WEBVTT - David Rosenberg on Emergency Policy Decisions (Podcast) 

0:00:02.200 --> 0:00:06.800
<v Speaker 1>This is Masters in Business with Barry Ridholts on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:09.600
<v Speaker 1>This week. On the podcast, I have an old friend

0:00:09.760 --> 0:00:13.360
<v Speaker 1>and a prior guest. His name is David Rosenberg, better

0:00:13.400 --> 0:00:16.520
<v Speaker 1>known as Rosie. I know Rosie for I don't know forever,

0:00:16.960 --> 0:00:21.040
<v Speaker 1>it seems like, and I have been hectoring him to

0:00:21.200 --> 0:00:24.599
<v Speaker 1>launch his own firm, really since the days of the

0:00:24.680 --> 0:00:28.840
<v Speaker 1>financial crisis, when he was the chief economist at Merrow

0:00:28.920 --> 0:00:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Lynch and really was I think chafing at the strictures

0:00:34.960 --> 0:00:37.560
<v Speaker 1>of a giant firm. I thought he would be better

0:00:37.600 --> 0:00:40.920
<v Speaker 1>off with those harnesses removed. And you know the old

0:00:40.920 --> 0:00:45.080
<v Speaker 1>expression with horses has given them their head, meaning loosening

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:47.840
<v Speaker 1>up the reins and let them run where they want. Uh.

0:00:47.920 --> 0:00:51.960
<v Speaker 1>And he's finally pulled the trigger and done that funny story.

0:00:52.400 --> 0:00:56.440
<v Speaker 1>In the process of hectoring him to launch his own firm,

0:00:56.800 --> 0:00:58.440
<v Speaker 1>we were chatting one day and he said, well, what

0:00:58.480 --> 0:01:01.400
<v Speaker 1>would the name be. I'm like, that's Odds Rosenberg Research.

0:01:01.920 --> 0:01:05.160
<v Speaker 1>And I nagged him to go out and reserve that

0:01:05.200 --> 0:01:08.800
<v Speaker 1>domain name, which, being Dave, he never got around to

0:01:08.920 --> 0:01:11.880
<v Speaker 1>doing it. So I grabbed it. I grabbed want to

0:01:12.040 --> 0:01:15.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it was said, go daddy, I grabbed Rosenberg

0:01:15.120 --> 0:01:17.680
<v Speaker 1>research dot com and forgot about it. You know, every

0:01:17.760 --> 0:01:21.759
<v Speaker 1>year just automatically renews. And one day he says to me,

0:01:22.400 --> 0:01:25.720
<v Speaker 1>I've been thinking about going out on my own, but

0:01:25.880 --> 0:01:29.440
<v Speaker 1>I can't use the name Rosenberg Research. Someone has that domain.

0:01:30.040 --> 0:01:33.280
<v Speaker 1>And I said to him, really well, let me show

0:01:33.319 --> 0:01:35.160
<v Speaker 1>you how to look it up and you could see

0:01:35.160 --> 0:01:38.199
<v Speaker 1>who owns it. I show him the who is search

0:01:38.280 --> 0:01:41.240
<v Speaker 1>feature and he goes through this whole process to identify

0:01:41.280 --> 0:01:44.800
<v Speaker 1>who owns it, and he says, wait a second, that's you.

0:01:45.280 --> 0:01:47.960
<v Speaker 1>And my response was, yeah, I know what a high

0:01:48.000 --> 0:01:50.200
<v Speaker 1>functioning idiot you are, and you would never get around

0:01:50.200 --> 0:01:52.760
<v Speaker 1>to doing it, and someone else would have grabbed it.

0:01:52.800 --> 0:01:55.560
<v Speaker 1>So I thought I would grab it for you, and

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:58.560
<v Speaker 1>lo and behold, Rosenberg research dot com is where his

0:01:58.800 --> 0:02:02.200
<v Speaker 1>uh website us. I don't know anybody with a greater

0:02:02.280 --> 0:02:08.520
<v Speaker 1>facility for economic data numbers. Dave can reel this information

0:02:08.560 --> 0:02:10.679
<v Speaker 1>off the top of his head. What was the U

0:02:10.840 --> 0:02:15.520
<v Speaker 1>three unemployment rate in seven in February. He knows that

0:02:15.560 --> 0:02:17.760
<v Speaker 1>he's he's a little bit of a rain man when

0:02:17.760 --> 0:02:21.919
<v Speaker 1>it comes to that. Nobody understands this data better than him.

0:02:22.040 --> 0:02:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Nobody understands how it interacts with the financial markets in

0:02:26.160 --> 0:02:29.680
<v Speaker 1>as great detail as Dave. So rather than me babbling

0:02:30.000 --> 0:02:35.519
<v Speaker 1>with no further ado, my conversation with David Rosenberg. This

0:02:36.000 --> 0:02:40.079
<v Speaker 1>is Masters in Business with Barry Ridholts on Bloomberg Radio.

0:02:40.720 --> 0:02:43.560
<v Speaker 1>My special guest this week is an old friend. His

0:02:43.680 --> 0:02:48.400
<v Speaker 1>name is David Rosenberg. He is probably best known as

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:52.720
<v Speaker 1>the former chief economist for North America for investing Giant

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Merrill lynch Uh. He is now running his own shop

0:02:56.760 --> 0:03:02.919
<v Speaker 1>called Rosenberg Research, headquartered in Toronto. David Rosenberg, Welcome to

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Masters in Business. It's great to be on the show, Barry,

0:03:06.320 --> 0:03:09.080
<v Speaker 1>thanks for inviting me. Right, you can't say here anymore

0:03:09.120 --> 0:03:13.240
<v Speaker 1>because no one knows where here is. So let's jump

0:03:13.520 --> 0:03:18.200
<v Speaker 1>right into it. Based on that comments prior to the

0:03:18.280 --> 0:03:22.280
<v Speaker 1>COVID nineteen pandemic, prior to the lockdown, how did you

0:03:22.320 --> 0:03:27.799
<v Speaker 1>see the state of the economy, let's call it fourth quarter. Well,

0:03:27.960 --> 0:03:32.839
<v Speaker 1>I had seen the situation before the calamity hit, as

0:03:32.880 --> 0:03:36.360
<v Speaker 1>I've seen the entire cycle all along, which was a

0:03:36.440 --> 0:03:41.840
<v Speaker 1>cycle that was very weak, very weak structural underpinnings, a

0:03:41.920 --> 0:03:47.360
<v Speaker 1>decade of very little productivity growth, very little capital spending.

0:03:47.400 --> 0:03:50.720
<v Speaker 1>In fact, I was saying most of last year even

0:03:50.720 --> 0:03:54.080
<v Speaker 1>though it wasn't a technical recession. Verry I was saying

0:03:54.080 --> 0:03:57.440
<v Speaker 1>that there was certainly a recession in corporate profits, there

0:03:57.520 --> 0:04:01.520
<v Speaker 1>was recession in capital spending, there was a recession in

0:04:01.600 --> 0:04:05.400
<v Speaker 1>non residential construction. And really what was keeping the glue

0:04:05.400 --> 0:04:10.760
<v Speaker 1>together was the consumer, which is d P and you

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:14.160
<v Speaker 1>just don't get a plane procession in a real sense

0:04:14.440 --> 0:04:17.440
<v Speaker 1>without the consumer playing a part. But it was a

0:04:17.600 --> 0:04:23.320
<v Speaker 1>very uneven economic performance. It continued into the opening months

0:04:23.360 --> 0:04:26.920
<v Speaker 1>of this year. It's very interesting when I hear people say, well,

0:04:27.040 --> 0:04:30.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, just wait till the pandemic ends and we

0:04:30.160 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 1>get the vaccine and will revert back to what the

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:36.680
<v Speaker 1>economy looked like previously. But the economy what it looked

0:04:36.680 --> 0:04:41.120
<v Speaker 1>like previously was very uneven, an economy where the corporate

0:04:41.160 --> 0:04:45.560
<v Speaker 1>sector embarked on the most pronounced debt requity swap of

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:48.640
<v Speaker 1>all time. You know, when I went to school, you

0:04:48.760 --> 0:04:53.120
<v Speaker 1>learned about how companies would issue debt to finance capital expenditure.

0:04:53.880 --> 0:04:56.440
<v Speaker 1>But the record debt issuance in the business sector went

0:04:56.560 --> 0:05:00.360
<v Speaker 1>for stock buy backs. So really the whole bullmark, when

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:04.719
<v Speaker 1>you think about it, um was in financial engineering. I

0:05:04.800 --> 0:05:08.680
<v Speaker 1>called it the Potempkan bull market. In the economy and

0:05:08.720 --> 0:05:11.320
<v Speaker 1>in the stock market. But actually what was very interesting

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:14.000
<v Speaker 1>to me, that's how we had one of the pronounced

0:05:14.240 --> 0:05:16.840
<v Speaker 1>bull markets of all time and equities in the context

0:05:16.839 --> 0:05:20.520
<v Speaker 1>of the weakest economic expansion. So did I see the

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:23.360
<v Speaker 1>pandemic hitting at no? Did I see that we were

0:05:23.360 --> 0:05:27.400
<v Speaker 1>going to be shutting down the economy? The answer is no.

0:05:28.120 --> 0:05:31.920
<v Speaker 1>I did always in my mind have fragility as part

0:05:32.040 --> 0:05:35.719
<v Speaker 1>of my theme, and that even the smallest shock could

0:05:35.720 --> 0:05:38.000
<v Speaker 1>send that the economy into a downturn. And I want

0:05:38.000 --> 0:05:40.600
<v Speaker 1>to take you just back to that period in the

0:05:40.600 --> 0:05:43.800
<v Speaker 1>final months of two thousand and eighteen, when God forbid,

0:05:43.839 --> 0:05:46.040
<v Speaker 1>all G. Powell did was take the funds rate to

0:05:46.080 --> 0:05:48.200
<v Speaker 1>two and a half percent. And that two and a

0:05:48.279 --> 0:05:51.560
<v Speaker 1>half percent, Oh my god, how can we get survived

0:05:51.560 --> 0:05:54.080
<v Speaker 1>with rates that high? Well, that's the point that I

0:05:54.120 --> 0:05:56.680
<v Speaker 1>think we have to come to grips with is that

0:05:56.960 --> 0:06:00.240
<v Speaker 1>once again we continue to fight these cycles of of

0:06:00.320 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 1>debt with even more debt, and we're doing it now

0:06:03.440 --> 0:06:07.359
<v Speaker 1>for a host reasons which are probably justified for the

0:06:07.400 --> 0:06:09.080
<v Speaker 1>here and now. We'll have to clean up this mass

0:06:09.080 --> 0:06:12.640
<v Speaker 1>at some point in the future. But I think that's

0:06:12.680 --> 0:06:14.760
<v Speaker 1>the major point, is what sort of cycle is it

0:06:15.520 --> 0:06:18.200
<v Speaker 1>for all the bulls out there? What does it mean

0:06:18.760 --> 0:06:22.039
<v Speaker 1>when you have a new Central Bank Chairman J Powell

0:06:22.200 --> 0:06:25.359
<v Speaker 1>telling you repeatedly when he took over the helm in

0:06:25.400 --> 0:06:28.279
<v Speaker 1>early two thousand and eighteen, and he kept on saying

0:06:28.279 --> 0:06:30.680
<v Speaker 1>over and over again, it is time to normalize interest

0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:33.080
<v Speaker 1>rates and normal to the fat back then was three

0:06:33.120 --> 0:06:35.920
<v Speaker 1>percent plus two and a half percent peak in the

0:06:35.920 --> 0:06:38.919
<v Speaker 1>fat funds rate was the lowest peak in the fat

0:06:38.960 --> 0:06:42.000
<v Speaker 1>funds rate since the nineteen thirties. UM. That tells you

0:06:42.000 --> 0:06:46.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot that we could not even withstand a normalization

