Speaker 1: You are entering the freedom Hunch. Democrats on the brink
Speaker 1: of total government control. The Save America March rallies in DC,
Speaker 1: Vice President Pence on the hot seat, and mask shaming
Speaker 1: on a train goes awry. This is the Buck Sexton Show,
Speaker 1: where the mission or mission is to decode what really
Speaker 1: matters with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake a great American Again,
Speaker 1: The Buck Sexon Show begins analyst, He's a great guy. No,
Speaker 1: no retreat, no surrender. My friends, if there was ever
Speaker 1: a time to start watching some of my favorite classic
Speaker 1: action and adventure move movies, now is that time. Because
Speaker 1: you need to steal your courage, friends, You need to
Speaker 1: get ready to hold the line. Democrats unfortunately have managed
Speaker 1: and I don't even want to spend too much of
Speaker 1: our time today getting into the Oh but the fraud,
Speaker 1: Oh but they change the rules. Yeah we know, but
Speaker 1: we have to deal with where we are in this battle.
Speaker 1: There's only so much that we can do when it
Speaker 1: comes to pointing out the tricks, the cheating, the fraud
Speaker 1: of the other side. We still have to fight within
Speaker 1: the system. We still have to beat them on the
Speaker 1: playing field somehow, some way, and it's not going to
Speaker 1: be easy. Right now, you're looking at a Senate now
Speaker 1: to be in the hands most likely unless something happens,
Speaker 1: and you're looking at a Senate that's going to be
Speaker 1: in the hands of the Democrats, a house in the
Speaker 1: hands of Nancy Pelosi and Joe Biden and Kamala Harris
Speaker 1: will be the president and vice president, respectively. This is
Speaker 1: a moment when we have to think about what do
Speaker 1: we do next, and we also have to know what
Speaker 1: we didn't do or what wasn't done in our name
Speaker 1: the right way this time around, so we don't repeat
Speaker 1: that error. Why did Mitch McConnell block two thousand dollar
Speaker 1: checks going to Americans under a certain income threshold to
Speaker 1: help them during this pandemic? What was the idea behind them?
Speaker 1: It wasn't conservative enough. Well, it's not conservative for the
Speaker 1: United States Senate to sit around and do nothing while
Speaker 1: government authorities across the country violate the constitution, institute unconstitutional lockdowns,
Speaker 1: take tyrannical and dictatorial power in their hands, shut down
Speaker 1: businesses and tell people that they're not allowed to make
Speaker 1: a living anymore, tell them they can't see loved ones,
Speaker 1: tell them they have to wear a mask. All this stuff.
Speaker 1: And what did the Senate do? Well, as we know,
Speaker 1: the United States Congress holds the purse strings that is there.
Speaker 1: That is their prerogative, that is their power, and they
Speaker 1: could have done a lot to help, and they were
Speaker 1: doing something to help. We had the PPP, we had
Speaker 1: those six hundred dollars checks that went out to people.
Speaker 1: But why not with the Senate in the balance, be
Speaker 1: the ones to say, you know what, we'll figure this
Speaker 1: out later. We're gonna get the checks of the American people. Now,
Speaker 1: we'll figure out how to pay for this down the line.
Speaker 1: But putting Democrats in charge, you know what we've managed
Speaker 1: to do here lose the battle as well as the
Speaker 1: war over the United States Senate. And that means that
Speaker 1: you're going to have two thousand dollar checks going to Americans,
Speaker 1: but guess what, Democrats are going to be the ones
Speaker 1: taking credit for it. So this principle stand was the
Speaker 1: equivalent of charging the machine gun. Ness without a plan,
Speaker 1: and we got wasted. That's what Mitch McConnell came up with.
Speaker 1: He has had his moments. Friends, He is good about
Speaker 1: the judicial machinery. We've gotten a lot of judges through.
Speaker 1: He has held the line on those issues, but on
Speaker 1: political strategy, this was disastrous, disastrous, and there is plenty
Speaker 1: of blame to go around. I don't want to focus
Speaker 1: too much of our time and attention on that because
Speaker 1: I know that can become just a circular firing squad
Speaker 1: for Republicans. And but we do need to understand what
Speaker 1: happened here. Kelly Leffler has no political skill or talent
Speaker 1: to anyone who's being an honest observer, but she's rich
Speaker 1: and connected and good at fundraising, and that was what
Speaker 1: got her into the position to get appointed as United
Speaker 1: States Editor. And Purdue is an entirely replaceable GOP machine
Speaker 1: politician as well. At least he had a little bit more,
Speaker 1: a little bit more juice in his own state, in
Speaker 1: the Peach state, as it were. But not enough, not enough.
Speaker 1: President Trump campaigned for these candidates, He did two rallies
Speaker 1: for these candidates. He did what he could to push
Speaker 1: them over the finish line. Wasn't enough, wasn't enough. As
Speaker 1: I've talked to you, now, there's still the chance, you know,
Speaker 1: they're they're looking at additional votes, and there's a recount
Speaker 1: territory we're talking about here with with Purdue. But Warnock
Speaker 1: looks like he's got this thing. Kelly Lefler likely defeated
Speaker 1: unless something crazy happens. And we also need to take
Speaker 1: into account what's been going on in recent weeks where
Speaker 1: we keep getting told just wait, it's coming, just wait,
Speaker 1: it's good to turn around, and it doesn't. And it doesn't.
Speaker 1: This is real talk. Friends. We are heading into a
Speaker 1: two year period where now the pendulum has swung and
Speaker 1: it's not going to a good place for those of
Speaker 1: us who believe in constitutional governance, in individual liberty, in
Speaker 1: personal freedom in America first love of this country, a
Speaker 1: feeling of unity and bomb with the American people. No,
Speaker 1: we're going back to a government that is globalist, internationalist, collectivist, authoritarian, woke, yes, socialist.
Speaker 1: But what we're seeing increasingly is that Americans aren't scared
Speaker 1: of socialism, at least not enough of us right now.
Speaker 1: We're in that phase because we're a very rich country,
Speaker 1: or we think socialism is just you get free stuff.
Speaker 1: You're just gonna keep getting free stuff. There's an endless
Speaker 1: amount of that free stuff. And while that's not true,
Speaker 1: it works for people who want to be in power.
Speaker 1: When you and I say socialism, there are a lot
Speaker 1: of Americans and states like Georgia who say, well, does
Speaker 1: that just mean I get free healthcare and my kids
Speaker 1: go to college for free? That sounds pretty good to
Speaker 1: me because they get the benefits up front and the
Speaker 1: pain comes later. And so much of life, so much
Speaker 1: of our existence, is really the battle between short term
Speaker 1: and long term gratification. Want to have a happy life,
Speaker 1: want to get what you want in life, and to
Speaker 1: achieve your dreams. One mantra, one thing that you can
Speaker 1: do more than almost anything else that will put you
Speaker 1: in the place to get what you want personally, professionally,
Speaker 1: everything else. Think long term, think strategically long term gratification.
Speaker 1: Don't eat the first stale, crumbly doughnut that's put in
Speaker 1: front of you. Wait for the two fresh ones to
Speaker 1: come out of the oven that are going to be
Speaker 1: glistening with that frosting and perfectly cooked. Right. That's one
Speaker 1: of the biggest challenges we all have in life, and
Speaker 1: in socialism. You get you get nothing but endless, free,
Speaker 1: but crumbly doughnuts that have been sitting there for who
Speaker 1: knows how long because you're not thinking about what else
Speaker 1: will come out of the oven. You don't care that's
Speaker 1: the way this has been set up for the American people.
Speaker 1: We are not winning this battle. Now, you would send
Speaker 1: me but but buck Bernie Sanders didn't didn't win. The
Speaker 1: primarian is not the president. Now. Isn't that a rejection
Speaker 1: of socialism? Now? This is all just about the messaging.
Speaker 1: They're going to pursue many of the same policies, just
Speaker 1: at a slightly slower pace that Bernie Sanders would have.
Speaker 1: But it just they call themselves democrats. You see, they
Speaker 1: don't tell you openly and honestly what they're really planning
Speaker 1: to do, and by the time everyone figures it out,
Speaker 1: it's too late. They've already done it. What are you
Speaker 1: going to do then, Now, Mitch McConnell's decision to block
Speaker 1: two thousand dollars checks for Americans has only done one thing,
Speaker 1: and has it even stopped Americans from getting those checks?
Speaker 1: And if you're so concerned about the debt and the deficit,
Speaker 1: and let's remember we haven't heard about that for four years,
Speaker 1: we're going to start talking about it now. But until
Speaker 1: people feel the pain of that, until they understand what
Speaker 1: it means to the currency, to the value of the dollar,
Speaker 1: to your purchasing power in the global marketplace. Until people
Speaker 1: really understand that, and who knows when that will happen.
Speaker 1: It just seems like it's all free funny money. Mitch
Speaker 1: McConnell picked a very strange time to take a stand
Speaker 1: for this. Then his leadership is over and I don't
Speaker 1: know if he'll ever be send a majority leader again.
Speaker 1: I don't think he should be. This was an unbelievable blunder.
Speaker 1: The focus on the cheating in Georgia. And I'm going
Speaker 1: to say this, I'm going to speak to you always
Speaker 1: honestly from the heart. The focus on the cheating from
Speaker 1: the Trump campaign in the last few weeks I think
Speaker 1: was too much, because are we actually gonna are we
Speaker 1: working to get the message out there to drive up votes,
Speaker 1: or are we gonna get are we gonna get bogged
Speaker 1: down in the continued oh but they cheated in the
Speaker 1: election rhetoric. And I'm just speaking purely about what work,
Speaker 1: don't I don't need to hear about Oh but it's
Speaker 1: you know, the principle of the thing. Yeah, We've been
Speaker 1: talking about the principle of the cheating in Georgia for
Speaker 1: now two months. And I told you that we had
Speaker 1: to get ready for January fifth, and that this was
Speaker 1: going to come up on us. And I was worried.
Speaker 1: Are those of you who listen to show yes, I've
Speaker 1: been worried that we're gonna lose these Senate seats from
Speaker 1: the beginning, I mean ever since the November election. I
Speaker 1: thought to hold on a second. We got a problem
Speaker 1: in Georgia as well, beyond what just happened at the
Speaker 1: president presidential level, and you know this Raffensburger feud with
Speaker 1: Trump and all this stuff. We needed a united and
Speaker 1: competent GOP in Georgia and we did not have it.
Speaker 1: So I'm not here to tell you to despair. I'm
Speaker 1: not here to tell you that, oh all is lost,
Speaker 1: because it's not. It's not. Just remember in two thousand
Speaker 1: and eight they were writing the GOP's obituary, and then
Speaker 1: in two thou and ten we got what six Senate
Speaker 1: seats I can't even remember how many, a huge red
Speaker 1: wave of House seats the Tea Party, and that's what
Speaker 1: we need to go to. Now. I'm not sitting here
Speaker 1: oh boo hoo, woe woe is America. No, we're learning,
Speaker 1: We're learning a tough lesson here. The other side is ruthless.
Speaker 1: They're unscrupulous, and they want power, and they will wield power,
Speaker 1: and they'll do it in such a way they hope
Speaker 1: we can never get it back. It is our job,
Speaker 1: it is our duty to this country to fight and
Speaker 1: to stop them from achieving those goals. It's our duty
Speaker 1: to make sure that we hold the line for what
Speaker 1: is most precious in this country and use what we
Speaker 1: can within the system, everything that we can to slow
Speaker 1: them down. That's right, they gave us a lesson for
Speaker 1: four years. In the extremes they will go to to
Speaker 1: thwart the Trump agenda, and unfortunately they were successful in
Speaker 1: some key areas well. Let's learn. One of my favorite
Speaker 1: things to do is to learn from an enemy, learn
Speaker 1: from an opponent, take their moves, and use them against them.
Speaker 1: That's what we need to do now, all out, stimy, stumble, hobble,
Speaker 1: slow it down, sabotage, whatever we have to do to
Speaker 1: stop them from turning this country into a one party
Speaker 1: state where you exist effectively at the whim and will
Speaker 1: of government bureaucrats, where nothing is sacred anymore. You have
Speaker 1: no right that they can't infringe on. And we see
Speaker 1: all this with COVID. That's what's really pulled, pulled off
Speaker 1: the mask, if you will. What their real long term
Speaker 1: plan is is to tell you that they can make
Speaker 1: you do anything they want. They don't have to pass
Speaker 1: legislation to do it. We must come up with a
Speaker 1: way to unify and fight back against them. And I
Speaker 1: hope this show is a part of this. That will
Speaker 1: be my mission every day. This is where we are friends.
