WEBVTT - Fed to Maintain Bond Buys Until ‘Substantial’ Economy Gains Seen

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:03.280
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser. Every day

0:00:03.279 --> 0:00:05.200
<v Speaker 1>we're bringing you the latest news from the world's of

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:08.920
<v Speaker 1>business and finance, plus technology, politics. So much going on

0:00:08.960 --> 0:00:12.160
<v Speaker 1>in the world of politics, economics, and it's all harnessing

0:00:12.160 --> 0:00:14.840
<v Speaker 1>the power of Business Week reporters and editors. If you

0:00:14.840 --> 0:00:18.280
<v Speaker 1>can download Bloomberg Business Week on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg

0:00:18.320 --> 0:00:20.480
<v Speaker 1>dot com. If you can also listen to our radio

0:00:20.520 --> 0:00:23.439
<v Speaker 1>show at two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio and be

0:00:23.440 --> 0:00:26.280
<v Speaker 1>sure to watch us too on YouTube by searching Bloomberg

0:00:26.360 --> 0:00:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Global News. It is fed Wednesday. We are Bloomberg Business Week,

0:00:30.120 --> 0:00:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Carol Master, along with Tim Stenovik. Let's bring in the

0:00:32.080 --> 0:00:35.800
<v Speaker 1>team Kathleen Hayes, Global Economics and Policy editor at Bloomberg News.

0:00:35.800 --> 0:00:38.600
<v Speaker 1>She's back in our interactive broker studio. Dave Wilson, Stocks

0:00:38.720 --> 0:00:41.839
<v Speaker 1>editor at Bloomberg News on the remote access from New Jersey. Kathleen,

0:00:41.840 --> 0:00:43.680
<v Speaker 1>you had a few minutes to look at these headlines.

0:00:43.720 --> 0:00:45.600
<v Speaker 1>What stands out for Well, I'd just like to start

0:00:45.640 --> 0:00:47.760
<v Speaker 1>with what the bond market has done, Carol, because I

0:00:48.200 --> 0:00:50.920
<v Speaker 1>made very careful note of where it was and the

0:00:50.920 --> 0:00:52.920
<v Speaker 1>there was it was flat. Just maybe the tenure was

0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:56.560
<v Speaker 1>down to tenth. The tenure is now down eleven thirty seconds.

0:00:56.560 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 1>The thirty year bond, which was down three three thirty seconds,

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:03.480
<v Speaker 1>now down a full point. Why, Kathleen do you ask? Well?

0:01:03.560 --> 0:01:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Because the Fed, as mostly expected, apparently, at least in

0:01:07.640 --> 0:01:12.720
<v Speaker 1>the policy statement, has said nothing about the possibility of

0:01:12.920 --> 0:01:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Number one increasing the number of bonds they've been buying.

0:01:15.880 --> 0:01:18.560
<v Speaker 1>That wasn't so expected. But the very least some signal

0:01:18.959 --> 0:01:22.680
<v Speaker 1>that they are ready to start changing the composition of

0:01:22.720 --> 0:01:26.240
<v Speaker 1>the bond maturities right go out the curve by more

0:01:26.319 --> 0:01:29.000
<v Speaker 1>long term bonds. Make sure that that ten year, which

0:01:29.000 --> 0:01:31.319
<v Speaker 1>the yield is currently zero point nine four, people are going,

0:01:31.319 --> 0:01:33.800
<v Speaker 1>oh my god. But if it goes above one percent, well,

0:01:33.840 --> 0:01:36.440
<v Speaker 1>the Fed apparently is not ready to say that yet.

0:01:36.560 --> 0:01:38.839
<v Speaker 1>Certainly at the press conference, J. Poe will be asked

0:01:38.880 --> 0:01:41.840
<v Speaker 1>about that. I think, what's surprised me? I guess not

0:01:42.880 --> 0:01:44.479
<v Speaker 1>when the when the Fed? One of the headlines here

0:01:44.680 --> 0:01:48.080
<v Speaker 1>is the FED Activity saying the economic activity and employment

0:01:48.080 --> 0:01:51.720
<v Speaker 1>have continued to recover. Okay, so some people are really

0:01:51.760 --> 0:01:55.520
<v Speaker 1>concerned about even a negative first quarter, for example, something

0:01:55.520 --> 0:01:58.560
<v Speaker 1>that didn't change meeting forecast sharing rates near zero through

0:01:59.720 --> 0:02:02.480
<v Speaker 1>So the dot plots will not have changed. And of

0:02:02.520 --> 0:02:07.840
<v Speaker 1>course they're revising their economic and inflation forcus etcetera, etcetera.

0:02:08.080 --> 0:02:10.079
<v Speaker 1>But the headlines one more thing when you throw in

0:02:10.280 --> 0:02:12.920
<v Speaker 1>um that they're study the temporary dollar swap lines and

0:02:13.080 --> 0:02:16.200
<v Speaker 1>repurchase facility, because that's just showing the doors open to

0:02:17.320 --> 0:02:20.240
<v Speaker 1>overseas central banks reaching out if they need a little

0:02:20.280 --> 0:02:22.120
<v Speaker 1>help from the FED. And I forgive me if you

0:02:22.160 --> 0:02:23.919
<v Speaker 1>said this, I'm like been listening to you going through

0:02:23.960 --> 0:02:27.280
<v Speaker 1>the bloomberg. The FED forecasting shows five of seventeen officials

0:02:27.280 --> 0:02:30.679
<v Speaker 1>saw a rate hike during So looking way out, Tim,

0:02:30.680 --> 0:02:33.119
<v Speaker 1>we got to talk about the equity market reaction to Yeah,

0:02:33.160 --> 0:02:36.359
<v Speaker 1>we we certainly do. I mean, is anything surprising equity

0:02:36.360 --> 0:02:38.320
<v Speaker 1>investors right now? Dave, if you want to come in

0:02:38.360 --> 0:02:41.400
<v Speaker 1>on that, Yeah, sure doesn't look like it because you

0:02:41.480 --> 0:02:44.120
<v Speaker 1>had a little bit of fluctuation in the SMP five

0:02:44.200 --> 0:02:49.079
<v Speaker 1>hundred after the meeting results were released. But I mean

0:02:49.080 --> 0:02:51.080
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about an SMP five d it's up a

0:02:51.120 --> 0:02:53.880
<v Speaker 1>tenth of a percent at this point. And if you

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:56.560
<v Speaker 1>look at things as they shake out in terms of

0:02:56.560 --> 0:02:59.600
<v Speaker 1>industry groups, it's a familiar kind of story. You know,

0:02:59.680 --> 0:03:03.360
<v Speaker 1>the performer among the eleven main groups Consumer Discretionary. It's

0:03:03.360 --> 0:03:06.840
<v Speaker 1>a category that includes retailion therefore includes Amazon dot Com,

0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:09.960
<v Speaker 1>and the entire gain in that index can be explained

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:13.040
<v Speaker 1>by the fact that Amazon is up one point eight percent,

0:03:13.320 --> 0:03:16.280
<v Speaker 1>and then right after that technology stocks, and certainly they've

0:03:16.320 --> 0:03:19.280
<v Speaker 1>been the story, you know for some time. Uh. But

0:03:19.400 --> 0:03:22.320
<v Speaker 1>seven of the eleven groups are lower utilities taking the

0:03:22.400 --> 0:03:25.360
<v Speaker 1>biggest hit. Uh. Talk about an initiest rate sensitive group.

0:03:25.440 --> 0:03:29.079
<v Speaker 1>So you know what we're seeing, not really a whole

0:03:29.320 --> 0:03:35.280
<v Speaker 1>lot in what the Federal Reserve release to change investors minds,

0:03:35.280 --> 0:03:38.320
<v Speaker 1>it seems when it comes to stocks here. So it's

0:03:38.360 --> 0:03:40.400
<v Speaker 1>so it's fair to say, Dave, that there were no

0:03:40.480 --> 0:03:43.080
<v Speaker 1>big surprises at least when it came to investors in

0:03:43.120 --> 0:03:46.280
<v Speaker 1>this latest FED meeting. Sure doesn't look that way. I mean,

0:03:46.760 --> 0:03:50.119
<v Speaker 1>not a whole lot of fluctuation in share prices, that's

0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:52.360
<v Speaker 1>for sure. Yeah, it's interesting too, and I'm just going

0:03:52.360 --> 0:03:55.520
<v Speaker 1>through our our Bloomberg live blog love this. Uh. Notably,

0:03:55.560 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 1>officials did not change their tone with respect to economic conditions,

0:03:58.640 --> 0:04:01.160
<v Speaker 1>reiterating that the recovery depend on the course of the

0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:03.680
<v Speaker 1>virus and that the pandemic will continue to weigh on

0:04:03.720 --> 0:04:06.320
<v Speaker 1>conditions in the near term. They say, it's it poses

0:04:06.320 --> 0:04:09.520
<v Speaker 1>considerable risks to the outlook in the medium term. Um,

0:04:09.560 --> 0:04:12.320
<v Speaker 1>you know we're watching this, Uh, Kathleen, you know it's

0:04:12.320 --> 0:04:15.040
<v Speaker 1>so interesting. I just think about FED decisions of the

0:04:15.080 --> 0:04:18.159
<v Speaker 1>past where we were also focused on the rates for often,

0:04:18.600 --> 0:04:20.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, but it's not really about that. Uh. It's

0:04:20.800 --> 0:04:22.960
<v Speaker 1>really about what they are doing to either help out

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:27.760
<v Speaker 1>this economy because of the pandemic. Well, and um, I

0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:30.000
<v Speaker 1>think you're right to point out the fact that, yes,

0:04:30.040 --> 0:04:33.680
<v Speaker 1>it's still gonna they're still saying that the economy is

0:04:33.720 --> 0:04:35.800
<v Speaker 1>going to depend on the virus. And we could even

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:38.120
<v Speaker 1>add to that, well, vaccines, how quickly can you get

0:04:38.120 --> 0:04:40.960
<v Speaker 1>them out? Et cetera. I think it's interesting too when

0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:44.240
<v Speaker 1>you look at the change in the summary of economic projections,

0:04:44.279 --> 0:04:46.279
<v Speaker 1>the steps, which that's where the dot plots for the

0:04:46.320 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 1>interest rate hikes come from. People were saying, including Elena

0:04:49.800 --> 0:04:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Shila Kiva and our Bloomberg Economics team before this came out,

0:04:53.160 --> 0:04:56.120
<v Speaker 1>that undoubtedly their outlook for unemployment because it's come down

0:04:56.120 --> 0:04:58.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot faster than they expect, it would be much brighter.

