WEBVTT - AES Chief on the Transition to Net Zero

0:00:00.320 --> 0:00:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Hi, I'm Dana Perkins, and you're listening to Switch on

0:00:03.880 --> 0:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>the b n F podcast. So today I speak with

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.399
<v Speaker 1>Andres Glusky, CEO of a S Corporation, and he shares

0:00:11.480 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>his thoughts on innovation from an electrical power company's perspective.

0:00:16.040 --> 0:00:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Can batteries be peakers? Is green hydrogen overhyped? And what

0:00:20.720 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 1>has a S already done to bring their emissions down?

0:00:23.560 --> 0:00:26.280
<v Speaker 1>And what are they innovating one for the future, in

0:00:26.320 --> 0:00:29.680
<v Speaker 1>particular in regard to their net zero target. If you'd

0:00:29.680 --> 0:00:31.920
<v Speaker 1>like to read some related b n F research, you

0:00:31.960 --> 0:00:34.680
<v Speaker 1>can go to the Bloomberg terminal at BENF Go or

0:00:34.840 --> 0:00:36.839
<v Speaker 1>to b NF dot com or a mobile app. Some

0:00:36.960 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 1>examples of things that might be of interest to you

0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:41.680
<v Speaker 1>include the corporate net zero state of play key trends

0:00:41.920 --> 0:00:46.400
<v Speaker 1>or the corporate pp A deal tracker from or our

0:00:46.560 --> 0:00:51.720
<v Speaker 1>first half energy storage market outlook, and lastly the Texas

0:00:51.720 --> 0:00:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Power failure the supply story. As a reminder, B and

0:00:55.160 --> 0:00:57.680
<v Speaker 1>the F does not provide investment or strategy advice, and

0:00:57.800 --> 0:00:59.960
<v Speaker 1>we have a complete disclaimer at the end of the show.

0:01:00.360 --> 0:01:11.200
<v Speaker 1>But now let's hear from Andres. Andres, thank you so

0:01:11.280 --> 0:01:15.039
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us on Switched. On today. Can you

0:01:15.560 --> 0:01:18.000
<v Speaker 1>tell me just a little bit about yourself and how

0:01:18.120 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 1>you got involved in the power sector. Well, Dana, first,

0:01:21.720 --> 0:01:23.880
<v Speaker 1>thanks for you very much for the invitation. It's a

0:01:23.920 --> 0:01:27.000
<v Speaker 1>real honor to be on this podcast. I got into

0:01:27.080 --> 0:01:32.319
<v Speaker 1>the electricity sector via telecoms. So I was in telecoms

0:01:32.319 --> 0:01:36.360
<v Speaker 1>in the nineties. I found it a fascinating time because

0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:40.800
<v Speaker 1>first you had digital networks, you had cellular networks, and

0:01:40.840 --> 0:01:45.200
<v Speaker 1>then you had internet service providers. So I was lucky

0:01:45.280 --> 0:01:48.800
<v Speaker 1>enough to be in the telecommunication sector in the nineties,

0:01:48.960 --> 0:01:55.400
<v Speaker 1>which really underwent tremendous transformation. So from telecoms, I got

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:59.720
<v Speaker 1>into an electricity company. It was a multinational and that

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:03.640
<v Speaker 1>multinational was based in Venezuela, where I'm from, and it

0:02:03.720 --> 0:02:06.560
<v Speaker 1>was bought by A S. And that's how I started

0:02:06.600 --> 0:02:09.560
<v Speaker 1>working for A S in the year two thousand. So

0:02:09.960 --> 0:02:12.480
<v Speaker 1>I find a lot of parallels between the sectors, between

0:02:12.639 --> 0:02:16.520
<v Speaker 1>a telecom and the electricity sector. And I think what

0:02:16.560 --> 0:02:21.280
<v Speaker 1>we're experiencing today in the electricity sector is most similar

0:02:21.440 --> 0:02:24.400
<v Speaker 1>to what I lived in the nineties in the telecom sector.

0:02:25.040 --> 0:02:27.800
<v Speaker 1>So it's a fascinating time to be in the electric sector.

0:02:28.320 --> 0:02:31.359
<v Speaker 1>It's undergoing a transformation. The likes of which it hasn't

0:02:31.400 --> 0:02:33.720
<v Speaker 1>had for a hundred years. Yes, so you're in this

0:02:33.880 --> 0:02:37.079
<v Speaker 1>super fast moving, rapidly changing space. And I bet when

0:02:37.080 --> 0:02:39.760
<v Speaker 1>you first got involved in the electricity sector it was

0:02:40.560 --> 0:02:44.160
<v Speaker 1>pretty box standard and then things seem to have well,

0:02:44.280 --> 0:02:47.160
<v Speaker 1>have changed quite a bit. So just reflecting back on

0:02:47.360 --> 0:02:49.639
<v Speaker 1>even just the time since you became CEO, So you've

0:02:49.680 --> 0:02:54.440
<v Speaker 1>been CEO for quite sometimes since, and what have you

0:02:54.560 --> 0:02:58.720
<v Speaker 1>seen change really in how people not only look at

0:02:58.760 --> 0:03:00.960
<v Speaker 1>this industry and what happens in this industry, but just

0:03:01.000 --> 0:03:03.760
<v Speaker 1>even in the terminology because we're thinking that you know,

0:03:03.800 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of companies right now talk about net zero

0:03:06.120 --> 0:03:09.560
<v Speaker 1>targets and E s G has become a phrase that

0:03:09.720 --> 0:03:12.240
<v Speaker 1>was you know, niche maybe when you first started, and

0:03:12.400 --> 0:03:16.320
<v Speaker 1>is now ubiquitous across a lot of investors in the

0:03:16.320 --> 0:03:19.679
<v Speaker 1>investment community. How is the terminology and really just kind

0:03:19.720 --> 0:03:23.440
<v Speaker 1>of the speed of change changed, Well, it's changed dramatically.

0:03:23.720 --> 0:03:27.080
<v Speaker 1>When I became CEO at the end of twenty eleven

0:03:28.040 --> 0:03:31.120
<v Speaker 1>and we saw that this was going to change, we

0:03:31.160 --> 0:03:34.280
<v Speaker 1>thought the sector was right for a change, but the

0:03:34.320 --> 0:03:38.480
<v Speaker 1>technologies weren't really ready. So for example, we started really

0:03:39.200 --> 0:03:43.320
<v Speaker 1>inventing I would say grid scale energy storage using lithium

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:46.280
<v Speaker 1>ion batteries for example. Back then, you know this this

0:03:46.360 --> 0:03:50.240
<v Speaker 1>goes back even I started to CEO a little bit

0:03:50.240 --> 0:03:54.720
<v Speaker 1>before I was CEO, working with people here like Chris Shelton,

0:03:55.360 --> 0:03:58.040
<v Speaker 1>we saw that, you know, energy storage was very much

0:03:58.120 --> 0:04:00.880
<v Speaker 1>needed if we were going to have a renewable revolution,

0:04:01.520 --> 0:04:06.200
<v Speaker 1>because as we all know, renewables are mostly intermittent and

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:11.200
<v Speaker 1>that means that they're not available, so you really needed capacity.

0:04:11.280 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 1>So how are you going to achieve zero carbon capacity?

0:04:15.040 --> 0:04:17.719
<v Speaker 1>We had this view of where the sector could go.

0:04:17.839 --> 0:04:21.200
<v Speaker 1>We also thought about digitalization, so we worked very hard

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:25.839
<v Speaker 1>to become very efficient, leading edge innovator, i would say

0:04:26.040 --> 0:04:29.919
<v Speaker 1>from the very start, but the cost of the of

0:04:30.000 --> 0:04:33.000
<v Speaker 1>renewables and many of the technologies weren't there. That that's

0:04:33.000 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 1>really been I would say in the last four or

0:04:35.200 --> 0:04:40.599
<v Speaker 1>five years, were renewable energy not capacity. Renewable energy really

0:04:40.640 --> 0:04:44.359
<v Speaker 1>became cheapest in many locations. So the good thing is

0:04:44.400 --> 0:04:47.800
<v Speaker 1>we had a great foundation to be able to incorporate

0:04:48.279 --> 0:04:51.840
<v Speaker 1>all of the latest technologies when they became really cost effective.

0:04:51.880 --> 0:04:53.919
<v Speaker 1>So we were, i'd like to say a little bit

0:04:53.920 --> 0:04:56.479
<v Speaker 1>ahead of the curve now in terms of how the

0:04:56.640 --> 0:04:59.600
<v Speaker 1>sector talked about it. It was interesting when I first started,

0:04:59.640 --> 0:05:04.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, making large investments in renewables, investing in leading technologies,

0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:07.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of them through joint ventures. I did get

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:10.240
<v Speaker 1>some pushback you know from uh, you know, some investors,

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:12.680
<v Speaker 1>and I remember the term. One said you you really

0:05:12.720 --> 0:05:15.560
<v Speaker 1>drank the kool aid, and I was saying, no, uh,

0:05:16.000 --> 0:05:18.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, we think we're going to be able to

0:05:18.160 --> 0:05:22.120
<v Speaker 1>make money in this and we think the transition will happen.