Speaker 1: So watch Braveheart, watch three hundred, watch a movie, whatever
Speaker 1: it is for you that gets you fired up, think
Speaker 1: about the tyrannies of the past, and understand that you
Speaker 1: if you want to be a part of this fight now,
Speaker 1: are going to have to get ready to play some
Speaker 1: serious defense. It's only going to be two years. I
Speaker 1: am very confident about these mid terms. But this is
Speaker 1: where we are dig in. Shields up, shields high. You're
Speaker 1: in the Freedom High. This is the Buck Sex and
Speaker 1: Show Podcast. It's the height of hypocrisy for people who
Speaker 1: claim to be the champions of rights for women to
Speaker 1: deny the very biological existence of women. And this recent
Speaker 1: rule change at the House just actually voted and passed
Speaker 1: on today that you were talking about removing references to
Speaker 1: you know mothers and fathers, brothers and sisters, sons and
Speaker 1: daughters from congressional rules and administration. It's mind blowing because
Speaker 1: it shows just how out of touch with reality and
Speaker 1: the struggles of everyday Americans people in Congress are. But
Speaker 1: also it shows that, you know, their first act as
Speaker 1: this new Congress could have been to make sure that
Speaker 1: elderly Americans are able to get the COVID vaccine now
Speaker 1: alongside frontline healthcare workers elderly amer perkins who have the
Speaker 1: highest mortality rates from this virus. But instead of doing
Speaker 1: something that could actually help save people's lives, they're choosing
Speaker 1: instead to say, well, you can't say mother or father
Speaker 1: in any of this congressional language. It's it's astounding. That's
Speaker 1: a very important point that a Democrat telse Telsea Gabbert,
Speaker 1: who is wrong on politics but clearly a good person,
Speaker 1: clearly a person of some decency in character, wrong about
Speaker 1: a lot, hates Trump, I get it, but still a
Speaker 1: good still a reasonable you know, a reasonable person on
Speaker 1: some things, and I think at her core someone that
Speaker 1: you can at least have a real conversation with. Then
Speaker 1: she's not you know why the left has always hated
Speaker 1: her because she doesn't disparage Republican she doesn't despise them.
Speaker 1: She disagrees with them, but she doesn't think if you
Speaker 1: voted for Donald Trump in the past, you're beneath contempt.
Speaker 1: Maybe it's in part because she served her country in
Speaker 1: the military and has greater ideals and aspirations beyond just
Speaker 1: the partisan fight. As I've said, I think she's wrong
Speaker 1: on some things, but on this she's making a key point.
Speaker 1: People are dying in large numbers from COVID nineteen. There's
Speaker 1: a need for urgent government action. The vaccine rollout at
Speaker 1: many different levels is too slow and is preposterous, all right,
Speaker 1: what they're doing here throwing vaccine out in the trash
Speaker 1: sometimes because they can't give it to people who aren't
Speaker 1: the people they're supposed to give it to. But they've
Speaker 1: already thought out some of it, and so for bureaucratic
Speaker 1: reasons that they can't get it to, you know, the
Speaker 1: exact right group, so they give it to no one.
Speaker 1: They throw it out. Think about that that's actually happening.
Speaker 1: And while that's going on, instead of taking urgent action
Speaker 1: to get this to people, And don't look, I'm talking
Speaker 1: about seniors should get the vaccine. The vaccine is less
Speaker 1: dangerous for seniors than the virus, is Okay, that's clear.
Speaker 1: If you're a senior listening this plea, I mean, it's
Speaker 1: it's up to you, but I would implore you. Even
Speaker 1: the people that have been like me that I've been
Speaker 1: talking about the craziness of the COVID mask shaming, lockdown lunatics,
Speaker 1: all of us are saying, well, well, if you're you know,
Speaker 1: if you're over sixty, over sixty five, and you can
Speaker 1: get this vaccine, you know, that may be the difference
Speaker 1: between you getting hospitalized with this and you're living another
Speaker 1: you know, twenty twenty five, thirty years happily, healthily. So
Speaker 1: please give it, give it some real consideration. But what
Speaker 1: Tolsi is saying here is that they're talking about eliminating
Speaker 1: mother and father from all congressional doctor you can't say
Speaker 1: mother and father. You gotta have more gender inclusive language. Now,
Speaker 1: I know, on the one hand this is idiotic and
Speaker 1: just worthy of mockery, but it's also part of a mindset.
Speaker 1: While we sit here and talk about and Republicans do
Speaker 1: this all the time, legislation, what can we do? What
Speaker 1: should the tax code be all these things. You know
Speaker 1: what they do. They change the rules of society. They
Speaker 1: change the culture, that changed the way we're allowed to speak,
Speaker 1: because that submission feeds into all the other policies, all
Speaker 1: the other things they're trying to do. They know that
Speaker 1: if they can get us to talk about issues a
Speaker 1: certain way, they can also get enough of us to
Speaker 1: agree with them on those issues. This degendering of language
Speaker 1: is insane, but there's a reason they're doing it. This
Speaker 1: is all part of a plan, and we're about to
Speaker 1: see this on steroids for the next two years. Thanks
Speaker 1: for listening to the buses and show podcasts. Remember to
Speaker 1: subscribe on Apple podcast, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you
Speaker 1: get your podcasts. If you're Mike pent who has a
Speaker 1: long history in Washington and as a governor, if you're
Speaker 1: gonna enable the disease of Trump, the lies, the attempt
Speaker 1: to steal an election, to undermine democracy, then history is
Speaker 1: going to judge you very harshly, and you don't deserve
Speaker 1: any future in electoral politics. There's no two ways about it.
Speaker 1: He's vice president of the United States. He has a
Speaker 1: responsibility to the integrity of that office, to the integrity
Speaker 1: of himself. What he's been engaged in as a hedge
Speaker 1: is a way to tack back and forth to stay
Speaker 1: in Donald Trump's a good favor. That's a decision he's
Speaker 1: made as an individual, and so he'll he'll have to
Speaker 1: be judged for that. But it's certainly not in keeping
Speaker 1: with everything that he claims to stand for as a
Speaker 1: human being and as a politician, because there's simply no
Speaker 1: excuse for trying to thwart the will of voters. It
Speaker 1: is undemocratic. Gave me a break, all right? Can we
Speaker 1: stop with all the oh my gosh, tar the Constitution.
Speaker 1: These people have neither read nor care about the Constitution,
Speaker 1: and they had no problem using the media and the
Speaker 1: federal government, the dj the FBI, the intelligence community as
Speaker 1: a weapon against Trump for four years with a Russia
Speaker 1: collusion in line that they were all active participants in
Speaker 1: and the initial creatures of. But I also need to
Speaker 1: tell you this, and this is just very clear. Vice
Speaker 1: President Pence is not going to give the election to try.
Speaker 1: He's already told them he doesn't have the authority to
Speaker 1: do this and he's not going to do this. That's
Speaker 1: not going to happen. So and I understand there's there's
Speaker 1: probably some people today and that you're gonna hear. You know,
Speaker 1: I would ask that you, I would ask that you
Speaker 1: pay attention to who who respects you enough to speak
Speaker 1: honestly to you, about all of us, who respects you
Speaker 1: enough to speak honestly, and who panders, because we're all
Speaker 1: we're all bothered right now. We're all very disappointed, very
Speaker 1: I'm disappointed for the country. I'm disappointed for the Democrats
Speaker 1: because I know they think that this circumstance that this
Speaker 1: government will be better, and in some ways, for their interests,
Speaker 1: they will think it is. But overall we're going to
Speaker 1: be less free, less prosperous, and less optimistic because of
Speaker 1: the decisions that have been made in the last three months.
Speaker 1: Five voters. And now I know, fraud, cheating, changing the rules,
Speaker 1: I understand that. But you know, at some point, if
Speaker 1: you've you know, if you've lost a football game because
Speaker 1: they paid off the refs, you can only talk about
Speaker 1: it for so long before you got to say, Okay, well,
Speaker 1: how do we stop that from happening in the next
Speaker 1: football game, and how do we win that game? And
Speaker 1: we're getting very close to that point, do it Mike,
Speaker 1: this is a time for extreme courage. Trump says in
Speaker 1: a tweet, he's saying, as he's saying that he wants
Speaker 1: Mike Pence to effectively overturn this whole thing. It's it's
Speaker 1: not gonna I keep telling you, it's just not gonna happen,
Speaker 1: the same way that I've been saying that you were
Speaker 1: going to deal with a presidency of Joe Biden and
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris. I'm here to tell you the truth, and
Speaker 1: the truth on this situation is that Mike Pence will
Speaker 1: not do this. He cannot and will not. Now I
Speaker 1: understand Trump, I think is trying to mobilize everybody for
Speaker 1: what's coming, and he wants to show that he will
Speaker 1: fight with everything he has. He wants to show that
Speaker 1: even if he knows that this is a this is
Speaker 1: a match, this is a boxing match where we're about
Speaker 1: to we're about to lose on points. He is gonna
Speaker 1: go down, throw and every punch he's got, and he's
Speaker 1: going to stay in this until the bell rings. And
Speaker 1: I respect that, and I can appreciate that. But they've
Speaker 1: out they've out pointed us, so to speak up this
Speaker 1: up to this phase and we don't have enough time
Speaker 1: to make it up in this election. We just don't.
Speaker 1: We just don't. If you think I'm missing something, if
Speaker 1: you think that there's some aspect of this I'm not saying,
Speaker 1: please let me know. I have one thing I love
Speaker 1: about this, about this audience is I have learned so much.
Speaker 1: Now going on almost ten years, I've learned so much
Speaker 1: from the people who listen to this show. I still
Speaker 1: remember when some of you in twenty people are still
Speaker 1: listening today, and many of you now have been listening
Speaker 1: to my radio show for eight years, nine years. But
Speaker 1: I remember when some of you were telling me, hey,
Speaker 1: Trump early in the primary, he's got something, you know,
Speaker 1: He's coming with something that people haven't seen before. And
Speaker 1: you were right. So if I'm if I'm in some
Speaker 1: way not seeing the matrix clearly here, by all means,
Speaker 1: let me know. Because I exist. I do this show
Speaker 1: every day to serve you, to inform and entertain all
Speaker 1: of you listening all across the country, hundreds of thousands
Speaker 1: of you, and it means a lot. But it also
Speaker 1: means that I have to share with you my honest
Speaker 1: feelings every day. I owe that to you, and you
Speaker 1: know today is one of these days where we have
Speaker 1: to just rally. You know, we have taken a punch
Speaker 1: and it's stinks and there are better words for it,
Speaker 1: but I can't say them on radio. That is where
Speaker 1: the situation is. So I appreciate that are all these
Speaker 1: patriots rallying today in DC, and this is what I
Speaker 1: would say, And you know there include friends of many
Speaker 1: friends of minor down there. What I would say about
Speaker 1: this is that there is a need right now for
Speaker 1: unity in opposition to what's happening. We need to come together.
Speaker 1: We need to be in a place, we need to
Speaker 1: be in a position where we understand what we're trying
Speaker 1: to achieve and what we're trying to thwart. And a
Speaker 1: part of this is going to be I want good
Speaker 1: faith Republicans from all across the spectrum, even people that
Speaker 1: were a little not never Trumpers who are just their Democrats,
Speaker 1: but people that were a little if beyond Trump or whatever.
Speaker 1: We all need to be in the same foxhol now.
Speaker 1: We all need to come together on this one and
Speaker 1: see what we're up against. Because the Democrats, they are
Speaker 1: gonna they're gonna spend two years trying to steam rollers.
Speaker 1: You know what I think Their first move is going
Speaker 1: to be, and you can mark this one down. They're
Speaker 1: going to eliminate the filibuster. You know what they're gonna do.
Speaker 1: They're going to eliminate the filibuster to pass two thousand
Speaker 1: dollars stimulus checks or to pass a national fifteen dollar
Speaker 1: minimum wage. That's what they're gonna do. Something that is
Speaker 1: generally popular, but that Republicans haven't been willing to go
Speaker 1: along with, or that Republicans have objections to. And they're
Speaker 1: gonna say, see, we got rid of the filibuster. We
Speaker 1: did this for you, America. How do you like this
Speaker 1: two thousand dollars checks? How do you like that fifteen
Speaker 1: dollars minimum rate? Minimum wage increase? And then as Republicans
Speaker 1: are but there's a think tank that wrote a study
Speaker 1: about the robot minimum wage, we're gonna do what we
Speaker 1: always do. Then they're gonna roll out, oh yeah, now
Speaker 1: that philipbus or things gone. How about we do an
Speaker 1: amnesty vote. And we're not going to do full scale amnesty.
Speaker 1: Let's do it incrementally. Let's let's do let's do DACA.
Speaker 1: Come on, we'll get to fifty fifty on DACA. Kamala
Speaker 1: gets to be the tiebreaker. You don't think that that's
Speaker 1: Think of the of the political boost that Kamala Harris
Speaker 1: gets if she is the tie breaking vote in the
Speaker 1: Senate for the passage of a limited amnesty that will
Speaker 1: grant permanent status legal status to millions of so called
Speaker 1: dreamers illegal aliens who allegedly came here at a certain
Speaker 1: age depending on you know, what the statutes say. Think
Speaker 1: about that. That's going to be part of the whole narrative,
Speaker 1: isn't it. Kamala Harris, So it's Biden gets to sign it,
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris gets to be the tie breaking vote. We
Speaker 1: need to We need to get this going. Friends. There
Speaker 1: is no Kraking coming to attack our enemies. In a fact,
Speaker 1: I remember the Kracking getting unleashed, you know, didn't work out.
Speaker 1: Remember that that's one thing about or at least to
Speaker 1: the crack, And the problem with it is that, yeah,
Speaker 1: the Krack had lost. We don't even have one. So
Speaker 1: one thing that I will tell you is that you're
Speaker 1: also going to see who really has ideas and knowledge
Speaker 1: and understanding of these issues and who was just hanging
Speaker 1: on Trump's coattails for the last four years, had nothing
Speaker 1: to add, had nothing to contribute really to the national conversation,
Speaker 1: but saw it all as just a case of individual opportunism.
Speaker 1: There are a lot of them in conservative media. I
Speaker 1: want you to understand this. There are other people that
Speaker 1: have always stood for things that matter to the country
Speaker 1: and can articulate them at will be worthwhile in opposition,
Speaker 1: because just trying to repeat whatever they think is going
Speaker 1: to be the most pleasing to Trump. That's not going
Speaker 1: to work anymore. When we are out of power in
Speaker 1: an opposition, we need more than that. We need to
Speaker 1: win on the battlefield of idea ideas, and that means
Speaker 1: also winning the culture, and it means finding common ground
Speaker 1: on these issues with independence where we can. It means
Speaker 1: mobilizing a populist conservative coalition to take back power from
Speaker 1: these lunatic libs. That's where we have to go. Now
Speaker 1: we have to build it. We have to construct it.