0:04:58.640 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 1>And in fact they do say the jobless rate six

0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:04.719
<v Speaker 1>point seven. Uh, they had forecast at seven point six

0:05:04.920 --> 0:05:07.440
<v Speaker 1>and for next year you'll get down to five five

0:05:07.440 --> 0:05:09.280
<v Speaker 1>point oh versus five point five. You know, those are

0:05:09.360 --> 0:05:12.239
<v Speaker 1>unemployment rates that look like the olden days, right before

0:05:12.279 --> 0:05:15.120
<v Speaker 1>we got to those fifty year lows. Uh. The GDP

0:05:15.360 --> 0:05:18.800
<v Speaker 1>forecast a little bit more optimistic on inflation, though they

0:05:18.920 --> 0:05:21.599
<v Speaker 1>really have a little bit of improvement, but not much.

0:05:21.640 --> 0:05:24.720
<v Speaker 1>They don't see us getting the economy getting to um

0:05:25.000 --> 0:05:28.440
<v Speaker 1>two percent on the core inflation rate until three But

0:05:28.480 --> 0:05:30.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that's kind of what they've been saying for

0:05:30.040 --> 0:05:31.800
<v Speaker 1>a while, Kathleen. I do want to ask you, we

0:05:31.800 --> 0:05:33.880
<v Speaker 1>were talking about it early on our planning call, that

0:05:34.080 --> 0:05:37.360
<v Speaker 1>if during the Powell press conference, if news comes down

0:05:37.360 --> 0:05:41.840
<v Speaker 1>about a stimulus plan or any progress, significant progress, um,

0:05:42.000 --> 0:05:44.320
<v Speaker 1>would we assume that everybody in the room will have

0:05:44.400 --> 0:05:46.599
<v Speaker 1>access to headlines and that is something that they could

0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:49.800
<v Speaker 1>bring up. You know that, Carl, because I remember thinking, now,

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:52.440
<v Speaker 1>you're absolutely right. The times I've been there, you have

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:55.200
<v Speaker 1>to uh, well, certainly the lock up because you go

0:05:55.240 --> 0:05:58.400
<v Speaker 1>in early, then you give over your cell phone. However,

0:05:58.520 --> 0:06:01.359
<v Speaker 1>you are allowed to have laptops because that's how you

0:06:01.360 --> 0:06:03.800
<v Speaker 1>put the headlines together to flash them. So yes, I

0:06:03.839 --> 0:06:05.600
<v Speaker 1>think it during the press or they will. I thought,

0:06:05.640 --> 0:06:07.400
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna ask me how j Power react, and I

0:06:07.400 --> 0:06:09.799
<v Speaker 1>was gonna say he he'll probably do a happy dance

0:06:10.000 --> 0:06:12.120
<v Speaker 1>right there in the middle of the press conference. I mean,

0:06:12.160 --> 0:06:16.719
<v Speaker 1>that's did a happy dance. I'm just gonna put that

0:06:16.760 --> 0:06:18.719
<v Speaker 1>out there. Yeah. Well, you know, he does play guitar,

0:06:18.760 --> 0:06:20.360
<v Speaker 1>and he and his wife love to dance. You read

0:06:20.360 --> 0:06:22.839
<v Speaker 1>this all the time. He's quite a renaissance man. But

0:06:23.360 --> 0:06:25.160
<v Speaker 1>it's certainly a big deal. It's probably the biggest deal

0:06:25.200 --> 0:06:27.159
<v Speaker 1>to the fat and I expect that, you know, reporters

0:06:27.160 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 1>going to ask him a number of different questions about this,

0:06:29.160 --> 0:06:31.599
<v Speaker 1>like what if this doesn't pass, do you get worried

0:06:31.640 --> 0:06:34.920
<v Speaker 1>chair about a negative first quarter? Etcetera. So I think

0:06:34.960 --> 0:06:38.240
<v Speaker 1>this is something that is clearly on the table. We'll

0:06:38.279 --> 0:06:40.880
<v Speaker 1>hear more about it. But who any minute. You know,

0:06:40.920 --> 0:06:42.520
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about that well into the night on

0:06:42.640 --> 0:06:45.240
<v Speaker 1>US ASIA, you know, our Daybreak Asia and Blueberg market

0:06:45.320 --> 0:06:48.559
<v Speaker 1>shows of the stimulus package. Everybody's watching. Yeah, absolutely, Dave Wilson,

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:50.039
<v Speaker 1>what are you gonna be watching for during that Power

0:06:50.040 --> 0:06:52.400
<v Speaker 1>press conference? Since it doesn't look like we're having Although

0:06:52.440 --> 0:06:54.320
<v Speaker 1>I will say the equity markets look like they're steepening

0:06:54.400 --> 0:06:56.760
<v Speaker 1>some of their losses. But mind you, um not a

0:06:56.760 --> 0:06:58.560
<v Speaker 1>ton and the NAZAC has paired its gain. It was

0:06:58.600 --> 0:07:01.000
<v Speaker 1>up about forty five fried to the FED announced, but

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:04.040
<v Speaker 1>now just up about eighteen nineteen points. What could Fed

0:07:04.960 --> 0:07:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Chief J. Powe will say that could maybe move the

0:07:07.240 --> 0:07:09.640
<v Speaker 1>equity markets here. I think the real question is how

0:07:09.720 --> 0:07:13.320
<v Speaker 1>much pressure does he put, in essence, on Congress in

0:07:13.320 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the White House to try and get something done in

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 1>terms of a stimulus. You know, how does he see

0:07:18.120 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 1>things shaking out based on whether they move, come together,

0:07:23.120 --> 0:07:26.360
<v Speaker 1>get something done or you know, it's wait until next year.

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:28.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's going to be well worth listening for.

0:07:28.600 --> 0:07:30.840
<v Speaker 1>All right. That is certainly setting us up really well.

0:07:30.880 --> 0:07:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Hey guys, thank you, Thank you so much. Dave Wilson,

0:07:32.960 --> 0:07:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Stocks editor at Bloomberg News on the remote access from

0:07:36.280 --> 0:07:39.440
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey. Kathleen Hayes, Global Economics and Policy editor at

0:07:39.480 --> 0:07:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News. She's back in our interactive Brokers studio. Our

0:07:42.480 --> 0:07:45.240
<v Speaker 1>top headline, top story tim the FED saying it will

0:07:45.280 --> 0:07:48.920
<v Speaker 1>continue to support the economy through massive monetary stimulus until

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:53.160
<v Speaker 1>it sees quote substantial further progress in employment and inflation.

0:07:53.280 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 1>So they are watching this and I'm assuming they're going

0:07:55.240 --> 0:07:57.960
<v Speaker 1>to get a lot of questions. J Powell will indeed

0:07:58.360 --> 0:08:01.120
<v Speaker 1>on all of this. Let's do some analysis and let's

0:08:01.160 --> 0:08:03.320
<v Speaker 1>talk about this because keep in mind, in just about

0:08:03.400 --> 0:08:05.600
<v Speaker 1>seventeen minutes time, at the bottom of the hour, we

0:08:05.640 --> 0:08:08.080
<v Speaker 1>will hear from J. Powell, Chairman of the Federal Reserve,

0:08:08.160 --> 0:08:10.840
<v Speaker 1>his comments, and of course that press conference with reporters

0:08:10.880 --> 0:08:14.480
<v Speaker 1>after today's decision. So let's bring in Francis Donald. She

0:08:14.680 --> 0:08:18.320
<v Speaker 1>is global chief Economist, head of macroeconomic Strategy at Manu

0:08:18.440 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Life Investment Management. She's on the phone in Toronto. Stephen

0:08:22.200 --> 0:08:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Skanky back with us, also chief economic advisor at kill Point,

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:28.320
<v Speaker 1>former U S. Treasury and White House National Security Council

0:08:28.360 --> 0:08:31.040
<v Speaker 1>staff member. He's based in Washington, d C. And I

0:08:31.080 --> 0:08:33.800
<v Speaker 1>believe that's where he is on the phone on this

0:08:33.880 --> 0:08:37.440
<v Speaker 1>FED Wednesday. Steve, let me start with you. So um

0:08:37.520 --> 0:08:40.920
<v Speaker 1>FED maintaining its bond buys, just watching looking for the

0:08:40.960 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 1>economy to see some improvement. What's key for you in

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:48.280
<v Speaker 1>terms of this decision. Well, it's not surprising that the

0:08:48.400 --> 0:08:52.199
<v Speaker 1>Fed didn't change any of his policy stance. Uh, there

0:08:52.280 --> 0:08:54.559
<v Speaker 1>was a little bit of expectation that they might say

0:08:54.600 --> 0:09:00.520
<v Speaker 1>something about the composition of their their bond buying. But uh,

0:09:00.640 --> 0:09:04.280
<v Speaker 1>you know on net there was nothing, there was nothing

0:09:04.320 --> 0:09:07.600
<v Speaker 1>for them to gain by doing that, so so they

0:09:07.640 --> 0:09:14.239
<v Speaker 1>just held it steady. Obviously the economic environment is particularly

0:09:14.280 --> 0:09:18.400
<v Speaker 1>complicated with the vaccine rolling out, but yet at the

0:09:18.440 --> 0:09:26.240
<v Speaker 1>same time record rates of infection, hospitalization's mortality. I think

0:09:26.280 --> 0:09:30.040
<v Speaker 1>what was most interesting to me though, was the adjustment

0:09:30.080 --> 0:09:34.280
<v Speaker 1>in their economic projections. Even with all the sworld that's

0:09:34.280 --> 0:09:38.880
<v Speaker 1>going on in this quarter and and weak economic news

0:09:39.360 --> 0:09:44.240
<v Speaker 1>on retail sales coming even just today, they did reduce,

0:09:44.640 --> 0:09:49.400
<v Speaker 1>uh that they did improve the projection e change in

0:09:49.480 --> 0:09:54.360
<v Speaker 1>real t GP for overall, taking it from minus three

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:57.200
<v Speaker 1>point seven percent for the year to to minus two

0:09:57.240 --> 0:10:03.560
<v Speaker 1>point four That's actually quite encourage and likewise for two

0:10:03.640 --> 0:10:08.199
<v Speaker 1>they also improved their their projected estimates. Well, it's interesting

0:10:08.200 --> 0:10:11.880
<v Speaker 1>and Neil Dada Renaissance Macro emailing me and saying, you know,

0:10:12.080 --> 0:10:14.280
<v Speaker 1>the bond market gets because he said to the Fed

0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:16.160
<v Speaker 1>marking up growth in need to the next two years,

0:10:16.280 --> 0:10:19.440
<v Speaker 1>marked down unemployment and marked up core inflation. The bond

0:10:19.520 --> 0:10:22.240
<v Speaker 1>markets selling off because it gets that positive growth story.