0:06:46.480 --> 0:06:50.560
<v Speaker 1>of interest rates, and it's because the whole economy, despite

0:06:50.600 --> 0:06:54.479
<v Speaker 1>the facade created by the stock market, the economy was

0:06:54.560 --> 0:06:58.080
<v Speaker 1>actually still in an abnormal state UM coming out of

0:06:58.160 --> 0:07:01.960
<v Speaker 1>the Great Recession. Notwithstanding you know how well capitalized the

0:07:02.000 --> 0:07:05.400
<v Speaker 1>banks were. The banks became well capitalized, but they also

0:07:05.440 --> 0:07:09.560
<v Speaker 1>became regulated utilities, and so the debt boom didn't happen

0:07:09.600 --> 0:07:12.560
<v Speaker 1>in the banking sector this time. It happened outside the

0:07:12.560 --> 0:07:15.800
<v Speaker 1>confines of the banking sector, which was in public sector

0:07:15.920 --> 0:07:19.360
<v Speaker 1>but was in public issuance of corporate debt, which took

0:07:19.680 --> 0:07:21.960
<v Speaker 1>it up to fifty percent of GDP, which we've never

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:25.400
<v Speaker 1>seen before. I want to stay with the idea that

0:07:26.280 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 1>low interest rates are a key aspect of what's been

0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:33.320
<v Speaker 1>going on. Is it safe to say that you believe

0:07:33.480 --> 0:07:37.559
<v Speaker 1>the recovery off of the O nine lows are due

0:07:37.600 --> 0:07:41.840
<v Speaker 1>in part to the engineering by the Federal Reserve and

0:07:41.920 --> 0:07:45.960
<v Speaker 1>the unusually low rates longer for lower Is that a

0:07:46.000 --> 0:07:49.960
<v Speaker 1>fair statement. Well, I would actually say that the primary

0:07:50.000 --> 0:07:54.800
<v Speaker 1>reasons for the recovery that we saw, you know, really

0:07:54.880 --> 0:07:59.720
<v Speaker 1>stemmed from the dramatic increase that we saw in corporate

0:07:59.720 --> 0:08:03.240
<v Speaker 1>debt showance that went into stop buy backs create this

0:08:03.360 --> 0:08:08.040
<v Speaker 1>illusion of a fundamentally based equity market rally, and that

0:08:08.160 --> 0:08:10.920
<v Speaker 1>you had some trickle down impact in terms of equity

0:08:10.960 --> 0:08:14.440
<v Speaker 1>wealth effects on spending. On top of that, we had

0:08:14.840 --> 0:08:18.560
<v Speaker 1>tremendous physical stimulus through most of the period. UH. It

0:08:18.640 --> 0:08:21.360
<v Speaker 1>started in China trying to continue to pump the system

0:08:21.400 --> 0:08:25.960
<v Speaker 1>with physical stimulus throughout the entire bull market in the

0:08:25.960 --> 0:08:31.240
<v Speaker 1>global economy, and you had the Obama UH physical stimulus

0:08:31.240 --> 0:08:33.920
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the infrastructure spending early on, which took

0:08:33.920 --> 0:08:36.520
<v Speaker 1>a while to percolate. UH. And then of course the

0:08:36.559 --> 0:08:41.160
<v Speaker 1>book ends with the historic tax cuts in two thousands

0:08:41.160 --> 0:08:44.839
<v Speaker 1>and eighteen by the Trump administration. So we had a

0:08:44.960 --> 0:08:48.000
<v Speaker 1>tremendous stimulus. I'm not. You know, the question becomes, I

0:08:48.000 --> 0:08:51.400
<v Speaker 1>guess you know, we're low interest rates a cause of

0:08:51.440 --> 0:08:55.400
<v Speaker 1>whatever economic growth that we saw. You know, it's um.

0:08:55.440 --> 0:08:58.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm almost gonna talk like a classic economist here.

0:08:58.080 --> 0:09:00.079
<v Speaker 1>It's it's a one hand another hand. It's really be

0:09:00.120 --> 0:09:04.000
<v Speaker 1>a two sided argument because you could argue all low

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:08.040
<v Speaker 1>interest rates give you the impetus um to issue debt um.

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Certainly low interest rates gives you the impetus to go

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:14.720
<v Speaker 1>and buy risky assets because all we heard also belong

0:09:14.840 --> 0:09:18.320
<v Speaker 1>was tina uh, there is no alternative. So there's that

0:09:18.440 --> 0:09:21.280
<v Speaker 1>aspect to it too. It's called financial oppression. You want

0:09:21.280 --> 0:09:24.920
<v Speaker 1>to punish traditional risk reverse savers, to push them in

0:09:24.960 --> 0:09:27.800
<v Speaker 1>the risk curve, to get animal spirits up and to

0:09:27.880 --> 0:09:31.240
<v Speaker 1>generate a recovery that way. And there's a good part

0:09:31.240 --> 0:09:34.040
<v Speaker 1>of the reason why we had an expansion was because

0:09:34.080 --> 0:09:36.720
<v Speaker 1>of that. But at the same time, what do little

0:09:36.760 --> 0:09:39.319
<v Speaker 1>interest rates as a price signal tell you an interest

0:09:39.400 --> 0:09:42.040
<v Speaker 1>rates there's certainly something that you borrow at is something

0:09:42.080 --> 0:09:44.640
<v Speaker 1>that you certainly will do your calculations on your dividend

0:09:44.679 --> 0:09:49.200
<v Speaker 1>discount model, or you will do your long term discount

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:52.800
<v Speaker 1>and earnings projections off the discount rate. But the interest

0:09:52.880 --> 0:09:57.200
<v Speaker 1>rate itself isn't just a lending rate or boring rate.

0:09:57.320 --> 0:10:00.679
<v Speaker 1>It is a price signal, just like in Japan, or

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:03.520
<v Speaker 1>just like in Europe where we've had negative rates. What

0:10:03.720 --> 0:10:09.480
<v Speaker 1>do these extremely low interest rates tell you about the economy?

0:10:09.480 --> 0:10:12.640
<v Speaker 1>It tells you that we have a very weak long

0:10:12.760 --> 0:10:15.200
<v Speaker 1>term economic outlook. That's what it's telling you these low

0:10:15.240 --> 0:10:18.520
<v Speaker 1>interest rates. It doesn't it also say that the credit

0:10:18.559 --> 0:10:23.400
<v Speaker 1>worthiness of the United States is good and the bond

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:26.720
<v Speaker 1>market doesn't see any inflation any time left in the future.

0:10:27.200 --> 0:10:29.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that there's a good part of that that

0:10:29.760 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 1>you've got. Look, you've got various components of what makes up,

0:10:33.280 --> 0:10:36.560
<v Speaker 1>say the interest rate. There's the term premium, which is

0:10:36.600 --> 0:10:41.320
<v Speaker 1>related to your expectations of the FED. There is inflation expectations,

0:10:41.360 --> 0:10:43.880
<v Speaker 1>which you actually just mentioned. But there's also a real

0:10:43.920 --> 0:10:46.960
<v Speaker 1>interest rate component, which tells you something about expectations of

0:10:47.000 --> 0:10:51.080
<v Speaker 1>real economic growth. So really there's all three. Now you

0:10:51.120 --> 0:10:52.960
<v Speaker 1>can say to me, well, jeez, you know, it's so

0:10:53.000 --> 0:10:56.000
<v Speaker 1>great to have low inflation expectations, to have low inflation,

0:10:56.400 --> 0:10:58.880
<v Speaker 1>you do look back in the nineteen seventies and eighties,

0:10:58.960 --> 0:11:02.120
<v Speaker 1>very we were for lower inflation. We couldn't week to

0:11:02.160 --> 0:11:05.640
<v Speaker 1>have lower inflation. And now over the past number of years,

0:11:06.080 --> 0:11:09.640
<v Speaker 1>we had just too much of lower inflation. But lower

0:11:09.640 --> 0:11:14.440
<v Speaker 1>inflation means lower inflation epso facto means lower pricing power,

0:11:14.800 --> 0:11:17.920
<v Speaker 1>and lower pricing power means that we have compressed margins.

0:11:18.000 --> 0:11:20.480
<v Speaker 1>So how you kept the gravy train growing throughout this

0:11:20.520 --> 0:11:22.839
<v Speaker 1>whole period? Remember last year, last year, we had a

0:11:22.840 --> 0:11:26.360
<v Speaker 1>bona fide earnings recession. There was no pricing power last year,

0:11:26.760 --> 0:11:29.719
<v Speaker 1>and yet the stock market finished with a run up.

0:11:30.080 --> 0:11:32.600
<v Speaker 1>And that had to do with the Powell pivot and

0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:34.240
<v Speaker 1>it had to do with the re expansion of the

0:11:34.240 --> 0:11:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Fed balance sheets starting in the fourth quarter. So let's

0:11:37.679 --> 0:11:44.480
<v Speaker 1>talk about this lockdown, quarantine, pandemic situation. This is Memorial

0:11:44.600 --> 0:11:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Day week. What is the state of the economy today? Well,

0:11:48.840 --> 0:11:53.120
<v Speaker 1>I say that we are right now still in the

0:11:53.120 --> 0:11:56.040
<v Speaker 1>are coming out of called the vertical down phase. Here,

0:11:56.200 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 1>that we really were hit with a double vammy of

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:04.720
<v Speaker 1>a shock that affected the demand. Because even before the lockdowns,

0:12:05.320 --> 0:12:08.480
<v Speaker 1>the economy was starting to sputter because people were getting

0:12:08.480 --> 0:12:14.000
<v Speaker 1>panicky over becoming sick over the coronavirus. And then so

0:12:14.080 --> 0:12:17.480
<v Speaker 1>even before call it the middle of March. Already things

0:12:17.480 --> 0:12:19.560
<v Speaker 1>are starting to really cool off. You can see that

0:12:19.640 --> 0:12:22.640
<v Speaker 1>in the data through February and in the March. And

0:12:22.679 --> 0:12:25.880
<v Speaker 1>then look, we've shut down most of the economy and

0:12:26.400 --> 0:12:29.319
<v Speaker 1>there's no precedent for this. There's no playbook for I mean,

0:12:29.320 --> 0:12:32.280
<v Speaker 1>there's a playbook for a pandemic, but you've got to

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:36.080
<v Speaker 1>go back at least a century. But a playbook for

0:12:36.160 --> 0:12:39.280
<v Speaker 1>shutting down really, when you think about the entire global

0:12:39.280 --> 0:12:41.880
<v Speaker 1>economy for a period of time, well that we haven't

0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:46.000
<v Speaker 1>seen before, and especially an economy globally that's so intertwined.

0:12:46.320 --> 0:12:49.640
<v Speaker 1>So this was simultaneously a demand shock and a supply shock.