Speaker 1: I wish I could say it was already there. I
Speaker 1: wish I could point to the house on the hill
Speaker 1: and say there we are, We're all set. No, now
Speaker 1: we have to go out into the woods and hack
Speaker 1: down the trees and build it from scratch. That's the feeling,
Speaker 1: at least of where we are at this moment in time,
Speaker 1: But embrace it. It's a fight worth having. You're in
Speaker 1: the freedom Hud. This is the Buck Sex and Show podcast.
Speaker 1: Do you think you'd get fair treatment from CNN if
Speaker 1: your brother had a primetime show on that channel? Well,
Speaker 1: ifs and Butts or can the Nuts every day would
Speaker 1: be Christmas. But you know, I think it's pretty clear
Speaker 1: some of these networks obviously they have agendas. They're they're
Speaker 1: doing narratives. They're not trying to report facts anymore. It's
Speaker 1: all about spinning whatever narrative they think can get ratings.
Speaker 1: And that's just the reality of the situation. So it
Speaker 1: doesn't impact me. We're going to continue keeping our eye
Speaker 1: on the ball and working as hard as we can
Speaker 1: and deliver results. And results have been delivered. Let's focus
Speaker 1: on some positives here. The lockdown libs, the Democrat left,
Speaker 1: they have been wrong on this stuff on how to
Speaker 1: handle COVID. And I know you'd say, well, but Buck,
Speaker 1: look at how the elections are going. Yeah, but it's
Speaker 1: really just Trump and Georgia that we have to to
Speaker 1: mourn at this point. As elections go, it's really just
Speaker 1: those And I know that's a lot. I'm not saying
Speaker 1: it's it's it's minor, but the House Republicans actually picked
Speaker 1: up seats, and state legislatures did well. You know, there
Speaker 1: are some there's some reason for limited optimism about that.
Speaker 1: I know, if we had if we had held the Senate,
Speaker 1: everything would have felt like it was okay. But I
Speaker 1: wouldn't say okay, but it would have felt better. Folks.
Speaker 1: I'm trying to find silver linings, you know what I'm saying.
Speaker 1: But still, but Florida is one big silver lining because
Speaker 1: you have a governor who has defied the consensus. You
Speaker 1: have a governor who has refused to go and bend
Speaker 1: the knee to the Fauciites. That guy Fauci is a
Speaker 1: complete jackass, and it's disgusting what he's done in the country.
Speaker 1: He should be ashamed of himself. He's not. He never
Speaker 1: will be. And that's important for everybody, know it. It
Speaker 1: doesn't matter. There will never come a time when the
Speaker 1: people who advocated for all of this sit back and say,
Speaker 1: you know what, we were wrong. You know what, we
Speaker 1: didn't have to lock down the country. After all, that
Speaker 1: didn't really give us any benefit and it caused a
Speaker 1: lot of drawbacks for us, So we're sorry. Unfortunately, I
Speaker 1: could sit here and tell you that's never gonna happen.
Speaker 1: It doesn't matter what the data shows, doesn't matter what
Speaker 1: the eventual epidemiological advances are, where we have a better
Speaker 1: understanding of how really the virus spreads, meaning how quickly,
Speaker 1: how easily. We have some general numbers about all that.
Speaker 1: But all right, you know, how well how well do notice?
Speaker 1: You can't even ask this question. If I say how
Speaker 1: well do masks work? People start screaming masks work? Okay?
Speaker 1: How well? I can tell you how well a vaccine
Speaker 1: works based on large controlled trials that nine of different
Speaker 1: vaccines ninety five ninety four percent effective for COVID nineteen.
Speaker 1: Though that's real data. How well do masks work? Anyone
Speaker 1: want to try it? Oh, we've got a model that
Speaker 1: says if eighty percent of people were a masked ninety
Speaker 1: percent of the time in forty percent of places, then
Speaker 1: it would be ninety five percent. This is all just
Speaker 1: make believe. They don't know. That's not real data. That's
Speaker 1: like when they're telling you what the climate's going to
Speaker 1: be in a hundred years. They don't and they're wrong.
Speaker 1: Of course, every ten years. They have to keep adjusting
Speaker 1: these things they don't know, but they're never going to change.
Speaker 1: They're never going to admit that this was all disastrous.
Speaker 1: And in fact, I'm of the belief that the Democrat's
Speaker 1: ability to dominate the narrative because of the media panic
Speaker 1: that was induced and or the media inducing panic in
Speaker 1: the public, the Democrat narrative about COVID and how Trump
Speaker 1: was so inapt and so ineffective and handling it. I
Speaker 1: think that played a very large role in the election,
Speaker 1: because you know, that's not something people would necessarily tell
Speaker 1: to a polster, or it's not something that the data
Speaker 1: would all that clearly indicate. But I think that it
Speaker 1: affected to overall perception is Trump doing a good job.
Speaker 1: A lot of people would look at what happened in
Speaker 1: twenty twenty with COVID and they'd say, well, look at
Speaker 1: how terrible things are in the country. Is that fair? No?
Speaker 1: Did the media exploit this, Yes? But it worked. It worked,
Speaker 1: And what we're going to see now is there are
Speaker 1: going to be these uh, these red state or redder
Speaker 1: states placed like Florida Haven's set up and where you
Speaker 1: have you have these mass migrations occurring from the blue
Speaker 1: strongholds California, New York. They're gonna have enormous problems. Now
Speaker 1: they're gonna try to make up that shortfall in tax revenue.
Speaker 1: And at the federal level, now that's right, the federal
Speaker 1: bailouts are coming for these cities. So understand there, that's
Speaker 1: the socialism that we don't spend much time talking about
Speaker 1: the redistribution of wealth to prefer Democrat enclaves. At the
Speaker 1: federal level. Now they would say, oh, but they you know,
Speaker 1: they pay more in taxes and the red states have
Speaker 1: ut getting more benefits per per resident. What I'm saying
Speaker 1: is that, yeah, but they're about to turn this whole
Speaker 1: thing around because they're gonna start shooting the money gun
Speaker 1: at all these blue states that are hemorrhaging residents. They
Speaker 1: can try to shore up the public sector unions, they
Speaker 1: can try to make it seem like the holes in
Speaker 1: the budgets are not so catastrophic. So they're going to
Speaker 1: try to stop that mass migration from happening because it's
Speaker 1: bad for the for the Democrat brand. Florida, I saw
Speaker 1: Dessent to say that they're up twenty percent in housing sales,
Speaker 1: twenty percent during a pandemic. People are fleeing, they're going there,
Speaker 1: they're saying enough, I can't do this anymore. I talked
Speaker 1: to friends in New York. I gotta say, we're under
Speaker 1: you know, a strict lockdown here, and people are just
Speaker 1: they're they're cracking up. I mean, they're losing it for what.
Speaker 1: What's the benefit. What would happen if you opened up
Speaker 1: restaurants in New York City but you had these mitigation
Speaker 1: measures in place, you know, limitations of people the answers,
Speaker 1: It would basically be what it is right now. So
Speaker 1: why not open up the restaurants? It would based on
Speaker 1: their data, it would be ninety nine percent the same.
Speaker 1: It's that's not worth it. It's not worth it. It's
Speaker 1: worth putting tens of thousands of people out of work, immiserated, sick, homeless.
Speaker 1: Perhaps all it's worth that to have a one a
Speaker 1: possible one percent reduction in cases. Wow, I guess you know,
Speaker 1: if it saves just one life, we better shut down
Speaker 1: every year for the flu. If that's going to be
Speaker 1: our approach every year, gotta shut down the flu's coming.
Speaker 1: What those tens of thousands of lives don't matter? You
Speaker 1: know what happened. If we also, I have to wonder
Speaker 1: the flu is basically eradicated. How is that possible? Oh,
Speaker 1: because social distancing and mask wearing now we're led to
Speaker 1: believe is almost one hundred percent effective against the influenza virus.
Speaker 1: But like not effective if really well, you can't prove
Speaker 1: it any data effectiveness whatsoever based on what's happening right
Speaker 1: now with COVID. Notice they don't even have an explanation
Speaker 1: for this other than yeah, it works against the flu
Speaker 1: super well. That's quite strange considering there are tens of
Speaker 1: millions of flucases every year. It's pretty contagious, folks. But
Speaker 1: DeSantis is a shining light from the Sunshine state we got.
Speaker 1: We gotta take our victories where we can. Thanks for
Speaker 1: listening to The Bust Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on
Speaker 1: Apple Podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Speaker 1: No charges for the police officer who shot Jacob Blake
Speaker 1: in Kenosha, Wisconsin. Now you may recall this was over
Speaker 1: the summer when BLM was engaged in riots across the country,
Speaker 1: when BLM was looting stores and attacking innocent people's businesses
Speaker 1: and homes, and throwing rocks at police officers. Antifa was
Speaker 1: trying to blind cops with lasers fired in their eyes.
Speaker 1: You remember when all that was going on, all about
Speaker 1: what was happening, the media was also looking for any
Speaker 1: opportunity to take a story of a police involved shooting
Speaker 1: and turn it into some kind of evil racist look
Speaker 1: another cop doing what cops do, being terrible, shooting an
Speaker 1: unarmed black man, and then get the cycle going all
Speaker 1: over again. I will say, just as an aside, it
Speaker 1: is deeply disappointing to me as an American that the
Speaker 1: Democrats did not pay a bigger price for their their
Speaker 1: reckless demagoguery on this issue. And there they're really wholesale
Speaker 1: embrace of not just the BLM movement, but also they're
Speaker 1: either turning a blind eye to or just open support
Speaker 1: of Antifa. And remember Antifa took up the Black Lives
Speaker 1: Matter banner at different points in order to give them
Speaker 1: a kind of moral legitimacy they would not have otherwise had.
Speaker 1: So that's what That's what was happening of the summer.
Speaker 1: And I will tell you I think I may have
Speaker 1: heard of Kenosha, Wisconsin before this summer, but I might
Speaker 1: not have not a place that I could say I
Speaker 1: know very well. It's a city of about fifty thousand.
Speaker 1: I think it just barely qualifies a city. It's really
Speaker 1: kind of a big town. But there was a shooting
Speaker 1: in Kenosha, Wisconsin, and we have video of the shooting,
Speaker 1: what occurred, what happened that led to riots. Remember Kenosha
Speaker 1: was the scene of riots, and those riots were so
Speaker 1: so extreme that then people like Kyle Rittenhouse showed up
Speaker 1: to protect some of the businesses and some of the
Speaker 1: government buildings that were being mobbed and assaulted. And then
Speaker 1: Rittenhouse was mobbed and assaulted, and then he shot, shot
Speaker 1: and killed someone. He says in self defense, and certainly
Speaker 1: seems from the video and the evidence presented so far
Speaker 1: that it was self defense. But we'll see what the
Speaker 1: courts say, right, We'll see where this goes. Now we
Speaker 1: have Kenosha, a final determination about the officer involved shooting
Speaker 1: that led to the riot that led to the written
Speaker 1: House incident. And here's what happened. The Democrat district attorney.
Speaker 1: The Democrat district attorney found that the police officer here
Speaker 1: should not be charged. Right, that the police officer involved
Speaker 1: in this shooting didn't actually break the law. And this
Speaker 1: is a This is a pretty a pretty straightforward case
Speaker 1: if you actually look at the facts. It's not surprising
Speaker 1: to me that the Democrat um oh, the Washington Post
Speaker 1: deleted the They deleted the tweet I've responded to. It's
Speaker 1: not surprised to me the Democrat prosecutor didn't bring the
Speaker 1: initial They didn't bring criminal charges. And here's why. They
Speaker 1: have video of of of Jacob Blake refusing police commands.
Speaker 1: Obviously and repeatedly and clearly. The police are saying stop, stop,
Speaker 1: don't move, don't move me your hands, show me your hands.
Speaker 1: They're yelling at this guy, and he's moving around to
Speaker 1: the driver's side of a car, reaching into the car
Speaker 1: to grab something. Okay, that's what's happening. He's reaching into
Speaker 1: the car to seize something, and he grabbed a knife.
Speaker 1: The officer who shot him had his hand on Blake's back,
Speaker 1: holding his shirt, yelling at him to show him his hands,
Speaker 1: show him his hands. He waited, He did everything he
Speaker 1: could do. The next level of this would have been
Speaker 1: that officer sitting waiting to see if Blake was going
Speaker 1: to stab him in the face or the throat or
Speaker 1: the chest with the knife. Why are you going for
Speaker 1: a knife when police have guns drawn on you in
Speaker 1: broad daylight and are saying stop, stop, stop. If police
Speaker 1: cannot fire under those circumstances, what we're saying is police
Speaker 1: are not allowed to defend themselves against lethal force. That's all.
Speaker 1: That's very straightforward. Is not a close call situation, all right?
Speaker 1: If someone if police say show me your hands, show
Speaker 1: me your hands, and you have a gun in your
Speaker 1: waistband and it's on video, and you reach for and
Speaker 1: grab your gun, they're going to shoot you. They're not
Speaker 1: going to wait to see if you draw that weapon
Speaker 1: and fire at them first. That act of refusing commands
Speaker 1: and reaching for a weapon is enough under the under
Speaker 1: the rules of force use you know, the rules of
Speaker 1: application of force for people in the law enforcement community. Okay,
Speaker 1: that is a that is a legitimate use of force situation.