0:10:22.440 --> 0:10:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Um Francis, come on in on this is that also

0:10:25.640 --> 0:10:27.600
<v Speaker 1>what is jumping out at you, or or is something

0:10:27.640 --> 0:10:31.480
<v Speaker 1>else here's a jumping out of me. We got a

0:10:31.720 --> 0:10:34.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, the end of the news on fiscal We're

0:10:34.000 --> 0:10:36.560
<v Speaker 1>getting a crystal package that looks like it's done done

0:10:36.600 --> 0:10:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Today we get up said that basically does nothing and

0:10:39.200 --> 0:10:42.040
<v Speaker 1>marks up growth and inflation, and all we got was

0:10:42.080 --> 0:10:44.240
<v Speaker 1>a three and a half basic point jump in the

0:10:44.240 --> 0:10:47.800
<v Speaker 1>ten year to nine basis points. Yes, the bond market

0:10:47.800 --> 0:10:50.000
<v Speaker 1>knows things are a little bit better now than they

0:10:50.000 --> 0:10:52.080
<v Speaker 1>were before, but the bond arm because is also staring

0:10:52.080 --> 0:10:54.920
<v Speaker 1>down three months of data that is going to quickly

0:10:55.000 --> 0:10:57.760
<v Speaker 1>deteriorate a central bank that is, whether they do it

0:10:57.840 --> 0:11:00.319
<v Speaker 1>now or next month, going to have to and way

0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:03.640
<v Speaker 1>to average maturity and the possibility that there are you know,

0:11:03.760 --> 0:11:07.160
<v Speaker 1>ongoing turbulence created by the disappearance of thirteen three programs.

0:11:07.360 --> 0:11:09.000
<v Speaker 1>When I look at this bond market, we can kind

0:11:09.000 --> 0:11:10.760
<v Speaker 1>of look at the daily charts, but it's telling me

0:11:10.880 --> 0:11:13.080
<v Speaker 1>the same thing, which is that we're still stuck in

0:11:13.120 --> 0:11:16.439
<v Speaker 1>a recessionary environment. Even if you throw a massive fiscal

0:11:16.480 --> 0:11:19.760
<v Speaker 1>package and a more hawkish than expected FED statement, you're

0:11:19.800 --> 0:11:22.160
<v Speaker 1>still only getting the ninety four basis points. And that's

0:11:22.200 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 1>the biggest message I can read in the last fifteen minutes. Well, Francis,

0:11:25.440 --> 0:11:27.400
<v Speaker 1>what more could could have Fed do here? I mean,

0:11:27.520 --> 0:11:29.439
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at the forecast. It shows that five of

0:11:29.520 --> 0:11:33.520
<v Speaker 1>seventeen officials see a rate hike happening during twenty twenty three,

0:11:33.760 --> 0:11:36.400
<v Speaker 1>the median forecast showing that rates are going to be

0:11:36.559 --> 0:11:39.640
<v Speaker 1>at near zero levels through three. What more can the

0:11:39.720 --> 0:11:43.080
<v Speaker 1>FED do to stimulate the economy? The FAN can't do

0:11:43.240 --> 0:11:45.520
<v Speaker 1>much to stimulate the economy at all, but they could

0:11:45.600 --> 0:11:48.480
<v Speaker 1>reduce the possibility of tail risks. They can make sure

0:11:48.520 --> 0:11:51.679
<v Speaker 1>that we don't incur a rate tantrum right at the

0:11:51.760 --> 0:11:54.720
<v Speaker 1>period when the economy goes through a double dip. And

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:56.719
<v Speaker 1>in fact, they should be doing this now. Powell is

0:11:56.760 --> 0:11:58.640
<v Speaker 1>going to get away with this just like Regard did

0:11:58.720 --> 0:12:01.800
<v Speaker 1>last week. Just a little bit of an increase in niels,

0:12:01.840 --> 0:12:04.439
<v Speaker 1>that's totally something that the that the entire economy and

0:12:04.480 --> 0:12:06.880
<v Speaker 1>financial system can deal with. But if we start to

0:12:06.880 --> 0:12:09.640
<v Speaker 1>see rates move above that one percent and we get

0:12:09.640 --> 0:12:12.400
<v Speaker 1>more nervous more of that reflation trade coming in, then

0:12:12.440 --> 0:12:14.400
<v Speaker 1>we might be heading into a period where those tail

0:12:14.480 --> 0:12:17.280
<v Speaker 1>risks starts to become higher probability. We don't rely on

0:12:17.320 --> 0:12:19.480
<v Speaker 1>the side to boost employment you can lower rate as

0:12:19.559 --> 0:12:21.880
<v Speaker 1>much as you want. I'm not going to a movie theater,

0:12:22.120 --> 0:12:23.599
<v Speaker 1>but what you can do is make sure that it

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:26.160
<v Speaker 1>doesn't create a spiraling event that creates a credit event.

0:12:26.480 --> 0:12:28.080
<v Speaker 1>I think Powell is going to have to come in

0:12:28.120 --> 0:12:30.480
<v Speaker 1>here in about twelve minutes and lean pretty heavily here

0:12:30.880 --> 0:12:32.600
<v Speaker 1>or else who's going to have to direct the New

0:12:32.679 --> 0:12:34.640
<v Speaker 1>York said to start buying the sadder at the curve

0:12:34.679 --> 0:12:36.880
<v Speaker 1>as they have been in the last week or so. Well, Francis,

0:12:36.920 --> 0:12:39.360
<v Speaker 1>she took us exactly where I want to go. Um, Steve,

0:12:39.360 --> 0:12:41.280
<v Speaker 1>come on in back on this conversation. I mean, what

0:12:41.320 --> 0:12:43.000
<v Speaker 1>do you want to hear from Pal? What would you

0:12:43.000 --> 0:12:45.160
<v Speaker 1>be asking him? And I do think about do we

0:12:45.200 --> 0:12:47.400
<v Speaker 1>need to really start thinking about This is the last

0:12:47.440 --> 0:12:49.400
<v Speaker 1>FED meeting of this year, then the first one of

0:12:49.520 --> 0:12:52.040
<v Speaker 1>next year will be just after the Biden administration gets

0:12:52.040 --> 0:12:55.000
<v Speaker 1>into the White House. Um, we've already talked about a

0:12:55.040 --> 0:12:58.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of collaboration expected between Pal and Yelling and the

0:12:58.920 --> 0:13:02.079
<v Speaker 1>economic team of Joe Biden. But what is it that

0:13:02.160 --> 0:13:03.760
<v Speaker 1>you would want to ask Powell and what are you

0:13:03.800 --> 0:13:08.960
<v Speaker 1>expecting come January? Well, what I'd really like to ask him,

0:13:09.160 --> 0:13:13.120
<v Speaker 1>But I'm sure he won't answer at all? Is how

0:13:13.160 --> 0:13:16.280
<v Speaker 1>does he look forward to the partnership with the new

0:13:16.280 --> 0:13:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Treasury secretary of his old friend Janny Yellen? And H

0:13:21.120 --> 0:13:24.680
<v Speaker 1>what types of things are are they thinking about? You know,

0:13:24.720 --> 0:13:28.400
<v Speaker 1>they're going to have some big challenges coming ahead, the

0:13:28.480 --> 0:13:34.199
<v Speaker 1>disadvantage labor groups, UH, some specific industries that are uh

0:13:34.600 --> 0:13:40.840
<v Speaker 1>facing insolvency and credit issues that liquidity won't really solve.

0:13:40.960 --> 0:13:44.640
<v Speaker 1>And um, what do they do when they can't get

0:13:44.679 --> 0:13:47.200
<v Speaker 1>the sort of fiscal stimulus that they really need to have?

0:13:47.400 --> 0:13:50.200
<v Speaker 1>And how is all that going to work together? I

0:13:50.240 --> 0:13:53.600
<v Speaker 1>think it's premature for him to tip his hand on that,

0:13:54.080 --> 0:13:56.520
<v Speaker 1>but we'll see if any of the questioning can tease

0:13:56.600 --> 0:13:59.880
<v Speaker 1>any of that out. Uh. That that's the big challenge.

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:05.439
<v Speaker 1>To do much right now is no game for the Fed.

0:14:06.120 --> 0:14:10.959
<v Speaker 1>Better better to be reserved, keep quiet, see how things

0:14:11.000 --> 0:14:14.640
<v Speaker 1>behave and if they need to do something before they

0:14:14.679 --> 0:14:18.080
<v Speaker 1>end of January, obviously they can do that. But but

0:14:18.240 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 1>for right now, just just lay low and act confident

0:14:22.960 --> 0:14:29.040
<v Speaker 1>and uh give give markets a positive signal. Francis, let's

0:14:29.120 --> 0:14:31.680
<v Speaker 1>let's get that same question over to you. What would

0:14:31.720 --> 0:14:34.400
<v Speaker 1>you ask the FED chair if you were able to

0:14:34.440 --> 0:14:36.800
<v Speaker 1>talk to him in a few minutes. Well, if it

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:38.480
<v Speaker 1>was over drinks, I'd asked him if he thought this

0:14:38.600 --> 0:14:40.720
<v Speaker 1>morning's retail sales report, I want to be at that.