0:12:50.160 --> 0:12:53.120
<v Speaker 1>So Dave on that note of demand shock and supply

0:12:53.200 --> 0:12:57.920
<v Speaker 1>shock simultaneously, give me a snapshot. What is the unemployment

0:12:58.000 --> 0:13:00.560
<v Speaker 1>rate today? You forget the b L S D. What

0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:02.800
<v Speaker 1>do you think the unemployment rate is? What do you

0:13:02.840 --> 0:13:06.000
<v Speaker 1>think US GDP is and what do you think global

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:09.319
<v Speaker 1>GDP is? Well, I think that you know the unemployment

0:13:09.400 --> 0:13:12.240
<v Speaker 1>rate right now. I think as well over if it's

0:13:12.280 --> 0:13:16.719
<v Speaker 1>measured accurately and on its way soon above and look,

0:13:16.760 --> 0:13:18.640
<v Speaker 1>these are numbers at the St. Louis bed was talking

0:13:18.640 --> 0:13:21.320
<v Speaker 1>about even a couple of months ago, and as far

0:13:21.360 --> 0:13:23.679
<v Speaker 1>as GDP is concerned in the US, I think you're

0:13:23.679 --> 0:13:26.760
<v Speaker 1>talking at least negative for the second quarter. It could

0:13:26.760 --> 0:13:29.480
<v Speaker 1>be worse than that, and I think that the entire

0:13:29.520 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 1>world is probably pretty well very close to that. I mean,

0:13:32.600 --> 0:13:36.120
<v Speaker 1>China has already come out of its worst detonation from

0:13:36.120 --> 0:13:39.000
<v Speaker 1>this and the world's second largest economy, So it could

0:13:39.040 --> 0:13:42.360
<v Speaker 1>be just a timing thing that the US economy is

0:13:42.440 --> 0:13:45.079
<v Speaker 1>contracting a sharper rate than is everywhere else is because

0:13:45.200 --> 0:13:47.640
<v Speaker 1>China's come out. But you know you're talking about for

0:13:47.760 --> 0:13:49.720
<v Speaker 1>this year. I think global GDP is going to be

0:13:49.760 --> 0:13:52.600
<v Speaker 1>down at least ten percent for the year. Now. Where

0:13:52.640 --> 0:13:55.400
<v Speaker 1>we are right now, well, look, you're seeing a pulse

0:13:55.600 --> 0:13:58.680
<v Speaker 1>in the economy now, so it's not surprising that we're

0:13:58.720 --> 0:14:01.880
<v Speaker 1>probably going to get some sort of a bounce in

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:04.200
<v Speaker 1>the third quarter. You know, I think that we're going

0:14:04.240 --> 0:14:07.920
<v Speaker 1>to be down four in the second quarter and then um,

0:14:07.920 --> 0:14:11.320
<v Speaker 1>we're probably up maybe twenty or better in the third quarter.

0:14:11.360 --> 0:14:13.240
<v Speaker 1>It's going to be a heck of a bounce. But

0:14:13.320 --> 0:14:15.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's like turning the light switch on. Um,

0:14:15.880 --> 0:14:19.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, after you've turned up the all the electricity

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 1>off in the house for a period of time. So

0:14:21.800 --> 0:14:23.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it's going to end up being a square

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:26.440
<v Speaker 1>root sort of a recovery. We're going to get some

0:14:26.480 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 1>sort of a bounce. It's logical because we are reopening

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:32.520
<v Speaker 1>there will be some activity, but there is no return

0:14:32.640 --> 0:14:36.560
<v Speaker 1>to normality until we either get a vaccine, which would

0:14:36.560 --> 0:14:40.480
<v Speaker 1>be preferable, or some sort of effective treatment. Because we

0:14:40.520 --> 0:14:43.400
<v Speaker 1>can reopen the economy, but we're not going to get

0:14:43.440 --> 0:14:46.280
<v Speaker 1>a perpetual increase in production and hiring and get going

0:14:46.320 --> 0:14:49.840
<v Speaker 1>to play right back down without demand. The demand has

0:14:49.920 --> 0:14:52.480
<v Speaker 1>to show up, and that's the wild card. Because we

0:14:52.520 --> 0:14:55.320
<v Speaker 1>can reopen the economy, and I frankly don't believe that

0:14:55.440 --> 0:14:57.520
<v Speaker 1>even if we get a second wave, we're not going

0:14:57.520 --> 0:15:00.960
<v Speaker 1>back to locking things down again. That might happen sporadically

0:15:00.960 --> 0:15:03.520
<v Speaker 1>and in some hotspots, but there's no more national lockdown.

0:15:03.560 --> 0:15:06.080
<v Speaker 1>That's not going to happen. But for the economy to

0:15:06.480 --> 0:15:09.240
<v Speaker 1>regain any verve whatsoever on a sustained basis, we need

0:15:09.240 --> 0:15:12.160
<v Speaker 1>to demand. And uh, you know, when you're asking me

0:15:12.200 --> 0:15:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the question about you know, where are we there's no

0:15:14.520 --> 0:15:17.160
<v Speaker 1>playbook or something like this. This isn't like waiting like

0:15:17.200 --> 0:15:19.440
<v Speaker 1>in March of oh nine, we have the ha moment,

0:15:19.880 --> 0:15:22.440
<v Speaker 1>the ring fence in the banking system, we capitalize the banks,

0:15:22.480 --> 0:15:25.440
<v Speaker 1>we could move on. You know, in two thousand and two,

0:15:25.600 --> 0:15:28.240
<v Speaker 1>we we mop up all the excess capacity and the

0:15:28.280 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 1>technology sector of Valla, we're off to a new bull market.

0:15:32.000 --> 0:15:34.480
<v Speaker 1>When the RTC was created and cleaned up the mass

0:15:34.520 --> 0:15:37.280
<v Speaker 1>left over by the savings alone crisis and commercial real estate,

0:15:37.320 --> 0:15:39.840
<v Speaker 1>well there we had the event that we could point

0:15:39.840 --> 0:15:42.160
<v Speaker 1>to that. Okay, now we can start getting things back

0:15:42.200 --> 0:15:44.120
<v Speaker 1>to normal. This is this is this has to do

0:15:44.160 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 1>with a vaccine basically. So let's say we get a

0:15:47.120 --> 0:15:49.520
<v Speaker 1>vaccine by the end of the year. Let's say December,

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:53.280
<v Speaker 1>there's a vaccine. How long beyond that does it take

0:15:53.840 --> 0:15:59.480
<v Speaker 1>for us to regain the economic peak of Well, the

0:15:59.520 --> 0:16:02.280
<v Speaker 1>whole was created is so big that could still take

0:16:02.320 --> 0:16:04.520
<v Speaker 1>a lease a year. But if we got a vaccine,

0:16:04.560 --> 0:16:06.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, the stock market is telling you that

0:16:06.360 --> 0:16:08.440
<v Speaker 1>right now. The stock market is telling you that they're

0:16:08.440 --> 0:16:10.840
<v Speaker 1>expecting there's going to be an announcement on a vaccine

0:16:10.880 --> 0:16:13.680
<v Speaker 1>by Labor Day that will be ready for a broad

0:16:13.760 --> 0:16:17.600
<v Speaker 1>distribution no later than early next year. So if we

0:16:17.640 --> 0:16:20.280
<v Speaker 1>get a vaccine in the next six or twelve months,

0:16:20.320 --> 0:16:22.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's a game changer. That is a game

0:16:22.480 --> 0:16:25.840
<v Speaker 1>changer basically, UM, that will take us on the road

0:16:25.880 --> 0:16:29.160
<v Speaker 1>back to normality. Not everything will return to normal, because

0:16:29.360 --> 0:16:33.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, months of isolation and lockdown has had some

0:16:33.400 --> 0:16:36.960
<v Speaker 1>impact on psychology and UH and has had an impact

0:16:37.000 --> 0:16:39.800
<v Speaker 1>on how we're going to approach our commercial and our

0:16:39.840 --> 0:16:42.200
<v Speaker 1>personal lives going forward. There will be I'm not gonna

0:16:42.200 --> 0:16:45.320
<v Speaker 1>even say scars, but there's going to be a second

0:16:45.360 --> 0:16:47.960
<v Speaker 1>or change in behavior that comes out of this be

0:16:48.120 --> 0:16:50.200
<v Speaker 1>that as the mate. A vaccine is a game changer

0:16:50.240 --> 0:16:52.160
<v Speaker 1>because think of a vaccine, we can actually go to

0:16:52.200 --> 0:16:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Yankee Stadium and watch a baseball game. We can actually

0:16:54.680 --> 0:16:56.800
<v Speaker 1>open up the malls. We're not going to be fearful

0:16:57.320 --> 0:17:00.400
<v Speaker 1>of getting the disease anymore, neither getting sick or post

0:17:00.560 --> 0:17:03.360
<v Speaker 1>and possibly dying. I mean, depending on the demography. But

0:17:03.440 --> 0:17:06.560
<v Speaker 1>the vaccine is the game changer. So I'll tell you

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:09.119
<v Speaker 1>right now, Barry, I will turn if I start getting

0:17:09.119 --> 0:17:12.359
<v Speaker 1>the signs. Now, everybody speaks to everybody. Everybody's got the

0:17:12.480 --> 0:17:15.800
<v Speaker 1>group of infectious disease specialists they speak to. We will

0:17:15.840 --> 0:17:18.760
<v Speaker 1>watch Scott Leave and Fauci on TV. UM. You know,

0:17:19.280 --> 0:17:21.600
<v Speaker 1>my sources for whatever they're worth. It's telling me that

0:17:21.640 --> 0:17:24.159
<v Speaker 1>a vaccine is going to be coming. Most of the

0:17:24.160 --> 0:17:26.719
<v Speaker 1>people I speak to that are knowledgeable are you know,

0:17:26.760 --> 0:17:29.440
<v Speaker 1>there's no such thing as a percent. But a vaccine

0:17:29.480 --> 0:17:32.280
<v Speaker 1>is coming, probably not un till the spring or summer

0:17:32.280 --> 0:17:34.960
<v Speaker 1>of next year. And that's good news and bad news

0:17:34.960 --> 0:17:37.199
<v Speaker 1>because it means they're going to have a vaccine, But

0:17:37.240 --> 0:17:39.920
<v Speaker 1>it does mean that the big recovery is going to

0:17:40.000 --> 0:17:42.800
<v Speaker 1>be delayed. And the longer it takes for that to happen,

0:17:43.000 --> 0:17:45.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, unless the government continues with the fiscals big,

0:17:45.720 --> 0:17:47.920
<v Speaker 1>it's the more bankruptcy and unemployment we're going to see

0:17:47.920 --> 0:17:50.639
<v Speaker 1>along the way. So let me address something you brought

0:17:50.720 --> 0:17:56.520
<v Speaker 1>up earlier about weakness in the economy and the pre

0:17:56.640 --> 0:18:00.359
<v Speaker 1>pandemic economy. You know, if we look at the Milan meals,

0:18:00.359 --> 0:18:04.200
<v Speaker 1>they're the biggest demographic group at least since the baby boomers,

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:08.200
<v Speaker 1>and they're now answering their thirties. We just saw them

0:18:08.320 --> 0:18:12.520
<v Speaker 1>start to increase household formation and housing demand was starting

0:18:12.520 --> 0:18:16.680
<v Speaker 1>to tick up amongst that demographic. What does it mean

0:18:16.800 --> 0:18:22.040
<v Speaker 1>for this group that was potentially starting a secular growth

0:18:22.040 --> 0:18:26.480
<v Speaker 1>story for this pandemic? Is this just temporarily delay them

0:18:26.520 --> 0:18:29.399
<v Speaker 1>a year or two or does this scar them as

0:18:29.560 --> 0:18:33.520
<v Speaker 1>as you implied earlier. Well, I don't think it scars them.

0:18:33.600 --> 0:18:37.400
<v Speaker 1>It really comes down to where they working. If these

0:18:37.400 --> 0:18:41.480
<v Speaker 1>are skilled millennials, they'll be fine. I mean, I estimate

0:18:41.560 --> 0:18:46.080
<v Speaker 1>that ten million jobs I've been eliminated permanently. Okay, one

0:18:46.080 --> 0:18:48.280
<v Speaker 1>thing that we wait, wait wait, ten million out of

0:18:48.280 --> 0:18:50.760
<v Speaker 1>the thirty nine million who were laid off or ten

0:18:50.760 --> 0:18:53.880
<v Speaker 1>million across the whole economy. Well both, I'm saying ten

0:18:53.880 --> 0:18:57.240
<v Speaker 1>million out of the rough and ten million out of

0:18:57.280 --> 0:19:00.560
<v Speaker 1>the thirty million workforce. I think that we've we've lost

0:19:00.560 --> 0:19:04.399
<v Speaker 1>ten million jobs permanently, Okay, in the sectors of the

0:19:04.440 --> 0:19:07.680
<v Speaker 1>economy that are not going to come back nearly as much.