0:05:23.080 --> 0:05:25.760
<v Speaker 1>So what we've done really is, I would say, be

0:05:25.800 --> 0:05:29.039
<v Speaker 1>a leader in the transition. We have let's say, we've

0:05:29.120 --> 0:05:34.520
<v Speaker 1>retired or sold more coal as a percentage of our

0:05:34.600 --> 0:05:38.200
<v Speaker 1>fleet than anybody in the States. Uh. And in terms

0:05:38.240 --> 0:05:41.080
<v Speaker 1>of absolute I think we're second, if not first. But

0:05:41.200 --> 0:05:44.800
<v Speaker 1>we've also are one of the largest renewable developers among

0:05:44.839 --> 0:05:47.520
<v Speaker 1>all the US companies. What we have done is shut

0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:50.880
<v Speaker 1>one down in a responsible fashion and build the new.

0:05:51.560 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 1>So now we find that we no longer get that pushback.

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:57.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't have anybody questioning it. And you know,

0:05:57.839 --> 0:06:01.520
<v Speaker 1>our leadership, you'll say in in g matters is becoming

0:06:01.520 --> 0:06:04.160
<v Speaker 1>more more commonplace. But you know, for example, we were

0:06:04.160 --> 0:06:07.600
<v Speaker 1>the first large US company in our sector to come

0:06:07.600 --> 0:06:10.719
<v Speaker 1>out with a report for the Task Force on Climate Disclosure.

0:06:10.760 --> 0:06:14.720
<v Speaker 1>In we came out with the second report last year.

0:06:16.080 --> 0:06:19.559
<v Speaker 1>We're part of the Dow Jones Sustainability Index. In terms

0:06:19.560 --> 0:06:23.599
<v Speaker 1>of innovation, it's very interesting. The Edison Electric Institute, which

0:06:23.600 --> 0:06:26.080
<v Speaker 1>is sort of the umbrella organization of the large electric

0:06:26.080 --> 0:06:30.159
<v Speaker 1>companies in the US, gives two prices for innovation every year,

0:06:30.320 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 1>one internationally and one domestically. We have won seven prizes

0:06:36.120 --> 0:06:39.720
<v Speaker 1>in the last twelve years, so if you think about that,

0:06:39.760 --> 0:06:42.520
<v Speaker 1>we've we've won a very high percentage. Nobody else comes

0:06:42.520 --> 0:06:45.200
<v Speaker 1>close for the domestic or the international because you guys

0:06:45.240 --> 0:06:48.640
<v Speaker 1>operate in both in North and South America. That's correct,

0:06:48.640 --> 0:06:52.240
<v Speaker 1>we've won both. We've won domestic for the US and

0:06:52.279 --> 0:06:56.760
<v Speaker 1>we've won international. We've been running up twice as well.

0:06:57.160 --> 0:06:59.760
<v Speaker 1>So I think that, you know, this shows that this

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:03.440
<v Speaker 1>spirit of entrepreneurship, the spirit of innovation that the a

0:07:03.800 --> 0:07:06.719
<v Speaker 1>S has somewhat unique, has given very good results. And

0:07:07.360 --> 0:07:11.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, we have really moved radically into renewables. I'd

0:07:11.720 --> 0:07:15.520
<v Speaker 1>say we're probably half half the way there. But at

0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:17.920
<v Speaker 1>the same time, you know, are we be we were

0:07:17.920 --> 0:07:20.880
<v Speaker 1>more profitable, you know, we're more profitable than we've ever been.

0:07:21.320 --> 0:07:23.480
<v Speaker 1>So we haven't really given up on the economic and

0:07:23.560 --> 0:07:26.880
<v Speaker 1>financial side to be able to make this transition. Well,

0:07:26.920 --> 0:07:28.960
<v Speaker 1>so perhaps instead of drinking the cool lady saw the

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:33.440
<v Speaker 1>future and speaking of the future, So a s a

0:07:33.560 --> 0:07:37.120
<v Speaker 1>net zero target, of when did you set that target?

0:07:37.360 --> 0:07:40.000
<v Speaker 1>We have multiple targets and so one of the things

0:07:40.000 --> 0:07:41.560
<v Speaker 1>that you know, a lot of people were setting sort

0:07:41.560 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 1>of twenty fifty targets and we thought, well, that's a

0:07:43.520 --> 0:07:47.280
<v Speaker 1>long times out and you know, the key executives aren't

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:49.720
<v Speaker 1>going to be here. One that happened, So we set

0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:55.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of shorter term goals. So we have set goals.

0:07:55.440 --> 0:08:00.560
<v Speaker 1>We said goals, we said goals. So are I'd say

0:08:00.560 --> 0:08:03.640
<v Speaker 1>our most dramatic is by we want to be net

0:08:03.720 --> 0:08:08.720
<v Speaker 1>zero from electricity and then completely net zero by but

0:08:08.920 --> 0:08:13.240
<v Speaker 1>we want to be below ten of our generation coming

0:08:13.280 --> 0:08:22.640
<v Speaker 1>from coal, and we wanted to be below by. So

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:26.880
<v Speaker 1>we have you know, made you know, dramatic commitments, but

0:08:27.040 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, so far we've been overachieving them. So I

0:08:29.640 --> 0:08:32.920
<v Speaker 1>think that we're on a good track to achieve these

0:08:33.679 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 1>uh and we're making the necessary investments today, So we

0:08:37.240 --> 0:08:40.320
<v Speaker 1>really aren't just making the investments. In many cases, we're

0:08:40.559 --> 0:08:44.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of inventing inventing the market on the digital space,

0:08:44.800 --> 0:08:49.240
<v Speaker 1>on the energy storage space, on the combination space. Uh.

0:08:49.280 --> 0:08:51.440
<v Speaker 1>And that that's what's allowed us to move that quickly.

0:08:51.920 --> 0:08:54.760
<v Speaker 1>About when do you think that a s IS portfolio

0:08:54.800 --> 0:08:57.959
<v Speaker 1>will reach kind of peak emissions? Are you already drawing

0:08:58.000 --> 0:09:00.840
<v Speaker 1>down on emissions now? Or is that thing that really

0:09:00.920 --> 0:09:03.600
<v Speaker 1>will take some time in some investment into before you

0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:06.280
<v Speaker 1>can reach that peak and then really start to come down. No. No,

0:09:06.360 --> 0:09:09.880
<v Speaker 1>we've passed peak emissions. We're certainly on a decreasing So

0:09:11.040 --> 0:09:14.720
<v Speaker 1>I've actually never you know, directly thought of that question,

0:09:14.760 --> 0:09:17.160
<v Speaker 1>but it must have been like two or three years

0:09:17.160 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 1>ago when we really started building giga watts of renewables

0:09:22.840 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 1>and when we started shutting down giggle watts of of

0:09:26.080 --> 0:09:29.480
<v Speaker 1>cold So you know, in the big picture, we've sold

0:09:30.520 --> 0:09:34.440
<v Speaker 1>or retired about twelve gigawatts of coal and you know,

0:09:34.480 --> 0:09:37.559
<v Speaker 1>some of it is still in the closing down phase

0:09:37.600 --> 0:09:40.120
<v Speaker 1>because you can't do this overnight, but it will happen

0:09:40.120 --> 0:09:42.840
<v Speaker 1>over the next couple of years. Uh. And we've built

0:09:42.920 --> 0:09:46.120
<v Speaker 1>probably twelve gigga watts of renewables in that time period.

0:09:46.520 --> 0:09:48.600
<v Speaker 1>But in addition, I would say we're doing a lot

0:09:48.640 --> 0:09:51.240
<v Speaker 1>for climate change that doesn't really count in those numbers

0:09:51.280 --> 0:09:55.560
<v Speaker 1>because today we're selling energy storage through our joint venture

0:09:55.960 --> 0:09:59.680
<v Speaker 1>with Siemens called Fluence. We're now in twenty nine countries,

0:10:00.360 --> 0:10:04.360
<v Speaker 1>and energy storage is really allowing people to put more

0:10:04.440 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 1>renewables on the grid. You know, we also have a

0:10:07.080 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 1>joint venture where we make prefabs holder a product called Maverick,

0:10:11.640 --> 0:10:13.880
<v Speaker 1>and the joint ventures with a company called five b

0:10:14.920 --> 0:10:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Uh and we're starting to roll that out, and so

0:10:16.800 --> 0:10:19.920
<v Speaker 1>that allows you to double the energy density of solar farms,

0:10:20.320 --> 0:10:22.760
<v Speaker 1>build them in a third of the time, and perhaps

0:10:22.760 --> 0:10:27.720
<v Speaker 1>most importantly, it's hurricane resistant. We have projects which have survived,

0:10:27.920 --> 0:10:31.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, very well to category four hurricanes and now

0:10:31.240 --> 0:10:34.280
<v Speaker 1>we're testing it in category five tunnel tests. So we're

0:10:34.280 --> 0:10:38.000
<v Speaker 1>doing a lot to help the transition to a sustainable

0:10:38.080 --> 0:10:41.560
<v Speaker 1>energy future beyond just our own platform. And as we

0:10:41.679 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 1>record today, there's actually a tropical storm headed for Florida,

0:10:44.880 --> 0:10:48.880
<v Speaker 1>so definitely something that you know, many people are keeping

0:10:48.880 --> 0:10:52.080
<v Speaker 1>an eye on. Let's expand on that. You know, climate

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:55.240
<v Speaker 1>change is often talked about in terms of global averages,

0:10:55.280 --> 0:10:57.800
<v Speaker 1>but really re experience them in these extremes and as

0:10:57.800 --> 0:11:02.320
<v Speaker 1>you referenced, hurricanes, and we have these high temperatures actually

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:05.200
<v Speaker 1>that happened recently in British Columbia, and then these incredibly

0:11:05.280 --> 0:11:08.360
<v Speaker 1>low temperatures that happened just this last winter in Texas,

0:11:08.800 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 1>and these have big implications for power companies. You're looking

0:11:12.160 --> 0:11:16.720
<v Speaker 1>at this resilience within as you referenced within your solar investments.