Speaker 1: And the way the way the Washington Post reported on
Speaker 1: this was appalling. There's no surprise. What do they do.
Speaker 1: They initially said the headline and then now they've deleted it.
Speaker 1: I was going to read it to you, but it
Speaker 1: was on Twitter. They deleted it. The headline was no choice,
Speaker 1: something like no charges in the shooting of Jacob Blake,
Speaker 1: an unarmed black man who was shot by police seven
Speaker 1: times in the back long headline? Why was that the headline?
Speaker 1: Why wasn't the headline just no charges? I mean, if
Speaker 1: you were just doing a news story, wouldn't it be
Speaker 1: no charges against police officer in Jacob Blake shooting. Why
Speaker 1: did the garbage heat publication known as the Washington Post,
Speaker 1: why they make the decision three people on the byeline,
Speaker 1: by the way, on a breaking news story that was
Speaker 1: clearly going to get a lot of attention like this
Speaker 1: to say that Jacob Blake was unarmed and that he
Speaker 1: was shot seven times in the back? Are those now?
Speaker 1: Those are those are details that you put in a
Speaker 1: new story? Or why is that of the headline? Because
Speaker 1: what the Washington Post was trying to do was say
Speaker 1: that this was a racist murder by police and it's
Speaker 1: going unpunished. And what Lebron do we have the Lebron
Speaker 1: audio mark? Yes, well this this Lebron James, one of
Speaker 1: the most wealthy, famous, influential people on the planet. This
Speaker 1: is how he reacts to the story publicly on his
Speaker 1: social media accounts with tens of millions of followers. Played.
Speaker 1: I'm smart enough to know that even though we're playing
Speaker 1: a game of basketball, that there's so much more that's
Speaker 1: going on in the world. It's so much more that's
Speaker 1: even more important than us playing a game. Um. And
Speaker 1: to hear what happened in Kenosha today was a was
Speaker 1: a blow to the heart and to the gut. Um,
Speaker 1: you know, not only to that community, um, you know,
Speaker 1: but to us and to every um you know, I
Speaker 1: guess you know black person that that just has been
Speaker 1: a part of this process and seeing these outcomes for
Speaker 1: so long, and not only just in the black community,
Speaker 1: but also in the white community as well. Who who
Speaker 1: will see uh, you know, MoMA's like this happened to
Speaker 1: us and to happen to his family, and to happen
Speaker 1: to the kid himself to see that verdict, it was just, Um,
Speaker 1: it was a blow to the gun, like I said,
Speaker 1: the blow to the heart. But we got to continue
Speaker 1: to we got to continue to stay strong, continue to
Speaker 1: believe in each other, and continue to push for the
Speaker 1: for the greater of change and for the great of good.
Speaker 1: So here here you have one of the most powerful,
Speaker 1: most influential, wealthiest people in the world, really Lebron James
Speaker 1: has tens of millions of followers on social media. I
Speaker 1: mean he's he's known pretty much everywhere where they have,
Speaker 1: you know, internet access and a TV. They're gonna doo
Speaker 1: Lebron James is for all intensive purposes. It's probably worth
Speaker 1: a billion dollars or close to it already, Okay, for
Speaker 1: playing basketball, and this guy is an international superstar. And
Speaker 1: what I want to know is, yes, there is absolutely
Speaker 1: a need, there's absolutely a role for sympathy for Jacob
Speaker 1: Blake's family. That's that's true. That's always the case. You know,
Speaker 1: even if someone is in a drunk driving accident that
Speaker 1: they cause and they die, you feel bad for the family.
Speaker 1: They've lost someone. Jacob Blake, as we know it was shot.
Speaker 1: He was paralyzed, so he did live, but he was
Speaker 1: paralyzed after being shot by by police. And that has
Speaker 1: a that's obviously a lifelong burden. It's a it's a
Speaker 1: it's a loss for that family as well. That's something
Speaker 1: that is a tragedy for them. But what's interesting to
Speaker 1: me about this is that Lebron James clearly wants an
Speaker 1: attempt an attempted murder charge here, right, I mean, this
Speaker 1: this man was paralyzed. He was he was shot at
Speaker 1: seven times. And so Lebron wants this cop to be
Speaker 1: treated like a racist would be killer. This cop, out
Speaker 1: of out of racism, tried to kill and paralyzed Jacob Blake.
Speaker 1: Does that Does that sound like justice to anyone? Does
Speaker 1: that sound like something that should happen here? I mean,
Speaker 1: in what world is that a fair outcome? You know,
Speaker 1: the Washington Post and their headlines said unarmed. You know
Speaker 1: what the problem with that is, he wasn't unarmed. So
Speaker 1: they had to delete the headline. They had to walk
Speaker 1: that whole thing back. So they're still at this stage
Speaker 1: lying about this incident because they're playing to a narrative,
Speaker 1: and that narrative is deeply destructive, and Lebron James is
Speaker 1: playing to that narrative too, although I think, you know,
Speaker 1: I think he believes it, and that is that police
Speaker 1: are racist murderers of black men, and that the police
Speaker 1: and the policing in America is deeply rooted in systemic
Speaker 1: and vicious racism. And that's a really dangerous charge to
Speaker 1: put out there, especially because it's not true. It's just
Speaker 1: not true. You know, they keep finding these into like this,
Speaker 1: and they tell us that it's racism, and then we
Speaker 1: see it and we learn more about it, whether it's
Speaker 1: what happened in Ferguson, Missouri. I'm not saying there's no racism,
Speaker 1: of course. I'm not saying there are no cops who
Speaker 1: are murderers. Of course there are. But you know, to
Speaker 1: treat all cops as though they're the bad guys and
Speaker 1: then to hold up these incidents where the comps aren't
Speaker 1: even doing anything wrong. It's a tragedy, but it's not
Speaker 1: a crime. That's irresponsible, it's reckless, it's destructive. And the
Speaker 1: Washington Post, of course, the Democrats are all a part
Speaker 1: of this. Why would the Washington Post get that's such
Speaker 1: a key detail. He wasn't unarmed. The guy had a knife.
Speaker 1: It's on video, and the district attorney in Kenosha saw it.
Speaker 1: It's all very clear. He went for a knife. You
Speaker 1: can't do that. You can't do it, or what are
Speaker 1: we gonna do? Tell cops that they have to get,
Speaker 1: you know, stabbed in the neck before they can use
Speaker 1: their service weapon and defense of themselves. At what phase
Speaker 1: are cops allowed to actually take action so that they
Speaker 1: get to go home to their families? And they're you know,
Speaker 1: we're talking to all human beings here. They people will
Speaker 1: love them, people will care about them. But we have
Speaker 1: police to protect all of us, to protect you and me.
Speaker 1: And there are very important laws and rules and regulations
Speaker 1: and use of force escalation that is taught and that
Speaker 1: is that is necessary for law enforcement. And what happened
Speaker 1: here was all within the scope of this officer's lawful duties.
Speaker 1: But that that But see, they lie about it because
Speaker 1: they're so desperate. The Washington Post lies. But they deleted
Speaker 1: the tweet. They've admitted they said, oh, we have a correction.
Speaker 1: The family says he was unarmed, they said on their correction,
Speaker 1: But the DA and the video says that he actually
Speaker 1: was grabbing a knife. Oh I'm sorry. So the family lawyer,
Speaker 1: Now that's that's how they do reporting. Well, this person's
Speaker 1: family lawyer says, you know that that they were innocent
Speaker 1: of the charge. So we're our headline is going to
Speaker 1: say innocent of the charge. That's not how it works,
Speaker 1: although it is for Democrats and for leftists. But here's
Speaker 1: the other here's the other issue. Here's the bigger part
Speaker 1: of this. Democrats are going to do a lot more
Speaker 1: of this going ahead. Now they feel emboldened to do this.
Speaker 1: They're going to build upon and try to hammer home
Speaker 1: this narrative of cops are racist, law enforcement is racist,
Speaker 1: and therefore we have to do things to hurt law enforcement,
Speaker 1: and we have to offer up sacrifices of law enforcement
Speaker 1: officers who will be ruined, who will be sent to prison,
Speaker 1: who of their lives won't be able to see their families,
Speaker 1: and be treated like murders, be treated like racists, in
Speaker 1: order to assuage the anger of the Democrat base, and
Speaker 1: in order to play into this narrative of our police
Speaker 1: officers as evil, bad, racist people, which is a lie.
Speaker 1: I don't care how often Lebron James says it. I
Speaker 1: don't care how many celebrities say I don't care how
Speaker 1: much the Democrats pander on this this issue. It's just
Speaker 1: not true. The rare and occasional criminal and or racist
Speaker 1: police officer in America out of hundreds of thousands of
Speaker 1: law enforcement officers across the country is not It is
Speaker 1: not in any way a fair basis form aligning all
Speaker 1: law enforcement as racist, and that is what the Democrats do.
Speaker 1: It is reckless. You're in the freedom hunt. This is
Speaker 1: the Buck Sex and Show podcast. And we got to remember,
Speaker 1: in a year from now, you're gonna start working on Congress.
Speaker 1: And we got to get rid of the weak Congress people,
Speaker 1: the ones that aren't any good, the Liz Cheneys of
Speaker 1: the world. We gotta get rid of them. We gotta
Speaker 1: get Drid. You know she never wants the soldier brought
Speaker 1: home twenty I brought a lot of our soldiers home.
Speaker 1: I don't know someone like in it. They're in country
Speaker 1: that nobody even knows the name. Nobody knows where they are.
Speaker 1: They're dying. They're great, but they're dying. They're losing their arms,
Speaker 1: their legs, their face. I brought them back home, largely
Speaker 1: back home Afghanistan, Iraq. And remember I used to say
Speaker 1: in the old days, don't go into Iraq, but if
Speaker 1: you go and keep the oil. We didn't keep the oil.
Speaker 1: We didn't keep the oil. And he is making a
Speaker 1: very good point here about the GOP establishment wanting to continue,
Speaker 1: wanting to go back to this forever war position is
Speaker 1: one of many things we're gonna have to be fighting against.
Speaker 1: This is gonna be on our own side. There are
Speaker 1: people who, for reasons of ideology or because I don't know,
Speaker 1: they think it's gonna make us all safer. And also
Speaker 1: it's going to be nice for the defense contractors, who
Speaker 1: are great if you're looking to get, you know, really
Speaker 1: cushy speaker gigs, or if you're looking to get to
Speaker 1: put on a board and get a nice check for
Speaker 1: not doing very much if anything, But for the soldiers
Speaker 1: who were actually fighting for the people who have to
Speaker 1: pay the price for this. It's it's still astonishing to
Speaker 1: me how many Republicans really would prefer if we would
Speaker 1: go back to invading countries and trying to build them
Speaker 1: and using the American using the American military to do this,
Speaker 1: and then just not even having an exit plan and
Speaker 1: not having any real ideal what we're supposed to do
Speaker 1: beyond that. Right, let's go invade, and you know, we'll
Speaker 1: see what happens. We'll make it all better. Another thing
Speaker 1: Trump said today in the speech that was interesting. I've
Speaker 1: been raising this to you that the caravans south of
Speaker 1: the border are forming again. I've been telling you get
Speaker 1: ready for it. There's gonna be a whole lot there's
Speaker 1: gonna be a whole lot of illegal aliens searching the board.
Speaker 1: It is something that we knew was going to happen
Speaker 1: because they're hoping that there would be a greater opportunity
Speaker 1: for them to get a part of the amnesty that's coming.
Speaker 1: We know that's gonna be that's almost a guarantee. And
Speaker 1: how do we stop it at this point? Oh gosh,
Speaker 1: I really I really don't know. I really don't know.
Speaker 1: I think that that's that's what we have to figure
Speaker 1: out out. How do we prevent them from being able
Speaker 1: to get the amnesty that they want. The illegal immigrants
Speaker 1: are already very aware of this, or there would be
Speaker 1: illegal immigrants. We're making their way to the border and
Speaker 1: Trump sees it coming. And this is going to be
Speaker 1: a disaster. Friends, this is gonna be a big problem
Speaker 1: for us. Thanks for listening to the buses and show podcasts.
Speaker 1: Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or
Speaker 1: wherever you get your podcasts. The mask shamers among my
Speaker 1: least favorite people out there. Mask shamers are super annoying.
Speaker 1: The mask Karen some of you, I know, we'll call
Speaker 1: them Karen's. But here's the reality of this. If you
Speaker 1: are too dumb to understand, and nobody listening to this
Speaker 1: show is because you listen to this show, which means
Speaker 1: you understand. But if you're too dumb to understand that
Speaker 1: wearing a mask on a train only for part of
Speaker 1: being on the train, or wearing a mask on the
Speaker 1: plane except for when people are eating, that that's not
Speaker 1: really rooted in epidemiology or science, but just this desire
Speaker 1: to do every little tiny thing that maybe will kind
Speaker 1: of possibly theoretically help against the virus. And if you
Speaker 1: don't do what, you're a bad person. You can't figure
Speaker 1: that out. I don't know what to say. Everybody should
Speaker 1: be able to apply reason and rationality this. Everybody should
Speaker 1: be in a place where they can understand exactly what's
Speaker 1: going on on here that a lot of this is
Speaker 1: pandemic theater. You know, there's this big story out there
Speaker 1: about how they're gonna be doing a cleansing and I'd look,
Speaker 1: let me this is obviously because Trump is so filthy
Speaker 1: and horrible and he's be smirched the office. But you know,
Speaker 1: there's these news stories about how they're going to do
Speaker 1: this a deep clean of the White House for COVID
Speaker 1: once Biden comes in. Clearly this is part of some
Speaker 1: narrative creation stunt here, right, But oh, they're gonna do
Speaker 1: all this stuff, and they're gonna clean it up, and
Speaker 1: they're gonna do all these you know. And I mean,
Speaker 1: I sit here and I just say, it couldn't be
Speaker 1: any more obvious. It couldn't be any more obvious that
Speaker 1: what's going on here is that they're trying to make
Speaker 1: it seem like Trump leaving is a cleansing of itself
Speaker 1: of the White House. But they're using COVID as the excuse.