0:14:40.760 --> 0:14:42.440
<v Speaker 1>I want to be at that drinks. By the way, Yes,

0:14:42.560 --> 0:14:46.680
<v Speaker 1>it's definitely it's definitely over drinks. Yeah. If I was

0:14:46.720 --> 0:14:48.840
<v Speaker 1>in the room though at two thirty, I'd probably dive

0:14:48.880 --> 0:14:51.640
<v Speaker 1>deeper into what they're expecting to do with the longer

0:14:51.680 --> 0:14:54.480
<v Speaker 1>maturities and how comfortable they are with them. And the

0:14:54.520 --> 0:14:56.320
<v Speaker 1>reason that I want to ask that is because I

0:14:56.320 --> 0:14:59.000
<v Speaker 1>would want to subtily get under the surface of how

0:14:59.080 --> 0:15:02.400
<v Speaker 1>much of a connection and Powell wants between fundamentals and rates.

0:15:02.720 --> 0:15:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Is he ready to take off the rains and let

0:15:05.000 --> 0:15:08.320
<v Speaker 1>the market trade off of better news push that tenure

0:15:08.400 --> 0:15:10.520
<v Speaker 1>higher up until where it should be, which is probably

0:15:10.520 --> 0:15:13.040
<v Speaker 1>closer to one forty, or do they want to maintain

0:15:13.080 --> 0:15:16.240
<v Speaker 1>some financial repression in this and allow them overheating. Of course,

0:15:16.280 --> 0:15:19.000
<v Speaker 1>he'll never say that he's happy with financial repression in

0:15:19.040 --> 0:15:21.040
<v Speaker 1>the bond market, but if you could get a sense

0:15:21.080 --> 0:15:23.920
<v Speaker 1>of where they're going on longer duration purchases, I might

0:15:23.960 --> 0:15:26.600
<v Speaker 1>give you a little bit of some insight into the

0:15:26.640 --> 0:15:28.840
<v Speaker 1>way they're thinking about that. Well, Francis and do you

0:15:28.840 --> 0:15:31.120
<v Speaker 1>think he's also thinking about something We've talked about a

0:15:31.120 --> 0:15:34.160
<v Speaker 1>lot on air with Peter Atwater about the K shaped recovery.

0:15:34.200 --> 0:15:38.600
<v Speaker 1>There are people who don't really even feel this economically,

0:15:38.720 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 1>or they're in the markets and they've made a lot

0:15:40.640 --> 0:15:42.760
<v Speaker 1>of money and they've actually done okay, And then there

0:15:42.760 --> 0:15:46.000
<v Speaker 1>are others who have felt so much too much um

0:15:46.080 --> 0:15:48.800
<v Speaker 1>And I do wonder if J Powell, I think he

0:15:48.920 --> 0:15:50.760
<v Speaker 1>is thinking about letting it run a little hot so

0:15:50.800 --> 0:15:53.680
<v Speaker 1>that those who really have been left out here again

0:15:54.320 --> 0:15:57.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe get some help. Yeah, Carol, I think they probably

0:15:57.440 --> 0:16:00.360
<v Speaker 1>obsess over the K shaped recovery, both because it impacts

0:16:00.440 --> 0:16:03.400
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing and services differently, so the stock market is going

0:16:03.440 --> 0:16:05.240
<v Speaker 1>to take off while the rest of the economy gets

0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:07.600
<v Speaker 1>left behind, but also because if we look at what

0:16:07.680 --> 0:16:10.720
<v Speaker 1>central banks are doing, they continue to expand the way

0:16:10.720 --> 0:16:14.160
<v Speaker 1>they're looking at the world. They're talking about climate change, incommitteequality,

0:16:14.280 --> 0:16:17.440
<v Speaker 1>racially in qualities, the Reserve Bank of New Zealand talking

0:16:17.440 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 1>about housing affordability. Now that doesn't mean they're going to

0:16:20.120 --> 0:16:23.960
<v Speaker 1>change their duel um, their inflation and employment mandate, but

0:16:23.960 --> 0:16:26.320
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't mean the scope over which they observe that

0:16:26.440 --> 0:16:28.720
<v Speaker 1>is going to change. And this is why, yes, we

0:16:28.760 --> 0:16:30.760
<v Speaker 1>can kind of talk about the three basis points in

0:16:30.800 --> 0:16:32.960
<v Speaker 1>the tenure, and we can talk about way at average maturity,

0:16:33.280 --> 0:16:35.440
<v Speaker 1>but look at the dot plot. Look at what they're

0:16:35.440 --> 0:16:37.960
<v Speaker 1>telling us an average inflation targeting. The set is not

0:16:38.080 --> 0:16:42.000
<v Speaker 1>lifting off until at least five and the rest of

0:16:42.000 --> 0:16:44.440
<v Speaker 1>it is really kind of coming down to tactical trading

0:16:44.480 --> 0:16:46.600
<v Speaker 1>and not the main messaging that they're trying to get across.

0:16:46.920 --> 0:16:49.600
<v Speaker 1>And I really hope that at two thirty Powell just

0:16:49.720 --> 0:16:51.960
<v Speaker 1>pounds that down to the table and reminds us we

0:16:52.000 --> 0:16:54.680
<v Speaker 1>are not thinking about thinking about raising indust rates because

0:16:54.680 --> 0:16:57.080
<v Speaker 1>we use the word like that today. Steve, want to

0:16:57.120 --> 0:16:58.720
<v Speaker 1>bring you back in here and then just talk more

0:16:58.720 --> 0:17:01.920
<v Speaker 1>about these interest rates POTENTI staying at near zero rates

0:17:01.960 --> 0:17:04.560
<v Speaker 1>until what are the long term implications of that? I

0:17:04.640 --> 0:17:07.199
<v Speaker 1>mean beyond financial markets. We look what's happening in the

0:17:07.200 --> 0:17:10.320
<v Speaker 1>real estate industry, because mortgage rates are just at rock

0:17:10.480 --> 0:17:14.840
<v Speaker 1>bottom right now and demand is pushing prices higher throughout

0:17:14.920 --> 0:17:17.960
<v Speaker 1>the country. Despite this week, Economy give us an idea

0:17:18.000 --> 0:17:22.520
<v Speaker 1>of long term implications of low interest rates. Well over time,

0:17:22.600 --> 0:17:27.960
<v Speaker 1>you can get um disruption in in fixed income and

0:17:28.040 --> 0:17:33.600
<v Speaker 1>borrowing markets when when rates stay too low, too long. Uh,

0:17:33.800 --> 0:17:37.320
<v Speaker 1>But it seems like they're willing to take that chance

0:17:37.320 --> 0:17:42.160
<v Speaker 1>and run that experiment. Both Janet Yellen and j Powella

0:17:42.840 --> 0:17:47.159
<v Speaker 1>have have spoken often about the need and the fact

0:17:47.200 --> 0:17:52.320
<v Speaker 1>that the lower income groups and disadvantaged labor groups only

0:17:52.359 --> 0:17:55.720
<v Speaker 1>benefit at the UH in the final stages of the

0:17:55.760 --> 0:18:00.560
<v Speaker 1>economic growth cycle, and so they are going to the

0:18:00.600 --> 0:18:03.920
<v Speaker 1>economy run a little bit hot and inflation be a

0:18:03.960 --> 0:18:06.440
<v Speaker 1>little bit on the high side to get out there,

0:18:07.400 --> 0:18:10.679
<v Speaker 1>and whether that means that they have to apply the

0:18:10.720 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 1>brake pedal all that much more firmly if if inflation

0:18:15.800 --> 0:18:21.400
<v Speaker 1>should accelerate, that might be the case. Um it it's

0:18:21.440 --> 0:18:26.000
<v Speaker 1>it's not helpful to longer equilibrium in in free markets. UH.

0:18:26.359 --> 0:18:29.040
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think that that's their focus right now.

0:18:29.400 --> 0:18:32.359
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's interesting. Real focus is the K the

0:18:32.440 --> 0:18:37.720
<v Speaker 1>case shape recovery and UH and doing something to benefit

0:18:38.080 --> 0:18:40.639
<v Speaker 1>those that are on the bottom length of that K

0:18:41.400 --> 0:18:44.399
<v Speaker 1>Muhammada area and tweeting out over PIMCO and he's saying

0:18:44.680 --> 0:18:48.080
<v Speaker 1>he highlighted a certain segment of a chair pals upcoming

0:18:48.240 --> 0:18:51.240
<v Speaker 1>press conference and or from the FED statement, I should say,

0:18:51.280 --> 0:18:53.320
<v Speaker 1>and he says that this should be talked about at

0:18:53.320 --> 0:18:55.840
<v Speaker 1>the press conference, but he said, in addition, the Fed

0:18:55.920 --> 0:18:57.919
<v Speaker 1>this is this is a statement from the FED. In addition,

0:18:57.960 --> 0:19:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the FED will continue to increase its holdings of treasure

0:19:00.119 --> 0:19:03.119
<v Speaker 1>securities by at least eighty billion dollars per month and

0:19:03.160 --> 0:19:06.320
<v Speaker 1>of agency mortgage back securities by at least forty billion

0:19:06.359 --> 0:19:09.520
<v Speaker 1>per month until substantial further progress has been made towards

0:19:09.760 --> 0:19:12.640
<v Speaker 1>the Committee's maximum employment and price stability goals. I mean,

0:19:13.040 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 1>so he's saying, you know, he'll be he'll be asked

0:19:15.560 --> 0:19:17.679
<v Speaker 1>a lot more about that UM and I guess some

0:19:17.760 --> 0:19:21.119
<v Speaker 1>more details about that. I mean, I don't know, for insis,

0:19:21.119 --> 0:19:23.639
<v Speaker 1>we talked about this before. I mean, there isn't a

0:19:23.680 --> 0:19:27.479
<v Speaker 1>lot more that the FED can do, especially when it

0:19:27.520 --> 0:19:30.600
<v Speaker 1>comes to you know, they're about lending, they're not about spending.