0:11:17.200 --> 0:11:19.959
<v Speaker 1>How do you think power companies can prepare for these

0:11:20.000 --> 0:11:22.680
<v Speaker 1>extremes and how important is it for power companies to

0:11:22.720 --> 0:11:25.880
<v Speaker 1>prepare for extremes when you just don't know how often

0:11:26.160 --> 0:11:28.600
<v Speaker 1>these things will happen. Well, as they say, it's not

0:11:28.960 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 1>just global warming, it's global weirding. So you will have

0:11:31.960 --> 0:11:35.400
<v Speaker 1>more extremes in temperatures, you'll have changes in rainfall patterns

0:11:35.600 --> 0:11:39.679
<v Speaker 1>as well. So we've looked at this very deeply, i'd say,

0:11:39.720 --> 0:11:42.520
<v Speaker 1>when we came out with a second task of for

0:11:43.400 --> 0:11:48.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, report on climate disclosure, the one we looked

0:11:48.040 --> 0:11:53.240
<v Speaker 1>at two scenarios and one scenario was basically that the

0:11:53.280 --> 0:11:57.439
<v Speaker 1>world doesn't do enough to reduce emissions and the temperature

0:11:57.559 --> 0:12:00.800
<v Speaker 1>rises on average four and a half degree celsius. And

0:12:00.840 --> 0:12:03.480
<v Speaker 1>the other scenario is that you know the world is

0:12:03.520 --> 0:12:09.080
<v Speaker 1>successful and keeps the temperature increased below to degrees celsius.

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:11.840
<v Speaker 1>And what we found is that our business is resilient

0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:15.200
<v Speaker 1>both in terms of its physical assets and in terms

0:12:15.240 --> 0:12:17.600
<v Speaker 1>of financially in terms of where our exposure will be

0:12:18.000 --> 0:12:21.520
<v Speaker 1>when these things occur. So we started that, we did

0:12:21.520 --> 0:12:25.560
<v Speaker 1>it again, and you know, we're more robust in Uh,

0:12:27.040 --> 0:12:32.240
<v Speaker 1>the scenarios have changed somewhat, but I feel confident of it. So,

0:12:32.679 --> 0:12:34.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, one of the things that I think is

0:12:34.400 --> 0:12:38.040
<v Speaker 1>very important is that we really be serious and look

0:12:38.040 --> 0:12:42.040
<v Speaker 1>at the details. Because when Hurricane Maria hit, for example,

0:12:42.679 --> 0:12:46.840
<v Speaker 1>our solar farms in the US Virgin Islands were completely destroyed.

0:12:47.559 --> 0:12:49.319
<v Speaker 1>If you look at what happened to wind farms in

0:12:49.360 --> 0:12:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Puerto Rico as well. You have to really have renewables

0:12:52.679 --> 0:12:55.560
<v Speaker 1>that can resist these extremes. So I go back to,

0:12:56.080 --> 0:12:58.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Maverick product of five B that's hurricane

0:12:59.000 --> 0:13:02.480
<v Speaker 1>resistant solar. That's key. You know, it doesn't make sense

0:13:02.520 --> 0:13:06.160
<v Speaker 1>to make people build something that will be destroyed. So

0:13:06.360 --> 0:13:09.120
<v Speaker 1>one of the approaches that we've taken I think that's

0:13:09.200 --> 0:13:12.080
<v Speaker 1>unique is that we think of ourselves as open source.

0:13:12.760 --> 0:13:15.400
<v Speaker 1>So when we come up with new developments, whether it

0:13:15.440 --> 0:13:22.439
<v Speaker 1>be energy storage, AI efficiency programs, whether it be you know,

0:13:22.559 --> 0:13:26.319
<v Speaker 1>hurricane resistant solar, farms. We sell it to third parties

0:13:27.080 --> 0:13:30.040
<v Speaker 1>because this is a global problem. So if we can

0:13:30.080 --> 0:13:33.800
<v Speaker 1>get people to put these on their platforms, will advance

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:36.760
<v Speaker 1>renewables much faster than we try to just keep it

0:13:36.800 --> 0:13:40.760
<v Speaker 1>as a competitive advantage for ourselves. That definitely does push

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:44.280
<v Speaker 1>things forward, because well, it pushes innovation. So you were

0:13:44.320 --> 0:13:48.320
<v Speaker 1>talking about how a S really looked at batteries before

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:51.320
<v Speaker 1>they were probably as popular as they are today. And

0:13:51.360 --> 0:13:54.240
<v Speaker 1>also a lot of these renewable technologies which now have

0:13:54.400 --> 0:13:58.400
<v Speaker 1>very strong economics, but didn't always. So this puts some

0:13:58.480 --> 0:14:02.960
<v Speaker 1>emphasis on technology an advancement. And of course there's advancing

0:14:03.000 --> 0:14:05.839
<v Speaker 1>existing technologies and making them more efficient better. But then

0:14:05.880 --> 0:14:09.360
<v Speaker 1>there's this concept of what don't we know? What haven't

0:14:09.400 --> 0:14:12.680
<v Speaker 1>we invented yet? And that came up earlier this year.

0:14:12.760 --> 0:14:16.280
<v Speaker 1>So Biden convene in this climate summit with world leaders,

0:14:16.320 --> 0:14:18.800
<v Speaker 1>and one of the things that Secretary carry said at

0:14:18.840 --> 0:14:21.560
<v Speaker 1>that summit was that many of the technologies that we

0:14:21.640 --> 0:14:24.600
<v Speaker 1>need for a net zero future haven't been invented yet.

0:14:25.040 --> 0:14:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that's true and if so, where do

0:14:28.840 --> 0:14:31.560
<v Speaker 1>you see the technology development going. Well, I think it's

0:14:31.600 --> 0:14:33.920
<v Speaker 1>true in the sense that we have to get to

0:14:34.240 --> 0:14:38.400
<v Speaker 1>net zero in all sectors, not just electricity. So I

0:14:38.440 --> 0:14:41.200
<v Speaker 1>think in the case of electricity that you will have

0:14:41.280 --> 0:14:45.920
<v Speaker 1>specific problems, mostly of capacity in places where you know

0:14:45.960 --> 0:14:47.920
<v Speaker 1>you don't have good win, you don't have good solar,

0:14:48.680 --> 0:14:52.960
<v Speaker 1>you have great seasonal variability. So the truth is thinking

0:14:53.000 --> 0:14:56.040
<v Speaker 1>of the US as a whole, you know, we probably

0:14:56.200 --> 0:15:00.080
<v Speaker 1>know how to get to probably about carbon free. The

0:15:00.160 --> 0:15:02.680
<v Speaker 1>last will be more difficult, and so the real question

0:15:02.720 --> 0:15:05.200
<v Speaker 1>is how do you approach that, and against it's a

0:15:05.280 --> 0:15:08.920
<v Speaker 1>question of doing it economically because you know you could

0:15:08.960 --> 0:15:11.720
<v Speaker 1>do it, but the cost of electricity would would not

0:15:11.800 --> 0:15:14.640
<v Speaker 1>be affordable, so that really there is that issue. There

0:15:14.640 --> 0:15:19.480
<v Speaker 1>are technologies on the horizon energy storage using lithiumine batteries

0:15:19.640 --> 0:15:22.560
<v Speaker 1>US keep getting cheaper, but it's not the ideal solution

0:15:22.640 --> 0:15:26.840
<v Speaker 1>for for example, interseasonal variations, because it's it's terrific for

0:15:27.000 --> 0:15:30.760
<v Speaker 1>even you know, I would say weekly variations, but it's

0:15:30.760 --> 0:15:33.920
<v Speaker 1>not the right technology for interseasons. So you know, will

0:15:33.960 --> 0:15:37.640
<v Speaker 1>it be green hydrogen, will it be modular nuclear, so

0:15:37.800 --> 0:15:40.520
<v Speaker 1>on something? Some of these you know, we do need

0:15:40.600 --> 0:15:45.400
<v Speaker 1>to really have the And again, the technology i'd say exists,

0:15:45.400 --> 0:15:47.840
<v Speaker 1>the real question is can you scale it up? Is

0:15:47.840 --> 0:15:50.560
<v Speaker 1>it cost efficient? Decisions have to be made. You know,

0:15:50.640 --> 0:15:54.600
<v Speaker 1>are we going to except, for example, modular nuclear, because

0:15:54.600 --> 0:15:56.560
<v Speaker 1>that would solve a lot of the problems of capacity.