Speaker 1: But wiping down surfaces and sanitizing things and all this,
Speaker 1: no one really thinks this is a major way of
Speaker 1: preventing the spread. But we've been told to do this
Speaker 1: so many times. Oh, people were wiping down their groceries
Speaker 1: in the beginning, remember that. And now where people just
Speaker 1: cling to the mask, all the mask is going to
Speaker 1: save us as the cases in California explode. You know
Speaker 1: why cases aren't exploding as much in New York City.
Speaker 1: It's not because we're better at masking. It's not because
Speaker 1: we take it more seriously. It's because so many of
Speaker 1: us got infected in March, April and May that there
Speaker 1: is a smaller population among whom the virus will spread
Speaker 1: now thus lower cases, thus less of a spike, still
Speaker 1: a spike, but less of a spike I mean would
Speaker 1: have otherwise had which this is all just indicating that
Speaker 1: these measures, these procedures that were that are being put
Speaker 1: into place all the time, they don't have the intended effect.
Speaker 1: They don't manage to do what they're supposed to do.
Speaker 1: And you see this playing out across the country, and
Speaker 1: these these feuds, these fights that will appear where you
Speaker 1: have bull who decide they're going to be the mask police.
Speaker 1: You know, they're going to be the one who tells
Speaker 1: everybody else what's acceptable, what's not acceptable. And here's an
Speaker 1: instance of this. This was on the train, a train
Speaker 1: I know very well, I'd take it so many times
Speaker 1: from New York to DC. And it involves a friend
Speaker 1: of mine, Ashley Saint Clair is her name, and she is, well,
Speaker 1: this is what happens. There are a couple of guys
Speaker 1: who are drinking coffee and have their masks down while
Speaker 1: they're drinking the coffee, because that's those those are the
Speaker 1: rules rules are you're drinking, mask comes down while you're drinking,
Speaker 1: because obviously you can't drink through a mask, right, Okay?
Speaker 1: And so you can't be somebody who's a stickler for
Speaker 1: the rules but then decide that there's some additional set
Speaker 1: of rules beyond it that that doesn't work. That's not
Speaker 1: going to fly, especially when the existing rules are already
Speaker 1: dumb ass. But that let's put that aside. So there's
Speaker 1: this woman and it turns out I don't remember name,
Speaker 1: it doesn't even matter, but she I mean, she looks
Speaker 1: like she sounds in this one for those of you
Speaker 1: that can imagine. And she's a huff Post supporter who is,
Speaker 1: like I'm sorry, a huff Post contributor who has a
Speaker 1: seventy thousand person Twitter following. So she's a journalist of
Speaker 1: some kind and kind of the ultimate Karen as well,
Speaker 1: although I don't really like that term, as you know,
Speaker 1: but on this one, I'll make an exception. And here
Speaker 1: she is on the train freaking out at people because
Speaker 1: of coffee drinking. And my friend Ashley Saint Clair taped
Speaker 1: this play clip one. You have seventy them on the
Speaker 1: Twitter followers, Well they're not. That means nothing. You're still
Speaker 1: being very rude. These men are just drinking coffee because
Speaker 1: they're allowed to have a mask through they're drinking and
Speaker 1: worry what your own business? Do you know what's safer
Speaker 1: than the mass social distancing that's more effective than the mass.
Speaker 1: So why don't you step back and yes on this
Speaker 1: tree with this graspox youving an issue here, problem mama? Okay,
Speaker 1: kind of police police to this, she says, would you
Speaker 1: like me to call the police we had if you
Speaker 1: don't want to police. Everybody needs to go back to
Speaker 1: the seat. Just go back to the seat. If not,
Speaker 1: I will call the police. And that's the police handling
Speaker 1: there you have the conductor intervening. Fortunately, So so ye,
Speaker 1: this this really this crazy lady. Um and I'm looking
Speaker 1: right now at Ashley Sinclair's time like she's got more
Speaker 1: of the details here and they're they're just it's amazing
Speaker 1: to see this. By one of the people that the
Speaker 1: crazy trained lady harassed was a disabled veteran. So you
Speaker 1: had a disabled veteran, a couple of friends drinking coffee,
Speaker 1: mining their own business, and this woman puts them on
Speaker 1: video because they're not masking up enough, puts them on
Speaker 1: video and and is trying to humiliate them public. I mean,
Speaker 1: that's why she's threatening them with you know, I have
Speaker 1: seventy thousand Twitter followers. I have seventy thousand Twitter followers,
Speaker 1: Like as if that's supposed to make everybody terrified of her.
Speaker 1: It was pretty pretty amazing. And then this, this woman
Speaker 1: who said that the mask shamer walks over to Ashley
Speaker 1: Saint Clair and we couldn't even play this clip for
Speaker 1: you because she starts calling her a Nazi and then
Speaker 1: just all think of all the most vile, awful words
Speaker 1: imaginable that you could put into one sentence and start
Speaker 1: saying all that to Ashley as well, lots of curses,
Speaker 1: and this person is clearly emotionally unwell, and I have
Speaker 1: not a neighbor. She claims that Ashley was doxinger, which
Speaker 1: is fascinating because she was actually trying to publicly humiliate
Speaker 1: a group of men who were just having coffee with
Speaker 1: their masks. They had masks on by the way, or
Speaker 1: they had masks I should say, on their faces, but
Speaker 1: they were pulled down so they could drink coffee. And
Speaker 1: that's set off this woman. But you see, the rules
Speaker 1: are stupid. That's something you have to remember. The rules
Speaker 1: are dumb. But if you're going to enforce dumb rules,
Speaker 1: you don't get to add a whole set beyond that
Speaker 1: of even dumber rules. And people are just so nasty
Speaker 1: over all this stuff. You know, I'm still angry about
Speaker 1: the few times I've had people say to me, oh,
Speaker 1: weren't you wearing a mask? I look at them say,
Speaker 1: because I'm outside, and wearing a mask outside is stupid,
Speaker 1: And you know I'm right, but you're just too scared.
Speaker 1: You're too intellectually and emotionally insecure to make your own decisions, right,
Speaker 1: So you want me to do this too because you're
Speaker 1: too scared to not do it. Look again, as I said,
Speaker 1: anyone who wants to mask up, go for it. I
Speaker 1: have no problem with masking. You want to mask up,
Speaker 1: go for it. It is the mentality that you want
Speaker 1: to tell other people when they're obeying the rules that
Speaker 1: that's somehow not good enough. That's where I've got a problem.
Speaker 1: That's where I have a major issue. And you see
Speaker 1: this continue to happen. And there's also the nastiness that
Speaker 1: this is creating in our society where people really believe
Speaker 1: that they take this propaganda to heart, where they think
Speaker 1: that someone who does not obey the mask mandates that
Speaker 1: somebody who tries to stand up. The mask shamers is
Speaker 1: really a bad person and should be humiliated, should be undermined,
Speaker 1: should publicly mocked. It's gross, it's wrong. I would never
Speaker 1: do this to my fellow Americans. I would never do
Speaker 1: this to another human being. Try to take my own
Speaker 1: anxieties and my own political religious beliefs about masking out
Speaker 1: on other people. We're gonna have to stop this, and
Speaker 1: they're not gonna want to stop. Understand that, they're gonna
Speaker 1: think masking. They're gonna want you masking up for another year.
Speaker 1: They're gonna want this to continue on for a long
Speaker 1: time in the future, because the moment we all stop,
Speaker 1: we're gonna start to be more the moment we don't
Speaker 1: have to do this, we can actually look at this
Speaker 1: process and look at what's happened here with some clarity
Speaker 1: and the most strident. I mean, the people that are
Speaker 1: putting masks on their faces in their Twitter photos, for example,
Speaker 1: are the same people who are putting pronouns in their
Speaker 1: Twitter bios. Why is that? Is it because they're so
Speaker 1: concerned with the risks of COVID nineteen or is it
Speaker 1: because they have made this a virtue signaling opportunity and
Speaker 1: they use this to separate themselves politically from other people.
Speaker 1: I think I think we all know the answer, and
Speaker 1: I think it's time that we hold those who are
Speaker 1: going to be so vicious to others to account for
Speaker 1: just the insanity of this continued authoritarian view about something
Speaker 1: that if they just spent a couple of minutes, if
Speaker 1: they just thought about this for a little bit, they'd
Speaker 1: be so much more willing to compromise. As I've said,
Speaker 1: when they'll when they'll finally agree that we don't have
Speaker 1: to wear masks outdoors, then I'll feel like we're having
Speaker 1: a real conversation until they'll say that everything they say
Speaker 1: is tainted because they're not being honest. They're they're not
Speaker 1: looking at the evidence they have taken. They've chosen a side,
Speaker 1: and they want to inflict that on all the rest
Speaker 1: of us. And I just lose my mind when I
Speaker 1: see this stuff happening, where people are yelling at somebody
Speaker 1: in a store, where's your mask? As if they're the problem.
Speaker 1: You got tens of millions of people infected with COVID
Speaker 1: across the country, you're gonna scream at one person for
Speaker 1: not wearing a mask for one second? I mean, that's
Speaker 1: really helping. This is no different than if you saw
Speaker 1: somebody who you know, had a wrapper how to receipt
Speaker 1: blow out of their hands and they walked out of
Speaker 1: the store. You ran up them. You're destroying the planet.
Speaker 1: You're destroying the planet. You're the cause of all the waste,
Speaker 1: the landfills and the waste and the waters, and you're
Speaker 1: choking the sea turtles. And it's the same mentality. No, actually,
Speaker 1: I just had a receipt blow out of my hands.
Speaker 1: Stop being such a lunatic. That's what we're dealing with, though,
Speaker 1: And the more you can see that, the more clarity
Speaker 1: we have as we define this and understand it, the
Speaker 1: better off we will all be. You're in the Freedom Hunt.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. But now the caravans,
Speaker 1: they think by he's getting in the caravans aforming again,
Speaker 1: they want to come in again and rip off our country.
Speaker 1: Canna let it happen? Yep, he's saying the truth. The caravans,
Speaker 1: as I mentioned before, they are coming, and the whole
Speaker 1: thing was a scam for a lot of them. I
Speaker 1: mean not everybody, but most of the people were showing
Speaker 1: up at the border the last time they were caravans.
Speaker 1: They were all abusing our system. They're really abusing the
Speaker 1: generosity of the American people, and they were doing it
Speaker 1: by pretending that they were fleeing oppression, that they were
Speaker 1: what they really needed. You see, what they were really
Speaker 1: trying to get was not amnesty, but they wanted I'm sorry,
Speaker 1: not asylum. That's the phrasen looking for it. It wasn't
Speaker 1: asylum they're trying to get. But they just wanted to
Speaker 1: get into the United States by pretending they were assiles.
Speaker 1: And they didn't show up in many cases for their
Speaker 1: court hearings. They didn't show up and actually deal with
Speaker 1: our system. They just knew that they could get entry
Speaker 1: by claiming asylum and then they would just stay. You're
Speaker 1: gonna have a whole lot more of that. Do you
Speaker 1: think a Biden administration is going to have any interests
Speaker 1: whatsoever in stopping that? You think a Biden administration is
Speaker 1: going to have any interest whatsoever in preventing further waves
Speaker 1: of illegal immigrants from coming to the country. No, of course,
Speaker 1: not that it's to their benefit. We're gonna have a
Speaker 1: border crisis, I think in twenty twenty one, the likes
Speaker 1: of which we haven't seen in decades. That's my that's
Speaker 1: my belief. I can see it coming. But let's get
Speaker 1: back to this now, because I know we've we've had
Speaker 1: these these hearings that are on Capitol Hill and you know,
Speaker 1: the Congress meeting to certify the results of the election. First,
Speaker 1: here's what Trump was saying about how he feels about
Speaker 1: the election. Of course, the fraud. This was today at
Speaker 1: his big rally in DC. Play the the election fraud
Speaker 1: case that Trump is making more than there were actual voters.
Speaker 1: You see that, So you have more votes again than
Speaker 1: you have voters. One hundred and fifty thousand people registered
Speaker 1: in Maya, Copa County. After the registration deadline, one hundred
Speaker 1: and three thousand ballots in the county were sent for
Speaker 1: electronic adjudication. With lots of election fraud allegations, lots of
Speaker 1: claims about this still out there. Trump is not backing
Speaker 1: down off of any of this. He very much believes
Speaker 1: that this election was stolen from him, and he was
Speaker 1: exhorting Mike Pence today to be the last, the last line,
Speaker 1: the last man here to do something about it. Let's
Speaker 1: play that play. His Mike Pence commentary left knows exactly
Speaker 1: what they're doing. They're ruthless and it's time that somebody
Speaker 1: did something about it. And Mike Pence, I hope you're
Speaker 1: going to stand up for the good of our constitution
Speaker 1: and for the good of our country. And if you're not,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna be very disappointed in you. I will tell
Speaker 1: you right now. I'm not hearing good stories. I'm not
Speaker 1: hearing good stories. Yeah, Penz ain't gonna do it. It's
Speaker 1: not happening. Didn't happen. Sorry, Pence is not about to
Speaker 1: I don't even know what the process is he thinks
Speaker 1: is gonna happen there, my friends, there's a lot of
Speaker 1: frustration out there. There's a lot of anger about this
Speaker 1: whole election and everything that's gone on. But for now,
Speaker 1: I would just say, we really really do need to
Speaker 1: prepare for what's coming our way and and be very
Speaker 1: honest with each other and be very honest going forward
Speaker 1: about what that's what that's going to mean. I can
Speaker 1: appreciate that the president wants to fight till the very
Speaker 1: end here, but now we're gonna need him. We're gonna
Speaker 1: need a president who will lead a movement out of office.