0:19:07.960 --> 0:19:10.000
<v Speaker 1>And they'll be and that includes some of the offsets

0:19:10.000 --> 0:19:14.520
<v Speaker 1>will see because some Amazon like companies and industries will

0:19:14.560 --> 0:19:16.960
<v Speaker 1>be hiring. Look at what we did, what we discovered

0:19:16.960 --> 0:19:19.240
<v Speaker 1>in this it's great to have discovery. Even though this

0:19:19.320 --> 0:19:24.399
<v Speaker 1>was a horrible situation that we we shut down economy

0:19:24.720 --> 0:19:27.600
<v Speaker 1>that was called a non essential economy because they left

0:19:27.600 --> 0:19:30.480
<v Speaker 1>the essential economy open. So here we figure out, well,

0:19:30.480 --> 0:19:35.399
<v Speaker 1>that's very interesting that of the economy isn't essential. Well,

0:19:35.480 --> 0:19:38.320
<v Speaker 1>that's a revelation, isn't it. We're talking about, you know,

0:19:38.440 --> 0:19:44.199
<v Speaker 1>in this whole two thousand and nine jobs boom, Uh,

0:19:44.359 --> 0:19:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the jobs boom that brought the unemployment of three and

0:19:46.960 --> 0:19:49.159
<v Speaker 1>a percent. As anybody ever bothered to see where these

0:19:49.240 --> 0:19:53.040
<v Speaker 1>jobs were created, they were created in low skilled, low

0:19:53.119 --> 0:19:57.800
<v Speaker 1>value added consumer cyclical industries. Okay, we don't produce anything

0:19:57.800 --> 0:20:02.159
<v Speaker 1>anymore now. Maybe as we on shore manufacturing in some

0:20:02.280 --> 0:20:04.680
<v Speaker 1>areas that will come back, but look at the industrial

0:20:04.680 --> 0:20:08.160
<v Speaker 1>production and manufacturing, look at the realifed sport data. We've

0:20:08.160 --> 0:20:11.760
<v Speaker 1>become really a society and economy that was really geared

0:20:11.760 --> 0:20:17.200
<v Speaker 1>towards entertainment and leisure and restaurants and retail and so

0:20:17.400 --> 0:20:19.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these jobs aren't coming back. But when

0:20:19.320 --> 0:20:21.879
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about the millennials, they're going to benefit from

0:20:21.920 --> 0:20:24.000
<v Speaker 1>one thing, which is that interest rates you're gonna remain

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 1>at the floor for a longer period of time than

0:20:27.400 --> 0:20:29.720
<v Speaker 1>they ever would have where you have a deflationary gap

0:20:29.800 --> 0:20:33.120
<v Speaker 1>to deal with. UH, and Powell's already said that they

0:20:33.119 --> 0:20:34.840
<v Speaker 1>are not going to raise interest rates as far as

0:20:34.880 --> 0:20:38.240
<v Speaker 1>the eye can see. So if you have a job,

0:20:39.040 --> 0:20:41.000
<v Speaker 1>if you're skilled, you have a job, and you have

0:20:41.080 --> 0:20:44.080
<v Speaker 1>job security. I mean, your financing constantly gonna be close

0:20:44.119 --> 0:20:47.400
<v Speaker 1>to zero to perpetuity. So I think actually in terms

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:49.679
<v Speaker 1>of housing, and that's going to be what type of

0:20:49.720 --> 0:20:51.320
<v Speaker 1>housing and what's going to come out of this, and

0:20:51.520 --> 0:20:55.480
<v Speaker 1>probably more positive for single family than it is, say

0:20:55.560 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 1>for condos or apartments. I think the multiples take a

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:03.080
<v Speaker 1>hit because once again, uh, we went through an experiment

0:21:03.480 --> 0:21:07.439
<v Speaker 1>what is it like to be isolated and to have

0:21:07.480 --> 0:21:11.119
<v Speaker 1>your mobility restricted in a condominium or an apartment against

0:21:11.160 --> 0:21:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the single family house with a backyard. And then of

0:21:14.520 --> 0:21:16.320
<v Speaker 1>course I think there's gonna be a lot of sensitivity

0:21:16.320 --> 0:21:19.320
<v Speaker 1>about what sort of density, what sort of urban density

0:21:19.359 --> 0:21:21.400
<v Speaker 1>do you want to be living in. So I think

0:21:21.400 --> 0:21:23.920
<v Speaker 1>this is going to be very good for suburban dwelling,

0:21:23.960 --> 0:21:26.760
<v Speaker 1>and I think that actually housing is going to come

0:21:26.800 --> 0:21:29.760
<v Speaker 1>out of this just fine, you know, as you're seeing

0:21:29.800 --> 0:21:32.320
<v Speaker 1>already in some of the numbers housing and for the

0:21:32.359 --> 0:21:35.840
<v Speaker 1>millennials that actually are in uh, the areas of the

0:21:35.840 --> 0:21:42.119
<v Speaker 1>economy that are essential or utility like and look, a

0:21:42.200 --> 0:21:44.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of millennials are in the technology industry. And as

0:21:44.680 --> 0:21:47.359
<v Speaker 1>we've seen in the cycle, the text talk sells up

0:21:47.400 --> 0:21:49.920
<v Speaker 1>well because we found out that tex stalks are a

0:21:49.960 --> 0:21:54.040
<v Speaker 1>lot like consumer staples, they are a necessity. So um,

0:21:54.160 --> 0:21:56.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that they'll be just fine. Job security is

0:21:56.800 --> 0:21:58.399
<v Speaker 1>going to be the key though, but they're going to

0:21:58.520 --> 0:22:01.760
<v Speaker 1>have the low financing costs that's going to escape them onside.

0:22:02.280 --> 0:22:05.840
<v Speaker 1>So Dave, we were talking about policy decisions. I can't help,

0:22:05.840 --> 0:22:10.520
<v Speaker 1>but notice you're in Toronto. It seems that Canada did

0:22:10.560 --> 0:22:14.840
<v Speaker 1>a much better job responding quickly to the COVID nineteen

0:22:14.880 --> 0:22:17.679
<v Speaker 1>pandemic than than we did down here in the US.

0:22:18.640 --> 0:22:23.359
<v Speaker 1>What sort of impact will this delayed response of the

0:22:23.520 --> 0:22:26.320
<v Speaker 1>US have, What does it mean to the state of

0:22:26.359 --> 0:22:28.600
<v Speaker 1>the economy today, and what does it mean to how

0:22:28.720 --> 0:22:31.280
<v Speaker 1>quickly we'll be able to recover? Well, you know, it's

0:22:31.359 --> 0:22:33.600
<v Speaker 1>it's a I don't even know if I look at

0:22:33.600 --> 0:22:37.040
<v Speaker 1>it country against country, because I mean, there are some

0:22:37.119 --> 0:22:39.600
<v Speaker 1>areas of the states that did better than than others.

0:22:40.040 --> 0:22:42.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think that you know, you can point

0:22:42.119 --> 0:22:46.040
<v Speaker 1>to Ohio, say in Canada, British Columbia is actually way

0:22:46.040 --> 0:22:49.439
<v Speaker 1>ahead of Ontario in terms of bending the curve. So

0:22:49.480 --> 0:22:51.600
<v Speaker 1>it's hard. It's hard to say, you know, Canada, it's

0:22:51.600 --> 0:22:55.240
<v Speaker 1>going to be I think a tougher slog here because

0:22:55.560 --> 0:22:58.159
<v Speaker 1>we're not gonna when it comes time to getting the vaccines,

0:22:58.200 --> 0:23:00.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure that they're going to be just first and

0:23:00.720 --> 0:23:02.879
<v Speaker 1>foremost in the in the States, then they're going to

0:23:02.920 --> 0:23:05.159
<v Speaker 1>be in Canada. And I would just say in the

0:23:05.200 --> 0:23:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Canadian situation, you know, here in Toronto, I mean we're

0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:12.480
<v Speaker 1>still pretty well on lockdown mode. And you know, look

0:23:12.480 --> 0:23:15.560
<v Speaker 1>we're doing a delicate balance here. You know, Uh, do

0:23:15.600 --> 0:23:18.320
<v Speaker 1>you reopen to early, get a second wave? But if

0:23:18.359 --> 0:23:21.679
<v Speaker 1>you don't reopen you destroy the economy. Uh. You know

0:23:21.720 --> 0:23:24.600
<v Speaker 1>here in Ontario, which is called it, you know, over

0:23:24.640 --> 0:23:27.520
<v Speaker 1>a third of the Canadian economy. You know, we're still

0:23:27.520 --> 0:23:29.920
<v Speaker 1>locked down. There's there's nothing here that's really opening yet.

0:23:30.359 --> 0:23:32.399
<v Speaker 1>But it's a it's a double ledged sword. Only history

0:23:32.440 --> 0:23:35.280
<v Speaker 1>we will be able to tell whether or not the

0:23:35.359 --> 0:23:38.680
<v Speaker 1>U S reopened early. Only history will tell whether Canada

0:23:39.000 --> 0:23:41.800
<v Speaker 1>waited too long to reopen. I mean, we don't really know,

0:23:41.960 --> 0:23:43.840
<v Speaker 1>and I don't I don't know, you know, if if

0:23:43.840 --> 0:23:46.760
<v Speaker 1>it matters really from an economic standpoint, because we can

0:23:46.800 --> 0:23:50.000
<v Speaker 1>point to Sweden. People like to look at the Sweden example.

0:23:50.160 --> 0:23:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Sweden had a much more lacy, fair attitude um much

0:23:54.160 --> 0:23:59.080
<v Speaker 1>higher mortality rate than anywhere else, including its European neighbors.

0:23:59.600 --> 0:24:02.280
<v Speaker 1>And while people had greater freedom and they didn't really

0:24:02.280 --> 0:24:06.560
<v Speaker 1>go through a lockdown outside of recommended social distancing, Sweden's

0:24:06.560 --> 0:24:09.760
<v Speaker 1>economy is still poised to contract ten percent this year,

0:24:09.800 --> 0:24:11.800
<v Speaker 1>which is what they're saying. All of Europe has going

0:24:11.840 --> 0:24:14.680
<v Speaker 1>to contract. So there's there was no evidence that even

0:24:15.400 --> 0:24:18.760
<v Speaker 1>not having your economy lockdown, that it did a lot

0:24:18.760 --> 0:24:20.480
<v Speaker 1>of good for your economy. And I'll just say why,

0:24:20.720 --> 0:24:23.560
<v Speaker 1>because there's a supply aspect and I said earlier demand

0:24:23.600 --> 0:24:27.119
<v Speaker 1>aspect um. We had a supply and demand shock, but

0:24:27.359 --> 0:24:29.520
<v Speaker 1>in Sweden they didn't have a supply shock, but they

0:24:29.520 --> 0:24:32.000
<v Speaker 1>had a pure demand shok. Because if people are fearful

0:24:32.040 --> 0:24:34.320
<v Speaker 1>and people are cautious, it doesn't matter whether they lost

0:24:34.320 --> 0:24:37.560
<v Speaker 1>down or not. They're just not going to expect. Quite fascinating, Dave.

0:24:37.680 --> 0:24:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk a little bit about launching your own firm

0:24:43.200 --> 0:24:45.920
<v Speaker 1>and full disclosure, I've been begging you to do this

0:24:46.040 --> 0:24:48.399
<v Speaker 1>for I don't know a decade. How long have you

0:24:48.680 --> 0:24:52.560
<v Speaker 1>and I've been talking about this, So so tell us

0:24:52.920 --> 0:24:58.119
<v Speaker 1>what made you decide to go independent? Well, you know,

0:24:58.200 --> 0:25:02.960
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's aunt percent true, Barry, and you were.

