 --> 0:52:51.960
<v Speaker 1>at him for getting the loss in this one. Definitely, definitely,

0:52:52.520 --> 0:52:56.640
<v Speaker 1>UM four Tampa. I just want to note Amelia Plagan

0:52:56.719 --> 0:53:00.120
<v Speaker 1>pitched the seventh, Diego Castillo pitched the eighth, and are

0:53:00.160 --> 0:53:02.839
<v Speaker 1>in line for a save. Correct sort of running the moment.

0:53:02.920 --> 0:53:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Alvarado would have come in in the ninth, it was

0:53:04.960 --> 0:53:08.080
<v Speaker 1>a safe situation. Instead, Chas Row comes in and he

0:53:08.680 --> 0:53:10.640
<v Speaker 1>pitches the ninth pitches well, if its one hit the

0:53:10.719 --> 0:53:13.880
<v Speaker 1>nine pitches later, Um, he got out of it. How

0:53:13.880 --> 0:53:17.200
<v Speaker 1>about Charlie Morton, if we're just talking about like Middle Arns,

0:53:17.960 --> 0:53:21.000
<v Speaker 1>we had questions coming into the year, was he going

0:53:21.040 --> 0:53:22.759
<v Speaker 1>to be able to pick up where he left off

0:53:22.800 --> 0:53:25.760
<v Speaker 1>with Houston all those strides that he made. The answer

0:53:25.840 --> 0:53:29.480
<v Speaker 1>greg resounding yes. This guy has a two point three

0:53:29.600 --> 0:53:32.880
<v Speaker 1>to e er A. He's been phenomenal. So if you

0:53:32.920 --> 0:53:35.040
<v Speaker 1>had any question marks about Charlie Morton and drafting him,

0:53:35.440 --> 0:53:37.680
<v Speaker 1>arrange that he was going in. He's paid off some

0:53:37.719 --> 0:53:39.880
<v Speaker 1>pretty good value so far as well. Without question, Charlie

0:53:39.920 --> 0:53:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Morton has been been wonderful at that two point three

0:53:41.960 --> 0:53:44.759
<v Speaker 1>to ear right undefeated here on the season. He had

0:53:44.800 --> 0:53:46.960
<v Speaker 1>one bad start where he allowed five runs. Everything else

0:53:47.040 --> 0:53:50.320
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty much the same five or six innings and

0:53:51.080 --> 0:53:53.839
<v Speaker 1>two or less runs. He's locked in as a rock

0:53:54.000 --> 0:53:56.360
<v Speaker 1>solid SP three. Although he doesn't go deep in the games,

0:53:57.000 --> 0:53:59.560
<v Speaker 1>he's really well in the sixties. He's better for Rhodo.

0:53:59.760 --> 0:54:02.640
<v Speaker 1>He is better for rot because sometimes like he doesn't

0:54:02.680 --> 0:54:04.600
<v Speaker 1>always go deep enough to give you that quality start

0:54:04.640 --> 0:54:06.880
<v Speaker 1>to give you the six innings because he does strike

0:54:06.920 --> 0:54:08.600
<v Speaker 1>out a lot of guys and he does run into

0:54:08.680 --> 0:54:10.560
<v Speaker 1>walks at times, so that builds up his pitch count

0:54:10.600 --> 0:54:12.719
<v Speaker 1>a lot, so we see a lot of five inning performances.

0:54:12.760 --> 0:54:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Better for Rohto, but overall still really good. On the

0:54:15.600 --> 0:54:18.799
<v Speaker 1>hitting side, Tommy fam got caught stealing for the third

0:54:18.840 --> 0:54:21.880
<v Speaker 1>time this season. I mentioned as Garcia's homer. It was

0:54:21.920 --> 0:54:29.440
<v Speaker 1>the seventh of the season. Former manatting average three Is

0:54:29.480 --> 0:54:35.439
<v Speaker 1>he out there? I want to see owned heat in league.

0:54:35.800 --> 0:54:41.120
<v Speaker 1>That would be thirteen Look at the production that people

0:54:41.160 --> 0:54:43.920
<v Speaker 1>are missing out on. Six batting average, seven homers, three

0:54:43.920 --> 0:54:46.400
<v Speaker 1>stone basis. You know, he's my man. He should be

0:54:46.440 --> 0:54:48.440
<v Speaker 1>owning more than thirteen percent. No, he's not like a

0:54:48.520 --> 0:54:50.759
<v Speaker 1>must owned player, but but we I would imagine we

0:54:50.840 --> 0:54:54.080
<v Speaker 1>have more Roto leagues than and in a five out

0:54:54.120 --> 0:54:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the of the league, he should be owned. Yeah, definitely, absolutely,

0:54:59.239 --> 0:55:02.839
<v Speaker 1>Okay for the one of the last games we'll talk about.