0:19:30.640 --> 0:19:33.480
<v Speaker 1>That's where Congress comes in. And I do wonder what

0:19:33.560 --> 0:19:35.200
<v Speaker 1>he will say or what we need him to say

0:19:35.200 --> 0:19:37.679
<v Speaker 1>at the press conference when it comes to that next

0:19:37.800 --> 0:19:40.639
<v Speaker 1>round of federal aid and federal stimulus that seems to

0:19:40.680 --> 0:19:44.800
<v Speaker 1>be making progress, but men, it's taking forever now, you know.

0:19:44.840 --> 0:19:47.240
<v Speaker 1>I think he'll push back against the idea that the

0:19:47.520 --> 0:19:50.640
<v Speaker 1>FED can't do anything else. They can latten this curve

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:53.720
<v Speaker 1>pretty aggressively, and they can make sure that the so

0:19:53.880 --> 0:19:59.280
<v Speaker 1>called inflation scare that's coming through doesn't maturely list rate prematurely,

0:19:59.400 --> 0:20:02.040
<v Speaker 1>particularly in the period where we're heading into weakness. But

0:20:02.080 --> 0:20:03.960
<v Speaker 1>I think one of the things Central Makes are gonna

0:20:04.040 --> 0:20:05.840
<v Speaker 1>have to push back on in the next year or

0:20:05.840 --> 0:20:08.560
<v Speaker 1>so is really, you know, trying to push back against

0:20:08.560 --> 0:20:11.840
<v Speaker 1>the idea that they're even thinking about normalizing. The DTV

0:20:12.320 --> 0:20:14.680
<v Speaker 1>just suddenly brings up the concept of a roll off.

0:20:14.760 --> 0:20:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Nobody was asking them about that. They just volunteered that information.

0:20:17.760 --> 0:20:21.080
<v Speaker 1>It's like those means that go like nobody, absolutely nobody, Hey,

0:20:21.119 --> 0:20:23.480
<v Speaker 1>you want to hear about our roll offs pens. These

0:20:23.520 --> 0:20:25.919
<v Speaker 1>are not really what we need to be hearing. What

0:20:26.000 --> 0:20:27.959
<v Speaker 1>we need to be hearing is we're boring. We're not

0:20:28.000 --> 0:20:31.240
<v Speaker 1>doing anything will be more needed. We're not even thinking

0:20:31.240 --> 0:20:33.520
<v Speaker 1>about what an exit plan looks like. We need that.

0:20:33.600 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 1>We just need that for three six more months. That's

0:20:35.840 --> 0:20:38.000
<v Speaker 1>all I need, just three six more months. Then we

0:20:38.000 --> 0:20:41.200
<v Speaker 1>can talk about roll offs. Going into a period that's very,

0:20:41.320 --> 0:20:43.119
<v Speaker 1>very weak and we have to prepare for it. We

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:45.359
<v Speaker 1>have to be relaxed and not reactive. Well, it's a

0:20:45.440 --> 0:20:48.000
<v Speaker 1>year where we talked you know so much about deliberate actions,

0:20:48.000 --> 0:20:50.199
<v Speaker 1>whether it you know of all that ails us right,

0:20:50.240 --> 0:20:52.800
<v Speaker 1>it needs to be and it sounds like you know, Francis,

0:20:52.800 --> 0:20:54.199
<v Speaker 1>that's what you're saying, Steve. Do you agree that the

0:20:54.200 --> 0:20:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Fed needs to be incredibly deliberate right here about and

0:20:57.880 --> 0:21:02.320
<v Speaker 1>make sure it's message is very clear? Oh? Absolutely, because

0:21:03.720 --> 0:21:08.280
<v Speaker 1>they can markets can be confused, especially as Frances says,

0:21:08.320 --> 0:21:10.000
<v Speaker 1>when you look at what the the e c B

0:21:10.200 --> 0:21:14.679
<v Speaker 1>just sort of uh, let let drop out there. The

0:21:14.760 --> 0:21:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Ft has been adamant about that, and I think that

0:21:18.160 --> 0:21:21.679
<v Speaker 1>the Chairman Powell will will reiterate that just so there's

0:21:22.080 --> 0:21:25.600
<v Speaker 1>absolutely no confusion that they're thinking about doing anything in

0:21:25.720 --> 0:21:31.640
<v Speaker 1>terms of raising rates or or or dampening down there

0:21:32.640 --> 0:21:39.920
<v Speaker 1>um quantitative easing until well well into or beyond even

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:43.280
<v Speaker 1>the end of tree, depending on where labor markets and

0:21:43.280 --> 0:21:46.320
<v Speaker 1>inviceing are at that point in time. I don't think

0:21:46.320 --> 0:21:49.159
<v Speaker 1>we'll hear about it today because these are are primarily

0:21:49.200 --> 0:21:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the biggest issues. But there there's also an opportunity if

0:21:55.560 --> 0:21:57.560
<v Speaker 1>if in the new Congress, and depending on what that

0:21:57.640 --> 0:22:01.160
<v Speaker 1>composition looks like, if if there's not an opportunity too

0:22:01.920 --> 0:22:06.360
<v Speaker 1>to obtain the sort of fiscal stimulus that the incoming

0:22:06.440 --> 0:22:10.960
<v Speaker 1>by the administration thinks that it needs of the yell

0:22:11.040 --> 0:22:14.840
<v Speaker 1>and power combination of figuring out how the Fed can

0:22:15.280 --> 0:22:21.960
<v Speaker 1>can provide fiscal like monetary stimulus in one to to

0:22:22.040 --> 0:22:26.160
<v Speaker 1>get that additional boost that they may decide they need

0:22:26.160 --> 0:22:28.720
<v Speaker 1>to have. Steve we we talked a lot about the

0:22:28.720 --> 0:22:31.600
<v Speaker 1>fetch her, of course being very deliberate with his language

0:22:31.600 --> 0:22:35.480
<v Speaker 1>and deliberate in those statements. But what could he say

0:22:35.520 --> 0:22:43.000
<v Speaker 1>today that could move markets? Well, I think if he walked,

0:22:43.840 --> 0:22:49.320
<v Speaker 1>if he waffles at all on their the interest rate outlook.

0:22:49.560 --> 0:22:52.360
<v Speaker 1>So it's more of a question what he doesn't say. Yes,

0:22:52.400 --> 0:22:55.320
<v Speaker 1>it's more a question of what he doesn't say. The

0:22:55.560 --> 0:22:58.159
<v Speaker 1>statement that they came out with was very clear. You know,

0:22:58.160 --> 0:23:00.760
<v Speaker 1>there's been a lot of hope and expect Mason that

0:23:00.880 --> 0:23:06.879
<v Speaker 1>they would say something about extending duration, uh increasing the

0:23:06.920 --> 0:23:12.639
<v Speaker 1>treasury bond buying at the expense of mortgage backed security

0:23:12.680 --> 0:23:17.119
<v Speaker 1>bond buying, and they avoided all of that. Um I

0:23:17.160 --> 0:23:21.280
<v Speaker 1>think because it's not needed, it's untimely, it clouds the issue,

0:23:21.840 --> 0:23:25.240
<v Speaker 1>and it gives the market's a better opportunity to to

0:23:25.400 --> 0:23:28.360
<v Speaker 1>misread what they're trying to say. So so so they

0:23:28.440 --> 0:23:32.080
<v Speaker 1>they are at a very narrow lane in uh what

0:23:32.119 --> 0:23:35.159
<v Speaker 1>they've put in their press release. Uh. I guess is

0:23:35.240 --> 0:23:39.520
<v Speaker 1>that Charmin Powell will will stay in that lane and

0:23:39.640 --> 0:23:42.760
<v Speaker 1>be deliberate about reiterating the points that they made in

0:23:42.800 --> 0:23:45.800
<v Speaker 1>the press conference. Got it, francis saving you thirty seconds.

0:23:45.880 --> 0:23:50.639
<v Speaker 1>Final thoughts here, Paul got a lean back against some

0:23:50.720 --> 0:23:54.080
<v Speaker 1>of this hawkishness after this statement. I'm very nervous about

0:23:54.080 --> 0:23:56.720
<v Speaker 1>this press conference. It will come down to communication. I

0:23:56.760 --> 0:23:59.080
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be surprised you can make an argument that we

0:23:59.200 --> 0:24:01.240
<v Speaker 1>see rape to one percent at the end of the

0:24:01.440 --> 0:24:04.400
<v Speaker 1>press conference or their back down five basis points. It's

0:24:04.400 --> 0:24:06.320
<v Speaker 1>been a long time since you head into a press

0:24:06.359 --> 0:24:09.359
<v Speaker 1>conference who have been so nervous and the range of

0:24:09.359 --> 0:24:12.920
<v Speaker 1>outcome so wide. Yeah, exactly, all right, Gonna leave it there.