0:15:57.120 --> 0:15:59.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, those are the decisions that have to be made. Now.

0:15:59.360 --> 0:16:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Do I think that we will get there? I do,

0:16:02.720 --> 0:16:05.320
<v Speaker 1>But I do think that there's a whole lot we

0:16:05.360 --> 0:16:09.160
<v Speaker 1>can do with today's existing technologies. It's a question of

0:16:09.240 --> 0:16:12.600
<v Speaker 1>having the right regulations in place to incentivize using the

0:16:12.640 --> 0:16:16.640
<v Speaker 1>best possible technology, because some of this is regulatory driven,

0:16:16.640 --> 0:16:20.960
<v Speaker 1>so sometimes regulations are keeping back the optimal technologies. Now

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:27.200
<v Speaker 1>for a very short break, stay with us. So I

0:16:27.280 --> 0:16:30.160
<v Speaker 1>love that you brought up green hydrogen because hydrogen is

0:16:30.320 --> 0:16:34.200
<v Speaker 1>definitely a very buzzy topic at the moment. A lot

0:16:34.240 --> 0:16:36.880
<v Speaker 1>of people want to know more about the potential of

0:16:36.920 --> 0:16:39.280
<v Speaker 1>hydrogen maybe when the costs are really going to be

0:16:39.320 --> 0:16:42.000
<v Speaker 1>at parody, and I think there are a lot of

0:16:42.040 --> 0:16:44.880
<v Speaker 1>companies that really are thinking about this as a is

0:16:44.920 --> 0:16:47.360
<v Speaker 1>a very viable solution for the future. So I'm maybe

0:16:47.400 --> 0:16:51.040
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily about hydrogen um, but about any technology. If

0:16:51.120 --> 0:16:55.120
<v Speaker 1>you had to pick, what is one energy transition technology

0:16:55.160 --> 0:16:59.040
<v Speaker 1>that you feel is a bit overhyped at the moment. Well, actually,

0:16:59.000 --> 0:17:01.960
<v Speaker 1>I do think it probably be green hydrogen. You know,

0:17:02.120 --> 0:17:08.000
<v Speaker 1>we have today probably the first industrial scale project in

0:17:08.080 --> 0:17:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Chile to produce green ammonia. It's a joint venture and

0:17:11.119 --> 0:17:13.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're in the feasibility study and as you say,

0:17:13.920 --> 0:17:16.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's really it can be produced. The question is,

0:17:17.040 --> 0:17:20.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, the price point. But if successful, you know,

0:17:20.240 --> 0:17:23.840
<v Speaker 1>this would be require almost a giggle watt of renewable

0:17:23.920 --> 0:17:27.240
<v Speaker 1>energy to crack the water and produce the hydrogen, and

0:17:27.240 --> 0:17:29.679
<v Speaker 1>then of course you have to transport it, and you know,

0:17:29.720 --> 0:17:33.200
<v Speaker 1>can you use a fuel like green ammonia for the transportation.

0:17:33.880 --> 0:17:37.240
<v Speaker 1>So we're actually I think leaving the pack in this.

0:17:37.359 --> 0:17:41.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm not aware of any other truly industrial scale in

0:17:41.800 --> 0:17:46.360
<v Speaker 1>this case. It's green ammonia, hydrogen based fuel that's at

0:17:46.359 --> 0:17:48.760
<v Speaker 1>this stage of advancement that we're in. So you have

0:17:48.840 --> 0:17:51.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of projects that are you know, twenty megawatts

0:17:51.640 --> 0:17:54.960
<v Speaker 1>or you know, pilot projects. So it gets hype like, well,

0:17:54.960 --> 0:17:58.000
<v Speaker 1>this is the solution. Well, no, we have to be

0:17:58.040 --> 0:18:00.679
<v Speaker 1>able to do, you know, make a million tons three

0:18:00.760 --> 0:18:04.560
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand tons a year from one facility to to

0:18:04.640 --> 0:18:06.520
<v Speaker 1>really drive down the cost. So I think it's a

0:18:06.520 --> 0:18:09.639
<v Speaker 1>little bit overhyped. Now. The other issue is Uh, you know,

0:18:09.680 --> 0:18:12.640
<v Speaker 1>there's the electric sectors. I said, the real problem is capacity,

0:18:13.280 --> 0:18:16.880
<v Speaker 1>uh and inter seasonal fluctuations. But then you have transportation.

0:18:17.600 --> 0:18:21.159
<v Speaker 1>In the case of transportation, I do think that you know,

0:18:21.280 --> 0:18:26.560
<v Speaker 1>for everyday commuting electric vehicles are you know, probably the solution.

0:18:26.640 --> 0:18:30.159
<v Speaker 1>Now when you're talking about long hauls of trucking and

0:18:30.160 --> 0:18:32.880
<v Speaker 1>the like, you know, that's where something like hydrogen comes in.

0:18:33.160 --> 0:18:36.119
<v Speaker 1>Do we have the engines that don't need a starter fuel?

0:18:36.560 --> 0:18:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Do we have you know, how are you going to

0:18:39.040 --> 0:18:40.919
<v Speaker 1>transport it? You know, how are you going to make

0:18:40.960 --> 0:18:44.320
<v Speaker 1>sure that the whole cycle makes sense? Because you know,

0:18:44.359 --> 0:18:45.840
<v Speaker 1>you have to think of the whole cycle. You know,

0:18:46.119 --> 0:18:49.040
<v Speaker 1>what is the energy loss when you produce the fuel,

0:18:49.560 --> 0:18:51.840
<v Speaker 1>when you store it, when you transport it, and then

0:18:51.840 --> 0:18:53.880
<v Speaker 1>you burn it again. You know, you have to look

0:18:53.880 --> 0:18:56.320
<v Speaker 1>at the complete picture. So there's still a lot of

0:18:56.320 --> 0:18:59.399
<v Speaker 1>things that have to happen. So I think some of

0:18:59.400 --> 0:19:01.760
<v Speaker 1>the companies are over hyping it. If if we get

0:19:01.800 --> 0:19:04.840
<v Speaker 1>this big project off, you know, by the end of

0:19:04.840 --> 0:19:07.479
<v Speaker 1>this year, I think that's going to be really a

0:19:07.480 --> 0:19:10.080
<v Speaker 1>milestone in the sector. So it's going to be very

0:19:10.119 --> 0:19:13.560
<v Speaker 1>specifically you know, for like say ocean transportation, but a

0:19:13.640 --> 0:19:16.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of it would go into actually fertilizer, I believe.

0:19:16.359 --> 0:19:18.639
<v Speaker 1>So I have to ask, do you have an electric vehicle? Yes?

0:19:18.720 --> 0:19:22.080
<v Speaker 1>I do, well, Yes, I do have a Tesla Model three.

0:19:22.520 --> 0:19:25.000
<v Speaker 1>In addition, you know here at a Yes, we've been

0:19:25.000 --> 0:19:28.719
<v Speaker 1>planting trees to offset our carbon emissions. It actually started

0:19:30.119 --> 0:19:33.240
<v Speaker 1>by Roger Sant, who's who's one of our two founders.

0:19:34.040 --> 0:19:37.120
<v Speaker 1>But you know today we've planted ten million trees. So

0:19:37.320 --> 0:19:41.360
<v Speaker 1>even today we calculate our carbon footprint for by for travel,

0:19:41.560 --> 0:19:43.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, because bart really jet travel is probably the

0:19:43.760 --> 0:19:47.720
<v Speaker 1>most carbon intensive thing that any of us does. Uh,

0:19:47.760 --> 0:19:50.800
<v Speaker 1>and we offset it by planting trees in Brazil. So yeah,

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:54.520
<v Speaker 1>we're very conscious about our own carbon footprint and trying

0:19:54.560 --> 0:19:57.639
<v Speaker 1>to reduce it in all our installations. How much of

0:19:57.680 --> 0:20:02.440
<v Speaker 1>an opportunity or potentially logistical challenge do you think electric

0:20:02.480 --> 0:20:04.600
<v Speaker 1>vehicles are going to pose for the grid and for

0:20:04.640 --> 0:20:08.480
<v Speaker 1>the electricity sector, because as you referenced, for long haul,

0:20:09.160 --> 0:20:11.560
<v Speaker 1>even an electric vehicle, you've got to figure out where

0:20:11.560 --> 0:20:13.520
<v Speaker 1>you're going to charge and where you're gonna take your breaks,

0:20:13.520 --> 0:20:16.960
<v Speaker 1>and it may not always happen at home. Yes, that's

0:20:16.960 --> 0:20:20.520
<v Speaker 1>a good question. Look, I think that first year you're

0:20:20.520 --> 0:20:23.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna have the you know, for example, electrification of bus fleets.