Speaker 1: That's what it is what we are heading towards. If
Speaker 1: you if you don't, friends, I don't want you to
Speaker 1: be frustrated with me. That is what is happening here.
Speaker 1: And you know I would I if I thought there
Speaker 1: were some way to stop this or some way that
Speaker 1: we'd avoid this, I would say, let's I've been all
Speaker 1: in on the recounts, all in on the voter fraud investigations,
Speaker 1: looking at every allegation that's out there. But this train
Speaker 1: is leaving the station and we can sit there as
Speaker 1: much as we want and say, but but they cheated,
Speaker 1: and they say that's right, and we now have control
Speaker 1: of the train. What are you going to do about it?
Speaker 1: That's where we are worthy. What do you want to
Speaker 1: do about it? Phase of this, which I think is
Speaker 1: where we all need. We all need to be in
Speaker 1: that place where we can understand this. Thanks for listening
Speaker 1: to The bus Esson Show podcast. Remember to subscribe on
Speaker 1: Apple Podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Speaker 1: Big March going on today in DC. We've got a
Speaker 1: man who's down there telling us about what's happening. What's
Speaker 1: going on. He is best known for the man behind
Speaker 1: DC Dreino Rogan o'handley, conservative commentator and meme creator as
Speaker 1: with us now, Rogan, thank you for having me on, brother.
Speaker 1: I am down here with literally hundreds of thousands of patriots.
Speaker 1: Every single person I've talked to is from a different
Speaker 1: state in the country. I've heard as far as California, Nebraska.
Speaker 1: I talked to someone there from Portugal. It's freezing out here,
Speaker 1: but the energy is insanely high. People are not going
Speaker 1: down without a fight. Rogan, tell me this, what are
Speaker 1: you what are you seeing out there? I mean, when
Speaker 1: you're talking to people, why why have they shown up
Speaker 1: in these numbers? What are they Are they hoping to
Speaker 1: just send a message or is there still a real
Speaker 1: sense that they think the outcome can still be changed.
Speaker 1: I think, you know, no matter what, they're not giving
Speaker 1: up until Joe Biden is sworn in. There are options,
Speaker 1: there are legal options, and you know right now today
Speaker 1: in Congress, everyone is here to put pressure on Republicans,
Speaker 1: especially to acknowledge the rampant fraud of which there are
Speaker 1: mountains of evidence, and to stand up for the Constitution
Speaker 1: and the integrity of our elections. So I'm looking around.
Speaker 1: Everyone's wearing very casual clothes, you know, a ton of
Speaker 1: Trump flags, a lot of Camo, a lot of Maga hats.
Speaker 1: Don't tread on me flags, and everyone's smiling. Everyone's very polite,
Speaker 1: and we are all marching down to the Capitol. We
Speaker 1: just saw Trump's speech. It was optimistic, it was hopeful.
Speaker 1: He's not conceding. And now he said, you know, I'm
Speaker 1: going to be marching with you to the Capitol. I
Speaker 1: don't know how exactly he's going to do that, but
Speaker 1: he's headed there as well. And now tell me this,
Speaker 1: are you are you seeing counter protest elements already out
Speaker 1: there or do they just wait till nighttime as the
Speaker 1: cowards they are, you know, these Antifa groups and others
Speaker 1: that are trying to menace what you guys are doing,
Speaker 1: which is peaceful assembly as protected under the Constitution to
Speaker 1: have your voices heard. Are you already seeing some of
Speaker 1: those figures out there as they're concerned about it. I
Speaker 1: haven't seen any counter protesters yet. They would be wildly overwhelmed. Again,
Speaker 1: Trump in a speech set, there's probably over two hundred
Speaker 1: and fifty thousand people, which is the largest gathering he's
Speaker 1: ever had, you know, rally, but based on what we've
Speaker 1: seen before. Chances are there the counter protesters, the Antifa
Speaker 1: scumbags as Senator Holly are probably taking the hyena approach
Speaker 1: and waiting for nighttime, looking for stragglers, looking for people
Speaker 1: that have you know, gotten stranded from the big group.
Speaker 1: And then and you know they pick on the weeks
Speaker 1: and the defenseless. So uh, thus far nothing. It's it's
Speaker 1: a selling operation of uh you know the constitution today
Speaker 1: and these people that that's what they're here a part.
Speaker 1: They know a scam when they see one. Uh, they've
Speaker 1: seen a scam in these Swings Dade elections and they're
Speaker 1: gonna do everything they can to stop it. Now, Rogan,
Speaker 1: you're kind of MAGA vanguard and have been now for
Speaker 1: four years. I mean, you're you're you're a frontline MAGA warrior.
Speaker 1: I've I've known I've known your work and I've known
Speaker 1: you now for years. What what are you thinking? I mean,
Speaker 1: try to try to give give us some words of
Speaker 1: perspective from what you're seeing here. A Georgia doesn't look good,
Speaker 1: my friend, I mean, I you know who knows, but
Speaker 1: it looks like we may have lost these Senate seats.
Speaker 1: A lot of people were Trump voters and really believe
Speaker 1: in the movement across the country are hearing you as
Speaker 1: you talk about this. What do you want to say
Speaker 1: to that? I mean, because I got a lot of
Speaker 1: people that are feeling Look, man, they're feeling dejected and
Speaker 1: they're really upset about this. Well, and that's that's what
Speaker 1: the news wants you to feel. You know, it's a
Speaker 1: suppression tactic. They want you to feel like you've lost
Speaker 1: the war before the war is over. I refuse to,
Speaker 1: you know, obey those types of commands, and I personally see,
Speaker 1: you know, at least a couple pathway is still to
Speaker 1: do this. Uh, there's a lot of constitutional ambiguity with
Speaker 1: what Vice President Pence can do. They're chant in USA
Speaker 1: right now around me, and you know anyone that says,
Speaker 1: well he can or he can't with a certainty, you
Speaker 1: know it will ultimately be determined. I think if Pence
Speaker 1: does pull something like that, does stand up in a
Speaker 1: historic sense, does position himself firmly in the lead for
Speaker 1: twenty twenty four, If he does send these electors back
Speaker 1: to their states for clarification, for this state legislatures to
Speaker 1: do their constitutional duty and either certify or de certify
Speaker 1: based on all the evidence of fraud that has been
Speaker 1: uncovered since the original certifications. You know that that's that's
Speaker 1: what uh people are expecting to happen. That's what President
Speaker 1: Trump was talking about. Uh, you know, brought up Vice
Speaker 1: President Pence multiple times during his speech and encouraging him
Speaker 1: to make the right decision. So, UM, you know, again,
Speaker 1: until hand is on that Bible taken the oath of office,
Speaker 1: this ain't over. And frankly, I think even after today
Speaker 1: if it were to be certified, if they re bided,
Speaker 1: which I don't think it will be today regardless, just
Speaker 1: with all the objections, Uh, you know, these states can
Speaker 1: possibly still decertify. And then you know, now we have
Speaker 1: a constitutional issue that we haven't dealt with before. Um
Speaker 1: and and we'll have to fight that front as well.
Speaker 1: So still a couple pathways. Stay optimistic, stay hopeful, and uh,
Speaker 1: you know, pressure your your state and federal representatives to
Speaker 1: do We're speaking to Rogan o'hanley. He is DC Draino.
Speaker 1: Those of you on Instagram and Twitter you know Rogan's work.
Speaker 1: He's one of the great meme creators and one of
Speaker 1: the really the culture warriors for our side in the
Speaker 1: in the MAGA movement and Rogan just can you you're
Speaker 1: also a lawyer, which I know people who know you know,
Speaker 1: but that might not come across all the time from
Speaker 1: you know the fact that you're doing the memes. Tell
Speaker 1: me this the pathway with Pence. Trump is putting a
Speaker 1: lot of heat on Pence. What what is the mechanid
Speaker 1: Put aside whether it's going to happen or not for
Speaker 1: a second, I put aside the likelihood if it's succeeding.
Speaker 1: But what would the mechanism be involving Vice President Pence? Essentially?
Speaker 1: What would Donald Trump like his vice president to do
Speaker 1: at this stage? I think he would like for you know,
Speaker 1: from what I've read on Twitter briefly before this call
Speaker 1: is that the Arizona electoral votes have already been objected to,
Speaker 1: and Tense I believe has adjourned or dismissed the joint
Speaker 1: session so that they can go deliberate for the constitutionally
Speaker 1: required two hours up to two hours, and then when
Speaker 1: they come back. I do believe the mechanism would be
Speaker 1: a House and Senate vote. It would need a majority
Speaker 1: vote to reject the Arizona results in favor of Biden.
Speaker 1: Based on the fraud. Realistically, that vote will not you know, happen.
Speaker 1: And so then there is a great deal of power
Speaker 1: vested in the President of the Senate, which is Vice
Speaker 1: President Pence in terms of what he can do. And
Speaker 1: you know, one of those options, based on some constitutional
Speaker 1: professor series, is that he can say, you know what,
Speaker 1: we're basically going to table this issue, send it back
Speaker 1: to the Arizona legislation, uh, you know, and and see
Speaker 1: what they what they do, have an evidentiary hearing, have
Speaker 1: a debate at the state level, and then re send
Speaker 1: the electoral votes based on all the information that we
Speaker 1: now have now, uh Rogan. I also want to ask you,
Speaker 1: because you've done You've done a lot that I would
Speaker 1: say is in the in the cultural fight realm for
Speaker 1: Trump and for the Trump movement. How do you see
Speaker 1: that continue irrespective of how these processes play out right
Speaker 1: now with the certification in DC and Vice President Patson
Speaker 1: and where the votes are, what do you see as
Speaker 1: as the future of of MAGA as a cultural phenomenon. Well,
Speaker 1: I see it as a you know, a Patriot party,
Speaker 1: um and and whether the Republican Party is going to
Speaker 1: be the home to this very um, powerful grassroots movement
Speaker 1: unlike anything we've seen probably in American history, just by
Speaker 1: sheer volume of people. Uh, you know, the Republican Party
Speaker 1: is now a big tent party and it's got uh,
Speaker 1: you know, record numbers of black, Latino, female Asian LGBT support,
Speaker 1: and frankly that's because of President Trump and and the
Speaker 1: message he brings, this populous message, a message for the
Speaker 1: working American, you know, not the coastal elites. That that
Speaker 1: problem is still here. Trump didn't get rid of it.
Speaker 1: These people think they know better than than you know,
Speaker 1: the people living in Nebraska and in the suburbs of
Speaker 1: you know, Ohio, But they don't. And so I think
Speaker 1: that this movement is only growing in strength. Um, you know,
Speaker 1: regardless of what happens with this election. Uh, it's not
Speaker 1: going anywhere. And the Republican Party and its leadership, they
Speaker 1: have already shown that they're trying to revert to the
Speaker 1: you know, polite using strategy of you know, Mitt Romney
Speaker 1: and John McCain. But the you know, modern day Republicans
Speaker 1: are a lot more awake and aware now that that
Speaker 1: strategy uh, you know, simply does not work. It is
Speaker 1: not in touch with uh, you know who these people are,
Speaker 1: what our problems are, and so I think this is
Speaker 1: just the beginning. If the Republican Party wants to shape
Speaker 1: up and be a home for these people, I think
Speaker 1: it'll be uh, you know, welcomes. But if they don't,
Speaker 1: if they want to backstab us, if they want to
Speaker 1: cross us, uh, you know, we'll dump them faster than
Speaker 1: we did Fox News in the NFL d you see
Speaker 1: Drano also known as Rogano Hanley Rogan, You're a warrior,
Speaker 1: my friend. Good to have you with us. Thank you
Speaker 1: so much for joining. Stay safe down there. Thank you. Buck,
Speaker 1: you're a warrior as well, my friend. And it was
Speaker 1: great talk with all with all of you you're in
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Show podcast. We need to federal
Speaker 1: government to step up here and ban all travel from
Speaker 1: the United Kingdom to the United States of America. And
Speaker 1: I'm obviously specifically most concerned about the three airports serving
Speaker 1: New York City. It's time to stop the half measures.
Speaker 1: I mean, right now, you can still get on a
Speaker 1: plane in London, not even have proof that you have
Speaker 1: a negative test and merrily come over to New York
Speaker 1: City and spread to the season. I mean, build a
Speaker 1: Blasio is a moron. I don't know who's going to
Speaker 1: try to defend him at this point. I don't know
Speaker 1: who wants to take the other side of this debate.
Speaker 1: But build a Blasio is a moron. I mean, really,
Speaker 1: this is a guy who the more you look at this,
Speaker 1: the more you just see. What does he not understand
Speaker 1: banning flights from the UK? We already have the UK
Speaker 1: variant in the United States, which means it's already spreading.