0:24:13.000 --> 0:24:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Thank you both. Francis Donald, chi's global chief Economist, head

0:24:15.920 --> 0:24:19.679
<v Speaker 1>of Macroeconomic Strategy and Manual Life Investment Management on the

0:24:19.720 --> 0:24:23.000
<v Speaker 1>phone from Toronto, and of course Steve Skanky, chief economic

0:24:23.040 --> 0:24:25.960
<v Speaker 1>advisor at Keel Point, former US Treasury and White House

0:24:26.000 --> 0:24:29.720
<v Speaker 1>National Security Council staff member. This is Bloomberg Business Week

0:24:29.880 --> 0:24:33.160
<v Speaker 1>with Carol Masser from Bloomberg Radio, and you are listening

0:24:33.200 --> 0:24:35.879
<v Speaker 1>to Bloomberg Business Week on this FED Wednesday Carol Masser

0:24:35.880 --> 0:24:39.720
<v Speaker 1>along with Tim Stanovic of Bloomberg quicktake and as expected,

0:24:40.080 --> 0:24:42.320
<v Speaker 1>leaving rates unchanged. But we did hear a lot from

0:24:42.640 --> 0:24:47.440
<v Speaker 1>FED Chief J Powell, certainly as Charlie highlighted there about expectations,

0:24:47.480 --> 0:24:49.800
<v Speaker 1>hopes if you will, for fiscal stimulus, something that is

0:24:49.800 --> 0:24:54.120
<v Speaker 1>still winding its way slowly through Congress, and we'll see

0:24:54.200 --> 0:24:57.120
<v Speaker 1>fultimately we get something, Tim before the end of the year. Slowly,

0:24:57.280 --> 0:25:01.040
<v Speaker 1>is right, We're counting down the days until something needs

0:25:01.040 --> 0:25:03.680
<v Speaker 1>to happen. Yeah, exactly right, And there's not much left

0:25:03.720 --> 0:25:06.800
<v Speaker 1>here in Hey, let's see what um our round table

0:25:06.840 --> 0:25:09.399
<v Speaker 1>has to say about this FED decision and really that

0:25:09.520 --> 0:25:12.520
<v Speaker 1>FED press conference with j Palasti Blitz back with US

0:25:12.560 --> 0:25:15.600
<v Speaker 1>chief US economist at T S. Lombard. Lombard, excuse me

0:25:15.680 --> 0:25:18.359
<v Speaker 1>on the phone in New York City. Also Bloomberg Economics

0:25:18.560 --> 0:25:22.119
<v Speaker 1>senior US economist Elana Shaleva. She's on the phone in

0:25:22.400 --> 0:25:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Long Island. Elena, let me start with you briefly. I

0:25:25.080 --> 0:25:27.800
<v Speaker 1>want to get from both of you, UM the highlights

0:25:28.400 --> 0:25:30.840
<v Speaker 1>in the press conference, things that you think investors are

0:25:30.840 --> 0:25:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg audience really need to take note of absolutely. I

0:25:34.640 --> 0:25:37.719
<v Speaker 1>think what was very interesting from the press conferences that

0:25:37.920 --> 0:25:42.639
<v Speaker 1>check Powell dismissed any expectations for a need term change

0:25:42.640 --> 0:25:46.560
<v Speaker 1>in the piece or the composition of as it touchased it. Uh.

0:25:46.600 --> 0:25:50.400
<v Speaker 1>He noted that financial conditions are appropriate for now, and

0:25:50.440 --> 0:25:55.720
<v Speaker 1>the FED is providing enough accommodation, uh, substantial accommodation, So

0:25:56.280 --> 0:26:01.280
<v Speaker 1>shifting towards Bloomber term maturities by simultaneous reducing the pace

0:26:01.359 --> 0:26:05.800
<v Speaker 1>of purchases something that was like hinted in the latest

0:26:05.840 --> 0:26:10.760
<v Speaker 1>affiency minutes. Uh, it's not high on our list of priorities,

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:14.280
<v Speaker 1>he said. So. I think what it was very interesting

0:26:14.560 --> 0:26:19.400
<v Speaker 1>uh in the whole uh effiency community was that they

0:26:19.480 --> 0:26:24.560
<v Speaker 1>did not hint at any more aggressive case of purchases

0:26:25.000 --> 0:26:31.000
<v Speaker 1>going forward. They did actually refined its communications um in

0:26:31.119 --> 0:26:34.720
<v Speaker 1>terms of what to expect in terms of purchases going forward,

0:26:34.800 --> 0:26:38.800
<v Speaker 1>but they were not aggressively saying that they will increase

0:26:39.040 --> 0:26:41.119
<v Speaker 1>the piece. In the daed to Steve, I want to

0:26:41.160 --> 0:26:45.840
<v Speaker 1>bring you into the conversation, chief chief US economist at T. S. Lombard. Um. Look,

0:26:45.880 --> 0:26:47.320
<v Speaker 1>I had a chance to look at your note and

0:26:47.440 --> 0:26:50.840
<v Speaker 1>your reaction right at two o'clock. You said not very interesting.

0:26:50.960 --> 0:26:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Nothing very interesting in the f O m C statement.

0:26:52.880 --> 0:26:55.320
<v Speaker 1>What about when it comes to fed your palace press conference,

0:26:55.800 --> 0:26:58.240
<v Speaker 1>any more color or anything else that you found anything

0:26:58.240 --> 0:27:02.520
<v Speaker 1>in there that you actually found interesting surprising? Well, yes

0:27:02.560 --> 0:27:04.600
<v Speaker 1>and no. I think first of all, I think he

0:27:04.720 --> 0:27:09.080
<v Speaker 1>basically waved again the white flag and said, look, near term,

0:27:09.200 --> 0:27:12.080
<v Speaker 1>over the next four or five months, you know, the

0:27:12.119 --> 0:27:16.920
<v Speaker 1>bridge to you know, the vaccinated world, and the ability

0:27:16.960 --> 0:27:20.000
<v Speaker 1>for the economy to get there and hold and whole

0:27:20.200 --> 0:27:24.239
<v Speaker 1>rests with fiscal policy, not monetary policy. That you know,

0:27:24.640 --> 0:27:28.199
<v Speaker 1>what's suffering is not interest rate sensitive, and therefore for

0:27:28.240 --> 0:27:31.000
<v Speaker 1>them to do anything more isn't going to help. I mean,

0:27:31.000 --> 0:27:33.639
<v Speaker 1>reading the reading between the lines here, that's a message

0:27:33.680 --> 0:27:36.520
<v Speaker 1>to Congress and to lawmakers that's like, hey, get something

0:27:36.560 --> 0:27:39.720
<v Speaker 1>done now. I think it's a sledge em and not

0:27:40.040 --> 0:27:44.040
<v Speaker 1>between the lines. But the other part of his message, though,

0:27:44.160 --> 0:27:46.840
<v Speaker 1>I think, as long as we're talking after your audience

0:27:46.920 --> 0:27:52.320
<v Speaker 1>are market participants, is this they're also making the bet

0:27:53.359 --> 0:27:58.440
<v Speaker 1>that when the recovery occurs, it's going to be another

0:27:58.640 --> 0:28:02.920
<v Speaker 1>extended growth low in station environment. I thought that was

0:28:02.960 --> 0:28:05.760
<v Speaker 1>really interesting, Steve. I thought that was really interesting that

0:28:05.840 --> 0:28:09.040
<v Speaker 1>he even actually put that out there. Yeah, And so

0:28:09.119 --> 0:28:13.080
<v Speaker 1>the question is, as a market participant, do you believe

0:28:13.359 --> 0:28:15.840
<v Speaker 1>that the next cycle is going to have the same

0:28:16.200 --> 0:28:19.680
<v Speaker 1>dynamic as the last one. I would argue the answer

0:28:19.760 --> 0:28:23.040
<v Speaker 1>is no, and that their timeline of when they're actually

0:28:23.080 --> 0:28:25.920
<v Speaker 1>going to begin to react is a lot shorter than

0:28:25.960 --> 0:28:29.480
<v Speaker 1>what they're laying out there. Um. But of course there's

0:28:29.480 --> 0:28:31.399
<v Speaker 1>no way for them right now. There's no way for

0:28:31.760 --> 0:28:34.280
<v Speaker 1>right now that they would alter that because it would

0:28:34.320 --> 0:28:39.360
<v Speaker 1>be counterproductive to their their messaging. So I understand that.

0:28:39.400 --> 0:28:42.760
<v Speaker 1>But as a market participant, are you going to bet

0:28:42.800 --> 0:28:45.440
<v Speaker 1>with that forward curve or you're gonna bet against that?

0:28:45.680 --> 0:28:47.960
<v Speaker 1>And I think it makes more sense to bet against

0:28:47.960 --> 0:28:50.240
<v Speaker 1>it that the economy is gonna end up being stronger

0:28:50.840 --> 0:28:55.040
<v Speaker 1>and so they're gonna gonna have to react. Well, Helena,

0:28:55.160 --> 0:28:57.280
<v Speaker 1>this is kind of your world too, in terms of

0:28:57.280 --> 0:28:59.760
<v Speaker 1>watching the economy. I mean, could we be setting this

0:29:00.040 --> 0:29:04.560
<v Speaker 1>age for another kind of very long protracted, you know,

0:29:04.680 --> 0:29:08.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of slow growth, low inflation economy, which is one

0:29:08.080 --> 0:29:12.640
<v Speaker 1>that we know market investors just love, certainly equity investors. Well,

0:29:12.840 --> 0:29:16.120
<v Speaker 1>I think I totally agree with that. And I think

0:29:16.800 --> 0:29:21.640
<v Speaker 1>despite some you know, expected rebound probably in the second

0:29:21.640 --> 0:29:24.800
<v Speaker 1>half of this year, it will take time for the

0:29:24.920 --> 0:29:29.520
<v Speaker 1>labor market to uh get fixed. So look at what

0:29:29.760 --> 0:29:33.160
<v Speaker 1>has happened already. You know, yes, there was a quick

0:29:33.240 --> 0:29:38.160
<v Speaker 1>rebound in economic growth, but lest over rebound in the

0:29:38.240 --> 0:29:40.880
<v Speaker 1>label market, and that's what we are facing going into

0:29:40.960 --> 0:29:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the next year. I think in terms of inflation, that

0:29:44.160 --> 0:29:48.200
<v Speaker 1>was very interesting as well. I think the you know,

0:29:48.280 --> 0:29:53.160
<v Speaker 1>the changes to the summer economic projections reflecting stronger growth,

0:29:53.920 --> 0:29:59.080
<v Speaker 1>lower unemployment rate, but no substantial changes to inflation projections

0:29:59.120 --> 0:30:03.200
<v Speaker 1>actually highl that the set is not expecting much of

0:30:04.120 --> 0:30:08.440
<v Speaker 1>higher inflation going forward. So that tells me that they're

0:30:08.480 --> 0:30:12.400
<v Speaker 1>not that optimistic with respect to developments in the label

0:30:12.440 --> 0:30:15.720
<v Speaker 1>market going forward. Lena, what would have to happen for

0:30:15.800 --> 0:30:22.520
<v Speaker 1>the Fed to raise interest rates? Oh my god, that's

0:30:22.560 --> 0:30:26.880
<v Speaker 1>the one. We are not expecting interest rates until by

0:30:26.920 --> 0:30:29.479
<v Speaker 1>the way, So so even further than the Fed the

0:30:29.480 --> 0:30:33.600
<v Speaker 1>FED set today, Yes, but you know, the consensus is

0:30:33.640 --> 0:30:38.880
<v Speaker 1>still pretty uh you know, in line with no interest

0:30:38.960 --> 0:30:43.680
<v Speaker 1>rates increases. Just a few of participants are expecting those.