0:25:02.960 --> 0:25:06.520
<v Speaker 1>You were a great inspiration. You still are Uh. You know. Look,

0:25:06.840 --> 0:25:10.800
<v Speaker 1>I left mary Lynch in two thousand and nine uh

0:25:11.000 --> 0:25:14.280
<v Speaker 1>to come back home from New York. The truth is

0:25:14.920 --> 0:25:17.919
<v Speaker 1>I didn't really like my long absences from my young family.

0:25:17.960 --> 0:25:21.560
<v Speaker 1>They were still in Toronto, and after a decade at Merrill,

0:25:21.640 --> 0:25:24.840
<v Speaker 1>I achieved all the goals I set out anyways, Uh.

0:25:24.880 --> 0:25:27.639
<v Speaker 1>You know. One of them was, of course, this daily

0:25:27.680 --> 0:25:31.320
<v Speaker 1>market note that's now called Breakfast with Dave that I

0:25:31.280 --> 0:25:35.360
<v Speaker 1>had started back and by the time I left mary

0:25:35.440 --> 0:25:39.159
<v Speaker 1>Lynch in two thousand nine, uh, much to my surprise, actually,

0:25:39.200 --> 0:25:40.960
<v Speaker 1>I was told that it was the most widely read

0:25:41.000 --> 0:25:44.880
<v Speaker 1>piece of research coming out of the Meryl system. So

0:25:45.480 --> 0:25:48.760
<v Speaker 1>when I left Meryll, I had numerous folks, by the way,

0:25:48.760 --> 0:25:54.720
<v Speaker 1>including you, uh, urging me to start my own firm. Uh.

0:25:54.720 --> 0:25:58.040
<v Speaker 1>And we both remember that. So the bottom line is

0:25:58.080 --> 0:26:01.639
<v Speaker 1>that starting Rosenberg Research spend on my mind for many years.

0:26:02.160 --> 0:26:05.080
<v Speaker 1>The reality, though a decade ago, is I wanted to

0:26:05.119 --> 0:26:08.560
<v Speaker 1>spend more time with my family. Starting a new business

0:26:08.800 --> 0:26:12.760
<v Speaker 1>would have conflicted with that, uh, And instead I chose

0:26:12.800 --> 0:26:15.320
<v Speaker 1>to take an offer from Gluskin Chef. They gave me

0:26:15.359 --> 0:26:19.000
<v Speaker 1>the work family balance that I was looking for, but

0:26:19.119 --> 0:26:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the beauty about my relationship with my prior firm, UH

0:26:23.760 --> 0:26:28.359
<v Speaker 1>was that we sold my research to the outside world,

0:26:28.400 --> 0:26:32.040
<v Speaker 1>as in to non Glusk and Chef clients, whether they

0:26:32.040 --> 0:26:35.600
<v Speaker 1>are a conference called speeches or my daily We went

0:26:35.640 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 1>to the paywall and we split the proceeds, and it

0:26:38.560 --> 0:26:41.520
<v Speaker 1>turned out to be a very nice business. So I

0:26:41.600 --> 0:26:45.080
<v Speaker 1>really already had an existing business that I just spun

0:26:45.160 --> 0:26:48.120
<v Speaker 1>out at the beginning of the year. I guess you'd

0:26:48.160 --> 0:26:52.480
<v Speaker 1>ask me about the timing and or the even the rationale,

0:26:53.119 --> 0:26:56.760
<v Speaker 1>and you know, I've long identified a shortage out there

0:26:57.320 --> 0:27:02.679
<v Speaker 1>of truly high quality, un biased research and research that

0:27:02.760 --> 0:27:06.640
<v Speaker 1>takes the economics to the financial markets and provides investors

0:27:07.320 --> 0:27:10.080
<v Speaker 1>with the degree of clarity that they're not going to

0:27:10.200 --> 0:27:14.000
<v Speaker 1>get anywhere else. And this realization often makes me think

0:27:14.400 --> 0:27:17.040
<v Speaker 1>that I probably should have done this earlier. UM. But

0:27:17.640 --> 0:27:20.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm grateful to have had made a decision to strike

0:27:20.080 --> 0:27:22.760
<v Speaker 1>out to my own because it also comes down to

0:27:22.880 --> 0:27:27.399
<v Speaker 1>better late than never. But in that period when I

0:27:27.440 --> 0:27:31.840
<v Speaker 1>was a buy side economist, I had the luxury of

0:27:31.960 --> 0:27:36.000
<v Speaker 1>reading uh everybody else, whether it was on Wall Street

0:27:36.119 --> 0:27:40.200
<v Speaker 1>or Bay Street, or Montgomery Street or Wilson Street, UM,

0:27:40.440 --> 0:27:43.320
<v Speaker 1>and I just found that it all sounded the same

0:27:43.359 --> 0:27:47.959
<v Speaker 1>to me. And so many economists out there. I found

0:27:48.119 --> 0:27:50.600
<v Speaker 1>over the past decade, in particulars I could read my

0:27:51.080 --> 0:27:54.480
<v Speaker 1>former competitors research, and I guess my current competitor's research

0:27:54.960 --> 0:27:57.160
<v Speaker 1>is that there's so many economists out there that are

0:27:57.240 --> 0:28:01.520
<v Speaker 1>just too fearful of being wrong to make a call.

0:28:02.440 --> 0:28:05.119
<v Speaker 1>And I guess that is what has set me apart.

0:28:05.280 --> 0:28:08.960
<v Speaker 1>I really just wanted to take the opportunity now at

0:28:09.000 --> 0:28:14.199
<v Speaker 1>fifty nine years of age UH, to produce research that

0:28:14.400 --> 0:28:21.040
<v Speaker 1>is unique. Of course, it's provocative, but also uncovers things

0:28:21.119 --> 0:28:24.639
<v Speaker 1>around the bend that other people aren't looking at. Because

0:28:24.640 --> 0:28:27.560
<v Speaker 1>so much of economics is a commodity, and so the

0:28:27.640 --> 0:28:32.320
<v Speaker 1>most important thing is to make the research a non commodity,

0:28:32.359 --> 0:28:35.239
<v Speaker 1>to make it unique and to make it differentiated. And

0:28:35.240 --> 0:28:38.080
<v Speaker 1>that's always some of my ethos going back thirty years.

0:28:38.840 --> 0:28:41.760
<v Speaker 1>But now I had the financial resources to do it myself,

0:28:42.240 --> 0:28:46.520
<v Speaker 1>and and and the opportunity, and it's been a phenomenon.

0:28:46.760 --> 0:28:49.200
<v Speaker 1>We're only four months into this, and it's been great

0:28:49.880 --> 0:28:54.040
<v Speaker 1>to direct my own traffic and to allocate the research

0:28:54.080 --> 0:28:56.840
<v Speaker 1>initiatives this tour. I think it's most appropriate for our

0:28:56.880 --> 0:29:01.720
<v Speaker 1>client base. Dave, what's been the biggest prize of launching

0:29:01.720 --> 0:29:07.200
<v Speaker 1>your own farm. Both positive and negative. Well, look for

0:29:07.440 --> 0:29:10.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, the positive really has been um, you know,

0:29:11.040 --> 0:29:15.720
<v Speaker 1>the the ability to uh you know, staff up. I

0:29:15.760 --> 0:29:18.880
<v Speaker 1>would say with the best macro team I've ever had

0:29:18.960 --> 0:29:22.600
<v Speaker 1>under my wing. I know that's a big statement, that's true.

0:29:23.400 --> 0:29:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Uh And so that's been a big part of it. Uh.

0:29:26.680 --> 0:29:29.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm staffed up with the conomics and strategists

0:29:29.320 --> 0:29:32.960
<v Speaker 1>and I've got a hold uh marketing team. They're all

0:29:33.000 --> 0:29:36.000
<v Speaker 1>in their thirties. So they most positive thing is that

0:29:36.160 --> 0:29:40.200
<v Speaker 1>they make me feel young again. Uh And um, you

0:29:40.240 --> 0:29:44.000
<v Speaker 1>know we are. I'm learning a lot about being an entrepreneur. Uh.

0:29:44.160 --> 0:29:47.800
<v Speaker 1>And that's the roller coachter ride and uh as I

0:29:47.880 --> 0:29:51.440
<v Speaker 1>was warned it was going to be um, but it's um,

0:29:51.520 --> 0:29:54.080
<v Speaker 1>you know what we were expanding. I mean, you know,

0:29:54.080 --> 0:29:58.560
<v Speaker 1>when I left Gluskin Chefs, we had a subscription lest

0:29:58.800 --> 0:30:02.320
<v Speaker 1>globally we're in Ford countries by the way, Um, we

0:30:02.400 --> 0:30:06.120
<v Speaker 1>had almost two thousand subscribers. Now we have north to

0:30:06.200 --> 0:30:10.440
<v Speaker 1>four thousand people reading our material. So I'm very proud

0:30:10.520 --> 0:30:13.800
<v Speaker 1>of that that you know that we have, that we

0:30:13.840 --> 0:30:18.240
<v Speaker 1>have that reach. So that's probably the proud of the

0:30:18.280 --> 0:30:24.520
<v Speaker 1>cousemen so far has been our ability through almost little

0:30:24.640 --> 0:30:28.280
<v Speaker 1>effort to expand our readership, which means that we are

0:30:29.400 --> 0:30:34.200
<v Speaker 1>we're hitting the right the right nerve points with investors

0:30:34.200 --> 0:30:39.400
<v Speaker 1>out there in terms of you know, looking at anything

0:30:39.480 --> 0:30:44.120
<v Speaker 1>that's negative or anything that is Has it met my expectations?

0:30:44.520 --> 0:30:47.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's early days yet, but so far, i'd

0:30:47.640 --> 0:30:49.520
<v Speaker 1>have to say that all the check marks are in

0:30:49.560 --> 0:30:55.400
<v Speaker 1>the plus column. How has the pandemic impacted what you

0:30:55.440 --> 0:30:59.360
<v Speaker 1>would normally be doing running a research shop? And I

0:30:59.400 --> 0:31:03.080
<v Speaker 1>know you travel, you speaking a lot of conferences, you

0:31:03.200 --> 0:31:07.440
<v Speaker 1>visit a lot of clients. Now that we're especially in Toronto,

0:31:07.600 --> 0:31:11.520
<v Speaker 1>still in a lockdown situation. How has that impacted running

0:31:11.640 --> 0:31:15.560
<v Speaker 1>a service business like yours? M hm, you know that's

0:31:15.600 --> 0:31:17.800
<v Speaker 1>a that's a great point. Well, listen again, is as

0:31:17.840 --> 0:31:23.640
<v Speaker 1>part of really assembling a great team um and um

0:31:23.720 --> 0:31:27.080
<v Speaker 1>and uh, you know, everybody knowing you know, uh, you

0:31:27.120 --> 0:31:29.840
<v Speaker 1>know what they have to do and and coming to

0:31:30.320 --> 0:31:33.560
<v Speaker 1>a variety of consensus. And that comes not just to

0:31:33.720 --> 0:31:36.360
<v Speaker 1>say when we're formulating a forecast, but what we're going

0:31:36.400 --> 0:31:39.040
<v Speaker 1>to do regarding the business. Uh. You know. So we

0:31:39.040 --> 0:31:42.440
<v Speaker 1>were early and very well prepared, and I'm going to

0:31:42.520 --> 0:31:47.520
<v Speaker 1>tip my hat to my entire team because we had

0:31:47.560 --> 0:31:50.400
<v Speaker 1>a feeling that something like this might happen. We had

0:31:50.480 --> 0:31:53.320
<v Speaker 1>a We didn't know that, you know, there was going

0:31:53.400 --> 0:31:56.440
<v Speaker 1>to be a situation where one evening the NBA says

0:31:56.880 --> 0:31:59.080
<v Speaker 1>season is over, and then it's lights out for the

0:31:59.200 --> 0:32:02.600
<v Speaker 1>entire economy. But we had a plan, uh. And I

0:32:02.600 --> 0:32:05.040
<v Speaker 1>got to thank my team for that. We had a

0:32:05.040 --> 0:32:07.480
<v Speaker 1>plan as to what would happen if So we had

0:32:07.520 --> 0:32:10.640
<v Speaker 1>a plan B. And we were already set up with

0:32:10.800 --> 0:32:14.280
<v Speaker 1>our server and with our technology that if we had

0:32:14.280 --> 0:32:19.000
<v Speaker 1>to work remotely, uh, we could work remotely. And so

0:32:19.120 --> 0:32:21.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, we had a really nice office in downtown

0:32:22.160 --> 0:32:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Toronto right by the lake in Brookville Place, really one

0:32:27.120 --> 0:32:31.960
<v Speaker 1>of the prime a commercial space in the city. Uh.