0:20:23.640 --> 0:20:25.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, that's going to require energy storage because it's

0:20:25.960 --> 0:20:29.320
<v Speaker 1>basically either you have to upgrade the whole grid or

0:20:29.440 --> 0:20:31.600
<v Speaker 1>or you're going to store up energy in certain you know,

0:20:31.680 --> 0:20:34.919
<v Speaker 1>bus team posts. When you think of cars, you know,

0:20:34.960 --> 0:20:38.720
<v Speaker 1>individually at the homes, they're kind of like mobile batteries,

0:20:38.840 --> 0:20:41.160
<v Speaker 1>and so how do they fit into a smart grid.

0:20:42.160 --> 0:20:44.520
<v Speaker 1>So one of the things that we're the leaders in

0:20:44.640 --> 0:20:48.400
<v Speaker 1>quite frankly through a joint venture called Uplight, we are

0:20:48.520 --> 0:20:54.159
<v Speaker 1>the leading energy efficiency services cloud based services provider, you know,

0:20:54.280 --> 0:20:56.400
<v Speaker 1>just a sort of a data point where we're the biggest,

0:20:56.400 --> 0:20:59.480
<v Speaker 1>I believe seller of nests in the country. We provide

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:05.960
<v Speaker 1>energy efficiency algorithms, etcetera to a d us electric and

0:21:06.000 --> 0:21:10.879
<v Speaker 1>gas utilities. So I think this part of using AI

0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:15.240
<v Speaker 1>and smart networks is part of the solution because the

0:21:15.320 --> 0:21:21.640
<v Speaker 1>most let's say, carbon friendly solution is to use electricity

0:21:21.680 --> 0:21:25.800
<v Speaker 1>more efficiently, and so we're approaching that as well. So

0:21:26.320 --> 0:21:28.280
<v Speaker 1>the way we look at it, what is unique about

0:21:28.280 --> 0:21:31.560
<v Speaker 1>AS is that we bring together all the technologies and

0:21:31.640 --> 0:21:35.119
<v Speaker 1>we joint venture with people. We've been very effective at

0:21:35.160 --> 0:21:40.600
<v Speaker 1>taking small startups and growing up to you know, unicorns valuations,

0:21:41.040 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, over a billion dollars, and the fact that

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:46.520
<v Speaker 1>we are pretty much open source, you know, we are

0:21:46.600 --> 0:21:51.960
<v Speaker 1>sharing our technological advances with with everybody. So again, when

0:21:51.960 --> 0:21:55.399
<v Speaker 1>we started using lithium ion batteries for energy storage, nobody

0:21:55.400 --> 0:21:58.080
<v Speaker 1>else was and we had the first great scale units

0:21:58.200 --> 0:22:01.560
<v Speaker 1>not only in the States, but you know in countries

0:22:01.640 --> 0:22:07.159
<v Speaker 1>like you know, Germany, the UK, India, Philippines, and a

0:22:07.200 --> 0:22:09.159
<v Speaker 1>lot of the work was, for example, with regulators to

0:22:09.200 --> 0:22:11.920
<v Speaker 1>get that pass. So, you know, we could have taken

0:22:11.920 --> 0:22:14.240
<v Speaker 1>an approach and saying, look, we're leading in this, let's

0:22:14.359 --> 0:22:18.119
<v Speaker 1>use it to you know, win more power purchase agreements.

0:22:18.480 --> 0:22:20.480
<v Speaker 1>But instead, you know, I think we took the right

0:22:20.560 --> 0:22:22.840
<v Speaker 1>role of saying, okay, we will sell it at the

0:22:22.880 --> 0:22:25.960
<v Speaker 1>same price to others because it will allow us to

0:22:26.119 --> 0:22:29.639
<v Speaker 1>massiffice and drop the cost. What's one of the areas

0:22:29.640 --> 0:22:34.320
<v Speaker 1>in particular in regard to storage, where you see there

0:22:34.320 --> 0:22:36.400
<v Speaker 1>are being some real potential and one of the things

0:22:36.400 --> 0:22:38.879
<v Speaker 1>that you're kind of maybe not experimenting, but trying out.

0:22:39.040 --> 0:22:40.920
<v Speaker 1>I think one of the areas that excites me most

0:22:41.359 --> 0:22:46.240
<v Speaker 1>is the application of energy storage to transmission, because transmission

0:22:46.280 --> 0:22:49.800
<v Speaker 1>lines are built, you know, the whole line for the

0:22:49.880 --> 0:22:53.240
<v Speaker 1>maximum use at any period of time. You know, it

0:22:53.280 --> 0:22:55.280
<v Speaker 1>could be a couple of days of a month, and

0:22:55.320 --> 0:22:58.520
<v Speaker 1>it could be a couple of hours during those days.

0:22:58.520 --> 0:23:01.000
<v Speaker 1>So really they're overbuilt, you know the words, they're a

0:23:01.040 --> 0:23:04.240
<v Speaker 1>little bit like you know, uh, you know, they have

0:23:04.320 --> 0:23:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the you have the opportunity like for an uber or

0:23:07.080 --> 0:23:10.720
<v Speaker 1>B and B Airbnb. So how can you make better

0:23:10.800 --> 0:23:13.920
<v Speaker 1>use of that transmission? So if you put energy storage

0:23:13.960 --> 0:23:17.960
<v Speaker 1>on it, you can basically run those same transmission line

0:23:18.560 --> 0:23:24.760
<v Speaker 1>at of capacity all the time because you are storing

0:23:24.800 --> 0:23:28.240
<v Speaker 1>it up in these banks and injecting it where you

0:23:28.280 --> 0:23:30.760
<v Speaker 1>need it when you need it. Now, this is very

0:23:30.760 --> 0:23:33.800
<v Speaker 1>important because we all talk about the renewables and how

0:23:33.800 --> 0:23:37.800
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna build you know, thousands of giga lots of renewables,

0:23:37.840 --> 0:23:41.480
<v Speaker 1>but those are not located where the energy demand is.

0:23:41.600 --> 0:23:43.800
<v Speaker 1>So you're going to have to create transmission to get

0:23:43.800 --> 0:23:47.520
<v Speaker 1>it across and that's going to take years for the permits,

0:23:47.760 --> 0:23:50.040
<v Speaker 1>and you know, tens of billions of dollars to build

0:23:50.040 --> 0:23:55.120
<v Speaker 1>that transmission. So the smart application of energy storage could

0:23:55.280 --> 0:23:57.480
<v Speaker 1>drastically reduce the amount of money you have to invest

0:23:57.520 --> 0:24:02.360
<v Speaker 1>in transmission. So right now we have through sements. We've

0:24:02.359 --> 0:24:05.320
<v Speaker 1>talked to the German government and they're they've put out

0:24:06.000 --> 0:24:10.159
<v Speaker 1>a request for proposals to use energy storage so that

0:24:10.200 --> 0:24:14.000
<v Speaker 1>they can use the existing transmission lines two more efficiently

0:24:14.080 --> 0:24:17.920
<v Speaker 1>bring energy from the North Sea down to the southeast

0:24:17.920 --> 0:24:21.679
<v Speaker 1>of Germany where you have a lot of the industrial load. So, um,

0:24:21.720 --> 0:24:25.440
<v Speaker 1>this is a great case where we can prove it. Uh.

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:28.480
<v Speaker 1>And then I think that the main restriction. I think

0:24:28.480 --> 0:24:30.919
<v Speaker 1>the technical issues are will be solvable or you know,

0:24:30.960 --> 0:24:34.080
<v Speaker 1>are solvable. It's just a question of getting the regulations

0:24:34.119 --> 0:24:37.960
<v Speaker 1>to incentivize people to make better use of existing infrastructure

0:24:38.000 --> 0:24:40.760
<v Speaker 1>and not necessarily building new infrastructure. And do you think

0:24:40.760 --> 0:24:42.199
<v Speaker 1>that this could save a lot of money in the

0:24:42.240 --> 0:24:44.040
<v Speaker 1>long run, because I know there's been a lot of

0:24:44.080 --> 0:24:48.040
<v Speaker 1>talk about how transmission lines are really underinvested in Well, absolutely,

0:24:48.080 --> 0:24:51.840
<v Speaker 1>I think time and money. Because so I'm not saying

0:24:51.840 --> 0:24:54.159
<v Speaker 1>that this would solve all the transmission problem, because obviously

0:24:54.200 --> 0:24:56.840
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna have renewables in areas where there's no transmission line,

0:24:56.880 --> 0:24:58.919
<v Speaker 1>so you need to get a line out there. But

0:24:59.000 --> 0:25:02.240
<v Speaker 1>what I'm saying is it it could definitely reduce the

0:25:02.240 --> 0:25:05.080
<v Speaker 1>amount of investment needed, and it could reduce the time

0:25:05.600 --> 0:25:08.720
<v Speaker 1>because you don't. You would require much less permiting. Since

0:25:08.840 --> 0:25:12.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, energy storage doesn't have any emissions, it can

0:25:12.320 --> 0:25:17.040
<v Speaker 1>be located anywhere. It could really optimize the transmission lines.