0:55:02.880 --> 0:55:04.799
<v Speaker 1>It was the Mariners and the Athletics. The Mariners picked

0:55:04.840 --> 0:55:09.000
<v Speaker 1>up their first save since April yesterday, a four to

0:55:09.080 --> 0:55:12.440
<v Speaker 1>three victory for Seattle with run Us Alias pitching two

0:55:12.520 --> 0:55:15.040
<v Speaker 1>and the third innings. Do you get the save following

0:55:15.080 --> 0:55:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Mike Leak because game six and two thirds three runs,

0:55:17.640 --> 0:55:19.479
<v Speaker 1>only one of them were earned, five hits, a walk

0:55:19.600 --> 0:55:22.440
<v Speaker 1>and six strike. As Brett Anderson went for Oakland six innings,

0:55:22.560 --> 0:55:24.399
<v Speaker 1>four run ball, he talked, I got a five while

0:55:24.640 --> 0:55:27.719
<v Speaker 1>walking one. Tim Beckham home over the eighth time. Dan

0:55:27.840 --> 0:55:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Vogelbach over for the eleventh time, Mitch Hagger for the

0:55:31.560 --> 0:55:35.440
<v Speaker 1>eleventh time as well. Yeah, yesterday I brought up the

0:55:35.600 --> 0:55:38.879
<v Speaker 1>conundrum that is the Seattle Mariners and what's gonna happen

0:55:39.040 --> 0:55:40.840
<v Speaker 1>when trying to get all these guys in the lineup.

0:55:41.000 --> 0:55:43.000
<v Speaker 1>While they used Tim Beckham at second base yesterday, which

0:55:43.000 --> 0:55:45.319
<v Speaker 1>means shed Long is on the bench. D Gordon did

0:55:45.440 --> 0:55:47.640
<v Speaker 1>pinch run for Tim Beckham in this game as well,

0:55:47.719 --> 0:55:50.080
<v Speaker 1>did not start, so pay attention to that. You should

0:55:50.080 --> 0:55:51.920
<v Speaker 1>have had d Gordon out of your lineup anyway. I

0:55:52.000 --> 0:55:53.719
<v Speaker 1>have him in the NFPC main event, and I had

0:55:53.800 --> 0:55:56.160
<v Speaker 1>him out of my lineup, even with his stolen base upside,

0:55:56.160 --> 0:55:58.320
<v Speaker 1>I missed out on the stolen base yesterday as a

0:55:58.360 --> 0:56:01.160
<v Speaker 1>pinch runner, but I figured he's probably gonna need a

0:56:01.200 --> 0:56:03.440
<v Speaker 1>couple of days off anyway, so I should have been

0:56:03.440 --> 0:56:04.560
<v Speaker 1>out of your line up. But it's good to see

0:56:04.560 --> 0:56:07.160
<v Speaker 1>that d Gordon at least still able to run. Remember,

0:56:07.200 --> 0:56:08.960
<v Speaker 1>he's dealing with a wrist century which obviously makes it

0:56:09.040 --> 0:56:11.719
<v Speaker 1>hard to swing a bat. JP Crawford still got another

0:56:11.719 --> 0:56:13.839
<v Speaker 1>start in this one, batting nine. We'll see how long

0:56:13.920 --> 0:56:16.439
<v Speaker 1>he sticks around. But I think as we're gonna start

0:56:16.480 --> 0:56:18.279
<v Speaker 1>to see Greg mentioned that they didn't have a safe

0:56:18.280 --> 0:56:21.640
<v Speaker 1>since April. Why is that? Because the Mariners are starting

0:56:21.680 --> 0:56:24.200
<v Speaker 1>to turn back into the Mariners. So as the season

0:56:24.239 --> 0:56:26.279
<v Speaker 1>goes along, they're gonna try and get some of their

0:56:26.360 --> 0:56:29.000
<v Speaker 1>younger players up and see what they have in these kids.

0:56:29.040 --> 0:56:31.320
<v Speaker 1>And don't don't be surprised if we get Edwin and

0:56:31.360 --> 0:56:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Karnoscione traded Jay Bruce and it's gonna open up playing

0:56:34.200 --> 0:56:36.720
<v Speaker 1>time for some of these other guys. Greg, it's made fifteen.

0:56:37.840 --> 0:56:42.359
<v Speaker 1>Alex Smith isn't up yet. Yes, let's see what happens. Yes,

0:56:42.800 --> 0:56:44.879
<v Speaker 1>I need him up. I don't think it's gonna happen.

0:56:45.040 --> 0:56:47.399
<v Speaker 1>He needs me up today. It's gonna happen tomorrow. That's fine.

0:56:47.440 --> 0:56:50.239
<v Speaker 1>It happened for like the weekends. We'll take tomorrow as

0:56:50.280 --> 0:56:52.600
<v Speaker 1>low as just to get called today. We're good. And

0:56:52.719 --> 0:56:55.719
<v Speaker 1>that means it's you owe me two lunches right to

0:56:55.760 --> 0:56:58.160
<v Speaker 1>the one I owe you. That's so. Can we just

0:56:58.200 --> 0:57:01.120
<v Speaker 1>cancel it and I just owe you one? Sure sounds great.

0:57:01.320 --> 0:57:05.040
<v Speaker 1>I like how this works for Frank Stafford. I'm Greg Sussman.

0:57:05.400 --> 0:57:07.919
<v Speaker 1>Have me talkman day, everybody. He was joined by Brad

0:57:08.000 --> 0:57:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Ziegler at Virginia Zakis Tomorrow, I have a wonderful afternoon

0:57:11.560 --> 0:57:13.439
<v Speaker 1>see tomorrow, we hope