Speaker 1: Its spreading very rapidly all throughout the population. What we've learned,
Speaker 1: I mean in the early days, you could say, before
Speaker 1: we knew what we were dealing with, before we knew
Speaker 1: whether we'd be able to handle this in our hospitals
Speaker 1: and everything else. Trying to just for a short period
Speaker 1: shut down travel from say China, when we thought that
Speaker 1: was the epicenter of this whole thing. That was one
Speaker 1: period in time, and it might have helped us get
Speaker 1: ready for what was coming. But now at this stage,
Speaker 1: it's already all over the place. So what is he
Speaker 1: talking We need the federal government to step up. You
Speaker 1: know what you're going to see now, my friends, So
Speaker 1: much finger pointing from these Democrats who spent the spring
Speaker 1: and the summer, patting themselves on the back news some
Speaker 1: Quomo de Blasio, Lori Lightfoot, Gretchen Wit and more, all
Speaker 1: these people who were, oh, look at us, we listened
Speaker 1: to the science. We really are they listening to the
Speaker 1: science now in California where they're having the worst COVID
Speaker 1: outbreak pretty much in the whole world right now? That
Speaker 1: is that because they were listening to the science. At
Speaker 1: the government level there with all the mandates and everything else.
Speaker 1: Who could really believe this stuff at this point? I mean,
Speaker 1: who really thinks that any and this could be considered true?
Speaker 1: And I sit here and I ask you, what is
Speaker 1: it going to take for us to be able to
Speaker 1: have a more forthright conversation about this. I don't have
Speaker 1: the answer, because we've already seen everything we need to know.
Speaker 1: I mean, Florida is open for business, doing well, continuing
Speaker 1: to operate, and places like New York and California are
Speaker 1: locked down and in the case California having terrible, terrible
Speaker 1: time dealing with COVID. What thesis do they have to
Speaker 1: explain this? I have a thesis. California didn't get hit
Speaker 1: as badly because of the seasonality of the virus when
Speaker 1: it first broke out in a major way in the
Speaker 1: United States, and so they had fewer people get infected then,
Speaker 1: so they're getting more infection now. New York had a
Speaker 1: very high level of infection in the first wave. So
Speaker 1: we're still having infections now, but it's to a lesser
Speaker 1: degree because of the limited herd immunity that was built up,
Speaker 1: not true herd immunity, but the limited herd immunity. That
Speaker 1: thesis is completely plausible. What thesis do they have in California, Oh,
Speaker 1: that people just got tired of mask And that's a
Speaker 1: lie because the more they add onto this, the more
Speaker 1: the more lockdown measures they put in place, the higher
Speaker 1: the cases still continue to go. They can't even bend
Speaker 1: down the curve. It's been weeks and weeks of this.
Speaker 1: They can't even begin to get the case load to
Speaker 1: come down. No, why is that because people still need
Speaker 1: to be out there buying food. You can actually the
Speaker 1: fundamental problem with lockdowns all along, and I mean with
Speaker 1: their effectiveness, never mind with their destruction or freedom and
Speaker 1: liberty and their unconstitutionality. I just mean the ways in
Speaker 1: which the lockdowns were not sound as a tool even
Speaker 1: to try to bring the cases down. Is that you're
Speaker 1: never really locking down. You're never really preventing human beings
Speaker 1: from seeing each other. You can't do it. You can't
Speaker 1: prevent people from going to the store to buy food.
Speaker 1: You have a lot of people that have jobs that
Speaker 1: have to continue to happen for society to function. Essential workers.
Speaker 1: Essential workers was expanded to include a whole bunch of
Speaker 1: things that, if we're being honest, aren't really essential workers.
Speaker 1: And then they are posing some risk of infection out
Speaker 1: there or at some risk of infection, and then they
Speaker 1: come home and they give it to their family, and
Speaker 1: then their family and then so on and so forth.
Speaker 1: That's what's happening. That's what's actually occurring. They can tell
Speaker 1: you it's because of Trump's supporters not doing enough to
Speaker 1: mask up. They can tell you it's because we don't
Speaker 1: social distance or wash hands it up. That's just because
Speaker 1: they don't have any better answers. And that's because they, ultimately,
Speaker 1: i mean, their single biggest priority is to avoid admitting
Speaker 1: that they were wrong, to avoid admitting that what has
Speaker 1: happened here is that they put this on our shoulders
Speaker 1: and told us that they were sure and that we
Speaker 1: had no choice, and they were wrong, and we always
Speaker 1: should have had a choice. That's heavy. That's not something
Speaker 1: that they're going to ever concede on. And so we're
Speaker 1: gonna go through this now and with with with this
Speaker 1: Biden federal government that we're heading toward right now, it's
Speaker 1: it's gonna get worse. You're gonna have even more federal manage.
Speaker 1: They're they're gonna do all kinds of things to show
Speaker 1: just how seriously they take the science. They're gonna they're
Speaker 1: gonna just pretend that nothing has been learned in the
Speaker 1: last three months. Let's say about what works and doesn't,
Speaker 1: namely that lockdowns and mass mandates do not have the
Speaker 1: intended effect. They are at minimal effectiveness at best, minimal
Speaker 1: effectiveness meaning so little. It's you got you got so little.
Speaker 1: They have to explain to us how well they work.
Speaker 1: If it worked, well, don't you think we would all
Speaker 1: sit around saying, Wow, that was great, that's great. That's no,
Speaker 1: it's and so that's why you have You have idiots,
Speaker 1: you have imbeciles liked to be Zio who are walking
Speaker 1: around saying, oh, yeah, you know what we really need
Speaker 1: to do. We need to ban flights from the UK.
Speaker 1: What's that gonna do? But there's always some other little, annoying,
Speaker 1: worthless inconvenience that these autocrats want to inflict on you.
Speaker 1: There's always one more thing. There's always one more limitation,
Speaker 1: one more infringement, one more dictate. Have you had enough?
Speaker 1: Because I have? I say, we tell them no more.
Speaker 1: We gotta bring lawsuits, we gotta have marches, we gotta
Speaker 1: get out there on the streets, we gotta organize. Otherwise
Speaker 1: it's mask up and shut up and do as you're told.
Speaker 1: And that's what we've been going through already. For what
Speaker 1: I can't even can't even point to benefits from this now.
Speaker 1: The only benefit of masking up is you don't have
Speaker 1: crazy ladies on trains and other places screaming in your
Speaker 1: face and videotaping you and acting like you're a murderer
Speaker 1: because you're having a cup of calls. Thanks for listening
Speaker 1: to the Bus Show podcast. Remember to subscribe on Apple Podcasts,
Speaker 1: the iHeartRadio app for wherever you get your podcasts. Hey,
Speaker 1: team Buck, it's time for roll call. Rememberna check in
Speaker 1: at buck Sexton dot com for for news updates throughout
Speaker 1: the day. Also, please do uh, follow on on Facebook
Speaker 1: and become a Facebook supporter if you're want to be
Speaker 1: kind of in the team Team Buck Insider. And we
Speaker 1: got a lot of things, a lot of things going on,
Speaker 1: so we also follow me on Instagram. You're having already.
Speaker 1: I'm communicating with people. We're gonna have to use every
Speaker 1: platform we've got. Parlor, I'm on Parlor. Love in Parlor.
Speaker 1: It's great. So there you have it. And with that
Speaker 1: producer Mark, it's kind of a tough day. You know,
Speaker 1: we've had kind of a tough day, a tough day
Speaker 1: for a lot of people in America right now. I
Speaker 1: know the giants are keeping their GM. Da've gettldman. It's
Speaker 1: just terrible news right there. We go see any anything
Speaker 1: but the terrible news that I have to I have
Speaker 1: to handle right now feels like it's an upgrade. I
Speaker 1: don't mean to pooh poo on you. I'm just trying
Speaker 1: to provide a little levity for the listeners and for you. No,
Speaker 1: I dude, I appreciate No, I'm big serious, I appreciate it.
Speaker 1: Any anything other than you know, the country has lost,
Speaker 1: the Republic is over is great news. The giants are
Speaker 1: keeping their GM. What was the Giant season, Like they
Speaker 1: went six and ten and still almost made the playoffs
Speaker 1: because the entire NFC East was just absolutely gut awful.
Speaker 1: So they're not good. Who's the quarterback Daniel Jones? I
Speaker 1: don't even know who that is. He's good. No, he's
Speaker 1: very bad and I hate him. But you do have
Speaker 1: you can see Mark, you can't. You can't win them
Speaker 1: all because you do have your your billionaire buddy, mister Cohen,
Speaker 1: who's running your Mets, and that's going to be very
Speaker 1: very good. Yes, baseball season should be good. Hockey seasons
Speaker 1: starting in a week, so I'm very excited about that too.
Speaker 1: Are they going to have in person games or no?
Speaker 1: What do you mean in person games like you know
Speaker 1: audi audience? I mean audio. It depends on the states,
Speaker 1: so yeah, and Florida they will it to be. It
Speaker 1: depends on certain states are allowing it. New York obviously
Speaker 1: is not. What was this whole hubbub with Cuomo and
Speaker 1: the Bills going to the Bills game? You know about this?
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, they're allowing I think a very oddly specific number.
Speaker 1: I think around six thousand of Bills fans to go
Speaker 1: to the games. Uh, the game I think this weekend
Speaker 1: they're hosting a game. Um, yeah, no, there's a there's
Speaker 1: a big there's a Big Bills game this weekend. Snow
Speaker 1: Princess a big Bills fan. She she loves all things
Speaker 1: Buffalo as she is a Buffalo. Oh. I think I'm
Speaker 1: giving this away that she comes from Buffalo folks. That's
Speaker 1: why we call her the snow Princess because it's very
Speaker 1: sore on the show. Oh I have okay, Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: I know. She's a big, big Buffalo fan and and
Speaker 1: likes to talk about the greatness of the Buffalo Wings. Yeah,
Speaker 1: like how Buffalo Wings, but but how they're the best
Speaker 1: in Buffalo, it turns out, of course, and on other places,
Speaker 1: while still perhaps tellectable in their own right, aren't aren't
Speaker 1: cheese steak in New York? You know, I Philly cheese steaks.
Speaker 1: I feel like they've fallen out of You don't see
Speaker 1: them as much these days. There even was a time
Speaker 1: when some fast food places, we're trying to do cheese
Speaker 1: steaks and everything else. And a good cheese steak is
Speaker 1: a brilliant idea. You know, A cheese steak is a
Speaker 1: really nice you know, I tried to make some I
Speaker 1: made great steak and the and the peppers and everything
Speaker 1: else and the cheese, but I used gluten free bread
Speaker 1: and it was just like eating eating a chalk brick
Speaker 1: or something. So that didn't work out as well. If
Speaker 1: you go to patsr Gino's in Philadelphia and ask for
Speaker 1: a gluten free roll, you're getting thrown out of there.
Speaker 1: I was gonna say they would screw in my face,
Speaker 1: but I can't do a Philly. A Philly accent is
Speaker 1: a very particular accent. They have an accent. Yes, oh, yes,
Speaker 1: there's a Philly accent. There's a there's a Philly accent.
Speaker 1: The Baltimore accent is like, you know, we got we
Speaker 1: got a great audience from WCBM Baltimore. The Baltimore accent,
Speaker 1: I I can't even They like to say hun h
Speaker 1: o n like a hun and and there's also a
Speaker 1: whole I can't even begin. I'm a guy who likes accents,
Speaker 1: like to mimic to try to do accents. I can't
Speaker 1: even touch the Baltimore accent. It's, you know, everyone kind
Speaker 1: of the Boston with the car and the pock and
Speaker 1: all that stuff. There's a little bit of that in ball.
Speaker 1: I don't know, man, I'll find somebody who can do
Speaker 1: the Baltimore accent and I'll have to play some mode.
Speaker 1: But it was just like words they use. I didn't
Speaker 1: realize that they actually there's words, but there's also there's
Speaker 1: also Look, a lot of people in Baltimore don't have it,
Speaker 1: but there are people who do, and you go, wow,
Speaker 1: that's a really you know, it's like New York. I
Speaker 1: mean New York. You get the Brooklyn accent and and
Speaker 1: sort of Brooklyn Queen's accent, which a little different than
Speaker 1: the Staten Island Jersey accent, which is you know, there's
Speaker 1: all kinds of differentiation here. I thought the Philadelphia accent
Speaker 1: was just obscenities and smelling like tresh oh and uh
Speaker 1: and starting fights at Eagles games. Yeah, I think that's
Speaker 1: right to our Philly audience. You could direct all of
Speaker 1: your you could throw all of your virtual cheese steaks
Speaker 1: at producer Mark in Roll calls. I'm not going to
Speaker 1: get into it. As a Giants fan, I have every
Speaker 1: right to hate the Eagles right now. How are the
Speaker 1: Eagles doing? Oh, they missed the playoffs and they put
Speaker 1: in their third string awful quarterback in a game that
Speaker 1: if they would have won, the Giants would have made
Speaker 1: the playoffs. Oh my gosh, harsh realities we're dealing with,
Speaker 1: all right, row call is another reality. Let's get to it. Andrew,
Speaker 1: dear Buck. I become a big fan of yours this
Speaker 1: past year. I'd like to see you run for president
Speaker 1: in twenty twenty four. I think you are very balanced
Speaker 1: and would be the next President Reagan. If you decide
Speaker 1: to run, you have my vote. Thanks for your diligent work.