0:30:43.720 --> 0:30:47.480
<v Speaker 1>But I think we need to see that the output

0:30:47.560 --> 0:30:51.560
<v Speaker 1>that gap to close, and we will need to see

0:30:51.600 --> 0:30:56.880
<v Speaker 1>inflation expectations picking up substantially. That will not happen without

0:30:57.640 --> 0:31:03.880
<v Speaker 1>substantial and sustainable will increase in the prices going forward.

0:31:03.960 --> 0:31:07.880
<v Speaker 1>So I think we are ways away from the first

0:31:08.120 --> 0:31:10.400
<v Speaker 1>race in Greason. By the way, we did not expect

0:31:10.840 --> 0:31:16.000
<v Speaker 1>a tapering of asset purchases until but listen, Tim brings

0:31:16.080 --> 0:31:18.040
<v Speaker 1>up a good point, and you know, I do understand.

0:31:18.120 --> 0:31:20.720
<v Speaker 1>What's is there's something out there, an outlier that we

0:31:20.800 --> 0:31:24.080
<v Speaker 1>could miss, you know, or that you're thinking about significantly.

0:31:24.120 --> 0:31:25.960
<v Speaker 1>It sounds like you're a little bit more tempered, but

0:31:26.160 --> 0:31:29.280
<v Speaker 1>something significantly on the downside or significantly on the upside.

0:31:29.320 --> 0:31:32.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we are living in unusual times this year

0:31:32.640 --> 0:31:34.720
<v Speaker 1>certainly where we saw, you know, a drop off like

0:31:34.760 --> 0:31:36.600
<v Speaker 1>no other in the economy and a bounce back like

0:31:36.640 --> 0:31:38.520
<v Speaker 1>no other in the economy. And we know the way

0:31:38.840 --> 0:31:41.680
<v Speaker 1>back is usually tip, you know, much much more difficult.

0:31:41.960 --> 0:31:44.000
<v Speaker 1>But is there something out there, an outlier when you

0:31:44.000 --> 0:31:46.480
<v Speaker 1>get your team together and you're like, don't forget, this

0:31:46.560 --> 0:31:50.480
<v Speaker 1>is still got to be on your radar the label market.

0:31:50.720 --> 0:31:54.360
<v Speaker 1>I think if we see a significant improvement in a

0:31:54.920 --> 0:32:00.520
<v Speaker 1>jobless rate as well as a significant improvements a patient,

0:32:00.720 --> 0:32:05.320
<v Speaker 1>that will uh you know, result in significant growth in

0:32:05.720 --> 0:32:10.280
<v Speaker 1>our personal income and consumer spending, like way better than

0:32:11.080 --> 0:32:14.800
<v Speaker 1>the market and the economy's expectations, that could incur some

0:32:14.960 --> 0:32:21.080
<v Speaker 1>high inflation Quaker. So that's something to watch for you. Yeah.

0:32:21.160 --> 0:32:24.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that the key thing here is that, first

0:32:24.360 --> 0:32:27.640
<v Speaker 1>of all, it's not your typical recession because it's been

0:32:28.080 --> 0:32:32.480
<v Speaker 1>it's been in effect falsely created, and it falsely created

0:32:32.480 --> 0:32:34.920
<v Speaker 1>in the sense that we asked a big part of

0:32:34.960 --> 0:32:37.960
<v Speaker 1>the economy to shut down, and that part of the

0:32:38.000 --> 0:32:42.680
<v Speaker 1>economy eventually reopens. What if you look at the last

0:32:42.760 --> 0:32:51.080
<v Speaker 1>ten years with Howell's essentially expecting is for a similar

0:32:52.120 --> 0:32:55.240
<v Speaker 1>pattern of growth, namely a lot of high end growth

0:32:55.280 --> 0:32:58.280
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of low end growth in the labor market.

0:32:58.960 --> 0:33:03.479
<v Speaker 1>If instead head because of COVID and everybody wanted to

0:33:03.520 --> 0:33:07.920
<v Speaker 1>move someplace else, you get more and and reshoring of

0:33:08.000 --> 0:33:14.920
<v Speaker 1>economic activity. You get higher um construction employment, higher manufacturing employment,

0:33:15.040 --> 0:33:19.680
<v Speaker 1>higher office administration employment. It's not gonna matter in one,

0:33:19.720 --> 0:33:21.640
<v Speaker 1>but because then you can see a lot of the

0:33:21.680 --> 0:33:24.800
<v Speaker 1>lower wage workers coming back as restaurant if it comes

0:33:24.840 --> 0:33:28.920
<v Speaker 1>back to online. But in two you're gonna see the

0:33:29.040 --> 0:33:32.280
<v Speaker 1>return of a much higher level of average hourly earning

0:33:32.320 --> 0:33:35.560
<v Speaker 1>growth and relative to the unemployment rate than what we

0:33:35.720 --> 0:33:39.120
<v Speaker 1>saw in the last recovery and to set all of

0:33:39.160 --> 0:33:42.080
<v Speaker 1>a sudden is going to be looking at a from

0:33:42.160 --> 0:33:45.200
<v Speaker 1>their perspective, not mine, but from their perspective, a return

0:33:45.200 --> 0:33:47.880
<v Speaker 1>of the Philip skirt. And so I think that at

0:33:47.880 --> 0:33:51.040
<v Speaker 1>the very end of two. First of all, I think

0:33:51.040 --> 0:33:54.280
<v Speaker 1>at the end of one they taper, if not in

0:33:54.520 --> 0:33:58.640
<v Speaker 1>the asset purchases, and by the end of two get

0:33:58.680 --> 0:34:01.400
<v Speaker 1>your first little ink in the funds rate. All right,

0:34:01.400 --> 0:34:03.320
<v Speaker 1>we gotta leave it there. Hey, guys, thank you so much.

0:34:03.360 --> 0:34:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Have a good holiday. Steve and Elena YouTube. If we

0:34:06.120 --> 0:34:07.920
<v Speaker 1>don't catch you before the new year, though I'm guessing

0:34:07.960 --> 0:34:11.120
<v Speaker 1>we probably will. Steve bletch chie you chief US economist

0:34:11.160 --> 0:34:14.560
<v Speaker 1>at T S. Lombard and Bloomberg Economics. Senior US economist Lena,

0:34:14.640 --> 0:34:21.799
<v Speaker 1>she'll like you, I brom journal. Yeah, but you let

0:34:21.880 --> 0:34:26.719
<v Speaker 1>me drive? No, no, no, dr home honey please, I'll

0:34:26.719 --> 0:34:32.759
<v Speaker 1>do the riding. Drivels me. I want to drive, Just

0:34:32.920 --> 0:34:45.760
<v Speaker 1>drive baby, good questions trying. Yeah, this is the drive

0:34:45.840 --> 0:34:49.759
<v Speaker 1>to the Globe Commune. Thanks, we'll drive us down on

0:34:49.880 --> 0:34:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. Yeah, let's get right to it. Time for

0:34:52.400 --> 0:34:54.319
<v Speaker 1>the drive to the clothes Ready wants back with us

0:34:54.360 --> 0:34:57.640
<v Speaker 1>chief investments stragist at O'Neil Global Advisors. He's with us

0:34:57.640 --> 0:34:59.840
<v Speaker 1>once again on the phone in Miami. Randy, good to

0:35:00.000 --> 0:35:03.080
<v Speaker 1>have you here with Tim and myself. Um, I hope

0:35:03.080 --> 0:35:05.239
<v Speaker 1>you're doing well, and I feel like there's so much

0:35:05.280 --> 0:35:08.760
<v Speaker 1>to talk about, So where so we begin. I'm curious

0:35:08.800 --> 0:35:11.799
<v Speaker 1>the Fed, the meeting today, anything that you think is

0:35:11.840 --> 0:35:15.359
<v Speaker 1>just really standing out for you and I think that well,

0:35:15.360 --> 0:35:17.399
<v Speaker 1>first of all, thanks for having me back. I'll try

0:35:17.440 --> 0:35:19.239
<v Speaker 1>to make it quick so you guys get get out

0:35:19.239 --> 0:35:22.560
<v Speaker 1>of there before the snow really starts in New York. Uh.

0:35:22.560 --> 0:35:24.840
<v Speaker 1>With with regard to the Fed, you know, I really

0:35:24.840 --> 0:35:26.719
<v Speaker 1>think there were a couple of things. The first is

0:35:26.760 --> 0:35:29.319
<v Speaker 1>that they're committed to continuing the bond buying. I'm sure

0:35:29.320 --> 0:35:31.280
<v Speaker 1>you've talked about some of this on the show already.

0:35:31.719 --> 0:35:34.880
<v Speaker 1>They said they'll increase asset purchases at the economy slows.

0:35:35.360 --> 0:35:38.279
<v Speaker 1>So what the bulls wanted to hear today they got right.

0:35:38.360 --> 0:35:41.080
<v Speaker 1>The Fed is committed. They're gonna keep buying bonds and

0:35:41.080 --> 0:35:43.120
<v Speaker 1>they're going to do more if they need to. The

0:35:43.160 --> 0:35:46.439
<v Speaker 1>balance sheets at seven point three trillion that doesn't seem

0:35:46.480 --> 0:35:48.399
<v Speaker 1>to bother them. They're willing to a low to keep going.

0:35:49.360 --> 0:35:51.480
<v Speaker 1>What's the market expecting from Congress right now, because we know,

0:35:51.520 --> 0:35:53.640
<v Speaker 1>and we just heard from Mitch McConnell sign a majority

0:35:53.719 --> 0:35:57.279
<v Speaker 1>leader that they're close but not yet. I mean they

0:35:57.280 --> 0:35:59.960
<v Speaker 1>expect this, you know, nine billion dollar bill they expect

0:36:00.440 --> 0:36:02.200
<v Speaker 1>before the end of the year. They would like to

0:36:02.200 --> 0:36:05.640
<v Speaker 1>see some relief for small business. I think the current

0:36:05.760 --> 0:36:09.000
<v Speaker 1>version does include direct payments to consumers. I think that's needed.