0:32:32.000 --> 0:32:35.080
<v Speaker 1>And so that's where we were uh. And at any

0:32:35.080 --> 0:32:36.880
<v Speaker 1>moment of time, though, we could all just do this

0:32:37.000 --> 0:32:40.360
<v Speaker 1>from our from our home offices where I'm for example,

0:32:40.440 --> 0:32:43.360
<v Speaker 1>calling you right now. And so it went out without

0:32:43.360 --> 0:32:46.240
<v Speaker 1>a hitch, Like I was amazed on day one, crossing

0:32:46.280 --> 0:32:48.800
<v Speaker 1>my fingers when we were putting out our variety of

0:32:48.840 --> 0:32:53.240
<v Speaker 1>research material. Nothing went out late. There wasn't one blitch. Um.

0:32:53.480 --> 0:32:56.160
<v Speaker 1>So look, it's a matter of road working remote Lee.

0:32:56.760 --> 0:32:59.000
<v Speaker 1>We're keeping in touch with each other in a variety

0:32:59.000 --> 0:33:01.320
<v Speaker 1>different ways. You know, I've had a bunch of speaking

0:33:01.360 --> 0:33:05.800
<v Speaker 1>engagements in a lot of places, especially in the States,

0:33:05.840 --> 0:33:09.800
<v Speaker 1>that turned into doing it on zoom or just doing

0:33:09.840 --> 0:33:12.720
<v Speaker 1>conference calls like I'm doing with you. I remember years

0:33:12.720 --> 0:33:15.800
<v Speaker 1>ago doing a radio interview with you, you know, at

0:33:15.840 --> 0:33:19.200
<v Speaker 1>the at the Bloomberg office, and you know, I wish

0:33:19.280 --> 0:33:21.800
<v Speaker 1>I was there right now. So you know, everything right

0:33:21.800 --> 0:33:23.959
<v Speaker 1>now is just be done remotely. It's either done you know,

0:33:24.120 --> 0:33:29.120
<v Speaker 1>via teleconference or via zoom, just like everybody else. So

0:33:29.640 --> 0:33:31.840
<v Speaker 1>i'd have to say, though, Look, I'll tell you right now,

0:33:31.960 --> 0:33:35.040
<v Speaker 1>it's not like I don't enjoy traveling, but um, I

0:33:35.040 --> 0:33:39.160
<v Speaker 1>don't miss going to airports. I mean, I mess who

0:33:39.800 --> 0:33:43.640
<v Speaker 1>I missed. I missed the human interaction, I missed the applause,

0:33:43.640 --> 0:33:46.080
<v Speaker 1>I missed the booze, I missed the cat calls. If

0:33:46.160 --> 0:33:48.680
<v Speaker 1>it's weird giving a speech that you know, there's a

0:33:48.680 --> 0:33:51.959
<v Speaker 1>thousand people out there, but you know you can't hear them,

0:33:52.000 --> 0:33:54.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, you can't gauge their body language, and that's

0:33:54.360 --> 0:33:58.360
<v Speaker 1>pretty weird. Um. But you know, so we're all learning

0:33:59.040 --> 0:34:02.720
<v Speaker 1>about this this new phenomenon called work at home. But

0:34:02.800 --> 0:34:04.120
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you that you know, we're going to

0:34:04.240 --> 0:34:07.320
<v Speaker 1>have some sort of consensus once things that we get

0:34:07.360 --> 0:34:09.600
<v Speaker 1>past the eye the storm and things in trying to

0:34:09.640 --> 0:34:12.320
<v Speaker 1>open up, and will come to some sort of consensus

0:34:12.400 --> 0:34:14.719
<v Speaker 1>as to you know, what we'll do with that office downtown,

0:34:14.880 --> 0:34:18.439
<v Speaker 1>or we'll probably have something rotational, I imagine. But things

0:34:18.520 --> 0:34:20.279
<v Speaker 1>are not going back to the way that they were,

0:34:20.440 --> 0:34:23.480
<v Speaker 1>that much is for sure. You know, our mutual friend

0:34:23.560 --> 0:34:28.719
<v Speaker 1>John Walden held his strategic investor conference recently and I

0:34:28.840 --> 0:34:33.680
<v Speaker 1>interviewed somebody for that event, and you could see at

0:34:33.719 --> 0:34:36.560
<v Speaker 1>the bottom of the screen how many attendees are present,

0:34:37.120 --> 0:34:39.759
<v Speaker 1>and it just doesn't feel like you're talking to a

0:34:39.880 --> 0:34:42.960
<v Speaker 1>room of a thousand to two thousand people. It's like

0:34:43.040 --> 0:34:46.120
<v Speaker 1>a zoom call. And it definitely is going to take

0:34:46.120 --> 0:34:51.880
<v Speaker 1>a little getting getting used to. Yeah, and uh, I

0:34:51.920 --> 0:34:54.160
<v Speaker 1>think frankly that we're going to see a lot more

0:34:54.160 --> 0:34:57.120
<v Speaker 1>of that. And that's because I think that even if

0:34:57.160 --> 0:35:02.640
<v Speaker 1>we start to go back towards something that's quasi normal,

0:35:02.719 --> 0:35:07.760
<v Speaker 1>even I think the one thing that comes back the

0:35:07.760 --> 0:35:11.480
<v Speaker 1>the longest is going to be air travel, especially business

0:35:11.480 --> 0:35:15.600
<v Speaker 1>air travel and conferences and events. Um So for people

0:35:15.640 --> 0:35:18.399
<v Speaker 1>like me and you, this will be a a new

0:35:18.440 --> 0:35:22.239
<v Speaker 1>normal for a lot longer, to say the least, So

0:35:23.080 --> 0:35:25.319
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to call this a v recovery in

0:35:25.360 --> 0:35:29.120
<v Speaker 1>the stock market. We had one of the fastest collapses

0:35:29.200 --> 0:35:32.400
<v Speaker 1>on record in the month of March, and here we

0:35:32.480 --> 0:35:36.000
<v Speaker 1>are within spinning distance of all time highs. What do

0:35:36.040 --> 0:35:39.400
<v Speaker 1>you think of this decline and rebound. I think that

0:35:39.920 --> 0:35:44.520
<v Speaker 1>the first leg of the rebound was policy driven, with

0:35:44.680 --> 0:35:47.480
<v Speaker 1>the fad, with all the fiscal support. And you have

0:35:47.600 --> 0:35:50.480
<v Speaker 1>to remember then in that period from mid February to

0:35:50.520 --> 0:35:54.200
<v Speaker 1>mid March, there was a lot about the coronavirus we

0:35:54.200 --> 0:35:56.520
<v Speaker 1>didn't know about, and all of a sudden, we went

0:35:56.560 --> 0:36:03.399
<v Speaker 1>from complacency in February uh to panic. Uh. I mean

0:36:03.440 --> 0:36:06.360
<v Speaker 1>people were comparing it to the Black plague, and people

0:36:06.400 --> 0:36:09.520
<v Speaker 1>are comparing it to the Spanish flu. Of course it's

0:36:09.560 --> 0:36:11.560
<v Speaker 1>it's needed one of those, but we didn't know it

0:36:11.600 --> 0:36:13.680
<v Speaker 1>was it going to mutate? Um, you know, what was

0:36:13.719 --> 0:36:15.640
<v Speaker 1>the mortality rate going to be? And then you looked

0:36:15.680 --> 0:36:18.960
<v Speaker 1>at all these official projections, which of course proved to

0:36:19.000 --> 0:36:22.319
<v Speaker 1>be wrong. It created a commendous amount of fear, and

0:36:22.360 --> 0:36:24.960
<v Speaker 1>then when we had the lockdown, you know, it was

0:36:25.040 --> 0:36:28.600
<v Speaker 1>really a frightening experience. You know, it's interesting that the

0:36:28.600 --> 0:36:33.040
<v Speaker 1>stock market as a whole didn't even go down uh

0:36:33.160 --> 0:36:36.640
<v Speaker 1>during that period. Um, and uh, you know we went

0:36:36.719 --> 0:36:41.640
<v Speaker 1>down in the last cycle, we went down in attack wreck.

0:36:42.160 --> 0:36:44.160
<v Speaker 1>This was vertical down. But there were a lot of

0:36:44.200 --> 0:36:47.160
<v Speaker 1>sectors of the market that held in reasonably well, parts

0:36:47.160 --> 0:36:51.200
<v Speaker 1>of healthcare, you know, biotech, big tech, and you know

0:36:51.280 --> 0:36:54.320
<v Speaker 1>consumer staples. And then of course you had all the

0:36:54.320 --> 0:36:57.040
<v Speaker 1>the deep cyclicles. Uh they were in a deep dive,

0:36:57.160 --> 0:36:59.560
<v Speaker 1>but they had such a small share of the stock

0:36:59.600 --> 0:37:03.280
<v Speaker 1>market that it didn't really register with a complete collapse.

0:37:03.280 --> 0:37:05.720
<v Speaker 1>But people talked about, well, it was the biggest decline

0:37:05.719 --> 0:37:09.239
<v Speaker 1>in the stock market in a short period of time. Um,

0:37:09.280 --> 0:37:11.640
<v Speaker 1>there were some sectors of hungan really well, and then

0:37:11.680 --> 0:37:13.800
<v Speaker 1>there were other ones that just detonated. And of course

0:37:13.960 --> 0:37:17.359
<v Speaker 1>uh um they've taken the longest to sort of come back.

0:37:17.400 --> 0:37:20.719
<v Speaker 1>And you've got this rotation right now happening towards these

0:37:20.760 --> 0:37:24.400
<v Speaker 1>more value cyclical trades because people have gotten excited about

0:37:24.400 --> 0:37:28.840
<v Speaker 1>the reopenings, and people are getting excited about a treatment

0:37:28.920 --> 0:37:31.560
<v Speaker 1>or vaccine coming to the fore you know, by the

0:37:31.640 --> 0:37:33.560
<v Speaker 1>end of the summer. That's what the market's got priced

0:37:33.600 --> 0:37:36.440
<v Speaker 1>in right now. So look, I would just say, and

0:37:36.520 --> 0:37:39.279
<v Speaker 1>as I said, earlier. You're always trying to identify, you know,

0:37:39.360 --> 0:37:42.600
<v Speaker 1>what is the inflection point, and the inflection point is

0:37:42.600 --> 0:37:46.160
<v Speaker 1>always built initially off of expectations. Will the expectations come

0:37:46.200 --> 0:37:48.600
<v Speaker 1>to fruition or not. If you remember, we thought the

0:37:48.640 --> 0:37:53.200
<v Speaker 1>market bottomed in October of two thousand and eight after

0:37:53.239 --> 0:37:55.719
<v Speaker 1>the Lehman collapsed because we thought we had TARP one

0:37:55.760 --> 0:37:57.920
<v Speaker 1>and that was going to be enough, and the market

0:37:58.000 --> 0:38:01.000
<v Speaker 1>rallied and then rolled over the lows and it didn't

0:38:01.040 --> 0:38:04.439
<v Speaker 1>hit the lows until TARP two, which we then deemed well,

0:38:04.440 --> 0:38:07.560
<v Speaker 1>that was enough ring fence the banking system, we capitalized

0:38:08.200 --> 0:38:12.440
<v Speaker 1>and we drove on UH. This time around, it's really Barry.