0:25:17.080 --> 0:25:20.240
<v Speaker 1>And then you you add to that artificial intelligence to

0:25:20.400 --> 0:25:23.760
<v Speaker 1>optimize the charging and the discharging. Um you're gonna have

0:25:23.800 --> 0:25:26.520
<v Speaker 1>a much better system. So I have absolutely no doubt

0:25:26.560 --> 0:25:28.560
<v Speaker 1>that this can save a lot of time and money.

0:25:28.760 --> 0:25:30.800
<v Speaker 1>And do you see these as potentially being kind of

0:25:30.840 --> 0:25:33.560
<v Speaker 1>companies unto themselves? And do you see them sitting under

0:25:33.600 --> 0:25:36.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of electricity providers as a part of their portfolio.

0:25:37.000 --> 0:25:40.280
<v Speaker 1>A lot of the issues surrounding energy storage is who

0:25:40.280 --> 0:25:43.199
<v Speaker 1>gets to own it? Is a degenerator, is a distributor?

0:25:43.680 --> 0:25:45.879
<v Speaker 1>Until today, you know, for example, you didn't get the

0:25:45.880 --> 0:25:49.359
<v Speaker 1>tax breaks the investment tax credit or a production tax

0:25:49.400 --> 0:25:54.160
<v Speaker 1>credit that applies to solar or wind for standalone energy storage.

0:25:54.760 --> 0:25:58.479
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of projects include energy storage with solar

0:25:58.600 --> 0:26:01.800
<v Speaker 1>or wind that may or not be optimal. So it's

0:26:01.920 --> 0:26:04.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think it's best just to say, look,

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:08.240
<v Speaker 1>all technologies have more or less the same subsidy and

0:26:08.320 --> 0:26:11.359
<v Speaker 1>allow people to use the one that is best. You know,

0:26:11.760 --> 0:26:13.520
<v Speaker 1>I think the meat key point will be, you know,

0:26:13.680 --> 0:26:17.199
<v Speaker 1>regulators should allow as many people as possible to have them.

0:26:17.240 --> 0:26:20.199
<v Speaker 1>They should allow utilities to rate base them. And I

0:26:20.240 --> 0:26:23.200
<v Speaker 1>think that you know, you shouldn't artificially say no only

0:26:23.240 --> 0:26:26.399
<v Speaker 1>generators can have it, our only distribution companies can have it.

0:26:26.760 --> 0:26:29.879
<v Speaker 1>I think make it widely available to all. So a S,

0:26:29.920 --> 0:26:33.360
<v Speaker 1>I would definitely say, see yourself as innovators and are

0:26:33.400 --> 0:26:38.679
<v Speaker 1>looking at opportunities to change, grow, improve the electricity sector

0:26:38.920 --> 0:26:41.359
<v Speaker 1>makes you fit in quite well in Silicon Valley, which

0:26:41.359 --> 0:26:43.679
<v Speaker 1>then brings me to Google. So there was a recent

0:26:43.720 --> 0:26:47.560
<v Speaker 1>announcement that a S would be providing electricity to Google,

0:26:47.920 --> 0:26:50.320
<v Speaker 1>providing green electricity to Google. Can you tell me a

0:26:50.400 --> 0:26:54.439
<v Speaker 1>little bit more about that relationship? That was a very interesting,

0:26:54.840 --> 0:26:58.280
<v Speaker 1>let's say process, and it really was a partnership because

0:26:58.320 --> 0:27:01.919
<v Speaker 1>this wasn't like a just the response to you know,

0:27:01.960 --> 0:27:04.920
<v Speaker 1>our FP or a bid. It was really we went

0:27:04.960 --> 0:27:07.160
<v Speaker 1>to Google and we said, look, we have these capabilities.

0:27:07.280 --> 0:27:10.919
<v Speaker 1>You want renewable energy. But what is happening is you know,

0:27:10.960 --> 0:27:14.640
<v Speaker 1>you have to cut through really what I would say

0:27:14.680 --> 0:27:16.240
<v Speaker 1>reality and a little bit of hype. A lot of

0:27:16.240 --> 0:27:20.440
<v Speaker 1>people say they're green, but the truth is they overpurchase

0:27:20.520 --> 0:27:25.320
<v Speaker 1>renewables certain hours and certain hours are taking non renewable

0:27:25.400 --> 0:27:28.879
<v Speaker 1>energy from the grid. So what we proposed to Google

0:27:29.040 --> 0:27:33.439
<v Speaker 1>was for their data centers here in Virginia was to

0:27:33.600 --> 0:27:38.680
<v Speaker 1>have seven carbon free energy and that we would provide

0:27:38.680 --> 0:27:42.320
<v Speaker 1>that for ten years. So that is very complex optimization

0:27:42.400 --> 0:27:47.000
<v Speaker 1>problem because like what is the optimal mix of solar, wind,

0:27:47.440 --> 0:27:51.159
<v Speaker 1>hydro and energy storage. Because you can do it, but

0:27:51.200 --> 0:27:53.480
<v Speaker 1>the question is how can you do it cost effectively?

0:27:53.600 --> 0:27:56.320
<v Speaker 1>So it takes a tremendous amount of you know, mathematical

0:27:56.359 --> 0:27:59.960
<v Speaker 1>modeling takes a tremendous amount of knowing all the different

0:28:00.240 --> 0:28:04.120
<v Speaker 1>energy sources. So we co developed this, I would say

0:28:04.160 --> 0:28:07.760
<v Speaker 1>to a large degree, and really what came out optimal

0:28:08.000 --> 0:28:12.240
<v Speaker 1>was Okay, we can net this on an hourly basis,

0:28:12.680 --> 0:28:15.719
<v Speaker 1>So that's unique. Nobody nets this on an hourly basis.

0:28:15.760 --> 0:28:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Usually they netted on a yearly basis. Now it's not

0:28:18.800 --> 0:28:23.840
<v Speaker 1>a carbon free, it's carbon free because quite frankly, that

0:28:23.880 --> 0:28:27.360
<v Speaker 1>was the price point that they wanted. Now this we are,

0:28:27.480 --> 0:28:30.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, in talks with other technology companies to provide

0:28:30.960 --> 0:28:33.920
<v Speaker 1>similar products. We were not only the first, but I

0:28:33.960 --> 0:28:35.960
<v Speaker 1>still think we're the only ones who can really provide it,

0:28:35.960 --> 0:28:40.120
<v Speaker 1>who really have the modeling capabilities today to do this,

0:28:40.960 --> 0:28:43.200
<v Speaker 1>so it wasn't just you know, giving them clean energy,

0:28:43.280 --> 0:28:46.040
<v Speaker 1>was giving them something new. And that's what we're really,

0:28:46.600 --> 0:28:49.520
<v Speaker 1>I think most interested in doing. You know, out in Kauai,

0:28:49.560 --> 0:28:53.440
<v Speaker 1>for example, we did the first really sort of DC

0:28:53.640 --> 0:28:58.120
<v Speaker 1>paired solar energy storage that would give them baseload capabilities,

0:28:58.280 --> 0:29:02.680
<v Speaker 1>So basically saying, look, you want to have solar power

0:29:02.760 --> 0:29:05.560
<v Speaker 1>around the clock, how can you do that efficiently? And

0:29:05.760 --> 0:29:08.400
<v Speaker 1>allowed them to retire a lot of their diesel plans.

0:29:08.920 --> 0:29:11.200
<v Speaker 1>So that's what's what we're about. But we work with

0:29:11.240 --> 0:29:13.120
<v Speaker 1>the clients. We don't we don't just come and say,

0:29:13.120 --> 0:29:15.160
<v Speaker 1>look what you need is X. You know, we come

0:29:15.160 --> 0:29:17.320
<v Speaker 1>and say, look, this is an interesting idea of what

0:29:17.360 --> 0:29:20.720
<v Speaker 1>do you want. So if we have other contracts that

0:29:20.800 --> 0:29:23.280
<v Speaker 1>are similar of you know, sort of twenty four seven

0:29:23.360 --> 0:29:27.400
<v Speaker 1>carbon free energy with other firms, you know, it might

0:29:27.440 --> 0:29:30.480
<v Speaker 1>be slightly different than what we did with Google, but

0:29:30.480 --> 0:29:33.600
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a very good partnership and you know, we

0:29:33.760 --> 0:29:36.400
<v Speaker 1>um you know, we're very happy we're working on several

0:29:36.440 --> 0:29:39.479
<v Speaker 1>things with them and that they chose us as as

0:29:39.520 --> 0:29:42.400
<v Speaker 1>a counterpart too to work these things. I certainly hope

0:29:42.440 --> 0:29:47.200
<v Speaker 1>you got to visit the Kawaii project. I haven't and

0:29:47.200 --> 0:29:49.600
<v Speaker 1>I've never been to Hawaii, but we have on the

0:29:49.640 --> 0:29:52.800
<v Speaker 1>island of Kauai. We worked with the Kauai Island Utility

0:29:52.960 --> 0:29:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Cooperative and you know, we did that solar energy storage

0:29:57.320 --> 0:30:01.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of baseload project. The military very interested in it

0:30:01.160 --> 0:30:04.320
<v Speaker 1>because the weakest link in the supply chain for them