0:36:09.320 --> 0:36:12.680
<v Speaker 1>I think again, as I've said before, the number one

0:36:12.960 --> 0:36:15.680
<v Speaker 1>thing that is not focused on enough is the damage

0:36:15.680 --> 0:36:17.440
<v Speaker 1>being done to small business. And you can see that,

0:36:17.520 --> 0:36:21.120
<v Speaker 1>particularly in Manhattan, where so many small businesses and restaurants

0:36:21.160 --> 0:36:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and bars are going out of business. Yeah, it's just devastating.

0:36:23.520 --> 0:36:25.319
<v Speaker 1>It kind of breaks my heart. Anytime I'm kind of

0:36:25.360 --> 0:36:27.640
<v Speaker 1>going through New York, it's just one boarded up or

0:36:27.719 --> 0:36:32.600
<v Speaker 1>closed um retail front after another, restaurants in particular Randy.

0:36:32.719 --> 0:36:34.759
<v Speaker 1>One thing that really stood out for Tim and me

0:36:34.920 --> 0:36:36.840
<v Speaker 1>today in listening to the FED chairman was what do

0:36:36.880 --> 0:36:38.920
<v Speaker 1>you have to say about climate change? And I love

0:36:39.040 --> 0:36:41.839
<v Speaker 1>you just put out an article UM at the end

0:36:41.840 --> 0:36:43.959
<v Speaker 1>of November and Forbes how to invest in the coming

0:36:43.960 --> 0:36:47.120
<v Speaker 1>alternative energy boom. I think that there is and many

0:36:47.120 --> 0:36:48.840
<v Speaker 1>people are thinking about this that we are at this

0:36:49.080 --> 0:36:51.719
<v Speaker 1>interesting critical time where there's a lot of money being

0:36:51.719 --> 0:36:55.239
<v Speaker 1>spent by global governments to kick start the global economies,

0:36:55.520 --> 0:36:59.280
<v Speaker 1>and that we can do it in a thoughtful, deliberate, environmentally,

0:37:00.000 --> 0:37:03.160
<v Speaker 1>a conscious way. And I'm just curious how you see it.

0:37:04.480 --> 0:37:07.040
<v Speaker 1>I'd say three things. First, I feel like clean energy,

0:37:07.120 --> 0:37:10.040
<v Speaker 1>like I mentioned in the article, it's like biotechnology and

0:37:12.680 --> 0:37:16.160
<v Speaker 1>biotechnology really got going Amgen had those two major drugs

0:37:16.160 --> 0:37:18.600
<v Speaker 1>in the whole sector took off. I think you're looking

0:37:18.600 --> 0:37:21.920
<v Speaker 1>at a thirty year cycle here for clean energy. If

0:37:21.960 --> 0:37:25.000
<v Speaker 1>you look at both the Biden administration and the European

0:37:25.000 --> 0:37:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Commission overseas, both of them want to get their respective

0:37:28.239 --> 0:37:32.680
<v Speaker 1>economies to basically carbon neutral by So if that's going

0:37:32.719 --> 0:37:35.400
<v Speaker 1>to happen, that's an awful lot of spending. The Biden

0:37:35.440 --> 0:37:39.880
<v Speaker 1>administration wants to spend four hundred billion initially over ten years.

0:37:40.400 --> 0:37:42.680
<v Speaker 1>In Europe it's even bigger. They want to spend a

0:37:42.719 --> 0:37:45.880
<v Speaker 1>trillion euros over ten years. So there's gonna be a

0:37:45.880 --> 0:37:48.359
<v Speaker 1>ton of spending. And then the third point is that

0:37:48.680 --> 0:37:51.440
<v Speaker 1>if you look at new builds, so brand new builds

0:37:51.440 --> 0:37:56.040
<v Speaker 1>for power generation, solar and wind are now actually cost effective.

0:37:56.480 --> 0:37:59.600
<v Speaker 1>They are as low cost as the lowest cost fossil fuel.

0:38:00.040 --> 0:38:02.000
<v Speaker 1>So if the cost is the same, why wouldn't you

0:38:02.000 --> 0:38:05.080
<v Speaker 1>do clean energy? So can I just can I just follow?

0:38:05.080 --> 0:38:09.120
<v Speaker 1>So then traditional oil carbon like I mean, you know

0:38:09.160 --> 0:38:12.319
<v Speaker 1>the big integrated oil companies, would you just run from them?

0:38:12.520 --> 0:38:15.880
<v Speaker 1>I know they're also getting involved in alternative energy. I

0:38:16.280 --> 0:38:18.160
<v Speaker 1>think they need to get involved. I think some are

0:38:18.160 --> 0:38:23.000
<v Speaker 1>transitioning quicker than others. Despides the integrated can also look

0:38:23.040 --> 0:38:26.000
<v Speaker 1>at things like utilities. I mean FPL here in Florida

0:38:26.040 --> 0:38:28.799
<v Speaker 1>has been very aggressive in terms of increasing its clean

0:38:28.880 --> 0:38:30.920
<v Speaker 1>energy exposure. But I think you want to be with

0:38:30.960 --> 0:38:32.879
<v Speaker 1>the companies that are really committed to it, and I've

0:38:32.880 --> 0:38:35.239
<v Speaker 1>already started a transition, not the ones that are gonna

0:38:35.239 --> 0:38:36.759
<v Speaker 1>be late to the party because it's gonna be it's

0:38:36.760 --> 0:38:38.319
<v Speaker 1>gonna hurt them, or it's going to be expensive for

0:38:38.320 --> 0:38:40.080
<v Speaker 1>them to catch up. Well, one of those companies that

0:38:40.120 --> 0:38:42.560
<v Speaker 1>you certainly have on your list is Tesla. Uh, this

0:38:42.600 --> 0:38:44.880
<v Speaker 1>company has just had an amazing year. It's up more

0:38:44.920 --> 0:38:50.440
<v Speaker 1>than sient so far this year. It's unbelievable. Um is

0:38:50.480 --> 0:38:52.080
<v Speaker 1>the party over? Though? I mean, is there still room

0:38:52.080 --> 0:38:54.440
<v Speaker 1>to get in on this? I think I think it's

0:38:54.440 --> 0:38:57.320
<v Speaker 1>a question of timing. Right. So they're the largest electronic

0:38:57.600 --> 0:39:00.919
<v Speaker 1>vehicle manufacturer in the world that gets sixteen percent share

0:39:00.960 --> 0:39:02.960
<v Speaker 1>of the EV market, but they've only got four percent

0:39:02.960 --> 0:39:04.520
<v Speaker 1>of the total markets. They have a lot of room

0:39:04.560 --> 0:39:07.359
<v Speaker 1>to grow. Their energy storage business is growing about forty

0:39:07.440 --> 0:39:11.480
<v Speaker 1>five percent a year, but only revenue. However, let's remember

0:39:11.520 --> 0:39:15.040
<v Speaker 1>the stocks going into the SMP on December one. That's

0:39:15.040 --> 0:39:17.600
<v Speaker 1>caused a lot of forward buying in the stock. I

0:39:17.640 --> 0:39:19.960
<v Speaker 1>think if I owned it, I would hold it, But

0:39:20.000 --> 0:39:21.880
<v Speaker 1>if I didn't own it, I'd really be looking for

0:39:21.920 --> 0:39:24.080
<v Speaker 1>a better chance to get in sometime in the first

0:39:24.160 --> 0:39:26.600
<v Speaker 1>or second quarter of next year. And that really I

0:39:26.640 --> 0:39:28.680
<v Speaker 1>think goes for a lot of stocks. If you if

0:39:28.680 --> 0:39:31.640
<v Speaker 1>you look at the market right now, technically it's trending

0:39:31.680 --> 0:39:34.239
<v Speaker 1>up along at a rising fifty day moving average, but

0:39:34.320 --> 0:39:36.680
<v Speaker 1>are an individual basis, there's an awful lot of names

0:39:36.680 --> 0:39:39.360
<v Speaker 1>that are that are very extended from proper entry points,

0:39:39.840 --> 0:39:42.320
<v Speaker 1>very extended from their fifty and two day moving averages,

0:39:42.600 --> 0:39:44.000
<v Speaker 1>And I think there are a lot of names out

0:39:44.000 --> 0:39:46.239
<v Speaker 1>there where people should be taken some profits because they're

0:39:46.239 --> 0:39:48.160
<v Speaker 1>probably gonna get a better chance to buy the stocks

0:39:48.160 --> 0:39:49.640
<v Speaker 1>back in the first half of the year. And I

0:39:49.680 --> 0:39:51.799
<v Speaker 1>know there's a lot of other names, Randy in the

0:39:51.880 --> 0:39:56.799
<v Speaker 1>alternative energy space that you're looking at and phase energy soilaria. Um.

0:39:57.040 --> 0:39:59.360
<v Speaker 1>So we're gonna have to have you come back and

0:39:59.480 --> 0:40:01.200
<v Speaker 1>join us a because we'd love to diggle a bit

0:40:01.239 --> 0:40:04.200
<v Speaker 1>more deeper into the space, Randy. Randy, have a great holiday,

0:40:04.239 --> 0:40:06.600
<v Speaker 1>a safe holiday, and happy New Year, and look forward

0:40:06.640 --> 0:40:10.440
<v Speaker 1>to talking with you in Randy Watt's chief Investment Strategies

0:40:10.480 --> 0:40:14.920
<v Speaker 1>at O'Neil Global Advisors, on the phone in Miami. Um.

0:40:14.960 --> 0:40:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Interesting to hear we did to say about Tesla. Thanks

0:40:17.080 --> 0:40:19.520
<v Speaker 1>so much for listening to Bloomberg Business Week. Download the

0:40:19.520 --> 0:40:22.880
<v Speaker 1>podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud, or at Bloomberg dot com, and

0:40:22.960 --> 0:40:24.960
<v Speaker 1>be sure to check out our daily radio show at

0:40:24.960 --> 0:40:27.600
<v Speaker 1>two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, and be sure to

0:40:27.640 --> 0:40:30.920
<v Speaker 1>watch us too on YouTube by searching Bloomberg Global News.