0:38:12.520 --> 0:38:16.920
<v Speaker 1>It's all about the vaccine, and if you take a

0:38:16.960 --> 0:38:19.880
<v Speaker 1>look at the market, it's a very interesting situation that

0:38:19.920 --> 0:38:23.439
<v Speaker 1>we have on our hands that you know, whenever we've

0:38:23.480 --> 0:38:26.839
<v Speaker 1>had i'd say since the middle of April, we've had

0:38:26.880 --> 0:38:30.440
<v Speaker 1>four days when there were some exciting major market movie

0:38:30.440 --> 0:38:33.799
<v Speaker 1>news over a vaccine or treatment. UM. You know, we

0:38:33.920 --> 0:38:36.719
<v Speaker 1>had a couple of them related to Gilead. We had

0:38:36.760 --> 0:38:41.640
<v Speaker 1>the Maderna, we had novovax UH and UM. Every time

0:38:41.680 --> 0:38:46.520
<v Speaker 1>we get UM something major, whether it's a first trial

0:38:46.640 --> 0:38:49.680
<v Speaker 1>or a second trial, the market just rips. And in fact,

0:38:50.280 --> 0:38:52.600
<v Speaker 1>in the four days that we had something that was

0:38:52.640 --> 0:38:57.319
<v Speaker 1>announced an announcement effect, the down in those four days collectively,

0:38:57.400 --> 0:38:59.840
<v Speaker 1>and this is just since the middle of April, the

0:39:00.040 --> 0:39:03.359
<v Speaker 1>collective rally was almost three thousand points in the Dow,

0:39:03.520 --> 0:39:08.040
<v Speaker 1>including the five point rally we saw yesterday. Um so

0:39:08.080 --> 0:39:10.879
<v Speaker 1>actually it wasn't for these announcement effects that that would

0:39:10.920 --> 0:39:14.080
<v Speaker 1>be below twenty four thousands a day instead of call

0:39:14.160 --> 0:39:18.000
<v Speaker 1>it twenty plus. So the markets are given a float

0:39:18.040 --> 0:39:22.040
<v Speaker 1>of information here and it's called hope and it's called fate.

0:39:22.440 --> 0:39:25.520
<v Speaker 1>But you know, the the stock market is a beast

0:39:25.760 --> 0:39:30.680
<v Speaker 1>that is often influenced by expectations and by sentiment, and

0:39:30.680 --> 0:39:33.120
<v Speaker 1>that's what animal spirits are all about. It doesn't have

0:39:33.160 --> 0:39:36.800
<v Speaker 1>to be really anything more fundamental than that. So clearly

0:39:36.880 --> 0:39:41.200
<v Speaker 1>biotech is leading the end Pharmaceutical and hopes on a

0:39:41.280 --> 0:39:45.560
<v Speaker 1>vaccine or a treatment is what's giving the animal spirits

0:39:45.600 --> 0:39:50.440
<v Speaker 1>some hope. What do you think about more discretionary sectors?

0:39:50.520 --> 0:39:54.560
<v Speaker 1>And what is oil and the energy sector telling you

0:39:55.320 --> 0:39:58.720
<v Speaker 1>about the future path of the economy. The energy sector

0:39:58.800 --> 0:40:03.920
<v Speaker 1>is only telling me about the discipline at OPEC and

0:40:04.080 --> 0:40:08.040
<v Speaker 1>OPEC plus, so there's nothing really telling me much about

0:40:08.120 --> 0:40:10.880
<v Speaker 1>demand as far as the old price is concerned. This

0:40:11.000 --> 0:40:15.239
<v Speaker 1>is really all came after the Emergency meeting and the

0:40:15.360 --> 0:40:19.520
<v Speaker 1>draconian production cuts. And by the way, not just among

0:40:20.080 --> 0:40:24.080
<v Speaker 1>OPEC and Russia, but also the shale guys unlike two

0:40:25.280 --> 0:40:28.839
<v Speaker 1>have also cut production dramatically. So, um, that just tells

0:40:28.880 --> 0:40:31.120
<v Speaker 1>me there's more pain in the energy sector from a

0:40:31.200 --> 0:40:34.680
<v Speaker 1>real economic standpoint. But obviously we needed to have a

0:40:34.719 --> 0:40:38.560
<v Speaker 1>supply shock in this direction to revive the old price.

0:40:38.719 --> 0:40:41.000
<v Speaker 1>What about some other commodities. What do you think of gold,

0:40:41.480 --> 0:40:44.320
<v Speaker 1>which has held up really, really well and is close

0:40:44.440 --> 0:40:48.799
<v Speaker 1>to decade long highs Well, I say that that's one

0:40:48.800 --> 0:40:52.200
<v Speaker 1>of my key investment ideas for this current state of

0:40:52.239 --> 0:40:55.319
<v Speaker 1>the world. I think that the gold gold is a

0:40:55.440 --> 0:40:59.840
<v Speaker 1>very good hedge against the instability that the extremes of

0:41:00.040 --> 0:41:05.120
<v Speaker 1>deflation and inflation. Brain If there is deflation, and the

0:41:05.200 --> 0:41:08.720
<v Speaker 1>almost certainly is, interest rates are going to remain low

0:41:09.200 --> 0:41:14.160
<v Speaker 1>or go negative, and that's going to make the opportunity

0:41:14.200 --> 0:41:19.520
<v Speaker 1>cost of holding gold basically nil. Historic inverse correlation between

0:41:19.560 --> 0:41:22.520
<v Speaker 1>real interest rates will will go more negative and the

0:41:22.560 --> 0:41:24.239
<v Speaker 1>price of gold, and it's not going to be a

0:41:24.239 --> 0:41:27.840
<v Speaker 1>straight line up. Um. But the second or bull market

0:41:28.160 --> 0:41:31.000
<v Speaker 1>that I really begin six years ago with the basic

0:41:31.080 --> 0:41:34.760
<v Speaker 1>formation is going to be intact now if there is inflation, gold,

0:41:34.840 --> 0:41:37.960
<v Speaker 1>as we all know, will do very well as a

0:41:38.080 --> 0:41:41.120
<v Speaker 1>store of value, and we've got a view all this

0:41:41.520 --> 0:41:45.200
<v Speaker 1>central bank alchemy has led to I think these ever

0:41:45.520 --> 0:41:50.240
<v Speaker 1>increasingly unstable markets. I mean, the volatility has been dramatic

0:41:50.320 --> 0:41:53.160
<v Speaker 1>in both directions. People don't only think about volatility when

0:41:53.160 --> 0:41:55.920
<v Speaker 1>the market's going down, but it's been a roller coaster

0:41:56.040 --> 0:41:57.960
<v Speaker 1>ride really for the past couple of months. And I

0:41:58.000 --> 0:42:01.600
<v Speaker 1>think gold will work well against the hedge in an

0:42:01.640 --> 0:42:05.720
<v Speaker 1>increasingly unstable financial market environment. So I'd say Barry's actually

0:42:05.920 --> 0:42:09.359
<v Speaker 1>at this point my highest conviction call, and I'd had

0:42:09.400 --> 0:42:11.840
<v Speaker 1>that if for any of the reason that you have

0:42:11.960 --> 0:42:14.319
<v Speaker 1>to look at gold today is a currency that is

0:42:14.360 --> 0:42:18.200
<v Speaker 1>no government's liability. You look at gold. Why has gold

0:42:18.280 --> 0:42:20.920
<v Speaker 1>always been viewed as something that you want to be

0:42:21.000 --> 0:42:26.080
<v Speaker 1>measured against is because the production growth of gold runs

0:42:26.080 --> 0:42:29.399
<v Speaker 1>at a pretty reliable and constant one percent annual rate.

0:42:30.000 --> 0:42:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Look at the production of money right now, look at

0:42:33.160 --> 0:42:35.040
<v Speaker 1>M one M to look at all the money numbers.

0:42:35.080 --> 0:42:37.680
<v Speaker 1>In fact, globally they're running it over a thirty percent

0:42:37.760 --> 0:42:40.680
<v Speaker 1>annual rate. So as I look at it as an economist,

0:42:41.360 --> 0:42:45.800
<v Speaker 1>at the relative supply fundamentals now and in the future

0:42:45.840 --> 0:42:50.040
<v Speaker 1>between gold production and the production of FIA money, I

0:42:50.080 --> 0:42:53.799
<v Speaker 1>think the conclusion is rather obvious, quite quite fascinating. You

0:42:53.840 --> 0:42:59.160
<v Speaker 1>mentioned technology earlier, which leads me to the question about

0:42:59.800 --> 0:43:04.759
<v Speaker 1>the dominance of growth over value. Is value investing dead

0:43:05.000 --> 0:43:08.080
<v Speaker 1>and if not, what's going to eventually turn it around

0:43:08.080 --> 0:43:12.520
<v Speaker 1>for value investing. Well, it's interesting because you know, you

0:43:12.600 --> 0:43:15.960
<v Speaker 1>get a few days of value stocks, you know, recovering,

0:43:16.960 --> 0:43:20.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, from their lows, and there's been a dramatic

0:43:20.600 --> 0:43:24.880
<v Speaker 1>increase recently in the airline stocks and the casino stock,

0:43:25.000 --> 0:43:30.040
<v Speaker 1>the hotel stocks because the economy has the economy has reopened,

0:43:30.360 --> 0:43:32.799
<v Speaker 1>and there's a view that people are going to be

0:43:32.880 --> 0:43:36.440
<v Speaker 1>spending more money. And as it reopens, the value stocks

0:43:36.480 --> 0:43:39.319
<v Speaker 1>are going to do better because the growth stocks are

0:43:39.360 --> 0:43:44.040
<v Speaker 1>so populated with these uh work at home thematics. The

0:43:44.080 --> 0:43:47.480
<v Speaker 1>answer is that, no, I'm not a believer that this

0:43:47.719 --> 0:43:49.720
<v Speaker 1>value trade is going to have a lot of legs.

0:43:49.800 --> 0:43:54.440
<v Speaker 1>It's really being premised on the reopening of the economy,

0:43:54.480 --> 0:43:56.600
<v Speaker 1>but also on the view that there will be a

0:43:56.719 --> 0:43:59.680
<v Speaker 1>vaccine and that people will start to spend again, and

0:43:59.719 --> 0:44:04.480
<v Speaker 1>there's hard to spend on these value areas in consumer

0:44:04.520 --> 0:44:08.399
<v Speaker 1>civil services that were so downbeat. I'm not so sure

0:44:08.440 --> 0:44:13.680
<v Speaker 1>about that. I think that I want to be focused on,

0:44:13.880 --> 0:44:17.600
<v Speaker 1>as I said earlier, things that people are going to need,

0:44:18.239 --> 0:44:22.000
<v Speaker 1>not what they want. People don't need restaurants. Of course,

0:44:22.040 --> 0:44:25.680
<v Speaker 1>there'll be an initial rush because we've been in our

0:44:25.719 --> 0:44:28.720
<v Speaker 1>homes and we've been locked up. There'll be an initial rush.

0:44:28.920 --> 0:44:32.719
<v Speaker 1>But I found it very interesting, and again because economics

0:44:33.160 --> 0:44:36.720
<v Speaker 1>at its root is a behavioral science, and I found

0:44:36.760 --> 0:44:40.839
<v Speaker 1>actually that behaviorally speaking, look at what consumers have spent

0:44:40.920 --> 0:44:43.360
<v Speaker 1>their money on in the past two months of the lockdown,

0:44:43.520 --> 0:44:48.840
<v Speaker 1>besides canned food, toilet paper and booze, garden supplies, bread makers,

0:44:48.960 --> 0:44:53.440
<v Speaker 1>jigsaw puzzles, and anything related to warring up your home

0:44:53.520 --> 0:44:56.279
<v Speaker 1>to become your new office. Dave, you have clients in

0:44:56.440 --> 0:45:01.200
<v Speaker 1>over forty countries. Your firm is an international no firm.