Speaker 1: Happy New Year, well, Andrew, that is very very kind
Speaker 1: of you, and I appreciate that. You know, it's nice
Speaker 1: to hear nice things these days, because these are you know,
Speaker 1: it's it's tough out there right now, folks, it's tough
Speaker 1: out there. Producer Mark in a Buck administration. If you
Speaker 1: could have any job, which of course you could, because
Speaker 1: I need you to actually make sure that you know
Speaker 1: the train run on time and all that, what job
Speaker 1: would you want or would we create a job like
Speaker 1: sports liaison czar or something that sounds great? If I
Speaker 1: could just get a paycheck to be the liaison to
Speaker 1: the sports league's great My first joking one would be,
Speaker 1: can I just hold the football that sounds funa. What
Speaker 1: do you mean, hold the football? Isn't the football the
Speaker 1: thing with the nuclear card? Oh? Oh, I'm sorry. I
Speaker 1: was like, yeah, of course, you're totally right. I was
Speaker 1: thinking football football as in I mean, I don't know,
Speaker 1: maybe we'll do that sometime, as like you know, throwing
Speaker 1: out the first pitch at the game. But no, no, yeah,
Speaker 1: hold the nuclear football. You'd be that guy. You get
Speaker 1: to wear a cool earpiece and have dark glasses in
Speaker 1: a suit, and probably carry a machine gun and you
Speaker 1: just hold the football, just follow you around. They don't
Speaker 1: actually do anything unless I'm needed, which hopefully I'm not. Yeah,
Speaker 1: it's probably a good gig. If you're needed, by the way,
Speaker 1: in that situation, that's a really bad day. Yeah. I
Speaker 1: don't want to be needed if I'm the guy holding Yeah.
Speaker 1: Can you imagine be the guy that's told yeah, no,
Speaker 1: we're serious, it's go time, like nuclear first strike, like
Speaker 1: we got to do this right now. That that's got
Speaker 1: to be heavy. Yeah. On the list of heavy moments
Speaker 1: one could have, being a part of a nuclear first
Speaker 1: strike or nuclear retaliatory strike would would be up there.
Speaker 1: So I did start watching the key for Sutherland show
Speaker 1: Designated Survivor. It was pretty good. I got a couple
Speaker 1: episodes into it. Yeah, I watched the whole thing. I
Speaker 1: really enjoyed it, so I should kind of give it
Speaker 1: another shot, get back to it. You know, I had
Speaker 1: a Team buck listener a few years ago or a few.
Speaker 1: A few people in Team Buck tell me to watch
Speaker 1: Pole Dark because I know that I like all that
Speaker 1: masterpiece theater, you know, English period stuff, and which is
Speaker 1: true I do, And I finally really really got into
Speaker 1: it recently. I really gave it a shot. It's great.
Speaker 1: I got my sister watching it and got my mom
Speaker 1: watching it. It's on Amazon Prime. If you have Amazon Prime,
Speaker 1: you could watch it for free. You and missus Mark,
Speaker 1: I think would straight up fall asleep. It's a lot
Speaker 1: of people like, oh, but what will we do for
Speaker 1: the pole We're running out of bread? Oh no, the
Speaker 1: mine will be closing tomorrow. How will we afford our tea?
Speaker 1: You know, there's a lot of that. Oh. I had
Speaker 1: to was Google and see the cover and I started
Speaker 1: falling asleep. You know, it's not it's not something you're
Speaker 1: gonna like at all, But I'm really I'm really enjoying
Speaker 1: a lot of fancy accents, British people. There's a little
Speaker 1: bit of a post revolutionary war vibe to talk about
Speaker 1: the French Revolution too. So good good things, good things
Speaker 1: if you're into that, if you like, uh, you know,
Speaker 1: British accents and people walking around talking about tea time
Speaker 1: and stuff. But it's set in the seventeen nineties or
Speaker 1: seventeen eighty seventeen nineties, I forget one or the other.
Speaker 1: You should you should check it out for sure, all right? Oh,
Speaker 1: and will I run for president? Andrew? No, I have
Speaker 1: way too much fun doing this radio show. We're growing
Speaker 1: too fast. Too many people people listen to the show
Speaker 1: one of my favorite things. We just need more people
Speaker 1: to know about it. I have so many listeners who say, oh,
Speaker 1: I didn't know about you until and then they say
Speaker 1: I either added you too or replaced whoever I was
Speaker 1: listening to before. So I will say that's that's very nice.
Speaker 1: So that's that's very encouraging. People hear about this show.
Speaker 1: They want to listen to this show. Look, I think
Speaker 1: it's the best show out there. I'm just gonna say,
Speaker 1: you're a lot easier on the ears some of your competition. Yes,
Speaker 1: that is, unless you want to punish your ear drums.
Speaker 1: There's some people with very grating voices out there and
Speaker 1: like to scream a lot. Uh, let's see, Mike hey Buck.
Speaker 1: As I sit back and watch these case numbers skyrocket
Speaker 1: in Massachusetts and they have since October, makes me wonder
Speaker 1: about the whole mask mania. It's quite obvious to anyone
Speaker 1: with a logical thought process that masks just aren't working.
Speaker 1: Brings me to my question, do you think they're pumping
Speaker 1: a sense of false security intentionally through mask mandates. It's
Speaker 1: almost like they know they don't work and everybody can
Speaker 1: see that, but in turn they want to provide people
Speaker 1: that sense of security, maybe in order to keep the
Speaker 1: economy going at a snail's pace. But going to say
Speaker 1: the least thank you for all you do, No, Mike,
Speaker 1: I think I understand what you're saying, and I think
Speaker 1: that's a good, good thinking. But I would tell you this.
Speaker 1: I believe that they really think that wearing a mask
Speaker 1: is is critical and science and because they don't think
Speaker 1: beyond that, so they've been told that this is what
Speaker 1: people who believe in science will do, and so that's
Speaker 1: what they are going to do. And they think that
Speaker 1: the dumb you know, redneck Trump supporters are like, I
Speaker 1: won't wear a mask because I don't believe in science
Speaker 1: that that's there. This is the whole caricature that the
Speaker 1: Left is created. And yet if you just sit around,
Speaker 1: as you put out, if you just think about this,
Speaker 1: masks work so well that we're sitting here, do they
Speaker 1: really think that you know that that if masks were
Speaker 1: great and they protect people, what I have a problem
Speaker 1: with that. No, I want no one to get COVID.
Speaker 1: I want no one to die from this virus. So
Speaker 1: if I thought this was some highly effective thing, you know,
Speaker 1: I would be the first one to say everybody should
Speaker 1: be doing this all the time. But as I've said,
Speaker 1: it's perhaps minimally effective. It might help a little bit
Speaker 1: sometimes in some situations, but as a policy that will
Speaker 1: turn this whole thing around, we can all see it
Speaker 1: is obvious. It is clear it does not work the
Speaker 1: way they told us it would. They can keep repeating themselves,
Speaker 1: keep demanding keep but you know, and I think a
Speaker 1: big part of this is also ego, as I've said,
Speaker 1: not just the ego of the people in charge. Like
Speaker 1: doctor Fauci. You know he's not gonna say at this point.
Speaker 1: I know, I told you mitigation and it didn't really work,
Speaker 1: and I ruined your business, and I stole a year
Speaker 1: of your life away from you, and I prevented you
Speaker 1: from seeing your loved ones, and you got no benefit
Speaker 1: from this. He's never going to say that, So what
Speaker 1: is he going to say, Well, exactly what he has
Speaker 1: been saying. There is no churning back for these mask maniacs.
Speaker 1: And beyond that, I would also say that there's such
Speaker 1: a big part of this as ego driven. There are
Speaker 1: so many people out there who don't want to admit,
Speaker 1: don't want to accept that they were fooled and that
Speaker 1: they're not as smart as they think they are. A
Speaker 1: lot of those people because there's there's a direct correlation
Speaker 1: between smugness and self satisfy, being self satisfied with one's
Speaker 1: perceived intellectual abilities and thinking that you were right on
Speaker 1: this issue of masks. I come at this the whole time,
Speaker 1: and I've been saying I didn't start out as some big,
Speaker 1: you know, anti masker. I kind of looked at this, said, okay,
Speaker 1: well they say wear a mask, I was wearing a mask.
Speaker 1: I looked at this doesn't work, not as a policy,
Speaker 1: and the fact that social media companies won't even let
Speaker 1: you say this now on their platforms is appalling, appalling,
Speaker 1: you know. I mean, of course it could work in
Speaker 1: some situations in some times, under certain circumstances, but that
Speaker 1: doesn't mean that this is a good idea. It's very
Speaker 1: very frustrating, all right. Muffett? Wow? Is that really someone?
Speaker 1: Is that really the name that was on it? Mark? Yeah,
Speaker 1: that was their Facebook name. I guess is it Miss Muffett?
Speaker 1: I don't think so. Didn't Who didn't Miss Muffett sat
Speaker 1: on a toe and eating her curds way right, Miss
Speaker 1: Molly Muffett or something? I believe that is the nurcy rhyme. Yes, well,
Speaker 1: Miss Muffett, we don't know if you're sitting on a tuffet,
Speaker 1: but we hope you're eating curds in way because that
Speaker 1: sounds kind of yummy. Because this is the part of
Speaker 1: the show where producer Mark and I get hungry. You
Speaker 1: right in cool name, by the way, love the show.
Speaker 1: You and producer Mark make me feel safe and warm
Speaker 1: at night. Well, Miss Muffett obviously also has fantastic taste.
Speaker 1: My husband and I are going to South Beach this weekend.
Speaker 1: Any restaurant recommendations, Well, Muffett, you are in luck. You
Speaker 1: gotta go to a place in South Beach called Stubborn Seed.
Speaker 1: I went there on my birthday December twenty eighth. Food
Speaker 1: it doesn't it looks it's like an it looks like
Speaker 1: a nice maybe gastro pub. It doesn't look like a
Speaker 1: fine dining restaurant really from the outside it's very new looking.
Speaker 1: The food is amazing, fantastic a plus very good service.
Speaker 1: Can't say enough good things about Stubborn Seed. I went
Speaker 1: there for my if they didnt in December twenty eighth,
Speaker 1: so Stubborn Seed was absolutely off the charts. UM. I
Speaker 1: will tell you that the meal I had at the
Speaker 1: Standard Hotel in South Beach was subpar and bad and overpriced,
Speaker 1: so sorry, don't go there. UM. I also liked this place,
Speaker 1: Amara at Paradiso. I believe it's called great restaurant, really
Speaker 1: nice views. Highly recommend that one. Uh and that though
Speaker 1: those are those are the wrecks that really come to
Speaker 1: mind for me. Those are the ones that I would
Speaker 1: I would say, oh and go to the one hotel,
Speaker 1: make a reservation at the one hotel rooftop restaurant. I
Speaker 1: think it's called Haven, I forget the name, but it's
Speaker 1: the One hotel, which is a beautiful hotel in South Beach.
Speaker 1: And go to the rooftop there. It you'll you'll think
Speaker 1: it's expensive. It's expensive. It's pricey. I just want to
Speaker 1: be very clear about that. I mean you're gonna pay,
Speaker 1: you know, fifteen dollars for a sushi roll. But the
Speaker 1: food is very, very good. It's an amazing setting. I
Speaker 1: think you'll enjoy it. But stubborn seed also, and if
Speaker 1: you want something cheap. I had a great taco taco
Speaker 1: right on Collins Avenue. I had a great time there.
Speaker 1: Bartender was real nice, gave me some marks, had some taco,
Speaker 1: sat outside like a civilized person eating food. It was great.
Speaker 1: You're in the freedom, Hud. This is the buck Sexton
Speaker 1: Show podcast and we continue on with roll Call here.
Speaker 1: Roger writes Buckets Snow Princess happy with her Buffalo bills. Roger,
Speaker 1: indeed she is. She is a big Buffalo booster and
Speaker 1: all things Buffalo. And I think she is very happy
Speaker 1: with her Buffalo bills right now. And I think she's
Speaker 1: actually go home to Buffalo soon, maybe to go skiing,
Speaker 1: so and maybe I'll go with her because I gotta
Speaker 1: learn how to ski. Steven, hey Buck, I love Mandalorian
Speaker 1: season two, but I think it was much more Star
Speaker 1: Wars fan oriented than season one was. I'm a lifelong
Speaker 1: Star Wars nerd, so for me it was great. But
Speaker 1: I could see you liking season two much less than one,
Speaker 1: so you're off the hook. Yeah, Stevens. Mandalorian season one
Speaker 1: was awesome and you didn't have to know anything about
Speaker 1: Star Wars to appreciate it. You just come in cold
Speaker 1: and be like, oh, this is really cool. Mandalorian season two,
Speaker 1: you know, there was there were some weaknesses, and my
Speaker 1: biggest problem is the action sequences. Mandalorian season one, he
Speaker 1: was like a space a Space Navy seal or something.
Speaker 1: Mandalorian season two, he's like everyone else running around with
Speaker 1: the pup pew little laser gun going pup pup mark,
Speaker 1: that's what laser guns sound like. Good to know. I'll
Speaker 1: cut that for later. Yeah, So that that was disappointing
Speaker 1: because the you don't think of Star Wars as having
Speaker 1: really I mean, yeah, the lightsaber fights or whatever, fine,
Speaker 1: but you don't think of it as as looking like
Speaker 1: it's almost tactical stuff in space, and season one Mandalorian
Speaker 1: really had a lot of that, you know, and season
Speaker 1: two Mandalorian it was just him running around with a blaster. Folks,
Speaker 1: we're gonna rally, We're gonna have a better week, a
Speaker 1: better day tomorrow. Thank you for being here with me.
Speaker 1: We come together in this one. We're going to get through.
Speaker 1: We will prevail. But until we get back into the fight,
Speaker 1: rest up, relax, and shields high.