0:30:04.600 --> 0:30:07.520
<v Speaker 1>was was the Navy having to have ship diesel to

0:30:07.680 --> 0:30:10.440
<v Speaker 1>say missile plants out in the Pacific. So if you

0:30:10.440 --> 0:30:14.040
<v Speaker 1>could do solar plus storage, that makes that missile base

0:30:14.120 --> 0:30:17.000
<v Speaker 1>more robust. So we're working on something with them. We're

0:30:17.040 --> 0:30:20.280
<v Speaker 1>also doing another one now also in Kauai with the

0:30:20.360 --> 0:30:24.720
<v Speaker 1>k I U S which is combining pump hydrome, wind,

0:30:24.800 --> 0:30:28.960
<v Speaker 1>solar and energy storage. And you know, we have been

0:30:30.000 --> 0:30:32.800
<v Speaker 1>very active in Hawaii, not only with k I you see,

0:30:32.800 --> 0:30:36.440
<v Speaker 1>but also with HICO helping them to become carbon free

0:30:36.800 --> 0:30:43.040
<v Speaker 1>and we've done that building solar wind energy storage. So

0:30:43.120 --> 0:30:45.760
<v Speaker 1>these these partnerships are exactly what what we think is

0:30:45.800 --> 0:30:48.400
<v Speaker 1>our sweet spot. You know, it's it's not selling a

0:30:48.400 --> 0:30:52.080
<v Speaker 1>commoditized product, but it's really creating the most value for

0:30:52.080 --> 0:30:57.400
<v Speaker 1>our clients through combinations of technology, inventing technology, and you know,

0:30:57.440 --> 0:31:01.000
<v Speaker 1>I think this is a very good place to be today.

0:31:01.200 --> 0:31:03.080
<v Speaker 1>But I love that you brought up pump hydro because

0:31:03.120 --> 0:31:05.400
<v Speaker 1>that's one of those technologies that's been around for a

0:31:05.440 --> 0:31:09.600
<v Speaker 1>while as a storage technology and is pretty effective. While

0:31:09.680 --> 0:31:12.680
<v Speaker 1>you referenced this at the beginning of today's conversation, you

0:31:12.760 --> 0:31:15.560
<v Speaker 1>talk about how batteries are really useful for helping with

0:31:15.880 --> 0:31:18.640
<v Speaker 1>intermittency on the daily or maybe even a weekly basis.

0:31:18.680 --> 0:31:21.040
<v Speaker 1>But then there's the seasonality issue. And if you're going

0:31:21.080 --> 0:31:26.520
<v Speaker 1>to be supplying seven, three and sixty five days energy,

0:31:26.680 --> 0:31:30.400
<v Speaker 1>what are the technologies where you see the most potential

0:31:30.520 --> 0:31:34.400
<v Speaker 1>for us to really work on this seasonality issue. For example,

0:31:34.440 --> 0:31:37.080
<v Speaker 1>pump hydros is great where you already have a reservoir

0:31:37.680 --> 0:31:41.920
<v Speaker 1>and you know you can you know, optimize it now. Now,

0:31:41.960 --> 0:31:46.440
<v Speaker 1>the truth is, for you know, shorter term fluctuations, it's

0:31:46.520 --> 0:31:49.720
<v Speaker 1>much more efficient to store electrons than be pumping molecules

0:31:49.760 --> 0:31:53.240
<v Speaker 1>up and down. But again, it you know, a reservoir

0:31:53.320 --> 0:31:58.360
<v Speaker 1>does provide interseasonal storage. You could also do that again

0:31:58.480 --> 0:32:01.760
<v Speaker 1>with a h'd gin fuel. That's where I think hydrogen

0:32:01.840 --> 0:32:05.040
<v Speaker 1>could be now. Again, it would be a hydrogen fuel

0:32:05.040 --> 0:32:07.640
<v Speaker 1>that you don't have to keep cry you know, so

0:32:07.800 --> 0:32:10.240
<v Speaker 1>cryogenically because you waste a lot of energy on that.

0:32:10.920 --> 0:32:13.160
<v Speaker 1>So I think that you know that part, you know

0:32:13.160 --> 0:32:15.959
<v Speaker 1>that there are various ways that society can go. It

0:32:16.000 --> 0:32:18.320
<v Speaker 1>has to take to take a decision. And then then

0:32:18.360 --> 0:32:20.959
<v Speaker 1>decision really is, you know, are we going to invest

0:32:21.120 --> 0:32:23.720
<v Speaker 1>in in hydrogen based fuels? Are you going to have

0:32:23.760 --> 0:32:27.680
<v Speaker 1>to subsidize it because it's it's not that cost effective

0:32:28.040 --> 0:32:30.320
<v Speaker 1>if you have to store it genically for long periods

0:32:30.360 --> 0:32:33.760
<v Speaker 1>of time, or do we go to something like modularor

0:32:33.840 --> 0:32:37.640
<v Speaker 1>nuclear because nuclear does is you know, is baseload and

0:32:37.760 --> 0:32:40.800
<v Speaker 1>nuclear you know, would solve that problem to a large extent,

0:32:41.400 --> 0:32:44.200
<v Speaker 1>but you know, there's a lot of pushback uh nimby.

0:32:44.240 --> 0:32:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Nobody wants nuclear plants in their neighborhood. So, you know,

0:32:48.400 --> 0:32:51.320
<v Speaker 1>those are the questions. I think that the Secretary Kerry

0:32:51.680 --> 0:32:53.760
<v Speaker 1>was really saying, you know, we have to what are

0:32:53.800 --> 0:32:56.239
<v Speaker 1>the technologies that they're going to close that gap? Do

0:32:56.240 --> 0:32:59.240
<v Speaker 1>you think a yes is closed on doing modular nuclear? No?

0:32:59.320 --> 0:33:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Quite for any of that. We've we've always shied away

0:33:01.840 --> 0:33:06.520
<v Speaker 1>from from nuclear because we think that uh it um

0:33:07.000 --> 0:33:09.480
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of resistance. It's going to be very

0:33:09.480 --> 0:33:13.560
<v Speaker 1>hard to um to get the permity, certainly for the

0:33:13.600 --> 0:33:17.280
<v Speaker 1>first ones. Uh on the other hand, you know, it's

0:33:17.320 --> 0:33:23.280
<v Speaker 1>it's the large traditional nuclear plants have had tremendous cost overruns.

0:33:24.360 --> 0:33:27.720
<v Speaker 1>It's been very expensive to do um and some of

0:33:27.760 --> 0:33:31.920
<v Speaker 1>the older nuclear plants are not economic. So, you know,

0:33:32.480 --> 0:33:35.880
<v Speaker 1>having said that, you know, nuclear is an important element

0:33:35.960 --> 0:33:43.080
<v Speaker 1>to keep carbon free uh baseload energy. So again that's

0:33:43.120 --> 0:33:45.760
<v Speaker 1>that's an area that we've decided not to not to enter.

0:33:46.040 --> 0:33:48.720
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned that just because I think that it might

0:33:48.760 --> 0:33:53.440
<v Speaker 1>be part of the solution to get to net zero.

0:33:53.920 --> 0:33:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Is there anything else that you think that I'd missed

0:33:56.840 --> 0:33:59.560
<v Speaker 1>that you want to discuss. I think just you know,

0:33:59.640 --> 0:34:02.120
<v Speaker 1>what an exciting time it is to be in the

0:34:02.160 --> 0:34:05.840
<v Speaker 1>sector and the electricity sector, and how in terms of

0:34:05.880 --> 0:34:10.120
<v Speaker 1>attracting talent, there's never been a better time because the

0:34:10.640 --> 0:34:14.640
<v Speaker 1>young generation is very mission driven and they want to

0:34:14.680 --> 0:34:18.520
<v Speaker 1>make a positive difference, and I think that, you know,

0:34:18.560 --> 0:34:21.920
<v Speaker 1>many of them feel that the renewable sector, the energy

0:34:21.960 --> 0:34:25.000
<v Speaker 1>sector in total, is a place that they can make

0:34:25.040 --> 0:34:28.800
<v Speaker 1>that difference and get meeting. So it's an interesting time

0:34:28.960 --> 0:34:32.200
<v Speaker 1>to to be in the sector. And I think it's

0:34:32.400 --> 0:34:35.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're just starting this this traumatic change and

0:34:35.800 --> 0:34:40.759
<v Speaker 1>it's going to involve not only building carbon free energy,

0:34:40.960 --> 0:34:43.479
<v Speaker 1>but also changing how we use it. You know, don't

0:34:43.560 --> 0:34:48.320
<v Speaker 1>underestimate the use of AI and digital and smart grids

0:34:48.840 --> 0:34:52.120
<v Speaker 1>to optimize our energy use well, and you talk about

0:34:52.120 --> 0:34:55.600
<v Speaker 1>attracting talent, so you know, when we were talking about

0:34:55.600 --> 0:34:59.640
<v Speaker 1>the targets, when I think of targets, I think about

0:34:59.640 --> 0:35:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the fact that my kids are going to be roughly

0:35:01.560 --> 0:35:05.120
<v Speaker 1>the age I am now when that happens. Um so

0:35:05.560 --> 0:35:07.839
<v Speaker 1>on the way there, we need to attract as many

0:35:07.840 --> 0:35:11.400
<v Speaker 1>people into solving these solutions as possible, and is a

0:35:11.440 --> 0:35:14.600
<v Speaker 1>really exciting time. What are the skills that you look

0:35:14.640 --> 0:35:17.200
<v Speaker 1>for in order to be in the electricity sector? This

0:35:17.239 --> 0:35:20.280
<v Speaker 1>is obviously a space that has attracted engineers all along,

0:35:20.320 --> 0:35:23.040
<v Speaker 1>but what are the other things that you think are

0:35:23.040 --> 0:35:27.040
<v Speaker 1>really required in order to make you competitive today's day

0:35:27.080 --> 0:35:31.040
<v Speaker 1>and age. What we're really looking for, I would say,

0:35:31.120 --> 0:35:34.759
<v Speaker 1>is people who have great intellectual curiosity because you're going

0:35:34.800 --> 0:35:37.800
<v Speaker 1>to have to be constantly learning things. And also people

0:35:37.840 --> 0:35:43.680
<v Speaker 1>who are able to I would say, have the open

0:35:43.760 --> 0:35:48.360
<v Speaker 1>minded listen to the clients to find innovative solutions. So

0:35:48.400 --> 0:35:50.520
<v Speaker 1>it's not just a matter of you know, being the

0:35:50.560 --> 0:35:55.200
<v Speaker 1>best engineer, because if you sort of stick to tried

0:35:55.280 --> 0:35:58.680
<v Speaker 1>and true solutions, that's not what's required, is really required,

0:35:58.760 --> 0:36:01.319
<v Speaker 1>is how can I come up with something new. It

0:36:01.360 --> 0:36:03.440
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have to be totally, but it really could be

0:36:03.520 --> 0:36:06.560
<v Speaker 1>how you integrate things, And that's what we're doing. You know,

0:36:06.560 --> 0:36:10.480
<v Speaker 1>we really feel that we have this suite of capabilities

0:36:10.880 --> 0:36:15.160
<v Speaker 1>and the very best developers were having really they're able

0:36:15.200 --> 0:36:18.240
<v Speaker 1>to bring these to bear to solve the client's problem.

0:36:18.640 --> 0:36:24.279
<v Speaker 1>So decarbonization, it's you'd reference that we are going to

0:36:24.520 --> 0:36:27.879
<v Speaker 1>need to well that the energy transition can't do at all,

0:36:28.400 --> 0:36:30.920
<v Speaker 1>and that there are a lot of areas, including some

0:36:30.960 --> 0:36:33.040
<v Speaker 1>of the really hard to abate sectors, that are going

0:36:33.080 --> 0:36:36.560
<v Speaker 1>to need to turn if we want to avoid not

0:36:36.640 --> 0:36:40.800
<v Speaker 1>just one point five or two, but higher temperature warming

0:36:40.840 --> 0:36:44.719
<v Speaker 1>on this planet. So I once heard Christiana Figures. She

0:36:44.800 --> 0:36:47.840
<v Speaker 1>said that the energy transition is already happening and it

0:36:47.920 --> 0:36:50.960
<v Speaker 1>has so much momentum that we really do need to

0:36:51.000 --> 0:36:53.719
<v Speaker 1>focus on a lot of these other areas like agriculture

0:36:53.760 --> 0:36:57.839
<v Speaker 1>that just don't have the wealth of solutions right now.

0:36:57.920 --> 0:37:02.120
<v Speaker 1>So outside of the electricity space, which you know so well,

0:37:02.760 --> 0:37:05.600
<v Speaker 1>what are the areas that you're watching most closely when

0:37:05.600 --> 0:37:08.000
<v Speaker 1>it comes to decarbonization, We think the next one really

0:37:08.000 --> 0:37:12.319
<v Speaker 1>would be transportation and they're going to be very intertwined.

0:37:12.360 --> 0:37:15.719
<v Speaker 1>As I said, electric vehicles are in a sense mobile batteries,

0:37:16.120 --> 0:37:18.760
<v Speaker 1>and they have to become part of the smart grid

0:37:19.600 --> 0:37:21.839
<v Speaker 1>in terms of how we manage it. So I would

0:37:21.840 --> 0:37:25.480
<v Speaker 1>say transportation. Now there are some areas, like say aircraft,

0:37:25.680 --> 0:37:28.200
<v Speaker 1>long haul aircraft, which will be more difficult. I mean

0:37:29.160 --> 0:37:31.120
<v Speaker 1>there you might have to go to some sort of

0:37:31.160 --> 0:37:34.759
<v Speaker 1>synthetic fuel or something that the whole processes is in

0:37:34.840 --> 0:37:37.600
<v Speaker 1>the zero. I think in terms of agriculture, there are

0:37:37.600 --> 0:37:40.799
<v Speaker 1>many things that can be done to make sure that

0:37:40.840 --> 0:37:44.480
<v Speaker 1>it's as sustainable as as possible. Now, you know, the

0:37:44.520 --> 0:37:48.239
<v Speaker 1>reality is that the world can feed itself today. You know,

0:37:48.360 --> 0:37:50.920
<v Speaker 1>we didn't fall into the sort of club of Rome

0:37:51.000 --> 0:37:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Malthusian trap. But it has a lot to do with

0:37:53.520 --> 0:37:58.080
<v Speaker 1>nitrogen and the fact that nitrogen based fertilizers. So there's

0:37:58.120 --> 0:38:00.279
<v Speaker 1>a whole point now I think of thinking how can

0:38:00.320 --> 0:38:04.040
<v Speaker 1>you make agriculture more sustainable, And it's not only a

0:38:04.160 --> 0:38:08.000
<v Speaker 1>question of methane and CEO two emissions, but it's also

0:38:08.040 --> 0:38:11.200
<v Speaker 1>an issue of you know, making sure that the soil

0:38:11.800 --> 0:38:15.160
<v Speaker 1>has all the nutrients and capability to for you know,

0:38:15.239 --> 0:38:18.560
<v Speaker 1>long term farming. So agriculture I think will probably be

0:38:18.680 --> 0:38:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the most difficult area. But I really like that she

0:38:21.600 --> 0:38:24.319
<v Speaker 1>brings that up because a lot of people, I think

0:38:24.400 --> 0:38:27.480
<v Speaker 1>rather simplistically of the problem and just say, well, if

0:38:27.520 --> 0:38:32.680
<v Speaker 1>we band burning coal, problems solved, and the truth is no,

0:38:33.560 --> 0:38:36.720
<v Speaker 1>it's unfortunately, it's going to take an all around effort

0:38:37.000 --> 0:38:39.080
<v Speaker 1>and who knows. I mean, maybe we come up with

0:38:39.080 --> 0:38:42.319
<v Speaker 1>an efficient way of capturing carbon from the atmosphere that

0:38:42.440 --> 0:38:44.319
<v Speaker 1>might be needed, but you know right now there's no

0:38:44.360 --> 0:38:47.200
<v Speaker 1>cost efficient technology to do that. Well, on that note,

0:38:47.440 --> 0:38:51.239
<v Speaker 1>here's to innovation and you know, hoping to see continued

0:38:51.280 --> 0:38:55.520
<v Speaker 1>innovation from a S and then just across the electricity industry.

0:38:55.560 --> 0:38:58.319
<v Speaker 1>So thank you very much for your time and for

0:38:58.440 --> 0:39:01.719
<v Speaker 1>sharing your insights today regarding where you see things now

0:39:01.760 --> 0:39:04.120
<v Speaker 1>and how you see things changing in the future. Thanks Andreis,

0:39:04.280 --> 0:39:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much. Data. It was a real pleasure.

0:39:14.280 --> 0:39:16.680
<v Speaker 1>This week's show was produced by Ava Gonzalezi Slaw and

0:39:16.840 --> 0:39:19.440
<v Speaker 1>edited by Rex Warner of grace Stok Media. Bloomberg an

0:39:19.480 --> 0:39:21.719
<v Speaker 1>e F is a service provided by Bloomberg Finance LP

0:39:21.800 --> 0:39:24.480
<v Speaker 1>and its affiliates. This recording does not constitute, nor it

0:39:24.480 --> 0:39:28.040
<v Speaker 1>should it be construed as investment advice. Investment recommendations or

0:39:28.080 --> 0:39:31.360
<v Speaker 1>a recommendation as to an investment or other strategy bloomberguin

0:39:31.400 --> 0:39:34.000
<v Speaker 1>e F should not be considered as information sufficient upon

0:39:34.000 --> 0:39:37.279
<v Speaker 1>which to base an investment decision. Neither Bloomberg Finance LP

0:39:37.520 --> 0:39:40.680
<v Speaker 1>nor any of its affiliates makes any representation or warranty

0:39:40.760 --> 0:39:43.680
<v Speaker 1>as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained

0:39:43.680 --> 0:39:46.120
<v Speaker 1>in this recording, and any liability as a result of

0:39:46.120 --> 0:39:47.520
<v Speaker 1>this recording that express it discl