0:45:01.280 --> 0:45:05.759
<v Speaker 1>We've seen international stocks lagging US stocks, and we've seen

0:45:05.800 --> 0:45:11.080
<v Speaker 1>the international economy lagging the US. Is that a permanent

0:45:11.239 --> 0:45:15.040
<v Speaker 1>change or is that something that is cyclical and eventually

0:45:15.040 --> 0:45:18.200
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the world catches up to the United States. Well,

0:45:18.239 --> 0:45:21.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm not so sure. About the premise bury that that

0:45:21.640 --> 0:45:24.440
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the world has done worse than the

0:45:24.480 --> 0:45:28.240
<v Speaker 1>U S from an economic standpoint, because China, uh, China

0:45:28.280 --> 0:45:31.000
<v Speaker 1>is already recovering, and we're going to see second quarter

0:45:31.080 --> 0:45:33.400
<v Speaker 1>numbers in the US that are gonna be negative forty negative.

0:45:34.320 --> 0:45:36.120
<v Speaker 1>The ID to storm in China was back in the

0:45:36.160 --> 0:45:39.200
<v Speaker 1>first quarter, and you think of the US reaction, in

0:45:39.200 --> 0:45:41.400
<v Speaker 1>some sense, they were quite a bit later than other countries.

0:45:41.440 --> 0:45:45.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, countries like Germany and even Japan ultimately had

0:45:45.160 --> 0:45:48.960
<v Speaker 1>much better testing and tracing procedures, and it wouldn't surprise

0:45:48.960 --> 0:45:52.080
<v Speaker 1>me if they probably come back ahead of the US does.

0:45:52.280 --> 0:45:55.440
<v Speaker 1>But look at its uh, we're just talking. We're talking

0:45:55.520 --> 0:45:58.239
<v Speaker 1>minus thirty, minus coorting minus fifty. You know, what's a

0:45:58.239 --> 0:46:01.680
<v Speaker 1>handful of basis points. But the U S stock market

0:46:01.920 --> 0:46:04.960
<v Speaker 1>is not the U S economy, and the U stock

0:46:05.040 --> 0:46:08.520
<v Speaker 1>market is chock full of the sort of stocks that

0:46:08.600 --> 0:46:10.680
<v Speaker 1>you probably want to own in this environment where you're

0:46:10.719 --> 0:46:15.000
<v Speaker 1>talking about defensive growth. You know how many other countries

0:46:15.000 --> 0:46:17.960
<v Speaker 1>in the world have like a Microsoft, which is defensive growth.

0:46:18.360 --> 0:46:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Amazon is a US company. Well, Amazon, as we found

0:46:22.200 --> 0:46:26.400
<v Speaker 1>out if we didn't discover earlier, Amazon has become a utility.

0:46:26.640 --> 0:46:29.160
<v Speaker 1>How many other stock markets in the world have a

0:46:29.640 --> 0:46:33.440
<v Speaker 1>have a company that big that has become an essential

0:46:33.560 --> 0:46:37.120
<v Speaker 1>I guess you could argue that Google has become a utility.

0:46:37.480 --> 0:46:39.520
<v Speaker 1>So I say that when you look at these parts

0:46:39.560 --> 0:46:42.839
<v Speaker 1>of the market, you look at healthcare, you look at

0:46:42.960 --> 0:46:47.680
<v Speaker 1>big tech, but big tech that have taken on utility characteristics,

0:46:47.680 --> 0:46:50.239
<v Speaker 1>which is something that we have to take an appreciation

0:46:50.320 --> 0:46:53.360
<v Speaker 1>of during the past couple of months. And we focus

0:46:53.440 --> 0:46:57.840
<v Speaker 1>on consumer staples and brand names. Well, stock A surprised

0:46:57.840 --> 0:46:59.400
<v Speaker 1>to me that the U S stock market in the

0:46:59.480 --> 0:47:01.520
<v Speaker 1>land of the line, the one eyed man is king,

0:47:01.560 --> 0:47:04.120
<v Speaker 1>and so that is the market if you're bullish on stocks.

0:47:04.120 --> 0:47:07.800
<v Speaker 1>They want to focus on the most quite quite interesting,

0:47:07.800 --> 0:47:09.920
<v Speaker 1>all right, I know I only have you for a

0:47:09.960 --> 0:47:13.240
<v Speaker 1>few moments left, so let's jump to our speed round.

0:47:13.280 --> 0:47:17.120
<v Speaker 1>These are our five lockdown questions we ask all our guests,

0:47:17.400 --> 0:47:19.439
<v Speaker 1>and let's bang through them as quickly as we can.

0:47:20.560 --> 0:47:24.719
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of essential utilities, what are you watching on Netflix

0:47:24.719 --> 0:47:28.280
<v Speaker 1>and Amazon Prime? What are you streaming these days? Well,

0:47:28.360 --> 0:47:32.760
<v Speaker 1>I really liked the last dance. I really liked Unorthodox

0:47:33.440 --> 0:47:38.160
<v Speaker 1>and um and Ozarks I thought was actually uh um,

0:47:38.200 --> 0:47:40.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, not quite up here with breaking bad, but

0:47:40.480 --> 0:47:44.200
<v Speaker 1>it was kept me engaged. You know. At some point though,

0:47:44.280 --> 0:47:46.279
<v Speaker 1>I think maybe we should hold us basically, you know,

0:47:46.440 --> 0:47:48.920
<v Speaker 1>pick up a couple of books and not gauge the

0:47:48.960 --> 0:47:51.880
<v Speaker 1>TV set so much. So let me jump right to

0:47:51.960 --> 0:47:53.920
<v Speaker 1>that question. What are your favorite books? What are you

0:47:53.960 --> 0:47:56.879
<v Speaker 1>reading now under lockdown? And what are some of your

0:47:56.920 --> 0:48:01.440
<v Speaker 1>favorite all time books? My favorite book as far as uh,

0:48:02.239 --> 0:48:05.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, this businessess concerned was the classic that was

0:48:05.640 --> 0:48:10.279
<v Speaker 1>written by Charles Kindlerberger Mannix, Panics and Crashes, and I

0:48:10.320 --> 0:48:13.319
<v Speaker 1>think everybody should be reading that. The one that I

0:48:13.440 --> 0:48:17.320
<v Speaker 1>was just getting through was the classic by Robert Gordon,

0:48:18.080 --> 0:48:21.919
<v Speaker 1>The Rise and Fall of American Growth, And uh, I'm

0:48:21.960 --> 0:48:26.160
<v Speaker 1>going to be getting on to uh, the latest biography

0:48:26.239 --> 0:48:29.200
<v Speaker 1>that was penned by Henry Kissinger. So those are the

0:48:29.200 --> 0:48:32.560
<v Speaker 1>ones that are on the shelf right now. Fascinating. What

0:48:32.719 --> 0:48:35.360
<v Speaker 1>sort of advice would you give someone who was a

0:48:35.440 --> 0:48:40.200
<v Speaker 1>recent college graduate who was thinking about going into economics

0:48:40.440 --> 0:48:45.560
<v Speaker 1>as a profession. Yeah, I'd say that you want to

0:48:45.600 --> 0:48:51.560
<v Speaker 1>make sure that as you become quantitatively proficient in this profession,

0:48:51.920 --> 0:48:54.719
<v Speaker 1>and that's where a lot of the emphasis is. I

0:48:54.760 --> 0:48:58.800
<v Speaker 1>would say, spend as much time as possible learning about

0:48:58.880 --> 0:49:03.520
<v Speaker 1>history ja as many economic and financial and market history

0:49:03.600 --> 0:49:08.719
<v Speaker 1>courses as you possibly can alongside your statistics and your econometrics,

0:49:08.760 --> 0:49:12.799
<v Speaker 1>because I found over the past three decades looking at

0:49:12.840 --> 0:49:16.600
<v Speaker 1>these recurring patterns in the markets, in the economy, understanding

0:49:17.239 --> 0:49:20.000
<v Speaker 1>that these extremes of fear and greed have always been

0:49:20.040 --> 0:49:23.399
<v Speaker 1>with us, and how the influence behavior that I think

0:49:23.440 --> 0:49:26.719
<v Speaker 1>that you want to constantly focus on history, read as

0:49:26.800 --> 0:49:30.480
<v Speaker 1>much about history as you possibly can. Quite fascinating. And

0:49:30.520 --> 0:49:33.080
<v Speaker 1>our final question, what do you know about the world

0:49:33.120 --> 0:49:36.719
<v Speaker 1>of economics today and econometrics today that you wish you

0:49:36.800 --> 0:49:40.600
<v Speaker 1>knew thirty or so years ago when you were a green,

0:49:40.800 --> 0:49:44.520
<v Speaker 1>young economist. Well, you know, I wish there was a

0:49:44.600 --> 0:49:49.680
<v Speaker 1>way that we can actually forecast our way through an

0:49:49.719 --> 0:49:52.839
<v Speaker 1>event that we've never seen before. You know, that would

0:49:52.840 --> 0:49:55.960
<v Speaker 1>be something brand spaking new, because usually we're running regressions

0:49:56.000 --> 0:49:58.319
<v Speaker 1>that are based on a sample size of things that

0:49:58.440 --> 0:50:01.520
<v Speaker 1>actually have happened before. So wouldn't it be nice to

0:50:01.560 --> 0:50:04.480
<v Speaker 1>actually have with the samplifies of one which is today's

0:50:04.520 --> 0:50:08.319
<v Speaker 1>pandemic and the reaction uh as, to actually take that

0:50:08.440 --> 0:50:11.560
<v Speaker 1>and model something into the future. Because I'd say that

0:50:11.719 --> 0:50:14.440
<v Speaker 1>right now, the confidence intervals run any forecast or as

0:50:14.480 --> 0:50:16.560
<v Speaker 1>why as I've ever seen In the thirty five years

0:50:16.600 --> 0:50:19.080
<v Speaker 1>in this business, I've seen a lot. Thanks Dave for

0:50:19.120 --> 0:50:21.840
<v Speaker 1>being so generous with your time. We have been speaking

0:50:21.840 --> 0:50:25.680
<v Speaker 1>with David Rosenberg. He is the founder of Rosenberg Research.

0:50:26.120 --> 0:50:28.920
<v Speaker 1>If you enjoy this conversation, well look up an inch

0:50:28.960 --> 0:50:31.439
<v Speaker 1>or down an inch on Apple iTunes and you could

0:50:31.440 --> 0:50:35.000
<v Speaker 1>see all of the previous three hundred plus conversations we've

0:50:35.000 --> 0:50:38.399
<v Speaker 1>had over the past six years. You can find that

0:50:38.600 --> 0:50:44.719
<v Speaker 1>at iTunes, Spotify, Google Podcast, Overcast, Stitcher, wherever final podcasts

0:50:44.760 --> 0:50:48.960
<v Speaker 1>are sold. We love your comments, feedback in suggestions right

0:50:49.040 --> 0:50:52.359
<v Speaker 1>to us at m IB podcast at Bloomberg dot net.

0:50:52.760 --> 0:50:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Check out my weekly column on Bloomberg dot com slash Opinion.

0:50:57.680 --> 0:51:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Follow me on Twitter at Ridholtz. Sign up for our

0:51:01.120 --> 0:51:04.960
<v Speaker 1>daily reads at Riholts dot com. I would be remiss

0:51:05.000 --> 0:51:07.000
<v Speaker 1>if I did not thank the crack staff that helps

0:51:07.040 --> 0:51:12.160
<v Speaker 1>put this conversation together each week. Michael Boyle is my producer.

0:51:12.880 --> 0:51:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Michael Batnick is my head of research. A. Tiko val

0:51:16.000 --> 0:51:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Bron is our project manager. I'm Barry Riholts. You've been

0:51:20.040 --> 0:51:23.240
<v Speaker 1>listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio